<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
        <channel>
        <title>R4D Fisheries</title><description>R4D Fisheries Feed Informer</description>
        <link>http://app.feed.informer.com/digest3/AQYWNXPZ4Q.html</link>
        <copyright>Respective post owners and feed distributors</copyright>
        <generator>http://feed.informer.com/</generator>

<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/r4dfisheries" /><feedburner:info uri="r4dfisheries" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><feedburner:emailServiceId>r4dfisheries</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname>http://feedburner.google.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><item>
	<title>What's the catch? Considering an EITI for fisheries</title>
	<description>&lt;b&gt;Document Type:&lt;/b&gt; Briefing&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Creator:&lt;/b&gt; Standing, A.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Production Year:&lt;/b&gt; 2011&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Citation:&lt;/b&gt; Standing, A. &lt;b&gt;What's the catch? Considering an EITI for fisheries.&lt;/b&gt; U4 Anti-Corruption Resource Centre, CMI, Bergen, Norway (2011) 4 pp. [U4 Brief, December 2011:18]&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Summary:&lt;/b&gt; Lack of transparency in commercial fisheries has been a longstanding issue for those working to promote small-scale fishers’ rights in developing countries. It is a feature of the management of fisheries that many believe has favoured short-term interests of industrial fishing firms from industrialized countries, while contributing to mismanagement, corruption and illegal fishing. It is also emerging as a consideration for several governmental organizations. In 2010, the African Union organized a ministerial meeting on fisheries
in Africa where transparency was highlighted as an important component of improving economic rents from fisheries, which experts suggest could potentially be USD 2 billion per year for the continent. The World Bank has also recently identified the issue of transparency in its lending and support for fisheries related projects in developing countries, while the FAO has identified transparency as critical for combating illegal fishing.&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/r4ddocs_fisheries?a=C9liftyOztY:CUeHafsipac:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/r4ddocs_fisheries?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/r4ddocs_fisheries?a=C9liftyOztY:CUeHafsipac:F7zBnMyn0Lo"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/r4ddocs_fisheries?i=C9liftyOztY:CUeHafsipac:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/r4ddocs_fisheries/~4/C9liftyOztY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/r4dfisheries?a=o-rhK7XOvkU:IMS03wrLXYk:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/r4dfisheries?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/r4dfisheries?a=o-rhK7XOvkU:IMS03wrLXYk:F7zBnMyn0Lo"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/r4dfisheries?i=o-rhK7XOvkU:IMS03wrLXYk:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/r4dfisheries/~4/o-rhK7XOvkU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
	<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/r4dfisheries/~3/o-rhK7XOvkU/Default.aspx</link>
	<source url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/r4ddocs_fisheries">R4D Fisheries Documents</source>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/r4ddocs_fisheries/~3/C9liftyOztY/Default.aspx?</guid>
	<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2012 05:51 GMT</pubDate>

<feedburner:origLink>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/r4ddocs_fisheries/~3/C9liftyOztY/Default.aspx</feedburner:origLink></item>

