<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/atom10full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0">
	<title>Regulations with recently opened comment periods</title>
	<subtitle>OpenRegs.com is an easy-to-navigate regulatory portal.</subtitle>
	
	<updated>2013-05-21T02:02:04-07:00</updated>
	<author>
		<name>OpenRegs.com</name>
		<email>contact@openregs.com</email>
	</author>
	<id>http://openregs.com/regulations/general_feed/recent_comment_periods_opening</id> 
	<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/open-regs-recently-opened-comment-periods" /><feedburner:info uri="open-regs-recently-opened-comment-periods" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><entry>
	<title><![CDATA[Source: Prevailing Rate Systems; Definition of Vanderburgh County, Indiana, to a Nonappropriated Fund Federal Wage System Wage Area]]></title>
	<link href="/regulations/view/122201/prevailing_rate_systems_definition_of_vanderburgh_county_indiana_to_a_nonappropriated" />
	<id>http://openregs.com/regulations/view/122201/prevailing_rate_systems_definition_of_vanderburgh_county_indiana_to_a_nonappropriated</id>
	<updated>2013-05-21T00:10:25-07:00</updated>
	<summary><![CDATA[Source: The U.S. Office of Personnel Management is issuing a proposed rule that would define Vanderburgh County, Indiana, as an area of application county to the St. Clair, IL, nonappropriated fund (NAF) Federal Wage System (FWS) wage area. This change is necessary because there are two NAF FWS employees working in Vanderburgh County and the county is not currently defined to a NAF wage area.]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
	<title><![CDATA[Source: Prevailing Rate Systems; Definition of Broward County, Florida, to a Nonappropriated Fund Federal Wage System Wage Area]]></title>
	<link href="/regulations/view/122202/prevailing_rate_systems_definition_of_broward_county_florida_to_a_nonappropriated" />
	<id>http://openregs.com/regulations/view/122202/prevailing_rate_systems_definition_of_broward_county_florida_to_a_nonappropriated</id>
	<updated>2013-05-21T00:10:25-07:00</updated>
	<summary><![CDATA[Source: The U.S. Office of Personnel Management is issuing a proposed rule that would define Broward County, Florida, as an area of application county to the Miami-Dade, FL, nonappropriated fund (NAF) Federal Wage System (FWS) wage area. This change is necessary because there are three NAF FWS employees working in Broward County and the county is not currently defined to a NAF wage area.]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
	<title><![CDATA[Source: Forfeiture Procedures Under the Endangered Species Act and the Lacey Act Amendments]]></title>
	<link href="/regulations/view/122203/forfeiture_procedures_under_the_endangered_species_act_and_the_lacey_act_amendments" />
	<id>http://openregs.com/regulations/view/122203/forfeiture_procedures_under_the_endangered_species_act_and_the_lacey_act_amendments</id>
	<updated>2013-05-21T00:10:25-07:00</updated>
	<summary><![CDATA[Source: The Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service is one of the agencies that administers the provisions of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (ESA), and the Lacey Act Amendments of 1981, as amended, that pertain to plants. We are proposing to update our regulations that set forth our forfeiture procedures with regard to plants or plant products seized under the authority of the ESA and the Lacey Act. The proposed changes would make our regulations conform to the requirements of the Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act of 2000, increase the monetary threshold of those cases proceeding through judicial forfeiture, provide for the assessment of storage costs of seized property, and make the regulations easier to understand.]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
	<title><![CDATA[Source: Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Airplanes]]></title>
	<link href="/regulations/view/122204/airworthiness_directives_airbus_airplanes" />
	<id>http://openregs.com/regulations/view/122204/airworthiness_directives_airbus_airplanes</id>
	<updated>2013-05-21T00:10:26-07:00</updated>
	<summary><![CDATA[Source: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain Airbus Model A330-200 and -300 series airplanes; Model A340-200 and -300 series airplanes; and Model A340-541 and -642 airplanes. This proposed AD was prompted by reports of wing tip brakes (WTBs) losing their braking function in service due to heavy wear on the brake discs. WTBs are designed to stop and hold the mechanical transmission of slats and flaps in certain failure cases. This proposed AD would require repetitive operational tests of certain WTB pressure-off-brakes (POBs) for performance on the flap and slat systems, and replacement of any affected WTB with a new or serviceable part if the test fails. This proposed AD would also require eventual replacement of all affected WTBs with a new part, which would terminate the repetitive tests. We are proposing this AD to prevent loss of the WTB braking function, and consequent inability of the flap or slat system to be stopped and held in position during operation, which could result in loss of control of the airplane.]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
	<title><![CDATA[Source: Airworthiness Directives; DASSAULT AVIATION Airplanes]]></title>
	<link href="/regulations/view/122205/airworthiness_directives_dassault_aviation_airplanes" />
	<id>http://openregs.com/regulations/view/122205/airworthiness_directives_dassault_aviation_airplanes</id>
	<updated>2013-05-21T00:10:27-07:00</updated>
	<summary><![CDATA[Source: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all DASSAULT AVIATION Model FAN JET FALCON, FAN JET FALCON SERIES C, D, E, F, and G airplanes; Model MYSTERE-FALCON 200 airplanes; and Model MYSTERE-FALCON 20-C5, 20-D5, 20-E5, and 20-F5 airplanes. This proposed AD was prompted by reports of a manufacturing defect in the charge indicator on fire extinguisher bottles. This proposed AD would require repetitive weighing of fire extinguisher bottles having a certain part number, and eventual replacement of those bottles to terminate the repetitive weighing. We are proposing this AD to detect and correct a dormant failure in the fire suppression system, which could result in the inability to put out a fire in an engine, auxiliary power unit, or rear compartment.]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
	<title><![CDATA[Source: Cardiovascular Devices; Reclassification of External Counter-Pulsating Devices for Treatment of Chronic Stable Angina; Effective Date of Requirement for Premarket Approval for External Counter-Pulsating Devices for Other Specified Intended Uses]]></title>
	<link href="/regulations/view/122207/cardiovascular_devices_reclassification_of_external_counter-pulsating_devices_for" />
	<id>http://openregs.com/regulations/view/122207/cardiovascular_devices_reclassification_of_external_counter-pulsating_devices_for</id>
	<updated>2013-05-21T00:10:27-07:00</updated>
	<summary><![CDATA[Source: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is issuing a proposed administrative order to reclassify external counter-pulsating (ECP) devices for treatment of chronic stable angina that is refractory to optimal anti-anginal medical therapy and without options for revascularization, which is a preamendments class III device, into class II (special controls) based on new information. FDA is also proposing to require the filing of a premarket approval application (PMA) or a notice of completion of a product development protocol (PDP) for ECP devices for other intended uses specified in this proposed order. The Agency is also summarizing its proposed findings regarding the degree of risk of illness or injury designed to be eliminated or reduced by requiring the devices to meet the statute's approval requirements for other intended uses specified in this proposed order. In addition, FDA is announcing the opportunity for interested persons to request that the Agency change the classification of any of the devices mentioned in this document based on new information. This action implements certain statutory requirements.]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
