First, I’d like to buy a round of apologies for writing that precocious Dan Ritchie is affiliated with the school that posted his short article about the “heresy” of Kinism. I assumed, and this is never a good thing, because when I assume I always make an ass of you. Young Dan responds to our previous post under the title “Oh Foolish Kinists, Who Hath Bewitched You?” (For those who don’t know, this implies that we are “Judaizers” seeking to make salvation dependent on works of the flesh, or maybe just the flesh.) It’s quite a scholarly rejoinder, punctuated with pious reflection and…naw, just kidding. As we’re very accustomed to seeing, it’s a load of obligatory name-calling.

The “Kinist idiots whose heads are stuck up their asses” have “one of the most vicious, hate-filled, and unapologetically racist websites that I have ever seen.” Our “insane hatred of black people” and “idolatry of the South” are the fruit of “heresies.” We are “asses” and “racist idiots” who write “some of the most absurd and irrational rubbish I have ever heard.” We are nothing more than “a few impressionable and credulous idiots who lack the discrimination to discern between good and evil, and who lack the ability to seriously engage in critical-analytical thought.” Here’s a good one: “Kinism is a doctrine of demons.” Another, who is apparently speedballing on Christian charity, says we like to rape dogs. The deepest cut of all comes from one who calls us “jejune.”

Once you get past the name-calling, there is no substantial refutation of the points we’ve made or the serious exegesis we helpfully provided in a link, which Danny Boy withholds from his readers, naturally. Ditto for Theonomy Resources, source of the original post, where the moderator would not even approve a comment linking to our response. Obviously, there are no links to SWB because one glance at this website could cause a “confessional Puritan’s” eyes to melt away, like what happened to the Nazis in Raiders of the Lost Ark. Thus, Ritchie feels comfortable in rehashing a lot of ground that has been well-covered by us. He even lies, saying that the WCF’s “only…qualification” for marriage is “degrees of consanguinity.” He skips over the more general “affinity forbidden by the Word” like it’s not even there. He again asserts, without proving, that “to be unequally yoked in the context of marriage means [merely] marrying someone of a different religion.” The only response to our Rushdoony quote is to go in search of another Rushdoony quote, which doesn’t actually contradict the point Rush himself made, and to steer readers towards a commentary on the WCF. Since there is no condemnation of miscegenation in said commentary, this is supposed to serve as proof that racists don’t know the Bible very well. Many of you will recognize that this is what Reformed wingnuts do with Dabney and other great men, but they are never bold enough to be consistent and call these church fathers “heretics.”

Most conspicuously (pardon the Hispanic racial slur), Ritchie dodges our point about the Fifth Commandment like it’s a jellyfish in his bathtub. Likewise, he doesn’t even attempt to prove us wrong when we say that, on race, modern Christians disagree with their fathers in the faith and agree with the reprobate. He shouldn’t feel bad, because no one could possibly deny this. Instead, his response is: Oh yeah? Well, you agree with Hitler!

This is not far from the anti-reasoning of Anthony Bradley, the Michael Steele of Reformed Christianity, who is bellyaching again about how various Kinists over the years have given him negative reviews. As you might recall, this is a man who graduated with a doctoral degree from Westminster Theological Seminary, has been on the masthead of the Acton Institute think-tank, is now a professor at The King’s College, and is turning into a prominent spokesman whenever issues of race and Christianity arise. His quota career has only been of interest to Kinists because it illustrates the synthesis of Scripture with the ideas of revolutionary Jews like Boas and Marx. Whites who have sat at the feet of these teachers have been willing to dumb down their civilization, even while calling themselves “conservative.” Blacks have responded in entirely predictable ways. As Rushdoony said, the Negro respects only authority as brute force; compassion is interpreted as weakness. Though white men traded Christianity for Judeochristianity with the intention of helping others, diversities have responded by trying to destroy both the giver and the gift. Anthony Bradley’s popularity is based on his consistent theme that white churches and families must be mixed until nothing remains of their former identity. And while blacks routinely call their homogeneous churches “bastions of strength,” no white man must ever again be allowed to experience this luxury.

When Bradley was hired by Joel Belz and Marvin Olasky at WORLD Magazine, he played up the relevance, writing stereotypical odes to cars and cologne, and praising vile songs by Outkast, a band with some ideas on what to do with your daughter’s mouth. It was in this ostensibly Christian blog that Bradley swooned over meeting the radical Marxist, Cornel West. He called West a “genius” and gave West’s rap album this hilarious review: “In all modesty, this project constitutes a watershed moment in musical history.” He lamented the lack of “cutting edge” books “exploring Crunk and Reggaeton.” He often repeated his desire to convince white churches to start “worshipping” to hip-hop music. He even said that the Presbyterian Church in America “should be ruling” the jungle of hip-hop. (I think these wiggers and their “cowboy hip-hop” are not what Bradley had in mind.)

On more than one occasion, he wrote about his desire to live in Miami because white and mestizo women will dance openly with black men there.

Why move to Miami. Because the multicultural Latin scene is amazing(haha). The only other venue I’ve witnessed the diversity present in the Latin dancing scene (Salsa, merengue, bachata, etc.) would be hip-hop. In Miami, it’s Asians, Hispanics, African Americans, whites, all mixed in together enjoy a multi-racial moment. Getting back to that would be sweet…

I could get back into the Latin Dancing scene like I was in Philly, the ministry opportunites are incredible, it’s a hip-hop mecca, it’s a multi-racial, multi-cultural city. It’s perfect.

He only regretted that no church in Miami was willing to hire him.

If the right opportunity came I pretty sure I’d take it. But, that’s the problem. Who’s gonna hire a black dude with degrees from Reformed seminaries who wants to bring people to The Way in a fresh , creative, non-baby-boomer, non-seeker sensitive way, and pay him “real good” so he can get out of debt (haha)? Exactly, so for now I remain in Dutch Michigan.

By Anthony Bradley on March 6, 2005 9:50 AM

What a pity. He was on the cutting edge of the sex sermon craze.

Sex is good, right? God created it for us, right? Then why don’t we talk about it at church regularly?…

For example, Mars Hill in Seattle where Pastor Mark Driscoll says that they teach:

“[a] liberated marital sex and provide frank teaching on everything from why husbands enjoy oral sex to the different types of orgasms a wife can experience…” (from his book The Radical Reformission, 185).

…Why is there no frank discussion in conservative white evangelical churches, like Mark said about “oral sex” and “orgasms?”

Posted by Anthony at October 18, 2005 09:28 AM

The guidance of his more sensible parents was lost on this aficionado of pop culture.

In the new Kanye West video of “Touch the Sky” Pamela Anderson is his girlfriend and the video accurately portrays just how much black women HATE it when they see a white girl with a black dude.

As a prominent black pastor, now in Los Angeles, said to me 12 years ago, “Anthony, if you want to close off your ministry to the black community completely, marry a white woman.” It’s so true. Whew, black women really, really hate that. Whew.

The video’s funny. The ex-girlfriend’s friend responds in a common tone: “girl, I told you that as soon as he [got all successful] he was gon’ leave yo [butt] for a white girl.” One of my [family members] gave me very specific instructions one day: ”Anthony, whatever you do just don’t marry a white girl.” Being “successful” and marrying a white girl is anathema in the black community. I didn’t know what to say.

Posted by Anthony at February 23, 2006 07:57 AM

When a governor came out of the homo closet, Bradley criticized those who wanted him fired. He said sin affects us all, so we shouldn’t be too hard on the guy. But when a young lady was forbidden by her school from wearing a Confederate flag dress to her prom, and she sued her school because of it, Bradley wrote, “Why can’t people give the flag thing up? Her family are all probably good Bible-believing Christians too.”

More recently, Bradley had a moment of infamy in the limelight when, on Fox News, during the great rape hoax, he called all 47 of the Duke lacrosse players liars, called one of them a rapist, and implored them to come forward and “tell the truth about what really happened.”

Usually, he mentioned the PCA only to condemn it for its latent “racism.” In 2005, he lamented: “The PCA can’t seem to deal with its racist theonomists.” Officially, the PCA had already issued an ahistorical and unbiblical “Pastoral Letter” condemning both “racism” and our forefathers while “repenting” of bogus sins. (An aside: We fully agree with Bradley that this vague statement had nothing to do with actual repentance. The WCF requires specificity in repentance: “Men ought not to content themselves with a general repentance, but it is every man’s duty to endeavor to repent of his particular sins, particularly.”) This was not of concern to Bradley, however. He meant that churches had to follow through with disciplining acts of “racism,” which are now defined as anything black people find disagreeable.

Here’s a representative, approving quote from one of his posts entitled “White Evangelical Seminaries: White Supremacy’s Greatest Friend.”

“What deepens my anger today is the appalling silence of white theologians on racism in the United States and the modern world… From Jonathan Edwards to Walter Rauschenbusch and Reinhold Niebuhr to the present, progressive white theologians, with few exceptions, write and teach as if they do not need to address the radical contradiction that racism creates from Christian theology. They do not write about slavery, colonialism, segregation, and the profound cultural link between white supremacy and Christianity… White images and ideas dominate the religious life of Christians and the intellectual life of theologians, reinforcing the ‘moral’ right of white people to dominate people of color economically and politically. White supremacy is so widespread that it becomes a ‘natural’ way of viewing the world… As long as religion scholars do not engage racism in their intellectual work, we can be sure that they are as racist as their grandparents, whether they know it or not.” ~ James H. Cone, Charles A. Briggs Distinguished Professor of Systematic Theology at Union Theological Seminary, in his book Risks of Faith: The Emergence of Black Theology of Liberation, 1968-1998 (Beacon Press, 1998), p.130-132

He followed this quote with a concilatory “Hmm…this may explain a lot on both sides.” It sure does, Anthony, and it explains a lot about you; namely, that you believe evangelical seminaries are “White Supremacy’s Greatest Friend” until they agree with you that a healthy, sanctified church must resemble Babel.

Notice that the words “racism” and “white supremacy” are used here not to denote violence or even discrimination against blacks. No, the very fact that white images and ideas have dominated Christian thinking is racism (regardless of its asymptotic proximity to the truth), and since racism is a “sin,” it must not be allowed to survive in the Church. Racists must be disciplined, not for anything they actually do or don’t do, but because of what they believe. Again, this is the brute force authority of the black man. It is as far removed from white, Christian liberty as one could imagine. No dissent can be tolerated.

Chuck Colson also allowed Bradley to publish the above quote from black liberation theologian James Cone in Breakpoint Magazine. As I’m sure you recall, Cone made the news in recent years for being the mentor of Jeremiah Wright, who was a mentor of Obamination. Wright based his “church’s” vision statement on the writings of Cone, which include these gems:

To be black is to be committed to destroying everything this country loves and adores…

[W]hiteness is the symbol of the antichrist… Black theology seeks to analyze the satanic nature of whiteness and by doing so, prepare all nonwhites for revolutionary action… Christianity and whiteness are opposites…

Black theology refuses to accept a God who is not identified totally with the goals of the black community. If God is not for us and against white people, then he is a murderer, and we had better kill him. The task of black theology is to kill gods who do not belong to the black community…

Black theology will accept only the love of God which participates in the destruction of the white enemy. What we need is the divine love as expressed in Black Power, which is the power of black people to destroy their oppressors here and now by any means at their disposal. Unless God is participating in this holy activity, we must reject his love…

The black theologian must reject any conception of God which stifles black self-determination by picturing God as a God of all peoples. Either God is identified with the oppressed to the point that their experience becomes God’s experience, or God is a God of racism…

If there is one brutal fact that the centuries of white oppression have taught blacks, it is that whites are incapable of making any valid judgment about human existence. The goal of black theology is the destruction of everything white, so that blacks can be liberated from alien gods…

The coming of Christ means a denial of what we thought we were. It means destroying the white devil in us. Reconciliation to God means that white people are prepared to deny themselves (whiteness), take up the cross (blackness), and follow Christ (the black ghetto).

Bradley distances himself from these outrageous statements and has even written a book against black liberation theology. But how is what he teaches any different in the end result? Before we answer this question, let’s take a look at what Bradley is currently writing.

Here he commemorates the 50th anniversary of the Marxists in SNCC and “the Black Revolution that spread nationwide in its wake.” He writes, in beaming prose, “The reunion was an outpouring of powerful emotions, living history and inspiring visions of radical democratic change still needed in the politics of today.” I wonder why he did not mention a word about the Communists, revolutionaries, and proto-Black Panthers who founded SNCC or the Black Power conferences they continue to support. (You know what’s really hateful? When David Duke or Jared Taylor tries to reserve a hotel room.) Does it matter that SNCC’s leader, H. Rap Brown, considered terrorism to be “as American as cherry pie”?

Here Bradley asks, rhetorically, and in his trademark broken English, “Is the PCA being held hostage by white, Western (and Southern) cultural captivity?” He concludes that the Church must be “freed from its white, Western (and Southern) culture and norms” because a “church predominantly made of white people is [sic] church that will likely close its doors within the next generation.”

Here he is shocked to discover that the PCA was founded by “racists.” Then he adds this personal note:

For at least 6 YEARS I have been repeatedly, and regularly called “nigger,” “Anthony Bradley, the Negro Prince of the PCA,” “The Token Negro and Filthy Pervert and a Stain on the Bedsheets of Life,” “Anthony Bradley, the Affirmative Action Ph.D,” and other racial slurs all over the internet since some white Reformed people discovered me; and it has not stopped. I had no idea what I was getting myself into in the early 1990′s and nobody told me what to expect. I have been completely caught of [sic] guard and I’m lucky to get a shoulder shrug from people who knew this would happen. Why didn’t anyone tell us?…

Have you ever been called, “the Negro Prince of the PCA?” Don’t people understand that if I leave the racists win. [sic]

I don’t know what he’s talking about. This appears to be a reference to Badlands, which has been offline for years. At the time, Bradley was singing quite a different tune:

Here’s why I liked the racists: they single-handedly increased my “google rating” significantly. Now what will I do? Perhaps another racist will take the lead and increase my rating even more!

Posted by Anthony at October 24, 2005 09:40 AM

Amazingly, Joel Belz, the founder of WORLD Magazine, tries to cheer Bradley by posting a link to the Southern Poverty Law Center, than which there has never been a thicker hive of hatred and bigotry. Are you following along here? A black man is anguished that white people don’t like to learn from black people, marry them, or hand over the leadership of their churches to them. Then a white patricide, who for years gave the black man a public forum to pollute the faith, links to a story published by notorious Christ-haters and white-haters about the persecution of a fine man named Neill Payne for the Orwellian thought-crime of believing that “black people are somewhere between average intelligence and mentally retarded” (a certifiably true statistic, on average). In the PCA, as in the Church at large, handing authority to Negroes means that opinions are no longer a matter of “Christian liberty.” Here’s the story, and another one about the “racist” foundation of the PCA. Belz means for these articles to encourage Bradley because they suggest that European Christianity is about to fall into the dustbin of history, after which wedding photos will no longer be insufferably white. Belz apologizes to Dr. Bradley, the seminary graduate, for not warning him that old-fashioned, conservative white Southerners are racists. “I am sorry that we weren’t more up front with you about this matter when you joined us during the 1990s.” Who could have guessed, seeing as how every other denomination in existence has a similar history?