<item>
	<title>Diagnosis and the Management Constituency of Small-scale
Fisheries.</title>
	<description>&lt;b&gt;Document Type:&lt;/b&gt; Working Paper&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Creator:&lt;/b&gt; Evans, L.; Andrew, N.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Production Year:&lt;/b&gt; 2009&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Citation:&lt;/b&gt; Evans, L.; Andrew, N. &lt;b&gt;Diagnosis and the Management Constituency of Small-scale
Fisheries.&lt;/b&gt; WorldFish Center, Penang, Malaysia (2009) 33 pp. ISBN 978-983-2346-74-6 (The WorldFish Center Working Paper 1941)&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Summary:&lt;/b&gt; Diagnosis and adaptive management can help improve the ability of small-scale fisheries
(SSF) in the developing world to better cope with and adapt to both external drivers
and internal sources of uncertainty. This paper presents a framework for diagnosis and
adaptive management and discusses ways of implementing the first two phases of learning:
diagnosis and mobilising an appropriate management constituency. The discussion
addresses key issues and suggests suitable approaches and tools as well as numerous
sources of further information. Diagnosis of a SSF defines the system to be managed,
outlines the scope of the management problem in terms of threats and opportunities,
and aims to construct realistic and desired future projections for the fishery. These steps
can clarify objectives and lead to development of indicators necessary for adaptive
management. Before management, however, it is important to mobilize a management
constituency to enact change. Ways of identifying stakeholders and understanding both
enabling and obstructive interactions and management structures are outlined. These
preliminary learning phases for adaptive SSF management are expected to work best if
legitimised by collaborative discussion among fishery stakeholders drawing on multiple
knowledge systems and participatory approaches to assessment.&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/r4ddocs_fisheries?a=547fMJpDBaQ:0h-lw8aAWp0:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/r4ddocs_fisheries?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/r4ddocs_fisheries?a=547fMJpDBaQ:0h-lw8aAWp0:F7zBnMyn0Lo"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/r4ddocs_fisheries?i=547fMJpDBaQ:0h-lw8aAWp0:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/r4ddocs_fisheries/~4/547fMJpDBaQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/r4dfisheries?a=iQPJaZpPL8s:3Beqy-m7lZI:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/r4dfisheries?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/r4dfisheries?a=iQPJaZpPL8s:3Beqy-m7lZI:F7zBnMyn0Lo"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/r4dfisheries?i=iQPJaZpPL8s:3Beqy-m7lZI:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/r4dfisheries/~4/iQPJaZpPL8s" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
	<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/r4dfisheries/~3/iQPJaZpPL8s/Default.aspx</link>
	<source url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/r4ddocs_fisheries">R4D Fisheries Documents</source>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/r4ddocs_fisheries/~3/547fMJpDBaQ/Default.aspx?</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 09:07 GMT</pubDate>

<feedburner:origLink>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/r4ddocs_fisheries/~3/547fMJpDBaQ/Default.aspx</feedburner:origLink></item>

<item>
	<title>Approaches and Frameworks for Management and Research
in Small-scale Fisheries in the Developing World</title>
	<description>&lt;b&gt;Document Type:&lt;/b&gt; Working Paper&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Creator:&lt;/b&gt; Andrew, N.; Evans, L.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Production Year:&lt;/b&gt; 2009&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Citation:&lt;/b&gt; Andrew, N.; Evans, L. &lt;b&gt;Approaches and Frameworks for Management and Research
in Small-scale Fisheries in the Developing World.&lt;/b&gt; WorldFish Center, Penang, Malaysia (2009) 29 pp. ISBN: 978-983-2346-73-9 (The WorldFish Center Working Paper 1914)&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Summary:&lt;/b&gt; Commonly adopted approaches to managing small-scale fisheries (SSFs) in developing
countries do not ensure sustainability. Progress is impeded by a gap between innovative
SSF research and slower-moving SSF management. The paper aims to bridge the gap
by showing that the three primary bases of SSF management—ecosystem, stakeholders’
rights and resilience—are mutually consistent and complementary. It nominates the
ecosystem approach as an appropriate starting point because it is established in national
and international law and policy. Within this approach, the emerging resilience perspective
and associated concepts of adaptive management and institutional learning can move
management beyond traditional control and resource-use optimization, which largely ignore
the different expectations of stakeholders; the complexity of ecosystem dynamics; and
how ecological, social, political and economic subsystems are linked. Integrating a rightsbased
perspective helps balance the ecological bias of ecosystem-based and resilience
approaches. The paper introduces three management implementation frameworks that
can lend structure and order to research and management regardless of the management
approach chosen. Finally, it outlines possible research approaches to overcome the
heretofore limited capacity of fishery research to integrate across ecological, social and
economic dimensions and so better serve the management objective of avoiding fishery
failure by nurturing and preserving the ecological, social and institutional attributes that
enable it to renew and reorganize itself.&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/r4ddocs_fisheries?a=x2EWSOv_peM:jws0PDvsUTM:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/r4ddocs_fisheries?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/r4ddocs_fisheries?a=x2EWSOv_peM:jws0PDvsUTM:F7zBnMyn0Lo"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/r4ddocs_fisheries?i=x2EWSOv_peM:jws0PDvsUTM:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/r4ddocs_fisheries/~4/x2EWSOv_peM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/r4dfisheries?a=yNObEGoFQcQ:fAV0PdNsAy4:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/r4dfisheries?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/r4dfisheries?a=yNObEGoFQcQ:fAV0PdNsAy4:F7zBnMyn0Lo"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/r4dfisheries?i=yNObEGoFQcQ:fAV0PdNsAy4:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/r4dfisheries/~4/yNObEGoFQcQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
	<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/r4dfisheries/~3/yNObEGoFQcQ/Default.aspx</link>
	<source url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/r4ddocs_fisheries">R4D Fisheries Documents</source>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/r4ddocs_fisheries/~3/x2EWSOv_peM/Default.aspx?</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 09:02 GMT</pubDate>

