<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0"><channel><description>

  var _gaq = _gaq || [];
  _gaq.push([‘_setAccount’, ‘UA-9641598-6’]);
  _gaq.push([‘_trackPageview’]);

  (function() {
    var ga = document.createElement(‘script’); ga.type = ‘text/javascript’; ga.async = true;
    ga.src = (‘https:’ == document.location.protocol ? ‘https://ssl’ : ‘http://www’) + ‘.google-analytics.com/ga.js’;
    var s = document.getElementsByTagName(‘script’)[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s);
  })();</description><title>Editor's Picks</title><generator>Tumblr (3.0; @scepticgeek)</generator><link>http://shares.skepticgeek.com/</link><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/skepticgeek/shares" /><feedburner:info uri="skepticgeek/shares" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://tumblr.superfeedr.com/" /><item><title>Will we react to the problem of plenty by becoming highly selective</title><description>&lt;a href="http://gigaom.com/2010/12/22/rewind-editing-the-playlist-of-our-lives/"&gt;Will we react to the problem of plenty by becoming highly selective&lt;/a&gt;: &lt;p&gt;“Will we react to the problem of plenty by becoming highly selective and  taking our hyper-personalized media consumption habits into how we  shop, live and behave?”&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/skepticgeek/shares/~4/ocUGMmSc8Yw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/skepticgeek/shares/~3/ocUGMmSc8Yw/2431391068</link><guid isPermaLink="false">http://shares.skepticgeek.com/post/2431391068</guid><pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 20:19:00 +0530</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://shares.skepticgeek.com/post/2431391068</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Social doesn't just mean friends — it means society.</title><description>&lt;a href="http://blogs.hbr.org/haque/2010/12/unlocking_the_mayor_badge_of_m.html"&gt;Social doesn't just mean friends — it means society.&lt;/a&gt;: &lt;p&gt;“Social media needs to enlarge its blinkered, myopic perspective on what the social really means. Trivialization, dehumanization, enslaved by the promise of a point, a badge, or a trophy, another friend, follower, or fan — that’s the very definition of antisocial.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;…&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Social is significance. The real promise of social tools is societal, not just relational; is significance, not just attention. You’ve got to get the first right before you tackle the second — and that means not just investing in “gamification,” a Twitter account, or a Facebook group. It means thinking more carefully how to utilize those tools to get a tiny bit (or a heckuva lot) more significant, and starting to mean something in enduring terms. The deepest test of a 21st century business isn’t just whether it glitters, but whether it can create thick value, that endures, benefits, and multiplies: whether it matters.”&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/skepticgeek/shares/~4/2oV1UkBQvsg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/skepticgeek/shares/~3/2oV1UkBQvsg/2335472242</link><guid isPermaLink="false">http://shares.skepticgeek.com/post/2335472242</guid><pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 16:43:55 +0530</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://shares.skepticgeek.com/post/2335472242</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>The iOS and Android App Economies</title><description>&lt;a href="http://daringfireball.net/2010/12/ios_android_app_economies"&gt;The iOS and Android App Economies&lt;/a&gt;: &lt;p&gt;“The differences between the iOS App Store and Android Market are a microcosm of the differences between Apple and Google. Apple is a retailer, a purveyor of well-crafted goods that people will line up to purchase. Google is an advertising company that builds popular services that command large audiences.”&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/skepticgeek/shares/~4/je2XxT74_cg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/skepticgeek/shares/~3/je2XxT74_cg/2163030411</link><guid isPermaLink="false">http://shares.skepticgeek.com/post/2163030411</guid><pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2010 11:48:01 +0530</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://shares.skepticgeek.com/post/2163030411</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Dealing with WikiLeaks: The Right Reaction</title><description>&lt;a href="http://www.economist.com/node/17677820?story_id=17677820&amp;fsrc=rss"&gt;Dealing with WikiLeaks: The Right Reaction&lt;/a&gt;: &lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;“For the American government, prosecution, not persecution, offers the best chance of limiting the damage and deterring future thefts.” …&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;“&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;The big danger is that America is provoked into bending or breaking its own rules, straining alliances, eroding credibility and—because it will not be able to muzzle WikiLeaks—ultimately seeming impotent. In recent years America has promoted the internet as a menace to foreign censorship. That sounds tinny now. So did its joy of hosting next year’s World Press Freedom Day this week. Chinese and Russian glee at American discomfort are a sure sign of such missteps.