<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Other World Computing Blog</title>
	
	<link>http://blog.macsales.com</link>
	<description>Everything OWC and Newer Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 19:22:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/owc_comments" /><feedburner:info uri="owc_comments" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><geo:lat>42.316121</geo:lat><geo:long>-88.438844</geo:long><feedburner:emailServiceId>owc_comments</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname>http://feedburner.google.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><item>
		<title>Comment on OWC Mercury Elite Pro Qx2 RAID Data Storage/Backup Solutions up to 16.0TB With FireWire 800/400, eSATA, USB 2.0 and Available USB 3.0 by OWC Eddie</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/owc_comments/~3/9UJVWmquB4E/comment-page-1</link>
		<dc:creator>OWC Eddie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 19:22:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.macsales.com/?p=18471#comment-63317</guid>
		<description>Hello Alex, 

This combination would still apply. The Newer Technology eSATA to USB 3.0 Adapter works by using the following 3 steps:

1. Power on your eSATA equipped external drive.
2. Connect the NewerTech Adapter to the external drive via a standard eSATA cable.
3. Connect the NewerTech Adapter to the USB 3.0 port on your computer via included **USB 3.0 cable. USB 2.0 also supported.

**To see USB 3.0 speeds, your Mac will need to be equipped with USB3.0</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Alex, </p>
<p>This combination would still apply. The Newer Technology eSATA to USB 3.0 Adapter works by using the following 3 steps:</p>
<p>1. Power on your eSATA equipped external drive.<br />
2. Connect the NewerTech Adapter to the external drive via a standard eSATA cable.<br />
3. Connect the NewerTech Adapter to the USB 3.0 port on your computer via included **USB 3.0 cable. USB 2.0 also supported.</p>
<p>**To see USB 3.0 speeds, your Mac will need to be equipped with USB3.0</p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?a=9UJVWmquB4E:7JXNJxofJDE:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?a=9UJVWmquB4E:7JXNJxofJDE:7Q72WNTAKBA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?a=9UJVWmquB4E:7JXNJxofJDE:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?i=9UJVWmquB4E:7JXNJxofJDE:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?a=9UJVWmquB4E:7JXNJxofJDE:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/owc_comments/~4/9UJVWmquB4E" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://blog.macsales.com/18471-owc-mercury-elite-pro-qx2-raid-data-storagebackup-solutions-up-to-16-0tb-with-firewire-800400-esata-usb-2-0-and-available-usb-3-0/comment-page-1#comment-63317</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 2011 MacBook Pro SATA Problems Resolved! by OWC Michael</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/owc_comments/~3/mCisQyqcgKo/comment-page-3</link>
		<dc:creator>OWC Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 15:11:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.macsales.com/?p=11895#comment-63316</guid>
		<description>Installing the SSD in the main hard drive bay will work as long as you've performed the firmware update. Then, as long as the original HDD is reporting as a SATA Revision 2.0 (3.0Gb/s) drive, all should be good for your planned setup.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Installing the SSD in the main hard drive bay will work as long as you&#8217;ve performed the firmware update. Then, as long as the original HDD is reporting as a SATA Revision 2.0 (3.0Gb/s) drive, all should be good for your planned setup.</p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?a=mCisQyqcgKo:5Ru8inWkdNs:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?a=mCisQyqcgKo:5Ru8inWkdNs:7Q72WNTAKBA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?a=mCisQyqcgKo:5Ru8inWkdNs:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?i=mCisQyqcgKo:5Ru8inWkdNs:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?a=mCisQyqcgKo:5Ru8inWkdNs:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/owc_comments/~4/mCisQyqcgKo" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://blog.macsales.com/11895-2011-macbook-pro-sata-problems-resolved/comment-page-3#comment-63316</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New 2012 Macs Means New OWC SSD Designs by OWC Michael</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/owc_comments/~3/uzThTJb-uis/comment-page-1</link>
		<dc:creator>OWC Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 14:51:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.macsales.com/?p=14040#comment-63315</guid>
		<description>No, although with the &lt;a href="http://eshop.macsales.com/item/Other%20World%20Computing/MAU3ENVOY12/" rel="nofollow"&gt;OWC Envoy&lt;/a&gt;, you can access that original drive via USB 3.0</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, although with the <a href="http://eshop.macsales.com/item/Other%20World%20Computing/MAU3ENVOY12/" rel="nofollow">OWC Envoy</a>, you can access that original drive via USB 3.0</p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?a=uzThTJb-uis:T9CS7yKL3-Q:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?a=uzThTJb-uis:T9CS7yKL3-Q:7Q72WNTAKBA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?a=uzThTJb-uis:T9CS7yKL3-Q:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?i=uzThTJb-uis:T9CS7yKL3-Q:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?a=uzThTJb-uis:T9CS7yKL3-Q:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/owc_comments/~4/uzThTJb-uis" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://blog.macsales.com/14040-new-2012-macs-means-new-owc-ssd-designs/comment-page-1#comment-63315</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Speed Time Machine Past 88MPH Over Your Local Network. by James Cutler</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/owc_comments/~3/a5WMFcZI3sk/comment-page-1</link>
		<dc:creator>James Cutler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 14:18:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.macsales.com/?p=18406#comment-63314</guid>
		<description>OWC Chris S wrote, "Note: I performed these steps in OS X 10.8.3; while this certainly should be possible with earlier (and I would assume later) versions of OS X, your mileage may vary."