<feedburner:origLink>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/r4ddocs_fisheries/~3/x2EWSOv_peM/Default.aspx</feedburner:origLink></item>

<item>
	<title>PN72 Final Report. Participatory diagnosis and adaptive management of small-scale fisheries in the Niger River Basin.</title>
	<description>&lt;b&gt;Document Type:&lt;/b&gt; Key Document&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Creator:&lt;/b&gt; B&amp;#233;n&amp;#233;, C.; Kodio, A.; Lemoalle, J.; Mills, D.; Morand, P.; Ovie, S.; Sinaba, F.; Tafida, A.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Production Year:&lt;/b&gt; 2009&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Citation:&lt;/b&gt; The CGIAR Challenge Program on Water and Food, Colombo, Sri Lanka. 85 pp.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Summary:&lt;/b&gt; In a broad sense, analysis of "resilience" is about the capacity of systems to adapt to
shocks, recognizing that disturbance and change are integral component of complex
systems. More formally, resilience analysis proposes to focus on mechanisms and
processes that help systems absorbing perturbations and shocks, and coping with
uncertainty and risks. Defined in such a way, the concept of resilience thus appears
particularly useful for the management of small-scale fisheries. However, while the
resilience concept is appealing, particularly in the face of the failure of current
management approaches, the danger is that it remains largely academic and theoretical,
and not of a great help in effectively improving the way natural resources are managed
on the ground. The challenge, therefore, lies in a pragmatic approach to operationalizing
the concept of resilience and making its implementation on the ground practical and
meaningful. In this project we propose a framework aimed at this objective and we test
it in the specific context of small-scale fisheries in the Niger River Basin.&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/r4ddocs_fisheries?a=5P55L_8r9QY:kvCeLSpgbKs:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/r4ddocs_fisheries?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/r4ddocs_fisheries?a=5P55L_8r9QY:kvCeLSpgbKs:F7zBnMyn0Lo"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/r4ddocs_fisheries?i=5P55L_8r9QY:kvCeLSpgbKs:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/r4ddocs_fisheries/~4/5P55L_8r9QY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/r4dfisheries?a=Wiw8rFXmdr4:j9Ts82orkR4:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/r4dfisheries?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/r4dfisheries?a=Wiw8rFXmdr4:j9Ts82orkR4:F7zBnMyn0Lo"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/r4dfisheries?i=Wiw8rFXmdr4:j9Ts82orkR4:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/r4dfisheries/~4/Wiw8rFXmdr4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
	<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/r4dfisheries/~3/Wiw8rFXmdr4/Default.aspx</link>
	<source url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/r4ddocs_fisheries">R4D Fisheries Documents</source>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/r4ddocs_fisheries/~3/5P55L_8r9QY/Default.aspx?</guid>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 07:27 GMT</pubDate>

<feedburner:origLink>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/r4ddocs_fisheries/~3/5P55L_8r9QY/Default.aspx</feedburner:origLink></item>