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The best lessons to bear in mind are those learned in such costly fashion during the past decade of the “war on terror”. Deal with the source of the problem, not just its symptoms. Keep the moral high ground. And pick fights you can win.”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/skepticgeek/shares/~4/18xgFb3JT1c" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/skepticgeek/shares/~3/18xgFb3JT1c/2155636553</link><guid isPermaLink="false">http://shares.skepticgeek.com/post/2155636553</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 22:45:20 +0530</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://shares.skepticgeek.com/post/2155636553</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>WikiLeaks: Moving Target</title><description>&lt;a href="http://www.renesys.com/blog/2010/12/wikileaks-moving-target.shtml"&gt;WikiLeaks: Moving Target&lt;/a&gt;: &lt;p&gt;“”You can’t burn down the Library of Alexandria any more— it will respawn in someone’s basement in Stockholm, or Denver, or Beijing.”&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/skepticgeek/shares/~4/ErQ7hczTKcs" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/skepticgeek/shares/~3/ErQ7hczTKcs/2152196457</link><guid isPermaLink="false">http://shares.skepticgeek.com/post/2152196457</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 12:29:28 +0530</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://shares.skepticgeek.com/post/2152196457</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>WikiLeaks, Amazon and the new threat to internet speech</title><description>&lt;a href="http://edition.cnn.com/2010/OPINION/12/02/mackinnon.wikileaks.amazon/"&gt;WikiLeaks, Amazon and the new threat to internet speech&lt;/a&gt;: &lt;p&gt;“What is troubling and dangerous is that in the internet age, public  discourse increasingly depends on digital spaces created, owned and  operated by private companies.”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Great op-ed by Rebecca MacKinnon on CNN&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/skepticgeek/shares/~4/SsWzkc8v8DY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/skepticgeek/shares/~3/SsWzkc8v8DY/2082016085</link><guid isPermaLink="false">http://shares.skepticgeek.com/post/2082016085</guid><pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 19:15:00 +0530</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://shares.skepticgeek.com/post/2082016085</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Your stature on Twitter influences how a page ranks in web search</title><description>&lt;a href="http://searchengineland.com/what-social-signals-do-google-bing-really-count-55389"&gt;Your stature on Twitter influences how a page ranks in web search&lt;/a&gt;: &lt;p&gt;Danny Sullivan explains how Google and Bing are incorporating social signals from Twitter and Facebook for regular web search. Indicates how social is becoming all-pervasive, and how authority ranking - so-called PersonRank - is already in place.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/skepticgeek/shares/~4/I3CPZIKtqlQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/skepticgeek/shares/~3/I3CPZIKtqlQ/2070501339</link><guid isPermaLink="false">http://shares.skepticgeek.com/post/2070501339</guid><pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2010 17:57:24 +0530</pubDate><category>search</category><category>social</category><feedburner:origLink>http://shares.skepticgeek.com/post/2070501339</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Internet Apps And Native Apps: Why Neither Is Going Away, But The Coming Years Will See A Tremendous Power Shift</title><description>&lt;a href="http://www.arcticstartup.com/2010/11/29/internet-apps-and-native-apps-why-neither-is-going-away-but-the-coming-years-will-see-a-tremendous-power-shift"&gt;Internet Apps And Native Apps: Why Neither Is Going Away, But The Coming Years Will See A Tremendous Power Shift&lt;/a&gt;: &lt;p&gt;“&lt;span&gt;They’ll always be a place where Apps are better than the native web, but the increasing importance of the browser, both because it’s the one platform that ties everything together, and because the increased fragmentation the smartphone market will have as time goes on, will make Apps less important than they are now”.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/skepticgeek/shares/~4/WJ3g3SjWSec" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/skepticgeek/shares/~3/WJ3g3SjWSec/2057655016</link><guid isPermaLink="false">http://shares.skepticgeek.com/post/2057655016</guid><pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2010 12:36:00 +0530</pubDate><category>mobile</category><feedburner:origLink>http://shares.skepticgeek.com/post/2057655016</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Lessons From The Media Apocalypse That Never Happened</title><description>&lt;a href="http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,2032304_2032746_2032903,00.html"&gt;Lessons From The Media Apocalypse That Never Happened&lt;/a&gt;: &lt;p&gt;“An  anarchic worldview coupled with brilliant code doesn’t travel as well  as you’d think in the bean-counting world of legitimate commerce. Good  code empowers users by giving them choices and options, but empowered  users aren’t necessarily good for business. What you need to hit it  really big in legitimate commerce is an authoritarian sensibility that  limits users to doing what you want them to.”&lt;/p&gt;
