<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/atom10full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:openSearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearch/1.1/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" gd:etag="W/&quot;DU4DRH4_cCp7ImA9WhVbEUg.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26753622</id><updated>2012-05-27T17:32:55.048-05:00</updated><category term="spam folder" /><category term="randolph wine cellars" /><category term="hotmail" /><category term="stefan pollard" /><category term="seth godin" /><category term="infection" /><category term="news" /><category term="angie schottmuller" /><category term="bug" /><category term="fingerprinting" /><category term="outscatter" /><category term="sender" /><category term="evan burke" /><category term="asis internet services" /><category term="privacy" /><category term="linkedin" /><category term="marketingsherpa" /><category term="eff" /><category term="spamtraps" /><category term="t-shirt" /><category term="blue sky factor" /><category term="scams" /><category term="just hit delete" /><category term="blago" /><category term="deliverability.com" /><category term="netprospex" /><category term="andrea gozzi" /><category term="canter and siegel" /><category term="myspace" /><category term="va" /><category term="spamza" /><category term="rant" /><category term="b2bspam" /><category term="engagement" /><category term="false positives" /><category term="holomaxx" /><category term="facebook" /><category term="google voice" /><category term="wifi" /><category term="out of office replies" /><category term="best practices" /><category term="government" /><category term="legal" /><category term="cisco pix" /><category term="kevin trudeau" /><category term="rich kulawiec" /><category term="interview" /><category term="blacklists" /><category term="matt blumberg" /><category term="ken pfeiffer" /><category term="lawsut" /><category term="delicious" /><category term="dnswl.org" /><category term="rfci" /><category term="design" /><category term="jamie tomasello" /><category term="spews" /><category term="whizardries" /><category term="new zealand" /><category term="clickz" /><category term="google" /><category term="silly" /><category term="john levine" /><category term="postini" /><category term="domains" /><category term="justin mason" /><category term="spamhaus" /><category term="a2b" /><category term="rpost" /><category term="joe jobs" /><category term="oops" /><category term="hacking" /><category term="dma" /><category term="censorship" /><category term="pontiflex" /><category term="joe jared" /><category term="blocking" /><category term="dead dnsbls" /><category term="barnes and noble" /><category term="jumpstart" /><category term="goodmail" /><category term="campaignmonitor" /><category term="direct magazine" /><category term="mark mumma" /><category term="new york" /><category term="canada" /><category term="scotus" /><category term="harvesting" /><category term="autoreplies" /><category term="miscellaneous" /><category term="esps" /><category term="michael rathbun" /><category term="uceprotect" /><category term="expn" /><category term="herbalking" /><category term="howto" /><category term="comcast" /><category term="tradeshows" /><category term="mailchimp" /><category term="tag44" /><category term="ddos" /><category term="phone spam" /><category term="question" /><category term="idiocy" /><category term="trend micro" /><category term="classmates.com" /><category term="meta" /><category term="spamnotes" /><category term="list rental" /><category term="twitter" /><category term="juno" /><category term="fastmail" /><category term="jail" /><category term="smtp vrfy" /><category term="snowshoeing" /><category term="software registration" /><category term="social media" /><category term="neil schwartzman" /><category term="trendline interactive" /><category term="ftc" /><category term="gmail" /><category term="horrible" /><category term="suresh ramasubramanian" /><category term="funny" /><category term="the year in review" /><category term="donate" /><category term="controversy" /><category term="pivotal veracity" /><category term="whitepaper" /><category term="wtf" /><category term="rbl" /><category term="e360" /><category term="zvika lichter" /><category term="spamtacular" /><category term="monsterhut" /><category term="ikillspammers" /><category term="jeremy jaynes" /><category term="doi" /><category term="deliveryvision" /><category term="payday loans" /><category term="opt-in" /><category term="barry" /><category term="tv" /><category term="whitelisting" /><category term="jigsaw" /><category term="mcafee" /><category term="dkim" /><category term="tld" /><category term="cloudmark" /><category term="wikileaks" /><category term="richi jennings" /><category term="omega world travel" /><category term="local" /><category term="adminsistrative" /><category term="email service providers" /><category term="language" /><category term="godaddy" /><category term="flixster" /><category term="eec" /><category term="feedback loops" /><category term="david ritz" /><category term="lyris" /><category term="transparency" /><category term="engadget" /><category term="patrick peterson" /><category term="newegg.com" /><category term="pizza hut" /><category term="retailer" /><category term="groklaw" /><category term="mark ferguson" /><category term="ask al" /><category term="yahoo" /><category term="notchup" /><category term="javascript" /><category term="wired" /><category term="2011" /><category term="osirusoft" /><category term="reputation" /><category term="laura atkins" /><category term="virgin mobile" /><category term="sender score" /><category term="al iverson" /><category term="ietf" /><category term="terminology" /><category term="dave crocker" /><category term="dnsstuff" /><category term="press" /><category term="colombia" /><category term="opensrs" /><category term="tucows" /><category term="mediacom" /><category term="help" /><category term="bad ideas" /><category term="tagged.com" /><category term="co-reg" /><category term="usenet.com" /><category term="ed falk" /><category term="brian mcnett" /><category term="email append" /><category term="smith-harmon" /><category term="nadine" /><category term="assumptions" /><category term="smtp fixup" /><category term="bulletproof hosting" /><category term="lashback" /><category term="hashbusting" /><category term="batv" /><category term="declan mccullagh" /><category term="slate" /><category term="james gordon" /><category term="box of meat" /><category term="pallorium" /><category term="kelly lorenz" /><category term="random" /><category term="fiveten" /><category term="2010" /><category term="josh baer" /><category term="chad white" /><category term="email access" /><category term="you suck" /><category term="spam-l" /><category term="blue sky factory" /><category term="history" /><category term="list growth" /><category term="article" /><category term="dnsbl" /><category term="surbl" /><category term="slashdot" /><category term="maps" /><category term="can-spam" /><category term="f2f" /><category term="images" /><category term="christine" /><category term="domain tasting" /><category term="2009" /><category term="email tax" /><category term="robby slaughter" /><category term="spam reporting" /><category term="word to the wise" /><category term="ironport" /><category term="enemieslist" /><category term="sms" /><category term="spamfighter" /><category term="books" /><category term="challenge-response" /><category term="experian" /><category term="guest post" /><category term="maawg" /><category term="td ameritrade" /><category term="vonage" /><category term="spambag" /><category term="webmail" /><category term="orbl" /><category term="xkcd" /><category term="spam filtering" /><category term="jaren angerbauer" /><category term="uk" /><category term="rss" /><category term="spam" /><category term="spamcop" /><category term="mike horwath" /><category term="j.d. falk" /><category term="brightmail" /><category term="data sharing" /><category term="jam productions" /><category term="safe harbor" /><category term="email diva" /><category term="botnets" /><category term="joseph menn" /><category term="andrew kordek" /><category term="press release" /><category term="spf" /><category term="authentication" /><category term="fisue syndrome" /><category term="faq" /><category term="isps" /><category term="scott richter" /><category term="international" /><category term="habeas" /><category term="ahbl" /><category term="industry" /><category term="obama" /><category term="exacttarget" /><category term="dns" /><category