<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/atom10full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0">
	<title>Regulations with upcoming closing comment periods</title>
	<subtitle>OpenRegs.com is an easy-to-navigate regulatory portal.</subtitle>
	
	<updated>2013-06-19T05:30:31-07:00</updated>
	<author>
		<name>OpenRegs.com</name>
		<email>contact@openregs.com</email>
	</author>
	<id>http://openregs.com/regulations/general_feed/upcoming_comment_periods_closing</id> 
	<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/open-regs-upcoming-closing-comment-periods" /><feedburner:info uri="open-regs-upcoming-closing-comment-periods" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><entry>
	<title><![CDATA[Source: Special Conditions: Embraer, S.A., Model EMB-550 Airplane; Side-Facing Seats; Installation of Airbag Systems in Shoulder Belts]]></title>
	<link href="/regulations/view/121906/special_conditions_embraer_s.a._model_emb-550_airplane_side-facing_seats_installation" />
	<id>http://openregs.com/regulations/view/121906/special_conditions_embraer_s.a._model_emb-550_airplane_side-facing_seats_installation</id>
	<updated>2013-05-06T00:10:20-07:00</updated>
	<summary><![CDATA[Source: This action proposes special conditions for the Embraer S.A. Model EMB-550 airplane. This airplane will have a novel or unusual design feature(s) associated with multiple place and single place side- facing seats and installation of airbag systems in the shoulder belts. The applicable airworthiness regulations do not contain adequate or appropriate safety standards for this design feature. These proposed special conditions contain the additional safety standards that the Administrator considers necessary to establish a level of safety equivalent to that established by the existing airworthiness standards.]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
	<title><![CDATA[Source: Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes]]></title>
	<link href="/regulations/view/121907/airworthiness_directives_the_boeing_company_airplanes" />
	<id>http://openregs.com/regulations/view/121907/airworthiness_directives_the_boeing_company_airplanes</id>
	<updated>2013-05-06T00:10:20-07:00</updated>
	<summary><![CDATA[Source: We are revising an earlier proposed airworthiness directive (AD) for all The Boeing Company Model 717-200 airplanes. That NPRM proposed requiring repetitive inspections for cracking of the overwing frames, and corrective actions if necessary. That NPRM was prompted by multiple reports of cracks of overwing frames. This action revises that NPRM by revising the initial compliance time and providing an optional modification that would extend the compliance time for the next repetitive inspection. We are proposing this supplemental NPRM to detect and correct such cracking, which could sever a frame and increase the loading of adjacent frames, and could result in damage to the adjacent structure and consequent loss of structural integrity of the airplane. Since certain actions impose an additional burden over that proposed in the NPRM, we are reopening the comment period to allow the public the chance to comment on these proposed changes.]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
	<title><![CDATA[Source: Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Listing the Lesser Prairie-Chicken as a Threatened Species With a Special Rule]]></title>
	<link href="/regulations/view/121913/endangered_and_threatened_wildlife_and_plants_listing_the_lesser_prairie-chicken" />
	<id>http://openregs.com/regulations/view/121913/endangered_and_threatened_wildlife_and_plants_listing_the_lesser_prairie-chicken</id>
	<updated>2013-05-06T00:10:22-07:00</updated>
	<summary><![CDATA[Source: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, propose to create a special rule under authority of section 4(d) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act), that provides measures that are necessary and advisable to provide for the conservation of the lesser prairie-chicken (Tympanuchus pallidicinctus). In addition, we announce the reopening of the public comment period on the December 11, 2012, proposed rule to list the lesser prairie-chicken as a threatened species under the Act. We also announce the availability of a draft rangewide conservation plan for the lesser prairie-chicken, which has been prepared by the Lesser Prairie-Chicken Interstate Working Group, and request comments on the plan as it relates to our determination of status under section 4(a)(1) of the Act.]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
	<title><![CDATA[Source: Prevailing Rate Systems; Definition of Vanderburgh County, Indiana, to a Nonappropriated Fund Federal Wage System Wage Area]]></title>
	<link href="/regulations/view/122201/prevailing_rate_systems_definition_of_vanderburgh_county_indiana_to_a_nonappropriated" />
	<id>http://openregs.com/regulations/view/122201/prevailing_rate_systems_definition_of_vanderburgh_county_indiana_to_a_nonappropriated</id>
	<updated>2013-05-21T00:10:25-07:00</updated>
	<summary><![CDATA[Source: The U.S. Office of Personnel Management is issuing a proposed rule that would define Vanderburgh County, Indiana, as an area of application county to the St. Clair, IL, nonappropriated fund (NAF) Federal Wage System (FWS) wage area. This change is necessary because there are two NAF FWS employees working in Vanderburgh County and the county is not currently defined to a NAF wage area.]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
	<title><![CDATA[Source: Prevailing Rate Systems; Definition of Broward County, Florida, to a Nonappropriated Fund Federal Wage System Wage Area]]></title>
	<link href="/regulations/view/122202/prevailing_rate_systems_definition_of_broward_county_florida_to_a_nonappropriated" />
	<id>http://openregs.com/regulations/view/122202/prevailing_rate_systems_definition_of_broward_county_florida_to_a_nonappropriated</id>
	<updated>2013-05-21T00:10:25-07:00</updated>
	<summary><![CDATA[Source: The U.S. Office of Personnel Management is issuing a proposed rule that would define Broward County, Florida, as an area of application county to the Miami-Dade, FL, nonappropriated fund (NAF) Federal Wage System (FWS) wage area. This change is necessary because there are three NAF FWS employees working in Broward County and the county is not currently defined to a NAF wage area.]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
	<title><![CDATA[Source: Safety Zone; Chicago Harbor, Navy Pier Southeast, Chicago, IL]]></title>
	<link href="/regulations/view/122208/safety_zone_chicago_harbor_navy_pier_southeast_chicago_il" />
	<id>http://openregs.com/regulations/view/122208/safety_zone_chicago_harbor_navy_pier_southeast_chicago_il</id>
	<updated>2013-05-21T00:10:29-07:00</updated>
	<summary><![CDATA[Source: The Coast Guard proposes to amend the Safety Zone for Chicago Harbor, Navy Pier Southeast, Chicago, IL. This Zone is intended to restrict vessels from a portion of Chicago Harbor during fireworks displays, races, and other marine events that occur throughout each calendar year. The safety zone established by this proposed rule is necessary to protect spectators, participants, and vessels from the hazards associated with these fireworks displays, boat races, and other events.]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
	<title><![CDATA[Source: Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Kentucky; Approval of Revisions to the Jefferson County Portion of the Kentucky SIP; Emissions During Startups, Shutdowns, and Malfunctions]]></title>
	<link href="/regulations/view/122209/approval_and_promulgation_of_implementation_plans_kentucky_approval_of_revisions" />
	<id>http://openregs.com/regulations/view/122209/approval_and_promulgation_of_implementation_plans_kentucky_approval_of_revisions</id>
	<updated>2013-05-21T00:10:30-07:00</updated>
