<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Blog by Edward B. Rockower, Ph.D.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.rockower.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.rockower.com</link>
	<description>One man&#039;s ruminations, explanations, pontifications...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2015 15:24:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Forbidden Planet, Movie &#038; Metaphor</title>
		<link>http://blog.rockower.com/forbidden-planet-movie-metaphor/</link>
					<comments>http://blog.rockower.com/forbidden-planet-movie-metaphor/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Edward Rockower]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2015 05:49:47 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Character]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psychology]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rockower.com/?p=431</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>“Forbidden Planet”, the Movie: a Metaphor for our times and a Cautionary Tale for “Cognitive Assistants”1, 2? In the 1956 movie, the extinct Krell are described as having had highly moral conscious minds, and vastly advanced technology that they developed to provide huge benefits to their race. However, they failed to take into account their [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://blog.rockower.com/forbidden-planet-movie-metaphor/">Forbidden Planet, Movie &#038; Metaphor</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://blog.rockower.com">Blog by Edward B. Rockower, Ph.D.</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.rockower.com/forbidden-planet-movie-metaphor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Your body language shapes who you are&#8221;, TED Talk Comment: Power vs. Humility Postures</title>
		<link>http://blog.rockower.com/body-language-shapes-you-power-vs-humility-postures/</link>
					<comments>http://blog.rockower.com/body-language-shapes-you-power-vs-humility-postures/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 02:25:47 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Art of Thinking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Character]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisdom]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rockower.com/?p=280</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Harvard Business School Sociologist Amy Cuddy&#8217;s TED Talk has been viewed over 9 million times She speaks about how &#8220;Body language affects how others see us, but it may also change how we see ourselves.&#8221;  and how &#8221; &#8216;power posing&#8217; &#8212; standing in a posture of confidence, even when we don’t feel confident &#8212; can affect testosterone [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://blog.rockower.com/body-language-shapes-you-power-vs-humility-postures/">&#8220;Your body language shapes who you are&#8221;, TED Talk Comment: Power vs. Humility Postures</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://blog.rockower.com">Blog by Edward B. Rockower, Ph.D.</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.rockower.com/body-language-shapes-you-power-vs-humility-postures/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Can&#8217;t We Solve Big Problems?:  My response to the TED Discussion</title>
		<link>http://blog.rockower.com/why-cant-we-solve-big-problems/</link>
					<comments>http://blog.rockower.com/why-cant-we-solve-big-problems/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2013 01:29:23 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Character]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organizational Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Problem Solving]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rockower.com/?p=197</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>This post is my (first) comment in response to the TED.com discussion &#8220;Why Can&#8217;t We Solve Big Problems?  The Discussion was started by Jason Pontin, Editor in Chief &#38; Publisher, MIT&#8217;s Technology Review.  He says:   &#8220;I think that  blithe optimism about technology’s powers has evaporated as big problems that people had imagined technology would [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://blog.rockower.com/why-cant-we-solve-big-problems/">Why Can&#8217;t We Solve Big Problems?:  My response to the TED Discussion</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://blog.rockower.com">Blog by Edward B. Rockower, Ph.D.</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.rockower.com/why-cant-we-solve-big-problems/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Was Socrates So Wise? (and in what way was he wise?)</title>
		<link>http://blog.rockower.com/why-was-socrates-so-wise/</link>
					<comments>http://blog.rockower.com/why-was-socrates-so-wise/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 20:41:59 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Character]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quotes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisdom]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rockower.com/?p=134</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Would Socrates have been so wise if he were born rich and handsome, and if he&#8217;d had a happy marriage?   I think not. One day, one of Socrates&#8217; students came to him asking, &#8220;a friend is thinking of getting married, would you advise him to marry or not?&#8221;  Socrates replied, &#8220;by all means he should marry.  [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://blog.rockower.com/why-was-socrates-so-wise/">Why Was Socrates So Wise? (and in what way was he wise?)</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://blog.rockower.com">Blog by Edward B. Rockower, Ph.D.</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.rockower.com/why-was-socrates-so-wise/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Humanistic Art of Thinking: Better</title>
		<link>http://blog.rockower.com/humanistic-art-thinking-better/</link>
					<comments>http://blog.rockower.com/humanistic-art-thinking-better/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2013 05:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Art of Thinking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personality Types]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Problem Solving]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisdom]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rockower.com/?p=77</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>This post includes the October, 2012 response I submitted to the US &#8220;Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Activity&#8221; (IARPA) Request for Information (RFI),   IARPA-RFI-12-04  The RFI was in support of &#8220;Strengthening Human Adaptive Reasoning and Problem Solving (SHARP)&#8221; &#8220;A Humanistic Art of Thinking: Better&#8221; Based on interviews I conducted with over 20 leaders of Modeling &#38; Simulation, Systems [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://blog.rockower.com/humanistic-art-thinking-better/">A Humanistic Art of Thinking: Better</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://blog.rockower.com">Blog by Edward B. Rockower, Ph.D.</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.rockower.com/humanistic-art-thinking-better/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Concentration of Power:  Focus, Lanchester, &#038; Network Effect</title>
		<link>http://blog.rockower.com/concentration-of-power-focus-lanchester-network-effect/</link>
					<comments>http://blog.rockower.com/concentration-of-power-focus-lanchester-network-effect/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 22:51:23 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organizational Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Problem Solving]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rockower.com/?p=26</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Consider 3 models of Systems of individual entities  (think: people, computers, companies, Social Network Analysis, Network Theory, Dark Networks, &#8230; ) 1)  In the Analysis I offered regarding Large Organizations becoming out of touch with reality, there was the tacit assumption that individuals &#8216;inside&#8217; the organization were somewhat blocked from seeing and interacting with the [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://blog.rockower.com/concentration-of-power-focus-lanchester-network-effect/">Concentration of Power:  Focus, Lanchester, &#038; Network Effect</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://blog.rockower.com">Blog by Edward B. Rockower, Ph.D.</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.rockower.com/concentration-of-power-focus-lanchester-network-effect/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why are Large Organizations Susceptible to Getting out of touch with Reality?</title>
		<link>http://blog.rockower.com/organizations-out-of-touch-with-reality/</link>
					<comments>http://blog.rockower.com/organizations-out-of-touch-with-reality/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 02:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Organizational Theory]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rockower.com/?p=1</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>My theory of &#8220;why large organizations are so susceptible to getting out of touch with reality?&#8221;   First, a little math background: The volume of a sphere scales like it&#8217;s Radius cubed                                        think of the number of [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://blog.rockower.com/organizations-out-of-touch-with-reality/">Why are Large Organizations Susceptible to Getting out of touch with Reality?</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://blog.rockower.com">Blog by Edward B. Rockower, Ph.D.</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.rockower.com/organizations-out-of-touch-with-reality/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