R.C. Sproul’s buddy, Ligon Duncan (an aspiring rap star himself), chimes in to inform readers that the once-noble First Presbyterian Church of Jackson, Mississippi, which he pastors, now has “interracial couples who are joyful and beloved church members and we are anticipating the union of a godly young couple (who happens to be interracial) in the next few weeks.” I’m sure James Cone is delighted.

This comment is a shining example of a young skull full of mush who is wasting his parents’ money.

Another seminarian writes: “More church discipline needs to be done against those who are racists & kinists precisely because their views are contrary to our creation in the imago dei and the unity of the Body of Christ…and that whole love your neighbor thing upon which the 2nd table of the law hangs. More pastors and Presbyteries need to hold people accountable for what they write on their blogs. One of the things that instills some hope is the growing commitment to adoption. Some PCA churches are creating cultures of adoption. We have not experienced any racism in the ARP or PCA for adopting a Chinese child. We expect the same if we adopt from Africa.”

Another writes: “From pulpits I’ve heard for decades a message insensitive to African-Americans. The message is that things used to be better, but at least since the 1960s they have gotten worse. Think how this must strike someone who knows only too well that their freedoms and prerogatives have improved fairly consistently in the last 50 years.” What else has improved?

Another equates slaveholders and segregationists with rapists. I suppose the slander could be worse, but I’m not sure how at the moment. At least he didn’t say anything about dogs.

Another writes that “kinism is little more than the last whisperings of a dying lot of bigots that have brought nothing but shame to the resurgence of Reformed theology in the 21st century.” Nothing else? Such ingratitude.

Then Nelson Jennings tells Bradley: “Slade’s book [about the PCA's racist foundation] and your blog have catalyzed further soul-searching and constructive discussion among our faculty at Covenant Seminary here in St. Louis.” He then grovels in pseudo-repentance on behalf of white people: “I am sorry for how I and others of us have failed you personally, both during your time among us and since then. I believe we have always stood with and defended you, but surely we have not done so adequately or properly. I know I and others have sought to understand your struggle amidst the attacks against you, but I know I did not seek enough or adequately… Thanks for your prayers for our faculty as we honestly, yet with our own baggage and shortsightedness, seek to follow Christ’s leading down the painful-glorious path that lies both behind and in front of us.”

Let me interrupt here to say that Bradley must be overjoyed when he reads this nonsense. He joins a white denomination for the express purpose of changing it irretrievably, and he knows he has succeeded because the bigwigs and illustrious potentates fall all over themselves to apologize to him for not stroking his tender ego more vigorously. They don’t actually repent of anything specific, but it sure sounds good, and that part about the “painful-glorious path” is a nice touch.

I’m still confused about these so-called “attacks.” All Bradley has said is that he has been called some names he doesn’t like. If I could go one day without being called a name like “dog rapist” or having some overblown slur used against me and my friends, I might feel like running for office. The names we’re called never fail to equate us with murderers, such as the Black Panthers who talk about killing “cracker babies,” and this happens even when we take great pains to have a polite and deferential conversation. For denying the religion of Equality, we are called by the same names used for criminals and pyschopaths, and no one has ever come to us and apologized for bearing false witness. If anyone has reason to complain of being mistreated, it’s us, not these thin-skinned cemeterians.

A couple of weeks ago, Bradley read here at SWB that he is “the feted token Negro of Reformed Christianity.” He didn’t like this, probably because he thinks that “feted” (highly esteemed) means “fetid” (an offensive smell). Despite his claim to having been “repeatedly and consistently” harrassed by Kinists for six years, this was one of the few times we have written about him. At any rate, his reaction was to chastise churches for not silencing people like us who dare to utter their opinions.

Reformed Christianity remains as [sic] safe haven for racists because few Reformed Christians have the fortitude to challenge racism in their churches and denominations it seems. If you are Reformed and racist you can just about guarantee that most Calvinist churches in America won’t even address the issue so you get off pretty easy.

Truth is irrelevant and liberty of conscience is irrelevant. The religion of Equality is all that matters, and those who dare to dispute it must be shut down. You really need to understand what he’s saying here; the people he wants to punish are guilty of nothing more than biblically-derived thought-crimes.

A few days ago, Glenn Beck proved that our word “feted” was well-chosen. Bradley appeared as a guest author on Beck’s show, and the subject was black liberation theology.

Actually, this is not the first time that those who have been criticized by Kinists have tried to get Glenn Beck to intervene on their behalf. Here’s an old clip of someone who called what has now become the third most-popular radio show in the country in the hope of exposing Kinists to millions as haters of mankind, probably related to Hitler. The caller was riled by one of the many brilliant observations of our friend, Badonicus, that God punished miscegenation to a greater degree than he punished sodomy. He destroyed two cities, Sodom and Gomorrah, which were filled with faggots, but He flooded the known world when the race of Sethites mixed with the race of Cainites. You can join the caller in dismissing this as “ridiculous” and you can qualify it to your heart’s content, but you can’t deny it.

Beck begins the show by introducing Bradley and then cutting away to a monologue. He does this to present his bonafides as a white man who can legitimately talk about race for an hour. Just to drive the point home, he seats Bradley in front of what appears to be a black producer with his dreadlocks in a cargo net. If Bradley had worn a sign bearing the word “token” on his chest, it would not have been any more obvious.

As Beck himself admits, this is his “weirdest show ever,” yet it’s refreshing to see how much he gets right. In parts it is almost like a sermon, and Beck is certainly correct that believing that Obama found Christian faith through the idolatry of James Cone is like believing someone could appreciate free enterprise by becoming a Marxist. But Beck is also extremely confused on several points, and since he says at the outset that he is getting his information from Anthony Bradley and Richard Land, I can’t help but think that Bradley is confused too. First, Beck claims that Jesus was a victor, not a victim at the hands of murderers. Actually, both statements are true. Beck says: “If He was a victim…then Jesus would have come back from the dead and made the Jews pay for what they did. That’s an abomination.” But this is precisely what happened in 70 AD. Not one stone of the temple was left upon another. An abomination? Does he know what that word means? On the other hand, I doubt that Bradley gave Beck the idea that “Jesus died for everyone who ever lived.” No Calvinist believes this.

In the process of showing the connection from Cone to Wright to Obama, Beck makes an issue of Cone’s idea of “collective salvation” versus the Christian idea of “individual salvation.” This point is the hinge on which the show turns. But while it’s false that personal salvation depends on collective salvation, as Obama puts it, Beck’s dichotomy is also false. The Great Commission is to baptize nations, not just individuals. See, for instance, Moses in Deut. 5, when he says the covenant at Sinai was made with “those of us alive here today,” even though the people to whom he spoke were not alive at the time. Nor do we await salvation in eternity; salvation is here and now as well, not just for us but for our people. White men like Beck have an easier time of making faith merely a personal matter because genetically encoded in every white man is a libertarian streak. Properly channelled, this can be a counterbalance on the hive mentality prevalent among the Chinese. If improperly channelled, it leads to nothing less than the destruction of civilization, as we are seeing before our eyes.

Cone’s anti-theology is discussed at length on the program. As shown above, the general thrust of Cone’s teaching is that white people can only be granted salvation if they relinquish the power to govern their own affairs and “identify” with the “powerless,” meaning, of course, black people. They can only be saved through massive transfer payments that “give back” what they have “taken.” But black people are far from powerless, and Bradley is living proof. For generations, they have benefited from special preferences, and there is no end in sight.

Again, even though Bradley has written a book opposing black liberation theology, how do his goals for the Church differ? Beck explains BLT in this way:

1. Identify something you want to control
2. Look to Marx
3. Look for a substantial number of victims
4. Infiltrate and corrupt institutions

Ever since Bradley joined what remained of the white, southern Presbyterian Church, he has contended that it must change to suit a polyglot world, or else white churches will go the way of the white race, which he assumes to be a foregone conclusion. Whites must grant quota positions to other races, who have had no part whatsoever in what we understand of orthodox, confessional Christianity; and finally, whites must hand over the churches to them to be mixed beyond recognition. Bradley has identified what must be controlled, he has looked to Marx (certainly not our fathers), he has found a body of Southerners who have been harangued for hundreds of years as oppressors and are eager to be recognized as victims, and with the complicity of the feckless leadership he is corrupting what used to be a healthy institution.

What’s the difference?

In response, there are a few things we need to make clear straight away, and these should come as no surprise.

1) We have always sought to justify the opinions of our Christian forefathers, who almost without exception agreed with us on miscegenation and social relations, using Scripture alone.

2) We agree, with very minor reservations, that the Westminster Confession of Faith is the finest encapsulation of Christian doctrine ever produced, and as a confession, it roots every word in Scripture.

3) Here comes the “but.” But we absolutely reject the idea that the WCF or any other confession is designed to extract from the Bible everything that needs to be said about every matter of importance.

With these in mind, here is the passage that allegedly contradicts what was believed to be true by every Christian who ever lived prior to 1950:

III. It is lawful for all sorts of people to marry, who are able with judgment to give their consent. Yet it is the duty of Christians to marry only in the Lord. And therefore such as profess the true reformed religion should not marry with infidels, papists, or other idolaters: neither should such as are godly be unequally yoked, by marrying with such as are notoriously wicked in their life, or maintain damnable heresies.

IV. Marriage ought not to be within the degrees of consanguinity or affinity forbidden by the Word. Nor can such incestuous marriages ever be made lawful by any law of man or consent of parties, so as those persons may live together as man and wife.

There is no dispute over part 4, where “the degrees of consanguinity” refer to incest. The dispute is over Ritchie’s interpretation of part 3, especially when read in the context of part 4. Notice the general words “or affinity forbidden by the Word.” Is it really acceptable for all Christians to intermarry, as long as the relationships are not prohibited by Leviticus 18? Clearly not. There are many good reasons for forbidding marriages between old men and young girls, between those of radically different stature or temperament or class, or others who are dissimilar.

What does it mean to be unequally yoked? Typically, the question is answered in the way that Ritchie has answered it, by citing the words “only in the Lord” from 1 Cor. 7:39. But this doesn’t really answer the question since “only in the Lord” means “only according to the will of the Lord,” not “only for those who believe in the Lord.” The larger question is, What is the will of God for Christian marriage? What sort of affinity is forbidden by the Word? In our opinion, R.J. Rushdoony answered this definitively in his comments on 2 Cor. 6:14:

Deuteronomy 22:10 not only forbids unequal yoking by inference, and as a case law, but also unequal yoking generally. This means that an unequal marriage between believers or between unbelievers is wrong. Man was created in the image of God (Gen. 1:26), and woman is the reflected image of God in man, and from man (1 Cor. 11:1-12; Gen. 2:18, 21-23). “Helpmeet” means a reflection or a mirror, an image of man, indicating that a woman must have something religiously and culturally in common with her husband. The burden of the law is thus against inter-religious, inter-racial, and inter-cultural marriages, in that they normally go against the very community which marriage is designed to establish. Unequal yoking means more than marriage. In society at large it means the enforced integration of various elements which are not congenial. Unequal yoking is in no realm productive of harmony; rather, it aggravates the differences and delays the growth of the different elements toward a Christian harmony and association.

Therefore, the wrong way to approach the subject of unequal yoking is to go to the WCF to see if there is any “condemnation of marriage between people of different skin colours” or other “super-added qualifications.” Since confessions take shape via controversy, why would anyone assume that an act that was universally unpracticed in the 17th century would be formally denounced by clerics of the time? Why would anyone attempt to project a modern pathology on the deliberations of the Westminster Divines? This is quite irresponsible.

Ritchie asserts: “The marriage of foreign wives was condemned, not on the basis of skin-colour, but on the basis of religious affiliation.” This desperately needs to be proved by him, as the question of whether qualifications for the covenant of marriage besides “religious affiliation” are not merely “prudent” but binding, makes or breaks the entire case. No evidence is presented, no proof is attempted. Without biblical or historical justification, Ritchie asserts that any two Christians who wish to marry each other may do so, and they have “no right to prohibit other people from so doing or to accuse them of being in sin.” This is libertarianism, not Christian doctrine.

The correct way to approach this subject is to first consult the Fifth Commandment and recognize that we are obligated to willfully obey the lawful commands and counsels of our parents. While Ritchie four times in two paragraphs attempts to divert attention by using the superficial term “skin color,” the Fifth Commandment goes to the core of our duty in marriage.

In his commentary on Gen. 24, John Calvin writes that it “should be taken by us as a common rule” that “it is not lawful for the children of a family to contract marriage, except with the consent of parents. Certainly natural equity dictates that, in a matter of such importance, children should depend upon the will of their parents.” Martin Bucer correctly called even a consensual marriage “rape” if the father did not bless it. In his commentary on 1 Cor. 7, Calvin tells us that “the authority of parents” has its origin—where?—in Westminster Confession proof-texts?—no, “in the common rights of nature.”

Now if in other actions of inferior moment no liberty is allowed to children, without the authority of their parents, much less is it reasonable that they should have liberty given them in the contracting of marriage. And that has been carefully enacted by civil law, but more especially by the law of God… Let us know, therefore, that in disposing of children in marriage, the authority of parents is of first-rate importance, provided they do not tyrannically abuse it, as even the civil laws restrict it. The Apostle, too, in requiring exemption from necessity, intimated that the deliberations of parents ought to be regulated with a view to the advantage of their children. Let us bear in mind, therefore, that this limitation is the proper rule—that children allow themselves to be governed by their parents, and that they, on the other hand, do not drag their children by force to what is against their inclination, and that they have no other object in view, in the exercise of their authority, than the advantage of their children.

Martin Luther agreed that “a child should not marry or become engaged without the knowledge and consent of his parents.” However, while “it is one thing to hinder a child’s marriage to this or that particular person,” it is “quite another thing to forbid marriage entirely.”

A father may lay down the rule that his child must not eat or drink this or that, or sleep here or there; but he cannot rule that the child abstain entirely from food, drink, and sleep. On the contrary, he is duty bound to provide his child with food, drink, clothing, sleep, and whatever else is needful for his well-being. If he fails to do this, he is no father at all, and the child will have to do it himself. In like manner, the father also has the authority to prevent his child from marrying this one or that one; but he does not have the authority to forbid him to marry altogether. On the contrary, he is duty bound to get his child a good mate who will be just right for him, or who seems to be just right for him.