	<summary><![CDATA[Source: EPA is proposing to approve part of a revision to the Kentucky State Implementation Plan (SIP), submitted by the Commonwealth of Kentucky, through the Kentucky Division for Air Quality (KDAQ), on March 22, 2011. The proposed revision was submitted by KDAQ on behalf of the Louisville Metro Air Pollution Control District (District), which has jurisdiction over Jefferson County, Kentucky. The portion of the revision that EPA is proposing for approval modifies the Regulation entitled, ``Emissions During Startups, Shutdowns, Malfunctions and Emergencies'' in the Jefferson County portion of the Kentucky SIP. EPA is proposing approval of this portion of the March 22, 2011, SIP revision because the Agency has determined that it is in accordance with the requirements for SIP provisions under the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act). EPA will act on the other portions of KDAQ's March 22, 2011, submittal, which are severable and unrelated, in a separate action.]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
	<title><![CDATA[Source: Earth Stations Aboard Aircraft Communicating with Fixed-Satellite Service Geostationary-Orbit Space Stations]]></title>
	<link href="/regulations/view/121292/earth_stations_aboard_aircraft_communicating_with_fixed-satellite_service_geostationary-orbit" />
	<id>http://openregs.com/regulations/view/121292/earth_stations_aboard_aircraft_communicating_with_fixed-satellite_service_geostationary-orbit</id>
	<updated>2013-03-29T00:10:22-07:00</updated>
	<summary><![CDATA[Source: The Federal Communications Commission is correcting the comment and reply comment dates for a proposed rule that appeared in the Federal Register of March 8, 2013. The document proposed rules for Earth Stations Aboard Aircraft.]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
	<title><![CDATA[Source: Airworthiness Directives; Eurocopter France Helicopters]]></title>
	<link href="/regulations/view/121667/airworthiness_directives_eurocopter_france_helicopters" />
	<id>http://openregs.com/regulations/view/121667/airworthiness_directives_eurocopter_france_helicopters</id>
	<updated>2013-04-22T00:10:30-07:00</updated>
	<summary><![CDATA[Source: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain Eurocopter France (Eurocopter) Model AS332C, AS332L, AS332L1, AS332L2, and EC225LP helicopters to require inspecting for the presence of blind holes in the tail gearbox (TGB) attachment fittings, and, if they are missing, installing an additional washer under the head of the attachment bolt until the attachment fitting is replaced with an airworthy attachment fitting. This proposed AD was prompted by the discovery of interference between the TGB aft attachment bolt and the structure fitting, caused by a manufacturing anomaly that omitted the blind hole required for proper fit of the attachment bolt. This condition, if not detected and corrected, could result in insufficient tightening of the TGB casing, damage to the TGB attachment, cracking under the attachment bolt, and loss of the TGB, resulting in loss of control of the helicopter.]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
	<title><![CDATA[Source: Airworthiness Directives; Bell Helicopter Textron Canada Inc. Helicopters]]></title>
	<link href="/regulations/view/121668/airworthiness_directives_bell_helicopter_textron_canada_inc._helicopters" />
	<id>http://openregs.com/regulations/view/121668/airworthiness_directives_bell_helicopter_textron_canada_inc._helicopters</id>
	<updated>2013-04-22T00:10:32-07:00</updated>
	<summary><![CDATA[Source: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain Bell Helicopter Textron Canada Inc. (BHT) Model 206A, 206B, and 206L helicopters. This proposed AD would require replacing certain part-numbered engine auto-relight kit control boxes. This proposed AD is prompted by a design review that revealed the control box chipset did not meet the required temperature range requirements, which could cause the control box to malfunction, disabling the engine auto-relight system. This condition could result in increased pilot workload during a power loss emergency and subsequent loss of control of the aircraft.]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
	<title><![CDATA[Source: Airworthiness Directives; Eurocopter France Helicopters]]></title>
	<link href="/regulations/view/121671/airworthiness_directives_eurocopter_france_helicopters" />
	<id>http://openregs.com/regulations/view/121671/airworthiness_directives_eurocopter_france_helicopters</id>
	<updated>2013-04-22T00:10:35-07:00</updated>
	<summary><![CDATA[Source: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for Eurocopter France (Eurocopter) Model AS350B, BA, B1, B2, B3, and D, and Model AS355E, F, F1, F2, and N helicopters with certain tail rotor (T/ R) blades. This proposed AD would require installing additional rivets to secure each T/R blade trailing edge tab (tab), and inspecting for evidence of debonding of the tab after the rivets are installed. This proposed AD is prompted by reports of T/R blade tab debonding. The actions specified by this proposed AD are intended to prevent loss of a T/R blade tab, which could result in excessive vibration and loss of control of the helicopter.]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
	<title><![CDATA[Source: Airworthiness Directives; Eurocopter Deutschland GmbH (ECD) Helicopters]]></title>
	<link href="/regulations/view/121673/airworthiness_directives_eurocopter_deutschland_gmbh_ecd_helicopters" />
	<id>http://openregs.com/regulations/view/121673/airworthiness_directives_eurocopter_deutschland_gmbh_ecd_helicopters</id>
	<updated>2013-04-22T00:10:37-07:00</updated>
	<summary><![CDATA[Source: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for ECD Model MBB-BK 117 C-2 helicopters. This proposed AD would require inspecting the rigging of the power-boosted control system and, if there is a nonparallel gap between the rigging wedges and the inner sleeves, performing a rigging procedure. This proposed AD is prompted by the discovery, during rigging of the main rotor controls, of movement of the longitudinal main rotor actuator piston after shut-down of the external pump drive. Such movement could cause incorrect rigging results. The proposed actions are intended to prevent incorrect rigging results, which could impair freedom of movement of the upper controls and subsequent reduced control of the helicopter.]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
	<title><![CDATA[Source: Airworthiness Directives; Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation Helicopters]]></title>
	<link href="/regulations/view/121674/airworthiness_directives_sikorsky_aircraft_corporation_helicopters" />
	<id>http://openregs.com/regulations/view/121674/airworthiness_directives_sikorsky_aircraft_corporation_helicopters</id>
	<updated>2013-04-22T00:10:37-07:00</updated>
	<summary><![CDATA[Source: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation (Sikorsky) Model S-92A helicopters to require modifying the No. 1 engine forward firewall center fire extinguisher discharge tube (No. 1 engine tube). This proposed AD is prompted by the discovery that the No. 1 engine tube installed on the helicopters is too long to ensure that a fire could be effectively extinguished on a helicopter. The proposed actions are intended to ensure the No. 1 engine tube would allow for complete coverage of an extinguishing agent in the No. 1 engine compartment area, ensure that a fire would be extinguished and prevent the loss of helicopter control.]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
	<title><![CDATA[Source: Copayment for Extended Care Services]]></title>
	<link href="/regulations/view/121676/copayment_for_extended_care_services" />
	<id>http://openregs.com/regulations/view/121676/copayment_for_extended_care_services</id>
	<updated>2013-04-22T00:10:38-07:00</updated>
