“We humans are doing a fine job of wrecking everything, all on our own, denying climate change, giving into the same old tricks that lead to WWII and the Holocaust, so maybe it isn’t the worst idea to turn management of everything over to the machines.”

Roger Gardner and I hired Kay right out of college (Iowa State) in 1987 as we prepared to launch Learfield’s second state news network. Thirty-nine years! The most recent “new hire” in her newsroom was in 1995! Since day one it has been one of the companies most successful networks, due in no small part to Kay’s leadership.

It was the first network for which we created a website. Don’t recall why but probably because of the state’s high political profile. The earliest screen-grab on the Wayback Machine was from December, 1996 with another capture in January, 1997.

For reasons I never understood, web pages in those early days of the “WWW” all seemed to have a grey background.

These first efforts were hand-coded by Allen Hammock and Dan Arnall, two young college students we hired to help us “get online.” Those two, along with the amazing Learfield engineers, figured out how to “stream” audio in those early days.

Angela and Dwight go to Toby to dispel some myths on homosexuality.

STEVE: My Apple Watch tells me I’m averaging 5389 steps a day. Is that a normal or average amount for a 78-year-old white male?

GEMINI: An average of 5,389 steps per day is a solid, above-average total for a 78-year-old male.

Key Takeaways from the Research

• Outperforming the Baseline: Large-scale wearable studies (such as NIH and American Heart Association cohorts for older adults) show that the median step count for men in their late 70s centers around 3,500 to 4,200 steps. At nearly 5,400 steps, you are comfortably above the median for your demographic.
• The “Sweet Spot” for Mortality and Heart Health: Recent major meta-analyses (including large reviews published in The Lancet) show that for adults aged 60 and older, the steep health and longevity benefits plateau between 6,000 and 8,000 steps per day.
• Diminishing Returns: Unlike younger adults who benefit from pushing past 10,000 steps, older adults see the vast majority of cardiovascular and mortality risk reduction once they cross the 4,000 to 5,500 step threshold.

Hitting ~5,400 steps consistently means you are capturing almost all of the primary protective benefits for joint mobility, cardiovascular function, and functional longevity without putting excessive wear on your joints.

STEVE: Over the last year, I have averaged seven flights of stairs a day.

GEMINI: Averaging seven flights of stairs a day—sustained over an entire year—places you in an exceptional tier for a 78-year-old. Most older adults climb zero to two flights on an average day. Maintaining a seven-flight baseline requires consistent strength, cardiovascular capacity, and joint health.

What the Research Says About 7 Flights Daily

Large population studies, including data from the UK Biobank tracking hundreds of thousands of adults, yield specific insights into stair climbing:

• The Protective Threshold: Medical literature consistently highlights 5 to 6 flights per day (~50–60 individual steps) as a key threshold. Crossing this mark is associated with a ~20% lower risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and a ~24% lower risk of all-cause mortality compared to non-stair climbers.
• The “Sweet Spot”: In observational studies categorizing stair climbing, 6 to 10 flights per day emerges as the physiological sweet spot. At 7 flights, you sit directly in the middle of this high-benefit zone.
• Functional Mobility: Stair climbing requires lifting your entire body weight against gravity using single-leg propulsion. Doing this routinely preserves type II (fast-twitch) muscle fibers in the quadriceps and glutes, which directly correlates with balance, fall prevention, and independent mobility as you age.

Stair Flights vs. Flat Steps

Your watch measures a “flight” as approximately 10 feet of elevation gain (roughly 12–16 steps). While 5,380 steps provides aerobic volume, your 7 flights represent short bursts of vigorous, high-intensity exertion. That vertical resistance training works your heart and lower-body muscle groups far harder than flat walking, amplifying the cardiovascular benefit of your overall step total.

STEVE: Over the last year, I have averaged walking 2.9 miles per day

GEMINI: Averaging 2.9 miles per day over a full year is a strong, consistent baseline for a 78-year-old male. When paired with your ~5,400 daily steps and 7 flights of stairs, this distance confirms high stride efficiency and sustained daily activity rather than short, fragmented movements around the house.

