<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/atom10full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:openSearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearch/1.1/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" gd:etag="W/&quot;C0INRH88fip7ImA9WhRRFEk.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1122713146033943639</id><updated>2011-11-27T18:53:15.176-06:00</updated><category term="mobile" /><category term="ISP" /><category term="usability design" /><category term="css" /><category term="javascript" /><category term="browsers" /><title>Open Web Development</title><subtitle type="html">Monty's web developer insights on open standards and open source software.</subtitle><link rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://openwebdev.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://openwebdev.blogspot.com/" /><author><name>Monty</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06986346022287100794</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="21" height="32" src="http://i214.photobucket.com/albums/cc237/Lumens7x/bw-face-sm.jpg" /></author><generator version="7.00" uri="http://www.blogger.com">Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>13</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/openwebdev" /><feedburner:info uri="openwebdev" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DkUMR30_fyp7ImA9WxJSEEg.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1122713146033943639.post-1672792401316249154</id><published>2008-11-23T11:55:00.005-06:00</published><updated>2009-04-29T20:18:06.347-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-04-29T20:18:06.347-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="browsers" /><title>Gentium &amp; Bitstream Vera</title><content type="html">&lt;img style="margin: 0pt 0pt 10px 10px; float: right; width: 192px;" src="http://scripts.sil.org/cms/sites/nrsi/media/Gentium_sample_alpha.png" alt="" border="0" /&gt;Through CSS &lt;a href="https://developer.mozilla.org/en/CSS/@font-face"&gt;@font-face&lt;/a&gt; Firefox 3.5 adds the ability to download a TrueType font from the webserver.  &lt;em&gt;All web designers shall henceforth therefore incorporate all redistributable fonts into their library!&lt;/em&gt;  :-)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Unfortunately, very few creators of fonts have been so generous to license their intellectual property as open source; blessed are &lt;a href="http://scripts.sil.org/cms/scripts/page.php?site_id=nrsi&amp;amp;item_id=Gentium"&gt;Gentium&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://www.bitstream.com/font_rendering/products/dev_fonts/vera.html"&gt;Bitstream Vera&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Giving preference and favor to using fonts in web design which are free for redistribution through the @font-face means can lighten the download weight of a webpage, and bring increased flexibility, by enabling your CSS/HTML builder to put &lt;b&gt;copy&lt;/b&gt; directly in the HTML instead of only in raster image formats.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1122713146033943639-1672792401316249154?l=openwebdev.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://openwebdev.blogspot.com/feeds/1672792401316249154/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1122713146033943639&amp;postID=1672792401316249154" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1122713146033943639/posts/default/1672792401316249154?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1122713146033943639/posts/default/1672792401316249154?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/openwebdev/~3/39yHxZ0IEzc/gentium-bitstream-vera.html" title="Gentium &amp; Bitstream Vera" /><author><name>Monty</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06986346022287100794</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="21" height="32" src="http://i214.photobucket.com/albums/cc237/Lumens7x/bw-face-sm.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://openwebdev.blogspot.com/2008/11/gentium-bitstream-vera.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CUUFSXo5fip7ImA9WxRWFUs.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1122713146033943639.post-2678193028174997174</id><published>2008-09-25T00:43:00.011-05:00</published><updated>2008-11-01T13:13:38.426-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2008-11-01T13:13:38.426-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="usability design" /><title>width one thousand</title><content type="html">&lt;img style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 10px; width: 200px;" src="http://www.slashgear.com/gallery/data_files/7/4/Lenovo_ThinkVision_L220W_HD_monitor_1.jpg" border="0" alt="" /&gt;2008 is the year of affordable &lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;1440x900&lt;/span&gt; screens for new PC buyers, but what is the display resolution of your audience?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;75% of web users now have 1024x768 screens, so we can leave designing for &lt;span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;800x600&lt;/span&gt; in the dust.  But if you craft a website more than a thousand pixels wide, how much of your audience will you lose?