<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/atom10full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.shopfloor.org/wp-atom.php">
	<title type="text">Shopfloor</title>
	<subtitle type="text">The Manufacturers Blog!</subtitle>

	<updated>2013-05-22T21:23:41Z</updated>

	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.shopfloor.org" />
	<id>http://www.shopfloor.org/feed/atom</id>
	

	<generator uri="http://wordpress.org/" version="3.1.3">WordPress</generator>
		<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/shopfloor/TDOl" /><feedburner:info uri="shopfloor/tdol" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><geo:lat>38.895268</geo:lat><geo:long>-77.027602</geo:long><entry>
		<author>
			<name>Ross Eisenberg</name>
					</author>
		<title type="html"><![CDATA[A True Bipartisan Breakthrough on TSCA Reform]]></title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/shopfloor/TDOl/~3/X83SvvNecTU/28766" />
		<id>http://www.shopfloor.org/?p=28766</id>
		<updated>2013-05-22T21:23:41Z</updated>
		<published>2013-05-22T21:23:41Z</published>
		<category scheme="http://www.shopfloor.org" term="Energy" /><category scheme="http://www.shopfloor.org" term="chemicals" /><category scheme="http://www.shopfloor.org" term="economy" /><category scheme="http://www.shopfloor.org" term="Senate" /><category scheme="http://www.shopfloor.org" term="TSCA" />		<summary type="html"><![CDATA[In this town, it’s a rare occurrence for a room full of lobbyists to be truly surprised.  This morning was<a href="http://www.shopfloor.org/2013/05/a-true-bipartisan-breakthrough-on-tsca-reform/28766" class="searchmore">Read the Rest...</a><div class="clr"></div>]]></summary>
		<content type="html" xml:base="http://www.shopfloor.org/2013/05/a-true-bipartisan-breakthrough-on-tsca-reform/28766"><![CDATA[<p>In this town, it’s a rare occurrence for a room full of lobbyists to be truly surprised.  This morning was one of those times.  In remarks to the American Alliance for Innovation, a coalition of industry trade groups of which the NAM is a member, Sen. David Vitter (R-LA) <a href="http://www.epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Minority.PressReleases&amp;ContentRecord_id=ccf8cd45-e41f-28bd-0252-9984333f7335" target="_blank">announced today</a> that he was introducing his long-awaited Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) reform legislation . . . except that rather than introducing an “alternative” bill to legislation from Sen. Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ), he had instead drafted a brand new bill <em>with</em> Sen. Lautenberg that they were introducing along with over a dozen other Republicans and Democrats.</p>
<p>We commend Sens. Vitter and Lautenberg for their leadership and for achieving a far too rare feat in Washington: coming together in bipartisan fashion to propose badly-needed reform to a federal law impacting human health, manufacturers in all sectors, and American innovation.</p>
<p>Manufacturers are committed to producing safe, innovative and sustainable products that provide essential benefits to consumers while protecting human health and the environment. To accomplish this, we believe Toxic Substance Control Act (TSCA), the primary statute regulating the manufacture and use of chemical substances in the United States, should be modernized. However, we worried that the debate over how to reform this outdated law would fall prey to partisan politics, much like the vast majority of other environmental and energy issues in recent memory.</p>
<p>Today at least, it appears that bipartisanship can prevail. We believed Senators needed to start from scratch; it appears that they did. We believed there needed to be broad stakeholder input; once again, there was. And there needed to be some way to bridge the substantive divide between Sen. Lautenberg’s Safe Chemicals Act, which industry opposed, and this new bill being drafted by Sen. Vitter.  The Senators made it happen.<span id="more-28766"></span></p>
<p>We look forward to reviewing the Chemical Safety Improvement Act of 2013 with our member organizations in the coming weeks in order to assess its impact on manufacturers. Ensuring the safety of products is the single most important goal of manufacturers. Safe chemical substances are produced and used in products throughout the supply chain and are critical to everything from producing the energy that fuels our country to manufacturing the medical equipment used in our hospitals.</p>
<p>Given the importance of chemical substances in countless products and processes and the role they will play in future technological breakthroughs, it is of the upmost importance that barriers to innovation and product development be minimized. As the engine for U.S. jobs and prosperity, manufacturers depend on policymakers from both political parties to work together to craft policies that support economic growth. Thus, we are encouraged to see such a broad group of Senators representing a diverse collection of states come together on this important manufacturing issue and applaud them for their cooperative effort.</p>
<p>Cosponsors of the bill include: Gillibrand (D-NY); Crapo (R-ID); Durbin (D-IL); Alexander (R-TN); Schumer (D-NY); Inhofe (R-OK); Udall (D-NM); Collins (R-ME); Manchin (D-WV); Rubio (R-FL); Landrieu (D-LA); Boozman (R-AR); Menendez (D-NJ); Hoeven (R-ND)</p>
<p><em>Ross Eisenberg is vice president of energy and resources policy, National Association of Manufacturers. </em></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content>
		<link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.shopfloor.org/2013/05/a-true-bipartisan-breakthrough-on-tsca-reform/28766#comments" thr:count="0" />
		<link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.shopfloor.org/2013/05/a-true-bipartisan-breakthrough-on-tsca-reform/28766/feed/atom" thr:count="0" />
		<thr:total>0</thr:total>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.shopfloor.org/2013/05/a-true-bipartisan-breakthrough-on-tsca-reform/28766</feedburner:origLink></entry>
		<entry>
		<author>
			<name>Lauren Airey</name>
					</author>
		<title type="html"><![CDATA[Senate Finance Holds Customs Reauthorization Hearing]]></title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/shopfloor/TDOl/~3/OrYnoZ16zMo/28763" />
		<id>http://www.shopfloor.org/?p=28763</id>
		<updated>2013-05-22T19:03:09Z</updated>
