Studying Political Science

Reading Gandhi Notes

noreply@blogger.com (OpenLearner) — Sat, 18 Dec 2010 11:20:00 +0000

Here are some notes of Reading Gandhi.

Gandhi on Law and Modern Medicine

The essence of modern system lies in that the dispute is settled by a stranger, third party the judiciary. Gandhi says 'we are in our simplicity and ignorance, imagine that a stranger, by taking our money gives us justice'. He turns his attention towards modern medical system. The relationship obtaining in this sphere between persons designated as doctors and patience is also a kind of communication which Gandhi considered to be wrong and against law of nature, the doctor is motivated by greed and lust for the money, while the patient is motivated by mean to set right the self created malfunctioning of the body. In Gandhi's word 'I have indulged in vices, I contracted the disease, a doctor cures me, the odds are that i shall repeat the vice, had the doctors not intervened, the nature would have acquired mastery over myself, would have freed from vice & would have been happy'. Modern medicine is rejected by Gandhi because it is based on methods of research - that involves violence against criminals and is based on incorrect conception of body-mind relationship and on a wrong kind of communication between persons.

According to Gandhi, hospitals are institutions for propagating sin, men take less care of their body and immortality increases.

On Modernisation

According to Gandhi, modern civilisation neglects ethical and religious dimensions. With women coming out of the veil.

On Technology

Machinery is the chief symbol of modern civilistion. 'It represents a great sin". Machinery is rooted in man's desire for bodily comfort at the cost of everything and ultimately it destroys the body itself by displacing it from the scheme of life. He says "Machinery is like a snake hole which may contain one to hundred snakes. I cannot recall a single good point in connection with machinery. Books can be written to demonstrate its evil making people lazy, creating unemployment, decline of cottage industries, small businessmen suffering due to poverty etc."

On Parliament

Gandhi is also critical of entire edifice of modern politics. For instance, he called parliament a sterile woman and a prostitute. Despite being a sovereign institution it cannot enact a law according to its own judgement but it constantly swayed by outside pressure and it continually shifts its allegiance from one set of ministers to another.

More Stuff to come

noreply@blogger.com (OpenLearner) — Sat, 11 Dec 2010 15:46:00 +0000

Starting this blog in a haphazard manner has produced much hassles. Proper planning and implementation is always helpful(note taken, once more:P)
This blog had enough of my neglect would be more regular in posting on it.

More Notes, I'll try to quickly cover other papers Colonialism and Nationalism in India and Indian Political Thought as soon as I am able to.

Plus I have found some old question papers, will be uploading them soon.

Keep Visiting!

Conservative Political Theory

noreply@blogger.com (OpenLearner) — Sat, 11 Dec 2010 15:17:00 +0000

CONSERVATIVE POLITICAL THEORY

Conservatism is a political and social philosophy that promotes the maintenance of traditional institutions and supports minimal and gradual change in society. Political science often credits the Irish politician EDMUND BURKE with many of the ideas now called conservative.

Conservative political theory thrives on traditionalism, i.e. on traditional values. For conservatives, all that is old is good and thus has to be preserved; all that is present is to be protected; all that is new is to be avoided; all that is innovative is to be opposed.

Conservatism is –

Authoritarian in so far, as it advocates ‘reform from above’ and rejects ‘ revolution fro below’
Libertarian in so far, as it seeks the greatest possible economic liberty and the least possible governmental regulation.
Paternalistic in so far, as it argues that the wealthy have an obligation to look after the less well-off, the duty being the price of privilege.

The central themes of the conservative ideology are tradition, human imperfection, organic society, authority and property. Conservatives view authority as the basis for social cohesion, arguing that it gives people a sense of who they are and what is expected of them and reflects the hierarchical nature of all social institutions.

SIGNIFICANCE

Conservative ideas and doctrines first emerged in the later 18th and early 19th century. They arose as a reaction against the growing pace of economic and social change, which was in many ways symbolized by the French revolution. Using BURKE’S notion of ‘change in order to conserve', conservatism is allowed to adapt values such a tradition, hierarchy and authority to the emerging conditions of mass politics, thereby broadening its social and electoral base.

CRITICAL APPRAISAL

However, conservative thought has always been open to the change that it amounts to nothing more than ruling–class ideology. In proclaiming the need to resist change, it legitimises the status-quo and defends the interest of dominant or elite groups. Other critics allege that division between traditional conservatism and libertarian conservatism run so deep that the conservative tradition has become entirely incoherent.

In their defense, conservatives argue that human beings are morally and intellectually imperfect, and seek the security that only tradition, authority and shared culture can offer. Experience and history, conservatives tell, will always provide a sounder basis for political action than will abstract principles such as freedom, equality and justice.

Marxist Political Theory

noreply@blogger.com (OpenLearner) — Tue, 07 Dec 2010 02:00:00 +0000

MARXIST POLITICAL THEORY

Marxism is an ideology that developed out of, and drew inspiration from the writings of Karl Marx (1818-83). The core of Marxism is a philosophy of history that outlines why capitalism is doomed and why socialism and eventually communism are destined to replace it.

The Marxists (Marx, Linen, Mao and the likes) do not regard individual or group interests and conflicts as natural. According to the Marxists, the conflicts among the individuals are man-made. The Marxists hold the view that conflicts among the individuals or groups are irreconcilable.