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;My read of &lt;a href="http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_display.asp"&gt;w3schools&lt;/a&gt;' statistics leads me to think it's about two-thirds.  So, whenever your graphic designer hands you a template exceeding &lt;span style="font-weight:bold;"&gt;1024x768&lt;/span&gt;, push back.  Just because s/he has dual 1440px wide screens is no excuse to inconvenience &amp;gt;half of your users.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Addendum: Drag this &lt;a href="javascript:self.resizeTo(1024,screen.availHeight);"&gt;1024&lt;/a&gt; link from the page onto your Bookmarks Toolbar to create a "bookmarklet" that will resize your browser to 1024px.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1122713146033943639-2678193028174997174?l=openwebdev.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://openwebdev.blogspot.com/feeds/2678193028174997174/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1122713146033943639&amp;postID=2678193028174997174" title="1 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1122713146033943639/posts/default/2678193028174997174?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1122713146033943639/posts/default/2678193028174997174?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/openwebdev/~3/rqQImACZkcI/width-1024px.html" title="width one thousand" /><author><name>Monty</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06986346022287100794</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="21" height="32" src="http://i214.photobucket.com/albums/cc237/Lumens7x/bw-face-sm.jpg" /></author><thr:total>1</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://openwebdev.blogspot.com/2008/09/width-1024px.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;Dk8DQ3k5eCp7ImA9WxRRE08.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1122713146033943639.post-2296696289135327253</id><published>2008-09-06T03:42:00.012-05:00</published><updated>2008-09-25T01:41:12.720-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2008-09-25T01:41:12.720-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="javascript" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="mobile" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="browsers" /><title>Google Chrome</title><content type="html">&lt;img style="margin: 0pt 0pt 10px 10px; float: right;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_AUND6f7C0KU/SMJFiFsNf1I/AAAAAAAAADE/MFDo90BMBb4/s200/v8.png" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5242829368158158674" border="0" /&gt;This week Google went public with its secret Chrome gBrowser desktop application for Windows. Long incubated in hiding, it was born slightly premature - allegedly because the &lt;a href="http://www.google.com/googlebooks/chrome/"&gt;comic ad&lt;/a&gt; seeped out early.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;We have all seen its CSS rendering before in Safari; the Chrome browser is built on Webkit (Apple's fork of the KDE's "KHTML" rendering engine used originally in the KDE Konqueror).  But its Javascript virtual machine, dubbed "&lt;a href="http://code.google.com/p/v8/"&gt;V8&lt;/a&gt;," is brand new!  Developed internally by Google team including &lt;a href="http://jaoo.dk/speaker/Lars+Bak"&gt;Lars Bak&lt;/a&gt; (VM pioneer and former technical lead of Sun's Java VM HotSpot project) and &lt;a href="http://www.verdich.dk/kasper/RES.pdf"&gt;Kasper Lund&lt;/a&gt;, it was opensourced under the &lt;a href="http://www.opensource.org/licenses/bsd-license.php"&gt;BSD license&lt;/a&gt;. Google plans to port V8 to every major desktop OS, including Mac and Linux, and also &lt;a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-1001_3-10031318-92.html?part=rss&amp;amp;subj=news&amp;amp;tag=2547-1_3-0-20"&gt;of course&lt;/a&gt; to Android, which is launching soon on the T-Mobile/HTC &lt;a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Dream/"&gt;Dream&lt;/a&gt; phone, just in time for the holiday sales.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The V8 VM competes directly with Microsoft &lt;a href="http://blogs.technet.com/seanearp/archive/2007/04/16/wpf-e-is-silverlight.aspx"&gt;Silverlight&lt;/a&gt;, Apple's &lt;a href="http://trac.webkit.org/wiki/SquirrelFish"&gt;SquirrelFish&lt;/a&gt;, Mozilla's &lt;a href="http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/roadmap/archives/2008/09/tracemonkey_update.html"&gt;TraceMonkey&lt;/a&gt; and Tamarin,  and indirectly with Sun's &lt;a href="http://java.sun.com/javase/6/docs/technotes/guides/scripting/"&gt;Java Virtual Machine&lt;/a&gt; (the granddaddy!), and Perl &lt;a href="http://www.programmersheaven.com/2/Parrot-a-Virtual-Machine-For-Everyone"&gt;Parrot&lt;/a&gt; (incubating for a decade?).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Although the 800lb gorilla in the room is not innovating with these little guys, &lt;a href="http://microsoft.com/ie"&gt;Internet Explorer&lt;/a&gt; is following close enough behind to keep market share.  &lt;span style="font-style:italic;"&gt;The Rest Of The World&lt;/span&gt; is competing for performance increases and technical advancement (and yes, for paltry market percentage points) in a way that will open up new possibilities for cloud-based web apps.