Rebel Dad: the stay-at-home dad revolution, online

Bright Lights (of Parenthood) in New York

noreply@blogger.com (Rebel Dad) — Thu, 09 Jul 2009 18:09:35 PDT

This is a can't miss event if you're a resident of the greater tri-state area: Jeremy Adam Smith (who I love) and Amy Richards (who also rocks) at the 92YTribeca on July 22. Good stuff:

The Daddy Shift: Transforming American Families

In cooperation with 92Y Parenting Center and NYC Dads Group

A revealing talk with audience discussion on a growing phenomenon among American families: fathers who cut back on paid work to focus on raising children. Explore with Jeremy Adam Smith, journalist and author of The Daddy Shift and Amy Richards, author of Opting In: Having a Child without Losing Yourself, what happens when dads stay home; What do stay-at-home fathers struggle with�and what do they rejoice in? How does taking up the mother�s traditional role affect a father�s relationship with his partner, children and extended family? And what does stay-at-home fatherhood mean for the larger society?

I'm Mr. Seahorse

noreply@blogger.com (Rebel Dad) — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 10:53:52 PDT

At the Mall of America
Originally uploaded by Rebel Dad

If you like your children's books with a healthy dose of gender-equality (or better yet, widespread destruction of traditional gender roles), you really ought to be reading your kids "Mr. Seahorse," an Eric Carle book on all of the fathers of the sea and the way that the whole pregnancy/egg-hatching thing becomes dad-first when it happens under water.

At the aquarium beneath the Mall of America, dads can do the seahorse thing and put on a fake belly that reads "I'm a Seahorse Dad." Corny, yes. But fun.

A Local TV Broadcast That Puts It All Into Perspective

noreply@blogger.com (Rebel Dad) — Wed, 24 Jun 2009 04:39:17 PDT

OK. It's official. If you are a TV producer doing a national piece and you don't try to book Jeremy Adam Smith, you're doing your job wrong. I love this piece, which -- visually -- isn't that different from the run-of-the-mill dad story. But it makes clear that we're dealing with changing gender roles and that is what makes this trend interesting.

Donating Your Dadness to Science

noreply@blogger.com (Rebel Dad) — Tue, 23 Jun 2009 14:29:41 PDT

More good stuff from the academy. If you meet the criteria, consider checking it out:

FATHERS WITH BABIES STUDY

Every day, in the United States alone, over 10,000 men become the fathers of new babies. Surprisingly little is known about the social and emotional experiences of fathers with babies and young children. In an interest to improve the well-being of new dads � and to foster the well-being of their children and families � the purpose of this study is to better understand the experiences of dads with babies, as well as the causes and consequences of the joys and challenges these fathers face.

ABOUT THE STUDY

This study is being conducted by Dr. Will Courtenay, in collaboration with the Center for Men and Young Men at McLean Hospital, Harvard Medical School. Dr. Courtenay is an internationally recognized researcher and scholar whose work focuses on understanding and helping men and fathers. Dr. Courtenay has served on the clinical faculty in the Department of Psychiatry at Harvard Medical School, and the University of California, San Francisco, Medical School.

Taking part in this study means completing an online survey. In the first part of the survey, you will be asked some background information about you and your baby. In the rest of the survey, you will be asked about experiences you�ve had as a father and with your spouse or partner, as well as your attitudes on a variety of topics. You will also be asked questions about your feelings and behaviors that relate to your moods. The survey should take about 20-25 minutes to complete.

The survey is completely anonymous. You will not be asked to identify yourself or provide any identifying information.

WHO SHOULD PARTICIPATE

For this study, we are interested in the participation of adult males over 18 years of age, who have had a baby (or babies) within the last year. If you are not an adult male over 18 years of age and have not had a baby (or babies) within the last year, thank you for your interest in the study, but please do not continue with the survey.

All fathers of babies are invited to participate, including fathers who have adopted, fathers who are gay, and fathers whose spouses or partners gave birth to their babies.

