“Enough of this groveling and cringing!” he said,
“I’ve no holes in my feet and no thorns on my head!
Why do you think that a God is a foe,
A being who judges and brings weal or woe?
You should understand that a God is a friend,
Yes, someone who’s like you, whom you comprehend!
This bowing and scraping is not what we need,
So pick yourselves up! Take a drink of my mead!”…

“Eschew alien ways and the preachers they suit!
And look deep within for your spiritual roots!
Your values, your virtues, and what it compels,
Yes, that’s your religion! You need nothing else!
Your heritage, culture! In this you should delve!
You must understand your religion’s yourselves!
For you are the Gods and they’re you, yes indeed!
I’m just a reflection of all you should be!”

Perhaps our neo-pagan friends could convince Thor to do something useful besides rhyming, like resurrecting the dead and restoring sight to the blind. Or is he busy, taking a long dump in Valhalla’s crapper? At the very least, they could introduce us to some white women who have been inspired by this verbal excrement to become devoted wives and mothers. Or are they determined to allow Christians to make them look foolish yet again? The future belongs to Christians.

John Derbyshire identifies three worldview categories: religion, culturalism, and biologism. This is a rather astute observation because, though Derbyshire himself would disagree, a balanced life is found in all three. There are atheists who reject religion, neo-pagans whose unitarian and monistic religion will never attain to the high culture of the West, and neo-Babelist Christians who reject biology, which is not very different from castrating themselves.

As everyone knows, the white race has carried the gospel throughout the world. Because of this fact, there has always been a strong effort in churches to downplay white history. (White people love to loathe themselves.) There is even a politically-correct compulsion to loudly denounce any suggestion that ancient Israelites and surrounding nations were white. See these remarkable pictures at Stormfront.

Ancient Judean women. Notice the round eyes, thin lips, and aqualine noses.

Blond-haired, blue-eyed Northern Israelites.

Ancient Galileans in a mosaic discovered in Sepphoris, all of them quite obviously our distant cousins.

Here’s an Amorite painted on the tomb of Seti.

The Encyclopædia Britannica, 14th ed., vol. 1, describes the Amorites in this way: “Egyptian illustrations of the New Kingdom show the Palestinian Amorites to have been a race much more like the Northern Europeans than the Semites; long-headed, with blue eyes, straight noses and thin lips.”

The name Esau means “red.” David and Solomon are also described as ruddy, just like Adam, meaning that they could blush in their white cheeks. The Nazirites (like Samson) are described as “brighter than snow, and whiter than milk; they were more ruddy in body than rubies, like sapphire in their appearance.”

Just because it’s easy to point out that self-loathing white preachers are lying once again does not mean that we can boast in the flesh.

Therefore remember that you…were without Christ, being aliens from the commonwealth of Israel and strangers from the covenants of promise, having no hope and without God in the world. But now in Christ Jesus you who once were far off have been brought near by the blood of Christ. (Ephesians 2:11-13)

Basically, the lying preachers go off into the weeds because they are Jacobins, as Dabney called them. They have forgotten Edmund Burke’s primary law of social relations. As he wrote in Reflections on the Revolution in France in 1790, “To love the little platoon we belong to in society, is the first principle (the germ as it were) of publick affections.” This is similar to what G.K. Chesterton said: “The true soldier fights not because he hates what is in front of him, but because he loves what is behind him.” Even so, we must hate evil with a perfect hatred, as King David said. And as John Tyndall said before he died, “The day that our followers lose their ability to hate will be the day that they lose their power and their will to achieve anything worthwhile at all.” Love and hate are in balance. As soon as you begin to think that your people are equal to all others, you have planted a seed that, when full grown, will cause you to hate both yourself and all humanity. Perhaps Jared Taylor has said it best: “We have the right to be us, and only we can be us.”

As Rushdoony wrote: “Freedom from God means freedom from man also, because it is God’s law which establishes man’s duty to his Creator and to his neighbor.” So-called “freedom” from man and God is anti-Kinism.

“Christ did not come to save only one race of people, but did He choose to save mankind by race-mixing? The entire canon of Scripture says the opposite. And when the Europeans were Christian, they opposed race-mixing. In order to support multi-culturalism, you must reject Scripture and claim that your European predecessors were not sufficiently Christian. This is precisely what the Christian liberals do.” ~ CWNY

Generation5 has two must-read posts here and here on miscegenation.

In His Providence, He has created and ordained our lot not as merely spiritual abstractions but as members of a particular family, tribe, nation and race with concentric levels of responsibilities toward each.

The only sentence that doesn’t sit well:

It is not about unlawfully and unjustly segregating people on the basis of race.

Racial segregation of any kind will be called unlawful and unjust, yet this is precisely what we need. Survival requires us to obey a higher law. As Dabney writes, God himself established caste restrictions on Ammonites, Moabites, Egyptians, and Edomites. Though this does not

obligate us positively to establish similar distinctions in our day…the fact that God once saw fit to establish them does prove that they cannot be essentially sinful. To assert that they are, impugns the righteousness of God. Whence it follows, in direct opposition to the Jacobin theory, that should suitable circumstances again arise such “caste distinctions” may be righteous. It will be exclaimed that the New Testament reversed all this. We shall be reminded of Paul’s famous declaration (Col. iii. 11): “Where there is neither Jew nor Greek, circumcision nor uncircumcision, barbarian, Scythian, bond nor free, but Christ is all and in all”; or this (Gal. iii. 28): “There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female, for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.” But before a literal and mechanical equality can be inferred from these, it must be settled what the Holy Spirit meant by being “one in Christ,” and whether the parts which are combined to construct a component unity are not always unequal instead of equal… The apostle himself demonstrates that he never designed the leveling sense to be put upon his words by proceeding after he had uttered them to subject women in one sense to an inequality by imposing upon them ecclesiastical subordination, and even a different dress, in the church. The Scriptures thus teach that all distinctions of caste are not unjust in the sense charged by the current theory.

According to the Black Eyed Peas, diversity of language, race, tribe, and blood, as God created the world, is evil. This reminds me of what U2 sang 25 years ago on their otherwise excellent Joshua Tree album:

I believe in the kingdom come
Then all the colors will bleed into one
Bleed into one

Even then, it was not unusual to pretend that adultery and the gospel are the best of chums.

“[He considered their oneness] as a reason why they must be scattered: ‘Behold, the people are one, and they have all one language.‘ If they continue as one…the power of their prince will soon be exorbitant; wickedness and profaneness will be insufferably rampant, for they will strengthen one another’s hands in it… Therefore it is decreed that they must not be one… The project of some to frame a universal character, in order to a universal language, how desirable soever it may seem, is yet, I think, but a vain thing to attempt; for it is to strive against a divine sentence, by which the languages of the nations will be divided while the world stands.” ~ Matthew Henry’s Commentary on Genesis 11

I would love to see someone prove from Scripture, said the spider to the fly, why languages are to be divided but races are to be amalgamated. Oughtn’t the conscientious race-mixer advocate esperanto as the universal language since we all came from Adam?

Another major problem with racial integration, especially in the absence of biblical hereditary laws, is that blood-money is no longer expected for offenses because kinship is no longer desired. All crimes are considered to be committed by and against individuals, with the Almighty State as arbitrator of justice. This is not how it used to be.

For the Saxons, murder as well as accidental homicide were settled by payment of blood-money to the kindred…

Wergeld, as our Saxon ancestors called it, is a custom of many nations, although none, perhaps, has elaborated it into a social system so successfully as the Germanic peoples. The monster Grendel, whom Beowulf kills, is an outlaw not so much because he kills the Danish king’s retainers as because his refusal to pay compensation puts him outside society…

Much of what underlies the principle of blood-revenge is summed up in the phrase “collective responsibility.” In other words, an individual who killed or maimed or robbed someone was not the only person responsible. If a town rose up against the king, it was not just the guilty parties who suffered. In Medieval Tuscany, Florence in particular, wide networks of kinfolks were held collectively responsible for paying the fines of an offending member, and this gave the Florentine business classes the ability to expel entire noble kindreds. One of King Alfred’s successors made local communities responsible for paying the fines for unpunished criminals—which must have served as a powerful incentive to punish the guilty parties.

The diversities who trouble us today have no incentive to stop. Some individuals are imprisoned, but their kin are never required to recompense the victims. Nor could they, which would properly result in their expulsion. But white Americans worship at the altar of Equality, not at the altar of Christ.

Read Ehud’s excellent comment on messianic white paternalism.

A woman named “DeNeen” spews hatred under the headline, “Single Black Women Being Urged to Date Outside Race.” Everyone already knows the reason. With few exceptions, black men are the most atrocious husbands and fathers imaginable. About three-fourths of all black children are bastards. Very few of the remainder have parents who stay married. The problems are compounded by integration, as black women face the impossible task of competing with white women for attention and black men face the impossible task of competing with white men for jobs. Hollywood takes care of the former and Washington takes care of the latter.

These are the facts which feminists persistently ignore. Instead, they reduce complex human relationships to the cold calculus of economics.

“Black women are in market failure,” says writer Karyn Langhorne Folan. “The solution is to find a new market for your commodity. And in this case, we are the commodity and the new market is men of other races”…

Lisa Vazquez agrees emphatically. “Divestment is an imperative of our self-preservation as black women”…

“There are some women who believe that racial loyalty should have precedence over self-preservation,” Vazquez says. “Where did that teaching come from?… Too many of us claim that we are God’s women, but our mentality reveals that we place racial validation above any and everything.”

This is self-hatred, and it will end in disaster for the black race, just as white do-gooders who treat strange children as the equals of their own children are filled with hatred.

Pastor Wigger. Your tithe dollars at work.

James Edwards on the incomprehensible mind of the leftist:

Dissent is only possible among a free, morally strong and homogenous people. People that believe in truth, beauty, and something greater than themselves. People with enough courage and humility to realize that they don’t know it all, that there is room to grow and discover and learn from the past as well as the future. Of course, those are all characteristics lacking in the leftist. He is driven by a subhuman rage, he is an “unreasoning animal” in the words of the apostle Peter. His instincts are to destroy, destroy, destroy. We can’t really know or understand how the leftist mind works. We’re not supposed to. It is alien to us in every sense of that word. That is why the leftist favors the alien in every way he can. We are to stand up for what is right, true, and just. There are only a small remnant willing to do so, but they are the true heroes of our people.

James has two excellent posts here and here on the “bizarro world conservatism” of the Tea Party movement, which is yet another promising reform by fed-up white men that becomes stillborn from a conscious effort to dissociate it from our race. If history is any guide, the ideas that originally animated these folks will be perverted and then assumed by the Republican Party, thereby sterilizing them. As James observes, this is already happening.

See Keith Olbermann and Dallas Tea Party representatives argue over which is more racist, the Tea Parties or MSNBC. Even though the Tea Partiers think they’ve scored some points against KO, they’ve actually conceded his primary point, which is that whites really are racists if they organize on their own and protect their own interests. All the diversities are trotted out for the camera (the RNC does the same) because the people in charge agree with liberals on race.

We’ve seen how Christians who take leave of their racial senses end up with Marxism that bears little resemblance to Christianity. This is even more true of conservatives. The Tea Partiers apparently believe that anything in the “marketplace of ideas” can be called conservative, or even constitutional. But when morality is traded in the marketplace then the market becomes god. This is as far from conservatism as you can get. Its only consistent end is nihilism.

To libertarians, nothing is perverse.

People loved liberty, even economic liberty, long before Adam Smith (much less Ludwig von Mises) ever propounded his fallacies. Our search is for truth, not for a comforting ideology, and the things we love that are real and true—our wives and children, the freedom to buy, sell, and compete in the marketplace—cannot be defended with illusions…

Rather than taking up actual transactions between real human beings, liberals take their stand on abstract concepts like the Market, Freedom, and Value. “Freedom to do what?” we ask. “Freedom to choose,” answers Professor Friedman. “Choose what?” we persist, like rude children. “Whatever you like,” they answer…

If all moral, social, aesthetic, and political questions can be reduced to what an individual happens to prefer, then there is no objective basis for truth, beauty, and right.

Which also proves the falsehoods of Darwinism.

The pro-white movement suffers from this moral relativism as well. At 51:30 in this Jim Giles interview [Giles is allegedly an FBI informant], Kevin MacDonald is critical of Alex Linder for advocating violence, just as Linder is critical of MacDonald (and Francis and Taylor, etc.) for thinking that they’re going to change anything by writing and speaking. MacDonald makes a good point on the quality of rhetoric, and Linder makes a good point that wars are won in the trenches, in the mud and the blood, not by keyboard commandos like us, bloviating on websites.

MacDonald’s strategy is to reach educated whites, just as Jewish intellectuals changed the world in the 1920s through Partisan Review and other organs by implanting the ideals of cosmopolitan Americanism from the top down.

We are trying to develop a rhetoric that will appeal to educated white people in this country…scientifically-based…rational…facts…psychological data… This is the only way to appeal to educated white Americans.

Strangely, while MacDonald criticizes Linder for “gutter-level talk” and is not even able to bring himself to utter the example of the word “kike,” he defends sodomy, which civilized societies, ever since God revealed His law to us, have always judged to be a capital offense.

Homosexuals have ethnic interests just like you and me… It’s not a choice they make… It is hormonal, it’s genetic, and we can’t change that… They are white people. There is no reason why a white movement should exclude homosexuals.

He goes on to say that the “culture” is heterosexual, as it should be, because this promotes families, and faggots in the “movement” (no pun intended) should want their own identity suppressed for this very reason. What?

“For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even His eternal power and Godhead, so that they are without excuse, because, although they knew God, they did not glorify Him as God, nor were thankful, but became futile in their thoughts, and their foolish hearts were darkened. Professing to be wise, they became fools, and changed the glory of the incorruptible God into an image made like corruptible man—and birds and four-footed animals and creeping things.” (Romans 1:20-23)

The primordial soup theory is finally being revised, long after sensible people realized that it’s laughable. Remember, even though Darwinists have no idea how life originated, they just know that it must have created itself, and this means they are not, I repeat, not religious. Let me say it again: They are not religious.

She blinded me with SCIENCE! (This is another of those “science proves that faith is a mental illness” stories.)

The AKC is breeding master races!

“White women seem to be able to think of pretty much anything as their children—except natural children from their own wombs: adopted children from Africa, expensive houses, dogs, even killer whales. It has to stop.”

Whites pronounced guilty of “cultural theft” by vast numbers of blacks and the Coca-Cola Company.

We’re #190!

The underground economy is growing fast. It’s very likely that the empire will respond with violence to its own “citizens” as tax revenues decline. Then, as colossal debts go unpaid, interest rates and inflation will rise, which will only cause the underground economy to grow faster. It’s the beginning of the end for the mother of harlots and abominations of the earth (i.e., Israel West).

A Jew professor who condemns Tea Partiers as racists.

And I’m pretty sure those programs he leads on “Israel awareness” aren’t focused on ending “contempt for the other” in Israel, nor discussing the rights and freedoms being denied over there to brown skinned Palestinians, nor is he expressing much concern over the fact that Arabs and other non-Jews aren’t a “legitimate part” of Israel, and I’m pretty sure his bleeding heart for “illegal immigrants” doesn’t extend to the ones entering Israel, either. And for all his outrage at people in America who look down on mixed race children, I’m pretty sure he has no problem with the fact that mixed marriages are outlawed in Israel.

See what Jew-banking has done for Iceland (video). “We gave a couple of guys the permission to use all the force of Iceland to sell Iceland, to make a fortune off it, and leave the bill with the common public… Before we knew it we had banks that were 10 or 11 times the size of GDP.” Now every man, woman, and child in Iceland owes $20,000 to pay off the theft-debt. Does any of this sound familiar?

Does it feel like you have a tongue-eating parasite in your mouth?

A Jew explains, in less than a minute, the purpose of his people.

The 65th anniversary of Churchill’s greatest war crime.

Israel will erect a memorial to the Soviet army, proving once and for all that they care nothing for the suffering of others yet expect the whole world to bow down in reverence at the suffering of Jooze.

It’s entertaining to read about Jews getting their panties in twist when other Jews are compared to Nazis. All it takes is for Paul Craig Roberts to write: “For Palestinians, Every Day is Kristallnacht.”

To favor the continued biological existence of Germans is “neo-Nazi.”

Are there any Jews who are not terrorists?

The Tel Aviv Chamber of Commerce jumps for joy.

Bishop Williamson, who learned about Jew-lies from Ernst Zundel, will go on trial shortly after Zundel is released from prison after seven years. Zundel is a free man on Monday, March 1, thank God.

Another RC bishop has been forced to apologize after accusing the Jews of “inventing the Holocaust.”

Read Tim’s excellent prima facie case for Holohoax research. It’s just superb, and you should give it to any friends or relatives who can think for themselves. His point 15, comparing the Holohoax to Gettysburg, is nothing short of brilliant. “Does anyone suggest throwing flat-earthers in prison, or Gettysburg-deniers? This shows that the holocaust is functioning as a state religion—in an age that pretends horror at religious persecution.”

“Indiana University has launched a new ‘Institute for the Study of Contemporary Anti-Semitism’… Any expression of Gentile self interest (such as opposing open borders) will be pathologized as a cocktail of irrational paranoia, conspiracy theories, racism, nativism, sexual repression, anti-Semitism and the like.”

Monstrous carbuncles at the new Dresden synagogue. “In architecture, as in music, painting, and sculpture the principal characteristic of the Jewish contribution to western civilisation is its emphasis on dissonance as opposed to harmonious expression.”

Obama is not much better than an anti-Semite, says the ADL hate group.

This is amazing. Joogle has banned materials that are critical of Obama as “hate.”

The next time your kids start whining because they aren’t getting enough to eat, tell them to be thankful that your paycheck is funding the Egyptian military. I mean, do they want war in the Middle East?

“Our King is calling us to clean out the vermin and restore Castle Europe. We cannot say no.”

Train up a child in the way he should go…

Mountains are racist.

Receipts are racist.

This week’s Diversity Award goes to the same winner from last week: Chuck E. Cheese, where a Negro can be a Negro™. It might be time to take chicken wings off the menu.

There’s a reason why “it takes a village to raise a child” is an African proverb.

All of a sudden, white parents in Detroit are alarmed that their children are dancing like Negroes. “If you open the door for that, what else comes after?” They must think that Detroit still looks like this.

Black people are like conservatives with a “hip hop flava.”

Legislators can’t balance a budget, but they’re on the job when it comes to outlawing freedom of expression and freedom of association. Meanwhile, white students are being murdered by black mobs and the Jew-media couldn’t care less. They’re much more concerned about a ghetto party.

One of the organizers of the party in question is black and calls himself “Jiggaboo Jones, the #1 Nigger in America.” Then a girl hung a noose in the school library, which is considered a hate crime, but since she hasn’t been arrested, she must be black as well. (Hate crimes are only for white people.) Cops aren’t even releasing her name, because this would be the same as releasing her race, if it begins with “La” or ends with “sha.”

Crystal Mangum is still being oppressed. I blame it on 400 years of slavery.

Wherever there are black people, someone must be treating them unfairly. There are only 18,500 black farmers in this entire country. (There are millions of white farmers, though they comprise only about 1% of the total population.) Banks have always known that it’s incredibly risky to lend money to blacks, and even worse to black farmers. (Farming takes more skill than you might imagine, and you pretty much have to be a genius to turn a profit. Now consider that blacks come from the huge continent of Africa, which has possibly the richest soil on earth, and lazy Africans must import food or else they’ll starve to death.) Therefore, this inequality must be given a name, “institutional racism,” and solved through institutional theft. Clinton gave these few thousand farmers more than a billion free, white dollars, and now Obama is giving them another $1.25 billion stolen from whites. This is what Bono and his liberal, tax-evading friends say we must do: Feed the world. We “racists” have a very different credo, and it comes from the Bible: If a man does not work then neither shall he eat. Don’t hold your breath waiting for us to adopt his starving children either.

Four hundred years of Christianity have just paid off in a big way for the black race! A clever Negro gentleman has just invented a way to save millions of dollars by harnessing the wind of passing motorists to drive turbines that power street lamps and more.

Naw, just kiddin’ ya. A honky invented it, of course. With the savings, we will have more funds at our disposal for oppressing, disempowering, and disenfranchising the off-whites.

Your partner in health.

Here’s a painting of a Russian primary school in 1895. Take a look at the problem on the board and see if you can do it in your head.

Despite being quite poor, Russians were blessed by God to have no blacks or mestizos to drag them down. “Blessed is the nation whose God is the LORD, the people He has chosen as His own inheritance.” (Psalms 33:12)

In this school that is 84% black and mestizo, the principal knows that 11 security guards are far too few. Embrace diversity!

Homeschoolers have great success in approximating the Russian painting above, but they are not immune from polluting their faith with the lies of a false religion. Michael Farris, who founded Patrick Henry College for homeschoolers, reads Uncle Tom’s Cabin to his children “to teach them both ‘history’ and ‘compassion for other people’ at the same time.”

So here’s a Southern, Christian man reading aloud to his daughters third-rate melodramatic propaganda written by a Yankee Unitarian (with no direct experience with southern slavery) who maligns his daughters’ ancestors as savage rapists. It could be argued that the false charges of rape in this novel led directly to the fervor of Northern citizens to support a civil war against their southern brethren.

This is true. Lincoln, when introduced to Stowe, praised her as being the little lady who started the war.

So the school, named after the great anti-federalist prophet Patrick Henry, serves to take the cream of the homeschool community and turn them into brilliant, well-educated servants and apologists for the federal Beast. The schizophrenia of this worldview is staggering: name a college after Henry, who warned against ratification of the Constitution because of the threat of a tyrant like Lincoln, then use it to propagandize homeschooled kids about why Lincoln was right. Farris rehabilitates the legitimacy of a federal government that sanctions the murder of unborn children while making southern kids feel guilty because their ancestors caused black people to be slaves in America instead of slaves in Africa.

This reminds me of why we badly need a real American history curriculum. On the one side are the liberals who portray America as an evil, racist country. On the other side are largely the conservative schizophrenics, like Michael Farris and David Barton, who share the egalitarian premises of the liberals but try to rehabilitate our history by portraying it as a progressive revelation of salvation through equality, with God’s Providence working all the way from Thomas Jefferson’s Abrahamic promise in the Declaration, to Moses Lincoln leading us out of the wilderness and to the Promised Land and finally culminating in the legacy of the true King of kings, the Reverend Doctor Martin Luther King Junior.

Our children are not allowed to say the Pledge of Allegiance, which happens to be protected by a 1943 Supreme Court ruling (not that it matters either way). It’s surprising to see how often we’re treated as lepers, even by Southern Christians. Apparently, refusing to pledge allegiance to a flag flown by invading armies commissioned by a dictator who imagined our voluntary union to be “indivisible” is akin to being a jet-hijacking terrorist. Here’s a school teacher in Maryland who is a true believer in the flag cult. So is this guy, who thinks that Mexicans will make fine Americans so long as he can lead them in the pledge. Boy, do they have a surprise for him.

School indoctrination is lot like taking a pilgrimage to the snow cave to pray to Father Abraham:

Dan Roodt’s letter to Red Jeffrey is outstanding. RJ would respond to it if he could speak in anything other than slogans and cliches.

Russia is interested in what the American Jew-media ignores.

Why don’t we ever see anything like this on C-SPAN?

“Conservatives” suddenly lose interest in James O’Keefe, the scourge of liberals.

The ugliest website in the world.

Sage advice from James: “Any time you see a white man on TV surrounded by a bunch of starving black kids, and he’s begging for money, just assume it’s a scam.”

The former chief global strategist at Morgan Stanley suggests this investment plan for your future: Buy land in the country, along with seed, fertilizer, canned foods, wine, medicine, clothes, and guns. Now that’s what I call a mutual fund.

Chlorine in chicken: the high cost of your cheap food. Don’t worry about it though. Drive to Walmart and think of all the money you’re saving on chlorine-flavored fecal soup with the Colonel’s 11 herbs and spices. Finger-lickin’ good!