	<title><![CDATA[Source: Safety Zone; Chicago Harbor, Navy Pier Southeast, Chicago, IL]]></title>
	<link href="/regulations/view/122208/safety_zone_chicago_harbor_navy_pier_southeast_chicago_il" />
	<id>http://openregs.com/regulations/view/122208/safety_zone_chicago_harbor_navy_pier_southeast_chicago_il</id>
	<updated>2013-05-21T00:10:29-07:00</updated>
	<summary><![CDATA[Source: The Coast Guard proposes to amend the Safety Zone for Chicago Harbor, Navy Pier Southeast, Chicago, IL. This Zone is intended to restrict vessels from a portion of Chicago Harbor during fireworks displays, races, and other marine events that occur throughout each calendar year. The safety zone established by this proposed rule is necessary to protect spectators, participants, and vessels from the hazards associated with these fireworks displays, boat races, and other events.]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
	<title><![CDATA[Source: Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Kentucky; Approval of Revisions to the Jefferson County Portion of the Kentucky SIP; Emissions During Startups, Shutdowns, and Malfunctions]]></title>
	<link href="/regulations/view/122209/approval_and_promulgation_of_implementation_plans_kentucky_approval_of_revisions" />
	<id>http://openregs.com/regulations/view/122209/approval_and_promulgation_of_implementation_plans_kentucky_approval_of_revisions</id>
	<updated>2013-05-21T00:10:30-07:00</updated>
	<summary><![CDATA[Source: EPA is proposing to approve part of a revision to the Kentucky State Implementation Plan (SIP), submitted by the Commonwealth of Kentucky, through the Kentucky Division for Air Quality (KDAQ), on March 22, 2011. The proposed revision was submitted by KDAQ on behalf of the Louisville Metro Air Pollution Control District (District), which has jurisdiction over Jefferson County, Kentucky. The portion of the revision that EPA is proposing for approval modifies the Regulation entitled, ``Emissions During Startups, Shutdowns, Malfunctions and Emergencies'' in the Jefferson County portion of the Kentucky SIP. EPA is proposing approval of this portion of the March 22, 2011, SIP revision because the Agency has determined that it is in accordance with the requirements for SIP provisions under the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act). EPA will act on the other portions of KDAQ's March 22, 2011, submittal, which are severable and unrelated, in a separate action.]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
	<title><![CDATA[Source: Ocean Dumping; Atchafalaya-West Ocean Dredged Material Disposal Site Designation]]></title>
	<link href="/regulations/view/122210/ocean_dumping_atchafalaya-west_ocean_dredged_material_disposal_site_designation" />
	<id>http://openregs.com/regulations/view/122210/ocean_dumping_atchafalaya-west_ocean_dredged_material_disposal_site_designation</id>
	<updated>2013-05-21T00:10:32-07:00</updated>
	<summary><![CDATA[Source: The EPA is proposing to re-designate the existing Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act of 1972 (MPRSA) Section 103(b) Atchafalaya-West Ocean Disposal Site (ODMDS-West) as a permanent MPRSA Section 102(c) ocean dredged material disposal site (ODMDS) located adjacent to and west of the Atchafalaya River Bar Channel (ARBC) of Louisiana. The approval for the ODMDS-West use expired in August 2012; therefore, the site can no longer accept shoal material dredged from the ARBC unless it is re-designated as a MPRSA Section 102(c) site by EPA. Studies have shown that use of the ODMDS-West reduces the amount and rate of shoal material runback into the ARBC, and thus, decreases the overall annual maintenance dredging effort needed for the ARBC while providing vessels with a longer period of safe navigation access prior to a maintenance dredging event. Therefore, there is a need to designate a permanent ODMDS on the west side of the ARBC. Approximately 10.8 million cubic yards will be placed every 7 months and must be conducted in accordance with the Site Management and Monitoring Plan. The proposed ODMDS will be monitored periodically to ensure that the site operates as expected.]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
	<title><![CDATA[Source: Control of Air Pollution From Motor Vehicles: Tier 3 Motor Vehicle Emission and Fuel Standards]]></title>
	<link href="/regulations/view/122212/control_of_air_pollution_from_motor_vehicles_tier_3_motor_vehicle_emission_and" />
	<id>http://openregs.com/regulations/view/122212/control_of_air_pollution_from_motor_vehicles_tier_3_motor_vehicle_emission_and</id>
	<updated>2013-05-21T00:10:34-07:00</updated>
	<summary><![CDATA[Source: This action would establish more stringent vehicle emissions standards and reduce the sulfur content of gasoline beginning in 2017, as part of a systems approach to addressing the impacts of motor vehicles and fuels on air quality and public health. The proposed gasoline sulfur standard would make emission control systems more effective for both existing and new vehicles, and would enable more stringent vehicle emissions standards. The proposed vehicle standards would reduce both tailpipe and evaporative emissions from passenger cars, light-duty trucks, medium-duty passenger vehicles, and some heavy-duty vehicles. This would result in significant reductions in pollutants such as ozone, particulate matter, and air toxics across the country and help state and local agencies in their efforts to attain and maintain health-based National Ambient Air Quality Standards. Motor vehicles are an important source of exposure to air pollution both regionally and near roads. These proposed vehicle standards are intended to harmonize with California's Low Emission Vehicle program, thus creating a federal vehicle emissions program that would allow automakers to sell the same vehicles in all 50 states. The proposed vehicle standards would be implemented over the same timeframe as the greenhouse gas/fuel efficiency standards for light-duty vehicles, as part of a comprehensive approach toward regulating emissions from motor vehicles.]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
	<title><![CDATA[Source: Blueberry Promotion, Research and Information Order; Assessment Rate Increase]]></title>
	<link href="/regulations/view/122171/blueberry_promotion_research_and_information_order_assessment_rate_increase" />
	<id>http://openregs.com/regulations/view/122171/blueberry_promotion_research_and_information_order_assessment_rate_increase</id>
	<updated>2013-05-20T00:10:10-07:00</updated>
	<summary><![CDATA[Source: This proposed rule invites comments on amending the Blueberry Promotion, Research and Information Order (Order) to increase the assessment rate from $12 to $18 per ton (an increase of $0.003 per pound). The Order is administered by the U.S. Highbush Blueberry Council (USHBC) with oversight by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). Under the program, assessments are collected from domestic producers and importers and used for research and promotion projects designed to maintain and expand the market for highbush blueberries in the United States and abroad. Additional funds would allow the USHBC to expand its health research activities and promotional efforts. The USHBC uses its health information in its promotion messaging to help build demand for blueberries. Increasing demand would help move the growing supply of blueberries, which would benefit producers and consumers.]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
	<title><![CDATA[Source: Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Airplanes]]></title>
	<link href="/regulations/view/122172/airworthiness_directives_airbus_airplanes" />
	<id>http://openregs.com/regulations/view/122172/airworthiness_directives_airbus_airplanes</id>
	<updated>2013-05-20T00:10:11-07:00</updated>
	<summary><![CDATA[Source: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all Airbus Model A330-200 Freighter, A330-200 and -300, and A340-200 and - 300 series airplanes. This proposed AD was prompted by reports of cracked adjacent frame forks of a forward cargo door. This proposed AD would require repetitive detailed inspections for cracks and sheared, loose, or missing rivets of the forward cargo door and, for certain airplanes, of the aft cargo door, and repair if necessary. We are proposing this AD to detect and correct cracked or ruptured cargo door frames, which could result in reduced structural integrity of the forward or aft cargo door.]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
