<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/atom10full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:openSearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearch/1.1/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" gd:etag="W/&quot;A0YAQXkyfip7ImA9WxNVGU8.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1782201568211911934</id><updated>2009-10-30T19:59:00.796+01:00</updated><title>The Skeptical Adaptationist</title><subtitle type="html">Randolph Nesse's blog about the challenge of &lt;br&gt;applying evolutionary principles in medicine and elsewhere.</subtitle><link rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://skepticaladaptationist.com/feeds/posts/default" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://skepticaladaptationist.com/" /><link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><author><name>Randolph Nesse</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><generator version="7.00" uri="http://www.blogger.com">Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>11</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><link rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/skepticaladaptationist" type="application/atom+xml" /><feedburner:emailServiceId>skepticaladaptationist</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname>http://feedburner.google.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" /><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DEUASHszcSp7ImA9WxJRGUk.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1782201568211911934.post-3755028112778762166</id><published>2009-05-03T20:20:00.015+02:00</published><updated>2009-05-22T00:50:49.589+02:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-05-22T00:50:49.589+02:00</app:edited><title>Short answers to big questions</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://skepticaladaptationist.com/feeds/3755028112778762166/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1782201568211911934&amp;postID=3755028112778762166" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1782201568211911934/posts/default/3755028112778762166?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1782201568211911934/posts/default/3755028112778762166?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/skepticaladaptationist/~3/JQErxRgYyxY/answers-to-big-questions.html" title="Short answers to big questions" /><author><name>Randolph Nesse</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="10726929002060524777" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><content type="html">John Brockman's Edge World Question Center has been an inspiration.Below are some of the questions posed in recent years, and my answers. 1998What is the most important invention in the past two thousand years?...and why?Text is special1999What is today's most unreported story?Is the Market on Prozac? (This was reported in hundreds of news sources just before the crash. The idea has been &lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/skepticaladaptationist?a=JQErxRgYyxY:nBn-hHvh1Rs:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/skepticaladaptationist?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/skepticaladaptationist?a=JQErxRgYyxY:nBn-hHvh1Rs:V_sGLiPBpWU"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/skepticaladaptationist?i=JQErxRgYyxY:nBn-hHvh1Rs:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/skepticaladaptationist?a=JQErxRgYyxY:nBn-hHvh1Rs:qj6IDK7rITs"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/skepticaladaptationist?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/skepticaladaptationist/~4/JQErxRgYyxY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://skepticaladaptationist.com/2009/05/answers-to-big-questions.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;C0MHRHg8eyp7ImA9WxRQEEo.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1782201568211911934.post-7529370999627248830</id><published>2008-10-03T23:30:00.005+02:00</published><updated>2008-10-04T00:03:55.673+02:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2008-10-04T00:03:55.673+02:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Nature nurture genetics mental disorders evolution heritability" /><title>Nature-Nurture, No Nonsense</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://skepticaladaptationist.com/feeds/7529370999627248830/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1782201568211911934&amp;postID=7529370999627248830" title="2 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1782201568211911934/posts/default/7529370999627248830?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1782201568211911934/posts/default/7529370999627248830?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/skepticaladaptationist/~3/434HFDOO4o4/nature-nurture-no-nonsense.html" title="Nature-Nurture, No Nonsense" /><author><name>Randolph Nesse</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="10726929002060524777" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">2</thr:total><content type="html">As often noted, it is senseless to ask whether a trait is caused more by genes or more by environment.  Like the length and width of a rectangle, both genes and environment are essential to the development of any trait.  However, if the task is to explain variations in a trait, then the same analogy holds--the area of the rectangle changes only if its width or length (or both) changes.  &lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/skepticaladaptationist?a=434HFDOO4o4:EAh-MCge8OI:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/skepticaladaptationist?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/skepticaladaptationist?a=434HFDOO4o4:EAh-MCge8OI:V_sGLiPBpWU"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/skepticaladaptationist?i=434HFDOO4o4:EAh-MCge8OI:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/skepticaladaptationist?a=434HFDOO4o4:EAh-MCge8OI:qj6IDK7rITs"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/skepticaladaptationist?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/skepticaladaptationist/~4/434HFDOO4o4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://skepticaladaptationist.com/2008/10/nature-nurture-no-nonsense.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CkEFQHwyeyp7ImA9WxdUE0w.