You think steel mills and refineries cause pollution? Eight times more is produced by chicken factories, which belch 480 million pounds of ammonia per year. Ammonia can travel through the air for 300 miles and cause all kinds of health problems. And eating the Frankenstein chickens produced in these factories is even more dangerous to your health. McDonald’s McNuggets come from such chickens, which are bred to have unnaturally large breasts. Less than 60% of a McNugget is meat (and I use that term loosely). The rest is batter, skin, and two tasty chemicals: tertiary butylhydroquinone, which is found in perfumes and varnishes, and causes stomach cancer; and polydimethylsiloxane, which is what makes Silly Putty bouncy, and is also used in implants for bimbos. So the chickens themselves have something in common with Hugh Hefner’s concubines, though they lack the tramp stamp on the lower back.

Using goats and chickens to do the work that agribusiness does with wetbacks, chemicals, and mechanization.

As we foolishly continue to push the limits of how far food may be transported and how long it may be kept on a shelf, which robs the food of everything that makes it nutritious, we find that deadly bacteria is ubiquitous. Now beef is being injected with ammonia as an attempt to deal with this! This is after the beeves have been slowly killed with corn, which turns their stomachs into E Coli factories, which in turn requires numerous harmful antibiotics to treat. You get what you pay for: fatty, tainted meat that must be overcooked if you hope to avoid food poisoning. Jews are brutal abusers of animals through their “kosher” crimes, but this isn’t any better. You can rent a good film from Netflix called Food, Inc., starring Joel Salatin, if you want to learn more about what real food tastes like.

Look at all the gluttons in that picture. Buy from farmer’s markets!

Do you realize that one gallon of Coke costs $8.50? Three times the cost of gasoline for corn syrup?

And by the way, what’s with all the Viagra ads flooding my email? Why would I need Viagra? I never use artificial sweeteners.

From a new study published in the International Journal of Biological Sciences: “We therefore conclude that our data strongly suggests that these GM [genetically modified] maize [corn] varieties induce a state of hepatorenal toxicity. This can be due to the new pesticides (herbicide or insecticide) present specifically in each type of GM maize, although unintended metabolic effects due to the mutagenic properties of the GM transformation process cannot be excluded.”

Be prepared!

In one video, we see that the company’s Jeep is stuck in a rut and must be pushed out. If not for the courage of the fearless crew, the footage would be lost. The footage would be lost.

Phillips has a bellyful to say against UNICEF, the laws of Haiti, and anyone else who gets in the way of his New Gospel. He’s particularly incensed that those baptist child smugglers were jailed. The baptists (“We jess wanna hep yoo”) were in fact taking advantage of vulnerable families and exploiting them. It matters not that the Haitian parents gave their children willingly. It’s against the law to help anyone cross a border without proper authorization. Judeochristians simply don’t care about these very important laws, which is also why they support amnesty for wetbacks. What about the language barrier? Did these parents really understand that they would never see their sons and daughters again? According to the NYT, some of the parents were assured that their children would be educated in the Dominican Republic, not flown to America to be stripped of their names and heritage. We know that many of the Haitian parents are even now placing their children in orphanages just so they can be fed.

Were there no close relatives who could have cared for the children? There is apparently no time to find out when one is preaching the gospel of Judeojesus. Even though a great tragedy had occurred, aid was being given, and there was no reason for anyone to circumvent the law. This is why aid organizations like UNICEF and the Red Cross, not to mention orphanages, exist. But Phillips dismisses everything UNICEF has to say simply because they support abortion. The fact remains that more than 80% of child trafficking occurs with the consent of the child’s parents. Since there are no international laws to prevent the sale of children, child prostitution, or trafficking, it becomes all the more important to prevent anyone, no matter how well-intentioned, from smuggling children across borders.

One of the Judeobaptists, Laura Silsby, admitted that she was breaking the law, but that’s okay, because her group was “just trying to do the right thing,” and “our hearts were in the right place.” Her heart is more important than the law, apparently. Do race-mixing Judeochristians even recognize the existence of borders?

And if your intention is to bring these children to the DR and put them up for adoption to “loving Christian homes,” how does telling their parents they are just going to get an education and can “come back to Haiti to visit” make you much different than the labor or sex trafficker who promises a woman that she is going to find lucrative work abroad in a new industry, only to be trafficked for other purposes? While these children might be adopted to “good homes” that does not obviate the lies, deception and abduction in which the group engaged to secure access to these children.

It’s admirable to see white folks dig into their own empty coffers and give freely to those in need, even to complete strangers. But which of our missionary ancestors, who took the gospel to the darkest corners of the globe, ever advocated adopting children of foreign races? The new evangelism is different because it operates on the premise of white supremacism; the goal is to grow the kingdom of God by removing children from “obviously inferior” circumstances (meaning people) and raise them in white homes. The objects of their compassion are really just props to fuel their own vanity.

The new evangelists have resigned themselves quietly to the fact that other races are not capable of maintaining orthodox religion. Therefore, if the tree of Equality is ever to bear fruit, whites must take charge and remove black children from black families, as Australians once did to Aborigines, even though this harms all parties involved. (Edmund Burke condemned the “doctrine of the equality of all men, which has been preached by knavery, and so greedily adopted by malice, envy, and cunning.”)

The objectives are no longer kept secret. Russell Moore, senior vice president for academic administration and dean of the School of Theology at Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, is critical of the Idaho baptists for attempting to smuggle children out of Haiti because it “could give a black eye to a budding movement of evangelicals who view adoption as a means of spreading the gospel.”

We predict a bitter backlash from this misguided do-goodism which is being gussied up as the work of the Holy Spirit.

There are probably many factors contributing to why the traffickers were released from jail, but it stands to reason that this will serve as an invitation for sex slavers and drug runners and other scum.

It is not hard to imagine the Chinese, some decades hence, sitting astride the world after Jew-usury has collapsed the West, coming to America to “liberate” (not “enslave”) white children from the “bondage” of Christian parents who are incapable of providing for them. (Someone could write a very believable work of fiction about this. White genes are highly coveted throughout the world.)

Viewed from this perspective, it is easy to see the white supremacist element at work in the adoption-evangelism of the new, false gospel, with the “better life” defined as being dependent on white people. This is only true materially; it is never better for a child to be separated from his parents and his people, even if the parents, in a fit of desperation, believe it to be true. But white, Judeochristian supremacists are unable to comprehend this. After all, they’re so full of love. Anthea Butler writes:

These ten do-gooders walked into the trap many well meaning white evangelical Christians fall into: those poor brown/black/yellow/red people need My help. Jesus wants Me to help them. To much of White American Evangelical Christianity the We often means Me. It’s what God called Me to do. It’s what God would want Me to do. The problem with the Me mentality of much of conservative Evangelical Christianity is that they often can’t see the We—the people of Haiti—who love their kids so much they’re willing to let some white people who claim to be “Christians” take them away to what they promise will be “a better life.”

This is because race-mixing neo-Christians believe that nationhood and ethnic solidarity must be delegitimized in favor of a coffee-colored race of the world and absolute (i.e., false) unity.

What could go wrong?

There have been many, many parents in such desperate straits that they would sell one or more of their children to buy food to live for another week. Would Doug Phillips advocate purchasing these slaves, even when slavery is illegal, in order to “help” the children? I would love to know the answer. And would he be willing to serve as a sterling example to others by taking the lead in “adopting” a Haitian or two into the Phillips family? Or is this a burden for others to bear?

What in the name of all that is holy?

As Generation5 points out, Phillips is hoping for jobs to magically appear for Haitian men, but they won’t, for the same reason that Zimbabwe has lost its wealth. Whites will dominate any free market that is truly free, because of IQ. But in Haiti, no one is even sure who owns what. Far from there being a free market, there is hardly any evidence of property rights. “Is there any indication that the racist attitudes of Haitians towards the property rights of white people can be reformed?” If not, money given to Haitians to rebuild and plant will be wasted.

The natural, fallen human instinct is to respond with envy and accuse the more successful group of exploitation, much like many blacks here in the US whine about their lack of success and blame it on racism. The only way to square this circle is either to A) talk openly about the reality of white advantages and hope that this explanation assuages blacks’ envy and hatred or B) pursue racial separation as a means of preventing the opportunity for conflict. Haiti has in its history chosen B), through murderous means, with horrible consequences for her people.

White people have unfortunately never met a problem that they thought could not be solved by throwing money at it. It rarely occurs to them that misguided aid can impoverish both the givers and the takers. Go ahead, check back in five or ten years and see if the “racists” were correct. Even though we now have no money, few of us have the sense to realize that there has been no return on the trillions that have been wasted.

Let’s waste some more and call it “compassion.”

To suggest that the best thing that outsiders can do once the immediate rescue work is finished, and the water is flowing, is to leave the Haitians to rebuild their own country is merely to invite shrill accusations of racism. However, you might have forgotten that the Chinese were hit by an earthquake two years ago. It killed 68,712 people, left 17,921 missing, with more than 374,000 injured and at least 15 million homeless.

Even if those figures are invented—and I suspect they’re not—they bespeak the existence of a government that can count, which is more than Haiti has ever had. (Cue hisses of “racist!” at this irrefutable truth)…

Pity is the most human of emotions. It is also one of the most ruinous. It robs its subjects of responsibility, initiative, independence, courage, self-respect and will: hence the fate of so many African countries. Yet no pity rescued Poland or Italy or the Ukraine or Germany or Japan after the Second World War. Their peoples alone did.

Even in our land of material plenty, blacks responded to Hurricane Katrina with threats against whites who were perceived as being reluctant to throw more money at them. All attention was focused on New Orleans, even though the hurricane did not hit the city directly. It hit Mississippi, where white folks suffered in silence and worked hard to rebuild. This story never changes.

You absolutely must read Steven Van Zandt’s solution for Haiti’s future. It would be funny if it had not already been tried again and again for decades. White liberals are inspiring in a grotesque sort of way, because they never lose hope that by the power of sheer will, they can transform anyone in the world to someone just like them.

Haiti doesn’t need to be rebuilt. Haiti needs to be reimagined.

The Haitian people need a partnership with a group of individuals that will help them, for the first time in their existence, establish a state-of-the-art infrastructure that will last 100 years, unencumbered by political and economic corruption. Then let the ingenuity, work ethic and spirit of the people do the rest.

So it’s time to call on Warren Buffett, Bill Gates, Larry Ellison, Sergey Brin, Larry Page, Michael Dell, Jeff Bezos, Oprah Winfrey, Steve Jobs, Paul Allen, George Clooney, Robert Johnson, Angelina Jolie, Jay-Z, Brad Pitt, Wyclef Jean, John W. Thompson, Bono, Bruce Springsteen, the Beatles, Sean Combs, the Rolling Stones, Jonathan Demme, Steven Spielberg, George Lucas, David Geffen, James Cameron, John Lasseter, futurist architects and engineers, and anybody else with expertise, vision and passion to organize a summit of Haitian leaders, with Clinton as chairman, and design a new Haiti. Let’s make it the high-tech capital of the world.

We need to start solving problems permanently on this planet instead of wasting time, money and energy on temporary Band-Aids that make us feel good.

This horrible event will be all the more horrible if we don’t learn from it. Either tens of thousands of lives have been lost in vain, or they have left us the one chance to begin to build the archetypal country of the future.

There will never again be an opportunity so obvious or a people more deserving of a chance to prove what they can do.

There will never again be an opportunity to permanently turn the kleptocracy of Haiti into the high-tech capital of the world. Now you know why we have no money.

Jack Kemp, who died last year, told a group of Republicans years ago that Haiti would have one of the highest standards of living in the world in just five years if it would adopt the same business ethics as Hong Kong. When he was politely asked after the speech if he really meant what he said, Kemp bristled and snarled, “Not five years. FOUR YEARS! Next question, please.” This loon nearly became Vice President of the empire. I recall hearing him talk endlessly about “enterprise zones” in the hood. It was all wasted breath and wasted ink. Kemp fancied himself an expert on black people, having showered with some of them while in the NFL.

Few and far between are the inquiring minds who wonder why there is such a difference between Haiti and the Dominican Republic. Once again, the answer is found in the blood. In the DR, the people work very hard to separate themselves from the blackest among them, and classify themselves as criollo, metizo, trigueno, mulato, indio, havao, and cuarteron.

Generation5 has an excellent suggestion for white families who would like to have children but are unable to conceive: embryo adoption. (See reasonable objections at The Thinking Housewife.) There are almost no already-born white children available for adoption; it’s very expensive, no matter what the race; and non-white children should not belong to white families. But there are (unfortunately) an abundance of white embryos. As Christians, we believe that these are conceived persons whose lives are treated as nothing. Almost all of them are killed, yet I haven’t heard a single preacher encourage white families to take them and carry them to term as natural-born children. Instead, these families are encouraged to run off to Haiti or China to “adopt” strangers. If white families effectively participate in black procreation through adoption, what objection could there be to participating in white procreation by carrying white embryos to term? Not an easy question, but there is an easy answer: Love your race! Despise lying preachers.

Are “racist” white women more fertile, or does high fertility sharpen the racial senses? Either way, we’ll take it. It means that women are natural Kinists, and though they very often rebel against their instincts, they are truly repulsed by miscegenation when they are true to themselves.

“This Valentine’s Day,” we read in Time Magazine, “relatively few women on mainstream dating sites will bother to respond to overtures from men of Asian descent. Likewise, black women will be disproportionately snubbed by men of all races.”

It doesn’t help that the Black Belt is the most obese area of the country.

Even though 70% of professional athletes are black, Sports Illustrated has only once put a black woman on the cover of the swimsuit issue, and she’s a mulatto (Tyra Banks). Of the 18 models in the current issue, only two are black, and they don’t appear until page 140. There sure is a lot of racism out there.

If a billboard were to read, “White children are an endangered species,” how long do you think it would last in Atlanta? In 2006, an Amren attendee from New York told a Washington Post reporter that “European Christian Americans are an endangered species.” The ADL hate group successfully pressured his employer to fire him.

Speaking of Amren, though you would never be able to tell from Judaic media outlets, Jared Taylor has not been able to secure the alleged rights to speech and assembly for hundreds of his friends, one of whom is a member of the European Parliament. Here is a very good compendium of recent terrorism. Sadly, the event was canceled again.

“Is there freedom of speech and assembly in Virginia?” Suppose the tables were turned and racialists called in terrorist threats to a hotel where the NAACP or La Raza was meeting. Suppose that this was the NAACP’s fourth attempt to find a meeting place and each time the hotel canceled the agreement because of death threats. How many news outlets would not be covering the story? Cable news stations would never give the story a rest. It would be in every newspaper, even overseas. Obama’s oratory would be suffused with indignation as he dispatches the FBI and Justice Department and pledges to bring the heavy hand of justice down upon the terrorists. But the tables aren’t turned. We “racists” don’t have any rights, it is widely believed, and this is why almost no one knows a think about what has happened.

As Jared says, “If AmRen can be shut down this way then anyone can be shut down. The meatpackers meeting can be shut down by PETA.”

Sometimes love-mongers must resort to death threats. As long as the end result is spreading the love around, what could hurt? To make an omelet one must crack a few eggs, as the Commies used to say.

Leftists are always very concerned for the ability of rightists to do their jobs. Better to take those jobs away so that nobody gets hurt.

For them, “diversity” is merely a euphemism for the stigmatization and dispossession of whites by Jews and non-whites.

“Diversity” does not mean diversity of opinion. It means black leftists, lesbian leftists, Asian leftists, mestizo leftists, feminist leftists, etc. all working under the tutelage of Jewish leftists to root out every possible form of white racial consciousness.

“Diversity” does not mean that all races and ethnic groups should take pride in themselves and watch out for their interests. No, when whites do that, it is not “diversity,” it is “hate.” And the fanatical persecution of “hate” is what leftists call “tolerance”—and, presumably, “love” (they are all just snarling and sputtering with love).

“All of those in our movement, who engage in any level, are taking tremendous risks. The strategy of anti-fascists is to increase the costs of involvement to the point that people fear not just to take action but to even think forbidden thoughts or associate with those who do… White advocates are not just opponents of the system—we are the only opponents of the system.” You can call us the disloyal opposition.

“I believe it was Huey Long who famously said that when fascism comes to America, it will come in the guise of anti-fascism.”

Many thanks to Wikitopian for putting us at #2 on his list of the top ten pro-White sites. Oh, so close! Edged out by Occidental Dissent. But that’s like complaining that you’ve lost a swim meet to Michael Phelps. (OD was the first to break the Amren 2010 terrorism news.) And what a list! Every site on it is far better than this Zionist trash. Wikitopian pays us the very handsome compliment that we are “a welcome alternative to the repackaged humanism of contemporary Christian ‘leaders’ and [we defend] White America with the same honor and vigor that Christians once defended Europe.”

David Yeagley, the great-great-grandson of the Comanche leader Bad Eagle, calls us anti-Semites. Here is what the ADL calls the most anti-Semitic verses of the Bible. I guess we are then. Yeagley is a good man, though. He was going to be one of the speakers at the Amren conference this weekend.

No list of the kind that Wikitopian assembled would be complete without TOQ. Jew Leonard Zeskind writes:

The Occidental Quarterly, with half a dozen PhDs on its advisory board, has emerged as the central address for the most advanced strategic thinking among intellectual antisemites, scientific racists and anti-immigrant white nationalists.

And for Wilmot’s sake, bookmark this one!

If you doubt that the words “white” and “racist” are synonymous, read all about how to raise racist children:

Step One: Don’t talk about race. Don’t point out skin color. Be “color blind.”

Step Two: Actually, that’s it. There is no Step Two.

To make matters worse, religious fidelity is directly proportional to racism.

In general, the more devout the community, the greater the racism, according to the authors of the analysis, led by Wendy Wood, Provost Professor of Psychology and Business at USC College and the USC Marshall School of Business.

Just ask Keith Olbermann, who says that “prejudice and discrimination still sit, defeated, dormant, or virulent, somewhere in the soul of each white man in this country.” Well, this is encouraging news.

Celebrating Black History Month is racist.

Speaking English is racist.

Prayer is racist.

Being born in Texas is racist. “The word ‘racist’ simply means white person. Period.”

Never color a train line yellow if it goes through an Asian community. This is racist!

Snowfall is an expression of white supremacy, says Ima Daike, a transgender, biracial, bisexual, bi-polar Jewish Hottentot.

“Racism” is healthy.

How to get rich in the gospel business.

The United Reformed Church has an anti-BNP plank: “The United Reformed Church believes support for extremist parties to be incompatible with Christian discipleship… [S]upport of parties that discriminate on racial grounds has no place amongst Christians.” We can expect many resolutions of this kind here in America now that pro-white parties are being formed. These impostors prove nothing from Scripture, of course. You’re just supposed to get on board with the modern idea that ethnic exclusion is forbidden in government, including family government. The moderator of the URC says: “Let us focus clearly on the truth that we are all members of one race – the human race. Within God’s Kingdom there is no place for racial hatred and I call upon us all to remain firm in our commitment to practise and promote racial justice and inclusion.” The assumption here is that ethnic interests never legitimately diverge within the human race, therefore no group of people has the right to determine its own course. To even suggest such a thing is “racial hatred.” Church property is off limits to such haters and “extremists,” but groups like the Boy Scouts, whose religion is patriotism, are more than welcome.

Presbyterian lunatics have just discovered, more than 40 years too late, that Equality is the gift that keeps on giving. Read on in stunned silence:

On the agenda is an overture rejecting a document on the sin of racism that some believe may be misused to promote gay ordination and other “same-sex causes”… The document partly declares “that separation, enmity and hatred between people and groups is sin which Christ has already conquered, and accordingly that anything which threatens this unity may have no place in the church and must be resisted.”

Notice that “separation” of any kind equals “hatred” and sin. As if this is not alarming enough, liberals are seeking to push this through as an amendment to the Confession. One presbytery correctly cautions that political opinions, convictions, ideals, and value judgments do not qualify as a confession of the church “for all times in all places.”

We will defeat these liars. Tomorrow Belongs to Me.

“Christianity without the cross is liberalism, and racial anemia is the result of liberalism.”

Go through the European’s history; everything the European ever did of lasting consequence was done because he kept faith with his God. Even if the neo-pagans could achieve their goal of a white-dominated society by 2020, who would want to live in such a world? A Godless Tower of Babel with whites at the top is still a Tower of Babel. What the faithful European wants to see is a renewal of the covenant between God and the European…

It will avail us nothing if we achieve equal rights within heathendom or if we teach “white history” without mentioning Christ. The European achieved world dominance because he sought and found the God above the gods of the colored tribes. Without his God, the European is a pathetic member of the rainbow coalition of colored peoples.

I wonder if our friend from Cambria was watching the opening ceremony of the Olympics when he wrote this. As always, the non-whites who attended the event were a tiny fraction, yet a large portion of the program was devoted to making Indians feel better about themselves, despite having nothing to do with the games in any respect. The reason for this is apparently because they were on the continent first, even though they weren’t, and as if this has anything to do with snowboarding.

According to Mulatto Gumbel, “any sport without gratuitously large numbers of Negroes is worthy of denigration instead of praise.” I wonder why he never says this about the game of golf. Could it have anything to do with Tiger “Where-My-Honeys-At” Woods?

Race in sports.

Despite getting “high marks for diversity,” the NBA lost $400 million this year. We eagerly anticipate the new white basketball league.

Here’s why you won’t hear about the Pearcy Massacre through your local Yiddish news outlets.

How to make hot news items disappear.

Don’t forget: “white people, no matter how much they love black people, simply aren’t allowed to use a word that the average black person uses several times a day.” Don’t try to understand this; you’re just supposed to go along with it, as is true for the U.S. tax code. The last two lines of James’s post are comedic gold.

Leroy the Jungle Savage messes with the wrong grandfather while trying to keep it real. Nigga say, “Call me a ambalamps!”

A sensible black mayoral candidate who wants to bring back lynching.

Stereotypes are bad because they’re generally true.

It’s important to emphasize the positive. A stereotype has been avoided!

The black man’s favorite terrorist, Denmark Vesey. The mayor of Charleston calls him a hero.

The “president” of South Africa has fertilized his twentieth child with his seventh concubine, but the important thing is that apartheid has ended. Souldaddy Lovethang laments that there are those who “think that their culture is superior to others,” and this “is a problem we have in the world.” Indeed, indeed.

You can have equality or liberty, but you can’t have both. The loss of your freedoms is the price for not being “racist.”

Thirty years after Indians banned miscegenation (just wait until I tell my pastor!), straggling honkies are being kicked off the reservations. “They are people with no native ancestry at all.” Well, shit. I’ve said the same thing at town council meetings, and it never works.

Too many autistic children are white, which makes it more difficult to steal white money and give it to strangers.

Your country is destined to change, says Sarah Palin, which means that it’s not your country. It belongs to the world, not the American tribe.

“A mixed race shall settle in Ashdod, and I will cut off the pride of the Philistines.” ~ Zechariah 9:6

“And it shall be as the chased roe, and as a sheep that no man taketh up: they shall every man turn to his own people, and flee every one into his own land. Every one that is found shall be thrust through; and every one that is joined unto them shall fall by the sword. Their children also shall be dashed to pieces before their eyes; their houses shall be spoiled, and their wives ravished.” ~ Isaiah 13:14-16

“Look, conservatives, any candidate who is not speaking up explicitly and unreservedly for white people is not on your side, and will eventually betray you.” Write that down.

“Ask your ‘colorblind’ conservative friends who think race doesn’t matter just how long America can continue to be a world leader at this rate.”

Tom Tancredo proposes a literacy test for voters, seeing as how we’re now being governed by the upper class of Bangladesh, and those who applaud him are called “haters” with “white hoods.” It’s now “hate” to expect that those who are voting our future away from us can at least read? I thought that we, who wish to be governed by our own kind, as the Bible requires, are the haters.

One-half of all immigrants are on welfare. California, the largest state, is now 58% non-white. Therefore, it stands to reason that President Who’s-Your-Daddy has decreed a back door amnesty for illegal aliens from Haiti, even releasing Haitian illegal alien criminals! Lying preachers will applaud this because “the mission field is coming to us.” The Democrat Party will applaud it because the children these people bear will be new voters. Our ancestors are turning in their graves, but that’s because they were “racists.”

You’re not going to believe this, but a decent white family has been granted asylum.

