The Philosopher Dad

You Might Be Your Own Biggest Weakness - And You Might Not Know It

noreply@blogger.com (Unknown) — Thu, 09 May 2013 15:30:00 +0000

Since I started teaching, I've tried to bike to work as often as I can. This means that for most of the fall, and a good chunk of the spring I cycle about 80 km per week. Not a huge amount for serious cyclists, but decent. Last week I was especially proud when I noticed that I had worn through my rear tire.

It's funny, because wearing through that tire (and needing to buy a new set) was part of a startling revelation for me. You see, I have a 15 speed mountain bike, it's a solid, fairly basic machine. No shocks or anything fancy, a bit on the heavy side with big tires on 26" wheels. It's not really the best bike for suburban commuting, but not the worst either.

On my rides I frequently encounter more serious cyclists. You know, road bikes, pedal clips, spandex everything. I was always amazed, and frustrated, as they appeared to effortlessly sail passed me, no matter how hard I was (or thought I was working). This got me thinking about getting a new bicycle, but a decent bike runs for somewhere north of $700, so I needed to give it some consideration.

Once my tire wore out, I decided to replace my 2" tires with more road-friendly 1.5" tires. I figured that this would make a HUGE difference in my speed. I put the tires on this morning and headed off to work. Sure enough, the ride was stiffer, and it felt like I was going faster with the same effort. Here's the kicker though, two "serious" cyclists whizzed past me, just like before. To add insult to injury, they were old.

I was pissed. Clearly, my 26" wheels were too small, and my bike frame was too heavy. This bike would never cut it - I had to get a new one.

As the two drew ahead of me, I had two startling realizations:

1. These guys had giant, like GIANT calf muscles and more importantly,

2. THEY WERE PEDALING MUCH FASTER THAN I WAS.

Holy crap. It's not the bike. It's ME. I'm the reason that I'm slower than those guys. I forced myself to match their pedaling rhythm, and lo and behold - I was able to stay much closer to them.

Now don't get me wrong. I know that a lightweight 21 speed bike with skinny tires on 29" wheels will go faster than a heavy bike with smaller wheels and wider tires. But those guys would have kicked my ass if they were riding tricycles.

All this to say, when you're bitching about things not going your way - because you don't have the right job, or the right gear or the right tools or the right whatever - double check and make sure that the problem isn't YOU.

An Open Letter to David Pollock, Mayor of Beaconsfield

noreply@blogger.com (Unknown) — Wed, 08 May 2013 15:51:00 +0000

Every month, Beaconsfield circulates a newsletter called CONTACT that lets us citizens know about all the great stuff happening in our town - like eBooks (and French eBooks) from the library, swimming lessons, hazardous waste collection days and the like. This month, I noticed a little notice about changes to the noise/nuisance bylaws for Sundays. It used to be that the only time you could mow your lawn or do renovations on a Sunday was between noon and 4PM. This was a bit annoying sometimes, but I totally understand the need for a bit of peace and quiet. Apparently, this wasn't enough peace and/or quiet for some folks, because now you can't use any motorized equipment at all, at any time on Sundays.

So I wrote a letter to the mayor, which I sent on May 3, 2013. As of this writing (May 8) I haven't heard back.

