<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>Peterson Institute Update</title>
	<link>http://www.piie.com</link>
		<description>The latest releases and news from the Peterson Institute for International Economics.</description>
		<category>Economics</category>
		<copyright>Copyright 2012 Peterson Institute for International Economics</copyright>
		<language>en-us</language>
		


<feedburner:info uri="peterson-update" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://www.petersoninstitute.org/rss/update.xml" /><feedburner:emailServiceId>peterson-update</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname>http://feedburner.google.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://add.my.yahoo.com/rss?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.petersoninstitute.org%2Frss%2Fupdate.xml" src="http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/my/addtomyyahoo4.gif">Subscribe with My Yahoo!</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.newsgator.com/ngs/subscriber/subext.aspx?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.petersoninstitute.org%2Frss%2Fupdate.xml" src="http://www.newsgator.com/images/ngsub1.gif">Subscribe with NewsGator</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://feeds.my.aol.com/add.jsp?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.petersoninstitute.org%2Frss%2Fupdate.xml" src="http://o.aolcdn.com/favorites.my.aol.com/webmaster/ffclient/webroot/locale/en-US/images/myAOLButtonSmall.gif">Subscribe with My AOL</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.bloglines.com/sub/http://www.petersoninstitute.org/rss/update.xml" src="http://www.bloglines.com/images/sub_modern11.gif">Subscribe with Bloglines</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.netvibes.com/subscribe.php?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.petersoninstitute.org%2Frss%2Fupdate.xml" src="http://www.netvibes.com/img/add2netvibes.gif">Subscribe with Netvibes</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://fusion.google.com/add?feedurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.petersoninstitute.org%2Frss%2Fupdate.xml" src="http://buttons.googlesyndication.com/fusion/add.gif">Subscribe with Google</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.pageflakes.com/subscribe.aspx?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.petersoninstitute.org%2Frss%2Fupdate.xml" src="http://www.pageflakes.com/ImageFile.ashx?instanceId=Static_4&amp;fileName=ATP_blu_91x17.gif">Subscribe with Pageflakes</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:browserFriendly>The latest releases from the Peterson Institute for International Economics.</feedburner:browserFriendly><item>
<title>US Anti-Dumping Duties on Chinese Solar  Cells: A Costly Step</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/peterson-update/~3/MUVxYJDgaZc/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.piie.com/realtime/?p=2900</guid>
<description>&lt;p&gt;On May 17, 2012, the Commerce Department announced that imports of  Chinese photovoltaic cells (solar cells) will be subject to preliminary anti-dumping  duties (ADDs) of 31 percent. This penalty tariff will be applied, along with new  countervailing duties (CVDs) ranging from  2.9 to 4.7 percent, to all imports of Chinese crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells,  even when assembled into panels outside the People&amp;rsquo;s Republic. While the announcement  of ADDs comes as no surprise, the size of the penalty is alarming and may spark  more trade friction between the two largest economies in the world. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;RealTime post by Gary Clyde Hufbauer and Martin Vieiro&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/peterson-update/~4/MUVxYJDgaZc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.piie.com/realtime/?p=2900</feedburner:origLink></item>

<item>
<title>Creating the New Healthcare Marketplace</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/peterson-update/~3/EvjRynaZgm4/event_detail.cfm</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.piie.com/events/event_detail.cfm?EventID=228</guid>
<description>&lt;p&gt;
Mark T. Bertolini, chairman and CEO of Aetna, addressed the topic of "Creating the New Healthcare Marketplace" at the Peterson Institute on May 24, 2012. His remarks covered the implementation of the Affordable Care Act, health entitlement costs, the changing needs of consumers and their employers, and the struggle for answers to these questions by political leaders.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/peterson-update/~4/EvjRynaZgm4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.piie.com/events/event_detail.cfm?EventID=228</feedburner:origLink></item>

<item>
<title>A Foreign Exchange Reserve Mystery: Which Major Advanced Economy Is Not Reporting the Currency Composition of Its Reserves?</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/peterson-update/~3/9HQ6g3HBgik/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.piie.com/realtime/?p=2898</guid>
<description>&lt;p&gt;The International  Monetary Fund (IMF) collects and publishes quarterly data on the currency  composition of official foreign exchange reserves, known as COFER. The data are  published for three groups: the world, the advanced economies, and the emerging  and developing economies. For each group, allocated reserves are broken down  into the traditional reserve currencies (US dollar, euro, sterling, yen, Swiss  franc) and &amp;ldquo;other&amp;rdquo; currencies. When a country does not report its currency  composition, or does so incompletely, the reserves are listed as &amp;ldquo;unallocated.&amp;rdquo; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
RealTime post by Allie E. Bagnall.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/peterson-update/~4/9HQ6g3HBgik" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.piie.com/realtime/?p=2898</feedburner:origLink></item>

