<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>BernardBraylaw.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bernardbraylaw.com/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.bernardbraylaw.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2012 21:46:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=5.8.13</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Can a DUI charge be successfully Defended?</title>
		<link>https://www.bernardbraylaw.com/dui-law/can-a-dui-charge-be-successfully-defended-part-i?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=can-a-dui-charge-be-successfully-defended-part-i</link>
					<comments>https://www.bernardbraylaw.com/dui-law/can-a-dui-charge-be-successfully-defended-part-i#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[b.bray]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2012 21:44:59 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[DUI Law]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bernardbraylaw.com/?p=330</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>I wasn't driving</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.bernardbraylaw.com/dui-law/can-a-dui-charge-be-successfully-defended-part-i">Can a DUI charge be successfully Defended?</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.bernardbraylaw.com">BernardBraylaw.com</a>.</p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<div>
<p>This will be the first in a series of blog entries that will examine various defenses available in DUI cases.</p>
<p>Although not available in every case, and often times defeated by a client’s admission to driving at the time of contact with the Police, an &#8220;I wasn’t driving&#8221; defense can be successfully asserted in some cases.</p>
<p>I have successfully  asserted this defense for clients, although  it required a trial before we found ears even willing to listen.</p>
<p>There are risks involved in presenting such a defense.  Lindsay Lohan asserted the defense earlier this month to an accusation that she was driving a car (in violation of her probation) that was involved in an accident on the Pacific Coast Highway.  Regrettably for Lindsay, an assistant that was riding with her at the time of the crash confirmed for the police that it was actually Lindsay driving during a follow up interview.</p>
<p>If you or a loved one have been arrested for driving under the influence, protect yourself to the fullest extent possible, contact <a onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/san-jose-criminal-lawyer.com');" href="http://san-jose-criminal-lawyer.com/wp-admin/San%20Jose%20Criminal%20Defense%20Attorney">San Jose DUI Lawyer</a> Bernard P. Bray at (408) 292-9700 and learn your options before you go to court.  It can make all the difference in the outcome of your case.</p>
</div>
<div><span style="font-size: 12.5pt;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;">     </span></span></div>
</div><p>The post <a href="https://www.bernardbraylaw.com/dui-law/can-a-dui-charge-be-successfully-defended-part-i">Can a DUI charge be successfully Defended?</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.bernardbraylaw.com">BernardBraylaw.com</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.bernardbraylaw.com/dui-law/can-a-dui-charge-be-successfully-defended-part-i/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>868</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>What is The Typical First Offender DUI Sentence in California?</title>
		<link>https://www.bernardbraylaw.com/criminal-law/what-is-the-typical-first-offender-dui-sentence-in-california?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=what-is-the-typical-first-offender-dui-sentence-in-california</link>
					<comments>https://www.bernardbraylaw.com/criminal-law/what-is-the-typical-first-offender-dui-sentence-in-california#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[b.bray]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jan 2011 22:10:07 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DUI Law]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bernardbraylaw.com/?p=318</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In many instances there are facts presented where the law requires an enhanced penalty for a first time offender.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.bernardbraylaw.com/criminal-law/what-is-the-typical-first-offender-dui-sentence-in-california">What is The Typical First Offender DUI Sentence in California?</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.bernardbraylaw.com">BernardBraylaw.com</a>.</p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a practicing criminal defense lawyer in California I get asked this question a lot.  And the answer is always the same: It depends.  California Superior Court Judges are given wide latitude when it comes to sentencing first time DUI offenders.  There are many factors, and local policies, that play a part in the DUI sentencing equation.  DUI first time offender sentencing is governed by California Vehicle Code section 23536 and section 23538.  While section 23536 requires a mandatory 48 hour jail sentence, and section 23538 allows for less than the required minimum in all cases where probation is granted, the predominant characteristic of first time DUI sentencing and practice is just how non- typical, and likely subject to upward departure, any individual sentence has the prospect of ultimately being.</p>