		<published>2013-05-22T19:03:09Z</published>
		<category scheme="http://www.shopfloor.org" term="Trade" /><category scheme="http://www.shopfloor.org" term="economy" /><category scheme="http://www.shopfloor.org" term="exports" /><category scheme="http://www.shopfloor.org" term="manufacturers" /><category scheme="http://www.shopfloor.org" term="manufacturing" />		<summary type="html"><![CDATA[Earlier today, the Senate Finance Committee held a hearing on the Trade Facilitation and Trade Enforcement Act of 2013 (S.<a href="http://www.shopfloor.org/2013/05/senate-finance-holds-customs-reauthorization-hearing/28763" class="searchmore">Read the Rest...</a><div class="clr"></div>]]></summary>
		<content type="html" xml:base="http://www.shopfloor.org/2013/05/senate-finance-holds-customs-reauthorization-hearing/28763"><![CDATA[<p>Earlier today, the Senate Finance Committee held a <a href="http://www.finance.senate.gov/hearings/hearing/?id=a4d7b3e9-5056-a032-527c-0eb7998800bd">hearing</a> on the <em>Trade Facilitation and Trade Enforcement Act of 2013</em> (S. 662). The <a href="http://www.finance.senate.gov/legislation/download/?id=e5a55a26-b488-43d1-b2f7-e018c37a39a8">bill</a> was introduced by Chairman Max Baucus and Ranking Member Orrin Hatch in March to help reduce costs and delays at the border by modernizing U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), two key trade-related agencies. CBP is charged with facilitating imported cargo through U.S. ports of entry, enforcing trade and customs laws at the border, collecting customs revenue and enforcing import security laws to prevent illicit shipments from entering the United States.</p>
<p>As Chairman Baucus noted in his <a href="http://www.finance.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/05222013%20Baucus%20Statement%20on%20the%20Trade%20Facilitation%20and%20Trade%20Enforcement%20Reauthorization%20Act%20of%20201311.pdf">opening statement</a>, about 365,000 entries move through U.S. ports – including more than 3,000 express entries – on a typical day. These goods arrive in more than 66,000 truck, rail and sea containers as well as hundreds of aircraft. “American businesses, ranchers, farmers and consumers depend on the timely movement of all these goods across borders to remain competitive. In business, time is money. So CBP and ICE must facilitate trade expeditiously,” Chairman Baucus said. In his <a href="http://www.finance.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/05%2022%2013%20Hatch%20Opening%20Statement%20at%20Customs%20Hearing2.pdf">opening statement</a>, Ranking Member Hatch reiterated the importance of international trade to the U.S. economy and highlighted the need to protect intellectual property rights.</p>
<p>Manufacturers were represented at the hearing by Chrysler, Procter &amp; Gamble and the National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA). William Cook, Director of Worldwide Logistics and Customs for Chrysler, described the impact of delays at the border on Chrysler’s bottom line in his <a href="http://www.finance.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/5-22-13%20William%20Cook-Chrysler%20Group%20LLC-Testimony%20-Senate%20Finance%20Commit%20%20%20.pdf">testimony</a>.<span id="more-28763"></span></p>
<blockquote><p>“Even minimal delays can have serious consequences for the company – if a shipment of parts destined for a manufacturing plant gets delayed at a border, operations may have to shut down until the shipment arrives. And now more than ever, with demand sky high for Chrysler products and fierce competition in the auto sector, we cannot afford any production delays.”</p></blockquote>
<p>Mr. Cook also called on CBP to fully implement the <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/docs/btb_implementation_report.pdf">Beyond the Border (BTB) Action Plan</a>. Earlier this year, the NAM sent a letter to CBP encouraging the agency to prioritize the implementation of the several recommendations from the Businesses for a Better Border (B3) Coalition. Mr. Cook noted that Chrysler was pleased to see language in S.662 requiring a pilot program to designate more 24-hour commercial ports of entry. Like many manufacturers, Chrysler relies on just-in-time inventory management practices.</p>
<p>David Cooper, Global Customs Compliance Manager for Procter &amp; Gamble, noted that timely processing of imported materials and other inputs helps companies like P&amp;G ensure reliable U.S. manufacturing operations. In his <a href="http://www.finance.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/David%20Cooper%20Senate%20Finance%20Testimony%20FINAL.pdf">testimony</a>, Mr. Cooper pointed to key imported materials for P&amp;G products – like Cascade dishwasher detergent and Pampers diapers – that are not manufactured in the United States. Further, CBP plays an important role in protecting consumers and companies from counterfeit goods.</p>
<blockquote><p>“Our ability to grow as a company and meet consumer needs depends on successful product and operations innovation. This includes the successful development, introduction and marketing of new products and improvements to our equipment and manufacturing processes. The IP generated from these innovations is sometimes copied and imported into the U.S. by counterfeiters, making a strong intellectual property rights (IPR) enforcement regime at CBP critical to P&amp;G’s innovation efforts.”</p></blockquote>
<p>Clark Silcox, General Counsel for NEMA, also highlighted in his <a href="http://www.finance.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/Silcox%20WrittenTestimony%20S622%2022May20131.pdf">testimony</a> the importance of efficient communication with CBP regarding suspected counterfeit imports and other intellectual property concerns – as provided for in Section 241 of S. 662.</p>
<p>Predictable, efficient and transparent customs procedures help U.S. manufacturers compete effectively around the world. The NAM has long advocated for legislation to help expedite the ever-increasing volume of legitimate trade while also more effectively helping to halt illicit trade. The NAM sent a <a href="http://documents.nam.org/IS/NAM%20Letter%20to%20Senate%20Finance%20Committee_Customs%20Reauth.pdf">letter</a> to the Senate Finance Committee earlier in the month, urging the Committee to act on a Customs reauthorization bill.</p>
