<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2enclosuresfull.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0"><channel><title>Movies We Like</title><link>http://rashpixel.tv/mwl</link><description>Movies We Like is a podcast for talking about movies. Andy Nelson and Pete Wright take on a movie each week, sharing history, background, and production notes. Think Ebert, without all the class. </description><generator>Feeder 2.3.1(2.3.1); Mac OS X Version 10.7.4 (Build 11E53) http://reinventedsoftware.com/feeder/</generator><docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs><language>en</language><copyright>© 2011 Rash Pixel</copyright><managingEditor>shows@rashpixel.com (Pete Wright)</managingEditor><webMaster>shows@rashpixel.com (Pete Wright)</webMaster><pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 13:35:18 -0700</pubDate><lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 13:35:18 -0700</lastBuildDate><itunes:author>Rash Pixel</itunes:author><itunes:keywords>Movie,Review,Film,Analysis,Rash,Pixel</itunes:keywords><itunes:image href="http://dl.dropbox.com/u/479531/feed_images/mwl200.jpg" /><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:new-feed-url>http://feeds.podtrac.com/TenVDO71_Dc$</itunes:new-feed-url><itunes:block>no</itunes:block><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/rashpixel-mwl" /><feedburner:info uri="rashpixel-mwl" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><media:copyright>© 2011 Rash Pixel</media:copyright><media:thumbnail url="http://dl.dropbox.com/u/479531/feed_images/mwl200.jpg" /><media:keywords>Movie,Review,Film,Analysis,Rash,Pixel</media:keywords><media:category scheme="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">TV &amp; Film</media:category><media:category scheme="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">Arts/Visual Arts</media:category><media:category scheme="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">Society &amp; Culture</media:category><itunes:owner><itunes:email>shows@rashpixel.com</itunes:email><itunes:name>Rash Pixel</itunes:name></itunes:owner><itunes:subtitle>Movies We Like is a podcast for talking about movies. Hosts Andy Nelson and Pete Wright take on a movie each week, sharing history, background, production notes, and personal reviews. </itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Movies We Like is a podcast for talking about movies. Hosts Andy Nelson and Pete Wright take on a movie each week, sharing history, background, production notes, and personal reviews. </itunes:summary><itunes:category text="TV &amp; Film" /><itunes:category text="Arts"><itunes:category text="Visual Arts" /></itunes:category><itunes:category text="Society &amp; Culture" /><feedburner:emailServiceId>rashpixel-mwl</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname>http://feedburner.google.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><item><title>Aliens</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/rashpixel-mwl/~3/B8mK8HjQkcE/aliens.html</link><description>"Game over, man!  Game over!"  There are few sequels that can stand up to the originals as well asAliens can to its predecessor, and it's clear that we -- Pete Wright and Andy Nelson -- really like this film.  Join us this week on Rash Pixel's "Movies We Like" as we talk about why we truly like this film and what it means to us.  We chat about the relationship this 1986 James Cameron film has with Ridley Scott's original Alien, how Cameron got the job to do it and what his vision for the film was.  We also talk about the differences between the original cut and the director's cut that came out under a decade later.  We chat about the amazing cast, the incredible crew, and the ALIENS -- damn, they're impressive in this film.  We talk about the lengths Cameron, Stan Winston and the rest of the team went to so that they could create what appears to be hundreds of aliens, and none of them moving like they're just a man in a costume.  We talk about the nature and possible controversy of the Alien Queen, and how the addition of the character messes up the intentions of the additional footage in the Alien director's cut (if it does at all).  We also talk about why this film works so well and how it fits as a partnership pairing with the first film.  It's a great movie and we love talking about it this week on "Movies We Like!"  Listen in!&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/rashpixel-mwl/~4/B8mK8HjQkcE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 11:00:40 -0700</pubDate><enclosure url="http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/traffic.libsyn.com/acconvo/mwl_ep31.mp3" length="78280298" type="audio/mpeg" /><guid isPermaLink="false">5AA8A410-3D0D-4064-81BA-EF377641ECF7</guid><itunes:author>Andy Nelson &amp; Pete Wright</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>There are few sequels that can stand up to the originals as well as Aliens can to its predecessor, and it's clear that we really like this film. Join us this week on Movies We Like as we talk about why we truly like this film and what it means to us.  </itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>"Game over, man!  Game over!"  There are few sequels that can stand up to the originals as well asAliens can to its predecessor, and it's clear that we -- Pete Wright and Andy Nelson -- really like this film.  Join us this week on Rash Pixel's "Movies We Like" as we talk about why we truly like this film and what it means to us.  We chat about the relationship this 1986 James Cameron film has with Ridley Scott's original Alien, how Cameron got the job to do it and what his vision for the film was.  We also talk about the differences between the original cut and the director's cut that came out under a decade later.  We chat about the amazing cast, the incredible crew, and the ALIENS -- damn, they're impressive in this film.  We talk about the lengths Cameron, Stan Winston and the rest of the team went to so that they could create what appears to be hundreds of aliens, and none of them moving like they're just a man in a costume.  We talk about the nature and possible controversy of the Alien Queen, and how the addition of the character messes up the intentions of the additional footage in the Alien director's cut (if it does at all).  We also talk about why this film works so well and how it fits as a partnership pairing with the first film.  It's a great movie and we love talking about it this week on "Movies We Like!"  Listen in!

</itunes:summary><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>1:21:21</itunes:duration><author>shows@rashpixel.com (Rash Pixel)</author><media:content url="http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/traffic.libsyn.com/acconvo/mwl_ep31.mp3" fileSize="78280298" type="audio/mpeg" /><itunes:keywords>Movie,Review,Film,Analysis,Rash,Pixel</itunes:keywords><feedburner:origLink>http://rashpixel.tv/mwl/aliens.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Alien</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/rashpixel-mwl/~3/oNex6uUpnYs/alien.html</link><description>"You still don't understand what you're dealing with, do you? A perfect organism. Its structural perfection is matched only by its hostility."  This week begins our journey into the Alien franchise, dear listeners, which ends with our discussion of Prometheus on June 15th.  We start with the amazing beginning of it all, 1979's Alien.  Ridley Scott and his team -- from the writers Dan O'Bannon, Ron Shusett, Walter Hill and David Giler, to the incredible production design of H.R. Giger, Ron Cobb and Michael Seymour, to Jerry Goldsmith's haunting and terrifying score, to the incredible performances led by Sigourney Weaver, to the amazing sound editing by Jim Shields, to the cinematography by Derek Vanlint -- took the science fiction and the horror genres and found a way to merge them in a way that redefined both those genres as well as many cinema conventions aftrward.  It's a stunning film and one we're happy to talk  about with you.  Join us -- Pete Wright and Andy Nelson -- on this week's episode of Rash Pixel's "Movies We Like" as we discuss the origins of the story as well as the importance of bringing H.R. Giger on board.  We chat about what this film did for its two genres (and we don't even mention how much it still influences sci fi and horror films to this day -- anyone remember who did the voice of Mother in WALL-E?).  We cover the amazing cast and their roles in all of the pivotal scenes that stand out still to this day.  We chat about the battles between Jerry Goldsmith and Ridley Scott over the score, and more. Listen in!&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/rashpixel-mwl/~4/oNex6uUpnYs" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 06:54:04 -0700</pubDate><enclosure url="http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/traffic.libsyn.com/acconvo/mwl_ep30.mp3" length="69628125" type="audio/mpeg" /><guid isPermaLink="false">49E3FA6C-28C8-4810-B0A4-DE8105DB3A6C</guid><itunes:author>Andy Nelson &amp; Pete Wright</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>This week begins our journey into the Alien franchise, dear listeners, which ends with our discussion of Prometheus on June 15th.  We start with the amazing beginning of it all, 1979's Alien.  </itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>"You still don't understand what you're dealing with, do you? A perfect organism. Its structural perfection is matched only by its hostility."  This week begins our journey into the Alien franchise, dear listeners, which ends with our discussion of Prometheus on June 15th.  We start with the amazing beginning of it all, 1979's Alien.  Ridley Scott and his team -- from the writers Dan O'Bannon, Ron Shusett, Walter Hill and David Giler, to the incredible production design of H.R. Giger, Ron Cobb and Michael Seymour, to Jerry Goldsmith's haunting and terrifying score, to the incredible performances led by Sigourney Weaver, to the amazing sound editing by Jim Shields, to the cinematography by Derek Vanlint -- took the science fiction and the horror genres and found a way to merge them in a way that redefined both those genres as well as many cinema conventions aftrward.  It's a stunning film and one we're happy to talk  about with you.  Join us -- Pete Wright and Andy Nelson -- on this week's episode of Rash Pixel's "Movies We Like" as we discuss the origins of the story as well as the importance of bringing H.R. Giger on board.  We chat about what this film did for its two genres (and we don't even mention how much it still influences sci fi and horror films to this day -- anyone remember who did the voice of Mother in WALL-E?).  We cover the amazing cast and their roles in all of the pivotal scenes that stand out still to this day.  We chat about the battles between Jerry Goldsmith and Ridley Scott over the score, and more. Listen in!
