<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0"><channel><title>Real Sceptic</title> <link>http://www.realsceptic.com</link> <description>Ventures into scepticism</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 13:34:01 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator> <atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/realsceptic" /><feedburner:info uri="realsceptic" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/</creativeCommons:license><item><title>Synthetic Biology</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/realsceptic/~3/1MACMzS2nQM/</link> <comments>http://www.realsceptic.com/2012/05/18/synthetic-biology/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 13:34:01 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Collin Maessen</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Science in the Media]]></category> <category><![CDATA[BBC]]></category> <category><![CDATA[BBC News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[David Shukman]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realsceptic.com/?p=1914</guid> <description><![CDATA[Science reporting is hard, and mistakes can be made. But I never expected the BBC could cover a subject this badly. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rr-FE4gV91o Back in March, David Shukman (BBC Science Editor) published a short report on synthetic biology. The reports cast a shadow on the hard work of scientists and implies that synthetic biology is not [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Science reporting is hard, and mistakes can be made. But I never expected the BBC could cover a subject this badly.</p><blockquote><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rr-FE4gV91o">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rr-FE4gV91o</a></p><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rr-FE4gV91o"><img src="http://img.youtube.com/vi/rr-FE4gV91o/default.jpg" width="130" height="97" border=0></a></p><p>Back in March, David Shukman (BBC Science Editor) published a short report on synthetic biology. The reports cast a shadow on the hard work of scientists and implies that synthetic biology is not accepted my the main stream scientific community.</p><p>Original video (BBC news at 10 on 28/3/12 15mins in)<br /> <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SDGbTxZzr9w">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SDGbTxZzr9w</a><br /> BBC Complaints<br /> <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/complaints/">http://www.bbc.co.uk/complaints/</a><br /> Synthetic Biology Explained<br /> <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rD5uNAMbDaQ">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rD5uNAMbDaQ</a><br /> Stab-Bot 5000<br /> <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=850E10G87lY">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=850E10G87lY</a></p></blockquote> 
<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/FMryFLfk_ptoVU0-4AnPDXC40Hw/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/FMryFLfk_ptoVU0-4AnPDXC40Hw/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/>
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/FMryFLfk_ptoVU0-4AnPDXC40Hw/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/FMryFLfk_ptoVU0-4AnPDXC40Hw/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/realsceptic/~4/1MACMzS2nQM" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.realsceptic.com/2012/05/18/synthetic-biology/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> <feedburner:origLink>http://www.realsceptic.com/2012/05/18/synthetic-biology/</feedburner:origLink></item> <item><title>Anti-Bullying Speaker Curses Christian Teens. Or Maybe not.</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/realsceptic/~3/n09dmAc0Y-E/</link> <comments>http://www.realsceptic.com/2012/04/28/anti-bullying-speaker-curses-christian-teens-or-maybe-not/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2012 07:20:07 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Collin Maessen</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Christianity]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Dan Savage]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Homosexuality]]></category> <category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Steven Crowder]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realsceptic.com/?p=1899</guid> <description><![CDATA[Through the years I&#8217;ve learned to keep an eye on people with different viewpoints. For one it exposes me to new ideas and challenges my own ideas and what I base them on. When done right this can create an interesting exchange of ideas. But sometimes, like with what I saw in my twitter feed [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Through the years I&#8217;ve learned to keep an eye on people with different viewpoints. For one it exposes me to new ideas and challenges my own ideas and what I base them on. When done right this can create an interesting exchange of ideas.</p><p>But sometimes, like with what I <a href="https://twitter.com/#!