You will be pleased to know that this process worked and continues to work for previous OS versions with time machine.  You can even create a disk image for use locally, thus allowing portable Time Machine volumes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OWC Chris S wrote, &#8220;Note: I performed these steps in OS X 10.8.3; while this certainly should be possible with earlier (and I would assume later) versions of OS X, your mileage may vary.&#8221;</p>
<p>You will be pleased to know that this process worked and continues to work for previous OS versions with time machine.  You can even create a disk image for use locally, thus allowing portable Time Machine volumes.</p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?a=a5WMFcZI3sk:63yC0kcPdEs:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?a=a5WMFcZI3sk:63yC0kcPdEs:7Q72WNTAKBA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?a=a5WMFcZI3sk:63yC0kcPdEs:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?i=a5WMFcZI3sk:63yC0kcPdEs:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?a=a5WMFcZI3sk:63yC0kcPdEs:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/owc_comments/~4/a5WMFcZI3sk" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://blog.macsales.com/18406-speed-time-machine-past-88mph-over-your-local-network/comment-page-1#comment-63314</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on OWC Mercury Elite Pro Qx2 RAID Data Storage/Backup Solutions up to 16.0TB With FireWire 800/400, eSATA, USB 2.0 and Available USB 3.0 by Erik</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/owc_comments/~3/fAWYxZk14IQ/comment-page-1</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 21:02:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.macsales.com/?p=18471#comment-63313</guid>
		<description>Hi there.

I have the same question as Alex.
I own a Qx2 but it is 2-3 years old. I was wondering the same thing because i already purchased the adaptor.
So i do hope it works. But i think it would, right. OWC would have been writing ** This device only works with Qx2 that have firmware xxx or are not older than xxx, i'm right, right ???
It would be extremely stupid if not because you can't guess that.

Thanks. Looking forward to get my device so i can attach it to my new iMac instead of USB2.. Damn thats slow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there.</p>
<p>I have the same question as Alex.<br />
I own a Qx2 but it is 2-3 years old. I was wondering the same thing because i already purchased the adaptor.<br />
So i do hope it works. But i think it would, right. OWC would have been writing ** This device only works with Qx2 that have firmware xxx or are not older than xxx, i&#8217;m right, right ???<br />
It would be extremely stupid if not because you can&#8217;t guess that.</p>
<p>Thanks. Looking forward to get my device so i can attach it to my new iMac instead of USB2.. Damn thats slow.</p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?a=fAWYxZk14IQ:azHmkXVKrXE:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?a=fAWYxZk14IQ:azHmkXVKrXE:7Q72WNTAKBA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?a=fAWYxZk14IQ:azHmkXVKrXE:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?i=fAWYxZk14IQ:azHmkXVKrXE:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?a=fAWYxZk14IQ:azHmkXVKrXE:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/owc_comments/~4/fAWYxZk14IQ" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://blog.macsales.com/18471-owc-mercury-elite-pro-qx2-raid-data-storagebackup-solutions-up-to-16-0tb-with-firewire-800400-esata-usb-2-0-and-available-usb-3-0/comment-page-1#comment-63313</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Yahoo! Discontinuing Older Versions of Mail by MD</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/owc_comments/~3/tWPoqMHc1k8/comment-page-1</link>
		<dc:creator>MD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 11:21:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.macsales.com/?p=18223#comment-63311</guid>
		<description>I am returning to report, there is hope!

According to --

Bringing the New Yahoo! Mail to Everyone
Yahoo! Mail Blog -- April 19th, 2013 -- by HuongT
http://www.ymailblog.com/blog/2013/04/bringing-the-new-yahoo-mail-to-everyone/

-- "If you’re on dial-up or an older browser, we will detect that and move you to an HTML-only / basic version of the new Yahoo! Mail."

Since that announcement, I took one of our auxiliary Yahoo! Mail Classic web mail accounts, and migrated it to the current, New Yahoo! Mail. I configured options, including themes and https, and tested for a few days. I reported to Yahoo! a number of bugs and other failings. (Btw -- Flash is being required simply to be able to copy an address from an email's address fields to the clip board, unless one goes to the trouble of pulling up the full headers.) Of course, there is absolutely no option to be found anywhere to switch back to Classic.

However, then I logged out, disabled JavaScript, and logged back in. Yahoo! Mail immediately complained about the lack of current JavaScript during the log-in process, warning that it really "requires" it, and giving options to do something about that -- or, to simply continue.