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1782201568211911934.post-3774526875893771744</id><published>2008-07-29T07:48:00.001+02:00</published><updated>2008-07-29T07:50:11.293+02:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2008-07-29T07:50:11.293+02:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="constructive engagement" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="debate" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="objectivity" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="subjectivity" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="evolution" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="bimodaltiy" /><title>Why Constructive Engagement is Rare</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://skepticaladaptationist.com/feeds/3774526875893771744/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1782201568211911934&amp;postID=3774526875893771744" title="3 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1782201568211911934/posts/default/3774526875893771744?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1782201568211911934/posts/default/3774526875893771744?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/skepticaladaptationist/~3/qKfuaUzdans/why-constructive-engagement-is-rare_29.html" title="Why Constructive Engagement is Rare" /><author><name>Randolph Nesse</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="10726929002060524777" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">3</thr:total><content type="html">Constructive engagement is rare, not just in political seasons, not just in our society, but always and everywhere, for good evolutionary reasons. Understanding those reasons gives us a fighting chance to avoid useless fighting and begin constructive engagement.By constructive engagement, I mean people trying as hard as they can to express their own ideas clearly, to understand other people’s &lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/skepticaladaptationist?a=qKfuaUzdans:Z7zi3MV2yXY:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/skepticaladaptationist?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/skepticaladaptationist?a=qKfuaUzdans:Z7zi3MV2yXY:V_sGLiPBpWU"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/skepticaladaptationist?i=qKfuaUzdans:Z7zi3MV2yXY:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/skepticaladaptationist?a=qKfuaUzdans:Z7zi3MV2yXY:qj6IDK7rITs"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/skepticaladaptationist?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/skepticaladaptationist/~4/qKfuaUzdans" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://skepticaladaptationist.com/2008/07/why-constructive-engagement-is-rare_29.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DEQFRXo8eyp7ImA9WxdUEko.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1782201568211911934.post-8561459980493902666</id><published>2008-07-28T21:59:00.004+02:00</published><updated>2008-07-28T22:18:34.473+02:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2008-07-28T22:18:34.473+02:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="depression" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="goals" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Schopenhauer" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="despair" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="philosophy" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="evolution" /><title>On reading Schopenhauer in Berlin</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://skepticaladaptationist.com/feeds/8561459980493902666/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1782201568211911934&amp;postID=8561459980493902666" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1782201568211911934/posts/default/8561459980493902666?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1782201568211911934/posts/default/8561459980493902666?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/skepticaladaptationist/~3/cE99o_yLsGw/on-reading-schopenhauer-in-berlin.html" title="On reading Schopenhauer in Berlin" /><author><name>Randolph Nesse</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="10726929002060524777" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><content type="html">I have spent much of this year trying to understand why natural selection shaped a capacity for low mood. The evolutionary perspective is new, but the core idea is ancient—despair comes from unsatisfied desires. Schopenhauer (1788-1860) was preoccupied with the connection between desires and despair. Like many aging philosophers, he wrote a late essay giving advice on how to live: The Wisdom of &lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/skepticaladaptationist?a=cE99o_yLsGw:8wCFLS1R4-w:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/skepticaladaptationist?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/skepticaladaptationist?a=cE99o_yLsGw:8wCFLS1R4-w:V_sGLiPBpWU"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/skepticaladaptationist?i=cE99o_yLsGw:8wCFLS1R4-w:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/skepticaladaptationist?a=cE99o_yLsGw:8wCFLS1R4-w:qj6IDK7rITs"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/skepticaladaptationist?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/skepticaladaptationist/~4/cE99o_yLsGw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://skepticaladaptationist.com/2008/07/on-reading-schopenhauer-in-berlin.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DUcNQHc5fSp7ImA9WxdSE0k.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1782201568211911934.post-366504317074784242</id><published>2008-05-15T10:33:00.001+02:00</published><updated>2008-05-21T07:18:11.925+02:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2008-05-21T07:18:11.925+02:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="genetics" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="evolutionary pharmacogenomics" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="toxins" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="adaptationism" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="co-evolution" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="P450" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Darwinian medicine" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Cytochrome" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Nebert" /><title>Evolutionary pharmacogenomics</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://skepticaladaptationist.com/feeds/366504317074784242/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1782201568211911934&amp;postID=366504317074784242" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1782201568211911934/posts/default/366504317074784242?