In other words, don’t pretend that you’re obeying the Fifth Commandment if you fail to honor your parents in the most important choice of your life. To reject their wisdom for the kind of person you should marry, who will carry your name and heritage to succeeding generations, is to sin. And here’s the key point: There has never, in all the ages of this earth, been a white man who wants his son or daughter to marry into the black race, or any other race for that matter, except the white race. To ignore this salient and incontrovertible fact, as Ritchie does, is to play fast and loose with the truth. There can be no lesson about marriage drawn from Scripture (least of all the WCF) that does not first draw from the well of the Fifth Commandment.

And now you know why we seldom see anyone rise to the challenge of placing substance behind their constant accusations about the “heresy” of Kinism. It’s because, on the subject of race, our side agrees with most of the Christians who have ever lived while the other side agrees with every sort of contemporaneous Christ-hater imaginable.

From the same school, New Geneva, comes this equally misguided and deceptive post on the immigration philosophy of Teddy Roosevelt. Read this quote, and when you’re finished we’d like to ask you a question.

In the first place, we should insist that if the immigrant who comes here in good faith becomes an American and assimilates himself to us, he shall be treated on an exact equality with everyone else, for it is an outrage to discriminate against any such man because of creed, or birthplace, or origin. But this is predicated upon the person’s becoming in every facet an American, and nothing but an American… There can be no divided allegiance here. Any man who says he is an American, but something else also, isn’t an American at all. We have room for but one flag, the American flag… We have room for but one language here, and that is the English language. And we have room for but one sole loyalty, and that is a loyalty to the American people.

Would it be safe to assume that an institution of higher learning that posts such a quote is careful not to misrepresent Roosevelt’s intended meaning?

Here is a quote from Roosevelt that shows exactly what he had in mind:

There is no room in this country for hyphenated Americanism… The one absolutely certain way of bringing this nation to ruin, of preventing all possibility of its continuing to be a nation at all, would be to permit it to become a tangle of squabbling nationalities, an intricate knot of German-Americans, Irish-Americans, English-Americans, French-Americans, Scandinavian-Americans or Italian-Americans, each preserving its separate nationality, each at heart feeling more sympathy with Europeans of that nationality, than with the other citizens of the American Republic.

As it turned out, the nations of Europe, being of common racial heritage with the British founding stock, assimilated quite easily. Leaving aside the question of whether this was good or bad, no honest historian would suggest that Roosevelt believed the American tribe could assimilate other races. Roosevelt loudly blamed the South for saddling the country with blacks, who he called “a perfectly stupid race.” He considered their presence here to be a millstone around our necks. “There is no solution to the terrible problem offered by the presence of the Negro on this continent,” he wrote in 1901; “he is here and can neither be killed nor driven away.” Roosevelt blamed lynchings on the disposition of black men to rape white women.

He called the white race “the forward race” in 1905, and to this race alone fell the task of “preserving the high civilization wrought out by its forefathers.” He believed that miscegenation and racial integration would cause us to degenerate, and history has made him a prophet. In his book, The Winning of the West, he wrote: “It is of incalculable importance that America, Australia, and Siberia should pass out of the hands of their red, black, and Aboriginal owners, and become the heritage of the dominant world races.” Again, the propriety of imperialism is open to question, but you can see that unlike Judeochristian race-mixers, we are presenting the real man, not a myth.

It’s not possible to honestly assess Roosevelt’s “immigration policy” without taking race into account. Those who pretend that Roosevelt did not carefully consider race himself only succeed in twisting his words to mean the exact opposite of what he intended. Just as they do with holy Scripture.

A friend of ours sent in this excellent quote from a book written in 1906 by Fr. James L. Meagher, D.D. Keep in mind, as you read it, that this is what Christians used to believe, but you won’t find a Sunday school or seminary today that will teach it. In their arrogance, our contemporaries believe this fact to be an indictment of the past.

Rising from his sacrifice, Noe [Noah] blessed and cursed, as Christ was to rise from the tomb after his sacrifice and bless his followers with the gift of the Holy Ghost, while the curse of his blood rested on the Jewish nation.

“Cursed be Canaan, a servant of servants shall he be unto his brethren.” He could not curse Ham, for God had blessed the three sons and the curse rested on Canaan’s children. Ham’s sons settled Palestine, which they cursed with the sins of Sodom and Gomorrah. But Ham’s tribes settled Africa, and find their vocation as slaves and servants waiting on the white men. Cursed in the passion their father mocked in Noe, the African race love to serve as servants to the other races. Living since in deepest degradation, among them never rose religion, literature, invention, genius, or progress. The other races will not receive on an equality one in whose veins flows their tainted blood.

Prophetic words the Holy Ghost pronounced through Noe on the sons who covered him. “Blessed be the Lord God of Sem [Shem], let Canaan be his servant.” Thus he determined that the “Lord God,” Jesus Christ, would be born of Sem’s race, the Jews [Judeans]. Christ’s genealogy shows him as son of Sem. He is the glory of the Jewish Semites. The other Semitic nations settled Asia, where they have remained stagnant, conservative, unprogressive, hardly improving since the patriarchs, for they were not blessed with the grace of change.

To Japheth: “The enlarging” or “The white man,” Noe said, “May God enlarge Japheth, and may he dwell in the tents of Sem, and Canaan be his servant.” The Hebrew has here for “God” the word “Shekina,” the Holy Ghost, who spoke through Noe and gave Japheth’s sons, the white races, that colonizing instinct, civilization, progress, advancement, innovation, superiority—the unrest of bright minds which down the ages lifted them to the highest prosperity, culture and refinement. This is the reason the white men are so superior to the other races. God foresaw the Jews would reject Christ, that the white men would receive him, and thus he prepared them for their mission to receive the Gospel and carry on the Church.

This is precisely how history has unfolded, and though race-mixers hate it, they can’t deny it.

It can’t be stressed too often that the villains who call themselves “Jews” today are the very same people who are called “anti-Christs” in the Bible.

“The Jewish religion as it is today traces its descent, without a break, through all the centuries, from the Pharisees.” ~ Universal Jewish Encyclopedia, Vol. VIII, p. 474

Blood has particular relevance to how the events of the Incarnation era and subsequent history unfolded. You will recall that Esau “despised his birthright” and willfully sold it to Jacob. From Esau came the Edomites, and from Jacob came the Israelites. Edomites were called Idumæans by Romans and Greeks. According to Flavius Josephus (Antiquities, book 13, chapter 9), the Idumæans were forcibly converted to the Mosaic law by the Hasmonæan leader, John Hyrcanus. The most famous and bloodthirsty of all the Idumæans was Herod the Great, the military dictator who called himself King of Judea. His father had been installed as procurator by Julius Caesar. Herod purged the Levites from the temple, replacing them with his own sons, the Pharisees. These men usurped what remained of the Levitical priesthood after Herod murdered the chief priests. From the sect of Pharisaism came Talmudism and finally modern Judaism. According to Jesus and the Dead Sea Scrolls by J.H. Charlesworth (p. 239), “some twenty-eight high priests (only two of which were from families that had any legitimate claim) held office in little more than one century (from 37 BCE to 70 CE).”

As you can see, this casts much of what might be mistaken as small details in the New Testament in a new light. When Jesus is arrested and brought before the Sanhedrin, He is the blood heir of King David facing those who have no authority to put Him on trial. Even Roman law stripped them of the authority. Christ’s own disciples see the prophecy of Daniel’s 70th week unfolding before their eyes, yet the priestly imposters, who were denounced as vipers and hypocrites and whitewashed sepulchers by the Master, appear to be victorious. When they finally capture Jesus, which they had never been able to do, though they often tried, it shakes the disciples to the core. Even Peter denies knowing Him. When He is crucified and buried, the disciples go into hiding, afraid for their lives. Yet even then, much to the dismay of the Pharisees, the Romans hang a prophetic sign above His head: “King of the Judeans.” This was the same title that Herod had claimed for himself, just as Augustus, the son of Julius Caesar, claimed for himself the title “Son of God.” It was the census decreed by Augustus that was the reason for Jesus being born in Bethlehem, rather than Galilee, where his parents lived. This fulfilled the prophecy of Micah 5:2. As a child, Jesus avoids Herod’s holocaust in Bethlehem, where Jacob’s wife, Rachel, is buried. It is also the town where King David was born. Herod’s actions fulfill the prophecy of Jeremiah 31:15: “Rachel weeping for her children, refusing to be comforted, because they are no more.” The Pharisees see the sign that is nailed to the cross, and they know it’s true, but there is nothing they can do about it. The true-blood Son of the King is murdered by aliens, and then…the Miracle of the ages.

“Remember, O LORD, against the sons of Edom the day of Jerusalem, who said, ‘Raze it, raze it, to its very foundation!’” ~ Psalms 137:7

Anthony Bradley, the feted token Negro of Reformed Christianity, writes that hipster Christians who try to take their (white) vision of Christianity to urban minorities are little more than colonists. And as we all know from what we learned in school about Columbus, colonists be racists.

Worst of all, Bradley writes, the building of churches in inner cities has not procured racially mixed congregations, as originally designed. Instead, whites refuse to live like blacks, in squalor, and so they renovate, which drives out the blacks. This is called gentrification.

Hipster Christians talk about wanting to live among minorities but are gentrifying the neighborhoods in the process and really don’t care. Both groups mainly worship with other whites just like them. White “in-flight” is purging the city of minorities and driving the underclass to the suburbs. These white in-flight Christians often have paternalistic visions bringing redemption to the poor little brown natives who currently inhabit neighborhoods with houses needing renovation. And their inflated hipster egos portray the city as a place that needs them desperately.

Doesn’t your heart bleed for the “poor little brown natives” who are forced into the suburbs because white people plant trees in what used to be a garbage pile? There goes the neighborhood. Whites are called racists if they don’t help and colonists if they do.

The article is followed by this funny comment: “I thought stereotyping was a bad thing.” This person obviously does not understand the definition of the word “racist.” Another writes: “I’m not sure why World has your drivel on this site… No matter what whitey does to benefit minorities, you would call it paternalistic and colonialistic.” What do you think they’re paying him for, Sherlock?

We have our disagreements with Steven Wedgeworth, but this paper, in which he exposes the flaws in “two kingdoms” theology, popularized by Michael Horton and some others, is exceptional. The idea behind 2K is that God rules over church and state in different ways and to different ends, and that Christ is the redeemer of the church and is the creator and sustainer of the state and civil realm. But for Calvin and Luther and the Reformers, “the two kingdoms were not approximations of the visible institutions of Church and State, but rather that of heaven and earth or spirit and body. The spiritual kingdom was eternal and immediate, whereas the civic kingdom was temporal and always mediated, by princes or by clergy and all other men in vocations.” Thus, both the state and visible church exist in the temporal realm, and it makes no sense to say that the “two kingdoms have significantly different ends, functions, and modes of operation,” as David VanDrunen claims. As Wedgeworth writes, “The individual Christian always finds himself living in both kingdoms at the same time.” And here’s another good point: “As distasteful as it may be for moderns of all stripes, it remains true that apart from kings with religious convictions, there simply would not have been a Reformation.” This is why Calvin calls princes “vicars of God.” If this sounds like a marriage of church and state to you, it should.

The eternal and temporal kingdoms relate to one another as the soul relates to the body. A proper view of the two kingdoms legitimizes the union of church and state, as was true in medieval times, and even in our own American history. Therefore, a Christian is not to “live as a divided self, holding one notion of ‘creation’ ethics and another notion of ‘redemption’ ethics.” The faith is for all of life, and God’s law applies to all. Wedgeworth brilliantly observes that Francis Schaeffer’s critique of modern culture was not merely “that it was insufficiently Christian or churchly. He actually claimed that it was insufficiently human. His vision of a redeemed culture was a culture that existed as it was originally designed to exist… We could say that it was a vision of natural culture.”

Likewise, at the heart of Kinism is the appreciation for how God designed men, nations, and races to live. We know that we can’t really claim to be Christians if we cease to be human. We are not ghosts; we are of flesh and blood, created for divine purpose, and we trust to be made whole in the resurrection. To work against God’s purpose in the world is sin.

In Italy, female employment in the government sector is 54%. It’s 64% in Ireland, 60% in Australia, and 64% in Germany. Meanwhile, taxing and spending has taxed us and spent us, and everyone is now realizing (too late) that Keynesianism is a lie. With austerity programs beginning to be enforced throughout the West, Laura Wood asks, “Can we afford to keep employing women?” In lean economic times, the non-essential jobs are first to go. As we “sexists” have long observed, the average woman does not have the strength or the aggression to do the most essential jobs (her essential role is in the home). Men construct the buildings where women can work in air-conditioned comfort. Laura’s husband jokes that if there were any female plumbers, he would have married one.

Almost all businesses used to be “sexist.” They commonly hired single women, but once those women were married, it was commonly recognized that they were called to a higher duty. The tide began to turn, as is true with a large number of other social pathologies, in the 1950s. Here’s a 1951 letter from IBM announcing the change in corporate policy. Just as women in combat have eased the necessity for a draft by placing less demand on men, married women in the workforce have halved the salaries of men, so that two incomes are now needed to cover expenses that used to be met with one. Children have suffered as a result. They are now raised by the state instead of their mothers. It is quite possible that feminism has decimated our race even more than wars for Jews.

“We’ve been much too nice,” says Gloria Jew Steinem.

Laura Wood also has a fascinating post on maternal lust. Few want to discuss this, but maternal desire can be perverted.

A woman who wants a child no matter what – even if that child will never know his father and even if she is not married – takes maternal desire to an unreasonable and immoral extreme. She may be a nurturing mother for the children she bears. She may sacrifice herself for years to raise them well and her children may praise her for giving them life, but all that cannot hide her selfishness and maternal lust.

I believe this is also true of Christian women who, with the best of intentions, adopt racial strangers. They are told by pulpit pirates that this is what God wants, and they apply their maternal instincts in a perverted fashion, refusing to countenance the possibility that selfishness is at the root of it.

Skin cancer is on the rise for self-loathing white women.

Breastfeeding is “creepy,” says a parenting magazine. Just recently, a woman was kicked out of a Colorado Rockies game for breastfeeding her baby. Meanwhile, Jew-TV can’t show enough skin.

Just as sexual porn is a vice for men, emotional porn (Sex and the City, Twilight) is a vice for women.

Here’s a lovely Irish woman who leaves Christianity and becomes a unitarian because she can’t deal with the fact that God is not her equal. As she puts it, she doesn’t understand how God can be three persons and yet One. To make herself feel better and more intelligent, she joins a large body of heretics who are comforted by performing rituals for a “god” who is easy to understand.

Just after John Calvin denounces the error that Christ, in forgiving the harlot of her sins, intended for there to be no capital punishment for harlotry, he writes these very interesting words that also pertain to race-mixing:

Besides, the adulteress, when she bears an unlawful child, not only robs the name of the family, but violently takes away the right of inheritance from the lawful offspring, and conveys it to strangers… [L]et us remember that, while Christ forgives the sins of men, he does not overturn political order…

When John Milton said, “New presbyter is but old priest writ large,” he intended it to be a rebuke of the Scottish Presbyterians who came very close to ending prelacy in Britain. But as a friend of ours reminds us, the same could be said of race and family. Race is just family writ large. The man who claims to love his family but hates his race or is indifferent to it is a liar, just as the man who says he loves God but hates his brother is a liar (1 John 4:20).