When I simply continued, it actually logged me into Yahoo! Mail Classic -- with JavaScript disabled, of course.

So I simply re-enabled JavaScript, refreshed my browser, and found myself still working in Yahoo! Mail Classic with JavaScript enabled. I logged out, logged back in with JavaScript still re-enabled -- and was automatically logged back in to Classic again. In Classic, with JavaScript enabled, one still has a link providing the option to "Get the newest Yahoo! Mail." With JavaScript disabled, that option does not appear.

I have now repeated this procedure with a second account, reproducing the same results.

So it appears that, at least for now, the "HTML-only / basic version of the new Yahoo! Mail" is simply, Yahoo! Mail Classic.

Of course, whether this will still be the case, and continue to work this way after June 3, remains to be seen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am returning to report, there is hope!</p>
<p>According to &#8211;</p>
<p>Bringing the New Yahoo! Mail to Everyone<br />
Yahoo! Mail Blog &#8212; April 19th, 2013 &#8212; by HuongT<br />
<a href="http://www.ymailblog.com/blog/2013/04/bringing-the-new-yahoo-mail-to-everyone/" rel="nofollow">http://www.ymailblog.com/blog/2013/04/bringing-the-new-yahoo-mail-to-everyone/</a></p>
<p>&#8211; &#8220;If you’re on dial-up or an older browser, we will detect that and move you to an HTML-only / basic version of the new Yahoo! Mail.&#8221;</p>
<p>Since that announcement, I took one of our auxiliary Yahoo! Mail Classic web mail accounts, and migrated it to the current, New Yahoo! Mail. I configured options, including themes and https, and tested for a few days. I reported to Yahoo! a number of bugs and other failings. (Btw &#8212; Flash is being required simply to be able to copy an address from an email&#8217;s address fields to the clip board, unless one goes to the trouble of pulling up the full headers.) Of course, there is absolutely no option to be found anywhere to switch back to Classic.</p>
<p>However, then I logged out, disabled JavaScript, and logged back in. Yahoo! Mail immediately complained about the lack of current JavaScript during the log-in process, warning that it really &#8220;requires&#8221; it, and giving options to do something about that &#8212; or, to simply continue.</p>
<p>When I simply continued, it actually logged me into Yahoo! Mail Classic &#8212; with JavaScript disabled, of course.</p>
<p>So I simply re-enabled JavaScript, refreshed my browser, and found myself still working in Yahoo! Mail Classic with JavaScript enabled. I logged out, logged back in with JavaScript still re-enabled &#8212; and was automatically logged back in to Classic again. In Classic, with JavaScript enabled, one still has a link providing the option to &#8220;Get the newest Yahoo! Mail.&#8221; With JavaScript disabled, that option does not appear.</p>
<p>I have now repeated this procedure with a second account, reproducing the same results.</p>
<p>So it appears that, at least for now, the &#8220;HTML-only / basic version of the new Yahoo! Mail&#8221; is simply, Yahoo! Mail Classic.</p>
<p>Of course, whether this will still be the case, and continue to work this way after June 3, remains to be seen.</p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?a=tWPoqMHc1k8:PARIIYrz_xs:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?a=tWPoqMHc1k8:PARIIYrz_xs:7Q72WNTAKBA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?a=tWPoqMHc1k8:PARIIYrz_xs:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?i=tWPoqMHc1k8:PARIIYrz_xs:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?a=tWPoqMHc1k8:PARIIYrz_xs:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/owc_comments/~4/tWPoqMHc1k8" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://blog.macsales.com/18223-yahoo-discontinuing-older-versions-of-mail/comment-page-1#comment-63311</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 2011 MacBook Pro SATA Problems Resolved! by Ravve</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/owc_comments/~3/xyKOu8irHwA/comment-page-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Ravve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 09:26:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.macsales.com/?p=11895#comment-63310</guid>
		<description>Hi

I have a MacBook Pro 17 early 2011. Yesterday i bought a OWC doubler here, and i just wondering, ite any issue if a get me orginal mac HDD in the OWC doubler into the Opticalbay then have a SSD disk in the Mainbay for the OSx and apps. 

The SSD i have bought is a Samsung 6 GB/s speed. My Macbook pro model is 8,3 with 2.2 GHz processor.


Intel 6 Series Chipset:

  Link Speed​​: 6 Gigabit
   Negotiated Link Speed​​: 3 Gigabit.