</itunes:summary><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>1:12:20</itunes:duration><author>shows@rashpixel.com (Rash Pixel)</author><media:content url="http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/traffic.libsyn.com/acconvo/mwl_ep30.mp3" fileSize="69628125" type="audio/mpeg" /><itunes:keywords>Movie,Review,Film,Analysis,Rash,Pixel</itunes:keywords><feedburner:origLink>http://rashpixel.tv/mwl/alien.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Field of Dreams</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/rashpixel-mwl/~3/I3xUw0Fd4Eg/field-of-dreams.html</link><description>It's the end of our baseball series, movie fans, and what a better way to end it than by talking about Phil Alden Robinson's fantastic fantasy film from 1989, "Field of Dreams."  Considering Pete's disdain of Kevin Costner (at least in Bull Durham), it's a refreshing surprise to hear that he really likes this movie.  On the other hand, it's a bit disturbing to hear Andy talk about why he loves it so much.  Regardless, it's clearly a great movie with a fascinating script about a character who is a grownup on a hero's journey to becoming a man.  Powerful stuff.  Join us -- Pete Wright and Andy Nelson -- this week on Rash Pixel's "Movies We Like" as we discuss the great Oscar-nominated script by Robinson and why it has such an interesting structure, setting us up right out of the gate for this fantasy world we're in.  We talk about the mythos it creates, both in the film and in the real world.  And we chat about the crew, the great actors and James Earl Jones' amazing speech.  It's one worth talking about, so listen in!  In addition, we touch on the amazing week The Avengers has had and what it could mean for Joss Whedon.  We also discuss Captain America's possible strange tie to Ronald Reagan.  We discuss some pretty-bad-but-entertaining-nonetheless movies, and we talk about the possibility of maybe doing an episode in the future using Google+ hangouts.  It's a great week!  Come on in!&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/rashpixel-mwl/~4/I3xUw0Fd4Eg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 08:00:10 -0700</pubDate><enclosure url="http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/traffic.libsyn.com/acconvo/mwl_ep29.mp3" length="65827622" type="audio/mpeg" /><guid isPermaLink="false">582531B6-BADC-48D8-A5B6-AF94E4ED12AD</guid><itunes:author>Andy Nelson &amp; Pete Wright</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>It's the end of our baseball series, movie fans, and what a better way to end it than by talking about Phil Alden Robinson's fantastic fantasy film from 1989, "Field of Dreams."  </itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>It's the end of our baseball series, movie fans, and what a better way to end it than by talking about Phil Alden Robinson's fantastic fantasy film from 1989, "Field of Dreams."  Considering Pete's disdain of Kevin Costner (at least in Bull Durham), it's a refreshing surprise to hear that he really likes this movie.  On the other hand, it's a bit disturbing to hear Andy talk about why he loves it so much.  Regardless, it's clearly a great movie with a fascinating script about a character who is a grownup on a hero's journey to becoming a man.  Powerful stuff.  Join us -- Pete Wright and Andy Nelson -- this week on Rash Pixel's "Movies We Like" as we discuss the great Oscar-nominated script by Robinson and why it has such an interesting structure, setting us up right out of the gate for this fantasy world we're in.  We talk about the mythos it creates, both in the film and in the real world.  And we chat about the crew, the great actors and James Earl Jones' amazing speech.  It's one worth talking about, so listen in!  In addition, we touch on the amazing week The Avengers has had and what it could mean for Joss Whedon.  We also discuss Captain America's possible strange tie to Ronald Reagan.  We discuss some pretty-bad-but-entertaining-nonetheless movies, and we talk about the possibility of maybe doing an episode in the future using Google+ hangouts.  It's a great week!  Come on in!
</itunes:summary><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>1:08:23</itunes:duration><author>shows@rashpixel.com (Rash Pixel)</author><media:content url="http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/traffic.libsyn.com/acconvo/mwl_ep29.mp3" fileSize="65827622" type="audio/mpeg" /><itunes:keywords>Movie,Review,Film,Analysis,Rash,Pixel</itunes:keywords><feedburner:origLink>http://rashpixel.tv/mwl/field-of-dreams.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Bull Durham</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/rashpixel-mwl/~3/9qtdV5uuuUE/bull-durham.html</link><description>"Man, that ball got outta here in a hurry." It's time for more 80s baseball movies, ladies and gentlemen! This week, we're talking about Bull Durham, Ron Shelton's 1988 tribute to the minor leagues. If there ever was a film to compare religion to baseball to sex, this would be that film.  Join us -- Pete Wright and Andy Nelson -- as we talk about what works (the script), what doesn't (the actors, at least two in particular for Pete), and why this film goes down in the pantheon of greatest sports films made. Aside from Pete's problems with Susan Sarandon in this film and Kevin Costner in most films, we discuss the great Tim Robbins and how much he's really bringing to the table as "Nuke" Laloosh. We discuss Ron Shelton, how he got to the point where he was able to make this film, and where he is now. We also chat about where this film fits as far as genre and what Shelton's really doing with this film -- it's much more a character piece than a story about a team trying to win the big game (or a romantic comedy sports movie -- romcomspofi -- as Wikipedia claims). While we're at odds about the43 acting, we both think the script is solid, and are happy to discuss it this week. Listen in!&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/rashpixel-mwl/~4/9qtdV5uuuUE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 09:37:02 -0700</pubDate><enclosure url="http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/traffic.libsyn.com/acconvo/mwl_ep28.mp3" length="56519670" type="audio/mpeg" /><guid isPermaLink="false">0EA198C0-60DF-4A2D-80F4-24DF71F8DDFA</guid><itunes:author>Andy Nelson &amp; Pete Wright</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>It's time for more 80s baseball movies, ladies and gentlemen! This week, we're talking about Bull Durham, Ron Shelton's 1988 tribute to the minor leagues. If there ever was a film to compare religion to baseball to sex, this would be that film. </itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary> "Man, that ball got outta here in a hurry." It's time for more 80s baseball movies, ladies and gentlemen! This week, we're talking about Bull Durham, Ron Shelton's 1988 tribute to the minor leagues. If there ever was a film to compare religion to baseball to sex, this would be that film.  Join us -- Pete Wright and Andy Nelson -- as we talk about what works (the script), what doesn't (the actors, at least two in particular for Pete), and why this film goes down in the pantheon of greatest sports films made. Aside from Pete's problems with Susan Sarandon in this film and Kevin Costner in most films, we discuss the great Tim Robbins and how much he's really bringing to the table as "Nuke" Laloosh. We discuss Ron Shelton, how he got to the point where he was able to make this film, and where he is now. We also chat about where this film fits as far as genre and what Shelton's really doing with this film -- it's much more a character piece than a story about a team trying to win the big game (or a romantic comedy sports movie -- romcomspofi -- as Wikipedia claims). While we're at odds about the43 acting, we both think the script is solid, and are happy to discuss it this week. Listen in!

</itunes:summary><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>58:41</itunes:duration><author>shows@rashpixel.com (Rash Pixel)</author><media:content url="http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/traffic.libsyn.com/acconvo/mwl_ep28.mp3" fileSize="56519670" type="audio/mpeg" /><itunes:keywords>Movie,Review,Film,Analysis,Rash,Pixel</itunes:keywords><feedburner:origLink>http://rashpixel.tv/mwl/bull-durham.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Major League</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/rashpixel-mwl/~3/RH3iE9mzLu4/major-league.html</link><description>"Juuuuust a bit outside."  That's right, ladies and gentlemen -- we're switching things up a bit this week on Rash Pixel's "Movies We Like" -- instead of "Bull Durham" as promised, we're pulling a switcheroo and flipflopping that with 1989's baseball comedy classic, "Major League."  Sure, it's a bit dated, but man, it's still a fun and funny film.  Join us -- Pete Wright and Andy Nelson -- this week as we talk about this comedy gem from David S. Ward, Academy Award-winning writer/director.  We jaw about the importance of casting actors who know how to play the game -- and how it's not just something they can "act" their way through.  We chat about the backgrounds of Ward and his all-star (at the time) cast as well as discuss Ward's lifetime love of the Cleveland Indians and why he chose to write and direct this movie.  We talk about the Indians and their long and sordid history (and yes, Andy even works his great-great uncle back into the conversation).  And we discuss why this film still works so well, but also why some of it doesn't work, namely the music that dates it.  It's a blast to reconnect with old memories and talk about this movie again.  Listen in, baseball and baseball movie lovers!&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/rashpixel-mwl/~4/RH3iE9mzLu4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 07:51:42 -0700</pubDate><enclosure url="http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/traffic.libsyn.com/acconvo/mwl_ep27.mp3" length="59314145" type="audio/mpeg" /><guid isPermaLink="false">9F92E24B-0D3F-4B78-9098-8A1B45BDAA8E</guid><itunes:author>Andy Nelson &amp; Pete Wright</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>"Juuuuust a bit outside."  That's right, ladies and gentlemen, it's 1989's baseball comedy classic, "Major League."</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>"Juuuuust a bit outside."  That's right, ladies and gentlemen -- we're switching things up a bit this week on Rash Pixel's "Movies We Like" -- instead of "Bull Durham" as promised, we're pulling a switcheroo and flipflopping that with 1989's baseball comedy classic, "Major League."  Sure, it's a bit dated, but man, it's still a fun and funny film.  Join us -- Pete Wright and Andy Nelson -- this week as we talk about this comedy gem from David S. Ward, Academy Award-winning writer/director.  We jaw about the importance of casting actors who know how to play the game -- and how it's not just something they can "act" their way through.  We chat about the backgrounds of Ward and his all-star (at the time) cast as well as discuss Ward's lifetime love of the Cleveland Indians and why he chose to write and direct this movie.  We talk about the Indians and their long and sordid history (and yes, Andy even works his great-great uncle back into the conversation).  And we discuss why this film still works so well, but also why some of it doesn't work, namely the music that dates it.  It's a blast to reconnect with old memories and talk about this movie again.  Listen in, baseball and baseball movie lovers!
