<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/atom10full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" xml:lang="en"><title type="text">Peter Gallagher</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.petergallagher.com.au/index.php/site/index/" /><subtitle type="text">Peter Gallagher:Peter Gallagher is a trade and public policy analyst</subtitle><rights type="text">Copyright (c) 2009, pwg</rights><updated>2009-07-14T09:50:41+00:00</updated><generator uri="http://www.pmachine.com/">ExpressionEngine</generator><id>tag:petergallagher.com.au,2009:07:14</id><link rel="license" type="text/html" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/" /><link rel="self" href="http://www.petergallagher.com.au/index.php/site/rss_2.0/" type="application/atom+xml" /><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://add.my.yahoo.com/rss?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.petergallagher.com.au%2Findex.php%2Fsite%2Frss_2.0%2F" src="http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/my/addtomyyahoo4.gif">Subscribe with My Yahoo!</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.newsgator.com/ngs/subscriber/subext.aspx?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.petergallagher.com.au%2Findex.php%2Fsite%2Frss_2.0%2F" src="http://www.newsgator.com/images/ngsub1.gif">Subscribe with NewsGator</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://feeds.my.aol.com/add.jsp?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.petergallagher.com.au%2Findex.php%2Fsite%2Frss_2.0%2F" src="http://o.aolcdn.com/favorites.my.aol.com/webmaster/ffclient/webroot/locale/en-US/images/myAOLButtonSmall.gif">Subscribe with My AOL</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.bloglines.com/sub/http://www.petergallagher.com.au/index.php/site/rss_2.0/" src="http://www.bloglines.com/images/sub_modern11.gif">Subscribe with Bloglines</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.netvibes.com/subscribe.php?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.petergallagher.com.au%2Findex.php%2Fsite%2Frss_2.0%2F" src="http://www.netvibes.com/img/add2netvibes.gif">Subscribe with Netvibes</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://fusion.google.com/add?feedurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.petergallagher.com.au%2Findex.php%2Fsite%2Frss_2.0%2F" src="http://buttons.googlesyndication.com/fusion/add.gif">Subscribe with Google</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.pageflakes.com/subscribe.aspx?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.petergallagher.com.au%2Findex.php%2Fsite%2Frss_2.0%2F" src="http://www.pageflakes.com/ImageFile.ashx?instanceId=Static_4&amp;fileName=ATP_blu_91x17.gif">Subscribe with Pageflakes</feedburner:feedFlare><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" /><entry><title type="text">Temperatures for June in Victoria</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/petergallagher_blog/~3/BsRUh3X4J3c/" /><category term="Ideas" /><author><name>pwg</name><email>peter@petergallagher.com.au</email><uri>http://www.petergallagher.com.au</uri></author><updated>2009-07-14T05:38:18-07:00</updated><id>tag:petergallagher.com.au,2009:index.php/2.2802</id><content type="html">
        &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.inquit.com/images/uploads/TempAnomVicJun09.png" title="Source: BOM" rel="prettyOverlay"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.inquit.com/images/uploads/TempAnomVicJun09_tmb.png" alt="Temperature anomalies for June, 1950 - 2009" width="100" height="100" class="photo" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;June 2009 was not as warm as June 2008, but still 0.8&amp;deg; C above the  average for 1961-1990, according to the Australian Bureau of Meteorology. There have been &lt;strong&gt;ten hotter Junes&lt;/strong&gt; since 1950.&lt;/p&gt; 
            &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/petergallagher_blog/~4/BsRUh3X4J3c" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://www.petergallagher.com.au/index.php/site/article/temperatures-for-june-in-victoria/</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><title type="text">Remove the buy-local tax on books</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/petergallagher_blog/~3/SfftN9Jj-kw/" /><category term="Trade" /><author><name>pwg</name><email>peter@petergallagher.com.au</email><uri>http://www.petergallagher.com.au</uri></author><updated>2009-07-14T02:50:41-07:00</updated><id>tag:petergallagher.com.au,2009:index.php/site/index/1.2801</id><content type="html">
