<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<feed version="0.3" xmlns="http://purl.org/atom/ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xml:lang="en">
  <title>Philocrites' Scrapbook</title>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.philocrites.com/scrapbook/" />
  <modified>2008-11-05T15:29:54Z</modified>
  <tagline>What else is Philocrites reading?</tagline>
  <id>tag:www.philocrites.com,2008:/scrapbook//4</id>
  <generator url="http://www.movabletype.org/" version="2.661">Movable Type</generator>
  <copyright>Copyright (c) 2008, Philocrites</copyright>
  <entry>
    <title>We&apos;re all Americans now</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.philocrites.com/scrapbook/2008_11.html#004003" />
    <modified>2008-11-05T15:29:54Z</modified>
    <issued>2008-11-05T10:29:54-05:00</issued>
    <id>tag:www.philocrites.com,2008:/scrapbook//4.4003</id>
    <created>2008-11-05T15:29:54Z</created>
    <summary type="text/plain">A biracial man with a Muslim father and an Arabic/Swahili name, reared by his white grandparents, has ascended to the highest position in American politics. This was not Malcolm&apos;s dream. It was not something he saw as possible. Another man...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Philocrites</name>
      <url>http://www.philocrites.com/</url>
      <email>philocrites@gmail.com</email>
    </author>
    <dc:subject>Barack Obama</dc:subject>
    <content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.philocrites.com/scrapbook/">
      <![CDATA[<p>A biracial man with a Muslim father and an Arabic/Swahili name, reared by his white grandparents, has ascended to the highest position in American politics. This was not Malcolm's dream. It was not something he saw as possible. Another man saw it, a man Obama paid homage to tonight when he said "we may not get there in one year or in one term, but America I promise you, we as a people will get there." That man knew he would not get here with us, and he was right. But we could not have come here without him. And we still have a ways to go.&nbsp;.&nbsp;.&nbsp;.</p>