<item>
	<title>PN71 Final Report. Commune Agroecosystem Analysis to Support Decision Making for Water Allocation for Fisheries and Agriculture in the Tonle Sap Wetland System.</title>
	<description>&lt;b&gt;Document Type:&lt;/b&gt; Technical Report&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Creator:&lt;/b&gt; Sellamuttu, S.S.; Samonn Mith; Hoanh Chu Thai; Johnston, R.; Baran, E.; Dubois, M.; Mak Soeun; Craig, I.; So Nam; Smith, L.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Production Year:&lt;/b&gt; 2010&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Citation:&lt;/b&gt; The CGIAR Challenge Program on Water and Food, Colombo, Sri Lanka. 64 pp.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Summary:&lt;/b&gt; The Project on Commune Agroecosystem Analysis to Support Decision Making for Water Allocation
for Fisheries and Agriculture in the Tonle Sap Wetland System was undertaken with the aim of
improving fisheries considerations in the Commune Agroecosystem Analysis (CAEA) process
undertaken in Cambodia, to facilitate better planning at the commune level. Under this project a
number of changes were made to the CAEA tools and process and pilot tested in an adaptive,
iterative manner in four communes - two that had conducted a CAEA previously and two that had
not. Results and analyses indicated that the project had significantly strengthened the manner in
which livelihoods, water resources and fisheries are now addressed by CAEA. The revised CAEA
guidance manual has also shown potential for having wider uptake, and a number of tools have
been used by several other projects within Cambodia.&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/r4ddocs_fisheries?a=krjY_mJO924:xrTQCVh69DA:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/r4ddocs_fisheries?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/r4ddocs_fisheries?a=krjY_mJO924:xrTQCVh69DA:F7zBnMyn0Lo"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/r4ddocs_fisheries?i=krjY_mJO924:xrTQCVh69DA:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/r4ddocs_fisheries/~4/krjY_mJO924" height="1" width="1"/&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/r4dfisheries?a=v4kiLZH2HK4:A1gnK593TTQ:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/r4dfisheries?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/r4dfisheries?a=v4kiLZH2HK4:A1gnK593TTQ:F7zBnMyn0Lo"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/r4dfisheries?i=v4kiLZH2HK4:A1gnK593TTQ:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/r4dfisheries/~4/v4kiLZH2HK4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
	<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/r4dfisheries/~3/v4kiLZH2HK4/Default.aspx</link>
	<source url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/r4ddocs_fisheries">R4D Fisheries Documents</source>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/r4ddocs_fisheries/~3/krjY_mJO924/Default.aspx?</guid>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 07:08 GMT</pubDate>

<feedburner:origLink>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/r4ddocs_fisheries/~3/krjY_mJO924/Default.aspx</feedburner:origLink></item>