</itunes:summary><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>1:01:36</itunes:duration><author>shows@rashpixel.com (Rash Pixel)</author><media:content url="http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/traffic.libsyn.com/acconvo/mwl_ep27.mp3" fileSize="59314145" type="audio/mpeg" /><itunes:keywords>Movie,Review,Film,Analysis,Rash,Pixel</itunes:keywords><feedburner:origLink>http://rashpixel.tv/mwl/major-league.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>The Natural</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/rashpixel-mwl/~3/BSM9UVziHYs/the-natural.html</link><description>Baseball. Just like apple pie, it's an intrinsic part of America. Movies about baseball, on the other hand, didn't really become popular forms of entertainment until 1984's "The Natural", which is what we're talking about this week on Rash Pixel's "Movies We Like" podcast. Join us -- Pete Wright and Andy Nelson -- as we expound on the mythos of this film and what makes it so great. Is it the amazing (and surprisingly dark) source material written by Bernard Malamud? Or the brilliant performances headed up by Robert Redford? The stunning and timeless score by Randy Newman? Or is it the nature of the game itself? It's hard to say, ladies and gentlemen, but we cover all of it. We talk about the amazing and Oscar-nominated cinematography and art direction. We talk about what makes baseball movies great -- possibly better than other sports movies as a whole (except Caddyshack). We chat about how Barry Levinson and his team came together to make this, the first film for Tri-Star Pictures, a brand new studio (until Sony swallowed it up). We touch on the history of baseball movies, and even mention Andy's tie to the history of the sport itself (even if he can't get his facts straight). It's a wonderful film about a true hero's journey that can make grown men cry. It's a great film to kick off our 80s baseball movie series. Listen in!&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/rashpixel-mwl/~4/BSM9UVziHYs" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 09:00:06 -0700</pubDate><enclosure url="http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/traffic.libsyn.com/acconvo/mwl_ep26.mp3" length="65937963" type="audio/mpeg" /><guid isPermaLink="false">B3CDAC02-19C1-4E4D-AC23-4BC0AB32C172</guid><itunes:author>Andy Nelson &amp; Pete Wright</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Baseball. Just like apple pie, part of America. Movies about baseball, on the other hand, didn't really become popular forms of entertainment until 1984's "The Natural", which is what we're talking about this week on Rash Pixel's "Movies We Like" podcast.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Baseball. Just like apple pie, it's an intrinsic part of America. Movies about baseball, on the other hand, didn't really become popular forms of entertainment until 1984's "The Natural", which is what we're talking about this week on Rash Pixel's "Movies We Like" podcast. Join us -- Pete Wright and Andy Nelson -- as we expound on the mythos of this film and what makes it so great. Is it the amazing (and surprisingly dark) source material written by Bernard Malamud? Or the brilliant performances headed up by Robert Redford? The stunning and timeless score by Randy Newman? Or is it the nature of the game itself? It's hard to say, ladies and gentlemen, but we cover all of it. We talk about the amazing and Oscar-nominated cinematography and art direction. We talk about what makes baseball movies great -- possibly better than other sports movies as a whole (except Caddyshack). We chat about how Barry Levinson and his team came together to make this, the first film for Tri-Star Pictures, a brand new studio (until Sony swallowed it up). We touch on the history of baseball movies, and even mention Andy's tie to the history of the sport itself (even if he can't get his facts straight). It's a wonderful film about a true hero's journey that can make grown men cry. It's a great film to kick off our 80s baseball movie series. Listen in!</itunes:summary><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>1:08:30</itunes:duration><author>shows@rashpixel.com (Rash Pixel)</author><media:content url="http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/traffic.libsyn.com/acconvo/mwl_ep26.mp3" fileSize="65937963" type="audio/mpeg" /><itunes:keywords>Movie,Review,Film,Analysis,Rash,Pixel</itunes:keywords><feedburner:origLink>http://rashpixel.tv/mwl/the-natural.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Joe versus the Volcano</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/rashpixel-mwl/~3/u72XSJQ9LaQ/joe-versus-the-volcano.html</link><description>What does a flibbertigibbet, bubaru, a set of artificial testicles, a luggage salesman, a brain cloud, and a volcano hungry for human sacrifices have in common? They're all part of the vastly underrated and misunderstood existential comedy from 1990, Joe Versus the Volcano.  A film much beloved by Pete Wright and Andy Nelson, join them as they chat about it this week on Movies We Like.  They'll talk about what the film is really all about and why it may have not connected with audiences when it came out. They'll hash through the plot and all its fine points, discussing the amazing writer/director John Patrick Shanley, as well as all the wonderful performances led by Tom Hanks and Meg Ryan. They'll talk about Bo Welch's amazing production design and Georges Delerue's beautiful score (along with all the stellar songs used throughout). And they'll discuss the problems the script and film have, particularly in the 3rd act. Despite those problems, it's a standout film with a message about not sleeping through life but standing up and taking a leap of faith. Andy and Pete love it and challenge you to revisit it with a fresh mindset this week. Listen in—you may walk away with a new favorite movie!&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/rashpixel-mwl/~4/u72XSJQ9LaQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 09:00:07 -0700</pubDate><enclosure url="http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/traffic.libsyn.com/acconvo/mwl_ep25.mp3" length="64797770" type="audio/mpeg" /><guid isPermaLink="false">A4BD3022-FE9F-4F4F-B28F-AF6880327900</guid><itunes:author>Andy Nelson &amp; Pete Wright</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>What does a flibbertigibbet, bubaru, a set of artificial testicles, a luggage salesman, and a volcano hungry for human sacrifice have in common? They're part of the vastly underrated and misunderstood existential comedy from 1990, Joe Versus the Volcano.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>What does a flibbertigibbet, bubaru, a set of artificial testicles, a luggage salesman, a brain cloud, and a volcano hungry for human sacrifices have in common? They're all part of the vastly underrated and misunderstood existential comedy from 1990, Joe Versus the Volcano.  A film much beloved by Pete Wright and Andy Nelson, join them as they chat about it this week on Movies We Like.  They'll talk about what the film is really all about and why it may have not connected with audiences when it came out. They'll hash through the plot and all its fine points, discussing the amazing writer/director John Patrick Shanley, as well as all the wonderful performances led by Tom Hanks and Meg Ryan. They'll talk about Bo Welch's amazing production design and Georges Delerue's beautiful score (along with all the stellar songs used throughout). And they'll discuss the problems the script and film have, particularly in the 3rd act. Despite those problems, it's a standout film with a message about not sleeping through life but standing up and taking a leap of faith. Andy and Pete love it and challenge you to revisit it with a fresh mindset this week. Listen in—you may walk away with a new favorite movie!

</itunes:summary><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>1:07:18</itunes:duration><author>shows@rashpixel.com (Rash Pixel)</author><media:content url="http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/traffic.libsyn.com/acconvo/mwl_ep25.mp3" fileSize="64797770" type="audio/mpeg" /><itunes:keywords>Movie,Review,Film,Analysis,Rash,Pixel</itunes:keywords><feedburner:origLink>http://rashpixel.tv/mwl/joe-versus-the-volcano.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>All the President's Men</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/rashpixel-mwl/~3/agKdDV_VERc/all-the-presidents-men.html</link><description>And thus begins the twisted journey, movie fans, that Woodward and Bernstein have to take to track down the truth behind one of the biggest scandals our country has ever faced, which led to the President's resignation. This week on Rash Pixel's "Movies We Like", join us—Pete Wright and Andy Nelson—as we talk about the third film in Alan J. Pakula's unofficial paranoia trilogy.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/rashpixel-mwl/~4/agKdDV_VERc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2012 08:00:32 -0700</pubDate><enclosure url="http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/traffic.libsyn.com/acconvo/mwl_ep24.mp3" length="56522178" type="audio/mpeg" /><guid isPermaLink="false">255FCA9B-C40B-428D-99EA-37E10546D4AB</guid><itunes:author>Andy Nelson &amp; Pete Wright</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>This week on Rash Pixel's "Movies We Like", join us as we talk about the third film in Alan J. Pakula's unofficial paranoia trilogy, "All the President's Men".</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>And thus begins the twisted journey, movie fans, that Woodward and Bernstein have to take to track down the truth behind one of the biggest scandals our country has ever faced, which led to the President's resignation. This week on Rash Pixel's "Movies We Like", join us—Pete Wright and Andy Nelson—as we talk about the third film in Alan J. Pakula's unofficial paranoia trilogy.</itunes:summary><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>58:41</itunes:duration><author>shows@rashpixel.com (Rash Pixel)</author><media:content url="http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/traffic.libsyn.com/acconvo/mwl_ep24.mp3" fileSize="56522178" type="audio/mpeg" /><itunes:keywords>Movie,Review,Film,Analysis,Rash,Pixel</itunes:keywords><feedburner:origLink>http://rashpixel.tv/mwl/all-the-presidents-men.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>The Parallax View</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/rashpixel-mwl/~3/VtBfuELjA5w/the-parallax-view.html</link><description>We're neck-deep in conspiracy this week, movie lovers, as we're talking about one of the 70s great conspiracy theory thrillers -- Alan J. Pakula's The Parallax View from 1974, the second film in his unofficial paranoia trilogy. It's dark, it's full of paranoia, and it's got a crazy montage film in the middle that's possibly being used by a secret government organization that's trying to determine if you're good material for an assassin. Join us -- Pete Wright and Andy Nelson -- on this week's episode of Rash Pixel's "Movies We Like" as we rattle on about the nature of paranoia and conspiracy, and how this film so brilliantly plays into them. We'll talk about how the film was designed to put people in large environments, giving a sense that these characters have no power in this world.  We'll talk about the nature of voyeurism and how the way the film is shot plays into this as well, which also plays well into the role of the Parallax Corporation in the story. And we, of course, talk about the montage in the middle of the film and what it's doing there. It's a fantastic -- and not really dated -- film that's worth talking about.  Listen in!&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/rashpixel-mwl/~4/VtBfuELjA5w" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 07:32:34 -0700</pubDate><enclosure url="http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/traffic.libsyn.com/acconvo/mwl_ep23.mp3" length="60946309" type="audio/mpeg" /><guid isPermaLink="false">BE43716F-CC71-460D-9FC6-E07914DB0E26</guid><itunes:author>Andy Nelson &amp; Pete Wright</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>We're neck-deep in conspiracy this week, movie lovers, as we're talking about one of the 70s great conspiracy theory thrillers -- Alan J. Pakula's The Parallax View from 1974, the second film in his unofficial paranoia trilogy.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>We're neck-deep in conspiracy this week, movie lovers, as we're talking about one of the 70s great conspiracy theory thrillers -- Alan J. Pakula's The Parallax View from 1974, the second film in his unofficial paranoia trilogy. It's dark, it's full of paranoia, and it's got a crazy montage film in the middle that's possibly being used by a secret government organization that's trying to determine if you're good material for an assassin. Join us -- Pete Wright and Andy Nelson -- on this week's episode of Rash Pixel's "Movies We Like" as we rattle on about the nature of paranoia and conspiracy, and how this film so brilliantly plays into them. We'll talk about how the film was designed to put people in large environments, giving a sense that these characters have no power in this world.  We'll talk about the nature of voyeurism and how the way the film is shot plays into this as well, which also plays well into the role of the Parallax Corporation in the story. And we, of course, talk about the montage in the middle of the film and what it's doing there. It's a fantastic -- and not really dated -- film that's worth talking about.  Listen in!</itunes:summary><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>1:03:28</itunes:duration><author>shows@rashpixel.com (Rash Pixel)</author><media:content url="http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/traffic.libsyn.com/acconvo/mwl_ep23.mp3" fileSize="60946309" type="audio/mpeg" /><itunes:keywords>Movie,Review,Film,Analysis,Rash,Pixel</itunes:keywords><feedburner:origLink>http://rashpixel.tv/mwl/the-parallax-view.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Klute</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/rashpixel-mwl/~3/bOcbKbKmWQQ/klute.html</link><description>Hey, movie lovers!  We're taking a leap back to the 70s with this next series—Alan J. Pakula's paranoia trilogy. First up, 1971's "Klute," a dark and gritty character study/thriller about a small town detective trying to get information from a call girl about his missing friend. Join us this week as we talk about this fantastic film!  We chat about the nature of 70s films and why they feel so dark and gritty. We talk about the amazing and dark cinematography of Gordon Willis. We discuss the nature of paranoia in the 70s and how this film plays into it, whether through the script, the acting, the directing, or the cinematography. And we talk about the performances, particularly Jane Fonda's Oscar-winning turn as Bree Daniels. She stands out in this film so much that we didn't give enough kudos to the brilliantly underplayed performance by Donald Sutherland in the title role. It's a great film that stands out as a movie we like (and tying it into previous podcasts, it's one of David Fincher's faves as well). So check out the movie and listen in!&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/rashpixel-mwl/~4/bOcbKbKmWQQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2012 14:43:37 -0700</pubDate><enclosure url="http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/traffic.libsyn.com/acconvo/mwl_ep22.mp3" length="63920892" type="audio/mpeg" /><guid isPermaLink="false">237D31B8-735D-427C-A4AC-225A5F51F581</guid><itunes:author>Andy Nelson &amp; Pete Wright</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>We're taking a leap back to the 70s with this next series—Alan J. Pakula's paranoia trilogy. First, 1971's "Klute," a dark and gritty character study about a small town detective trying to get information from a call girl about his missing friend. </itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Hey, movie lovers!  We're taking a leap back to the 70s with this next series—Alan J. Pakula's paranoia trilogy. First up, 1971's "Klute," a dark and gritty character study/thriller about a small town detective trying to get information from a call girl about his missing friend. Join us this week as we talk about this fantastic film!  We chat about the nature of 70s films and why they feel so dark and gritty. We talk about the amazing and dark cinematography of Gordon Willis. We discuss the nature of paranoia in the 70s and how this film plays into it, whether through the script, the acting, the directing, or the cinematography. And we talk about the performances, particularly Jane Fonda's Oscar-winning turn as Bree Daniels. She stands out in this film so much that we didn't give enough kudos to the brilliantly underplayed performance by Donald Sutherland in the title role. It's a great film that stands out as a movie we like (and tying it into previous podcasts, it's one of David Fincher's faves as well). So check out the movie and listen in!