<p><em>Lauren Airey is director of trade facilitation policy, National Association of Manufacturers. </em></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content>
		<link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.shopfloor.org/2013/05/senate-finance-holds-customs-reauthorization-hearing/28763#comments" thr:count="0" />
		<link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.shopfloor.org/2013/05/senate-finance-holds-customs-reauthorization-hearing/28763/feed/atom" thr:count="0" />
		<thr:total>0</thr:total>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.shopfloor.org/2013/05/senate-finance-holds-customs-reauthorization-hearing/28763</feedburner:origLink></entry>
		<entry>
		<author>
			<name>Joe Trauger</name>
						<uri>http://www.nam.org</uri>
					</author>
		<title type="html"><![CDATA[Immigration Reform Clears First Hurdle]]></title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/shopfloor/TDOl/~3/dSXuOWFpwKI/28759" />
		<id>http://www.shopfloor.org/?p=28759</id>
		<updated>2013-05-22T16:49:43Z</updated>
		<published>2013-05-22T16:49:43Z</published>
		<category scheme="http://www.shopfloor.org" term="Immigration" /><category scheme="http://www.shopfloor.org" term="economy" /><category scheme="http://www.shopfloor.org" term="immigration" /><category scheme="http://www.shopfloor.org" term="manufacturers" /><category scheme="http://www.shopfloor.org" term="manufacturing" />		<summary type="html"><![CDATA[The Senate Judiciary Committee completed work on S. 744 last night, which sets up consideration by the full Senate in<a href="http://www.shopfloor.org/2013/05/immigration-reform-clears-first-hurdle/28759" class="searchmore">Read the Rest...</a><div class="clr"></div>]]></summary>
		<content type="html" xml:base="http://www.shopfloor.org/2013/05/immigration-reform-clears-first-hurdle/28759"><![CDATA[<p>The Senate Judiciary Committee completed work on S. 744 last night, which sets up consideration by the full Senate in June. The vote was 13-5 and demonstrated bi-partisan support for the framework. Prior to passage, the committee adopted an amendment negotiated by Senator Orrin Hatch (R-UT) and Chuck Schumer (D-NY), which would address critical aspects of the H-1B visa provisions of the bill.</p>
<p>The NAM joined the U.S. Chamber in sending a letter of support for Senator Hatch’s amendment to all members of the Judiciary Committee. In June, the Senate will take up a comprehensive immigration package that contains the following: increased access to high-skilled talent; increased legal access to lower-skilled workers; a pathway to citizenship for the undocumented; and an enhanced verification program with protections for employers acting in good faith. The NAM is anticipating vigorous debate on this legislation over the summer in both the Senate and the House of Representatives.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content>
		<link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.shopfloor.org/2013/05/immigration-reform-clears-first-hurdle/28759#comments" thr:count="0" />
		<link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.shopfloor.org/2013/05/immigration-reform-clears-first-hurdle/28759/feed/atom" thr:count="0" />
		<thr:total>0</thr:total>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.shopfloor.org/2013/05/immigration-reform-clears-first-hurdle/28759</feedburner:origLink></entry>
		<entry>
		<author>
			<name>Chad Moutray</name>
					</author>
		<title type="html"><![CDATA[Business Economists Predict Modest Growth in Real GDP]]></title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/shopfloor/TDOl/~3/FazQV6-aBkM/28755" />
		<id>http://www.shopfloor.org/?p=28755</id>
		<updated>2013-05-21T14:26:39Z</updated>
		<published>2013-05-21T14:26:39Z</published>
		<category scheme="http://www.shopfloor.org" term="Economy" /><category scheme="http://www.shopfloor.org" term="General" /><category scheme="http://www.shopfloor.org" term="business economists" /><category scheme="http://www.shopfloor.org" term="industrial production" /><category scheme="http://www.shopfloor.org" term="inflation" /><category scheme="http://www.shopfloor.org" term="NABE" /><category scheme="http://www.shopfloor.org" term="nonfarm payrolls" /><category scheme="http://www.shopfloor.org" term="Outlook Survey" /><category scheme="http://www.shopfloor.org" term="real GDP" />		<summary type="html"><![CDATA[Business economists expect real GDP growth of 2.4 percent in 2013, with slightly faster growth of 3.0 percent in 2014.<a href="http://www.shopfloor.org/2013/05/business-economists-predict-modest-growth/28755" class="searchmore">Read the Rest...</a><div class="clr"></div>]]></summary>
		<content type="html" xml:base="http://www.shopfloor.org/2013/05/business-economists-predict-modest-growth/28755"><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://nabe.com/NABE_Outlook_Summary">Business economists expect real GDP growth of 2.4 percent in 2013, with slightly faster growth of 3.0 percent in 2014</a>. The May Outlook Survey from the National Association of Business Economics (NABE) found that output estimates for this year and next have not changed from what was predicted three months ago in the February survey.</p>
<p>Beyond the headline figure, there were improvements in some of the key components of GDP. Specifically, respondents expect improved consumer spending (2.3 percent in 2013), residential investment (15.0 percent), nonresidential structure investment (4.6 percent), and business inventories. Regarding the housing sector growth rate, new residential starts are expected to average 1 million in 2013, rising to 1.18 million in 2014. In contrast to these positive contributors to real GDP, shrinking government budgets are expected to fall by 2.3 percent in 2013 and 0.9 percent in 2014, suggesting that they will continue to be a drag on growth.</p>
<p>Industrial productoin should increase 3.1 percent in 2013 and 3.5 percent in 2014. This would suggest a pickup from the most recent year-over-year growth rate of  1.3 percent.</p>
<p>Businesses are expected to add 168,000 nonfarm payroll workers per month in 2013, increasing to 198,000 per month in 2014. This modest growth in hiring, though, is not anticipated to bring the unemployment rate down much from its current 7.5 percent rate, with business economists forecasting the unemployment rate to average 7.1 percent in 2014.</p>