“I wished I completely belonged somewhere,” says Obama’s sister, reflecting on the mixed-race, borderless, and kinless existence that was the legacy of the deranged white slut from Kansas whom she and Barack called their “mother.” Judeochristians are now giving their “adoptees” the same rich experience, all in the name of the gospel, of course.

“Of Whites marrying outside their race in 2008, nearly half—49 percent—married a Hispanic, 18 percent married an Asian, 14 percent married an African-American, and the remainder married someone from another group.” Even for adulterers, Negroes are the least desirable. It’s kind of amazing that articles are appearing in major newspapers about “fat, angry, loud, domineering” black women who say they are driven to such extremes from dealing with black men who are beneath them in every way. Much (but certainly not all) of this is caused by integration and the attendant expectation that black men will turn white by being in proximity with whites. It is not difficult to understand why any man who is expected to do the unnatural would respond to the pressure with violence. To be the master of a little domain is the essence of manhood.

“Evangelicals are finally starting to wake up and smell the coffee. Unfortunately, it’s about 30 years after the coffee maker shorted out and burned the house down.” (James is an excellent writer.) All of a sudden, sexual immorality is important to them.

“Jerry Falwell was proud to have a non-white heading up his university (even if he is very light skinned), and thousands of future preachers wanted to attend a school headed by a non-white to prove how much they love Jesus.” Until the news came out that the man is a liar. Still, being a liar is not enough to outweigh the diversity points, so he gets to keep his job and blame the whole affair on Calvinists. Back in the 1960s, Falwell was a strong advocate for giving white Christian children a white Christian education. Then he realized that he loved money even more.

The evangelical race-mixing nuts who grabbed their L.L. Bean safari outfits and fedora hats, and rushed off to Haiti after the big earthquake, because Negroes were in dire need of adoption by competitive, middle-aged, menopausal, white American women, couldn’t look more ridiculous today. In less than two years, the population of Haiti will be more than restored. Those kids must be eating something. Hey, here’s an idea: We could all stop having children and allow Haiti to supply us with young prodigies henceforth. This will give Christians a bountiful supply of props on which to demonstrate their superiority. Where would Christians be without their props? They would be like Gallagher or Carrot Top when the luggage is lost.

A hospital medicine cabinet in Haiti. With organizational skills like these, would you trust a Haitian doctor to even know how to prescribe lethal medicine?

Diversities “face foreclosure” and are “disproportionately affected” by foreclosure and are “hit harder” by foreclosure. The Jew-headlines never tell the truth, which is that diversities are more likely to default on their contracts. Instead, whites are blamed for discriminatory lending practices and, of course, racism. “Since there was broad agreement that minorities should borrow more, nobody is in any hurry to revisit this bipartisan blunder.”

Naturally, “minority-owned” banks are exempt from reform laws. At what point will whites, who have long been a minority in the world and will soon be a minority in America, get to take advantage of minority quotas? Or when the day soon arrives when we are officially marginalized, will we be living in white shantytowns like these Afrikaners? You see, apartheid never actually ends; it just changes hands.

Slavery lives on in the Congo. But you know what’s really evil? Those white people in South Africa and Rhodesia who built separate schools, homes, and post offices for blacks. White people are racists.

Here’s a picture of the “RapeAxe” (female condom) being sold in South Africa. The teeth on the sides embed themselves in the African Family Values.

Ah, the smell of tires burning at eventide. The mobs gathering to drag crackers from their cars and beat them to death. It must be Juneteenth! It’s always nice to see black people celebrating traditional holidays. It just feels like a Norman Rockwell painting. On Father’s Day this year, black men dominated the advertisements. And why not? Every time Father’s Day rolls around, they rush out to get someone pregnant. They must love children.

“It is a mistake to assume blacks riot because they have some legitimate grievance. Blacks are likely to riot whenever there is a large number of them together in one place. A rap concert or a basketball game is as good an excuse for a riot as ‘racial profiling and police brutality.’” ~ Jared Taylor

More bad news for the colorblind. First, recall that everyone, including the Supreme Court, knows that white children do better in white schools. But schools were forcibly integrated based on the religious belief that it would be better for non-whites, and a sacrifice that whites would have to make. Now a Dutch sociology professor has verified what other studies have shown, that non-whites do better in segregated schools. His research shows that students’ grades are inversely proportional to ethnic diversity. Any “racist” could have told you this, but sociology degrees are apparently impressive.

Illiterate blacks and the jobs they deserve. But as you know, no one in “education” is allowed to keep his job if he questions the religion of Equality.

What America is all about: “A former crack dealer and criminal speaks to the soul of the young Southern girl, giving her the courage to pursue her dreams.”

If black women die young, white “racism” must be to blame.

Blacks are upset that Cleopatra is not played in movies by a black woman (Angelina Jolie is the latest to take the role). It is obvious from her eyes, nose, and mouth that Cleopatra was white, but these days, African = black.

Remember the Black Panthers who were blocking access to polling places a couple of years ago? A DOJ attorney has resigned over Obama’s unwillingness to prosecute the bruthas. Whites and non-whites have fundamentally different views of the role of government.

Righteous Black Rage is the defense in this sickening rape trial from France. It takes a strong stomach to listen to the testimony, but it’s important to know what kind of world our people have created for our own daughters. It does no good to get angry at savages for behaving like savages. The problem is with the popular religion of Equality and the white people who bow at the altar. One commenter states it well: “We are dishonored, and dishonorable.” May God have mercy and bring us to repentance, and may the day soon come when these horrors are no more than bad memories.

In off-white Chicago, 54 people have been shot dead in just three days. How can this be? Isn’t there a handgun ban in Chicago? Liberals are flummoxed as to why criminals don’t obey the law. In Chicago schools, which are 91% off-white, and where only 3% of off-whites go on to earn a bachelor degree, so-called “students” receive $11,500 per year for their mockery of an education. (It would be racist to expel them as being unfit.) Now 1,500 of the most violent “students” will receive an additional $6,667 each from white taxes to convince them to stop acting like savages.

The Supreme Court’s gun decision is of very good effect, but it is unfortunately based on the illegal “constitutional Amendments adopted in the aftermath of the Civil War,” as Justice Samuel Alito put it. In other words, it is based on “settled law” rather than the intent of those who wrote the Bill of Rights. I think Alexander H. Stevens, the Vice President of the Confederacy, said it best: “One of the most striking characteristics of insanity, in many instances, is forming correct conclusions from fancied or erroneous premises.”

The 50 best guns ever made.

Gun control is racist.

Tom Emmer, the Republican candidate for governor in Minnesota, has an excellent idea: he wants to defend the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution by ensuring that federal laws only apply in Minnesota if they are validated by super-majorities of the state legislature.

For Supreme Court nominee Jew Kagan, the NRA is like the KKK. And here’s a good Ann Coulter column about how, for Kagan’s liberal Manhattan family, “nothing was sacrosanct.”

When liberals say “nothing is sacrosanct,” they mean “nothing other Americans consider sacrosanct is sacrosanct.” They demonstrate their open-mindedness by ridiculing other people’s dogma, but will not brook the most trifling criticism of their own dogmas.

Sounds like some Christians I’ve met.

“An overweight Jewish lesbian, whose career seems to have been put on fast track by her political supporters both inside and outside the media and someone who if she held diametrically opposed views, would not even be considered for a grounds crew post at Harvard, she is the quintessential symbol of Obama’s America.” ~ Jew Paul Gottfried

According to Jews, Jewish terrorism is “romantic” and Jewish terrorists are “freedom fighters.” Aren’t words remarkably plastic little things? I wonder if Jews would equate Irgun to the NRA and KKK.

“Any other government that murdered thousands of civilians in other countries, as Israel does routinely in Lebanon, Gaza, and the West Bank, would have its entire government and military on trial before the War Crimes Tribunal at the Hague… Every time the rest of the world tries to hold the Israeli government accountable for its crimes, the US vetoes the UN resolution.” ~ Paul Craig Roberts

Jews reveal their plans for the world. Don’t say you haven’t been warned.

Paul McCartney equates global warming deniers with Holocaust deniers. Maybe there’s something to that.

Jew Noah Feldman, writing in the Jew York Times about Jew Elena Kagan, calls it a “cause for celebration” that whites no longer care about religious faith and ethnic homogeneity.

Unlike almost every other dominant ethnic, racial or religious group in world history, white Protestants have ceded their socioeconomic power by hewing voluntarily to the values of merit and inclusion, values now shared broadly by Americans of different backgrounds. The decline of the Protestant elite is actually its greatest triumph.

Hunter Wallace replies:

Of course the same Jews who celebrate WASP colorblindness and encourage WASP racial masochism are the same ones who push the hardest for “inclusiveness” and “diversity” in every institution. The Supreme Court needs a lesbian because she is a lesbian; a Hispanic because she is Hispanic; a negro because he is a negro; a woman because she is a woman, etc.

Strangely, Jews never write about how it would be a “cause for celebration” if Israel stopped outlawing Jewish-Arab marriages, elected a Palestinian Prime Minister, balanced ethnic and religious control of the Knesset, and encouraged non-Jewish immigration. Oh, right, this is necessary to prevent the rise of another Hitler. Well then, I retract my anti-Semitic musings.

The Judeo-Marxists in control of Britain are now trying to imprison Nick Griffin for not updating the BNP website fast enough with a link to the new mandated constitution that admits non-whites to the party. Jews will never rest until similar laws are enforced in America.

Every real nation is a country of common blood, as Thomas Jefferson said. The only “nations” that are defined by creeds are totalitarian.

“Americanism,” as explained by a Jew. The primary goal of “Americanism” is war for Israel. This is usually described as “defending freedom” against “the ascendance of evil.” One of the primary assumptions of “Americanism” is that the all-purpose, self-rising “values” of the founding fathers (now called “founders” out of respect for feminists) is always more important than the blood of the founding fathers. Hence, while “Americanism” can fit any mold for any and all people, its objective never changes.

It’s remarkable that Igor Stravinsky was arrested in 1940 for tampering with the Star-Spangled Banner (he re-orchestrated the “public property” for the Boston Symphony), but Americanists and “loose constructionists” are free to tamper at will with what was in the minds of our “racist,” Christian forefathers.

Despite supposedly not existing or being merely a social construct, race is of utmost importance to the government. What else do you know that is so important to those who believe it doesn’t exist? The options of “unknown,” “multiracial,” or “declined to answer” have been excised from school questionnaires. But remember, you’re a racist if you disagree with conventional wisdom about race. You’re free to think about it and talk about it, as long as you agree with liberals. Otherwise, you should lose your job.

“When Solzhenitsyn came to the West in the 1970’s he stated that the most striking thing about the European people was their lack of courage. And of course Solzhenitsyn was not saying that there were not any Europeans left who would rush into a burning building to save a child or face a firing squad without flinching; he was talking about the courage to defend one’s people against an implacable enemy. In order to have the latter type of courage a people have to be a people. They must feel bound to their people by ties of faith and race. The problem with the Europeans is that they don’t believe they are a people and they do not have faith.”

“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” ~ G.K. Chesterton

This writer is chagrined to discover that “racists” are always right.

This is a jaw-dropping statistic: If present trends continue, 82% of population growth through 2050 will be from immigrants who arrived here since 2005, and their descendants.

Mint.com links to VDare in an article about the high costs of immigration, and then the editor puts up a special page to apologize for the racism of referring to facts. (Facts are anti-Semitic, too.)

An endangered species on its way to oblivion, but this particular species gets no sympathy from liberal tree-huggers.

“The world is indeed full of peril, and in it there are many dark places; but still there is much that is fair, and though in all lands love is now mingled with grief, it grows perhaps the greater.” ~ The Fellowship of the Ring

Every race except Non-Hispanic Whites will make a state’s abortion rate go up. Jews are the biggest promoters of (non-Jewish) murder.

Hispanic geography, brought to you by the Woman of the Year.

“I thought the wailings we heard at night were the coyotes barking at the moon. I didn’t know until later that these sounds were the cries of women being raped in the Mexican desert, some less than a hundred yards away from the border.”

Swans are bigots.

“If this doesn’t stop soon,” Goldstein said, “we’ll have to find a solution for the black swans in order to restore tranquility to their lives. In the meantime we are trying all sorts of intermediary solutions to open the water channels to them. It’s funny to say, but the caretakers are using peace activists to deal with this.”

Indians have a better sense of humor than negrified, judaicized, hyper-sensitive Americans.

I wonder how long it will be before this website is denounced as racist.

The NBA, which is 80% black in a country that is 13% black, gets an A for “diversity.” Read about the unbearable whiteness of soccer. The top five players in the world are white. Therefore, 80% black is “diverse” but 80% white is not diverse.

Look at these stunning pictures of the Gulf oil spill.

Far worse than Watergate.

John Marshall is organizing some Kinist meet-and-greets.

Wow! Have you visited Instauration Online lately? Twenty-one of the twenty-five volumes are now scanned, and soon the collection will be complete. Wilmot Robertson would be proud to see his hard work kept alive. Thank goodness for Al Gore, toiling late into the night in his laboratory with his masseuse, to bring us this wonderful Internet thing. Like Edison, he must have burned the midnight oil. Or was it motion lotion?

It was very kind of James Edwards to call our review of his new book the best 30th birthday present he could have imagined. Thirtieth birthday! That makes me feel old. I’m somewhat embarrassed to say that I was one of the dittoheads who rushed out to buy Rush Limbaugh’s book, The Way Things Ought to Be, in 1992. That was before James was shaving. It made the career of publisher Judith Regan and it launched Limbaugh’s TV show, which was produced by Roger Ailes, who is now the head honcho at Fox. Limbaugh’s broadcasting skills are considerable, but I can tell you for a fact that Racism, Schmacism is of greater substance, better-written, and simply right. James doesn’t have a media empire backing him, but don’t let that fool you into thinking that he has not written a superior book. There I go again, using the word “superior.” I need to be careful or someone will accuse me of being a supremacist.

There are many political books published that hinge on some aspect of a presidential administration. A select few of these hinge on a racial aspect, such as Steve Sailer’s America’s Half-Blood Prince. Racism, Schmacism is not the first book to poke holes in the ridiculous plaudits garnered by Obama as a race-transcending messiah, but it could very well be the best book of the genre because, in addition to this, it gives solid evidence that our people have been neutered by what Joseph Sobran calls semitically correct language.

Behold
The arch-enchanters wand!—itself a nothing!—
But taking sorcery from the master-hand
To paralyse the Cæsars, and to strike
The loud earth breathless!

