Pinkies Up!

Cannes: Synecdoche, New York Still Looking for a Date to U.S. Theaters?

2008-05-21T11:25:00.000-07:00

I love saying the name of this movie. Synecdoche. It means: "a figure of speech in which a part is used for the whole or the whole for a part, the special for the general or the general for the special, as in ten sail for ten ships or a Croesus for a rich man." It's a play on Schenectady - one of the boroughs of New York. And, in true Charlie Kaufman style, the two terms are going to be inextricably entwined. Philip Seymour Hoffman is a theater director making an ambitious (understatement of the year) production about New York, love, death, "earth" (?), and beyond, and starts to fill an empty warehouse with actual life-sized buildings and ...real people (!) to live in and experience and communicate his version of the world. It's like Michel Gondry's ('Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind') Bjork music video, Bachelorette, on celluloid! The clips, while definitely fulfilling that requisite Kaufman tone, don't give away too much. Still, it's enough to pique my interest. I hope it gets a distributor soon, and I find it quite odd that not a single one has landed it despite its early showing and praise (Anne Thompson: “ambitious, arty and brilliant, if not entirely accessible.”) not to mention its most compelling draw - this is a Charlie Kaufman work!

Slashfilm has the three clips. (Hot Blog has them too.)
(Slash's is a bit more user-friendly, but can't be embedded as far as I can tell.)

IMAGE from: Variety

Cannes: Clint Eastwood's Movie ...Changes.

2008-05-20T14:12:00.000-07:00

News out of the festival: Clint Eastwood's 'Changeling' starring Angelina Jolie in 1920s period dress (a perfect fit after her somewhat short stint as the face of St. John) has become 'The Exchange'. Very appropriate that the name would change given the name itself, but I kind of liked 'Changeling' - gave it sort of a steam punk vibe which only heightened the mystery element that the movie is founded on. Basic premise, which is based on the real-life Wineville Chicken Murders case: Christine Collins (Jolie) and her son live humbly in a quiet neighborhood in 20s Los Angeles, but one evening after pulling in some overtime, she finds her son has mysteriously disappeared. Months go by before her son is returned by the LAPD, and in the meantime her plight has become regional news, so when she finally reunites with him at the platform of a train station, she's stunned to find that this new boy isn't hers. Her cries of confusion are blunted by the police who label her deluded and loony, and she's placed in a mental ward by corrupt cop Chief James E. Davis (Colm Feore). But with the help of radio Evangelist Rev. Gustav Briegleb (John Malkovich), she uncovers a web of corruption, politics and murder.

One of my absolute favorite films out of the 90s (it was my no.1 for a good long time in high school, years ago) is 'L.A. Confidential' and another of my favorites in general is 'Chinatown' so it's struck me that maybe I just like these historical fiction tales on Los Angeles in its early history, which is certainly very rich and tangled. This film sounds a heck of a lot like 'Confidential' and in the best way, but being written by J. Michael Straczynski whose best-known vehicle was creating 'Babylon 5' I imagine the characterizations will be a lot broader, and less pulpy than 'Confidential' which was adapted from a James Ellroy novel (whose other book turned into Brian De Palma's 'The Black Dahlia' - another Los Angeles-spun historical fiction film). 'Exchange' definitely has my attention, and with Todd McCarthy's early review of the film, I imagine only greater things could be coming out of this between now and its release later in the year. The content alone has it poised for some kind of run through the awards season early in 2009, and J. Michael Straczynski's script has seen some great responses. What do you think? Surefire Best Picture contender? (If Awards Daily has placed it on the tracker, then it must be!)

(Also interesting to note is that Amy Ryan, the Academy Award-nominated mother from 'Gone, Baby, Gone' plays a supporting role in this as well, which gives the film an unintentional (?) flavoring of that film, which was rather good I thought. I wonder if Eastwood will splice that route and lift it to some subtext, or simply ignore it and pin the LAPD as the sole source of immorality?)

