<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Windows Gatekeeper FAQs]]></title><link>http://www.windowsitpro.com/FAQs/WindowsGatekeeperFAQs/rss/windowssecurityfaqs</link><description><![CDATA[The latest FAQs on Windows security by Jan De Clercq]]></description><language>en-US</language><pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 14:01:05 GMT</pubDate><lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 14:01:05 GMT</lastBuildDate><managingEditor>brian.reinholz@penton.com (Managing Editor)</managingEditor><webMaster>service@windowsitpro.com (Customer Service)</webMaster><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/secvip" /><feedburner:info uri="secvip" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item><title><![CDATA[Q: What's the easiest way to digitally sign an internally developed application's executable?]]></title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/secvip/~3/r0BzhpiEF7U/whats-easiest-digitally-sign-internally-developed-applications-executable-143188</link><description>&lt;img src="http://www.windowsitpro.com/content/authors/855.jpg;pvdbd7655abac9a66e" border="0" hspace="10" vspace="10" align="left" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;By Jan De Clercq&lt;br /&gt;To digitally sign an executable, you can use Microsoft&amp;#8217;s Authenticode code-signing technology and the Sign Tool command-line utility.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/secvip/~4/r0BzhpiEF7U" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><dc:creator>Jan De Clercq</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 13:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.windowsitpro.com/article/public-key-infrastructure-pki/whats-easiest-digitally-sign-internally-developed-applications-executable-143188</guid><feedburner:origLink>http://www.windowsitpro.com/article/public-key-infrastructure-pki/whats-easiest-digitally-sign-internally-developed-applications-executable-143188</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title><![CDATA[Q: What firewall ports should we open to make IPSec work through our firewalls?]]></title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/secvip/~3/tv9rLpojns8/firewall-ports-open-ipsec-work-firewalls-143187</link><description>&lt;img src="http://www.windowsitpro.com/content/authors/855.jpg;pvdbd7655abac9a66e" border="0" hspace="10" vspace="10" align="left" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;By Jan De Clercq&lt;br /&gt;To use IPSec through your firewalls, here are the ports to open and what they&amp;#8217;re used for.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/secvip/~4/tv9rLpojns8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><dc:creator>Jan De Clercq</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 13:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.windowsitpro.com/article/ip-security-ipsec2/firewall-ports-open-ipsec-work-firewalls-143187</guid><feedburner:origLink>http://www.windowsitpro.com/article/ip-security-ipsec2/firewall-ports-open-ipsec-work-firewalls-143187</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title><![CDATA[Q: What is the krbtgt account used for in an Active Directory (AD) environment?]]></title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/secvip/~3/oEhNSrgTs4s/krbtgt-account-active-directory-ad-environment-143186</link><description>&lt;img src="http://www.windowsitpro.com/content/authors/855.jpg;pvdbd7655abac9a66e" border="0" hspace="10" vspace="10" align="left" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;By Jan De Clercq&lt;br /&gt;The krbtgt Active Directory account is a special account used with the Kerberos protocol for user authentication.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/secvip/~4/oEhNSrgTs4s" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><dc:creator>Jan De Clercq</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 16:22:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.windowsitpro.com/article/kerberos/krbtgt-account-active-directory-ad-environment-143186</guid><feedburner:origLink>http://www.windowsitpro.com/article/kerberos/krbtgt-account-active-directory-ad-environment-143186</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title><![CDATA[Q: Is there any way to influence the interval at which Windows security policies are applied?]]></title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/secvip/~3/toKu-MiH_uw/interval-windows-security-policies-applied-142694</link><description>&lt;img src="http://www.windowsitpro.com/content/authors/855.jpg;pvdbd7655abac9a66e" border="0" hspace="10" vspace="10" align="left" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;By Jan De Clercq&lt;br /&gt;Windows security policy settings refresh every 16 hours by default but you can change that interval with a registry hack.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/secvip/~4/toKu-MiH_uw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><dc:creator>Jan De Clercq</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 13:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.windowsitpro.com/article/security/interval-windows-security-policies-applied-142694</guid><feedburner:origLink>http://www.windowsitpro.com/article/security/interval-windows-security-policies-applied-142694</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title><![CDATA[Q: How can we verify that a Software Restriction Policy (SRP) rule we defined for one of our applications is effectively applied?]]></title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/secvip/~3/ZXcxYj-u4qI/verify-software-restriction-policy-rule-142693</link><description>&lt;img src="http://www.windowsitpro.com/content/authors/855.jpg;pvdbd7655abac9a66e" border="0" hspace="10" vspace="10" align="left" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;By Jan De Clercq&lt;br /&gt;Software Restriction Policy (SRP) rules generate events in the Windows application event log, but you can get more detail by enabling verbose trace logging.