	<summary><![CDATA[Source: The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) proposes to amend how VA determines the ``spousal resource protection amount,'' which is the amount of liquid assets of a veteran and community (i.e., not institutionalized) spouse that is considered unavailable when calculating the veteran's maximum monthly copayment obligation for extended care services longer than 180 days. This proposed rule would define the ``spousal resource protection amount'' by reference to the Maximum Community Spouse Resource Standard, which is published each year by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and is adjusted annually based on the Consumer Price Index. This change would have the immediate effect of increasing the spousal resource protection amount from $89,280 to $115,920, and would ensure that the spousal resource protection amount stays consistent with the comparable protection for the spouses of Medicaid recipients.]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
	<title><![CDATA[Source: Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act Provisions; Fisheries of the Northeastern United States; Atlantic Herring Fishery; Amendment 5]]></title>
	<link href="/regulations/view/121679/magnuson-stevens_fishery_conservation_and_management_act_provisions_fisheries_of" />
	<id>http://openregs.com/regulations/view/121679/magnuson-stevens_fishery_conservation_and_management_act_provisions_fisheries_of</id>
	<updated>2013-04-22T00:10:44-07:00</updated>
	<summary><![CDATA[Source: NMFS announces that the New England Fishery Management Council (Council) has submitted Amendment 5 to the Atlantic Herring Fishery Management Plan (FMP) (Amendment 5), incorporating the Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) and the Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA), for review by the Secretary of Commerce and is requesting comments from the public.]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
	<title><![CDATA[Source: Proposed Amendment of Class E Airspace; Plattsburgh, NY]]></title>
	<link href="/regulations/view/121935/proposed_amendment_of_class_e_airspace_plattsburgh_ny" />
	<id>http://openregs.com/regulations/view/121935/proposed_amendment_of_class_e_airspace_plattsburgh_ny</id>
	<updated>2013-05-07T00:10:13-07:00</updated>
	<summary><![CDATA[Source: This action proposes to amend Class E Airspace at Plattsburgh, NY, as the Clinton County Airport has closed and controlled airspace removed. New Class E Airspace at Plattsburgh International Airport would be created to accommodate standard instrument approach procedures developed at the airport. This action would enhance the safety and airspace management of Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) operations.]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
	<title><![CDATA[Source: Proposed Establishment of Class E Airspace; Presidio, TX]]></title>
	<link href="/regulations/view/121936/proposed_establishment_of_class_e_airspace_presidio_tx" />
	<id>http://openregs.com/regulations/view/121936/proposed_establishment_of_class_e_airspace_presidio_tx</id>
	<updated>2013-05-07T00:10:13-07:00</updated>
	<summary><![CDATA[Source: This action proposes to establish Class E airspace at Presidio, TX. Controlled airspace is necessary to accommodate new Standard Instrument Approach Procedures (SIAP) at Presidio Lely International Airport. The FAA is taking this action to enhance the safety and management of Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) operations for SIAPs at the airport.]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
	<title><![CDATA[Source: Migratory Bird Hunting; Proposed 2013-14 Migratory Game Bird Hunting Regulations (Preliminary) With Requests for Indian Tribal Proposals and Requests for 2015 Spring and Summer Migratory Bird Subsistence Harvest Proposals in Alaska]]></title>
	<link href="/regulations/view/121440/migratory_bird_hunting_proposed_2013-14_migratory_game_bird_hunting_regulations" />
	<id>http://openregs.com/regulations/view/121440/migratory_bird_hunting_proposed_2013-14_migratory_game_bird_hunting_regulations</id>
	<updated>2013-04-09T00:10:17-07:00</updated>
	<summary><![CDATA[Source: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (hereinafter the Service or we) proposes to establish annual hunting regulations for certain migratory game birds for the 2013-14 hunting season. We annually prescribe outside limits (frameworks) within which States may select hunting seasons. This proposed rule provides the regulatory schedule, describes the proposed regulatory alternatives for the 2013-14 duck hunting seasons, requests proposals from Indian tribes that wish to establish special migratory game bird hunting regulations on Federal Indian reservations and ceded lands, and requests proposals for the 2015 spring and summer migratory bird subsistence season in Alaska. Migratory game bird hunting seasons provide opportunities for recreation and sustenance; aid Federal, State, and tribal governments in the management of migratory game birds; and permit harvests at levels compatible with migratory game bird population status and habitat conditions.]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
	<title><![CDATA[Source: Effective Date of Requirement for Premarket Approval for Automated External Defibrillator System.]]></title>
	<link href="/regulations/view/121134/effective_date_of_requirement_for_premarket_approval_for_automated_external_defibrillator" />
	<id>http://openregs.com/regulations/view/121134/effective_date_of_requirement_for_premarket_approval_for_automated_external_defibrillator</id>
	<updated>2013-03-25T00:10:24-07:00</updated>
	<summary><![CDATA[Source: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is proposing to require the filing of a premarket approval application (PMA) or a notice of completion of a product development protocol (PDP) for the following class III preamendments devices: Automated external defibrillators systems (AEDs), which includes the AED device and its accessories (i.e., pad electrodes, batteries, and adapters). The Agency is also summarizing its proposed findings regarding the degree of risk of illness or injury designed to be eliminated or reduced by requiring this device to meet the statute's premarket approval requirements and the benefits to the public from the use of the device. In addition, FDA is announcing the opportunity for interested persons to request that the Agency change the classification of the automated external defibrillator based on new information. This action implements certain statutory requirements.]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
	<title><![CDATA[Source: Passenger Screening Using Advanced Imaging Technology]]></title>
	<link href="/regulations/view/121191/passenger_screening_using_advanced_imaging_technology" />
	<id>http://openregs.com/regulations/view/121191/passenger_screening_using_advanced_imaging_technology</id>
	<updated>2013-03-26T00:11:01-07:00</updated>
	<summary><![CDATA[Source: The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) is proposing to revise its civil aviation security regulations to clarify that TSA may use advanced imaging technology (AIT) to screen individuals at security screening checkpoints. This proposed rule is issued to comply with a decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, which ordered TSA to engage in notice-and-comment rulemaking on the use of AIT for screening. The Court decided that TSA should provide notice and invite comments on the use of AIT technology for primary screening.]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
	<title><![CDATA[Source: Unlicensed National Information Infrastructure (U-NII) Devices in the 5 GHz Band]]></title>
	<link href="/regulations/view/121466/unlicensed_national_information_infrastructure_u-nii_devices_in_the_5_ghz_band" />
	<id>http://openregs.com/regulations/view/121466/unlicensed_national_information_infrastructure_u-nii_devices_in_the_5_ghz_band</id>
	<updated>2013-04-10T05:30:19-07:00</updated>