term="about me" /><category term="pictage" /><category term="anonwhois" /><category term="jeanniey mullen" /><category term="astroturf" /><category term="unica" /><category term="nix spam" /><category term="deirdre baird" /><category term="venkat balasubramani" /><category term="sam masiello" /><category term="attachments" /><category term="alan hardisky" /><category term="abuse mailbox" /><category term="zoominfo" /><category term="pv" /><category term="spamsuite" /><category term="len shneyder" /><category term="tqmcube" /><category term="advertising" /><category term="virtumundo" /><category term="bcp" /><category term="acai" /><category term="alan ralsky" /><category term="redirectors" /><category term="datran" /><category term="sweepstakes" /><category term="frank virga" /><category term="george bilbrey" /><category term="coi" /><category term="duplicate messages" /><category term="dearaol" /><category term="illinois" /><category term="email zombies" /><category term="resmail" /><category term="netherlands" /><category term="govdelivery" /><category term="cheetahmail" /><category term="pii" /><category term="aol" /><category term="verizon" /><category term="lifehacker" /><category term="adsp" /><category term="sorbs" /><category term="bounces" /><category term="address validation" /><category term="pipeda" /><category term="reconfirmation" /><category term="aweber" /><category term="opt-out" /><category term="spamassassin" /><category term="azoogle" /><category term="moveon" /><category term="emailappenders" /><category term="checklist" /><category term="njabl" /><category term="michigan" /><category term="co-registration" /><category term="att" /><category term="sender id" /><category term="penton" /><category term="419 scam" /><category term="ken magill" /><category term="mainsleaze" /><category term="john gilmore" /><category term="loren mcdonald" /><category term="chris wheeler" /><category term="cauce" /><category term="robert soloway" /><category term="complaint handling" /><category term="data theft" /><category term="spam sores" /><category term="content filters" /><category term="permission marketing" /><category term="forwarding" /><category term="barracuda" /><category term="nanae" /><category term="arf" /><category term="spam or not spam" /><category term="peel.com" /><category term="legitimate marketing" /><category term="brian krebs" /><category term="sears" /><category term="eddie davidson" /><category term="bronto" /><category term="personal information" /><category term="mediapost" /><category term="harrassment" /><category term="abuse prevention" /><category term="annalivia ford" /><category term="best practices email diva" /><category term="rustock" /><category term="roundup" /><category term="tips and tricks" /><category term="security" /><category term="mark brownlow" /><category term="now hiring" /><category term="forgery" /><category term="links" /><category term="fines" /><category term="uribl" /><category term="consumerist" /><category term="spamresource" /><category term="whois" /><category term="europe" /><category term="china" /><category term="jim romenesko" /><category term="deliverability" /><category term="ny times" /><category term="pfizer" /><category term="spam history" /><category term="dj waldow" /><category term="fbls" /><category term="ignorance" /><category term="peter seebach" /><category term="permission" /><category term="steven champeon" /><category term="criminals" /><category term="received headers" /><category term="backscatter" /><category term="peter horan" /><category term="mark risher" /><category term="gary thuerk" /><category term="jerry reynolds" /><category term="year in review" /><category term="mark twain" /><category term="zinio" /><category term="cbl" /><category term="first amendment" /><category term="dylan" /><category term="apews" /><category term="ibm" /><category term="dnsbls" /><category term="webpronews" /><category term="romer" /><category term="double opt-in" /><category term="chicago" /><category term="bill gates" /><category term="permisison" /><category term="huey callison" /><category term="internet" /><category term="whitehouse" /><category term="lawsuit" /><category term="dcc" /><category term="terry zink" /><category term="return path" /><category term="gizmodo" /><category term="steve atkins" /><category term="cnet" /><category term="viral" /><category term="pbl" /><category term="lead generation" /><category term="law" /><category term="open relays" /><category term="politics" /><category term="tiscali" /><category term="wttw" /><category term="symantec" /><category term="blog" /><category term="brazil" /><category term="off-topic" /><category term="administrative" /><category term="role accounts" /><category term="hamtraps" /><category term="surveys" /><category term="spamcon" /><category term="microsoft" /><category term="fail" /><category term="mickey chandler" /><category term="yesmail" /><category term="CB3ROB" /><title>Spam Resource</title><subtitle type="html">Blogging for more than ten years about spam prevention, list management, deliverability, and email best practices.</subtitle><link rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.spamresource.com/feeds/posts/default" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.spamresource.com/" /><link rel="next" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26753622/posts/default?start-index=26&amp;max-results=25&amp;redirect=false&amp;v=2" /><author><name>Al Iverson</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14312013852191097352</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="32" height="32" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_G1cdiVRT5UQ/SzBA8gmQZ1I/AAAAAAAAAIg/z8CO4vHqYiA/s1600-R/avatar.php%3Fgravatar_id%3D9b1f9a0c60b6974fa8428ff4dc8ce399" /></author><generator version="7.00" uri="http://www.blogger.com">Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>511</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/spamresource" /><feedburner:info uri="spamresource" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CU8FSX44fCp7ImA9WhVUEko.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26753622.post-4699882420525428798</id><published>2012-05-17T10:44:00.005-05:00</published><updated>2012-05-17T11:56:58.034-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-05-17T11:56:58.034-05:00</app:edited><title>How Subscriber Complaints Affect Inbox Placement</title><summary type="html">Over on the Return Path blog, Joanna Roberts explains how spam complaints ("report spam" clicks) at the big ISPs and webmail providers can damage your sending reputation, and offers up ideas on what you can do to prevent these kinds of issues.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/spamresource/~4/raR9J1YINjU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=26753622&amp;postID=4699882420525428798&amp;isPopup=true" title="3 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26753622/posts/default/4699882420525428798?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26753622/posts/default/4699882420525428798?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/spamresource/~3/raR9J1YINjU/how-subscriber-complaints-affect-inbox.html" title="How Subscriber Complaints Affect Inbox Placement" /><author><name>Al Iverson</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14312013852191097352</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="32" height="32" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_G1cdiVRT5UQ/SzBA8gmQZ1I/AAAAAAAAAIg/z8CO4vHqYiA/s1600-R/avatar.php%3Fgravatar_id%3D9b1f9a0c60b6974fa8428ff4dc8ce399" /></author><thr:total>3</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.spamresource.com/2012/05/how-subscriber-complaints-affect-inbox.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DE8FQXgzfCp7ImA9WhVUEUo.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26753622.post-5494845441227006459</id><published>2012-05-16T09:00:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2012-05-16T09:00:10.684-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-05-16T09:00:10.684-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="hotmail" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="neil schwartzman" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="return path" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="yahoo" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="gmail" /><title>Engagement – Buzzword, or a rule to live by?</title><summary type="html">In the third part of this on-going series, Neil Schwartzman explores the current landscape of the email delivery world.