        &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Yes&lt;/strong&gt;! The right recommendation for a more competitive and better-informed (or, at least, &lt;em&gt;better-read&lt;/em&gt;) Australia.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;"The Government should repeal Australia&amp;rsquo;s Parallel Import Restrictions (PIRs) for books. The repeal should take effect three years after the date that it is announced." &lt;strong&gt;Extract from&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href="http://www.pc.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/90268/03-recommendations.pdf" title="link to "&gt;Research report - Productivity Commission&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This discretionary quota on books maintains local margins for the global book publishers and printers at the cost of readers and competitive Australian publishing. Now maybe&amp;mdash;at last&amp;mdash;we will see a more aggressive release of electronic titles ('Kindle books') in Australia. Welcome to the 21&lt;sup&gt;st&lt;/sup&gt; century.&lt;/p&gt; 
            &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/petergallagher_blog/~4/SfftN9Jj-kw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://www.petergallagher.com.au/index.php/site/article/remove-the-buy-local-tax-on-books/</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><title type="text">Market and PPP measures of GDP</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/petergallagher_blog/~3/iGOoTPAzPqw/" /><category term="Trade" /><author><name>pwg</name><email>peter@petergallagher.com.au</email><uri>http://www.petergallagher.com.au</uri></author><updated>2009-07-13T18:25:44-07:00</updated><id>tag:petergallagher.com.au,2009:index.php/site/index/1.2800</id><content type="html">
        &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.inquit.com/images/uploads/IMFGDPAnim.gif" title="GDP measured on an MER and PPP basis" rel="prettyOverlay[GDP]"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.inquit.com/images/uploads/IMFNomGDP_tmb.png" alt="Source: IMF data mapper" class="photo"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.inquit.com/images/uploads/IMFGDP_ChinaAnim.gif" title="PPP and MER measures including China" rel="prettyOverlay[GDP]"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.inquit.com/images/uploads/IMFNomGDP_china_tmb.png" alt="Source: IMF data mapper" height="100" class="photo" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In comments on the &lt;a href="http://www.petergallagher.com.au/index.php/site/article/2797/" title="Link to post on petergallagher.com.au"&gt;previous post&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://www.assa.edu.au/fellows/profile.php?id=56"&gt;Ian Castles AO&lt;/a&gt;, the former Australian Statistician, notes that the World Bank and IMF create confusion in their reports by mixed use of market-exchange-rate (MER) and purchasing-power-parity (PPP) bases for estimating output and growth. Simply, using market exchange rates to compare the value of output among countries over-estimates the size of developed economies and under-estimates the size of developing economies. This confusion affects their analyses of, among other things, trade data.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The charts (&lt;em&gt;click&lt;/em&gt; the thumbnails), taken from the two sets of &lt;a href="http://imf.org/external/datamapper/" title="Link to IMF Datamapper" target="IMF"&gt;data prepared by the IMF&lt;/a&gt;, show the dramatic difference between MER and PPP bases for comparing output and growth. Using the PPP basis for comparison, developing countries' economies are much larger in relation to developed economies and projected to 'close the gap' sometime after 2015 (take the IMF projections with a grain of salt: they're just 'straight line' extensions of current patterns of growth). The only difference between the two charts is the identification of China. Note that using a PPP basis for comparison, China appears less dominant in the developing country group.&lt;/p&gt;
 
       &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.petergallagher.com.au/index.php/site/article/market-and-ppp-measures-of-gdp/"&gt;Read more&amp;hellip;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;     &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/petergallagher_blog/~4/iGOoTPAzPqw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://www.petergallagher.com.au/index.php/site/article/market-and-ppp-measures-of-gdp/</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><title type="text">Caloric restriction diet doesn’t work</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/petergallagher_blog/~3/aje8h_H6LlU/" /><author><name>pwg</name><email>peter@petergallagher.com.au</email><uri>http://www.petergallagher.com.au</uri></author><updated>2009-07-13T04:02:24-07:00</updated><id>tag:petergallagher.com.au,2009:index.php/2.2799</id><content type="html">