So please tell me after i read this post am very doubfull about its woking?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi</p>
<p>I have a MacBook Pro 17 early 2011. Yesterday i bought a OWC doubler here, and i just wondering, ite any issue if a get me orginal mac HDD in the OWC doubler into the Opticalbay then have a SSD disk in the Mainbay for the OSx and apps. </p>
<p>The SSD i have bought is a Samsung 6 GB/s speed. My Macbook pro model is 8,3 with 2.2 GHz processor.</p>
<p>Intel 6 Series Chipset:</p>
<p>  Link Speed​​: 6 Gigabit<br />
   Negotiated Link Speed​​: 3 Gigabit.</p>
<p>So please tell me after i read this post am very doubfull about its woking?</p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?a=xyKOu8irHwA:40fWeraZthk:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?a=xyKOu8irHwA:40fWeraZthk:7Q72WNTAKBA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?a=xyKOu8irHwA:40fWeraZthk:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?i=xyKOu8irHwA:40fWeraZthk:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?a=xyKOu8irHwA:40fWeraZthk:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/owc_comments/~4/xyKOu8irHwA" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://blog.macsales.com/11895-2011-macbook-pro-sata-problems-resolved/comment-page-3#comment-63310</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New 2012 Macs Means New OWC SSD Designs by Tim</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/owc_comments/~3/FHXLKiZYZbk/comment-page-1</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 23:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.macsales.com/?p=14040#comment-63309</guid>
		<description>Do you currently have an adapter for the the mid-2012 MacBook Air SSD to sata? For bare drive recovery of data.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you currently have an adapter for the the mid-2012 MacBook Air SSD to sata? For bare drive recovery of data.</p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?a=FHXLKiZYZbk:nkrDkwjDd_Y:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?a=FHXLKiZYZbk:nkrDkwjDd_Y:7Q72WNTAKBA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?a=FHXLKiZYZbk:nkrDkwjDd_Y:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?i=FHXLKiZYZbk:nkrDkwjDd_Y:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?a=FHXLKiZYZbk:nkrDkwjDd_Y:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/owc_comments/~4/FHXLKiZYZbk" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://blog.macsales.com/14040-new-2012-macs-means-new-owc-ssd-designs/comment-page-1#comment-63309</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Shielding Resolves USB 3.0 Conflict with Bluetooth by Bradley Dichter</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/owc_comments/~3/E3NqRi7Xkuo/comment-page-1</link>
		<dc:creator>Bradley Dichter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 20:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.macsales.com/?p=15990#comment-63308</guid>
		<description>FCC approved for shipping in the US electronic devices are allowed a certain amount of EMI. So a new vacuum may be allowed to interfere with a TV if used beyond reasonable limits, or perhaps it's better to say too close, as interference gets worse with greater distances. Some products are designed with greater than required tolerances to emit less than the limit. Some products are more susceptible to interference than other's due to shortcomings in their shielding and or grounding. It's up to the user to check for these types of EMI problems, but it's clearly not a consumer level thing to check for radiations of various frequencies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FCC approved for shipping in the US electronic devices are allowed a certain amount of EMI. So a new vacuum may be allowed to interfere with a TV if used beyond reasonable limits, or perhaps it&#8217;s better to say too close, as interference gets worse with greater distances. Some products are designed with greater than required tolerances to emit less than the limit. Some products are more susceptible to interference than other&#8217;s due to shortcomings in their shielding and or grounding. It&#8217;s up to the user to check for these types of EMI problems, but it&#8217;s clearly not a consumer level thing to check for radiations of various frequencies.</p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?a=E3NqRi7Xkuo:q-RO6FroBn4:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?a=E3NqRi7Xkuo:q-RO6FroBn4:7Q72WNTAKBA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?a=E3NqRi7Xkuo:q-RO6FroBn4:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?i=E3NqRi7Xkuo:q-RO6FroBn4:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?a=E3NqRi7Xkuo:q-RO6FroBn4:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/owc_comments/~4/E3NqRi7Xkuo" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://blog.macsales.com/15990-shielding-resolves-usb-3-0-conflict-with-bluetooth/comment-page-1#comment-63308</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Shielding Resolves USB 3.0 Conflict with Bluetooth by Richard</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/owc_comments/~3/-IJq79YBU4U/comment-page-1</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 19:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.macsales.com/?p=15990#comment-63307</guid>
		<description>Your mother's vacuum wasn't intended as an accessory to the TV. The OWC product is expressly marketed as an accessory to the Mac mini with which it interferes. Your analogy, and the resulting conclusion, are not applicable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your mother&#8217;s vacuum wasn&#8217;t intended as an accessory to the TV. The OWC product is expressly marketed as an accessory to the Mac mini with which it interferes. Your analogy, and the resulting conclusion, are not applicable.</p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?a=-IJq79YBU4U:9L0xRP1sW_Y:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?a=-IJq79YBU4U:9L0xRP1sW_Y:7Q72WNTAKBA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?a=-IJq79YBU4U:9L0xRP1sW_Y:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?i=-IJq79YBU4U:9L0xRP1sW_Y:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?a=-IJq79YBU4U:9L0xRP1sW_Y:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/owc_comments/~4/-IJq79YBU4U" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://blog.macsales.com/15990-shielding-resolves-usb-3-0-conflict-with-bluetooth/comment-page-1#comment-63307</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Shielding Resolves USB 3.0 Conflict with Bluetooth by Doug</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/owc_comments/~3/l28pvNLqaDk/comment-page-1</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 19:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.macsales.com/?p=15990#comment-63306</guid>
		<description>I have to agree with others, there is a problem with the design here. A device should not conflict with itself. It has bluetooth and USB 3.0. One causes problems for the other. There is clearly an issue here that someone missed. I think the fault lies with those who built USB 3.0. They should have found out sooner it created interference on the 2.4ghz spectrum and redesigned it so it would not or designed shielding and made it part of the spec. SOMETHING so these features work together and not in conflict.