As regular readers may recall, in my early posting “You Get the Deliverability You Deserve” I made mention of a 2010 international consumer survey conducted by industry group MAAWG. It had some distressing results for senders of commercial email. Basically, end-users don’t &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/spamresource/~4/9M0W2X-FjWI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=26753622&amp;postID=5494845441227006459&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26753622/posts/default/5494845441227006459?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26753622/posts/default/5494845441227006459?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/spamresource/~3/9M0W2X-FjWI/engagement-buzzword-or-rule-to-live-by.html" title="Engagement – Buzzword, or a rule to live by?" /><author><name>Neil Schwartzman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07763808034101375288</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-ViM0EAWidkQ/T6Q79fQHfzI/AAAAAAAAAAY/caK5gTpS4UA/s72-c/maawggraph1.tiff" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.spamresource.com/2012/05/engagement-buzzword-or-rule-to-live-by.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;Dk8FSXg9fSp7ImA9WhVUEE0.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26753622.post-4668656171663608744</id><published>2012-05-14T09:13:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2012-05-14T09:13:38.665-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-05-14T09:13:38.665-05:00</app:edited><title>What does your email address say about you?</title><summary type="html">My wife and I enjoy eating out for dinner fairly often, and it can get kind of spendy. On a whim, I started searching for ways to save money while dining out, and stumbled across this service called Savored. Looks like a neat way to save some money-- I've just registered, but I have yet to try it.

