Source

Source

Source

Grab the iTunes feed or the plain old feed. You can also download the file (40:28, 37 MB). Or just listen below:

Source

Colangelo isn’t “ticked” as Leiweke described, but is “disappointed” that he didn’t get to see the job through. “Ticked off isn’t the right terminology…it’s a mischaracterization”. Says the team is “well on its way to being competitive”. He doesn’t believe that he’s completely being left out of the basketball side (as Leiweke suggested), but that his input may be sought and he’s glad to give it. Basically, he’s finding a way to soften the blow for him. Says he’s in the “process of constructing businesses” now more than the “process of constructing basketball teams”.

Would another GM job interest you, if it opens up?

“I’m committed….but I have an NBA out”. So, Leiweke has said he can leave if he finds a real GM job, but he says his “focus and commitment is to the Toronto Raptors”. Doesn’t see this situation as a bad situation and says that “there was steady growth but maybe that growth wasn’t fast enough”. Says, “I’m certainly not going to get in the way of the new GM”.

Will it be difficult if new GM says “amnesty Fields” or something like that? (Grange asked this question and Colangelo shot back saying you can’t amnesty Fields)

“Whatever the basketball matter is, I hope that my opinion will be asked” but the decision will rest on somebody else. “I’ve been known as a guy who zigs when everyone else is zagging” and that wont’ change. He’s saying that he brings something to the table, and hopefully people will make use of his opinion.

His new role:

Says the deal between the MLSE and the NBA needs to be revamped, and that’s something he will be focusing on now and he “hasn’t had time to focus on that in the past”. He’s going to busy with Board of Canada Basketball, grassroot level initiatives. He’s talking about women’s basketball, growth of the game, etc. All the stuff that’s Canada-specific more than the Raptors, really. He’ll be looking into new practice facilities and that’s also something he “didn’t have time before to look at”, but now does. “I’m pretty good at projects”, says Colangelo, and he’s going to make the “best damn practice facility in the League”

I’m losing interest in this presser…

If you were a guy looking for a GM job, would you want to take a job where former GM is sitting in the next office

“When I’m involved with something, I’m going to put everything into it. If there are parameters within it, I will stick to those parameters…I probably know all the candidates, and some of them I would be able to work with in a glowing fashion…the bottom line is that if I get in the way, I’m not going to be around…I’m not going to run the new guy over…The new guy will appreciate that I’m there and in his corner”

Were you reluctant to focus on the business side exclusively now?

“The role will be more than just focusing on business, and I will guide if asked”. BC’s really trying to frame this in a way where it looks like his basketball opinion still matters.

What do you think of hiring an outside firm to make the hire?

“I have no problem with it….you’ll have to ask Tim what the process was in making that decision…if they need me, I will give my input and opinion there”.

Andrea Bargnani, if he was better would this be different.

“I’m not sure I would [handle it differently]. Maybe I would’ve traded him before he got hurt..but you can’t control the injury aspect”. “A change of scenery is probably the best thing for both sides”, regarding Andrea.

Any good luck charm tonight (lottery)?

There are pros and cons to getting in the top three (basically, saying it’s a weak draft). “Hopefully this is the last time we’re there in a long time…I don’t think Tim needs to be faulted for making that decision (sending him to lottery)”

Says people have called him trying to get a foot in the door for the new GM job.

What if coin flip had gone your way (Terrence Ross)?

“With one less win, we would’ve been in a position to draft at 7, and a coin toss for 6″. Says he was targeting Damian Lillard and Harrison Barnes. Where are those idiots who were getting excited about winning meaningless games. Show yourselves.

You going to be vocal about Casey staying on?

“No, if I’m asked my opinion I’ll give it, but that’s a decision the new guy will have to make.”

Is Stefanski capable of being the GM?

“Is Stefanski capable of being a #1. Yes.”

