<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/atom10full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0">
    <title>Our Taxing Times</title>
    
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.ourtaxingtimes.com/" />
    <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:weblog-31805</id>
    <updated>2013-06-07T16:41:43-05:00</updated>
    <subtitle>A blog about US taxes, tax system, and the tax preparation business from my perspective.</subtitle>
    <generator uri="http://www.typepad.com/">TypePad</generator>
    <atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/ourtaxingtimes/qyYX" /><feedburner:info uri="ourtaxingtimes/qyyx" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><feedburner:browserFriendly></feedburner:browserFriendly><entry>
        <title>Just Remembered - e-Services Cuts</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.ourtaxingtimes.com/2013/06/just-remembered-e-services-cuts.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.ourtaxingtimes.com/2013/06/just-remembered-e-services-cuts.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341fca1353ef01901d1dd14f970b</id>
        <published>2013-06-07T16:41:43-05:00</published>
        <updated>2013-06-07T16:41:43-05:00</updated>
        <summary>I wonder how much the TIGTA report last September had to do with cutting Disclosure Authorizations from e-Services?</summary>
        <author>
            <name>trishmc</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Government " />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="IRS Programs" />
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://www.ourtaxingtimes.com/">
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">I wonder how much the <a href="http://www.ourtaxingtimes.com/2012/09/e-services-and-tigta.html" target="_blank">TIGTA repor</a>t last September had to do with cutting Disclosure Authorizations from e-Services?</div>
</content>



    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>e-Services Cuts</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.ourtaxingtimes.com/2013/06/e-services-cuts.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.ourtaxingtimes.com/2013/06/e-services-cuts.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341fca1353ef0192aadc25c2970d</id>
        <published>2013-06-07T16:27:05-05:00</published>
        <updated>2013-06-07T16:27:05-05:00</updated>
        <summary>Just after I tweeted about NAEA (National Association of Enrolled Agents) announcing in an email that the IRS is talking about closing two of the e-Services programs on August 11th, I received an e-News for Tax Professions from the IRS...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>trishmc</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Government " />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="IRS Programs" />
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://www.ourtaxingtimes.com/">
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Just after I tweeted about NAEA (National Association of
Enrolled Agents) announcing in an email that the IRS is talking about closing
two of the <a href="www.irs.gov/Tax-Professionals/e-services---Online-Tools-for-Tax-Professionals" target="_blank">e-Services programs</a> on August 11th, I received an e-News for Tax Professions
from the IRS with the same information.</p>
<p>E-services is a service from the IRS which allows tax
professionals to do a wide variety of services online. The programs the IRS is
talking about cutting are the Disclosure Authorization (DA) and the Electronic
Accounts Resolution (EAR). The DA allows forms 2848 and 8821 to be filed online
and instantly get access to transcripts for clients. With EAR, a tax pro can
help resolve account issues for a client and receive answers by email. With
EAR, the tax pro deals with the same IRS employee until the matter is resolved.</p>
<p>The reason for the program cuts seems to be the low number
of DAs and EARs filed through e-Services. Only about 10% of the DAs have gone
through e-Services while only 3% of account issues have used e-Service. In
order to prepare for the closures, the IRS is looking to improve their regular processes
and looking for electronic replacements for the DA and EAR.</p>
<p>I use and like e-Services and I wouldn’t want to see any
part of it cut. I file all the Forms 2848 I can through the system. But there
are some clients that have to have their forms faxed in. So my question is of
the 90% of the DAs that didn’t go through e-Service, how many actually could
go? Two thirds of my Forms 2848 this summer had to be faxed because the clients
hadn’t filed in years or didn’t have back year returns. (e-Service needs the
Adjusted Gross Income from one of the last 3 years as a way to verify taxpayer identity.)</p>
<p>Working on an account problem through EAR is great because I
am dealing with the same person and have an answer is writing. I don’t have to
spend time on hold with the Practitioner Priority Hotline. And let’s face it
the wait times there have been increasing with each IRS cutbacks.</p>
<p>I hope that tax pros will raise hell about these cuts and
the IRS will at least delay the closures until they can improve the quality of
the non-online programs. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.mactaxcenter.com/" target="_blank">McIntire
Tax Center</a> - on <a href="https://www.facebook.com/mactaxctr" target="_blank">Facebook</a>
- on <a href="https://plus.google.com/u/0/b/118057112802072457497/118057112802072457497/posts" target="_blank">Google+</a> - or Twitter @ mactax.</p></div>
</content>