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Everyone knows a paradigm shift will throw down the reigning king of the hill, and that one of those comes every now and again.  Until then, the arts &amp;amp; sciences are advancing, which is a win for consumers, developers, and the American dream.  &lt;span style="font-style:italic;"&gt;Carpe diem.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1122713146033943639-2296696289135327253?l=openwebdev.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://openwebdev.blogspot.com/feeds/2296696289135327253/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1122713146033943639&amp;postID=2296696289135327253" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1122713146033943639/posts/default/2296696289135327253?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1122713146033943639/posts/default/2296696289135327253?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/openwebdev/~3/bn9yB85wTb8/welcome-google-chrome.html" title="Google Chrome" /><author><name>Monty</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06986346022287100794</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="21" height="32" src="http://i214.photobucket.com/albums/cc237/Lumens7x/bw-face-sm.jpg" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_AUND6f7C0KU/SMJFiFsNf1I/AAAAAAAAADE/MFDo90BMBb4/s72-c/v8.png" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://openwebdev.blogspot.com/2008/09/welcome-google-chrome.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CEMER349fSp7ImA9WxdbE0g.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1122713146033943639.post-2391044832706919061</id><published>2008-08-10T00:59:00.003-05:00</published><updated>2008-08-10T02:13:26.065-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2008-08-10T02:13:26.065-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="browsers" /><title>Mozilla Prism</title><content type="html">&lt;img style="margin: 0pt 0pt 10px 10px; float: right; cursor: pointer;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_AUND6f7C0KU/SJ6K1Bpti8I/AAAAAAAAAC8/P0UjJt2ZErw/s200/prismposs.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5232772460632181698" border="0" /&gt;Mozilla &lt;a href="https://wiki.mozilla.org/Prism"&gt;Prism &lt;/a&gt; (formerly known by names &lt;a href="http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/XULRunner"&gt;xulrunner&lt;/a&gt; or &lt;a href="http://starkravingfinkle.org/blog/2007/10/webrunner-becomes-prism-a-mozilla-labs-project/"&gt;webrunner&lt;/a&gt;) is useful to web application developers who wish to create a &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Site-specific_browser"&gt;site specific browser&lt;/a&gt; lacking all the menus, toolbars, and the usual chrome of a web browser.  &lt;a href="http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/Prism"&gt;Prism&lt;/a&gt; will allow a webapp to more tightly integrate with the native OS and desktop user interface.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Mozilla &lt;a href="http://labs.mozilla.com/2007/10/prism/"&gt;Prism&lt;/a&gt; should become mature and useful in the &lt;a href="https://wiki.mozilla.org/Firefox3.1/Features"&gt;Firefox 3.1&lt;/a&gt; launch around January 2009, but there is a Firefox &lt;a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/6665"&gt;add-on&lt;/a&gt; you can try today (be forewarned: it is intended for developers not users at this point).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Mozilla Prism will compete with Adobe &lt;a href="http://www.adobe.com/products/air/develop/ajax/"&gt;AIR&lt;/a&gt;.  For a comparison read &lt;a href="http://www.openparenthesis.org/2007/11/10/prism-vs-air"&gt;John Eckman&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1122713146033943639-2391044832706919061?l=openwebdev.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://openwebdev.blogspot.com/feeds/2391044832706919061/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1122713146033943639&amp;postID=2391044832706919061" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1122713146033943639/posts/default/2391044832706919061?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1122713146033943639/posts/default/2391044832706919061?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/openwebdev/~3/39xXznzwu8Y/mozilla-prism.html" title="Mozilla Prism" /><author><name>Monty</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06986346022287100794</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="21" height="32" src="http://i214.photobucket.com/albums/cc237/Lumens7x/bw-face-sm.jpg" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_AUND6f7C0KU/SJ6K1Bpti8I/AAAAAAAAAC8/P0UjJt2ZErw/s72-c/prismposs.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://openwebdev.blogspot.com/2008/08/mozilla-prism.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DUIGSXw-eip7ImA9WxdbE0k.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1122713146033943639.post-7164430053313763684</id><published>2008-07-20T17:49:00.004-05:00</published><updated>2008-08-10T00:52:08.252-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2008-08-10T00:52:08.252-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="css" /><title>multiple CSS classes per element</title><content type="html">&lt;img style="margin: 0pt 0pt 10px 10px; float: right; cursor: pointer;" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_AUND6f7C0KU/SJ6B3Y9mpxI/AAAAAAAAAC0/bkY-zxRH1Do/s200/css.png" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5232762605644719890" border="0" /&gt;This isn't a ground shaking blog.  