<p>On financial matters, business economists say that pricing pressures shuld be modest, up 1.8 percent in 2013 and 2.0 percent in 2014. Each of these numbers are slightly lower than what was forecast in February, most likely due to lower energy costs in the most recent data. More importantly, they are also consistent with the Federal Reserve&#8217;s stated goal of keeping inflation at or below 2 percent. Oil prices are predicted to average $93 per barrel in 2013 and $95 per barrel next year.</p>
<p><em>Chad Moutray is the chief economist, National Association of Manufacturers. Note that he is also a former board member of NABE and a current participant in NABE&#8217;s Outlook Survey. </em></p>
]]></content>
		<link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.shopfloor.org/2013/05/business-economists-predict-modest-growth/28755#comments" thr:count="0" />
		<link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.shopfloor.org/2013/05/business-economists-predict-modest-growth/28755/feed/atom" thr:count="0" />
		<thr:total>0</thr:total>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.shopfloor.org/2013/05/business-economists-predict-modest-growth/28755</feedburner:origLink></entry>
		<entry>
		<author>
			<name>Chad Moutray</name>
					</author>
		<title type="html"><![CDATA[Monday Economic Report &#8211; May 20, 2013]]></title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/shopfloor/TDOl/~3/09phoGNmTIY/28747" />
		<id>http://www.shopfloor.org/?p=28747</id>
		<updated>2013-05-20T20:30:42Z</updated>
		<published>2013-05-20T14:00:50Z</published>
		<category scheme="http://www.shopfloor.org" term="Economy" /><category scheme="http://www.shopfloor.org" term="General" /><category scheme="http://www.shopfloor.org" term="20/20 Vision" /><category scheme="http://www.shopfloor.org" term="conference board leading indicators" /><category scheme="http://www.shopfloor.org" term="consumer confidence" /><category scheme="http://www.shopfloor.org" term="Empire State Manufacturing Report" /><category scheme="http://www.shopfloor.org" term="housing permits" /><category scheme="http://www.shopfloor.org" term="industrial production" /><category scheme="http://www.shopfloor.org" term="Monday Economic Report" /><category scheme="http://www.shopfloor.org" term="Philly Fed survey" /><category scheme="http://www.shopfloor.org" term="retail sales" />		<summary type="html"><![CDATA[Here is a summary of this week&#8217;s Monday Economic Report: The manufacturing economy has hit some speed bumps, according to<a href="http://www.shopfloor.org/2013/05/monday_economic_report/28747" class="searchmore">Read the Rest...</a><div class="clr"></div>]]></summary>
		<content type="html" xml:base="http://www.shopfloor.org/2013/05/monday_economic_report/28747"><![CDATA[<p>Here is a summary of this week&#8217;s Monday Economic Report:</p>
<p>The manufacturing economy has hit some speed bumps, according to recent data. Industrial production declined 0.5 percent in April—more than expected—with capacity utilization levels back to where we were at the beginning of the year. The slower pace of domestic and global sales has negatively impacted activity, with production down mostly across-the-board. Only four of the 19 major manufacturing sectors experienced an increase in output for the month. Moreover, annual growth in manufacturing production of just 1.3 percent is insufficient, and such low rates of industrial growth are not enough to help boost hiring and output. Ideally, we would like to see annual output growth of 4.5 percent or greater, as outlined in the NAM’s <a href="http://lists.nam.org/t/113189/226027/30962/0/">“20/20 Vision”</a> earlier this year.</p>
<p>The national pullback in manufacturing activity extends to two of the regional manufacturing surveys released last week. Sentiment surveys from the New York and Philadelphia Federal Reserve Banks found contracting levels of new orders, shipments and the average workweek. In addition, manufacturers were more negative in their overall views of the current business environment. However, employment was mixed between the two reports, with a pickup in hiring reported in the Empire State survey, and manufacturers in both Fed districts were cautiously optimistic about future growth. As a result, capital investments are expected to increase in the coming months.</p>
<p>The Conference Board’s Leading Economic Index—a forward-looking measure of the U.S. economy—rose a healthy 0.6 percent in April, with strong growth in housing permits. New residential permits exceeded the 1 million mark for the first time since June 2008, even as housing starts fell for the month. The long-term trend for the housing market remains positive, with permits data highlighting growth in future activity. Other good news can be seen in the latest University of Michigan consumer sentiment survey, with Americans reporting optimism levels not seen since mid-2007. Retail sales were also higher, even with declines in gasoline station spending due to lower petroleum costs.<span id="more-28747"></span></p>
<p>Businesses and consumers continue to benefit from lower energy costs, according to the most recent inflation numbers. Core inflation—which excludes food and energy prices—is rising at less than 2 percent for consumers and producers, suggesting that pricing pressures have eased significantly over the past year. The 2 percent threshold is important, as that is the Federal Reserve Board’s stated target for price increases. With inflation under control, at least for now, the Federal Open Market Committee feels free to pursue accommodative policies.</p>
<p>This week is a somewhat slower one on the economic front, with only a handful of key indicators being released. From the manufacturing perspective, we will be closely watching the Kansas City Federal Reserve Bank survey and the preliminary figures on durable goods orders, both of which will come out toward the end of the week. In addition, the Markit Flash purchasing managers’ indices for the United States, Eurozone and China should provide some clues as to whether some of April’s weaknesses have continued into May. Certainly, the European situation is not expected to improve (as we saw in last week’s lower <a href="http://lists.nam.org/t/113189/226027/32419/0/">Eurozone GDP</a> figure), but there should be modest growth in the U.S. and Chinese manufacturing activity reports.</p>
<p style="text-align: left"><em>Chad Moutray is the chief economist, National Association of Manufacturers.</em></p>
