<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>Science News</title>
	
	<link>http://science-news.org</link>
	<description>Read the latest top stories in topics ranging from Health to Technology - We Update often with the most intriguing information - Explore the incredible</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 19:28:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/</creativeCommons:license><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/sciencetech" type="application/rss+xml" /><feedburner:emailServiceId>sciencetech</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname>http://feedburner.google.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://add.my.yahoo.com/rss?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2Fsciencetech" src="http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/my/addtomyyahoo4.gif">Subscribe with My Yahoo!</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.newsgator.com/ngs/subscriber/subext.aspx?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2Fsciencetech" src="http://www.newsgator.com/images/ngsub1.gif">Subscribe with NewsGator</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://feeds.my.aol.com/add.jsp?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2Fsciencetech" src="http://o.aolcdn.com/favorites.my.aol.com/webmaster/ffclient/webroot/locale/en-US/images/myAOLButtonSmall.gif">Subscribe with My AOL</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.bloglines.com/sub/http://feeds.feedburner.com/sciencetech" src="http://www.bloglines.com/images/sub_modern11.gif">Subscribe with Bloglines</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.netvibes.com/subscribe.php?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2Fsciencetech" src="http://www.netvibes.com/img/add2netvibes.gif">Subscribe with Netvibes</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://fusion.google.com/add?feedurl=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2Fsciencetech" src="http://buttons.googlesyndication.com/fusion/add.gif">Subscribe with Google</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.pageflakes.com/subscribe.aspx?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2Fsciencetech" src="http://www.pageflakes.com/ImageFile.ashx?instanceId=Static_4&amp;fileName=ATP_blu_91x17.gif">Subscribe with Pageflakes</feedburner:feedFlare><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" /><item>
		<title>Motor Vehicles and Carbon Emissions - A General Overview</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/sciencetech/~3/H2UxD1bavO0/</link>
		<comments>http://science-news.org/carbon-emissions/motor-vehicles-and-carbon-emissions-a-general-overview/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 01:10:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Monahan</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Emissions]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[gasoline]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[hybrid]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[motor vehicles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://science-news.org/?p=395</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The motor vehicles that operate in the world today account for a significant percentage of carbon emissions released by man. Of course, the U.S. accounts for half of all global warming linked to cars worldwide. In 2004 carbon dioxide emissions from personal vehicles in the United States equaled 314 million metric tons. That&#8217;s a significant [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The motor vehicles that operate in the world today account for a significant percentage of carbon emissions released by man. Of course, the U.S. accounts for half of all global warming linked to cars worldwide. In 2004 carbon dioxide emissions from personal vehicles in the United States equaled 314 million metric tons. That&#8217;s a significant number. The U.S. is responsible for half of all the emissions and pollution from cars in the world!</p>
<p>The are many reasons why our cars and trucks are responsible for a major portion of air pollution. In America we are known for having our big SUV&#8217;s monster trucks, gas guzzling sports cars, etc. We consume an incredible amount of fuel, and up until recently we haven&#8217;t done much to curb our consumption.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-396 aligncenter" title="hybrid" src="http://science-news.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/hybrid.bmp" alt="" width="391" height="170" /></p>
<p>In 2004 U.S. cars and light trucks drove 2.6 trillion miles. Which is the equivalent of 10 MILLION TRIPS from the earth to the moon! The average fuel economy of those cars were 19.6 miles per gallon (now fuel economy has gone up to the low 20s). The gasoline in our cars has about 5.3 pounds of carbon per gallon. Annually we are each responsible for putting 1.5 tons of carbon in the air from the exhaust from the fuel in our cars and trucks.</p>
<p>From our cars and trucks we are raising the temperature of the atmosphere, killing animals, causing cancer, respiratory problems, and a lot more. Thankfully things are starting to turn around (slowly).</p>