<p>From the Court of conviction a convicted first offender in most California counties, where no aggravating or mitigating facts are present, should expect to receive three years of probation, six days of community service, fines and court fees of approximately $2000.00, and participation in a drinking driver program.  From the DMV, a first offender, under the same circumstances, will face a four month license suspension or a thirty day suspension with five months of restricted driving thereafter.</p>
<p>Of particular note in the sentencing equation are those instances where an upward departure is indicated because of particular facts, or even required by statute, because particular facts that have been alleged as sentencing enhancements.  An example of considerations that could  result in enhanced penalties are in instances where an offender was involved in an accident, produced a high blood alcohol content result, engaged in excessively inappropriate driving, was particularly uncooperative with police, was driving without a valid license, or where the police report reveals the existence of other uncharged law violations.</p>
<p>In many instances there are facts presented where the law requires an enhanced penalty for a first time offender.  Pursuant to California Vehicle Code section 23572 a jail sentence of an additional 48 hours is required where a first time offender had a passenger under the age of 14 at the time of arrest.  Pursuant to California Vehicle Code section 23578 an aggravated sentence shall be considered by the Judge where a first offender produced a blood alcohol result of .15% or higher.  The same section also requires that a Judge shall consider a higher sentence where a first offender refused to take a blood alcohol test.  And California Vehicle Code section 23582 requires that an additional jail sentence of 60 days be imposed where a first offender drives 30 miles per hour over the speed limit on a freeway, or 20 miles per hour over the speed limit on any street or highway while under the influence.</p>
<p>If you or a loved one have been arrested for driving under the influence, protect yourself to the fullest extent possible, contact <a href="http://san-jose-criminal-lawyer.com/wp-admin/San%20Jose%20Criminal%20Defense%20Attorney">San Jose DUI Lawyer</a> Bernard P. Bray at (408) 292-9700 and learn your options before you go to court.  It can make all the difference in the outcome of your case.</p><p>The post <a href="https://www.bernardbraylaw.com/criminal-law/what-is-the-typical-first-offender-dui-sentence-in-california">What is The Typical First Offender DUI Sentence in California?</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.bernardbraylaw.com">BernardBraylaw.com</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.bernardbraylaw.com/criminal-law/what-is-the-typical-first-offender-dui-sentence-in-california/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>245</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Marijuana Possession Really Not A Crime in California?</title>
		<link>https://www.bernardbraylaw.com/uncategorized/is-marijuana-possession-really-not-a-crime-in-california?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=is-marijuana-possession-really-not-a-crime-in-california</link>
					<comments>https://www.bernardbraylaw.com/uncategorized/is-marijuana-possession-really-not-a-crime-in-california#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[b.bray]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jan 2011 19:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bernardbraylaw.com/?p=314</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Last November California voters had the opportunity to legalize marijuana possession by way of Proposition 19.  While California voters failed to pass the Proposition, as of January 1, 2011, it is no longer a misdemeanor to possess up to one ounce of marijuana in California for personal use.  It is now an infraction only, the [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.bernardbraylaw.com/uncategorized/is-marijuana-possession-really-not-a-crime-in-california">Is Marijuana Possession Really Not A Crime in California?</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.bernardbraylaw.com">BernardBraylaw.com</a>.</p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last November California voters had the opportunity to legalize marijuana possession by way of Proposition 19.  While California voters failed to pass the Proposition, as of January 1, 2011, it is no longer a misdemeanor to possess up to one ounce of marijuana in California for personal use.  It is now an infraction only, the maximum punishment for which is a fine of $100.00.</p>
<p>This change in the law was made effective by changing the classification of the crime of possession of up to an ounce of marijuana form a misdemeanor to an infraction in California Health and Safety Code section 11357 (b), and California Vehicle Code section 23222(b).  As an infraction crime only, persons charged under the amended laws will not be subject to arrest, nor will they any longer be entitled to a jury trial or to an attorney at taxpayer expense.</p>
<p>Keep in mind that while this change in the law is significant, it does not apply when the marijuana is possessed for the purpose of selling it.</p>
<p>If you have questions regarding California&#8217;s drug laws, or you or someone you know has been arrested for a drug crime, contact <a title="San Jose DUI Lawyers" href="../drunk_driving.htm">San Jose drug lawyer</a> Bernard P. Bray at: (408) 292-9700.</p><p>The post <a href="https://www.bernardbraylaw.com/uncategorized/is-marijuana-possession-really-not-a-crime-in-california">Is Marijuana Possession Really Not A Crime in California?</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.bernardbraylaw.com">BernardBraylaw.com</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.bernardbraylaw.com/uncategorized/is-marijuana-possession-really-not-a-crime-in-california/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>549</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Business Booming for Santa Clara County Vice Cops?</title>