<p style="text-align: center"><em><a rel="attachment wp-att-28748" href="http://www.shopfloor.org/2013/05/monday_economic_report/28747/monthly-industrial-production-changes-may2013"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-28748" src="http://shopfloor.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/monthly-industrial-production-changes-may2013.jpg" alt="" width="540" height="405" /></a></em></p>
]]></content>
		<link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.shopfloor.org/2013/05/monday_economic_report/28747#comments" thr:count="0" />
		<link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.shopfloor.org/2013/05/monday_economic_report/28747/feed/atom" thr:count="0" />
		<thr:total>0</thr:total>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.shopfloor.org/2013/05/monday_economic_report/28747</feedburner:origLink></entry>
		<entry>
		<author>
			<name>Jeff Ostermayer</name>
						<uri>http://www.nam.org</uri>
					</author>
		<title type="html"><![CDATA[President Obama Tours Manufacturing Facility to Talk Infrastructure]]></title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/shopfloor/TDOl/~3/Fo1eSbEUpj0/28742" />
		<id>http://www.shopfloor.org/?p=28742</id>
		<updated>2013-05-17T19:49:40Z</updated>
		<published>2013-05-17T19:49:40Z</published>
		<category scheme="http://www.shopfloor.org" term="Energy" /><category scheme="http://www.shopfloor.org" term="Keystone XL" /><category scheme="http://www.shopfloor.org" term="manufacturers" /><category scheme="http://www.shopfloor.org" term="manufacturing" />		<summary type="html"><![CDATA[This afternoon President Obama toured the facility and spoke at of Ellicott Dredges in Maryland. During his visit the President<a href="http://www.shopfloor.org/2013/05/president-obama-tours-manufacturing-facility-to-talk-infrastructure/28742" class="searchmore">Read the Rest...</a><div class="clr"></div>]]></summary>
		<content type="html" xml:base="http://www.shopfloor.org/2013/05/president-obama-tours-manufacturing-facility-to-talk-infrastructure/28742"><![CDATA[<p>This afternoon President Obama toured the facility and spoke at of Ellicott Dredges in Maryland. During his visit the President spoke about the importance of infrastructure projects. He announced a Presidential Memorandum to modernize infrastructure review and permitting regulations, policies and procedures.</p>
<p>Our nation’s infrastructure is in need of investment and repair. Manufacturers rely on our rails, roads, ports and waterways to deliver billions worth of commodities annually. It is a positive step that President Obama is discussing the need for reforms but we need real action to speed up the review process of many infrastructure projects. The environmental streamlining reforms in the Water Resources Development Act, which passed the Senate this week, are the types of reforms that we would need to see for future projects.</p>
<p>Just yesterday Peter Bowe, President and CEO of Ellicott Dredge Enterprises, <a href="http://smallbusiness.house.gov/uploadedfiles/5-16-2013_revised_bowetestimony_.pdf" target="_blank">testified before</a> the House Small Business Subcommittee on Agriculutre, Energy and Trade about the benefits of Keystone XL.</p>
<blockquote><p>“So what does the Keystone pipeline have to do with us, and why do we care? For us, it’s all about jobs, not construction jobs for the pipeline itself, but ongoing jobs every year for decades to come, all related to the production of oil from the Alberta oil sands deposits. This oil needs the Keystone pipeline. The oil sands in Alberta are one of the largest markets worldwide for dredging equipment. Our dredges are used to rehandle the tailings generated by the mining process. Tailings are the wet waste which is a combination of clay, sand, and water after the oil- bearing bitumen has been removed. All the oil sands projects generate substantial amounts of tailings which are deposited into ponds. Oil sands producers have been criticized for water usage, but now, thanks to tailings reclamation, they recycle 85% to 90% of water used, and dredges are an integral part of the recycling process.”</p></blockquote>
<p>Keystone XL will create thousands of jobs and is critical for the competitiveness of companies like Ellicott Dredges. Keystone XL has been pending for more than 5 years, the time has come to approve this important energy and infrastructure project.</p>
<p><em>Chip Yost is assistant vice president of energy and resources policy, National Association of Manufacturers. </em></p>
]]></content>
		<link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.shopfloor.org/2013/05/president-obama-tours-manufacturing-facility-to-talk-infrastructure/28742#comments" thr:count="0" />
		<link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.shopfloor.org/2013/05/president-obama-tours-manufacturing-facility-to-talk-infrastructure/28742/feed/atom" thr:count="0" />
		<thr:total>0</thr:total>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.shopfloor.org/2013/05/president-obama-tours-manufacturing-facility-to-talk-infrastructure/28742</feedburner:origLink></entry>
		<entry>
		<author>
			<name>Chad Moutray</name>
					</author>
		<title type="html"><![CDATA[Conference Board’s Leading Indicators Rise in April on Improved Housing, Credit Numbers]]></title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/shopfloor/TDOl/~3/IHH0Bejzruk/28739" />
		<id>http://www.shopfloor.org/?p=28739</id>
		<updated>2013-05-17T19:01:47Z</updated>
		<published>2013-05-17T19:01:47Z</published>
		<category scheme="http://www.shopfloor.org" term="Economy" /><category scheme="http://www.shopfloor.org" term="economy" /><category scheme="http://www.shopfloor.org" term="manufacturers" /><category scheme="http://www.shopfloor.org" term="manufacturing" />		<summary type="html"><![CDATA[The Conference Board said that its Leading Economic Index rose 0.6 percent in April. The largest component of the increase<a href="http://www.shopfloor.org/2013/05/conference-board%e2%80%99s-leading-indicators-rise-in-april-on-improved-housing-credit-numbers/28739" class="searchmore">Read the Rest...</a><div class="clr"></div>]]></summary>