IMAGE from: First Showing

Cannes: Woody Allen's 'Vicky Cristina Barcelona'.

2008-05-18T13:35:00.000-07:00

As much a part of Woody Allen's mystique goes to his dedicated audience's experiences with his films as it does his knack for being an auteur. The stories behind the films, about how his fans have reacted to each or all, are certainly an important element when considering his influence. Even when he makes a film that stagnates or a film that hardly makes any strides creatively, his films are a bridge into his mind, and it's always a compelling experience to go there. His latest film, 'Vicky Cristina Barcelona', which debuted at Cannes this year, may have received some pretty mixed reviews thus far (many coming from confusion over whether or not he's parodying himself - he may very well be), but I think he's still more fascinating at his worst than quite a few directors are when they're "on the money".

When I first saw that the film was going to play at Cannes, I was interested, but not entirely excited. 'Scoop' looked like it had his idiosyncrasies, but not much intrigue. 'Cassandra's Dream' looks like the opposite. The early reviews affirmed me, many were put off by its pacing, its melodrama, and its odd sexual tension (without actual sex). I was disappointed that a film with such a wonderful cast as this (Javier Bardem, Scarlett Johansson, Penelope Cruz, Rebecca Hall - who played Christian Bale's wife magnificently in 'The Prestige' but has yet to surface to noted acclaim) could be sloughed off as having unfocused tension and chemistry issues. 'Match Point' was such a wonder, an unadulterated joy to behold, that I've almost been holding my breath to see how Allen might evolve next (I thought the new location in Barcelona could do it). Lucky for me, the good stuff is starting to pour in...

Kim Voynar of Cinematical gets the idea with Woody Allen, and relates the experience of watching a film of his to opening a Christmas gift from your eccentric aunt, his latest being of the good bunch:

"I've said before that a new film from Woody Allen is something like getting a Christmas gift from your eccentric aunt; you never know if you'll get a crocheted toilet paper cozy, or a piece of priceless heirloom jewelry. Fortunately, Allen's newest film, 'Vicky Cristina Barcelona', turns out to be more like the latter.

....Allen has succeeded in making an excellent film; Vicky Cristina Barcelona is a lovely gift from a filmmaker who, when he's on his game, truly hits the mark."

Yet if Woody Allen is proficient in anything and quite consistently, it's extracting captivating performances from his actresses (his muse now being Scarlett Johansson, as overexposed as she is), this time from Penelope Cruz, who's still hot (and bothered?) off of 'Volver' and receiving the most glowing responses of any element of the film. It's because of her powerhouse performance in this that's returned my hopes to their high place for this film. Todd McCarthy of Variety:

"Cruz, who officially graduated from sex kitten to powerhouse melodramatic actress in “Volver,” is in full Anna Magnani mode here, storming up and down mountain peaks of emotion and captivating everyone in the process. Allen even generates affectionate comic mileage from the common rap on Cruz’s acting–that she’s great in Spanish but blah in English–by having her deliver Maria Elena’s colorful tirades in her native language, only to be told again and again by Juan Antonio to speak English so Cristina can understand her. She’s dynamite here in either language."

Professional critics may be losing their jobs and criticism as a whole may be on the decline, but doesn't that just get your blood roiling with anticipatory glee?

IMAGE from: FishbowlNY
IMAGE from: First Showing

Cannes: Most Anticipated.

2008-05-10T18:57:00.000-07:00

This year's Cannes Film Festival (with poster efforts by none other than David Lynch, below; employing a familiar motif) boasts some highly-anticipated new films from some of the most exciting filmmakers around, and a good number of them are set to open. The rest of the schedule, of course, looks just as splendid. (Here's the Variety coverage.) The first unveiling goes to Fernando Meirelles' ('The Constant Gardener' and 'City of God') Blindness which is one of the most curious films and one that I'm incredibly excited about. It takes a high concept like an epidemic of contagious blindness sweeping across a city and turns it into an elegant (so I hear) allegory about the fragility of civilization. It's adapted from Nobel prize-winner Jose Saramago's 1995 novel of the same name. 'Children of Men' and 'The Diving Bell and the Butterfly' come to mind whenever I hear or read about this film, and that's definitely a good thing, it's a good combination. The cast looks shining, too, consisting of Julianne Moore, Mark Ruffalo, Danny Glover, and Gael Garcia Bernal.

