<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0" --><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for </title>
	<link>http://ryanhegs.com/components/com_jd-wp</link>
	<description>Business, Investing, Technology, Marketing, and Innovation</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 06:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0</generator>

	<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/ryanhegs/comments" type="application/rss+xml" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" /><item>
		<title>Comment on RYANHEGS.COM IS CHANGING! by ryanhegs</title>
		<link>http://ryanhegs.com/index.php?option=com_jd-wp&amp;Itemid=26&amp;p=102#comment-2424</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 05:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ryanhegs.com/index.php?option=com_jd-wp&amp;Itemid=26&amp;p=102#comment-2424</guid>
					<description>OK...so it hasn't changed yet. Sorry. I've been super busy. While I have been pretty lazy about revamping this site, it is encouraging to know that we still have several people taking advantage of the members only discussion board and sharing some great arbitrage opportunities. If you want in just click the register link and provide your info.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK&#8230;so it hasn&#8217;t changed yet. Sorry. I&#8217;ve been super busy. While I have been pretty lazy about revamping this site, it is encouraging to know that we still have several people taking advantage of the members only discussion board and sharing some great arbitrage opportunities. If you want in just click the register link and provide your info.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on RYANHEGS.COM IS CHANGING! by ryanhegs</title>
		<link>http://ryanhegs.com/index.php?option=com_jd-wp&amp;Itemid=26&amp;p=102#comment-2324</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 04:42:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ryanhegs.com/index.php?option=com_jd-wp&amp;Itemid=26&amp;p=102#comment-2324</guid>
					<description>You will need to click the "register" link under the login area and provide some information about yourself. Once approved you will be able to access the discussion board.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You will need to click the &#8220;register&#8221; link under the login area and provide some information about yourself. Once approved you will be able to access the discussion board.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on RYANHEGS.COM IS CHANGING! by casandra relation</title>
		<link>http://ryanhegs.com/index.php?option=com_jd-wp&amp;Itemid=26&amp;p=102#comment-2323</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 15:53:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ryanhegs.com/index.php?option=com_jd-wp&amp;Itemid=26&amp;p=102#comment-2323</guid>
					<description>How can I take part in your discussions in your board? I had a look on the site and I found some interesting stuff so I'd like to find out more. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How can I take part in your discussions in your board? I had a look on the site and I found some interesting stuff so I&#8217;d like to find out more. Thanks!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Information Asymmetry by Valerie Celibataires</title>
		<link>http://ryanhegs.com/index.php?option=com_jd-wp&amp;Itemid=26&amp;p=99#comment-2262</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 11:01:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ryanhegs.com/index.php?option=com_jd-wp&amp;Itemid=26&amp;p=99#comment-2262</guid>
					<description>I also read Freakonomics and, as a person that doesn't have any knowledge of economy and think of it as a boring subject, I was pleasently surprised. It's really well-written and made me see things differently.
Jobs are not in danger by the huge amount of information on the internet. You need to know how to handle this information. However, there is a gain for the client/pacient, because he is well informed now and cannot be tricked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also read Freakonomics and, as a person that doesn&#8217;t have any knowledge of economy and think of it as a boring subject, I was pleasently surprised. It&#8217;s really well-written and made me see things differently.<br />
Jobs are not in danger by the huge amount of information on the internet. You need to know how to handle this information. However, there is a gain for the client/pacient, because he is well informed now and cannot be tricked.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Information Asymmetry by Tom</title>
		<link>http://ryanhegs.com/index.php?option=com_jd-wp&amp;Itemid=26&amp;p=99#comment-1964</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 05:12:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ryanhegs.com/index.php?option=com_jd-wp&amp;Itemid=26&amp;p=99#comment-1964</guid>
					<description>I read Freakonomics a few years back when I was in high school.  For a person that doesn't read much (only non-fiction), I found the book to be very thought-provoking.  