Quota-industry “professionals” who laugh in their round trips to the bank.

It’s getting harder to keep score.

Headline of the week.

Crazy Uncle Tom Fleming strikes again. Just to show you how double-minded his Chronicles team can be, see this excellent article on secession by Pat Buchanan (which your children should know, if you want us to recognize them as educated), followed by this insanity by Alexander Cockburn. A commenter stings Crazy Uncle Tom where it counts:

I’ve always thought it strange that certain elements on the right will scream “racism” at people like Jared Taylor and then turn around and publish people like Cockburn.

Crazy Uncle Tom replies (spelling errors intact) that the Cockburn articles are free, and besides, the hallowed halls of impotent, colorblind paleoconservatism have no place for “bigots” like our ancestors:

How many errors–or are they lies–can one cram into a brief comment. First there is no alliance with Mr Cockburn, whom I met just once. We started taking his column because his syndicatemade gave us some free columns when Sam [Francis] died and whe continued because it stimulates discussion, at least among those capable of thinking. I don’t recall ever screaming raciism at Taylor. Why should I? He is a scientific racist. This does not disturb me. I have more than a few racist friends and according to all right thinking people I am also a bigot. But he is also an antiChristian and a man of some guile. He has many fine qualities–intelligence and courtesy–but after some experience I concluded he does far more harm than good. Most of his associates and followers are, with one or two exceptions, people I would not like to meet again. People who would visit our website to spew their lies.

Remember when it wasn’t considered “racist” to have all white people in an advertisement?

I can’t wait to hear lying, anti-gospel preachers explain to Wake Forest Assistant Professor of Psychology Lisa Kiang that ethnic bonds are not important.

I don’t think this or this could be shown on TV today. White people are no longer allowed to be involved in what’s really funny, meaning race humor. This is now the exclusive domain of blacks, Jews, and fags, or some combination of the three.

Obama is on the job! He has determined that our problem is not enough government.

He is on track to be the biggest spender in history, bigger than FDR. It’s all about hopeful change and changing hope.

“Since 1930, the federal government has run deficits in all but eight years.” You can see in the graphic that not enough is being stolen by the legal counterfeiters in D.C. to cover discretionary spending, and the debts are locked in. If this were the budget of a company, it would have to declare bankruptcy.

One dollar in 1913 was worth $21.57 in 2008 dollars. (The Federal Jew Reserve was established in 1913.)

Radical Muslims are gainfully employed by the U.S. military, but displaying a cross at the Air Force Academy is a hate crime that must be investigated forthwith.

The aroma of Afghanistan.

Now, in addition to escorting little Afghan girls to school, we must prevent the Haitian economy from inflating. Next stop: the Brazilian “rainforest.” And after that, there are surely seals somewhere giving penguins hell. These injustices shall not stand!

Captain America sez: Tea Parties are racist. It looks like a Ron Paul campaign rally.

Tea Partiers are mass murderers, says Jew Kunstler.

All “subversives” in South Carolina are now required to register themselves with the Secretary of State. “There’s even a $5 filing fee.” I’m sure the definition of “subversive” will expand soon to include anyone disliked by Jews.

It’s the American Way: Require teachers to do the impossible and threaten them with job loss if they fail to accomplish it. The important thing is that we Americans care. This is why the principal who threatened to commit suicide if his teachers did not somehow raise black test scores fills us with the warm glow of patriotism.

State temples in North Carolina will now teach “students” that nothing meaningful happened in America prior to 1877.

“The only freedom which can last is a freedom embodied somewhere, rooted in a history, located in space, sanctioned by genealogy, and blessed by a religious establishment. The only equality which abstract rights, insisted upon outside the context of politics, are likely to provide is the equality of universal slavery.” ~ M.E. Bradford, A Better Guide Than Reason

“A People without a culture exclusively their own will perish.” ~ David Lane

Eustace Mullins died last Wednesday. We wrote about him last October after hearing Bill Rolen’s interview, but there’s even more about him in this post. Rest in peace, Eustace.

Ever on guard against the possibility that little white girls might turn into mothers, Mattel has found a new career for them. You go, girl! George Gilder has made some astute observations on the cancer of feminism, but for my money there is none wiser than Roger Devlin. “Sexists” like us used to place women on a high, untouchable plane. Feminism has devalued them to the degree that they are now merely political subjects and cannon fodder.

Wikitopian has written an excellent article called “Revenge of the Matriarchs.” Having gained “equality,” by which they mean mass mastectomies, what do women now fantasize about? Simple home life and domestic graces, of course.

American women are liberated from their homes, unburdened by the biological curse of motherhood, and treated by society like tiny castrated men. They’ve achieved the feminist dream! For some reason, a growing number of White American women aren’t even grateful for the cubicle that they’ve worked so hard for the opportunity to dwell in. They spend their lunches in the corporate break room, eating corporate food, in their corporate pantsuits, reading fantasy novels about being barefoot and pregnant in a country kitchen…

Every few months, somebody in the White Advocacy movement writes an article lamenting the fact that our movement ought to have more ladies. Our atheists and materialists will keep writing these because they’re fundamentally incapable of offering what women want: Tradition…

Travel back in time and tell a Russian dissident in the eighties that his omnipotent oppressors would disappear altogether within a few years; that the Russian national spirit would rise like a phoenix from the ruins of the once-invincible Jewish oligarchy. Would he believe you? Would you believe me if I told you that there are millions of potential matriarchs hiding in plain sight in corporate break rooms across America, patiently awaiting the opportunity to restore our White American nation and its communities to their former glory?

It can’t be done without them.

Happy shoveling!

Therefore, how could the disappearance of the white race be considered bad or wrong, if we are simply meant to pass from the earth, unwept and unsung, like every other species that has succumbed to Survival of the Fittest? The Darwinist stands mute, much like his god, Nature.

The theme of these articles, which end with a marvelous tip of the hat to Reformed theology and homeschooling, is that the future belongs to those who are having children, and these folks will be drawn from those who enjoy reality rather than eschew it.

White nationalism, as it currently exists as a movement on the ground, is not sufficient to produce viable, high-fertility families.

I think there are several reasons for this. First, is my belief that an atheistic mindset, independent of its truth value, inevitably produces a sense of despair, a paralyzing emotion not conducive to the hope for the future necessary to motivate marriage and child-rearing.

After you read the enclosed Bertrand Russell quote, consider the biblical adage that wisdom is proved right by all her children (Luke 7:35). If we are blessed by God with life and a future, does this not prove that obedience reaps its own rewards? And if we abandon Him and are cursed with barrenness, I think we can safely infer that our ideology is in desperate need of reassessment. Will not the Judge of all the earth do right? (Gen. 18:25).

Atheism is dysgenic because it seems to cause high IQ people to have fewer children… For materialists [and logical positivists] who insist that all of their beliefs be proved, the choice is between what you perceive as truth and life, i.e. evolutionary success. The former is rational, the latter is meta-rational. What choice must a consistent Darwinian make?

Choose life, forsake atheism, and my apologies for being redundant. Mr. White explores some other interesting avenues: “fast food (or more generally, the obesity epidemic), pornography, and video games. The evolutionary cul-de-sac before us is represented by a 20 to 40-something male in our society who consumes Taco Bell for nutrition, Internet porn for sex, and seeks fulfillment through the simulated accomplishments of video games.” There are also excellent comments on feminism, the balance of capacity and drive which has made the West supreme, and the degeneracy of Jews.

Porn is an industry uniquely suited to the strengths of Jews. For its efficient production, it requires a level of exploitation and cruelty to women that most white males (in sufficient quantities to dominate a given industry) simply lack. It takes a cruel, Middle Eastern, woman-hating religion and culture to produce the stuff. This Jewish dominance leads to other consequences.

A friend of mine once pointed out that the degeneracy of Broadway plays and musicals, now almost obsessed with various sexual perversions and paraphilias (particularly homosexuality), cannot be attributed merely to a primarily homosexual market, a mere 10% at most of the Jewish population. He pointed out that the main market for Broadway productions actually consists of heterosexual Jews, and in this we see a key difference between Jews and non-Jews. Many Jewish heterosexual men enjoy watching homosexuals, transvestites, and other assorted freaks prance around a stage singing and dancing in mock irony. That which disgusts heterosexual European men entertains Jewish men.

So the variety which the porn market demands will inevitably be a Jewish variety. Some anti-pornography crusaders have claimed that the process of orgasm, with its intense chemical payload in the brain, causes a permanent imprinting of the sexual stimulus into the brain. If this is true, droves of Western men are having their minds imprinted with sexual stimuli produced from Jewish sexual deviancy.

In other words, the men of the West, who are bound to the Cross with a blood oath pledged by their noble sires, are becoming Christ-killers. This is like seeing Life gleaming on the horizon and running away from it, to hide in deep caves, far from the light of day.

Reap his old reward.

The Washington Post demands “at a minimum…monthly airlifts of 5,000 or 10,000″ Haitian pre-voters.

A Jew defends a Jew who defends race-mixing “missionaries” accused of trafficking. I detect a theme.

Read seven reasons why interracial adoption is a bad idea.

The unchecked compassion of Christian wives.

Judeochristians have mobilized a massive operation, once again, to feed and clothe and “adopt” Negroes, who have never adequately done these things for themselves. They’re hoping that the money won’t be wasted this time if the gospel that accompanies the aid finally takes root. This enthusiasm for evangelism is certainly not a bad thing, we believe, but it’s remarkable to those of us who know that the same big-haired, toothy preachers, with their crisp new safari vestments from L.L. Bean, not only refuse to evangelize “racists” but do everything in their power to evade the recognition that we and our biblical way of thinking even exist.

Wheeler writes:

I challenge them to go to the white people whom they consider “racists” and take the gospel to such people. I challenge them to spend their money (and their supporters’ money) to build churches and missions and activity centers and food pantries and education centers for the skinheads, for the rednecks, for the “Rahowa!” pagans, for the Klansmen, for the trailer park denizens, for the thin-ribbed, snake-handling, sang-digging holler-dwellers in Appalachia, for the t-shirted Irish toughs in Hell’s Kitchen, for the Jamison’s-pounding Southies, for the quiet kinists who school and church their own red-haired children, for the beaten-down and confused high-schoolers whose brains and souls are festering sores under the scrape of the rasp of today’s relentlessly boundary-and-distinction-hating culture…

Why spill money traveling to far corners of the world to gain one shaky dark-skinned proselyte but refuse to puff even one lungful of good news to a young fellow in the same town who just happens to have white skin? Could it be that the Dave Blacks and the bean-counting seminarians don’t consider white people as valuable a “catch” as they do a strong black buck? Could it be that their self-hatred causes them to despise the redneck or the skinhead or the Christian Identity chick or the garage mechanic with the rebel flag on his front porch with a confusing intensity they’d rather not examine? Could it be that these people would rather put on a fair show in the flesh, spending God’s money to scramble after colored people who, deep inside, they know won’t ever require any real discipling, won’t ever require any real conversations, won’t ever require anything except more easy-and-guilty money?

We Kinists are living proof of this. We have dutifully tried to engage the sanctified race-mixers, and every time they bravely run away.

While “Focus on the Family” is focusing on Haitians instead, Colorado Springs, where the organization is headquartered, has run out of money.

Botswanans ask in horror, “What if there were no white people?”

Haiti is a land of black people. I would have expected the place to be swarming with black people helping their own. They were nowhere to be seen. I never saw any ships from black countries pulling into the harbour.

As the air traffic circled above the small airport, none of the planes was reported as coming from Africa. The blacks were nowhere to be found. They issued tepid statements of condolence to the people of Haiti and a few of the African countries donated small amounts of cash.

This relates closely to what Edmund Burke wrote in 1781: “A man that breeds a family without competent means of maintenance, encumbers other men with his children.” The same could be said of a race. And if large numbers of men who comprise that race profess to be Christians but rely for their very survival on perpetual alms from strangers, it’s obvious that they are making a mockery of their profession of faith.

Honduras, suddenly finding itself ignored, says, “Show me the money!” That’s Afro-Christianity for you.

“This was not an earthquake disaster… [This] was caused by people that didn’t know how to use codes, that built things in bad shape. These were the people that caused the tragedy.”

You can’t help but be impressed with the quality of Gary DeMar’s operation, but he is a racial imbecile. In recent podcasts, I’ve heard him and Joel McDurmon say that Haiti’s problems are a religious deficit, lack of a free market, no access to bank loans, and even inadequate building codes, which is kind of like saying that obesity is caused by big bones. Our people are plagued by false religion and socialism too, but the obvious differences aren’t enough to bring Judeochristians to even think of race.

Still, in fairness we must give credit where credit is due. We highly recommend the links here, here, and here, which are Joel McDurmon’s response to an article by Michael Horton in Christianity Today.

Horton, a racial imbecile himself of the highest order, contends that the only “Christian nation” is the body of Christ scattered throughout all nations. On the contrary, a man is much like a nation; without both racial and religious fidelity, he is unbalanced, double-minded, unstable in all his ways. Horton, in changing the meaning of the word “nation” by calling it the Church, is an example of why the Church has been a failure in our time. This robs us of cultural balance every bit as much as liberals who think that the collectivist state has the answer to every question.

According to Horton, there is no such thing as a Christian nation until Christ returns. Until then, equity and fraternalism are good enough for the civil realm. This is what Horton calls “justice.”

Only when Christ returns will He reign in a kingdom of glory, as the realms of this age are made subservient to His will.

No, Christ will rule until all enemies are made His footstool. He will not return and then conquer; He will conquer and then return. As McDurmon asks, “How can the gospel conquer the earth through the word and the power of the spirit and not have a visible effect overall in the secular powers and cultural labors?” He has a good term for Horton’s desire to keep Christianity in the churches and out of the public square: “militant amillennialism.” This also has a lot to do with Horton’s strange belief that “living the gospel” through “faithful obedience” is legalism.

Church and state should be married in purpose, with distinct spheres of authority but never under different laws. Horton disagrees, saying that “Christendom is a contrived empire” rather than the charter on which all white nations have been founded and derive their authority. If Cortez had agreed with our presbyterian imbeciles today, he would have called the Aztec government legitimate and their culture equal to all others.

John Calvin is no help here because he contradicts himself. In one place he says that nations can legitimately govern themselves differently, depending on their circumstances, as long as they conform to the “moral” law of the Bible, natural law, and conscience. In another place he writes that “barbarous and savage laws, such as give honor to thieves,” are illegitimate. In other words, he holds that theonomic law is unnecessary (and could even be called “seditious”!), but laws by any other standard are not laws at all. McDurmon chides: “Even if Old Testament law did not supply the most biblical and ideal legislation for modern states (though I believe it does), could he rightfully argue that such a notion was seditious and foolish? Are they really fools who hold God’s prescribed judgments and punishments for theft, etc., in higher esteem than man’s?” In Calvin’s defense, most of the theologians on which we rely had a narrower, monoracial field of vision. We easily forget this because we don’t have the same luxury.

Calvin’s other major blunder extends from this. “Usury is not now unlawful,” he writes, “except in so far as it contravenes equity and brotherly union.”

Kinship counts for more than the laws of men.

Here’s a superb question that a reader sent in, and if anyone knows the answer, do tell:

I have a question regarding the genealogy of the Kings of Israel & Judah which ultimately relates to the ancestry of Christ. The Bible says that Jezebel was the daughter of King Ithobaal (or Ethbaal) of Tyre and of the Sidonians (1 Kings 16:31), presumably making her a Canaanite. Athaliah, the wife of King Jehoram of Judah and mother of King Ahaziah of Judah was described as being the daughter of King Ahab, presumably with Jezebel, thus making Ahaziah (who is listed in the genealogy of Christ in the Gospel of Matthew) of mixed Israelite and Canaanite descent. Can you help me find an answer to this apparent dilemma?

So Ahab married a Phoenician, Jezebel. Their daughter was Athaliah, and she married Jehoshaphat’s son, Jehoram. She gave birth to several children, and all but Ahaziah were killed. Later, Ahaziah and his uncle, Joram, were killed by Jehu, who was doing God’s work for the prophet Elisha. It was significant that Athaliah lost her brother and her son on the same day, and both of them were kings. Then Jehu killed Jezebel, and dogs ate her corpse. Athaliah then murdered any possible successors to the crown (her own grandchildren), but Ahaziah’s infant son, Joash, was kept in hiding. Meanwhile, Athaliah became history’s only ruling queen of either Judah or Israel. When Joash was brought out of hiding years later and acclaimed as king, Athaliah tried to stop the “treason” but was captured and executed. Joash himself was later assassinated for his most infamous deed, which was denounced by Jesus Himself in Matthew 23:35. When his own cousin, Zechariah, spoke out against him, Joash had him stoned. This is kind of the opposite of John the Baptist preparing the way for his cousin, Jesus. Apparently, the two assassins of Joash were an Ammonite and a Moabite, which is also significant (the two peoples of incest). Joash’s son Amaziah then became king, but the three kings who were closely descended from Athaliah (Ahaziah, Joash, and Amaziah) are omitted from Christ’s genealogy in the first chapter of Matthew.

Getting back to the question then: Was Jezebel a Canaanite? If so, her marriage to Ahab was forbidden, yet Christ apparently descended through their offspring. There are two possibilities.

Perhaps Jezebel was a Canaanite. We know that God drowned the earth for prohibited marriages (Gen. 6:1-7), and we know that God hated Jezebel (2 Chron. 19:2). We know that in such cases, God swore to visit the iniquities of parents to the children of the third and fourth generations and to blot out their names from remembrance (Ex. 20:5; 34:7; Num. 14:18; Deut. 5:9; Ps. 69:28; 109:13-15: Jer. 32:18; Ezek. 13:9). There were plenty of idolaters who never received such a harsh penalty, but if this was an adulterous union we can see why Christ’s genealogy skips the names, going from Asa to Jehoshaphat to Jehoram to Uzziah. Uzziah is considered cleansed of the wicked blood line, because Jehoram is actually his great-great-grandfather, not his father. This presents a conundrum, however, because Matthew 1:17 states very clearly: “There were fourteen generations in all from Abraham to David, fourteen from David to the exile to Babylon, and fourteen from the exile to the Christ.” We’ll assume that there were real generations being skipped here, but it does seem very strange. To insert gaps in a definite timeline actually lends credence to dispensationalists, who insert a millennia-long gap between the 69th and 70th weeks of Daniel’s prophecy.

Perhaps Jezebel was not a Canaanite. Many scholars teach that the Phoenicians were related to Trojans and Cretans. Others say that the tribe of Dan joined with Edomites to form the Phoenician empire. Justin, Pliny, Ptolemy, and Strabo considered it to be a known fact that the Phoenicians originally came from Bahrain, far away in the Persian Gulf. See the bottom of this page, under the heading The Phoenicians, and you’ll see that the modern Lebanese, who are believed to have descended from the Phoenicians, have DNA markers that are Tarshish Japhethite, not Canaanite. We know that Canaanites did not trade with Israelites, yet Hiram had a very close business relationship with Solomon before Jezebel was born. They could very likely have been distant relatives.

It’s not very helpful to answer a question with so many indecisive words, but let’s see if anyone else can shed some light.

Some criticism of certain Kinists from Generation5.

We disagree that words should not be used just because a sizeable number of people don’t like hearing them. Sodomites don’t like the word “faggot,” but it suits them well. On the other hand, we agree that there is no need to offend unnecessarily. There are better words than “nigger” or “whatever the name was in those days” to use as labels for blacks, but that doesn’t mean there’s anything wrong with the word. In fact, it needs to be heard by those who get more upset about words than about crime statistics. This is at least no worse than the use of the word by some blacks who seek to blunt its impact. For instance, a black “singer” recently released an album called Nigger and a hit song called “Be a Nigger Too,” set to the tune of the old Dr. Pepper commercial. He obviously intends to shock his listeners into realizing that anyone can be a “nigger” because all people are equal. Far from encountering resistance, he is given millions of dollars to preach this message. Why is it wrong to use the same word for shock value to teach a quite different lesson?

Generation5 writes: “I call ‘Christian Scientists’ by their preferred name even though they’re neither Christian nor scientific, but quite the contrary!” Me too, but a more accurate word for a “Christian Scientist” is “cultist” or “heretic.” We should never shy away from words that are more accurate. I can truly say that we have never been concerned here with “alienat[ing] potential readers.” This explains why we would make terrible politicians. But again, the point is well made and well taken: Why grate on someone’s nerves with unbecoming speech if the context does not call for it? The final clause makes all the difference. “[I]f it makes no difference to your essential argument, why advertise low status?” There probably isn’t a reason in most cases, other than to be anachronistic, but the reference to “low status” is offensive in itself. The assumption is that the way our grandparents casually spoke is now to be shunned on the authority of those who just happen to be alive. I don’t follow the reasoning, but I suppose it has something to do with the widely-held belief that our grandparents invalidated their credibility by owning slaves, not allowing blacks to vote, etc. We could not disagree more vehemently. And what have the living done to deserve such respect? If I may quote Chesterton, “Tradition refuses to submit to the small and arrogant oligarchy of those who merely happen to be walking about.” We are surrounded by too great a cloud of witnesses (Heb. 12:1) to credit the living with undue esteem. Instead, we should have the mind of King Theoden, who could say when he died, “I go to my fathers, in whose mighty company I shall not now feel ashamed.”

Nor do I follow the reasoning that, for expediency, we should “Stop talking about ‘loving your own race’… Stop talking about the achievements of the white race… Stop talking about genetic differences,” etc., as our good friend Yggdrasil recommends. I think we have far too many people making far too many rules about what can and can’t be said and written. There is no dispute if the objective is ease of communication, but this is hardly ever the true objective. Refusal to talk about loving your race, when you really do, is simply spin of an ignoble nature.

As for the sin of miscegenation, mentioned in the critique, I think we’ve adequately covered that ground elsewhere. The main criticism in this area is that God tolerates improper marriages, so we have no authority to try to nullify them. This could only be logically argued (before we even touch upon Scripture) if one is willing to weigh every other form of marriage nullification on the scales of justice. Does the state have any reason at all to nullify some marriages as having been unlawfully joined? Obviously, yes. I think you can see where I’m going with this.

Generation5 insinuates that a “theonomic interpretation of Nehemiah” is illegitimate if there is not unambiguous agreement from “mainstream theologians” and “specifically in the New Testament.” As I say, we’ve covered this ground thoroughly, but it needs to be stated here that this objection breaks the hermeneutic of continuity between the testaments. In other words, it is not necessary for the New Testament to condemn bestiality; it is sufficiently condemned in the Old. Ditto for usury. The NT has a great deal to say about the subject of marriage as well, but this is not really the issue at hand. Here’s the real issue: “This particular doctrine will also be flown as a bloody shirt by liberals…” We hope so.

Remember how men on the Titanic saved the women and children and sacrificed themselves? Yeah, well, those were white men, and specifically, Christian white men. The white men who had earlier rejected their Lord were exemplified by the barbaric reason-worshipers in France. Edmund Burke lamented, in his Reflections on the Revolution in France, “I thought that ten thousand swords would have leaped from their scabbards to avenge even a look that threatened her [Marie Antoinette] with insult. But the age of chivalry is gone. That of sophisters, economists, and calculators has succeeded.”

In the same book, Burke tells us that “superstition is the religion of feeble minds,” which is why, even long after Christianity was introduced to Haiti, there is nothing like chivalry to be found there. The United Nations has now opened food distribution sites for women only since the men will trample the women and children.

Many charities are taking their own crews to Haiti to unload supplies. “Whenever Haitians are asked to unload anything, they grab as much stuff as they can and run away. In many cases, armed and masked UN soldiers have to hold Haitian thugs back at gun point while UN workers unload trucks.”

There’s a huge effort to get orphaned Haitian children adopted by white families, and it’s mostly spearheaded by Judeochristians who have no interest in keeping the children with anyone who closely approximates their own lost families. We now have the spectacle of Christians engaging in child trafficking. That’s because it’s not really about the children, it’s about the vanity of white adults who can’t sleep at night unless they know that they are blessing someone, somewhere with their charity. This is an admirable virtue when properly directed, and an abomination when it is not.