    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Fiscal Cliff-Kansas Style</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.ourtaxingtimes.com/2013/05/fiscal-cliff-kansas-style.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.ourtaxingtimes.com/2013/05/fiscal-cliff-kansas-style.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341fca1353ef0192aa8f1eaa970d</id>
        <published>2013-05-31T14:20:59-05:00</published>
        <updated>2013-05-31T14:20:59-05:00</updated>
        <summary>While Washington DC is focused on the IRS tax exempt scandal and Federal tax reform seems to be on hold, the Kansas legislature keeps trying to change the state’s tax structure. On Thursday (May 30th), the Kansas House voted down...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>trishmc</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Government " />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Kansas Info" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Tax Reform" />
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://www.ourtaxingtimes.com/">
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>While Washington DC is focused on the IRS tax exempt scandal
and Federal tax reform seems to be on hold, the Kansas legislature keeps trying
to change the state’s tax structure. On Thursday (May 30<sup>th</sup>), the
Kansas House voted down a proposal to reduce the state sales tax on groceries
to 4.9% while everything else would be taxed at 6.3%.</p>
<p>Last year, the Kansas lawmakers drastically changed the<a href="http://www.ourtaxingtimes.com/2012/05/worse-tax-bill.html" target="_blank">
state income tax</a>. Tax rates were decreased and standard deductions were
increased for some taxpayers. The big change was removing business profits from
taxation. To help pay for the tax cuts, the legislature cut many tax credits
and deductions including the Food Sales Tax Refund. Kansas is one of the few
states that adds sales tax to groceries. The Food Sales Tax Refund helped
offset part of the burden of the sales tax on the lower income elderly,
families with children and the disabled.</p>
<p>The latest proposal would reduce the sales tax on food to
4.9% while everything else would be taxed at 6.3%. The bill seemed to have
support from the Kansas Senate and Governor Brownback but was defeated in the
House by a 94-18 vote. The big issue is not the lower food rate but the 6.3%
for everything else. The current state sales tax is 6.3% but that is scheduled
to decrease to 5.7% in August. The Governor has been fighting to keep the higher
rate to help pay for the income tax cuts passed last year and prevent a budget
shortfall in the future. However, too many of the legislators do not want to
explain any tax increase to their constituents back home. </p>
<p>The deadlock on the sales tax has forced a hold on the
passage of a budget for the next two years. The new budget should go into
effect in July of this year. The pressure is on state lawmakers because they
have already gone over their 90 day legislative session. They are now up to day
97 with no true end in sight. And they are adding to any deficit with the
additional cost of $35, 000 to $45,000 a day they stay in session.</p>
<p>It seems that the Kansas Legislature has taken a page from
Congress’s last minute tax deal in January and is waiting until they are at
their Fiscal Cliff to set the state’s budget and the taxes that will pay for
it. Not a good example to follow. </p></div>
</content>



