<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Policy Reports</title>
<link>http://johnlocke.org/policy_reports</link>
<description />
<pubDate>Fri, 1 Jun 2012 09:19:39 EDT</pubDate>
<generator>PHP/5.2.6</generator>
<language>en</language>

<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/policyreports" /><feedburner:info xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" uri="policyreports" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item>
<pubDate>Wed, 9 May 2012 07:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
<link>http://johnlocke.org/policy_reports/display_story.html?id=243</link>
<title>Review of the Triangle Transit Authority's Response to Questions Regarding Costs and Ridership</title>
<description><![CDATA[In November 2011, Wake County NC (the Raleigh, NC urbanized area) in conjunction with the Triangle Transit Authority (TTA) and other agencies, released the Wake County Transit Plan1. This Plan called for significant expansion of the transit system in Wake County, including doubled bus transit service, new commuter rail service (CR) between Raleigh and Durham, and a new light rail service (LRT)...]]></description>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 07:00:00 EST</pubDate>
<link>http://johnlocke.org/policy_reports/display_story.html?id=242</link>
<title>By the Numbers: What Government Costs in North Carolina Cities and Counties FY 2010</title>
<description><![CDATA[The economic recession that hit full force in 2008 was declared officially over in June 2009 when the country experienced two quarters of very slow growth. But a troubled housing sector and a still-sluggish economy with high unemployment have contributed to the fiscal crises facing many cities and counties in North Carolina. As always, this edition of By the Numbers (BTN) is must reading for...]]></description>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 07:00:00 EST</pubDate>
<link>http://johnlocke.org/policy_reports/display_story.html?id=241</link>
<title>Wake County Sustainability Task Force Report: An Alternate Opinion</title>
<description><![CDATA[This Regional Brief critiques the process used by the Wake County Sustainability Task Force and its final report. The author was a member of the task force.
The entire task force report and this critique can be found online at www.ces.ncsu.edu/depts/agecon/WECO/wake/index.htm.
Background:

In...]]></description>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 07:00:00 EST</pubDate>
<link>http://johnlocke.org/policy_reports/display_story.html?id=240</link>
<title>Raleigh Convention Center: Throwing good money after bad</title>
<description><![CDATA[This report examines 52 contracts signed by the Raleigh Convention Center for the period of July&amp;ndash;December 2011 and is a follow-up to the September 2008 John Locke Foundation report &amp;ldquo;The New Raleigh Convention Center: A taxpayer-funded money pit.&amp;rdquo;
Key Facts

Raleigh Convention Center...]]></description>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 07:00:00 EST</pubDate>
<link>http://johnlocke.org/policy_reports/display_story.html?id=239</link>
<title>Review of the Wake County Transit Plan</title>
<description><![CDATA[The draft Wake County Transit Plan, released in November 2011, proposes a doubling of bus service, new commuter rail service between East Garner and Durham, and light rail service between Cary and northeast Raleigh. The expanded service is proposed to be funded by a 1&amp;frasl;2-cent sales tax, a $10 increase in vehicle registration fees, increased vehicle rental fees, transit bonds, state and...]]></description>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 07:00:00 EST</pubDate>
<link>http://johnlocke.org/policy_reports/display_story.html?id=238</link>
<title>First Annual North Carolina County Privatization Survey</title>
<description><![CDATA[County governments all over North Carolina are saving money by privatizing services. In an effort to assist in the exchange of information about these activities, the John Locke Foundation conducted a survey of all 100 counties asking county managers to tell us about governmental activities that they currently supply privately. We also asked them if they had problems in the past with a...]]></description>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Tue, 1 Nov 2011 07:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
<link>http://johnlocke.org/policy_reports/display_story.html?id=237</link>
<title>A Quarter-Million More for Montgomery? Secretive county seeks a third tax increase in three years</title>
<description><![CDATA[Key points:

Montgomery County commissioners have raised the property tax by nine cents over the last three years, from 58 cents to 67 cents per $100 valuation &amp;mdash; a 15.5 percent increase.
Now the commissioners want voters to approve a quarter-cent sales-tax increase worth an estimated $250,000 &amp;mdash; an amount that would be about the same as another one-cent...]]></description>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 07:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
<link>http://johnlocke.org/policy_reports/display_story.html?id=236</link>
<title>Durham's Tale of Two Tax Increases: County seeks $26.5 million's worth of sales-tax hikes for schools and transit</title>
<description><![CDATA[Key facts:
Durham County commissioners are asking voters to approve two sales-tax increases on November 8. The requested increases would amount to $26.5 million per year.
Commissioners promise voters that revenue from the proposed quarter-cent sales-tax increase would be used for schools, but there is no legal basis for that promise, so the approximately $9.2 million per year...]]></description>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 07:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
<link>http://johnlocke.org/policy_reports/display_story.html?id=235</link>
<title>Orange Crush Revisited: County commissioners ask voters a third time for a tax increase</title>
<description><![CDATA[Key Facts