WHY YOU SHOULD PARTICIPATE

Fathers have an enormously positive impact on their babies and young children. We understand this from lots of good research. But the impact that babies have on their fathers, is relatively unknown. Your participation will help to generate a greater understanding of the experiences of dads with babies. We hope that, ultimately, this greater understanding will help foster the well-being of fathers, their children and their families as a whole.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

If you would like additional information about the study, or have questions about it, you can contact Dr. Will Courtenay at DadsStudy@MensDoc.com to answer any questions about the survey.

While We're Still Feeling the Dad's Day Buzz

noreply@blogger.com (Rebel Dad) — Mon, 22 Jun 2009 09:05:02 PDT

I wanted to take a second to put in an additional plug (not the first, and certainly not the last) for the At-Home Dad Convention, which will be held in Omaha this year on October 10. Given that there are a lot of new AHDs (or so the media would have us believe), I'm hoping for a stellar turnout.

So block your calendars now and keep checking Southwest for good rates. Registration rates are signficantly lower this year (thanks to all of the new sponsors), and this should be another great opportunity for dads of all stripes to share experiences.

Pampers Has Figured Out That I Am a Dad. I Think.

noreply@blogger.com (Rebel Dad) — Sun, 21 Jun 2009 16:18:01 PDT

Every year, I give the Pampers people a hard time because they send me Mother's Day e-mails telling me how great it is that I am a mom and how special moms like me really are. It is one of those subtle reminders that society still doesn't see moms and dads as equally fit parents. (Or equally committed consumers.)

But I should note, in the interest of fairness, that I did receive a Father's Day greeting from them:

Hello BRIAN,

Moms get a lot of focus, but now it's Dad's day in the sun! Dads share their own special bond with their little ones that deserves special thanks and appreciation. ...

Now, you can argue that everyone gets this e-mail -- moms, dads, grandparents, obsessive coupon hoarders -- and that it hardly shows that Pampers has my parenting status figure out. But, heck, I give them credit for trying. And I'll give them extra credit if their Mother's Day e-mail next year is equally gender-neutral.

Happy Dads Day to All

noreply@blogger.com (Rebel Dad) — Sun, 21 Jun 2009 08:55:07 PDT

I usually wake up early to give a Father's Day shoutout to all of the fathers out there doing right by their kids, but my first present this morning was a couple of extra hours of sleep (thanks, RebelMom!), so I'm running behind. That said, let me throw out some quick hits:

Happy Father's Day, Jimbo. Everything I know about loving kids unconditionally I learned from you.

Thanks to RebelMom, not just for letting me sleep in this morning, but for working with me every day to make sure that we're making the best possible decision for the kids ... and the marriage.

Thanks to all of the other Rebel Dads out there for making involved fatherhood a reality. And thanks to everyone who has supported those dads: parenting is never a solo effort.

Anyone looking for last-minute gift ideas can check out my gift guide from my Washington Post parenting column on Friday. Or just buy Daddy Shift already.

Longtime readers my remember back when I tried to chronicle every Father's Day story about at-home dads, back when such stories were rare enough that such a project made sense. (I also had more free time back them.) But various folks *are* scanning the headlines. You may want to check out Daddy Dialectic's link round up ("part 1"). Or check out Daddy Types' "Token Father's Day Story Contest," which is loaded with wonderful stories that I would love to mock, if time permits, in the days to come.

Media Take Note: This Is How to Do a Dad Story

noreply@blogger.com (Rebel Dad) — Thu, 18 Jun 2009 11:48:25 PDT

Yesterday, my post detailed how the Today Show, a profitable arm of the largest company in the world, could not manage to produce a story on at-home dads with any depth or originality at all. So what *would* a deep, original at-home dad story look like?

Probably a lot like yesterday's USA Today piece on the "new daditude." This is the single best piece of journalism on fathers this year, and maybe the best in memory. I could go, blow-by-blow, through the whole thing, but it would be more efficient if you just went and read it.