        &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2009-07/uow-rdt070609.php" title="Link to Eureka newsletter" target="JFS"&gt;Reports&lt;/a&gt; this week that a "nutritious but reduced-calorie diet blunts aging and significantly delays the onset of such age-related disorders as cancer&amp;hellip;" are a perverse account of a study that showed &lt;strong&gt;no statistically significant effect&lt;/strong&gt; of calorie restriction. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://junkfoodscience.blogspot.com/2009/07/calorie-restrictive-eating-for-longer.html" title="Link to JunkfoodScience" target="JFS"&gt;Sandy Szwarc&lt;/a&gt; shows that the supposed benefits appear only if the results are cooked by 'cherry picking' the trial's mortality records. She also summarizes the weight of evidence that calorie restriction 'life extension' is vodoo (or possibly a commercial venture in this case)&lt;/p&gt; 
            &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/petergallagher_blog/~4/aje8h_H6LlU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://www.petergallagher.com.au/index.php/site/article/caloric-restriction-diet-doesnt-work1/</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><title type="text">Carbon tariffs, permits and subsidies</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/petergallagher_blog/~3/nfTQUoJDoHk/" /><category term="Trade" /><category term="People" /><author><name>pwg</name><email>peter@petergallagher.com.au</email><uri>http://www.petergallagher.com.au</uri></author><updated>2009-07-09T20:47:51-07:00</updated><id>tag:petergallagher.com.au,2009:index.php/site/index/1.2797</id><content type="html">
        &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.ghorlick.com/ghorlick/" title="Gary Horlick - Attorney at Law"&gt;Gary Horlick&lt;/a&gt;, Washington trade attorney, former senior official of the Commerce Department and a very fine analyst of WTO law, sets out some of the impossibly tricky technical questions in plain langugage&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;"Perhaps the biggest international trade challenge -- and one on which a lot more work needs to be done -- is how the mechanics of international trade will work if each of the hundred and ninety countries (or even 10-15 regional groupings) has its own individual climate change implementation. What if some of them have border taxes, some require permits for imports, and others instead offset the costs for their domestic industry. Or each country has a cap- and-trade system with different limitations on the permits?" &lt;strong&gt;Extract from&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href="http://finance.senate.gov/hearings/testimony/2009test/Gay Horlick.pdf"&gt;testimony to the U.S. Senate Finance Committee&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A short paper that asks the right questions (to which there are few, if any, satisfactory answers). Thanks to &lt;a href="http://worldtradelaw.typepad.com/ielpblog/"&gt;Simon Lester&lt;/a&gt; for finding this.&lt;/p&gt; 
            &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/petergallagher_blog/~4/nfTQUoJDoHk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://www.petergallagher.com.au/index.php/site/article/carbon-tariffs-permits-and-subsidies/</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><title type="text">The life of Robert McNamara</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/petergallagher_blog/~3/AfX5l1M8qLA/" /><category term="People" /><author><name>pwg</name><email>peter@petergallagher.com.au</email><uri>http://www.petergallagher.com.au</uri></author><updated>2009-07-06T17:56:10-07:00</updated><id>tag:petergallagher.com.au,2009:index.php/site/index/1.2796</id><content type="html">
        &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.inquit.com/images/uploads/McNamaraJohnson.png" title="Robert Strange McNamara: 1916-2009" rel="prettyOverlay"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.inquit.com/images/uploads/McNamaraJohnson_tmb.png" alt="McNamara and Lyndon Johnson" height="100" class="photo"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Dead at 93 years of age. The last survivor (? I'm &lt;em&gt;pretty sure&lt;/em&gt;) of Kennedy's clever, risk-taking, technocracy of the early 1960s. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A man who, like Lyndon Johnson, struggled with the terrible consequences of the wrong choices he helped to make in Vietnam, but unlike Johnson survived them. His unlikely translation to the World Bank from the U.S. Defense Department was (in contrast to the recent Wolfowitz debacle) a &lt;a href="http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/EXTABOUTUS/EXTARCHIVES/0,,contentMDK:20502974~pagePK:36726~piPK:437378~theSitePK:29506,00.html" title="Archives - Robert Strange McNamara"&gt;remarkable success&lt;/a&gt;, expanding the role and scope and intelligence of the Bank during the classic era of 'industrializing' development while pushing it strongly toward preferential support for the poor.&lt;/p&gt; 
