<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0"><channel><title>Latest Comments on PassionforCinema.com</title><link>http://passionforcinema.com</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 15:52:21 PST</lastBuildDate><generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator><sy:updatePeriod xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/">hourly</sy:updatePeriod><sy:updateFrequency xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/">1</sy:updateFrequency><xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/pfc-comments" type="application/rss+xml" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" /><item><title>Comment on Jail Movie Review : What a jail bin machhli! by  Deepak Singh</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/pfc-comments/~3/gnk3AR8MjIA/</link><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Deepak Singh</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 07:52:21 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://passionforcinema.com/?p=26931#comment-401134</guid><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<p>Good luck Shekhar, Madhur, Neil, Mugdha, Manoj and the entire Madhur&#8217;s kind family. Hope to see the family in more colours than pure pessimism next time.</p>
<p>Hope to see and know what we already don&#8217;t get in overdose on those flimsy news channels selling sadism.</p>
<p>Harsh but true, Madhur has gone sadist too. Hard, depressing and all-is-lost kind of message won&#8217;t do the society any better.</p>
<p>Hopefully, he goes beyond only selling problems and starts selling solutions some day.</p>

<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/txZnSt4jsIh7Xij0WYIVIpCyRAk/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/txZnSt4jsIh7Xij0WYIVIpCyRAk/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/>
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/txZnSt4jsIh7Xij0WYIVIpCyRAk/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/txZnSt4jsIh7Xij0WYIVIpCyRAk/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/pfc-comments/~4/gnk3AR8MjIA" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded><description>Good luck Shekhar, Madhur, Neil, Mugdha, Manoj and the entire Madhur's kind family. Hope to see the family in more colours than pure pessimism next time.

Hope to see and know what we already don't get in overdose on those flimsy news channels selling sadism.

Harsh but true, Madhur has gone sadist too. Hard, depressing and all-is-lost kind of message won't do the society any better.

Hopefully, he goes beyond only selling problems and starts selling solutions some day.</description><feedburner:origLink>http://passionforcinema.com/jail-movie-review-what-a-jail-bin-machhli/#comment-401134</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Comment on APKGK : Hasna Zaroori hai in this Love Story of Mr. President by Rk</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/pfc-comments/~3/gASOo5qVBEs/</link><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rk</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 07:51:30 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://passionforcinema.com/?p=26986#comment-401133</guid><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<p>MG park &#8211; Mahatma Gandhi park, Milne Green park.</p>
<p>I remember you had made a similar comment on some other post some days ago.<br />
Enjoy if that is your fun <img src='http://passionforcinema.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_lol.gif' alt=':lol:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>

<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/Jr8BSs2emVyuJTCtnYoenX4QLx8/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/Jr8BSs2emVyuJTCtnYoenX4QLx8/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/>
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/Jr8BSs2emVyuJTCtnYoenX4QLx8/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/Jr8BSs2emVyuJTCtnYoenX4QLx8/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/pfc-comments/~4/gASOo5qVBEs" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded><description>MG park - Mahatma Gandhi park, Milne Green park.

I remember you had made a similar comment on some other post some days ago.
Enjoy if that is your fun :lol:</description><feedburner:origLink>http://passionforcinema.com/apkgk-hasna-zaroori-hai-in-this-love-story-of-mr-president/#comment-401133</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Comment on APKGK : Hasna Zaroori hai in this Love Story of Mr. President by Rk</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/pfc-comments/~3/40SxHMJO3VI/</link><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rk</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 07:47:26 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://passionforcinema.com/?p=26986#comment-401132</guid><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<p>anurag,<br />
as mentioned in one of the earlier comments, APKGK presents Ranbir Kapoor in 95% scenes. It is his show.<br />
Your criticism is not going to stop his progress. </p>
<p>You are entitled to your opinion. It is democracy.</p>
<p>In my area of interest I will praise what I find as good. </p>
<p>If recognising and praising Ranbir&#8217;s good performance works as an advertisement for him then there is no harm. You may understand and see things in any manner. That is your area of concern.<br />
People had reservations with the write up on Abhay Deol, as it was written on the basis of SNT and Ahsita Ahista only.  Talent is not dependent on any kind of advertisement. Abhay has reached to a stage because of his talent and choices and Ranbir too has reached at a comfortable stage because of his talent.<br />
If you don&#8217;t recognise things when they are happening then it is your problem.  <img src='http://passionforcinema.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_lol.gif' alt=':lol:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>