	<summary><![CDATA[Source: This document proposes to amend the Commission's rules governing the operation of Unlicensed National Information Infrastructure (U-NII) devices in the 5 GHz band. The Commission has gained much experience with U-NII devices since it first made spectrum available in the 5 GHz band for U-NII in 1997. The Commission believes that the time is now right to revisit the rules. The initiation of this proceeding satisfies the requirements of the ``Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012'' which requires the Commission to begin a proceeding to modify the rules to allow unlicensed U-NII devices to operate in the 5350-5470 MHz band. The Commission believes that an increase in capacity gained from 195 megahertz of additional spectrum, combined with the ease of deployment and operational flexibility provided by its U-NII rules would continue to foster the development of new and innovative unlicensed devices, and increase wireless broadband access and investment.]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
	<title><![CDATA[Source: Generator Requirements at the Transmission Interface]]></title>
	<link href="/regulations/view/121718/generator_requirements_at_the_transmission_interface" />
	<id>http://openregs.com/regulations/view/121718/generator_requirements_at_the_transmission_interface</id>
	<updated>2013-04-24T00:10:29-07:00</updated>
	<summary><![CDATA[Source: Pursuant to section 215 of the Federal Power Act (FPA),\1\ the Commission proposes to approve modifications to four existing Reliability Standards as submitted by the North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC), the Commission certified Electric Reliability Organization. Specifically, the Commission is proposing to approve Reliability Standards FAC-001-1 (Facility Connection Requirements), FAC-003-3 (Transmission Vegetation Management), PRC-004- 2.1a (Analysis and Mitigation of Transmission and Generation Protection System Misoperations), and PRC-005-1.1b (Transmission and Generation Protection System Maintenance and Testing). The proposed modifications improve reliability either by extending their applicability to certain generator interconnection facilities, or by clarifying that the existing Reliability Standard is and remains applicable to generator interconnection facilities. The Commission also proposes to approve the related Violation Risk Factors and Violation Severity Levels, as well as the implementation plan and effective dates proposed by NERC. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
	<title><![CDATA[Source: Version 5 Critical Infrastructure Protection Reliability Standards]]></title>
	<link href="/regulations/view/121719/version_5_critical_infrastructure_protection_reliability_standards" />
	<id>http://openregs.com/regulations/view/121719/version_5_critical_infrastructure_protection_reliability_standards</id>
	<updated>2013-04-24T00:10:31-07:00</updated>
	<summary><![CDATA[Source: Pursuant to section 215 of the Federal Power Act, the Commission proposes to approve the Version 5 Critical Infrastructure Protection Reliability Standards, CIP-002-5 through CIP-011-1, submitted by the North American Electric Reliability Corporation, the Commission-certified Electric Reliability Organization. The proposed Reliability Standards, which pertain to the cyber security of the bulk electric system, represent an improvement over the current Commission- approved CIP Reliability Standards as they adopt new cyber security controls and extend the scope of the systems that are protected by the CIP Reliability Standards. The Commission is concerned, however, that limited aspects of the proposed CIP version 5 Standards are potentially ambiguous and, ultimately, raise questions regarding the enforceability of the standards. Therefore, the Commission proposes to direct that NERC develop certain modifications to the CIP version 5 Standards to address the matters identified by the Commission.]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
	<title><![CDATA[Source: National Guard Bureau Privacy Program]]></title>
	<link href="/regulations/view/121720/national_guard_bureau_privacy_program" />
	<id>http://openregs.com/regulations/view/121720/national_guard_bureau_privacy_program</id>
	<updated>2013-04-24T00:10:31-07:00</updated>
	<summary><![CDATA[Source: This proposed rule establishes policies and procedures for the National Guard Bureau (NGB) Privacy Program. The NGB is a Joint Activity of the Department of Defense (DoD). This rule will cover the privacy policies and procedures associated with records created and under the control of the Chief, NGB that are not otherwise covered by existing DoD, Air Force, or Army rules.]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
	<title><![CDATA[Source: Airworthiness Directives; Various Sikorsky-Manufactured Transport and Restricted Category Helicopters]]></title>
	<link href="/regulations/view/121742/airworthiness_directives_various_sikorsky-manufactured_transport_and_restricted" />
	<id>http://openregs.com/regulations/view/121742/airworthiness_directives_various_sikorsky-manufactured_transport_and_restricted</id>
	<updated>2013-04-25T00:10:09-07:00</updated>
	<summary><![CDATA[Source: We are revising the proposals in an earlier notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for certain Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation (Sikorsky) Model S-61A, D, E, L, N, NM (serial number 61454), R, and V; Croman Corporation Model SH-3H, Carson Helicopters, Inc., Model S-61L; Glacier Helicopters, Inc. Model CH-3E; Robinson Air Crane, Inc. Model CH-3E, CH-3C, HH-3C, and HH-3E; and Siller Helicopters Model CH-3E and SH-3A helicopters. The NPRM proposed superseding an existing AD but retaining some requirements of that AD, removing certain dowel pin bores, expanding the applicability to include additional helicopters, and implementing a new retirement life for each main rotor shaft (MRS) based on a reevaluation of the MRS service life. This SNPRM is prompted by the comments received in response to the NPRM and a reevaluation of the relevant data. The proposed actions are intended to prevent MRS structural failure, loss of power to the main rotor, and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
	<title><![CDATA[Source: Airworthiness Directives; AgustaWestland S.p.A. Helicopters]]></title>
	<link href="/regulations/view/121743/airworthiness_directives_agustawestland_s.p.a._helicopters" />
	<id>http://openregs.com/regulations/view/121743/airworthiness_directives_agustawestland_s.p.a._helicopters</id>
	<updated>2013-04-25T00:10:10-07:00</updated>
	<summary><![CDATA[Source: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for AgustaWestland S.p.A. (AgustaWestland) Model A119 and AW119 MKII helicopters to require inspecting the pilot and co-pilot doors to ensure that the windows are properly bonded within the doors. If the windows are not properly bonded, the proposed AD would require applying bonding to the windows, the seals, and the window frames of the pilot and co-pilot doors. This proposed AD is prompted by the loss of a pilot-door window during a test flight. The proposed actions are intended to ensure the windows do not detach from the doors, potentially injuring persons on the ground and damaging the helicopter's tailboom and the tail rotor blades.]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
	<title><![CDATA[Source: Airworthiness Directives; Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc. (Bell) Model Helicopters]]></title>
	<link href="/regulations/view/121744/airworthiness_directives_bell_helicopter_textron_inc._bell_model_helicopters" />
	<id>http://openregs.com/regulations/view/121744/airworthiness_directives_bell_helicopter_textron_inc._bell_model_helicopters</id>
	<updated>2013-04-25T00:10:10-07:00</updated>