Our language has been controlled through the media, and wresting control of it again is easier said than done. As Napoleon Bonaparte knew, “Four hostile newspapers are more to be feared than a thousand bayonets.” But when the emperor parades down the boulevard naked, men of courage do not shrink from pointing out the obvious (excuse the puns), even when they must stand alone. Courage is the deciding factor. As Shakespeare observed in Hamlet, “many wearing rapiers are afraid of goosequills.”

Not James Edwards. He shows that, in the Age of Obama, the word “racism” still carries the same counter-intuitive definitions, and all the old double standards still apply. For instance, according to conventional wisdom, race exists merely as a social construct, which is to say that it is not real. But the government and media and courts expend a tremendous amount of time and energy and money to ensure that opinions about this thing that does not exist meet official approval. From the Census to the student body to the surgery room, race is of utmost importance. It is said that racial diversity is “our greatest strength,” so great and so strong as to require vigilant enforcement. As always, the challenge for liberals is to keep whites anaesthetized to their own dispossession, and if anything like the Tea Party movement arises, their job is to assuage the grumbling masses by steering reforms into the black hole of a political party owned and operated by the establishment. (See how the Republican Party succeeded in neutralizing anti-abortion dissent.) By doing so, they guarantee that whites are ashamed to be white and Christians are ashamed to act upon their faith in public, except when God’s help is needed for one of Israel’s wars.

This game plan was rather successful until the fabled post-racial future became the majority-minority present in these once-United States. Thus, Edwards begins his book with the ludicrous spectacle of John McCain dumping his bid for the presidency he long sought, for fear of being called a racist. McCain is representative of what our race has become. We are no longer blessed with men who stand on principle. Politicians today are as craven as the voters; they are made for each other. Obama’s accession to the White House is what naturally rushes in to the vacuum when white men take leave of their senses and backbones.

If we fail to turn this tide, we will be well on our way to extinction in 20 years, impotent and oppressed minorities in the country we inherited from our own brave fathers. Most of our kinsmen still fail to realize this, but with each passing year more of them become aware. The first thing they begin to realize is what Edwards has long preached: “A racist is a white person.” More specifically, a racist is one who:

1) is white,
2) loves being white,
3) loves the country he inherited from his ancestors,
4) wants his children and grandchildren to be like him and his ancestors, and
5) doesn’t believe that any of the above is replaceable.

If this is how our enemies define “racism,” let us revel in it. Let every man, woman, and child among us shout from the rooftops that we are proud racists! This is what our Southern ancestors did with the epithet “rebel.” To rebel against the rebellion against the Constitution is to be a rebel indeed. We too must choose between racism and patricide. Whether to triumph or not, we vow to stand with our race.

Many average folks came to realize that “a racist is a white person” when they saw that race was not finally vanquished by the election of Obama, as his supporters exulted. Instead of transcending race, Obama has proved that his whole life has been a quest to seek validation from his black kin. Discrimination against whites has only intensified. The Attorney General felt perfectly at ease in calling us a race of cowards, despite the fact that we have bled ourselves dry to accommodate and assimilate diversities. White people who thought that electing Obama would end their status as second-class citizens have had a rude awakening. Even Rep. Steve King of Iowa (the state where early white support for Obama ended Hillary Clinton’s campaign) is stating publicly that Obama favors the black race.

It is crucial that this book be placed in the hands of such people. It will be to them like a light cutting through the fog. But it is about much, much more than politics. It explores the differences in how whites and non-whites think. For instance, jokes are regularly considered “hate speech” when told by whites. “Hate crimes” are designed to be charged overwhelmingly to whites. The double standards continue to exist because of the tendency of whites to comply with the law even when it is biased against them, and because of the steadfast desire of non-whites to bias the law in their favor. One side is ethical to its own hurt while the other is unashamedly unethical.

Liberals and conservatives alike get very upset when they hear certain words of old that are believed to have unfairly kept minorities “in their place.” Edwards has done a great service by showing that the word “racist” is now designed to keep white people in their place. It is a “slur directed at white people in order to shame us into voting, believing or behaving a certain way.” The old words are verboten, but the new, undefinable word “racist” (first used by Communists) is considered perfectly acceptable, from the pulpit to the classroom to the workplace.

Edwards documents stories from recent years that seem almost unbelievable, but they are all too shockingly true. Such weighty matters of life and death could be ponderous and gloomy in the hands of another writer, but the style of James Edwards is to laugh in the face of the devil (i.e., the SPLC), to mock him, to dare him to make a move. Even in the face of our demise as a people, Edwards is light-hearted and carefree, or so his prose indicates. He understands the art of war. He drives his enemies mad by deriding them as fools. They can’t stop talking about him. In recent weeks, he has drawn the ire of MSNBC’s Keith Olbermann and Media Matters. He has scooped the entire, big-budget mainstream media. Well-funded anti-white hate groups have teams dedicated to monitoring his every move. And still he laughs. He is inspiring white men and women everywhere to reclaim their birthright. We believe his first book (the first of many, we hope) makes an excellent case that the charge of “racism” has lost its sting. Let’s spread the word that we are no longer intimidated, James Edwards least of all.

Radio, web, print… When will he have a TV show?

Expecting white people to be represented in a mural in an area that is overwhelmingly white is racist. An Arizona talk show host has been fired for questioning why the largest figure in the mural, ten times larger than the others, is black, when he says he knows all of four black families in the area. “The focus doesn’t need to be on what’s different, the focus doesn’t need to be on the minority all the time.” This statement was followed by the perennial favorite of white folks everywhere (say it with me now): “I am not a racist individual.” He was fired anyway, despite his assurances. The attached video is absolutely unbelievable; white people cheering for their own dispossession.

Meanwhile, down in Texas…

You’d think that if we’re not supposed to care about race, we shouldn’t care about race. But, just like radical left wingers, “colorblind conservatives” think that not caring about race means caring a great deal about race, and imposing racial quotas in order to show just how “little” we care about race.

When you fly into Atlanta’s Hartsfield Airport (the largest airport in this former nation) and ascend the escalator to the terminal, you’ll see above your head a huge, 70 foot wide mural with hardly any white people in it. It’s rather ironic in light of the city’s slogan: “The City Too Busy to Hate.” This was painted after the 1996 Olympics, when the city was majority black. Now, I think the city has reverted to being slim-majority white, but rest assured that even now, if such a mural were to be painted, it would be considered racist for there to be more than a token number of whites represented.

The focus must certainly be “on the minority all the time” because popular orthodoxy dictates that whites must pay for their crimes of racism by going extinct. Even the rules governing elections must change if the vote favors whites. Whites must not be allowed a heritage to celebrate. They must be scorned until they are shamed into killing themselves. (See Germany, South Africa, etc.) This genocide is done in the name of LOVE, of course, and all attempts to resist it are HATE. The idea is that once you realize you are EVIL, you should be glad to perish. You should consider it your duty. This is the “redemption” of the anti-gospel.

Speak of the devil. R.C. Sproul Jr. is back with more of his anti-Christian and anti-white folly, and of course, once again, he is the Victim. (Accept no victim substitutes.) For a man who doesn’t believe in race, he sure does write about it a lot, and always with veiled references to us.

Still others draw lines [for family] based on secondary genetic markers. They believe that their family consists of those who share a common genetic makeup. Their loyalties go to a particular skin color. These folks consider my own family to be “race traitors” because God has blessed us with a little boy whose ancestors hail from Africa. My little boy may have brown hair, brown eyes, and brown knees, but he is a Sproul, and like the rest of us, he is called to seek first the kingdom of God…

My kin are not those who can trace their lineage back to the British Isles. My kin are those who have been bought by the blood of the Lamb.

If this weren’t posted on the Ligonier website, you would think it’s a parody of anti-familism! What Sproul dismisses as “secondary genetic markers” are considered so important to God that He has used them to divide men from Genesis onwards. God does not desire an amalgamated humanity resembling Sproul’s frankenfamily. Instead, He seeks to bless our covenant children with homogeneity, from which flows safety, security, and trust. It’s important for all men to have loyalty to their own heritage and kindred, even as they honor their own parents above the parents of others. This is the very definition of the Fifth Commandment. As it says in Proverbs 13:22, a faithful man leaves an inheritance to his children’s children. This birthright is passed according to blood, and therefore by what Sproul dismisses as “a particular skin color.” Race-traitors and hate-pastors like Sproul believe instead that a faithful man leaves an inheritance to “those who have been bought by the blood of the Lamb.” To reject the gift of lineage, as P.C. Fool Jr. does, is to join the ranks of the fatherless, which the Apostle James tells us is pitiable. Each passing year proves the wisdom of Sproul’s former presbytery in defrocking him from the ministry.

Notice that Sproul refuses to call his “son” an “African” or “black.” He always uses something more verbose, like “having ancestors who hail from Africa.” This is his way of saying that where the boy was born and to whom makes no difference whatsoever—he’s a Sproul, dangit! If the Apostle Paul had agreed with this then Romans 9:3 would have completely lost its impact. Instead of one of the deepest and purest statements of love in our language, it would have been reversed to a statement of unambiguous hatred.

The problem for Sproulian preachers of hate is that our spiritual kinship with the Christians of the world and our identification with them as a “chosen race,” a “holy nation,” and a “royal priesthood” (1 Peter 2:9) is only spiritually meaningful if our bonds of blood have physical meaning. My love for a brother in Christ is only significant to me if I know the importance of my brothers in the flesh. Otherwise, what does the word “brother” mean? A spiritual “nation” cannot exist in the absence of physical nations, just as the Church of the Elect cannot exist without physical, visible churches. How does one explain to a “brother in Christ” that there is no brotherhood and loyalty to genetic family and kin? Only a liar would traffick in such nonsense. And since, by his own admission, Sproul has no loyalty to his own kin, he expects the same of his “son.” He is not disturbed in the slightest about taking the boy from his own people, because he doesn’t recognize blood loyalty. But in the process, he has saddled the poor boy with a lifetime of disillusionment and quite possibly rage. If so, it will be spun as another strand in Sproul’s web of victimhood. Where does this leave his children of blood, who were born with the right to expect from their father a faithful inheritance, just as the heirs of our people have the right to demand a future from us?

Consider the absurdity of the race-mixing “Christian” who professes to loathe “racism” yet is himself a white supremacist who, in the sight of as many witnesses as he can find, painstakingly shoulders the White Man’s Burden. The number of white Christians who earnestly desire to assimilate a respectable number of blacks in their churches and communities is legion, yet they have no desire to be where blacks actually live, unless it is for a photo-op. The black people themselves are merely props for white vanity. Vain whites patronize blacks and mestizos by pretending that they have “traditional family values” and look the other way when the same steadfastly refuse to vote in accordance with their “traditional family values.” Liberals have never met a problem that paternalism (and of course, money) could not fix.

You can also see how the anti-gospel of our time carries with it gnostic heresies that are thousands of years old. The focus is solely on what we know rather than who we are, because it is believed that the flesh is wicked and must be suppressed in favor of heavenly things. This is the root of the idea that faith is all-important and things like blood and nationality are antiquated relics of the period of time prior to the Cross. You’ll hear many Judeochristians say that there can be no such thing as a Christian nation, and they cite Philippians 3:20 as proof, where Paul writes that “our citizenship is in heaven.” But it was also Paul who privileged himself, in Acts, to appeal to his Roman citizenship and then to Caesar directly.

If you think Sproul Jr. is a parody of the anti-familist fanatic, he’s a piker next to Gary North. This is from the March 1990 issue of North’s Christian Reconstruction newsletter:

Christians acknowledge that the church alone will survive as an institution in eternity. Both the family and historical civil governments will disappear in eternity. Non-Christians have no biblical doctrine of eternity, so they deny this unique status to the church. This is why both familism (patriarchal clans) and statism have been the chief rivals of the church in history.

“In Gen. 11 we have an attempt to build the first ‘United Nations’ building (Gen. 11:4), which kept the people together in a one-world government instead of spreading them out as national entities as God had intended. In Gen. 11:5-9, God frustrated the building of the tower by causing them to speak different languages, and then reaffirmed nationalism: Gen. 11:9. God further reaffirms nationalism in Deut. 32:8 and Acts 17:26. National entities will continue even during Christ’s millennial rule on earth (Isa. 2:4; 66:18; Rev. 12:5; 20:3,8), and perhaps even in heaven (Rev. 21:24,26). Nationalism is God’s order for the human race.” ~ John Eidsmoe, God & Caesar: Political Faith & Political Action

The average person can only relate to an inner group of 30-50 people. The next ring of loyalty extends to about 150 people. The circles radiate outward in a concentric pattern with steadily decreasing allegiance. Battle units provide a helpful analogy for loyalty, from squad to platoon to company. This is how the world works, and it fits the “racist” model. Human history does not comport with the rainbow-christian and colorblind-conservative model, in which we are to treat all souls equally. When liar-pastors teach that race is “insignificant,” and borders are meaningless by consequence, it makes about as much sense as telling the Army that squads, platoons, and companies are irrelevant to efffectiveness. This advice will be ignored because experience proves it to be false.

As soon as next year, whites will become a minority in their own country among newborns. White children are now less than 8% of Houston school in-mates and less than 5% of Dallas school in-mates. Meanwhile, every year there are 190,000 fewer Germans in the world.

Here’s another article on evangelicals for amnesty.

Political conservatives have long balked at an immigration policy that includes what they term “amnesty” for illegal immigrants, but the evangelicals see the issue differently.

“A significant part of our churches and denominations are part of the immigrant community so we have a very close connection and a very great interest,” Leith Anderson, president of the influential lobbying group National Evangelical Association, said Wednesday, “…but our interest is really rooted in what the Bible teaches how we treat people and how we treat particularly people who are aliens or strangers in the land.”

Anderson’s group last year authored a resolution in favor of reform using biblical immigrants Abraham, Joseph, Naomi, Mary and Jesus. Their examples, the group said, “reveal God’s hand in the movement of people and are illustrations of faith and God in difficult circumstances.”

Translation: God hates borders. This is clearly false to anyone who has actually read the Bible. Jacob had far more respect for his own brother Esau’s borders than alleged Christians have for ours.

As Jared Taylor mocks, there we were, choking on our own homogeneity, and the Guatemalans and Cambodians came to rejuvenate this dung heap of a country. Jared’s 2010 CofCC speech is excellent. It has more laugh lines than I’ve heard in any of his Amren speeches. I especially love his absurd example of homeowners in an all-white neighborhood finding that a litter of Mexicans has moved in. They say, “Hot damn, look at all this diversity (our greatest strength)! My property value will go through the roof!” That’s when the same white people quickly put their houses up for sale, move to an overwhelmingly white suburb of a suburb, and donate to the Somalian Relocation Ministry at their new megachurch.

Those of you who have never had the pleasure of witnessing a Sam Dickson speech will enjoy this (part 1, part 2, part 3, part 4), though the sound and picture are terrible. The facilities are also undesirable because, as you know, leftists used death threats to ensure that these American citizens were prevented from exercising their constitutional rights to speech and assembly. The “tolerant” are the most intolerant people you’ll ever meet. I’m not sure why Sam calls himself a liberal Christian when everything else about him is conservative.

