<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>Planning Jargon</title>
	
	<link>http://www.planningjargon.com</link>
	<description>Making planning more accessible to the public...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 May 2013 05:19:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/planningjargon" /><feedburner:info uri="planningjargon" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><feedburner:emailServiceId>planningjargon</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname>http://feedburner.google.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><item>
		<title>Goodbye California Watch, Bay Citizen</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/planningjargon/~3/x5vpz0IlNF8/</link>
		<comments>http://www.planningjargon.com/2013/05/goodbye-california-watch-bay-citizen/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2013 05:19:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nonprofit Organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bay Citizen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Center For Investigative Reporting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planningjargon.com/?p=934</guid>
		<description>Say goodbye to &lt;a href="http://californiawatch.org"&gt;California Watch&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://www.baycitizen.org"&gt;Bay Citizen&lt;/a&gt; because tomorrow (&lt;strong&gt;29 May 2013&lt;/strong&gt;), they will be &lt;a href="http://cironline.org/onenewsroom"&gt;merged&lt;/a&gt; into the existing &lt;a href="http://cironline.org"&gt;The Center For Investigative Reporting&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/planningjargon/~4/x5vpz0IlNF8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.planningjargon.com/2013/05/goodbye-california-watch-bay-citizen/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.planningjargon.com/2013/05/goodbye-california-watch-bay-citizen/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Urban Planning With The Peace Corps</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/planningjargon/~3/m9wPhj7totQ/</link>
		<comments>http://www.planningjargon.com/2013/05/urban-planning-for-the-peace-corps/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 05:19:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Urban Planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Community Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Municipal Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peace Corps]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planningjargon.com/?p=928</guid>
		<description>This is kind of old news, but for those urban planners who thought about joining the &lt;a href="http://www.peacecorps.gov"&gt;Peace Corps&lt;/a&gt;' Municipal Development program I would say you (like me) waited too long.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/planningjargon/~4/m9wPhj7totQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.planningjargon.com/2013/05/urban-planning-for-the-peace-corps/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.planningjargon.com/2013/05/urban-planning-for-the-peace-corps/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Sen. Tom Berryhill On SB 787 And CEQA Reform</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/planningjargon/~3/Rk1PV5mt5m0/</link>
		<comments>http://www.planningjargon.com/2013/05/sen-tom-berryhill-on-sb-787-and-ceqa-reform/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 06:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CEQA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CEQA Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SB 787]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Berryhill]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planningjargon.com/?p=924</guid>
		<description>"The Legislature is quick to support waiving CEQA when it comes to a stadium for an NFL or NBA team but silent when it comes to making
the process work for the rest of us. SB 787 in no way would have circumvented CEQA or weakened the environmental protections put in
place by CEQA. What it would have done is get at the heart of the problem –- projects being delayed or killed for reasons other than environmental concerns."

-- Sen. Tom Berryhill, R-Twain Harte&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/planningjargon/~4/Rk1PV5mt5m0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.planningjargon.com/2013/05/sen-tom-berryhill-on-sb-787-and-ceqa-reform/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.planningjargon.com/2013/05/sen-tom-berryhill-on-sb-787-and-ceqa-reform/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Parking Lot: Houston George Bush Intercontinental Airport</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/planningjargon/~3/bS51WxAE020/</link>
		<comments>http://www.planningjargon.com/2013/04/parking-lot-houston-george-bush-intercontinental-airport/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 02:19:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Places]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Houston George Bush Intercontinental Airport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parking Lot]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planningjargon.com/?p=917</guid>
		<description>Interesting &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/add1sun/3466383400/"&gt;photo&lt;/a&gt; of the parking lot at &lt;a href="http://airport-houston.com/"&gt;Houston George Bush Intercontinental Airport&lt;/a&gt;. Staring at endless rows of parked cars can be quite hypnotic.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/planningjargon/~4/bS51WxAE020" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.planningjargon.com/2013/04/parking-lot-houston-george-bush-intercontinental-airport/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.planningjargon.com/2013/04/parking-lot-houston-george-bush-intercontinental-airport/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Important Public Viewing Details Within Environmental Documents…</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/planningjargon/~3/RDlO7o2Uw1k/</link>
		<comments>http://www.planningjargon.com/2013/03/important-public-viewing-details-within-environmental-documents/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2013 02:20:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California Department Of Water Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CEQA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Levees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Small Erosion Repair Program]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planningjargon.com/?p=911</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.water.ca.gov"&gt;California Department of Water Resources&lt;/a&gt; recently released the Draft Program Environmental Impact Report (PEIR) for its &lt;a href="http://www.water.ca.gov/floodmgmt/fmo/msb/smallerosionrepairs.cfm"&gt;Small Erosion Repair Program&lt;/a&gt; (SERP).&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/planningjargon/~4/RDlO7o2Uw1k" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.planningjargon.com/2013/03/important-public-viewing-details-within-environmental-documents/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.planningjargon.com/2013/03/important-public-viewing-details-within-environmental-documents/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Citizens At Top Of The Org Chart: Clayton, California</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/planningjargon/~3/GcMX1FuB5wc/</link>