		<link>https://www.bernardbraylaw.com/uncategorized/is-business-booming-for-santa-clara-county-vice-cops?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=is-business-booming-for-santa-clara-county-vice-cops</link>
					<comments>https://www.bernardbraylaw.com/uncategorized/is-business-booming-for-santa-clara-county-vice-cops#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[b.bray]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2010 21:32:48 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bernardbraylaw.com/?p=295</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>As anyone who has ever perused a copy of the San Jose Metro, or who has ever visited MYREDBOOK.COM already knows, the world’s oldest profession is very alive and well in San Jose and Santa Clara County.  Santa Clara County Sheriff’s Department Deputy Mike Paresa reported to the San Jose Mercury News last week that [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.bernardbraylaw.com/uncategorized/is-business-booming-for-santa-clara-county-vice-cops">Is Business Booming for Santa Clara County Vice Cops?</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.bernardbraylaw.com">BernardBraylaw.com</a>.</p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As anyone who has ever perused a copy of the San Jose Metro, or who has ever visited MYREDBOOK.COM already knows, the world’s oldest profession is very alive and well in San Jose and Santa Clara County. </p>
<p>Santa Clara County Sheriff’s Department Deputy Mike Paresa reported to the San Jose Mercury News last week that an investigation that lasted eight months, and involved more than thirty officers, netted two people that oversaw an alleged prostitution ring headquartered in Santa Clara County.  The ring employed mainly Chinese women that were making $12,000.00 a month.  Sheriff’s Department Lieutenant Joe Walldherr commented that “The way the economy is and how lucrative this is, it’s very common.  We’ll shut one down and there will be 10 of them opening up.  They’re all over.”</p>
<p>Notwithstanding the huge investment of manpower and resources, the Sheriff’s office justified the investigation, in part, because prostitutes can be vulnerable to robberies and sometimes held in the industry against their wishes. </p>
<p>San Jose Criminal Defense Lawyer Bernard P. Bray has extensive experience handling prostitution cases. He has been successful in asserting defenses based on many theories, including double jeopardy and outrageous police misconduct in attacking prostitution charges on technical grounds, and has an excellent track record with prostitution cases in front of juries.</p>
<p>Prostitution allegations should not be taken lightly. When faced with prostitution charges call <a title="San Jose Criminal Attorney" href="http://www.bernardbraylaw.com/">San Jose Criminal Attorney</a> Bernard P. Bray at: (408) 292-9700. Chinese, Vietnamese, and Korean interpreters are available on request.</p><p>The post <a href="https://www.bernardbraylaw.com/uncategorized/is-business-booming-for-santa-clara-county-vice-cops">Is Business Booming for Santa Clara County Vice Cops?</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.bernardbraylaw.com">BernardBraylaw.com</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.bernardbraylaw.com/uncategorized/is-business-booming-for-santa-clara-county-vice-cops/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>250</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Were Labor Day Weekend 2010 DUI Arrests Down?</title>
		<link>https://www.bernardbraylaw.com/dui-law/why-were-labor-day-weekend-dui-arrests-down?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=why-were-labor-day-weekend-dui-arrests-down</link>
					<comments>https://www.bernardbraylaw.com/dui-law/why-were-labor-day-weekend-dui-arrests-down#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[b.bray]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 18:24:16 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[DUI Law]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bernardbraylaw.com/?p=287</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Labor Day Weekend 2010 DUI arrests were down across California this year.  According to the California Highway Patrol there were 900 DUI related arrests statewide over the long three day weekend as compared with 923 arrests for the same period last year. Could the flat statistics be a result of the recession?  In other words, [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.bernardbraylaw.com/dui-law/why-were-labor-day-weekend-dui-arrests-down">Why Were Labor Day Weekend 2010 DUI Arrests Down?</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.bernardbraylaw.com">BernardBraylaw.com</a>.</p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Labor Day Weekend 2010 DUI arrests were down across California this year.  According to the California Highway Patrol there were 900 DUI related arrests statewide over the long three day weekend as compared with 923 arrests for the same period last year.</p>