</itunes:summary><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>1:06:23</itunes:duration><author>shows@rashpixel.com (Rash Pixel)</author><media:content url="http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/traffic.libsyn.com/acconvo/mwl_ep22.mp3" fileSize="63920892" type="audio/mpeg" /><itunes:keywords>Movie,Review,Film,Analysis,Rash,Pixel</itunes:keywords><feedburner:origLink>http://rashpixel.tv/mwl/klute.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Hot Fuzz</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/rashpixel-mwl/~3/weE-s-oklt0/hot-fuzz.html</link><description>Helllooooooo! Tonight, we're talking "Hot Fuzz", the perfect comedy homage to every cop action film ever made! The second and last film made thus far in the Three Flavours Cornetto Trilogy, this film was again written by Simon Pegg and Edgar Wright, directed by Wright and starring Pegg. Join us as we talk about the fantastic filmmaking style that Wright brings to this film, particularly the ever-so-perfect Tony Scott-style series of shots, which we aptly name the "Jiggly Monkey". We also faun over the stellar cast, particularly the Daltonator in all his 'stache glory. We chat about the intense over-the-top violence and how it works in the film. We discuss the nature of parody or spoof films vs. homage films, and we rattle off all the cliches that this film employs so perfectly. It's an action film that features the shortest car chase in film history, a cuddly monkey and a Japanese Peace Lily, with a bit of impaling thrown in for good measure. Listen in!  And by the way, did you know that NASA named the Japanese Peace Lily one of the top 10 air cleaning plants? Good to know.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/rashpixel-mwl/~4/weE-s-oklt0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 09:00:59 -0700</pubDate><enclosure url="http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/traffic.libsyn.com/acconvo/mwl_ep21.mp3" length="53944206" type="audio/mpeg" /><guid isPermaLink="false">2085693B-CE49-4978-B1DD-8E4F05852DEE</guid><itunes:author>Andy Nelson &amp; Pete Wright</itunes:author><itunes:summary>Helllooooooo! Tonight, we're talking "Hot Fuzz", the perfect comedy homage to every cop action film ever made! The second and last film made thus far in the Three Flavours Cornetto Trilogy, this film was again written by Simon Pegg and Edgar Wright, directed by Wright and starring Pegg. Join us as we talk about the fantastic filmmaking style that Wright brings to this film, particularly the ever-so-perfect Tony Scott-style series of shots, which we aptly name the "Jiggly Monkey". We also faun over the stellar cast, particularly the Daltonator in all his 'stache glory. We chat about the intense over-the-top violence and how it works in the film. We discuss the nature of parody or spoof films vs. homage films, and we rattle off all the cliches that this film employs so perfectly. It's an action film that features the shortest car chase in film history, a cuddly monkey and a Japanese Peace Lily, with a bit of impaling thrown in for good measure. Listen in!  And by the way, did you know that NASA named the Japanese Peace Lily one of the top 10 air cleaning plants? Good to know.

</itunes:summary><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>56:00</itunes:duration><author>shows@rashpixel.com (Rash Pixel)</author><media:content url="http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/traffic.libsyn.com/acconvo/mwl_ep21.mp3" fileSize="53944206" type="audio/mpeg" /><itunes:subtitle>Helllooooooo! Tonight, we're talking "Hot Fuzz", the perfect comedy homage to every cop action film ever made! The second and last film made thus far in the Three Flavours Cornetto Trilogy, this film was again written by Simon Pegg and Edgar Wright, direc</itunes:subtitle><itunes:keywords>Movie,Review,Film,Analysis,Rash,Pixel</itunes:keywords><feedburner:origLink>http://rashpixel.tv/mwl/hot-fuzz.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Shaun of the Dead</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/rashpixel-mwl/~3/Y8BApxIquCI/shaun-of-the-dead.html</link><description>Hellooooooo! Time for a break from all those heavy films, movie fans. Tonight, join Pete and Andy as we discuss the first of the Three Flavours Cornetto Trilogy (despite the fact that there are only two films thus far). Yes, we're going to be chatting about Edgar Wright's hilarious ode to zombie cinema, "Shaun of the Dead," a film he co-wrote with star Simon Pegg. It's a hilarious film that also works wonderfully as an homage to every zombie convention you can imagine. We talk about why it works so well, how it came to be, the hilarious cast (particularly our fave Bill Nighy), British manners, Edgar Wright's filmmaking style, and the endlessly quotable lines. And yes, we quote them. Endlessly. Join us for a laugh. Now how's that for a slice of fried gold? Yeeeee-aaahh, bo-iiieeee!&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/rashpixel-mwl/~4/Y8BApxIquCI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2012 20:00:12 -0800</pubDate><enclosure url="http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/traffic.libsyn.com/acconvo/mwl_ep20.mp3" length="49220013" type="audio/mpeg" /><guid isPermaLink="false">BBA8E1F4-A0F5-4E8E-9D07-3B9EF1F1E12C</guid><itunes:author>Andy Nelson &amp; Pete Wright</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Tonight, we're going to be chatting about Edgar Wright's hilarious ode to zombie cinema, "Shaun of the Dead," a film he co-wrote with star Simon Pegg.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Hellooooooo! Time for a break from all those heavy films, movie fans. Tonight, join Pete and Andy as we discuss the first of the Three Flavours Cornetto Trilogy (despite the fact that there are only two films thus far). Yes, we're going to be chatting about Edgar Wright's hilarious ode to zombie cinema, "Shaun of the Dead," a film he co-wrote with star Simon Pegg. It's a hilarious film that also works wonderfully as an homage to every zombie convention you can imagine. We talk about why it works so well, how it came to be, the hilarious cast (particularly our fave Bill Nighy), British manners, Edgar Wright's filmmaking style, and the endlessly quotable lines. And yes, we quote them. Endlessly. Join us for a laugh. Now how's that for a slice of fried gold? Yeeeee-aaahh, bo-iiieeee!
</itunes:summary><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>51:05</itunes:duration><author>shows@rashpixel.com (Rash Pixel)</author><media:content url="http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/traffic.libsyn.com/acconvo/mwl_ep20.mp3" fileSize="49220013" type="audio/mpeg" /><itunes:keywords>Movie,Review,Film,Analysis,Rash,Pixel</itunes:keywords><feedburner:origLink>http://rashpixel.tv/mwl/shaun-of-the-dead.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>The 84th Academy Awards Recap Show</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/rashpixel-mwl/~3/UzT5X9SwKzQ/the-84th-academy-awards-recap-show.html</link><description>Gobsmacked. We made our picks, and we stand by 'em. Join Andy Nelson and Pete Wright for a quick roundup of The 84th Academy Awards telecast, a summary of all 24 of the awards, and a split appraisal of Billy Crystal's work as usher. And caterer.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/rashpixel-mwl/~4/UzT5X9SwKzQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2012 21:30:37 -0800</pubDate><enclosure url="http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/traffic.libsyn.com/acconvo/mwl_ep19.mp3" length="31449354" type="audio/mpeg" /><guid isPermaLink="false">FD57E445-4E1D-4261-A1EE-4A902DE31D9B</guid><itunes:author>Andy Nelson &amp; Pete Wright</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Gobsmacked. We made our picks, and we stand by 'em. Join Andy Nelson and Pete Wright for a quick roundup of The 84th Academy Awards telecast, a summary of all 24 of the awards, and a split appraisal of Billy Crystal's work as usher. And caterer. 

</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Gobsmacked. We made our picks, and we stand by 'em. Join Andy Nelson and Pete Wright for a quick roundup of The 84th Academy Awards telecast, a summary of all 24 of the awards, and a split appraisal of Billy Crystal's work as usher. And caterer. 

</itunes:summary><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>32:34</itunes:duration><author>shows@rashpixel.com (Rash Pixel)</author><media:content url="http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/traffic.libsyn.com/acconvo/mwl_ep19.mp3" fileSize="31449354" type="audio/mpeg" /><itunes:keywords>Movie,Review,Film,Analysis,Rash,Pixel</itunes:keywords><feedburner:origLink>http://rptv.squarespace.com/mwl/the-84th-academy-awards-recap-show.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Se7en</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/rashpixel-mwl/~3/IefbtZSPOUY/se7en.html</link><description>Well, movie lovers, it's that time.  We've hit the end of our Benjamin Button style Fincher Fest.  This week, Pete Wright and Andy Nelson talk about David Fincher's knock-you-out-of-your-seat detective thriller Seven, or Se7en if you prefer.  Join us as we talk about how we feel about this film now that we've worked backward through Fincher's oeuvre.  We talk about all the wonderful performances (though we get sidetracked on Brad Pitt and don't give Morgan Freeman enough attention) and how Fincher really from the start knew how to work with his actors as well as his technical partners.  We discuss the script and how it found its way to Fincher.  We hash through the ending and what other endings it could have had.  And we chat about the bleach bypass process that Fincher used to give the film its look.  It's a stellar film that stands out as a highlight in Fincher's career and we look forward to you joining us this week as we talk about it on "Movies We Like!"&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/rashpixel-mwl/~4/IefbtZSPOUY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 20:00:56 -0800</pubDate><enclosure url="http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/traffic.libsyn.com/acconvo/mwl_ep18.mp3" length="71303305" type="audio/mpeg" /><guid isPermaLink="false">CB89F9D8-FD10-40C9-A71B-03B1D46D2869</guid><itunes:author>Andy Nelson &amp; Pete Wright</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Well, movie lovers, it's that time.  We've hit the end of our Benjamin Button style Fincher Fest.  This week, Pete Wright and Andy Nelson talk about David Fincher's knock-you-out-of-your-seat detective thriller Seven, or Se7en if you prefer.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Well, movie lovers, it's that time.  We've hit the end of our Benjamin Button style Fincher Fest.  This week, Pete Wright and Andy Nelson talk about David Fincher's knock-you-out-of-your-seat detective thriller Seven, or Se7en if you prefer.  Join us as we talk about how we feel about this film now that we've worked backward through Fincher's oeuvre.  We talk about all the wonderful performances (though we get sidetracked on Brad Pitt and don't give Morgan Freeman enough attention) and how Fincher really from the start knew how to work with his actors as well as his technical partners.  We discuss the script and how it found its way to Fincher.  We hash through the ending and what other endings it could have had.  And we chat about the bleach bypass process that Fincher used to give the film its look.  It's a stellar film that stands out as a highlight in Fincher's career and we look forward to you joining us this week as we talk about it on "Movies We Like!"