/EWErickson/status/196022533303177217">saw in my twitter feed this morning</a>, it makes me cock an eyebrow and wonder what really happened (retweeted by Steven Crowder):</p><blockquote><p>Anti-Bullying Speaker Curses, Mocks Christian Teens | FOX News &amp; Commentary: Todd Starnes <a href="http://radio.foxnews.com/toddstarnes/top-stories/anti-bullying-speaker-curses-mocks-christian-teens.html">http://radio.foxnews.com/toddstarnes/top-stories/anti-bullying-speaker-curses-mocks-christian-teens.html</a> via @toddstarnes</p></blockquote><p><span id="more-1899"></span><a href="http://www.realsceptic.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Dan_Savage.jpg" rel="lightbox"><img class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-1902 " title="Dan_Savage" src="http://www.realsceptic.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Dan_Savage-150x150.jpg" alt="Dan Savage" width="150" height="150" /></a>The anti-bullying speaker they are talking about is Dan Savage. For those not familiar with him he&#8217;s the founder of the “<a href="http://www.itgetsbetter.org/page/s/pledge?gclid=CJaN6orp1a8CFQp76wodQkTkcQ">It Gets Better</a>” project, an anti-bullying campaign that has reached more than 40 million viewers. A very effective project for raising awareness about the bullying gays experience. Which, not uncommonly, can get so bad that people commit suicide to escape the bullying they are experiencing.</p><p>This project has garnered the support of many famous and influential people, such as president Obama:</p><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=geyAFbSDPVk">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=geyAFbSDPVk</a></p><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=geyAFbSDPVk"><img src="http://img.youtube.com/vi/geyAFbSDPVk/default.jpg" width="130" height="97" border=0></a></p><p>For someone like Dan savage, who is behind a project that is anti-bullying and does its best to spread a message of hope for victims, it&#8217;s very strange to bully himself. This is why I cocked an eyebrow when I saw the tweet.</p><p>And the article indeed makes it look bad.</p><blockquote><p>As many as 100 high school students walked out of a national journalism conference after an anti-bullying speaker began cursing, attacked the Bible and reportedly called those who refused to listen to his rant “pansy asses.”</p><p>The speaker was <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dan_Savage">Dan Savage</a>, founder of the <a href="http://www.itgetsbetter.org/page/s/pledge?gclid=CJaN6orp1a8CFQp76wodQkTkcQ">“It Gets Better”</a> project, an anti-bullying campaign that has reached more than 40 million viewers with contributors ranging from President Obama to Hollywood stars. Savage also writes a sex advice column called “Savage Love.”</p><p>Savage, and his husband, were also guests at the White House for President Obama’s 2011 <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/keshet/5912792696/">LGBT Pride Month reception</a>. He was also invited to a <a href="http://mynorthwest.com/category/local_news_articles/20110310/White-House-invites-Dan-Savage-to-anti~bullying-conference/">White House anti-bullying conference.</a></p><p>Savage was supposed to be delivering a speech about anti-bullying at the National High School Journalism Conference sponsored by the Journalism Education Association and the National Scholastic Press Association. But it turned into an episode of Christian-bashing.</p><p>Rick Tuttle, the journalism advisor for Sutter Union High School in California, was among several thousand people in the audience. He said they thought the speech was one thing – but it turned into something else.</p><p>“I thought this would be about anti-bullying,” Tuttle told Fox news. “It turned into a pointed attack on Christian beliefs.”</p><p>Tuttle said a number of his students were offended by Savage’s remarks – and some decided to leave the auditorium.</p><p>“It became hostile,” he said. “It felt hostile as we were sitting in the audience – especially towards Christians who espouse beliefs that he was literally taking on.”</p><p>Tuttle said the speech was laced with vulgarities and “sexual innuendo not appropriate for this age group.” At one point, he said Savage told the teenagers about how good his partner looked in a speedo.</p><p>The conservative website <a href="http://www.citizenlink.com/2012/04/18/students-walk-out-on-dan-savage/">CitizenLink</a> was the first to report about the controversy. They interviewed a 17-year-old girl who was one of students who walked out of the auditorium.</p><p>“The first thing he told the audience was, ‘I hope you’re all using birth control,’” she told <a href="http://www.citizenlink.com/2012/04/18/students-walk-out-on-dan-savage/">CitizenLink.</a> “he said there are people using the Bible as an excuse for gay bullying, because it says in Leviticus and Romans that being gay is wrong. Right after that, he said we can ignore all the (expletive deleted) in the Bible.”</p><p>As the teenagers were walking out, Tuttle said that Savage heckled them and called them “pansy asses.”</p><p>&#8230;</p><p>The NSPA said they did not have a prior transcript of Savage’s speech and that wish “he had stayed more on target for the audience of teen journalists.” They also said it provided a “teachable moment” for students.</p><p>As for Savage’s attack on people of faith?</p><p>“While some of his earlier comments were so strongly worded that they shook some of our audience members, it is never the intent of JEA or NSPA to let students get hurt during their time at our conventions,” they wrote.