       &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.petergallagher.com.au/index.php/site/article/the-life-of-robert-mcnamara/"&gt;Read more&amp;hellip;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;     &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/petergallagher_blog/~4/AfX5l1M8qLA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://www.petergallagher.com.au/index.php/site/article/the-life-of-robert-mcnamara/</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><title type="text">Modeling a Doha agreement on agriculture</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/petergallagher_blog/~3/M6D26D-hBkA/" /><category term="Trade" /><author><name>pwg</name><email>peter@petergallagher.com.au</email><uri>http://www.petergallagher.com.au</uri></author><updated>2009-07-06T15:48:24-07:00</updated><id>tag:petergallagher.com.au,2009:index.php/site/index/1.2795</id><content type="html">
        &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?width=400&amp;height=307&amp;flashvars=clip_id=5472935&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=00ADEF&amp;fullscreen=1" rel="prettyPhoto[flash]" title="ATPSM movie from Vimeo"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.inquit.com/images/uploads/ATPSMVideo_tmb.png" alt="Building an ATPSM simulation" width="133" height="100" class="photo" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To conclude my series of posts on modeling a critical mass agreement on agriculture, I would like to show you how I set up UNCTAD's &lt;strong&gt;Agricultural Trade Policy Simulation Model&lt;/strong&gt; (ATPSM) to project the economic impacts of an agreement to liberalize agricultural trade based on WTO's December, 2008, draft 'modalities'. In &lt;a href="http://www.petergallagher.com.au/index.php/site/article/critical-mass-agreement-vs-the-doha-round/" title="Peter Gallagher | Critical mass agreement vs the Doha Round"&gt;my previous post&lt;/a&gt;, I compared the results of this simulation with the results of a simulated critical mass agreement, also modeled in ATPSM.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In this video (&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;click&lt;/strong&gt; the thumbnail image&lt;/em&gt;: 17.5 minutes, about 25mb.), I walk through the setup of the simulation. Because the ATPSM program uses a graphic interface to the modeling tools, a video seems to be the best way to give you a feeling for what's going on and, perhaps, prompt you to think of ways to use the program yourself.&lt;/p&gt; 
       &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.petergallagher.com.au/index.php/site/article/modeling-a-doha-agreement-on-agriculture/"&gt;Read more&amp;hellip;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;     &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/petergallagher_blog/~4/M6D26D-hBkA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://www.petergallagher.com.au/index.php/site/article/modeling-a-doha-agreement-on-agriculture/</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><title type="text">How bad is global deforestation?</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/petergallagher_blog/~3/8Zkx4f0Mlpc/" /><category term="Policy" /><author><name>pwg</name><email>peter@petergallagher.com.au</email><uri>http://www.petergallagher.com.au</uri></author><updated>2009-07-04T23:31:22-07:00</updated><id>tag:petergallagher.com.au,2009:index.php/site/index/1.2794</id><content type="html">
        &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.inquit.com/images/uploads/FAO2005DeforestationData.gif" title="Source: FAO &amp; my calculations" rel="prettyOverlay"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.inquit.com/images/uploads/FAO2005DeforestationData_tmb.gif" alt="Deforestation, selected countries 1990-2005 " width="171" height="100" class="photo" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The short answer: if the data is reliable (it may not be) annual forest 'loss'&amp;mdash;mostly conversion of land to agriculture&amp;mdash;is &lt;em&gt;small&lt;/em&gt;: a fifth of one percent and &lt;em&gt;slowing&lt;/em&gt;. Does this small loss of forest add to net CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; emissions, or reduce them, or make no difference? It's &lt;em&gt;not clear&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In this post I take a look at the FAO data on global deforestation rates, just to get a feeling for the size of the problem from a climate-change perspective (there are other perspectives, of course, including land-care). The data on the loss rate seems is questionable because of the difficulty of collecting it. Given the uncertainty about the net-emissions of forests&amp;mdash;see over the fold&amp;mdash;the reported rate of forest loss looks to be insignificant &lt;em&gt;for climate change&lt;/em&gt; (only).&lt;/p&gt; 