</itunes:summary><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>1:14:05</itunes:duration><author>shows@rashpixel.com (Rash Pixel)</author><media:content url="http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/traffic.libsyn.com/acconvo/mwl_ep18.mp3" fileSize="71303305" type="audio/mpeg" /><itunes:keywords>Movie,Review,Film,Analysis,Rash,Pixel</itunes:keywords><feedburner:origLink>http://rptv.squarespace.com/mwl/se7en.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>The Game</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/rashpixel-mwl/~3/24zPHSzUdPg/the-game.html</link><description>Greetings, movie lovers!  This week, we continue our Fincher Fest with a discussion about "The Game," a dark and twisting tale that Pete finds he doesn't really like anymore while Andy still connects with.  Join us as we chat about why this film doesn't seem to work for Pete anymore and how Blake Snyder's book "Save the Cat!" may give us the answer, particularly as it relates to the current 99% movement and possibly also to some extent previous roles Michael Douglas has portrayed.  We dig into why some people bought into this elaborate hoax that the story sets up and others didn't.  We discuss how this movie came to be and who was originally slated to star in it, and we really get off on some of the great language in the script.  It's a gloomy ride that satisfies some and leaves other pining for later and greater Fincher efforts, but we still have a great time talking about it so join in!&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/rashpixel-mwl/~4/24zPHSzUdPg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 20:00:30 -0800</pubDate><enclosure url="http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/traffic.libsyn.com/acconvo/mwl_ep17.mp3" length="56599500" type="audio/mpeg" /><guid isPermaLink="false">70A37BF7-353C-467A-8028-4FCDB11F391F</guid><itunes:author>Andy Nelson &amp; Pete Wright</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Greetings, movie lovers!  This week, we continue our Fincher Fest with a discussion about "The Game," a dark and twisting tale that Pete finds he doesn't really like anymore while Andy still connects with.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Greetings, movie lovers!  This week, we continue our Fincher Fest with a discussion about "The Game," a dark and twisting tale that Pete finds he doesn't really like anymore while Andy still connects with.  Join us as we chat about why this film doesn't seem to work for Pete anymore and how Blake Snyder's book "Save the Cat!" may give us the answer, particularly as it relates to the current 99% movement and possibly also to some extent previous roles Michael Douglas has portrayed.  We dig into why some people bought into this elaborate hoax that the story sets up and others didn't.  We discuss how this movie came to be and who was originally slated to star in it, and we really get off on some of the great language in the script.  It's a gloomy ride that satisfies some and leaves other pining for later and greater Fincher efforts, but we still have a great time talking about it so join in!

</itunes:summary><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>58:46</itunes:duration><author>shows@rashpixel.com (Rash Pixel)</author><media:content url="http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/traffic.libsyn.com/acconvo/mwl_ep17.mp3" fileSize="56599500" type="audio/mpeg" /><itunes:keywords>Movie,Review,Film,Analysis,Rash,Pixel</itunes:keywords><feedburner:origLink>http://rptv.squarespace.com/mwl/the-game.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Fight Club</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/rashpixel-mwl/~3/kZP5YRziKmQ/fight-club.html</link><description>Greetings, movie lovers.  This week, we hit David Fincher's film "Fight Club."  Is it just an anarchic, pugilistic sensation or is Fincher really working at tapping into a dark zeitgeist affecting the average person at the turn of the century?  Join us as we talk about this tale of an everyman narrator struggling to find sense in his Ikea life and how his dark counterpart, Tyler Durden, helps him find himself.  We hit on the brilliant performances by Edward Norton and Brad Pitt, as well as the always wonderful Helena Bonham Carter.  We discuss the message Fincher is saying and how this is, possibly, the only real film that Fincher's made that is more than just a genre film of some sort.  Listen in, and let us know what you think of this wild ride!&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/rashpixel-mwl/~4/kZP5YRziKmQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 20:00:30 -0800</pubDate><enclosure url="http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/traffic.libsyn.com/acconvo/mwl_ep16.mp3" length="70545963" type="audio/mpeg" /><guid isPermaLink="false">661B86D4-B046-4D2D-8FB4-F835F1D33895</guid><itunes:author>Andy Nelson &amp; Pete Wright</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Greetings, movie lovers.  This week, we hit David Fincher's film "Fight Club."  Is it just an anarchic, pugilistic sensation or is Fincher really working at tapping into a dark zeitgeist affecting the average person at the turn of the century?</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Greetings, movie lovers.  This week, we hit David Fincher's film "Fight Club."  Is it just an anarchic, pugilistic sensation or is Fincher really working at tapping into a dark zeitgeist affecting the average person at the turn of the century?  Join us as we talk about this tale of an everyman narrator struggling to find sense in his Ikea life and how his dark counterpart, Tyler Durden, helps him find himself.  We hit on the brilliant performances by Edward Norton and Brad Pitt, as well as the always wonderful Helena Bonham Carter.  We discuss the message Fincher is saying and how this is, possibly, the only real film that Fincher's made that is more than just a genre film of some sort.  Listen in, and let us know what you think of this wild ride!

</itunes:summary><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>56:34</itunes:duration><author>shows@rashpixel.com (Rash Pixel)</author><media:content url="http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/traffic.libsyn.com/acconvo/mwl_ep16.mp3" fileSize="70545963" type="audio/mpeg" /><itunes:keywords>Movie,Review,Film,Analysis,Rash,Pixel</itunes:keywords><feedburner:origLink>http://rptv.squarespace.com/mwl/fight-club.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>The Oscar Pick Show</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/rashpixel-mwl/~3/cf7VivcrsKs/mwl14</link><description>Hey there, movie fans!  Oscar nominations came out this past week and as movie lovers, we thought we'd offer up our first special podcast episode weighing in with our thoughts on what was nominated, what wasn't, what should have been, what shouldn't have been, and what we want to see win.  Join us for a special Oscar nomination episode on "Movies We Like!"&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/rashpixel-mwl/~4/cf7VivcrsKs" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 15:43:30 -0800</pubDate><enclosure url="http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/traffic.libsyn.com/acconvo/mwl_ep14.mp3" length="54490060" type="audio/mpeg" /><guid isPermaLink="false">34B5C0D3-8DCC-49CB-BB0C-8747EE32984A</guid><itunes:author>Andy Nelson &amp; Pete Wright</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Oscar nominations came out and as movie lovers, we thought we'd offer up our first special episode weighing in with our thoughts on what was nominated, what wasn't, what should have been, what shouldn't have been, and what we want to see win.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Hey there, movie fans!  Oscar nominations came out this past week and as movie lovers, we thought we'd offer up our first special podcast episode weighing in with our thoughts on what was nominated, what wasn't, what should have been, what shouldn't have been, and what we want to see win.  Join us for a special Oscar nomination episode on "Movies We Like!"  