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1782201568211911934/posts/default/366504317074784242?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/skepticaladaptationist/~3/xL7Z7y8FOHU/evolutionary-pharmacogenomics-is-toxin.html" title="Evolutionary pharmacogenomics" /><author><name>Randolph Nesse</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="10726929002060524777" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><content type="html">Articles about evolution and medicine are spread so widely over the scientific landscape that no matter how much you read, you know you are missing things. The pleasure on finding them is, however, like finding a diamond in the sand. Such is the case with evolutionary pharmacogenomics (a phrase that turns up not one hit on Goggle!). At our seminar yesterday, Mark Thomas put us onto work by Daniel&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/skepticaladaptationist?a=xL7Z7y8FOHU:jLx042462sg:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/skepticaladaptationist?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/skepticaladaptationist?a=xL7Z7y8FOHU:jLx042462sg:V_sGLiPBpWU"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/skepticaladaptationist?i=xL7Z7y8FOHU:jLx042462sg:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/skepticaladaptationist?a=xL7Z7y8FOHU:jLx042462sg:qj6IDK7rITs"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/skepticaladaptationist?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/skepticaladaptationist/~4/xL7Z7y8FOHU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://skepticaladaptationist.com/2008/05/evolutionary-pharmacogenomics-is-toxin.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DUYERn8zeCp7ImA9WxdSEkU.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1782201568211911934.post-4873681919712493188</id><published>2008-05-15T10:30:00.000+02:00</published><updated>2008-05-20T14:38:27.180+02:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2008-05-20T14:38:27.180+02:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="genetics" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="psychiatry" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="evolutionary pharmacogenomics" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="candidate genes" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Saunders" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="indels" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="CNV" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="schizophrenia" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Darwinian medicine" /><title>No genes for schizophrenia--What gives?</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://skepticaladaptationist.com/feeds/4873681919712493188/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1782201568211911934&amp;postID=4873681919712493188" title="2 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1782201568211911934/posts/default/4873681919712493188?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1782201568211911934/posts/default/4873681919712493188?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/skepticaladaptationist/~3/K3hVuY-E--Q/no-genes-for-schizophrenia-what-gives.html" title="No genes for schizophrenia--What gives?" /><author><name>Randolph Nesse</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="10726929002060524777" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">2</thr:total><content type="html">Ten years ago, most of us paying attention were exhilarated about the prospects for psychiatric genetics. Heritability is high for many disorders--80% of the variation in vulnerability to bipolar disorder and schizophrenia can be attributed to genetic variations. We thought we would soon find the responsible abnormal genes, and this would quickly reveal the biochemical defects that cause these &lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/skepticaladaptationist?a=K3hVuY-E--Q:GDjc3iXyzII:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/skepticaladaptationist?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/skepticaladaptationist?a=K3hVuY-E--Q:GDjc3iXyzII:V_sGLiPBpWU"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/skepticaladaptationist?i=K3hVuY-E--Q:GDjc3iXyzII:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/skepticaladaptationist?a=K3hVuY-E--Q:GDjc3iXyzII:qj6IDK7rITs"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/skepticaladaptationist?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/skepticaladaptationist/~4/K3hVuY-E--Q" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://skepticaladaptationist.com/2008/05/no-genes-for-schizophrenia-what-gives.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DUQER3Y6cCp7ImA9WxdSEkU.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1782201568211911934.post-57306206052000324</id><published>2008-05-15T10:29:00.000+02:00</published><updated>2008-05-20T14:41:46.818+02:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2008-05-20T14:41:46.818+02:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="psychiatry" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="evolutionary pharmacogenomics" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="balancing selection" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="fitness" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Darwinian medicine" /><title>Balancing selection--no answer for schizophrenia</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://skepticaladaptationist.com/feeds/57306206052000324/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1782201568211911934&amp;postID=57306206052000324" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1782201568211911934/posts/default/57306206052000324?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1782201568211911934/posts/default/57306206052000324?