    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Phishing Again</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.ourtaxingtimes.com/2013/05/phishing-again.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.ourtaxingtimes.com/2013/05/phishing-again.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341fca1353ef0192aa79ad2b970d</id>
        <published>2013-05-29T15:17:29-05:00</published>
        <updated>2013-05-29T15:17:29-05:00</updated>
        <summary>Since there is a new set of phishing emails saying they’re from the IRS going around, a quick reminder. The IRS does not, repeat, does not initiate contact with taxpayers by email. No, not ever. They will send you a...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>trishmc</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Government " />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="IRS Info" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Scams" />
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://www.ourtaxingtimes.com/">
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Since there is a new set of phishing emails saying they’re
from the IRS going around, a quick reminder. The IRS does not, repeat, does not
initiate contact with taxpayers by email. No, not ever. They will send you a
letter.</p>
<p>In my inbox this morning was an email that said it was from fraud.dep@irs.gov.
The subject line said that there was a complaint against me. Scary; a complaint
and it’s from the IRS. But it’s not as scary as what might happen if I
downloaded the rest of the message. A phishing scheme like this could contain a
virus or request confidential information. So, don’t do anything but trash it.</p>
<p>The IRS has a lot of information of their website about
phishing and what you can do if you receive an email that says it’s from them.
The first line on the <a href="http://www.irs.gov/uac/Report-Phishing" target="_blank">Phishing page</a> is:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>The IRS does not
initiate contact with taxpayers by email to request personal or financial
information. This includes any type of electronic communication, such as
text messages and social media channels.</strong></p>
<p>If you receive one,
or more, of the latest phishing emails that say they are from the IRS (I’ve
received 5 today), use their website to let the IRS know but don’t panic and
most especially don’t open or download or respond anything on that email.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.mactaxcenter.com/" target="_blank">McIntire
Tax Center</a> - on <a href="https://www.facebook.com/mactaxctr" target="_blank">Facebook</a>
- on <a href="https://plus.google.com/u/0/b/118057112802072457497/118057112802072457497/posts" target="_blank">Google+</a> - or Twitter @ mactax.</p></div>
</content>



    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>New Form I-9</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.ourtaxingtimes.com/2013/05/new-form-i-9.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.ourtaxingtimes.com/2013/05/new-form-i-9.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341fca1353ef01901c7ead0d970b</id>
        <published>2013-05-23T14:28:54-05:00</published>
        <updated>2013-05-23T14:28:54-05:00</updated>
        <summary>Attention employers! The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service (USCIS) has issued a new form I-9, Employment Eligibility Verification. This is the form which you are required to have all new (and rehired) employees complete when they are hired to verify...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>trishmc</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Government " />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Running a business" />
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://www.ourtaxingtimes.com/">
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Attention employers! The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration
Service (USCIS) has issued a new form I-9, Employment Eligibility Verification.
This is the form which you are required to have all new (and rehired) employees
complete when they are hired to verify they are eligible to work in the U.S.</p>
<p>The new I-9 (revision date 3/8/13) expands the actual form
from one to two pages but really doesn’t ask for too much more information. There
is more space to list which documents have been used for verification and the area
where the employee verifies that they are eligible for U.S. employment has been
expanded slightly. The instructions have also been expanded.</p>
<p>Employers have been required since 1986 to have all
employees complete an I-9 and keep the form in their files. This has not
changed. Also, employers are not required to have current employees with an I-9
on file fill out the new form. The new form is only required for new and
re-hired employees. The form needs to be completed by the first day the
employee works but it shouldn’t be done before the employee accepts the job.</p>
<p>Employers must keep the completed forms on file and they can
be inspected by several Federal departments. Employers who don’t maintain the
files can be subject to civil penalties and possible criminal penalties.</p>
<p>The new I-9 can be downloaded on the <a href="http://www.uscis.gov/files/form/i-9.pdf" target="_blank">USCIS website</a>. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.mactaxcenter.com/" target="_blank">McIntire
Tax Center</a> - on <a href="https://www.facebook.com/mactaxctr" target="_blank">Facebook</a>
- on <a href="https://plus.google.com/u/0/b/118057112802072457497/118057112802072457497/posts" target="_blank">Google+</a> - or Twitter @ mactax.</p></div>
</content>