Whites have not yet begun to cut their own veins for Haitians, but white women are being asked to pump their breasts to feed Haitian infants. It seems that our gross national product, which David Yeagley calls the Great White Throne, is not enough.

Jew Elliott Abrams has the solution for Haiti: Move them all here and throw money at them until they turn white, or at least a jaundiced shade of Sammy Sosa-yellow. I’m sure this will work, because Jews know about such things and always have the best interests of others at heart. They are so brave, giving, and forgiving that I feel like opening my wallet and telling them, with a wink, to take whatever they can find. Others, with Chewy Jewy names like Berg, Kahn, and Zelinsky have joined Abrams in volunteering to steal our wealth.

Hey, look! It’s the “cultural heartland” after those black adoptees come of age:

There sure are a lot of racists out there trying to prevent poor, family-oriented Haitians from living the American Dream.

A Haitian barbecue and beach party.

Can the Negro rule himself? Is he congenitally capable?

“We torched your farm and we’ll come back to eat your children.” No U.S. military “peace-keeping” force, no United Nations involvement, no corporate charity, no concern of any kind in the world, except from a few white “racists.” Even if there had been a 7.0 earthquake, no one else would care. As Steve Sailer says, “There’s no chance that the international community will declare the first-ever black republic an official failure,” no matter how much it costs us.

Black Independence, as good as it gets.

Pretty much everyone – even the local government officials – defecates and urinates in the open. Drugs, prostitution and armed robbery are the main industries… Next we visited a local brothel. The women who lived there talked with us about the U.N. soldiers who have sex with the child prostitutes and beat the older women, and then leave without paying… But perhaps the most revelatory portions of our trip to Liberia came from meeting the major warlords of the nation’s civil wars. There’s a tradition in Liberian militias of taking on extravagant noms de guerre. Hence, our subjects were named General Bin Laden, General Rambo and General Butt Naked. The ulatter, in particular, was one of the most notorious Liberian warlords. He claims to have personally killed 20,000 people including babies, and to have sometimes cannibalized his victims.

Footage from Liberia here. Malaria, AIDS, rape, murder, prostitution, cannibalism, and Obama supporters squatting on the beach. It’s all very sad. As R.L. Dabney said centuries ago, black women, without white paternalism, become “the besotted victims of brutal passions.” We wish that no one in the world had to live like this, but our first duty is to our own people. We must pledge that only over our dead bodies will our children be considered the equals of the subjects of these videos. As Dabney also wrote, black women “breed the future incubus of your descendants.”

Theodore Roosevelt’s contention that the United States only has room for one flag and one language is racist.

Cheering for Brett Favre is racist.

Reliability is racist.

Forgetfulness is racist. Bad news for the elderly.

Not wanting Iran invaded is racist.

Everyone deserves respect, says Katie Couric, except racists.

If you think saying the word “Negro” is wicked, vile racism, don’t ever refer to “those folks” in front of Chicago County Commissioner Deborah Sims.

I’m offended. “Those folks?” If that isn’t the most racist statement that’s ever been made in this board… You know, I’m not a person who…calls people names, but you are the worst person I think I have ever seen!

That’s an actual quote. You might recall that “I’m Ross, You’re the Boss” Perot once addressed Negroids as “you people,” which caused them to make more noise than welfare queens and pickaninnies shouting for paternity rewards on the Maury Povich show. I can’t decide if I like “You-People-Americans” or “Kaffirnated-Americans” better.

This 1921 headline was unusual in that the New York Times printed something true: “Negroes a Problem in South Africa.”

Sarah Palin calls the Spanish word for black “unacceptable.” Well, I guess she doesn’t hear much Spanish up in Alaska. James does an excellent job here of expounding on the wonders of black “conservatism.” He writes: “If [whites] want to hear about ‘racism’ and what’s good for blacks all the time, they can watch MSNBC. And the movement eventually fizzles out, just as the Tea Party movement will.” Well, no sooner did I read this than I heard Glenn Beck say something hilarious. He’s now looking for a way to “restore honor,” which is a flowery way of beating Hannity and O’Reilly in the ratings by banking on his enthusiastic Tea Party supporters, most of whom want him to run for president. He said the other day, in an interview with Don Imus, that the last big Tea Party was held in front of the Capitol, but conservatives know that no honor is to be found there. So Beck is going to lead his flock back to first principles by hosting a big MLK rally in front of the Lincoln Memorial, at the other end of the Mall. This is how to restore honor, he said. He was serious, which made it even funnier.

Obama means “black.”

According to a black wunderkind at the Washington Post, criticizing John Edwards is like calling him a “nigger” or dragging him behind a pickup truck.

During Black History Month, Knoxville Negroes wax nostalgic about living like apes in squalor. A pig to the mire, a dog to his vomit.

Affirmative Action is creating jobs, and jobs are good for the economy.

This theory, that slaves did not build the pyramids, is very interesting. The Hebrew slaves built storage cities for the Egyptians, not pyramids. Though there was an abundance of black slaves in Egypt, it’s difficult to imagine them building anything. I’ve never even met a black general contractor. But maybe everything I know about history is wrong. I just learned that the Anglo-Saxons were black! And the knights of the Crusades were “black Jews.” And the word “Scotland” means “black son,” or something. Blacks also invented chess and Greek dancing. And “Plantagenet” is pronounced “Plantagenic.” There’s pretty much nothing you can’t learn on Youtube.

Racists used to believe that Christian children needed Christian education, but that outdated way of thinking causes the youngsters to miss out on a variety of motivational speeches. It’s best to leave things like “education” to the experts.

The Department of Health and Human Services finally admits that Head Start is a colossal failure that has cost hundreds of billions of dollars. “Out of 44 separate cognitive tests given to former Head Start students at the end of the first grade, only two showed even marginally significant effects.” They seemed so sure that they could turn black kids white if they could get to them soon enough. Well, I hope you don’t miss the money. The important thing is that liberals care enough to dip into your paycheck, even if they never produce results. (This is what aid for Haiti is all about too.)

White teenagers used to have vocabularies of tens of thousands of words before reaching age 16. Now it’s down to 800, and about a hundred of those are variations on the word “like.” Keep in mind that over $10,000 is being spent on each of these dummies every year for “education.”

“Every schoolboy knows who imprisoned Montezuma, and who strangled Atahualpa,” wrote Lord Macaulay 168 years ago. Schoolkids don’t even know how to spell these words now. They know all about Lincoln, King, Parks, Tubman, Carver, and Sojourner Truth though.

Bill Gates’s billion-dollar scholarship endowment is off-limits to white students. “Students are eligible to be considered for a GMS scholarship if they are African American, American Indian/Alaska Native, Asian and Pacific Islander American, or Hispanic American.” I wonder when King’s I-Have-a-Dreamworld speech, about the content of character rather than the color of skin, is going to take effect.

The rebirth of sportsmanship. This new white basketball league is being formed to get away from Negro “street-ball” and return to “fundamental basketball.” I wonder how few in number we must become before the Tolerant will indulge us and allow us to have our own institutions. I propose a White Entertainment Television channel stat.

With the whole house of cards about to topple, the black president has his priorities.

Michelle Obama has her priorities too: 60 new outfits in 79 days. I wonder where the peasants take their dry cleaning.

One of Obama’s appointees advocates, in all seriousness, banning conspiracy theories, taxing them, or mounting secret conspiracies against conspiracy theorists. There were some white racists and slaveowners who governed us a long time ago, and they gave us the First Amendment. You might have read about this in a book, but surely not in school.

Erroll Southers, the black man who was nominated to head the Transportion Security Administration (now withdrawn), is apparently a big fan of Jewfilms, where nuclear physicists look like supermodels, ebonic blacks are computer hackers, and Aryans are terrorists. He was asked in a 2008 interview: “Which home-grown terrorist groups pose the greatest danger to the U.S.?” His amazing answer:

Most of the domestic groups that we have to pay attention to here are white supremacist groups. They’re anti-government and in most cases anti-abortion. They are usually survivalist-type in nature, identity orientated. If you recall, Buford Furrow came to Los Angeles in, I believe, it was 1999. When he went to three different Jewish institutions, museums, and then wound up shooting people at a children’s community center, then shooting a Filipino postal worker later on. Matthew Hale, who’s the Pontifex Maximus of the World Church of the Creator out of Illinois, and Ben Smith, who went on a shooting spree in three different cities where he killed a number of African Americans and Jews and Asians that day. Those groups are groups that claim to be extremely anti-government and Christian-identity oriented.

I count two valid examples, and von Brunn could also be mentioned, out of tens of thousands of anti-white murderers. Lopsided isn’t the word.

Wilhelm Marr wrote of “the loathing Jews demonstrate for real work…their codified hatred against all non-Jews…[their subduction of] the monarchical, knightly, lumbering German by enabling him in his vices.” This next quote will make your knees tremble. It is a shot between the eyes of the Judeochristian West, as though Marr could look more than a hundred years into the future and see precisely what is happening to us.

Germanic indolence, Germanic stinginess, convenient Teutonic disdainfulness of expression are responsible [for the fact] that the agile and clever Israel now decides what one shall say and what not… You have turned the press over to them because you find brilliant frivolity more to your liking than moral fortitude… The Jewish people thrive because of their talents and you have been vanquished, as you should have been and as you have deserved a thousandfold…

We are no longer a match for this foreign tribe.

There is a very clear and simple reason why nominal Christians are no longer a match for racially-cohesive anti-Christs, and it is our mission in this world as Kinists to tell it. But Kevin MacDonald doesn’t seem to get it. He claims that “medieval Christianity tend[ed] to be bad for Jews” because it was “collectivist” and because it was a “strongly defined ingroup.” This is a badly half-digested interpretation of history, and it stems from failure to understand that “Europe is the Faith, and the Faith is Europe,” and idolaters were purposely driven out of it. This is why MacDonald implies that post-Enlightenment societies were every bit as successful as Christian societies in “develop[ing] cultures with a strong sense of national identity,” which is preposterous.

More quotes from Marr:

The Jew has no real religion, he has a business contract with Jehovah and pays his god with statutes and formulations and in return is charged with the pleasant task of exterminating all that is not Jewish…

Jewry will have to face a final, desperate assault particularly by Germanism, before it will achieve authoritarian dominance…

To comment on [Jewish] rituals is ‘hatred,’ but if the Jew takes it upon himself to pronounce the last word in our religious and state affairs, then it is quite a different matter…

Within less than four generations there will not be a single office in the land, including the highest, which will not have been usurped by the Jews.

While Kevin MacDonald rightly identifies the Jewish agenda for our dispossession, Sam Francis was a Burnhamite who believed that this was the work of a nameless, faceless managerial elite, whose agenda just so happened to be “perfectly congruent” with that of the Jews. He did say that Jews “serve as the cultural vanguard of the managerial class” and are instrumental in “public bureaucracies, mass labor unions, political parties, mass media, financial institutions, universities, foundations, and other organizations that [are] immense in size, scale, and technical complexity.” But he never gave sufficient reason for what motivates the managers. Not even money is a reason as good as the bond of blood. Race is the key to history, as Benjamin Disraeli said. Francis knew it but was unwilling to connect certain dots because he had to earn a living as a writer.

It’s always dangerous for unitarians, who have dualism on the brain, to write about weighty material like Christianity and the history of the white race. This is as true for race-worshipers as it is for Babelist Christians. Here’s a painful-to-read article by Tom Sunic that shows what I mean.

Whites are not naturally submissive to God, he writes, contrary to all of recorded history. As proof for the “tolerance” of pre-Christian Europeans, he mentions the Iliad, which is quite funny if you think about it for a moment. Sunic can be comforted that the Trojan War was never intended to convert anyone to faith in Jesus Christ or to “make the world safe for democracy.” The bloodshed was mercifully free of preaching and proselytizing.

When the “Semitic spiritual baggage of Christianity” rose like the sun over Europe, whites failed to see that “Yahweh is a merciless totalitarian god.” Sunic does his best to explain this Great Truth to us, and urges us to pay no attention to thousands of years of unprecedented prosperity and blessings. Christianity is dualistic rather than organic, he says, and merely “preaches individual salvation.” This is all quite false, of course, as millions of Europeans and the European diaspora have known for millennia. It can never be denied that whites are the most cooperative people on earth and have almost always exhibited a healthy balance between individual liberty and corporate duty. If this were not the case, we would be as communal as Chinese or as libertine as Negroes. In fact, the cold winter theory of intelligence has been formulated to explain why whites are so cooperative and why they expect everyone else in the world to be just as cooperative. Now Sunic claims that the faith which has transformed us (and there is no going back, as Flannery O’Connor knew) is strictly individualistic. But if salvation had ever been viewed as solely eternal and not temporal as well, Christianity would never have reached the starting gate, and the world as we know it would not exist.

After brutally misinterpreting Galatians 3:28, the most-raped verse in all of Scripture, Sunic proclaims, without any proof whatsoever, that Christianity is “a Universalist religion with a special mission to transform the Other into the Same.” He plays several tricks in this regard. He says Christian churches never endorsed miscegenation historically, but they never opposed it either. We white Southern Americans immediately think of our fathers, who opposed it to the death. Rather than draw attention to what would contradict his theory, Sunic points to libidinous Spanish and Portuguese, who eagerly bedded the natives.

“There is a race which, coming down through the centuries, enveloped with antagonistic influences and hostile nationalities, has stood out in perpetual protest against surrendering our principles by amalgamating with other peoples.” ~ John L. Girardeau

Reading Tom Sunic brings to mind the excuse of Charles Babbage for being at a loss for words: “I am not able to rightly apprehend the confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question.”

To all enthusiastic Darwinists, atheists, and neo-pagans who would like to convince us that Our Lord Jesus Christ did not really come to seek and save His lost sheep, because they are not really lost, and who would like to argue that trust in our Savior has been a curse upon our people, we propose that proofs are more pleasing than platitudes. And for the sake of heaven, please inform us of our destination after we jettison Christianity. Where is this train going, and will there be tracks under it when it gets there?

Our misguided friends should ponder whether their morality is merely a chemical reaction. As author Marilynne Robinson has written,

[S]cience cannot serve in the place of religion because it cannot generate an ethics or a morality. It can give us no reason to prefer a child to a dog, or to choose honorable poverty over fraudulent wealth. It can give us no grounds for preferring what is excellent to what is sensationalistic… If, as the Darwinists assure us, there is only the natural world, then nothing can be alien to it, and our arrangements, however extravagantly they depart from the ways of other creatures, can never be called unnatural… We are to believe we are the dupes of the very reactions that make us judges of circumstance, and that make us free in relation to it.

Our atheist friends assure us that there is no proof for God, therefore He must not exist, therefore they are free to live as they wish. If they are Darwinists, they will say that evolution programs us to do what works, and this is why we form families and the like; acts that have the facade of selflessness but are actually fundamentally selfish in that we are each compelled to leave a legacy. This is, quite simply, amorality.

I love this line from CWNY: “Post-Christian Europe is hell, and we can’t vote hell away.”

There is a true statement (with reservations) at the bottom of this article: “Acceptance of macroevolutionary theory is not a precondition for the intelligent study of racial biology. It is perfectly possible to remain an unbeliever, skeptic, or agnostic about cosmology and ‘ape into man’ but still acknowledge the objective existence of human races and oppose white genocide because it is evil.” The only part that is disagreeable is the insinuation that cosmology objectively proves macroevolution, but some of us are too stubborn to accept it. Darwinists who pretend that they are solely driven by “science” are fooling themselves. The belief that the universe came into being from nothing, of its own accord, requires more blind faith than I am capable of stirring, but there can be no denying that it is a religious faith, blind or not. Moreover, on what basis can those who deny the existence of God and a metaphysical standard for law and morality believe that white genocide is evil? How can survival of the fittest be considered wrong or bad? Without God, there is no hope for us, and most certainly no hope for our race.

Michael Sheuer with some excellent statements aired live on C-SPAN, to the consternation of anti-Christs:

Israel is a country that is of no particular worth [strategically] to the United States… Their association with us is a negative for the United States… Why don’t we talk about that? Because AIPAC and other influential American Jewish groups are extraordinarily involved in the funding of American political campaigns and have the ability to reach out and make sure that people lose their jobs, or are otherwise hurt, if they dare to criticize Israel.

He says it’s a fact that Israel’s association with us is a negative, and he knows what he’s talking about. Jews caused him to lose a think tank job when he said candidate Obama was “doing what I call the Tel Aviv Two Step.”

Jeffrey Goldberg of The Atlantic “strongly believes that Jews should enjoy the privilege of having their racial and ethnic motives exempt from criticism.” If you doubt it, see here, here, and here. Also see the film Defamation, made by a Jew in search of “anti-Semitism.” You’ll discover that there are Jews who don’t get floating holidays and who read articles that are disagreeable in their newspapers, both of which are blocks in a pyramid of unpleasantness that is capped with genocide.

Rush Limbaugh runs to the Jews for cover when he is accused by the ADL of anti-Semitism, because he knows that his career is on the line for offending Chosenites. The question is never asked, What gives these people the right to outlaw criticism of them? And why should white Christians care what anti-Christs think anyway? Why should we give a moment’s thought to their gutter religion and racist, terrorist state?

Commentary is “a magazine with a special mission to explain the Jewish community to itself… Jew to Jew.” Don’t try this at home, kids, because it’s racist unless you have Approved Genes.

A Jew who says accusing people of being “anti-Semitic” is “a trick” that Jews have perfected.

This is hilarious. When a Jew asks Mel Gibson why anyone should allow him to earn a living after he offended the most holy and sacred people on earth (not even humans really but more like gods), Gibson asks him, “Do you have a dog in this fight?” You can’t help but laugh when you realize that Gibson knows that only a Jew would raise the issue. No one else cares.

If retirement is not scrapped, there won’t be enough revenue to fight wars for Israel, the ethnostate of the wealthiest race in the world.

Here’s a Jew who believes that the “greatest mass murder in world history” (what about Stalin?) should remain uninvestigated. Instead, we should rely exclusively on testimony from former inmates, none of whom had anything to do with the planning and execution. “Try to imagine murder trials in which there are no bodies of victims, no autopsy reports, no expert opinions as to cause of death, no time of death, etc.!”

This is a funny line from one of the Holohoaxers: “To put the Holocaust in some separate category and to demand that it be there – to demand that we have more material evidence – is actually us somehow giving in to the Holocaust deniers by providing some sort of special evidence.” Evidence detracts from the mythology.

Jews are excellent writers of fiction. How do they think up these crazy stories?

A Jew liar named Moshe Peer says he was sent to the gas chamber at least six times. When asked how it could be true, given that the Nazis were expert killers, he fishes for an escape hatch from his lie: “Maybe children resist better, I don’t know.” At Bergen-Belsen, where there were no gas chambers, he says the corpses were strewn about on the ground, and the in-mates, who were given no food or water, turned to cannibalism. Where is Steven Spielberg when you need him? I smell an Academy Award.

Jew Norman Finkelstein is tired of his fellow Jews exhuming the bodies of his parents and parading them through the streets in order to extort money for every war that Israel wants to fight. To be silenced, Finkelstein has been fired from his professorship. He is not what you would call a Jew in good standing.

Oliver Stone is causing Jews to hyperventilate by depicting Hitler as a real man rather than a demon, but the end result will be to tame Stalin, which will only cement the exclusivity of the Holocaust. Stone is very clever.

To accuse these Jews of sterilizing Negroes would be anti-Semitic.

Jews hate Bible verses and call them unconstitutional. It’s amazing that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof” has come to mean that no religious message of any kind can be witnessed under the state’s jurisdiction.

One of the ways in which Jews have subverted White Christian Culture is through music. In this clip, Jew fag Leonard Bernstein indoctrinates a group of young white kids on what makes American music “American.” Our music, he says, reflects “our great, varied, many-sided democracy… Think of all the races…from around the globe that make up our country.” (He lists only white countries.) Then he introduces fellow Jew fag Aaron Copland as a “real American composer.” (Naturally, Copland supported the Communist Party USA ticket during the 1936 presidential election.)

This event was held under the auspices of American Youth for Democracy which, until WWII reached its peak, was called the Young Communist League. One of the Negro Communists who belonged to it was Frank Marshall Davis, the Stalinist pedophile who, along with Jew Communist Saul Alinsky, mentored Barack Obama in red “community organizing.” Two other Negro Communists in the group were Langston Hughes and Adam Clayton Powell. These were men who paved the way for the most significant Negro Communist of all, Michael King. (Julian Bond, the high-yellow chairman of the NAACP, appreciatively calls King a “radical” who “sought a modified form of socialism for the United States.”)

In 1970, Tom Wolfe charged Bernstein with “radical chic” for hosting a fundraiser for the Black Panthers.

This cartoon appeared in the Chicago Tribune in 1934. In the lower left, you can see Jew Leon Trotsky writing the planks of the Roosevelt/Communist Manifesto. “It worked in Russia!” he says. There are also several Jews in the wagon, and Roosevelt himself was a Rosenfeld. Purely coincidental, I’m sure.

Does any of this sound familar? They’ve been doing this for a long time, and they’ve almost succeeded.

We now have over a thousand times more debt than gold.

“In the current hodge podge of abstract finance, it is easy to get lost in the numbers and lose sight of the forest for the trees. Which is why we provide the ultimate simplification: In calendar (not fiscal) 2009, the US grew its budget deficit by $1.47 trillion. In the same time, the Federal Reserve grew its securities holdings from $500 billion to $1.85 trillion, a $1.34 trillion increase. Keeping it simple: 91% of the budget deficit increase in 2009, under the authority of President Obama, was funded by the…United States.”

The second pope to ever visit a synagogue of Satan condemns Christians for the “scourge” (torture) of telling the truth about Talmudists, which he calls “anti-Judaism”! Hoffman explains:

Christ was scourged at the pillar and we are supposed to believe that the rabbis are scourged by telling them the truth about their Bible-nullifying oral tradition (Torah shebeal peh) and Babylonian superstitions.

The pope, who as a much ballyhooed scholar certainly knows better, nevertheless proceeds to deceive by conflating the religion of rabbinic Judaism, which destroys the word of God, with the Old Testament religion itself.

The Bible tells us that light has no fellowship with darkness, but the pope gushes about the “closeness and spiritual fraternity” that Christians share with anti-Christs, and of “our common roots, our history and the rich spiritual patrimony that we share.” He says we have this “profound bond” with the Jews of today, who have no spiritual descent whatsoever from the ancient Hebrews, and only a claimed but likely false descent from them by blood. He therefore infers salvation by race, which is not Christianity at all but rather Holocaustianity. If you harbor any doubts, you will be floored by the evil implications of this statement from the pope:

The Jewish faith, unlike other non-Christian religions, is already a response to God’s revelation in the Old Covenant. To the Jews “belong the sonship, the glory, the covenants, the giving of the law, the worship, and the promises; to them belong the patriarchs and of their race, according to the flesh is the Christ” (Rom 9:4-5), “for the gifts and the call of God are irrevocable!” (Rom 11:29)

Read that a few times until you understand the spiritual and physical connections he is drawing. (It’s the same as what John Hagee is teaching, but Hagee is actually more consistent; he is forced to conclude that “Jesus did not come to earth to be the Messiah,” and the Jews did not therefore reject the Messiah.) Because of this requisite “solidarity,” says the pope, Christians must promote “a renewed respect for the [false] Jewish interpretation of the Old Testament.” He even supports a sort of Noahidism that is binding “for all of humanity.” He teaches that “the living covenant between God and the Jewish people is irrevocable, and that the charge of deicide is utterly baseless.” This man is a rabid wolf in the clothing of an ostentatious sheep. I feel guilty even writing the word “pope” because it means “father.”

Norway pays the price for being colorblind. Bringing this to the attention of the public is “controversial,” says Oslo Police Woman.

“Westergaard, the BBC, and the entire Western world take it for granted that he must live for the rest of his life under security. It doesn’t occur to them for even a hundredth of a second that a Muslim community which presents such threats to the Danish people and Danish liberties should not be in Denmark.”

One-fifth of the Swedish population is now foreign.

French president Jew Sarkozy is hoping for the same fate to befall France. As the first non-French president of France, he says the French have a duty to “métissage” (miscegenate).