</itunes:summary><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>56:34</itunes:duration><author>shows@rashpixel.com (Rash Pixel)</author><media:content url="http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/traffic.libsyn.com/acconvo/mwl_ep14.mp3" fileSize="54490060" type="audio/mpeg" /><itunes:keywords>Movie,Review,Film,Analysis,Rash,Pixel</itunes:keywords><feedburner:origLink>http://rashpixel.tv/mwl/mwl14</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Panic Room</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/rashpixel-mwl/~3/DmY97TTe4c0/mwl15</link><description>We've made it to the middle of the Fincher-Fest, movie lovers!  This week, join us as we talk about his one-location movie, "Panic Room."  Falling right between "Fight Club" and "Zodiac", this movie really marks a turning point for David Fincher's films -- starting here, he moves into the land of digital cinema (mostly) and finds a more controlled approach to his storytelling.  Join us as we talk about the trials and tribulations that went into getting this film made -- an impending writers' strike, last minute actress and supporting actress replacements, a seemingly simple script that redefined complexity of camerawork on the set, and a six-month production schedule that had to work around not only Jodie Foster's pregnancy going from 1st to 3rd term, but also Kristin Stewart -- then not so famous for being Bella in "Twilight" -- growing from being shorter than Jodie Foster to being taller than her.  This in a film that takes place over the course of one night for the most part.  It's a tense, claustrophobic, well-paced thrill ride that's worth taking, and we have a blast talking about it.  Listen in!&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/rashpixel-mwl/~4/DmY97TTe4c0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:00:52 -0800</pubDate><enclosure url="http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/traffic.libsyn.com/acconvo/mwl_ep15.mp3" length="60193949" type="audio/mpeg" /><guid isPermaLink="false">1228AB4D-7F17-49E4-A5FF-09309DFA989A</guid><itunes:author>Andy Nelson &amp; Pete Wright</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>We've made it to the middle of the Fincher-Fest, movie lovers!  This week, join us as we talk about his one-location movie, "Panic Room."  Falling right between "Fight Club" and "Zodiac", this movie really marks a turning point for David Fincher's films.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>We've made it to the middle of the Fincher-Fest, movie lovers!  This week, join us as we talk about his one-location movie, "Panic Room."  Falling right between "Fight Club" and "Zodiac", this movie really marks a turning point for David Fincher's films -- starting here, he moves into the land of digital cinema (mostly) and finds a more controlled approach to his storytelling.  Join us as we talk about the trials and tribulations that went into getting this film made -- an impending writers' strike, last minute actress and supporting actress replacements, a seemingly simple script that redefined complexity of camerawork on the set, and a six-month production schedule that had to work around not only Jodie Foster's pregnancy going from 1st to 3rd term, but also Kristin Stewart -- then not so famous for being Bella in "Twilight" -- growing from being shorter than Jodie Foster to being taller than her.  This in a film that takes place over the course of one night for the most part.  It's a tense, claustrophobic, well-paced thrill ride that's worth taking, and we have a blast talking about it.  Listen in!</itunes:summary><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>1:04:03</itunes:duration><author>shows@rashpixel.com (Rash Pixel)</author><media:content url="http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/traffic.libsyn.com/acconvo/mwl_ep15.mp3" fileSize="60193949" type="audio/mpeg" /><itunes:keywords>Movie,Review,Film,Analysis,Rash,Pixel</itunes:keywords><feedburner:origLink>http://rashpixel.tv/mwl/mwl15</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Zodiac</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/rashpixel-mwl/~3/iYA7SkyKwfY/mwl13</link><description>Back in 2007, David Fincher created what many consider his best film, Zodiac.  Hailed by dozens of critics as one of the best films of the year, it unfortunately never found its audience and ended up a financial failure.  This week, movie lovers, join us as we delve into this meticulously crafted, haunting and sometimes scary film that details the obsession one man had in solving the Zodiac killings in the San Francisco area in the late 60s.  From a script by James Vanderbilt based on Robert Graysmith's doggedly detailed books "Zodiac" and "Zodiac Unmasked",  Fincher's pursuit to create as accurate a portrayal of the truth as possible give us a beautifully restrained look at how the police and newspaper reporters worked hard to try to find an answer to the killings yet never did so.  We talk about how this potentially is the reason the film didn't fare well at the box office.  We also discuss the film's impeccable cast (let's all give a hand to John Carroll Lynch's unforgettably creepy portrayal of Arthur Leigh Allen!); chat about the amazing (and invisible) visual effects used to recreate the San Francisco area from 1968 to 1991 that truly take us back in time; and cover how this film was the first film to shoot with the then new digital camera, the Viper, and what that allowed Harry Savides, the cinematographer, to do.  It's a drastically underwatched film, in our opinion, and we think you ALL need to go rent it right now then listen in!&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/rashpixel-mwl/~4/iYA7SkyKwfY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 20:00:52 -0800</pubDate><enclosure url="http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/traffic.libsyn.com/acconvo/mwl_ep13.mp3" length="60193949" type="audio/mpeg" /><guid isPermaLink="false">91A55288-FA43-4D4F-9ABA-13A416AB8E0C</guid><itunes:author>Andy Nelson &amp; Pete Wright</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>This week, movie lovers, join us as we delve into David Fincher's "Zodiac," a meticulously crafted, haunting and sometimes scary film that details the obsession one man had in solving the Zodiac killings in the San Francisco area in the late 60s.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Back in 2007, David Fincher created what many consider his best film, Zodiac.  Hailed by dozens of critics as one of the best films of the year, it unfortunately never found its audience and ended up a financial failure.  This week, movie lovers, join us as we delve into this meticulously crafted, haunting and sometimes scary film that details the obsession one man had in solving the Zodiac killings in the San Francisco area in the late 60s.  From a script by James Vanderbilt based on Robert Graysmith's doggedly detailed books "Zodiac" and "Zodiac Unmasked",  Fincher's pursuit to create as accurate a portrayal of the truth as possible give us a beautifully restrained look at how the police and newspaper reporters worked hard to try to find an answer to the killings yet never did so.  We talk about how this potentially is the reason the film didn't fare well at the box office.  We also discuss the film's impeccable cast (let's all give a hand to John Carroll Lynch's unforgettably creepy portrayal of Arthur Leigh Allen!); chat about the amazing (and invisible) visual effects used to recreate the San Francisco area from 1968 to 1991 that truly take us back in time; and cover how this film was the first film to shoot with the then new digital camera, the Viper, and what that allowed Harry Savides, the cinematographer, to do.  It's a drastically underwatched film, in our opinion, and we think you ALL need to go rent it right now then listen in!
</itunes:summary><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>1:09:39</itunes:duration><author>shows@rashpixel.com (Rash Pixel)</author><media:content url="http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/traffic.libsyn.com/acconvo/mwl_ep13.mp3" fileSize="60193949" type="audio/mpeg" /><itunes:keywords>Movie,Review,Film,Analysis,Rash,Pixel</itunes:keywords><feedburner:origLink>http://rashpixel.tv/mwl/mwl13</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>The Curious Case of Benjamin Button</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/rashpixel-mwl/~3/kSkd18JUrLY/mwl12</link><description>Our third stop on the Fincher Fest train brings us to David Fincher's 2008 drama, "The Curious Case of Benjamin Button."  Fincher outdid himself on this film, combining all elements available to him from tried and true practical elements through state-of-the-art digital effects -- not to mention countless top-notch performances --  to create an astounding period film about an astounding person who is born old and ages backward.  We discuss the journey this F. Scott Fitzgerald story took to get to the silver screen -- a long one that at one point had Frank Oz slated to direct it and Martin Short to star as Benjamin!   We chat about watching Benjamin Button, played by Brad Pitt in one of his best performances, age backward and the unreal makeup work done to pull it off, not just for him but for all the characters in the film.   We talk about the themes this story is hitting upon and why it works so well, and we discuss the immense amount of money put into getting this film made and how Fincher managed to pull it all off and still turn it into a profitable film.  The film won 3 Academy Awards and was nominated for an amazing 13 Academy Awards (though it should have been 14 as Cate Blanchett, who didn't get a nomination as Best Actress, has never been better!).  Join us as we dig into this gorgeous film!&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/rashpixel-mwl/~4/kSkd18JUrLY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 20:00:52 -0800</pubDate><enclosure url="http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/traffic.libsyn.com/acconvo/mwl_ep12.mp3" length="67042211" type="audio/mpeg" /><guid isPermaLink="false">652D94C0-F646-45C4-B73B-641CAAEE89B6</guid><itunes:author>Andy Nelson &amp; Pete Wright</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Our third stop on the Fincher Fest train brings us to his 2008 drama, "The Curious Case of Benjamin Button."  Fincher outdid himself on this film, combining all elements available to him to create an astounding period film of man born old, aging backward.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Our third stop on the Fincher Fest train brings us to David Fincher's 2008 drama, "The Curious Case of Benjamin Button."  Fincher outdid himself on this film, combining all elements available to him from tried and true practical elements through state-of-the-art digital effects -- not to mention countless top-notch performances --  to create an astounding period film about an astounding person who is born old and ages backward.  We discuss the journey this F. Scott Fitzgerald story took to get to the silver screen -- a long one that at one point had Frank Oz slated to direct it and Martin Short to star as Benjamin!   We chat about watching Benjamin Button, played by Brad Pitt in one of his best performances, age backward and the unreal makeup work done to pull it off, not just for him but for all the characters in the film.   We talk about the themes this story is hitting upon and why it works so well, and we discuss the immense amount of money put into getting this film made and how Fincher managed to pull it all off and still turn it into a profitable film.  The film won 3 Academy Awards and was nominated for an amazing 13 Academy Awards (though it should have been 14 as Cate Blanchett, who didn't get a nomination as Best Actress, has never been better!).  Join us as we dig into this gorgeous film!</itunes:summary><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>1:09:39</itunes:duration><author>shows@rashpixel.com (Rash Pixel)</author><media:content url="http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/traffic.libsyn.com/acconvo/mwl_ep12.mp3" fileSize="67042211" type="audio/mpeg" /><itunes:keywords>Movie,Review,Film,Analysis,Rash,Pixel</itunes:keywords><feedburner:origLink>http://rashpixel.tv/mwl/mwl12</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>The Social Network</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/rashpixel-mwl/~3/QktIXG1AhVA/mwl11</link><description>Greetings and salutations, movie aficionados!  Welcome to the second episode of our Benjamin Button-style David Fincher-fest!  Tonight, we discuss arguably his greatest film—certainly his most critically acclaimed.  It's "The Social Network," from Aaron Sorkin's script that is simply on fire.  Joining us tonight as a special guest is Chadd Stoops:  actor, longtime friend of Pete and Andy, and HUGE fan of this film.  In this episode, we discuss the realities of the movie's reality—was it fair for the filmmakers in telling this story to change the truths in order to make a more compelling film? We talk about the spot-on performances all around as well as the amazing magic Fincher worked to double Armie Hammer as the Winklevoss twins. We look at what this film is really saying about social networking and the people behind Facebook, and we discuss how "Fincher" this film really is. We also chime in on our opinions as to why it didn't win Best Picture at the Oscars. It's a spirited conversation about an incredibly relevant and hugely important piece of modern history. Listen in!  Oh, and since we're talking about a movie about Facebook, make sure you go to the Rash Pixel page on Facebook and Like us!  That way you can be a part of OUR social network!  Happy listening!&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/rashpixel-mwl/~4/QktIXG1AhVA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 21:00:52 -0800</pubDate><enclosure url="http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/traffic.libsyn.com/acconvo/mwl_ep11.mp3" length="73368087" type="audio/mpeg" /><guid isPermaLink="false">29DFF4DA-CB7E-4696-98A2-614493682FE7</guid><itunes:author>Andy Nelson &amp; Pete Wright</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Greetings and salutations, movie aficionados!  Welcome to the second episode of our Benjamin Button-style David Fincher-fest!  Tonight, we discuss arguably his greatest film—certainly his most critically acclaimed: "The Social Network."</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Greetings and salutations, movie aficionados!  Welcome to the second episode of our Benjamin Button-style David Fincher-fest!  Tonight, we discuss arguably his greatest film—certainly his most critically acclaimed.  It's "The Social Network," from Aaron Sorkin's script that is simply on fire.  Joining us tonight as a special guest is Chadd Stoops:  actor, longtime friend of Pete and Andy, and HUGE fan of this film.  In this episode, we discuss the realities of the movie's reality—was it fair for the filmmakers in telling this story to change the truths in order to make a more compelling film? We talk about the spot-on performances all around as well as the amazing magic Fincher worked to double Armie Hammer as the Winklevoss twins. We look at what this film is really saying about social networking and the people behind Facebook, and we discuss how "Fincher" this film really is. We also chime in on our opinions as to why it didn't win Best Picture at the Oscars. It's a spirited conversation about an incredibly relevant and hugely important piece of modern history. Listen in!  Oh, and since we're talking about a movie about Facebook, make sure you go to the Rash Pixel page on Facebook and Like us!  That way you can be a part of OUR social network!  Happy listening!