	<title><![CDATA[Source: Rules andRegulations Under the Textile Fiber Products Identification Act]]></title>
	<link href="/regulations/view/122173/rules_andregulations_under_the_textile_fiber_products_identification_act" />
	<id>http://openregs.com/regulations/view/122173/rules_andregulations_under_the_textile_fiber_products_identification_act</id>
	<updated>2013-05-20T00:10:11-07:00</updated>
	<summary><![CDATA[Source: Based on comments received in response to its Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (``ANPR''), the Commission proposes amending the rules and regulations under the Textile Fiber Products Identification Act (``Textile Rules'' or ``Rules'') to: Incorporate the updated ISO standard 2076:2010(E); allow certain hang-tags that do not disclose the product's full fiber content information; better address electronic commerce by amending the definition of the terms invoice and invoice or other paper; update the guaranty provisions by, among other things, replacing the requirement that suppliers provide a guaranty signed under penalty of perjury with a certification that must be renewed annually, and revising accordingly the form used to file continuing guaranties with the Commission under the Textile, Fur, and Wool Acts; and clarify several other provisions. The Commission seeks comment on these proposals and several remaining issues.]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
	<title><![CDATA[Source: Safety Standard for Carriages and Strollers]]></title>
	<link href="/regulations/view/122174/safety_standard_for_carriages_and_strollers" />
	<id>http://openregs.com/regulations/view/122174/safety_standard_for_carriages_and_strollers</id>
	<updated>2013-05-20T00:10:12-07:00</updated>
	<summary><![CDATA[Source: The Danny Keysar Child Product Safety Notification Act, Section 104 of the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008 (CPSIA), requires the United States Consumer Product Safety Commission (Commission or CPSC) to promulgate consumer product safety standards for durable infant or toddler products. These standards are to be ``substantially the same as'' applicable voluntary standards or more stringent than the voluntary standard if the Commission concludes that more stringent requirements would further reduce the risk of injury associated with the product. The Commission is proposing a safety standard for carriages and strollers in response to the direction under Section 104(b) of the CPSIA.]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
	<title><![CDATA[Source: Safety Zone; Big Bay Boom, San Diego Bay, San Diego, CA]]></title>
	<link href="/regulations/view/122175/safety_zone_big_bay_boom_san_diego_bay_san_diego_ca" />
	<id>http://openregs.com/regulations/view/122175/safety_zone_big_bay_boom_san_diego_bay_san_diego_ca</id>
	<updated>2013-05-20T00:10:12-07:00</updated>
	<summary><![CDATA[Source: The Coast Guard proposes to establish four temporary safety zones upon the navigable waters of San Diego Bay for the Port of San Diego Big Bay Boom Fireworks display from 8:45 p.m. to 10 p.m. on July 4, 2013. These proposed safety zones are necessary to provide for the safety of the crew, spectators, and other users and vessels of the waterway. Persons and vessels are prohibited from entering into, transiting through, or anchoring within these temporary safety zones during, immediately before and after the fireworks event unless authorized by the Captain of the Port or his designated representative.]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
	<title><![CDATA[Source: Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Florida; Infrastructure Requirements for the 2008 8-Hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards]]></title>
	<link href="/regulations/view/122177/approval_and_promulgation_of_implementation_plans_florida_infrastructure_requirements" />
	<id>http://openregs.com/regulations/view/122177/approval_and_promulgation_of_implementation_plans_florida_infrastructure_requirements</id>
	<updated>2013-05-20T00:10:14-07:00</updated>
	<summary><![CDATA[Source: EPA is proposing to approve in part, and disapprove in part, the State Implementation Plan (SIP) submission, submitted by the State of Florida, through the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) on October 31, 2011, to demonstrate that the State meets the infrastructure requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act) for the 2008 8-hour ozone national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS). The CAA requires that each state adopt and submit a SIP for the implementation, maintenance and enforcement of each NAAQS promulgated by the EPA, which is commonly referred to as an ``infrastructure'' SIP. FDEP certified that the Florida SIP contains provisions that ensure the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS are implemented, enforced, and maintained in Florida (hereafter referred to as ``infrastructure submission''). EPA is now taking two related actions on FDEP's infrastructure submission for Florida. First, EPA is proposing to disapprove in part portions of Florida's infrastructure submission as it relates to the regulation of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Second, EPA is proposing to determine that Florida's infrastructure submission, addresses all other required infrastructure elements for the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS, with the exception of the aforementioned portions and the requirement that the SIP include provisions prohibiting any source or other type of emissions activity in one state from interfering with measures to protect visibility in another state.]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
	<title><![CDATA[Source: Approval and Promulgation of State Implementation Plans; State of Utah; Interstate Transport of Pollution for the 2006 PM2.5]]></title>
	<link href="/regulations/view/122178/approval_and_promulgation_of_state_implementation_plans_state_of_utah_interstate" />
	<id>http://openregs.com/regulations/view/122178/approval_and_promulgation_of_state_implementation_plans_state_of_utah_interstate</id>
	<updated>2013-05-20T00:10:14-07:00</updated>
	<summary><![CDATA[Source: EPA is proposing to disapprove a portion of a State Implementation Plan (SIP) submission from the State of Utah that is intended to demonstrate that its SIP meets certain interstate transport requirements of the Clean Air Act (``Act'' or ``CAA'') for the 2006 fine particulate matter (``PM<INF>2.5</INF>'') National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). This SIP submission addresses the requirement that Utah's SIP contain adequate provisions to prohibit air emissions from adversely affecting another state's air quality through interstate transport. Specifically, EPA is proposing to disapprove the portion of the Utah SIP submission that addresses the CAA requirement prohibiting emissions from Utah sources from significantly contributing to nonattainment of the 2006 PM<INF>2.5</INF> NAAQS in any other state or interfering with maintenance of the 2006 PM<INF>2.5</INF> NAAQS by any other state. Under a recent court decision, this disapproval does not trigger an obligation for EPA to promulgate a Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) to address these interstate transport requirements.]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
	<title><![CDATA[Source: Child Care and Development Fund (CCDF) Program]]></title>
	<link href="/regulations/view/122179/child_care_and_development_fund_ccdf_program" />
	<id>http://openregs.com/regulations/view/122179/child_care_and_development_fund_ccdf_program</id>
	<updated>2013-05-20T00:10:14-07:00</updated>