<p>Originally a few companies decided to introduce electric cars to a small segment of the market back in the early 90s. These cars had a short run and in total, the numbers of cars sold was tiny. The majority of these cars looked ugly/weak, had no power, cost a ton, and had a horrible driving range. It was argued that the car companies which released electric cars at the time were doing it more for publicity than to actual produce a good product it wished to sell. Car companies knew that oil was still in and the small niche of people who wanted cleaner cars didn&#8217;t represent a major portion of the market of car buyers, by any means. So a few companies put out their electric cars in small numbers (50-100k) ended the electric car models, and that was it.</p>
<p>Not much else happened in terms of advancement as a whole industry for clean cars in the 90s. There were technological improvements of course, but no company saw the &#8220;Green Car&#8221; market as being profitable so they had no reason to produce a car with a high fuel economy.</p>
<p>In The early 2000s things began to change. Oil prices went up through the roof (now oil prices are just unbelievable) and many more average people started realizing just how important it is to curb and reduce emissions, stop pollution, and hopefully save the earth.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s move on to what has changed the market. We are presented with the Toyota Prius. This car has a fuel economy of about 45 miles per gallon, one of the highest fuel economy vehicles you can buy for a standard sedan. This car is a hybrid. It efficiently consumes gasoline and uses electricity generated by the motor to also move the vehicle. This combination of using electricity and gasoline to power a car is a lot more efficient than using gasoline to run a car alone.</p>
<p>There are now many cars on the market that come in Hybrid Models, and Hybrid Exclusive Models. In fact, by Christmas this year Cadillac is releasing a hybrid Escalade SUV. The Escalade is known for complete luxury and horrible fuel economy. The hybrid Escalade will offer about 22 miles per gallon, compared to the 12 - 14 miles per gallon previous model.</p>
<p>Besides personal automobiles, Volvo has begun testing Hybrid Garbage Trucks. These trucks run on Diesel Engines (Which is a lot cleaner than they used to be) and Lithium-ion battery packs. The trucks use electric motors to power them when they accelerate up to 12mph. After that, the diesel motors kick in. These trucks are expected to have 30% less carbon emissions than their non-hybrid equivalents and may be put out in full production if trials go well this year.</p>
<p>Electric cars were also seen as weak too. Technology now offers us Lithium-ion batteries that can store huge amounts of power. Thus, there are specialized companies developing electric cars that were unimaginable just a decade ago.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a company called Tesla Motors based in California, that is designing a sports car called the &#8220;Tesla Roadster&#8221;. This car looks amazing and has the power of a sports car. It can go over 200 miles on a single 3 hours charge, and it can accelerate from 0 to 60mph in about 4 seconds. The car costs an arm and a leg but major advancements from sports cars like these usually find their way into the common consumer marketplace. It&#8217;s also at least 1/4th the price to charge the electric car than to pay the price of gas for an equivalent fuel consuming model.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-397 aligncenter" title="gas" src="http://science-news.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/gas.bmp" alt="" /></p>
<p>We have discussed electric motors, hybrid motor cars and trucks, and now I&#8217;m presenting you with the final design that will increase fuel economy to cars and trucks that should ultimately help reduce emissions put in the atmosphere by a major amount.</p>
<p>Companies (Ford, Toyota, GM to name a few) are developing hybrid electric cars. Which combine all three sources of power to increase the fuel economy of cars to 100-200 miles per gallon / charge. The car works by running on gasoline (smaller fuel tanks as well), it gets charged, and it also stores and uses energy produced from a hybrid drive system. All three systems work together to compliment each other and offer a huge driving range for the vehicle. 1000 Miles Per charge/fill up are what the manufacturers are aiming for. These cars and crossovers will be released in about 2 years and should make their way into trucks in about 6 years.</p>
<p>In conclusion, motor vehicles have been a huge source of pollution for America and the world for the last hundred years. The major car companies and governments are finally starting to see profits and necessity in curbing emission limits and delivering consumers better solutions. Eventually gasoline will be cut out of the equation but for now hybrid and hybrid electric engines will gain traction.</p>
<p style="TEXT-ALIGN: center"> </p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/sciencetech/~4/H2UxD1bavO0" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://science-news.org/carbon-emissions/motor-vehicles-and-carbon-emissions-a-general-overview/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://science-news.org/carbon-emissions/motor-vehicles-and-carbon-emissions-a-general-overview/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Exercise May Help Prevent Uterine Cancer In Heavy Women</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/sciencetech/~3/NfWR_-B8YcM/</link>