</itunes:summary><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>1:16:14</itunes:duration><author>shows@rashpixel.com (Rash Pixel)</author><media:content url="http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/traffic.libsyn.com/acconvo/mwl_ep11.mp3" fileSize="73368087" type="audio/mpeg" /><itunes:keywords>Movie,Review,Film,Analysis,Rash,Pixel</itunes:keywords><feedburner:origLink>http://rashpixel.tv/mwl/mwl11</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/rashpixel-mwl/~3/h2kxiRVrl6w/mwl10</link><description>It's the start of the Benjamin Button-style Fincher-Fest, movie lovers!  And what better way to kick it off than to take a look at David Fincher's current film, "The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo," based on Stieg Larsson's first book in his internationally best-selling "Millenium" trilogy.  It's already racking up end-of-the-year accolades and incredible buzz about Rooney Mara's knock-your-socks-off performance of Lisbeth Salander (all well-earned), even though some contingents of fans of the original Swedish films (great films in their own right that only came out last year) question why Hollywood felt it so necessary to adapt the books again so quickly after the others were made.  The Swedish films certainly put Noomi Rapace and Michael Nyqvist -- who play Lisbeth Salander and Mikael Blomkvist, respectively -- on the map in international casting circles (Rapace has since appeared in Sherlock Holmes:  A Game of Shadows and just wrapped in Ridley Scott's Prometheus while Nyqvist appeared in John Singleton's Abduction earlier this year and currently can be seen in Mission: Impossible -- Ghost Protocol.)  In this episode, we talk about the various iterations of this first of Larsson's stories -- did the Americans need to make their own version, what works in each version and what doesn't, what did Fincher and his team bring to the table, etc.   We work to put in context what the Swedish film is to Swedish audiences by comparing similar statistics with American films.   We discuss the performances -- Rooney Mara's brilliant work as well as the amazing Daniel Craig who we both feel isn't just playing James Bond in Sweden.  We discuss the change in the end of the story and how we feel about it as well as all of the sequences that come after the climax.  We chat about the team behind this -- Steven Zaillian who is having a great year with this and Moneyball, Jeff Cronenweth, Ren Klyce, Kirk Baxter, Angus Wall, Trent Reznor, Atticus Ross -- and that's just some of the crew!  Robin Wright, Stellan Skarsgard, Julian Sands and the always amazing Christopher Plummer all give brilliant performances.  One actor we don't mention in this episode but who is worth mentioning here is Yorick van Wageningen, the poor actor stuck with playing the brutal role of Nils Bjurman.  He was so traumatized after filming his pivotal rape scene with Mara that he locked himself in his hotel room for a day and cried.  Obviously his choice to take the role, but it's always good to be reminded that an actor is not the character they portray.  So if you haven't had a chance to read the book or watch either film version, go do so before listening in because we have some spoilers, then tune in and join us as we take on this fascinating murder mystery with one of film's most intriguing characters in years.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/rashpixel-mwl/~4/h2kxiRVrl6w" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 21:00:52 -0800</pubDate><enclosure url="http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/traffic.libsyn.com/acconvo/mwl_ep10.mp3" length="73964033" type="audio/mpeg" /><guid isPermaLink="false">3E375973-9640-4940-BE4C-5F5BCF720D8B</guid><itunes:author>Andy Nelson &amp; Pete Wright</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>It's the start of the Benjamin Button-style Fincher-Fest, movie lovers!  And what better way to kick it off than to take a look at David Fincher's current film, "The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo," based on Stieg Larsson's first book in his trilogy.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>It's the start of the Benjamin Button-style Fincher-Fest, movie lovers!  And what better way to kick it off than to take a look at David Fincher's current film, "The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo," based on Stieg Larsson's first book in his internationally best-selling "Millenium" trilogy.  It's already racking up end-of-the-year accolades and incredible buzz about Rooney Mara's knock-your-socks-off performance of Lisbeth Salander (all well-earned), even though some contingents of fans of the original Swedish films (great films in their own right that only came out last year) question why Hollywood felt it so necessary to adapt the books again so quickly after the others were made.  The Swedish films certainly put Noomi Rapace and Michael Nyqvist -- who play Lisbeth Salander and Mikael Blomkvist, respectively -- on the map in international casting circles (Rapace has since appeared in Sherlock Holmes:  A Game of Shadows and just wrapped in Ridley Scott's Prometheus while Nyqvist appeared in John Singleton's Abduction earlier this year and currently can be seen in Mission: Impossible -- Ghost Protocol.)  In this episode, we talk about the various iterations of this first of Larsson's stories -- did the Americans need to make their own version, what works in each version and what doesn't, what did Fincher and his team bring to the table, etc.   We work to put in context what the Swedish film is to Swedish audiences by comparing similar statistics with American films.   We discuss the performances -- Rooney Mara's brilliant work as well as the amazing Daniel Craig who we both feel isn't just playing James Bond in Sweden.  We discuss the change in the end of the story and how we feel about it as well as all of the sequences that come after the climax.  We chat about the team behind this -- Steven Zaillian who is having a great year with this and Moneyball, Jeff Cronenweth, Ren Klyce, Kirk Baxter, Angus Wall, Trent Reznor, Atticus Ross -- and that's just some of the crew!  Robin Wright, Stellan Skarsgard, Julian Sands and the always amazing Christopher Plummer all give brilliant performances.  One actor we don't mention in this episode but who is worth mentioning here is Yorick van Wageningen, the poor actor stuck with playing the brutal role of Nils Bjurman.  He was so traumatized after filming his pivotal rape scene with Mara that he locked himself in his hotel room for a day and cried.  Obviously his choice to take the role, but it's always good to be reminded that an actor is not the character they portray.  So if you haven't had a chance to read the book or watch either film version, go do so before listening in because we have some spoilers, then tune in and join us as we take on this fascinating murder mystery with one of film's most intriguing characters in years.
</itunes:summary><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>1:16:51</itunes:duration><author>shows@rashpixel.com (Rash Pixel)</author><media:content url="http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/traffic.libsyn.com/acconvo/mwl_ep10.mp3" fileSize="73964033" type="audio/mpeg" /><itunes:keywords>Movie,Review,Film,Analysis,Rash,Pixel</itunes:keywords><feedburner:origLink>http://rashpixel.tv/mwl/mwl10</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>When Harry Met Sally...</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/rashpixel-mwl/~3/y0NmPLk7f88/mwl09</link><description>It's a new year, movie lovers, and in this episode, we take on an incredible film with crisp, spot-on, endlessly quotable dialogue, a cast that is absolutely perfect, and not one but two fantastic New Year's Eve scenes.  That's right, we're talking about Rob Reiner's 1989 romantic comedy classic When Harry Met Sally....  We talk about how the film sprang from the real lives of Rob Reiner, his producing partner Andrew Scheinman and the Oscar-nominated writer Nora Ephron.  We discuss the nature of the filmmaking process for this film and how smart it was to let the storytelling stand out front even though they could have easily brought out an arsenal of cinematic tools to use.  Restraint can be a good thing!  We laugh about the neverending lines from the film that are still quoted to this day.  And we report on the truth of those cute old couples who pop up throughout the film to recount their own tales of falling in love.  It's a magical, heartwarming tale of love, friendship, and the constant struggle between men and women to try to understand each other.  Tune in and join us to start 2012 off right!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Notes &amp;amp; Links&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://rashpixel.co/Ai1RC9"&gt;Daniel Craig Interview at TimeOut London&lt;/a&gt;&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/rashpixel-mwl/~4/y0NmPLk7f88" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 21:00:06 -0800</pubDate><enclosure url="http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/traffic.libsyn.com/acconvo/mwl_ep09.mp3" length="57962047" type="audio/mpeg" /><guid isPermaLink="false">AC155E2A-3169-41D8-AF2E-34876EEFEC3F</guid><itunes:author>Rash Pixel</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>This week, we take on a film with crisp, endlessly quotable dialogue, a cast that is absolutely perfect, and not one but two fantastic New Year's Eve scenes: we're talking about Rob Reiner's 1989 romantic comedy classic "When Harry Met Sally…."</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>It's a new year, movie lovers, and in this episode, we take on an incredible film with crisp, spot-on, endlessly quotable dialogue, a cast that is absolutely perfect, and not one but two fantastic New Year's Eve scenes.  That's right, we're talking about Rob Reiner's 1989 romantic comedy classic When Harry Met Sally....  We talk about how the film sprang from the real lives of Rob Reiner, his producing partner Andrew Scheinman and the Oscar-nominated writer Nora Ephron.  We discuss the nature of the filmmaking process for this film and how smart it was to let the storytelling stand out front even though they could have easily brought out an arsenal of cinematic tools to use.  Restraint can be a good thing!  We laugh about the neverending lines from the film that are still quoted to this day.  And we report on the truth of those cute old couples who pop up throughout the film to recount their own tales of falling in love.  It's a magical, heartwarming tale of love, friendship, and the constant struggle between men and women to try to understand each other.  Tune in and join us to start 2012 off right!