<item>
	<title>Discussion Paper 17. Functions and forms of brokerage in the Malawi fisheries platform.</title>
	<description>&lt;b&gt;Document Type:&lt;/b&gt; Discussion Paper&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Creator:&lt;/b&gt; Madzudzo, E.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Production Year:&lt;/b&gt; 2011&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Citation:&lt;/b&gt; RIU 2011 Discussion Paper 17, 33 pp.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Summary:&lt;/b&gt; Making agricultural research relevant for development remains a challenge for development planning. The Research Into Use (RIU) programme has attempted to tackle this question and has identified the role of an innovation broker as key in creating a conducive environment to make better use of research, by building up networks of relevant actors. This paper examines the facilitation or brokering efforts of the RIU Malawi country programme in developing the fish farming sector of the country, specifically chambo fish production. Chambo is a major source of animal protein for the rural and urban poor in Malawi, but its production has been declining over the last 20 years. While it is too early to gauge the long-term impact of RIU initiatives in Malawi, this paper shows that the programme did not develop new technologies but facilitated a way of working together between private hatcheries, government departments and research organisations. According to the paper, flexibility in the roles performed by RIU Malawi allowed innovation to take place.&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/r4ddocs_fisheries?a=aYPus5VyFto:N7CEhKtjmPI:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/r4ddocs_fisheries?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/r4ddocs_fisheries?a=aYPus5VyFto:N7CEhKtjmPI:F7zBnMyn0Lo"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/r4ddocs_fisheries?i=aYPus5VyFto:N7CEhKtjmPI:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/r4ddocs_fisheries/~4/aYPus5VyFto" height="1" width="1"/&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/r4dfisheries?a=a8aIh6f_2Ts:QkomILTSJ5w:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/r4dfisheries?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/r4dfisheries?a=a8aIh6f_2Ts:QkomILTSJ5w:F7zBnMyn0Lo"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/r4dfisheries?i=a8aIh6f_2Ts:QkomILTSJ5w:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/r4dfisheries/~4/a8aIh6f_2Ts" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
	<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/r4dfisheries/~3/a8aIh6f_2Ts/Default.aspx</link>
	<source url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/r4ddocs_fisheries">R4D Fisheries Documents</source>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/r4ddocs_fisheries/~3/aYPus5VyFto/Default.aspx?</guid>
	<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 09:10 GMT</pubDate>

<feedburner:origLink>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/r4ddocs_fisheries/~3/aYPus5VyFto/Default.aspx</feedburner:origLink></item>

<item>
	<title>Policy Brief No. 40. CAADP and Fisheries Policy in Africa: are we aiming for the right reform?</title>
	<description>&lt;b&gt;Document Type:&lt;/b&gt; Briefing&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Creator:&lt;/b&gt; Bene, C.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Production Year:&lt;/b&gt; 2011&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Citation:&lt;/b&gt; Future Agricultures Policy Brief 040, April 2011, 8 pp.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Summary:&lt;/b&gt; There has been much talk in the last few years about how agriculture is key to both poverty reduction and economic growth. In Africa, the New Economic Partnership for African Development (NEPAD) launched the Comprehensive African Agricultural Development Programme (CAADP) in 2003 with the objective to attract significant donor funding for a new push for agricultural development. Although fisheries are officially part of the CAADP, the sector has yet to demonstrate its capacities to contribute to the CAADP objectives. This brief reviews the main policy issues related to fisheries in Africa. It discusses in particular the current model (the so-called 'wealth-based approach') that is being proposed as the overall policy 'blanket' for the continent’s fisheries, and examines why this model may not be the most appropriate for African small-scale fisheries.&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/r4ddocs_fisheries?a=0wni8fcHQTA:BnDrrLsmih0:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/r4ddocs_fisheries?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/r4ddocs_fisheries?a=0wni8fcHQTA:BnDrrLsmih0:F7zBnMyn0Lo"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/r4ddocs_fisheries?i=0wni8fcHQTA:BnDrrLsmih0:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/r4ddocs_fisheries/~4/0wni8fcHQTA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/r4dfisheries?a=ETl0oXux6As:rVZFFGbontw:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/r4dfisheries?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/r4dfisheries?a=ETl0oXux6As:rVZFFGbontw:F7zBnMyn0Lo"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/r4dfisheries?i=ETl0oXux6As:rVZFFGbontw:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/r4dfisheries/~4/ETl0oXux6As" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
	<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/r4dfisheries/~3/ETl0oXux6As/Default.aspx</link>
	<source url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/r4ddocs_fisheries">R4D Fisheries Documents</source>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/r4ddocs_fisheries/~3/0wni8fcHQTA/Default.aspx?</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 07:51 GMT</pubDate>

<feedburner:origLink>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/r4ddocs_fisheries/~3/0wni8fcHQTA/Default.aspx</feedburner:origLink></item>