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/skepticaladaptationist/~3/wQWCb2_MnaE/balancing-selection-no-answer-for.html" title="Balancing selection--no answer for schizophrenia" /><author><name>Randolph Nesse</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="10726929002060524777" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><content type="html">Many have asked why genes that cause such a serious disease persist, and a number of evolutionary hypotheses have been inspired by the kind of balancing selection that explains the persistence of genes that cause sickle cell disease. A new article by Adriaens debunks such hypotheses. He offers a nice review of studies about the reproductive success of people with schizophrenia, although I think &lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/skepticaladaptationist?a=wQWCb2_MnaE:Y352t2w1NP4:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/skepticaladaptationist?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/skepticaladaptationist?a=wQWCb2_MnaE:Y352t2w1NP4:V_sGLiPBpWU"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/skepticaladaptationist?i=wQWCb2_MnaE:Y352t2w1NP4:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/skepticaladaptationist?a=wQWCb2_MnaE:Y352t2w1NP4:qj6IDK7rITs"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/skepticaladaptationist?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/skepticaladaptationist/~4/wQWCb2_MnaE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://skepticaladaptationist.com/2008/05/balancing-selection-no-answer-for.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CkYFRHk-fSp7ImA9WxVbFUg.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1782201568211911934.post-6588149534426703898</id><published>2008-05-02T10:27:00.001+02:00</published><updated>2009-04-01T03:41:55.755+02:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-04-01T03:41:55.755+02:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="dog training" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="evolutionary psychology" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="evolutionary pharmacogenomics" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="poodle" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="adaptationism" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="ethology" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="teaching" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="learning" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="adaptations" /><title>Why are humans such lousy dog trainers?</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://skepticaladaptationist.com/feeds/6588149534426703898/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1782201568211911934&amp;postID=6588149534426703898" title="4 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1782201568211911934/posts/default/6588149534426703898?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1782201568211911934/posts/default/6588149534426703898?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/skepticaladaptationist/~3/k46s_y2WtB0/why-are-humans-such-lousy-dog-trainers.html" title="Why are humans such lousy dog trainers?" /><author><name>Randolph Nesse</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="10726929002060524777" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://bp2.blogger.com/_eyLfBN85mBo/SBrXCCYmVJI/AAAAAAAAAbU/wzeTMDDODts/s72-c/LucyLooking.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">4</thr:total><content type="html"> Training Lucy has taught me so much. Mostly it has taught me what a lousy dog trainer I am. I started off confident that my knowledge of psychology and learning theory would make me a superior dog trainer. Besides, humans have been training dogs for thousands of years, and, we have had a few hundred thousand years to learn how to influence each other. So, it shouldn't be hard to train an eager, &lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/skepticaladaptationist?a=k46s_y2WtB0:Lv6X5GNV-Qk:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/skepticaladaptationist?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/skepticaladaptationist?a=k46s_y2WtB0:Lv6X5GNV-Qk:V_sGLiPBpWU"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/skepticaladaptationist?i=k46s_y2WtB0:Lv6X5GNV-Qk:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/skepticaladaptationist?a=k46s_y2WtB0:Lv6X5GNV-Qk:qj6IDK7rITs"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/skepticaladaptationist?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/skepticaladaptationist/~4/k46s_y2WtB0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://skepticaladaptationist.com/2008/05/why-are-humans-such-lousy-dog-trainers.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;C0YHRHs4eip7ImA9WxdTFUo.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1782201568211911934.post-4814517001298288805</id><published>2008-02-22T08:32:00.001+01:00</published><updated>2008-05-12T07:45:35.532+02:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2008-05-12T07:45:35.532+02:00</app:edited><title>Can we ever be sure about what happened long ago?</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://skepticaladaptationist.com/feeds/4814517001298288805/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1782201568211911934&amp;postID=4814517001298288805" title="1 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1782201568211911934/posts/default/4814517001298288805?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1782201568211911934/posts/default/4814517001298288805?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/skepticaladaptationist/~3/XqBJx_8MdP0/can-we-ever-be-sure-about-what-happened.html" title="Can we ever be sure about what happened long ago?" /><author><name>Randolph Nesse</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="10726929002060524777" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">1</thr:total><content type="html">Often when I lecture about evolutionary biology, a member of the audience will say, "You don't have a time machine, so you can never be sure about what happened long ago, this is all this speculation."Well, it is hard work, and often no experiment can conclusively differentiate the hypotheses. However, sometimes one can be as sure as sure can be.Paleontologists have long recognized a major &lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/skepticaladaptationist?a=XqBJx_8MdP0:6qSSNe-9E-0:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/skepticaladaptationist?