<p>Could the flat statistics be a result of the recession?  In other words, could the decrease in arrests be a reflection of statewide police layoffs and cutbacks?  In Santa Clara County the facts would indicate otherwise.  From Friday August 20, 2010, through Saturday September 4, 2010, DUI patrols and sobriety check points were increased as part of a summer DUI crackdown campaign.  Notwithstanding the added enforcement efforts, there were only 343 driving under the influence arrests compared with 363 arrests for the same period a year ago.</p>
<p> Although the above statistics may reflect a year over year decrease in California DUI related arrests, penalties for a DUI conviction are still potentially quite severe including license suspension, jail time, probation, fines, court fees, alcohol classes, increased insurance premiums, and a criminal record.</p>
<p> If you or a loved one have been arrested for driving under the influence or should you have questions regarding California DUI law please call San Jose DUI Attorney Bernard P. Bray: (408) 292-9700.</p><p>The post <a href="https://www.bernardbraylaw.com/dui-law/why-were-labor-day-weekend-dui-arrests-down">Why Were Labor Day Weekend 2010 DUI Arrests Down?</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.bernardbraylaw.com">BernardBraylaw.com</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.bernardbraylaw.com/dui-law/why-were-labor-day-weekend-dui-arrests-down/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>252</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does The Recession Affect Domestic Violence?</title>
		<link>https://www.bernardbraylaw.com/domestic-violence/does-the-recession-affect-domestic-violence?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=does-the-recession-affect-domestic-violence</link>
					<comments>https://www.bernardbraylaw.com/domestic-violence/does-the-recession-affect-domestic-violence#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[b.bray]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 17:15:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Domestic Violence]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bernardbraylaw.com/?p=283</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>No question about it the recession has caused increased stress, but is it really making people more violent?</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.bernardbraylaw.com/domestic-violence/does-the-recession-affect-domestic-violence">Does The Recession Affect Domestic Violence?</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.bernardbraylaw.com">BernardBraylaw.com</a>.</p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If there is a link between financial stress and domestic violence, than the recession must be affecting domestic violence.  No question about it the recession has caused increased stress, but is it really making people more violent?  In a recent blog post, 4-14-10, I addressed the year over year spike in local domestic violence arrests.  In an earlier blog post, 2-15-10, I suggested a review of how we are utilizing our public resources on domestic violence prevention efforts.  Now I am urging a re-consideration of current policies that slash funding for domestic violence services from state and local government budgets.</p>
<p>Experts have noted for years that oftentimes victims of domestic violence are financially dependant on their abusers, and therefore, locked into the relationship.  The recession has made life much more difficult for this category of victim.  This is so because public funds for domestic violence services and support programs have been drastically cut by strained local governments.  In California the annual budget stalemate in Sacramento does not bode well for state funding of domestic violence services in the coming year.  Last year Governor Schwarzenegger slashed $16.3 million dollars of funds budgeted for domestic violence services, and if this history is to be the guide, the near term future does not look good, for either the budget, and for domestic violence victims.</p>
<p>Domestic violence is a serious social problem with awful consequences for everyone.  Attorney Bernard P. Bray has many years of experience successfully dealing with domestic violence issues, and assisting clients and their families in minimizing the impact of an arrest for a domestic violence related offense.    Should you have questions regarding domestic violence, or should you or a loved one need effective representation because of a domestic violence related arrest please call San Jose Criminal Defense Lawyer Bernard P. Bray at (408) 292-9700.</p><p>The post <a href="https://www.bernardbraylaw.com/domestic-violence/does-the-recession-affect-domestic-violence">Does The Recession Affect Domestic Violence?</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.bernardbraylaw.com">BernardBraylaw.com</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.bernardbraylaw.com/domestic-violence/does-the-recession-affect-domestic-violence/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>262</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Should There Be a Law?</title>
		<link>https://www.bernardbraylaw.com/uncategorized/should-there-be-a-law?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=should-there-be-a-law</link>