	<summary><![CDATA[Source: We propose to supersede an existing revised airworthiness directive (AD) for all Bell Model 204B and certain serial-numbered Model 205A-1 helicopters with a certain tail rotor pitch control chain (chain) installed. The existing AD requires visually inspecting the chain to detect a crack in the link segments and, for affected Model 205A-1 helicopters, replacing the tail rotor chain and cable control system with a push-pull control system. Since we issued that AD, we have determined the need to apply the requirements to a newly-produced, similarly-designed chain with a different part number. Also, for the Model 204B, data shows the need to reduce the inspection interval of the chain and revise its inspection procedures because the rapid growth of a crack can lead to premature chain failure and to install a tail rotor cable and chain damper kit (damper kit) to reduce the oscillatory loading. We have also determined that installing a push-pull control system should apply to Model 205A-1 helicopters with certain serial numbers, regardless of the chain part number installed. These proposed actions are intended to prevent failure of the chain, loss of tail rotor blade pitch control, and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
	<title><![CDATA[Source: Airworthiness Directives; Robinson Helicopter Company (Robinson)]]></title>
	<link href="/regulations/view/121745/airworthiness_directives_robinson_helicopter_company_robinson" />
	<id>http://openregs.com/regulations/view/121745/airworthiness_directives_robinson_helicopter_company_robinson</id>
	<updated>2013-04-25T00:10:10-07:00</updated>
	<summary><![CDATA[Source: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for Model R22, R22 Alpha, R22 Beta, and R22 Mariner helicopters with certain fuel shut-off valves installed. This proposed AD would require replacing the fuel shut-off valve with a newer design fuel shut-off valve. This proposed AD is prompted by three accidents that occurred because the fuel shut-off valve was inadvertently moved to the ``off'' position. The proposed actions are intended to prevent inadvertent closing of the fuel valve, which could result in engine power loss and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
	<title><![CDATA[Source: Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Endangered Status for the Sierra Nevada Yellow-Legged Frog and the Northern Distinct Population Segment of the Mountain Yellow-Legged Frog, and Threatened Status for the Yosemite Toad]]></title>
	<link href="/regulations/view/121748/endangered_and_threatened_wildlife_and_plants_endangered_status_for_the_sierra" />
	<id>http://openregs.com/regulations/view/121748/endangered_and_threatened_wildlife_and_plants_endangered_status_for_the_sierra</id>
	<updated>2013-04-25T00:10:11-07:00</updated>
	<summary><![CDATA[Source: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, propose to list the Sierra Nevada yellow-legged frog and the northern distinct population segment (DPS) (populations that occur north of the Tehachapi Mountains) of the mountain yellow-legged frog as endangered species, and the Yosemite toad as a threatened species under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act). The effect of this regulation would be to add the species to the List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife under the Act.]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
	<title><![CDATA[Source: Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Designation of Critical Habitat for the Sierra Nevada Yellow-Legged Frog, the Northern Distinct Population Segment of the Mountain Yellow-Legged Frog, and the Yosemite Toad]]></title>
	<link href="/regulations/view/121749/endangered_and_threatened_wildlife_and_plants_designation_of_critical_habitat_for" />
	<id>http://openregs.com/regulations/view/121749/endangered_and_threatened_wildlife_and_plants_designation_of_critical_habitat_for</id>
	<updated>2013-04-25T00:10:11-07:00</updated>
	<summary><![CDATA[Source: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, propose to designate critical habitat for the Sierra Nevada yellow-legged frog, the northern distinct population segment (DPS) (populations that occur north of the Tehachapi Mountains) of the mountain yellow-legged frog, and the Yosemite toad under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act). In total, we propose to designate as critical habitat approximately 447,341 hectares (1,105,400 acres) for the Sierra Nevada yellow-legged frog in Butte, Plumas, Lassen, Sierra, Nevada, Placer, El Dorado, Amador, Calaveras, Alpine, Mariposa, Mono, Madera, Tuolumne, Fresno, and Inyo Counties, California; approximately 89,637 hectares (221,498 acres) for the northern DPS of the mountain yellow-legged frog in Fresno and Tulare Counties, California; and approximately 303,889 hectares (750,926 acres) for the Yosemite toad in Alpine, Tuolumne, Mono, Mariposa, Madera, Fresno, and Inyo Counties, California.]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
	<title><![CDATA[Source: Imposition of Special Measures Against Kassem Rmeiti &amp; Co. for Exchange as a Financial Institution of Primary Money Laundering Concern]]></title>
	<link href="/regulations/view/121750/imposition_of_special_measures_against_kassem_rmeiti_co._for_exchange_as_a" />
	<id>http://openregs.com/regulations/view/121750/imposition_of_special_measures_against_kassem_rmeiti_co._for_exchange_as_a</id>
	<updated>2013-04-25T00:10:12-07:00</updated>
	<summary><![CDATA[Source: In a finding, notice of which is published elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register, the Director of FinCEN found that Kassem Rmeiti & Co. For Exchange (``Rmeiti Exchange'') is a financial institution operating outside of the United States that is of primary money laundering concern. FinCEN is issuing this notice of proposed rulemaking (``NPRM'') to propose the imposition of two special measures against Rmeiti Exchange.]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
	<title><![CDATA[Source: Imposition of Special Measures Against Halawi Exchange Co. as a Financial Institution of Primary Money Laundering Concern]]></title>
	<link href="/regulations/view/121751/imposition_of_special_measures_against_halawi_exchange_co._as_a_financial_institution" />
	<id>http://openregs.com/regulations/view/121751/imposition_of_special_measures_against_halawi_exchange_co._as_a_financial_institution</id>
	<updated>2013-04-25T00:10:12-07:00</updated>
	<summary><![CDATA[Source: In a finding, notice of which is published elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register, the Director of FinCEN found that Halawi Exchange Co. (``Halawi Exchange'') is a financial institution operating outside of the United States that is of primary money laundering concern. FinCEN is issuing this notice of proposed rulemaking (``NPRM'') to propose the imposition of two special measures against Halawi Exchange.]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
	<title><![CDATA[Source: Restructuring of Regulations on the Importation of Plants for Planting]]></title>
	<link href="/regulations/view/121753/restructuring_of_regulations_on_the_importation_of_plants_for_planting" />
	<id>http://openregs.com/regulations/view/121753/restructuring_of_regulations_on_the_importation_of_plants_for_planting</id>
	<updated>2013-04-25T00:10:12-07:00</updated>
	<summary><![CDATA[Source: We are proposing to restructure our regulations governing the importation of plants for planting. In the proposed structure, restrictions on the importation of specific types of plants for planting would no longer be found in the regulations, but instead would be found in the Plants for Planting Manual. We would change those restrictions after taking public comment through notices published in the Federal Register. As part of this restructuring, we would group together restrictions in the plants for planting regulations that apply to the importation of most or all plants for planting, and we would add general requirements for the development of integrated pest risk management measures that we would use to mitigate the risk associated with the importation of a specific type of plants for planting. We would also amend our foreign quarantine regulations to remove various provisions regarding the importation of specific types of plants for planting that are not currently subject to the general plants for planting regulations; these provisions would also be found in the Plants for Planting Manual. This action would not make any major changes to the restrictions that currently apply to the importation of plants for planting. These changes would make restrictions on the importation of specific types of plants for planting easier for readers to find and less cumbersome for us to change.]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