<p>Obama's gift is that he understood America's great secret, that Americans have a deep and abiding need to love one another, and that we only lack the courage to do so. The theme of Obama's campaign has been a simple affirmation that we are in fact, one, in ways Malcolm never could have though possible and in ways Martin Luther King only dreamed of.<br />
</p>]]>
      <![CDATA[<p>Adam Serwer, TAPPED 11.5.08</p>]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Dukakis on the politics of &apos;experience&apos;</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.philocrites.com/scrapbook/2008_09.html#003993" />
    <modified>2008-09-12T13:44:13Z</modified>
    <issued>2008-09-12T09:44:13-05:00</issued>
    <id>tag:www.philocrites.com,2008:/scrapbook//4.3993</id>
    <created>2008-09-12T13:44:13Z</created>
    <summary type="text/plain">I think this experience thing is phony as a three-dollar bill. [Barack Obama]&apos;s been in elected office for twelve consecutive years. That&apos;s more than Reagan was, more the Carter was, more than George Bush was, in fact double the amount...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Philocrites</name>
      <url>http://www.philocrites.com/</url>
      <email>philocrites@gmail.com</email>
    </author>
    <dc:subject>Politics</dc:subject>
    <content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.philocrites.com/scrapbook/">
      <![CDATA[<p>I think this experience thing is phony as a three-dollar bill. [Barack Obama]'s been in elected office for twelve consecutive years. That's more than Reagan was, more the Carter was, more than George Bush was, in fact double the amount of time Bush was in elected office, the same as Clinton and Bush One, and a couple of years less than John Kennedy. Some of that was in Illinois which is hardly the minor leagues of American politics, and he represented more people in his state senate district than live in the entire state of Alaska. He was an extremely effective state legislator. He's been an extremely effective United States senator. And frankly I don't know exactly what John McCain's executive experience is, to tell you the truth.</p>]]>
      <![CDATA[<p>Michael Dukakis, The Plank (tnr.com) 9.11.08</p>]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Democrats, beware the sympathy backlash for Palin</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.philocrites.com/scrapbook/2008_08.html#003992" />
    <modified>2008-08-30T19:53:41Z</modified>
    <issued>2008-08-30T15:53:41-05:00</issued>
    <id>tag:www.philocrites.com,2008:/scrapbook//4.3992</id>
    <created>2008-08-30T19:53:41Z</created>
    <summary type="text/plain"><![CDATA[The Obama campaign and its supporters won't win very many hearts and minds attacking [Republican vice presidential nominee Sarah] Palin for her personal life or even lack of political experience &mdash; she's simply too compelling of a figure. So let's...]]></summary>
    <author>
      <name>Philocrites</name>
      <url>http://www.philocrites.com/</url>
      <email>philocrites@gmail.com</email>
    </author>
    <dc:subject>Sarah Palin</dc:subject>
    <content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.philocrites.com/scrapbook/">
      <![CDATA[<p>The Obama campaign and its supporters won't win very many hearts and minds attacking [Republican vice presidential nominee Sarah] Palin for her personal life or even lack of political experience &mdash; she's simply too compelling of a figure. So let's stick to the issues when discussing Palin: her denial of human causes of global warming, her opposition to abortion even in cases of rape and incest, and evidence of her possible corruption. There's more than enough there without descending into the attacks that are only all too common when it comes to female politicians.</p>]]>
      <![CDATA[<p>Dana Goldstein, TAPPED 8.30.08</p>]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Obama should unleash Hillary Clinton on McCain</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.philocrites.com/scrapbook/2008_08.html#003985" />
    <modified>2008-08-27T16:50:32Z</modified>
    <issued>2008-08-27T12:50:32-05:00</issued>
    <id>tag:www.philocrites.com,2008:/scrapbook//4.3985</id>
    <created>2008-08-27T16:50:32Z</created>
    <summary type="text/plain"><![CDATA[[Hillary Clinton] knows what it's like to be slapped around by Republicans better than anyone in this country, and, whatever bipartisan strides she has made in her senate years, she still has the taste for Republican blood.&nbsp;.&nbsp;.&nbsp;. Better still, playing...]]></summary>
    <author>
      <name>Philocrites</name>
      <url>http://www.philocrites.com/</url>
      <email>philocrites@gmail.com</email>
    </author>
    <dc:subject>Hillary Clinton</dc:subject>
    <content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.philocrites.com/scrapbook/">
      <![CDATA[<p>[Hillary Clinton] knows what it's like to be slapped around by Republicans better than anyone in this country, and, whatever bipartisan strides she has made in her senate years, she still has the taste for Republican blood.&nbsp;.&nbsp;.&nbsp;. </p>

<p>Better still, playing the attack dog would lessen the need for Hillary to fake enthusiasm for Obama. All her anger and resentment and disappointment of the past 20 months &mdash; hell, the last 20 years &mdash; could be channeled into gutting McCain like a trout. People expect Hillary to rage against the Republican machine. For years, she has been their whipping girl, just as for years she has stood as a symbol of perseverence and strength for many Democrats &mdash; especially women. Instead of having her run around trying to sunnily convince women or working-class whites of what a swell guy her former opponent is, Obama's people should just wind her up, point her in the direction of these constituencies, and let her rip John McCain and his whole lousy party a new one. </p>]]>
      <![CDATA[<p>Michelle Cottle, The Plank 8.27.08</p>]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The big-tent fundamentalism of Rick Warren and Joel Osteen</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.philocrites.com/scrapbook/2008_08.html#003981" />
    <modified>2008-08-21T18:51:46Z</modified>
    <issued>2008-08-21T14:51:46-05:00</issued>
    <id>tag:www.philocrites.com,2008:/scrapbook//4.3981</id>
    <created>2008-08-21T18:51:46Z</created>
    <summary type="text/plain">Rick Warren, Joel Osteen, and the business-friendly fundamentalism of the post-Christian Right era don&apos;t set off liberal alarms the way the pulpit pounders such as John Hagee, Pat Robertson, and James Dobson do. The irony is that the agenda of...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Philocrites</name>
      <url>http://www.philocrites.com/</url>
      <email>philocrites@gmail.com</email>
    </author>
    <dc:subject>Religion news</dc:subject>
    <content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.philocrites.com/scrapbook/">
      <![CDATA[<p>Rick Warren, Joel Osteen, and the business-friendly fundamentalism of the post-Christian Right era don't set off liberal alarms the way the pulpit pounders such as John Hagee, Pat Robertson, and James Dobson do. The irony is that the agenda of this new lifestyle evangelicalism is more far-reaching than that of the traditional Christian Right: the Christian Right wanted a seat at the table; lifestyle evangelicalism wants to build the table. It wants to set the very terms in which we imagine what's possible, and to that end it dispenses with terms that might scare off liberals. It's big tent fundamentalism &mdash; everybody in.</p>