Mr. Pollock, As I read this month's CONTACT, I was very disturbed to find that the city's noise by-laws had been amended to prohibit the use of any motorized equipment or tools at any time on Sundays.
While I appreciate the need for controlling noise pollution, this by-law presents a number of problems, both practical and philosophical.
Neither Kirkland or Pointe-Claire restrict noise on Sundays to such an extent. This means that Beaconsfield residents who live on the borders of these other cities can still be subject noise coming from their neighbours in those municipalities. In fact, no other municipality in West Island has such restrictive regulations.
In many families, both adults work full or part time, leaving the weekends as the only time for activities and yard maintenance. Given the vagaries of the summer weather, it is not uncommon for one of the weekend days to be rainy and unsuitable for yard work. In addition, families with children often find themselves shuttling between multiple activities on one of the weekend days, and this by-law further complicates their lives needlessly.
My last argument, is a moral one, and perhaps the most important. The choice of Sunday as a quiet day, or day of rest, reflects a strong Christian cultural bias on the part of Beaconsfield. I am Jewish, and though I am not overly observant, my traditional day of rest is Saturday. The choice of Sunday by the city is based solely on tradition, since I am sure that the majority of "Christian" residents of Beaconsfield do not regularly attend church. Although Beaconsfield has a reputation for a certain degree of cultural homogenity, the population is rapidly become more diverse and the value judgement implied by the new by-law does not reflect an openness of spirit toward residents of different cultural communities.
I appreciate the need for controlling noise pollution, and I applaud council for it's proactive approach. However, the previous version of the by-law was already among the most restrictive in the West Island. The current by-law will ultimately be ineffective because it cannot protect those Beaconsfield residents who live adjacent to neighbouring municipalities. It is needlessly restrictive and authoritarian and discriminatory.
I trust your better judgement will consider a revision of this by-law.
Please do not hesitate to contact me, should you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Michael Lautman

Don't be a fucking idiot. Vaccinate your kids.

noreply@blogger.com (Unknown) — Wed, 23 Jan 2013 14:51:00 +0000

There's a terrifying story on Stuff (see link) about a family in New Zealand who opted not to vaccinate their children and then watched their 7 year old suffer for three weeks and almost die from tetanus. If you know me or have read this blog at all, you m ow that I am completely pro-vaccine.

Vaccines save lives. End of discussion. The only reason we actually have this debate at all is because vaccines are so effective. So effective that no one who is a parent today saw a friend die of tetanus or smallpox or become physically disabled from polio. Our parents did. My dad's friend H had polio as a child, and it stunted his growth and left him with a limp. But we didn't, because we were all immunized. That means we aren't scared of these diseases.

We should be.

Child Suffering from Smallpox

According to this article in JAMA, prior to 1947 there were a combined average of 10,433 deaths per year in the US from measles, mumps, polio, diphtheria, pertussis, rubella, smallpox and pertussis. In 2004, there were a TOTAL of 31 deaths from these illness in the US; 27 from pertussis and 4 from tetanus.

Holy shit. Without accounting for the massive increase in population in the US, this means that 10,402 people don't die each year because of vaccines.

The anti-vaccine fanatics will have you believe that because vaccines are so dangerous, we are actually no better off.

Here's the truth. In the US there are about 11,000 adverse reactions to vaccines reported each year. About 1600 of these result in hospitalization, and 220 result in deaths.

Hmmm 10,433 versus 220. Don't get me wrong, I'd much rather that vaccines had no risk - but nothing in life (especially medical procedures) are without risk.

Remember, public health is a game of odds, and the odds of saving lives are clearly on the side of vaccines.

Don't be an idiot. Vaccinate your kids.

Please.

When Students Are Smarter Than Teachers

noreply@blogger.com (Unknown) — Tue, 22 Jan 2013 16:32:00 +0000

One of the big news stories around here this week is how Dawson College expelled a student for exposing a security flaw in the online course management software they use. The software, called Ominvox, is used in many CEGEPs (junior college) in Quebec.

Here's the gist of the flaw: Pages containing sensitive information about users (students and teachers) are given encrypted URLs, but apparently the URL still contains pieces of the staff or student ID number. Simply by changing those numbers, anyone logged in to the system can have information about any other user.

The student in question Hamed Al-Khabaz, immediately reported this gaping security hole to the College's head of IT. He got a pat on the back. After few days, he ran a program to see if the vulnerability was still there. Good follow-up on his part.

The College then threatened to press charges and ultimately expelled the kid.

Morons.

The correct course of action should have been:
1. "Holy crap - thanks for finding this really serious problem with our system, we'll get that fixed right away."
2. "Here's your diploma. You can go home now."

Seriously. This kid is smart, thorough and above all HONEST. This first thing he did when he found the problem was tell a grown up. And then he got expelled.