Just wanted to say that I think having &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;multiple CSS classes per element&lt;/span&gt; is the best thing since sliced bread.  That's all.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1122713146033943639-7164430053313763684?l=openwebdev.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://openwebdev.blogspot.com/feeds/7164430053313763684/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1122713146033943639&amp;postID=7164430053313763684" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1122713146033943639/posts/default/7164430053313763684?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1122713146033943639/posts/default/7164430053313763684?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/openwebdev/~3/Q7SHxv6rLoU/multiple-css-classes-per-element.html" title="multiple CSS classes per element" /><author><name>Monty</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06986346022287100794</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="21" height="32" src="http://i214.photobucket.com/albums/cc237/Lumens7x/bw-face-sm.jpg" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_AUND6f7C0KU/SJ6B3Y9mpxI/AAAAAAAAAC0/bkY-zxRH1Do/s72-c/css.png" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://openwebdev.blogspot.com/2008/07/multiple-css-classes-per-element.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CEINRnk4eip7ImA9WxdaFUw.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1122713146033943639.post-4096279486443009019</id><published>2008-06-24T11:25:00.006-05:00</published><updated>2008-08-23T12:29:57.732-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2008-08-23T12:29:57.732-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="browsers" /><title>Tamarin cometh</title><content type="html">&lt;img style="margin: 0pt 0pt 10px 10px; float: right; cursor: pointer; width: 200px;" src="http://www.aqua.org/images/animals_details/golden_lion_tamarin.jpg" alt="" border="0" /&gt;While Microsoft focuses on an 3.1 incremental improvement for ECMAScript in IE 8, Brendan Eich (CTO of Mozilla and father of JavaScript) is developing the Tamarin ECMAScript engine from Flash (donated to open source by Adobe) for Microsoft's &lt;a href="http://www.infoworld.com/article/08/06/23/eich-javascript-interview_6.html"&gt;Internet Explorer&lt;/a&gt;, to ensure the world goes to the ECMA4 level with JavaScript 2.0 before 2009.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Clever, commissioning the same ActiveState developer whom Microsoft did (for Perl and Python engines) to wire their JavaScript into IE.  Only the code is not just Mozilla's; it was born of Adobe, owner of Photoshop and Flash, who has motive &amp;amp; means for its worldwide distribution.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Addendum: &lt;a href="http://people.mozilla.com/~schrep/tm-image-adjustment.swf"&gt;See&lt;/a&gt; the difference.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1122713146033943639-4096279486443009019?l=openwebdev.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://openwebdev.blogspot.com/feeds/4096279486443009019/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1122713146033943639&amp;postID=4096279486443009019" title="2 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1122713146033943639/posts/default/4096279486443009019?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1122713146033943639/posts/default/4096279486443009019?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/openwebdev/~3/dxw--LOOuRg/tamarin-cometh.html" title="Tamarin cometh" /><author><name>Monty</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06986346022287100794</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="21" height="32" src="http://i214.photobucket.com/albums/cc237/Lumens7x/bw-face-sm.jpg" /></author><thr:total>2</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://openwebdev.blogspot.com/2008/06/tamarin-cometh.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;A0cHR3c5cSp7ImA9WxdXFEk.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1122713146033943639.post-6805512766378832881</id><published>2008-06-21T12:46:00.003-05:00</published><updated>2008-06-25T21:57:16.929-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2008-06-25T21:57:16.929-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="mobile" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="browsers" /><title>iPhone basics</title><content type="html">&lt;img style="margin: 0pt 0pt 10px 10px; float: right; cursor: pointer; width: 200px;" src="http://www.mobilewhack.com/10-15-07-iphone.jpg" alt="iPhone" border="0" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Although iPhone wallpapers are 320x480, its WebKit-based browser's viewing resolution is &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;320x396&lt;/span&gt; (navigation buttons occupy the bottom, and address etc controls are on the top).  The iPhone has no java (unlike Android) and no real Adobe Flash plugin, but Safari now has HTML5's offline storage support.