</p><p>However, not once did the NSPA or the JEA offer any apologies to the students or faculty advisors or anyone else in attendance.</p><p>Candi Cushman, who writes a <a href="http://www.citizenlink.com/2012/04/19/savage-incident-shows-why-we-need-the-day-of-dialogue/">blog on CitizenLink</a>, noted the irony.</p><p>“Using profanity to deride the bible – and then mocking the Christian students after they left the room — is obviously a form of bullying and name-calling,” she wrote. “This illustrates perfectly what we’ve been saying all along: Too many times in the name of ‘tolerance,’ Christian students find their faith being openly mocked and belittled in educational environments.”</p><p>Tuttle said that he “felt duped” by the event. “There were Christian schools who went to the conference. To have this happen was disappointing and shocking.”</p><p>And for some of his students – they felt like the anti-bullying activist was in fact – the bully.</p></blockquote><p>Looks bad doesn&#8217;t it? Not the kind of behaviour and language you would expect from an anti-bullying campaigner. So to figure out what transpired I did something novel: look up video material form the keynote. And the first hit on YouTube was the section of the keynote that this article is about.</p><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ao0k9qDsOvs">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ao0k9qDsOvs</a></p><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ao0k9qDsOvs"><img src="http://img.youtube.com/vi/ao0k9qDsOvs/default.jpg" width="130" height="97" border=0></a></p><p>Now that paints a different picture of what he&#8217;s conveying and transpired.</p><p>The only explicit being used in that section is the word &#8220;bullshit&#8221;, referring to the teachings of the bible on shellfish, slavery, infidelity and your wife being a virgin or not on her wedding night. Often stoning, or some other form of death sentence, is mandated as punishment for these sins.</p><p>Except slavery, the bible there gives you instructions on how you can treat your slaves. For one you are allowed to beat them <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W-4zv1zagNE">to an inch of their lives</a>, as long as they live at least two more days.</p><p>The word bullshit might have been too strong to use. But the bibles position is just as wrong on human sexuality as it is on those other subjects mentioned. We now know better.</p><p>Unfortunately there is still a large part of the population that hasn&#8217;t come to terms with our current understanding of sexuality. Hence the bullying a lot of gays, or such as transgendered, are the victim of during their life.</p><p>It is not wrong to call out this behaviour. It is not wrong to call out the hypocrisy and sensitivity from certain believers on these topics. The &#8220;pansyness&#8221; as Dan Savage called it.</p><p>Someone challenging your position, or beliefs, isn&#8217;t fun. And can even hurt, depending on how invested you are in the belief/position. But that isn&#8217;t bullying.</p><p>And neither is what Dan Savage did. His only crime being that he might have slammed down harder on these beliefs than might have been necessary considering his audience.</p> 
<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/_9K6L5Fwc9Tl9h2Y5HXUhj4gW_s/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/_9K6L5Fwc9Tl9h2Y5HXUhj4gW_s/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/>
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/_9K6L5Fwc9Tl9h2Y5HXUhj4gW_s/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/_9K6L5Fwc9Tl9h2Y5HXUhj4gW_s/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/realsceptic/~4/n09dmAc0Y-E" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.realsceptic.com/2012/04/28/anti-bullying-speaker-curses-christian-teens-or-maybe-not/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>3</slash:comments> <feedburner:origLink>http://www.realsceptic.com/2012/04/28/anti-bullying-speaker-curses-christian-teens-or-maybe-not/</feedburner:origLink></item> <item><title>Is the Christian God A Maniac?</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/realsceptic/~3/84_TpERPH1o/</link> <comments>http://www.realsceptic.com/2012/04/20/is-the-christian-god-a-maniac/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 17:00:58 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Collin Maessen</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Christianity]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realsceptic.com/?p=1879</guid> <description><![CDATA[The following blog post was written by my friend CSBair on his blog. I&#8217;ve reposted it here, with permission, to highlight one of the issues I have with certain claims surrounding the Christian god. For those who argue that the Christian god is omniscient, omnipotent and omnipresent, then it stands to reason: This god created [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>The following blog post was written by my friend CSBair <a href="http://idebunkforme.wordpress.com/2012/04/17/is-the-christian-god-a-maniac/">on his blog</a>. I&#8217;ve reposted it here, with permission, to highlight one of the issues I have with certain claims surrounding the Christian god.