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/secvip/~4/ZXcxYj-u4qI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><dc:creator>Jan De Clercq</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 13:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.windowsitpro.com/article/event-logs/verify-software-restriction-policy-rule-142693</guid><feedburner:origLink>http://www.windowsitpro.com/article/event-logs/verify-software-restriction-policy-rule-142693</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title><![CDATA[Q: Can I apply a different password policy to two different Active Directory (AD) organizational units (OUs)?]]></title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/secvip/~3/h-d6p5KpwdU/password-policy-active-directory-142692</link><description>&lt;img src="http://www.windowsitpro.com/content/authors/855.jpg;pvdbd7655abac9a66e" border="0" hspace="10" vspace="10" align="left" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;By Jan De Clercq&lt;br /&gt;Active Directory doesn&amp;#8217;t support different password policies on different organizational units (OUs), but you can use shadow groups as a workaround.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/secvip/~4/h-d6p5KpwdU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><dc:creator>Jan De Clercq</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 13:05:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.windowsitpro.com/article/security/password-policy-active-directory-142692</guid><feedburner:origLink>http://www.windowsitpro.com/article/security/password-policy-active-directory-142692</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title><![CDATA[Q: What could prevent security policy settings that have been defined in a domain-wide Group Policy Object (GPO) from being applied to Windows 7 clients?]]></title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/secvip/~3/Ij8pimGzQ1A/security-policy-settings-gpo-windows-7-142647</link><description>&lt;img src="http://www.windowsitpro.com/content/authors/855.jpg;pvdbd7655abac9a66e" border="0" hspace="10" vspace="10" align="left" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;By Jan De Clercq&lt;br /&gt;A corrupt security database on Windows 7 clients can prevent GPO security settings from being applied, but you can use esentutl.exe to fix the problem.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/secvip/~4/Ij8pimGzQ1A" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><dc:creator>Jan De Clercq</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 12:32:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.windowsitpro.com/article/security/security-policy-settings-gpo-windows-7-142647</guid><feedburner:origLink>http://www.windowsitpro.com/article/security/security-policy-settings-gpo-windows-7-142647</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title><![CDATA[Q: What's the best way to retrieve the audit policy in effect for a Windows machine?]]></title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/secvip/~3/FxKNvbzyn9E/retrieve-audit-policy-windows-142393</link><description>&lt;img src="http://www.windowsitpro.com/content/authors/855.jpg;pvdbd7655abac9a66e" border="0" hspace="10" vspace="10" align="left" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;By Jan De Clercq&lt;br /&gt;The most reliable tool to retrieve the effective audit policy from a Windows machine is the auditpol.exe command-line tool.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/secvip/~4/FxKNvbzyn9E" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><dc:creator>Jan De Clercq</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 13:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.windowsitpro.com/article/monitoring-analysis/retrieve-audit-policy-windows-142393</guid><feedburner:origLink>http://www.windowsitpro.com/article/monitoring-analysis/retrieve-audit-policy-windows-142393</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title><![CDATA[Q: In addition to Certification Authority (CA)–level auditing settings, are there any other configuration settings that must be set to enable auditing of CA management actions?]]></title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/secvip/~3/U-LVE1PTQlY/enable-auditing-certification-authority-management-actions-142391</link><description>&lt;img src="http://www.windowsitpro.com/content/authors/855.jpg;pvdbd7655abac9a66e" border="0" hspace="10" vspace="10" align="left" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;By Jan De Clercq&lt;br /&gt;Setting up auditing in Windows is always a two step process: You configure what to audit, then you configure the audit policy.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/secvip/~4/U-LVE1PTQlY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><dc:creator>Jan De Clercq</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 11:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.windowsitpro.com/article/public-key-infrastructure-pki/enable-auditing-certification-authority-management-actions-142391</guid><feedburner:origLink>http://www.windowsitpro.com/article/public-key-infrastructure-pki/enable-auditing-certification-authority-management-actions-142391</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title><![CDATA[Q: How can I make sure that a given Windows account is assigned only a single Certification Authority (CA) management role?]]></title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/secvip/~3/6C8uDagSoA8/assign-single-certification-authority-management-role-142390</link><description>&lt;img src="http://www.windowsitpro.com/content/authors/855.jpg;pvdbd7655abac9a66e" border="0" hspace="10" vspace="10" align="left" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;By Jan De Clercq&lt;br /&gt;To ensure a Windows account is assigned only a single Certification Authority (CA) management role, you must use certutil to enable role separation on your Windows CA.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/secvip/~4/6C8uDagSoA8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><dc:creator>Jan De Clercq</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 13:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.windowsitpro.com/article/certificates/assign-single-certification-authority-management-role-142390</guid><feedburner:origLink>http://www.windowsitpro.com/article/certificates/assign-single-certification-authority-management-role-142390</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title><![CDATA[Q: How can I implement the public key infrastructure (PKI) management roles that are defined in the Common Criteria Certificate Issuing and Management Components Security Level 4 standard?]]