<p>But the ultimate goals remain the same. True, Osteen steers clear of abortion for the most part, and Warren, every bit as opposed to homosexuality as Jerry Falwell was, prefers to talk about AIDS relief. But both men &mdash; and the new evangelicalism as a movement &mdash; continue to preach the merger of Christianity and capitalism pioneered three quarters of a century ago. On the surface, it's self-help; scratch, and it's revealed as a profoundly conservative ideology that conflates church and state, scripture and currency, faith and finance. </p>]]>
      <![CDATA[<p>Jeff Sharlet, The Revealer 6.14.08</p>]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Obama the &apos;Magic Negro&apos;</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.philocrites.com/scrapbook/2008_08.html#003976" />
    <modified>2008-08-13T19:51:05Z</modified>
    <issued>2008-08-13T15:51:05-05:00</issued>
    <id>tag:www.philocrites.com,2008:/scrapbook//4.3976</id>
    <created>2008-08-13T19:51:05Z</created>
    <summary type="text/plain"><![CDATA[Obama also is running for an equally important unelected office, in the province of the popular imagination &mdash; the "Magic Negro." The Magic Negro is a figure of postmodern folk culture, coined by snarky 20th century sociologists, to explain a...]]></summary>
    <author>
      <name>Philocrites</name>
      <url>http://www.philocrites.com/</url>
      <email>philocrites@gmail.com</email>
    </author>
    <dc:subject>Barack Obama</dc:subject>
    <content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.philocrites.com/scrapbook/">
      <![CDATA[<p>Obama also is running for an equally important <em>unelected</em> office, in the province of the popular imagination &mdash; the "Magic Negro."</p>

<p>The Magic Negro is a figure of postmodern folk culture, coined by snarky 20th century sociologists, to explain a cultural figure who emerged in the wake of Brown vs. Board of Education. "He has no past, he simply appears one day to help the white protagonist," reads the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magical_Negro">description</a> on Wikipedia.</p>

<p>He's there to assuage white "guilt" (i.e., the minimal discomfort they feel) over the role of slavery and racial segregation in American history, while replacing stereotypes of a dangerous, highly sexualized black man with a benign figure for whom interracial sexual congress holds no interest.&nbsp;.&nbsp;.&nbsp;.</p>