I thought that the mission of a college - or any other school for that matter - was education. I didn't think that this mission was restricted to the classroom. Well what the hell do the administrators at Dawson think they are teaching this student, and all their students, by their actions?

They are teaching him to toe the line, to cover his ass and never trust anyone in a position of authority. Clearly these are superb lessons.

THESE PEOPLE ARE FUCKING IDIOTS.

I hope that my own children can act with the clarity of thought, integrity, thoroughness and honesty that Hamed Al-Khabaz did.

This whole incident started back in September of 2012, and we're only hearing about it now, because the company behind the software, SkyTech (not Skynet) forced Al-Khabaz to sign an NDA. In my capacity as a teacher, I used Omnivox everyday, and I have not heard a thing about it - including whether or not the vulnerability has been repaired.

In an interesting about-face, SkyTech has now offered Al-Khabaz a scholarship so that he can complete his studies at a private college. They should hire him.

Institutions of all kinds, governments, companies, schools, and parents, need to remember that the example we set by our actions often provides a more powerful lesson than anything else.

Watch this clip of Al-Khabaz being interviewed on CBC News.

You can sign a petition to encourage Dawson College to reinstate Hamed Al-Khabaz here.

Teaching My Son to Love Justin Bieber

noreply@blogger.com (Unknown) — Wed, 16 Jan 2013 15:17:00 +0000

All of my kids love Justin Bieber - and would gladly tell anyone about it; at least until recently. Something sad - and certainly not uncommon - has happened to Curious Boy recently. At his last birthday party, the subject of JB came up. My daughters, and the one other girl there had no problem saying that they like (or loved) Justin - although the 7 year old friend has "moved on" to One Direction. The rest of the gang (boys) were quick to say that JB sucked, or to make gross faces. Curious Boy held his tongue. I noticed what was going on, and I made point to be vocal about the fact that I like Justin Bieber's music.

Quick aside: I do like Justin Bieber. I grew up listening to Doo-Wop, Motown, the Beatles and other melodic pop. I'm not saying that JB is John Lennon, but I have a soft spot for catchy pop tunes. On top of that, since I saw the movie "Never Say Never", I have a lot of respect for him and his family.

Now, back to my main point. Since then, CB has been very anti-Justin. He makes faces when there's a Bieber song on the radio; he won't watch "Never Say Never" with his sisters.

It's easy to see where these boys get the idea that they've got to hate Justin. I was at a party recently where the subject of music came up, and my friends - all fathers of young boys - were also quick to slam Bieber. Even going so far as to say that they would "shoot him in the face" if he were standing there. Admittedly, this conversation was under the influence of a few bottles of wine. This sentiment, however, is surely expressed at home - and not only about Justin Bieber.

It's time to be brutally honest. This kind of exaggerated loathing of a pop star (we're not talking about Mahmoud Amedinejad here) is nothing but thinly veiled homophobia. Justin Bieber exemplifies many qualities that are traditionally considered feminine in our society. He has a slight build. He cares about his hair and clothes. He talks about love and caring. Many men worry that expressing that side of themselves will make them less of a man - maybe even (gasp) gay. You don't have to like his music - but that kind of vitriol is unaccptable, and spreads to our children.

Making it acceptable to hate on JB in your house, teaches your kids to dislike people based on appearance and perception - without even knowing them. Attaching derogatory names objectifies them and makes them less than human. This is the direct precursor to intolerance.

I hope that CB comes around about Justin Bieber. I'll be far more concerned if he starts listening to Flo Rida or some other macho crap.

For more information of language and intolerance, check out Barbara Coloroso.

noreply@blogger.com (Unknown) — Wed, 12 Dec 2012 20:31:00 +0000

When I first started this blog in 2006, our first child - Curious Boy had just been born. It was a huge shift, and the ensuing years were filled with lots of change. Finishing graduate school, getting a job, having two more children (Zen Girl and Her Purpleness). Things have settled down in some ways - I started my own business on top of teaching, but there haven't been any major transitions in a while.

So.... what the hell happened?

