<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <title>Scorched America</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://politics.mediapundit.net/" />
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://politics.mediapundit.net/atom.xml" />
    <id>tag:politics.mediapundit.net,2011-07-24://5</id>
    <updated>2014-01-25T21:11:21Z</updated>
    
    <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.38</generator>
    <rights>Copyright (c) 2007-2014, Paul William Tenny. All Rights Reserved.</rights>
    
    <entry>
        <title type="text">Into the minds of the one percent: attacks on the rich are just like what the Nazi&apos;s did to Jews</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://politics.mediapundit.net/2014/01/into-the-minds-of-the-one-percent-attacks-on-the-rich-are-just-like-what-the-nazis-did-to-jews.html" />
        <id>tag:politics.mediapundit.net,2014://5.1488</id>

        <updated>2014-01-25T20:15:50Z</updated>

				<summary type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://politics.mediapundit.net/">In any other crime other than stealing money and defrauding people of it, many of the one percent would be recognized as dangerous sociopaths.</summary>
        <author>
          <name>Paul William Tenny</name>
          <uri>http://mediapundit.net/pwtenny</uri>
          <email>pwtenny@mediapundit.net</email>
        </author>
        
        
        <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://politics.mediapundit.net/">
          
          <![CDATA[<p><em><a href="http://politics.mediapundit.net/images/Heathhallmain_2385835b.jpg"><img class="mt-image-right" style="float: right; margin: 0 0 20px 20px;" src="http://politics.mediapundit.net/assets_c/2014/01/Heathhallmain_2385835b-thumb-250x156-804.jpg" alt="Heathhallmain_2385835b.jpg" height="156" width="250" /></a><a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/101302230">CNBC</a></em><a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/101302230">, December 30th, 2013</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Pope Francis' critical comments about the wealthy and capitalism have at least one wealthy capitalist benefactor hesitant about giving financial support to one of the church's major fundraising projects.</p>
<p>At issue is an effort to raise $180 million for the restoration of St. Patrick's Cathedral in New York being spearheaded by billionaire Ken Langone, the investor known for founding Home Depot, among other things.</p>
<p><strong>Langone told CNBC that one potential seven-figure donor is concerned about statements from the pope criticizing market economies as "exclusionary," urging the rich to give more to the poor and criticizing a "culture of prosperity" that leads some to become "incapable of feeling compassion for the poor."</strong></p>
</blockquote>
<p><a href="http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/tom-perkins-liberal-war-one-percent-kristallnacht">Venture Capitalist <em>Tom Perkins</em>, January 25, 2014</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Regarding your editorial "<a href="http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702303465004579322773368846510">Censors on Campus</a>" (Jan. 18): Writing from the epicenter of progressive thought, San Francisco, <strong>I would call attention to the parallels of fascist Nazi Germany to its war on its "one percent," namely its Jews, to the progressive war on the American one percent, namely the "rich."</strong> [..]</p>
<p>From the Occupy movement to the demonization of the rich embedded in virtually every word of our local newspaper, the San Francisco Chronicle, I perceive a rising tide of hatred of the successful one percent.</p>
</blockquote>
<p><a href="http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2009/11/09/goldman-chief-says-he-is-just-doing-gods-work/?_php=true&amp;_type=blogs&amp;_r=1"><em>Dealbook</em>, November 9, 2013</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>The chief executive of Goldman Sachs, which has attracted widespread media attention over the size of its staff bonuses, says he believes banks serve a social purpose and are "doing God's work."</p>
<p>"We're very important," Lloyd C. Blankfein said in an interview with The Times of London. "We help companies to grow by helping them to raise capital. Companies that grow create wealth. This, in turn, allows people to have jobs that create more growth and more wealth. [...] It's a virtuous cycle." He said that he understood, however, that people were angry with bankers' actions: "I know I could slit my wrists and people would cheer." <strong>But he is, he told The Times, just a banker "doing God's work."</strong></p>
</blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-09-20/berkshire-s-munger-says-cash-strapped-should-suck-it-in-not-get-bailout.html"><em>Bloomberg</em>, September 20, 2013</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Charles Munger, the billionaire vice chairman of Berkshire Hathaway Inc., defended the U.S. financial-company rescues of 2008 and <strong>told students that people in economic distress should "suck it in and cope."</strong></p>
<p><strong>"You should thank God" for bank bailouts, Munger said</strong> in a discussion at the University of Michigan on Sept. 14, according to a video posted on the Internet. <strong>"Now, if you talk about bailouts for everybody else, there comes a place where if you just start bailing out all the individuals instead of telling them to adapt, the culture dies."</strong></p>
</blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/blogs/taibblog/aig-ceo-robert-benmosche-compares-bonus-criticism-to-lynch-mobs-20130924"><em>Matt Taibbi</em>, September 24, 2013</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>AIG has a lengthy history of producing some of the biggest tools on Wall Street. <strong>Former CEO Maurice "Hank" Greenberg was considered one of the world's preeminent unapologetic narcissists even before he sued the government for providing an insufficiently generous bailout.</strong> Joe Cassano, former chief of AIG's financial products division, was another. First, he arrogantly blew off the accountants who warned him his portfolio of hundreds of billions in uncollateralized bets might destroy the world. Then, after it all went kablooey, he tiptoed back to D.C. (after first being assured of not being prosecuted, mind you) from his lavish four-story townhouse in London just long enough to tell the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission that he had absolutely nothing to be sorry about and they could bite him and his hundreds of millions in earnings if they disagreed.</p>
<p>Now a third AIG executive enters the pantheon of tone-deaf AIG bigwigs: <strong>CEO Robert Benmosche, who just told the Wall Street Journal that the post-crash public outcry over the use of bailout money to pay bonuses to executives in Cassano's Financial Products unit was comparable to - get this - lynchings in the deep south. From reporter Leslie Scism's interview</strong>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>The uproar over bonuses "was intended to stir public anger, to get everybody out there with their pitch forks and their hangman nooses, and all that - sort of like what we did in the Deep South [decades ago]. And I think it was just as bad and just as wrong."</p>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<p>If any of these people had the slightest predilection towards violence, they'd probably be rapists and murderers. Instead, with their primary focus on greed, they've lucked out that their cold hearts and lack of a soul is a perfect fit for one of the last lawless areas in American society: high finance. (The other one, of course, is politics.)</p>
<p>Banksters have something in common with violent sociopaths in that you don't need evidence of wrongdoing to see them for what they truly are, you just have to listen them for five minutes. Like many lunatics, many of these people are proud of what they are and want to defend what they've done, because not only don't they see anything wrong with it, they see it as virtuous.</p>
<p>Is it any wonder that billionaires who share none of the problems facing 99% of world's population would see complaints about their behavior and attitude as persecution and genocide? There's nothing worse to these people than taking away their money, not even ethnic cleansing, apparently. Sitting in a posh office all day dreaming up new scams that haven't been outlawed yet, and paying 14% on a four-billion-per-year fortune is doing "God's work", unless that work entails donating some of those billions to charity to help the poor, in which case they'll take their ball and go home unless the Pope blows smoke up their ass about what great saints they are.</p>
<p>And these morons wonder why people hate them? Amazing.</p>]]>
          
        </content>
    </entry>
    
    <entry>
        <title type="text">The three faces of the Republican Party</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://politics.mediapundit.net/2014/01/the-three-faces-of-the-republican-party.html" />
        <id>tag:politics.mediapundit.net,2014://5.1487</id>