	<summary><![CDATA[Source: The Administration for Children and Families (ACF) proposes to amend the Child Care and Development Fund (CCDF) regulations. This proposed rule makes changes to CCDF regulatory provisions in order to strengthen health and safety requirements for child care providers, reflect current State and local practices to improve the quality of child care, infuse new accountability for Federal tax dollars, and leverage the latest knowledge and research in the field of early care and education to better serve low-income children and families.]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
	<title><![CDATA[Source: Proposed Priorities, Requirements, Definitions, and Selection Criteria-Race to the Top-Early Learning Challenge]]></title>
	<link href="/regulations/view/122180/proposed_priorities_requirements_definitions_and_selection_criteria-race_to_the" />
	<id>http://openregs.com/regulations/view/122180/proposed_priorities_requirements_definitions_and_selection_criteria-race_to_the</id>
	<updated>2013-05-20T00:10:15-07:00</updated>
	<summary><![CDATA[Source: The Secretary of Education and Secretary of Health and Human Services (``the Secretaries'') propose priorities, requirements, definitions, and selection criteria under the Race to the Top--Early Learning Challenge (RTT-ELC) Grant program. The Secretaries may use one or more of these priorities, requirements, definitions, and selection criteria for competitions in fiscal year (FY) 2013 and later years. The U.S. Department of Education (ED) and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) (collectively, ``the Departments'') conducted the first competition under the RTT-ELC program in FY 2011 and awarded grants to nine States. In FY 2012, the five next highest- rated applicants on the slate of high-scoring applications from the FY 2011 competition were funded at up to 50 percent of the funds each requested in their FY 2011 applications. We propose to maintain the overall purpose and structure of the FY 2011 RTT-ELC competition in future competitions. These proposed priorities, requirements, definitions, and selection criteria are almost identical to the ones used in the FY 2011 competition. We describe the changes at the beginning of each section of this document.]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
	<title><![CDATA[Source: Safety Zone; Discovery World Fireworks, Milwaukee Harbor, Milwaukee, WI]]></title>
	<link href="/regulations/view/122153/safety_zone_discovery_world_fireworks_milwaukee_harbor_milwaukee_wi" />
	<id>http://openregs.com/regulations/view/122153/safety_zone_discovery_world_fireworks_milwaukee_harbor_milwaukee_wi</id>
	<updated>2013-05-17T00:10:04-07:00</updated>
	<summary><![CDATA[Source: The Coast Guard proposes to establish a safety zone within Milwaukee Harbor, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. This safety zone is intended to restrict vessels from a portion of Milwaukee Harbor due to 4 fireworks displays at Discovery World Pier. This proposed safety zone is necessary to protect the surrounding public and vessels from the hazards associated with these fireworks displays.]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
	<title><![CDATA[Source: Safety Zones; Hawaiian Island Commercial Harbors, HI]]></title>
	<link href="/regulations/view/122154/safety_zones_hawaiian_island_commercial_harbors_hi" />
	<id>http://openregs.com/regulations/view/122154/safety_zones_hawaiian_island_commercial_harbors_hi</id>
	<updated>2013-05-17T00:10:04-07:00</updated>
	<summary><![CDATA[Source: The Coast Guard proposes to establish permanent safety zones in Hawaii's nine commercial harbors (Nawiliwili and Port Allen, Kauai; Barber's Point and Honolulu Harbor, Oahu; Kaunakakai, Molokai; Kaumalapau, Lanai; Kahalui, Maui and Kawaihae and Hilo on the Island of Hawaii). The purpose of these safety zones is to expedite the evacuation of the harbors in the event a tsunami warning is issued for the main Hawaiian Islands.]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
	<title><![CDATA[Source: Safety Zone; Outer Banks Bluegrass Festival; Shallowbag Bay, Manteo, NC]]></title>
	<link href="/regulations/view/122155/safety_zone_outer_banks_bluegrass_festival_shallowbag_bay_manteo_nc" />
	<id>http://openregs.com/regulations/view/122155/safety_zone_outer_banks_bluegrass_festival_shallowbag_bay_manteo_nc</id>
	<updated>2013-05-17T00:10:04-07:00</updated>
	<summary><![CDATA[Source: The Coast Guard is proposing the establishment of a temporary safety zone on Shallowbag Bay, Manteo, NC on October 4, 2013, for a fireworks display as part of the Outer Banks Bluegrass Festival. This action is necessary to protect the life and property of the maritime public from the hazards posed by fireworks displays. This safety zone is intended to restrict vessels from a portion of Shallowbag Bay River during the Outer Banks Bluegrass Festival Fireworks display.]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
	<title><![CDATA[Source: Safety Zone; Coronado Fourth of July Fireworks, Glorietta Bay; Coronado, CA]]></title>
	<link href="/regulations/view/122156/safety_zone_coronado_fourth_of_july_fireworks_glorietta_bay_coronado_ca" />
	<id>http://openregs.com/regulations/view/122156/safety_zone_coronado_fourth_of_july_fireworks_glorietta_bay_coronado_ca</id>
	<updated>2013-05-17T00:10:04-07:00</updated>
	<summary><![CDATA[Source: The Coast Guard proposes a temporary safety zone for the Coronado Fourth of July Fireworks from 8:45 p.m. to 10 p.m. on July 4, 2013. This regulated area encompasses the navigable waters of Glorietta Bay in Coronado, CA in support of Coronado Fourth of July Fireworks display. This action is necessary to provide for the safety of the participants, crew, spectators, participating vessels, and other vessels and users of the waterway. Persons and vessels will be prohibited from entering into, transiting through, or anchoring within this safety zone unless authorized by the Captain of the Port, or his designated representative.]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
	<title><![CDATA[Source: Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Tennessee; Transportation Conformity Revisions]]></title>
	<link href="/regulations/view/122157/approval_and_promulgation_of_implementation_plans_tennessee_transportation_conformity" />
	<id>http://openregs.com/regulations/view/122157/approval_and_promulgation_of_implementation_plans_tennessee_transportation_conformity</id>
	<updated>2013-05-17T00:10:04-07:00</updated>
	<summary><![CDATA[Source: EPA is proposing to approve a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submitted by the State of Tennessee, through the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation, Bureau of Environment, Air Pollution Control Division, on July 12, 2012. This revision consists of updates to transportation conformity criteria and procedures related to interagency consultation and enforceability of certain transportation-related control and mitigation measures. The intended effect is to update the transportation conformity criteria and procedures in the Tennessee SIP. This action is being taken pursuant to section 110 of the Clean Air Act. In the final rules section of this issue of the Federal Register, EPA is approving the State's SIP revision as a direct final rule without prior proposal because the Agency views this as a noncontroversial submittal and anticipates no adverse comments. A detailed rationale for the approval is set forth in the direct final rule. If no adverse comments are received in response to this rule, no further activity is contemplated. If EPA receives adverse comments, the direct final rule will be withdrawn and all public comments received will be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on this proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second comment period on this document. Any parties interested in commenting on this document should do so at this time.]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
	<title><![CDATA[Source: Endangered and Threatened Wildlife; 90-Day Finding on a Petition To List Iliamna Lake Seals as a Threatened or Endangered Species]]></title>
	<link href="/regulations/view/122160/endangered_and_threatened_wildlife_90-day_finding_on_a_petition_to_list_iliamna" />
	<id>http://openregs.com/regulations/view/122160/endangered_and_threatened_wildlife_90-day_finding_on_a_petition_to_list_iliamna</id>