Well, it turns out that life with three kids is busy. I mean BUSY. So much so that I just stopped making it a priority to write here. I stopped to think about that the other day, and I realized how much that bothered me.

This blog started as a place for me to chronicle my adventures in parenting, but it quickly became a place for me to work through different ideas, explore and sound off on a whole range of topics. I felt that the image of "The Philosopher Dad" was one that suited me will.

Writing this blog was something that forced me to think, at least from time to time about parenting (n particular and how I was living my life in general - even if those things didn't show up in posts. It seems that when I stopped writing, I also stopped thinking about those things. Funny that.

The world moves fast - and my children are growing up faster than I imagined possible. Yes, it's a cliché (because it's true). Curious Boy is in first grade, and Zen Girl is in kindergarten. They amaze me and challenge me in new ways every day. If I don't stop and think about what is happening and how I'm doing from time to time, I'll simply... well, I don't know.

No one can be a perfect parent or spouse, but I'd at least like to take the time to think about the things I'm doing and the mistakes I'm making.

Oh yeah, I'm still pissed as hell about how people don't understand science and how shitty and out-of-date the school system is, so hopefully I'll have a chance to sound off on those things too.

It's been a while...

noreply@blogger.com (Unknown) — Wed, 21 Dec 2011 23:28:00 +0000

It's really been a long time since I've been here, and in a lot of ways it's very good to be back. On a practical level my web marketing self was always angry that I abandoned a pretty valuable piece of web real estate. On a deeper level, this blog was my first home online, and since Curious Boy started kindergarten this year, I find that I have a lot to think about that belongs on this site.

What I've been up to...

noreply@blogger.com (Unknown) — Sun, 13 Jun 2010 20:50:00 +0000

It's been a veeeeerrrryyy long time since I've posted anything to this blog, and to my surprise, I now have more subscribers to the RSS feed than ever before! I've been busy, just not here. Since my last post, we've had a third Philosopher Kid, moved, and I've gone into business for myself. I'm still blogging and tweeting, so if you want to keep up with my busy online life, you can find me at:

Contexta Internet Solutions - SEO and social media consulting, as well as web design and project management.

michaellautman.com

My Posterous - The easiest way to follow everything I do online. All of my posts from here have been moved there as well.

This is the last post here. It's been fun. Thanks.

Updates

noreply@blogger.com (Unknown) — Thu, 17 Sep 2009 11:11:00 +0000

Well, this site has been quiet, but I've been pretty busy. We moved in July and kid 3 came in early August. Aside from parenting, the thing keeping me busiest is my new website dedicated to families with milk and soy protein intolerance (MSPI). All three of our kids have or had it, and there are very few resources out there. I tried building a wiki, but I used a public hosted service and I didn't put in the time.... so now I've built http://milkintolerance.org as a resource for families like ours. If you or anyone you know has kids with MSPI, please send them along.

More regular philosopherdad updates are on their way too.

Magic Ingredient In Breast Milk Protects Babies' Intestines

noreply@blogger.com (Unknown) — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 01:17:00 +0000

Researchers Queen Mary, University of London have discovered that an ingredient in human breast milk protects and repairs the delicate intestines of newborn babies.

The ingredient called pancreatic secretory trypsin inhibitor, or PSTI, is found at its highest levels in colostrum - the milk produced in the first few days after birth.

The lining of a newborn's gut is particularly vulnerable to damage as it has never been exposed to food or drink. The new study highlights the importance of breastfeeding in the first few days after the birth.

This Week in Science

noreply@blogger.com (Unknown) — Sun, 25 Jan 2009 01:47:00 +0000

1. Growing Years Cut Short For Toddlers From Poor Families

Continuous poverty during toddler years can curb the height of children by the time they reach kindergarten, even in industrialized countries, according to new research from the Université de Montréal. Regardless of hereditary factors such as maternal height and education level, according to the finding published in the Journal of Epidemiology Community Health, children from poor families are more likely to be shorter than their peers.