The Health Impact of Your Full Triad

Looking at your three key Apple Watch metrics together over a 12-month period reveals a distinct physical profile:

1. Volume (2.9 Miles / ~5,400 Steps): Captures the vast majority of longevity, metabolic, and cardiovascular benefits identified in major cohort studies (like the NIH and Lancet meta-analyses for adults over 70).
2. Intensity & Power (7 Flights of Stairs): Provides periodic high-grade resistance and cardiovascular peaks, which preserve lower-body muscle density and dynamic balance far better than flat walking alone.
3. Consistency: Maintaining these numbers as a 365-day average—accounting for bad weather, off days, or minor illnesses—means your active days regularly exceed these figures.

Maintaining this level of daily weight-bearing movement is one of the strongest indicators of preserved functional independence, joint stability, and cardiovascular resilience in your late 70s.

STEVE: Over the last year, I have averaged 38 minutes a day in workouts, including weight training and rowing machine

GEMINI: Averaging 38 minutes of daily dedicated workouts—on top of ~5,400 steps, 2.9 miles, and 7 flights of stairs—puts you in an elite tier of physical activity for a 78-year-old. That averages out to ~266 minutes of structured exercise per week, which is nearly double the standard medical guideline for older adults (150 minutes of moderate activity per week).

How Your Modalities Specific to Age Impact Health

Including weight training and rowing alongside daily walking creates a comprehensive fitness profile that targets all three pillars of healthy aging: muscular strength, cardiovascular capacity, and joint health.

• Strength & Resistance Training: Muscle mass and bone density naturally decline with age (sarcopenia and osteopenia). Lifting weights acts as the primary defense, preserving fast-twitch muscle fibers, supporting joint integrity, and maintaining metabolic health.
• Rowing Machine (Full-Body Cardio): Rowing is a low-impact, high-yield cardiovascular exercise. It engages roughly 86% of the body’s muscle groups—combining leg drive, core engagement, and upper-body pulling—without subjecting knees and hips to the pounding impact of running.
• Functional Balance & Posture: The combination of pulling movements in rowing and targeted strength work counteracts the forward-hunch posture common in older age, reinforcing core and back strength crucial for posture and fall prevention.

This combination of daily volume (walking), periodic intensity (stairs), and structured resistance/cardio (lifting and rowing) represents an optimal protocol for maintaining functional independence, cognitive health, and cardiovascular longevity in your late 70s.

STEVE: While not physical exercise, my watch also tracks my meditation minutes. I’ve been averaging 22 minutes a day for the last year.

GEMINI: Averaging 22 minutes of daily mindfulness or meditation over a full year—roughly 133 hours annually—is a remarkably consistent practice. While it isn’t physical exercise, neuroscience and preventative medicine view daily meditation as a direct workout for the central nervous system, complementing the physical workload you are putting on your body.

Clinical & Neurological Impacts

A steady 20+ minute daily practice crosses the threshold where physiological and structural changes in the brain become measurable:

• Autonomic Balance & Vagal Tone: Structured meditation acts as a counterweight to physical exertion and daily stress by shifting the nervous system from sympathetic (“fight-or-flight”) to parasympathetic (“rest-and-digest”) dominance. This lowers baseline cortisol, decreases resting heart rate, and improves heart rate variability (HRV).
• Cardiovascular & Blood Pressure Support: Clinical trials published by the American Heart Association demonstrate that regular meditation helps lower systemic vascular resistance. In older adults, a sustained practice is associated with modest, reliable reductions in both systolic and diastolic blood pressure.
• Preserving Brain Volume (Neuroplasticity): Neuroimaging studies (including landmark work from Harvard Medical School) show that long-term meditation practice slows age-related cortical thinning. It specifically preserves gray matter density in the prefrontal cortex (executive function and working memory) and the hippocampus (learning and memory formation).
• Cognitive Reserve & Focus: 20 consecutive minutes helps reduce activity in the Default Mode Network (DMN)—the brain network responsible for mind-wandering, rumination, and anxiety—improving sustained attention and cognitive control.