</em></p><p>For those who argue that the Christian god is omniscient, omnipotent and omnipresent, then it stands to reason:</p><ol><li>This god created everything</li><li>Therefore, this god created the tree with the forbidden fruit, and the fruit itself.</li><li>This god knew that creating this would allow mankind to fall from its grace</li><li>This god could foresee this event.</li><li>This god then punished its own creation for doing what it knew would happen based on its own work.</li><li>This god would then constantly destroy its creation because they did exactly what it knew they would do.</li><li>It stands to reason, then, that arguments of the Christian god being omniscient, omnipotent and omnipresent mean that the Christian god is a sadistic, deranged maniac.</li></ol><p><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-1880 alignright" title="Creation_of_the_Sun_and_Moon_face_detail" src="http://www.realsceptic.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Creation_of_the_Sun_and_Moon_face_detail-150x150.jpg" alt="Creation of the Sun and Moon face detail" width="150" height="150" />However, if this god could not know the events after the choice of whether to eat the fruit, then this god is not omniscient.</p><p>If this could not remove the tree, knowing what would transpire, then it is not omnipotent.</p><p>And if this god could not prevent the eating of the fruit, then it is not omnipresent.</p><p>One cannot make contradictory explanations to justify the act with the attribute, and still argue that such a god is just and loving. It’s illogical.</p> 
<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/YzvqxEAD9APhqSa8pRlQ3kYlOww/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/YzvqxEAD9APhqSa8pRlQ3kYlOww/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/>
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/YzvqxEAD9APhqSa8pRlQ3kYlOww/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/YzvqxEAD9APhqSa8pRlQ3kYlOww/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/realsceptic/~4/84_TpERPH1o" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.realsceptic.com/2012/04/20/is-the-christian-god-a-maniac/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>1</slash:comments> <feedburner:origLink>http://www.realsceptic.com/2012/04/20/is-the-christian-god-a-maniac/</feedburner:origLink></item> <item><title>Anti-evolution And Anti-climate Science Bills Laid Bare</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/realsceptic/~3/x9aMQo4XCq0/</link> <comments>http://www.realsceptic.com/2012/04/18/anti-evolution-and-anti-climate-science-bills-laid-bare/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 07:23:22 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Collin Maessen</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Creationism]]></category> <category><![CDATA[monkey bill]]></category> <category><![CDATA[NCSE]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Steve Newton]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realsceptic.com/?p=1886</guid> <description><![CDATA[Before I became active on YouTube I wasn&#8217;t aware of the NCSE, but I&#8217;ve become a big supporter of this organisation in the past few years, as they provide a very valuable service: NCSE is a not-for-profit membership organization that defends the teaching of evolution and climate change in the public schools. NCSE provides information, [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before I became active on YouTube I wasn&#8217;t aware of the NCSE, but I&#8217;ve become a big supporter of this organisation in the past few years, as they provide a very valuable service:</p><blockquote><p>NCSE is a not-for-profit membership organization that defends the teaching of evolution and climate change in the public schools. NCSE provides information, resources, and advice to schools, teachers, parents, and concerned citizens defending science education.</p></blockquote><p>And one of their activities are presentations about these issues. Of which the following video is a good example. It is a long video but well worth the time as it provides some insight in the language used and positions held by creationists. Especially in the context of laws they are attempting to pass to enable the teaching of it in schools:</p><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vZJnMTJBwiw">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vZJnMTJBwiw</a></p><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vZJnMTJBwiw"><img src="http://img.youtube.com/vi/vZJnMTJBwiw/default.jpg" width="130" height="97" border=0></a></p><blockquote><p>Policy director Steve Newton dissects the recently passed Tennessee &#8220;monkey bill&#8221;, its cohorts, and the chilling effects on American science education. When: 4/15/2012. Where: Berkeley Public Library</p></blockquote><p><strong>Update 25 April 2012:</strong></p><p>The Q&amp;A section for this talk is now available.</p><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8qjgWU2i4tM">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8qjgWU2i4tM</a></p><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8qjgWU2i4tM"><img src="http://img.youtube.com/vi/8qjgWU2i4tM/default.jpg" width="130" height="97" border=0></a></p> 