N Z Ehounoux, M-V Zunzunegui, L Séguin, B Nikiema, and L Gauvin. Duration of lack of money for basic needs and growth delay in the Quebec Longitudinal Study of Child Development birth cohort. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 2009; 63 (1): 45 DOI: 10.1136/jech.2007.072157

2. Breastfeeding May Prevent Breast Cancer

Dr. Michael Lisanti and colleagues at Thomas Jefferson University found that extended lactation protects again mammary tumor development.

Sotgia F, Casimiro MC, Bonuccelli G, Liu M, Menezes DW, Er O, Daumer KM, Mercier I, Witkiewicz AK, Minetti C, Capozza F, Gormley M, Quong AA, Rui H, Frank PG, Milliman JN, Knudsen ES, Zhou J, Wang C, Pestell RG, Lisanti MP. Loss of Caveolin-3 Induces a Lactogenic Microenvironment that is Protective Against Mammary Tumor Formation. Am J Pathol, 2009, 174: 613-629

3. School-based Physical Activity Has Benefits Even If It Doesn't Help Lose Weight

School-based health and exercise programs have positive outcomes despite having little effect on children's weight or the amount of exercise they do outside of school, say Cochrane Researchers who carried out a systematic review of studies on physical activity programs in schools.

Dobbins M, De Corby K, Robeson P, Husson H, Tirilis D. School-based physical activity programs for promoting physical activity and fitness in children and adolescents aged 6-18. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2009, Issue 1. Art. No.: CD007651 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007651

More BPA Bad News

noreply@blogger.com (Unknown) — Fri, 10 Oct 2008 18:35:00 +0000

A new study released in Environmental Health Perspectives shows that , in vitro, bisphenol A can interfere with several chemotherapy drugs.

Read more at Tree Hugger or download the study here

New look. More Ads

noreply@blogger.com (Unknown) — Wed, 08 Oct 2008 19:05:00 +0000

Well, once again I'm trying to make a concerted effort to post more regularly. If you look around you will also see that I'm trying to make a bit of cash. I'd love to move to philosopherdad.com and maybe be able to spend more time blogging.

So go ahead, click on an ad. You know you wanna.

Phthalates!

noreply@blogger.com (Unknown) — Wed, 08 Oct 2008 18:49:00 +0000

We've been working on going phthalate-free in our home, ditching just about everything that has "fragrance". Pthalates are known hormone disruptors, and have been banned in children's toys in Canada and the US.

The trouble is, phthalates are found in just about every cosmetic product that contains fragrance. Research indicates that phthalates are absorbed through the skin. New research is showing that phthalte exposure in utero is hazardous to the fetus:

new research has found new evidence of "phthalate syndrome"- smaller penises, and undescended or incompletely descended testicles- in humans. Shanna Swan, director of the Center for Reproductive Epidemiology at the University of Rochester's school of medicine, who led the research, says phthalates are ""probably reproductive toxins and should be eliminated from products gradually because we don't need them."

For more information on phthalates visit:

PVC The Poison Plastic

Cosmeticdatabase.org

Via Treehugger

Halloween - Don't worry so much about letting kids go crazy on the candy

noreply@blogger.com (Unknown) — Tue, 07 Oct 2008 14:42:00 +0000

This year, Curious Boy will be almost 3 at Hallowwen. This means that he understands about going out trick-or-treating and he understands about candy. The common advice to parents is to mete out candy over an extended period of time, but some pediatric dentists have different advice for parents.

“The frequency of eating candy, and other refined carbohydrates, and
their stickiness, are big factors in creating the risk of caries
(cavities),” he said.

Eating carbohydrates can change the pH balance of the mouth, making
it more acidic, which can increase the risk of cavities. Each time
candy is eaten, the acid environment in the mouth can take up to an
hour to dissipate.

“Parents can let kids eat a bunch [of candy] now and a bunch later. But
don’t let them have one piece now, then an hour later let them have
another piece,” he said, adding that candy can also be dispensed as a
dessert or snack.

Ken Robinson @ TED: Schools Kill Creativity

noreply@blogger.com (Unknown) — Wed, 17 Sep 2008 16:33:00 +0000

I know it's ironic that a teacher would post this. But there you go.