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1122713146033943639-6805512766378832881?l=openwebdev.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://openwebdev.blogspot.com/feeds/6805512766378832881/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1122713146033943639&amp;postID=6805512766378832881" title="1 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1122713146033943639/posts/default/6805512766378832881?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1122713146033943639/posts/default/6805512766378832881?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/openwebdev/~3/tpZTLkonVtE/iphone-basics.html" title="iPhone basics" /><author><name>Monty</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06986346022287100794</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="21" height="32" src="http://i214.photobucket.com/albums/cc237/Lumens7x/bw-face-sm.jpg" /></author><thr:total>1</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://openwebdev.blogspot.com/2008/06/iphone-basics.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CkEMRn06cSp7ImA9WxZVGUw.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1122713146033943639.post-3953262822915753732</id><published>2008-03-30T14:11:00.012-05:00</published><updated>2008-03-30T15:58:07.319-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2008-03-30T15:58:07.319-05:00</app:edited><title>The Android Platform</title><content type="html">What are Sprint, T-Mobile, China Mobile, Samsung, Motorola, HTC, and LG doing together? &lt;img style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 10px;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_AUND6f7C0KU/R-_90ReGK0I/AAAAAAAAACo/HqjbrdEzCK8/s200/android-g.png" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5183640770611391298" /&gt; They're members of the &lt;a href="http://www.openhandsetalliance.com/oha_overview.html"&gt;Open Handset Alliance&lt;/a&gt; developing phones based on Google's &lt;a href="http://code.google.com/android/what-is-android.html"&gt;Android&lt;/a&gt; software for mobile devices (a complete stack including OS, middleware, and key apps).  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The investor analyst press gave it the moniker "gPhone" since it was announced after the Apple &lt;a href="http://www.apple.com/iphone/"&gt;iPhone&lt;/a&gt; launch, but the iPhone has little to fear from Android which seems aimed at the mass market for consumer phones.  Apple has always been happy with their niche; Google on the other hand needs ubiquity to control advertising on as many screens as possible.  (The threatened include &lt;a href="http://www.symbian.com/symbianos/"&gt;Symbian&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://pdn.palm.com/regac/pdn/page?Page_Name=WHY_DEVELOP_FOR_PALM"&gt;Palm&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://www.microsoft.com/windowsmobile/pocketpc/"&gt;Windows Mobile&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://www.danger.com/press/pr.php?cat=2008&amp;id=20080211"&gt;Danger Hiptop&lt;/a&gt; [Sidekick]).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Why should a web developer care?  The "phone" as a browser client has an installed base of 3x that of personal computers, and in the post-iPhone era, the phone is no longer a "mini" platform but is actually richer and fuller than a PC client.  It is also mobile, much more intensely personal, and many times more lucrative for digital products and services.  And it's &lt;span style="font-style:italic;"&gt;fun&lt;/span&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;My initial perception of Android was that it was just like the other proprietary phone operating systems; I didn't realize it was built on Linux, SQL*Lite, and Java.  It seems like it will be fun &amp;amp; easy to develop for.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1122713146033943639-3953262822915753732?l=openwebdev.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://openwebdev.blogspot.com/feeds/3953262822915753732/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1122713146033943639&amp;postID=3953262822915753732" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1122713146033943639/posts/default/3953262822915753732?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1122713146033943639/posts/default/3953262822915753732?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/openwebdev/~3/mNOnrnfzeCw/android-platform.html" title="The Android Platform" /><author><name>Monty</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06986346022287100794</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="21" height="32" src="http://i214.photobucket.com/albums/cc237/Lumens7x/bw-face-sm.jpg" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_AUND6f7C0KU/R-_90ReGK0I/AAAAAAAAACo/HqjbrdEzCK8/s72-c/android-g.png" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://openwebdev.blogspot.com/2008/03/android-platform.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CUcGQnw6fCp7ImA9WxZVGU0.