<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/NDxUPRos_aMzGGgupzYgnX9W9tU/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/NDxUPRos_aMzGGgupzYgnX9W9tU/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/>
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/NDxUPRos_aMzGGgupzYgnX9W9tU/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/NDxUPRos_aMzGGgupzYgnX9W9tU/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/pfc-comments/~4/40SxHMJO3VI" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded><description>anurag,
as mentioned in one of the earlier comments, APKGK presents Ranbir Kapoor in 95% scenes. It is his show.  
Your criticism is not going to stop his progress. 

You are entitled to your opinion. It is democracy.

In my area of interest I will praise what I find as good. 

If recognising and praising Ranbir's good performance works as an advertisement for him then there is no harm. You may understand and see things in any manner. That is your area of concern. 
People had reservations with the write up on Abhay Deol, as it was written on the basis of SNT and Ahsita Ahista only.  Talent is not dependent on any kind of advertisement. Abhay has reached to a stage because of his talent and choices and Ranbir too has reached at a comfortable stage because of his talent.
If you don't recognise things when they are happening then it is your problem.  :lol:</description><feedburner:origLink>http://passionforcinema.com/apkgk-hasna-zaroori-hai-in-this-love-story-of-mr-president/#comment-401132</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Comment on Jail Movie Review : What a jail bin machhli! by  Deepak Singh</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/pfc-comments/~3/UyfzIr0aKDc/</link><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Deepak Singh</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 07:44:57 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://passionforcinema.com/?p=26931#comment-401131</guid><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<p>Sell anything. But please do not try to hardsell anything more than twice in Bollywood anymore. That simply doesn&#8217;t work.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>A decent review Khalid, not letting (launching) any salvo without a reasoning this time, for a change <img src='http://passionforcinema.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>In sync with what you say, what I&#8217;d like to add is that Madhur has gone quite stereotyped to the extent that a big class of cinegoers &#8211; me included &#8211; concludes by himself/herself about the movie, just going by the title and a glance through promos. Madhur, listening?</p>
<p>The director who established his hallmark identity by &#8220;exposing&#8221; formula of different facets of our lives, is somehow caught in his own web of formulas. The basic problem with his &#8220;realistic&#8221; movies is the way he conceptualizes the story &#8212; a la a reporter of a news channel under pressure to &#8220;break a story&#8221; for the next episode of so-called crime shows, even though nothing pathbreaking has happened.</p>
<p>The entire outlook and treatment often tend to be so ludicrous due to overdose of extreme pessimism with stuffed and out-of-place humour. This is not something about a Jail, or a Traffic Signal, Page 3, COrporate or Fashion. But, about his entire genre. The plot is always conceptualized, designed and developed by painting things in black and white. Man, grow up. Nothing in this world comes in either only black or white. Try looking around for shades of gray. Your plots will become more wholistic. More inclusive. More realistic.</p>
<p>Selling pessimism for a very long time like those sundry Hindi News channels who always can be seen predicting the end of the universe on a particular date &amp; time for umpteenth time cannot help. World would believe once, twice, thrice but, not always.</p>
<p>Sell anything. But please do not try to hardsell anything more than twice in Bollywood anymore. That simply doesn&#8217;t work.</p>
<p>Every profession, everything in life has a good side to it too. Had it not been so, forget other things, Bollywood would also have just been a fiasco called casting couch. But, it is not. It is into serious business of making films. Good. Bad. And, indifferent films that don&#8217;t matter. Your films have mattered. But, please don&#8217;t be so cliched, so negative in outlook and, so dipped in your own formula that your films start stopping to matter. The Indian Junta has huge and high hopes from you <img src='http://passionforcinema.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Mr. Bhandarkar, listening?</p>

<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/7UbXm0XBBrGy0I83Zx6cKHOlLXw/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/7UbXm0XBBrGy0I83Zx6cKHOlLXw/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/>
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/7UbXm0XBBrGy0I83Zx6cKHOlLXw/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/7UbXm0XBBrGy0I83Zx6cKHOlLXw/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/pfc-comments/~4/UyfzIr0aKDc" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded><description>Sell anything. But please do not try to hardsell anything more than twice in Bollywood anymore. That simply doesn't work.
---------

A decent review Khalid, not letting (launching) any salvo without a reasoning this time, for a change :)

In sync with what you say, what I'd like to add is that Madhur has gone quite stereotyped to the extent that a big class of cinegoers - me included - concludes by himself/herself about the movie, just going by the title and a glance through promos. Madhur, listening?