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/skepticaladaptationist?a=XqBJx_8MdP0:6qSSNe-9E-0:V_sGLiPBpWU"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/skepticaladaptationist?i=XqBJx_8MdP0:6qSSNe-9E-0:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/skepticaladaptationist?a=XqBJx_8MdP0:6qSSNe-9E-0:qj6IDK7rITs"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/skepticaladaptationist?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/skepticaladaptationist/~4/XqBJx_8MdP0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://skepticaladaptationist.com/2008/02/can-we-ever-be-sure-about-what-happened.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;D0AERXs6cSp7ImA9WxZSGUk.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1782201568211911934.post-1735355617881052138</id><published>2008-02-02T06:35:00.000+01:00</published><updated>2008-02-02T10:48:24.519+01:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2008-02-02T10:48:24.519+01:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="EvoMed" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Journal article" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Standards of evidence" /><title>Ten Ways to Apply Evolution in Medicine</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://skepticaladaptationist.com/feeds/1735355617881052138/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1782201568211911934&amp;postID=1735355617881052138" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1782201568211911934/posts/default/1735355617881052138?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1782201568211911934/posts/default/1735355617881052138?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/skepticaladaptationist/~3/iSJSHd2RdLI/ten-evolutionary-appllicationst-in.html" title="Ten Ways to Apply Evolution in Medicine" /><author><name>Randolph Nesse</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="10726929002060524777" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><content type="html">I have always found it somewhat confusing that evolutionary principles can be applied to medicine in so many ways. From the start of my work with George Williams, it has seemed clear that our attempts to ask why natural selection left the body vulnerable to so many diseases are fundamentally different from applications of population genetics or phylogenetic trees. Finally, in preparing an article&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/skepticaladaptationist?a=iSJSHd2RdLI:5Pt5VfZVQng:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/skepticaladaptationist?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/skepticaladaptationist?a=iSJSHd2RdLI:5Pt5VfZVQng:V_sGLiPBpWU"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/skepticaladaptationist?i=iSJSHd2RdLI:5Pt5VfZVQng:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/skepticaladaptationist?a=iSJSHd2RdLI:5Pt5VfZVQng:qj6IDK7rITs"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/skepticaladaptationist?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/skepticaladaptationist/~4/iSJSHd2RdLI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://skepticaladaptationist.com/2008/02/ten-evolutionary-appllicationst-in.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DUMBSXc-fip7ImA9WxdSEkU.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1782201568211911934.post-920408540389778354</id><published>2008-01-31T08:39:00.000+01:00</published><updated>2008-05-20T14:44:18.956+02:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2008-05-20T14:44:18.956+02:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="natural selection" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="biology" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="disease" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="maladaptations" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="adaptationism" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="evolutionary medicine" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="adaptations" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Darwinian medicine" /><title>Welcome, Skeptical Adaptationists</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://skepticaladaptationist.com/feeds/920408540389778354/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1782201568211911934&amp;postID=920408540389778354" title="2 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1782201568211911934/posts/default/920408540389778354?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1782201568211911934/posts/default/920408540389778354?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/skepticaladaptationist/~3/Br_wHBlc8qE/welcome-skeptical-adaptationist.html" title="Welcome, Skeptical Adaptationists" /><author><name>Randolph Nesse</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="10726929002060524777" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">2</thr:total><content type="html">Adaptations shaped by natural selection are so interesting because fascination with function gave our ancestors selective advantages. The mechanism works overtime, seeing functions where they don’t exist. And, not surprisingly given human nature, this has created critics who are skeptical about all adaptationism. This blog should help to connect skeptical adaptationists everywhere as we work &lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/skepticaladaptationist?a=Br_wHBlc8qE:J2_AuawehJk:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/skepticaladaptationist?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/skepticaladaptationist?a=Br_wHBlc8qE:J2_AuawehJk:V_sGLiPBpWU"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/skepticaladaptationist?i=Br_wHBlc8qE:J2_AuawehJk:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/skepticaladaptationist?a=Br_wHBlc8qE:J2_AuawehJk:qj6IDK7rITs"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/skepticaladaptationist?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/skepticaladaptationist/~4/Br_wHBlc8qE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://skepticaladaptationist.com/2008/01/welcome-skeptical-adaptationist.html</feedburner:origLink></entry></feed>