Charlie Kaufman's directorial debut, Synecdoche, New York, is another of my personal picks for most anticipated, as Kaufman is one of the few screenwriters in or around Hollywood who has managed to turn the auteur theory on its head, or his. He's a hot commodity, as they say, and his new pic is being trailed by studio execs like a lion to a calf (seen the Battle at Kruger video yet?). They may get lost in this one, though, because it looks like a doozy: Phillip Seymour Hoffman is a theater director (living in Schenectady, New York, where else?) whose wife - played by Catherine Keener - leaves him, so to prove his worth decides to build a replica of the city in a warehouse, which he expands ultimately for forty years and populates with actual people. Even more of a doozy: Kaufman always said he wanted to make a horror film, and he calls this one it. His first time directing (he's the only first-timer this year at the festival), he's got some major ambitions.

Some of the other films to debut: Steven Soderbergh's Che, which follows Benicio del Toro as the 'Lawrence of Latin America' in a two-parter; Woody Allen's continuation of his re-energized phase that started with 'Match Point', Vicky Cristina Barcelona, which follows Javier Bardem, Penelope Cruz and Rebecca Hall in another twisty, lusty plot; James Gray's Two Lovers about a man, played by Joaquin Phoenix, who's stuck in the middle between a woman his family loves and a new and volatile neighbor; and Clint Eastwood's The Changeling, which stars Angelina Jolie as a mother (the story of her life) who finds with the return of her abducted child that something's not quite right. A year with big names has quite a few fighting for the top spot.

IMAGE from: Anne Thompson

Circle of Critics Loses Another.

2008-05-08T23:26:00.000-07:00

It was last year that Premiere Magazine succumbed to the pressures of online, and published its last issue (it had Will Ferrell on the cover promoting Blades of Glory) only to retreat to a tiny corner of the internet where their old prominence and clout became virtual anonymity wrapped up in ugly page designs. Do you think the site will last much longer next to more extensive and expansive sites like Empire and even Entertainment Weekly (which is less a cinema mag and more a tome of pop culture and box office numbers) who have successfully made the transition to digital? It's the scenario that many print publications are facing - either go online, or get out. I'm not so sure Premiere.com will last, especially now with the forced departure of one of their best, one of their vets who was also one of the only to draw any kind of traffic (so says Anne Thompson; I'm sure a majority of readers for any given columnist/critic don't look them up online and probably don't even know their names - a sad truth). Glenn Kenny was one of my personal heroes at the magazine and he was one of the earliest to leave an impression on me (Peter Travers of Rolling Stone is the other), so his absence there will surely be felt (and tallied and analyzed on their feed, since that's how these publications have to do it now). (Read his comments to some other "critics" in defense of his art, which is a dying art.) He's got a great mind and a lucid, distinct writing style, so I'm sure he'll surface again soon, and hopefully on a better-looking interface. Read his final words on the Premiere Blog.

IMAGE from: GeekRoar

'Speed' for Seven Minutes.

2008-05-08T18:44:00.000-07:00

You'll find at Yahoo! Movies a new clip of Speed Racer which features the first seven minutes of the new film hitting tomorrow (5/9). It's definitely a stylish movie, and it appeals to the geek in me with all of its sugary, neon, anime-based, CGI-powered confection, but I don't have enough excitement to go out and see it in place of, say, Iron Man, which I've sadly not seen yet (one out of the many millions who have). It looks too much like a migraine waiting to happen, as delicious of a migraine that would be, and I'll always opt for the superhero, even if he is a drunkard, over a chase-flick (it might give me diabetes). But it is rather unfortunate that it's turned out this way, since I had warmed up a bit to the trailer. (I initially thought it was a live-action Hot Wheels movie, then I saw the white helmet with the 'R' emblazoned on it, then I saw Emile Hirsch and I got confused again, then it started to make sense, then came the swirling red 'Speed Racer,' and some peace of mind.) But, then, I figure this might also be the case where the trailer gives essentially everything away, and all that's left to discover is the secret weapon which threatens to destroy Speed Racer, but which is overcome by the love Speed has for racing, his family and mankind.