Orange County commissioners are asking voters for a $2.5 million sales-tax increase at a time of high unemployment.
Twice before Orange County voters rejected tax increases. Just last November, rural county voters rejected a sales-tax increase by 2 to 1.
It seems that commissioners are attempting to win approval this time by cynically manipulating...]]></description>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 07:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
<link>http://johnlocke.org/policy_reports/display_story.html?id=234</link>
<title>A Blank Check for Buncombe: County commissioners ask voters for a sales-tax increase</title>
<description><![CDATA[Key facts:

Buncombe County commissioners and the president of Asheville-Buncombe Technical Community College (AB Tech), Hank Dunn, are promising voters that the $7 million that would be raised by a proposed sales-tax increase would be given to AB Tech for a new building and renovations, despite knowing that the funds would go into the county&amp;rsquo;s general fund and could be...]]></description>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Wed, 6 Jul 2011 07:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
<link>http://johnlocke.org/policy_reports/display_story.html?id=233</link>
<title>North Carolina&amp;#039;s Forced-Sterilization Program: A Case for Compensating the Living Victims</title>
<description><![CDATA[North Carolina used to decide who was worthy of reproducing and who would be denied this natural and fundamental right. From 1929 to at least the 1970s, the state was involved in eugenics and forcibly sterilized individuals from across the state.
This dark chapter in the state&amp;rsquo;s history should not be forgotten. It is not a remnant from the distant past but something that is...]]></description>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 07:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
<link>http://johnlocke.org/policy_reports/display_story.html?id=232</link>
<title>Taxers' Choice in Cabarrus: If the sales-tax increase fails, county threatens to hike property taxes</title>
<description><![CDATA[Key Facts

Like federal and state officials, Cabarrus County commissioners have saddled county taxpayers with a mountain of debt. Now they want taxpayers to bail them out by approving a quarter-cent sales tax increase on May 17. If the voters do not approve the tax increase, commissioners threaten to hit them with a 2.2-cent property tax increase.
About twenty percent...]]></description>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 May 2011 07:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
<link>http://johnlocke.org/policy_reports/display_story.html?id=231</link>
<title>Reforming North Carolina's Medicaid Program</title>
<description><![CDATA[Executive summary
Medicaid is a program in crisis &amp;ndash; poorly serving many enrollees and taxpayers. Total Medicaid spending at the federal and state levels has increased from $72 billion in 1990 to over $400 billion in 2010. Low Medicaid provider payment rates in many states result in access problems for Medicaid recipients and an overuse of emergency care for...]]></description>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 May 2011 07:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
<link>http://johnlocke.org/policy_reports/display_story.html?id=230</link>
<title>An Economic Analysis of State Tax Changes in North Carolina</title>
<description><![CDATA[The John Locke Foundation asked The Beacon Hill Institute at Suffolk University (BHI) to use its North Carolina State Tax Analysis Modeling Program (NC-STAMP&amp;reg;) to analyze three state tax proposals.  NC-STAMP is a Computable General Equilibrium model of the North Carolina economy and is used to determine the economic and fiscal effects of a tax change when compared to a baseline...]]></description>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 07:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
<link>http://johnlocke.org/policy_reports/display_story.html?id=228</link>
<title>Should NCDOT Add More Piedmont Trains?</title>
<description><![CDATA[There has been debate in North Carolina about the wisdom of accepting grants under the federal high-speed rail program to add a third and fourth Piedmont train. Similar controversy has erupted in other states, leading three governors to refuse high-speed rail funding (Florida, Wisconsin, and Ohio), while a legislative committee declined to include high-speed rail funding in the budget in a...]]></description>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 07:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
<link>http://johnlocke.org/policy_reports/display_story.html?id=226</link>
<title>North Carolina&amp;#039;s Auto Insurance System: Still Unfair, Still in Need of Improvements</title>
<description><![CDATA[North Carolina&amp;rsquo;s auto insurance system is unfair to low-risk drivers because it overcharges them in  order to subsidize some of the state&amp;rsquo;s more risky and dangerous drivers. Every insured driver pays a hidden tax &amp;ndash; which averages about 6 percent &amp;ndash; that goes to the government-mandated, privately run insurance pool for risky drivers.  This pool uses...]]></description>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 07:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
<link>http://johnlocke.org/policy_reports/display_story.html?id=225</link>
<title>By the Numbers: What Government Costs in North Carolina Cities and Counties FY 2009</title>
<description><![CDATA[The economic recession that hit full force in 2008 officially ended in June 2009. But the slow growth that followed the supposed end of the recession has contributed to the fiscal crises faced by most cities and counties in North Carolina. As always, this edition of By the Numbers (BTN) is must reading for government officials and taxpayers alike. It highlights what kinds of fiscal problems...]]></description>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 07:00:00 EST</pubDate>
<link>http://johnlocke.org/policy_reports/display_story.html?id=224</link>
<title>The First 100 Days: Eleven Action Items for the 2011 Legislative Session</title>
<description><![CDATA[...]]></description>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2010 07:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
<link>http://johnlocke.org/policy_reports/display_story.html?id=223</link>
<title>A Million Wasn't Enough? Montgomery County commissioners want even more tax money</title>
<description><![CDATA[Key points:

Montgomery county commissioners have raised the property tax by nine cents over the last two years, from 58 cents to 67 cents per $100 valuation &amp;mdash; a 15.5 percent increase. 
Now the commissioners want $225,000 tax increase (an amount about the same as another one-cent increase in the property tax). If voters approve this tax increase, the total tax...]]></description>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 07:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
<link>http://johnlocke.org/policy_reports/display_story.html?id=222</link>
<title>Tax First, Duck Questions Later: Highly secretive Clay County wants voters to approve a tax increase</title>
<description><![CDATA[Key points:

Clay County commissioners are asking county voters to approve a $200,000 tax increase at a time of high unemployment. That amount would be equal to a property tax increase of 1.4 cents per hundred dollars of value. 
County commissioners have said the tax would help pay for a $10 million elementary school in Hayesville. The sales tax would only cover less...]]></description>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 07:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
<link>http://johnlocke.org/policy_reports/display_story.html?id=221</link>
<title>Speculators' Tax in Alleghany? County commissioners seek tax grab based on guesses</title>
<description><![CDATA[Key points:

Alleghany County commissioners are asking county voters to approve a $160,000 tax increase at a time of high unemployment. That amount would be equal to a property tax increase of 0.9 cents per hundred dollars of value. 
County commissioners have tied the tax vote to speculation of lower state education spending next year, but other state and federal...]]></description>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 07:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
<link>http://johnlocke.org/policy_reports/display_story.html?id=220</link>
<title>Get the Math Right: Columbus County leaders are wrong about proposed tax hike's size, need</title>
<description><![CDATA[Key Points:

Columbus County commissioners are overselling the value of a proposed tax increase to voters by at least $300,000. 
County commissioners have repeatedly said the new quarter-cent sales tax increase would raise $1.0 million, but recent county estimates suggest the tax would bring in about $700,000. That would be equivalent to a 2.2-cent property tax rate...]]></description>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 07:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
<link>http://johnlocke.org/policy_reports/display_story.html?id=219</link>
<title>A Taxing Legacy in Cherokee: County voters face vote on higher taxes proposed by rejected commissioners</title>
<description><![CDATA[Key points:

Outgoing Cherokee County commissioners are asking voters to approve a $600,000 tax increase, an amount equivalent to a property tax increase of 1.5 cents per hundred dollars of value. 
County voters already rejected all three county commissioners who proposed the tax hike, but those lame-duck commissioners have since committed nearly $10 million to expand...]]></description>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 07:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
<link>http://johnlocke.org/policy_reports/display_story.html?id=218</link>
<title>A Question of Trust: Alamance County commissioners don't trust voters; can voters trust them?</title>
<description><![CDATA[Key points:

Alamance County commissioners are asking county voters to approve a $2.4 million tax increase at a time of high unemployment. This amount is equal to a property tax increase of 1.9 cents per hundred dollars of value. 
The three commissioners who supported the tax hike rejected a public hearing on the referendum. 
Payment on debt has grown faster...]]></description>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 07:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
<link>http://johnlocke.org/policy_reports/display_story.html?id=217</link>
<title>Strike Four? Despite three strikes on tax hikes, Harnett County officials try again</title>
<description><![CDATA[Key points:

