Unfortunately I won’t be able to attend ChangeCamp Ottawa (the first ChangeCamp since we created the format in January) myself, due to the inevitable post-event exhaustion (and likely hangover) from organizing the SpinTO fundraising launch event on Friday, May 15th. The stars just weren’t aligned for this one. But no matter, because Mark Faul, Ian Capstick and many other great Ottawa folks have been doing a great job with minimal advice from me. Which is perfect for me and shows that the model can scale and propagate.

For those who are able to come to the Ottawa SMB, here’s a little preview of what I’ll be talking about:

Social Web, Social Change & the Return of Community.

The social web is making possible new and exciting capabilities, new ways of participating in a global conversation. However, often those interested in social media and online community leave something very important, and very human, behind: our need for face-to-face interaction, to meet people around our shared passions and to have an impact, to create meaning.  Drawing from his work creating hybrid online and face-to-face participatory experiences, Toronto-based ChangeCamp organizer and consultant Mark Kuznicki will outline some theory and practice about how the social web meets physical community.

For the next few decades, journalism will be made up of overlapping special cases. Many of these models will rely on amateurs as researchers and writers. Many of these models will rely on sponsorship or grants or endowments instead of revenues. Many of these models will rely on excitable 14 year olds distributing the results. Many of these models will fail. No one experiment is going to replace what we are now losing with the demise of news on paper, but over time, the collection of new experiments that do work might give us the journalism we need.

My work with TVO’s The Agenda with Steve Paikin has been fascinating and rewarding in this context of massive change in the media business model and questions about the future of journalism as craft and practice. I think that what is important during this transformation is to unpack, unbundle and reconfigure the elements that we think of when we think about “broadcaster” or “newspaper” and reimagine how they can be reconfigured to deliver more value to more people. Value that people want to pay for.

The Agenda: on the Road project is an interesting experiment along the lines of what Shirky describes above. What began as a way to bring TVO’s flagship current affairs program into local communities has developed into an ongoing experiment in open source journalism and community engagement.

The editorial direction of this series of on-the-road broadcasts was conceived last summer, before the true depth of the economic crisis had taken shape. It was to focus on Ontario’s changing regional economies, to reflect local realities and to bring as many local voices into the conversation as possible. AgendaCamp became a full-day unconference event to explore these issues with passionate community leaders and citizens prior to the live-to-air broadcast of The Agenda. Participants created fantastic digital artifacts of highly informed conversations that would never be able to be fit inside the parameters of a 60 minute broadcast.

While all this user-generated content is being created and uploaded to TVO.org, YouTube, Flickr, Twitter, etc., the editorial team from The Agenda and Steve Paikin himself mix and mingle through up to 40 conversations on topics proposed and led by over 100 participants. Steve Paikin says it best, that every time he does this, he learns something new. He is learning from the community with locally relevant knowledge, he is able to further inform how he approaches the panel of experts, politicos and pundits during the broadcast and identifies interesting ideas, questions and people to call upon in the audience. Overall, we notice that the pre-planned questions to the panel tend to be completely reworked based on the new insights the editorial team glean from AgendaCamp participants.

So it came to be that I sat down with Sandra Gionas, The Agenda Producer responsible for the next in this series of on the road broadcasts, this one taking place in Waterloo on Sunday, March 29th and Monday, March 30th and focused on Ontario’s innovation economy. (AgendaCamp spaces still available.) In the interest of further experimentation and to encourage earlier, deeper engagement with the content, Sandra agreed to “open source” her research and thinking as she produced the show with the AgendaCamp community, via the blog, the wiki and her Twitter stream.

The idea is to both reveal a little bit of the work that a producer undertakes to help assemble a show like this one, and to share with the community some of the source material and research that have been undertaken. People with an interest in the topic of the innovation economy can edit the wiki page, suggest experts, link to reports and online resources, and otherwise add to Sandra’s research space that she’s sharing with the community.

Is this a signal of an open source future of journalistic media? Are we seeing possible new models for public media renewal? Time will tell.

Among other factors, powerful global corporations, emergence of Web 2.0 technologies, and the increased ease of information displacement have changed our social landscapes. In light of this shift, how will cities, like Toronto, be using technology to gain a competitive advantage in the changing global landscape? Are they improving the quality of life for its residents? What defines a fully developed/knowledge city? Where does Toronto stand?

The panel was moderated by the engaging James Norrie, Associate Dean of the Ted Rogers School of Management with fellow esteemed panelists Dave Wallace, CIO – City of Toronto, John Cannon, CIO – Toronto Transit Commission and Diane Francis, Editor-at-Large, National Post. The panel was introduced by our Twitter-obsessed Mayor David Miller (@mayormiller), who likes to tweet photos of journalists, clearly feeling empowered and tickled by the opportunity to turn the camera on the press.