		<comments>http://science-news.org/exercise/exercise-may-help-prevent-uterine-cancer-in-heavy-women/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 21:44:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Monahan</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[american cancer society]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[cancer]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[exercise]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[obese]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://science-news.org/?p=393</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Besides the long list of benefits that exercise provides, obese women may benefit even more with a recent finding. Light to moderate physical activity has been shown to lower the risk of cancer to the lining of the uterus in overweight women. The study showed women who were proactive and worked towards a better lifestyle through [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="Post URL"></a>Besides the long list of benefits that exercise provides, obese women may benefit even more with a recent finding. Light to moderate physical activity has been shown to lower the risk of cancer to the lining of the uterus in overweight women. The study showed women who were proactive and worked towards a better lifestyle through more exercise had a lower risk of developing Uterine Cancer than those women who had sedentary behavior.</p>
<p>These findings come from the American Cancer Society&#8217;s prospective Cancer Prevention Study 2 Nutrition Cohort study.</p>
<p style="TEXT-ALIGN: center"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-394" title="cancer" src="http://science-news.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/cancer-220x143.jpg" alt="" width="220" height="143" /><a href="Post URL"></a></p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/sciencetech/~4/NfWR_-B8YcM" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://science-news.org/exercise/exercise-may-help-prevent-uterine-cancer-in-heavy-women/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://science-news.org/exercise/exercise-may-help-prevent-uterine-cancer-in-heavy-women/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Beluga Whale Endangered</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/sciencetech/~3/Kg_rWd98r1k/</link>
		<comments>http://science-news.org/alaska/beluga-whale-endangered/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 21:25:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Monahan</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Alaska]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Beluga]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[NOAA]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[cook inlet]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[whale]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://science-news.org/?p=390</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The federal government placed the Beluga Whales in Alaska under the protection of the Endangered Species Act. Protective measures in place for the last decade have failed to ensure the survival of this species.
Interestingly enough, the findings made by NOAA&#8217;s National Marine Fisheries Service conflict with Sarah Palin&#8217;s reports. Which she has questioned there being [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The federal government placed the Beluga Whales in Alaska under the protection of the Endangered Species Act. Protective measures in place for the last decade have failed to ensure the survival of this species.</p>
<p>Interestingly enough, the findings made by NOAA&#8217;s National Marine Fisheries Service conflict with Sarah Palin&#8217;s reports. Which she has questioned there being true evidence that the Beluga Whale population has been on the decline.</p>
<p>NOAA said the &#8220;Cook Inlet&#8221; which harbors many of these whales, has had a decline of 50 percent in the Beluga population between 1994 and 1998. Unfortunately the population still hasn&#8217;t recovered and conditions have gotten worse.</p>
<p>There are now an estimated 375 Beluga Whales in the Cook Inlet compared with 653 back in 1995.</p>
<p> </p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-392" title="beluga" src="http://science-news.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/beluga.bmp" alt="" /></p>
<p> </p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/sciencetech/~4/Kg_rWd98r1k" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://science-news.org/alaska/beluga-whale-endangered/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://science-news.org/alaska/beluga-whale-endangered/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Ice Age Scene at Ground Zero</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/sciencetech/~3/rBaBnHhmups/</link>
		<comments>http://science-news.org/ice-age/ice-age-scene-at-ground-zero/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 21:51:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Monahan</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[glaciers]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[ground zero]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[ice age]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[world trade center]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://science-news.org/?p=384</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This summer, crews excavating the World Trade Center site for the foundations of the new skyscraper have uncovered features carved into the bedrock by glaciers 20,000 years ago. One of these was a 40 foot deep pothole.