		<content type="html" xml:base="http://www.shopfloor.org/2013/05/conference-board%e2%80%99s-leading-indicators-rise-in-april-on-improved-housing-credit-numbers/28739"><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.conference-board.org/pdf_free/press/TechnicalPDF_4818_1368778972.pdf">The Conference Board said that its Leading Economic Index rose 0.6 percent in April</a>. The largest component of the increase stemmed from the jump in <a href="http://www.shopfloor.org/2013/05/housing-permits-soar-while-new-multi-family-unit-starts-plummet-in-april/28707">housing permits</a> for the month, which exceeded the 1 million mark for the first time since June 2008. This factor alone added 0.4 percentage points to the Leading Economic Index. The other major factor helping to push this forward-looking measure higher were measures of credit, including the interest rate spread and the Conference Board’s index of credit conditions.</p>
<p>At the same time, the Leading index also highlighted some of the current weaknesses in the economy, particularly for manufacturers. Measures for new orders and the average workweek of production workers were net drags on the index. Indeed, <a href="http://www.shopfloor.org/2013/05/manufacturing-employment-was-unchanged-in-april/28557">manufacturing employment</a> has been quite sluggish of late, with hiring unchanged in April. In addition, while <a href="http://www.shopfloor.org/2013/04/conference-board-consumer-confidence-moves-higher-in-april/28510">consumer confidence</a> did improve in April, it remains sub-par, lowering the index somewhat.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, the Coincident Economic Index – which measures the current climate – increased 0.1 percent in April. The higher figure resulted from stronger growth in <a href="http://www.shopfloor.org/2013/05/manufacturing-employment-was-unchanged-in-april/28557">nonfarm payrolls</a> and <a href="http://www.shopfloor.org/2013/04/personal-income-and-spending-eases-in-march/28499">personal income</a>, with modest growth in new manufacturing sales. These increases, though, were mitigated by the 0.5 percent decline in <a href="http://www.shopfloor.org/2013/05/manufacturing-production-declines-for-the-third-time-in-the-past-four-months/28696">industrial production</a> in the month. As such, softness in the manufacturing sector has dampened the U.S. economy, something we continue to see in a number of economic indicators lately.</p>
<p><em>Chad Moutray is chief economist, National Association of Manufacturers.</em></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content>
		<link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.shopfloor.org/2013/05/conference-board%e2%80%99s-leading-indicators-rise-in-april-on-improved-housing-credit-numbers/28739#comments" thr:count="0" />
		<link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.shopfloor.org/2013/05/conference-board%e2%80%99s-leading-indicators-rise-in-april-on-improved-housing-credit-numbers/28739/feed/atom" thr:count="0" />
		<thr:total>0</thr:total>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.shopfloor.org/2013/05/conference-board%e2%80%99s-leading-indicators-rise-in-april-on-improved-housing-credit-numbers/28739</feedburner:origLink></entry>
		<entry>
		<author>
			<name>Chad Moutray</name>
					</author>
		<title type="html"><![CDATA[University of Michigan: Consumer Confidence Rebounded in May]]></title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/shopfloor/TDOl/~3/nzGxVx3kl5s/28736" />
		<id>http://www.shopfloor.org/?p=28736</id>
		<updated>2013-05-17T15:05:58Z</updated>
		<published>2013-05-17T15:05:58Z</published>
		<category scheme="http://www.shopfloor.org" term="Economy" /><category scheme="http://www.shopfloor.org" term="consumer confidence" /><category scheme="http://www.shopfloor.org" term="economy" /><category scheme="http://www.shopfloor.org" term="manufacturers" />		<summary type="html"><![CDATA[Consumer confidence rebounded in May, according to the University of Michigan and Thomson Reuters. The Consumer Sentiment Survey’s overall index<a href="http://www.shopfloor.org/2013/05/university-of-michigan-consumer-confidence-rebounded-in-may/28736" class="searchmore">Read the Rest...</a><div class="clr"></div>]]></summary>
		<content type="html" xml:base="http://www.shopfloor.org/2013/05/university-of-michigan-consumer-confidence-rebounded-in-may/28736"><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://thomsonreuters.com/products_services/financial/financial_products/a-z/umichigan_surveys_of_consumers/#tab3">Consumer confidence rebounded in May, according to the University of Michigan and Thomson Reuters</a>. The Consumer Sentiment Survey’s overall index rose from 76.4 in April to 83.7 in May, its highest level since July 2007. It is also a sign that the lull that we have seen in consumer confidence since November has dissipated, at least in this preliminary figure. (A revised number, with more complete information, will be released on May 31.)</p>
<p>The gain in confidence was more than expected, with a consensus estimate of 78.0. Perceptions about the current and future economic environment improved, with the largest gains regarding present conditions. The index for the current situation increased from 89.9 to 97.5; whereas, the forward-looking component moved from 67.8 to 74.8.</p>
<p>Surveys such as this one tend to rise and fall on pocketbook issues, and manufacturers tend to focus in particular on confidence indices to see if they might impact consumer behavior. The recent declines were in large part due to fiscal uncertainties, higher payroll taxes, and persistent economic worries. These issues have not necessarily gone away, but Americans are more than likely reacting to lower energy costs, decent nonfarm payroll gains, and modest growth in the U.S. economy. Earlier in the week, we did learn that retail sales – particularly when you exclude gasoline station spending – rose, a sign that consumers have picked up their purchases of late.</p>
<p>Moreover, the University of Michigan data tend to mirror similar upticks in confidence from the National Federation of Independent Business on <a href="http://www.shopfloor.org/2013/05/small-business-owner-optimism-moved-higher-in-april/28674">small business sentiment</a> and the most recent <a href="http://www.shopfloor.org/2013/04/conference-board-consumer-confidence-moves-higher-in-april/28510">consumer survey</a> from the Conference Board.</p>
<p><em>Chad Moutray is chief economist, National Association of Manufacturers.</em></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content>