Concretely, this means giving preference to minorities in job hiring and prosecuting those who do not comply. In other words, affirmative action as a government policy from which none are exempt.

In his message Sarkozy insisted that the French people must change, that there will be dire consequences if they don’t, and that not to intermarry racially is bad for the survival of the country.

You could boil everything said and done by Jews down to one basic theme: Whites must change. Truly, it’s either them or us.

\

Agricultural workers in Italy are shocked that Italians are retaliating over lost jobs. The commentariat chimes in to say that the migrants are being “ethnically cleansed” by the Italian version of the “Ku Klux Klan,” as though jobs should be freely given by any business that wants to save money. Then the pope chimes in with more irrelevant statements, such as: “An immigrant is a human being… God loves him as God loves me… He is a person to respect… We have to go to the heart of the problem, of the significance of the human being.” If only the “KKK” had realized that they were running human beings out of town!

“I have conservative nationalist literature dating as far back as 1979 in which the reader is urged to stop illegal and legal colored immigration by writing to his local congressmen. Why do such actions never work? Because we cannot stop an invasion by placing a form of government above the interests of our people. The cry should be, ‘In the name of our God and our people, this invasion must be stopped!’ Fortunately, Alfred the Great didn’t have a congressman to write to; if he had, he never would have become Alfred the Great.”

“Are we to bring into the body politic eight or ten million Asiatics so different from us in race and history that amalgamation is impossible? Are they to share with us in making the laws and shaping the destiny of this nation? No republican of prominence has been bold enough to advocate such a proposition.” ~ William Jennings Bryan

The Aristotelian view of abstractions.

Not only is the Aristotelian view incorrect, it is profoundly destructive and dangerous. One need only repeat the Aristotelian view often enough, taken to sufficiently great extremes, to destroy the basis of all human knowledge. The fallacy of the Aristotelian view of abstractions becomes obvious if I say, “There is no such thing as courage, only individual acts of courage,” or “There is no such thing as the complete works of Shakespeare, only the individual words which make up these works”…

Common variants include the following:

“There is no such thing as the nation, only individual members of the nation.”

“There is no such thing as society, only individual members of society.”

“There is no such thing as the American people, only individual American citizens.”

“There is no such thing as the White race, only individual white people.”

You might notice that this also relates to Tom Sunic’s fallacious view of Christianity.

California joins Arizona, Hawaii, Maryland, Nevada, New Mexico, and Texas as states where diversities are now the majority. Florida is almost there.

“Immigrants are 21 percent of the uninsured but only 7 percent of the population. This means white folks on Medicare or headed there will see benefits curtailed, while new arrivals from the Third World, whence almost all immigrants come, get taxpayer-subsidized health insurance. Any wonder why all those tea-party and town-hall protests seem to be made up of angry white folks?” ~ Pat Buchanan

“The sanctuary given over to aliens.”

Half of all young blacks in England are unemployed.

“America exists solely for the purpose of allowing immigrants to earn money.” It’s racist to think of Americans being of a particular tribe with property of their own.

What do these liberals mean by “our” when they say “our daughters should not be cut”?

Through the Blood.

Who do liberals and blacks routinely blame for all the ills of the world? White people, of course. And to whom do blacks and liberals appeal for aid? Let’s take a page from Frank Capra’s It’s a Wonderful Life script and imagine a world without white people. Would such a world be a happy paradise of blended brown people? Well, you wouldn’t have to worry about earthquake relief efforts any more, because there would be no concept of charitable outreach in the blended brown world. The idea of relieving someone else’s misery would be as inconceivable as self-propelled flight…

The post-Christian European still engages in feel-good charity, the charity that stems from human pride, while the people of color continue to regard charity as an entitlement to be had on demand…

The European, because of his union with Christ, loved his kith and kin with a far greater intensity than the savage races who did not regard each and every individual soul as a personality of “eternal moment.” Ties of family and blood were doubly important to the European, because it was through those human ties of blood that Christ entered the world…

Why is it that anywhere the idea that “every man is our kith and kin” flourishes, as in the egalitarian United States and the former Soviet Union, there are abortuaries and gulags? Perhaps it is because saving grace comes to us through our ties to kith and kin and not via the medium of generic, diverse humanity.

In other words, Jesus is a Kinist.

Jew Ben Wattenberg has a good line about expecting too much from minorities: “If I own a horse, that horse will not survive long if, under the delusion that it is a unicorn, I insist on giving it stardust to eat and moonbeams to drink.” But in response to this Jew’s genocidal wishfulness about America being the world’s First Universal Nation, Chilton Williamson writes: “Soon perhaps he will suggest changing the printing on our currency from ‘In God We Trust’ to ‘God We Are.’” That’s the way to think like a Talmudist.

According to NPR, one-third of women in the military have been raped. How is feminism working out for you gals?

In praise of women with curves.

“While there are plenty of sites for blacks seeking blacks, and whites and blacks seeking each other, there don’t appear to be any dating sites for whites seeking other whites. In fact, when reclusive publishing heir William Regnery proposed creating such a dating site in 2004, he was attacked for it.”

Fundamentalist Mormons prove that white people can still thrive, even if they’re idolaters.

“If 99% of your town shares your race, language and religion you may end up believing that the biggest difference you could have with a human being is over what the tax rate should be.” ~ Richard Hoste

Race suddenly becomes important in stories about white criminals.

The kikenmedia plays into the hands of “racists” when it fails to censor black behavior, says the Huffington Post.

MSNBC is all about diversity…for others.

Thirty percent of megachurches have racial integration of 20 percent or more, which is very high for churches.

Funny how when blacks talk “about race in general,” it never fails to be cosmopolitan in spirit but rooted in black self-interest; it’s never “about race in general.” Likewise, liberals who seek racial “dialogue” never seek dialogue from us.

In Finland, “just visiting a racist website would be enough to sentence someone to 4 years in prison.” This is what happens when you “liberate” yourself from God’s law. The Ten Commandments of God are replaced by the 10,000 commandments of men, which are disproportionate and unjust.

Saudi women are buying expensive placenta injections to lighten their skin.

Beautiful White art, for children no less.

White music played for a sea of white faces.

“The ‘pro-life’ movement has aborted itself.” Christians refuse to admit that the abortion industry is simply another facet of the genocide of our people. Even when it’s clearly explained to them, they refuse to admit it or do anything about it. As this excellent post from CLR shows, courage is the prince of virtues, for without it no other virtues are possible.

The latest target of the Tolerant is Andre Bauer, Lt. Governor of South Carolina, for having too much common sense. Bauer says what we all know to be true, that what you subsidize will grow, and what you tax will diminish. But saying that teenage mothers should not be subsidized is the same as saying that white money should be withheld from blacks, which is gloriously racist.

Is it merely a coincidence that the United States flag bears a striking resemblance to the British East India Company flag?

No African, Asian, Arab, Caribbean, or Latino “Briton” is eligible to assume the role of British head of state.

Get your stab vest for the World Cup in South Africa. The important thing is that apartheid has ended, because mass murders are fine, but racism is really bad.

Blacks are at higher risk of diabetes because they metabolize sugar differently than whites.

A long article on Kent Hovind.

This is a very interesting site showing Bob Jones University race correspondence.

“The ADL and SPLC must be very proud to have a person like Perez Hilton in their corner.”

Not to mention Jeffrey Imm, who is trying to shut down this year’s Amren conference in the name of “love.” It’s actually amusing to hear him talk because he rattles off so many slogans and buzzwords that he could stretch two substantial sentences out to a half hour. He must have a seminary degree. Watch this. It’s fascinating that he can rationalize revoking our constitutional rights in the name of liberty and equality, which are opposite concepts.

I’m reluctant to even use the words “constitutional rights,” because Americans today have forgotten (and have not been told) that our founding fathers considered these rights to be given by God, and the Constitution merely listed them and prevented the government from interfering with them. We should have known that we would lose our Constitution the day we came to think that a piece of paper is all that stands between us and our dispossession.

As for love, we have instructions in the second table of the Ten Commandments. Dr. R.J. Rushdoony knew that love “is not an emotional attitude but a keeping of the law in relation to our neighbor. This means respecting his right to life (Thou shalt not kill), the sanctity of his home (Thou shalt not commit adultery), and his property (Thou shalt not steal), and his reputation (Thou shalt not bear false witness), and finally, respecting these things in thought (Thou shalt not covet) as well as in deed.” Our people are victimized by these sins every day.

Ted Olson is making a consistent case for Equality. He’s correct that fag marriage is a necessity according to the illegal 14th Amendment, and “conservatives” are too blind to see the ramifications of their cheering after the South was vanquished.

The best thing a Jew ever wrote:

[W]e must always remember, we must never forget, we must put in the dock and hang higher than Haman, those who, in modern times, opened the Pandora’s Box of genocide and the extermination of civilians: Sherman, Grant, and Lincoln.

Perhaps, some day, their statues, like Lenin’s in Russia, will be toppled and melted down; their insignias and battle flags will be desecrated, their war songs tossed into the fire. And then Davis and Lee and Jackson and Forrest, and all the heroes of the South, “Dixie” and the Stars and Bars, will once again be truly honored and remembered.

I’ve had many preachers tell me, quite sincerely, that using old-fashioned words is sinful, because they carry with them a connotation of hatred. “Negro” must now be added to this list since Reid’s use of it culminated in threatened job loss as well as the expectation that he must apologize to a representative sample of The Duly Aggrieved, including the emperor himself. Of course, what Reid said, that Obama is “light-skinned” and has “no Negro dialect, unless he wants to have one,” is patently true. As for appearance, how is noticing the shade of Obama’s skin any different than Obama himself referring to his father as an “ink-black Luo”? As for blacking it up, it’s hard to top Oprah, but here is Obama in action. Anyway, let’s not allow facts to get in the way of a good racist-hunt. And above all, let’s not dwell on the fact that what Reid said was actually a compliment about being articulate.

On ABC’s This Week, George Will exulted that finally, someone (Reid) had said something about race on which everyone could agree, but Dick Cheney’s daughter, clearly shocked by Will’s defense of the anachronism, said it was unquestionably racist. How can there be such disagreement? As Steve Sailer observes, it has everything to do with the widespread refusal to believe that limitations are inherited genetically. Thus, it’s fine to notice that skin color, hair color, and eye color come to us by nature.

It’s fine to recognize, for example, that “Samoans are born big.” But nothing about the brain or character or potential for achievement can have anything to do with nature. Those are entirely products of nurture, it is said. So along comes Obama, black by nature and white by nurture; the messiah who will conquer race as Christ conquered the grave; who will prove to liberals that their lives have not been in vain. (Notice the White Supremacist assumption which liberals cannot avoid, try as they might, that whiteness is divine and blackness carnal. The Obamessiah, from his incarnation in the womb of a whore to his apotheosis, spans both worlds, and to be absolved by him is to be born again.)

The vicious reactions to Reid are too numerous to list. Here is Mychal Massie, one of those rare black “conservatives” beloved of Judeochristians:

Reid is a loathsome individual whose apology was based on exposure not repentance. Reid’s comments are proof positive that the racial animus of the past is alive and prevalent among liberals today…

Could someone let Massie know that Reid did not actually commit murder or rape? He only used the word NEGRO!

Another of these Afro-conservatives, Robert George, writes, sarcastically:

Thank goodness no jive-talkin’ darky ever thought about running for president! No way Reid could have supported him!!

Does Mr. George insinuate that he would support a jive-talker for the office of president? If so, what does this tell us about black “conservatism”?

Someone at BeliefNet, one of the most banal sites on the intertubez, asks rhetorically: “Americans wouldn’t vote for a black politician if he had a ‘Negro’ dialect?” Well, no, sweetie, and I hate to shatter your juvenile illusions.

This incident will force everyone to say “African-American” all the more. It’s kind of funny that Glenn Beck, before this story broke, had the perfect timing to recognize that “African-American” is a phony term.

Jive-talker Michael Steele has asked Reid to resign for uttering the evil word “Negro,” and he’s correct that it would be justice after what was done to that weasel, Trent Lott. But Steele doesn’t simply point to the double standard, which was applied to him as well when he said the words “honest Injun.” No, according to Steele, an evil word like Negro “harkens back to the 1950s and 60s, and it confirms to me a mind-set that’s out of step with where America is today.” We honestly thank God whenever we find a man who is “out of step” with the perverted time in which we live.

Just think about what’s happening here. This phony government has a death rattle in its throat, and everyone is frantic because of words like “Injun” and “Negro” being used. It’s just unbelievable; it’s as though children are in charge. At first glance, it seems silly that there is such hyperventilation and threatened ruination over words like “Negro” and “Injun” when we are teetering on the verge of total economic collapse, but it actually makes perfect sense. Despite what Judeochristians believe, it’s not possible to mix races under a system of pretended equality and expect to retain liberty in anything but name. Loving equality is like spitting in the face of God. The gift of God is liberty, not equality. Christians have always been faced with a choice between liberty and equality, and before they lost their faith they were able to choose wisely. Where there is liberty, white men govern themselves, for the most part. They are never without law, but they are less in need of being forced to obey it. Totalitarianism follows equality as night follows day, and it’s bloody expensive. Eventually, the totalitarians run out of money, a revolution follows, and white men rediscover their lost liberties. (There is no evidence that non-whites ever have.) As Christians, we recognize that there is no guarantee that the cycle will come back around, and if it does at all, it is because men repent of their refusal to obey God’s law, which was the source of the cancerous equality in the first place.

We see that America is on an arc that culminates in what is happening in Europe today. The condition of free speech in England is such that a man was arrested, fingerprinted, and detained for four hours, at a cost of £12,000, for being linked (falsely) to an email that contained the words “do as you likey,” which rhymes with “pikey,” which is a euphemism for gypsies. His predictable defense: “one of his best friends is a gypsy.” In a country that once helped to teach the world about liberty, it is a crime for a white man to offend someone who is not white. I know what will save us from this tyranny in America, though. What we need is for Christians to adopt millions of black boys and Chinese girls, since that’s why Jesus died on the cross, and they can be the first non-whites in the history of the world who really understand liberty. Then the rights of the white minority will be protected as the non-white population explodes. What could go wrong?

This video makes me severely nauseous. What kind of sickness rots the minds of white people to make them think they can only show love to strangers by taking them into their families and making them heirs, equal to their own children? God gave us very clear rules for how to show love to both neighbors and to those who are far off. Commandments Five through Ten have nothing to do with this madness.

Florida, our camp of the saints. For “jobs that Americans won’t do” we have 200,000 Haitians on the way, which is only slightly less than the number of slaves in that small country. Ah, the pungent odor of irony.

Despite the outpouring of emotion over Haiti, our politicians know where their bread is buttered, and it’s not in Port-au-Prince.

President Obama has allocated $2.775 billion to Israel in the 2010 foreign aid budget. Israel is set to receive over $30 billion in U.S. foreign aid over the next decade. In the wake of the devastating earthquake, Obama promised Haiti a mere $100 million for its recovery effort.

Obama calls this mandatory deduction from your paycheck an “investment,” which is true in the same sense that you invest in the septic tank every time you flush. Remember when racists used to give their money to their own children? Those were the good old days.

Sailer asks: “Does President Barack Obama have any more idea what to do with Haiti after the horrific earthquake than did President Woodrow Wilson when he sent the Marines in back in 1915?” This line from Obama makes me feel all warm inside: “We look into the eyes of another and see ourselves.”

Just as is true of every war in which Jewmerica asserts itself, no one has even thought about an exit strategy from Haiti.

Garrett Hardin’s maxim that you “can’t just do one thing” foretells of the likely permanent albatross for the U.S. and other western nations…

In Newsweek’s feature article, President Obama writes, “In the days, months, and years ahead, we’ll need to work closely with the government and people of Haiti to reclaim the momentum that they achieved before the earthquake… The United States will be there with the Haitian government and the United Nations every step of the way.”

Obama could have added “decades” and beyond to the duration of assistance.

And no one even asked you if you wanted to throw money at these savages for eternity. How does it feel to be the world’s sugar daddy? We have no one but ourselves to blame for it. Long ago, our forebears decided that Jews are pretty much like Christians, and Jews taught us that whites are pretty much like everyone else.

This is an unintentionally funny article by a Jew about Haiti’s “glorious past” but unfortunate run of bad “luck.” The 800-pound gorilla called Race, which is about to take a massive dump on the Queen Anne furniture in your sitting room, is never mentioned in the article, of course. That would be racist.

The word “looting” is racist.

Collard greens are racist.

White Dating on Facebook is racist.

Pickup trucks are racist.

“Soul food” is the new blackface.

Economic stimulus, Congo-style.

“Germans paying to bang on bongo drums in celebration of a Negro president in charge of 60,000 troops stationed on German soil, it’s like a bad film, or at least a comedy.”

The Sons of Confederate Veterans in Cross City, Florida (Dixie County), marched in the MLK parade last week. “Black Confederate” H.K. Edgerton, who dishonorably dresses as a soldier, led the procession, and was chosen for the occasion to symbolize King’s vision of “All men sitting together at the table of Brotherhood” (with the white women evenly distributed). As a friend of mine mocks, we’ve got the Yankees on the run! The League of the South calls Edgerton a “champion of true liberty.” They would never say any such thing about a white “racist” who agrees wholeheartedly with his Confederate ancestors.

First Word asks why Westminster Theological Seminary honors an adulterer and plagiarist with a holiday. “Anyone can guess: Because Martin Luther King, Jr. is a popular Negro, and they want to ‘reach out’ to the Negro community with Reformed theology, by ’showing solidarity’ or whatever the current buzzword might be. The only problem is, honesty is more important than being Reformed.” Needless to say, no seminary would ever “reach out” to “racists” under any circumstances.

Solzhenitsyn on slavery.

Nick Griffin quoting 1 Timothy 5:8 on the floor of the European Parliament: Priceless.

It was once called “the gem of the West Indies” when whites controlled it, and it supplied 40% of the world’s sugar. When Haiti became the world’s first independent black state, it earned the title the Island of the Damned. Now its only exports are voodoo, rape, kidnapping, and murder. “Never did the Negro have more work, healthier lives, and actual families then when they were under the rule of the benevolent European.”

Here’s the answer for why there is no clean water.

This video is amazing. Haitian men demonstrate their chivalry by pushing women and children aside to get to the food trucks. And they’re not starving, because they carefully inspect and then reject the packages. Being Haitians, they misinterpret the expiration date. Then the truck drives away before the rest of the food can be distributed. Your money at work.

“[Jew David] Brooks quickly dispels several liberal myths: foreign aid will work in Haiti, the country is poor because of the legacy of slavery and colonialism, the environment is holding Haiti back.” In general, “hell on earth” is being blamed on that old perennial chestnut, poverty. Even though this article refers to similar behavior in New Orleans after Katrina, it is said that Negroes act as they do simply because they are trying to find food to eat. We have nothing to worry about though, because as the history of school integration and bussing proves, there are areas of magical dirt in this country which coincidentally follow white people, and all the new Haitian adoptees and pseudo-citizens will transform into Yankee Doodle Dandies once they arrive.

Danny Glover believes the Haitian earthquake was the result of failing to appease the earth goddess, Gaia.

“Haitians may be 95% Catholic, but they are 100% voodoo.” ~ John Hoet, Roman Catholic Missionary

Pat Robertson, who cheers for the massacre of Palestinians, thinks the devil can make covenants with people. (Like other dispensationalists, he believes that Daniel 9:27 refers to Satan making a covenant, but it’s just the opposite.) If he had spoken the truth and said that God judges the wicked, he would have been denounced as a racist (even more than usual).

“The Haitian ambassador asserts the insane notion that the U.S. owes the Louisiana Purchase to the Haitians.” Further, “what pact the Haitian has made with the devil has helped the United States become what it is.” The Haitian ambassador agrees with Pat Robertson?

The Negroes in Haiti were so eager to be free of French colonialism that they murdered every white man, woman, and child on the island. “As their standard, they carried a pike with the carcass of an impaled white baby.” Lothrop Stoddard, who wrote his Ph.D. thesis on Haiti and later published it as The French Revolution in San Domingo, called the black uprising “the first shock between the ideals of white supremacy and racial equality.”

Here is the record, from that book, of the first black attempt at self-government:

All, without exception, have been massacred, down to the very women and children. Madame de Boynes was killed in a peculiarly horrible manner. A young mulatto named Fifi Pariset ranged the town like a madman searching the houses to kill the little children. Many of the men and women were hewn down by sappers, who hacked off their arms and smashed in their chests. Some were poniarded, others mutilated, others ‘passed on the bayonet,’ others disemboweled with knives or sabers, still others stuck like pigs. At the beginning, a great number were drowned.

“After the Negroes massacred the last of the White population in 1804, Haiti remained a part of Santo Domingo until 1844 when it became a separate ‘republic.’ Between 1844 and 1915 only one Haitian President completed his term of office. Fourteen were ousted by armed uprisings, one was blown up, one was poisoned and another was hacked to pieces by a mob. Between 1908 and 1915 the revolutions and assassinations increased so rapidly that a United States military occupation was needed to restore order. This lasted from 1915 to 1934. Thereafter followed twelve years of rule by a mulatto elite which ended in the resumption of control by the black military in 1946. Since then wholesale corruption and political murder have been the rule… The deterioration had approached the ludicrous. During the sixty days prior to January 1, 1966, five ‘democratic’ African governments—Upper Volta, the Central African Republic, Dahomey, Nigeria and the Congo—were overthrown by force. Since 1960 there had been at least 24 African rebellions, mutinies, assassinations or attempted assassinations, and coup d’etats. Under such circumstances it was not surprising that while the crime rate was rising in the United States cannibalism and human sacrifice were increasing in Africa.” ~ Carleton Putnam

“Nothing African remains in the statute law [of Haiti]. All memories of the land of Ham have been officially expunged from men’s minds. The State language has never shown a trace of African influence. The institutions, as I said before, are completely European. Let us consider how they harmonize with the manners of the people… The question of cleanliness never enters anyone’s head. If you wish to approach a high official in this country, you find yourself being introduced to a gigantic negro lying on his back, on a wooden bench… The State is divided among two factions. These are separated from each other by a certain incompatibility, not of political theory, but of skin. The mulattoes are on one side, the negroes on the other. The former have certainly more intelligence and are more open to ideas. As I have already remarked in the case of San Domingo, the European blood has modified the African character. If these men were set in the midst of a large white population, and so had good models constantly before their eyes, they might become quite useful citizens. Unfortunately the negroes are for the time being superior in strength and numbers. Although their racial memory of Africa has its origin, in many cases, as far back as their grandfathers, they are still completely under the sway of African ideals. Their greatest pleasure is idleness; their most cogent argument is murder. The most intense hatred has always existed between the two parties in the island. The history of Hayti, of democratic Hayti, is merely a long series of massacres; massacres of mulattoes by negroes, or of negroes by mulattoes, according as the one or other held the reins of power. The constitution, however enlightened it pretends to be, has no influence whatever. It sleeps harmlessly upon the paper on which it is written. The power that reigns unchecked is the true spirit of these peoples. According to the natural law already mentioned, the black race, belonging as it does to a branch of the human family that is incapable of civilization, cherishes the deepest feeling of repulsion towards all the others. Thus we see the negroes of Hayti violently driving out the whites and forbidding them to enter their territory. They would like to exclude even the mulattoes; and they aim at their extermination. Hatred of the foreigner is the mainspring of local politics. Owing, further, to the innate laziness of the race, agriculture is abolished, industry not even mentioned, commerce becomes less every day. The hideous increase of misery prevents the growth of population, which is actually being diminished by the continual wars, revolts, and military executions.” ~ Count Arthur de Gobineau, 1853

“We are in for a new St. Domingo. The Yankees have raised the devil, and now they cannot guide him.” ~ Mary Chesnut

As Hunter Wallace points out, we refused to grant these savages diplomatic recognition until 1862. If the South had succeeded in swinging Lincoln from a tree, Haiti might still not be recognized as a legitimate nation.

Having “freed” themselves from the yoke of French slavery, the Haitians enslaved their own children. As for France and their experiment in absorbing Negroes, their Minister for Immigration and National Identity has recently stated: “France is neither a people, nor a language, nor a territory, nor a religion, it is a conglomerate of peoples who want to live together. There is no ethnic Frenchman, there is only a France where the blood is mixed.”