</itunes:summary><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>1:04:10</itunes:duration><author>shows@rashpixel.com (Rash Pixel)</author><media:content url="http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/traffic.libsyn.com/acconvo/mwl_ep09.mp3" fileSize="57962047" type="audio/mpeg" /><itunes:keywords>Movie,Review,Film,Analysis,Rash,Pixel</itunes:keywords><feedburner:origLink>http://rashpixel.tv/mwl/mwl09</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/rashpixel-mwl/~3/oPm9mn7kNQ0/mwl08</link><description>Greetings and salutations, movie lovers! In tonight's episode, we'll wrap up 2011 and our Charlie Kaufman trilogy with 2004's Eternal Sunshine for the Spotless Mind, directed by Michel Gondry. Kaufman won the Oscar for Best Original Screenplay for this film, along with Gondry and Pierre Bismuth with whom he shares story credit, and they certainly deserved this award along with every other accolade they received for this incredible film. We discuss how this story about relationships fits in Kaufman's canon. We talk about all of the amazing tools of filmmaking, both digital and practical, that Gondry and his team employ to create this disintegrating world within our protagonist's head as his memories of his girlfriend are erased. We cover Gondry and what he's bringing to the table. We also discuss the actors and how much they all bring to the table, whether its Kate Winslet in her Oscar-nominated performance as Clementine, Jim Carrey in one of his greatest serious performances ever, or Elijah Wood in maybe the creepiest role he's played. It's an incredible film about love, loss, destiny, memory and identity. Listen in as we end the year with a bang!&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/rashpixel-mwl/~4/oPm9mn7kNQ0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 09:00:06 -0800</pubDate><enclosure url="http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/traffic.libsyn.com/acconvo/mwl_ep08.mp3" length="57962047" type="audio/mpeg" /><guid isPermaLink="false">A4F9E569-D146-43AB-9EAB-FDB6611C804D</guid><itunes:author>Rash Pixel</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>In tonight's episode, we'll wrap up 2011 and our Charlie Kaufman trilogy with 2004's Eternal Sunshine for the Spotless Mind, directed by Michel Gondry.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Greetings and salutations, movie lovers! In tonight's episode, we'll wrap up 2011 and our Charlie Kaufman trilogy with 2004's Eternal Sunshine for the Spotless Mind, directed by Michel Gondry. Kaufman won the Oscar for Best Original Screenplay for this film, along with Gondry and Pierre Bismuth with whom he shares story credit, and they certainly deserved this award along with every other accolade they received for this incredible film. We discuss how this story about relationships fits in Kaufman's canon. We talk about all of the amazing tools of filmmaking, both digital and practical, that Gondry and his team employ to create this disintegrating world within our protagonist's head as his memories of his girlfriend are erased. We cover Gondry and what he's bringing to the table. We also discuss the actors and how much they all bring to the table, whether its Kate Winslet in her Oscar-nominated performance as Clementine, Jim Carrey in one of his greatest serious performances ever, or Elijah Wood in maybe the creepiest role he's played. It's an incredible film about love, loss, destiny, memory and identity. Listen in as we end the year with a bang!</itunes:summary><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>1:06:25</itunes:duration><author>shows@rashpixel.com (Rash Pixel)</author><media:content url="http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/traffic.libsyn.com/acconvo/mwl_ep08.mp3" fileSize="57962047" type="audio/mpeg" /><itunes:keywords>Movie,Review,Film,Analysis,Rash,Pixel</itunes:keywords><feedburner:origLink>http://rashpixel.tv/mwl/mwl08</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>We're No Angels (1955)</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/rashpixel-mwl/~3/ZwYMgpthYnI/mwl07</link><description>Merry Christmas and happy holidays, movie nerds! Tonight, in the spirit of the season, we talk about Michael Curtiz's curious gem of a Christmas comedy from 1955, "We're No Angels." We look at the film's story—which certainly has charmed both of us—and how it fits in the holiday film genre, despite being a tale of criminals on the lam. We talk about the history of the studio system and how this comes during its decline. We discuss Michael Curtiz, his place within that system, and what he brought to the history of film. We also chat about the fantastic actors, and give our two cents on adding this to the annual list of Christmas movies worth watching. So put on your ugliest Santa sweater, sit back by the fire (where you're roasting chestnuts, no doubt) and join us with a hot peppermint latte as we delve into this wonderful, and to some extent forgotten, Christmas treat!&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/rashpixel-mwl/~4/ZwYMgpthYnI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 21:00:06 -0800</pubDate><enclosure url="http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/traffic.libsyn.com/acconvo/mwl_ep07.mp3" length="63932948" type="audio/mpeg" /><guid isPermaLink="false">8E5C4756-A6A9-418D-8EA4-32BFCEC1616C</guid><itunes:author>Rash Pixel</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Tonight, in the spirit of the season, Andy and Pete talk about Michael Curtiz's curious gem of a Christmas comedy from 1955, "We're No Angels."</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Merry Christmas and happy holidays, movie nerds! Tonight, in the spirit of the season, we talk about Michael Curtiz's curious gem of a Christmas comedy from 1955, "We're No Angels." We look at the film's story—which certainly has charmed both of us—and how it fits in the holiday film genre, despite being a tale of criminals on the lam. We talk about the history of the studio system and how this comes during its decline. We discuss Michael Curtiz, his place within that system, and what he brought to the history of film. We also chat about the fantastic actors, and give our two cents on adding this to the annual list of Christmas movies worth watching. So put on your ugliest Santa sweater, sit back by the fire (where you're roasting chestnuts, no doubt) and join us with a hot peppermint latte as we delve into this wonderful, and to some extent forgotten, Christmas treat!</itunes:summary><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>1:06:25</itunes:duration><author>shows@rashpixel.com (Rash Pixel)</author><media:content url="http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/traffic.libsyn.com/acconvo/mwl_ep07.mp3" fileSize="63932948" type="audio/mpeg" /><itunes:keywords>Movie,Review,Film,Analysis,Rash,Pixel</itunes:keywords><feedburner:origLink>http://rashpixel.tv/mwl/mwl07</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Adaptation</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/rashpixel-mwl/~3/LDvvnFudUq8/mwl06</link><description>Andy &amp; Pete talk about "Adaptation"&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/rashpixel-mwl/~4/LDvvnFudUq8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 21:00:06 -0800</pubDate><enclosure url="http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/traffic.libsyn.com/acconvo/mwl_ep06.mp3" length="57244347" type="audio/mpeg" /><guid isPermaLink="false">29C17309-2B86-41EC-8768-B6B101CD2FF9</guid><itunes:author>Rash Pixel</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Andy &amp; Pete talk about "Adaptation"</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Andy &amp; Pete talk about "Adaptation"</itunes:summary><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>59:27</itunes:duration><author>shows@rashpixel.com (Rash Pixel)</author><media:content url="http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/traffic.libsyn.com/acconvo/mwl_ep06.mp3" fileSize="57244347" type="audio/mpeg" /><itunes:keywords>Movie,Review,Film,Analysis,Rash,Pixel</itunes:keywords><feedburner:origLink>http://rashpixel.tv/mwl/mwl06</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Being John Malkovich</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/rashpixel-mwl/~3/7RdKigajTAU/mwl05</link><description>Andy &amp; Pete talk about "Being John Malkovich"&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/rashpixel-mwl/~4/7RdKigajTAU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 21:00:06 -0800</pubDate><enclosure url="http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/traffic.libsyn.com/acconvo/mwl_ep05.mp3" length="57393141" type="audio/mpeg" /><guid isPermaLink="false">CFFD044F-A9AB-4741-82A1-07A279B6890D</guid><itunes:author>Rash Pixel</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Andy &amp; Pete talk about "Being John Malkovich"</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Andy &amp; Pete talk about "Being John Malkovich"</itunes:summary><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>59:35</itunes:duration><author>shows@rashpixel.com (Rash Pixel)</author><media:content url="http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/traffic.libsyn.com/acconvo/mwl_ep05.mp3" fileSize="57393141" type="audio/mpeg" /><itunes:keywords>Movie,Review,Film,Analysis,Rash,Pixel</itunes:keywords><feedburner:origLink>http://rashpixel.tv/mwl/mwl05</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Crystal Skull</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/rashpixel-mwl/~3/b-1Sh3Mwvvc/mwl04</link><description>Andy &amp; Pete talk about The Kingdom of the Crystal Skull.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/rashpixel-mwl/~4/b-1Sh3Mwvvc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 21:00:02 -0800</pubDate><enclosure url="http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/traffic.libsyn.com/acconvo/mwl_ep04.mp3" length="48764406" type="audio/mpeg" /><guid isPermaLink="false">C5A3DB5C-D197-433B-B798-45F198345597</guid><itunes:author>Rash Pixel</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Andy &amp; Pete talk about The Kingdom of the Crystal Skull.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Andy &amp; Pete talk about The Kingdom of the Crystal Skull.</itunes:summary><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>1:07:43</itunes:duration><author>shows@rashpixel.com (Rash Pixel)</author><media:content url="http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/traffic.libsyn.com/acconvo/mwl_ep04.mp3" fileSize="48764406" type="audio/mpeg" /><itunes:keywords>Movie,Review,Film,Analysis,Rash,Pixel</itunes:keywords><feedburner:origLink>http://rashpixel.tv/mwl/mwl04</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Last Crusade</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/rashpixel-mwl/~3/rH8n6Y49Jjo/mwl03</link><description>Andy &amp; Pete talk about "The Last Crusade"&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/rashpixel-mwl/~4/rH8n6Y49Jjo" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 21:00:57 -0800</pubDate><enclosure url="http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/traffic.libsyn.com/acconvo/mwl_03.mp3" length="56154960" type="audio/mpeg" /><guid isPermaLink="false">6169A308-C0BD-445C-A352-D6AFE8D50704</guid><itunes:author>Rash Pixel</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Andy &amp; Pete talk about "The Last Crusade"</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Andy &amp; Pete talk about "The Last Crusade"</itunes:summary><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>1:03:47</itunes:duration><author>shows@rashpixel.com (Rash Pixel)</author><media:content url="http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/traffic.libsyn.com/acconvo/mwl_03.mp3" fileSize="56154960" type="audio/mpeg" /><itunes:keywords>Movie,Review,Film,Analysis,Rash,Pixel</itunes:keywords><feedburner:origLink>http://rashpixel.tv/mwl/mwl03</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Temple of Doom</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/rashpixel-mwl/~3/BIebnBx1vnc/mwl02</link><description>Andy &amp; Pete talk about Temple of Doom.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/rashpixel-mwl/~4/BIebnBx1vnc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 21:00:57 -0800</pubDate><enclosure url="http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/traffic.libsyn.com/acconvo/mwl_ep02.mp3" length="46938736" type="audio/mpeg" /><guid isPermaLink="false">D296607A-3665-49BB-8637-AAB1BF1FA1C7</guid><itunes:author>Rash Pixel</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Andy &amp; Pete talk about Temple of Doom.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Andy &amp; Pete talk about Temple of Doom.</itunes:summary><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>1:03:47</itunes:duration><author>shows@rashpixel.com (Rash Pixel)</author><media:content url="http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/traffic.libsyn.com/acconvo/mwl_ep02.mp3" fileSize="46938736" type="audio/mpeg" /><itunes:keywords>Movie,Review,Film,Analysis,Rash,Pixel</itunes:keywords><feedburner:origLink>http://rashpixel.tv/mwl/mwl02</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Raiders</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/rashpixel-mwl/~3/FdYbfV8_hjA/mwl01</link><description>Andy &amp; Pete talk about Raiders of the Lost Ark.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/rashpixel-mwl/~4/FdYbfV8_hjA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 21:00:13 -0800</pubDate><enclosure url="http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/traffic.libsyn.com/acconvo/mwl_ep01.mp3" length="49575263" type="audio/mpeg" /><guid isPermaLink="false">1832FD38-28F3-4FB9-A809-F094096EB70A</guid><itunes:author>Rash Pixel</itunes:author><itunes:subtitle>Andy &amp; Pete talk about Raiders of the Lost Ark.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Andy &amp; Pete talk about Raiders of the Lost Ark.</itunes:summary><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>1:07:26</itunes:duration><author>shows@rashpixel.com (Rash Pixel)</author><media:content url="http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/traffic.libsyn.com/acconvo/mwl_ep01.mp3" fileSize="49575263" type="audio/mpeg" /><itunes:keywords>Movie,Review,Film,Analysis,Rash,Pixel</itunes:keywords><feedburner:origLink>http://rashpixel.com/mwl/mwl01</feedburner:origLink></item><media:credit role="author">Rash Pixel</media:credit><media:rating>nonadult</media:rating></channel></rss>