What makes the piece so great? For starters, author Sharon Jayson talks to just about every expert on the new fatherhood: they have Kyle Pruett from Yale, who has been doing this forever. She has Aaron Rochlen from Texas, who is as smart as he is a nice guy. She has a couple of other academics who are new to me. She quote Jeremy Adam Smith (of the wonderful Daddy Shift) and she chooses, as the centerpiece of the article, the guys from DadLabs, who are great spokespeople for the idea that fatherhood is a) important and b) not the same as motherhood.

There is also the absolutely needed to-be-sure section of the piece. Whatever revolution in fatherhood may be taking place, it's not happening everywhere at the same pace. And it's worth remembering that before anyone declares victory over old stereotypes.

There will be a flood of stories about dads over the next three days, most of them retreads following old formulas. If we're lucky, though, more and more reporting will take Jayson's piece as a model and try to figure out exactly what's going on with today's dad.

All the Vasectomy News That's Fit to Print

noreply@blogger.com (Rebel Dad) — Thu, 18 Jun 2009 08:05:00 PDT

Since I'm a big fan about writing about vasectomies (hey! someone has to do it), I should point you to this week's USA Today column on the subject. It's kind of a good-news, bad-news kind of thing. The good news is that vasectomies seem to be on the rise, a consequence of the recession. (This isn't breaking news, but seeing it in USA Today does raise the profile.) The bad news is that the procedure is still under-used.

There are a lot of bad reasons why the procedure isn't all that common, and USA Today tries to bust those myths. Sadly, there's a lot of work to be done. In Home Game, the Michael Lewis book I talked about Monday, Lewis writes about his traumatic experience with a vasectomy. (It wasn't actually traumatic, but that didn't seens to squelch Lewis' sense of drama.)

So let me say again -- as a public service -- a vasectomy is not a procedure to get worked up about.

The Today Show Drops the Ball. Again.

noreply@blogger.com (Rebel Dad) — Wed, 17 Jun 2009 07:33:19 PDT

Full disclosure: I think that the men behind the New York City at-home dad group are wonderful guys. They are well-spoken, thoughtful and -- as best I can tell -- excellent fathers. Nothing I am about to say should reflect poorly on them. Also, full disclosure: the Today Show producers sometime show strokes of genius (sarcasm).

That said ... c'mon, Today Show. There are so many different ways into the at-home dad story (or, better yet, the New American Family story ... which includes some sort of acknowledgement that women, too, are part of the equation) that today's broadcast was a huge disappointment.

I swear that every single TV package on at-home dads runs exactly the same way: there is a day-in-the-life montage of one dad, a brief interview with that guy, a clip from "Mr. Mom" and a scene shot at a local park. So take a look at today's clip:

Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy

Now compare it to this clip FROM THE VERY SAME SHOW, in January:

Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy

THEY USE THE SAME GUYS. The same tagline. The same "Mr. Mom" clip. This from the top-rated morning show.

Lazy.

(And I won't even dwell on the recurring and extensive use of the agonizing phrase "Mr. Mom.")

Words Matter

noreply@blogger.com (Rebel Dad) — Tue, 16 Jun 2009 18:05:14 PDT

Almost all of the commentary I've received around this blog over the almost 6+years I've posting have been positive. But the negative comments almost all fall into the category of people telling me to lighten up: there is no reason to froth at the mouth about the term "Mr. Mom" or assume that a mothers-only internet community should be seen as somehow suspect.

I'm not sure I've always been able to answer that criticism well, but now I can simply point folks to this excellent guest blog over at the New York Times' Motherlode blog. A quick hit from author Paul Hankes Drielsma:

I don�t want to play the role of the �woe is me� father; to the contrary, I believe that everybody loses when we use trivializing language. Scour the parenting forums on the Internet and you�ll find the common lament that �DH� (darling husband) expects a medal whenever he �babysits� junior for a few hours. I have little sympathy for DH in these cases, but maybe a step in the right direction would be to stop using language that suggests hired help � to stop referring to DH�s job in the same terms as somebody who could legitimately stick his hand out at the end of his shift and demand a tip. DH isn�t babysitting, he�s parenting, and just changing that one word changes, for me at least, all sorts of connotations. A parent assumes supreme responsibility, and the only short-term thanks expected are the smiles on those chubby little cheeks. A babysitter assumes some responsibility, but never without those emergency numbers on the fridge, and he or she expects a ride home and fifteen bucks an hour.