<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/GnQFjCXpbgdVp3S1s7tud8pDbUQ/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/GnQFjCXpbgdVp3S1s7tud8pDbUQ/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/>
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/GnQFjCXpbgdVp3S1s7tud8pDbUQ/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/GnQFjCXpbgdVp3S1s7tud8pDbUQ/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/realsceptic/~4/x9aMQo4XCq0" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.realsceptic.com/2012/04/18/anti-evolution-and-anti-climate-science-bills-laid-bare/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>1</slash:comments> <feedburner:origLink>http://www.realsceptic.com/2012/04/18/anti-evolution-and-anti-climate-science-bills-laid-bare/</feedburner:origLink></item> <item><title>Weird Winter – Mad March</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/realsceptic/~3/46-jNn9QQcs/</link> <comments>http://www.realsceptic.com/2012/04/17/weird-winter-mad-march/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 17:37:59 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Collin Maessen</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Greenman3610]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Peter Sinclair]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realsceptic.com/?p=1872</guid> <description><![CDATA[Yet again two great videos from Peter Sinclair (Greenman3610) on the subject of climate change. This time he tackles the weather extremes we&#8217;ve seen the past few years. And gives scientists a chance to explain what is causing this, how it relates to global warming (and where not) and what this might mean for the [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yet again two great videos from Peter Sinclair (Greenman3610) on the subject of climate change. This time he tackles the weather extremes we&#8217;ve seen the past few years. And gives scientists a chance to explain what is causing this, how it relates to global warming (and where not) and what this might mean for the future.</p><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_-1iBHAivmw">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_-1iBHAivmw</a></p><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_-1iBHAivmw"><img src="http://img.youtube.com/vi/_-1iBHAivmw/default.jpg" width="130" height="97" border=0></a></p><blockquote><p>This extraordinary mild winter in north america, followed by an unprecedentedly warm march, has shocked a lot of people who formerly dismissed the reality of climate change.<br /> In addition, several years of violent tornado seasons have many asking if we are entering a &#8220;new Normal&#8221; in regard to our seasons.<br /> For this two part series, I interviewed a number of climate scientists and experts from around the country, and found some surprising answers.</p></blockquote><p><span id="more-1872"></span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HTAZue6ylZ8">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HTAZue6ylZ8</a></p><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HTAZue6ylZ8"><img src="http://img.youtube.com/vi/HTAZue6ylZ8/default.jpg" width="130" height="97" border=0></a></p><blockquote><p> One of the most confusing effects of climate change is the increasing incidence of weather extremes, that may include hot, AND cold, snow and rain, wet and dry, drought and flood.<br /> Scientists have been examining this problem intensely over recent years, as Europe, America, and Asia have all been subject to wave after wave of record breaking weather events. Now the picture is coming into focus.</p></blockquote><p>These videos give the greater context of <a href="http://www.realsceptic.com/2011/01/16/a-cold-snap-so-global-warming-must-be-false/">one of my own releases</a>. Where I talk about one of the recent cold spells and the outcry from sceptics that this is somehow proof against global warming. A look at a small piece of the bigger picture of the changes in the Jet Stream.</p><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7aiI8_mSDpc">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7aiI8_mSDpc</a></p><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7aiI8_mSDpc"><img src="http://img.youtube.com/vi/7aiI8_mSDpc/default.jpg" width="130" height="97" border=0></a></p> 
<p><a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/L5HFN7hYJOtenfqQCgSe5fclzI0/0/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/L5HFN7hYJOtenfqQCgSe5fclzI0/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a><br/>
<a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/L5HFN7hYJOtenfqQCgSe5fclzI0/1/da"><img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/L5HFN7hYJOtenfqQCgSe5fclzI0/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"></img></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/realsceptic/~4/46-jNn9QQcs" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.realsceptic.com/2012/04/17/weird-winter-mad-march/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> <feedburner:origLink>http://www.realsceptic.com/2012/04/17/weird-winter-mad-march/</feedburner:origLink></item> </channel> </rss><!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 14/38 queries in 0.069 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 550/595 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.realsceptic.com @ 2012-05-18 15:34:25 -->