- Spent a lot of time talking to people around the NBA he respected getting feedback and analysis – The window took a bit too long, but the process took what it took – Protects the best interest of the organization going forward in a few respects: 1) On basketball, there is great debate on decisions made that resulted in no playoffs for 5 years 2) Has a great relationship with Canadian Basketball Association; and trying to grow that relationship 3) Want to win the 2016 All-Star game 4) Build out a new practice facility – Great stress on Bryan’s relationship within the NBA – Need to hire a GM that has the responsibility and authority on all basketball related issues; reporting directly to Tim – There is no budget for a GM per sey; but ownership is willing to do what it takes

Tim Leiweke on potential conflicts with keeping Colangelo on

- Understands this will take a lot of effort – Understands that the previous President/GM is now just the GM – The timing and circumstances and Bryan’s choice to stay will go a long way in making this work – Will be challenging for Bryan, but if he can’t make it work “I’m pretty sure we aren’t going to fire the Toronto Raptors” – Will have to honor this process, and make sure that the GM will have the authority to make decisions without disruptions from anyone otherwise Tim will clean it up

Tim Leiwke on Bryan having the opportunity to explore other basketball opportunities in the NBA

- Yes, he can explore

Tim Leiweke on the process to finding the GM

- Tim is doing the search himself – Speaking to candidates, and trying to get permission from other clubs to speak to their execs – The last two weeks were spent talking to people around the NBA who gave Tim direct feedback on mistakes and good decisions that were made over the last few years – The spectrum of advice ranged from cleaning house to keeping Bryan in his current role – Bryan will be involved in the process, giving advice, but ultimately the decision is Tim’s – Search firm is only giving background on the candidates, nothing more – Is the most important activity of the organization for the next couple weeks

Tim Leiweke on where other people on the basketball side stand

- All up to the new GM who comes in – The person who they trust, will be handed all authority to make whatever decision he will want to make; neither Tim nor Bryan will have any say other than advice is asked

Tim Leiweke on his ambition to rebrand this team

- Has given a lot of thought to this – Spent an entire day with Stern/NBA from a basketball, business and image standpoint – Clear that all of Canada doesn’t support the Raptors; they are Toronto’s team, but not Canada’s team – This needs to change – The Raptors should reflect Canada in their image and branding for the upcoming 20th anniversary of this team – 2016 All-Star game is a must have for Toronto to have – “Toronto is not bidding on the 2016 All-Star game; Canada is” – Tim Leiweke

Tim Leiweke on who will be running the basketball side while the GM is being hired

- Will lean on Bryan and Ed for the operation in the interim – Prefer to not make any major decisions aka Casey’s situation is the decision of the new GM – There is an immediacy to get this settled in the near future

Tim Leiweke on the training facility

- The CBA has impacted the league – Recruiting/environment/atmospher is as important factor in getting players – “Players love Toronto; including big players in the league today” – Tim Leiweke – Big misconception that the Raptors have a disadvantage in attacting and retaining talent; he’s not sure where this came from – We are going to change how people think about this organization

Tim Leiweke on Bryan Colangelo

- Bryan loves the city – He is ticked off at Tim, but understands the process and his role in this – Bryan has the wherewithall to stand aside and let the new GM make all basketball related decisions – Bryan fought very hard to keep his job, which is why he is still part of the organization – Key will be to channel his focus to help the team, otherwise will fix it

Tim Leiweke on how extensive the list for the new GM is

- Have good relationships around the league – Have spoken to a lot of people to get a lot of feedback on the top 3 or 4 people who should get the chance to run their own team – Focused list where the candidate has had success in making trades – Require experience, track record and knowledge in drafting – Will need to express a philosophy of play to the coaching staff, and be able to keep communications open to maintain that vision – Not a list of 20, but closer to a half-dozen; some of the people on the list haven’t got permission from teams to speak with – Ed Stefanski is on the list

My first thoughts on Tim are that I really like him, a lot! Granted I was also enamored with Colangelo from his first conference call, but this smells wholly different in a few ways:

1. Tim was brought on board to build a winning organization; so was Bryan, but the reporting structure is much different with a capable exec overseeing management rather than a faceless board with potentially many different voices
2. The new GM will be subject to much more feedback and scrutiny (in terms of results as opposed to specific moves) on a more frequent basis than Bryan was since Bryan reported to the board, and the new GM will report to Tim
3. Feels like there will be a shorter accountability cycle than the 7 years Bryan had (you like how I’m referring to him as Bryan and not Bryan Colangelo?)
4. He is running the search for the GM himself, and hasn’t outsourced it; the search firm is only doing background checks
5. It is very important to change the optics of this team to being Canada’s team and not Toronto’s team; the bid will be a Canadian bid and not a Toronto centric one
6. There will be new attention and focus given to recruiting players
7. Also very important to change the perception that players don’t want to be in Toronto; Tim finds this ridiculous
8. Sounds like there will be a re-branding, or at least a refresh of the image/brand, thank God!!!!
9. Tim stressed a couple times about the relationships that Bryan has around the league. He’s been in the NBA for a very long time, and has great relationships with a lot of powerful owners/execs around the league which was, I imagine, a big determining factor in extending his employment with the team

And now it’s down to four.

