<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Science Forums Blogs</title>
    <link>http://www.scienceforums.net/</link>
    <description>Free science blogs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 21:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 21:00:00 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>WordPress MU RSS Generator</generator>
    <managingEditor>staff@scienceforums.net (SFN Staff)</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>staff@scienceforums.net (SFN Staff)</webMaster>
    
<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/sfn-blogs" /><feedburner:info uri="sfn-blogs" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item>
<title>swansont: Out of Work</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/sfn-blogs/~3/iZcS2uTg-Yk/4994</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.scienceforums.net/swansont/archives/4994</guid>
<description>&lt;a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=124251060"&gt;The Jobs Of Yesteryear: Obsolete Occupations&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No, these were not outsourced overseas.  I remember milk delivery  we had an insulated box on the front porch, and got the delivery at about 4 AM a few times a week. The clinking of the bottles as the delivery man walked up to the house would wake me up now and then.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/sfn-blogs/~4/iZcS2uTg-Yk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 08:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>swansont</dc:creator>
<feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.scienceforums.net/swansont/archives/4994</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>swansont: The Most Ridiculous Thing I've Heard  Today</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/sfn-blogs/~3/6_ammfylSmk/5018</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.scienceforums.net/swansont/archives/5018</guid>
<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nypost.com/p/news/national/lohan_such_baby_jVdQWABj9z0MgXzCv1Nh1O"&gt;Lindsay Lohan wants $100M over E-Trade ad&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;Lohan's lawyer, Stephanie Ovadia, said the actress has the same single-name recognition as Oprah or Madonna.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
"They used the name Lindsay," Ovadia said. "They're using her name as a parody of her life. Why didn't they use the name Susan? This is a subliminal message. Everybody's talking about it and saying it's Lindsay Lohan."&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yeah, right.  I'm barely aware of who Lindsay Lohan is, and I'm more than happy to testify that I did not think of her when I saw the commercial.  I didn't associate her with the commercial until now; besides, they said 'milkaholic,' not 'attention whore.'  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A really funny thing is that because I'm a geek, and since Lindsay/Lindsey is a fairly common name, I actually &lt;a href="http://www.babynamewizard.com/voyager"&gt;checked a baby-name database&lt;/a&gt; (requires java to be enabled) and Lindsay and Lindsey are much more popular names than Susan these days and have been for a while now.  As far as single-name recognition goes, Oprah doesn't crack the top 1000 and Madonna never got used on more than a few dozen babies a year and dropped off the radar by the '70s.  i.e. those are recognized single names because the people a) have unusual names and are b) actually quite famous &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(As an aside, especially to Johnny Cash fans,  if you check the stats for the names, you can restrict them to one gender or the other.  There actually have been boys named Sue.)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/sfn-blogs/~4/6_ammfylSmk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 21:11:00 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>swansont</dc:creator>
<feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.scienceforums.net/swansont/archives/5018</feedburner:origLink></item>
</channel>
</rss>
