<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:openSearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/" xmlns:blogger="http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0" version="2.0"><channel><atom:id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4307463452612599565</atom:id><lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Oct 2024 04:29:01 +0000</lastBuildDate><category>CT</category><category>PET/CT</category><category>adenocarcinoma</category><category>ground-glass</category><category>lung cancer</category><category>multifocal</category><category>synchronous</category><title>US Molecular</title><description>Molecular imaging news and research</description><link>http://www.usmolecular.com/</link><managingEditor>noreply@blogger.com (test)</managingEditor><generator>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>11</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4307463452612599565.post-8658666619488283487</guid><pubDate>Sun, 27 Mar 2016 15:10:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2016-03-27T08:13:03.892-07:00</atom:updated><title>PET-CT Surveillance versus Neck Dissection in Advanced Head and Neck Cancer.</title><description>&lt;blockquote&gt;This study compared routine neck dissection vs PET-CT guided surveillance in head and neck cancer patients with Stage N2 or N3 disease. Survival was the same in both groups, however, surveillance resulted in considerably fewer operations and it was more cost-effective.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;i&gt;(&lt;a href=&quot;http://1.usa.gov/21MF10L&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;N Engl J Med. 2016 Mar 23.&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://medjournal.net/pearls/index.php?uid=781&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Read More&lt;/a&gt;  </description><link>http://www.usmolecular.com/2016/03/pet-ct-surveillance-versus-neck.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Unknown)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4307463452612599565.post-8247481887490140224</guid><pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2015 23:10:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2015-02-11T15:10:03.595-08:00</atom:updated><title>18F-FDG PET/CT in inflammation of unknown origin: a cost-effectiveness pilot-study.</title><description>&lt;blockquote&gt;For patients with inflammation of unknown origin, this study found that the use of diagnostic FDG PET/CT reduced hospital costs by over 50%.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;i&gt;(&lt;a href=&quot;http://1.usa.gov/1Fry8sa&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015 Feb 6&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://medjournal.net/pearls/index.php?uid=660&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Read More&lt;/a&gt;  </description><link>http://www.usmolecular.com/2015/02/18f-fdg-petct-in-inflammation-of.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Unknown)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4307463452612599565.post-7041232559782471729</guid><pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2015 23:10:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2015-02-11T15:10:03.219-08:00</atom:updated><title>18F-FDG PET/CT lung focalities without coregistered CT findings: an interpretative clinical dilemma.</title><description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Focal lung uptake of FDG without anatomic correlate is very rare (1.5 cases/1000 PET scans). Respiratory gating can improve scan interpretation, avoiding erroneous reports or further imaging procedures.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;i&gt;(&lt;a href=&quot;http://1.usa.gov/1KFY8kC&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Nucl Med Commun. 2015 Feb 5. .&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://medjournal.net/pearls/index.php?uid=652&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Read More&lt;/a&gt;  </description><link>http://www.usmolecular.com/2015/02/18f-fdg-petct-lung-focalities-without.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Unknown)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4307463452612599565.post-8128237074530367657</guid><pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2014 23:29:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2014-12-07T15:29:57.562-08:00</atom:updated><title>Eye dose monitoring of PET/CT staff</title><description>&lt;div dir=&quot;ltr&quot; style=&quot;text-align: left;&quot; trbidi=&quot;on&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;table border=&quot;0&quot; style=&quot;width: 100%px;&quot;&gt;&lt;tbody&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td align=&quot;left&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align=&quot;right&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?db=pubmed&amp;amp;cmd=Link&amp;amp;LinkName=pubmed_pubmed&amp;amp;from_uid=25109711&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/tbody&gt;&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;display: none;&quot;&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Eye dose monitoring of PET/CT workers.&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;display: none;&quot;&gt;
Authors:  Walsh C, O&#39;Connor U, O&#39;Reilly G&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;          QUESTION: does eye radiation dose exposure need to be measured in PET/CT workers?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
METHODS: a newly designed dosimeter was used to measure eye dose.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
RESULTS: radiographers received the highest exposure of the staff groups studied, with the highest receiving an exposure of 0.5 mSv over the 3-month survey period. The estimated maximum eye dose for 1 year is approximately 2 mSv. A conservative estimate of eye dose can be made as being up to approximately twice the numeric value for whole-body dose.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CONCLUSION: Routine whole-body dose measurements may be a useful starting point for assessing whether eye dose monitoring should be prioritized in a PET facility.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;          ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Following the proposal of a reduced eye dose limit, this article provides new measurement data on staff eye doses for PET/CT workers.&lt;br /&gt;          &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25109711?dopt=Abstract&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Br J Radiol. 2014 Oct;87(1042):20140373&lt;/a&gt;  &lt;/div&gt;
</description><link>http://www.usmolecular.com/2014/12/eye-dose-monitoring-of-petct-staff.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (test)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4307463452612599565.post-7937432953348780992</guid><pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2014 00:43:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2014-11-30T16:43:59.490-08:00</atom:updated><title>Does Your Home Need a UPS?</title><description>&lt;div dir=&quot;ltr&quot; style=&quot;text-align: left;&quot; trbidi=&quot;on&quot;&gt;