    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Oklahoma DIsaster- Tax Relief.</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.ourtaxingtimes.com/2013/05/oklahoma-disaster-tax-relief.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.ourtaxingtimes.com/2013/05/oklahoma-disaster-tax-relief.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341fca1353ef019102625fc4970c</id>
        <published>2013-05-21T13:57:44-05:00</published>
        <updated>2013-05-21T13:57:44-05:00</updated>
        <summary>The IRS has announced (IR-2013-53) its tax relief for victims of the Oklahoma tornados on Monday. Taxpayers in Cleveland, Lincoln, McClain, Oklahoma and Pottawatomie counties (possibly more to be added later) will be able to postpone tax and payment filings...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>trishmc</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Disasters" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="IRS Info" />
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://www.ourtaxingtimes.com/">
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>The IRS has announced (IR-2013-53) its tax relief for victims
of the Oklahoma tornados on Monday. Taxpayers in Cleveland, Lincoln, McClain,
Oklahoma and Pottawatomie counties (possibly more to be added later) will be
able to postpone tax and payment filings until September 30<sup>th</sup>.The IRS will abate failure to file and failure to pay penalties for taxpayers who have to delay their tax filings.</p>
<p>The tax and payment filings include any due from May 18<sup>th</sup>.
This will include 2<sup>nd</sup> and 3<sup>rd</sup> quarter estimates for
individuals and a wide variety of business taxes. The IRS will also work with
taxpayers whose books and records are in the disaster area and workers with recognized
relief organizations but live outside the disaster area. (They can contact the
IRS at 866-562-5227.)</p>
<p>The IRS also reminds taxpayers who might qualify to take a
casualty loss that they don’t have to wait until filing their 2013 tax return.
Since they are in a federal disaster area, they have the option of taking the
loss on their 2012 return. They can file an amended return or, if they haven’t
filed a return yet, original 2012 return.</p>
<p>For more disaster relief, tax and otherwise, check out the <a href="http://www.disasterassistance.gov/" target="_blank">disaster website</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.mactaxcenter.com/" target="_blank">McIntire
Tax Center</a> - on <a href="https://www.facebook.com/mactaxctr" target="_blank">Facebook</a>
- on <a href="https://plus.google.com/u/0/b/118057112802072457497/118057112802072457497/posts" target="_blank">Google+</a> - or Twitter @ mactax.</p></div>
</content>



    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Bad Year</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.ourtaxingtimes.com/2013/05/bad-year.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.ourtaxingtimes.com/2013/05/bad-year.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341fca1353ef0192aa2248eb970d</id>
        <published>2013-05-20T15:34:31-05:00</published>
        <updated>2013-05-20T15:34:31-05:00</updated>
        <summary>The IRS is having a bad year. No, they are having a terrible, horrible, no good, very bad year. (Nod to Judith Viorst) Congress put off dealing with the tax changes until after the first of 2013. As a result,...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>trishmc</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Government " />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="IRS Programs" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Tax Business" />
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://www.ourtaxingtimes.com/">
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>The IRS is having a bad year.</p>
<p> </p>
<p> No, they are having a
terrible, horrible, no good, very bad year. (Nod to Judith Viorst)</p>
<ul>
<li>Congress put off dealing with the tax changes until after
the first of 2013. As a result, the IRS had to delay the start of the tax
season to implement those changes. It took until the middle of February to get
everything working.</li>
<li>Tax preparer regulation gets thrown a loop by the Loving
Decision. And the IRS didn’t get a stay on the injunction. Now they’re in the
appeal process.</li>
<li>H&amp;R Block’s issues with the Education Credit Form 8863
forced the IRS to clean up after them to get taxpayers their refunds faster.</li>
<li>“Where’s My Refund” got bogged down from all the use and
taxpayers had to be asked to only try once a day.</li>
<li>Modernized e-file needed maintenance a few days before the
end of the tax season.</li>
<li>There were delays e-filing on April 15<sup>th</sup> because
of the volume of returns filed.</li>
<li>Long delays on phone help lines due to budget cutbacks. </li>
<li>5 to 7 furlough days without pay.</li>
<li>No leadership. Shulman gave notice on Oct 21, 2012 but no
replacement was named until last week.</li>
<li>The tax exempt mess has already cost several people their
jobs and promises to continue for a while.</li>
</ul>
<p>I’m sure I missed something. But the stress level at the IRS
must be off the meter right now. Hang in there everyone.  Hopefully, someone else will mess up and take
over the media spotlight away from you and change your luck/karma.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.mactaxcenter.com/" target="_blank">McIntire
Tax Center</a> - on <a href="https://www.facebook.com/mactaxctr" target="_blank">Facebook</a>
- on <a href="https://plus.google.com/u/0/b/118057112802072457497/118057112802072457497/posts" target="_blank">Google+</a> - or Twitter @ mactax.</p></div>
</content>