Harnett County commissioners are asking county voters to approve a $1.2 million tax increase at a time of high unemployment. This amount is equal to a property tax increase of 1.8 cents per hundred dollars of value. 
This is the third time county officials have sought a higher sales tax and the fourth vote on higher taxes since 2007. Voters soundly rejected...]]></description>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 07:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
<link>http://johnlocke.org/policy_reports/display_story.html?id=216</link>
<title>Tax Hike in Person Would Be Bad for Small Business: Three of Five Commissioners Agree</title>
<description><![CDATA[Key points:

Person County commissioners are asking county voters to approve a $675,000 tax increase at a time of high unemployment. This amount is equal to a property tax increase of 1.8 cents per hundred dollars of value. 
The commissioners voted 3-to-2 to put the tax increase to a vote of the people, but three commissioners expressed concerns that this tax increase...]]></description>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Thu, 7 Oct 2010 07:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
<link>http://johnlocke.org/policy_reports/display_story.html?id=215</link>
<title>An Unnecessary Tax Hike: Bladen commissioners go back on their 'No Tax Increase' promise</title>
<description><![CDATA[Key points:

Bladen county commissioners are asking voters to approve a $375,000 tax increase. 
If voters approve, commissioners promise to spend the new revenue on specified school needs. 
Commissioners are asking for a tax increase while ignoring the county manager&amp;rsquo;s proposed fiscal year 2011 budget that fulfills the commissioners&amp;rsquo; &amp;ldquo;No Tax...]]></description>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Wed, 6 Oct 2010 07:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
<link>http://johnlocke.org/policy_reports/display_story.html?id=214</link>
<title>Third Time's Not the Charm: Guilford County still needs better spending, not higher taxes</title>
<description><![CDATA[Key points:

Guilford county commissioners are asking for an $11.6 million tax increase at a time of high unemployment. 
In 2008, they twice asked voters to pass a tax increase, but by large majorities, the voters turned them down. 
Voters did approve two school bonds in 2008, but county commissioners squandered much of that money by building two of the three...]]></description>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Tue, 5 Oct 2010 07:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
<link>http://johnlocke.org/policy_reports/display_story.html?id=213</link>
<title>Orange Crush: Tax hike would crush taxpayers and county economy</title>
<description><![CDATA[Key points:

Orange County commissioners are asking voters for a $2.3 million tax increase at a time of high unemployment. 
Regardless of the county commissioners&amp;rsquo; promises, all of the new revenue from the tax increase would go into the general fund and could be spent for any legal purpose. 
Promises to spend the new tax revenue for certain...]]></description>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 07:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
<link>http://johnlocke.org/policy_reports/display_story.html?id=212</link>
<title>Deregulating Health Insurance and Health Providers in North Carolina</title>
<description><![CDATA[...]]></description>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 07:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
<link>http://johnlocke.org/policy_reports/display_story.html?id=211</link>
<title>Boone-Doggle: Watauga County's proposed $1.9 million tax increase</title>
<description><![CDATA[Key points:
&amp;bull; Watauga County commissioners want voters to approve a $1.9 million sales tax increase to build new recreational facilities.  If past is prologue, this new money will not be spent wisely.
&amp;bull; Watauga County commissioners approved the most expensive high school ever built in the state, without a vote of taxpayers.
&amp;bull; At $79.5 million, this...]]></description>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 07:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
<link>http://johnlocke.org/policy_reports/display_story.html?id=210</link>
<title>Robeson County's Vote to Increase the Sales Tax: Would you buy a used car from these guys?</title>
<description><![CDATA[Key facts:
&amp;bull; Robeson County officials want a quarter-cent sales tax hike and promise a two-cent reduction in the property tax rate.
&amp;bull; The net effect would be like a two-cent property tax hike, since the sales tax increases would bring in an additional $2.3 million a year, while the reduction in property tax revenues would be only $1.2 million.
&amp;bull; If the...]]></description>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 07:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
<link>http://johnlocke.org/policy_reports/display_story.html?id=209</link>
<title>By The Numbers: What Government Costs in North Carolina Cities and Counties FY 2008</title>
<description><![CDATA[ ]]></description>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 07:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
<link>http://johnlocke.org/policy_reports/display_story.html?id=208</link>
<title>A Planners&amp;#039; Glossary: Understanding Raleigh&amp;#039;s New Development Code, the Diagnostics &amp;#038; Approach Report</title>
<description><![CDATA[This glossary defines and explains terms used in the consultant&amp;#039;s report, &amp;quot;Diagnostic &amp;amp; Approach Report&amp;quot; (DAR), which contains recommendations for implementing Raleigh&amp;#039;s newly approved 2030 Comprehensive Plan.  ]]></description>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 07:00:00 EST</pubDate>
<link>http://johnlocke.org/policy_reports/display_story.html?id=207</link>
<title>Regulating the Regulators: Seven Reforms for Sensible Regulatory Policy in North Carolina</title>
<description><![CDATA[...]]></description>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 07:00:00 EST</pubDate>
<link>http://johnlocke.org/policy_reports/display_story.html?id=206</link>
<title>Why Transparency? Creating trust in government</title>
<description><![CDATA[...]]></description>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 07:00:00 EST</pubDate>
<link>http://johnlocke.org/policy_reports/display_story.html?id=205</link>
<title>Trust But Verify: Open government is better government</title>
<description><![CDATA[ 
  ]]></description>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Thu, 3 Sep 2009 07:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
<link>http://johnlocke.org/policy_reports/display_story.html?id=204</link>
<title>Crucial Questions: A Checklist for School Board Candidates and Citizens</title>
<description><![CDATA[...]]></description>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 07:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
<link>http://johnlocke.org/policy_reports/display_story.html?id=203</link>
<title>Crucial Questions: A Checklist for City Council Candidates and Citizens</title>
<description><![CDATA[...]]></description>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Mon, 3 Aug 2009 07:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
<link>http://johnlocke.org/policy_reports/display_story.html?id=202</link>
<title>The Economic Impact of North Carolina&amp;#039;s Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Portfolio Standard</title>
<description><![CDATA[...]]></description>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 07:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
<link>http://johnlocke.org/policy_reports/display_story.html?id=201</link>
<title>Ten Myths about North Carolina's Private Schools: A Parent's Guide</title>
<description><![CDATA[...]]></description>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 07:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
<link>http://johnlocke.org/policy_reports/display_story.html?id=200</link>
<title>Building a Case for School Choice: Initial Results from a Survey of North Carolina&amp;#039;s Private Schools</title>
<description><![CDATA[...]]></description>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 07:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
<link>http://johnlocke.org/policy_reports/display_story.html?id=199</link>
<title>Why North Carolina Should Not Build High-Speed Rail</title>
<description />
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Thu, 7 May 2009 07:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
<link>http://johnlocke.org/policy_reports/display_story.html?id=198</link>
<title>Salisbury's Fiber-Optic Cable System: Another corporate welfare project paid for by average taxpayers</title>
<description><![CDATA[...]]></description>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Wed, 8 Apr 2009 07:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
<link>http://johnlocke.org/policy_reports/display_story.html?id=197</link>
<title>City and County Issue Guide 2009</title>
<description><![CDATA[...]]></description>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Mon, 6 Apr 2009 07:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
<link>http://johnlocke.org/policy_reports/display_story.html?id=196</link>
<title>Tax Reform in North Carolina</title>
<description><![CDATA[...]]></description>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Wed, 4 Mar 2009 07:00:00 EST</pubDate>
<link>http://johnlocke.org/policy_reports/display_story.html?id=195</link>
<title>City and County Budget Crises: When in a hole, first stop digging</title>
<description><![CDATA[This report documents the change in locally generated revenues of 98 North Carolina counties* and the 30 largest N.C. cities between 2002 and 2007. Locally generated revenues increased faster than population and inflation in 96 of 98 counties and 24 of 30 cities. In Union County, revenue increased 48 percent faster than population and inflation over five years. For that reason, many counties...]]></description>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 07:00:00 EST</pubDate>
<link>http://johnlocke.org/policy_reports/display_story.html?id=194</link>
<title>By The Numbers:  What Government Costs in North Carolina Cities and Counties FY 2007</title>
<description><![CDATA[ ]]></description>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 07:00:00 EST</pubDate>
<link>http://johnlocke.org/policy_reports/display_story.html?id=193</link>
<title>Does Avery need a land-transfer tax increase?</title>
<description><![CDATA[ ]]></description>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Tue, 6 Jan 2009 07:00:00 EST</pubDate>
<link>http://johnlocke.org/policy_reports/display_story.html?id=192</link>
<title>Wilson's Fiber-Optic Cable Boondoggle: City Invests $28 Million in a Technology That Could Be Obsolete Before It's Paid For</title>
<description><![CDATA[...]]></description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