While securing the site for construction workers have unearthed small land formations and potholes created by glaciers. Digging on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This summer, crews excavating the World Trade Center site for the foundations of the new skyscraper have uncovered features carved into the bedrock by glaciers 20,000 years ago. One of these was a 40 foot deep pothole.</p>
<p>While securing the site for construction workers have unearthed small land formations and potholes created by glaciers. Digging on the site has given scientists a rare window into the past.</p>
<p>Of course, the potholes and other formations will be covered, filled, and blasted away to create a strong foundation for the new tower.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"> </p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-306 aligncenter" title="Ice" src="http://science-news.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/ice.bmp" alt="" width="220" height="144" /></p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/sciencetech/~4/rBaBnHhmups" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://science-news.org/ice-age/ice-age-scene-at-ground-zero/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://science-news.org/ice-age/ice-age-scene-at-ground-zero/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Honda Releases Hydrogen Car</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/sciencetech/~3/Sn2qFpgLD2A/</link>
		<comments>http://science-news.org/honda/honda-releases-hydrogen-car/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 21:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Monahan</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[fcx clarity]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[fuel cell]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[honda]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[hydrogen car]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://science-news.org/?p=382</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today Honda has released its hydrogen fuel cell car. Called the Honda &#8220;FCX Clarity&#8221; the car runs on only electricity and hydrogen. It is two times more energy efficient than a gas-electric hybrid car and three times more efficient than a standard gasoline powered car.
The FCX is completely clean and produces no carbon emissions. The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today Honda has released its hydrogen fuel cell car. Called the Honda &#8220;FCX Clarity&#8221; the car runs on only electricity and hydrogen. It is two times more energy efficient than a gas-electric hybrid car and three times more efficient than a standard gasoline powered car.</p>
<p>The FCX is completely clean and produces no carbon emissions. The car only expels water. Japan&#8217;s biggest automaker will lease a &#8220;few dozen&#8221; vehicles this year and expects to up the number to 200 units within three years.</p>
<p>Although Honda received 50,000 applications for the Clarity it only considered applicants who lived near Hydrogen Fueling stations in Torrance, Santa Monica, and Irvine California.</p>
<p>The FCX Clarity weighs 3,600 pounds, can reach speeds up to 100 miles per hour, and has a range of 270 miles.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-381 aligncenter" title="fcx" src="http://science-news.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/fcx.bmp" alt="" /></a></p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/sciencetech/~4/Sn2qFpgLD2A" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://science-news.org/honda/honda-releases-hydrogen-car/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://science-news.org/honda/honda-releases-hydrogen-car/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Smallest Extrasolar Planet Found</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/sciencetech/~3/5IqFqh09eTs/</link>
		<comments>http://science-news.org/nasa/smallest-extrasolar-planet-found/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 22:06:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Monahan</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[MOA-2007-BLG-192Lb]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[NASA]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[extrasolar]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[kepler]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[planet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://science-news.org/?p=379</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The hunt for true &#8220;Earth-like&#8221; planets is heated, with many  participants eagerly searching, hoping to be the first to find  one. We are not there yet, but getting very close.