It appears that I've captured the general consensus, though, as the film currently has a 37% rating from 20 reviews on Metacritic, and a 35% at Rotten Tomatoes currently counting 63 reviews, with the best comments being about its particularly crazy, kitschy anti-realistic style and the worst reviews ...saying the same thing. Joe Morgenstern of the Wall Street Journal: "This toxic admixture of computer-generated frenzy and live-action torpor succeeds in being, almost simultaneously, genuinely painful -- the esthetic equivalent of needles in eyeballs -- and weirdly benumbing, like eye candy laced with lidocaine." And Michael Phillips of the Chicago Tribune (who frequently headlines in place of Roger Ebert on his program while Ebert recovers from a botched surgery): "At its best, it's buoyant pop entertainment focused on three things: speed, racing and retina-splitting oceans of digitally captured color."

Based on its ill reception and its narrow appeal (male youths, and maybe youths in general - Susan Sarandon, John Goodman and Matthew Fox won't be pulling in much else), I reckon it'll be another big weekend for Iron Man (though if it loses, it won't be by much), which has shown it can attract women and older folks above 25. We'll see next week if The Chronicles of Narnia: Prince Caspian, which has a wider appeal and has a track record that's enormous globally, will be able to pose a greater threat.

IMAGE from: AICN.

'Milk' Does Everybody Good.

2008-05-06T21:26:00.000-07:00

It's probably a good thing that Bryan Singer's production of the biopic about assassinated San Francisco supervisor Harvey Milk didn't get made. Not that he wouldn't have done a great job, or a particularly accurate or humane one, but just for the sake of giving the memory of the groundbreaking openly-gay public official all that he deserves, I think it's better that we'll end up with just one picture. Gus Van Sant's version of the film, though much less neatly named (Singer's was called The Mayor of Castro Street), is the one that's pulled ahead. The lack of competition for location shooting, talent and awards expectations means that more can go into the production, and better care can be taken. And for director Van Sant, the cast and crew of Milk and the citizens of San Francisco - and especially Castro Street, which metamorphosed during the 70s from an Irish neighborhood to a predominant gay district - it's definitely a labor of love. The film's been in production for quite some time (extended and suspended due to the WGA Strike earlier in the year) and won't be in theaters for some time either, so the film's already making hearts heavy with melancholy and anguish. After all, several of the consultants and crew have fond memories of Mr. Milk, and the daily reminder of what happened in November of 1978 that's been recreated with the sets and costumes still shakes their roots. The San Francisco Chronicle spoke to quite a few of them back in January, and it makes for some good reading on the production and the remnants of Mr. Milk's legacy.

But the recreated sets and costumed actors have given quite a few some good old hope and faith, too. A good amount has changed in all of America in the last 30 years, and with so many more gay and lesbian public officials having been in office since and with the visibility of the LGBT community and the Gay Rights Movement on the rise, many who've long advocated greater tolerance and awareness are probably looking forward to the days where we'll take gay characters and gay culture for granted. With Gus Van Sant at the helm, one needn't worry about sentimentalism or sensationalism, and with his talent comes more talent: Sean Penn will play Milk himself (below), with James Franco as his first lover and campaign manager Scott Smith, Emile Hirsch as student activist and intern of Milk's Cleve Jones, Victor Garber as Mayor George Moscone, Diego Luna as Jack Lira - another lover of Milk's, and Josh Brolin as the noted killer and fellow official Dan White. Such a serious cast as that should easily be able to deliver some cathartic and enlightened moments, and enlighten the viewers who aren't aware of who Milk was. Maybe they'll even immortalize his best quote, which was an almost prophetic wish of what was to come: "If a bullet should enter my brain, let that bullet destroy every closet door." He gets a second chance to say it.