<p>Like a comic-book superhero, Obama is there to help, out of the sheer goodness of a heart we need not know or understand. For as with all Magic Negroes, the less real he seems, the more desirable he becomes. If he were real, white America couldn't project all its fantasies of curative black benevolence on him.</p>]]>
      <![CDATA[<p>David Ehrenstein, Los Angeles Times 3.19.08 (via <a href="http://www.prospect.org/csnc/blogs/tapped_archive?month=08&year=2008&base_name=_the_folly_of_peter_beinart">TAPPED</a> 8.13.08)</p>]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Jack Bauer, America&apos;s leading interrogation policy intellectual</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.philocrites.com/scrapbook/2008_07.html#003973" />
    <modified>2008-07-31T15:48:12Z</modified>
    <issued>2008-07-31T11:48:12-05:00</issued>
    <id>tag:www.philocrites.com,2008:/scrapbook//4.3973</id>
    <created>2008-07-31T15:48:12Z</created>
    <summary type="text/plain">The most influential legal thinker in the development of modern American interrogation policy is not a behavioral psychologist, international lawyer or counterinsurgency expert. Reading both Jane Mayer&apos;s stunning &quot;The Dark Side,&quot; and Philippe Sands&apos;s &quot;Torture Team,&quot; it quickly becomes plain...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Philocrites</name>
      <url>http://www.philocrites.com/</url>
      <email>philocrites@gmail.com</email>
    </author>
    <dc:subject>War</dc:subject>
    <content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.philocrites.com/scrapbook/">
      <![CDATA[<p>The most influential legal thinker in the development of modern American interrogation policy is not a behavioral psychologist, international lawyer or counterinsurgency expert. Reading both Jane Mayer's stunning "The Dark Side," and Philippe Sands's "Torture Team," it quickly becomes plain that the prime mover of American interrogation doctrine is none other than the star of Fox television's "24," Jack Bauer.<br />
</p>]]>
      <![CDATA[<p>Dahlia Lithwick, Newsweek 8.4.08</p>]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Defining outrage down</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.philocrites.com/scrapbook/2008_07.html#003958" />
    <modified>2008-07-15T14:24:01Z</modified>
    <issued>2008-07-15T10:24:01-05:00</issued>
    <id>tag:www.philocrites.com,2008:/scrapbook//4.3958</id>
    <created>2008-07-15T14:24:01Z</created>
    <summary type="text/plain">Outrage is supposed to be extreme anger about an extreme and dignity-damaging insult. It has instead become the quotidian autonomic emotional register of most species of political actors, including partisans, campaign operatives and pundits. Hence: what used to be normal...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Philocrites</name>
      <url>http://www.philocrites.com/</url>
      <email>philocrites@gmail.com</email>
    </author>
    <dc:subject>Politics</dc:subject>
    <content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.philocrites.com/scrapbook/">
      <![CDATA[<p>Outrage is supposed to be extreme anger about an extreme and dignity-damaging insult. It has instead become the quotidian autonomic emotional register of most species of political actors, including partisans, campaign operatives and pundits. Hence: what used to be normal is now considered extreme.&nbsp;.&nbsp;.&nbsp;.</p>