></title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/secvip/~3/uReFsnLPEOs/implement-public-key-infrastructure-pki-management-roles-defined-common-criteria-certificate-issuing-management-components-security-level-4-standard-142388</link><description>&lt;img src="http://www.windowsitpro.com/content/authors/855.jpg;pvdbd7655abac9a66e" border="0" hspace="10" vspace="10" align="left" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;By Jan De Clercq&lt;br /&gt;Microsoft software supports 4 public key infrastructure (PKI) management roles, which you can implement through the Microsoft Management Console.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/secvip/~4/uReFsnLPEOs" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><dc:creator>Jan De Clercq</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:10:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.windowsitpro.com/article/public-key-infrastructure-pki/implement-public-key-infrastructure-pki-management-roles-defined-common-criteria-certificate-issuing-management-components-security-level-4-standard-142388</guid><feedburner:origLink>http://www.windowsitpro.com/article/public-key-infrastructure-pki/implement-public-key-infrastructure-pki-management-roles-defined-common-criteria-certificate-issuing-management-components-security-level-4-standard-142388</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title><![CDATA[Q: Can I store my Encrypting File System (EFS) private key on my smart card?]]></title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/secvip/~3/1HZz1HZzNmk/store-encrypting-file-system-efs-private-key-smart-card-142075</link><description>&lt;img src="http://www.windowsitpro.com/content/authors/855.jpg;pvdbd7655abac9a66e" border="0" hspace="10" vspace="10" align="left" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;By Jan De Clercq&lt;br /&gt;With Windows Server 2008, Windows Vista, and later, you can store EFS private keys on users&amp;#8217; smart cards and control these settings with Group Policy.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/secvip/~4/1HZz1HZzNmk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><dc:creator>Jan De Clercq</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 13:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.windowsitpro.com/article/security/store-encrypting-file-system-efs-private-key-smart-card-142075</guid><feedburner:origLink>http://www.windowsitpro.com/article/security/store-encrypting-file-system-efs-private-key-smart-card-142075</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title><![CDATA[Q: How can I disable or enable the Windows Firewall for a specific network connection?]]></title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/secvip/~3/OEXvaI0Bi6E/disable-enable-windows-firewall-specific-network-connection-142072</link><description>&lt;img src="http://www.windowsitpro.com/content/authors/855.jpg;pvdbd7655abac9a66e" border="0" hspace="10" vspace="10" align="left" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;By Jan De Clercq&lt;br /&gt;You can control specific network connections through the Microsoft Management Console (MMC) Windows Firewall with Advanced Security snap-in.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/secvip/~4/OEXvaI0Bi6E" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><dc:creator>Jan De Clercq</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 13:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.windowsitpro.com/article/windows-server/disable-enable-windows-firewall-specific-network-connection-142072</guid><feedburner:origLink>http://www.windowsitpro.com/article/windows-server/disable-enable-windows-firewall-specific-network-connection-142072</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title><![CDATA[Q: Can we disable the default Windows administrative shares (C$, D$, Admin$, IPC$) to lock down some of our Windows servers?]]></title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/secvip/~3/Mzv9yK8gVTg/disable-windows-administrative-shares-142069</link><description>&lt;img src="http://www.windowsitpro.com/content/authors/855.jpg;pvdbd7655abac9a66e" border="0" hspace="10" vspace="10" align="left" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;By Jan De Clercq&lt;br /&gt;You can remove the administrative shares on Windows servers and prevent them from being created automatically, although Microsoft doesn&amp;#8217;t recommend it.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/secvip/~4/Mzv9yK8gVTg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><dc:creator>Jan De Clercq</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 11:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.windowsitpro.com/article/windows-server/disable-windows-administrative-shares-142069</guid><feedburner:origLink>http://www.windowsitpro.com/article/windows-server/disable-windows-administrative-shares-142069</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title><![CDATA[Q: How can I find out if my clients are using NTLM for authentication instead of Kerberos against specific Windows servers, applications, or services?]]></title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/secvip/~3/9uurRGhHNBo/ntlm-authentication-kerberos-142066</link><description>&lt;img src="http://www.windowsitpro.com/content/authors/855.jpg;pvdbd7655abac9a66e" border="0" hspace="10" vspace="10" align="left" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;By Jan De Clercq&lt;br /&gt;These new Group Policy settings can help you audit, analyze, and restrict NTLM authentication use in your Windows environment.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/secvip/~4/9uurRGhHNBo" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><dc:creator>Jan De Clercq</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 16:14:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.windowsitpro.com/article/group-policy/ntlm-authentication-kerberos-142066</guid><feedburner:origLink>http://www.windowsitpro.com/article/group-policy/ntlm-authentication-kerberos-142066</feedburner:origLink></item></channel></rss>