        <updated>2014-01-23T21:45:00Z</updated>

				<summary type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://politics.mediapundit.net/">State of the Union responses are arrogant enough, but the GOP is holding no fewer than three of them this year.</summary>
        <author>
          <name>Paul William Tenny</name>
          <uri>http://mediapundit.net/pwtenny</uri>
          <email>pwtenny@mediapundit.net</email>
        </author>
        
        <category term="randpaul" label="Rand Paul" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" /><category term="stateoftheunion" label="State of the Union" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
        <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://politics.mediapundit.net/">
          
          <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://politics.mediapundit.net/images/Rand-Paul-11.jpg"><img class="mt-image-right" style="float: right; margin: 0 0 20px 20px;" src="http://politics.mediapundit.net/assets_c/2014/01/Rand-Paul-11-thumb-250x156-802.jpg" alt="Rand Paul" height="156" width="250" /></a>The opposition party has been giving a "response" to the State of the Union speech (that they have no foreknowledge of and therefore can't respond to) ever since Republicans began the asinine practice in 1966. It's arrogant, juvenile, and self destructive. Most politicians are damaged by it and yet it's still done every year by both parties.</p>
<p>This year is no exception, and if ever there was plain evidence that the Republican Party is suffering from an identity and policy crisis, this is it. The Republican Party will have no fewer than <em>three responses</em> to the address next week. The official televised response will come from Representative <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cathy_McMorris_Rodgers">Cathy McMorris Rodgers </a>(R-Washington), vice chair of the House Republican Conference.</p>]]>
          <br/><a href="http://politics.mediapundit.net/2014/01/the-three-faces-of-the-republican-party.html">Click to read the rest</a>...
        </content>
    </entry>
    
    <entry>
        <title type="text">Is a general theory of conservatism possible?</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://politics.mediapundit.net/2014/01/is-a-general-theory-of-conservatism-possible.html" />
        <id>tag:politics.mediapundit.net,2014://5.1486</id>

        <updated>2014-01-15T22:29:00Z</updated>

				<summary type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://politics.mediapundit.net/">Paul Krugman, Josh Barro, and Julian Sanchez may be close to forging a general theory of conservatism.</summary>
        <author>
          <name>Paul William Tenny</name>
          <uri>http://mediapundit.net/pwtenny</uri>
          <email>pwtenny@mediapundit.net</email>
        </author>
        
        <category term="gop" label="GOP" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
        <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://politics.mediapundit.net/">
          
          <![CDATA[<p>I'm catching up on Krugman's NYT blog and my mind got stuck <a href="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/12/16/conservative-wonks-conservative-politicians-and-recessions/">on this</a>. It's easy and lazy to <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Ann-Coulter/e/B001H6GJTW">invent personal faults</a> as scapegoats for political policy and ideology that you don't like and don't understand. Building a model that analyzes and predicts that behavior is a little more involved than that.</p>
<p>Krugman, via Josh Barro, notes that Republicans don't seem to have a policy for how to deal with recessions:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>As [Barro] says, GOP policy prescriptions - deregulate, cut spending (especially on the poor), and cut taxes (on the rich) - are the same when unemployment is above 9 percent as when it is below 5.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Conservative policies being driven by doctrine rather than practical concerns explains that easily enough, but is there more to it than that?</p>]]>
          <br/><a href="http://politics.mediapundit.net/2014/01/is-a-general-theory-of-conservatism-possible.html">Click to read the rest</a>...
        </content>
    </entry>
    
    <entry>
        <title type="text">Fox News is raising an entire generation of fools</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://politics.mediapundit.net/2014/01/fox-news-is-raising-an-entire-generation-of-fools.html" />
        <id>tag:politics.mediapundit.net,2014://5.1485</id>

        <updated>2014-01-08T21:05:00Z</updated>

				<summary type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://politics.mediapundit.net/">From denying political reality like polls predicting Obama&apos;s reelection in 2012, to denying science itself, Fox News is making America dumber.</summary>
        <author>
          <name>Paul William Tenny</name>
          <uri>http://mediapundit.net/pwtenny</uri>
          <email>pwtenny@mediapundit.net</email>
        </author>
        
        <category term="evolution" label="Evolution" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" /><category term="foxnews" label="Fox News" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" /><category term="globalwarming" label="Global Warming" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" /><category term="mediacriticism" label="Media Criticism" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
        <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://politics.mediapundit.net/">
          
          <![CDATA[<p>Nobody has died as the result of a foreign terrorist attack in the United States since September 11th, 2001. We spend countless billions of dollars on unending wars in the middle east that routinely slaughter civilians and children in the name of keeping our own butts safe from The Terrorists, money desperately needed to combat a failing education system, a slowly improving health care crisis, and increasing poverty here at home.</p>
<p>There are threats to our society that far exceed what foreign terrorism presents these days and rather than combating these threats, we hide behind the first amendment and the right to dissent (more often the right to be stupid and hateful). I suppose that's a price we pay, and given how things are in other parts of the world, it's a small price indeed. But in the long run, these threats from inside our borders are the ones capable of destroying our society. Terrorists can kill us and that's obviously pretty bad, but they can't take away our constitutional rights, can't make us stupid and weak, can't blind us to threats that could eventually destroy the planet itself.</p>
<p>That's what we have Fox News for.</p>]]>
          <br/><a href="http://politics.mediapundit.net/2014/01/fox-news-is-raising-an-entire-generation-of-fools.html">Click to read the rest</a>...
        </content>
    </entry>
    
    <entry>
        <title type="text">Obama administration contradicts its new spying advisory committee in court</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://politics.mediapundit.net/2013/12/obama-administration-contradicts-its-new-spying-advisory-committee-in-court.html" />
        <id>tag:politics.mediapundit.net,2013://5.1482</id>

        <updated>2013-12-22T00:32:00Z</updated>

				<summary type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://politics.mediapundit.net/">The Obama administration has contradicted its new spy reform advisory committee in court, arguing its controversial programs are both effective and necessary.</summary>
        <author>
          <name>Paul William Tenny</name>
          <uri>http://mediapundit.net/pwtenny</uri>
          <email>pwtenny@mediapundit.net</email>
        </author>
        
        <category term="dni" label="DNI" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" /><category term="jamesclapper" label="James Clapper" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" /><category term="nsa" label="NSA" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" /><category term="spying" label="Spying" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" /><category term="statesecrets" label="State Secrets" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
        <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://politics.mediapundit.net/">
          
          <![CDATA[<div style="float: right; margin: 0 0 20px 20px; width: 252px;"><a href="http://politics.mediapundit.net/images/600x4021-600x350.jpg"><img class="mt-image-right" src="http://politics.mediapundit.net/assets_c/2013/12/600x4021-600x350-thumb-250x145-800.jpg" alt="James Clapper" height="145" width="250" /></a>DNI James Clapper, who has admitted lying to Congress about the NSA.</div>
<p>Charlie Savage and David Sanger have a new story in the Times tonight that perfectly illustrates the truth behind the spin when it comes to domestic spying by the NSA, and President Obama's <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/12/22/us/white-house-tries-to-prevent-judge-from-ruling-on-surveillance-efforts.html?hp&amp;_r=1&amp;">attempts to shield it</a> from judicial review.</p>
<p>Some of this behavior is more laughable than it is upsetting, because it's gotten so absurd:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Mr. Clapper's unclassified affidavit to the court - he also filed a classified version, the documents state - contrasts sharply with the findings of President Obama's advisory committee on signals intelligence, which said in a report made public on Wednesday that the collection of bulk telephone data was of little proven value.</p>
<p>The panel's experts concluded that "there has been no instance in which N.S.A. could say with confidence that the outcome would have been different" in a terror investigation without the collection of the telephone data. "Moreover, now that the existence of the program has been disclosed publicly, we suspect that it is likely to be less useful still."</p>
<p>Mr. Clapper, however, suggested that the program was one of many that needed to continue, and he discussed a litany of threats, mostly emanating from Al Qaeda and its affiliates, that he said made the program vital. He argued that revealing additional details, including whom it targets or how companies like AT&amp;T and Verizon have given the N.S.A. access to its equipment and data, would be harmful.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>It's one thing to bullshit the public about the usefulness of controversial government programs, where officials can't be questioned at length under oath and be forced to provide evidence of their claims. It's quite another matter to bullshit a (real) federal court.</p>]]>
          <br/><a href="http://politics.mediapundit.net/2013/12/obama-administration-contradicts-its-new-spying-advisory-committee-in-court.html">Click to read the rest</a>...
        </content>
    </entry>
    