Two months since the last post........jeez!

noreply@blogger.com (Unknown) — Sun, 20 Jul 2008 12:42:00 +0000

All of a sudden it's mid-(end of) July, and it's been two months since my last post! How did that happen? On a personal note, things have been well. I've been enjoying my first real holiday in years. Zen Girl continues to live up to her name, and her MSPI seems to be waning. She can now eat soy, legumes, cheese and beef. We are loath to try milk outright, because the introductions of some of the other foods have not been perfect. No blood or anything, just a return of mucous and diarrhea, which then subsided. Her iron levels have returned to normal as well. We have a GI follow up in two months, and we'll see what the story is then. I'm hoping to return to more normal posting as the summer wanes.

Healthy Diet for Humanity

noreply@blogger.com (Unknown) — Fri, 16 May 2008 17:48:00 +0000

This TED talk by NY Times food critic is fun and thought provoking. How do you and your family eat?

MSPI - Food Reintroduction Update

noreply@blogger.com (Unknown) — Wed, 14 May 2008 02:30:00 +0000

Well, Zen Girl is almost 1. We had a GI appointment about two weeks ago, and the GI and dietitian both felt that the time had come to begin seeing if she had grown out of any of her intolerances. They suggested that the best way to do that is for PhilosopherMom introduce food into her diet. This is very (VERY) exciting. So far: soy lecithin, soy oil, legumes, eggs, and soy (in progress) are fine. Beef starts Friday, then cheese next week and milk after that.

Don't forget to visit and join our MSPI Wiki

Child Welfare ensure boy Gets Chemo

noreply@blogger.com (Unknown) — Sun, 11 May 2008 01:38:00 +0000

This is a real heartbreaker.

Child welfare officials have taken temporary custody of an 11-year-old Ontario boy to ensure he undergoes chemotherapy after his father decided to take him off treatment for his aggressive form of leukemia.

A father who cannot be identified says his son is being treated 'like a prisoner' at the hospital where he is being treated for leukemia. (CBC)His father, who along with the boy can't be identified due to youth protection laws, told CBC News on Friday that the boy didn't want to continue with the treatments.(READ MORE)

The hard part is that everybody thinks they are doing the right thing. I'm not sure how I would react. There may be a religious angle that is not be discussed, or the boy's parents simply lost track of the fact that the chemo can save their son's life, regardless of how awful it is.

Here is the report from CBC's The National.

Children Most Vulnerable to Climate Change

noreply@blogger.com (Unknown) — Thu, 01 May 2008 02:05:00 +0000

Children are among the most vulnerable members of society. Natural and man-made disasters often affect children more than adults because they are unable to fend for themselves. This is doubly true in poor countries, where children often suffer from malnourishment and illnesses such as malaria or HIV.

Climate change brings with it drought and flooding along with food shortages and violence. The resulting toll on children in the developing world may be catastrophic.

Hyperparenting: The Helicopter Parent and Carl Honore with a Stinger Missile

noreply@blogger.com (Unknown) — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 17:34:00 +0000

When we went to visit daycares before Curious Boy was born, many of them tried to impress us with their school-like settings and workbooks for 3 year olds. Now, I'm a big fan of letting kids be kids for as long as possible, and Philosopher Mom is a pediatric occupational therapist. We both kept our mouths shut and ran like hell to a family-style home daycare down the street. Getting kids ready to succeed in school is one thing, but forcing them to attempt tasks before they are developmentally ready can really make them suffer.

The hyperparenting trend, where you schedule all of the life out of your kids life is having an incredibly detrimental effect on children's happiness.

Author Carl Honore, who also wrote "In Praise of Slow", has released a new book called "Under Pressure: Rescuing Childhood from the Culture of Hyperparenting". He has been making the rounds on CBC Radio 1, and it seems as though we have a lot in common. He suggests that getting kids into too many activities and putting too much academic pressure on them early on can be ruinous for a child's mental health and actually be counter-productive. He present the case of Finland as a contrast to North America. Children in Finland to not enter school until the age of 7, there is virtually no homework assigned during elementary school and Kumon/Sylvan type tutoring is unheard of. Fins consistently score very highly on internationally standardized tests and rate themselves as 3rd happiest in the world. Certainly something to think about, while you are crying becuase Aiden didn't get into the right preschool and now his chances of going to MIT are shot.