It was a wide-ranging conversation, and provided a great opportunity for the City of Toronto to tell the audience of Ryerson Information Technology Management students, alumni, faculty and members of the technology community and industry about the City’s initiatives and vision for the future.

Congratulations to organizers, Matthew Merritt, Dimitry Sapon and Jaime Sorgente (@jsorgent) for a very pro-style conference. As a tech conference created by students for the wider Ryerson and Toronto community I was very impressed with their professionalism and attention to detail.

There was a lot of audience interest in the TTC’s new information initiatives, include next bus/train information, and the upcoming trip planner and Google Transit integration. Dave Wallace shared an update about the City’s 311 program, spoke about the important lessons they learned at the Web 2.0 Summit about fast, iterative web development approaches and listening to the community. He is also clearly excited to be a leader in municipal open data and is working out some of the difficult issues around privacy, standards and industry and community collaboration. He did drop a little mention about dark fibre in the city which I had hoped we could follow-up, but we ran out of time. Diane Francis opened the panel discussion with a high-level overview of Toronto’s natural advantages as a global financial capital and reviewed the current state of the imploding media industry and the radical transformation underway in this important sector of Toronto’s economy. Read her very insightful piece, It’s not about AIG, stupid…, about the massive global financial system bailout happening with AIG as a conduit.

I was there to bring a provocation about the creative city, the importance of social technology and place, the future of community and the responsibility and opportunity for students and graduates to get involved in co-creating our future city. I was pleased that both the Mayor and Dave Wallace recognized ChangeCamp as an important forum for exploring future community collaboration, and that John Cannon also recognized the impact of TransitCamp in helping inform the future direction of TTC.ca and it’s customer information initiatives.

I am excited by the growing momentum we have in Toronto right now towards open, participatory, creative and effective government that recognizes how technology can enable a transformation in our city. 2009 is looking very promising!

Below the jump are my full prepared remarks for the panel discussion. Enjoy.

RICHARD FLORIDA’S CREATIVE CLASS

• Many in this room are familiar with the work of Richard Florida, who wrote “Rise of the Creative Class”
• Richard Florida has been warmly welcomed and celebrated across the City of Toronto for choosing us among all creative cities to live and do his work.
• Richard’s selection of Toronto as his home base is absolutely an honour and a signal of Toronto’s stature in the global pantheon of creative cities
• It is also a sign of the importance that our political class is giving to his theories
• However, his presence is also mostly meaningless in terms of the reality we experience on the ground and how we will together build the true future of Toronto as a global knowledge city.
• Florida’s argument is that creative talent drives future prosperity, that global creative talent is attracted to vibrant, livable, tolerant places with high concentrations of technology, bohemians and artists.

SOCIAL TECHNOLOGY AND COMMUNITY-BUILDING

• But while Richard Florida and the Martin Prosperity Institute are busy counting patent applications and measuring relative concentrations of artists & designers, the technology that is truly transforming global creative hubs like Toronto is social technology and we’re not paying it enough attention
• Because of social technologies like Twitter, Facebook and wikis, communities of talented, knowledgeable and creative people are finding each other and discovering their shared passions.
• These are not “virtual communities”, they are very real.
• Creative people are interacting and meeting one another using social web tools at an accelerating rate
• They are discovering their shared passions and are choosing to meet in physical face-to-face meetups and unconference-like gatherings to share knowledge, expertise and to build community together.
• For those who are unfamiliar, an unconference is an event for knowledge sharing where the participants create the content.
• It is a free and open structure for self-organizing a knowledge community.
• Since the first BarCamp, an unconference for technologists, landed in Toronto in the fall of 2005, these communities have been growing and propagating at an accelerating rate.
• BarCamp spored to create DemoCamp, PodCamp, EnterpriseCamp, SustainabilityCamp, FacebookCamp, SciBarCamp, StartupCamp, TransitCamp and ChangeCamp

OPEN CREATIVE COMMUNITIES

• Toronto’s ‘Camp communities are signals from the future.
• They are examples of what I call open creative communities.
• An open creative community is a community that forms around shared practices, interests, values or geographic proximity.
• They are creative, in that their members are engaged in the collaborative creation and sharing of original and meaningful new ideas.
• They are open in that anyone can join, there is no professional accreditation process, no membership fee.
• These communities are NOT democratic, they are meritocratic.
• Status exists and is earned and lost in a free-market of reputational authority.
• These communities are becoming distributed and decentralized laboratories of technological, business and social innovation.
• They are figuring out how to create value outside of organizational structures and without heavy overhead or hard infrastructure.
• They are forming new business and personal relationships and people are leaving traditional corporations to become free agents and forming distributed networks of capability.
• They are building an internal economy based on values, passion, creativity, trust and personal reputation.