       &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.petergallagher.com.au/index.php/site/article/how-bad-is-global-deforestation/"&gt;Read more&amp;hellip;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;     &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/petergallagher_blog/~4/8Zkx4f0Mlpc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://www.petergallagher.com.au/index.php/site/article/how-bad-is-global-deforestation/</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><title type="text">Another small step</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/petergallagher_blog/~3/MaF9hr9N4pg/" /><category term="Countries" /><author><name>pwg</name><email>peter@petergallagher.com.au</email><uri>http://www.petergallagher.com.au</uri></author><updated>2009-07-04T23:54:04-07:00</updated><id>tag:petergallagher.com.au,2009:index.php/2.2792</id><content type="html">
        &lt;p&gt;But it's impossible to ignore the significance of this &lt;a href="http://www.petergallagher.com.au/index.php/site/article/renminbi-reserve-currency/"&gt;continuing&lt;/a&gt; internationalization of the remminbi.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;"Although it has no short-term implications for the full convertibility of the renminbi, the announcement provides ballast to the volley of political signals Beijing has been sending in recent months over its dissatisfaction with the US dollar." &lt;strong&gt;Extract from&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/088d8158-6726-11de-925f-00144feabdc0.html" title="link to "&gt;Financial Times&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
 
            &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/petergallagher_blog/~4/MaF9hr9N4pg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://www.petergallagher.com.au/index.php/site/article/another-small-step/</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><title type="text">Ex-PMs attack Defense White Paper</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/petergallagher_blog/~3/uydA7XCwmWc/" /><author><name>pwg</name><email>peter@petergallagher.com.au</email><uri>http://www.petergallagher.com.au</uri></author><updated>2009-07-02T22:39:36-07:00</updated><id>tag:petergallagher.com.au,2009:index.php/2.2791</id><content type="html">
        &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.theage.com.au/opinion/peace-is-our-best-defence-20090628-d17h.html?page=-1"&gt;Malcolm Fraser&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,,25726790-7583,00.html"&gt;Paul Keating&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;em&gt;who would have believed it&lt;/em&gt;? Both criticize the obscurely Sino-phobic tone of the White Paper and advocate&amp;mdash;in place of a more belligerent regionalism, or reliance on the US alliance (for something it is not designed to deliver)&amp;mdash;a more effective regional engagement.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Doesn't convince the &lt;a href="http://www.lowyinterpreter.org/post/2009/07/02/Malcolm-Frasers-naivete.aspx"&gt;Colonel Blimps&lt;/a&gt;, of course, who imagine that with sufficient expensive and obsolescing weaponry, Australia could run a "totally independent foreign policy" (independent of those &lt;em&gt;pesky foreigners&lt;/em&gt;, presumably).&lt;/p&gt; 
            &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/petergallagher_blog/~4/uydA7XCwmWc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://www.petergallagher.com.au/index.php/site/article/ex-pms-attack-defense-white-paper/</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><title type="text">Global Trade Alert</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/petergallagher_blog/~3/ZLJ4KEI2wpM/" /><category term="Trade" /><category term="Policy" /><author><name>pwg</name><email>peter@petergallagher.com.au</email><uri>http://www.petergallagher.com.au</uri></author><updated>2009-07-02T22:13:07-07:00</updated><id>tag:petergallagher.com.au,2009:index.php/site/index/1.2790</id><content type="html">