    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Another Tax Exempt Twist</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.ourtaxingtimes.com/2013/05/another-tax-exempt-twist.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.ourtaxingtimes.com/2013/05/another-tax-exempt-twist.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341fca1353ef01901c63c0a4970b</id>
        <published>2013-05-20T14:58:01-05:00</published>
        <updated>2013-05-20T14:58:01-05:00</updated>
        <summary>By now, everyone should know about the IRS and the tax exempt status “scandal”. For those hiding in the attic the last few weeks, the IRS used key words like: tea party” and “patriot” to give some applications for 501(c)(4)...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>trishmc</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="IRS Programs" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="TIGTA" />
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://www.ourtaxingtimes.com/">
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>By now, everyone should know about the IRS and the tax
exempt status “scandal”. For those hiding in the attic the last few weeks, the
IRS used key words like: tea party” and “patriot” to give some applications for
501(c)(4) status extra attention.</p>
<p>A 501(c)(4) organization is an organization which is set up to
promote social welfare or a local association of employees which has a
charitable, educational or recreational purpose. They have become very popular
in recent years as a way for an organization to do some limited political
activity without having to publish their donors. This is different from a
Section 527 political organization. A section 527 group also has tax exempt
status but tighter information reporting requirements.</p>
<p>The Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration TIGTA)
has issued their report on the subject and found that the IRS did select some
501(c)(4)  applications for more
attention. This action was not politically motivated but based on lack of clear
vetting criteria to screen applications for organizations which will be too political.</p>
<p>As with any political scandal there has been much finger pointing,
calls for resignations and Congressional hearings. In Friday’s hearing (May17,
2013), Rep. Lloyd Doggett (D-TX) introduced a new twist when he asked TIGTA’s
J. Russell George if the scandal would have been avoided if the IRS had
followed the actual Internal Revenue Code wording for a 501(c)(4) organization.
It turns out that the IRC specifically states that to qualify for tax exempt
status under section501(c)(4) an organization must be operated <em><strong>exclusively</strong></em> for
social welfare. The regulations the IRS wrote to carry out that section,
however, say that the organization only needs to operate <em><strong>primarily</strong></em> for social
welfare. Primarily isn’t exclusive.</p>
<p>This isn’t a new argument. Citizens for Responsible Ethics
in Washington (CREW) filed a brief on Friday in the Gill v. Department of the
Treasury court case. (The IRS had filed to have the case dismissed.) Dr. David
Gill is challenging the IRS about their 50 year old regulation defining 501(c)(4)
as <em>primarily</em> for social welfare and not following the IRC’s  <em>exclusive</em> definition. While a candidate for
Congress, he alleges that he was targeted by a 501(c)(4) organization which
would not meet the exclusive test.  </p>
<p>In an already bad year for the IRS, they are now in the
spotlight for handling a sensitive subject badly and that they might have been
doing it wrong for 50 years. </p>
<p>Thanks to <a href="http://www.accountingtoday.com/news/Group-Challenges-IRS-Tax-Exempt-Criteria-66738-1.html?ET=webcpa:e7119:301805a:&amp;st=email" target="_blank">Accounting Today</a> for the head's up.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.mactaxcenter.com/" target="_blank">McIntire
Tax Center</a> - on <a href="https://www.facebook.com/mactaxctr" target="_blank">Facebook</a>
- on <a href="https://plus.google.com/u/0/b/118057112802072457497/118057112802072457497/posts" target="_blank">Google+</a> - or Twitter @ mactax.</p></div>
</content>