My thoughts on the erosion of information asymmetry is that is a good thing because it makes people more productive.  I believe that productivity increases are what fuels the American economy.  The Internet and the decrease in information asymmetry can sort of be correlated to general advances in technology (for example, agriculture and manufacturing used to be over 90% of the jobs).  The only difference is that advances in technology will always occur, while the decrease in information asymmetry will approach a limit because humans only have so much brain capacity, and there is only so much time in a day.  American's today already work in excess of 40 hours per week and have many other responsibilities...it is just not plausible for people to do everything mainly because of opportunity cost.  Lawn maintenance and other things end up being outsourced.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read Freakonomics a few years back when I was in high school.  For a person that doesn&#8217;t read much (only non-fiction), I found the book to be very thought-provoking.  </p>
<p>My thoughts on the erosion of information asymmetry is that is a good thing because it makes people more productive.  I believe that productivity increases are what fuels the American economy.  The Internet and the decrease in information asymmetry can sort of be correlated to general advances in technology (for example, agriculture and manufacturing used to be over 90% of the jobs).  The only difference is that advances in technology will always occur, while the decrease in information asymmetry will approach a limit because humans only have so much brain capacity, and there is only so much time in a day.  American&#8217;s today already work in excess of 40 hours per week and have many other responsibilities&#8230;it is just not plausible for people to do everything mainly because of opportunity cost.  Lawn maintenance and other things end up being outsourced.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sold KRE - Worst Investment Yet by ryanhegs</title>
		<link>http://ryanhegs.com/index.php?option=com_jd-wp&amp;Itemid=26&amp;p=92#comment-1649</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 05:57:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ryanhegs.com/index.php?option=com_jd-wp&amp;Itemid=26&amp;p=92#comment-1649</guid>
					<description>I'm not blaming Cramer...I'm the one that took the advice, mostly because the argument sounded good at the time. Can't expect every investment to be a winner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not blaming Cramer&#8230;I&#8217;m the one that took the advice, mostly because the argument sounded good at the time. Can&#8217;t expect every investment to be a winner.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Arbitrage Progress Report by Chad</title>
		<link>http://ryanhegs.com/index.php?option=com_jd-wp&amp;Itemid=26&amp;p=81#comment-1288</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 04:42:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ryanhegs.com/index.php?option=com_jd-wp&amp;Itemid=26&amp;p=81#comment-1288</guid>
					<description>Ryan,

The short I have in should work in either case.  With JLN I was mostly long with the short being more of an experiment.  Unfortunately, most of these stocks are not optionable or I would simply buy a call to offset my short risk.  The obvious risk with shorts is that they literally can keep going up and you have to buy it back at some point.  With the payout figure I have an upper cap, so the volatility really doesn't scare me.  

To get into a long and short position for this one really does not make much sense.  I would simply be offsetting my expected gains.  Both payout cases should work.  If they kill the deal, it's pretty obvious.  If they fund it, I will have to wait for a few more days until the reorg is complete and then watch as the stock drops.  I don't want to be a position where I would be long the stock and they not fund, that is the one losing position guaranteed.