…&lt;br/&gt;“It  turns out that there is something that can compete with free: easy.  Napster, Gnutella and BitTorrent never attained the user-friendliness  that Apple products have, and nobody vets the content on file-sharing  networks, so while the number of files on offer is enormous, the files  are rotten with ads, porn, spyware and other garbage. When Jobs offered  us the easy way out, we took it. Freedom is overrated, apparently — at  least where digital media are concerned.”&lt;span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;span&gt;From TIME: &lt;a href="http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,2032304_2032746_2032903,00.html"&gt;The Men Who Stole the World&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/skepticgeek/shares/~4/08dpXasjUQk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/skepticgeek/shares/~3/08dpXasjUQk/1986398619</link><guid isPermaLink="false">http://shares.skepticgeek.com/post/1986398619</guid><pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 19:49:41 +0530</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://shares.skepticgeek.com/post/1986398619</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>The Algorithm + the Crowd are Not Enough</title><description>&lt;a href="http://randfishkin.com/blog/58/algorithm-crowd-not-enough"&gt;The Algorithm + the Crowd are Not Enough&lt;/a&gt;: &lt;p&gt;“…&lt;span&gt;I do think there’s an opportunity brewing for entrepreneurs, websites and companies to add editorial components to the algo-crowd paradigm.”&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/skepticgeek/shares/~4/4G6V0Q9sXRk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/skepticgeek/shares/~3/4G6V0Q9sXRk/1982799439</link><guid isPermaLink="false">http://shares.skepticgeek.com/post/1982799439</guid><pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 09:50:01 +0530</pubDate><category>curation</category><feedburner:origLink>http://shares.skepticgeek.com/post/1982799439</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>The world doesn't need more entrepreneurs. It needs more people for entrepreneurs to hire.</title><description>&lt;a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2275871/"&gt;The world doesn't need more entrepreneurs. It needs more people for entrepreneurs to hire.&lt;/a&gt;: &lt;p&gt;“Many large companies in emerging markets such as Russia and India  train their own employees, because college graduates often lack the  requisite skills. That’s good for large companies, but it leaves behind  smaller companies that can’t afford to train the middle ranks or compete  for the best. This misalignment of incentives stifles many economies.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Countries  that want to be successful overall, rather than merely to play host to a  couple of billionaire entrepreneurs who eventually will decamp to a tax  haven, must focus on building a strong educational system for all their  citizens. That is where the notion of the entrepreneur as hero can be  helpful – by inducing more young people to study math and science, which  will help them in many ways even if they pursue a nontechnical career.”&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/skepticgeek/shares/~4/gfh4Ys34FUU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/skepticgeek/shares/~3/gfh4Ys34FUU/1726405025</link><guid isPermaLink="false">http://shares.skepticgeek.com/post/1726405025</guid><pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 17:27:00 +0530</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://shares.skepticgeek.com/post/1726405025</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Information overload, the early years</title><description>&lt;a href="http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/articles/2010/11/28/information_overload_the_early_years/?page=full"&gt;Information overload, the early years&lt;/a&gt;: &lt;p&gt;“In many ways, our key methods of coping with overload haven’t changed  since the 16th century: We still need to select, summarize, and sort,  and ultimately need human judgment and attention to guide the process.”&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/skepticgeek/shares/~4/mA9CDzd2Beo" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/skepticgeek/shares/~3/mA9CDzd2Beo/1725979312</link><guid isPermaLink="false">http://shares.skepticgeek.com/post/1725979312</guid><pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 16:04:55 +0530</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://shares.skepticgeek.com/post/1725979312</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>"Most people will say that Facebook Connect handle the whole “people” thing for any new social..."