    <entry>
        <title type="text">Forget 2016, union bashing Walker may not survive 2014.</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://politics.mediapundit.net/2013/12/gov-scott-walker-in-trouble-for-2014-little-chance-at-2016.html" />
        <id>tag:politics.mediapundit.net,2013://5.1480</id>

        <updated>2013-12-17T20:13:18Z</updated>

				<summary type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://politics.mediapundit.net/">Trailing Iowa polls, book falling flat, Wisconsin&apos;s Republican governor might not even make it to see 2016.</summary>
        <author>
          <name>Paul William Tenny</name>
          <uri>http://mediapundit.net/pwtenny</uri>
          <email>pwtenny@mediapundit.net</email>
        </author>
        
        <category term="2014election" label="2014 Election" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" /><category term="2016election" label="2016 Election" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" /><category term="elections" label="Elections" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" /><category term="polls" label="Polls" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" /><category term="scottwalker" label="Scott Walker" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
        <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://politics.mediapundit.net/">
          
          <![CDATA[<div style="float: right; margin: 0 0 20px 20px; width: 252px;"><a href="http://politics.mediapundit.net/images/wisconsin-protests.jpg"><img class="mt-image-right" src="http://politics.mediapundit.net/assets_c/2013/12/wisconsin-protests-thumb-250x158-798.jpg" alt="Walker Protests" height="158" width="250" /></a>Voters protest the controversial policies of Republican Governor Scott Walker in 2011.</div>
<p>I get the feeling today that the conservative pundit class is coalescing around Scott Walker for 2016. Some of it is his book tour, but there's more to it than that. Walker has political victories that Paul Ryan and Chris Christie don't, putting a government boot on the throat of the middle class and his own employees, but isn't seen as either too conservative or too moderate.</p>
<p>If there's anything the pundits love, it's squeezing the middle class to protect government spending and policies to make life easier for the wealthy and corporations.</p>
<p>Real accomplishments are few and far between. Walker's record on job creation is predictably awful, with Wisconsin <a href="http://www.politifact.com/wisconsin/statements/2012/dec/16/scott-walker/gov-scott-walker-says-wisconsin-has-created-almost/">being the last in the nation</a> in 2011 and probably 2012 as well. That shouldn't be surprising from a party that still believes the fantasy that government can't create jobs.</p>]]>
          <br/><a href="http://politics.mediapundit.net/2013/12/gov-scott-walker-in-trouble-for-2014-little-chance-at-2016.html">Click to read the rest</a>...
        </content>
    </entry>
    
    <entry>
        <title type="text">Reminder 532,919,442: Republicans invented Obamacare.</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://politics.mediapundit.net/2013/12/reminder-532919442-republicans-invented-obamacare.html" />
        <id>tag:politics.mediapundit.net,2013://5.1479</id>

        <updated>2013-12-12T21:09:00Z</updated>

				<summary type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://politics.mediapundit.net/">Everything from the mandate to buy insurance to the health care exchanges have been Republican ideas for decades.</summary>
        <author>
          <name>Paul William Tenny</name>
          <uri>http://mediapundit.net/pwtenny</uri>
          <email>pwtenny@mediapundit.net</email>
        </author>
        
        <category term="gop" label="GOP" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" /><category term="healthcare" label="Health Care" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" /><category term="ppaca" label="PPACA" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" /><category term="singlepayer" label="Single Payer" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
        <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://politics.mediapundit.net/">
          
          <![CDATA[<p>Stories <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2013/12/12/obamacare-exposes-republican-hypocrisy-on-health-care/">like this one</a> from Ezra Klein today reminding everyone that Obamacare is made up mostly of Republican/conservative ideas, and not just old ones either, are the kind that need to be spread far and wide. Americans deserve to know the truth about what their government does, good and bad, so they can know who to rightly blame:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>This, too, is a success for a longtime conservative health-policy idea.  Insurance exchanges have been in every major Republican health-care bill  since the early 1990s. <strong>They were in Paul Ryan's 2009 health-care  proposal</strong>. They're the basis of the GOP's plan for Medicare reform.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I have a small soap box so people mostly don't see it, but I've been saying for years that <em>most</em> GOP criticism of Obamacare is insultingly stupid.</p>
<p>What Republicans want to do to Medicare is what Democrats just did with private insurance -- give you "vouchers" or "subsidies" to go buy insurance on the private market. It's the basis of Medicare Advantage, a program that ended up spending more than Medicare does and is generally considered a failure from what I understand.</p>
<p>If it really is a <em>Democrats like it/Republicans hate it</em> paradigm, then Republicans need to be made to understand that they are hating their own ideas:</p>]]>
          <br/><a href="http://politics.mediapundit.net/2013/12/reminder-532919442-republicans-invented-obamacare.html">Click to read the rest</a>...
        </content>
    </entry>
    
    <entry>
        <title type="text">Who would benefit if America were more democratic?</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://politics.mediapundit.net/2013/11/who-would-benefit-if-america-were-more-democratic.html" />
        <id>tag:politics.mediapundit.net,2013://5.1477</id>

        <updated>2013-11-23T21:33:00Z</updated>

				<summary type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://politics.mediapundit.net/">A more democratic America where voters have a stronger voice would be devastating for the GOP.</summary>
        <author>
          <name>Paul William Tenny</name>
          <uri>http://mediapundit.net/pwtenny</uri>
          <email>pwtenny@mediapundit.net</email>
        </author>
        
        
        <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://politics.mediapundit.net/">
          
          <![CDATA[<p>A conservative commenter on my previous post <a href="http://pwtenny.newsvine.com/_news/2013/11/21/21564676-dont-blame-radical-right-senators-for-nuclear-option-blame-moderate-gopers-who-over-and-over-again-voted-to-filibuster?lite#th3872818-c80595835">wrote that</a> he's glad that America isn't a democracy (assuming a democracy is a form of government or civil society where the majority truly rules).</p>
<p>He should be.</p>
<p>If this country were a true democracy, we'd have a sweeping wave of new gun regulations including limits on the number of bullets that a magazine can hold and universal background checks, the latter of which has the support of 90% of the citiznry yet was blocked by Republicans in the Senate.</p>
<p>Same-sex marriage would be legal across the nation and we'd be spending more money on education and less on defense. Obamacare would be expanded, taxes on the wealthy increased, defense spending cut, the minimum wage increased, social safety net programs like Social Security would be forever protected from benefit cuts and program-ending privatization, and we'd see new spending on a jobs bill.</p>
<p>Polls consistently show majority public support for all of that.</p>]]>
          <br/><a href="http://politics.mediapundit.net/2013/11/who-would-benefit-if-america-were-more-democratic.html">Click to read the rest</a>...
        </content>
    </entry>
    