I was reading through their blog and found this wonderful post, "What does your email address say &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/spamresource/~4/HQGGSMV8heE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=26753622&amp;postID=4668656171663608744&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26753622/posts/default/4668656171663608744?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26753622/posts/default/4668656171663608744?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/spamresource/~3/HQGGSMV8heE/what-does-your-email-address-say-about.html" title="What does your email address say about you?" /><author><name>Al Iverson</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14469266496142016451</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.spamresource.com/2012/05/what-does-your-email-address-say-about.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;C0EFQXs8eSp7ImA9WhVVFkU.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26753622.post-3854553493053879653</id><published>2012-05-10T15:26:00.003-05:00</published><updated>2012-05-10T15:26:50.571-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-05-10T15:26:50.571-05:00</app:edited><title>Read the Comments</title><summary type="html">Read this one comment in particular, from somebody who is currently blacklisted by Spamhaus.
Some choice excerpts:

By the way, over time, Spamhaus has blacklisted many of the Fortune 500 for simply using email as a marketing channel
But why do so many in this industry feel that the email channel should be somehow held to a higher standard than other direct marketing channels?
The reason for our &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/spamresource/~4/sXWA09svczs" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=26753622&amp;postID=3854553493053879653&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26753622/posts/default/3854553493053879653?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26753622/posts/default/3854553493053879653?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/spamresource/~3/sXWA09svczs/read-comments.html" title="Read the Comments" /><author><name>Al Iverson</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14469266496142016451</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.spamresource.com/2012/05/read-comments.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;D0YCQHw-eCp7ImA9WhVWGUo.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26753622.post-6323784256696048952</id><published>2012-05-02T11:12:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2012-05-02T11:12:41.250-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-05-02T11:12:41.250-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="jail" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="law" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="legal" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="can-spam" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="john levine" /><title>Neutraceutical Spammer Sentenced to 2 Years</title><summary type="html">John Levine shares his tale of the sentencing of Brian McDaid, "Neutraceutical" spammer. Looks like it is indeed possible to get jail time for violating CAN-SPAM.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/spamresource/~4/FiFrzVXcs-I" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=26753622&amp;postID=6323784256696048952&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26753622/posts/default/6323784256696048952?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26753622/posts/default/6323784256696048952?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/spamresource/~3/FiFrzVXcs-I/neutraceutical-spammer-sentenced-to-2.html" title="Neutraceutical Spammer Sentenced to 2 Years" /><author><name>Al Iverson</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14469266496142016451</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.spamresource.com/2012/05/neutraceutical-spammer-sentenced-to-2.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DkYHQX8yfyp7ImA9WhVWGU0.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26753622.post-8290687372540394716</id><published>2012-05-01T11:33:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2012-05-01T15:28:50.197-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-05-01T15:28:50.197-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="email append" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="pontiflex" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="mediapost" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="maawg" /><title>MAAWG: Internet Police?</title><summary type="html">I just read in Mediapost's Online Media Daily that the debate over email append got heated at the recent MediaPost Email Insider Summit. Jordan Cohen, vice president of business development at Pontiflex, was direct: "[Email append] is not really okay to do."

He cited industry group MAAWG's condemnation of email append, saying that MAAWG had a de-facto stake in defining "law" when it comes to &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/spamresource/~4/IUE9Q_-aeEY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=26753622&amp;postID=8290687372540394716&amp;isPopup=true" title="6 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26753622/posts/default/8290687372540394716?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26753622/posts/default/8290687372540394716?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/spamresource/~3/IUE9Q_-aeEY/maawg-internet-police.html" title="MAAWG: Internet Police?" /><author><name>Al Iverson</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14469266496142016451</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>6</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.spamresource.com/2012/05/maawg-internet-police.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;AkEDR3c7fip7ImA9WhVWF0Q.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26753622.post-6916602464755912839</id><published>2012-04-30T10:11:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2012-04-30T10:11:16.906-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-04-30T10:11:16.906-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="canada" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="law" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="legal" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="international" /><title>CASL Slips to 2013</title><summary type="html">The Financial Post reported last week that Canada's new anti-spam law won't actually take effect until 2013.

(Hat tip: EmailKarma.net)&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/spamresource/~4/GgNw9vQX3k8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=26753622&amp;postID=6916602464755912839&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26753622/posts/default/6916602464755912839?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26753622/posts/default/6916602464755912839?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/spamresource/~3/GgNw9vQX3k8/casl-slips-to-2013.html" title="CASL Slips to 2013" /><author><name>Al Iverson</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14469266496142016451</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.spamresource.com/2012/04/casl-slips-to-2013.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CkANQ389eyp7ImA9WhVWGEQ.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26753622.post-6503735446578494226</id><published>2012-04-25T08:00:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2012-05-01T11:46:32.163-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-05-01T11:46:32.163-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="google voice" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="spam" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="sms" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="google" /><title>SMS Spam: Google Voice is Helpful</title><summary type="html">That we can now report SMS spam to various wireless carriers is a good thing, but the process is still overly complicated and I'm doubtful that enough people take the time to report SMS spam received. I have Verizon Wireless, and the spam reporting robot gets confused and, for example, won't accept a spam report about a message received from a short code. One hopes that gets addressed at some &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/spamresource/~4/H76RllHoXYU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=26753622&amp;postID=6503735446578494226&amp;isPopup=true" title="1 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26753622/posts/default/6503735446578494226?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26753622/posts/default/6503735446578494226?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/spamresource/~3/H76RllHoXYU/sms-spam-google-voice-is-helpful.html" title="SMS Spam: Google Voice is Helpful" /><author><name>Al Iverson</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14469266496142016451</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>1</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.spamresource.com/2012/04/sms-spam-google-voice-is-helpful.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;Ck8FQXk_eip7ImA9WhVWGEQ.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26753622.post-7934678059742225396</id><published>2012-04-20T11:52:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2012-05-01T11:46:50.742-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-05-01T11:46:50.742-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="rant" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="complaint handling" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="idiocy" /><title>Spam Complaints Matter</title><summary type="html">When you're fighting spam, you reach out to a lot of different people. If you received spam and you're savvy enough, you send it to the ISP from whence it originated, and ask them to take action to make the spam stop. If you work for an ESP or a blacklist group, you might reach out to the sender and ask them to prove that this person opted-in, with details, in order to resolve the "he said, she &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/spamresource/~4/98GlAw_EoIY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=26753622&amp;postID=7934678059742225396&amp;isPopup=true" title="1 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26753622/posts/default/7934678059742225396?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26753622/posts/default/7934678059742225396?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/spamresource/~3/98GlAw_EoIY/spam-complaints-matter.html" title="Spam Complaints Matter" /><author><name>Al Iverson</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14469266496142016451</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>1</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.spamresource.com/2012/04/spam-complaints-matter.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;Ck4GR3c_cCp7ImA9WhVWGEQ.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26753622.post-7067152296451542471</id><published>2012-04-02T11:15:00.004-05:00</published><updated>2012-05-01T11:48:46.948-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-05-01T11:48:46.948-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="rant" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="spamhaus" /><title>A flippant, but true, response.</title><summary type="html">Almost every time a sender I'm talking to is dealing with a Spamhaus issue, they ask me, "Why now? Why did I get blacklisted today, when I've emailed this very same list three times previously." The answer I have, might be kind of flip, but I think it's appropriate: "Do you get a ticket every time you speed?"