It is almost like Steve Jobs blaming the iPhone 4 antenna issues on how people hold their phone. I'm not using USB 3.0 right because I put my drive near my computer? Seriously people....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree with others, there is a problem with the design here. A device should not conflict with itself. It has bluetooth and USB 3.0. One causes problems for the other. There is clearly an issue here that someone missed. I think the fault lies with those who built USB 3.0. They should have found out sooner it created interference on the 2.4ghz spectrum and redesigned it so it would not or designed shielding and made it part of the spec. SOMETHING so these features work together and not in conflict.</p>
<p>It is almost like Steve Jobs blaming the iPhone 4 antenna issues on how people hold their phone. I&#8217;m not using USB 3.0 right because I put my drive near my computer? Seriously people&#8230;.</p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?a=l28pvNLqaDk:7E8uuU-_RSo:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?a=l28pvNLqaDk:7E8uuU-_RSo:7Q72WNTAKBA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?a=l28pvNLqaDk:7E8uuU-_RSo:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?i=l28pvNLqaDk:7E8uuU-_RSo:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?a=l28pvNLqaDk:7E8uuU-_RSo:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/owc_comments/~4/l28pvNLqaDk" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://blog.macsales.com/15990-shielding-resolves-usb-3-0-conflict-with-bluetooth/comment-page-1#comment-63306</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Shielding Resolves USB 3.0 Conflict with Bluetooth by Raul</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/owc_comments/~3/Tcx1oRAHSag/comment-page-1</link>
		<dc:creator>Raul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 19:09:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.macsales.com/?p=15990#comment-63305</guid>
		<description>Hi Michael,
I gess that the designers of tv's or vacuum cleaners did not take into account the possible intereferences between them, it's understandable, it would be a minor problem. But it's very common to use a bluetooth device on a computer with an external disk, no?. So, I think that the two examples are not comparable, but I understand your point.
A design problem of "someone"?, I do not know, I guess you are more qualified to understand what happens, but for me it is not normal.

Sorry if I bothered you with my post.

Best regards,
Raül.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Michael,<br />
I gess that the designers of tv&#8217;s or vacuum cleaners did not take into account the possible intereferences between them, it&#8217;s understandable, it would be a minor problem. But it&#8217;s very common to use a bluetooth device on a computer with an external disk, no?. So, I think that the two examples are not comparable, but I understand your point.<br />
A design problem of &#8220;someone&#8221;?, I do not know, I guess you are more qualified to understand what happens, but for me it is not normal.</p>
<p>Sorry if I bothered you with my post.</p>
<p>Best regards,<br />
Raül.</p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?a=Tcx1oRAHSag:PIH6MED07-0:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?a=Tcx1oRAHSag:PIH6MED07-0:7Q72WNTAKBA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?a=Tcx1oRAHSag:PIH6MED07-0:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?i=Tcx1oRAHSag:PIH6MED07-0:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?a=Tcx1oRAHSag:PIH6MED07-0:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/owc_comments/~4/Tcx1oRAHSag" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://blog.macsales.com/15990-shielding-resolves-usb-3-0-conflict-with-bluetooth/comment-page-1#comment-63305</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Proprietary cable can put the brakes on upgrading Late ’09 iMacs. by Mark K</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/owc_comments/~3/TehN6RHDNFY/comment-page-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 18:20:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.macsales.com/?p=2751#comment-63304</guid>
		<description>I have a Western Digital Caviar Black 1.0TB SATA / 32Mb Cache HDD, Model No: WD101FALS-40U9B0 in my late 2009 27″iMac (10.1). I want to upgrade that to the new 4TB WED drive which you have http://eshop.macsales.com/item/Western%20Digital/WD4001FAEX/

You do not have any installation videos for HDDs for the late 2009 27″iMac (10.1) despite the comment in the original post saying "As we were getting information together for the new iMac instructional videos, we came across ..."  See: http://eshop.macsales.com/installvideos/