<p>Outrage is often phony; major campaigns contrive their outrage precisely for effect. (When I ask about these contrivances, I am told that they are "part of the game.") But outrage is often phony even if it seems real. Phony outrage is outrage for the sake of feeling outraged; it's a comfortable outrage, an outrage that serves to reinforce feelings of solidarity and get rid of feelings of dissonance. Outrage is a covering emotion, like its close cousin, self-righteousness. We love to be offended. We love to feel affronted.<br />
</p>]]>
      <![CDATA[<p>Marc Ambinder, TheAtlantic.com 7.15.08</p>]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Who owns a congregation?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.philocrites.com/scrapbook/2008_04.html#003940" />
    <modified>2008-04-23T15:37:47Z</modified>
    <issued>2008-04-23T11:37:47-05:00</issued>
    <id>tag:www.philocrites.com,2008:/scrapbook//4.3940</id>
    <created>2008-04-23T15:37:47Z</created>
    <summary type="text/plain">Who, then, is the owner of a congregation? Who plays the role of stockholders in a business? Not the members. Not the board. Not the clergy or the bishop or the staff. These all are fiduciaries whose duty is to...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Philocrites</name>
      <url>http://www.philocrites.com/</url>
      <email>philocrites@gmail.com</email>
    </author>
    <dc:subject>Theology</dc:subject>
    <content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.philocrites.com/scrapbook/">
      <![CDATA[<p>Who, then, is the owner of a congregation? Who plays the role of stockholders in a business? Not the members. Not the board. Not the clergy or the bishop or the staff. These all are fiduciaries whose duty is to serve the owner. Symbolically, we might say God or Jesus is the owner. But God's whole will is too big to guide one congregation. Instead, the board's job is to discern our mission, the small piece of God's intention that belongs to us. Or to put it differently, our job is to find the mission we belong to, the real owner for whose benefit we hold and deploy the congregation's resources.</p>]]>
      <![CDATA[<p>Dan Hotchkiss, Alban Institute 4.21.08; via <a href="http://www.episcopalcafe.com/lead/mission/who_owns_a_congregation.html">The Lead</a></p>]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Catholics divided by pop music for Mass</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.philocrites.com/scrapbook/2008_04.html#003937" />
    <modified>2008-04-21T11:11:43Z</modified>
    <issued>2008-04-21T07:11:43-05:00</issued>
    <id>tag:www.philocrites.com,2008:/scrapbook//4.3937</id>
    <created>2008-04-21T11:11:43Z</created>
    <summary type="text/plain">Imagine a bizarro world where all the 25-year-olds want Mozart and all the 60-year-olds want adult-contemporary. The kids think the adults are too wild. The backlash against &quot;Kumbaya Catholicism&quot; has anyone under 40 allegedly clamoring for the Tridentine Mass in...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Philocrites</name>
      <url>http://www.philocrites.com/</url>
      <email>philocrites@gmail.com</email>
    </author>
    <dc:subject>Religion news</dc:subject>
    <content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.philocrites.com/scrapbook/">
      <![CDATA[<p>Imagine a bizarro world where all the 25-year-olds want Mozart and all the 60-year-olds want adult-contemporary. The kids think the adults are too wild. The backlash against "Kumbaya Catholicism" has anyone under 40 allegedly clamoring for the Tridentine Mass in Latin, while the old folks are most sentimental about Casual Sunday (even more rockin', the Saturday vigil Mass), and still cling to what's evolved from the lite-rock guitar liturgies of the 1970s. The result, for most parishes, has been decades of Masses in which no one is entirely satisfied, and very few enjoy the music enough to sing along.&nbsp;.&nbsp;.&nbsp;.</p>

<p>It's been a long time since anyone at church was singing the hosanna from "Jesus Christ Superstar" or Cat Stevens's "Morning Has Broken" at the offertory. Even the vast catalogue of the St. Louis Jesuits &mdash; the stalwart, lite-rock ballads heard in almost any Mass for the past few decades ("One Bread, One Body"; "Be Not Afraid"; "For You Are My God") &mdash; has come under assault.<br />
</p>]]>
      <![CDATA[<p>Hank Stuever, Washington Post 4.16.08</p>]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Pin a flag pin on a donkey</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.philocrites.com/scrapbook/2008_04.html#003935" />
    <modified>2008-04-17T22:56:32Z</modified>
    <issued>2008-04-17T18:56:32-05:00</issued>
    <id>tag:www.philocrites.com,2008:/scrapbook//4.3935</id>
    <created>2008-04-17T22:56:32Z</created>
    <summary type="text/plain">Obama&apos;s memoir dripped with contempt for modern gotcha politics, for a campaign culture obsessed with substantively irrelevant but supposedly symbolic gaffes like John Kerry ordering Swiss cheese or Al Gore sighing or George H.W. Bush checking his watch or Michael...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Philocrites</name>
      <url>http://www.philocrites.com/</url>
      <email>philocrites@gmail.com</email>
    </author>
    <dc:subject>Politics</dc:subject>
    <content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.philocrites.com/scrapbook/">
      <![CDATA[<p>Obama's memoir dripped with contempt for modern gotcha politics, for a campaign culture obsessed with substantively irrelevant but supposedly symbolic gaffes like John Kerry ordering Swiss cheese or Al Gore sighing or George H.W. Bush checking his watch or Michael Dukakis looking dorky in a tank. "What's troubling is the gap between the magnitude of our challenges and the smallness of our politics&mdash;the ease with which we are distracted by the petty and trivial," he wrote.</p>