					<comments>https://www.bernardbraylaw.com/uncategorized/should-there-be-a-law#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[b.bray]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 18:13:29 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bernardbraylaw.com/?p=280</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Center for Disease Control and Prevention has come out with a well regarded report that estimates, based on 2005 data, that the national cost associated with deaths and injuries from car crashes exceeds $99 billion annually.  Worldwide, traffic accidents are the ninth leading cause of death.  By 2030 car crashes are expected to increase [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.bernardbraylaw.com/uncategorized/should-there-be-a-law">Should There Be a Law?</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.bernardbraylaw.com">BernardBraylaw.com</a>.</p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Center for Disease Control and Prevention has come out with a well regarded report that estimates, based on 2005 data, that the national cost associated with deaths and injuries from car crashes exceeds $99 billion annually.  Worldwide, traffic accidents are the ninth leading cause of death.  By 2030 car crashes are expected to increase in rank to the fifth leading cause of death worldwide.</p>
<p>The above statistics are staggering.  There is a lot that can be done.  Get off that cell phone when driving.  Wear a helmet when riding on a motorcycle.  Don’t drive after drinking alcohol. </p>
<p>The above types of suggestions make a difference.  On December 21, 2007, fast developing Vietnam adopted a mandatory helmet law for motorcyclists, and same had an instantaneous effect.  All major hospitals surveyed noticed an immediate drop in the number of patients admitted for traumatic brain injuries.  In Ho Chi Minh City alone, reports of serious traffic accident injuries fell by 50%. </p>
<p>In California crash causalities have steadily declined since the 1980’s.  Safer cars, cell phone use crackdowns, mandatory seat-belt use laws, mandatory helmet use laws for motorcycle and bike riders, and sobriety checkpoints have all undoubtedly helped , but there is still more that can be done.  Many Judges in California are now requiring that convicted drunk drivers install an ignition interlock device in their cars to prevent them from driving drunk.</p>
<p>If you have questions regarding this blog, California DUI laws, sobriety check points, or should you or a loved have had the misfortune of a DUI arrest, protect yourself to the fullest extent possible, call <a title="San Jose DUI Lawyer" href="http://www.bernardbraylaw.com/drunk_driving.htm">San Jose DUI Lawyer</a> Bernard P. Bray.</p><p>The post <a href="https://www.bernardbraylaw.com/uncategorized/should-there-be-a-law">Should There Be a Law?</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.bernardbraylaw.com">BernardBraylaw.com</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.bernardbraylaw.com/uncategorized/should-there-be-a-law/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>331</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Should California Decriminalize the Use and Possession of Marijuana?</title>
		<link>https://www.bernardbraylaw.com/criminal-law/should-california-decriminalize-the-use-and-possession-of-marijuana?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=should-california-decriminalize-the-use-and-possession-of-marijuana</link>
					<comments>https://www.bernardbraylaw.com/criminal-law/should-california-decriminalize-the-use-and-possession-of-marijuana#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[b.bray]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 22:46:48 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drug Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California Law]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bernardbraylaw.com/?p=272</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Proposition 19 appears to be another step in the right direction.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.bernardbraylaw.com/criminal-law/should-california-decriminalize-the-use-and-possession-of-marijuana">Should California Decriminalize the Use and Possession of Marijuana?</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.bernardbraylaw.com">BernardBraylaw.com</a>.</p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This coming November California voters will be presented with a Proposition that will decriminalize and tax the use and possession of marijuana if enacted.  Proponents, of what is otherwise known as Proposition 19, argue the fact the initiative will generate millions of dollars in tax revenues in support of the measure.  Opponents argue quite forcefully and logically: why would any one support a measure that essentially supports people getting high?</p>
<p>This writer certainly shares the measure’s opponents concerns about recreational drug use and abuse, and opposes same, but as a practicing criminal defense attorney, I also know that there is a terrible disparity in society’s enforcement of its drug laws along racial and ethnic lines.  And, our society has spent billions of dollars, has ruined perhaps an many as millions of lives, and has the highest incarceration rate in the world, because of our so called war on drugs.</p>
<p>Our scheme of drug laws in archaic, doesn’t work, and is to expensive to enforce in our current economic times.  Along with its predecessors, Proposition 215, the 1996 initiative allowing for the medicinal use of marijuana, and Proposition 36, the 2000 initiative allowing an opportunity for first and second time drug possession offenders to be placed in treatment, rather than incarcerated, Proposition 19 appears to be another step in the right direction.</p>