At the American Astronomical Society (AAS) researcher David  Bennett announced the finding of an extrasolar planet called  MOA-2007-BLG-192Lb. It&#8217;s located 3,000 light-years [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The hunt for true &#8220;Earth-like&#8221; planets is heated, with many  participants eagerly searching, hoping to be the first to find  one. We are not there yet, but getting very close.</p>
<p>At the American Astronomical Society (AAS) researcher David  Bennett announced the finding of an extrasolar planet called  MOA-2007-BLG-192Lb. It&#8217;s located 3,000 light-years away from  Earth and has three times the mass of our planet. The lightest  extrasolar planet discovered weighed in at five-Earth masses and  was discovered in April.</p>
<p>The host planet&#8217;s star is anywhere from 3,000 to 1 million times  fainter than our sun so the planet may be colder than Pluto, but  based upon the findings in this discovery astrophysicists suggest  MOA-2007-BLG-192Lb could have a thick atmosphere that blankets  the planet by trapping in heat. They also go on to theorize this  planet may also be covered with a deep ocean.</p>
<p>Once the Kepler Mission is under way (NASA mission to hunt for  Earth sized planets. Kepler will launch in February 2009) news  like this will occur much more often and bring many exciting  possibilities with it.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-380" title="planet" src="http://science-news.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/planet-220x148.gif" alt="" width="237" height="159" /></p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/sciencetech/~4/5IqFqh09eTs" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://science-news.org/nasa/smallest-extrasolar-planet-found/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://science-news.org/nasa/smallest-extrasolar-planet-found/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Wind Could Produce 20 Percent of US Electricity by 2030</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/sciencetech/~3/fEEuzCL4J4s/</link>
		<comments>http://science-news.org/carbon-emissions/wind-could-produce-20-percent-of-us-electricity-by-2030/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 03:42:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Monahan</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Emissions]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[clean energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[electricity]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[fossil fuels]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[wind power]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://science-news.org/?p=377</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Twenty years from now the United States may be getting 20 percent of its electricity from wind power.
A report released from industry experts and Energy Department Labs stated we can achieve this within the next two decades. Currently 20 percent of the electricity in the United States is generated through nuclear reactors. Combined this would [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twenty years from now the United States may be getting 20 percent of its electricity from wind power.</p>
<p>A report released from industry experts and Energy Department Labs stated we can achieve this within the next two decades. Currently 20 percent of the electricity in the United States is generated through nuclear reactors. Combined this would  greatly reduce our reliance on fossil fuels.</p>
<p>Wind energy also currently accounts for only 1 percent of the USA&#8217;s electricity but there has been a 45 percent leap from the previous year&#8217;s production. Today wind power in the states produces about 16,000 megawatts, estimated forecasts would have  75,000 more wind turbines producing 300,000 megawatts of power by 2030.</p>
<p>Not only would this alleviate our complete dependency on oil but it would reduce carbon emissions by 825 million metric tons  a year. Executive director of the American Wind Energy Association, Randall Swisher, said &#8220;This is the equivalent of taking 140 million cars off the road.&#8221;</p>
<p>This report does not account for other technological advancements that may emerge in wind power or through other forms of clean energy production.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-378" title="wind" src="http://science-news.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/wind.bmp" alt="" width="257" height="171" /></p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/sciencetech/~4/fEEuzCL4J4s" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://science-news.org/carbon-emissions/wind-could-produce-20-percent-of-us-electricity-by-2030/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://science-news.org/carbon-emissions/wind-could-produce-20-percent-of-us-electricity-by-2030/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Artificial Food Coloring Dangers</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/sciencetech/~3/DYEPbyM_KV4/</link>
		<comments>http://science-news.org/artificial-food-coloring/artificial-food-coloring-dangers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 06:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Monahan</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Artificial food coloring]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[coal tar]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[food]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[food coloring]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[food dye]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[petrochemicals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://science-news.org/?p=375</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Artificial food coloring ingredients (food dye) contain plenty of chemicals. Many are derived  from highly toxic sources and can cause many different diseases, disorders, and mutations in humans. Although it seems unlikely that a trivial amount of food coloring in a piece of a  candy you eat (like liquorice) would have any harmful [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Artificial food coloring ingredients (food dye) contain plenty of chemicals. Many are derived  from highly toxic sources and can cause many different diseases, disorders, and mutations in humans. Although it seems unlikely that a trivial amount of food coloring in a piece of a  candy you eat (like liquorice) would have any harmful effect on you, you would be wrong,  because it does.</p>