    <entry>
        <title type="text">&quot;Don&apos;t blame radical right Senators for nuclear option. Blame moderate GOPers, who, over and over again, voted to filibuster.&quot;</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://politics.mediapundit.net/2013/11/dont-blame-radical-right-senators-for-nuclear-option-blame-moderate-gopers-who-over-and-over-again-v.html" />
        <id>tag:politics.mediapundit.net,2013://5.1476</id>

        <updated>2013-11-21T19:08:00Z</updated>

				<summary type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://politics.mediapundit.net/">This is the price that Republicans pay for adopting the governing philosophy of George W. Bush, treating any amount of compromise as total surrender. What Republicans don&apos;t understand is that compromise in politics isn&apos;t about winning, it&apos;s about not losing *big*.</summary>
        <author>
          <name>Paul William Tenny</name>
          <uri>http://mediapundit.net/pwtenny</uri>
          <email>pwtenny@mediapundit.net</email>
        </author>
        
        <category term="filibuster" label="Filibuster" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" /><category term="gop" label="GOP" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" /><category term="senate" label="Senate" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
        <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://politics.mediapundit.net/">
          
          <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://politics.mediapundit.net/images/harryreid.jpg"><img class="mt-image-right" style="float: right; margin: 0 0 20px 20px;" src="http://politics.mediapundit.net/assets_c/2013/11/harryreid-thumb-250x241-796.jpg" alt="Harry Reid" height="241" width="250" /></a>I should be working instead of doing this, but I want to expand just a little bit on what I said on Twitter this afternoon.</p>
<p>There's nothing "nuclear" about what Democrats just did in the Senate, revising the rules in the middle of a session on a majority vote which the rules wouldn't normally allow. The argument for this change is that Senate rules are superseded by the Constitution, which says that votes in the Senate are subject to a simple majority.</p>
<p>That's why everyone agrees that it only takes 51 votes to set the rules at the beginning of a new session of Congress. Nobody argues otherwise. If the Constitution dictates that it only takes 51 votes to set the rules -- regardless of when -- then no rule <em>or federal law</em> can change that.</p>
<p>Similarly, that line of thought would make the filibuster rule itself unconstitutional anyway.</p>
<p>What today's action does is return the Senate to the way it was envisioned to function by the founders and the way it is supposed to function according to the Constitution. That was a good start, but the work isn't done. There are other ways to keep extremist judges off the bench, the best of them is probably to eliminate lifetime appointments.</p>]]>
          <br/><a href="http://politics.mediapundit.net/2013/11/dont-blame-radical-right-senators-for-nuclear-option-blame-moderate-gopers-who-over-and-over-again-v.html">Click to read the rest</a>...
        </content>
    </entry>
    
    <entry>
        <title type="text">CBS News apologizes for misleading Benghazi story; book publisher yanks book at center of controversy</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://politics.mediapundit.net/2013/11/cbs-news-apologizes-for-misleading-benghazi-story-book-publisher-yanks-book-at-center-of-controversy.html" />
        <id>tag:politics.mediapundit.net,2013://5.1475</id>

        <updated>2013-11-09T01:29:00Z</updated>

				<summary type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://politics.mediapundit.net/">CBS News is now denouncing its own story about Benghazi as false and misleading while its fading-star witness has his book yanked by his publisher.</summary>
        <author>
          <name>Paul William Tenny</name>
          <uri>http://mediapundit.net/pwtenny</uri>
          <email>pwtenny@mediapundit.net</email>
        </author>
        
        <category term="60minutes" label="60 Minutes" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" /><category term="benghazi" label="Benghazi" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" /><category term="dylandavies" label="Dylan Davies" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" /><category term="mediacriticism" label="Media Criticism" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
        <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://politics.mediapundit.net/">
          
          <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://politics.mediapundit.net/images/Benghazi_Main_640x480.jpg"><img class="mt-image-right" style="float: right; margin: 0 0 20px 20px;" src="http://politics.mediapundit.net/assets_c/2013/11/Benghazi_Main_640x480-thumb-250x187-794.jpg" alt="Benghazi" height="187" width="250" /></a>Simon &amp; Schuster imprint Threshold Editions is <a href="http://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/publisher-suspends-discredited-benghazi-book-written-by-cbs-source">yanking the book</a> at the center of the CBS News/'60 Minutes' Benghazi scandal, after <a href="http://www.mediaite.com/tv/cbs-60-minutes-lara-logan-apologizes-for-erroneous-benghazi-survivor-report-we-were-wrong/">CBS apologized</a> for publishing falsehoods.</p>
<p>It's good to finally see some accountability in the media for misleading the public about important issues, but this isn't enough. The real scandal involving Benghazi has been the circus that Republicans have put on in the House of Representatives wasting time on frivolous investigative hearings. More money and time has been spent by the GOP trying put more of the blame for the attacks on the Obama administration than the terrorists who committed it.</p>]]>
          <br/><a href="http://politics.mediapundit.net/2013/11/cbs-news-apologizes-for-misleading-benghazi-story-book-publisher-yanks-book-at-center-of-controversy.html">Click to read the rest</a>...
        </content>
    </entry>
    
    <entry>
        <title type="text">&apos;60 Minutes&apos; Benghazi report completely implodes</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://politics.mediapundit.net/2013/11/60-minutes-benghazi-report-completely-implodes.html" />
        <id>tag:politics.mediapundit.net,2013://5.1474</id>

        <updated>2013-11-08T02:52:00Z</updated>

				<summary type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://politics.mediapundit.net/">The &quot;explosive&quot; &apos;60 Minutes&apos; special on Benghazi has blown up in its face as its star witness is revealed as a huckster spinning lies to sell a book.</summary>
        <author>
          <name>Paul William Tenny</name>
          <uri>http://mediapundit.net/pwtenny</uri>
          <email>pwtenny@mediapundit.net</email>
        </author>
        
        <category term="60minutes" label="60 Minutes" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" /><category term="benghazi" label="Benghazi" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" /><category term="cbsnews" label="CBS News" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" /><category term="dylandavies" label="Dylan Davies" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" /><category term="mediacriticism" label="Media Criticism" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
        <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://politics.mediapundit.net/">
          
          <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://politics.mediapundit.net/images/dylan-davies.jpg"><img class="mt-image-right" style="float: right; margin: 0 0 20px 20px;" src="http://politics.mediapundit.net/assets_c/2013/11/dylan-davies-thumb-250x138-792.jpg" alt="Dylan Davies" height="138" width="250" /></a>CBS News <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-18560_162-57611428/60-minutes-reviewing-account-of-morgan-jones-on-benghazi/?tag=socsh">issued a statement</a> a little over an hour ago announcing that they were reviewing their "60 Minutes" report on the attack against the United States Special Mission in Benghazi last year.</p>
<p>The statement ran just 52 words:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>60 Minutes has learned of new information that undercuts the account told to us by Morgan Jones of his actions on the night of the attack on the Benghazi compound.</p>
<p>We are currently looking into this serious matter to determine if he misled us, and if so, we will make a correction.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>CBS News is in panic mode right now. All video and clips from the special have been pulled offline.</p>]]>
          <br/><a href="http://politics.mediapundit.net/2013/11/60-minutes-benghazi-report-completely-implodes.html">Click to read the rest</a>...
        </content>
    </entry>
    