<p>Last night at the National Constitution Center, at a Democratic debate that was hyped by ABC as a discussion of serious constitutional issues, America got to see exactly what Obama was complaining about.</p>]]>
      <![CDATA[<p>Michael Grunwald, Time 4.17.08</p>]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Martin Marty on Jeremiah Wright: Prophet and pastor</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.philocrites.com/scrapbook/2008_03.html#003925" />
    <modified>2008-03-26T21:50:39Z</modified>
    <issued>2008-03-26T17:50:39-05:00</issued>
    <id>tag:www.philocrites.com,2008:/scrapbook//4.3925</id>
    <created>2008-03-26T21:50:39Z</created>
    <summary type="text/plain"><![CDATA[The four S's charged against Wright &mdash; segregation, separatism, sectarianism, and superiority &mdash; don't stand up, as countless visitors can attest. I wish those whose vision has been distorted by sermon clips could have experienced what we and our white...]]></summary>
    <author>
      <name>Philocrites</name>
      <url>http://www.philocrites.com/</url>
      <email>philocrites@gmail.com</email>
    </author>
    <dc:subject>Religion news</dc:subject>
    <content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.philocrites.com/scrapbook/">
      <![CDATA[<p>The four S's charged against Wright &mdash; segregation, separatism, sectarianism, and superiority &mdash; don't stand up, as countless visitors can attest. I wish those whose vision has been distorted by sermon clips could have experienced what we and our white guests did when we worshiped there: feeling instantly at home.&nbsp;.&nbsp;.&nbsp;.</p>

<p>While Wright's sermons were pastoral&nbsp;.&nbsp;.&nbsp;. they were also prophetic. At the university, we used to remark, half lightheartedly, that this Jeremiah was trying to live up to his namesake, the seventh-century B.C. prophet. Though Jeremiah of old did not "curse" his people of Israel, Wright, as a biblical scholar, could point out that the prophets Hosea and Micah did.&nbsp;.&nbsp;.&nbsp;.</p>

<p>In the end, however, Jeremiah was the prophet of hope&nbsp;.&nbsp;.&nbsp;.<br />
</p>]]>
      <![CDATA[<p>Martin Marty, Chronicle Review 4.11.08; via <a href="http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2008/03/martin-marty-on.html">Andrew Sullivan</a></p>]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Clinton has almost no chance of winning</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.philocrites.com/scrapbook/2008_03.html#003923" />
    <modified>2008-03-21T19:07:20Z</modified>
    <issued>2008-03-21T15:07:20-05:00</issued>
    <id>tag:www.philocrites.com,2008:/scrapbook//4.3923</id>
    <created>2008-03-21T19:07:20Z</created>
    <summary type="text/plain">One big fact has largely been lost in the recent coverage of the Democratic presidential race: Hillary Rodham Clinton has virtually no chance of winning. Her own campaign acknowledges there is no way that she will finish ahead in pledged...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Philocrites</name>
      <url>http://www.philocrites.com/</url>
      <email>philocrites@gmail.com</email>
    </author>
    <dc:subject>Politics</dc:subject>
    <content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.philocrites.com/scrapbook/">
      <![CDATA[<p>One big fact has largely been lost in the recent coverage of the Democratic presidential race: Hillary Rodham Clinton has virtually no chance of winning. </p>

<p>Her own campaign acknowledges there is no way that she will finish ahead in pledged delegates. That means the only way she wins is if Democratic superdelegates are ready to risk a backlash of historic proportions from the party's most reliable constituency.&nbsp;.&nbsp;.&nbsp;.</p>

<p>One important Clinton adviser estimated to Politico privately that she has no more than a 10 percent chance of winning her race against Barack Obama, an appraisal that was echoed by other operatives. </p>