The director who established his hallmark identity by "exposing" formula of different facets of our lives, is somehow caught in his own web of formulas. The basic problem with his "realistic" movies is the way he conceptualizes the story -- a la a reporter of a news channel under pressure to "break a story" for the next episode of so-called crime shows, even though nothing pathbreaking has happened.

The entire outlook and treatment often tend to be so ludicrous due to overdose of extreme pessimism with stuffed and out-of-place humour. This is not something about a Jail, or a Traffic Signal, Page 3, COrporate or Fashion. But, about his entire genre. The plot is always conceptualized, designed and developed by painting things in black and white. Man, grow up. Nothing in this world comes in either only black or white. Try looking around for shades of gray. Your plots will become more wholistic. More inclusive. More realistic.

Selling pessimism for a very long time like those sundry Hindi News channels who always can be seen predicting the end of the universe on a particular date &amp; time for umpteenth time cannot help. World would believe once, twice, thrice but, not always.

Sell anything. But please do not try to hardsell anything more than twice in Bollywood anymore. That simply doesn't work.

Every profession, everything in life has a good side to it too. Had it not been so, forget other things, Bollywood would also have just been a fiasco called casting couch. But, it is not. It is into serious business of making films. Good. Bad. And, indifferent films that don't matter. Your films have mattered. But, please don't be so cliched, so negative in outlook and, so dipped in your own formula that your films start stopping to matter. The Indian Junta has huge and high hopes from you :)

Mr. Bhandarkar, listening?</description><feedburner:origLink>http://passionforcinema.com/jail-movie-review-what-a-jail-bin-machhli/#comment-401131</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Comment on APKGK : Hasna Zaroori hai in this Love Story of Mr. President by Ajitesh Pathak</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/pfc-comments/~3/CJwFUZV6dWE/</link><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ajitesh Pathak</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 07:42:37 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://passionforcinema.com/?p=26986#comment-401130</guid><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<p>I always knew RK Stands for Rishi Kapoor. RK, seriously, are you Rishi Kapoor? <img src='http://passionforcinema.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/wpml_wacko.gif' alt=':wacko:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>

<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/0VwQ-Xi7a_UfjSdUuFBhz2X6Dx8/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/0VwQ-Xi7a_UfjSdUuFBhz2X6Dx8/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/>
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/0VwQ-Xi7a_UfjSdUuFBhz2X6Dx8/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/0VwQ-Xi7a_UfjSdUuFBhz2X6Dx8/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/pfc-comments/~4/CJwFUZV6dWE" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded><description>I always knew RK Stands for Rishi Kapoor. RK, seriously, are you Rishi Kapoor? :wacko:</description><feedburner:origLink>http://passionforcinema.com/apkgk-hasna-zaroori-hai-in-this-love-story-of-mr-president/#comment-401130</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Comment on Assistant Director : To be or not to be by loy</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/pfc-comments/~3/EJk9Ae3GRhQ/</link><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">loy</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 07:37:16 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://passionforcinema.com/?p=15769#comment-401129</guid><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<p>if u ask me abt assisting&#8230;..i think a ltl experience is required&#8230;.u know d technichal stuffs abt film making&#8230;.which u can not get my reading books&#8230;.or watching cinemas&#8230;.the experience of working in a set&#8230;..enlighten u with practical,hard hitting knowldge&#8230;..</p>
<p>althou&#8230;.its just teaches u the technical stuffs abt making a film<br />
the original creativity n vision comes frm u</p>
<p>bt ofcourse being an assistance is not compulsory&#8230;</p>

<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/pp6pUf7G6IofcvWkdJF8p3QTEls/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/pp6pUf7G6IofcvWkdJF8p3QTEls/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/>
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/pp6pUf7G6IofcvWkdJF8p3QTEls/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/pp6pUf7G6IofcvWkdJF8p3QTEls/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/pfc-comments/~4/EJk9Ae3GRhQ" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded><description>if u ask me abt assisting.....i think a ltl experience is required....u know d technichal stuffs abt film making....which u can not get my reading books....or watching cinemas....the experience of working in a set.....enlighten u with practical,hard hitting knowldge.....