    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>What You Don't Save May Cost You.</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.ourtaxingtimes.com/2013/05/what-you-dont-save-may-cost-you.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.ourtaxingtimes.com/2013/05/what-you-dont-save-may-cost-you.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341fca1353ef017eeb4618e7970d</id>
        <published>2013-05-17T14:28:43-05:00</published>
        <updated>2013-05-17T14:28:43-05:00</updated>
        <summary>I’ve said it over and over again; keep copies of your tax returns and the supporting documents. That means the state return too. It can save you both time and money. Here’s the situation. I was asked to help respond...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>trishmc</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Suggestions" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Tax Pro" />
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://www.ourtaxingtimes.com/">
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>I’ve said it over and over again; keep copies of your tax
returns and the supporting documents. That means the state return too. It can
save you both time and money.</p>
<p>Here’s the situation. I was asked to help respond to a
notice from the Kansas Department of Revenue but the clients didn’t have a copy
of the KS-40 return they filed (I didn’t prepare the return.) So, I sent in a
request for a copy of the return or transcript info and a copy of a Kansas
Power of Attorney. Today, I was told that since I didn’t send in payment for
the info I requested, KDOR won’t send anything. A month after I sent my original
request, I had to fill out the special form and write a check for $5.00 to get
the information I need. </p>
<p>This mess illustrates two lessons. Taxpayers need to keep a
copy, paper or electronic, of their tax returns. All returns. And state revenue
departments are hard up and previously free information may now come with a
price tag. Don’t assume because the IRS doesn’t charge for transcripts and
account info doesn’t mean that that your state won’t require payment for that
info. </p>
<p> </p>
<p><a href="http://www.mactaxcenter.com/" target="_blank">McIntire
Tax Center</a> - on <a href="https://www.facebook.com/mactaxctr" target="_blank">Facebook</a>
- on <a href="https://plus.google.com/u/0/b/118057112802072457497/118057112802072457497/posts" target="_blank">Google+</a> - or Twitter @ mactax.</p></div>
</content>



    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Important Tax Exempt Information</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.ourtaxingtimes.com/2013/05/important-tax-exempt-information.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.ourtaxingtimes.com/2013/05/important-tax-exempt-information.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341fca1353ef017eeb2a26ba970d</id>
        <published>2013-05-14T14:55:49-05:00</published>
        <updated>2013-05-14T14:55:49-05:00</updated>
        <summary>Tax returns for tax exempt organizations are due tomorrow. That’s right, the due dates for 990s is May 15th. If a return isn’t filed for 3 consecutive years, then the organization will lose their tax exempt status and have to...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>trishmc</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Non-Profit" />
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://www.ourtaxingtimes.com/">
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Tax returns for tax exempt organizations are due tomorrow.
That’s right, the due dates for 990s is May 15<sup>th</sup>. If a return isn’t
filed for 3 consecutive years, then the organization will lose their tax exempt
status and have to re-apply. Not a fun prospect so get that return filed.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>And no, I’m not going to write a big post on the IRS tax
exempt scandal. I’ve never been a conspiracy person and think this was a stupid
over extension by the IRS. I’ll wait for the TIGTA report and for all the details
to come out. I hope that the scandal allows a good discussion on how to balance
the need to accurately screen Forms 1023 and 1024 for qualified organizations
with the organization’s rights. That’s what I hope but I think most people will
rather point fingers than solve problems.</p>
<p>If you are looking for a good variety of blog posts on the
tax exempt crisis, check out Joe Kristan’s <a href="http://rothcpa.com/2013/05/tax-roundup-5142013-worst-acting-commissioner-ever/" target="_blank">Tax Update Blog.</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.mactaxcenter.com/" target="_blank">McIntire
Tax Center</a> - on <a href="https://www.facebook.com/mactaxctr" target="_blank">Facebook</a>
- on <a href="https://plus.google.com/u/0/b/118057112802072457497/118057112802072457497/posts" target="_blank">Google+</a> - or Twitter @ mactax.</p></div>
</content>



    </entry>
 
</feed><!-- ph=1 -->