        &lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.inquit.com/images/uploads/53021_tmb.png" alt="Global Trade Alert website" class="photo"&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Just before the London G-20 Meeting in April, Andy Stoler and I wrote a paper for &lt;a href="http://www.petergallagher.com.au/index.php/site/article/Can-the-G20-halt-murky-protectionism/"&gt;a booklet&lt;/a&gt; published by the Center for Economic Policy Research in which we suggested that the best way to make G-20 governments live up to their promises was to expose their misdeeds on trade policy&amp;mdash;including those that nominally &lt;em&gt;complied&lt;/em&gt; with their WTO obligation&amp;mdash;using a public website.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Specifically, &lt;a href="http://www.petergallagher.com.au/index.php/site/article/Would-open-surveillance-of-protection-work/"&gt;we recommended&lt;/a&gt; that the site should not be run by one of the global institutions (WTO, World Bank) that are owned by governments, but should be a private venture open to contributions from individuals around the world. Why? Well, as the FT notes, in an editorial today, sovereigns are not likely to put much pressure on themselves:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;"The problem with naming and shaming wrongdoers is that, all too often, they turn out to be shameless." &lt;strong&gt;Extract from&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/24a74f8a-6736-11de-925f-00144feabdc0.html" title="link to "&gt;Financial Times&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am delighted to learn that the co-editor of the booklet (Simon Evenett) and the publishers (CEPR) have created just such a website: &lt;a href="http://globaltradealert.org/" target="GTA"&gt;Global Trade Alert&lt;/a&gt;. It has been launched in the past couple of weeks with the backing of institutional sponsors (government funds, mostly) and an advisory board of distinguished analysts. GTA already lists a couple of dozen measures with useful details including the trading partners and tariff lines affected (for goods measures).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A nicely implemented and potentially intriguing experiment in global transparency. Please &lt;a href="http://globaltradealert.org/" target="GTA" title="GTA site"&gt;visit&lt;/a&gt; and contribute.&lt;/p&gt; 
            &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/petergallagher_blog/~4/ZLJ4KEI2wpM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://www.petergallagher.com.au/index.php/site/article/global-trade-alert/</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><title type="text">Critical mass agreement vs the Doha Round</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/petergallagher_blog/~3/lyd4oYX2sp0/" /><category term="Trade" /><author><name>pwg</name><email>peter@petergallagher.com.au</email><uri>http://www.petergallagher.com.au</uri></author><updated>2009-07-02T15:39:54-07:00</updated><id>tag:petergallagher.com.au,2009:index.php/site/index/1.2789</id><content type="html">
        &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.inquit.com/images/uploads/CMAvsDoha.png" title="Results of ATPS Model" rel="prettyOverlay"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.inquit.com/images/uploads/CMAvsDoha_tmb.png" alt="Projected welfare impacts of a CM agreement on agriculture" class="photo"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We'll &lt;em&gt;cut to the chase&lt;/em&gt;, shall we, in this fourth of my posts on modeling the impact of a 'critical mass' agreement in agriculture? Click on the tags at the left-side or at the bottom of this article to find the earlier posts.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;A '&lt;strong&gt;critical mass&lt;/strong&gt;' agreement among 38 countries that account for 80 percent of world trade in the 30 top-traded agricultural products (all of them food) to eliminate import duties on those products would achieve about &lt;em&gt;two thirds of the projected value&lt;/em&gt; of the global Doha agreement on agriculture. If the members of the CM eliminated production and export subsidies, too (turns out, they won't have much choice) the global gains would be &lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;a third as much again&lt;/em&gt; as those projected for the Doha agreement&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Click the thumbnail&lt;/em&gt; to see the results in a table. A brief explanation of the table: the CM-35 scenario assumes that 3 of the potential members of the critical mass agreement decide not to join. They are China, India and Indonesia. As you can see the projected 'static' global welfare impact is actually slightly larger if they stand-back because China and India (especially) would benefit from the opportunity to 'free ride' on the open markets of the other 35 countries.