2008: Year of the Comic Book Movie?

2008-05-06T16:23:00.000-07:00

With the summer season having been kicked off this last weekend to an incredible start with Iron Man (which opened to more than $100 million in its first weekend - the largest for a non-sequel), the stakes are now even higher for the other big comic books films shooting for the top spot as Summer 2008's biggest tentpole adaptation, The Incredible Hulk and The Dark Knight. The Paramount-distributed flick has proven to be a big earner for Marvel, who produced and developed the film independently and had gambled on bringing director Jon Favreau, ultimately to great success with him at the helm.

But of course Universal (whose 'Hulk' will be released on June 13) and Warner (with their 'Dark Knight' to debut on July 18) were aware of the anticipation surrounding the film, which had a $50 million ad campaign behind it, and decided to capitalize on its timing and newly-energized demographic to promote their own blockbusters with new trailers to call their own. 'Hulk' was released exclusively through Apple, while 'Dark Knight' had its posted on one of their viral websites (the latter also taking the opportunity to draw more hype around Harvey Dent, who of course becomes Two-Face, in a strategic move away from reminding audiences of Heath Ledger's tragic passing, who is still extensively featured in the trailer).

Also awaiting release are Wanted, which is helmed by Russian filmmaker Timur Bekmambetov and stars James McAvoy, Angelina Jolie, and Morgan Freeman, based on the comic by Mark Millar, and Hancock, which isn't based on a comic but nonetheless features Will Smith as a bad-mouthed and ill-received superhero who decides to change his public image with the help of Jason Bateman. It's a definite summer of hotly-anticipated flicks of all kinds, it'll be fascinating to see how this season yields by the time it closes.

And even beyond the summer, films like Frank Miller's adaptation of the Will Eisner comic The Spirit and Zack Snyder's follow-up to smash hit 300 are awaiting wide release with almost fever pitch, the former still waiting a release date (though it does already has a teaser).

*Speaking of Iron Man and The Dark Knight, two major spoilers have found their way onto the internet. For the one concerning what happens after the credits roll in Iron Man, click here. For a truly disturbing, but exciting, image from the Batman sequel, click here.

the big show.

2008-01-17T01:06:00.000-08:00

Here are my predictions for the nominees and winners of this year's Academy Awards ceremony, if it does indeed happen, and it seems it will because show producers are vehemently saying that it will take place whether the writers support it or not. (The Oscars have continually brought in millions, perhaps billions, of dollars into the Los Angeles and California economy, so it not happening would be not only distressing for Hollywood, but also the many businesses who count on the Oscars for profit and sustenance.) I'm crossing my fingers for the negotiations and I hope they occur sooner than later (with or without mediation by A-listers, guild heads, etc.) so that dues can be paid to those who have contributed most last year to the art of films, which is as important as making films.

There are some glaring omissions when it comes to categories, but I'm working on it.

Best Original Score
Atonement -- Will Win / Should Win
There Will Be Blood -- Could Win
Into the Wild
Beowulf
Ratatouille

Best Cinematography
The Diving Bell and the Butterfly -- Will Win
There Will Be Blood -- Should Win
No Country for Old Men
Atonement
The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford -- Could Win

Best Editing
Sweeney Todd: The Demon Barber of Fleet Street -- Will Win
Michael Clayton -- Could Win
Atonement -- Should Win
Into the Wild
No Country for Old Men

Best Original Screenplay
Juno -- Will Win / Should Win
Michael Clayton -- Could Win
Ratatouille
The Savages
Lars and the Real Girl