“While most Americans agree that we should provide disaster relief to our neighbors, support for perpetually sustaining a nation for all time is hard to stomach.”

Every black politician and celebrity from David Paterson to Tiger Woods, driven by racial solidarity, is clamoring for money to be sent to Haiti. With what stipulations? Has any politician you know, who is so eager to give your money away, even asked the question? As Rush Limbaugh courageously observes, “We’ve already donated to Haiti. It’s called the U.S. income tax.” For the last hundred years we’ve thrown money at the wastrels on that island. Now our men, who are incapable of feeding their families on one income, and have to send their wives to work, and even have to find a second or third job because they can’t find full-time work that provides health coverage, must find more money to flush down the crapper? I feel like letting loose with a string of expletives, but there might be womenfolk present. Everyone seems to forget that Obama has just spent trillions of dollars that don’t exist. Now we’re supposed to come to the rescue of those who have never been able to care for themselves? This is an important point, because as the black population of the world explodes, and they are no closer to being civilized and self-sufficient, a greater share of white resources is expected by them, even as the white population dwindles. Questions about the future need to be asked and answered right now.

Africans have never been able to care for their own, and there is no evidence that they ever will. It is unreasonable to expect whites to perpetually give their wealth away for nothing in return. When we need help, we must pay for it in a number of ways that hurt. Eritrea is the only country in Africa that is trying to feed itself, and it’s not working. Keep in mind that Africa is fertile beyond imagination, and a small corner of it could easily feed the entire world. The problem is the Africans themselves, which is why money sent overseas by do-gooders is promptly purloined by gangs.

Here is an excellent, must-read article on why Africa has gone to hell. (Obviously, Haiti is an extension of Africa, just as America is an extension of Europe.)

White Zimbabweans used to tell a joke—what is the difference between a tourist and a racist? The answer—about a week…

Zimbabwe was just the latest African state to squander its potential, to swap civil society for civil strife and pile high its corpses. Then the wrecking virus moves on and a fresh spasm of violence erupts elsewhere. Congo, Ivory Coast, Sudan, Rwanda, Sierra Leone, even Kenya. Take your pick, for it is the essence of Africa, the recurring A-Z of horror…

Whenever apartheid is held up as a blueprint for evil, I want to mention Bokassa snacking on human remains, Amin clogging a hydro-electric dam with floating corpses, the President of Equatorial Guinea crucifying victims along the roadway from his airport. Whenever slavery is dredged up, I want to remind everyone the Arabs were there before us, the native Ashanti and others were no slouches at the game, and it remains extant in places like the Ivory Coast. Whenever I hear the AIDS pandemic somehow blamed on western indifference, I want to point to the African native practice of dry sex, the hobby-like prevalence of rape and the clumps of despotic black leaders who deny a link between the disease and HIV and who block the provision of antiretrovirals. And whenever Africans bleat of imperialism and colonialism, I want to campaign for the demolition of every road, college, and hospital we ever built to let them start again. It is time they governed themselves. Yet few play the victim card quite so expertly as black Africans; few are quite so gullible as the white liberal-left…

When asked about the problem of Africa, Harold Macmillan suggested building a high wall around the continent and every century or so removing a brick to check on progress. I suspect that over entire millennia, the view would prove bleak and unvarying…

Famine… Drought… Overpopulation… Deforestation… Conflict… Barbarism… Cruelty… Machetes… Child Soldiers… Massacres… Diamonds… Warlords… Tyranny… Corruption… Despair… Disease…AIDS… Africa.

Africa remains the heart of darkness. Africa is hell.

How can we hope to be spared of these evils if we treat savages as our equals, or worse, welcome them into our families, as God-forsaken Judeochristians have done?

“In most if not all of the newly independent Black nations of Africa, little if anything during the past 5,000 or more years can be pointed to as having made a contribution that in any way enhances the life of man.” ~ Walter Arnold, 1969

Now let’s look at a device that was, to our modern eyes, 1,500 years ahead of its time. The Antikythera mechanism is “so astonishing that its discovery is like finding a functional Buick in medieval Europe.” By simply turning a crank, it could predict the month, day, and hour of an eclipse, account for leap years and even the moon’s elliptical orbit, could predict the positions of the sun and moon against the zodiac, the moon’s phase, the astronomical positions of the planets, and even the dates of Olympic events! Without looking, tell me which race invented it. You get one guess.

Thomas Dixon contrasts the wondrous Antikythera mechanism with the entire history of the Negro:

Since the dawn of history the Negro has owned the continent of Africa—rich beyond the dream of poet’s fancy, crunching acres of diamonds beneath his bare black feet. Yet he never picked one up from the dust until a White man showed to him its glittering light. His land swarmed with powerful and docile animals, yet he never dreamed a harness, cart, or sled. A hunter by necessity, he never made an axe, spear, or arrowhead worth preserving beyond the moment of its use.
He lived as an ox, content to graze for an hour. In a land of stone and timber he never sawed a foot of lumber, carved a block, or built a house save of broken sticks and mud. With league on league of ocean strand and miles of inland seas, for four thousand years he watched their surface ripple under the wind, heard the thunder of the surf on his beach, the howl of the storm over his head, gazed on the dim blue horizon calling him to worlds that lie beyond, and yet he never dreamed a sail! He lived as his fathers lived—stole his food, worked his wife, sold his children, ate his brother, content to drink, sing, dance, and sport as the ape.

And this creature, half child, half animal, the creature of impulse, whim and conceit, pleased with a rattle, tickled with a straw; a being who left to his will, roams at night and sleeps in the day, whose speech knows no word of love, whose passions once aroused, are as the fury of the tiger—they have set this thing to rule over the Southern people… Merciful God… it surpasses human belief.

N.L.U.: Not Like Us.

“Nothing can be more unfounded and false, than the prevalent opinion that all men are born equal, for it rests upon the assumption of a fact which is contrary to universal observation.” ~ John C. Calhoun

“The idea that all men are equal is a palpable incredibility and a delirious absurdity.” ~ Thomas Caryle

And so there grew great tracts of wilderness,
Wherein the beast was ever more and more,
But man was less and less, till Arthur came.

This exchange with John Lofton, Recovering Republican, is illustrative of our frustration in wrenching dialogue out of Judeochristians today. Watch him artfully dodge some very important and simple questions. I would be embarrassed to be asked such simple questions and then run and hide from them the way he did. It’s funny that we have atheists coming at us from one end saying that Christianity was never Kinist, and on the other end, when we ask fellow Christians to deny it, they can’t.

It’s an old parlor trick to take a firm stand on the Bible and dismiss what Christians have always believed as inadmissible evidence. In reality, very few have actually put this model into practice. The Anabaptists did, and the next thing you know, they were swapping wives. They found justification for it in the Bible, or so they believed, and weren’t nobody gonna tell them differ’nt. A few o’ them gals R-U-N-N-O-F-T.

William F. Buckley Jr. once called Lofton “extra-rational,” which is a good word to describe him. I lost count of the questions he refused to answer, but one of these, from Luther, has been rolling around in my head, and I would love to hear Lofton’s answer to it, even if he answers nothing else. “In your view, are racial characteristics the consequences of evolutionary accidents, or are they the design of a purposeful God?” Actually, we already know the answer. The irony is that Lofton dismisses race as a Darwinist construct yet agrees with Darwinists that it is accidental and irrelevant. If this makes sense to anyone, perhaps you can explain it to us.

Lofton does a serviceable job of microwaving the conventional wisdom of the churches of the 21st century. We hope to see him and the rest of our people turn from their folly and obey the law of God. Our own sins compel us to be as longsuffering as possible with them, but there will eventually come a time when we will be compelled to cut the ties that bind us to those who refuse to deviate from the path of destruction. We will call them our people no longer. As Sir Walter Scott said: “Affection can withstand very severe storms of vigor, but not a long polar frost of indifference.”

This forum on race is interesting because the question is asked, “Is there a race problem in the American church? Are whites missing it?” The four blacks answer it directly: “I must answer by saying obviously yes… Indeed there is… There is a race problem in the American church, if for no other reason than the fact that there is a race problem in America… Is there a ‘race problem’ in the American church? OF COURSE!” The others hem and haw. They try their best to be as p.c. as John Lofton, but they clearly aren’t as worked up about it. And the blacks are even worse, denying the Gospel of Lofton for believing that race exists.

The Right Reverend Clifford O. Chappell explains that “racism” will never go away, because such a thing isn’t even possible. The “victims” of racism will never be satisfied, because what else are they going to do for a living?

Chuck Baldwin lies again about Confederates. He writes that “there is no record of either Lee or Jackson ever speaking disparagingly of the black race.” In May of 1865, right after the war, Lee wrote to Col. Thomas H. Carter: “Wherever you find the Negro everything is going down around him, and wherever you find the White man you see everything around him improving.” On March 12, 1868, he gave his son Rob this excellent business advice:

You will never prosper with the blacks, and it is abhorrent to a reflecting mind to be supporting and cherishing those who are plotting and working for your injury, and all of whose sympathies and associations are antagonistic to yours. I wish them no evil in the world – on the contrary, will do them every good in my power, and know that they are misled by those to whom they have given their confidence; but our material, social, and political interests are naturally with the whites.

Along with our founding fathers (his close relatives), and against all race-mixing preachers today, Lee strongly believed that immigration should be restricted to whites, “for although temporary benefit might be derived from importation of Chinese or Japanese, it would result I think in eventual injury to the country, & her institutions. We not only want reliable labourers but good citizens whose interests & feelings would be in unison with ours.”

As he told one Northern Presbyterian clergyman, “I think it would be better for Virginia if she could get rid of [all Negroes]… I think that everyone there would be willing to aid it… I have always thought so, and have always been in favor of emancipation – gradual emancipation” so that more land in Virginia would be made available to European immigrants. This is very similar to Lincoln’s motivation for African colonization – so that Western lands would be reserved for whites. (On the subject of race, Northerners and Southerners thought alike. There were very few agitators.)

How many people alive today would deny that these statements constitute “speaking disparagingly of the black race”?

True, Lee considered slavery to be “a moral and political evil,” but because of what it did to the white man, not because of what it did to blacks. Baldwin lies about this too. He writes:

To think that Lee and Jackson (and the vast majority of Confederate soldiers) would fight and die to preserve an institution they considered evil and abhorrent – and that they were already working to dismantle – is the height of absurdity. It is equally repugnant to impugn and denigrate the memory of these remarkable Christian gentlemen.

Well, like it or not, they did fight and die to preserve slavery, and this is not debatable. The right to preserve slavery was the primary reason for secession, as you can see in each state’s declaration. Who does Baldwin think is going to swallow this nonsense? It is “repugnant to impugn and denigrate the memory of these remarkable Christian gentlemen,” he writes. What a jackass. These are two of the greatest men in American history, and Baldwin is so eager to avoid being called a racist that he lards his ridiculous columns with verbal suck-ups to strangers. To hell with him.

As my friend Tom Jefferson used to say, if the federal government has the right to determine the extent of its own power, we have no right to be surprised when it is no longer federal. And the people who have the least right of all to complain are those who cheer their damnyankee ancestors for killing the angels of the South.

If you watch this video (which is from a liberal perspective, and which is purposely front-loaded with some special-needs boys who like to play dress-up) from 16:30 on, you’ll see why the Council of Conservative Citizens is far, far more effective than groups like the League of the South and the Sons of Confederate Veterans. The CofCC is not afraid to discuss race; the others are impotent.

The VNN guys have designed this excellent symbol:

The very upscale Berkeley High School, right in the middle of Silicon Valley, might cancel all science labs in order to artificially lift the abyssmal grades of blacks and mestizos. Steve Sailer asks, “Why not just hit the white kids on the head with a ballpeen hammer?”

Behold what integration has done to us.

In Houston, a high school with 2500 students was closed because not enough black students (who made up only 4% of the student body) were able to pass a state-mandated math exam. The school had spent hundreds of thousands of dollars implementing a new math program designed to boost math scores among blacks. It was unsuccessful, and because a handful of blacks couldn’t pass the test, nearly 2400 white and Hispanic students had to be relocated to other overcrowded schools…

Schools no longer care about achievement itself; the racial achievement gap is the only thing that matters. And since programs designed to raise minority achievement haven’t closed the racial achievement gap, steps are now being taken to deliberately hinder white achievement.

The problem will never be solved by throwing money at it. Meanwhile, Indians are being imported to do the high-tech jobs that whites “can’t do,” because they aren’t being educated, because to educate them would be racist.

And we’re eliminating science labs A) because blacks and Mexicans aren’t interested in them and don’t do well in them and B) so we can spend even MORE money on black and Mexican students? This is nothing less than insanity. But it’s the logical outcome of the belief in Equality.

Here’s a young scholar getting all scientific on us:

Testing police officers is also racist.

Honesty is racist.

McDonald’s hamburgers are racist. What else could drive our normally composed countrymen to think with their fists?

One of the major problems in dealing with blacks is that they are just not very smart.

A graduate from Saucer School with a degree in Saucerology is bringing hope to Detroit! Go to 18:48 in this video for some real entertainment.

“He moved with deliberation, like a man aware of the stakes.”

Like dumb, violent children, blacks think the same words they have called each other in the past are now personal insults. “The fact that it’s 2010 and they’re still putting ‘Negro’ [on a census form], I am a little offended,” said Secaucus resident Dawud Ingram. Dawud? Isn’t that the Welsh form of Dagwood?

Instead they prefer to be called “African-Americans.” But as Glenn Beck has the guts to observe, “African-American is a bogus, PC, made-up term.” Is Charlize Theron also an African-American? This is reminiscent of how the biggest so-called “anti-Semites” in the world are themselves Semites. Who thinks up these idiotic terms?

One of the greatest authors in history is Joseph Conrad, and one of his best works is The Nigger of the Narcissus. It has now been republished as The N-Word of the Narcissus to protect the frail ears and eyes of groids. John Lennon made a song called Woman is the Nigger of the World, and I’ve never seen that title censored. It’s on the shelf at my public library.

There’s no pleasing those people. Mattel has finally given them “black” Barbies, but they’re like the Disney fantasy of black girls, with lighter skin and ironed hair. Black parents “complain that five of the six dolls feature fine-textured, waist-length hair; half of them have blue or green eyes.” Mattel isn’t stupid. They know that portraying blacks as they really are would be terrible press. Blacks would howl about it in the same way that they howl about the word “Negro” on a census form. “If they had given the dolls short, kinky hair or an Afro, people might have complained that it was too Afro-centric,” says Nicole Coles, a 40-year-old mother from Temecula, California. “We’re so hard and picky.” Remember when white people had their own culture and didn’t have to patronize retards every single day?

Browse the ruins of Detroit. These are very good pictures, and they will instantly remind you of the ruins of an ancient civilization, except that these ruins won’t survive. They’re built of wood that rots and iron that rusts, and entropy will claim them much faster.

Norway versus Niger. The most and least desirable places in the world, which is another way of referring to the most and least desirable people.

Norwegians riot!

Scandinavians are just about as excellent as human beings can get. While we’re praising white people, let’s say a word for the heavenly music of the Celts. Love those bagpipes!

Let’s not forget their cousins, the Dutch and Germans, made of the hardy stock that pioneered Africa and dared anyone to take their freedom from them.

What used to be.

“I once wrote Harold Covington after I read his Northwest trilogy, asking if he would want to write about his experiences in Rhodesia, but he replied that we must write of no more defeats, but to prepare a new world and place for our race; perhaps an American Voortrek is all that will save us.”

You won’t be able to understand the lyrics, but watch this excellent video by Bok van Blerk about the hell of living with too many Negroes:

As this suited Zulu, laughably acclaimed as the president of South Africa, takes his third wife, it’s worthwhile to reflect on what December 16 represents in that stolen land. Blacks and neutered whites celebrate the day as the beginning of armed struggle against apartheid in 1961, and as a Day of Reconciliation between the races. But thousands of Afrikaners still recognize it as the Day of the Vow, a covenant that was made between their ancestors and God in 1838 that led to the glorious slaughter of 3,000 Zulus at Rorke’s Drift. Would that our own shepherds of the flock in America took their faith so seriously. How would our atheist and neo-pagan friends, who sneer at covenants with God, inspire our people to such acts of heroism and selflessness? Well, they could pull out the charts showing differences in brain size. They could also mention that some German primitives were monogamous about 3,000 years ago. Yeah, that should do it.

When an Indian is murdered in Australia, all hell breaks loose. When white people are murdered by blacks in America, Martha Stewart has some fabulous dessert tips on channel 230.

Here’s a KFC ad that has some fun with what is charitably called “awkward,” and more accurately called chaotic. As James puts it: “Need to make friends with a bunch of black people ASAP? Buy ‘em a bucket of fried chicken!” The man in the ad says, “Too easy!” The afro has hit the fan, and KFC will probably pull the ad pronto, even though Australians think it’s funny. They also think blackface is a scream.

In the city where Christian and Newsom were murdered, the quota class is turning a university into a penal colony.

Heads will roll for allowing this story to slip through the Jew filter. It was supposed to be news about a gay-bashing hate crime. As you know, hate crimes can only be perpetrated against the SPLC’s and ADL’s favorite demographic groups. Then the victim had to admit that he isn’t a fag, ruining the story for everyone.

At what point will Christians begin to choose life and provide a real future for their white sons and daughters? Does it require having your little girl scalped and nearly killed, and then seeing the assailant spend only 18 days in jail for it? What if this had been your daughter or your wife? Are Christians so selfish that they don’t care about what is happening in the West, as long as it doesn’t affect them personally? If so, can this really be called Christianity? A revolution is coming, with or without the jackals in the churches.

Blacks are now only 34% of the population of Harlem. In the comments, there are some interesting ethnic explanations for this. I recall driving through Harlem around about 1980, and there was trash everywhere, and stripped cars too. A decreased black population is always a blessing.

Some states are nullifying imperial gun laws.

The good old days, when kids learned about guns in school. If you want to know why they were the good old days, count the white faces.

Kate Gosselin 2.0 is suing to give birth to more than nine mestizos. If nine mestizos are good for Massachusetts, fifteen should be gooderer.

Wikitopian is correct that “secular evolutionists are less correct in the aggregate than Christian Identity adherents and Kinists,” and the prima facie case for the latter includes “high birthrates, effectively indoctrinating their offspring with an affirmative White identity, and defying the strong pull of modernity.”

“There are more people currently alive in Asia, Africa and Latin America than the total number of people who died—anywhere, and for any reason—during the entire 20th century.”

Celebrate it!

How to kill yourself with “love.”

Discrimination is good! “The Bible says you shall have one law, but we have to get to the point where having ‘one law’ does not entail our extinction as a political force… We don’t want a fair nation, we want a white nation that’s fair.” Most Christians will blanch at the statement that discrimination is good, but even they want to discriminate against fags if they have an apartment to rent. This is what we used to call hypocrisy in a more sensible age.

The Babelists thought the new god of democracy could trump race. Another hard lesson learned. “There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide,” said John Adams.

Minarets on display with nativity scenes in Switzerland. The lying-bastard-traitor “priest” approves of them, saying, “The fact that a cradle with minarets is in a Franciscan church only reinforces the message of peace and dialogue.”

“Europe as we have known it is about to disappear,” writes an indifferent Charles Murray.

General George Casey, who believes that diversity is more important to the Army than defense, is proud of the racial and sexual diversity of the victims at Fort Hood! “Where else could a shooter find such a diverse array of victims to kill?” We’re beyond those hateful days when racist and sexist Christians refused to send any but white men into combat. Now we have body counts that “look like America.”

Equality entails quotas for blacks and repression of men.

Linda Ronstadt, who comes from a German family who immigrated to Mexico and then the states, is speaking out against Sheriff Joe Arpaio, who is quite possibly the best sheriff in the country, for rounding up wetbacks and deporting them.

Here’s what White America used to be like everywhere.

Not even animals treat their offspring the way these Ugandans treat their children. Pretty soon, when we import these potential voters to America, we can all pay for a new government agency to regulate human sacrifice, just as Uganda has (with dead seriousness) an official Anti-Human Sacrifice Taskforce.

Thanks to racially-unrestricted immigration and an utterly corrupt church and government, sex slaves are now being sold on the streets of Wilberforce’s England.

An estimated 18,000 enslaved white European women and children are thought to be working in the vile sex industry in the UK…

In the mindset of the average liberal, white people cannot be classed as slaves. In all schools across Britain there is never any mention of the one million white European slaves who were sold at Arabic markets during the time of the North African Barbary pirates.

Instead children are subject to liberal Marxist brainwashing on how their ancestors were wicked slave drivers, despite the fact that even today Albanian Muslim gangs are selling white women on busy streets in London.

Children enslaved by the state.

“I have never understood why Christian women, under the influence of feminism, think they prefer to say ’submit to’ rather than ‘obey.’ Obey is something everyone does that has a boss. (Most men have to obey many men. Most women only have to obey one man.) Submission goes way beyond that, to a bending and accommodation of the will to another that mere simple obedience does not do.”

The Thinking Housewife makes an excellent point: “The bared female flesh on display almost everywhere today, and especially visible in the average high school, is emasculating. In general, female reticence, not the overt display of female sexuality, arouses masculine behavior.”

Cankles and cornrows.

This is an interesting graphic of famous women whose images are composited. Even though they aren’t all white, the final image appears white. I think this proves that computers are racist.

The Chinese appreciate beauty, and we all know who personifies it.

Even the mannequins have Western features…

“The [white] models’ faces are much more three-dimensional,” Ou said. “They look nicer in pictures.”

He added that he never hires black models. “Our clients don’t ask for black models,” he said. “It’s an issue of Chinese people’s aesthetic view.”

Needless to say, we find it extremely funny that white liberals, who would rather die than be called racists, never fail to exhibit supremacism and paternalism at every turn, treating minorities as props for their own inflated sense of self-worth. Perhaps this syndrome ought to be called “white makes right.” Paternalistic policies provide liberals with money in order to supply various services to needy inferiors. Such is the case with James Cameron, the director of Avatar, i.e., Pocahontas in Space. The main character is “a white hero who leads people of another color in a struggle of liberation,” and this titillates fellow white liberals with “pleasing images of themselves as saviors rather than oppressors.” This is a brilliant insight by Hunter Wallace because it demonstrates a messianic complex on the part of liberals. They have traded the true God for themselves, but since there still must be redemption of a sort, these phony “messiahs” must sacrifice their whiteness and cross over to the dark side. In this film, as in many others, they literally cross over. Because, as we all know, non-white natives are never savages; they are always peace-loving, scantily-clad frolickers, in harmony with nature.

All the inanities and hypocrisies of Liberals are there: that all the plants and animals of the world are connected in a cosmic life-force; natives living in the wilderness are superior to civilized people who have even mastered intergalactic flight; non-white natives can only win against whites when a brave white joins ranks with the non-whites to lead them (displaying the paternalistic White Supremacism of white Liberals), capitalists are inherently evil and will rape any planet for profits; racist whites will violently displace any people in the way of said capitalist profits…

Another example of liberal paternalism (i.e., White Supremacism) is the glee over indigenous languages going extinct. Ninety percent of all languages will be gone in the next century, they say. They wouldn’t want their own language, English, to go extinct, but the more strangers they can catch in their web of care, the more essential they can make themselves feel. Language is a function of culture, and culture is a function of race. It only stands to reason that Babelists want languages to be absorbed into one in the same way that they want races to be absorbed into one; the one being theirs.

It’s just like real life!

Avatar benefits from the Obama effect. Stripped of its technological camouflage, the film is quite blatantly the celebration of a victory of Coloreds over Whites. Who would dare criticize such a wonderful thing?

Of the ten named stars on the film web site, one is an American Indian, two are black, and the two young female stars, Zoe Saldana and Michelle Rodriguez, are both Dominican/Puerto Rican crosses. Two other characters named in the current Wikipedia essay on the movie (”Dr. Max Patel” and “Akwey” are an (east) Indian and Ghanaian black (a third is white).