&lt;/p&gt; 
       &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.petergallagher.com.au/index.php/site/article/critical-mass-agreement-vs-the-doha-round/"&gt;Read more&amp;hellip;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;     &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/petergallagher_blog/~4/lyd4oYX2sp0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://www.petergallagher.com.au/index.php/site/article/critical-mass-agreement-vs-the-doha-round/</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><title type="text">Is the U.S.A. really warming?</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/petergallagher_blog/~3/Yb-ri3KvSFo/" /><category term="Policy" /><author><name>pwg</name><email>peter@petergallagher.com.au</email><uri>http://www.petergallagher.com.au</uri></author><updated>2009-06-28T15:49:12-07:00</updated><id>tag:petergallagher.com.au,2009:index.php/2.2736</id><content type="html">
        &lt;p&gt;An examination of the evidence using the U.S. government's own records. The Australian BOM 'adjustments' are similarly large.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;"The corrected data from NOAA has been used as evidence of anthropogenic global warming yet it would appear that the rising trend over the 20th century is largely if not entirely an artefact arising from the 'corrections' applied to the experimental data, at least in the US, and is not visible in the uncorrected experimental data record." &lt;strong&gt;Extract from&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href="http://jennifermarohasy.com/blog/2009/06/how-the-us-temperature-record-is-adjusted/" title="link to Jennifer Marohasy"&gt;Jennifer Marohasy&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/p&gt; 
            &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/petergallagher_blog/~4/Yb-ri3KvSFo" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://www.petergallagher.com.au/index.php/site/article/is-the-u.s.a.-really-warming/</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><title type="text">Let’s hope this means more clarity</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/petergallagher_blog/~3/_AUb_iLOyEk/" /><category term="Trade" /><author><name>pwg</name><email>peter@petergallagher.com.au</email><uri>http://www.petergallagher.com.au</uri></author><updated>2009-06-25T16:51:20-07:00</updated><id>tag:petergallagher.com.au,2009:index.php/site/index/1.2735</id><content type="html">
        &lt;p&gt;Trade ministers in Paris for the June OECD meetings are looking for Lamy's '&lt;a href="http://www.petergallagher.com.au/index.php/site/article/two-tracks-out-of-the-doha-wasteland-/"&gt;second track&lt;/a&gt;' to a Doha deal.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;"U.S. Trade Representative Ron Kirk called for a new approach to the Doha talks, involving direct negotiations with key trading partners as the traditional multilateral format was not working&amp;hellip;'We think getting more clarity around that ['exactly what the U.S. would gain'] may be the key to helping us find a solution to a way forward,' Kirk said after a meeting of ministers at the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)." &lt;strong&gt;Extract from&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href="http://www.portfolio.com/business-news/reuters/2009/06/25/trade-ministers-seek-doha-progress-for-pittsburgh-g20" title="link to "&gt;Reuters &lt;em&gt;via&lt;/em&gt; Portfolio.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Lamy &lt;strong&gt;did not mean&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;mdash;as this news report suggests&amp;mdash;that the 'second track' would be series of bilateral deals. That's a long-standing U.S. fallback position (from the days of GATT), but I doubt Kirk had that in mind either. &lt;a href="http://www.ustr.gov/about-us/press-office/blog/ambassador-kirk-organisation-economic-co-operation-and-development-minis-0"&gt;Here's&lt;/a&gt; the official account of what he said. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;By the way, isn't it great to see that USTR has finally dumped that crappy old web-site and has adopted the much more accessible Obama-&lt;a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/"&gt;Whitehouse&lt;/a&gt; (or, maybe, &lt;a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/President-Obama-Names-Vivek-Kundra-Chief-Information-Officer/"&gt;Vivek Kundra&lt;/a&gt;) style?&lt;/p&gt; 
            &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/petergallagher_blog/~4/_AUb_iLOyEk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://www.petergallagher.com.au/index.php/site/article/lets-hope-this-means-more-clarity/</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><title type="text">Manufacturing copyright ‘consensus’</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/petergallagher_blog/~3/0QfK0v4gsBg/" /><category term="Policy" /><category term="Ideas" /><author><name>pwg</name><email>peter@petergallagher.com.au</email><uri>http://www.petergallagher.com.au</uri></author><updated>2009-06-25T15:42:23-07:00</updated><id>tag:petergallagher.com.au,2009:index.php/site/index/1.2734</id><content type="html">