Best Adaptated Screenplay
No Country for Old Men -- Will Win / Should Win
There Will Be Blood -- Could Win
Atonement
The Diving Bell and the Butterfly
Sweeney Todd: The Demon Barber of Fleet Street

Best Art Direction
Sweeney Todd: The Demon Barber of Fleet Street -- Will Win / Should Win
Atonement
Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix
300 -- Could Win
Across the Universe

Best Supporting Actress
Cate Blanchett :: I'm Not There -- Will Win / Should Win
Tilda Swinton :: Michael Clayton -- Could Win
Amy Ryan :: Gone Baby Gone -- Could Win
Saoirse Rohan :: Atonement
Catherine Keener :: Into the Wild

Best Supporting Actor
Javier Bardem :: No Country for Old Men -- Will Win / Should Win
Casey Affleck :: The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford -- Could Win
Philip Seymour Hoffman :: Charlie Wilson's War
Tom Wilkinson :: Michael Clayton
Hal Holbrook :: Into the Wild

Best Actor
Daniel Day-Lewis :: There Will Be Blood -- Will Win / Should Win
George Clooney :: Michael Clayton -- Could Win
Johnny Depp :: Sweeney Todd: The Demon Barber of Fleet Street
Viggo Mortenson :: Eastern Promises
Ryan Gosling :: Lars and the Real Girl

Best Actress
Julie Christie :: Away From Her -- Will Win / Should Win
Ellen Page :: Juno -- Could Win
Marion Cotillard :: La Vie en Rose -- Could Win
Angelina Jolie :: A Mighty Heart
Amy Adams :: Enchanted

Best Director
The Coen Brothers :: No Country for Old Men -- Will Win / Should Win
Paul Thomas Anderson :: There Will Be Blood -- Could Win
Sean Penn :: Into the Wild -- Could Win
Tim Burton :: Sweeney Todd: The Demon Barber of Fleet Street
Julian Schnabel :: The Diving Bell and the Butterfly

Best Picture
No Country for Old Men -- Will Win
There Will Be Blood -- Should Win
Atonement -- Could Win
Juno
Michael Clayton

classes begin.

2008-01-15T01:28:00.000-08:00

I attended my CTCS402 class for the first time today at the Robert Zemeckis Center and my professor is Anne Thompson. She works for the trade publication Variety which is based in Los Angeles though it was contributors in other countries and is read widely around the world. If I do well enough in this class, maybe I'll muster up the courage to ask my Prof. Thompson if a job there might be good for me after I graduate. Wish me luck!

the globes looked a little flat.

2008-01-15T00:12:00.000-08:00

That was a depressing Golden Globes conference. There wasn't even any suspense or excitement to the show! Billy Bush and Nancy O'Dell could have at least tried to go for the long pauses after reading off the nominees before announcing the winner. And this would have been the year to do something like that, too, since there were a few surprises. I thought everyone was already rooting for Cate Blanchett to win for "I'm Not There" (in the category of Supporting Actress), but I guess that wasn't really the case (so I wasn't surprised when her name was called). Quite a few people, I realize now, were pulling for Amy Ryan to win for "Gone Baby Gone" - though Blanchett's film has been getting more glowing attention than Ryan's, which I think will be better for Blanchett's campaign to win once again at the upcoming Oscars (should they indeed happen).