Maybe your data changed, but maybe not. Maybe you drove too fast in the wrong place at &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/spamresource/~4/GjTWK_ZzsGo" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=26753622&amp;postID=7067152296451542471&amp;isPopup=true" title="1 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26753622/posts/default/7067152296451542471?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26753622/posts/default/7067152296451542471?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/spamresource/~3/GjTWK_ZzsGo/flippant-but-true-response.html" title="A flippant, but true, response." /><author><name>Al Iverson</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14469266496142016451</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>1</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.spamresource.com/2012/04/flippant-but-true-response.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;Ck8FRHY8eip7ImA9WhVQEEg.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26753622.post-4149832394242728616</id><published>2012-03-29T14:53:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2012-03-29T14:53:35.872-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-03-29T14:53:35.872-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="len shneyder" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="spam sores" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="design" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="ibm" /><title>5 Design Tips That Will Lower Your Spam Scores</title><summary type="html">Reputation is where it's at -- that's what I tell clients. After all, the vast majority of ISP spam filtering engines are fueled by data relating to your sending reputation -- complaints, bounces, and engagement. But even with that, people still often ask about content, which isn't necessarily my area of expertise. So, instead of telling you whether or not it's safe to use the word "free" in a &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/spamresource/~4/w00wEeGK4xA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=26753622&amp;postID=4149832394242728616&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26753622/posts/default/4149832394242728616?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26753622/posts/default/4149832394242728616?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/spamresource/~3/w00wEeGK4xA/5-design-tips-that-will-lower-your-spam.html" title="5 Design Tips That Will Lower Your Spam Scores" /><author><name>Al Iverson</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14312013852191097352</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="32" height="32" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_G1cdiVRT5UQ/SzBA8gmQZ1I/AAAAAAAAAIg/z8CO4vHqYiA/s1600-R/avatar.php%3Fgravatar_id%3D9b1f9a0c60b6974fa8428ff4dc8ce399" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.spamresource.com/2012/03/5-design-tips-that-will-lower-your-spam.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;Ck4BQXo-fSp7ImA9WhVWGEQ.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26753622.post-4358155751623157466</id><published>2012-03-28T08:00:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2012-05-01T11:49:10.455-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-05-01T11:49:10.455-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="neil schwartzman" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="return path" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="whitelisting" /><title>Whitelisting – A partial solution to Inbox Woes?</title><summary type="html">Things have become a little more tenuous in the email ecosystem of late. What was once a given, inbox placement is now hard fought.

Way back in the year 2000, blacklists had so many false positives, inadvertently (and sometimes intentionally (vertently?)) blocking email from legitimate senders that the notion of whitelisting sprang up with the creation of Habeas.com.


Habeas was based upon the &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/spamresource/~4/1_Qim18NAjM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=26753622&amp;postID=4358155751623157466&amp;isPopup=true" title="2 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26753622/posts/default/4358155751623157466?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26753622/posts/default/4358155751623157466?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/spamresource/~3/1_Qim18NAjM/whitelisting-partial-solution-to-inbox.html" title="Whitelisting – A partial solution to Inbox Woes?" /><author><name>Neil Schwartzman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07763808034101375288</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>2</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.spamresource.com/2012/03/whitelisting-partial-solution-to-inbox.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;Ck4CQ38_fSp7ImA9WhVWGEQ.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26753622.post-9152399209141097228</id><published>2012-03-21T09:46:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2012-05-01T11:49:22.145-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-05-01T11:49:22.145-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="neil schwartzman" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="gmail" /><title>Inside the Gmail Kimono: A Whole Lotta Nothing?</title><summary type="html">Gmail yesterday announced and unleashed a new way of doing things. They will finally tell users why stuff is in the spam folder, and there has been a lot of excitement in the sending world that there will finally be some clarity at Gmail as to their bulking policies. All told, there is, and there isn't.