	<updated>2013-05-17T00:10:04-07:00</updated>
	<summary><![CDATA[Source: We, NMFS, announce a 90-day finding on a petition to list the Pacific harbor seals in Iliamna Lake (Phoca vitulina richardii) as threatened or endangered under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). We find that the petition presents substantial scientific or commercial information indicating that the petitioned action may be warranted. Therefore, we are initiating a status review of the harbor seals in Iliamna Lake to determine if listing under the ESA is warranted. To ensure this status review is comprehensive, we solicit scientific and commercial information regarding this species.]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
	<title><![CDATA[Source: Endangered and Threatened Wildlife; 90-Day Finding on Petitions To List the Dusky Shark as Threatened or Endangered Under the Endangered Species Act]]></title>
	<link href="/regulations/view/122161/endangered_and_threatened_wildlife_90-day_finding_on_petitions_to_list_the_dusky" />
	<id>http://openregs.com/regulations/view/122161/endangered_and_threatened_wildlife_90-day_finding_on_petitions_to_list_the_dusky</id>
	<updated>2013-05-17T00:10:04-07:00</updated>
	<summary><![CDATA[Source: We, NMFS, announce a 90-day finding on petitions to list the dusky shark (Carcharhinus obscurus) range-wide or, in the alternative, the Northwest Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico population of the dusky shark as a threatened or endangered distinct population segment (DPS) under the Endangered Species Act (ESA), and to designate critical habitat concurrently with the listing. We find that the petitions present substantial scientific or commercial information indicating that the petitioned action may be warranted for the Northwest Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico population of dusky shark; we find that the petitions fail to present substantial scientific or commercial information indicating that the petitioned action may be warranted for the dusky shark range- wide. Therefore, we will conduct a status review of the Northwest Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico population of dusky shark to determine if the petitioned action is warranted. To ensure that the status review is comprehensive, we are soliciting scientific and commercial information pertaining to this petitioned species from any interested party.]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
	<title><![CDATA[Source: Privacy Act of 1974: Implementation of Exemptions; Department of Homeland Security U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement-014 Homeland Security Investigations Forensic Laboratory System of Records]]></title>
	<link href="/regulations/view/122118/privacy_act_of_1974_implementation_of_exemptions_department_of_homeland_security" />
	<id>http://openregs.com/regulations/view/122118/privacy_act_of_1974_implementation_of_exemptions_department_of_homeland_security</id>
	<updated>2013-05-16T00:10:43-07:00</updated>
	<summary><![CDATA[Source: The Department of Homeland Security is giving concurrent notice of a newly established system of records pursuant to the Privacy Act of 1974 for the ``Department of Homeland Security/U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement--014 Homeland Security Investigations Forensic Laboratory System of Records'' and this proposed rulemaking. In this proposed rulemaking, the Department proposes to exempt portions of the system of records from one or more provisions of the Privacy Act because of criminal, civil, and administrative enforcement requirements.]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
	<title><![CDATA[Source: Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company]]></title>
	<link href="/regulations/view/122119/airworthiness_directives_the_boeing_company" />
	<id>http://openregs.com/regulations/view/122119/airworthiness_directives_the_boeing_company</id>
	<updated>2013-05-16T00:10:45-07:00</updated>
	<summary><![CDATA[Source: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain The Boeing Company Model 737-300, -400, and -500 series airplanes. This proposed AD was prompted by fuel system reviews conducted by the manufacturer. This proposed AD would require, depending on airplane configuration, replacing fuel pump power control relays with new relays having a ground fault interrupter (GFI) feature, installing ground studs and a bonding jumper, doing certain bonding resistance measurements, and changing the GFI relay position. This proposed AD would also require revising the maintenance program to incorporate certain airworthiness limitations. We are proposing this AD to prevent damage to the fuel pumps caused by electrical arcing that could introduce an ignition source in the fuel tank, which, in combination with flammable fuel vapors, could result in a fuel tank explosion and consequent loss of the airplane.]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
	<title><![CDATA[Source: Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes]]></title>
	<link href="/regulations/view/122120/airworthiness_directives_the_boeing_company_airplanes" />
	<id>http://openregs.com/regulations/view/122120/airworthiness_directives_the_boeing_company_airplanes</id>
	<updated>2013-05-16T00:10:46-07:00</updated>
	<summary><![CDATA[Source: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain The Boeing Company Model 747-100, 747-100B, 747-100B SUD, 747- 200B, 747-200C, 747-200F, 747-300, 747-400, 747-400D, 747-400F, 747SR, and 747SP series airplanes. This proposed AD was prompted by a report of a disbonded doubler and a skin crack in section 41 of the fuselage, and multiple reports of cracked or missing fastener heads. This proposed AD would require repetitive inspections for cracking of the fuselage skin, discrepant fasteners, and for disbonds at the doublers; and related investigative and corrective actions if necessary. For certain airplanes, this proposed AD would also require a terminating repair for repair doublers. We are proposing this AD to prevent rapid decompression and loss of structural integrity of the airplane due to such disbonding and subsequent cracking of the skin panels.]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
	<title><![CDATA[Source: Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Maryland; Adoption of Control Techniques Guidelines for Miscellaneous Metal and Plastic Parts Which Includes Pleasure Craft Coating Operations]]></title>
	<link href="/regulations/view/122122/approval_and_promulgation_of_air_quality_implementation_plans_maryland_adoption" />
	<id>http://openregs.com/regulations/view/122122/approval_and_promulgation_of_air_quality_implementation_plans_maryland_adoption</id>
	<updated>2013-05-16T00:10:47-07:00</updated>
	<summary><![CDATA[Source: EPA is proposing to approve revisions to the Maryland State Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by the Maryland Department of the Environment (MDE) on January 10, 2013. The SIP revision consists of a new regulation pertaining to control of volatile organic compound emissions from pleasure craft coating operations. This action is being taken under the Clean Air Act (CAA).]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
	<title><![CDATA[Source: Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; North Carolina; State Implementation Plan Miscellaneous Revisions]]></title>
	<link href="/regulations/view/122123/approval_and_promulgation_of_implementation_plans_north_carolina_state_implementation" />
	<id>http://openregs.com/regulations/view/122123/approval_and_promulgation_of_implementation_plans_north_carolina_state_implementation</id>
	<updated>2013-05-16T00:10:47-07:00</updated>
