<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><!-- generator="WordPress/2.8" --><rss xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="0.92">
<channel>
	<title>Pactix - pretty good contract clauses</title>
	<link>http://www.ontechnologycontracts.com</link>
	<description>Clauses, commentary, and case notes. By D. C. Toedt.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 15:28:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss092</docs>
	<language>en</language>
	
	<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/pactix" type="application/rss+xml" /><feedburner:emailServiceId>pactix</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname>http://feedburner.google.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" /><item>
		<title>Another argument for using contract forms that start in mid-field</title>
		<description>According to Justin Fogarty, IACCM president Tim Cummins reported that an unidentified IACCM member had its sell-side negotiators review the contract forms used by the buy-siders, and vice versa.   Each was “apopletic.” (Hat tip: Jason Anderman of WhichDraft)&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/pactix/~4/zefKjcCUNfo" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/pactix/~3/zefKjcCUNfo/</link>
			<feedburner:origLink>http://www.ontechnologycontracts.com/2009/06/another-argument-for-using-contract-forms-that-start-in-mid-field/</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Letters of intent: their highest and best use is disavowing a binding contract</title>
		<description>A letter of intent — aka an LOI, sometimes known as a memorandum of understanding or MOU — is the equivalent of comfort food; it's something you can show your boss to reassure her that the transaction you're supposed to make happen is moving forward.  

The most useful function of a ...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/pactix/~4/Enhk-gGbRvI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/pactix/~3/Enhk-gGbRvI/</link>
			<feedburner:origLink>http://www.ontechnologycontracts.com/2009/06/letters-of-intent-their-highest-and-best-use-is-disavowing-a-binding-contract/</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Amazon.com drops marketing affiliates in NC, RI to avoid having to collect sales tax – good thing they had a termination-at-will clause in their contract</title>
		<description>Amazon.com is dropping its online marketing affiliates in North Carolina and Rhode Island.  It did so to avoid having to deal with recent sales-tax legislation in Rhode Island and North Carolina. These bills would require Amazon and other companies to collect sales tax for in-state sales if they ...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/pactix/~4/QpeBAewiMfY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/pactix/~3/QpeBAewiMfY/</link>
			<feedburner:origLink>http://www.ontechnologycontracts.com/2009/06/amazon-com-drops-marketing-affiliates-in-nc-ri-to-avoid-having-to-collect-sales-tax-good-thing-they-had-a-termination-at-will-clause-in-their-contract/</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Nail down what happens to your personal data – Jeff Gordon</title>
		<description>Jeff Gordon at LicensingHandbook.com points out that Clear — the company that was supposed to speed up frequent travelers' airline security screenings, but suddenly shut down — apparently will be selling the user data it collected. He notes that this is something that should be explicitly addressed in relevant contract documents.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/pactix/~4/FO7xH1tCu9Q" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/pactix/~3/FO7xH1tCu9Q/</link>
			<feedburner:origLink>http://www.ontechnologycontracts.com/2009/06/nail-down-what-happens-to-your-personal-data-jeff-gordon/</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Sales rep crosses the line by first hinting, then flatly misstating, that his company was part of a competitor</title>
		<description>A sales rep working for a company called Alliantgroup made marketing phone calls to customers of a competitor, BDO. The Alliantgroup sales rep used a script that said things like, “I am calling because you are part of the BDO Alliance and we are having great success with BDO Alliance ...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/pactix/~4/3n7zj495_ok" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/pactix/~3/3n7zj495_ok/</link>
			<feedburner:origLink>http://www.ontechnologycontracts.com/2009/06/sales-rep-crosses-the-line-by-first-hinting-then-flatly-misstating-that-his-company-was-part-of-a-competitor/</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Think twice before suing a departed employee for trade-secret misappropriation in California, or risk a big attorneys’ fees award</title>
		<description>“The court affirmed a judgment both denying an injunction and awarding the ex-employees $1,641,216.78 in attorneys’ fees where their former employer was found to have sought an injunction in bad faith—since misappropriation was possible but not actually ‘threatened’ ....”  Rodger R. Cole and Rachael G. Samberg (Fenwick &amp; West), Litigation Alert: ...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/pactix/~4/iOFG8VQEv8w" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/pactix/~3/iOFG8VQEv8w/</link>
			<feedburner:origLink>http://www.ontechnologycontracts.com/2009/06/think-twice-before-suing-a-departed-employee-for-trade-secret-misappropriation-in-california-or-risk-a-big-attorneys-fees-award/</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Professional-liability insurance policy doesn’t cover patent infringement, says Penn. appeals court</title>
		<description>“For two reasons, we reverse and direct that judgment be entered in [insurance company] Caliber’s favor.      “First, because we find that a patent infringement action brought by another vendor is not a ‘professional liability’ action under the terms of the policy.     ...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/pactix/~4/G-m2DxyLDcs" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/pactix/~3/G-m2DxyLDcs/</link>
			<feedburner:origLink>http://www.ontechnologycontracts.com/2009/06/professional-liability-insurance-policy-doesnt-cover-patent-infringement-says-penn-appeals-court/</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Reminder: Different blog feeds for different interests</title>
		<description>Readers who are interested only in blog posts on particular topics can (without disclosing personal information here) sign up for sign up for specific feeds that, in effect, provide different blogs addressing:     particular topics    department-specific topics - e.g., R&amp;D, HR, Finance, BusDev, etc. ...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/pactix/~4/OhHwowv88Q0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/pactix/~3/OhHwowv88Q0/</link>
			<feedburner:origLink>http://www.ontechnologycontracts.com/2009/06/reminder-different-blog-feeds-for-different-interests/</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Netflix Prize contest rules – a crowdsourcing drafting resource</title>
		<description>A multinational team claims to have qualified for Netflix’s $1 million prize for coming up with an improved algorithm for recommending specific movie rentals to subscribers. The contest is a real bargain for Netflix:  it gets thousands of contestants doing free R&amp;D work for them (not to mention the free ...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/pactix/~4/eRNP8Oi-gsA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/pactix/~3/eRNP8Oi-gsA/</link>
			<feedburner:origLink>http://www.ontechnologycontracts.com/2009/06/netflix-prize-rules-a-drafting-resource-for-crowdsourcing-contests/</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Preparing for a corporate-representative deposition – article with good pointers</title>
		<description>Weil Gotshal litigators Lori Pines and Ardith Bronson have a useful piece coming out in Monday’s Corporate Counsel about how to prepare for a corporate-representative deposition under federal-court rule 30(b)(6).&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/pactix/~4/uxE3qfqf7Us" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/pactix/~3/uxE3qfqf7Us/</link>
			<feedburner:origLink>http://www.ontechnologycontracts.com/2009/06/preparing-for-a-corporate-representative-deposition-article-with-good-pointers/</feedburner:origLink></item>
</channel>
</rss>