</title><description>“&lt;p&gt;Most people will say that Facebook Connect handle the whole “people” thing for any new social product. I would argue that Facebook Connect is a start but if you can’t quickly show someone a new relationship dynamic or similar people in your social product in a way that is unique to your application, the value of people interacting in your new product will accrue back to Facebook and not you.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;For example, I’ve found that on most new social applications I join I have the same 10 Facebook friends – typically my most prolific friends on Facebook already – on this new service too. In most cases, because these new social applications are just an extension of the things I’m already following them do on Facebook, such as sharing photos, events, lists, and videos, I don’t have a reason to come back to this new application a second time.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;For a new social product, you need to think about how your social product expands, deepens, and changes the relationships people have today online and in the real world. This isn’t easy to achieve. The best example of a social product doing this well is Quora.&lt;/p&gt;”&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt; - &lt;em&gt;Gina Bianchine, Founder of Ning, makes a good point. You can leverage Facebook Connect without being subservient to it.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/skepticgeek/shares/~4/I3lWVflN7vI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/skepticgeek/shares/~3/I3lWVflN7vI/1697235588</link><guid isPermaLink="false">http://shares.skepticgeek.com/post/1697235588</guid><pubDate>Sat, 27 Nov 2010 08:09:02 +0530</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://shares.skepticgeek.com/post/1697235588</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>"A hundred years ago this month the first volume of Whitehead and Russell’s nearly-2000-page..."</title><description>“A hundred years ago this month the first volume of Whitehead and Russell’s nearly-2000-page monumental work Principia Mathematica was published. A decade in the making, it contained page after page like the one below, devoted to showing how the truths of mathematics could be derived from logic.”&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt; - &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href="http://blog.stephenwolfram.com/2010/11/100-years-since-principia-mathematica/"&gt;Stephen Wolfram Blog : 100 Years Since Principia Mathematica&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/skepticgeek/shares/~4/5YtLONHEA5c" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/skepticgeek/shares/~3/5YtLONHEA5c/1691792797</link><guid isPermaLink="false">http://shares.skepticgeek.com/post/1691792797</guid><pubDate>Fri, 26 Nov 2010 21:41:51 +0530</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://shares.skepticgeek.com/post/1691792797</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>"And once reporters learned that Berners-Lee did not turn his creation into a company but instead put..."</title><description>“And once reporters learned that Berners-Lee did not turn his creation into a company but instead put it out there as a tool for the good of humanity, he was asked time and again, “Why didn’t you get rich off the Web?” Meaning, “You fool. You could have been a billionaire.” Now you can understand why Berners-Lee isn’t keen on interviews.”&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt; - &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/blog/post.cfm?id=the-web-is-not-deadif-you-believe-s-2010-11-22"&gt;Observations: The Web is (not) dead…if you believe Scientific American , not Wired&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/skepticgeek/shares/~4/mMtBs0l4LpM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/skepticgeek/shares/~3/mMtBs0l4LpM/1690004312</link><guid isPermaLink="false">http://shares.skepticgeek.com/post/1690004312</guid><pubDate>Fri, 26 Nov 2010 16:23:23 +0530</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://shares.skepticgeek.com/post/1690004312</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Long Live the Web: A Call for Continued Open Standards and Neutrality</title><description>&lt;a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=long-live-the-web"&gt;Long Live the Web: A Call for Continued Open Standards and Neutrality&lt;/a&gt;: &lt;p&gt;A must-read for any tech enthusiast.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/skepticgeek/shares/~4/4-PdmMzHPII" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/skepticgeek/shares/~3/4-PdmMzHPII/1689990376</link><guid isPermaLink="false">http://shares.skepticgeek.com/post/1689990376</guid><pubDate>Fri, 26 Nov 2010 16:20:29 +0530</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://shares.skepticgeek.com/post/1689990376</feedburner:origLink></item></channel></rss>