Can you please confirm that this WD 4TB drive will work with my late 2009 27″iMac (10.1) ie. 1. it will be compatible with the existing WD temperature controller cable 2. It doesn't matter that the drives are now SATA-III (6.0Gb/s) and 3. that the Motherboard can support the higher capacity. I am running the latest operating system in Mac OSX but I mainly use Bootcamp Windows 7.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a Western Digital Caviar Black 1.0TB SATA / 32Mb Cache HDD, Model No: WD101FALS-40U9B0 in my late 2009 27″iMac (10.1). I want to upgrade that to the new 4TB WED drive which you have <a href="http://eshop.macsales.com/item/Western%20Digital/WD4001FAEX/" rel="nofollow">http://eshop.macsales.com/item/Western%20Digital/WD4001FAEX/</a></p>
<p>You do not have any installation videos for HDDs for the late 2009 27″iMac (10.1) despite the comment in the original post saying &#8220;As we were getting information together for the new iMac instructional videos, we came across &#8230;&#8221;  See: <a href="http://eshop.macsales.com/installvideos/" rel="nofollow">http://eshop.macsales.com/installvideos/</a></p>
<p>Can you please confirm that this WD 4TB drive will work with my late 2009 27″iMac (10.1) ie. 1. it will be compatible with the existing WD temperature controller cable 2. It doesn&#8217;t matter that the drives are now SATA-III (6.0Gb/s) and 3. that the Motherboard can support the higher capacity. I am running the latest operating system in Mac OSX but I mainly use Bootcamp Windows 7.</p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?a=TehN6RHDNFY:ybQsPVx-v2M:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?a=TehN6RHDNFY:ybQsPVx-v2M:7Q72WNTAKBA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?a=TehN6RHDNFY:ybQsPVx-v2M:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?i=TehN6RHDNFY:ybQsPVx-v2M:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?a=TehN6RHDNFY:ybQsPVx-v2M:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/owc_comments/~4/TehN6RHDNFY" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://blog.macsales.com/2751-proprietary-cable-can-put-the-brakes-on-upgrading-late-09-imacs/comment-page-3#comment-63304</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on OWC Mercury Elite Pro Qx2 RAID Data Storage/Backup Solutions up to 16.0TB With FireWire 800/400, eSATA, USB 2.0 and Available USB 3.0 by Steve</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/owc_comments/~3/RQ8U5KZY5OQ/comment-page-1</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 16:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.macsales.com/?p=18471#comment-63302</guid>
		<description>Hoping we'll see a model with native Thunderbolt soon.  I really want to buy one, but not until is has Thunderbolt on it (and hopefully native USB3 as well).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hoping we&#8217;ll see a model with native Thunderbolt soon.  I really want to buy one, but not until is has Thunderbolt on it (and hopefully native USB3 as well).</p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?a=RQ8U5KZY5OQ:8_RM3hQ9Rls:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?a=RQ8U5KZY5OQ:8_RM3hQ9Rls:7Q72WNTAKBA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?a=RQ8U5KZY5OQ:8_RM3hQ9Rls:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?i=RQ8U5KZY5OQ:8_RM3hQ9Rls:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?a=RQ8U5KZY5OQ:8_RM3hQ9Rls:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/owc_comments/~4/RQ8U5KZY5OQ" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://blog.macsales.com/18471-owc-mercury-elite-pro-qx2-raid-data-storagebackup-solutions-up-to-16-0tb-with-firewire-800400-esata-usb-2-0-and-available-usb-3-0/comment-page-1#comment-63302</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on OS X 10.8.3 Now Offers Fusion Drive Possibilities For Non-Fusion Drive Equipped Macs by Arjan</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/owc_comments/~3/iEtQXAVym0c/comment-page-1</link>
		<dc:creator>Arjan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 15:14:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.macsales.com/?p=17624#comment-63301</guid>
		<description>Ooops, made mistake in Debug mode, it must (of course be:)

defaults write com.apple.DiskUtility DUDebugMenuEnabled 1

to enable debug mode voor DiskUtility

in orde te be able to see and erase the small Boot OS X partition on your second drive.

Arjan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ooops, made mistake in Debug mode, it must (of course be:)</p>
<p>defaults write com.apple.DiskUtility DUDebugMenuEnabled 1</p>
<p>to enable debug mode voor DiskUtility</p>
<p>in orde te be able to see and erase the small Boot OS X partition on your second drive.</p>
<p>Arjan</p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?a=iEtQXAVym0c:wCGRZMSkaJs:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?a=iEtQXAVym0c:wCGRZMSkaJs:7Q72WNTAKBA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?a=iEtQXAVym0c:wCGRZMSkaJs:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?i=iEtQXAVym0c:wCGRZMSkaJs:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?a=iEtQXAVym0c:wCGRZMSkaJs:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/owc_comments/~4/iEtQXAVym0c" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://blog.macsales.com/17624-os-x-10-8-3-provides-fusion-drive-setup-option-for-non-fusion-drive-equipped-macs/comment-page-1#comment-63301</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on OS X 10.8.3 Now Offers Fusion Drive Possibilities For Non-Fusion Drive Equipped Macs by Arjan</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/owc_comments/~3/7aYLrC7K3LI/comment-page-1</link>
		<dc:creator>Arjan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 14:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.macsales.com/?p=17624#comment-63300</guid>
		<description>Yeah!