althou....its just teaches u the technical stuffs abt making a film
the original creativity n vision comes frm u

bt ofcourse being an assistance is not compulsory...</description><feedburner:origLink>http://passionforcinema.com/assistant-director-to-be-or-not-to-be/#comment-401129</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Comment on Ajab Prem Ki Ghazab Kahani Movie Review : Laugh’s like that by manoj</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/pfc-comments/~3/5Cyr4CPgC5Y/</link><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">manoj</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 07:36:56 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://passionforcinema.com/?p=26950#comment-401128</guid><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<p>Dear Khalid Mohd,<br />
         It seems like you&#8217;re bitten by the &#8216;K&#8217; bug while writing this review. Are you the same person who wrote Madhur Bhandarkar&#8217;s Jail? Samajh nahi aar raha, I Fail.<br />
  The very fact that he&#8217;s the only male scion of the KKapoor KKhandaan that&#8217;s been ruthlessly unleashed on the hapless Indian audiences makes Ranbir Kapoor the &#8216;next big thing&#8217; by default. Say it isn&#8217;t so.Kyon?<br />
   [If anyone doubts his genes, plz see the photo Khalid has attached with the review.What looks! What expressions!!! <img src='http://passionforcinema.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/wpml_wacko.gif' alt=':wacko:' class='wp-smiley' />  ]<br />
Then there&#8217;s the obvious PR-overdrive that seems to leave no stone unturned that needs praise.<br />
 I&#8217;m not sure Ranbir needs it after the super success of his very first film (Saanwariya). It may further raise the audience&#8217;s expectations-don&#8217;t you think? <img src='http://passionforcinema.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/wpml_wacko.gif' alt=':wacko:' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
 It would do &#8217;senseless&#8217; filmmakers like Bhandarkar &amp; Co. a lot of good if you-Khalid Mohd could let them in on what it takes(or how much it takes) to get into your good books.<br />
   After all, aren&#8217;t you the same Filmfarce editor who handed Salman Khan a Best Supporting Actor (What film was it?) over Manoj Bhiku Mhatre Bajpai?<br />
 About Katrina, you say that she &#8216;does reveal an incipient flair for comedy&#8217;. Now, its common knowledge that the lady can&#8217;t talk in hindi to save her life.In real life. So, tell us how That was achieved. Or could it be now that in the world of Ghazab Bollywood- basic conversational skills in a prescribed language are no longer a skill that&#8217;s required to be able to pass a quip? <img src='http://passionforcinema.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/wpml_unsure.gif' alt=':notsure:' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
 What say chief?</p>