<item>
<title>Policy Brief 12-13: Right Idea, Wrong Direction: Obama's Corporate Tax Reform Proposals [pdf]</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/peterson-update/~3/g3ePk3OiSWg/pb12-13.pdf</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.piie.com/publications/pb/pb12-13.pdf</guid>
<description>&lt;p&gt;The need for US corporate tax reform is blindingly obvious. Conservatives contend that the top corporate tax rate&amp;mdash;whether measured in statutory or effective terms&amp;mdash;is the second highest in the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). Liberals argue that the US corporate tax system is riddled with complex "loopholes," enabling many firms&amp;mdash;whether or not incorporated&amp;mdash;to pay less than their fair share.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Responding to these criticisms, Obama's White House and Treasury Department released a joint report entitled "The President's Framework for Business Tax Reform." Unfortunately, the report omits the detail needed to fully assess its proposals. But if the devil ever lives in the details, it is in the details of the tax code. Instead of details, the Framework report focuses on five elements of reform: the nominal and effective corporate tax rate, incentives for domestic manufacturing, taxation of international income, the tax code for small business, and the fiscal impact of proposed reforms. The report greatly exaggerates the revenue loss entailed by cutting the statutory corporate tax rate, and it proposes damaging new taxes on international business that would undermine US exports. Overall, the report unduly concentrates on manufacturing activity, while neglecting America's strength in services, the most prominent future driver of jobs, investment, and growth. Projected revenue gains are not large enough to help curb the rising debt-to-GDP ratio, but the report ducks any discussion of a national consumption tax. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Policy Brief by Gary Clyde Hufbauer and Martin Vieiro.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/peterson-update/~4/g3ePk3OiSWg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.piie.com/publications/pb/pb12-13.pdf</feedburner:origLink></item>

<item>
<title>Congressional Testimony: Assessing the Strategic and Economic Dialogue [pdf]</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/peterson-update/~3/pH8920_OruU/bergsten20120523.pdf</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.piie.com/publications/testimony/bergsten20120523.pdf</guid>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I have proposed since 2004 that the United States and China create an informal G-2 to help steer the world economy. The reason is simple: Progress is impossible on most important global economic issues without agreement by these two global economic superpowers. Examples including exchange rates and the international monetary system, the world trade regime and climate change. (The one notable exception is financial regulatory reform, where China is not yet an important player so most decisions remain with a subset of the membership of the Financial Stability Board.)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There are now three global economic superpowers, the European Union along with China and the United States. But Europe, or even the more integrated euro area, speaks with a single voice on very few issues. Moreover, its current economic weakness limits its influence on most topics. So a G-2 is the only practical possibility for achieving effective global economic leadership.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Congressional Testimony from C. Fred Bergsten.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/peterson-update/~4/pH8920_OruU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.piie.com/publications/testimony/bergsten20120523.pdf</feedburner:origLink></item>


<item>
<title>Interview: Are World Currencies Becoming More Aligned?</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/peterson-update/~3/MqzfQ47Yn28/interview.cfm</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.piie.com/publications/interviews/interview.cfm?ResearchID=2130</guid>
<description>&lt;p&gt;
John Williamson says the world is groping toward more realistically aligned currency values, but the US-China and Northern vs. Southern Europe current account imbalances remain worrisome.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/peterson-update/~4/MqzfQ47Yn28" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.piie.com/publications/interviews/interview.cfm?ResearchID=2130</feedburner:origLink></item>




<item>
<title>Latvia Shows the Way, Proving Some Famous Merchants of Doom Wrong</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/peterson-update/~3/y1YWQ4MaWMc/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.piie.com/realtime/?p=2896</guid>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Today, the Latvian government can claim victory. In the  first quarter of this year, Latvia&amp;rsquo;s annualized GDP grew by 6.8 percent, the  highest growth rate in Europe, and last year Latvia recorded a growth rate of  5.5 percent, the third highest in Europe. Four years ago, GDP plummeted by a  total of 24 percent because of the sudden stop of international financing in  September 2008. But that decline lasted only two years. Unemployment has fallen  from 21 percent in early 2010 to 16 percent two years later.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;RealTime post by Anders &amp;Aring;slund.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/peterson-update/~4/y1YWQ4MaWMc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.piie.com/realtime/?p=2896</feedburner:origLink></item>


<item>
<title>Interview: Stimulus vs. Austerity in Europe</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/peterson-update/~3/lRi1S9rGQMM/interview.cfm</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.piie.com/publications/interviews/interview.cfm?ResearchID=2129</guid>
<description>&lt;p&gt;
Anders &amp;Aring;slund says it is more important for ailing European countries to cut their budgets, reduce their debts, and win market confidence than to embark on economic stimulus right now. 
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/peterson-update/~4/lRi1S9rGQMM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.piie.com/publications/interviews/interview.cfm?ResearchID=2129</feedburner:origLink></item>


