<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Sparks of sanity</title>
	
	<link>http://blog.blaten.nl</link>
	<description>Thoughts about Software Engineering, *nix, (Business) Processes, Tools and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 18:57:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/sparksofsanitycommentsrss" /><feedburner:info uri="sparksofsanitycommentsrss" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item>
		<title>Comment on SEO vs GO by Jeffrey Ridout</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/sparksofsanitycommentsrss/~3/ZmVRO08Gbpw/</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffrey Ridout</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 18:57:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.blaten.nl/?p=70#comment-36</guid>
		<description>I couldn't agree more, but is Google really the most used search engine? The answer is yes, google accounts for about 90% while Bind accounts for almost 5%, quite a huge gap. Considering IE is still the most used browser, this would mean even most IE users, use Google to search.
The problem is though, that there are no real standards about SEO, most is made up by Google, Yahoo and Microsoft. W3C defines HTML &amp; CSS, why not SEO too?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn’t agree more, but is Google really the most used search engine? The answer is yes, google accounts for about 90% while Bind accounts for almost 5%, quite a huge gap. Considering IE is still the most used browser, this would mean even most IE users, use Google to search.<br />
The problem is though, that there are no real standards about SEO, most is made up by Google, Yahoo and Microsoft. W3C defines HTML &amp; CSS, why not SEO too?</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/sparksofsanitycommentsrss/~4/ZmVRO08Gbpw" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://blog.blaten.nl/2010/10/seo-vs-go/comment-page-1/#comment-36</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SSIS Lookup com­po­nent is case sensitive by Todd McDermid</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/sparksofsanitycommentsrss/~3/BEAkbC5drgU/</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd McDermid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 12:52:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.blaten.nl/?p=58#comment-8</guid>
		<description>Welcome to the blogging and SSIS community, Chris!

Yes - they should find some way to "advertise" that limitation more perdominantly.  It comes as quite a surprise - especially when it only occurs in cached mode.  It makes sense once you start thinking of the cached mode as a Hashtable - which wouldn't support case-insensitive lookups unless coded specifically to do so.  Just FYI - the cached Lookup is also space-sensitive and collation-sensitive.  The uncached Lookup leaves the comparison up to the database engine (whatever one that is) - but the cached Lookup compares it internally, very strictly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welcome to the blogging and SSIS community, Chris!</p>
<p>Yes — they should find some way to “advertise” that limitation more perdominantly.  It comes as quite a surprise — especially when it only occurs in cached mode.  It makes sense once you start thinking of the cached mode as a Hashtable — which wouldn’t support case-insensitive lookups unless coded specifically to do so.  Just FYI — the cached Lookup is also space-sensitive and collation-sensitive.  The uncached Lookup leaves the comparison up to the database engine (whatever one that is) — but the cached Lookup compares it internally, very strictly.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/sparksofsanitycommentsrss/~4/BEAkbC5drgU" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://blog.blaten.nl/2010/03/ssis-lookup-component-is-case-sensitive/comment-page-1/#comment-8</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Now I’ll use shortened urls in my twitter feed by Chris</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/sparksofsanitycommentsrss/~3/DOsxZ24ItfI/</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 14:57:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.blaten.nl/?p=42#comment-7</guid>
		<description>Next up... feedburner for feeds :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Next up… feedburner for feeds <img src='http://blog.blaten.nl/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/sparksofsanitycommentsrss/~4/DOsxZ24ItfI" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://blog.blaten.nl/2010/02/now-ill-use-shortened-urls-in-my-twitter-feed/comment-page-1/#comment-7</feedburner:origLink></item>
</channel>
</rss>