	<summary><![CDATA[Source: EPA is proposing to approve a portion of a revision to the North Carolina State Implementation Plan submitted on February 3, 2010, through the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources. This revision updates the North Carolina SIP to reflect EPA's current national ambient air quality standards for ozone, lead and particulate matter found in the Code of Federal Regulations. In the Final Rules Section of this Federal Register, EPA is approving the State's implementation plan revision as a direct final rule without prior proposal because the Agency views this as a noncontroversial submittal and anticipates no adverse comments. A detailed rationale for the approval is set forth in the direct final rule. If no adverse comments are received in response to this rule, no further activity is contemplated. If EPA receives adverse comments, the direct final rule will be withdrawn and all public comments received will be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on this proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second comment period on this document. Any parties interested in commenting on this document should do so at this time.]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
	<title><![CDATA[Source: Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Georgia; State Implementation Plan Miscellaneous Revisions]]></title>
	<link href="/regulations/view/122124/approval_and_promulgation_of_implementation_plans_georgia_state_implementation" />
	<id>http://openregs.com/regulations/view/122124/approval_and_promulgation_of_implementation_plans_georgia_state_implementation</id>
	<updated>2013-05-16T00:10:48-07:00</updated>
	<summary><![CDATA[Source: EPA is proposing changes to the Georgia State Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by the Georgia Environmental Protection Division to EPA in four separate SIP submittals dated September 15, 2008, August 30, 2010 (two submittals), and December 15, 2011. In the portions of the submittals being approved today, the SIP revisions update the Georgia SIP to reflect EPA's current national ambient air quality standards for sulfur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, ozone, lead, and particulate matter found in the Code of Federal Regulations. In the Final Rules Section of this Federal Register, EPA is approving the State's implementation plan revision as a direct final rule without prior proposal because the Agency views this as a noncontroversial submittal and anticipates no adverse comments. A detailed rationale for the approval is set forth in the direct final rule. If no adverse comments are received in response to this rule, no further activity is contemplated. If EPA receives adverse comments, the direct final rule will be withdrawn and all public comments received will be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on this proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second comment period on this document. Any parties interested in commenting on this document should do so at this time.]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
	<title><![CDATA[Source: Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Kentucky; Stage II Requirements for Enterprise Holdings, Inc. at Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky International Airport in Boone County]]></title>
	<link href="/regulations/view/122125/approval_and_promulgation_of_implementation_plans_kentucky_stage_ii_requirements" />
	<id>http://openregs.com/regulations/view/122125/approval_and_promulgation_of_implementation_plans_kentucky_stage_ii_requirements</id>
	<updated>2013-05-16T00:10:48-07:00</updated>
	<summary><![CDATA[Source: EPA is proposing to approve a source-specific State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submitted to EPA by the Commonwealth of Kentucky, through the Kentucky Division for Air Quality (KDAQ) on April 25, 2013, for the purpose of exempting Enterprise Holdings, Inc., facility from the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act) Stage II vapor control requirements. The Enterprise Holdings, Inc., facility is currently being constructed at the Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky International Airport in Boone County, Kentucky. EPA's proposed approval of this revision to Kentucky's SIP is based on the December 12, 2006, EPA policy memorandum from Stephen D. Page, entitled ``Removal of Stage II Vapor Recovery in Situations Where Widespread Use of Onboard Refueling Vapor Recovery is Demonstrated.'' This action is being taken pursuant to the CAA.]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
	<title><![CDATA[Source: Control Date for Qualifying Landings History and To Limit Speculative Entry Into the Longfin Squid/Butterfish Fishery; Mackerel, Squid and Butterfish Fishery Management Plan]]></title>
	<link href="/regulations/view/122133/control_date_for_qualifying_landings_history_and_to_limit_speculative_entry_into" />
	<id>http://openregs.com/regulations/view/122133/control_date_for_qualifying_landings_history_and_to_limit_speculative_entry_into</id>
	<updated>2013-05-16T00:10:53-07:00</updated>
	<summary><![CDATA[Source: At the request of the Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, this notice announces a control date that may be applicable, but not limited to, qualifying landings history for continued access to the longfin squid/butterfish moratorium limited access permit program. NMFS intends this notice to promote awareness of possible rulemaking, alert interested parties of potential eligibility criteria for future access, and discourage speculative entry into and/or investment in the longfin squid/butterfish fishery while the Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council considers if and how access to the longfin squid/butterfish fishery should be controlled.]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
	<title><![CDATA[Source: Revisions to Transportation Safety Requirements and Harmonization With International Atomic Energy Agency Transportation Requirements]]></title>
	<link href="/regulations/view/122135/revisions_to_transportation_safety_requirements_and_harmonization_with_international" />
	<id>http://openregs.com/regulations/view/122135/revisions_to_transportation_safety_requirements_and_harmonization_with_international</id>
	<updated>2013-05-16T00:10:56-07:00</updated>
	<summary><![CDATA[Source: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), in consultation with the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT), is proposing to amend its regulations for the packaging and transportation of radioactive material. These amendments would make NRC regulations conform to revisions to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) regulations for the international transportation of radioactive material and maintain consistency with DOT regulations. These changes are necessary to maintain a consistent regulatory framework for the transportation and packaging of radioactive material. These changes would make the regulation of quality assurance programs more efficient by allowing changes that do not change quality assurance approval holder commitments to be made without prior NRC approval, and extending the duration of quality assurance program approvals. These changes would clarify the responsibilities of general licensees and further limit the shipping of fissile material under a general license. The parallel DOT proposed rulemaking was published in the Federal Register on August 12, 2011.]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
	<title><![CDATA[Source: Establishing Quality Assurance Programs for Packaging Used in Transport of Radioactive Material]]></title>
	<link href="/regulations/view/122136/establishing_quality_assurance_programs_for_packaging_used_in_transport_of_radioactive" />
	<id>http://openregs.com/regulations/view/122136/establishing_quality_assurance_programs_for_packaging_used_in_transport_of_radioactive</id>
	<updated>2013-05-16T00:10:57-07:00</updated>
	<summary><![CDATA[Source: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is proposing to amend its regulations for the packaging and transportation of radioactive material. The NRC is issuing for public comment draft regulatory guide (DG), DG-7009, ``Establishing Quality Assurance Programs for Packaging Used in Transport of Radioactive Material.'' This draft regulatory guide describes a proposed method that the NRC staff considers acceptable for use in complying with the NRC's proposed amendments to its regulations on quality assurance programs related to transport of radioactive materials.]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
	<title><![CDATA[Source: Freedom of Information, Privacy Act, and Government in the Sunshine Act Procedures]]></title>