We learn from Crazy Uncle Tom Fleming that when abrasive paleoconservatives meet abrasive libertarians, they call each other Nazis. C.U. Tom explains that libertines defected from the John Randolph Club because Hans Hoppe denounced Sam Francis’s economic nationalism, which Pat Buchanan tried to carry to the presidency, “as a form of national socialism.” Then Fleming replied that Hoppe has no room to talk after a reference in his speech to “Jews, Gypsies, and other human garbage.” Fleming carefully distances himself from nationalists as well as Nazis, but explains that he was compelled to respond to Hoppe, who is published by Peter Brimelow, who is therefore no longer Fleming’s friend. Crazy Uncle Tom has also called Roger Devlin a “misogynist” for his excellent essay on female hypergamy.

Meet the generation of perpetual adolescents, raised by feminists and the state.

Homeland Security is hard at work protecting the border. No, not the Mexican border, silly! They’re preventing Shi’ite aliens from crossing the border into Saudia Arabia from Yemen. What else did you think Homeland Security should be doing with your taxes?

Islam is all about fostering relationships.

Edgar Steele has been charged with trying to kill several people, including his wife. The FBI has a long history of entrapment, but if they really taped him planning the murders, it sounds as though he’s guilty. His political beliefs also bias the judicial system against him, as is clear from the article. The article ends with this “wink, wink” statement, which is supposed to make you reply, “Well, of course he’s a murderer, if he’s also a Holocaust denier.”

Last year, in response to the shooting of a security guard at the national Holocaust Memorial Museum by neo-Nazi James von Brunn, Steele said, “Why did von Brunn choose to unload at the National Holocaust Museum? Because it is an edifice to one of the most stupendous lies of modern times, paid for and maintained with taxpayer dollars, that’s why.”

This is absolutely true, but according to the Jew-media, if you agree with it, you’re just a step away from taking to the streets to fire upon security guards. As we show repeatedly, such irresponsible lies from the press has the effect of inciting violence from small-minded thugs. But the inciters of violence are never taken to trial. They never have to pay for their hate speech. This goes to show that our Bill of Rights only works for white Christians, like the men who wrote it.

At almost age 90, Helen Thomas, the “dean of the Washington press corps,” has been fired for disputing the unquestionable doctrines of Zionism. So much blood has been shed and money spent to install Jews in a part of the world that will be eternally hostile to them, and where they are being rapidly outbred, that no one is allowed to speak an unfavorable word about it. Everyone is well aware of the new blasphemy laws, and they are all written by Jews. If you want to make a lot of noise about the British getting out of Ireland, no one will care. But voicing “heretical” opinions about Jews results in job loss for a woman whose career was called an “institution.” This is just like James Watson, the most highly esteemed scientist in the world, perhaps, losing his job for voicing “heretical” and entirely truthful opinions about Negroes. Yet we live in a world where Jew Larry David can piss on a portrait of Christ, call it entertainment, and get gullible white post-Christians to pay to have this filth brought into their homes.

Helen Thomas was the only White House reporter who opposed Bush’s War on Terra. Now, for offending the delicate “apple of God’s eye,” she has lost her job. Jews must never be criticized, but Jews are free to slander all others. Richard Jew Cohen, in the Washington Post, takes this opportunity to call Poles thieves, murderers and haters, and General George Patton a “hideous” “bigot.” So the nation of Poland is guilty of “sheer ethnic hatred” of Jews, but Jews are not guilty of “sheer ethnic hatred” of Poles. Once you cut through the emotionalism, you see that Thomas is correct: Jews would be much safer today in Europe than in Israel, despite the slander of Jews and their constant accusations of anti-Semitism. The West cut its own veins to give them a homeland of their own.

“In another time and place, perhaps even in the U.S.A. not long ago, shame would prevent such a mob attack on Helen Thomas, a 90 year-old woman… Note the disproportion between President Obama’s immediate condemnation of Miss Thomas’ casual remarks and his non-reaction to the American citizen shot four times in the head by Israeli IDF thugs aboard a humanitarian ship in international waters. The disparity reveals an insanity of rabbinic proportions.” (Our friend Winston Smith was the first I saw who made this point here.)

Remember the Liberty, but not if you want a career in Washington.

Regardless of whether or not the attack on the USS Liberty was a mistake, the failure of the United States government to protect the Liberty when it was under attack was absolutely deliberate. Then, when faced with conflicting testimony between the American survivors of the attack and the foreign country that attacked them, the U.S. government and media sided with the foreign government. No country would treat it ordinary citizens, much less its honorable servicemen, this way.

I love Steve Sailer’s erudition. This is so very true:

What you get in trouble for is saying what everybody figures is true. In contrast, the Vice President of the United States frequently says stuff that makes no sense, but nobody cares because it’s just random gibberish. Nobody is offended because it’s not true. What gets you in trouble is when you point out that the emperor has no clothes.

But it turns out that Hans Christian Andersen was wrong. No one would actually laugh at the naked emperor. Instead, they would turn with anger on the little boy for pointing out the obvious. They would call him a conspiracy theorist. There are entire industries based on convincing the public that obvious truths must be false. (One of these is that the anus is not a sex organ.)

Oh, dear. Jew Emma Lazarus is widely associated with the Judaizing of our country and with turning the Statue of Liberty into a beacon of heterogeneity. But her good will apparently did not extend to Orthodox Jews. “She suggested that another place, not America, should be found for that unappealing ‘mass of semi-Orientals, Kabbalists, and Hassidim.’” Such hatred. Such racism. What’s next, recolonization to Liberia?

It’s obvious that Egyptians care more about their own future than Americans. Every Egyptian who marries a Jew will now be stripped of his citizenship, and his children will be stripped of their citizenship as well. This is very similar to what we read in Ezra and Nehemiah.

There’s a difference between assimilating into the economy and assimilating into the culture, as Pat Buchanan says here. “We’re becoming a Tower of Babel.” The interviewer calls the new Texas school curriculum controversial for being sympathetic to Joe McCarthy. Funny how the liberals who love to demonize McCarthy never want to teach students about Alger Hiss. (Not even children in Christian schools know the name.) They truly hope that you’ll never read the book Witness by Whittaker Chambers. Instead, they hope that you’ll view the countless Jew-films on blacklisted Hollywood directors. One is “controversial” and the other is not.

The Almighty Genome is the latest idol of the reprobate to gloriously flame out. The next idol: Soccer. They can dress up their Wilsons as Tom Hanks did in that castaway movie. They’ll keep trying to find some false god to unite all people, but only the gospel can do it (and that’s not the gospel of race-mixers). White-worshippers, whose religion is race, are even more pathetic than Tom Hanks conversing with a piece of rubber on a deserted island.

The decline of France in pictures.

At the World Cup in South Africa, someone played a joke by pairing Nigeria with Germany on the schedule.

That’s just ghetto. I think we need to elevate the level of discourse in sports broadcasts.

These “traditional African instruments” are predictably so cacophonous that almost everyone who is not a savage wants them banned from the World Cup. Watch the clip from Zulu at the bottom of that page to see a reenactment of Rorke’s Drift, one of the finest acts of heroism in all of white history, right up there with Thermopylae and the Alamo. It is also an example of the angelic music of Europeans defeating the animalistic jungle grunts of savages.

In honor of the fine people that Zora Neale Hurston affectionately labeled “zigaboos” and “eight-balls,” we offer this piece of “traditional music,” with bombastic flatulence in the night:

We know that the making of fine music has nothing to do with IQ. Some of the lowest-IQ whites to be found are the hillbillies of Appalachia, and with instruments they crafted by hand, they invented genres that still rake in billions. It must be encoded in the blood.

“A lot of people [in Africa] still have that mentality that the European knows more,” said Thomas Mlambo, a well-known TV presenter and analyst on the South Africa-based sports network SuperSport. Mr. Mlambo has just been awarded the Nobel Prize for Perspicacity.

Obama’s National Academy of Sciences is now blaming low black IQ on the “post-traumatic stress” of living in the midst of rampant crime. Oh, good answer! I think these “scientists” deserve a round of applause. It’s not easy to come up with such clever excuses.

Praise the Lord for an “unprecedented” consecutive death penalty sentencing for the leader of the Knoxville Horror. Deena Christian asked the HNIC if he “bothered” to learn the name of her daughter before raping and killing her, but the answer to this question is obvious to anyone who is familiar with Tiger Woods. Tiger has still not apologized to the white bimbos he treated as meat, despite his public pretended repentance. At no time did he even buy them anything, even though he thought nothing of gambling away $150,000 on a single hand of poker with his friend, Michael Jordan. Nigger rapists are more at ease with abusing white women because there is no call of the blood. It is easier to despoil a competitor’s vineyard than your own. This is also the basis of the Jewish pornography and sex slavery industries. Many white men (Christian and non-Christian alike) have a weakness for Internet porn, but the best way to cure it is to have a racial awakening. As soon as you realize the motivation for polluting the minds and bodies of those poor young girls, it’s hardly possible to look at them without feeling nausea and anger. “Racism” and a delight in God’s law are the double-shot cure for porn addiction.

I highly recommend going to 44:23 in this Rushdoony conversation. Rush observes that the Negro only recognizes authority as brute force, and does not respect anything else. White compassion is interpreted as weakness by blacks. Whites simply don’t understand how they can pay for a Negro to go to college, only to be repaid with contempt. Otto Scott adds that these lessons have still not been learned by whites who wish to assist blacks in South Africa, or even in America. “The assumption here is that everyone is the same…there is no difference in ethnic groups… It is considered almost a sin to recognize cultural differences, yet they are very deep.”

“It does not do to leave a live dragon out of your calculations, if you live near him.” ~ The Hobbit

Behold the black voter. Alvin Greene has won the Democratic primary for U.S. Senator in once-white South Carolina. He went to no campaign events, spent no money, gave no speeches, was kicked out of the Army, is unemployed, lives with his mother, and is facing felony charges for showing lewd photos to students. Clearly, he is an ideal representative for black people, and the black voters agree.

This is by far the best Glenn Beck video ever. It’s just hilarious. He claims that the Revolutionary War was won by a black man, and a couple of Michael Jackson’s kids, off in the corners of paintings, were not merely slaves but were heroes who were crucial to the First War of secession and independence. He even calls them founding fathers! (This is even better than Rainbow Confederates pretending that slaves fought as soldiers in defense of the South.) As I said, it’s his best video ever. He talks to someone off-screen named David, and if I had to guess, it’s David Barton of Wallbuilders, who has made a career of peddling baloney like this. His biggest whopper is that we have lived under the Constitution for more than 200 years, completely skipping over the secession of the South and creation of a new nation, which was the most significant event in American history. Afterwards, the “USA” had to be reconstituted. Amendments to the old Constitution were passed illegally. The president became an emperor. Like Louis XIV, who ordered that the words Ultima Ratio Regmim (“the final argument of kings”) be engraved on French cannons, Lincoln crushed the attempt of millions to peacefully withdraw from a voluntary union. It would be wrong to honor such men by calling them kings. The origin of “king” is “kinning,” and when a king brings his own people under an iron yoke, he has forfeited the throne. (See this map for a visual on how decentralized was the Holy Roman “Empire.”) Now David Barton (I think) is teaching Glenn Beck a bastardized view of history that doesn’t even bear resemblance to what the old Yankees believed. Glenn Beck is awesome. As our friend Mark says, he induces gales of regilititious matickular spasmodics, augmented by wibxicretious phelegfarstions extraordinaire, as noted by Rosencrantz & Pizzahutterites in their seventeen volume ”Opus Day-O, Daylight Come and Me Wanna Add Syllables.”

Our former nation’s founding documents now require this disclaimer, since they were written by Christian, fag-hating “racists”:

This book is a product of its time and does not reflect the same values as it would if it were written today. Parents might wish to discuss with their children how views on race, gender, sexuality, ethnicity, and interpersonal relations have changed since this book was written before allowing them to read this classic work.

How the South was saved: by Andrew Jackson removing Indians far from us. It’s hard to hold his opposition to secession against him. He was a genuine hero.

On August 30, 1813, Creek Indians attacked Fort Mims, a makeshift enclosure about 40 miles north of Mobile, Alabama. They came in through an open gate and killed every man, woman, and child they could. They picked up small children by the heels and smashed their brains out against the stockade fence. They scalped the women, and cut unborn children out of pregnant mothers. Some 20 to 40 escaped but more than 250 people were butchered. Thus began the Creek War, and Andrew Jackson’s first major military command…

The great Shawnee chief Tecumseh was no doubt expressing his sincerest desires at an 1811 war council meant to stir up as many tribes as possible: “Let the white race perish!… Burn their dwellings, destroy their stock, slay their wives and children, that the very breed may perish”…

Andrew Jackson genuinely believed that what he had accomplished rescued these people from inevitable annihilation. And although that statement sounds monstrous, and although no one in the modern world wishes to accept or believe it, that is exactly what he did.

In Southern women, propriety, hospitality, and femininity have given way to Paula Deen and other exemplars of white trash. In like manner, the race of the Lees and Washingtons and Jeffersons and Calhouns are represented today by vile bastards like the Hank Williams progeny. We trust that our Lord will resurrect the South.

In an act of charity towards preachers everywhere, the state of New York is going to change its Office of Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities to a name without the word “retard” in it. Lawmakers vow to continue calling us “racists” and “anti-Semites,” however, despite our displeasure with the words. Also, Native Americans must never be called “Indians,” simply because they dislike the word. Calling them by a name they don’t like would be a sin on our part, but it’s perfectly appropriate for anyone who wishes to call us “racists,” regardless of our wishes. This is what equality is all about.

Hot on the heels of his excellent new book (our review is forthcoming), James Edwards interviewed Tim Adams, the former clerk of elections in Honolulu, who claims to have witnessed proof that Obama was not born in Hawaii. As everyone should now know, the 7-minute interview made such a splash that WorldNetDaily and other major media outlets ran with it. It has been hilarious to see the entire mainstream media scooped by so-called “racists.” But then WorldNetDaily returned to its old tabloid tricks. They now claim that Adams “burst onto the scene last week in a WND story.” They go on to say that their “original report about Adams’ claims has already been made into a YouTube video, getting thousands of hits.” But the original YouTube video came from James Edwards at the CofCC conference, as did the “original report.” Joe Farah is shameless, and he knows that no one “important” will call him on his lies.

But here’s the best part. Keith Olbermann jumps all over WND for picking up a story scooped by those who oppose miscegenation (yes, this is his argument, though he has no complaint when Israel does it), and for (as he puts it) quoting “white supremacists” during the term of a black president. You just can’t make this stuff up. Seriously, how does Olbermann get away with making so much money?

Who’s hiring?