    <entry>
        <title type="text">Rand Paul&apos;s big problem</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://politics.mediapundit.net/2013/11/another-day-and-another-example.html" />
        <id>tag:politics.mediapundit.net,2013://5.1473</id>

        <updated>2013-11-08T01:40:00Z</updated>

				<summary type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://politics.mediapundit.net/">2016 hopeful Rand Paul&apos;s little plagiarism problem isn&apos;t so little anymore, it&apos;s a sign of intellectual bankruptcy from a man who wants to run it all.</summary>
        <author>
          <name>Paul William Tenny</name>
          <uri>http://mediapundit.net/pwtenny</uri>
          <email>pwtenny@mediapundit.net</email>
        </author>
        
        <category term="randpaul" label="Rand Paul" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
        <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://politics.mediapundit.net/">
          
          <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://politics.mediapundit.net/images/6a00d8341c630a53ef015432452585970c-600wi.jpg"><img class="mt-image-right" style="float: right; margin: 0 0 20px 20px;" src="http://politics.mediapundit.net/assets_c/2013/11/6a00d8341c630a53ef015432452585970c-600wi-thumb-250x166-790.jpg" alt="Rand Paul" height="166" width="250" /></a>Another day and <a href="http://www.buzzfeed.com/andrewkaczynski/more-instances-of-plagiarism-in-rand-pauls-book-lets-duel">another example</a> of Rand Paul stealing work from other people for profit. Doing it in political speeches and even newspaper op-eds is one thing, that's the plagiarism part. But doing it in a for-profit book changes the offense to copyright infringement and demonstrates a clear lack of respect for the intellectual property rights of other people.</p>
<p>It puts to rest any notion that Rand Paul can be taken seriously when repeating the cute little stories that Republicans love to tell during campaigns about how people should pull themselves up by their own bootstraps and be self-reliant instead of relying on government to help them.</p>
<p>Remember how Mitt Romney's solution for young adults who can't afford to go to college is to magically have a brand new set of rich parents to pay for it on their behalf? I guess Rand Paul's version of that is if you can't be troubled to do research of your own, just take it.</p>]]>
          <br/><a href="http://politics.mediapundit.net/2013/11/another-day-and-another-example.html">Click to read the rest</a>...
        </content>
    </entry>
    
    <entry>
        <title type="text">When getting kicked in the balls counts as a win</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://politics.mediapundit.net/2013/11/when-getting-kicked-in-the-balls-counts-as-a-win.html" />
        <id>tag:politics.mediapundit.net,2013://5.1472</id>

        <updated>2013-11-05T05:18:00Z</updated>

				<summary type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://politics.mediapundit.net/">Some still believe that message crafting, rather than platform extremism, is the GOP&apos;s primary obstacle to winning elections, despite all evidence to the contrary.</summary>
        <author>
          <name>Paul William Tenny</name>
          <uri>http://mediapundit.net/pwtenny</uri>
          <email>pwtenny@mediapundit.net</email>
        </author>
        
        <category term="2013elections" label="2013 Elections" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" /><category term="elections" label="Elections" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" /><category term="kencuccinelli" label="Ken Cuccinelli" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" /><category term="vagov" label="VA-GOV" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
        <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://politics.mediapundit.net/">
          
          <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://politics.mediapundit.net/images/130801_JURIS_KenCuccinelli.jpg.CROP.original-original.jpg"><img class="mt-image-right" style="float: right; margin: 0 0 20px 20px;" src="http://politics.mediapundit.net/assets_c/2013/11/130801_JURIS_KenCuccinelli.jpg.CROP.original-original-thumb-250x166-788.jpg" alt="Ken Cuccinelli" height="166" width="250" /></a>Who <a title="Virginia blame game begins" href="http://www.politico.com/story/2013/11/virginia-gubernatorial-election-2013-republican-ken-cuccinelli-99249.html?ml=po_r">does this</a> remind you of?</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Republican Governors Association executive director Phil Cox, whose group has spent nearly $8 million boosting Cuccinelli, firmly rejected the idea that the Virginia race reflected any limitations of conservative ideas. But he allowed that there may be lessons to learn about how you go about delivering a conservative message.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Cox sounds like nearly every Republican in America I heard speak the day after the 2012 election. What people like Cox don't understand is that there's a difference between accepting the limits of ideology, and surrendering on everything you believe in and completely caving to the opposition.</p>]]>
          <br/><a href="http://politics.mediapundit.net/2013/11/when-getting-kicked-in-the-balls-counts-as-a-win.html">Click to read the rest</a>...
        </content>
    </entry>
    
    <entry>
        <title type="text">Poll details continue to show most Americans support Obamacare</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://politics.mediapundit.net/2013/11/poll-details-continue-to-show-most-americans-support-obamacare.html" />
        <id>tag:politics.mediapundit.net,2013://5.1471</id>

        <updated>2013-11-01T20:37:00Z</updated>

				<summary type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://politics.mediapundit.net/">Detailed polls continue to show that most Americans support Obamacare as it is or want it expanded, not repealed or replaced.</summary>
        <author>
          <name>Paul William Tenny</name>
          <uri>http://mediapundit.net/pwtenny</uri>
          <email>pwtenny@mediapundit.net</email>
        </author>
        
        <category term="healthcare" label="Health Care" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" /><category term="polls" label="Polls" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" /><category term="ppaca" label="PPACA" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
        <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://politics.mediapundit.net/">
          
          <![CDATA[<p>Detailed non-entertainment  polls continue to show the same results as they have every year since 2010, that most Americans actually support the Affordable Care Act if you dig down further than simplistic support/oppose questions.</p>
<p>If you only ask the topline question, you'll keep finding the same thing: most people "oppose" the ACA. But if you ask <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/heres-why-republicans-have-no-alternative-to-obamacare-2013-11">what people want done</a> with it, most want it either left alone (25%), or expanded (22%). The repeal and replace (13%) crowd is small, probably because the Republican Party hasn't said what they would replace the ACA with. Only 24% want it repealed with no replacement.</p>
<p>Even 18% of Republicans want Obamacare left alone or expanded, more than the 11% of Democrats that want it repealed and/or replaced (the latter with single payer, which could easily fall under "expand").</p>
<p>Add it up: 47% want the law left alone or expanded, 37% want it gone and/or replaced. Obamacare is not a train wreck or a disaster and it's a law that most Americans favor.</p>
<p>There's lots to be said about what's going on, what we should take away from all of this, and then what should be done about it. Republicans are hammering the exchange roll out failure but they're essentially shooting at themselves.</p>]]>
          <br/><a href="http://politics.mediapundit.net/2013/11/poll-details-continue-to-show-most-americans-support-obamacare.html">Click to read the rest</a>...
        </content>
    </entry>
    
    <entry>
        <title type="text">GOP fiscal policy is the real disaster</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://politics.mediapundit.net/2013/10/gop-fiscal-policy-is-the-real-disaster.html" />
        <id>tag:politics.mediapundit.net,2013://5.1470</id>

        <updated>2013-10-24T17:40:00Z</updated>

				<summary type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://politics.mediapundit.net/">Obamacare is not a disaster, GOP fiscal policy is.</summary>
        <author>
          <name>Paul William Tenny</name>
          <uri>http://mediapundit.net/pwtenny</uri>
          <email>pwtenny@mediapundit.net</email>
        </author>
        
        <category term="fiscalpolicy" label="Fiscal Policy" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" /><category term="fiscalresponsibility" label="Fiscal Responsibility" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" /><category term="gop" label="GOP" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" /><category term="ppaca" label="PPACA" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
        <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://politics.mediapundit.net/">
          