	<title><![CDATA[Source: Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Airplanes]]></title>
	<link href="/regulations/view/121956/airworthiness_directives_airbus_airplanes" />
	<id>http://openregs.com/regulations/view/121956/airworthiness_directives_airbus_airplanes</id>
	<updated>2013-05-08T05:30:13-07:00</updated>
	<summary><![CDATA[Source: We propose to supersede an existing airworthiness directive (AD) that applies to all Airbus Model A330-200 and -300 series airplanes, and Model A340-200 and -300 series airplanes. The existing AD currently requires a repetitive inspection program on certain check valves in the hydraulic systems that includes, among other things, inspections for lock wire presence and integrity, traces of seepage or black deposits, proper torque, alignment of the check valve and manifold, installing new lock wire, and corrective actions if needed. Since we issued that AD, additional in-service reports of check valves loosening at lower flight cycle thresholds than previously reported have been received. This proposed AD would expand the applicability, reduce the compliance time, change torque values of the check valve tightening, and require a repetitive inspection program for certain check valves in the hydraulic systems on airplanes that have had a certain modification embodied during production or in-service. We are proposing this AD to detect and correct such check valve loosening, which could result in hydraulic leaks, possibly leading to the loss of all three hydraulic systems and consequent loss of control of the airplane.]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
	<title><![CDATA[Source: Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes]]></title>
	<link href="/regulations/view/121957/airworthiness_directives_the_boeing_company_airplanes" />
	<id>http://openregs.com/regulations/view/121957/airworthiness_directives_the_boeing_company_airplanes</id>
	<updated>2013-05-08T05:30:14-07:00</updated>
	<summary><![CDATA[Source: We propose to supersede an existing airworthiness directive (AD) that applies to certain The Boeing Company Model 747-100, 747- 100B, 747-100B SUD, 747-200B, 747-200C, 747-300, 747-400, 747-400D, and 747SR series airplanes. The existing AD requires, for certain airplanes, inspection to determine the material of a main entry door (MED) reveal; repetitive inspections of certain reveals for cracking; a detailed inspection of certain reveals for a sharp edge and cracking; and corrective action if necessary. That AD also allows a certain replacement as an optional action for certain inspections of certain airplanes. Since we issued that AD, an operator reported a crack found in a 6061 machined aluminum one-piece corner reveal. This proposed AD would add, for certain airplanes, an inspection to determine material type of MED reveals, repetitive inspections for cracking of 6061 machined aluminum one-piece corner reveals, and replacement with 6061 machined aluminum two-piece corner reveals if necessary. This proposed AD would also allow replacement with two-piece corner reveals as an option for certain repetitive inspections. This proposed AD would also revise the applicability by removing a certain airplane. We are proposing this AD to detect and correct fatigue cracking of the lower forward corner reveal of the number 3 MEDs, which could lead to the door escape slide departing the airplane when the door is opened and the slide is deployed, and consequent injuries to passengers and crew using the door escape slide during an emergency evacuation.]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
	<title><![CDATA[Source: Verification of Statements of Account Submitted by Cable Operators and Satellite Carriers]]></title>
	<link href="/regulations/view/121997/verification_of_statements_of_account_submitted_by_cable_operators_and_satellite" />
	<id>http://openregs.com/regulations/view/121997/verification_of_statements_of_account_submitted_by_cable_operators_and_satellite</id>
	<updated>2013-05-09T00:10:08-07:00</updated>
	<summary><![CDATA[Source: On June 14, 2012, the United States Copyright Office published a notice of proposed rulemaking and request for comments concerning a new regulation that will allow copyright owners to audit the Statements of Account and royalty fees that cable operators and satellite carriers deposit with the Copyright Office for secondary transmissions of broadcast programming made pursuant to statutory licenses. The Copyright Office has revised the proposed regulation based on comments that it received from copyright owners, cable operators, and satellite carriers. The Copyright Office seeks comments on the revised proposal before it is adopted as a final rule.]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
	<title><![CDATA[Source: Airworthiness Directives; the Boeing Company Airplanes]]></title>
	<link href="/regulations/view/122011/airworthiness_directives_the_boeing_company_airplanes" />
	<id>http://openregs.com/regulations/view/122011/airworthiness_directives_the_boeing_company_airplanes</id>
	<updated>2013-05-10T00:10:05-07:00</updated>
	<summary><![CDATA[Source: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain The Boeing Company Model 777-200 and -300 series airplanes. This proposed AD was prompted by reports of smoke or flames in the passenger cabin of various transport category airplanes related to the wiring for the passenger cabin in-flight entertainment (IFE) system, cabin lighting, and passenger seats. This proposed AD would require installing wiring and changing certain electrical load management system (ELMS) panels and other concurrent requirements to ensure the flightcrew is able to turn off electrical power to the IFE systems and other non-essential electrical systems through a switch in the flight compartment in the event of smoke or flames. In the event of smoke or flames in the airplane flight deck or passenger cabin, the flightcrew's inability to turn off electrical power to the IFE system and other non-essential electrical systems could result in the inability to control smoke or flames in the airplane flight deck or passenger cabin during a non-normal or emergency situation, and consequent loss of control of the airplane.]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
	<title><![CDATA[Source: Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc. Airplanes]]></title>
	<link href="/regulations/view/122012/airworthiness_directives_bombardier_inc._airplanes" />
	<id>http://openregs.com/regulations/view/122012/airworthiness_directives_bombardier_inc._airplanes</id>
	<updated>2013-05-10T00:10:06-07:00</updated>
	<summary><![CDATA[Source: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain Bombardier, Inc. Model CL-600-2C10 (Regional Jet Series 700, 701, & 702), CL-600-2D15 (Regional Jet Series 705), and CL-600-2D24 (Regional Jet Series 900) airplanes. This proposed AD was prompted by a report that traces of oil could be found in the crew oxygen system due to the use of incorrect pressure testing procedures during manufacturing. This proposed AD would require cleaning the crew oxygen system. We are proposing this AD to detect and correct oil contaminants, which could cause an ignition and result in a fire in the oxygen system.]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
	<title><![CDATA[Source: Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes]]></title>