The Good Guy/Bad Guy breakdown is extreme. Half the six whites are Black Hats. The least important white Good Guy is “Norm Spellman” – clearly intended to be Jewish. All the coloreds are Goodies. Although the wide shots of the Earth forces initially show some diversity I believe in the final battle scenes all the fighting men were white.

Like real life, indeed.

David Brooks, writing in the New York Times, says Avatar breaks new ground in “the White Messiah formula.”

It rests on the stereotype that white people are rationalist and technocratic while colonial victims are spiritual and athletic. It rests on the assumption that nonwhites need the White Messiah to lead their crusades.

Kabul forty years ago, and today.

As you know, we need to bomb and kill until everyone can vote, but let’s not forget all the other problems at which we need to throw money. Here’s a $32,000 booklet of helpful illustrations to assist the youth with shooting heroin. Health is important, which is why we have a Department of Health. If you don’t eat your meat, you can’t have any pudding! How can you have any pudding if you don’t eat your meat?

The Bright Sunny South is “the first region in the country in which more than half of public school students are poor and more than half are minorities.”

Now schools can be sued for $150,000 when blacks bully other blacks for “acting white.” Meanwhile, whites are called hateful words like “racist” at every opportunity.

“Americans could be in for a rude awakening in coming months when they discover the true scope of the massive national debt racked up by the U.S. government.” China is no longer willing to buy our debt, and so last year alone the Federal Jew Reserve had to purchase 70% of it. In other words, they’re inflating the currency. Counterfeiters are sent to jail for doing the same.

Ten governments that went bankrupt. Ours will soon be added to the list. For the first time, the Standard & Poor’s 500 stock index finished a calendar decade with a negative total return.

What is going on at VDare? I know Peter Brimelow remarried, so maybe he’s distracted. At least I hope so, because what is the explanation of allowing a Jew to write about “the battle between Judaism and Hellenism,” as though that has anything to do with the price of gefilte fish?

In Texas, Hispanics are 48% of public school enrollment, followed by whites at 34%, blacks at 14%, and Asians at 4%. Nearly 17 percent of all students have limited English-speaking skills. Down at the kindergarten and first grade levels, it’s much worse. Whites aged 5 and 6 are less than 20% of enrollment. We’ve been told that it’s racist to desire more whites and fewer non-whites. At what point does it become okay, when whites reach 0% of the population? Is nothing short of total genocide acceptable?

The Jews at Commentary are now saying “that mass illegal Hispanic immigration has the effect of reducing crime in the United States.” Better yet, this is the thesis of David Jew Gelernter’s book Judaism: A Way of Being: “Judaism is the most important intellectual development in Western history. The best ideas we have come straight from Judaism.”

Nominally Christian churches are now agreeing to advertise for Jews in Hollywood. The Jews are providing sermon outlines, and the Judeochristian preachers are teaching how to apply a “biblical connection” and “life application” to the race-mixing propaganda.

Archie (the comic) promoting miscegenation.

Stink, stank, stunk:

Brooke and Daniel having fun at the Holohoax monument.

The stats on Israelis and Palestinians.

Racial profiling in service to Jews is perfectly acceptable. Examples are here and here. Everyone flying in from Muslim countries or Cuba will now be suspect, which is only common sense. But when whites use statistics to protect themselves, it can only be because they want to drag a queer down a dirt road behind a pickup truck.

The Gentiles are responsible for Bernard Madoff’s crimes, says Madoff’s wife. But if we ascribe blame to Jews, we’re called anti-Semites.

Bueller Jew Stein calls Ron Paul an anti-Semite. To me, that’s like calling Dr. Paul prudent, thoughtful, deliberate, healthy, wealthy, and wise.

“According to the International Monetary Fund, the United States began the century producing 32 percent of the world’s gross domestic product. We ended the decade producing 24 percent. No nation in modern history, save for the late Soviet Union, has seen so precipitous a decline in relative power in a single decade.” ~ Pat Buchanan

And what a coincidence! The same people are responsible for both tragedies.

“To run his Hungarian satrapy, Stalin picked one Matyas Rakosi (born ‘Roth’), described by Irving as an ‘ugly Jewish dwarf’ who had ‘the tact of a Kosher butcher.’” All the leaders were Jews. And the first Russian phrase that “Hungary’s beautiful and lissom girls” were taught by their anguished parents was: “I’ve got syphilis and TB.” The Hungarian revolt was not so much anti-Communist as anti-Jewish, or as they say in Hollywood, “anti-Semitic.” God bless the anti-Semites of the world. In the attached video clip, David Irving says the Jews themselves are responsible for Auschwitz.

See here and here for how Life Magazine scared readers into believing the possibility of a combined Nazi/Jap attack on America, which was never on the table at any time. You can tell it’s a load of crap from the imperial propaganda office when you see the major military operation planned for Greenland.

Global warming carries with it the same mandate to toe a political line as the Holohoax religion. Notice, in this clip, that Al Gore and Arnold Schwarzenegger say, “The debate is over.” In other words, their view is not to be questioned, and taxes must be levied to support it. Just as there are scientists who question global warming (now called “climate change”), there are scientists who question the Holohoax. But ABC’s 20/20 doesn’t go to their offices to film them as they point at a computer screen showing colorful gradients. Far from winning awards, they are thrown in jail for offending anti-Christs.

Don’t you hate it when your “scream-in” is cancelled due to “climate change”? Where else is a guy supposed to meet a girl who doesn’t shave her pits?

Did Jesus ever win a Nobel Peace Prize? I think not.

Cloister Cemetery in the Snow, lost to Allied bombing.

Female ski jumpers are being herded into ghettoes and transported by cattle cars to the ovens! Oh, the humanity! I never knew the Olympics was a front for anti-Semitism.

Only a neo-Nazi would care to know the race of a murderer.

The top ten most hateful quotes of 2009.

Is there a radio show better than the Political Cesspool? Don’t be daft.

An unusual defense of the faith on Fox News, which would have been even better if Brit Hume had told Elin Nordegren to repent of her mudsharking.

“Were it not for White players like Tim Tebow or Colt McCoy, [college football] really wouldn’t be worth watching.” It’s upsetting to see even the white players mimic black showboating. There is even a black-inspired penalty called “excessive celebration.” Compare this to the old white baseball players who were so humble that they seldom even tipped a hat to the crowd.

You people probably don’t share my sense of humor, but I think this Twitter page is hilarious.

Lovin all my kids. What delightful pagans-in-the-sphere-of-the-covenant they are!

Tempted to make the bed for wife, but then I remembered that I need to love Christ more. The gospel is glorious!

No way Paul wrote “obey the gospel” in 2 Th 1:8. That’s turning gospel into law.

Had to recite Apostles’ Creed yesterday. What a worthless piece of sh*t. Doesn’t even mention justification by faith alone.

It looks like Rush Limbaugh is doing okay:

Giraffes on the streets of London:

This new party could be America’s BNP. As always, our belief is that anything not explicity Christian will eventually become explicitly anti-Christian, but it’s good to see white interests being defended politically.

American Renaissance’s 2010 conference, with Nick Griffin and Craig Bodeker.

Don’t you wish these toys were still for sale? I like Dapper Dan the Coon Jigger. In fact, if anyone is looking for a business opportunity sure to have tons of free advertising…

James can write great comedy in the space of one sentence.

This is amazing.

If I may be so bold, the biggest problem with the readers of SWB is that they don’t appreciate good poetry, like this:

That’s some serious pickin’. The Occident and Orient in harmony.

The Orient and Africa, not so much:

That was more fun than a Japanese game show.

A teacher in Las Vegas shocked her students recently by denying that Jesus Christ was born of a virgin, died on a cross, and was resurrected days later. This horrendous outrage occurred on the Wednesday before Thanksgiving while decorating the room for the holiday. “Why should we give thanks to God when there is no God?” she asked. “Jesus could not have been crucified because the Romans did not have the technology to pull it off,” she added. “Therefore, Jesus did not exist.” Her venomous spittle has created such a poisonous atmosphere at the school that district police are treating it as a hate crime. Parents and students alike are demanding that she apologize or be fired, but the school is too cowardly to follow through with the demands. The teacher protests that she was merely sharing her opinion, but right-thinking people everywhere know that some opinions are superior to others. I mean, what, should the school hire Mahmoud Ahmadinejad too, simply because he has opinions? Phyllis Friedman, regional director for the Anti-Defamation League of Nevada, says Las Vegas is home to many Christ-deniers and their spurious offspring. “Christ-deniers are out there, much to my amazement,” she says. “You might have even stood next to one while waiting in line at the local supermarket.”

But hold the phone, because there is now an even worse sin than Holocaust Denial, and it is called Holocaust Inversion, i.e., portraying Jews and Israelis as Nazis who have ethnically cleansed their rivals in Gaza, Lebanon, etc. Even Holocaust Remembrance Day in Spain is condemned by the new inversion-hunters for daring to commemorate the “genocide of the Palestinian people.” As Michael Hoffman says, this is because “Talmudists believe they have a superior nefesh (soul) compared with gentiles… The suffering of gentiles is always of lesser value compared with the cosmic contretemps of the Holy People.” And this, my friends, is Supremacism, if anything can be called by the word. Accept no substitutes. The 60 million killed in WWII are always of less importance than the (fictional) 6 million anti-Christs who died in concentration camps.

Still, denial of the Holohoax is not quite as all-encompassing as the Jews would have it. Even Holocaust Inversion doesn’t go far enough. Therefore, new thought crime penalties are necessary. “Today the New York Times made reference to denying ‘the scope of the Holocaust.’ I predict that soon we will have a category for those who deny the dimensions of the ‘Holocaust.’”

Christmas Eve is a Jew holiday called Nitel Night.

The klipot are parasitical evil forces that attach themselves to the forces of good. According to kabbala (Jewish mysticism), on the night on which “that man” — a Jewish euphemism for Jesus – was born, not even a trace of holiness is present and the klipot exploit every act of holiness for their own purposes.

For this reason, Nitel Night, from nightfall to midnight, is one of the few occasions when Hasidim refrain from Torah study. On this horrific night, they neither conduct weddings nor do they go to the mikveh (ritual bath).

“And all those lousy holiday songs by Jewish guys that trash up the malls every year, Rudolph and the chestnuts and the rest of that dreck. Did one of our guys write ‘Grab your loafers, come along if you wanna, and we’ll blow that shofar for Rosh Hashanah’? No, we didn’t.” ~ Garrison Keillor

Now, I thought that was a very good line, but surely, I thought to myself, the Jews who own big media wouldn’t censor a popular leftist like Garrison Keillor. I was wrong. Another good line from Keillor: “If you don’t believe Jesus was God, OK, go write your own damn ‘Silent Night’ and leave ours alone.”

This would be a good lesson for some friends of ours at the National Policy Institute to learn. On Christmas Day, they posted videos from It’s a Wonderful Life, Scrooge, Walt Disney, and Gene Autry singing Rudolph. What, no Jingle Bell Rock?

Asking pagans and liberals to rise to the poetic is apparently asking too much.

All things rich and wonderful that this world has ever known stem from the fact that Christ walked this earth. And Europe is sacred ground because European men and women made Christ their kinsman and their liege Lord. The pagan poet, like the pagan warrior, ultimately disgusts us because he lacks the spirit that elevates a man to a higher realm of existence, to the poetic realm.

This is a very encouraging video in which a group of Moldovan Christians are so outraged by a menorah in their town square that they take it apart and lay it at the feet of a statue of Stephen the Great. Police looked on approvingly. Father Anatoly Chirbik spoke for the patriots:

We’re an Orthodox Christian country. Placing a Jewish symbol next to the statue of Stephen the Great is an offense. Stephen the Great defended our country from all kinds of Jews and now they come and put their menorah right in the middle of our square. This is sacrilege!… The Cross here on our flag is our symbol. We will protect our nation with the holy Cross! No Jew will oppress us in our own nation!

Can you believe it? Christianity is still alive, and so are Christian heroes!

That didn’t take long. Jimmy Carter apologizes to Jews for accusing them of constructing a system of apartheid. The reason is found in paragraph 9. His grandson is running for office “in a district with a vocal Jewish population,” and obviously, Jews, operating as a racial collective, threatened to send massive funds to his opponent. In fact, we know this is true because it was specifically denied.

Jason Carter, who is running, said in a statement that his grandfather’s letter was unrelated to his campaign and hailed the apology as a “great step towards reconciliation.”

Don’t worry, be happy, at the Auschwitz swimming pool! And don’t forget your sunglasses. It’s a known fact that all German soldiers during the war were required to take the Elmer Fudd Correspondence Course on Genocide. If you doubt this fact, I’ll see to it that you’re taken from your family and imprisoned until your children no longer recognize you.

That’s a catchy tune in the video. Another good choice for an Auschwitz soundtrack would be Celia Cruz’s version of I Will Survive.

Hitler killed 6 million secularists and liberal elites!

Impressive: Ann Coulter is saying that the ACLU is Jewish.

When Rush Limbaugh was bought off. Terrorist Jew Sharon gave him a personal tour of Israel. “The best right-wing gatekeeper that 400 million federal reserve notes can buy.”

With a black president, you would think that Kwanzaa would finally be taken seriously, but even blacks are now tired of it. Then along comes one of the “conservative” anagramming blacks to explain why ethnic and racial traditions are unamerican.

The Rev. Jesse Lee Peterson, founder of BOND (Brotherhood Organization of a New Destiny) and author of “SCAM: How the Black Leadership Exploits Black America” believes the holiday is racist. He advocates for blacks to see themselves as Americans—not African-Americans, thus no separate holiday.

“Get rid of it,” said Peterson, who is black. “Reject it completely. Just as we would do if a white racist came up with a false holiday to celebrate whiteness.”

Will Spain elect an Abraham Lincoln to slaughter the Catalonians and force them to remain in a compulsory “union”?

Some history trivia.

The next time someone tells you that Lincoln made war on the South to free the slaves, ask why Lincoln guaranteed the right of states to legalize slavery if only the South would rejoin the North. Had this amendment been ratified, “the JP Morgan-Rockefeller-Rothschild bankers would not have been able to submit joint resolutions to enact the 16th and 17th Amendments, nor create the Federal Reserve System. And Barack Obama would not have been able to take over the US banking institution or the auto industry. Nor would he have been able to fire the CEO of GM.”

“Know that wherever there is money there is the Jew.” ~ Montesquieu, Persian Letters

R.J. Rushdoony had a bad habit of equating foreigners with unbelievers, in Scripture, and viewing this as a general principle, and this often caused him to miss much of what the Bible says about the obligations and joys of kinship. For instance, he said our primary duty is to our families, and after this to all believers, which misses a huge swath of vital relationships in the middle, without which we are robbed of all that men cherish about their ethnic bonds, nationality, culture, and other things. (Go ahead, tell these 56 Chinese ethnicities that their kinship is accidental, and belief is all that matters. See how far that gospel train carries you down the tracks. Try to convince them that their ethnic traditions would still exist if only they would be permissive in blood and restrictive in ideology. Tell them to read a Jesse Lee Peterson book.) Still, this article on usury is quite interesting. Rushdoony writes that the lechery of usury was born not in ancient Israel but in Babylon, which more closely ties it to the Jews of today. The prophet Nahum lamented that Assyria had sinfully “multiplied merchants above the stars of heaven.” This is not, of course, because Nahum had anything against buying and selling.

The Babylonians were money-lenders not only out of dedicated policy but with fervor, zest, and relish. One of their proverbs expresses this outlook clearly: “The giving of a loan is like making love; the returning of a loan is like having a son born.” They were thus a breed of proud and happy Shylocks. Their whole world of business moved in terms of credit financing, and their whole concept of social control and of imperialism rested on usury. It is not surprising that Babylon the Great, the harlot, is the type in Revelation of the one-world order which shall seduce all nations…

Banks “create” money by fiat and by the unilateral action of simply recording a loan and a deposit on their books. The consequence is, not the personal and limited action of a biblical loan, but inflation, the dilution of the prior relationship of money units to total goods and services. As a result, there is a dilution of all money, and such “loans” mean an element of robbery in that they reduce the value of all other money units previously in existence. Fractional reserves and modern central banking (i.e., the Federal Reserve System) are modern applications of the old Babylonian principles and are equally conducive to the dream of empire…

“Babylon the great is fallen, is fallen… And the merchants of the earth shall weep and mourn over her…” In terms of this comes the summons, “Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues.”

Shylock? The Federal Reserve? Lending money is like making love? There is only one race of parasites that fits this bill, and we don’t call them Babylonians.

The Jewish pyramid of power:

You might like to gaze into this pit of folly, at the bottom of which may be found your tax dollars:

We must bomb and kill until everyone is permitted to vote!

There is not enough money in the world to pay down our debt. Meanwhile, these Babelist clowns have elicited the headline: “There’ll be Nowhere to Run from the New World Government.” And who will pay for it?

Congress is now considering the Native Hawaiian Government Reorganization Act, which would transfer public-owned lands to a native Hawaiian government within the state of Hawaii, creating a semi-sovereign, tribal state like Israel.

Proponents say the plan would duplicate the legal scenario set up for Native Americans, but the Akaka bill carves out new territory. Unlike Indian tribes made up of tightly knit populations that have lived together continuously, participation in the new group would be available to nearly anyone able to trace their roots back to a Native Hawaiian ancestor, no matter where they now reside. U.S. Civil Rights Commission member Gail Heriot told Congress in June that, “If ethnic Hawaiians can be accorded tribal status, why not Chicanos in the Southwest? Or Cajuns in Louisiana?”

The focus of the article is solely on non-whites, because anything more would be racist, but in fact, whites want to do the same thing in the Northwest and other places. This bill may not pass, but the legislation is actually being deliberated in Congress. The double standard is absolutely stunning. Hawaiians are only doing this out of love and concern for their own, but if we do the same thing, it means that we want to round up undesirables on cattle cars, gas them, incinerate them, and steal their shoes, gold teeth, and hair.

Indigroes finally get their own casino.

East Indians are finding that ideology isn’t enough to hold a billion of them together. They are now splitting along ethnic lines. As soon as they’re ready to let go of their hatred, we can send them some Jews to teach them about liberty.

It’s no good, Montag. We’ve all got to be alike.

Finally, do remember to tolerate your friends’ friends, however alien and peculiar they may seem to you. Don’t despise minorities…

“I think it’s irresponsible to have children.”

“Somebody’s got to have children, Jackie. They can’t let the race die out.”

“Babies grow up to look like you. That must be fun.”

Smother malice. Strangle violence. Suppress prejudice. Hate hate. Be tolerant today…

Meanwhile, the “report those who threaten you” campaign met with particular success today.

All birds are the same beneath their feathers, and words like “distinct” and “unique” are social constructs anyway.

“For after all,” the ducks declared, “we’re sisters ‘neath the skin.”

“[W]henever foreigners begin to mass in American towns, American citizens are called upon, even required, to sacrifice their community standards and traditions to give way to the aliens.”

Political jungle fever is an incurable condition. “Just as in Tom Wolfe’s great novel, Bonfire of the Vanities, the DA was always searching for the Great White Defendant to prove he wasn’t a racist, neocons and GOP cheerleaders are always looking for the Great Colored Conservative to prove they’re not racists, no matter how many times they make fools of themselves.”

Conservative of the Year.

“If a European is not a Christian, he will be susceptible to utopian thinking – Communism, racial egalitarianism, neo-paganism, whatever ideology that looks to a future without God and without real human beings of flesh and blood.”

The integration and miscegenation that preachers champion today was first pushed by Jews and Commies and Commie Jews, like this man. Ask your pastor what else Communists were right about.

Avatar is about a white colonist who becomes a hero “by turning against his own race and leading the fight of the natives to preserve their existence… As reviewer Armond White put it, ‘Avatar is the corniest movie ever made about the white man’s need to lose his identity and assuage racial, political, sexual and historical guilt.’” It’s like the opposite of the Magical Negro stories in which the omniscient character, generally played by Morgan Freeman, sets all things right by his blackness. In this case, the white character is not even needed except as the superior character who triumphs through whiteness, which usually takes the form of military might.

Movies that depict “the black family as a total failure” are unavoidable.

Here’s a still shot from Avatar 2, tentatively subtitled Cut the Bull:

Two white women treating adultery as something that just happens, like the afternoon rain.

It’s interesting that blacks are considered to be a branch of homo sapiens that makes them unlike everyone else on earth. (Never mind the “out of Africa” thesis, which is very likely incorrect. In fact, the whole diagram is likely incorrect since no one has ever explained how to go from white to black to white skin. I’ve tried it with chocolate milk, and there ain’t no way to get there from here.)

Chegroes are about as popular as SARS in China. The mother is correctly considered a whore by the Chinese, who, unlike Americans, are smart enough to realize that the entire people suffer from a “shameless bitch” like this who makes selfish decisions. And the same old lies are told that we always hear, such as the Chegro “only rarely feeling out of place” while growing up. Yeah, right. Naturally, she has never met her “father.” This line from James is priceless: “African culture seems remarkably consistent across the planet.”

A “no Indians allowed” ice cream store.

The British martial song, Heart of Oak, is shocking to read now that foes are welcomed to Britain as equals.

They swear they’ll invade us, these terrible foes,
They frighten our women, our children, and beaus;
But should their flat bottoms, in darkness get o’er,
Still Britons they’ll find to receive them on shore.

Our demise has been delayed. Let’s see if we can continue pushing the date back and even reverse the trend. If we fail, these will be the new stained glass windows in churches:

The master prophet and the prophetess. There’s a lot of head-wagging and crazy hair in that second clip.

Speaking of nappy hair, a new two hour documentary, just in time for the Tiger Woods scandal, covers “the remarkably complex, controversial, costly, time-consuming, and even toxic world of Black female haircare.” You know it wasn’t made by a white person, because that would be racist. The question of why black women are trying so hard to look white is explored. Sharpton and Rock conclude that black women “are merely being vain or stupid and should cut it out.” But the women will not stop, as long as cosmetics are available to them, because they know what everyone else knows: that there are no human beings on earth who are more beautiful than white women. “W.E.B. DuBois’ talented tenth are chasing blonde women.” Each race has its own qualities, but some things are just not debatable.

Then along comes Publisher’s Weekly with a cover showing a black head full of afro picks, each of which sports a “black power”/Communist clenched fist. The afro hit the fan, of course, since PW is not a black periodical, and only blacks are allowed to say anything about the sensitive subject. The senior news editor excused the cover shot as a “sweet, tongue-in-cheek funny and striking” image of “the 1970s-era wave of black pride, black power and big afros with big afro picks stuck right in the back.” In other words, black nationalism is endearing, but white nationalism is the stuff of Nazis.

You need to be careful about how long you spend in places like San Francisco. There must be something in the air that poisons the mind.

Use your mouse to find the best congressional districts.

Look at this very good blog on white places.

Shrinking mainline churches are finding a growth strategy in linguistic, gastronomical, and racial confusion.

Poor little Sanjay won’t be able to participate in the pluralistic winter festival because his father is an illegal alien. Dang if that don’t twist my hickory.

An illegal alien has stabbed a teenager to death for “daring to speak English in America.” This line, appearing in a mainstream newspaper, is a very good sign:

So much for the notion that illegal immigrants are universally a hard-working, law abiding set committed to doing the jobs Americans won’t do, all while trying to assimilate.

“We’ve got it tough,” says Senator Lindsey Graham. “We’re on our knees. Twelve percent of our people are unemployed and 31 percent of our people are black.” Every Christian should pray for the second number to be as low as possible.

At 29:45 of this White Horse Inn show, the guest exults that M.L. King, in his overrated Letter from a Birmingham Jail, appeals to Augustine and Aquinas rather than Marx, and this is why he was successful in overturning segregation. Then Michael Horton calls King a “scholar” with a “Ph.D.”

“I’m f*cking for God!… I’m not a Negro tonight!” ~ M.L. King, overheard by the FBI in the Willard Hotel, Washington DC, 6 January 1964

“Rape was an insurrectionary act. It delighted me that I was defying and trampling upon the white man’s law, upon his system of values, and that I was defiling his women.” ~ Eldridge Cleaver, Soul on Ice

“According to Jimmy Carter, the reason genital mutilation, rape, and other violence against females is common throughout the world is that the Catholic Church does not allow women to be priests.” Blaming Whitey is a respected Democrat tradition.

