<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>Smooth Harold, The Blog of Blake Snow</title>
	
	<link>http://www.smoothharold.com</link>
	<description>Husband, father, writer, and proprietor.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 14:53:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/SmoothHarold" /><feedburner:info xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" uri="smoothharold" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><feedburner:emailServiceId xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0">SmoothHarold</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0">http://feedburner.google.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><item>
		<title>How to get “rich”</title>
		<link>http://www.smoothharold.com/how-to-get-rich-in-life/</link>
		<comments>http://www.smoothharold.com/how-to-get-rich-in-life/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 15:48:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blake</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[happiness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lifehacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[living large]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[self worth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[this is living]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[work]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smoothharold.com/?p=8503</guid>
		<description>I was searching for &amp;#8220;internet authors&amp;#8221; last week and stumbled on this man&amp;#8217;s webpage, who dubs himself &amp;#8220;the best-selling Internet author of all time.&amp;#8221; I chuckled a bit upon reading his claim and seeing his photo, until I realized he knows what he&amp;#8217;s talking about on at least one subject, How to get rich:
In the long run, [...]
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/DNrMWSVFcmRV5UP7tTVrSbWNBYk/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/DNrMWSVFcmRV5UP7tTVrSbWNBYk/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/DNrMWSVFcmRV5UP7tTVrSbWNBYk/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/DNrMWSVFcmRV5UP7tTVrSbWNBYk/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.smoothharold.com/how-to-get-rich-in-life/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Keep telling yourself excessive work hours are a noble endeavor</title>
		<link>http://www.smoothharold.com/keep-telling-yourself-excessive-work-hours-are-a-noble-endeavor/</link>
		<comments>http://www.smoothharold.com/keep-telling-yourself-excessive-work-hours-are-a-noble-endeavor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 13:09:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blake</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[offline balance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[white collar work]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smoothharold.com/?p=8571</guid>
		<description>When I was younger and dumber, I used to work 11 hour weekdays, half-day Saturdays, and was mentally distracted with work for much of the rest of time. Although I work for myself and have a ridiculously flexible of schedule, I vacationed very little at the time. I was seeking fortune and professional notoriety. I [...]
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/P-NPoNtYvbR_AIjZxCvU_bLRv4k/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/P-NPoNtYvbR_AIjZxCvU_bLRv4k/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/P-NPoNtYvbR_AIjZxCvU_bLRv4k/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/P-NPoNtYvbR_AIjZxCvU_bLRv4k/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.smoothharold.com/keep-telling-yourself-excessive-work-hours-are-a-noble-endeavor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Four albums you should be listening to but probably aren’t</title>
		<link>http://www.smoothharold.com/four-albums-you-should-be-listening-to-but-probably-arent/</link>
		<comments>http://www.smoothharold.com/four-albums-you-should-be-listening-to-but-probably-arent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 07:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blake</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alabama shakes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jack white]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[of monsters and men]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[st. lucia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smoothharold.com/?p=8604</guid>
		<description>Either I enjoy music more than ever or 2012 is off to a great start. Either way, here are four recent albums that you should, at the very least, consider sampling: 

Alabama Shakes, Boys &amp;#38; Girls ($5). If musical eras are in fact overactions to previous eras, then Alabama Shakes might have just ushered in [...]
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/-90d8AwYG46jsbP-YTEgrBhqRIw/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/-90d8AwYG46jsbP-YTEgrBhqRIw/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/-90d8AwYG46jsbP-YTEgrBhqRIw/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/-90d8AwYG46jsbP-YTEgrBhqRIw/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.smoothharold.com/four-albums-you-should-be-listening-to-but-probably-arent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>At the movies: Is applause appropriate in the absence of performers?</title>
		<link>http://www.smoothharold.com/is-applause-suitable-in-the-absent-of-performers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.smoothharold.com/is-applause-suitable-in-the-absent-of-performers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 13:11:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blake</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archives]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smoothharold.com/?p=8563</guid>
		<description>Whenever I hear a theater audience applauding for a movie, even one I enthusiastically approve of, I look like this:

At the same time, I&amp;#8217;m happy to applaud during live events when the recipient of the applause &amp;#8212; usually performers or athletes &amp;#8212; are in attendance. But it&amp;#8217;s always felt &amp;#8220;wrong&amp;#8221; for me to applaud after a pre-recorded film concludes, unless [...]
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/9Z_XdPe5Pr6CK22FeSt1T3kdYkg/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/9Z_XdPe5Pr6CK22FeSt1T3kdYkg/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/9Z_XdPe5Pr6CK22FeSt1T3kdYkg/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/9Z_XdPe5Pr6CK22FeSt1T3kdYkg/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.smoothharold.com/is-applause-suitable-in-the-absent-of-performers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>You don’t have to “put in your time” to take time off</title>
		<link>http://www.smoothharold.com/you-dont-have-to-put-in-your-time-to-take-time-off/</link>
		<comments>http://www.smoothharold.com/you-dont-have-to-put-in-your-time-to-take-time-off/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 15:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blake</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[offline balance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smoothharold.com/?p=8515</guid>
		<description>As I&amp;#8217;ve said before, the idea of overworking yourself while you&amp;#8217;re young so you can relax later in life is bunk. Which is why I take issue with the below remark by Amber Mac, writing for Fast Company on how to validate your unwillingness to take time off:
I&amp;#8217;m not saying that [notable businessmen who leave [...]
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/XMFEmhkkg_j8wsqy2WaHB73-JDQ/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/XMFEmhkkg_j8wsqy2WaHB73-JDQ/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/XMFEmhkkg_j8wsqy2WaHB73-JDQ/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/XMFEmhkkg_j8wsqy2WaHB73-JDQ/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.smoothharold.com/you-dont-have-to-put-in-your-time-to-take-time-off/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why I love web comments</title>
		<link>http://www.smoothharold.com/why-i-love-web-comments-reason-428/</link>
		<comments>http://www.smoothharold.com/why-i-love-web-comments-reason-428/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 17:19:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blake</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bolero]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[classical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ravel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web comments]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smoothharold.com/?p=8554</guid>
		<description>Reason #428: The YouTube comment thread for Maurice Ravel&amp;#8217;s masterful single-movement crescendo, Boléro. Some of my favorites:

doesn&amp;#8217;t anyone ever feel bad for the drummer?
if i could squeeze my whole childhood into one thing it﻿ would be this song
If I had a dollar for every poorly written Ravel piece, I&amp;#8217;d have zero﻿ dollars.
I love the﻿ part from 0:00 [...]
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/OfxAgeuUPqAEgDl_tA_JtlWJiNM/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/OfxAgeuUPqAEgDl_tA_JtlWJiNM/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/OfxAgeuUPqAEgDl_tA_JtlWJiNM/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/OfxAgeuUPqAEgDl_tA_JtlWJiNM/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.smoothharold.com/why-i-love-web-comments-reason-428/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to fix online comments in one fell swoop</title>
		<link>http://www.smoothharold.com/how-to-fix-online-comments-in-one-fell-swoop/</link>
		<comments>http://www.smoothharold.com/how-to-fix-online-comments-in-one-fell-swoop/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 15:07:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blake</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online comments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trolls]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smoothharold.com/?p=8528</guid>
		<description>Trolls — breaking online comments since 1994. 
Online comments and reader reaction to news are often enlightening. Unless of course they&amp;#8217;re disrupted by attention trolls, which they often are. Which is why commenting for the most part is still broken. Even the world&amp;#8217;s largest bloggerprenuers know this.
Blocking trolls, however, is useless. They just create new accounts to perpetuate the [...]
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/PruFU2npUtGI50fIELpFCywb19o/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/PruFU2npUtGI50fIELpFCywb19o/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/PruFU2npUtGI50fIELpFCywb19o/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/PruFU2npUtGI50fIELpFCywb19o/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.smoothharold.com/how-to-fix-online-comments-in-one-fell-swoop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>This wired life: You’re still doing it wrong</title>
		<link>http://www.smoothharold.com/this-wired-life-youre-still-doing-it-wrong/</link>
		<comments>http://www.smoothharold.com/this-wired-life-youre-still-doing-it-wrong/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 14:59:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blake</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[offline balance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smoothharold.com/?p=8534</guid>
		<description>The below commentary by Sherry Turkle in the New York Times is brimming with so much contemporary wisdom, I&amp;#8217;m gonna share my favorite excerpts in the hope you&amp;#8217;ll not only read the entire article, but ponder what it&amp;#8217;s telling you:
I spend the summers at a cottage on Cape Cod, and for decades I walked the same [...]
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/iyUgvXX_pLTRyAS8qg9Uiq-HwgY/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/iyUgvXX_pLTRyAS8qg9Uiq-HwgY/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/iyUgvXX_pLTRyAS8qg9Uiq-HwgY/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/iyUgvXX_pLTRyAS8qg9Uiq-HwgY/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.smoothharold.com/this-wired-life-youre-still-doing-it-wrong/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Timex “easy reader” is precisely that</title>
		<link>http://www.smoothharold.com/timex-easy-reader-is-precisely-that/</link>
		<comments>http://www.smoothharold.com/timex-easy-reader-is-precisely-that/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 15:57:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blake</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fonts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[puma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[timex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[typography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[watches]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smoothharold.com/?p=8491</guid>
		<description>The Timex easy reader is the best watch I&amp;#8217;ve ever owned. The reason: The clock typography is perfectly weighted, sized, and immediately recognizable. You might say a watch is just a watch, or that the time it takes to discern one analog clock from another is immaterial.
It&amp;#8217;s not.
After using my smoking hot Puma watch for a year, the [...]
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/_i05g8TKQCdRpm8YbBU5aKZCsJ0/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/_i05g8TKQCdRpm8YbBU5aKZCsJ0/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/_i05g8TKQCdRpm8YbBU5aKZCsJ0/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/_i05g8TKQCdRpm8YbBU5aKZCsJ0/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.smoothharold.com/timex-easy-reader-is-precisely-that/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Proof that lack of focus kills a company (or how to save Sony)</title>
		<link>http://www.smoothharold.com/proof-that-lack-of-focus-kills-a-company-or-how-to-save-sony/</link>
		<comments>http://www.smoothharold.com/proof-that-lack-of-focus-kills-a-company-or-how-to-save-sony/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 15:21:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blake</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electronics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.smoothharold.com/?p=8451</guid>
		<description>The New York times ran an insightful piece this weekend on the decline of Sony, which is valued at just a quarter of where it was a decade ago, and just one thirtieth the size of Apple:
“Sony makes too many models, and for none of them can they say, ‘This contains our best, most cutting-edge [...]
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/SV5VJskZDByyBrMM-wXBLHrVoXQ/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/SV5VJskZDByyBrMM-wXBLHrVoXQ/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/SV5VJskZDByyBrMM-wXBLHrVoXQ/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/SV5VJskZDByyBrMM-wXBLHrVoXQ/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.smoothharold.com/proof-that-lack-of-focus-kills-a-company-or-how-to-save-sony/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

