<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ProMarket</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.promarket.org/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.promarket.org/</link>
	<description>The publication of the Stigler Center at the University of Chicago Booth School of Business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2026 09:25:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Consumers Prefer AI Music Until They’re Told It’s AI</title>
		<link>https://www.promarket.org/2026/08/27/consumers-prefer-ai-music-until-theyre-told-its-ai/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jana Friedrichsen, Julia Schwarz and Michel Clement]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2026 09:25:31 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Culture & Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Digital Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital platforms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.promarket.org/?p=45526</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<a href="https://www.promarket.org/2026/08/27/consumers-prefer-ai-music-until-theyre-told-its-ai/" data-wpel-link="internal"><img width="300" height="169" src="https://www.promarket.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/Friedrichsen-et-al-300x169.jpg" alt="Consumers Prefer AI Music Until They’re Told It’s AI" align="left" style="margin: 0 20px 20px 0;max-width:100%" /></a><p>Across three studies, Jana Friedrichsen, Julia Schwarz, and Michel Clement explore how generative AI will change the music industry. They find that while consumers enjoy and even prefer AI-generated music, preferences shift upon learning that the song was AI-generated.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.promarket.org/2026/08/27/consumers-prefer-ai-music-until-theyre-told-its-ai/" rel="nofollow" data-wpel-link="internal">Read it at ProMarket &gt;&gt;</a></p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Dynamic Competition Framework Petit et al. Advocate Is Neither Pro-Enforcement nor Anti-Enforcement. It Doesn’t Exist</title>
		<link>https://www.promarket.org/2026/08/22/the-dynamic-competition-framework-petit-et-al-advocate-is-neither-pro-enforcement-nor-anti-enforcement-it-doesnt-exist/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lawrence B. Landman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2026 05:28:43 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Antitrust and Competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2026 EU Draft Merger Guidelines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2026 EU Draft Merger Guidelines Symposium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antitrust and competition]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.promarket.org/?p=46231</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<a href="https://www.promarket.org/2026/08/22/the-dynamic-competition-framework-petit-et-al-advocate-is-neither-pro-enforcement-nor-anti-enforcement-it-doesnt-exist/" data-wpel-link="internal"><img width="300" height="169" src="https://www.promarket.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/Landman-300x169.jpg" alt="The Dynamic Competition Framework Petit et al. Advocate Is Neither Pro-Enforcement nor Anti-Enforcement. It Doesn’t Exist" align="left" style="margin: 0 20px 20px 0;max-width:100%" /></a><p>The dynamic competition school claims that competition authorities, by analyzing firms’ capabilities, can protect what this school calls dynamic competition.  Competition authorities, however, cannot adequately analyze firms’ capabilities. This school, therefore, lacks any framework which the authorities can use to analyze what they call dynamic competition. Any framework to protect dynamic competition, or what some call competition to innovate, must instead first identify the future products the competing firms are trying to make, writes Larry Landman.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.promarket.org/2026/08/22/the-dynamic-competition-framework-petit-et-al-advocate-is-neither-pro-enforcement-nor-anti-enforcement-it-doesnt-exist/" rel="nofollow" data-wpel-link="internal">Read it at ProMarket &gt;&gt;</a></p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Did Liberals Break Liberal Democracy?</title>
		<link>https://www.promarket.org/2026/08/21/did-liberals-break-liberal-democracy/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matthew Lucky]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Book Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capitalisn't]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Woke Capitalism]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.promarket.org/?p=46307</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<a href="https://www.promarket.org/2026/08/21/did-liberals-break-liberal-democracy/" data-wpel-link="internal"><img width="300" height="169" src="https://www.promarket.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/Lucky-300x169.jpg" alt="Did Liberals Break Liberal Democracy?" align="left" style="margin: 0 20px 20px 0;max-width:100%" /></a><p>Matt Lucky reviews Daron Acemoglu’s “What Happened to Liberal Democracy?: Remaking a Politics of Shared Prosperity,” now out at Penguin Press.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.promarket.org/2026/08/21/did-liberals-break-liberal-democracy/" rel="nofollow" data-wpel-link="internal">Read it at ProMarket &gt;&gt;</a></p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Ctrip Case Reveals the Limits of Administrative Interviews in China’s Antitrust Enforcement</title>