I found the cause and (NOT THOROUGHLY TESTED!) solution for deleting the double startup Drive with a DIY Fusion Drive.

Startup from an external Drive

Put DiskUtility in Debug mode by typing the following in Terminal:

defaults write com.apple.DiskUtility DUDebugMenuEnabled 0

And than tick/select:
Show All Partitions 

in the DiskUtility Debug Menu you will see that the second drive (probably your old HDD) contains a part ion called:
OS X Boot it was about 134MB big (small) on my HDD

Under Partion DELETE that OS X boot partition (it's useless anyway) because your never going to boot from that CoreStorage drive anyway.

The second boot icon wil disappear from your ALT/Option boot menu, only the InternalHD-icon from your SSD wil show up.

Disclaimer:
Although it works like charm on my mid 2010 iMac (i could do the test because it was empty anyway after Fusionizing it) I DID NOT TEST THIS WITH BOOT CAMP, so use at your own risk</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah!</p>
<p>I found the cause and (NOT THOROUGHLY TESTED!) solution for deleting the double startup Drive with a DIY Fusion Drive.</p>
<p>Startup from an external Drive</p>
<p>Put DiskUtility in Debug mode by typing the following in Terminal:</p>
<p>defaults write com.apple.DiskUtility DUDebugMenuEnabled 0</p>
<p>And than tick/select:<br />
Show All Partitions </p>
<p>in the DiskUtility Debug Menu you will see that the second drive (probably your old HDD) contains a part ion called:<br />
OS X Boot it was about 134MB big (small) on my HDD</p>
<p>Under Partion DELETE that OS X boot partition (it&#8217;s useless anyway) because your never going to boot from that CoreStorage drive anyway.</p>
<p>The second boot icon wil disappear from your ALT/Option boot menu, only the InternalHD-icon from your SSD wil show up.</p>
<p>Disclaimer:<br />
Although it works like charm on my mid 2010 iMac (i could do the test because it was empty anyway after Fusionizing it) I DID NOT TEST THIS WITH BOOT CAMP, so use at your own risk</p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?a=7aYLrC7K3LI:P6SD-TTWCjk:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?a=7aYLrC7K3LI:P6SD-TTWCjk:7Q72WNTAKBA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?a=7aYLrC7K3LI:P6SD-TTWCjk:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?i=7aYLrC7K3LI:P6SD-TTWCjk:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?a=7aYLrC7K3LI:P6SD-TTWCjk:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/owc_comments/~4/7aYLrC7K3LI" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://blog.macsales.com/17624-os-x-10-8-3-provides-fusion-drive-setup-option-for-non-fusion-drive-equipped-macs/comment-page-1#comment-63300</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Shielding Resolves USB 3.0 Conflict with Bluetooth by OWC Michael</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/owc_comments/~3/WHSKDbFIFOw/comment-page-1</link>
		<dc:creator>OWC Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 14:14:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.macsales.com/?p=15990#comment-63299</guid>
		<description>It is interference - nobody "did their work wrong".

I'm going to show my age a bit here, but I remember watching Saturday morning cartoons and getting so upset when my mom would start vacuuming because the picture on the TV would go all fuzzy.
There wasn't anything wrong with the vacuum cleaner - it did exactly what it is supposed to do.
There wasn't anything wrong with the television - it did exactly what it is supposed to do.
There wasn't anything wrong with the TV Station's broadcast signal  - it did exactly what it is supposed to do.
However, interference from the vacuum cleaner distorted that signal so the TV couldn't display it properly. When the vacuum cleaner was turned off or moved far enough away from the TV, the signal became clear again.

Much the same is happening with USB 3.0 and Bluetooth.

There isn't anything wrong with USB 3.0 - it works as it is designed to do.
There isn't anything wrong with Bluetooth - it works as it is designed to do.
However, when the USB 3.0 protocol is active, it causes interference in the 2.4GHz broadcast band that Bluetooth uses.

In both cases the choices of a solution is the same:
&lt;ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Add distance between the two to lessen the effect of the interference.&lt;/li&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Block the interference with shielding&lt;/li&gt;
        &lt;li&gt;Resolve yourself to using one or the other individually&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

Some choices are obviously not ideal for certain situations.
Growing up I had only one TV and it was too large for me to move - so adding distance wasn't going to work.
Try as I would, piling up the couch cushions and some blankets around me the TV while the vacuuming occurred just didn't work.
So, I needed to come to terms that when my mom vacuumed, watching TV was just not an option - and I'd go play outside instead.