	<link href="/regulations/view/122013/airworthiness_directives_the_boeing_company_airplanes" />
	<id>http://openregs.com/regulations/view/122013/airworthiness_directives_the_boeing_company_airplanes</id>
	<updated>2013-05-10T00:10:06-07:00</updated>
	<summary><![CDATA[Source: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all The Boeing Company Model 757 airplanes. This proposed AD was prompted by reports of fractured rudder pedal pushrod connecting bolts in a rudder pedal assembly. This proposed AD would require repetitive replacements of the rudder pedal pushrod connecting bolts and repetitive inspections of the rudder pedal assembly bolt holes in each of the captain and the first officer rudder pedal assemblies, and if necessary, repair or replacement of worn rudder pedal assemblies. We are proposing this AD to prevent fracture of the rudder pedal pushrod connecting bolts during pedal use, which could result in a large involuntary input to the rudder, nose-wheel steering, and braking systems, leading to a runway excursion.]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
	<title><![CDATA[Source: Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc. Airplanes]]></title>
	<link href="/regulations/view/122014/airworthiness_directives_bombardier_inc._airplanes" />
	<id>http://openregs.com/regulations/view/122014/airworthiness_directives_bombardier_inc._airplanes</id>
	<updated>2013-05-10T00:10:07-07:00</updated>
	<summary><![CDATA[Source: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain Bombardier, Inc. Model CL-600-2C10 (Regional Jet Series 700, 701, & 702) airplanes, Model CL-600-2D15 (Regional Jet Series 705) airplanes, and Model CL-600-2D24 (Regional Jet Series 900) airplanes. This proposed AD was prompted by a report of corrosion of the components of the main landing gear (MLG) retraction actuator found in service; the corrosion was found at the interface of the rod end and the piston, and at the bracket and related pins. This proposed AD would require inspection of the MLG retraction actuator components; corrective actions if necessary; and, for certain retraction actuators, installation of a new jam nut. We are proposing this AD to prevent disconnection of the MLG retraction actuator, which could result in extension of the MLG without damping, and consequent structural damage and collapse of the MLG during landing.]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
	<title><![CDATA[Source: Avocados Grown in South Florida; Change in Minimum Grade Requirements]]></title>
	<link href="/regulations/view/122241/avocados_grown_in_south_florida_change_in_minimum_grade_requirements" />
	<id>http://openregs.com/regulations/view/122241/avocados_grown_in_south_florida_change_in_minimum_grade_requirements</id>
	<updated>2013-05-23T00:10:08-07:00</updated>
	<summary><![CDATA[Source: This proposed rule invites comments on an increase to the minimum grade requirements currently prescribed under the Florida avocado marketing order (order). The order regulates the handling of avocados grown in South Florida, and is administered locally by the Avocado Administrative Committee (Committee). This action would increase the current minimum grade requirement from a U.S. No. 2 to a U.S. Combination grade for avocados shipped to destinations outside the production area. Increasing the minimum grade requirement would align marketing order regulations with current industry practices to the benefit of growers, handlers, and consumers.]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
	<title><![CDATA[Source: Transmission Planning Reliability Standards]]></title>
	<link href="/regulations/view/122250/transmission_planning_reliability_standards" />
	<id>http://openregs.com/regulations/view/122250/transmission_planning_reliability_standards</id>
	<updated>2013-05-23T00:10:10-07:00</updated>
	<summary><![CDATA[Source: On April 19, 2012, the Commission issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NOPR) that proposed to remand proposed Reliability Standard TPL-001-2, submitted by the North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC). Proposed Reliability Standard TPL-001-2 includes a provision that would allow a transmission planner to plan for non- consequential load loss following a single contingency provided that the plan is documented and vetted in an open and transparent stakeholder process. The Commission explained in the NOPR that the proposed Reliability Standard does not meet the statutory criteria for approval because the provision pertaining to planned non-consequential load loss is vague and unenforceable. On February 28, 2013, NERC submitted proposed Reliability Standard TPL-001-4, which further modifies the planned non-consequential load loss provision. The Commission believes that the proposed modifications satisfy the concerns set forth in the NOPR. Accordingly, the Commission supplements the NOPR by proposing to approve Reliability Standard TPL- 001-4, which supersedes proposed Reliability Standard TPL-001-2.]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
	<title><![CDATA[Source: Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Illinois; Air Quality Standards Revision]]></title>
	<link href="/regulations/view/122253/approval_and_promulgation_of_air_quality_implementation_plans_illinois_air_quality" />
	<id>http://openregs.com/regulations/view/122253/approval_and_promulgation_of_air_quality_implementation_plans_illinois_air_quality</id>
	<updated>2013-05-23T00:10:11-07:00</updated>
	<summary><![CDATA[Source: EPA is proposing to approve a revision to the Illinois State Implementation Plan (SIP) to reflect current national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for ozone, lead, and particulate matter. EPA is proposing to approve a revision to add new incorporations by reference associated with current ozone, lead, and particulate matter NAAQS into the Illinois SIP. EPA is also proposing to approve revisions that amend typographical errors in the Illinois SIP.]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
	<title><![CDATA[Source: Promulgation of State Implementation Plan Revisions; Infrastructure Requirements for the 1997 and 2006 PM2.5]]></title>
	<link href="/regulations/view/122254/promulgation_of_state_implementation_plan_revisions_infrastructure_requirements" />
	<id>http://openregs.com/regulations/view/122254/promulgation_of_state_implementation_plan_revisions_infrastructure_requirements</id>
	<updated>2013-05-23T00:10:11-07:00</updated>
	<summary><![CDATA[Source: EPA is proposing to approve the State Implementation Plan (SIP) submissions from the State of Colorado to demonstrate that the SIP meets the infrastructure requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA) for the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) promulgated for particulate matter less than or equal to 2.5 micrometers ([mu]m) in diameter (PM<INF>2.5</INF>) on July 18, 1997 and on October 17, 2006. The CAA requires that each state, after a new or revised NAAQS is promulgated, review their SIP to ensure that they meet the requirements of the ``infrastructure elements'' necessary to implement the new or revised NAAQS. Colorado submitted certifications of its infrastructure SIP for the 1997 and the 2006 PM<INF>2.5</INF> NAAQS on April 4, 2008 and on June 4, 2010, respectively. Colorado also submitted revisions to Regulation 3 of the Air Quality Control Commission permitting requirements for the Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) program on May 11, 2012 and May 13, 2013 that incorporate the required elements of the 2008 PM<INF>2.5</INF> Implementation Rule and the 2010 PM<INF>2.5</INF> Increment Rule. EPA proposes to approve portions of these two SIP revisions that bring Colorado's PSD regulations up to date for regulated pollutants. EPA does not propose to act on the portions of the submission for the 2006 PM<INF>2.5</INF> NAAQS that are intended to meet requirements related to interstate transport of air pollution. EPA will act on the remainder of the submissions in a separate action.]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