<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/q8rwwyFaiI_-FHtPTJja6TyOoJ0/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/q8rwwyFaiI_-FHtPTJja6TyOoJ0/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/>
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/q8rwwyFaiI_-FHtPTJja6TyOoJ0/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/q8rwwyFaiI_-FHtPTJja6TyOoJ0/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/pfc-comments/~4/5Cyr4CPgC5Y" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded><description>Dear Khalid Mohd,
         It seems like you're bitten by the 'K' bug while writing this review. Are you the same person who wrote Madhur Bhandarkar's Jail? Samajh nahi aar raha, I Fail.
  The very fact that he's the only male scion of the KKapoor KKhandaan that's been ruthlessly unleashed on the hapless Indian audiences makes Ranbir Kapoor the 'next big thing' by default. Say it isn't so.Kyon?
   [If anyone doubts his genes, plz see the photo Khalid has attached with the review.What looks! What expressions!!! :wacko: ]
Then there's the obvious PR-overdrive that seems to leave no stone unturned that needs praise.
 I'm not sure Ranbir needs it after the super success of his very first film (Saanwariya). It may further raise the audience's expectations-don't you think? :wacko: 
 It would do 'senseless' filmmakers like Bhandarkar &amp; Co. a lot of good if you-Khalid Mohd could let them in on what it takes(or how much it takes) to get into your good books. 
   After all, aren't you the same Filmfarce editor who handed Salman Khan a Best Supporting Actor (What film was it?) over Manoj Bhiku Mhatre Bajpai?
 About Katrina, you say that she 'does reveal an incipient flair for comedy'. Now, its common knowledge that the lady can't talk in hindi to save her life.In real life. So, tell us how That was achieved. Or could it be now that in the world of Ghazab Bollywood- basic conversational skills in a prescribed language are no longer a skill that's required to be able to pass a quip? :notsure: 
 What say chief?</description><feedburner:origLink>http://passionforcinema.com/ajab-prem-ki-ghazab-kahani-movie-review-laugh%e2%80%99s-like-that/#comment-401128</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Comment on Reviewing as a weapon of murder by manoj</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/pfc-comments/~3/BeZdVMXGkEc/</link><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">manoj</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 07:18:42 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://passionforcinema.com/?p=26786#comment-401127</guid><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<p>@Deepak Singh,<br />
   Sorry to ruin your party, but Main Azad Hoon-was &#8216;perspired&#8217; from 1941 Hollywood film named- Meet John Doe. Go see THAT timeless classic before you sing any more bhajans for Tinnu Anand&#8217;s film. The Film was seminal enough to bring on the identity of a &#8216;John Doe&#8217; to the American Lexicon.<br />
 The &#8216;problem&#8217; most &#8216;pseudo intellecutual&#8217; critics have with most current/popular/big-budget watcha-ma-call-it films is thus.<br />
  With the new-found access to all kinds of mainstream/niche/kitsch world-cinema, they see a great lack of sincerity in the whole process of film-making as an art form, as a hitherto shiny badge of cultural/national identity that&#8217;s now being pedalled for a penny on the streets of London and New Yuck.<br />
   At the same time, they are apalled to see middle of the road films that are made abroad make it big commerically/critically/whatever-ally every month. Why shouldn&#8217;t they get mad?<br />
 If our phones are made in Finland and car technology comes from Germany/Japan-what prevents us from having the same high-expectations from a film that we are expected to pay for?<br />
   Film-makers should stop expecting scathing reviews the day they start doing free screenings for the audience in plush multiplexes and hand out pipping hot popcorn worth sixty bucks to boot.<br />
No one&#8217;s asking the Chopras and the Johars to descend to the bowels of India&#8217;s parched heartlands and make 80s &#8217;style&#8217;  &#8216;art-cinema&#8217;<br />
but everyone would everyone would agree that they&#8217;re dithering at the other extreme.<br />
 Make your big bucks-sure-but how about doing a bit of cinema for cinema&#8217;s sake? Art gratia artis?<br />
 Shahrukh Khan may shield his face and ape Manoj Kumar till the kingdom come but who can deny the power of popular Indian cinema as a definition of national ethos in the days gone by?<br />
  Mere Desh ki dharti kahan gayee?</p>

<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/RLIQbUUmhw2KxZed83du7G2vcbs/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/RLIQbUUmhw2KxZed83du7G2vcbs/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/>
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/RLIQbUUmhw2KxZed83du7G2vcbs/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/RLIQbUUmhw2KxZed83du7G2vcbs/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/pfc-comments/~4/BeZdVMXGkEc" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded><description>@Deepak Singh,
   Sorry to ruin your party, but Main Azad Hoon-was 'perspired' from 1941 Hollywood film named- Meet John Doe. Go see THAT timeless classic before you sing any more bhajans for Tinnu Anand's film. The Film was seminal enough to bring on the identity of a 'John Doe' to the American Lexicon.
 The 'problem' most 'pseudo intellecutual' critics have with most current/popular/big-budget watcha-ma-call-it films is thus.
  With the new-found access to all kinds of mainstream/niche/kitsch world-cinema, they see a great lack of sincerity in the whole process of film-making as an art form, as a hitherto shiny badge of cultural/national identity that's now being pedalled for a penny on the streets of London and New Yuck.  
   At the same time, they are apalled to see middle of the road films that are made abroad make it big commerically/critically/whatever-ally every month. Why shouldn't they get mad?
 If our phones are made in Finland and car technology comes from Germany/Japan-what prevents us from having the same high-expectations from a film that we are expected to pay for?
   Film-makers should stop expecting scathing reviews the day they start doing free screenings for the audience in plush multiplexes and hand out pipping hot popcorn worth sixty bucks to boot.
No one's asking the Chopras and the Johars to descend to the bowels of India's parched heartlands and make 80s 'style'  'art-cinema' 
but everyone would everyone would agree that they're dithering at the other extreme.
 Make your big bucks-sure-but how about doing a bit of cinema for cinema's sake? Art gratia artis?
 Shahrukh Khan may shield his face and ape Manoj Kumar till the kingdom come but who can deny the power of popular Indian cinema as a definition of national ethos in the days gone by?
  Mere Desh ki dharti kahan gayee?</description><feedburner:origLink>http://passionforcinema.com/reviewing-as-a-weapon-of-murder/#comment-401127</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Comment on APKGK : Hasna Zaroori hai in this Love Story of Mr. President by anurag</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/pfc-comments/~3/jRK0jj7vzJI/</link><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">anurag</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 07:08:05 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://passionforcinema.com/?p=26986#comment-401125</guid><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<p>wtf RK!please do us a favor by not flaunting your puerile sense of humor.its the most colossally stupid reveiw i ever read on pfc.wrote nothin sensibe besides advertising ranveer kapoor..</p>