Home Game Book Review

noreply@blogger.com (Rebel Dad) — Mon, 15 Jun 2009 11:14:27 PDT

A couple of weeks ago, Chris asked me in the comments if I'd had the chance to read Michael Lewis' new book, Home Game, a collection of essays, many of them already posted to Slate, about being a dad. I used one of the themes in the book to build an On Parenting post, but that wasn't really a "review." Here are my fuller thoughts:

Michael Lewis might be the greatest nonfiction writer of our generation. The book is entirely readable. So he has that going for him.

What he doesn't have going for him is any particular interest in fatherhood. He admits upfront that the book might be seen as a report from a "kind of Dark Age of Fatherhood. Obviously, we're in the midst of some unhappy transition between the model of fatherhood as practiced by by father and some ideal model, approved by all, to be practiced with ease by the perfect fathers of the future."

Let this snarky line serve as warning: Lewis doesn't want to hear about how fatherhood is evolving. Indeed, by kid number three, he is no longer changing diapers or doing any of the other things that would seem to define modern fatherhood.

I don't hold his lack of passion for parenting against him. But the undertone of the book is that fatherhood is a nuisance, and maybe men would be better off if we didn't have any of these silly new expectations that dads should actually place an active role in the family. This does not make for an enlightening fatherhood book, and I have no idea why Norton (or Slate, for that matter) would be interested in Lewis' thoughts on an aspect of his like that he seems so often to undervalue.

Every once in a while, Lewis stops the narrative to profess his love for his kids and draw a parallel between all of the annoyances of parenthood and his deep bond. These are the least convincing parts of the book. Not because Lewis doesn't love his kids -- I'm sure he does -- but because they clash so stridently with everything else he records about his experience as a parent.

In short, it's not the best Father's Day gift, elegant though the prose might be. In fact, it might be a better graduation gift, a $23.95 dose of birth control.

Work-Life Balance: Coming to an ER Near You

noreply@blogger.com (Rebel Dad) — Fri, 12 Jun 2009 09:20:04 PDT

As important as I think straight-ahead at-home fatherhood is in reshaping what it means to be a dad, I believe that improved work-life balance for guys across the spectrum is every bit as important. Since I no longer have the On Balance outlet to use to spread the idea that workaholism ain't the best way to live, I hope you'll excuse this disgression.

One of the companies I work with just fired up their own blog, on managing emergency rooms. But what made me happiest was that the second post ever on that blog was about the lessons that older ER docs can learn from younger ones, who are more likely to look for work-life balance in the ER.

This "balance" thing is everywhere. And I couldn't be happier.

New York Magazine Drives Against the Convention Wisdom on Laid-Off Dads

noreply@blogger.com (Rebel Dad) — Tue, 02 Jun 2009 04:42:15 PDT

I have no idea what to make of this line from a recent New York Magazine cover story (thanks, Matt!) on how the recession is reshaping the Big Apple:

As a rule, able-bodied, unemployed men spend an average of just three and a half extra minutes per day actively caring for their kids, according to Jay Stewart, an economist at the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Most spend their extra time on sleep and �leisure activities� (including almost two extra hours of TV), though they do spend an extra hour and 42 minutes on �unpaid household work,� which includes passive forms of child supervision (like being in the same room).

First, I suspect this is historical data, so it doesn't automatically apply to New York's newly unemployed. Maybe they are just like the unemployed of old. But maybe not.

Second, let's be clear about what "unemployed" means: by definition, it means that you're actively looking for new work, not making a formal shift to take on the household duties. In fact, against all common sense, the BLS believes that "at-home dads" (according to the silly, undercounted stat released each spring) and the "unemployed" are mutually exclusive groups, demographically.

Third the piece makes it sound like "unpaid household work" is mostly sitting around, ignoring the kids. That's certainly part of the definition, but most of the "unpaid household work" is actually "unpaid household work," not second-rate childcare.