	<title><![CDATA[Source: Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Connecticut; Reasonably Available Control Technology Update To Address Control Techniques Guidelines Issued in 2006, 2007, and 2008]]></title>
	<link href="/regulations/view/122282/approval_and_promulgation_of_air_quality_implementation_plans_connecticut_reasonably" />
	<id>http://openregs.com/regulations/view/122282/approval_and_promulgation_of_air_quality_implementation_plans_connecticut_reasonably</id>
	<updated>2013-05-24T00:10:13-07:00</updated>
	<summary><![CDATA[Source: The EPA is proposing to approve a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submitted by the State of Connecticut. This revision establishes and requires Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) for several categories of volatile organic compound (VOC) sources. The intended effect of this action is to propose approval of these requirements into the Connecticut SIP. This action is being taken in accordance with the Clean Air Act.]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
	<title><![CDATA[Source: Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico, and South Atlantic; Snapper-Grouper Fishery Off the Southern Atlantic States; Regulatory Amendment 15]]></title>
	<link href="/regulations/view/122289/fisheries_of_the_caribbean_gulf_of_mexico_and_south_atlantic_snapper-grouper" />
	<id>http://openregs.com/regulations/view/122289/fisheries_of_the_caribbean_gulf_of_mexico_and_south_atlantic_snapper-grouper</id>
	<updated>2013-05-24T00:10:15-07:00</updated>
	<summary><![CDATA[Source: NMFS proposes regulations to implement Regulatory Amendment 15 to the Fishery Management Plan for the Snapper-Grouper Fishery of the South Atlantic Region (FMP), as prepared by the South Atlantic Fishery Management Council (Council). Regulatory Amendment 15 would revise the optimum yield (OY) and the annual catch limit (ACL) for yellowtail snapper. If implemented, this rule would increase the commercial and recreational ACLs and recreational annual catch target (ACT) for yellowtail snapper harvested in or from the South Atlantic exclusive economic zone (EEZ). This rule would also modify the commercial ACL and the accountability measure (AM) for gag that requires a closure of all other South Atlantic shallow-water grouper (SASWG) when the gag commercial ACL is met or projected to be met. This rule also proposes several administrative changes to regulatory text, which are unrelated to the measures contained in Regulatory Amendment 15. The intent of this rule is to provide socio-economic benefits to snapper-grouper fishermen and communities that utilize the snapper-grouper resource, while maintaining fishing mortality at sustainable levels according to the best scientific information available.]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
	<title><![CDATA[Source: Oil and Gas; Hydraulic Fracturing on Federal and Indian Lands]]></title>
	<link href="/regulations/view/122290/oil_and_gas_hydraulic_fracturing_on_federal_and_indian_lands" />
	<id>http://openregs.com/regulations/view/122290/oil_and_gas_hydraulic_fracturing_on_federal_and_indian_lands</id>
	<updated>2013-05-24T00:10:15-07:00</updated>
	<summary><![CDATA[Source: On May 11, 2012, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) published in the Federal Register a proposed rule entitled Oil and Gas; Well Stimulation, Including Hydraulic Fracturing, on Federal and Indian Lands. The BLM has used the comments on that draft to make improvements and is now seeking additional comment on a revised proposed rule. Key issues in this updated draft include: the use of an expanded set of cement evaluation tools to help ensure that usable water zones have been isolated and protected from contamination; and more detailed guidance on how trade secrets claims will be handled, modeled on the procedures promulgated by the State of Colorado. The revised proposed rule would also provide opportunities for the BLM to coordinate standards and processes with individual States and tribes to reduce administrative costs and to improve efficiency.]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
	<title><![CDATA[Source: Family Advocacy Command Assistance Team (FACAT)]]></title>
	<link href="/regulations/view/121771/family_advocacy_command_assistance_team_facat" />
	<id>http://openregs.com/regulations/view/121771/family_advocacy_command_assistance_team_facat</id>
	<updated>2013-04-26T00:10:38-07:00</updated>
	<summary><![CDATA[Source: This part updates Department of Defense (DoD) policy and responsibilities and prescribes procedures for the implementation and use of the FACAT in accordance with 10 U.S.C. 1794. It is DoD policy to provide a safe and secure environment for DoD personnel and their families by promoting the prevention, early identification, and intervention in all allegations of child abuse and neglect.]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
	<title><![CDATA[Source: Endangered and Threatened Wildlife; 90-Day Finding on Petitions To List the Great Hammerhead Shark as Threatened or Endangered Under the Endangered Species Act]]></title>
	<link href="/regulations/view/121774/endangered_and_threatened_wildlife_90-day_finding_on_petitions_to_list_the_great" />
	<id>http://openregs.com/regulations/view/121774/endangered_and_threatened_wildlife_90-day_finding_on_petitions_to_list_the_great</id>
	<updated>2013-04-26T00:10:43-07:00</updated>
	<summary><![CDATA[Source: We, NMFS, announce a 90-day finding on two petitions to list the great hammerhead shark (Sphyrna mokarran) range-wide or, in the alternative, the Northwest Atlantic distinct population segment (DPS) or any other identified DPSs as threatened or endangered under the Endangered Species Act (ESA), and to designate critical habitat. We find that the petitions and information in our files present substantial scientific or commercial information indicating that the petitioned action may be warranted. We will conduct a status review of the species to determine if the petitioned action is warranted. To ensure that the status review is comprehensive, we are soliciting scientific and commercial information pertaining to this species from any interested party.]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
	<title><![CDATA[Source: Radio Broadcasting Services; Ehrenberg, Arizona]]></title>
	<link href="/regulations/view/121960/radio_broadcasting_services_ehrenberg_arizona" />
	<id>http://openregs.com/regulations/view/121960/radio_broadcasting_services_ehrenberg_arizona</id>
	<updated>2013-05-08T05:30:17-07:00</updated>
	<summary><![CDATA[Source: This document requests comments on a Petition for Rule Making filed by S and H Broadcasting, LLC, proposing the substitution of Channel 228C2 for vacant Channel 286C2 at Ehrenberg, Arizona. The proposed channel substitution at Ehrenberg accommodates the contingent hybrid application that requests the city of license modification for Station KRSX-FM, from Channel 287A, Twentynine Palms, California, to Channel 286A, North Shore, California. A staff engineering analysis indicates that Channel 228C2 can be allotted to Ehrenberg, Arizona consistent with the minimum distance separation requirements of the Commission's Rules with a site restriction located 11.1 kilometers (6.9 miles) east of Ehrenberg. In this regard, the Audio Division, on its own motion, modifies the reference coordinates for proposed Channel 228C2 at Ehrenberg, Arizona to the least restricted site. The reference coordinates are 33-36-54 NL and 114-24-14 WL. Channel 228C2 at Ehrenberg is located within 320 kilometers (199 miles) of the U.S.- Mexican border, so concurrence by the Government of Mexico is required. Mexican concurrence has been requested for this vacant allotment, but has not yet been received.]]></summary>
</entry>
</feed>