		<comments>http://www.planningjargon.com/2013/03/citizens-at-top-of-the-org-chart-clayton-california/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 05:36:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[City Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clayton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organizational Chart]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planningjargon.com/?p=905</guid>
		<description>I just came across this &lt;a href="http://www.ci.clayton.ca.us/index.php?section=3"&gt;organizational chart&lt;/a&gt; for the &lt;a href="http://www.ci.clayton.ca.us/"&gt;City of Clayton&lt;/a&gt;, California.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/planningjargon/~4/GcMX1FuB5wc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.planningjargon.com/2013/03/citizens-at-top-of-the-org-chart-clayton-california/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.planningjargon.com/2013/03/citizens-at-top-of-the-org-chart-clayton-california/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Pershing County Courthouse In Lovelock, Nevada</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/planningjargon/~3/-SfSaBu6T1I/</link>
		<comments>http://www.planningjargon.com/2013/03/pershing-county-courthouse-in-lovelock-nevada/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 06:18:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[County Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Landmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frederick J. Delongchamps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lovelock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nevada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pershing County]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pershing County Courthouse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reno]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stillwater National Wildlife Refuge]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planningjargon.com/?p=902</guid>
		<description>Bored during a recent trip to Reno, Nevada, my friend and I decided to take a supposed short trip to check out the &lt;a href="http://www.fws.gov/stillwater/stillwater_refuge/stillwater.html"&gt;Stillwater National Wildlife Refuge&lt;/a&gt;. It wasn't short, and we couldn't find any easy spot to observe the refuge.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/planningjargon/~4/-SfSaBu6T1I" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.planningjargon.com/2013/03/pershing-county-courthouse-in-lovelock-nevada/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.planningjargon.com/2013/03/pershing-county-courthouse-in-lovelock-nevada/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>So Six Urban Planners Play SimCity 5…</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/planningjargon/~3/lhdO9Y35nUo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.planningjargon.com/2013/03/so-six-urban-planners-play-simcity-5/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 06:21:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Urban Planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Co.Exist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edward Glaeser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greg Lindsay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McDermott]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SimCity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Urban Planners]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planningjargon.com/?p=894</guid>
		<description>Last month, &lt;a href="http://www.fastcoexist.com"&gt;Co.Exist&lt;/a&gt; and Greg Lindsay brought together a diverse group of six urbanists, three architects, three journalists, and a video game designer and let them loose in a tournament to build the best city in &lt;a href="http://www.simcity.com"&gt;SimCity 5&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/planningjargon/~4/lhdO9Y35nUo" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.planningjargon.com/2013/03/so-six-urban-planners-play-simcity-5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.planningjargon.com/2013/03/so-six-urban-planners-play-simcity-5/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>A Terrible Reason To Build A Park…</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/planningjargon/~3/lNmYs5A_74I/</link>
		<comments>http://www.planningjargon.com/2013/03/a-terrible-reason-to-build-a-park/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2013 08:06:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neighborhoods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Los Angeles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parklets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex Offenders]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planningjargon.com/?p=890</guid>
		<description>I admire your aim to build parks, no matter how small, in order to give residents access to the wonderful benefits of more public space. There's no need for parklets if you have permanent parks.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/planningjargon/~4/lNmYs5A_74I" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.planningjargon.com/2013/03/a-terrible-reason-to-build-a-park/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.planningjargon.com/2013/03/a-terrible-reason-to-build-a-park/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Rui’an River: What About The Fish?</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/planningjargon/~3/wLkmJfUE-d0/</link>
		<comments>http://www.planningjargon.com/2013/02/ruian-river-what-about-the-fish/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 06:05:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[River]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rui'an]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zhejiang Province]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planningjargon.com/?p=884</guid>
		<description>Would a Chinese public environmental official swim in an obviously polluted river for 200,000 yuan (~$32,000)? That's the &lt;a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/news/chinese-dare-officials-swim-polluted-104559100.html"&gt;challenge&lt;/a&gt; from a local businessman.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/planningjargon/~4/wLkmJfUE-d0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.planningjargon.com/2013/02/ruian-river-what-about-the-fish/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.planningjargon.com/2013/02/ruian-river-what-about-the-fish/</feedburner:origLink></item>
	</channel>
</rss>