Well, one thing’s for sure. These playoffs have highlighted the difference between the East and the West. While every series in the West has been fun and exciting, the East has been like the final season of The Office. Entertaining once in a while, frequently painful to watch, and really only watched by the die hard fans¹.

I find every round gives you something a little different. The stakes are a little higher, the competition a little tougher, and there’s always more storylines to follow.

And like the first round, there were a few lessons I learned (or had confirmed).

THE WARRIORS ARE BETTER CONSTRUCTED THAN THE THUNDER

The Thunder won 13 games more than the Warriors, and have been the team-building model many have wanted to follow throughout the league. In three years, they were able to draft Kevin Durant, Russell Westbrook, Serge Ibaka and James Harden, three of whom will undoubtably appear on this year’s All NBA team, and go from the lottery to the Finals in just four years.

Sam Presti has been touted as one of the best GMs in the NBA and the Thunder have been on the forefront of the analytics revolution. Plus, teams are looking to pick their front office clean, in their search for GMs, just as they’ve previously done with the Spurs (Rich Cho, the current GM of the Bobcats was the Thunder assistant GM), which has be one of the greatest compliments a franchise can have.

So what exactly is the problem?

Well, both the Thunder and Warriors lost All Stars (and the team’s second best player) to injury early in the first round, and while neither team made it out of the second round, the Warriors barely missed David Lee’s presence while Oklahoma went from having the league’s most efficient and high scoring offense, to a team that averaged less than 90 points a game against Memphis.

Obviously Russell Westbrook is a better player than David Lee, and more instrumental to the Thunder offense than Lee is, but it goes deeper than that. Golden State was able to overcome the loss of Lee better because they had more weapons.

While Kevin Durant and Kevin Martin were really the only Thunder players, outside of Westbrook, who had the ability to create their own shot and score consistently, Golden State had Stephen Curry, Klay Thompson, Jarrett Jack, Carl Landry and even Harrison Barnes.

Serge Ibaka was Oklahoma’s third leading scorer, but all he proved was that he can’t create for himself and desperately needs to work on his post up game.

Of course, Scott Brooks’ rather pedestrian offensive sets didn’t help, but that brings up the question of whether or not he’s even the right coach to take the team to a title.

But while Sam Presti has surrounded Durant and Westbrook with role players who fill specific roles, but don’t have the ability to expand on that, Golden State features a roster full of players who can step up, if needed, making it more likely they’ll be able to withstand droughts or injuries to their key players better than the Thunder.

And Golden State features more two-way players who can score AND defend consistently (I’m looking at you Kevin Martin).

If you take away Golden State’s two best players and Oklahoma’s two best players, which team would you rather have?

BIG MEN BEATS SMALL BALL

This season we supposedly saw the evolution of the NBA towards small ball, highlighted by Miami’s domination despite not having a legit center on the team for the majority of the season. There were other examples, though. The Knicks won 54 games with Carmelo Anthony as their starting power forward, and Denver won 57 games with Danilo Gallinari often times the tallest players on the court.

And then came the playoffs. Denver was bounced in the first round and the Knicks struggled against and aged and injury depleted Celtics team and their vaunted offence (3rd most efficient offence in the league during the regular season) came to a crashing halt against the Pacers.

Three of the four teams left also happen to have three of the biggest front lines in the league. And the fourth team happens to feature LeBron James, who is bigger and stronger than most starting power forwards in the league, but also happens to be the most dominant offensive player in the NBA and one of the best defensive players. Miami could run anything and be pretty successful at it.

I think the whole small ball revolution thing is overstated and more likely a trend, much like Mike D’Antoni’s 7-seconds or less was. It’s definitely useful, especially in the regular season and in short stretches in the playoffs, but the change we’ve seen has been done more out of necessity, rather than due to it being a better way to play. The dearth of quality centers and lack of good 2-way power forwards has made going small a good way to compensate while knowing few teams will be able to punish you for going small.