TORONTO, GLOBAL KNOWLEDGE CITY?

• So what does this all mean to Toronto as a global knowledge city?
• We need to pay attention to these new forms of self-organization that are made possible by the social web.
• People in positions of power need to realize that there are huge, growing and increasingly organized and self-aware creative communities that are ready to be engaged, to solve the most pressing and challenging problems of the day.
• We are facing the greatest transformational crisis in the global economy since the 1930’s.
• The world is not going to be the same. We can’t put the genie back in the bottle.
• The bailouts are buying time, not solving the problem.
• Toronto has one of the most vibrant, connected, creative and diverse set of innovators and problem-solvers in the world.
• We are arguably the most advanced global city in the world in terms of our adoption of social technology and the thought leaders and practitioners that are using these enabling technologies to create new models for creating value.
• What we lack is a leadership class that truly understands the transformation that is happening now, just below the threshold of our shared day-to-day awareness.
• Government, academia and the not-for-profit sectors need to realize that global corporations (and all our major corporations are global) are increasingly disconnected from their communities, are organized globally and therefore with little interest in investing in local communities in real ways.
• Our citizens, however, are invested.
• We are invested in the place we call home, in the social relationships we have formed and in our shared future.
• If we can engage one another as citizens again, if we can get people out of their corporate and organizational silos and re-invigorate the public sphere, we can release a huge amount of creative energy for change, for resilience, for innovation and adaptation.
• That means work. Hard work. By all of us. In this room. Now.

As one of the instigators of ChangeCamp at MaRS in Toronto on January 24th, I have spent much of the past 10 days trying to process all the content, ideas, outcomes and possibilities that it generated. It’s been a little overwhelming. Clearly we tapped a rich vein of attention.

Wordle (Merkley, transcribed) by Suzanne Long

So what did we do together? Let’s do a quick rundown of the numbers:

• 140 participants (one person for every character in a Tweet!)
• 100 wiki pages
• 40 YouTube videos
• 450 Flickr photos
• Thousands of tweets, the #1 trending topic on Twitter in the world that day!
• 96 blog mentions from around the world
• one story in the Globe & Mail:
• one beautifully produced segment on CBC Radio’s Spark: (full unedited interview)
• one piece by Kris Reyes on CityNews
• one piece by Jamie Woo in Torontoist
• one Best of ChangeCamp piece by Matthew Hayles in BlogTO
• many new relationships
• several new projects initiated
• several existing projects accelerated
• VanChangeCamp organizing already underway
• and one great big meme propagating through the underbrush

That’s a lot of heat from our ChangeCamp fire! But how much light was there? How much change was made? What was the quality of the products of our co-creation?

To my mind, the jury is still out on this question. A lot will happen not at ChangeCamp, but in the weeks and months to come because of ChangeCamp. We need to hear, share and tell those stories. We need your help:

1. Please complete our Participant Survey
2. Please leave your comments on this blog post. Don’t be shy, don’t be overly polite. We have thick skins.
3. If you prefer to be discrete, send an email to changecamp@remarkk.com.
4. Have more feedback? Write a post about what worked, what didn’t and ideas for the future, like this, this, this, this or this.

The organizers came to this event with modest goals: to ignite and accelerate a new conversation about the shifting ideas of government and citizenship in this “age of participation”, enabled by new tools and thanks to the web. Based on the buzz in online social media, traditional media and face-to-face conversations, I think we can safely say that we achieved that modest goal.

For people in other cities and countries that have been inspired by the ChangeCamp idea, it is important to understand all the preparatory ground work that made ChangeCamp a success in Toronto. An event of this kind is all about having the right mix of participants. Engaging that mix from government, technology, design, social innovation and media-making was key to our success.

Toronto is blessed by a dense cluster of some of the most talented designers, developers, creators and social innovators in the world. Toronto is also home to one of the most connected and innovative BarCamp and Twitter communities in the world, who have been using online tools together with face-to-face events to create change in areas of civic life outside the technology sector. We have leaders like Mark Surman of Mozilla Foundation who laid the groundwork within our City government, opening the door to open data. We had a recent “Web 2.0 Summit” event at City Hall where social media and open data in the context of government had centre stage in front of an influential audience both at the City and the Province. We have a Mayor who said:

When you open up the data, there’s no limit to what people can do. It engages the imagination of citizens in building the city.

What direction does ChangeCamp go next? That’s another post. We want to make sure that our emerging community has lots of opportunity to inform its future direction, to participate in it, to get involved in many new ways. We can’t do it all, we can’t do it alone, we can’t boil the ocean, but we can start with some small steps that in the long-run can enable major change.