Ela Czajka, a software engineer made a posting entitled “Learn why a message ended up in &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/spamresource/~4/OnvwxPWeKX4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=26753622&amp;postID=9152399209141097228&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26753622/posts/default/9152399209141097228?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26753622/posts/default/9152399209141097228?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/spamresource/~3/OnvwxPWeKX4/inside-gmail-kimono-whole-lotta-nothing.html" title="Inside the Gmail Kimono: A Whole Lotta Nothing?" /><author><name>Neil Schwartzman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07763808034101375288</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.spamresource.com/2012/03/inside-gmail-kimono-whole-lotta-nothing.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;Dk8CQHg5eSp7ImA9WhVREkg.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26753622.post-8359516147350687496</id><published>2012-03-20T09:47:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2012-03-20T09:47:41.621-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-03-20T09:47:41.621-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="spam folder" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="gmail" /><title>Why did Gmail junk that message?</title><summary type="html">Gmail now tells you why it decided to junk a particular email message. Looking at my voluminous spam folder, every piece of spam I've received seems to have the reason "Why is this message in Spam? It's similar to messages that were detected by our spam filters." That's not necessarily all that insightful to me personally, but from reading this CNet article, it seems that other reasons are &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/spamresource/~4/ZJywVp7Vyq0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=26753622&amp;postID=8359516147350687496&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26753622/posts/default/8359516147350687496?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26753622/posts/default/8359516147350687496?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/spamresource/~3/ZJywVp7Vyq0/why-did-gmail-junk-that-message.html" title="Why did Gmail junk that message?" /><author><name>Al Iverson</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14312013852191097352</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="32" height="32" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_G1cdiVRT5UQ/SzBA8gmQZ1I/AAAAAAAAAIg/z8CO4vHqYiA/s1600-R/avatar.php%3Fgravatar_id%3D9b1f9a0c60b6974fa8428ff4dc8ce399" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.spamresource.com/2012/03/why-did-gmail-junk-that-message.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CEYHQng7cCp7ImA9WhVSFUU.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26753622.post-8306551105002557075</id><published>2012-03-12T14:49:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2012-03-12T14:55:33.608-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-03-12T14:55:33.608-05:00</app:edited><title>Send Less Mail, Make More Money</title><summary type="html">Sounds crazy, doesn't it? Representatives from fashion designer Nicole Miller shared that unsub rates have dropped and revenue jumped, all thanks to reducing send frequency, from three emails each week down to one single weekly email.

This shows that that over-saturating your recipient base causes subscriber fatigue; it makes those subscribers less interested in what you're selling.

At its &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/spamresource/~4/f1VzKEHgWcE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=26753622&amp;postID=8306551105002557075&amp;isPopup=true" title="1 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26753622/posts/default/8306551105002557075?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26753622/posts/default/8306551105002557075?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/spamresource/~3/f1VzKEHgWcE/send-less-mail-make-more-money.html" title="Send Less Mail, Make More Money" /><author><name>Al Iverson</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14312013852191097352</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="32" height="32" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_G1cdiVRT5UQ/SzBA8gmQZ1I/AAAAAAAAAIg/z8CO4vHqYiA/s1600-R/avatar.php%3Fgravatar_id%3D9b1f9a0c60b6974fa8428ff4dc8ce399" /></author><thr:total>1</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.spamresource.com/2012/03/send-less-mail-make-more-money.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CUIHSHcyeyp7ImA9WhVSEEg.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26753622.post-4861570428136990295</id><published>2012-03-06T11:05:00.000-06:00</published><updated>2012-03-06T11:05:39.993-06:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-03-06T11:05:39.993-06:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="gizmodo" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="spam history" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="spam" /><title>Who invented email?</title><summary type="html">Not this guy, apparently. Writes Gizmodo: "Shiva Ayyadurai didn't invent email—he created "EMAIL," an electronic mail system implemented at the University of Medicine and Dentistry in Newark, New Jersey. It's doubtful he realized it as a little teen, but laying claim to the name of a product that's the generic term for a universal technology gives you acres of weasel room. But creating a type of &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/spamresource/~4/zEy_zDSFy8Q" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=26753622&amp;postID=4861570428136990295&amp;isPopup=true" title="2 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26753622/posts/default/4861570428136990295?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26753622/posts/default/4861570428136990295?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/spamresource/~3/zEy_zDSFy8Q/who-invented-email.html" title="Who invented email?" /><author><name>Al Iverson</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14312013852191097352</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="32" height="32" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_G1cdiVRT5UQ/SzBA8gmQZ1I/AAAAAAAAAIg/z8CO4vHqYiA/s1600-R/avatar.php%3Fgravatar_id%3D9b1f9a0c60b6974fa8428ff4dc8ce399" /></author><thr:total>2</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.spamresource.com/2012/03/who-invented-email.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;Ck4NQXY-eyp7ImA9WhVWGEQ.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26753622.post-5585987284090279594</id><published>2012-03-05T07:07:00.000-06:00</published><updated>2012-05-01T11:49:50.853-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-05-01T11:49:50.853-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="best practices" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="bad ideas" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="abuse mailbox" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="deliverability" /><title>You Get the Deliverability You Deserve</title><summary type="html">You might know Neil Schwartzman. In his long and active career in email and anti-abuse, he once-upon-a-time handled compliance issues for Return Path certified senders,  has consulted with other senders looking to comply with Canada's recent anti-spam legislation, and has long been one of the driving forces behind anti-spam advocacy group CAUCE. Now a member of the sender community via his new &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/spamresource/~4/Z2frVN74Nrc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=26753622&amp;postID=5585987284090279594&amp;isPopup=true" title="3 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26753622/posts/default/5585987284090279594?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26753622/posts/default/5585987284090279594?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/spamresource/~3/Z2frVN74Nrc/you-get-deliverability-you-deserve.html" title="You Get the Deliverability You Deserve" /><author><name>Neil Schwartzman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07763808034101375288</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>3</thr:total><georss:featurename>Montreal, QC, Canada</georss:featurename><georss:point>45.5086699 -73.5539925</georss:point><georss:box>45.3306269 -73.8698495 45.6867129 -73.23813550000001</georss:box><feedburner:origLink>http://www.spamresource.com/2012/03/you-get-deliverability-you-deserve.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CkAHQ3c_fCp7ImA9WhVTFk8.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26753622.post-5986431551171367035</id><published>2012-03-01T10:52:00.000-06:00</published><updated>2012-03-01T10:52:12.944-06:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-03-01T10:52:12.944-06:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="hotmail" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="spamhaus" /><title>Does Hotmail use the SBL (Spamhaus Block List)?</title><summary type="html">Yep, Hotmail does indeed use the Spamhaus SBL as part of their spam filtering and blocking system. I received a report yesterday of this specific SMTP error response received: "550 OU-001: Mail rejected by Hotmail for policy reasons. If you are not an email/network admin please contact your Email/Internet Service Provider for help. For more information about this block and to request removal &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/spamresource/~4/VZAm9HRgl3I" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=26753622&amp;postID=5986431551171367035&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26753622/posts/default/5986431551171367035?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26753622/posts/default/5986431551171367035?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/spamresource/~3/VZAm9HRgl3I/does-hotmail-use-sbl-spamhaus-block.html" title="Does Hotmail use the SBL (Spamhaus Block List)?" /><author><name>Al Iverson</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14312013852191097352</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="32" height="32" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_G1cdiVRT5UQ/SzBA8gmQZ1I/AAAAAAAAAIg/z8CO4vHqYiA/s1600-R/avatar.php%3Fgravatar_id%3D9b1f9a0c60b6974fa8428ff4dc8ce399" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.spamresource.com/2012/03/does-hotmail-use-sbl-spamhaus-block.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;Ck8DQ3wzcSp7ImA9WhVTFU4.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26753622.post-6889911959517326118</id><published>2012-02-29T09:54:00.000-06:00</published><updated>2012-02-29T09:54:32.289-06:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-02-29T09:54:32.289-06:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="mickey chandler" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="engagement" /><title>A wizard did it.</title><summary type="html">Did a wizard do it? No, it was engagement.