		<link>https://www.promarket.org/2026/08/20/the-ctrip-case-reveals-the-limits-of-administrative-interviews-in-chinas-antitrust-enforcement/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chun-Kit (Kitson) Ng]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Antitrust and Competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antitrust and competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China Three Letters and One Notice System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ctrip Case]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.promarket.org/?p=46201</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<a href="https://www.promarket.org/2026/08/20/the-ctrip-case-reveals-the-limits-of-administrative-interviews-in-chinas-antitrust-enforcement/" data-wpel-link="internal"><img width="300" height="166" src="https://www.promarket.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/Ng-300x166.jpg" alt="The Ctrip Case Reveals the Limits of Administrative Interviews in China’s Antitrust Enforcement" align="left" style="margin: 0 20px 20px 0;max-width:100%" /></a><p>The recent case of Chinese online travel platform Ctrip ignoring the warnings of provincial competition authorities until the central government stepped in reveals the limits of China’s decentralized regulatory system. Chun-Kit (Kitson) Ng suggests several ways that China can reform its system to empower the provincial authorities and fulfill the regulatory system’s design to avoid drawing on the central government’s resources.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.promarket.org/2026/08/20/the-ctrip-case-reveals-the-limits-of-administrative-interviews-in-chinas-antitrust-enforcement/" rel="nofollow" data-wpel-link="internal">Read it at ProMarket &gt;&gt;</a></p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Government Bond Markets See Ecological Decline as a Growth Problem</title>
		<link>https://www.promarket.org/2026/08/19/government-bond-markets-see-ecological-decline-as-a-growth-problem/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jitendra Aswani and William Xiong]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Green Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Role of the State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bonds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[borrowing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green bonds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Growth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainability]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.promarket.org/?p=46299</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<a href="https://www.promarket.org/2026/08/19/government-bond-markets-see-ecological-decline-as-a-growth-problem/" data-wpel-link="internal"><img width="300" height="171" src="https://www.promarket.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/Aswani-300x171.jpg" alt="Government Bond Markets See Ecological Decline as a Growth Problem" align="left" style="margin: 0 20px 20px 0;max-width:100%" /></a><p>Summary Teaser: In new research, Jitendra Aswani and William W. Xiong show that countries facing greater risks to their natural assets, from overfishing to deforestation, pay more to borrow, as investors discount their long-run growth prospects. Governments can reduce that premium by implementing green projects that address the risks they actually face, but announcing an intention to do so is not enough.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.promarket.org/2026/08/19/government-bond-markets-see-ecological-decline-as-a-growth-problem/" rel="nofollow" data-wpel-link="internal">Read it at ProMarket &gt;&gt;</a></p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Randy Picker on Competition Law, Copyright, and Entertainment</title>
		<link>https://www.promarket.org/2026/08/18/randy-picker-on-competition-law-copyright-and-entertainment/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Saul Levmore]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2026 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Stigler Center News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Honoring Randy Picker]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.promarket.org/?p=46295</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<a href="https://www.promarket.org/2026/08/18/randy-picker-on-competition-law-copyright-and-entertainment/" data-wpel-link="internal"><img width="300" height="169" src="https://www.promarket.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/Randy-Picker-300x169.jpg" alt="Randy Picker on Competition Law, Copyright, and Entertainment" align="left" style="margin: 0 20px 20px 0;max-width:100%" /></a><p>University of Chicago Law School professor Randy Picker passed away this weekend. Saul Levmore, a colleague at the Law School, remembers Randy's contributions to law scholarship and the University. </p>
<p><a href="https://www.promarket.org/2026/08/18/randy-picker-on-competition-law-copyright-and-entertainment/" rel="nofollow" data-wpel-link="internal">Read it at ProMarket &gt;&gt;</a></p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Farewell, Randy</title>
		<link>https://www.promarket.org/2026/08/17/farewell-randy/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Filippo Lancieri]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2026 21:36:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Stigler Center News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Honoring Randy Picker]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.promarket.org/?p=46279</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<a href="https://www.promarket.org/2026/08/17/farewell-randy/" data-wpel-link="internal"><img width="300" height="169" src="https://www.promarket.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/Randy-Picker-300x169.jpg" alt="Farewell, Randy" align="left" style="margin: 0 20px 20px 0;max-width:100%" /></a><p>University of Chicago Law School professor Randy Picker passed away this weekend. Georgetown professor Filippo Lancieri pens a tribute to his colleague and former PhD advisor.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.promarket.org/2026/08/17/farewell-randy/" rel="nofollow" data-wpel-link="internal">Read it at ProMarket &gt;&gt;</a></p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>How To Preserve the Online Information Ecosystem in the Presence of Google AI Overviews</title>