<item>
	<title>Fisheries ecology of spiny lobsters Panulirus argus (Latreille) and Panulirus guttatus (Latreille) on the Bermuda Platform: estimates of sustainable yields and observations on trends in abundance</title>
	<description>&lt;b&gt;Document Type:&lt;/b&gt; Miscellaneous&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Creator:&lt;/b&gt; Evans, C.R. and Evans, A.J.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Production Year:&lt;/b&gt; 1995&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Citation:&lt;/b&gt; Fisheries Research (1995) 24 (2) 113-128 [doi:10.1016/0165-7836(94)00367-6]&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Summary:&lt;/b&gt; The maximum sustainable yield (MSY) of legal-size spiny lobsters Panulirus argus (Latreille) was estimated at 37 (±SE 7.7) × 103 animals by regression of catch per unit effort (CPUE) on total effort. A graphical plot of P. argus fishery catch and effort data for lobster seasons from 1975/76 to 1986/87 resulted in a second estimate of the P. argus MSY of 30 × 103 lobsters per season by a quadratic regression of catch on total effort. A graphical plot of catch on total fishing effort data for the Guinea chick Lobster Panulirus guttatus (Latreille), with a quadratic curve fit (R2 = 0.612), resulted in an estimate of MSY of approximately 33 × 103 lobsters per calendar year. The 1985 and 1986 fishery catches of Guinea chick lobsters were close to the MSY. There was an overall increase in the CPUE of P. argus lobsters (1975/76–1986/87), whereas there was an overall decline in the CPUE of P. guttatus spiny lobsters over the same time period.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;

The two species interannual patterns of change of CPUE followed that of sea temperature change on the Bermuda Platform; superimposed was a 5-year cycle of CPUE, which was particularly noticeable with P. guttatus lobsters, suggesting a causal relationship with a 5-year cycle in the annual mean temperature of sea surface waters, averaged from six temperature stations on the Platform. Annual yield of P. argus lobsters was correlated with Platform average sea temperature at the 10% level (Spearman rank test).&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;

Both P. guttatus and P. argus yields on Platform sea temperature were parabolic in form. Platform CPUE of Guinea chicks on Hamilton Harbour temperature also suggested a parabolic relationship in the range 22–26 °C (coefficient of determination R2 = 0.43). There was clearly a parabolic association between P. argus CPUE and Hamilton Harbour temperature over the same temperature range (R2 = 0.93). It is suggested that the Lellis and Russell quadratic model for survival and growth of P. argus postlarvae may be extended to juvenile P. argus to explain these findings.&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/r4ddocs_fisheries?a=LRY-ULHl_4E:hkcv-QjXkJU:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/r4ddocs_fisheries?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/r4ddocs_fisheries?a=LRY-ULHl_4E:hkcv-QjXkJU:F7zBnMyn0Lo"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/r4ddocs_fisheries?i=LRY-ULHl_4E:hkcv-QjXkJU:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/r4ddocs_fisheries/~4/LRY-ULHl_4E" height="1" width="1"/&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/r4dfisheries?a=p6_O9y8yOyA:ZILEut4v2dM:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/r4dfisheries?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/r4dfisheries?a=p6_O9y8yOyA:ZILEut4v2dM:F7zBnMyn0Lo"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/r4dfisheries?i=p6_O9y8yOyA:ZILEut4v2dM:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/r4dfisheries/~4/p6_O9y8yOyA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
	<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/r4dfisheries/~3/p6_O9y8yOyA/Default.aspx</link>
	<source url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/r4ddocs_fisheries">R4D Fisheries Documents</source>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/r4ddocs_fisheries/~3/LRY-ULHl_4E/Default.aspx?</guid>
	<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 05:10 GMT</pubDate>

<feedburner:origLink>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/r4ddocs_fisheries/~3/LRY-ULHl_4E/Default.aspx</feedburner:origLink></item>