Those are my attempted explanations. There is a fourth: the laid-off guy do a terrible job of stepping up at home. If it's true that the average unemployed guy spends an average of 3.5 extra minutes a day with the kids, that's absolutely unconscionable. Anyone have any perspective on that stat?

Note to Media: Please, Please, Please Don't Link AHDs to the UChicago Bozos

noreply@blogger.com (Rebel Dad) — Sat, 30 May 2009 10:15:57 PDT

So some kid at the University of Chicago thought it would be funny to launch a new student organization dedicated to the advancement of men. It's the sort of nutty thing that happens on college campuses all the time, during that wonderful hair-on-fire time of life where intellectual capacity tends to far exceeds your empathy, experience and understanding of the social fabric. As a student newspaper editor, I published way too many similar pieces from similarly smart people with nary a clue as to how the world actually works.

So my issue isn't with the naive kid at Chicago, who -- left to his own devices -- would probably end up with small group of guys who drink beer a couple of times a month and bitch and complain. Eventually, they'd wake up to reality, and that would be that. No, my issue is with the media frenzy around him. That this would be treated as an issue worthy of newsprint or the broadcast spectrum actually makes me root for the downfall of the mainstream media.

I'd be more than happy to ignore this, except that GMA Weekend -- in a feat of extraordinary journalistic gymnastics -- ended up tieing this student group to the at-home dad trend, then giving the stage to chief spokesperson for the up-is-down, black-is-white idea that men's voices are somehow being silenced in America, Warren Farrell.

Let me be clear: the bozo in Chicago ought not be speaking to the idea of at-home fatherhood. Warren Farrell ought not speaking for at-home fatherhood.

So reporters and producers: do you want to talk about how fatherhood is changing, and place that in the context of larger societal shifts? Drop me a note, and I'll get Jeremy Adam Smith in the studio with you in under 90 minutes.

Why Dads Should Count Our Blessings That We're Not the Target of Laundry Ads

noreply@blogger.com (Rebel Dad) — Fri, 29 May 2009 18:17:59 PDT

Just a little levity for a Friday night:

Buy This Book: The Daddy Shift

noreply@blogger.com (Rebel Dad) — Thu, 28 May 2009 20:10:20 PDT

Getting scooped by the New York Times is a double-edged sword. On the one hand, I like staying on top of the whole at-home dad thing and being the first and most curmudgeonly commentator around. On the flip side, if the NY Times is beating me to an at-home dad meme, that means good things for at-home dads. After all, the Grey Lady's reach is a bit further than mine.

So let me graciously concede that the Times did a great job of scooping me by drawing attention to Jeremy Adam Smith's excellent book, The Daddy Shift*. She published a two-part interview with Jeremy yesterday, and it is well worth spending the next 30 minutues reading over it. A snippet:

... And yet men and women are living their lives according to scripts that are hundreds, maybe thousands, of years old, scripts that are not terribly relevant to our twenty-first-century reality. Women worry that they are being bad mothers when they go off to work; dads worry that they are bad fathers when they don�t. Some moms feel responsible � sometimes in overcompensating, overbearing ways � for kids and housework, and blame caregiving dads when something seems to go wrong at home.

But I discovered, in examining my own experience and in interviewing parents around the country, that these drawbacks can be overcome. The happiest couples I interviewed were the ones who prize time with kids and are able to articulate what they are gaining through a reverse-traditional arrangement. They value work and care equally, and are grateful to each other for the contributions each makes to the household, and so they value each other.

Needless to say, The Daddy Shift is a book well worth reading (and I may post a more thoughtful review once I have the time to sit down and really write). Jeremy does more than just gush about his choices regarding fatherhood, he makes a compelling argument that the whole institution of parenting is changing for the better because the definition of the "good" father is getting an overhaul.

* I'd say nice things about the book even if Jeremy did not include an absolutely unnecessary thank-you in it.