          <![CDATA[<div style="float: right; margin: 0 0 20px 20px; width: 320px;"><a href="http://politics.mediapundit.net/images/10-10-12bud_rev2-28-13-f1.jpg"><img src="http://politics.mediapundit.net/assets_c/2013/10/10-10-12bud_rev2-28-13-f1-thumb-300x348-786.jpg" alt="CPBB deficit drivers" height="348" width="300" /></a>Bush administration policies and the Lesser Depression account for virtually all of recent, current, and future deficits.</div>
<p>The media's need to treat every story as an epic disaster to boost ratings and corporate profits is a two-fold failure. It hides the true scale and damage of real disasters by mixing them with minor problems the same way that Wall Street hid the danger of sub-prime mortgages by bundling them with good ones, and it overstates the impact of small problems even when those problems are predictable and can be fixed relatively easily.</p>
<p>The Affordable Care Act (Obamacare or ACA) is not a disaster. Anyone who pays attention to the private sector knows how common ineptitude is. Lehman Brothers and Bear Stern didn't implode because of the government, they failed because the supposed best minds in finance calculated risk poorly, or were people who worked their way into positions of great power when they didn't even care. Worldcom didn't go under because of harsh telecommunication regulations, or Enron because of oppressive energy regulations. Instead, they both perpetrated great accounting frauds and market manipulation after significant deregulation allowed them to operate in the dark.</p>
<p>Asking a dozen or more private companies to create interconnected Internet-scale websites was unreasonable and begging for failure from the very beginning.</p>]]>
          <br/><a href="http://politics.mediapundit.net/2013/10/gop-fiscal-policy-is-the-real-disaster.html">Click to read the rest</a>...
        </content>
    </entry>
    
    <entry>
        <title type="text">Fox News gets into the propaganda business</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://politics.mediapundit.net/2013/10/fox-news-gets-into-the-propaganda-business.html" />
        <id>tag:politics.mediapundit.net,2013://5.1469</id>

        <updated>2013-10-18T20:01:00Z</updated>

				<summary type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://politics.mediapundit.net/">Eric Stern of Salon fact-checks three people who called Sean Hannity to complain about Obamacare, hilarity ensues.</summary>
        <author>
          <name>Paul William Tenny</name>
          <uri>http://mediapundit.net/pwtenny</uri>
          <email>pwtenny@mediapundit.net</email>
        </author>
        
        <category term="foxnews" label="Fox News" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" /><category term="mediacriticism" label="Media Criticism" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" /><category term="ppaca" label="PPACA" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" /><category term="seanhannity" label="Sean Hannity" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
        <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://politics.mediapundit.net/">
          
          <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://politics.mediapundit.net/images/sean-hannity-immigration-illegal-immigrants-fox-news-sad-hill-news.jpg"><img class="mt-image-right" style="float: right; margin: 0 0 20px 20px;" src="http://politics.mediapundit.net/assets_c/2013/10/sean-hannity-immigration-illegal-immigrants-fox-news-sad-hill-news-thumb-250x187-784.jpg" alt="Sean Hannity." height="187" width="250" /></a>Eric Stern knows a lot about the Affordable Care Act and couldn't believe what he heard from callers complaining about it on Sean Hannity's show last Friday, so he <a style="color:blue;" href="http://www.salon.com/2013/10/18/inside_the_fox_news_lie_machine_i_fact_checked_sean_hannity_on_obamacare/">tracked them down</a> and interviewed them for a story on his Salon column that went live today.</p>
<p>I expected some shenanigans, given how biased Fox News is. This is the network that acted as the official PR wing of the Tea Party in 2010, with Hannity himself speaking at events as an advocate and member.</p>
<p>What I didn't expect was to find the country's most watched "news" channel perpetrating a fraud on the American people.</p>]]>
          <br/><a href="http://politics.mediapundit.net/2013/10/fox-news-gets-into-the-propaganda-business.html">Click to read the rest</a>...
        </content>
    </entry>
    
    <entry>
        <title type="text">What&apos;s in the deal that ends the shutdown tonight</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://politics.mediapundit.net/2013/10/whats-in-the-deal-that-ends-the-shutdown-tonight.html" />
        <id>tag:politics.mediapundit.net,2013://5.1468</id>

        <updated>2013-10-16T20:15:00Z</updated>

				<summary type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://politics.mediapundit.net/">The GOP shutdown will end sometime tonight or early Thursday morning. It&apos;s over, and here&apos;s what&apos;s in the deal that ended it.</summary>
        <author>
          <name>Paul William Tenny</name>
          <uri>http://mediapundit.net/pwtenny</uri>
          <email>pwtenny@mediapundit.net</email>
        </author>
        
        <category term="houseofrepresentatives" label="House of Representatives" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" /><category term="johnboehner" label="John Boehner" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" /><category term="medicare" label="Medicare" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" /><category term="ppaca" label="PPACA" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" /><category term="senate" label="Senate" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" /><category term="shutdown" label="Shutdown" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" /><category term="socialsecurity" label="Social Security" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" /><category term="tedcruz" label="Ted Cruz" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
        <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://politics.mediapundit.net/">
          
          <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://politics.mediapundit.net/images/110519_john_boehner_sad_westcott_328.jpg"><img class="mt-image-right" style="float: right; margin: 0 0 20px 20px;" src="http://politics.mediapundit.net/assets_c/2013/10/110519_john_boehner_sad_westcott_328-thumb-250x135-782.jpg" alt="John Boehner" height="135" width="250" /></a>I'm going to sort of synthesize the news I'm catching up on this afternoon. Here are the big points:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>1.</strong> The House will vote on the Reid-McConnell deal at 11pm, and the Senate will take it up after. Nobody will say it, but we'll definitely be in default by the time President Obama signs the deal, if you stick to the Obama administration timeline.</p>]]>
          <br/><a href="http://politics.mediapundit.net/2013/10/whats-in-the-deal-that-ends-the-shutdown-tonight.html">Click to read the rest</a>...
        </content>
    </entry>
    
    <entry>
        <title type="text">GOP source: It&apos;s over, Boehner will give in tomorrow (15th)</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://politics.mediapundit.net/2013/10/gop-source-its-over-boehner-will-give-in-tomorrow-15th.html" />
        <id>tag:politics.mediapundit.net,2013://5.1467</id>

        <updated>2013-10-16T00:22:30Z</updated>

				<summary type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://politics.mediapundit.net/">Sources say that John Boehner is preparing to cave tomorrow on the government shutdown and default crisis.</summary>
        <author>
          <name>Paul William Tenny</name>
          <uri>http://mediapundit.net/pwtenny</uri>
          <email>pwtenny@mediapundit.net</email>
        </author>
        
        <category term="debtlimit" label="Debt Limit" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" /><category term="houseofrepresentatives" label="House of Representatives" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" /><category term="johnboehner" label="John Boehner" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" /><category term="shutdown" label="Shutdown" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" /><category term="teaparty" label="Tea Party" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
        <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://politics.mediapundit.net/">
          