<item>
<title>What Is India's Real Growth Potential?</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/peterson-update/~3/5UPx0hZ-y0I/oped.cfm</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.piie.com/publications/opeds/oped.cfm?ResearchID=2128</guid>
<description>&lt;p&gt;In  2004, before India&amp;rsquo;s growth surge toward Chinese levels  became evident, Dani Rodrik of Harvard University and I wrote in the &lt;em&gt;Economic  and Political Weekly&lt;/em&gt; that India&amp;rsquo;s potential growth was &amp;ldquo;at least 7 percent.&amp;rdquo;  The outcome over the next few years was a pleasant surprise but also a mild  rebuke of our analysis. Not only did actual growth surpass our projection, it  was achieved much sooner than our &amp;ldquo;medium-term&amp;rdquo; horizon&amp;mdash;which was evasive econospeak  for &amp;ldquo;not immediately but sometime in the future.&amp;rdquo; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Op-ed by Arvind Subramanian.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/peterson-update/~4/5UPx0hZ-y0I" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.piie.com/publications/opeds/oped.cfm?ResearchID=2128</feedburner:origLink></item>

<item>
<title>Interview: Russia's New Cabinet Could Bring Economic Reform</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/peterson-update/~3/pheGo5rKpSM/interview.cfm</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.piie.com/publications/interviews/interview.cfm?ResearchID=2127</guid>
<description>&lt;p&gt;
Anders &amp;Aring;slund says President Putin will continue a hard line on foreign policy, but his team of technocrats is notable for the absence of KGB operatives and others with a reputation for corruption.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/peterson-update/~4/pheGo5rKpSM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.piie.com/publications/interviews/interview.cfm?ResearchID=2127</feedburner:origLink></item>




<item>
<title>Implementing Basel III in the European Union: A Deeply Flawed Compromise</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/peterson-update/~3/4GHQJBHdaS4/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.piie.com/realtime/?p=2891</guid>
<description>&lt;p&gt;
By all accounts, EU member countries have for months been debating how to implement the minimum bank capital standards agreed under Basel III. Their arguments have unfolded as the EU works to complete its fourth Capital Requirements Directive (CRD4) and its Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR); (see Veron 2012). Three issues have been contentious: (i) whether member countries should be permitted to enact minimum capital ratios considerably tougher (higher) than those specified under Basel III without approval of the EU: (ii) whether the restrictions on what can be counted as high-quality capital under Basel III should be scrupulously adhered to in EU legislation; and (iii) whether the Basel III deadlines for introducing an unweighted leverage requirement for bank capital and two new quantitative liquidity standards (the liquidity coverage ratio and the net stable funding ratio) should be mirrored in EU legislation.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;RealTime post by Morris Goldstein.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/peterson-update/~4/4GHQJBHdaS4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.piie.com/realtime/?p=2891</feedburner:origLink></item>

<item>
<title>Endgame in Greece: Don't Look for an Imminent "Grexit"</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/peterson-update/~3/1Lp3sCrWHBA/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.piie.com/realtime/?p=2889</guid>
<description>&lt;p&gt;As the countdown toward a new Greek election heads toward  June 17, most analysts predict an imminent Greek exit from the euro area.  Almost anything can happen, but a few possibilities are worth considering. Any  newly elected Greek government will have trouble implementing the current  austerity program called for by euro leaders and the International Monetary  Fund (IMF). A loss of funding at least from the IMF in 2012 appears likely. On  the other hand, it is also likely that Greece will remain a member of the  euro in the short run, through 2012. Prospects for an outright Greek Exit&amp;mdash;a Grexit&amp;mdash;are no more than 5 percent. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;RealTime post by Jacob Funk Kirkegaard.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/peterson-update/~4/1Lp3sCrWHBA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.piie.com/realtime/?p=2889</feedburner:origLink></item>

<item>
<title>Increasing Market Access for US Financial Firms in China [pdf]</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/peterson-update/~3/etmMZvOEXik/lardy20120516.pdf</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.piie.com/publications/testimony/lardy20120516.pdf</guid>
<description>&lt;p&gt;The US-China Strategic and Economic Dialogue (S&amp;amp;ED) and  its predecessor, the US-China Strategic Economic Dialogue, have made some  progress in addressing economic issues in the bilateral relationship. China has  agreed in principal to rebalance the sources of its economic growth away from  exports and investment and toward domestic consumption demand and has made  small but concrete commitments on more specific issues, for example, increased  access by US firms to China&amp;rsquo;s financial services market.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Congressional Testimony from Nicholas R. Lardy.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/peterson-update/~4/etmMZvOEXik" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.piie.com/publications/testimony/lardy20120516.pdf</feedburner:origLink></item>



</channel>
</rss>