<p>Artificial colors look great. They make food look vibrant and appealing. The majority of food  colors are made with petroleum. They are a derivative of Petrochemicals and Coal tar. These  chemicals are in no way made to be ingested by humans or any other animal. In fact, food dye  is pulled off of the market regularly because of health concerns. Yellow #2 food dye will likely be the next to go. It&#8217;s be shown to cause ADHD, multiple types  of cancer, male sterility, and many other issues.</p>
<p>Artificial Colors aren&#8217;t just in junk food or sodas. Some salmon farms actually add red food  dye to their salmon to make them appear more appetizing. It works. When looking for fish a  customer always wants the freshest they can buy. A pink/red salmon is much more appealing to  eat than one that&#8217;s gray or just darker.</p>
<p>There have been petitions to ban these chemicals and dyes, but most of them still remain on  the market. It will really take a lot more research and widespread awareness to ban these chemicals from making their way into our food.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-376" title="food" src="http://science-news.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/food-219x203.jpg" alt="" width="219" height="203" /></p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/sciencetech/~4/DYEPbyM_KV4" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://science-news.org/artificial-food-coloring/artificial-food-coloring-dangers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://science-news.org/artificial-food-coloring/artificial-food-coloring-dangers/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Australia’s Koalas Threatened By Global Warming</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/sciencetech/~3/PDy2qjTu_mA/</link>
		<comments>http://science-news.org/global-warming/australias-koalas-threatened-by-global-warming/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 03:25:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Monahan</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[carbon dioxide emissions]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[eucalyptus]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[koalas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://science-news.org/?p=373</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Australia&#8217;s Koalas are being threatened by rising carbon dioxide pollution in the atmosphere.  Their survival is at stake because the Eucalyptus leaves they feed on are losing their  nutrients from the worsening air quality.
In fact, rising carbon dioxide are making the plants become toxic because they start producing  &#8220;anti-nutrients&#8221; which interfere with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Australia&#8217;s Koalas are being threatened by rising carbon dioxide pollution in the atmosphere.  Their survival is at stake because the Eucalyptus leaves they feed on are losing their  nutrients from the worsening air quality.</p>
<p>In fact, rising carbon dioxide are making the plants become toxic because they start producing  &#8220;anti-nutrients&#8221; which interfere with the digestion of regular nutrients. Some species of  Eucalyptus contain a high protein content, but when higher levels of anti-nutrients are  present they bind to them and make digesting protein not possible by the Koalas.</p>
<p>Koala&#8217;s only eat the leaves from about 25 Eucalyptus species out of the 600 species in  Australia. If carbon dioxide emissions continue to be released in the atmosphere at the  current rate then there will be a significant loss in Australia&#8217;s Koala population within 50  years.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-374" title="koala" src="http://science-news.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/koala.bmp" alt="" /></p>
<p style="text-align: center;">
<p style="text-align: center;">
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/sciencetech/~4/PDy2qjTu_mA" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://science-news.org/global-warming/australias-koalas-threatened-by-global-warming/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://science-news.org/global-warming/australias-koalas-threatened-by-global-warming/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Tokyo Shaken By 6.8 Earthquake</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/sciencetech/~3/Du75xSMShk0/</link>
		<comments>http://science-news.org/earthquake/tokyo-shaken-by-68-earthquake/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 23:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Monahan</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Earthquake]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[japan]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[seismologists]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[tokyo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://science-news.org/?p=371</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A magnitude 6.8 earthquake off the coast of Japan hit Tokyo early Wednesday morning.
Seismologists said the epicenter of the quake was 100 miles northeast of Tokyo, and struck at 16:45 GMT. A half an hour later a second quake hit the same area with a magnitude of 5.3.
No injuries have been reported, and power/communication lines [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A magnitude 6.8 earthquake off the coast of Japan hit Tokyo early Wednesday morning.</p>
<p>Seismologists said the epicenter of the quake was 100 miles northeast of Tokyo, and struck at 16:45 GMT. A half an hour later a second quake hit the same area with a magnitude of 5.3.</p>
<p>No injuries have been reported, and power/communication lines are all running normally.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-372" title="earthquake" src="http://science-news.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/earthquake-220x115.jpg" alt="" width="238" height="124" /></p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/sciencetech/~4/Du75xSMShk0" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://science-news.org/earthquake/tokyo-shaken-by-68-earthquake/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://science-news.org/earthquake/tokyo-shaken-by-68-earthquake/</feedburner:origLink></item>
	</channel>
</rss>