Most of the other categories I could have predicted fairly easily, as the precursor awards (critics circles, top tens, etc.) were nearly consistent in favor of several folks. Daniel Day-Lewis for one, his performance is being likened to "Citizen Kane" and "The Treasure of Sierra Madre" and those kinds of references don't come by often at all. His previous competition was thought to be George Clooney for "Michael Clayton" but now it seems it's Johnny Depp (for "Sweeney Todd") since Clooney hasn't been able to pull away enough of the limelight from the notoriously-dedicated actor and Depp just won the Golden Globe for Actor in a Musical or Comedy. Julie Christie was also my guess for the win, and it appears she'll have little to fear come Oscar-time since most of the other nominees are in films that haven't been very successful as with Christie's "Away From Her". The nominees aren't out yet, of course, but if they retain mostly nominees from the Drama side of things (versus the nominees under Comedy/Drama) then Christie should have nothing to fear. Blanchett is already getting nods for her Bob Dylan portrayal so it's likely the AMPAS will just let her have that (assuming she wins there too). Besides, "Elizabeth: The Golden Age" wasn't a very well-received film. "Atonement" was, however, but it isn't particularly noted for Keira Knightley's performance in it. If Christie doesn't get it (but as one of the only veterans in this category, she's very likely to), it'll go to Angeline Jolie or Marion Cotillard, the latter for her role in "La Vie en Rose" which, like "Elizabeth" and unlike "Atonement", is only being recognized for the performance more so than the film itself.

The only real upsets for me were for Director and Dramatic Picture. I understand that "Diving Bell" hardly got its dues in the nominations (snubs in the Picture and Acting categories), but I have a strong feeling that the Hollywood Foreign Press really gave Julian Schnabel the award because they opted not to even nominate him in the Picture category. No doubt the man touches some nerves with his creative filmic reflection of the lead character's plight, but next to the superb work of the Coens in "No Country for Old Men", I don't think there's quite a contest - it should have gone to the gruesome twosome. I do suppose that feeling good will always win out against feeling disconcerted, and "No Country" had that bleakness in spades. (For the record, I'd have chosen Paul Thomas Anderson in this category were it up to me, because the man has not only reinvigorated his career, which wasn't failing in any way, shape or form, but he's done so in a way that's vastly different from his previous body of work. His direction of actors is astonishing and his knack for layered visual storytelling is sparkling.)

When one of the Access Hollywood hosts announced Julian Schnabel as the winner for Director, I started making bets that "No Country" was going to win not only because it deserves to, but also because the Coens got robbed in that category and they needed to be compensated for it. So for "Atonement" to win is well and good, but it was rather upsetting for me at the time because I don't think "Atonement" will hold up as well in the process of aging, whereas "No Country for Old Men" will be around for decades to come, yearning to be digested for its tough moral and literary content. I still love "Atonement", though, and hope it still makes the nomination at least for Best Picture at the Oscars, but I'm crossing my fingers for "No Country" not to mention my personal favorite of the year, "There Will Be Blood".

If neither of those two films win for Picture next month, then there will, indeed, be blood.

go suck a hockey puck, doo doo head!

2008-01-09T21:53:00.000-08:00

I really get a kick out of how my fellow Americans try so hard to sanitize the media, even our own language (as messed up as it is) and how it's gotten to the point that we'd rather have political correctness than practicality. Sometimes it really is just that much simpler to say "For fuck's sake!!" (though those exclamation marks should never be fulfilled lest you want to be stared down by any parents or elderly in the immediate area - which is far scarier than any one of those emo/punk/goth kids). And sometimes the original meaning or context is lost when there's so much rhetoric involved. And sometimes the point is even assisted by bad language! I went through my whole childhood thinking that Maleficent from Sleeping Beauty was the ultimate badass because she said "...and all the powers of HELL!". Who cares that she's killed by a sword in the bladder, she said Hell!

This Orbit Gum commercial is hilarious because it satirizes this phenomenon of sanitizing our language (and our behavior, as the office setting evokes images of sexual harassment lectures) with some pretty absurd euphemisms. Who says kumquat anymore? (What are they, anyways?) Either way, it's inspired me to start using ridiculous monikers as comebacks, so if I call you a lint licker, be sure and feign shock and distress to appease me.

I think the hilarity of this commercial is helped by their British accents. And the delivery of the lines! In this awards season for films, I think it's a shame there aren't awards for Best Performance in a Commercial. That woman in the leopard print totally deserves Best Supporting! haha!