<item>
	<title>EU Agricultural and Fisheries
Market Access for
Developing and Transition Countries. Final Report.</title>
	<description>&lt;b&gt;Document Type:&lt;/b&gt; Miscellaneous&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Production Year:&lt;/b&gt; 2000&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Citation:&lt;/b&gt; Institute of Development Studies and Bureau Européen de Recherches S.A. 44 pp.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Summary:&lt;/b&gt; This report describes the characteristics of a trade policy analysis database constructed for the
International Trade Department (ITD) of the Department for International Development (DFID) and
the findings of an initial round of enquiries undertaken either with the database or as a result of its
outputs. The objective of the project has been to assist the ITD to undertake a range of enquiries on
agriculture and fisheries trade policy. With respect to agriculture, this has been particularly with
regard to the implications of alternative EU positions on market access in the WTO Agreement on
Agriculture negotiations for developing countries.&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/r4ddocs_fisheries?a=JgD1jgr8XG4:MYsrtnWyXAg:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/r4ddocs_fisheries?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/r4ddocs_fisheries?a=JgD1jgr8XG4:MYsrtnWyXAg:F7zBnMyn0Lo"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/r4ddocs_fisheries?i=JgD1jgr8XG4:MYsrtnWyXAg:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/r4ddocs_fisheries/~4/JgD1jgr8XG4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/r4dfisheries?a=svSwWVHrpiQ:nw2DDYy3fKk:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/r4dfisheries?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/r4dfisheries?a=svSwWVHrpiQ:nw2DDYy3fKk:F7zBnMyn0Lo"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/r4dfisheries?i=svSwWVHrpiQ:nw2DDYy3fKk:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/r4dfisheries/~4/svSwWVHrpiQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
	<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/r4dfisheries/~3/svSwWVHrpiQ/Default.aspx</link>
	<source url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/r4ddocs_fisheries">R4D Fisheries Documents</source>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/r4ddocs_fisheries/~3/JgD1jgr8XG4/Default.aspx?</guid>
	<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2011 02:51 GMT</pubDate>

<feedburner:origLink>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/r4ddocs_fisheries/~3/JgD1jgr8XG4/Default.aspx</feedburner:origLink></item>

<item>
	<title>Liquid assets: community-based fisheries management in Bangladesh</title>
	<description>&lt;b&gt;Document Type:&lt;/b&gt; Miscellaneous&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Creator:&lt;/b&gt; WRENmedia&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Production Year:&lt;/b&gt; 2010&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Citation:&lt;/b&gt; WRENmedia Impact Brief, WRENmedia, Eye, UK, 5 pp.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Summary:&lt;/b&gt; This case study describes the work of the community&amp;#8208;based fisheries management (CBFM) initiative. This initiative has  developed a series of management approaches for ensuring equitable access to fisheries resources for community&amp;#8208;based organisations (CBOs), which has resulted in over 60 per cent of fishers in project areas experiencing significant increases in their fishing incomes.&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/r4ddocs_fisheries?a=wrnDhuMYPAg:sCBQ4EYbpwk:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/r4ddocs_fisheries?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/r4ddocs_fisheries?a=wrnDhuMYPAg:sCBQ4EYbpwk:F7zBnMyn0Lo"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/r4ddocs_fisheries?i=wrnDhuMYPAg:sCBQ4EYbpwk:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/r4ddocs_fisheries/~4/wrnDhuMYPAg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/r4dfisheries?a=dLJAJUi46D0:QttS6080_Kc:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/r4dfisheries?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/r4dfisheries?a=dLJAJUi46D0:QttS6080_Kc:F7zBnMyn0Lo"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/r4dfisheries?i=dLJAJUi46D0:QttS6080_Kc:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/r4dfisheries/~4/dLJAJUi46D0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
	<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/r4dfisheries/~3/dLJAJUi46D0/Default.aspx</link>
	<source url="http://feeds.feedburner.com/r4ddocs_fisheries">R4D Fisheries Documents</source>
	<guid isPermaLink="false">http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/r4ddocs_fisheries/~3/wrnDhuMYPAg/Default.aspx?</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2011 02:33 GMT</pubDate>

<feedburner:origLink>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/r4ddocs_fisheries/~3/wrnDhuMYPAg/Default.aspx</feedburner:origLink></item>


</channel></rss>