Dad, Beware the Sandwich Generation

noreply@blogger.com (Rebel Dad) — Wed, 27 May 2009 06:40:00 PDT

File this under I-have-no-idea-what-to-make-of-it: the Wall Street Journal earlier this month reported on a survey that found that adult children were generally more willing to have mom move back in with them than dad. The Journal does a good job of teasing out all of the reasons why, but -- for the at-home dads out there that are doing the sandwich thing (caring for both children and aging) parents, I figured it was worth flagging.

The NY Times, Late to the Movement

noreply@blogger.com (Rebel Dad) — Mon, 25 May 2009 18:40:31 PDT

I know this is a month late, but -- I assure you -- you won't be any worse off for having missed it: the New York Times stumbled across the trend of the economy creating involved fathers out of the rubble of the financial sector.

Now, let me give full credit to the Times. They appear to have actually tracked down a whole community of these guys, which is a damn sight better than a lot of the other reporting on this topic, which has tended to recycle the same few gentlemen (not that there is anything wrong with those fathers). But the general message isn't new: "Holy crap, men around here are sudden being forced to parent. Can they possibly adjust to this new and alien lifestyle?"

The answer is -- of course -- that, yeah, the guys are doing just fine. It's a bit weird with the new role (what new role isn't), but no one appears to be off their rocker with misery. Which is no shock to the rest of us.

(I guess I cannot let it pass without notice that the so-called paper of record saddled the story with a headline that included the phrase "Mr. Mom." So let me say to the headline writers of America, for the millionth time, "Mr. Mom" is -- at best -- a lazy, outdated phrase. At worst, it's a pejorative. Please, please look for some alternatives.)

On Excellent Fortune: Happy Mother's Day, RebelMom

noreply@blogger.com (Rebel Dad) — Sun, 10 May 2009 03:46:01 PDT

No one other than Pampers ever asks me what I want for Mother's Day, which is only fair, given my sex. But, for the record, all I want on this holiday is more families in which moms and dads* work every day to be loving and supportive of each other and the kids and ready and willing to change the world for the better. (It's not a modest wish, but it is heartfelt.)

I already live in such a family, and full credit goes to the amazing RebelMom.

Happy Mother's Day, RM!

Love,

Brian

* Or moms and moms or moms and grandfathers or stepdads and stepmoms or aunts and uncles or partners or whatever family structure works for you.

My Third Annual Open Letter to the Morons at Pampers

noreply@blogger.com (Rebel Dad) — Thu, 07 May 2009 14:20:15 PDT

Dear Pampers,

When my youngest was born, I signed up for your nice e-mail service, in hopes of knocking a buck or two off of diapers every once a while. As part of your e-mail marking plan, you send me an e-mail *every Mother's Day* that attempts to butter me up. Allow me to quote from the latest edition:

Happy Mother's Day, BRIAN,

Whether it's your first Mother's Day or beyond, it's always a great day to bask in your family's appreciation. ...

I cannot watch TV or open a magazine without someone telling me how the recession/new gender roles/Gen Y fathers/etc. are changing fatherhood and how no aspect of parenting, beyond the actual birth and breastfeeding, is the sole domain of moms anymore. Certainly, there are millions of dads out there buying diapers. It's not exactly a secret.

And yet, every year, you blanket me (and, presumably tens of thousands of other dads) with a sweet reminder that one of the largest consumer-products companies in the history of the world still assumes that every person who wants diaper coupons is a women.

That's dumb, and it makes us guys feel less warm and fuzzy about your brand.

Happy Mother's Day,

Brian

"Even the Most Enlightened, Feminist Males Struggle" With At-Home Role, Says ABC

noreply@blogger.com (Rebel Dad) — Tue, 05 May 2009 18:45:13 PDT

Somewhere, an engineer at Google is developing an algorithm that allows a computer to write the in-vogue working-man-loses-job-and-starts-doing-the-kid-thing story without any human intervention. All the computer would have to do is find a guy, automatically insert a generic harmless quote about adjusting to the role. There would be a quote from the spouse expressing support for her mate -- and concern about being the sole breakwinner. And there would be some expert commentary on how this is a trend that may or may not be here to last.