James Goldsmith correctly predicted what happened to our economy in 1987 and in the years since 2005. Listen to what he says about corporations (meaning banksters) having successfully eliminated Labor’s share of value-added. Profits rise, and the stock market with them, but it’s all smoke and mirrors because the equilibrium of the market has been destroyed. I remember Ross Perot taking his stack of charts on the Larry King show to debate Al Gore and explain why NAFTA and GATT were terrible for us. Goldsmith does a much better job of explaining it.

The debt is on its way to $20 trillion in the next five years, and that is undoubtedly a lowball figure, kind of like the amount of oil per day that was seeping into the Gulf, according to BP’s original estimate. We have as much chance of repaying this debt as BP has of relocating its lost oil, yet both of these are very bad things that could ultimately work for good.

Let’s put the spill in context. To whites, it’s an absolute catastrophe. But in Nigeria, more oil is spilled every year. Negroes wreck their lives enough on their own. They don’t need help from white polluters who avoid criminal liability by hiding behind the legal fiction called the “corporation.”

And now, we give you the blackest name in Blacktown, juxtaposed with a Scottish surname to make it all the more ridiculous.

A Jew, in the Wall Street Journal, calls Obama “The Alien in the White House.”

After having gone 365Black, McDonald’s also goes queer. We give them bonus points for being consistently anti-white. They’re following the same pattern as the Archie comics. First Archie gets Jungle Fever:

And the next thing you know, a fag character is introduced to the series:

Archie has come a long way since his Christian phase.

According to this study, the children of lesbians, “all conceived through donor insemination, were rated higher than their peers in social, academic, and overall competence, and lower in aggressive behavior, rule-breaking, and social problems, on standardized assessments of psychological adjustment.” The Apostle Paul was apparently not familiar with the Jewish science of pyschology when he said, in Romans 1, that faggotry is “against nature.”

Speaking of which, the “man” who recently called the Lord Jesus Christ a fag sang at the wedding of Rush Limbowel. The important thing is that Rush and Elton are not racists, because that would be bigoted.

All who hate God love death. Thus, Peter Singer asks in the New York Times:

So why don’t we make ourselves the last generation on earth? If we would all agree to have ourselves sterilized then no sacrifices would be required—we could party our way into extinction!

A model scout in Brazil sets out “to find the right genetic cocktail of German and Italian ancestry, perhaps with some Russian or other Slavic blood thrown in.” Even in such a huge country of mixed-race people, the only kind of diversity that matters when it comes to beauty is white diversity. “Indeed, scouts say that more than 70 per cent of the country’s models come from three southern states that hardly reflect the multiethnic melting pot that is Brazil, where more than half the population is nonwhite.”

This guy produces a huge amount of food on just one-tenth of an acre. Notice what he says at the end about lawns, which are almost totally useless, and one of the leading causes of pollution. Even before the BP oil spill, there were huge dead zones in the Gulf of Mexico, where no living thing moves, because of runoff from the millions of people who move to Florida and want a green, pristine lawn where one cannot exist without the heavy use of petroleum-based fertilizer.

Finally, please pray for our good friends Winston and Stan. Most of you reading this will have no idea how important these men have been to us (and to you), so just take our word for it. To lose them would be an immeasurable loss. Winston has heart disease and Stan has a very aggressive cancer.

Rand Paul is learning the difficult task of trying to be an honest white man while remaining politically marketable in a Judaized establishment. He sought to avoid the smear of racism by making supplication to God’s Only Son, the Reverend Doctor Martin Luther King Junior. It didn’t take NPR long to make him look foolish. He was asked: “You would have marched with Martin Luther King but voted with Barry Goldwater?” Such contradictions are familiar territory for the racially retarded.

“[Rand] Paul felt the need to reassure us that he is not a racist by revealing that he gets emotional and weepy when listening to a Martin Luther King Jr. speech. That may tell us something about his vulnerable mental state, but nothing else.” ~ Elizabeth Wright

Fag-apologist George Will approvingly admits that the God-endowed right to private property was revoked in 1964 in the name of granting “civil rights” to Negroes, who were never intended to be fellow citizens in the first place. (The illegal 14th Amendment granted them fictitious “citizenship” in Lincoln’s new entity called the USA because sovereign states refused to do so.)

“One does not have to be a racist to recognize that the federal government has no constitutional authority to prohibit racial or any other kind of discrimination by private parties.” ~ Walter Williams, The Right to Discriminate

Gary North has some advice for Rand Paul: campaign to abolish the quota factory called the EEOC. He is correct that this anti-white agency “violates a basic principle of liberty: the employer should hire the person he thinks will best benefit his organization, if the candidate wants the job on the employer’s terms.” But since the Civil Rights Act repealed the right to private property, and colorblind “conservatives” applaud this as a victory for Equality, there is no chance that they can salvage freedom of association from the deal. We’ve long been of the opinion that Gary North is half-insane, and this is additional evidence. He cheers for everything done in the name of our dispossession, but as soon as Rand Paul says something negative about the CRA (and then quickly apologizes for it), he scratches his chin until he comes up with the idea to eliminate the EEOC without doing anything about the genocidal laws that gave it birth. This is like hacking at leaves rather than striking the root.

Rand Paul can win in November. All he has to do is tell his audiences that the reason he opposes the 1964 Civil Rights Act is because it created a system of racial quotas in hiring, where the best-qualified person for the job cannot get the job because he has the wrong color. He would then say this: “If I am elected, the first piece of legislation I will introduce on day one will be a bill to abolish the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.”

He would crush his opponent in November.

It’s good to oppose racial quotas, but not if it’s because you mistakenly believe that all races are equal and should enjoy equal citizenship under the same government, a thought which caused Thomas Jefferson to shudder. The real problem is equality, not just quotas. Liberty and equality are eternal enemies. (I speak not only of race; any society that treats men and women as equals will eventually disintegrate. Treating them as equals does not make them so, because they are not equal.) The trouble for libertarians is that every employer out there is already hiring “the person he thinks will best benefit his organization, if the candidate wants the job on the employer’s terms.” Many of these are illegal aliens. North says this “violates a basic principle of liberty,” but for whom? It seems to be a winning situation for everyone involved except for us “racists” who want to keep America for Americans. Obviously, race is crucial to considerations of liberty. (It’s no coincidence that Rand Paul hopes to be elected in 88% white Kentucky, and would not stand a chance in any less-white parts of the country.) It is equally obvious that pinhead libertarians love to talk about liberty without really understanding it. You would be much wiser to learn about liberty from our forefathers, all of whom were “racists.”

The good news is that the emotions and ideas that fuel popular movements never remain static. We could look back and recognize Arizona as being the spark that ignited a greater fire. You can see a hint of this in Gary North’s own article. He even calls The Bell Curve a “tour de force“! This would never have happened unless Rand Paul’s faux pas had given him the opportunity for a moment of honesty. One moment of honesty gives rise to another, and pretty soon there is honesty from white men everywhere rather than political posturing. This is how revolutions begin. The truth always spreads by necessity (in this case Arizona’s need to survive).

Amalgamutt Alicia Keys has a new song and video about miscegenation and how “racist” whites used to be horrified by “the unthinkable,” and how wrong they were for interfering with twue wuv. Does it make sense to anyone that the same people who denounce Southerners for rejecting miscegenation as “unthinkable” also assure us that Southerners routinely raped their harems of slave girls on the plantations? Something doesn’t compute here, kind of like Jewish math.

Popular adultery (aka miscegenation) is slowing.

The number of interracial marriages in the U.S. has risen 20 percent since 2000 to about 4.5 million, according to the latest census figures. While still growing, that number is a marked drop-off from the 65 percent increase between 1990 and 2000.

About 8 percent of U.S. marriages are mixed-race, up from 7 percent in 2000.

The following statement on Europe by Alexander Hamilton (Federalist #11) is a perfect summation of what causes our race to bend towards white supremacy and paternalism:

The superiority she has long maintained, has tempted her to plume herself as the mistress of the world, and to consider the rest of mankind as created for her benefit. Men, admired as profound philosophers, have, in direct terms, attributed to her inhabitants a physical superiority; and have gravely asserted, that all animals, and with them the human species, degenerate in America; that even dogs cease to bark, after having breathed a while in our atmosphere.

Thus, white liberals (who call themselves conservatives) adopt savages, knowing full well that they are savages, but believing they will be transformed when some of the whiteness rubs off on them. They assume this right of conquest to be theirs because they believe mankind is created for their benefit. Foolish Judeochristians, carried away by fables, add another layer to this insanity by convincing themselves that they are growing God’s kingdom by undoing God’s mistakes.

Anchor babies are given free American citizenship. The law specifically favors non-white immigrants and ties the hands of police to check their papers and deport them. These people get free health care, schooling, social services, driver’s licenses, “sanctuary cities,” and now Social Security. “The Senate voted yesterday to allow illegal aliens to collect Social Security benefits based on past illegal employment—even if the job was obtained through forged or stolen documents.” Meanwhile, Fred Reed comes out for amnesty and denounces any attempt to salvage our birthright as Nazism. Fred married a mestizo, and is published in The American Conservative by Scott McConnell, who married a Japanese. Just two more assclowns peddling their “conservatism” in America; hence the name of the magazine.

“Conservatism is the negation of ideology,” said Russell Kirk. This definition was never good enough for R.J. Rushdoony. Continuity, custom, and convention can be evil. Liberalism has all these things but by definition is not conservative. Faith is the difference. Whatsoever is not of faith, said Saint Paul, is sin. Sadly, with Rush it’s always a mixed bag. At 14:15 in the linked lecture, you can hear what he thinks about white dispossession, and whites becoming a minority in their own country.

So what? That doesn’t bother me in the slightest. What bothers me, and upsets me greatly, is that these people who are upset about the United States possibly ceasing to be a white country are not upset about the abandonment of Christian faith.

We Kinists agree with him on the latter part, but it doesn’t follow that “God doesn’t care two cents about godless whites.” We don’t have the luxury of pretending that our kinsmen are irrelevant to our own existence or the existence of our civilization. We agree that God owns our land and will give it to whom He will, but this doesn’t make our birthright of no effect. It is a gift from Him and we are charged with its stewardship. Jesus did not die on the cross to reverse His judgment at Babel and erase national borders.

Here’s another lecture, on hate crimes, that leaves much to be desired. But here’s a good interview of the great Southern pastor, John Weaver. Those of you who are interested in John Lofton, who came here with bombastic exhortations for Kinists to start reading their Bibles, before high-tailing it like the redcoats in 1812, can see him during his Amish beard phase in these videos. Chris Ortiz has done a fantastic job building the Chalcedon website. Generations will benefit from his work. It’s staggering to think of the vast knowledge freely available to all.

Getting back to amnesty and such, Judeochristians have exacerbated the problem by misapplying certain Bible verses about treating the stranger as the native-born. (Atheist white nationalists then assume these horrific misapplications to be representative of Christian orthodoxy, but we’ll deal with that another day.) In the Bible, there are at least three words for “stranger,” and while it is quite right to abide by just weights and measures with all men, it was never the case that all strangers were treated as the native-born of Israel. For example, interest could be charged to aliens but not to blood sojourners, though both could be categorized as “strangers.” Deuteronomy in the NIV refers to these respectively as “foreigners” and “brothers.”

The boycotters had better hurry up because 17 states now have anti-wetback laws. At this rate, Massachusetts will be all alone in boycotting the rest of the country.

Reds and browns unite! “ONE RACE, ONE PEOPLE, ONE NATION!” Being anti-white is the true reason for their unity, but they are ostensibly united under the banner of the indigenous, as though this has anything to do with the price of rice. Caucasians were on this continent before anyone else, but this is irrelevant to the fact that our fathers founded a nation for their own posterity, and it is our duty to defend it against all threats, foreign and domestic.

The country’s first megaplex succumbs to wets and jigs and gang turf wars. Remember when West Side Story was considered entertainment?

Don’t you love South Carolinians?

This is a stunning example of immigration fraud.

“Could you imagine if big-name white political figures and white pop stars were speaking at something called a ‘White Power Convention‘?”

I wonder if any of these companies would support white interests and white survival. Would they oppose the slogan, “For the white race everything, outside the white race nothing”?

An army of security personnel will do wonders for maintaining the illusion of peace and brotherhood in the new, negrified South Africa. The World Cup will be an enjoyable event for those who can afford protection. The rest of us will stay here and watch our tax dollars circle the bowl clockwise before disappearing from sight.

Here’s another of those stories we see all the time. It should be on the front page of every newspaper, but it doesn’t fit the liberal agenda. If this poor boy were a queer, God forbid, he would be famous. Hate crime legislation would bear his name. Notice that the attackers were whipped into a frenzy because their ancestors were enslaved hundreds (even thousands) of years ago. White people are culpable for such attacks when they allow others to propagate myths about American domestic slavery. Blacks, who naturally have very low intelligence, take the false witness to heart and act out of rage. As Otto Scott points out here (16:10), the white race is the only race on earth that has ever ended slavery. But as Rushdoony points out, it is considered a crime if a white man says anything negative about a diversity. This is most common when discussing IQ differences, which white liar-pastors interpret as hatred.

When a hate crime isn’t a hate crime.

What a white man can expect when incarcerated with savages.

Tea Partiers have Uncle Tom Fever. Notice the key phrase of the campaign ad: “They’re not going to call me a racist.” This is clearly the most important thing in life for white people. The most advanced stage of Uncle Tom Fever is called Tranny Fever. “One of the worst symptoms of Uncle Tom Fever is an irresistible urge to horribly embarrass yourself.”

Chicago has been ordered to hire firefighters “randomly.” This is the only way to get ignorant blacks hired, even after standards were lowered in 2006 to ensure that the EEOC’s four-fifths rule was met, “which means that all the test does is eliminate complete idiots.”

So while Rand Paul is being asked about how he would have voted in the last century, disparate impact laws in the here-and-now are designed to be genocidal. And remember: “if minorities fail tests at a higher rate than whites, it’s the test that’s wrong.”

In “just one year, deficient schools all over Texas have suddenly become good schools. It says so right there in the paper!” The secret: Lower passing grades to 43.6%, and hey presto! The racial achievement gap is closed! Why didn’t someone think of this before?

Walmart is liable for billions for not giving women the same amount of money for pressing buttons as men get for unloading trucks. Disparate impact quotas still have not leveled races and sexes with magically-delicious equality.

This is one of the issues that Craig Bodeker brought out in his excellent documentary. We are expected to stop heaven and earth if some black person somewhere doesn’t get the job he wants. (Of course, I’ve had many jobs that I didn’t really want, but no one advocated for me.) I hope we all would agree that rape is far more serious than job opportunities and demands more attention. But we’re expected to make potential lost jobs a matter of the gravest concern, and when one of us suggests that a hundred of our women being raped every day is a far more serious matter, we’re denounced as racists.

The very honorable black columnist Elizabeth Wright asks a question that is very pertinent to her race: “How is it possible to win the respect of others if you produce nothing?” Nothing but crime statistics, that is.

This is a voter.

Road signs get creative.

Empathy is racist.