As a user of advanced medical imaging equipment, I&#39;m a believer in steady, reliable power for both my imaging equipment and computers. What is important to note, is that the batteries in UPS units eventually need to be replaced, maybe every 2 or 3 years.Currently, I use APC units, however, am impressed with some of the new players in this area, and currently am looking at &lt;a href=&quot;http://amzn.to/1yqTFOJ&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;CyberPower&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Home equipment also deserves to have the power supply regulated with a UPS unit. We have one for our TV and others for our office workstations. &lt;/div&gt;
</description><link>http://www.usmolecular.com/2014/11/does-your-home-need-ups.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Unknown)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4307463452612599565.post-1111510847516264120</guid><pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2014 00:09:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2014-11-10T16:11:24.136-08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">adenocarcinoma</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">CT</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">ground-glass</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">lung cancer</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">multifocal</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">PET/CT</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">synchronous</category><title>Should my lung lesion be surgically removed?</title><description>&lt;div dir=&quot;ltr&quot; style=&quot;text-align: left;&quot; trbidi=&quot;on&quot;&gt;
BACKGROUND: it is common for people to have multiple primary lung cancers with 
ground-glass opacity. How should these lesions be managed medically?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
RESULTS: this is a case report of a 62y M with 7 lesions in the lung field. High resolution CT was performed along with F-18 FDG PET/CT imaging.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CONCLUSION: the authors found that using FDG &lt;span class=&quot;highlight&quot;&gt;PET/CT &lt;/span&gt;in addition to high resolution CT helped determine the most appropriate surgical strategy in managing multifocal lung adenocarcinoma.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24792307?dopt=Abstract&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 May;97(5):e151-3.&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
</description><link>http://www.usmolecular.com/2014/11/should-my-lung-lesion-be-surgically.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (test)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4307463452612599565.post-3109708239368007489</guid><pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2014 18:38:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2014-10-29T11:38:57.669-07:00</atom:updated><title>Obamacare sends health premiums skyrocketing</title><description>For young adults, men are seeing an average 78.2 percent price increase &lt;br /&gt;
in their health insurance, and women having their &lt;br /&gt;
premiums rise 44.9 percent, according to a recent report by HealthPocket, as reported by the Washington Times.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/oct/28/obamacare-sends-health-premiums-skyrocketing-by-as/&quot;&gt;Obamacare sends health premiums skyrocketing by as much as 78 percent - Washington Times&lt;/a&gt;</description><link>http://www.usmolecular.com/2014/10/obamacare-sends-health-premiums.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Unknown)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4307463452612599565.post-8316032764079080042</guid><pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 19:44:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2013-04-03T12:44:30.955-07:00</atom:updated><title>Combined 18F-fluoride and 18F-FDG PET/CT scanning - an Idea Whose Time has Arrived</title><description>Dual tracer single acquisition PET/CT scanning is an idea whose time has come. The combination of 18F-Fluoride with 18F-FDG has been consistently shown to be clinically accurate and cost-effective compared to separate acquisitions. This &lt;a href=&quot;http://q.gs/1197984/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23243299?dopt=Abstract#.UVyF20D8ZJI.blogger&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;latest research&lt;/a&gt; from Stanford University confirms the proposition that DTSA PET/CT is clinically useful and cost-effective.&amp;nbsp; </description><link>http://www.usmolecular.com/2013/04/combined-18f-fluoride-and-18f-fdg-petct.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Unknown)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4307463452612599565.post-8874140562006990878</guid><pubDate>Sat, 23 Mar 2013 18:37:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2013-03-23T11:37:20.218-07:00</atom:updated><title>International Validation Study for Interim PET in Hodgkins Disease</title><description>This study published in the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23516309?dopt=Abstract#.UU31WAmad-A.blogger&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Journal of Nuclear Medicine&lt;/a&gt; verified the utility of the  Deauville 5-point score to evaluate PET/CT images in people with advanced stage Hodgkins Lymphoma.The authors concluded that the 5-point Deauville score is helpful when reviewing PET scans  in patients with advanced Hodgkin lymphoma.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
ICD-10 C81.9</description><link>http://www.usmolecular.com/2013/03/international-validation-study-for.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Unknown)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4307463452612599565.post-6366092343373208848</guid><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 13:25:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-05-28T06:28:37.172-07:00</atom:updated><title>SNM 2009 Abstract: Gadgets and Hacks for the Nuclear Medicine Professional</title><description>The oral presentation on Computer Gadgets and Hacks for the Nuclear Medicine Professional has been posted online at YouTube. Visit:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C3J6VUJbwIQ&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It also is on the NuclearWiki at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nuclearwiki.com&quot;&gt;http://www.nuclearwiki.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This presentation will be presented at the Society of Nuclear Medicine&#39;s Annual Meeting 2009 held in Toronto, Canada.</description><link>http://www.usmolecular.com/2009/05/snm-2009-abstract-gadgets-and-hacks-for.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (test)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4307463452612599565.post-695545809074450831</guid><pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2007 23:40:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2013-03-23T08:24:55.401-07:00</atom:updated><title>US Molecular</title><description>&lt;div dir=&quot;ltr&quot; style=&quot;text-align: left;&quot; trbidi=&quot;on&quot;&gt;
US Molecular is an organization of health care professionals dedicated to helping people get and stay healthy through the use of advanced molecular imaging and therapies. Our main website for the company is located at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.usmolecular.com/&quot;&gt;http://www.usmolecular.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
</description><link>http://www.usmolecular.com/2007/04/announcement-family-medicine-update.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (test)</author></item></channel></rss>