          <![CDATA[<p>Robert  Costa is the most GOP-wired reporter on the hill. There's no point in  giving examples, just accept what I'm saying and then listen to what  he's reporting tonight:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><strong>7:40p</strong> Member texts from Cap Hill Club basement, tells me the whole R scene is "depressing... everyone needs a drink after today"</p>
<p><strong>7:45p</strong> "Boss heard Boehner will bring [Senate deal] to the floor... House action probably over." --House GOP aide, via e-mail.</p>
<p><strong>7:51p</strong> per sources, options for the House GOP are limited: accept what Reid-McConnell broker, or at last minute try for a short DL ext</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I  think it was always going to end this way. The House isn't like the  Senate, the Speaker can bring anything he wants to the floor for a vote  and nobody can stop it. If John Boehner had brought the clean Senate CR  to the floor on Sept 30, it would have passed with more than 300 votes  -- all Democrats and some Republicans voting for it and no government  shut down.</p>
<p>That appears to be what's going to happen tomorrow.</p>]]>
          <br/><a href="http://politics.mediapundit.net/2013/10/gop-source-its-over-boehner-will-give-in-tomorrow-15th.html">Click to read the rest</a>...
        </content>
    </entry>
    
    <entry>
        <title type="text">Fiscal conservatism, fiscal sham.</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://politics.mediapundit.net/2013/10/fiscal-conservatism-fiscal-sham.html" />
        <id>tag:politics.mediapundit.net,2013://5.1466</id>

        <updated>2013-10-15T22:44:00Z</updated>

				<summary type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://politics.mediapundit.net/">Various notes: Evidence that Republicans only care about fiscal conservatism when Democrats are in the White House, social safety net hypocrisy, the price our economy has paid for the GOP winning the House of Representatives in 2010.</summary>
        <author>
          <name>Paul William Tenny</name>
          <uri>http://mediapundit.net/pwtenny</uri>
          <email>pwtenny@mediapundit.net</email>
        </author>
        
        <category term="economics" label="Economics" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" /><category term="gop" label="GOP" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" /><category term="medicare" label="Medicare" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" /><category term="ppaca" label="PPACA" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" /><category term="socialsecurity" label="Social Security" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" /><category term="taxes" label="Taxes" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
        <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://politics.mediapundit.net/">
          
          <![CDATA[<p>Lots of things to say, but too late in the day to edit and post any of it.</p>
<p>There's a <a href="http://mischiefsoffaction.blogspot.com/2013/10/fiscal-conservatism-is-for-losers.html">great post here</a> that I haven't dug into yet that graphs mentions of terms like "balanced budget" from National Review Online over the past three administrations. I disagree that it's a good measurement about what Republicans care about, especially since NRO is a policy-driven pundit site and not representative of what members of Congress are thinking, much less conservative voters.</p>
<p>But it's still hilarious. At the very least, NRO writers don't give a shit about balanced budgets or cutting spending when a Republican is in the White House, but can't shut up about either when a Democrat is in office. It doesn't seem to matter who controls Congress, either. Just the White House. Which says a lot about how fake these fiscal debates always are since Congress writes the budget.</p>]]>
          <br/><a href="http://politics.mediapundit.net/2013/10/fiscal-conservatism-fiscal-sham.html">Click to read the rest</a>...
        </content>
    </entry>
    
    <entry>
        <title type="text">This is who shut down your government</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://politics.mediapundit.net/2013/10/much-of-what-the-republican.html" />
        <id>tag:politics.mediapundit.net,2013://5.1465</id>

        <updated>2013-10-14T23:30:00Z</updated>

				<summary type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://politics.mediapundit.net/">A little reminder of who shut down the US government will give you some insight into what the next few years lead by these idiots would look like.</summary>
        <author>
          <name>Paul William Tenny</name>
          <uri>http://mediapundit.net/pwtenny</uri>
          <email>pwtenny@mediapundit.net</email>
        </author>
        
        <category term="ppaca" label="PPACA" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" /><category term="teaparty" label="Tea Party" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
        <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://politics.mediapundit.net/">
          
          <![CDATA[<p>Much of what the Republican Party has done in the past month takes me back to the day after the 2012 election. Like <a href="http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/blogs/taibblog/hey-rush-limbaugh-starting-an-abortion-industry-wont-win-you-female-voters-20121108">a lot of people</a>, I listened to Rush Limbaugh in a sort of intellectual masturbation. I wanted someone to suffer for making me listen to Mitt Romney and his merry band of sociopathic primary opponents for six straight months.</p>
<p>A number of really awful events come to mind. At the Tea Party debate in Tampa, Florida, Ron Paul <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/09/12/tea-party-debate-health-care_n_959354.html">asked a rhetorical question</a>: should a person without insurance be allowed to die? Paul's answer was no, but several people in the audience enthusiastically shouted "Yes!" in response. Mark Williams, former chairman of the Tea Party group that sponsored the debate, was forced to resign from it in 2010 after displaying bigoted views of no fewer than three hot-button groups: <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/tea-party-express-leader-mark-williams-kicked-colored-people-letter-article-1.438854">Jews, Muslims, and African Americans</a>.</p>
<p>A week later in Orlando, a gay soldier serving in Iraq asked a question about "Don't Ask, Don't Tell". The service member <a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/183475-gay-soldier-booed-at-gop-debate-candidates-stay-mum">was booed by the GOP-friendly crowd</a> and not a single Republican candidate for President spoke out against it. Rick Santorum didn't answer the question and frankly didn't seem to understand it, saying that "Any type of sexual activity has no place in the military."</p>]]>
          <br/><a href="http://politics.mediapundit.net/2013/10/much-of-what-the-republican.html">Click to read the rest</a>...
        </content>
    </entry>
    
    <entry>
        <title type="text">Where Republicans will hurt the most in the next few years</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://politics.mediapundit.net/2013/10/where-republicans-will-hurt-the-most-in-the-next-few-years.html" />
        <id>tag:politics.mediapundit.net,2013://5.1464</id>

        <updated>2013-10-11T22:12:00Z</updated>

				<summary type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://politics.mediapundit.net/">Polls show the Republican Party is taking enormous damage over the government shutdown, here&apos;s where it will hurt them the most.</summary>
        <author>
          <name>Paul William Tenny</name>
          <uri>http://mediapundit.net/pwtenny</uri>
          <email>pwtenny@mediapundit.net</email>
        </author>
        
        <category term="2014election" label="2014 Election" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" /><category term="2016election" label="2016 Election" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" /><category term="congress" label="Congress" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" /><category term="elections" label="Elections" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" /><category term="gerrymandering" label="Gerrymandering" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" /><category term="gop" label="GOP" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" /><category term="houseofrepresentatives" label="House of Representatives" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" /><category term="polls" label="Polls" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" /><category term="ussenate" label="US Senate" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
        <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://politics.mediapundit.net/">
          
          <![CDATA[<p>The two lowest favorable ratings the Republican Party had during the Bush administration were 35% in 2006, when Democrats won a majority of seats in the House and Senate, and 32% in 2008, when Democrats expanded those majorities and Barack Obama won the White House.</p>
<p>Now it's closer to 24%.</p>
<p>There's <a href="http://firstread.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/10/10/20903624-nbcwsj-poll-shutdown-debate-damages-gop?lite">no good news</a> in polls for Republicans anymore. The Tea Party is more unpopular than ever before. The more people learn about Ted Cruz, the more they dislike him. President Obama's job approval is up and Americans want Democrats to control Congress next year by the largest margin either party has had since 2009.</p>]]>
          <br/><a href="http://politics.mediapundit.net/2013/10/where-republicans-will-hurt-the-most-in-the-next-few-years.html">Click to read the rest</a>...
        </content>
    </entry>
    
    <entry>
        <title type="text">Bain to the rescue? It&apos;d be more pleasant to hang yourself.</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://politics.mediapundit.net/2013/10/bain-to-the-rescue-itd-be-more-pleasant-to-hang-yourself.html" />
        <id>tag:politics.mediapundit.net,2013://5.1463</id>