		<link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.shopfloor.org/2013/05/university-of-michigan-consumer-confidence-rebounded-in-may/28736#comments" thr:count="0" />
		<link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.shopfloor.org/2013/05/university-of-michigan-consumer-confidence-rebounded-in-may/28736/feed/atom" thr:count="0" />
		<thr:total>0</thr:total>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.shopfloor.org/2013/05/university-of-michigan-consumer-confidence-rebounded-in-may/28736</feedburner:origLink></entry>
		<entry>
		<author>
			<name>Chip Yost</name>
					</author>
		<title type="html"><![CDATA[House Small Business Committee Hold Keystone Hearing]]></title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/shopfloor/TDOl/~3/Boj5TV6WGrE/28731" />
		<id>http://www.shopfloor.org/?p=28731</id>
		<updated>2013-05-17T13:30:49Z</updated>
		<published>2013-05-17T13:30:04Z</published>
		<category scheme="http://www.shopfloor.org" term="Energy" /><category scheme="http://www.shopfloor.org" term="General" /><category scheme="http://www.shopfloor.org" term="Keystone XL" /><category scheme="http://www.shopfloor.org" term="manufacturers" /><category scheme="http://www.shopfloor.org" term="manufacturing" />		<summary type="html"><![CDATA[Yesterday the House Committee on Small Business’s Subcommittee on Agriculture, Energy and Trade held a hearing on the Keystone XL<a href="http://www.shopfloor.org/2013/05/house-small-business-committee-hold-keystone-hearing/28731" class="searchmore">Read the Rest...</a><div class="clr"></div>]]></summary>
		<content type="html" xml:base="http://www.shopfloor.org/2013/05/house-small-business-committee-hold-keystone-hearing/28731"><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday the House Committee on Small Business’s Subcommittee on Agriculture, Energy and Trade <a href="http://smallbusiness.house.gov/calendar/eventsingle.aspx?EventID=326584" target="_blank">held a hearing on the Keystone XL and Small Business</a>.  This hearing is that most recent in a number of hearings held by the House to talk about the importance of the Keystone XL pipeline project.</p>
<p>There were four witnesses, one of which was Mr. Peter Bowe, an NAM member, the President and CEO of Ellicott Dredge Enterprises, LCC. Ellicott Dredge makes dredging equipment that is used in the processing and the reclamation of tailing ponds at the mining site. President Obama is visiting the Ellicott Dredge facility in Maryland today to discuss infrastructure.</p>
<p>The other witnesses included Mr. Brent Booker, Secretary Treasurer, Building and Construction Trades Department, Department, AFL-CIO, ; Mr. Mat Brainerd, President, Brainerd Chemical Company, Tulsa, OK; and Mr. Christopher Knittel from the Center of Energy and Environmental Policy Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.</p>
<p>Peter’s business is a small business with about 200 employees in four locations, Maryland, Wisconsin and Europe. For Peter and the Ellicott Dredge organization, the Keystone XL is critical because it will move oil more quickly and result in additional demand. As oil demand increases so does the demand for his products and will result in $10s of millions of dollars being spend within his supply chain. These are small and large companies located throughout the United States. The ripple effect of spending within his supply chain is substantial and impacts a number of smaller communities throughout the country.<span id="more-28731"></span></p>
<p>Brent Booker’s testimony discussed the importance of the Keystone XL pipeline to the building and construction trades. Brent called the Keystone XL pipeline a lifeline for many construction workers and that the unemployment among these workers is over 13 percent. He expressed frustration with the administration for the long delay in the approval of the project. He noted that the State Department’s study determined there as “no discernible impact on greenhouse gasses through the construction of this pipeline.” In closing he noted that this project will create tens of thousands of good  paying jobs both  here in the U.S. and Canada; and that it would further boost the American manufacturing resurgence.</p>
<p>Matt Brainerd’s company has 83 employees in three locations and serves 3,000 customers nationwide. His company is a chemical distribution company that is part of the chemical supply chain providing products to over 750,000 businesses.  Matt stated that his company would benefit a great deal from increased supply of crude and a decrease in price. Companies like his take bulk volumes of chemicals and then break them into smaller units and also blend the chemicals before they transport and resell it to their customers.</p>
<p>Right now there is oil stranded in Canada because of the lack of pipeline capacity and Keystone XL would provide that additional capacity and in doing so place downward pressure on prices for the products created by crude oil. Some of these products are used in hydraulic fracturing and would decrease the costs of extracting gas from shale formation. He urged the committee to do all that they could to get this project approved and underway.</p>
<p>Christopher Knittel is an Energy and Environmental Economist that believes using oil from the oil sands and transporting it through the Keystone XL pipeline would have little impact on the greenhouse gas emissions. The fact that this oil would replace heavy oil from California and Venezuela, he noted, the overall impact on the environment would be far less than many would have you believe. Many make this calculation base on replacing oil sand crude with more traditional crude but that is simply not the case. It is not replacing traditional crude but it is replacing heavy crude which means that the overall impact as we switch from one source to another is not significant.</p>
<p>Christopher also argued that the economics of the pipeline are pretty straight forward. Building the pipeline will increase the profits of the producers by lowering costs and in turn those lower cost will get passed down throughout the economy. Finally, he said “The pipeline’s effect on jobs is amplified by the fact that the economy is still recovering from the Great Recession. When an economy is at less than full employment, short-term stimulus measures, such as governmental stimulus or capital intensive projects like the Keystone XL pipeline, can have longstanding effects beyond the short term employment effects tied to the actual project.”</p>