		<link>https://www.promarket.org/2026/08/17/how-to-preserve-the-online-information-ecosystem-in-the-presence-of-google-ai-overviews/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Saharsh Agarwal and Ananya Sen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2026 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Antitrust and Competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Digital Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI and Internet Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antitrust and competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google AI Overviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Search]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.promarket.org/?p=46258</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<a href="https://www.promarket.org/2026/08/17/how-to-preserve-the-online-information-ecosystem-in-the-presence-of-google-ai-overviews/" data-wpel-link="internal"><img width="300" height="169" src="https://www.promarket.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/Agarwal-and-Sen-300x169.jpg" alt="How To Preserve the Online Information Ecosystem in the Presence of Google AI Overviews" align="left" style="margin: 0 20px 20px 0;max-width:100%" /></a><p>In new research, Saharsh Agarwal and Ananya Sen study how Google AI Overviews reduce traffic to content publishers, their impact on consumer experience, and the implications of these findings for platform regulation and copyright and competition law.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.promarket.org/2026/08/17/how-to-preserve-the-online-information-ecosystem-in-the-presence-of-google-ai-overviews/" rel="nofollow" data-wpel-link="internal">Read it at ProMarket &gt;&gt;</a></p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Anatomy of a Supervisory Failure</title>
		<link>https://www.promarket.org/2026/08/15/anatomy-of-a-supervisory-failure/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Niccolò Comati]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2026 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2023 Banking Turmoil in Retrospect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Banking Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Silicon Valley Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SVB]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.promarket.org/?p=46262</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<a href="https://www.promarket.org/2026/08/15/anatomy-of-a-supervisory-failure/" data-wpel-link="internal"><img width="300" height="169" src="https://www.promarket.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/MIT-300x169.jpg" alt="Anatomy of a Supervisory Failure" align="left" style="margin: 0 20px 20px 0;max-width:100%" /></a><p>For its entire 15-year life as a regional bank, SVB held the same risky bet. The risks were visible the whole time, yet supervisors reacted only once losses had materialized. SVB's collapse is less a story of hidden danger than of a supervisory system that polices process rather than risk.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.promarket.org/2026/08/15/anatomy-of-a-supervisory-failure/" rel="nofollow" data-wpel-link="internal">Read it at ProMarket &gt;&gt;</a></p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Abortion Bans May Have Changed How People Have Sex </title>
		<link>https://www.promarket.org/2026/08/14/abortion-bans-may-have-changed-how-people-have-sex/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James Flynn, David Munro and Caitlin Myers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture & Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Information Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion ban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CDC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contraceptives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dobbs vs Jackson Women's Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political Economy of Fertility]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.promarket.org/?p=46167</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<a href="https://www.promarket.org/2026/08/14/abortion-bans-may-have-changed-how-people-have-sex/" data-wpel-link="internal"><img width="300" height="169" src="https://www.promarket.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/GettyImages-1272584377-e1785248051191-300x169.jpg" alt="Abortion Bans May Have Changed How People Have Sex " align="left" style="margin: 0 20px 20px 0;max-width:100%" /></a><p>In new research, James Flynn, David Munro, and Caitlin Myers document how sexual behavior has changed in light of total abortion bans enacted after Dobbs vs. Jackson Women’s Health. They find that abortion bans reduced sexual activity and increased contraceptive use, motivated by individuals having an increased awareness of state policy.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.promarket.org/2026/08/14/abortion-bans-may-have-changed-how-people-have-sex/" rel="nofollow" data-wpel-link="internal">Read it at ProMarket &gt;&gt;</a></p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