<p>If you or someone you know has been arrested for a drug crime in Santa Clara County, contact the <a title="San Jose DUI Lawyers" href="http://www.bernardbraylaw.com/drunk_driving.htm">San Jose drug lawyers</a> at the Law Offices of Bernard P. Bray.</p><p>The post <a href="https://www.bernardbraylaw.com/criminal-law/should-california-decriminalize-the-use-and-possession-of-marijuana">Should California Decriminalize the Use and Possession of Marijuana?</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.bernardbraylaw.com">BernardBraylaw.com</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.bernardbraylaw.com/criminal-law/should-california-decriminalize-the-use-and-possession-of-marijuana/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>341</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>It Must Be the Economy!</title>
		<link>https://www.bernardbraylaw.com/criminal-law/it-must-be-the-economy?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=it-must-be-the-economy</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[b.bray]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 20:49:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Violence]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bernardbraylaw.com/?p=264</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>As I recently commented, statistics for domestic violence in Santa Clara County for 2009 were staggering.  I was initially taken back by the increase in domestic violence related deaths, and opined that perhaps one reason for the jump was the downturn in the economy.  Statistics also show that the general jump cuts across all socio-economic [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.bernardbraylaw.com/criminal-law/it-must-be-the-economy">It Must Be the Economy!</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.bernardbraylaw.com">BernardBraylaw.com</a>.</p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I recently commented, statistics for domestic violence in Santa Clara County for 2009 were staggering.  I was initially taken back by the increase in domestic violence related deaths, and opined that perhaps one reason for the jump was the downturn in the economy. </p>
<p>Statistics also show that the general jump cuts across all socio-economic lines.  Even in high end Los Gatos &#8211; Monte Sereno there was a year over year, 2008 to 2009, increase in domestic violence related case arrests of 32 percent. </p>
<p>Unquestionably, the economic stress associated with the recession has pushed some families to the economic brink, and the consequences can be sometimes awful.  But any arrest, let alone one for domestic violence, can ruin a life, and even an entire family.  </p>
<p>Domestic violence is a serious social problem with awful consequences for everyone.  Attorney Bernard P. Bray has many years of experience successfully dealing with domestic violence issues, and assisting clients and their families in minimizing the impact of an arrest for a domestic violence related offense.    Should you have questions regarding domestic violence, or should you or a loved one need effective representation because of a domestic violence related arrest please call San Jose Criminal Defense Lawyer Bernard P. Bray at (408) 292-9700.</p><p>The post <a href="https://www.bernardbraylaw.com/criminal-law/it-must-be-the-economy">It Must Be the Economy!</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.bernardbraylaw.com">BernardBraylaw.com</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Blood Alcohol Concentrations of .15% Matter?</title>
		<link>https://www.bernardbraylaw.com/criminal-law/why-blood-alcohol-concentrations-of-15-matter?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=why-blood-alcohol-concentrations-of-15-matter</link>
					<comments>https://www.bernardbraylaw.com/criminal-law/why-blood-alcohol-concentrations-of-15-matter#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[b.bray]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 22:24:18 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DUI Law]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bernardbraylaw.com/?p=255</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Blood alcohol concentrations higher than .15%.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.bernardbraylaw.com/criminal-law/why-blood-alcohol-concentrations-of-15-matter">Why Blood Alcohol Concentrations of .15% Matter?</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.bernardbraylaw.com">BernardBraylaw.com</a>.</p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pursuant to California Vehicle Code section 23578, persons convicted of driving under the influence in California can expect enhanced penalties in sentencing when they admit to having driven with a blood alcohol concentration of .15% or higher.</p>
<p>The reason for this enhancement is justified by statistics.  Most drivers who have consumed alcohol have low blood alcohol concentrations, and few of these drivers are involved in fatal crashes.  On the hand, while only a relatively few number of drivers have blood alcohol concentrations higher than .15%, a much higher proportion of those drivers have fatal crashes.</p>
<p>If you have questions regarding California DUI law, or should you or a loved have had the misfortune of a DUI arrest, protect yourself to the fullest extent possible, call <a title="San Jose DUI Lawyer" href="http://www.bernardbraylaw.com/drunk_driving.htm">San Jose DUI Lawyer</a> Bernard P. Bray.</p><p>The post <a href="https://www.bernardbraylaw.com/criminal-law/why-blood-alcohol-concentrations-of-15-matter">Why Blood Alcohol Concentrations of .15% Matter?</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.bernardbraylaw.com">BernardBraylaw.com</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.bernardbraylaw.com/criminal-law/why-blood-alcohol-concentrations-of-15-matter/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>235</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