Please read after the jump and give all the originators, organizers, contributors, sponsors and supporters some love. They deserve it. I’m sure I’ve missed a couple of people, so raise your hand at changecamp@remarkk.com if I missed you!

ChangeCamp would not have been possible if not for the contributions of so many:

Origins: Mark Surman at Mozilla Foundation, Tonya Surman at Centre for Social Innovation, Mayor David Miller and the City of Toronto Web 2.0 Summit, David Crow and BarCamp Toronto, TransitCamp, OpenEverything, TVO’s AgendaCamp, #HoHoTO.

Organizers & Contributors: Mark Kuznicki, Daniel Rose, Meghan Warby, Lisa Torjman, Ryan Taylor, Matthew Milan, Sean Howard, Meghan Warby, Gerry Kirk, Rohan Jayasekera, David Eaves, Ryan Merkley, Darren Chartier, Suzanne Long, Will Pate, Jennifer Bell, Michael Cayley, Duarte Da Silva, Blair Francey, Martin Kuplens-Ewart, Alistair Morton, Mark McKay, Dan Hocking, Michele Perras, Heather Williams, Matt Nish-Lapidus, Justin Kozuch, Mark Bondyra, Sandy Kemsley

Sponsors: SiG@MaRS, MaRS Centre, City of Toronto, Churchill Society, MASS LBP, Torch Partnership, Samara, Remarkk!, Omakase Group, Peapod Studios, Apolitic, Unspace, BFDesign

Community Supporters & Donators: Sebastien Chorney, Kevin Lee, Wesley Hodgson, Aidan Nulman, Lee Dale, Peter Jones, Phil Nelson, Pamela Quiroga, Andrae Griffith, Marc-Antoine Parent, Kieran Huggins, Peter Smith, Keith Stephan-Giermek, Ellen Michelson, Miroslav Glavic, Gillian Kerr, Jennifer Bell, Zeena Abdulla, Alex Sirota, Andre Gaulin, Mario Bourque, Patrick Robinson, Matthew Milan, Geoff Whitlock, Patrick Dinnen, Andrew Lockhart, Elizabeth Littlejohn, Eric Squair, This Magazine (Graham F. Scott), Lucia Mancuso Mancuso, Sappho Mullins, Ryan Taylor, Meghan Warby, David Janes, Ryan Merkley, Stephen Chanasyk, Darren Chartier, Duarte Da Silva, Kurt Gooden, Rohan Jayasekera, Michael Jones

Whale in the sky, by Gail Johnson

In Toronto, #HoHoTO was a holiday party held December 16, 2008 to raise funds for the Daily Bread Foodbank that has had a big local impact and received coverage all over the online and traditional media.  I think the Toronto tech community will look at this event the way some of us look back at the first BarCamp in Toronto in November 2005, a milestone in the emergence of a new community made possible by technology.

Since then, a myriad projects have hatched on or been assisted by Twitter. #thmvmnt is reimagining how free-agent creative and design professionals work, collaborate and make the world better. #ChangeCamp is changing the way we think about government, democracy and citizenship. #tsTO is a conversation about “TwitterSpace” – garages and war rooms provided by Twitter patrons that act as distributed temporary incubators for projects born in the swarm. #svc is looking to launch a Social Venture Commons leveraging the power of the hyper-connected twittersphere.

What is going on here?

Jay Goldman recently described it as ant colony communication – we’re leaving little pheromone signals in our digital wake. They act as attractors to trigger self-organizing behaviours among others in the colony.

Hive, a short film by The Movement co-founder and instigator Alan Smith, foretold the story of its emergence:

Clay Shirky has talked about how online social networks and communities are entering a new phase of development, one of collective action. We’re watching this new form emerge from its cocoon, and it’s fascinating.

Humanity appears to be undergoing a techno-social evolution right in front of our eyes. Is Hive’s superorganism being born, and are we part of it? Is the Web truly Us?

I believe it is, and I believe that this is not only good, but it is critical to our survival. All around us are huge, intractable problems of collective action: crisis and the risk of collapse are in our ecological, economic, political and cultural environments. What better evolutionary development than a collective intelligence enabled to in a decentralized way coordinate collective action to these very problems?

To realize the potential of this collective intelligence, we have problems to solve:

1. How do we involve, include and reflect the values of the non-connected periphery in our hyper-connected core?
2. How do the myriad fleeting ideas that emerge find stable structures to see them through to execution?
3. How will existing structures have to adapt in order to allow this new potential to be realized and harnessed?
4. Whose interests are served by the new emergent order and whose interests are harmed? How will those conflicting interests be negotiated?

If you’re interested in these questions and have some ideas on how to solve these meta problems, I’d love to hear from you. Leave a comment or better yet join the conversation on Twitter: #swarmintelligence, I’m @remarkk.