        <updated>2013-10-09T19:31:00Z</updated>

				<summary type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://politics.mediapundit.net/">What Bain Capital would do to America if it managed our finances.</summary>
        <author>
          <name>Paul William Tenny</name>
          <uri>http://mediapundit.net/pwtenny</uri>
          <email>pwtenny@mediapundit.net</email>
        </author>
        
        <category term="baincapitalmittromney" label="Bain Capital. Mitt Romney" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" /><category term="economics" label="Economics" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" /><category term="finance" label="Finance" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" /><category term="financialcrisis" label="Financial Crisis" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
        <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://politics.mediapundit.net/">
          
          <![CDATA[<p>Someone I've debated economics with in the past made the frightening suggestion in the comment section of my last story that Bain Capital could be hired by the federal government to manage spending and find an arbitrary 10% ($350 billion or so) in spending to cut without the government "experiencing any effective changes in capability."</p>
<p>Although he was talking about total spending, in reality that'd have to come out of non-defense discretionary spending because Bain would never act against the military industrial complex, and Social Security and Medicare would require changes by Congress to cut benefits, and there's no support for that. That rules out $2.1 trillion of a $3.5 trillion budget.</p>
<p>A 10% cut in total spending then would mean a staggering 25% drop in discretionary spending, which would mean permanently closing dozens of federal agencies that would make it impossible for the government to do things like keep Wall Street from running Ponzi schemes, keeping the food supply reasonably safe, keeping drugs from killing you, and keeping planes from crashing because it's cheaper to do safety checks once per year instead of every few days or weeks.</p>
<p>That wouldn't just significantly degrade the federal government's capabilities in public safety, it would cripple them.</p>]]>
          <br/><a href="http://politics.mediapundit.net/2013/10/bain-to-the-rescue-itd-be-more-pleasant-to-hang-yourself.html">Click to read the rest</a>...
        </content>
    </entry>
    
    <entry>
        <title type="text">What extreme really means</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://politics.mediapundit.net/2013/10/what-extreme-really-means.html" />
        <id>tag:politics.mediapundit.net,2013://5.1462</id>

        <updated>2013-10-07T23:05:00Z</updated>

				<summary type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://politics.mediapundit.net/">It&apos;s not Big Government vs Small Government, it&apos;s Some Government vs No Government.</summary>
        <author>
          <name>Paul William Tenny</name>
          <uri>http://mediapundit.net/pwtenny</uri>
          <email>pwtenny@mediapundit.net</email>
        </author>
        
        <category term="dems" label="Dems" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" /><category term="gop" label="GOP" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" /><category term="ppaca" label="PPACA" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" /><category term="shutdown" label="Shutdown" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" /><category term="teaparty" label="Tea Party" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
        <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://politics.mediapundit.net/">
          
          <![CDATA[<p>This shutdown and now default fight isn't about right vs left, liberal vs conservative, Republican vs Democrat, or pro-ACA vs anti-ACA. Democrats can bargain and compromise with Republicans, and they have in the past, but Democrats aren't dealing with Republicans. They're dealing with the Tea Party faction.</p>
<p>You can't bargain or compromise with a faction that sees the federal government's existence as illegitimate, and that's what the Tea Party Congressmen in the House of Representatives believe. Shutting down the government and keeping it closed is a bigger win for the Tea Party than repealing the Affordable Care Act would have been.</p>]]>
          <br/><a href="http://politics.mediapundit.net/2013/10/what-extreme-really-means.html">Click to read the rest</a>...
        </content>
    </entry>
    
    <entry>
        <title type="text">Our casual acceptance of violence and death says a lot about America</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://politics.mediapundit.net/2013/10/our-casual-acceptance-of-violence-and-death-says-a-lot-about-america.html" />
        <id>tag:politics.mediapundit.net,2013://5.1461</id>

        <updated>2013-10-04T23:30:00Z</updated>

				<summary type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://politics.mediapundit.net/">I&apos;m somewhat heartened that I&apos;m not the only one asking why Miriam Carey -- the woman shot to death by DC Capitol Police yesterday afternoon -- had to die, and why we all seem to be okay with it. I&apos;m not okay with it.</summary>
        <author>
          <name>Paul William Tenny</name>
          <uri>http://mediapundit.net/pwtenny</uri>
          <email>pwtenny@mediapundit.net</email>
        </author>
        
        
        <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://politics.mediapundit.net/">
          
          <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://politics.mediapundit.net/images/gty_capitol_shooting_LL_131003_16x9_992.jpg"><img class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" src="http://politics.mediapundit.net/assets_c/2013/10/gty_capitol_shooting_LL_131003_16x9_992-thumb-600x337-778.jpg" alt="gty_capitol_shooting_LL_131003_16x9_992.jpg" height="337" width="600" /></a>I'm somewhat heartened that I'm not the only one asking why Miriam Carey -- the woman shot to death by DC Capitol Police yesterday afternoon -- had to die, and why we all <a href="http://www.newrepublic.com/article/115019/capitol-hill-shooting-leads-many-congratulations-few-questions">seem to be okay</a> with it.</p>
<p>I'm not okay with it. If Carey had mental health issues like I've heard rumored, the first failure of our society was that it didn't notice that she was sick needed help. Its second failure was that it didn't care. Its third failure is that she had to die for it.</p>
<p>Nothing about this tragedy is okay.</p>]]>
          <br/><a href="http://politics.mediapundit.net/2013/10/our-casual-acceptance-of-violence-and-death-says-a-lot-about-america.html">Click to read the rest</a>...
        </content>
    </entry>
    
    <entry>
        <title type="text">More than a few unasked questions about the incident in the capitol</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://politics.mediapundit.net/2013/10/more-than-a-few-unasked-questions-about-the-incident-in-the-capitol.html" />
        <id>tag:politics.mediapundit.net,2013://5.1460</id>

        <updated>2013-10-04T02:56:00Z</updated>

				<summary type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://politics.mediapundit.net/">Some big questions need asking about the Capitol Police response.</summary>
        <author>
          <name>Paul William Tenny</name>
          <uri>http://mediapundit.net/pwtenny</uri>
          <email>pwtenny@mediapundit.net</email>
        </author>
        
        
        <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://politics.mediapundit.net/">
          
          <![CDATA[<p>The incident with the woman who seems to have tried to ram a security barrier in D.C. this afternoon already has significant problems. There are retractable security barriers in the roadway around the Capitol that can be raised in an emergency to stop traffic by force. One police cruiser ran through one going 40 or 50mph and was destroyed by it.</p>
<p>Apparently most of them weren't raised until the woman's car had made it all the way down to the Supreme Court, and it's not at all clear yet if they stopped her even there, or if it was something else.</p>
<p>There's one really important aspect of all of this that I doubt will be addressed for days, if at all, because people will fall into old patterns of heart-first-brain-last behavior. Our tendency to rally around others and praise them to excess ends up turning off critical thinking skills far too often.</p>
<p>It's troubling that the Capitol Police fired their weapons into a car occupied by a child, more than once, until they successfully killed an unarmed driver. Before you jump to their defense by arguing that a car qualifies as a deadly weapon, I agree, but there are exceptions to that guided by common sense.</p>]]>
          <br/><a href="http://politics.mediapundit.net/2013/10/more-than-a-few-unasked-questions-about-the-incident-in-the-capitol.html">Click to read the rest</a>...
        </content>
    </entry>
    
</feed>