        &lt;a href="http://www.inquit.com/images/uploads/copyrightConsensus.png" title="From Michael Geist" rel="prettyOverlay"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.inquit.com/images/uploads/copyrightConsensus_tmb.png" alt="The path to copyright consensus in Canada" width="88" height="100" class="photo" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;p&gt;A fascinating analysis of a 'coalition of interest' at work&amp;mdash;strategies often alleged but rarely detailed with such clarity.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Geist shows how three Canadian entertainment industry organizations have manufactured the appearance of widening concern over copyright piracy and growing evidence of its impact.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;"It is not just that these reports all receive financial support from the same organizations and say largely the same thing.&amp;#160; It is also that the reports each build on one another, creating the false impression of growing momentum and consensus on the state of Canadian law and the need for specific reforms" &lt;strong&gt;Extract from&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href="http://www.michaelgeist.ca/content/view/4079/125/" title="link to "&gt;Michael Geist&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Geist notes that experienced politicians seem to understand what's going on here. That's to be expected: this is nothing more than an elaborate, effective and, in the scheme of things, &lt;em&gt;acceptable&lt;/em&gt; lobbying strategy.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But that knowledge doesn't shield polticians&amp;mdash;or the public debate&amp;mdash;from the misrepresentation of either the data or the 'consensus' unless the insight is widely shared. Few make the effort that Geist has made to evaluate either.&lt;/p&gt; 
            &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/petergallagher_blog/~4/0QfK0v4gsBg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://www.petergallagher.com.au/index.php/site/article/manufacturing-copyright-consensus/</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><title type="text">How to prepare for FTA negotiations (Part III)</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/petergallagher_blog/~3/SwkBKos7Wdw/" /><category term="Trade" /><author><name>pwg</name><email>peter@petergallagher.com.au</email><uri>http://www.petergallagher.com.au</uri></author><updated>2009-04-17T18:28:59-07:00</updated><id>tag:petergallagher.com.au,2009:index.php/8.2595</id><content type="html">
        {teaser}&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.petergallagher.com.au/index.php/workshops/how-to-prepare-for-fta-negotiations-part-iii/"&gt;Read more&amp;hellip;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt; 
      &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/petergallagher_blog/~4/SwkBKos7Wdw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://www.petergallagher.com.au/index.php/workshops/how-to-prepare-for-fta-negotiations-part-iii/</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><title type="text">How to prepare for FTA negotiations (Part II)</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/petergallagher_blog/~3/d57yZecuX2I/" /><category term="Trade" /><category term="Resources" /><author><name>pwg</name><email>peter@petergallagher.com.au</email><uri>http://www.petergallagher.com.au</uri></author><updated>2009-04-17T18:29:35-07:00</updated><id>tag:petergallagher.com.au,2009:index.php/8.2587</id><content type="html">
        {teaser}&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.petergallagher.com.au/index.php/workshops/How-to-prepare-for-FTA-negotiations-Part-II/"&gt;Read more&amp;hellip;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt; 
      &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/petergallagher_blog/~4/d57yZecuX2I" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://www.petergallagher.com.au/index.php/workshops/How-to-prepare-for-FTA-negotiations-Part-II/</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><title type="text">How to prepare for FTA negotiations (Part 1)</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/petergallagher_blog/~3/oAuDU-f5h7w/" /><category term="Trade" /><author><name>pwg</name><email>peter@petergallagher.com.au</email><uri>http://www.petergallagher.com.au</uri></author><updated>2009-04-17T18:29:21-07:00</updated><id>tag:petergallagher.com.au,2009:index.php/8.2550</id><content type="html">
        {teaser}&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.petergallagher.com.au/index.php/workshops/how-to-prepare-for-fta-negotiations-part-1/"&gt;Read more&amp;hellip;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt; 
      &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/petergallagher_blog/~4/oAuDU-f5h7w" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://www.petergallagher.com.au/index.php/workshops/how-to-prepare-for-fta-negotiations-part-1/</feedburner:origLink></entry></feed>