	<link href="/regulations/view/122093/freedom_of_information_privacy_act_and_government_in_the_sunshine_act_procedures" />
	<id>http://openregs.com/regulations/view/122093/freedom_of_information_privacy_act_and_government_in_the_sunshine_act_procedures</id>
	<updated>2013-05-15T00:10:34-07:00</updated>
	<summary><![CDATA[Source: The Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board is proposing regulations to implement the Freedom of Information Act, the Privacy Act of 1974, and the Government in the Sunshine Act. This proposed rulemaking describes the procedures for members of the public to request access to records. In addition, this notice also proposes procedures for the Board's responses to these requests, including the timeframe for response and applicable fees.]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
	<title><![CDATA[Source: Airworthiness Directives; Hawker Beechcraft Corporation]]></title>
	<link href="/regulations/view/122094/airworthiness_directives_hawker_beechcraft_corporation" />
	<id>http://openregs.com/regulations/view/122094/airworthiness_directives_hawker_beechcraft_corporation</id>
	<updated>2013-05-15T00:10:35-07:00</updated>
	<summary><![CDATA[Source: We are revising an earlier proposed airworthiness directive (AD) for certain Hawker Beechcraft Corporation (HBC) Models 58, 58TC, 58P, 95C55, E55, and 56TC airplanes. That NPRM proposed requiring inspections of elevator balance weights and replacement of defective elevator balance weights. That NPRM was prompted by reports of elevator balance weights becoming loose or failing because the balance weight material was under strength and did not meet material specifications. This action revises that NPRM to prohibit the installation of designated spare parts and to clarify applicability. We are proposing this supplemental NPRM to correct the unsafe condition on these products. Since these actions impose an additional burden over that proposed in the NPRM, we are reopening the comment period to allow the public the chance to comment on these proposed changes.]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
	<title><![CDATA[Source: Proposed Priority-National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research-Rehabilitation Research and Training Centers]]></title>
	<link href="/regulations/view/122095/proposed_priority-national_institute_on_disability_and_rehabilitation_research-rehabilitation" />
	<id>http://openregs.com/regulations/view/122095/proposed_priority-national_institute_on_disability_and_rehabilitation_research-rehabilitation</id>
	<updated>2013-05-15T00:10:36-07:00</updated>
	<summary><![CDATA[Source: The Assistant Secretary for Special Education and Rehabilitative Services proposes a priority under the Rehabilitation Research and Training Center (RRTC) Program administered by the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research (NIDRR). Specifically, this notice proposes a priority for an RRTC on Community Living Policy. We take this action to focus research attention on areas of national need. We intend the priority to contribute to improved outcomes in this area for individuals with disabilities.]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
	<title><![CDATA[Source: Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Wisconsin; Permit Exemption Rule]]></title>
	<link href="/regulations/view/122097/approval_and_promulgation_of_air_quality_implementation_plans_wisconsin_permit" />
	<id>http://openregs.com/regulations/view/122097/approval_and_promulgation_of_air_quality_implementation_plans_wisconsin_permit</id>
	<updated>2013-05-15T00:10:36-07:00</updated>
	<summary><![CDATA[Source: EPA is proposing to approve revisions to the Wisconsin State Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR) on April 23, 2008. WDNR has submitted for approval revisions that exempt certain sources of air pollution from construction permit requirements. EPA is proposing to approve these revisions because they are consistent with Federal regulations governing state permit programs.]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
	<title><![CDATA[Source: Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Indiana; Lake and Porter Counties, Indiana, 1997 8-Hour Ozone Maintenance Plan and 1997 Annual Fine Particulate Matter Maintenance Plan Revisions to Approved Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets]]></title>
	<link href="/regulations/view/122098/approval_and_promulgation_of_air_quality_implementation_plans_indiana_lake_and" />
	<id>http://openregs.com/regulations/view/122098/approval_and_promulgation_of_air_quality_implementation_plans_indiana_lake_and</id>
	<updated>2013-05-15T00:10:36-07:00</updated>
	<summary><![CDATA[Source: EPA is proposing to approve Indiana's request to revise the Lake and Porter State Implementation Plans (SIPs) for the 1997 8-hour ozone standard, and the 1997 annual fine particulate matter (PM<INF>2.5</INF>) standard to replace the previously approved motor vehicle emissions budgets (budgets) with budgets developed using EPA's Motor Vehicle Emissions Simulator (MOVES) 2010a emissions model. The Indiana Department of Environmental Management (IDEM) submitted these requests to EPA with submittal letters dated February 1, 2013.]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
	<title><![CDATA[Source: Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Ohio; Canton-Massillon 1997 8-Hour Ozone Maintenance Plan Revision to Approved Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets]]></title>
	<link href="/regulations/view/122099/approval_and_promulgation_of_air_quality_implementation_plans_ohio_canton-massillon" />
	<id>http://openregs.com/regulations/view/122099/approval_and_promulgation_of_air_quality_implementation_plans_ohio_canton-massillon</id>
	<updated>2013-05-15T00:10:37-07:00</updated>
	<summary><![CDATA[Source: EPA is proposing to approve the request by Ohio to revise the Canton-Massillon, Ohio, 1997 8-hour ozone maintenance air quality State Implementation Plan (SIP) under the Clean Air Act to replace the previously approved motor vehicle emissions budgets with budgets developed using EPA's Motor Vehicle Emissions Simulator (MOVES) emissions model. Ohio submitted the SIP revision request to EPA on November 26, 2012.]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
	<title><![CDATA[Source: Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Age in Federally Assisted Programs or Activities]]></title>
	<link href="/regulations/view/122101/nondiscrimination_on_the_basis_of_age_in_federally_assisted_programs_or_activities" />
	<id>http://openregs.com/regulations/view/122101/nondiscrimination_on_the_basis_of_age_in_federally_assisted_programs_or_activities</id>
	<updated>2013-05-15T00:10:37-07:00</updated>
	<summary><![CDATA[Source: The National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH) is issuing Age Discrimination Act of 1975 regulations at 45 CFR part 1172. These regulations implement provisions of the Age Discrimination Act of 1975 and the general, government-wide age discrimination regulations promulgated by the United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). These regulations are designed to guide the actions of recipients of Federal financial assistance from NEH and incorporate the basic standards set forth in the general, government-wide regulations for determining what constitutes age discrimination. The regulations also discuss the responsibilities of NEH recipients and the investigations, conciliation, and enforcement procedures NEH has been using and will continue to use to ensure compliance with the Act.]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
	<title><![CDATA[Source: Grapes Grown in Designated Area of Southeastern California; Increased Assessment Rate]]></title>
	<link href="/regulations/view/122068/grapes_grown_in_designated_area_of_southeastern_california_increased_assessment" />
	<id>http://openregs.com/regulations/view/122068/grapes_grown_in_designated_area_of_southeastern_california_increased_assessment</id>
	<updated>2013-05-14T00:10:27-07:00</updated>