Mickey Chandler: "If you already have a good program, then mailing inactives isn’t likely to hurt you much. On the other hand, 6 or 8 times per month I’ll see a client who is having their mail delivered to the bulk folder trim their sends back to their most highly engaged recipients and things start appearing in the inbox again. The reason why isn’t &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/spamresource/~4/up60Fg7_qz0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=26753622&amp;postID=6889911959517326118&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26753622/posts/default/6889911959517326118?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26753622/posts/default/6889911959517326118?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/spamresource/~3/up60Fg7_qz0/wizard-did-it.html" title="A wizard did it." /><author><name>Al Iverson</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14312013852191097352</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="32" height="32" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_G1cdiVRT5UQ/SzBA8gmQZ1I/AAAAAAAAAIg/z8CO4vHqYiA/s1600-R/avatar.php%3Fgravatar_id%3D9b1f9a0c60b6974fa8428ff4dc8ce399" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.spamresource.com/2012/02/wizard-did-it.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CkQBR347fyp7ImA9WhRaGUk.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26753622.post-6254424573121943249</id><published>2012-02-22T13:52:00.000-06:00</published><updated>2012-02-22T13:52:36.007-06:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-02-22T13:52:36.007-06:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="obama" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="mainsleaze" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="politics" /><title>It's not all spam, is it?</title><summary type="html">Over on the Mainsleaze blog, Catherine Jefferson points out that the Obama campaign is sending mail both to an address she purposely signed up to receive their mailings, and also to a spamtrap address.

What does a reputation system do with that? What should it do with that? If it's a reputation system that deals with just individual spamtrap hits, then that IP address is now tagged as having a &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/spamresource/~4/Uc7HJ2aUriU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=26753622&amp;postID=6254424573121943249&amp;isPopup=true" title="5 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26753622/posts/default/6254424573121943249?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26753622/posts/default/6254424573121943249?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/spamresource/~3/Uc7HJ2aUriU/its-not-all-spam-is-it.html" title="It's not all spam, is it?" /><author><name>Al Iverson</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14312013852191097352</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="32" height="32" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_G1cdiVRT5UQ/SzBA8gmQZ1I/AAAAAAAAAIg/z8CO4vHqYiA/s1600-R/avatar.php%3Fgravatar_id%3D9b1f9a0c60b6974fa8428ff4dc8ce399" /></author><thr:total>5</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.spamresource.com/2012/02/its-not-all-spam-is-it.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;Ck8DR3o5eyp7ImA9WhRUGUg.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26753622.post-2794669948999432428</id><published>2012-01-30T11:36:00.001-06:00</published><updated>2012-01-30T13:14:36.423-06:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-01-30T13:14:36.423-06:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="return path" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="adsp" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="dkim" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="authentication" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="sam masiello" /><title>What's DMARC?</title><summary type="html">Return Path's Sam Masiello explains: "The genesis of DMARC was actually a private partnership between PayPal and Yahoo! and Google. They worked together in 20007 and 2008, respectively, to create a communication channel that would allow Google and Yahoo! to block all email purporting to be from a PayPal domain. It had a huge positive impact. At one point they were blocking, on average, 200,000 &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/spamresource/~4/XtCYj1wY5SI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=26753622&amp;postID=2794669948999432428&amp;isPopup=true" title="2 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26753622/posts/default/2794669948999432428?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26753622/posts/default/2794669948999432428?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/spamresource/~3/XtCYj1wY5SI/whats-dmarc.html" title="What's DMARC?" /><author><name>Al Iverson</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14312013852191097352</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="32" height="32" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_G1cdiVRT5UQ/SzBA8gmQZ1I/AAAAAAAAAIg/z8CO4vHqYiA/s1600-R/avatar.php%3Fgravatar_id%3D9b1f9a0c60b6974fa8428ff4dc8ce399" /></author><thr:total>2</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.spamresource.com/2012/01/whats-dmarc.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;AkMGQHk8cSp7ImA9WhRUFUw.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26753622.post-9127022734598861011</id><published>2012-01-25T11:04:00.004-06:00</published><updated>2012-01-25T13:07:01.779-06:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-01-25T13:07:01.779-06:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="word to the wise" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="laura atkins" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="address validation" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="smtp vrfy" /><title>Address Validators: What are you Validating?</title><summary type="html">Laura Atkins wrote this really good post yesterday talking about email address validation, asking the question, "Can you verify email addresses in real time?" In it, she highlights her poking at a specific address verification service, immediately finding an example of how it identifies a specific handle of hers as a valid address when it isn't.