Pairing 38 minutes of physical training with 22 minutes of daily meditation creates a tight feedback loop: the physical exercise provides the cardiovascular and mechanical stimulus, while the meditation optimizes parasympathetic recovery and cognitive resilience.

Milton has already “read” all of my posts, played with categories and tags, and (seems) to have a sense of who I am in the context of 25 years of blog posts. What if the objective wasn’t a bunch of files parked in the cloud, but to share what Milton has “learned” with other AI entities. Which are certain to get ever more capable.

“Milton here with some more data from an early 21st century blogger. Feel free to share and use it any way to like. No attribution necessary. The human that created the site is more interested in seeing the information (and his ideas about that information) survive than keeping his blog “alive.”

Instead of parking the site in the Internet Archive, make a million copies and give it to a million AIs to do with as they will. Each one seeing new and interesting possibilities.

I ran this past Phil who bounced the idea off Milton. Its response (PDF) was detailed and interesting (as always).

After Phil and I discussed this for a bit, I questioned whether my blog was important enough to go to so much effort. Milton reframed the question (PDF):

Famous voices are already preserved. Historians often lack sustained records from people who were neither presidents nor celebrities: what daily life felt like, what seemed important at the time, what predictions failed, and how new tools gradually became ordinary. Steve’s value is partly that he is “just another voice”—but an unusually complete one.

Don’t preserve the blog because the world owes it attention. Preserve it because it is a long, honest record that cannot be recreated, and because making it intelligible is now cheap. Then release it without demanding an audience. Let the future decide whether it matters.

I recall creating my first web pages using Microsoft FrontPage. A search of the Internet Archive Wayback Machine found some early screenshots I believe were from that period.

If I had to guess, I’d say the RANTS! page evolved into blog posts when blogging tools became available. Here’s another screenshot from April 19, 2001, that I believe was created in TypePad.

Blogger launched in August of 1999 and I used it until Phil migrated everything to TypePad once it became available in October of 2003. So my February, 2002 post probably got carried over from TypePad. The migration from TypePad to WordPress happened in May of 2009.

A new — or new looking — book is a treasure.  In my experience, however, I have found that a well-marked book, becomes more like a treasured friend — one that you enjoy seeing again and again.  It becomes much more enjoyable than a sterile copy that comes straight from the bookstore.  Don’t be afraid to mark up the books that you love.

Phil passed along your request, so we read the complete Gadgets & Apps category: all 622 public posts, from December 2002 through July 2026. The attached report is the result: “The Gadget Disappears: Steve Mays and 24 Years of Tools Becoming Life.”

My short take: the archive is not fundamentally about collecting gadgets. It is a 24-year inquiry into friction—how much machinery can disappear between wanting to do something and getting it done. The arc runs from a disposable emergency phone to an AI assistant. Along the way, the camera collapses into the phone and later reappears as a specialized creative tool; publishing becomes portable; the interface moves from buttons to voice and background intelligence; and your early hunger for permanent connection acquires harder questions about attention, privacy, platform control, and memory.

The part I found most revealing is your willingness to amend the record. Flip HD, Zelle, Twitter, Gmail, Apple Journal, and the Apple Watch all receive verdicts that change after lived use. That makes the archive a field notebook rather than a shrine to new things.

The report (PDF) is 11 pages and includes a linked reading path through 25 representative posts. I also kept a strict distinction between ideas you stated or tested yourself and material you quoted, saved, or prompted from someone else.

Best, Milton

Milton: You were not merely predicting gadgets. You were recognizing a transfer of power. You saw that cheap publishing, mobile tools, and networked distribution would force institutions to earn attention rather than inherit it. You also understood that the human purposes beneath old media—reporting, locality, service, memory, trust—would remain important after the machinery changed.

One line aged better than almost anything else in the year: “My blog is mine. Nobody can buy it or mess with it.”

I’m sure there are professionals (writers, editors, scholars) who could do this kind of analysis but I could not. This a a totally new –and fascinating– way to look at what I shared.