Micheal Duverger says, “Politics for the Marxists is conflict, struggle, in which power allows those who possess it to ensure their hold on the society and to profit by it.”

According to the Marxists, the so-called common interest, for all practicable purposes, becomes and is always the interest of the economically dominant class, that politics is class politics in a class society.

The characteristic features of Marxist political theory are:-

The conflicts among the individuals and groups are a feature of the class society.
The common interest is nothing but the interest of the economically dominant classes.
The state is never a neutral institution. Rather, it protects and promotes the interests of the possessing classes and exploits and suppresses the non-possessing classes.
Politics arises in the class society. It is an activity of the possessing classes, and among those who have the economic power.
Politics is a competition among the people of the possessing classes. Among themselves, they clash for the power; against the non-possessed classes, they wage the class war.
The class war is a phenomenon that exists only in class society. In the classless society (socialist society and communist society) there is no class struggle.
Revolution serves as locomotive of history, pushing the lower stage of social development (or material development) of society to its higher stage.
Politics ceases to exist in the classless society, though it remains in the form of the dictatorship of the proletariat in the socialist society so as to abolish capitalism and establish socialism in full. That is what makes politics an instrument of class struggle as also a means to bring about socio-economic changes.

Approaches to Political Theory - Normative and Empirical

noreply@blogger.com (OpenLearner) — Thu, 02 Dec 2010 18:41:00 +0000

APPROACHES TO POLITICAL THEORY – NORMATIVE AND EMPIRICAL

The two approaches- normative and empirical belong to different times, differing in their nature and in their methodologies while addressing the political phenomenon.

Broadly speaking, the empirical approach seeks to discover and describe facts whereas the normative approach seeks to determine and prescribe values.
The empirical approach aims at making an empirical statement which is concerned with ‘is’ whereas the normative approach aims at making a normative statement which is concerned with what ‘ought to be’ or ‘ should be’.
The crucial point is that empirical statement is concerned with a situation which can be observed by our sense-experience, which can be verified by repeated observation and whose accuracy can be tested. On the other hand, a normative statement tends to express preference for a particular type of order as dictated by a sense of duty or universal need or by commitment to moral principle or ideal. Normative statements are not capable of being discovered, described or verified by our sense-experience.
A normative statement requires something to be done in order to serve an intrinsic value-which is an end-in-itself (eg. the truth, the good, the beautiful). On the other hand, an empirical statement requiring something to be done is intended to serve an instrumental value – which is a means to some higher end (eg. ‘Do regular exercise to improve your health’). In short, it is the content of a statement, not its form, which makes it empirical or normative.
The empirical approach remains largely descriptive while the normative approach is mainly prescriptive. Empirical approach seeks to discover laws that are unalterable (eg. Law of gravitational force). Hence, they are beyond man’s control; one can discover and describe them. Normative approach is concerned with laws and conditions largely created or adopted by human society, which are alterable (eg. Laws governing property and public order). One can examine how far they are morally right or wrong and then prescribe the right course.

The champions of empirical approach have been very vocal in criticising the normative approach on the ground that there is no ‘scientifically valid’ or reliable method of determining what is morally right or wrong. The supporters of normative approach do not condemn the empirical approach as such, but they criticise its indifference towards values, particularly its ignorance of discrimination between higher and lower values.

The Issue	Empirical Approach	Normative Approach
Chief Concern	FACTS (It is so)	VALUES (It “should be” or “ought be”
Nature	Scientific & Descriptive (Instrumental Values)	Critical & Perspective (Intrinsic Values)
Based on	Sense, experience & logic	Speculation & logic
Criterion of Validity	True or False	Right or Wrong

White Man's Burden

noreply@blogger.com (OpenLearner) — Mon, 22 Nov 2010 03:30:00 +0000

A case for women empowerment?

noreply@blogger.com (OpenLearner) — Sat, 20 Nov 2010 07:11:00 +0000

Mrs Ronzulli, an MEP from Italy, took her tiny daughter Victoria to a vote at Strasbourg. She kept her baby carefully cradled against her in a sling and occasionally leant to kiss her on the forehead.

Bringing her newborn to the voting session she said:

It was not a political gesture. It was first of all a maternal gesture—that I wanted to stay with my daughter as much as possible, and to remind people that there are women who do not have this opportunity [to bring their children to work], that we should do something to talk about this.

What is Theory?

noreply@blogger.com (OpenLearner) — Thu, 11 Nov 2010 15:25:00 +0000

A theory is a form of systematic reflection with six features.

Conceptual Sensitivity : almost obsessive and self conscious, concerned with the internal structure of concepts, with, how concepts relate to one another.
Rational Structure: theory is a rational enterprise where the term rational is understood very broadly, to mean the conclusion arrived at has come discernible structure of reasons behind it.
Truth and Objectivity: the truth that theories aspire to are not valid for all the times and all places. The truth of most theories are context dependent and therefore limited to specific time and place.
Generality: a theory aspires to some degree of generality and abstraction. It does so because it aims to cover a wide variety of related phenomenon.
Unearthing background assumptions: theory is committed to unearthing the background assumptions of our statements, beliefs, actions and practices.
Strong non-speculative intent: theory is a product of modern conditions. A theory must be rooted in and transcend the lived experience of people, the collective practices of society and the embedded understandings and common sense of community.