** By the way, I just saw There Will Be Blood no more than one hour ago so I'll be able to put together my list of personal favorites (and picks for what the year's best films are) by this time next week. I hate to ruin the suspense, but Paul Thomas Anderson has on his hands another gorgeous masterpiece and I'm leaning heavily towards it as my top pick. (Leaning? More like hunching over with one arm sticking out in that general direction.) Anyways, it'd probably have been more exciting (for you and me) for me to figure out who else will fill out the Top Ten. Where will Atonement fit in? No Country for Old Men? Sweeney Todd? 3:10 to Yuma!?

wicked witch of the western world.

2008-01-08T01:09:00.000-08:00

Have you heard of Ann Coulter? I don't profess to hating a lot of people, especially those I don't know personally, but I have a strong sense of conviction in my disgust and disdain for that wretch of a woman. Some of the absurd, hateful and outlandish things she's said really make me worry about the state of national ethics, not to mention the general direction of American politics - and I'm an optimist! She made some statements about Jews needing to "be perfected" by the cleansing qualities of Christianity (I'm not Christian, but that's only supposed to sound minimally facetious) and about how women shouldn't vote because their faculties render them malleable to what she might call the deceptive powers of liberalism that made me quiver at the knees; I even spent a couple moments silently praying to some higher power to strike that woman dead before she can harm any more in our world. Her attacks on the wives of the 9/11 victims and on John Edwards are simply frightening things - they're like warm-up words for a planned genocide or something. She's like Hitler reincarnated into an ugly, bony, limp and lame woman, and she hardly even resembles that - a woman. Who could marry that!? (As I understand it, no one, since she's been engaged several times only to have them broken off not too much later.)

One thing I will admit to is being fascinated with her singularity. She has such hate for liberals (or anyone she deems to be liberal enough, like Guiliani, which is ridiculous) that her words seem to almost transform into little puffs of hot smoke that morph into mythological demons as they leave her poisonous lips. It's like listening to Hitler's speeches dubbed over lions attacking innocent goats. Her cracked, harsh voice sounds like utter pain, like her own throat can't stand the evil that looms in her dark, dank head. But like a poorly-made foreign film or reality television or a disturbing quasi-porn flick, it's compelling only because her worldview and beliefs are so odd, so enormously incorrect and stupid that they must be viewed by the rest of the world in order for us to know - to know truly and deeply - what it'd be like if we were devoid of a moral center and thirsty for the light that is consciousness and humanity.

But perhaps her whole shtick is all a joke and a big publicity stunt, at which point it would cease to be even minimally compelling and she would be sloughed to leave relevance. Not that she's very relevant in the political landscape, anyways, but still.

this is like our first date!

2008-01-07T23:01:00.000-08:00

I just got myself one of these things after having seen so many of them penetrate my repertoire of sites that I visit frequently, and after having decided that I want something better to do with my time and energy when browsing the internet instead of simply doing just that. (I also got an iPod Touch for Christmas and wanted some use for it since the thing isn't exactly intuitive when it comes to social networking sites like MySpace or Facebook.) So expect random, meandering, pointless posts from time to time! haha.

Actually, the point of this was so that I have a more legitimate way to channel and contemplate things that are affecting me or really piquing my interests - like films or music that have struck me recently, or restaurants and ideas that I find to be tasteful and intriguing. Since no one uses Xanga anymore, I thought I'd reserve some of my time and output to something a little more popular (though I'm still planning on posting on my Xanga from time to time, maybe about more personal stuff since, like I said, no one really reads it anymore and I can anticipate few folks laying their eyes on my streams of consciousness and secrets).

At the moment, I'm drafting up a revised Top Ten list for films of the last year (2007) since it's kind of unfair that the original list included films I've yet to actually see. I'm also evaluating a list of films I'm personally looking forward to most for this new year, 2008.

But aside from film, I still need to outline what my visions and hopes are for this site since I'm really pining for this thing to stay alive and actively-involved in my life for the long run, so I'll have to update with something along the lines of a mission statement or promise or something. Think of it sort of as a New Year's Resolution.

I'm traditionally not good at keeping up with those, but maybe this is the year!