I don't think that a computer program assembled last night's ABC News piece on layoffs and at-home dads, but it's certainly possible. The only element of the story that caught my eye was the "expert" quote:

'Even the most enlightened, feminist males struggle when they can no longer be the primary earner,' said Deborah Carr, professor of sociology at Rutgers University.

Now, I don't want to claim that the transition to at-home fatherhood is all chocolate and roses, but for most guys who make the decision (or have the decision thrust on them), losing the primary earner status is not a huge deal. It's like any other transition in life: scary, kind of weird, certainly an adjustment. But not a struggle.

Sheesh.

Help a Blogger Out: School and Soap

noreply@blogger.com (Rebel Dad) — Thu, 30 Apr 2009 15:18:18 PDT

Stacey Garfinkle, the fearless writer of the On Parenting blog at the washingtonpost.com, is trying to get an answer to a couple of questions. If you can help her out, please let her know:

1. Does your school have soap in the bathrooms?
2. Does your school regularly have children wash hands before eating?

Send along any thoughts to parenting@washingtonpost.com ...

Food (or Stats) For Thought

noreply@blogger.com (Rebel Dad) — Wed, 29 Apr 2009 05:55:00 PDT

Thanks to Jason, who pointed me to this Boston Globe piece from last week, I am only now stumbling upon this absolutely brilliant Families and Work Institute release that details their surveys on what the next generation thinks about work and home.

I've argued for a long time that Gen X has a completely different (broader, more flexible) view of work-family balance than the boomers before them and that Gen Y is waaay more willing to step off the hampster wheel for family than even my Xer peers. The FWI study backs that up.

Among the highlights:

"26 percent of women living in dual-earner couples had annual earnings at least 10 percentage points higher than that of spouses/partners, up from 15 percent in 1997." That's a huge expansion of families that could afford to have dads at home.
Only 41 percent of employees in 2008 believe it is better to have dad be the breadwinner and mom at home. It was down from 64 percent in 1977. More striking: 74 percent of guys thought that way in 1977, when I was in diapers. Today, the number among men is 42 percent. Is that low enough? No. But it's an amazing change in societies attitudes in the blink of an eye, demographically.
In 1992, 21 percent of moms said that dads were pulling equal duty -- or better -- around the house. We're up to 31 percent now. (If you ask the dads, 49 percent say they are at least equal partners. *That* discrepancy deserves some followup.)
Dads who work spend 50 percent more time with their kids per day than a similar group of dads did 30 years ago. (3 hours a day versus 2 hours a day. Working moms have held steady at 3.8 hours.) For working dads under 29, that number jumps to 4.3 hours.

There are a lot of numbers to digest, but they suggest that we're moving quickly (though not quickly enough) to a more equal work when it comes to the home duties. Of course, my worry continues to be that we'll hit a point of diminishing returns: sure, most of us are doing more around the house than our dads did, but will the next generation make similar gains. Or are we nearing the point of "good enough," where a dad in 2010 is about as engaged as a dad from 2000 -- and still less engaged than the average mom?

This isn't all good news: dads are may more work-life stressed than they ever used to be, but it's a small price to pay for progress.

More on the Economy and Dads

noreply@blogger.com (Rebel Dad) — Tue, 28 Apr 2009 04:48:01 PDT

Though I find this storyline tiring, I should point out this story from Sacramento on another economy-created at-home dad. (There is video, too.) I don't mean to denigrate Chris Smith's choice -- I'm thrilled for him -- but this gets back to the one-dimensional look at things.

I'd love to see reporters start to dig deeper: will guys like Chris go back to work once the economy heats up? Will they stay home? Are they fundamentally similar to the guys who decided to be at-home dads under different economic circumstances? And what is the real cost of going to work versus staying home (this isn't a new topic, but I haven't seen any really interesting analyses lately)? Are preschools getting hammered? Are marketers waking up to dads-as-consumers?

There is a lot that could be spun off of this story. Hopefully, the reporting will get better.