“Black people are never responsible for how they live… They just ‘end up’ in prison, somehow, by ‘chance.’” According to Jimmy Carter, Baptists and Roman Catholics are to blame for “creating an environment [throughout the world] where violations against women are justified.” Since they don’t allow women to be ministers, they’re responsible for female genital mutilation in Africa. “You can’t be a good American anymore if you don’t accuse anyone who disagrees with you politically of racism.”

Somebody should go to jail.

Parents in Detroit are calling for their kids’ teachers to be imprisoned for their low test scores. And, frankly, it’s hard to argue with their logic if you believe that there are no differences in average intelligence between the races. We’ve tried everything we know how to do, no matter how costly or ridiculous, and the black/white achievement gap just keeps on chugging along like the Energizer bunny, even when adjusted for income, family status, etc.

“Do you think that people who give their children such names as Turkia (after Thanksgiving), Marashino Sherie, and Latrina should be allowed to have any say in the government of society?” How about Na’Tricianna Ma’Khayvighnon Philpot? Or “La-a” (pronouced “Luh Dash Uh”).

The population of Africa has quadrupled in just 60 years.

There will never be more than a relative few black homeschoolers because black women have math and verbal skill levels at the 19.7 percentile. The average white mother is at the 52.5 percentile. Steve Sailer has identified liberal schizophrenia in this way: IQ is of no importance at all, and problems that appear to be related to IQ can be solved by hiring white liberals to run Head Start programs.

A landlord who thinks he owns his own property.

I do not have any blacks on my property and I am aware that we have a biracial president, but no federal law will make me rent to anyone I do not want to… I’ll burn it down before I let the government tell me who to rent it to.

God bless this man. The one who came to arrest him “gave me a stare like he came to arrest a child molester.” As Rushdoony wrote in Foundations of Social Order, “An employer therefore has a property right to prefer whom he will, and he can prefer whom he will in terms of color, creed, race, or national origin.” Ownership of property is considered quite racist in our Communist age.

Articles like this make us laugh for being so absurd but also make us angry because of the malicious intent behind them. R.J. Rushdoony is denounced as “a racist, sexist, Jew-hating bigot who denies the holocaust. Don’t take it from me: The British Centre for Science Education refers to him as ‘a man every bit as potentially murderous as Stalin, Hitler, Pol Pot or anyone else you may want to name amongst the annals of evil.’” That sounds pretty serious, except for the word “potentially.”

The hateful entrapment of the FBI.

This is another of those classic James Edwards posts. It’s just too good to pass up.

Likewise, whenever you see an article by Winston Smith zoom by on Al Gore’s freeway, you would be a fool if you did not chase it down with a pickup truck, shoot a grappling hook to its stern, and winch it to a stop. That may be the most tortured prose ever to appear here, but seriously, Winston’s articles are must-reads. And for the love of Porky Beirich, don’t miss his Cesspool show on Sunday night (tomorrow) in which he runs down the top ten most hateful quotes of 2009.

Body language is racist.

Webcams are racist.

The term “anchor baby” is racist.

It’s time to play guess the white and guess the black.

Guess the president.

The global warming religion.

Chiropractic is dead, according to a new study. The concept of subluxation has been discredited, which should leave chiropractors in competition with physical therapists.

A very interesting article on how the Bible is not necessarily ruralistic.

Oklahoma could very well be the most sensible state in the compulsory union. Now only liberal judges stand in the way of a law that requires information to be posted online for women who get abortions.

Now pro-lifers have joined “racists” as being considered mentally ill and incompetent for the legal profession.

Women are worse at parking than men, a new study confirms. In other news, scientists have learned that the moon is not made of green cheese, and fish are able to breathe underwater. Ladies, God knows we love you, but give us the keys before someone gets hurt. DWF (Driving While Female) is illegal in most states and provinces.

The deadliest place on earth. No, it’s not East St. Louis.

Only white men, the sons of Japheth, have dared to be explorers. Though on paper he would appear to be a failure, one of the greatest and most memorable explorers of them all was Ernest Shackleton. The stories of his adventures in Antarctica never cease to amaze.

For most people a 12-mile walk is considered very long, even in good weather, when well fed, sufficiently hydrated, and adequately attired. Imagine, then, doing that a hundred times over, while pulling 200-pound sledges across rugged and sticky surfaces, sinking up to your waist in snow, at temperatures of 60 or more degrees [below] of frost, beset by freezing winds and blizzards, on starvation rations (consisting of months-old meat and biscuits every day, for every meal), wearing threadbare and ragged clothing, with painfully frostbitten hands and face, sleeping in bags that have frozen solid, unable to bathe, shaking violently with cold every night, having to defecate into a hole in the ice inside a freezing tent, and, eventually, with a severe case of scurvy, without access to medicine, analgesics, or fresh food. Consider that at –4º F (-20º C), boiling water freezes instantly if thrown up in the air; –4º F was considered a warm day for the old Antarctic explorers. If you think this is bad, this is just the beginning.

There was no possibility of rescue, yet “civility, mutual respect, and a sense of responsibility were always maintained. The narrative does not suggest at any point that there was ever any panic, hysterics, back-stabbing, or selfish dog-eat-dog behavior, like that which we see so often and so convincingly depicted in modern [Jew] films.” They were simply overjoyed by their quest. And this review doesn’t even touch on Shackleton’s greatest act of heroism and his greatest accomplishment, being his unbelievable rescue of 22 men on Elephant Island. Contrast this behavior with New Orleans when part of the city was flooded.

“Western man towers over the rest of the world in ways so large as to be almost inexpressible. It’s Western exploration, science, and conquest that have revealed the world to itself. Other races feel like subjects of western power long after colonialism, imperialism and slavery have disappeared. The charge of racism puzzles whites who feel not hostility, but only baffled good will, because they don’t grasp what it really means: humiliation. The white man presents an image of superiority even when he isn’t conscious of it. Superiority excites envy. Destroying white civilization is the inmost desire of the league of designated victims we call ‘minorities.’” ~ Joseph Sobran, 1997

Like many Reformed Christians, I have benefited from the ministry of RC Sproul for decades. Around the middle of the 1990s, I found that his son, RC Sproul Jr, was teaching many things of interest on politics, agrarianism, homeschooling, and even paedocommunion. At littlegeneva.com, I sometimes left appreciative comments on his work, and to this day I continue to appreciate what he has written on these subjects. I have never met him, never spoken to him on the phone, posted one comment to his old blog, and sent him one email in response to the one email he sent to me. But RC knew my opinions based on what I have written over the years, and in 2004 he chose to publish an “open letter” to me in his newsletter rather than correspond with me privately on any matters of concern to him, even though he knew that I could very likely become a member of his church. This struck me as odd showmanship for a pastor.

The open letter begins with a reference to the one and only message I have ever received from him:

I have written you before, though in an entirely different format, trying to help you understand where our identity is, trying to help you see that believers of every stripe are closer kin to us than unbelieving, anti-leviathan, agrarian, southern patriots. Your sad response seemed to concede that heaven will have a Jew or two, and some people of color.

This is as bald a lie as has ever been told about me. I did not believe then that heaven is off-limits to some races, and I don’t believe it today. The question of whether some races will ever be converted in large numbers is beyond my ability to predict. (Douglas and Nathan Wilson, on page 28 of this edition of their magazine Credenda/Agenda, were equally libelous in implying that I think all whites will go to heaven. It is apparently asking too much for these men to deal with what I have actually written. Instead, they prefer to tell lies and call names.)

This was the beginning of my experience with RC’s craft in artfully omitting details. He carefully omits the fact that I had respectfully tried to question him about racial demographics and the future of our country through the comment section of his blog. He purposely ignored me, preferring to set a larger stage for his theatrics. Afterwards, he wrote to me only once, to notify me of his intention to make me the subject of his newsletter. He received a very brief clarification of my views, and rather than make further inquiries personally through dialogue, he simply reworked the open letter that he had already admittedly written (referring therein to what he calls my “sad” response). This is not only flabbergasting, it’s extremely unethical and unpastoral. He had a golden opportunity here to save face, especially since he admitted that I have been “so right on so many things” and “have an insight that demonstrates deliberateness.” He had no intention of being so deliberate that he would allow me to defend myself, because dialogue was not to his purpose.

There are other lies in the letter, which would embarrass him if he had any shame, such as the insinuation that I have called for minorities “to repent…[of] their ethnic heritage.” Ludicrous. Simply put, it galls RC that I think our white, Christian forefathers bequeathed a good country to their blood heirs, and we should not change it, whether by interracial marriage, interracial adoption, or racially-unrestricted immigration. Rather than explain to me why I was wrong or in sin on each of these points, he chose to tell lies. He knew very well that I agree with every last one of our Christian forefathers that there is strength, trust, and safety in homogeneity, and weakness in heterogeneity.

RC submits the word “human” when asked for his race, because he has “always puzzled over the definition of race.” In one “sermon” about me


, like a true Boasian, he says he doesn’t believe race exists. Yet this doesn’t prevent him from charging me with the “sin” of “racism.” Logically, if race does not exist then racism does not exist. He even publicly exposed his own grandfather as a “racist” for joking many years ago that the Pittsburgh Pirates should be renamed the Nairobi Nine.

RC states authoritatively, “race…no longer matters. Indeed, it never mattered at all.” Therefore, “A righteous man in the pre-civil rights movement south would have found himself at odds with the state government had he rightly shared Martin Luther King’s dream.” Ninety-nine percent of our forefathers were not righteous, writes RC, because they believed that private property belongs to the people who own it. Such widespread, alleged apostasy is hard to reconcile with the fact that they had a thriving civilization and we do not.

Jared Taylor explains why it is foolish to toss around such undefined and undefinable terms: “If it is ‘racist’ to prefer the company of people of one’s race, to prefer the culture created by one’s race, and to want one’s race to survive and flourish, then virtually everyone of every color is ‘racist,’ and the term has no useful meaning.”

RC realizes that I “would not characterize [my] views as racist.” He devotes an entire newsletter to the discussion of race, which he says does not exist, and all to avoid dealing with my argument that a triune God has created a triune world and actually likes the biodiversity of His creation; to avoid dealing with my argument that it’s perfectly reasonable to expect our nation to belong to our blood kin, and to no one else; to tapdance around the meaning of words like “nation” and “heritage” and “patriotism.” Strong’s Concordance defines the word “nation” as a race or a tribe. The Oxford English Dictionary defines it as an “extensive aggregate of persons, so closely associated with each other by common descent, language or history, as to form a distinct race or people.” In Revelation 22, the leaves of the Tree of Life are for the healing of the races. This was not at all confusing for our ancestors.

(Also in the OED, we find that a Communist, Leon Trotsky, invented the word “racism.” But not to worry, says RC. Jews are never guilty of conspiring against Christians: “even if there were some sort of Jewish conspiracy, the problem would [sic] the conspiracy, not the Jews.”)

RC writes that God has promised “to remake the family,” even as RC has remade his own family, to disastrous consequences. After all, MLK “spoke the words of the King.”

RC denies that unsaved family members are actually family members, and that unsaved countrymen are actually countrymen:

Because He has made us citizens of a different nation, our loyalty is to Him and not to the stars and stripes. Because He has placed us in a different family, our loyalty is to that family, not the racial one we claim to have left behind when we first took up our cross.

RC does not explain where the Bible commands us to “leave behind” our families and kin. Clearly, our forefathers missed the Sproulian doctrine that the 5th Commandment requires obedience only to Christian fathers and mothers. But when we are all really saved, writes RC the uniformitarian, “we will have a shared culture. We will love the same music… We will wear the same clothes… We will eat the same food… We will wash in the same waters… We will dance the same dances…”

The builders of Babel had the same idea. God is judging America today and decimating our race because we care so little about conserving His created order. We have not even sold our birthright—we have given it away. The apostle Paul explains in 1 Cor. 12:11-14 that “the body is one,” and there is spiritual unity, yet “the body is not one member but many.” In Acts 17:26, he tells us that God sets boundaries among the nations “so that they should seek the Lord, in the hope that they might grope for Him and find Him.”

Not so, writes RC. Nationhood, as it has been understood since time began, has been abolished under the new covenant:

God was pleased in the old covenant to have His people be visible in the nation of Israel. He was pleased to comingle [sic] a national identity with a spiritual one. Now, in these latter days, He is looking for those who worship in spirit and in truth.

And just like that—hey presto!—no more national, blood identity, because of RC’s fallacious interpretation of Galatians 3:28, from which the title of his newsletter is taken. (If race does not exist then neither does sex.) A far wiser man, John Jay, signer of the Declaration of Independence and first Chief Justice of the United States, said: “Providence has been pleased to give this one connected country to one united people, a people descended from the same ancestors, speaking the same language, professing the same religion, attached to the same principles of government, very similar in their manners and customs…” I too consider nationhood to be sacred, and I believe that contempt for any race, including our own, leads to contempt of all races, including our own, which is hatred of men and revolution against God.

The idea that culture is spiritual rather than physical (or religious rather than racial) might be a popular theory, but there is no evidence for it, and there never has been. Here are Rev. Dr. R.J. Rushdoony’s wise comments on 2 Cor. 6:14:

Unequal yoking plainly means mixed marriages between believers and unbelievers is clearly forbidden. But Deuteronomy 22:10 not only forbids unequal yoking by inference, and as a case law, but also unequal yoking generally. This means that an unequal marriage between believers or between unbelievers is wrong. Man was created in the image of God (Gen. 1:26), and woman is the reflected image of God in man, and from man (1 Cor. 11:1-12; Gen. 2:18, 21-23). “Helpmeet” means a reflection or a mirror, an image of man, indicating that a woman must have something religiously and culturally in common with her husband. The burden of the law is thus against inter-religious, inter-racial, and inter-cultural marriages, in that they normally go against the very community which marriage is designed to establish. Unequal yoking means more than marriage. In society at large it means the enforced integration of various elements which are not congenial. Unequal yoking is in no realm productive of harmony; rather, it aggravates the differences and delays the growth of the different elements toward a Christian harmony and association.

Rev. Matt Trewhella gives this context:

Historically, all the states in America had laws outlawing the marriage of blacks and whites. In the mid-1800’s, certain states began allowing interracial marriages or miscegenation as long as those marrying received a license from the state… Black’s Law Dictionary points to this historical fact when it defines “marriage license” as, “A license or permission granted by public authority to persons who intend to intermarry.” “Intermarry” is defined in Black’s Law Dictionary as, “Miscegenation; mixed or interracial marriages”…

Not long after these licenses were issued, some states began requiring all people who marry to obtain a marriage license. In 1923, the Federal Government established the Uniform Marriage and Marriage License Act (they later established the Uniform Marriage and Divorce Act). By 1929, every state in the Union had adopted marriage license laws.

In other words, marriage was a function of the church until the state got involved, and the state only got involved to fulfill the illegal 14th Amendment, which was a result of Lincoln’s subjugation of the South, where Christendom mounted its last glorious stand. And what does RC conclude about those of us who reject miscegenation on both scriptural and historical grounds? That we desire to keep the gospel to ourselves. This is, by far, his greatest lie and most vicious slander against me, and against all Kinists.

Some very unfortunate and avoidable events then occurred. While RC was waxing philosophical on race, he was also sending his congregants through the wringer of ecclesiastical abuse. You can read about the most famous of these cases here, which led not only to RC’s defrocking from the ministry but the defrocking of three other associates as well. Has there ever been a case when four men have been defrocked at once, even for extreme abuse? The presbytery leaders came to Bristol, Virginia, one day to hear the testimonies of mistreatment from those within the church and without, some of them quite heart-rending. But RC, to this day, has repented to no one. His abuse of Dennis Cochran was especially vile. But who bothers to take notice of such things? We read stories of abuse quite often in the news, and it tends to make us jaded. The poor victims retreat and are never heard from again. Those who remain are taught to shun those who leave (this turns out to be one of the worst aspects of Sproul Jr’s legacy).

It all could have been avoided. If RC had acted responsibly and opened his allegations against me for scrutiny, many of his congregants might have realized that a man who could so easily lie about someone he doesn’t know would not suddenly discover scruples when dealing with those who are actually in his pastoral care.

After the defrocking, having drifted to Doug Wilson for refuge, since no one else would give him a job, RC developed his cosmopolitanism into a Babelist freakshow on the order of a Michael Jackson video. This is the sort of bile he has disgorged upon the quiet Appalachian town where he lives:

Racial diversity is code language for racism. That is, the Bible says that in Christ there is neither Jew nor Greek. Our calling isn’t to judge people for being white, nor for being black. Our calling, to borrow a phrase, is to judge men by the content of their character. We should be color blind, and the left is at least as color conscious as the most barbaric racists. If the left isn’t angry at you for not treating minorities as special, and if the “conservative” moonbats are not angry at you for not preferring your own racial “kin” to others, you’re doing it wrong. [The latter half of that sentence is a reference to me. For a long while, Doug Wilson linked to Little Geneva under the category of Moonbats, now unfortunately removed.] At Saint Peter Presbyterian Church we are likely the most racially diverse church within 500 miles, all right here in the rural south. We got that way, however, not by going out of our way to appeal to this demographic or that. We got that way by welcoming into our families precious blessings from all over the world via adoption. We don’t see Africans. We see Baileys and Cottrills and Sprouls. We don’t see Asians. We see Kisers and Brockmyres and Wellons. We don’t see racial strangers, but gracial family. In half a century we may well see a whole community that is coffee colored. For more on this I’d commend our back issue of Every Thought Captive magazine titled “Neither Jew nor Greek.”

One of the most outrageous things I’ve ever witnessed occurred about a year after the aforementioned events, at the hands of self-professed Christians. I was following Douglas Phillips’s bully-excommunication of the Epstein family from his church, most of which is documented here and here. Phillips, through his proxies, waged a malicious campaign against all who were publicly critical of him, and when he realized that his accusations were gaining no traction, had the clever idea to accuse the loudest critics of being conspiratorial racists. Nothing diverts attention like racism. At the same time—coincidentally, b’gosh!—the servers for several websites that had posted information on the controversy were hacked, and some were threatened who had not commented on any of it but were merely friends of the alleged ringleaders (or as they are known in the Phillips orbit, the Four Nazguls of the Apocalypse).

I was so disgusted by these cowardly terror tactics, not to mention the inadequacy of Wordpress security, that I closed Little Geneva. Phillips immediately spun this incident as cowardice on my part, which was wishful thinking on his part. I had never bothered to use a pseudonym in all the years I was online, even at great personal loss, and in the time since these events I never asked my friends to withdraw my writings from publication. My reason for closing Little Geneva was stated then and has been stated now. It takes a lot of work to stay ahead of the hackers. Moreover, since the material of those who wrote at Little Geneva was being stolen by the Holy Terrorists through a series of “mirrors,” I wanted to make it plain that this was, and is, theft. I now look at it differently. Phillips and others like him have helped me spread the word about Kinism for years. I should mail fruit baskets.

Now I’m busier than ever and could not return to full-time blogging even if I desired. Simply put, I have far more important things to do. Here you can see the current focus of my attention.

Doug Wilson and many other clergymen like him, who tuck themselves away in the very whitest parts of the country, gloated over the “death” of their long-time nemesis, Little Geneva. So did our old friend, RC Junior. The following is taken from a squib he wrote for his church called Never Mind. I don’t see a date on it, but I think it is very recent. Again, the title is a Gilda Radner reference to cowardice on my part.

When your writing is published, it can often haunt you. It remains out there for people to read, even when you wish they wouldn’t…

Still, some go to great lengths to try to cover their tracks. They erase old websites. They seek to nuance their previous views, spinning them into their current views. Others, far more strangely, go heavily on the attack against what they once believed, believing perhaps if they yell loudly enough now, people will not hear them back then. I once had a fan on the internet. It was his habit to quote from me extensively, to praise my wisdom, to encourage others to drink deeply of that wisdom. While he was saying all these nice things about me, however, he was saying some not so nice things about friends of mine. I then published a brief piece pointing out to this friend where we disagreed. Suddenly, though nothing of what I had believed had changed, I became an enemy. No, I became THE enemy. This gentlemen [sic] wrote tens of thousands of words articulating just which hell hole I had apparently crawled out from. All of which is fine by me. The issue we disagreed on was a biggie for him. What surprised me was that there was no acknowledgment by this writer that he had once been foolish enough to be a fan. There was no apologizing to the folks he had encouraged to look my way, for giving them a bum steer.

In the end, that great African bishop Augustine showed the greater wisdom [by publishing retractions]. One way to see if your commitment is more to the doctrine of total depravity, or more to acknowledging our own desperately wicked hearts is to see whether we spend more time confessing our own sins, or pointing out the sins of others. I know which one I do—I point out the sins of others. For that, I need to repent.

I think you can see why men like this disgust me. Lies and mistaken assumptions take on a life on their own, and when pastors join in the gossip it lends the lies and mistaken assumptions an air of credibility. In this case, a story began to make the rounds that I closed Little Geneva to “cover my tracks,” so “haunted” was I by the dreadful, politically incorrect ideas that used to be the unanimous voice of Christendom.

Here’s what RC is not saying, even though he knows it very well. I still think he has good and courageous things to say on many subjects, and my writings attest to this. His opinions on politics and farm life were never the issue for me, but by the way he tells it in this article, I was a “fan” who turned on him after the theatrical open letter he wrote and then re-wrote. The idea conveyed is that I used to agree with him across the board and now dishonestly exclaim that he crawled out of a “hell hole.” But this is another lie about entirely different subjects. Even after the open letter, I never criticized him on the things that I had previously appreciated about him, and I still don’t. Another “fan” who came to realize that RC missed his calling as a carnival ticket salesman is Rick Saenz. In fact, Rick was RC’s right-hand man and the brain behind his once-successful operation. But when Rick saw RC’s abusiveness and the content of his character, he found better things to do with his life—much better. There are many more like him who will go unmentioned by me, but they may decide to tell their stories someday.

My writings and my beliefs have not “haunted” me at all. I’m quite proud of them, on balance. Actually, if I could go through everything I’ve written, I estimate that I would retract about 2% of it, and perhaps another 10% desperately needs to be rephrased. Any blog that has controversial topics posted with no more than a few minutes’ thought, and topped with a large dollop of anger from reading the news, is bound to contain its share of duds. Still, I continue to agree with me. I won’t pretend that my views have not evolved over time; I’m no different than anyone else in this regard. It would just be nice if someone like RC could just once, in logical fashion, say: Harry’s points A, B, and C are false, and here is why. (One brave pastor I know has swung at the ball. He wasn’t standing over home plate, but it’s a start.) Instead, RC tells these ridiculous lies. Not only are they ridiculous, but they are of absolutely no benefit to anyone; he might as well be raging against a phantom. To this day, he very strangely refuses to call me by my full name (the name I allegedly keep locked in a vault, so “haunted” am I by the threat of an audit), even though he has been writing and talking about me for years. It’s bizarre.

Could excessive, red-faced imbibing have something to do with it?

I’m not going to waste my time trying to prove that I’ve never considered RC to be “THE enemy” or that I think he has crawled from a “hell hole.” Nor have I wasted my time responding to the lies told about me which he has used as the basis for telling more lies.

The man is shameless. The self-deprecating way in which he ends the article above is a trademark of his. He doesn’t mean it at all but he knows it makes the ladies swoon. If he were truly a penitent man, he would go to the innocent people he scarred for life and beg them to forgive him, as he was ordered to do long ago by the wise men to whose authority he voluntarily submitted himself.

So here’s a little Christmas gift in RC’s honor. I have asked my friends, who are doing an excellent job running SWB, to post the slightly-incomplete LG archives. I’ve received many requests to do this over the past few years and have never been interested (nor have my fellow LG writers been interested), but since the pages are being stolen by some other sites anyway, people might as well go to the authorized source. At the very least, it will prove that wishful accusations you might have read are simply not true.

Feel free to contact me by “speed-tapping” a message to my “computer address,” as it says in that great work of fiction, Left Behind.

harry<dot>seabrook<at>gmail<dot>com

Don’t say I never gave you nothin’, RC. ‘Tis the season for egg nog. Bottoms up!