Is there any doubt that Oklahoma would be a much better playoff team if they had a big man who could score in the post, as well as defend? They certainly wouldn’t have missed Westbrook’s presence nearly as much if they had a post threat that demanded double teams and could open up the shooters more.

If you want to be a force in the playoffs, you need to be able to compete with the big boys, and you can’t do that without a big front line.

This is obviously good news for the Raptors. For those lamenting Colangelo turning down James Harden for Jonas Valanciunas, maybe it wasn’t such a bad thing. Harden is obviously the better player, but if the Raptors want to be successor in the playoffs, they’ll need a guy like Valanciunas.

GOOD COACHING MATTERS

There is a line of thinking that coaching is overrated. The claim is that there are only a small handful of coaches that even make a difference, so unless Gregg Popovich is walking through the door, it really matters very little who the coach is. It explains why we see so many of the same coaches recycled throughout the league, and why Vinnie Del Negro still has a job.

And that may be true, to a degree, in the regular season. In the playoffs, however, coaching matters. Over a seven game series, it’s the adjustments that coaches make that are often the difference between going home early and staying for another round.

After getting blown out by the Nets in the first game of the first round, Tom Thibodeau made some adjustments that slowed the pace and shut down the lane. If the Bulls weren’t being coached by Thibodeau, they probably would have started their summer vacation a couple of weeks earlier.

Memphis wasn’t necessarily a more talented team than the Clippers, but they were definitely better coached. And Lionel Hollins is a better coach than Scott Brooks, too.

That’s why, if I was Memphis , I would lock Hollins up long term, offering him a 10 year contract. It tells the players that this is his team, and it allows the organization to create a system around him and acquire players that fit that system.

Well coached teams play differently than regular teams. No matter what the talent level, they usually do what they’re supposed to do, even if the final result isn’t what they’d hoped. Obviously it helps to have players who fit what the coach wants to run, but the wrong players will tend to play better with a good coach.

Is Dwane Casey the type of coach that makes a difference? Do his teams seem well coached to you? Do his players develop well?

I’ll leave that for you to decide.

DEFENSE STILL MATTERS

Defense has alway been a key ingredient in Championship teams. And despite more of a focus on small ball, and a shortage of good two way big men, the top three defensive teams all made it to the Conference Finals. And Miami isn’t far behind, at 9th, in defensive efficiency.

I’ve always talked about how the deeper you get in the playoffs, the more likely weaker defensive players will be exploited, and those weak links on defense will become more and more difficult to overcome.

That’s why it’s important to build a team with a good defensive base from the start, and not have players that you need to cover for. Because if you have any Championship hopes for your team, you know that you’ll get to a point when you can’t cover for those players, and you’re likely to end up losing because of them.

PREDICTIONS FOR THE CONFERENCE FINALS

San Antonio vs Memphis: San Antonio in 6

Truth be told, I’m writing this after their first game, but that didn’t change my prediction.

I have a difficult time watching Memphis in the Conference Finals for a couple of reasons. The first is because I know in some different reality, they are still the Vancouver Grizzlies and I’m anxiously awaiting the franchise’s first Conference Finals home game, where I’ll be sitting, cheering them on in person.

The second reason is because this is a team that came into the league the same time as the Toronto Raptors, and didn’t even make the playoffs for their first 8 seasons, finishing below the Raptors in the standings for all but one of those years. And now they have made the playoffs more times than the Raptors and have gone deeper than the Raptors ever have.

But that’s not why I’m picking them to lose in six. I honestly wouldn’t have a problem seeing them get to the Finals, especially now that the guy who was responsible for ripping the Grizzlies out of Vancouver is no longer associated with the club: Michael Heisley.

Memphis is an excellent defensive team and very well coached. Marc Gasol and Mike Conley are both underrated, and they have some very good role players. But their offense is below average and San Antonio is simply a better team on both ends of the floor.

Miami vs Indiana: Indiana in 6

Just kidding. I wanted to see if you were still paying attention. Actually, I’m picking Miami in 5, but I wouldn’t be surprised if they sweep the Pacers. While the Pacers defense is excellent, like Memphis, their offense leaves something to be desired, and Miami will exploit that. David West isn’t big enough to take advantage of Miami’s lack of interior defense, and Roy Hibbert simply isn’t enough of an offensive threat to make the Heat pay.