Your margin account should not have any additional fees to it.  If it does, you should shop for another broker.  Again, simply having the margin account does not mean you will be trading with borrowed money.  You can continue to trade like you would a cash type of an account.  The difference is that your marginable stocks (and not all of them are) will be held in the margin side of the account allowing you to build SMA credit for anything long term you had in mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ryan,</p>
<p>The short I have in should work in either case.  With JLN I was mostly long with the short being more of an experiment.  Unfortunately, most of these stocks are not optionable or I would simply buy a call to offset my short risk.  The obvious risk with shorts is that they literally can keep going up and you have to buy it back at some point.  With the payout figure I have an upper cap, so the volatility really doesn&#8217;t scare me.  </p>
<p>To get into a long and short position for this one really does not make much sense.  I would simply be offsetting my expected gains.  Both payout cases should work.  If they kill the deal, it&#8217;s pretty obvious.  If they fund it, I will have to wait for a few more days until the reorg is complete and then watch as the stock drops.  I don&#8217;t want to be a position where I would be long the stock and they not fund, that is the one losing position guaranteed.</p>
<p>Your margin account should not have any additional fees to it.  If it does, you should shop for another broker.  Again, simply having the margin account does not mean you will be trading with borrowed money.  You can continue to trade like you would a cash type of an account.  The difference is that your marginable stocks (and not all of them are) will be held in the margin side of the account allowing you to build SMA credit for anything long term you had in mind.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Arbitrage Progress Report by RyanHegs</title>
		<link>http://ryanhegs.com/index.php?option=com_jd-wp&amp;Itemid=26&amp;p=81#comment-1287</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 03:04:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ryanhegs.com/index.php?option=com_jd-wp&amp;Itemid=26&amp;p=81#comment-1287</guid>
					<description>Chad,
It sounds like you could hedge your bet by being both long and short, similar to how you handled JLN. In your first scenario, where the company does pay out, you'd make money on the cash out, and (since it sounds like you are reasonably confident that the price would still drop substantially) you'd make a profit on the short as well. If they do kill the deal you'd still come out ahead with the short, but maybe not as much. On the other hand, if the stock does make a move upward you're limiting your losses (the only reason I'd see it making a move up is if it appears the reverse split is still going to happen as advertised, in which case we are back to scenario #1).

What are your thoughts? Sounds like you are feeling confident in your short and not anticipating the cash-out (if you were, the long/short would make a lot of sense to me). I'm asking more for myself as this would be my first time shorting a stock and I'd like to take a conservative approach.

I plan to sit down at my local Scottrade branch this week and make sure I have a good understanding of how their margin accounts work (fees, penalties, rules, etc.). I'm apprehensive about trading with borrowed money, but I think that as long as I take a rational approach to each investment and don't get in over my head it may be a good thing.

I appreciate your wisdom and experience. It is nice to have you frequenting this blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chad,<br />
It sounds like you could hedge your bet by being both long and short, similar to how you handled JLN. In your first scenario, where the company does pay out, you&#8217;d make money on the cash out, and (since it sounds like you are reasonably confident that the price would still drop substantially) you&#8217;d make a profit on the short as well. If they do kill the deal you&#8217;d still come out ahead with the short, but maybe not as much. On the other hand, if the stock does make a move upward you&#8217;re limiting your losses (the only reason I&#8217;d see it making a move up is if it appears the reverse split is still going to happen as advertised, in which case we are back to scenario #1).</p>
<p>What are your thoughts? Sounds like you are feeling confident in your short and not anticipating the cash-out (if you were, the long/short would make a lot of sense to me). I&#8217;m asking more for myself as this would be my first time shorting a stock and I&#8217;d like to take a conservative approach.</p>
<p>I plan to sit down at my local Scottrade branch this week and make sure I have a good understanding of how their margin accounts work (fees, penalties, rules, etc.). I&#8217;m apprehensive about trading with borrowed money, but I think that as long as I take a rational approach to each investment and don&#8217;t get in over my head it may be a good thing.</p>
<p>I appreciate your wisdom and experience. It is nice to have you frequenting this blog.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Arbitrage Progress Report by Chad</title>
		<link>http://ryanhegs.com/index.php?option=com_jd-wp&amp;Itemid=26&amp;p=81#comment-1282</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 16:34:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ryanhegs.com/index.php?option=com_jd-wp&amp;Itemid=26&amp;p=81#comment-1282</guid>
					<description>Now that's interesting.  A little blog room stock manipulation perhaps.  Let's see buy in $14, watch your position sink and then quote our featured stock with the obligatory "I recommend you not get involved" followed by "leaning towards holding it and seeing what happens".  Here fishy fishy fishy.