<p>In other words: The notion of the Democratic contest being a dramatic cliffhanger is a game of make-believe.<br />
</p>]]>
      <![CDATA[<p>Jim Vandehei and Mike Allen, Politico 3.21.08; via <a href="http://talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/184836.php">TPM</a></p>]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Black clergy say Wright is condemned unfairly</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.philocrites.com/scrapbook/2008_03.html#003922" />
    <modified>2008-03-20T11:58:50Z</modified>
    <issued>2008-03-20T07:58:50-05:00</issued>
    <id>tag:www.philocrites.com,2008:/scrapbook//4.3922</id>
    <created>2008-03-20T11:58:50Z</created>
    <summary type="text/plain"><![CDATA["[Jeremiah Wright's] remarks are unsettling in isolation, but, let's be honest, some of the things he said are true," said the Rev. Martin D. McLee&nbsp;.&nbsp;.&nbsp;. "The US has been pretty ugly internationally under George Bush, and I don't translate and...]]></summary>
    <author>
      <name>Philocrites</name>
      <url>http://www.philocrites.com/</url>
      <email>philocrites@gmail.com</email>
    </author>
    <dc:subject>Religion news</dc:subject>
    <content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.philocrites.com/scrapbook/">
      <![CDATA[<p>"[Jeremiah Wright's] remarks are unsettling in isolation, but, let's be honest, some of the things he said are true," said the Rev. Martin D. McLee&nbsp;.&nbsp;.&nbsp;. "The US has been pretty ugly internationally under George Bush, and I don't translate and say we deserved 9/11, but he didn't say that either. Even his comments about Hillary Clinton not having felt the suffering of not getting a cab &mdash; that's not antiwhite, that's true, and anybody who is black and knows the pain of not being able to get a cab knows that's true."&nbsp;.&nbsp;.&nbsp;.</p>

<p>"Jeremiah Wright is one of the giants in our community, but we all get it wrong sometimes," [said the Rev. Gerald E. Bell]. "Have I preached like Jeremiah Wright? Absolutely. Take two minutes of my sermons, and you don't know what you'll get. But I was proud that Barack was able to distinguish himself from his pastor's incendiary remarks but not dismiss him totally."&nbsp;.&nbsp;.&nbsp;.</p>

<p>"I have heard from dozens of pastors over the past five or six days, and they just laugh out loud that people would think their parishioners agree with every word," [the Rev. Jim] Antal said. "It's just absurd. Obviously what's going on is guilt by association, and that's what politics is about, but that only works with an authoritarian understanding of religion, and we don't have that in mainline Protestantism."</p>]]>
      <![CDATA[<p>Michael Paulson, Boston Globe 3.19.08</p>]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Economic quicksand</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.philocrites.com/scrapbook/2008_03.html#003919" />
    <modified>2008-03-18T12:12:02Z</modified>
    <issued>2008-03-18T08:12:02-05:00</issued>
    <id>tag:www.philocrites.com,2008:/scrapbook//4.3919</id>
    <created>2008-03-18T12:12:02Z</created>
    <summary type="text/plain">Many economists expect Fed policy makers to cut the central bank&apos;s key interest rate by 1 percentage point, but they worry even this reduction won&apos;t halt the erosion in confidence undermining the economy. Lower interest rates, which aim to boost...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Philocrites</name>
      <url>http://www.philocrites.com/</url>
      <email>philocrites@gmail.com</email>
    </author>
    <dc:subject>News</dc:subject>
    <content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.philocrites.com/scrapbook/">
      <![CDATA[<p>Many economists expect Fed policy makers to cut the central bank's key interest rate by 1 percentage point, but they worry even this reduction won't halt the erosion in confidence undermining the economy. Lower interest rates, which aim to boost the economy by enticing consumers and businesses to borrow and spend, provide little help if lenders aren't loaning money out of fear they won't be repaid.&nbsp;.&nbsp;.&nbsp;.</p>

<p>Consumer spending is responsible for more than two-thirds of US economic activity, but consumers are unlikely to borrow if they are worried about losing jobs. And lower mortgage rates don't provide much of an enticement to buyers worried that home values are going to continue to fall.&nbsp;.&nbsp;.&nbsp;.</p>

<p>Deeper interest rate cuts hold other dangers, such as further weakening the dollar and igniting inflation. The dollar has fallen along with interest rates, losing value against currencies in countries with higher interest rates, and hence, higher returns.<br />
</p>]]>
      <![CDATA[<p>Robert Gavin, Boston Globe 3.18.08</p>]]>
    </content>
  </entry>

</feed>