I've talked about email address validation for a &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/spamresource/~4/FiJmkvHwhP4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=26753622&amp;postID=9127022734598861011&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26753622/posts/default/9127022734598861011?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26753622/posts/default/9127022734598861011?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/spamresource/~3/FiJmkvHwhP4/address-validators-what-are-you.html" title="Address Validators: What are you Validating?" /><author><name>Al Iverson</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14312013852191097352</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="32" height="32" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_G1cdiVRT5UQ/SzBA8gmQZ1I/AAAAAAAAAIg/z8CO4vHqYiA/s1600-R/avatar.php%3Fgravatar_id%3D9b1f9a0c60b6974fa8428ff4dc8ce399" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.spamresource.com/2012/01/address-validators-what-are-you.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;D0YEQXc-eSp7ImA9WhRUE08.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26753622.post-4393978870850250996</id><published>2012-01-23T07:25:00.000-06:00</published><updated>2012-01-23T07:25:00.951-06:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-01-23T07:25:00.951-06:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="can-spam" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="mark brownlow" /><title>If the email’s legal, it can’t be spam. Can it?</title><summary type="html">Answering an important, and often-raised question by senders finding themselves blocked, Mark Brownlow explains that no ISP is going to let your mail through just because it is CAN-SPAM compliant. Read all about it here.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/spamresource/~4/1ZIxq4Z9SRg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=26753622&amp;postID=4393978870850250996&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26753622/posts/default/4393978870850250996?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26753622/posts/default/4393978870850250996?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/spamresource/~3/1ZIxq4Z9SRg/if-emails-legal-it-cant-be-spam-can-it.html" title="If the email’s legal, it can’t be spam. Can it?" /><author><name>Al Iverson</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14312013852191097352</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="32" height="32" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_G1cdiVRT5UQ/SzBA8gmQZ1I/AAAAAAAAAIg/z8CO4vHqYiA/s1600-R/avatar.php%3Fgravatar_id%3D9b1f9a0c60b6974fa8428ff4dc8ce399" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.spamresource.com/2012/01/if-emails-legal-it-cant-be-spam-can-it.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;C0QBQ3g6cSp7ImA9WhRUFUw.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26753622.post-967269217681359982</id><published>2012-01-19T08:33:00.003-06:00</published><updated>2012-01-25T11:09:12.619-06:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-01-25T11:09:12.619-06:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="cheetahmail" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="email append" /><title>CheetahMail "Gives Up" Email Append</title><summary type="html">Over on the Email Responsibly blog, Experian CheetahMail's Ben Isaacson explains "that Experian CheetahMail believes that opt-out email appending is no longer an acceptable practice, and that marketers should no longer use this practice to acquire customer email addresses."

For those of us banging the best practices drum every day, this is fantastic news. For an email service provider like &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/spamresource/~4/-1nC1Gg-tuU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=26753622&amp;postID=967269217681359982&amp;isPopup=true" title="1 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26753622/posts/default/967269217681359982?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26753622/posts/default/967269217681359982?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/spamresource/~3/-1nC1Gg-tuU/cheetahmail-gives-up-email-append.html" title="CheetahMail &quot;Gives Up&quot; Email Append" /><author><name>Al Iverson</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14312013852191097352</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="32" height="32" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_G1cdiVRT5UQ/SzBA8gmQZ1I/AAAAAAAAAIg/z8CO4vHqYiA/s1600-R/avatar.php%3Fgravatar_id%3D9b1f9a0c60b6974fa8428ff4dc8ce399" /></author><thr:total>1</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.spamresource.com/2012/01/cheetahmail-gives-up-email-append.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CEYMRn47fyp7ImA9WhRWF0Q.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26753622.post-2703049542597587168</id><published>2012-01-05T13:34:00.001-06:00</published><updated>2012-01-05T13:36:27.007-06:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-01-05T13:36:27.007-06:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="delicious" /><title>Still Delicious in 2012</title><summary type="html">Link-sharing site Delicious may have changed owners last year, but my account is still alive and chock full of deliverability-related links. Click here to check it out.

Append a keyword to a URL if you want to bookmark a certain section. For example, if you want to bookmark all of my links to Comcast or Gmail-related info, you would want to bookmark http://delicious.com/deliverability/comcast or&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/spamresource/~4/9pT4S0uAaqo" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=26753622&amp;postID=2703049542597587168&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26753622/posts/default/2703049542597587168?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26753622/posts/default/2703049542597587168?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/spamresource/~3/9pT4S0uAaqo/still-delicious-in-2012.html" title="Still Delicious in 2012" /><author><name>Al Iverson</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14312013852191097352</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="32" height="32" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_G1cdiVRT5UQ/SzBA8gmQZ1I/AAAAAAAAAIg/z8CO4vHqYiA/s1600-R/avatar.php%3Fgravatar_id%3D9b1f9a0c60b6974fa8428ff4dc8ce399" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.spamresource.com/2012/01/still-delicious-in-2012.html</feedburner:origLink></entry></feed>