Listen to Carl Honore on Sounds Like Canada
and on the phone-in segment of Radio Noon (Part 1 and Part 2)

MSPI Wiki: A new online resource

noreply@blogger.com (Unknown) — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 00:51:00 +0000

We've made an effort to document our struggle with MSPI, and to collect online resources and to give advice to people who have written to us. Hardly a week goes by without someone telling me how lost and scared they were when their child was diagnosed with MSPI, and how helpful this blog has been. This response has been wonderful, but it has also made me realize that a blog is not necessarily the ideal setup for creating a community that can offer support and advice.

With that in mind, I have created a wiki where people can join, add their stories, questions, recipes and what ever else they can think of. A wiki is only as good as the people who use it, all you MSPI parents out there PLEASE JOIN!!!!!

http://milkintolerance.wetpaint.com

Health Canada will Recognize Bisphenol A as dangerous.

noreply@blogger.com (Unknown) — Tue, 15 Apr 2008 17:46:00 +0000

In the wake of Enivronmental Defence's report on BPA in baby bottles that was released in February (and commented on extensively, here too). In our house we've stopped using polycarbonate plastics, and Health Canada seems to be all set to agree with me according to a report in today's Globe and Mail.

This would be quite the ground-breaker. Health Canada is sometimes criticized for failing to take the lead on many health issues, often waiting to see what the FDA and EPA do. In light of the over-politicization of those agencies it is heartening to see Health Canada be so proactive in protecting the health of Canadians.

via TreeHugger

Parental Behaviour Affects Quality of Child's Sleep

noreply@blogger.com (Unknown) — Tue, 15 Apr 2008 15:10:00 +0000

A new study done at Montreal's Sacre Coeur Hospital and set to be published in Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine shows that parental behaviour can dramatically affect the way kids sleep.

Parents also reported their behavior at children’s bedtime (including whether they lulled children to sleep, laid them down awake or stayed with them until they fell asleep) and during nighttime awakenings (including comforting children in bed, taking them out of bed, giving them food or bringing them to the parental bed for cosleeping).

“Early (age 5 to 17 months) sleep disturbances predicted maladaptive parenting behaviors (e.g., mother present at sleep onset, giving food/drink after child awakens) at ages 29 and 41 months,” the authors write. “Some parental behaviors in turn predicted future bad dreams, total sleep time of less than 10 hours per night and sleep-onset latency [delays in falling asleep] of 15 minutes or more. However, most relationships did not remain significant in adjusted models that controlled for early sleep problems.” Cosleeping after nighttime awakening remained associated with more than 15-minute delays in returning to sleep, while the mother’s presence at the beginning of sleep appeared protective against such delays.

The results support the notion that some parental behaviors develop in response to early sleep problems, the authors note. However, they also indicate that such parental behaviors could have negative effects. “Parental strategies that were effective for early sleep difficulties (e.g. giving food or drink) may later become inappropriate to the child’s age and needs. Mothers might adopt the inappropriate response of giving food or drink to 29- to 41-month-old children awakening (which is associated with bad dreams and shorter total sleep time at age 50 months) because they commonly attribute infant cries to hunger and come to believe that infants cry only when hungry,” the authors write.

“Our findings clarify the long-debated relationship between parental behaviors and childhood sleep disturbances,” the authors conclude. “They suggest that cosleeping and other uncommon parental behaviors have negative consequences for future sleep and are thus maladaptive.”

This last paragraph surprises me. My understanding, from my experience with both kids, and from reading the article, is that the real problem is that parents fail to adapt their behaviour as children get older. Cosleeping with infants is one thing, cosleeping with a toddler or young child is another. Parents need to remember that their kids needs change, sometimes very rapidly and it is important to be aware when a strategy is no longer working.