Luckily, with the USB 3.0 / Bluetooth issue, the options are a bit more manageable.
As you yourself have already found, adding more distance between the two is working for you.
We offer the &lt;a href="http://eshop.macsales.com/item/OWC/DIYIMM12BTS/" rel="nofollow"&gt;shielding kit&lt;/a&gt; for those that would like to more successfully block the interference then my ill-conceived cushion attempt in my youth.
Personally, I've taken the same option that I did as a kid. I use a wired Apple Extended Keyboard on all my desktop machines and either a corded or wireless mouse - eliminating the immediate need for Bluetooth altogether.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is interference &#8211; nobody &#8220;did their work wrong&#8221;.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m going to show my age a bit here, but I remember watching Saturday morning cartoons and getting so upset when my mom would start vacuuming because the picture on the TV would go all fuzzy.<br />
There wasn&#8217;t anything wrong with the vacuum cleaner &#8211; it did exactly what it is supposed to do.<br />
There wasn&#8217;t anything wrong with the television &#8211; it did exactly what it is supposed to do.<br />
There wasn&#8217;t anything wrong with the TV Station&#8217;s broadcast signal  &#8211; it did exactly what it is supposed to do.<br />
However, interference from the vacuum cleaner distorted that signal so the TV couldn&#8217;t display it properly. When the vacuum cleaner was turned off or moved far enough away from the TV, the signal became clear again.</p>
<p>Much the same is happening with USB 3.0 and Bluetooth.</p>
<p>There isn&#8217;t anything wrong with USB 3.0 &#8211; it works as it is designed to do.<br />
There isn&#8217;t anything wrong with Bluetooth &#8211; it works as it is designed to do.<br />
However, when the USB 3.0 protocol is active, it causes interference in the 2.4GHz broadcast band that Bluetooth uses.</p>
<p>In both cases the choices of a solution is the same:</p>
<ul>
<li>Add distance between the two to lessen the effect of the interference.</li>
<li>Block the interference with shielding</li>
<li>Resolve yourself to using one or the other individually</li>
</ul>
<p>Some choices are obviously not ideal for certain situations.<br />
Growing up I had only one TV and it was too large for me to move &#8211; so adding distance wasn&#8217;t going to work.<br />
Try as I would, piling up the couch cushions and some blankets around me the TV while the vacuuming occurred just didn&#8217;t work.<br />
So, I needed to come to terms that when my mom vacuumed, watching TV was just not an option &#8211; and I&#8217;d go play outside instead.</p>
<p>Luckily, with the USB 3.0 / Bluetooth issue, the options are a bit more manageable.<br />
As you yourself have already found, adding more distance between the two is working for you.<br />
We offer the <a href="http://eshop.macsales.com/item/OWC/DIYIMM12BTS/" rel="nofollow">shielding kit</a> for those that would like to more successfully block the interference then my ill-conceived cushion attempt in my youth.<br />
Personally, I&#8217;ve taken the same option that I did as a kid. I use a wired Apple Extended Keyboard on all my desktop machines and either a corded or wireless mouse &#8211; eliminating the immediate need for Bluetooth altogether.</p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?a=WHSKDbFIFOw:AIOL3Nrla8U:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?a=WHSKDbFIFOw:AIOL3Nrla8U:7Q72WNTAKBA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?a=WHSKDbFIFOw:AIOL3Nrla8U:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?i=WHSKDbFIFOw:AIOL3Nrla8U:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?a=WHSKDbFIFOw:AIOL3Nrla8U:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/owc_comments/~4/WHSKDbFIFOw" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://blog.macsales.com/15990-shielding-resolves-usb-3-0-conflict-with-bluetooth/comment-page-1#comment-63299</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on OWC Mercury Elite Pro Qx2 RAID Data Storage/Backup Solutions up to 16.0TB With FireWire 800/400, eSATA, USB 2.0 and Available USB 3.0 by OWC Michael</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/owc_comments/~3/ouW0Md-kgcY/comment-page-1</link>
		<dc:creator>OWC Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 13:34:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.macsales.com/?p=18471#comment-63298</guid>
		<description>The bluetooth interference issue you're referring to has to do with &lt;em&gt;ALL&lt;/em&gt; USB 3.0 devices.
&lt;a href="http://support.apple.com/kb/TS4512" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://support.apple.com/kb/TS4512&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The bluetooth interference issue you&#8217;re referring to has to do with <em>ALL</em> USB 3.0 devices.<br />
<a href="http://support.apple.com/kb/TS4512" rel="nofollow">http://support.apple.com/kb/TS4512</a></p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?a=ouW0Md-kgcY:-jOMy0fMhMM:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?a=ouW0Md-kgcY:-jOMy0fMhMM:7Q72WNTAKBA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?a=ouW0Md-kgcY:-jOMy0fMhMM:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?i=ouW0Md-kgcY:-jOMy0fMhMM:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?a=ouW0Md-kgcY:-jOMy0fMhMM:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/owc_comments?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/owc_comments/~4/ouW0Md-kgcY" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://blog.macsales.com/18471-owc-mercury-elite-pro-qx2-raid-data-storagebackup-solutions-up-to-16-0tb-with-firewire-800400-esata-usb-2-0-and-available-usb-3-0/comment-page-1#comment-63298</feedburner:origLink></item>
</channel>
</rss>