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1122713146033943639.post-7403808108899159425</id><published>2008-03-30T12:51:00.006-05:00</published><updated>2008-03-30T13:50:23.214-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2008-03-30T13:50:23.214-05:00</app:edited><title>OpenSocial</title><content type="html">&lt;img style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 10px;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 200px;" src="http://code.google.com/apis/opensocial/images/opensocial.jpg" border="0" alt="" /&gt;Yahoo &lt;a href="http://ycorpblog.com/2008/03/25/announcing-the-opensocial-foundation"&gt;joined&lt;/a&gt; the &lt;a href="http://code.google.com/apis/opensocial/"&gt;OpenSocial&lt;/a&gt; collaboration (launched in November 2007 by Google) this week, joining partners MySpace, LinkedIn, et. al.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://developers.facebook.com/"&gt;Facebook&lt;/a&gt; is the 800lb. gorilla in the room not participating in the OpenSocial cooperative.  Facebook received an equity purchase from Microsoft and is a formidable competitor to Google for eyeballs &amp;amp; ads.  Shrewd move, Redmond, to create a wall of enmity between these two.  But Google read a page from the GNU book of knowledge, opening their Orkut app API to be an open alliance with open standards &amp;amp; open source software.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;You'll see criticism of how "open" OpenSocial is and how standard, too; this should be expected, and I'll watch how it all pans out.  This group of (Google-led) companies is still trying to figure out how to interoperate with developers, while maintaining security and preserving the focus and mission of their communities and web properties.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;How does this affect the webmaster?  OpenSocial support could be integrated into web development frameworks like Zope or content management systems like Drupal.  DrupalJedi &lt;a href="http://www.drupaljedi.com/blog/6/opensocial-drupal"&gt;says&lt;/a&gt; "all web site developers need to be familiar with this standard;" I agree that being aware is required; let's see how it grows.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1122713146033943639-7403808108899159425?l=openwebdev.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://openwebdev.blogspot.com/feeds/7403808108899159425/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1122713146033943639&amp;postID=7403808108899159425" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1122713146033943639/posts/default/7403808108899159425?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1122713146033943639/posts/default/7403808108899159425?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/openwebdev/~3/avdc8_HiL38/opensocial.html" title="OpenSocial" /><author><name>Monty</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06986346022287100794</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="21" height="32" src="http://i214.photobucket.com/albums/cc237/Lumens7x/bw-face-sm.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://openwebdev.blogspot.com/2008/03/opensocial.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CUIARHc_eip7ImA9WxZVGU0.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1122713146033943639.post-5773095925527608299</id><published>2008-03-23T00:21:00.013-05:00</published><updated>2008-03-30T13:59:05.942-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2008-03-30T13:59:05.942-05:00</app:edited><title>ECMAScript Edition 4</title><content type="html">&lt;a href="http://blog.jeremymartin.name/2008/03/web-20-meet-javascript-20.html"&gt;Web 2.0, Meet JavaScript 2.0&lt;/a&gt; by Jeremy Martin&lt;ul&gt;&lt;img style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 10px;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 200px;" src="http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/covers/0596101996_thumb.gif" border="0" alt="" /&gt;&lt;li&gt;OOP at last?  Are AJAX programmers really crying out for that?  "Classes will provide far more flexibility through its many designators and directives (final, dynamic, extends, implements, etc.)"&lt;/li&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;li&gt;static type checking - great for compiled code, but for interpreted? maybe they're planning on introducing a bytecode VM in the next edition, incompatible with &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.NET_Framework"&gt;.Net&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Java_Virtual_Machine"&gt;JVM&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href="http://www.parrotcode.org"&gt;Parrot&lt;/a&gt;?&lt;/li&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;li&gt;namespaces, constants, operator overloading, not null operator for DBMS interactions&lt;/li&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;li&gt;program units look cool but why units, why not dynamically loaded/linked classes? I guess to permit non-OOP code to have units too.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;It seems like a good portion of the developer community, along with other browser developers, are in disagreement on evolving JavaScript in the direction of Java, PHP5, and C#.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Why not just leave JavaScript non-OOP and add another language to the browser runtime (e.g. IE supports two, JS and VBA) called something like Livescript, thereby maintaining backward compatibility and freeing browsers up to begin again on the perfect client side Ajax language?