	<summary><![CDATA[Source: This proposed rule would increase the assessment rate established for the California Desert Grape Administrative Committee (Committee) for the 2013 and subsequent fiscal periods from $0.0150 to $0.0165 per 18-pound lug of grapes handled. The Committee locally administers the marketing order that regulates the handling of grapes grown in a designated area of southeastern California. Assessments upon grape handlers are used by the Committee to fund reasonable and necessary expenses of the program. The fiscal period begins January 1 and ends December 31. The assessment rate would remain in effect indefinitely unless modified, suspended or terminated.]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
	<title><![CDATA[Source: Cranberries Grown in States of Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut, New Jersey, Wisconsin, Michigan, Minnesota, Oregon, Washington, and Long Island in the State of New York; Revising Determination of Sales History]]></title>
	<link href="/regulations/view/122069/cranberries_grown_in_states_of_massachusetts_rhode_island_connecticut_new_jersey" />
	<id>http://openregs.com/regulations/view/122069/cranberries_grown_in_states_of_massachusetts_rhode_island_connecticut_new_jersey</id>
	<updated>2013-05-14T00:10:27-07:00</updated>
	<summary><![CDATA[Source: This proposed rule invites comments on revisions to the determination of sales history provisions currently prescribed under the cranberry marketing order (order). The order regulates the handling of cranberries grown in Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut, New Jersey, Wisconsin, Michigan, Minnesota, Oregon, Washington, and Long Island in the State of New York, and is administered locally by the Cranberry Marketing Committee (Committee). This change would modify sales history calculations so that they would be applicable for future seasons and would adjust the number of years that could be considered when determining the highest four years of past sales.]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
	<title><![CDATA[Source: Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Airplanes]]></title>
	<link href="/regulations/view/122070/airworthiness_directives_airbus_airplanes" />
	<id>http://openregs.com/regulations/view/122070/airworthiness_directives_airbus_airplanes</id>
	<updated>2013-05-14T00:10:28-07:00</updated>
	<summary><![CDATA[Source: We propose to supersede an existing airworthiness directive (AD) that applies to certain Airbus Model A318-111 and -112 airplanes, Model A319 series airplanes, Model A320 series airplanes, and Model A321 series airplanes. The existing AD currently requires repetitive inspections of the 80VU rack lower lateral fittings for damage; repetitive inspections of the 80VU rack lower central support for cracking; and corrective action if necessary. That existing AD also specifies optional terminating action for the repetitive inspections. Since we issued that AD, we have received reports of worn lower lateral fittings of the 80VU rack. This proposed AD would reduce the inspection compliance time, add an inspection of the upper fittings and shelves of the 80VU rack, and add airplanes to the applicability. We are proposing this AD to detect and correct damage or cracking of the 80VU fittings and supports, which could lead to possible disconnection of the cable harnesses to one or more computers and, if occurring during a critical phase of flight, could result in reduced control of the airplane.]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
	<title><![CDATA[Source: Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc. Airplanes]]></title>
	<link href="/regulations/view/122071/airworthiness_directives_bombardier_inc._airplanes" />
	<id>http://openregs.com/regulations/view/122071/airworthiness_directives_bombardier_inc._airplanes</id>
	<updated>2013-05-14T00:10:29-07:00</updated>
	<summary><![CDATA[Source: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain Bombardier, Inc. Model DHC-8-400 series airplanes. This proposed AD was prompted by reports of excessive wear on the lower latch surface of the main landing gear (MLG) up-lock hook. This proposed AD would require revising the maintenance program. We are proposing this AD to detect and correct up-lock hooks worn beyond the wear limit, which could prevent the successful extension of the MLG using the primary landing gear extension system, which in combination with an alternate extension system failure could result in the inability to extend the MLG.]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
	<title><![CDATA[Source: Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Airplanes]]></title>
	<link href="/regulations/view/122072/airworthiness_directives_airbus_airplanes" />
	<id>http://openregs.com/regulations/view/122072/airworthiness_directives_airbus_airplanes</id>
	<updated>2013-05-14T00:10:30-07:00</updated>
	<summary><![CDATA[Source: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain Airbus Model A300 series airplanes; Model A300 B4-600, B4-600R, and F4-600R series airplanes, and Model A300 C4-605R Variant F airplanes (collectively called Model A300-600 series airplanes). This proposed AD was prompted by a report that cracking was found in area 2 of the frame base fittings between frame 41 and frame 46. This proposed AD would require a check of maintenance records to determine if certain repairs were done in area 1 of the frame brace fittings, and, for affected airplanes, a detailed inspection for cracking in area 2 of the frame base fittings between frame 41 and frame 46, and repair if necessary. We are proposing this AD to detect and correct cracking in area 2 of the frame base fittings between frame 41 and frame 46, which could adversely affect the structural integrity of the airplane.]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
	<title><![CDATA[Source: Airworthiness Directives; Rolls-Royce plc Turbofan Engines]]></title>
	<link href="/regulations/view/122073/airworthiness_directives_rolls-royce_plc_turbofan_engines" />
	<id>http://openregs.com/regulations/view/122073/airworthiness_directives_rolls-royce_plc_turbofan_engines</id>
	<updated>2013-05-14T00:10:30-07:00</updated>
	<summary><![CDATA[Source: We propose to supersede an existing airworthiness directive (AD) that applies to all Rolls-Royce plc (RR) model RB211 Trent 553-61, 553A2-61, 556-61, 556A2-61, 556B-61, 556B2-61, 560-61, and 560A2-61; and RB211 Trent 768-60, 772-60, and 772B-60; and RB211-Trent 875-17, 877-17, 884-17, 884B-17, 892-17, 892B-17, and 895-17; and RB211-524G2- T-19, -524G3-T-19, -524H-T-36, and -524H2-T-19 turbofan engines that have a high-pressure (HP) compressor stage 1 to 4 rotor disc installed, with a certain part number (P/N) installed. The existing AD requires repetitive inspections of the axial dovetail slots, and follow-on corrective action depending on findings. This proposed AD expands the population of affected parts. This proposed AD also changes, for the purposes of this AD, the definition of ``engine shop visit.'' We are proposing this AD to detect cracks in the HP compressor stage 1 and 2 disc posts, which could result in failure of the disc post and HP compressor blades, damage to the engine, and damage to the airplane.]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
	<title><![CDATA[Source: Special Local Regulation; Aguada Offshore Grand Prix, Bahia de Aguadilla; Aguada, PR]]></title>
	<link href="/regulations/view/122075/special_local_regulation_aguada_offshore_grand_prix_bahia_de_aguadilla_aguada" />
	<id>http://openregs.com/regulations/view/122075/special_local_regulation_aguada_offshore_grand_prix_bahia_de_aguadilla_aguada</id>
	<updated>2013-05-14T00:10:32-07:00</updated>
	<summary><![CDATA[Source: The Coast Guard proposes to establish a special local regulation on the waters of Bahia de Aguadilla in Aguada, Puerto Rico during the Aguada Offshore Grand Prix, a high speed boat race. The event is scheduled to take place on Sunday, August 4, 2013. Approximately 30 high-speed power boats will be participating in the races. It is anticipated that 20 spectator crafts will be present during the races. The special local regulation is necessary for the safety of race participants, participant vessels, spectators, and the general public during the event.]]></summary>
</entry>
</feed>