In any case, Ryan, I don't hold shorts too long.  I just don't like them.  I do expect the stock to get down somewhere below $11/share, at that point I will probably look to cover.  The meeting is around June 10th and expect to see some added volatility (can't imagine why:)  I think my position will be in trouble if there is a concerted move above $16.50 for a couple of days.  But my reason for the short was two fold:
First, the company bites the bullet and pays out.  Virtually every company this has chosen to reclassify has sunk very quickly after the reclassification.  I think most shareholders who would be long term investors would want to move into something else.  Second, the board kills the deal, which is what I expect.  Why would a company want to pay such a high premium for the stock and take such a large interest expense for a sector that is getting hammered.  If I was the board I would be looking for any reason to kill the deal.  The company probably would still want to delist from the pinks, but you will probably get a better price if you were to wait.

In either case, I think I will come out ahead.

Now go out and open your margin account.  There are a lot of reasons to add the margin feature and only one of them is for shorting stock.  The reason I use it is for the SMA feature of margin.  Essentially SMA tracks your good stock performance by adding in a bookeeping feature that allows you to buy large amounts of stock without coming up with all the money right away.  You get to use the credit that you have accumulated without needing the money upfront.  There is risk because of margin call for a bad stock position, but overall is more advantageous to have it than not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that&#8217;s interesting.  A little blog room stock manipulation perhaps.  Let&#8217;s see buy in $14, watch your position sink and then quote our featured stock with the obligatory &#8220;I recommend you not get involved&#8221; followed by &#8220;leaning towards holding it and seeing what happens&#8221;.  Here fishy fishy fishy.</p>
<p>In any case, Ryan, I don&#8217;t hold shorts too long.  I just don&#8217;t like them.  I do expect the stock to get down somewhere below $11/share, at that point I will probably look to cover.  The meeting is around June 10th and expect to see some added volatility (can&#8217;t imagine why:)  I think my position will be in trouble if there is a concerted move above $16.50 for a couple of days.  But my reason for the short was two fold:<br />
First, the company bites the bullet and pays out.  Virtually every company this has chosen to reclassify has sunk very quickly after the reclassification.  I think most shareholders who would be long term investors would want to move into something else.  Second, the board kills the deal, which is what I expect.  Why would a company want to pay such a high premium for the stock and take such a large interest expense for a sector that is getting hammered.  If I was the board I would be looking for any reason to kill the deal.  The company probably would still want to delist from the pinks, but you will probably get a better price if you were to wait.</p>
<p>In either case, I think I will come out ahead.</p>
<p>Now go out and open your margin account.  There are a lot of reasons to add the margin feature and only one of them is for shorting stock.  The reason I use it is for the SMA feature of margin.  Essentially SMA tracks your good stock performance by adding in a bookeeping feature that allows you to buy large amounts of stock without coming up with all the money right away.  You get to use the credit that you have accumulated without needing the money upfront.  There is risk because of margin call for a bad stock position, but overall is more advantageous to have it than not.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Arbitrage Progress Report by RyanHegs</title>
		<link>http://ryanhegs.com/index.php?option=com_jd-wp&amp;Itemid=26&amp;p=81#comment-1273</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 06:53:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ryanhegs.com/index.php?option=com_jd-wp&amp;Itemid=26&amp;p=81#comment-1273</guid>
					<description>Tom,
I purchased a small handfull of shares a while back at $13.75 (before I took a better look at what was going on). I sold my shares a few days ago for a small loss. Not just because of the warnings posted here, but also from another respected source. I figured that I'd rather lose a small amount now than gamble on a decent payout and lose big. It will be very interesting to see what happens. If you hold your shares keep us posted.

Chad has me thinking about shorting the stock. It would be my first short...so I want to take my time and look into it further.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom,<br />
I purchased a small handfull of shares a while back at $13.75 (before I took a better look at what was going on). I sold my shares a few days ago for a small loss. Not just because of the warnings posted here, but also from another respected source. I figured that I&#8217;d rather lose a small amount now than gamble on a decent payout and lose big. It will be very interesting to see what happens. If you hold your shares keep us posted.</p>
<p>Chad has me thinking about shorting the stock. It would be my first short&#8230;so I want to take my time and look into it further.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