&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1122713146033943639-5773095925527608299?l=openwebdev.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://openwebdev.blogspot.com/feeds/5773095925527608299/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1122713146033943639&amp;postID=5773095925527608299" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1122713146033943639/posts/default/5773095925527608299?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1122713146033943639/posts/default/5773095925527608299?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/openwebdev/~3/XmduI2FWEUo/ecmascript-edition-4.html" title="ECMAScript Edition 4" /><author><name>Monty</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06986346022287100794</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="21" height="32" src="http://i214.photobucket.com/albums/cc237/Lumens7x/bw-face-sm.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://openwebdev.blogspot.com/2008/03/ecmascript-edition-4.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CEEMSHw_eyp7ImA9WxdbE0g.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1122713146033943639.post-6273730504627524987</id><published>2008-03-11T01:39:00.016-05:00</published><updated>2008-08-10T02:18:09.243-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2008-08-10T02:18:09.243-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="ISP" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="browsers" /><title>Offline Web Apps</title><content type="html">&lt;a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://gears.google.com/images/logo_153x43.gif"&gt;&lt;img style="margin: 0pt 0pt 10px 10px; float: right; cursor: pointer; width: 200px;" src="http://gears.google.com/images/logo_153x43.gif" alt="" border="0" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Gears is Google's open source browser extension for developers to adapt web applications to run offline, providing&lt;ol&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;li&gt;local http server to cache and deliver resources (HTML, JavaScript, images, etc.)&lt;/li&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;li&gt;local database, to store and access data from within the browser&lt;/li&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;li&gt;a worker thread pool, to make JS code more responsive (by performing expensive operations in the background)&lt;/li&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/ol&gt;Although offline support will be built-in to Firefox 3.1, Firefox 3 and IE 7 (on XP or Vista or Windows Mobile) need the Gears add-on to run offline applications.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Why should Google fund the development of this offline app code development in the browser or add-on?  Obviously, Google Apps in browsers will then compete with desktop applications like Microsoft Excel, Microsoft Word, Microsoft Outlook, Microsoft Exchange, etc.  It brings the Netscape threat &amp;amp; promise of the web as the a platform (and Software as a Service SaaS) closer to reality, enabling web apps to run on a computer which is "undocked" from the network.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Why pay an IT department $250,000 per year to maintain an infrastructure, when Google costs alot less?  This first consumer target is SOHO, micro capitalization companies, and small businesses.  Google is giving away the client in order to dominate on the server.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I'd also like to see blogging websites be able to compose, spell check and save blog drafts offline (for upload on connect).  Why not also photo gallery software, audio blogs, and even social network sites?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The flood is coming; the web is invading our offline world.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Why stop with offline; extend the paradigm to barely online (low bandwidth) caching, so the computer can catch up in the background.  Mom will love that on her country modem dial up connection!  Could this drive broadband ISP prices lower?&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1122713146033943639-6273730504627524987?l=openwebdev.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel="related" href="http://gears.google.com" title="Offline Web Apps" /><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://openwebdev.blogspot.com/feeds/6273730504627524987/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1122713146033943639&amp;postID=6273730504627524987" title="2 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1122713146033943639/posts/default/6273730504627524987?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1122713146033943639/posts/default/6273730504627524987?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/openwebdev/~3/gKJTg-oCQNw/offline-web-apps.html" title="Offline Web Apps" /><author><name>Monty</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06986346022287100794</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="21" height="32" src="http://i214.photobucket.com/albums/cc237/Lumens7x/bw-face-sm.jpg" /></author><thr:total>2</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://openwebdev.blogspot.com/2008/03/offline-web-apps.