<p>Several members including Chairman Scott Tipton (CO-03) and Ranking Member Rep. Patrick Murphy (FL-18) asked the panel to discuss their feelings about the drawn out process and if there was anything they could add to why this project should not be approved quickly. Most of the Subcommittee Members express frustration with the slowness of the process and the lack of urgency. H.R. 3, Northern Route Approval Act, will come to the House Floor early next week for a final vote. It is expected to pass easily with support from both sides.</p>
<p><em>Chip Yost is assistant vice president of energy and resources policy, National Association of Manufacturers. </em></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content>
		<link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.shopfloor.org/2013/05/house-small-business-committee-hold-keystone-hearing/28731#comments" thr:count="0" />
		<link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.shopfloor.org/2013/05/house-small-business-committee-hold-keystone-hearing/28731/feed/atom" thr:count="0" />
		<thr:total>0</thr:total>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.shopfloor.org/2013/05/house-small-business-committee-hold-keystone-hearing/28731</feedburner:origLink></entry>
		<entry>
		<author>
			<name>Christina Crooks</name>
					</author>
		<title type="html"><![CDATA[Senate Taxwriters Look At Ways to Synchronize State Tax Laws]]></title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/shopfloor/TDOl/~3/8yS0kmtUdIk/28728" />
		<id>http://www.shopfloor.org/?p=28728</id>
		<updated>2013-05-16T20:38:19Z</updated>
		<published>2013-05-16T20:38:19Z</published>
		<category scheme="http://www.shopfloor.org" term="Taxation" /><category scheme="http://www.shopfloor.org" term="economy" /><category scheme="http://www.shopfloor.org" term="manufacturers" /><category scheme="http://www.shopfloor.org" term="tax" />		<summary type="html"><![CDATA[Manufacturers that sell/and or distribute  their products outside of their home state—and that’s most Manufacturers—currently face a myriad of confusing<a href="http://www.shopfloor.org/2013/05/senate-taxwriters-look-at-ways-to-synchronize-state-tax-laws/28728" class="searchmore">Read the Rest...</a><div class="clr"></div>]]></summary>
		<content type="html" xml:base="http://www.shopfloor.org/2013/05/senate-taxwriters-look-at-ways-to-synchronize-state-tax-laws/28728"><![CDATA[<p>Manufacturers that sell/and or distribute  their products outside of their home state—and that’s most Manufacturers—currently face a myriad of confusing and conflicting tax rules that cost them time, money and sometimes, business.  In a tax reform options paper  on <a href="http://www.finance.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/051513%20Economic%20and%20Community%20Development%20Options%20Paper.pdf">Economic and Community Development</a> released May 15th, the Senate Finance Committee did a good job of outlining some changes Congress could make to ensure that tax rules are consistent among the states, thus reducing potential double taxation and compliance costs, while also providing some certainty to states struggling to balance their budget.  And that’s a win-win in our eyes.</p>
<p>The NAM-supported chances include:</p>
<ul>
<li>Establishing uniform rules for taxing digital goods and services so that manufacturers would no longer be subject to taxation from multiple states based on just one online transaction.  <strong>The Digital Goods and Services Tax Fairness Act</strong>, introduced last Congress by Sens. John Thune (R-SD) and Ron Wyden (D-OR) would eliminate duplicative taxes on digital goods;</li>
<li>Creating a bright-line test for when a state can assess income tax on an out-of-state employee who is temporarily working in that state.  The <strong>Mobile Workforce State Income Tax Simplification Act</strong>, introduced by Rep. Howard Coble (R-NC), would establish a 30 day bright-line test before states could tax these employees.</li>
<li>Permanently extending the moratorium on Internet access taxes and multiple and discriminatory taxes on electronic commerce.  Without an extension of this moratorium, which expires in 2014, businesses of all sizes could be facing new taxes, further increasing the cost of doing business in the United States.  The <strong>Permanent Internet Tax Freedom Act</strong> of 2013 introduced by Sen. Kelly Ayotte (R-NH) in the Senate and Steve Chabot (R-OH) in the House, would permanently ban the internet tax; and,</li>
<li>Clarifying how much activity a business must engage in within a state to become subject to that state&#8217;s business activity taxes.  The NAM has supported legislation (<strong>Business Activity Tax Simplification Act</strong>) to establish a bright-line, physical presence test clarifying when states can impose business activity taxes so that manufacturers will no longer be subject to punitive tax assessments by states where they have no plant or employees in the state.</li>
</ul>
<p>While the Senate taxwriters make it clear that their paper discusses options, not proposals, we’re glad that these common-sense clarifications were part of the mix.  Each of the options outlined above would further spur economic and job growth by reducing the complexities brought on by having a plethora of differing state taxation rules creating administrative, compliance, and duplicative taxation burdens for manufacturers in the United States.</p>
<p><em>Christina Crooks is director of tax policy, National Association of Manufacturers. </em></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content>
		<link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.shopfloor.org/2013/05/senate-taxwriters-look-at-ways-to-synchronize-state-tax-laws/28728#comments" thr:count="0" />
		<link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.shopfloor.org/2013/05/senate-taxwriters-look-at-ways-to-synchronize-state-tax-laws/28728/feed/atom" thr:count="0" />
		<thr:total>0</thr:total>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.shopfloor.org/2013/05/senate-taxwriters-look-at-ways-to-synchronize-state-tax-laws/28728</feedburner:origLink></entry>
	</feed><!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.734 seconds. --><!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2013-05-23 09:11:48 -->