<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/jczDFA_WyxWsINE1qdTMrL9kqwc/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/jczDFA_WyxWsINE1qdTMrL9kqwc/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/>
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/jczDFA_WyxWsINE1qdTMrL9kqwc/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/jczDFA_WyxWsINE1qdTMrL9kqwc/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/pfc-comments/~4/jRK0jj7vzJI" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded><description>wtf RK!please do us a favor by not flaunting your puerile sense of humor.its the most colossally stupid reveiw i ever read on pfc.wrote nothin sensibe besides advertising ranveer kapoor..</description><feedburner:origLink>http://passionforcinema.com/apkgk-hasna-zaroori-hai-in-this-love-story-of-mr-president/#comment-401125</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Comment on Jail by Sethumadhavan</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/pfc-comments/~3/ASajrEov2p4/</link><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sethumadhavan</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 07:02:36 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://passionforcinema.com/?p=26878#comment-401124</guid><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<p>One of the more straight tales from Madhur Bhandarkar with not too much of sensationalism as seen in his movies usually.An average movie at best.Watch it or leave it- either ways no harm done  <img src='http://passionforcinema.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>

<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/oZUfxd5JJ6dzqMNUypwpjCSXKYg/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/oZUfxd5JJ6dzqMNUypwpjCSXKYg/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/>
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/oZUfxd5JJ6dzqMNUypwpjCSXKYg/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/oZUfxd5JJ6dzqMNUypwpjCSXKYg/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/pfc-comments/~4/ASajrEov2p4" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded><description>One of the more straight tales from Madhur Bhandarkar with not too much of sensationalism as seen in his movies usually.An average movie at best.Watch it or leave it- either ways no harm done  :)</description><feedburner:origLink>http://passionforcinema.com/jail/#comment-401124</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Comment on Ajab Prem Ki Ghazab Kahani Movie Review : Laugh’s like that by Gourav Ghosh</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/pfc-comments/~3/9RncOEgoxx8/</link><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gourav Ghosh</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 06:36:47 PST</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://passionforcinema.com/?p=26950#comment-401123</guid><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[<p>The scene, the intercutting of don&#8217;s gang and happy club, where they decide upon the same dress code and same makeup,gave me expectations of a upcoming exciting and laugh riot scene full of confusing situations. But when it happened I was confused. For what reason the build up to the party was like that? It made no difference.<br />
I am not asking for logic. Just that the party scene, where kidnapping of Upen Patel takes place could be much more of fun.</p>

<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/gCffIEwADiNrPHAwdeotNHvMgJU/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/gCffIEwADiNrPHAwdeotNHvMgJU/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/>
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/gCffIEwADiNrPHAwdeotNHvMgJU/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/gCffIEwADiNrPHAwdeotNHvMgJU/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/pfc-comments/~4/9RncOEgoxx8" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded><description>The scene, the intercutting of don's gang and happy club, where they decide upon the same dress code and same makeup,gave me expectations of a upcoming exciting and laugh riot scene full of confusing situations. But when it happened I was confused. For what reason the build up to the party was like that? It made no difference. 
I am not asking for logic. Just that the party scene, where kidnapping of Upen Patel takes place could be much more of fun.</description><feedburner:origLink>http://passionforcinema.com/ajab-prem-ki-ghazab-kahani-movie-review-laugh%e2%80%99s-like-that/#comment-401123</feedburner:origLink></item></channel></rss>