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CEIERXk5eip7ImA9WxZQF08.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1122713146033943639.post-5905077193827838582</id><published>2008-02-22T13:59:00.005-06:00</published><updated>2008-02-22T17:21:44.722-06:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2008-02-22T17:21:44.722-06:00</app:edited><title>New Firefox</title><content type="html">&lt;img style="float:right; width:200px;" src="http://www.lifehack.org/wp-content/files/2007/05/20070520-firefox_logo.jpg" border="0" alt="" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I've become a beta tester of Firefox 3, and I'm very impressed that it is more nimble.  It also seems to be smaller and require less memory!  If this was the only improvement, I'd be pleased, although I know there are more goodies beneath the hood; here are some highlights:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;ol&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;li&gt;Simple &amp;amp; elegant system for managing add-on's&lt;/li&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;li&gt;New "Places" system simplifies bookmarks and history, using SQL*Lite&lt;/li&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;li&gt;Increased security for downloads, tying in with virus scanners&lt;/li&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;li&gt;The gecko 1.9 rendering engine is now based on the Cairo vector graphics library&lt;/li&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;li&gt;CSS rendering passes the ACID2 test&lt;/li&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;li&gt;Better OS platform integration with Vista &amp;amp; Mac&lt;/li&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;li&gt;New thumbnail images for tab management, like IE7&lt;/li&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;li&gt;SysAdmin friendly features like silent install&lt;/li&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/ol&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1122713146033943639-5905077193827838582?l=openwebdev.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel="related" href="http://wiki.mozilla.org/Firefox3#Firefox_3" title="New Firefox" /><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://openwebdev.blogspot.com/feeds/5905077193827838582/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1122713146033943639&amp;postID=5905077193827838582" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1122713146033943639/posts/default/5905077193827838582?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1122713146033943639/posts/default/5905077193827838582?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/openwebdev/~3/Pb2KJYx1YT0/new-firefox.html" title="New Firefox" /><author><name>Monty</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06986346022287100794</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="21" height="32" src="http://i214.photobucket.com/albums/cc237/Lumens7x/bw-face-sm.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://openwebdev.blogspot.com/2008/02/new-firefox.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CUYMQH44fyp7ImA9WxZQF00.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1122713146033943639.post-2068369140197190786</id><published>2008-02-22T11:49:00.003-06:00</published><updated>2008-02-22T11:59:41.037-06:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2008-02-22T11:59:41.037-06:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="browsers" /><title>RIP Netscape</title><content type="html">&lt;a href="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/blog.netscape.com/media/2008/02/eos.gif"&gt;&lt;img style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 10px;width: 200px;" border="0" src="http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/blog.netscape.com/media/2008/02/eos.gif" alt="EOL Netscape Dialog" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;AOL will let Netscape the browser rest in peace after this month; they're officially ending support for their product and helping customers to migrate to Flock or Firefox.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/1122713146033943639-2068369140197190786?l=openwebdev.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel="related" href="http://blog.netscape.com" title="RIP Netscape" /><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://openwebdev.blogspot.com/feeds/2068369140197190786/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1122713146033943639&amp;postID=2068369140197190786" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1122713146033943639/posts/default/2068369140197190786?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1122713146033943639/posts/default/2068369140197190786?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/openwebdev/~3/b6hQ9xCi-0I/rip-netscape.html" title="RIP Netscape" /><author><name>Monty</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06986346022287100794</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="21" height="32" src="http://i214.photobucket.com/albums/cc237/Lumens7x/bw-face-sm.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://openwebdev.blogspot.com/2008/02/rip-netscape.html</feedburner:origLink></entry></feed>