Claudia Schiffer is racist.

White robes are racist, even when used to denounce racism. I hope you people are writing down these rules. So help me, I’ll flunk you if you don’t pay attention.

Private property is racist.

Lactose tolerance is racist.

Astronomy is racist. (Hallmark has ordered a complete recall out of deference to black imbeciles.)

Read James Edwards’s new book for the final word on the matter.

Down in Texas, a white patriot is being called a terrorist. Also in Texas, a white terrorist is being called a patriot.

No months remain for white people.

“Make this world a blonder place.” How delightfully racist!

Is this what you had in mind?

The black governor of Massachusetts believes that opposing Obama’s policies “borders on sedition.” Now that’s what I call African politics! At this rate, whites will soon be bowing before another Idi Amin.

The cowardly American Academy of Pediatrics is trying to give doctors the right to “nick” the clitorises of savage girls so that the parents won’t go for full female genital mutilation. The correct way to handle this problem is to prevent savages from gaining entrance to white Christian civilization.

“Women do almost all the daily work in southern Africa: cooking, finding food, raising children, and tidying up around the hut, which leaves men free to spend the day pursuing more amiable interests, like drinking until they can barely stand or form sentences.” Liberals think feminism is the answer to Negroism. Apparently, women are now supposed to give men a small allowance so that they don’t drink away the rent money. Good luck with that.

Bristol Palin, a feminist chip off the old block. “A baby is extra work but doesn’t interfere with a woman’s independence.”

Steve Sailer absolutely nails the desire of women to make bad decisions feel fashionable in this review.

“No nation has ever demonized manhood to its own reward.”

Flooded While White. Compare the woman at 8:20 to every savage from New Orleans that you saw on the news back in 2005. Hint: The “amazing part of the country” to which she refers is a white code phrase, like “good schools” and “good neighborhoods.”

You remember that after Katrina, Kanye West famously said that “George Bush doesn’t care about black people.” Volunteer Staters are not saying the equivalent about Obama, which is good, because no one would listen.

The reason for no looting when white men are free. We’re not the most subtle people in the world at sending messages to diversities.

This headline makes me laugh. The problem is not sodomites, you see. Oh, heavens no. The problem is the skinheads who attack them. Jews are creative writers.

We don’t have much to say about the flotilla holocaust by murderous Jews, except that it’s quite entertaining to read Lawrence Auster’s verbal hysterics. Here he has a fit because Pat Buchanan equates Israel’s blockade of Gaza with Stalin’s blockade of West Berlin.

Here’s a video that supports Alex Linder’s statement that “Jews are a genetic criminal clan masquerading as a religion.”

“The ADL says it’s ‘inappropriate‘ for people like Newt Gingrich to compare people to Nazis, but it’s perfectly okay for them to label others as such.”

Yes! Rahm Emanuel is hereby an anti-Semite. Now we can teach him the secret handshake. Welcome to the club, Rahm.

Israel offered to sell nuclear weapons to white South Africa. You have to wonder if this meets Rachel Maddow’s approval, or maybe it’s more important to focus on who got to sit at lunch counters 50 years ago. The lesbian Jewish freak of nature certainly has no problem with the fact that Israel builds apartheid walls and prevents Palestinians from even walking in some areas, not to mention the segregated schools and marriages there.

Why do we never hear in the press that “some say” the Israeli flag is a symbol of apartheid and hatred? In fact, far more people in the world today believe this than believe what is said about the Confederate flag.

State temples (aka public schools) are so horrendously pitiful that most people get all the way through college believing that Lincoln’s War was fought to end slavery. Lawrence Auster has one of the best, short history lessons you’ll ever read here. It takes great skill to say so much in so few words. In retrospect, it was perhaps not asking too much to confine slavery to the existing southern states, as northerners required. Southerners should have had the right to migrate west and take their property with them, but given the way in which this issue tore the country apart, it would have been a worthwhile concession. The North’s motivation was to keep the West for whites, and there was certainly nothing wrong with that. It was just a bad deal for our entire race. If the South had agreed, we would be mercifully free today of all the silliness in the history books about the Yankee’s love for equality and the need to bathe the South in blood so that Negroes could live the American Dream, and someday spread the legs of white girls.

As Sam Francis wrote in the July 27, 1995, column that got him fired from the Washington Times:

If the sin is hatred or exploitation, they [Southern Baptists repenting of their support of slavery in the 19th century] may be on solid grounds, but neither “slavery” nor “racism” as an institution is a sin. Indeed, there are at least five clear passages in the letters of Paul that explicitly enjoin “servants” to obey their masters, and the Greek words for “servants” in the original text are identical to those for “slaves.” Neither Jesus nor the apostles nor the early church condemned slavery, despite countless opportunities to do so, and there is no indication that slavery is contrary to Christian ethics or that any serious theologian before modern times ever thought it was.

Not until the Enlightenment of the 18th century did a bastardized version of Christian ethics condemn slavery. Today we know that version under the label of “liberalism,” or its more extreme cousin, communism.

“Did not the South have the same right to secede from the Union as the 13 colonies did to secede from England? Did Lincoln have the right to use blockade and invasion to drive Old Dixie down? His predecessor James Buchanan did not think so. Was the Civil War essential to ending slavery, when many states had already abolished it by legislation and every nation in the hemisphere ended it without a civil war, save for Haiti?” ~ Pat Buchanan

Texas, as usual, is not playing along very well with the imperial shell game. Now they’re teaching kids that the “separation of church and state” doesn’t appear in the Constitution at all, and that our economic system is free enterprise rather than (Jewish) “capitalism.” What’s next? Soon they’ll be teaching kids that Texas was robbed of its republican sovereignty by Lincoln, just 15 years after voluntarily entering the federal compact. Schools need to stick to the three R’s: racism, recycling, and reproductive rights. Steer clear of the unspeakably obvious.

We owe Dr. Ron Rumberg a great debt for writing this incomparable paper on the rape of Galatians 3:28 by pulpit pirates. My friends and I heard him speak in the church where Robert E. Lee is buried on the 200th anniversary of the birth of the greatest American. Here’s another great one on castration.

He told us if we provided not for our own we are worse than infidels. He revealed that His Word is the only acceptable guide for faith and practice. Thus, we should love God and love no other. We are to love our wives as we love no other women. We are to love and correct our children in a way we love no others. We are to follow the Bible as we follow no other book. We are to love our forefathers as we love no others. We are to love our race as we love no other. We are to love our local church as we love no other. We are to love our heritage as we love no other… However, if we listen to the humanists, the politically correct and the neocons then all of this partisan teaching is racism. It appears that the historic Biblical hermeneutic has been replaced by the humanist, egalitarian, French Revolution hermeneutic. It is the hermeneutic of egalitarian love.

Now the abolitionist agenda is being forced on Christian people of the South, declaring that they cannot be Biblical or partisan, but must favor the extermination of their heritage, must submit to the removal of the moral standards of their ancestors and should hate their race or extol another above it. Have you been thus castrated?…

This new wave of political correctness aimed at the castration of the Southern people will lead to the impugning of our holy God, the rejection of the deity of Christ, the compromising of the inspiration of Scripture, the abandonment of the sanctity of marriage, the replacement of the biblical norm of the home, the redefining of the masculinity of men, the removal of the separation of nations, the dishonor of our fathers and mothers, and the eradication of our Confederate heritage.

Did God divide the nations into linguistic groups, racial groups and cultural groups? Was it God’s idea to assert this as a corrective of man’s sinful intentions? Did God in the Book of Genesis give us the table of nations? Was that His idea? Has God rescinded His actions? Obviously, we have as much, if not more reason today, to believe that men are as depraved and disobedient to God as then. Regeneration does not remove these divisions, but it is the divine bestowal of life to dead sinners.

Are we going to submit to castration? Are we going to obey God or men? Are we in favor of honoring our Southern heritage or not? Are you ashamed of being from the South? Have the descendants of Confederates been castrated, or are they undergoing such treatment or are they submitting to such out of imposed false guilt feelings? Remember the admonition of the fifth commandment, “Honour thy father and thy mother,” even if they were Southern or Confederate. This is not optional!

“Where now is the horse and the rider? Where is the horn that was blowing? Where is the helm and the hauberk, and the bright hair flowing?” ~ The Two Towers

“Pro-White activism is something you can do when you are young and want to live like a college student. But it’s not a viable career option.” Sadly, Kevin MacDonald is correct. The most stinging blow of all is that young pro-white activists desperately need to get married and have big families, but they get almost no support from their own race, and volunteer work doesn’t pay the bills. Contrast this with Jewish advocacy groups which are well-funded by almost all Jewish professionals. Their Holohoax gig deflects all accusations of racism, and they are free to protect their own interests without fear of recrimination. Whites are still cowering with guilt because a couple hundred years ago a few of them gave mandatory employment to savages barely removed from cannibalism. This is why we could never be White Supremacists. We are often convinced that white people are only supreme in the art of being frightened by their own shadows. It’s certain that we’ll never get anywhere until whites are as interested in supporting their own causes as other races are interested in supporting theirs. But if you recall the quote from William Blake, you know that money and power are not what drive us. “I tell the truth not to convince those who do not know it, but to defend those that do.”

In our age of diversity-worship, escapists seek a return to tradition. The new Robin Hood movie, for instance, is about “an Anglo-Saxon nationalist” with a “visceral sense of birthright liberty” who participates in a non-democratic parliament without an inkling of “universal solidarity,” and who speaks of the French “as vile foreign invaders, almost as another race.” Just to drive the point home, the French are depicted as “olive-skinned, dark-haired, and quasi-Moorish. Even the insincere, shifty King John…is noticeably swarthy. In [Ridley] Scott’s England, complexion reflects character.” Tolkien wholeheartedly agreed. The film has a bit of obligatory feminism, but not a single diversity in Sherwood Forest.

In a recent BBC-produced version of Robin Hood, Friar Tuck is actually played by a black actor. (One shouldn’t hold one’s breath for reciprocation and the casting of, say, Hugh Jackman in the role of Nelson Mandela in a future biopic.)…

Libertarians aren’t up to the task of limiting government anyway, for quite unlike Robin, they lack any sense of community and birthright, and thus will only engage people in endless, abstract, braniac debates about how, say, the welfare state retards black entrepreneurship or how much minorities would benefit by the lowering of the minimum wage…

Men rise and fight against tyranny in defense of their people. No one has yet died for “free markets,” not to mention the right to enjoy cannabis and sodomy at will.

“Christianity went deep into the soul of the European. Even when he renounces Christianity, his new faith mimics, in a perverted form, the old faith of the Europeans. There is still heaven – the future without white people; there is still hell – the European past; there is still a God – the black race; and there is still a devil – the white race… You cannot convert the heathen to a religion of charity by sacrificing your own people to the heathens.”

“When the liberals tell us the Grimm’s fairy tales are too violent and too moralistic, what they really mean is the Grimm’s fairy tales are too Christian in their ethos. In the Grimm’s tales the good prevail over the wicked and the wicked people do the type of thing, such as betray their own kith and kin and support perversion, which modern liberals now do under the guise of virtuous behavior.”

“True to his instincts, true to his traditions, fearing nothing, loving only his own, loving and hating with all his heart – a Goth.” ~ Thomas Nelson Page

I’d like very much for these words to be on my tombstone: He loved and hated with all his heart.

Ray Stevens was careful to put a non-racist get-out-of-jail-free card at the end of that video. White men are too scared to let the truth of their words stand on their own. No sooner do they let slip a controversial opinion than they issue disclaimers to protect themselves from the r-word. Hopefully, a day is coming when white men will stop acting like timid little girls. (For a lesson in backbone, see the clip of the governor of New Jersey below.)

The big news recently has been the kabuki over what is nothing more than a once-sovereign state taking federal law seriously. The pop culture groupies and Professionally Appalled, like Seth MacFarlane, are saying that Arizona will now do what the Nazis did in asking for traveling papers. The assumption here is that the border doesn’t exist, and if it does exist, anyone who crosses it, legally or illegally, should be treated no different than Aunt Joann, who crosses a state border to visit her sister. Every one of us is asked for papers when crossing a national border, and every time a policeman stops you, no matter where you are, you’re expected to show your papers. Sieg Heil!

Filthy Jew Frank Rich uses these words to describe the widely-supported Arizona immigration law: “angry,” “virus,” “hysteria,” “vicious,” “bigoted,” “apoplexy,” “slimed,” “snarling,” “notorious,” “incendiary,” “rage.”

It’s the greatest atrocity of the 21st century! “When I heard about it, it reminded me of Nazi Germany,” said Hispanic Federation President Lillian Rodriguez Lopez. Los Angeles Cardinal Roger Mahony said Arizona was “reverting to German Nazi” methods. A New Jersey cartoonist drew Hitler with a mustache in the shape of Arizona.

And don’t get us started on colorblind conservatives. “No matter how many times they lie, and insist that race has nothing to do with their opposition to illegal immigration, no one believes them, and they get called ‘racist’ anyway. So why keep lying about it?”

The kikenpress is hyperventilating over hundreds of thousands of mestizos fleeing Arizona, one step ahead of the law. This should surprise them, because until now they’ve said repeatedly that there is no way to deport millions of wetbacks. Funny how that works. They’ve also said (too many times to count) that wets are crucial for economic stability because (repeat after me) they do the jobs Americans refuse to do. By this logic, Arizona will immediately grind to a halt. Dishes will pile up in kitchens, weeds will overcome lawns, and garbage will overflow from dumpsters. White people will just stand there, picking their noses. This won’t happen, of course. Jews and their clones are exposed yet again as liars. Their only hope is to fall back on tear-jerking anecdotes about poor “undocumented immigrants” who came here for the “American Dream” and simply want to feed, house, clothe, educate, and care for their litters with your money. They hope that your emotions will cause you to join your lying preacher and the president in denying that borders exist. Thankfully, even the governor of Arizona is refusing to budge. Her people have been kidnapped, carjacked, raped, murdered, and financially squeezed for too long. Let’s hope that Arizona is a microcosm of the white race, and that tomorrow belongs to us.

“That this Assembly doth explicitly and peremptorily declare, that it views the powers of the federal government, as resulting from the compact [the Constitution], to which the states are parties; as limited by the plain sense and intention of the instrument constituting the compact; as no further valid that they are authorized by the grants enumerated in that compact; and that in case of a deliberate, palpable, and dangerous exercise of other powers, not granted by the said compact, the states who are parties thereto, have the right, and are in duty bound, to interpose for arresting the progress of the evil, and for maintaining within their respective limits, the authorities, rights and liberties appertaining to them.” ~ Virginia Resolution, 1798

Obama says: “In the 21st century, we are defined not by our borders but by our bonds.” But not ethnic, racial, and religious bonds, because that would be bigoted. No one really knows what kind of bonds he’s talking about, but I think it has something to do with capitalism and democracy.

The point is that secularists and Judeochristians are united in viewing both geographical borders and ethnic bonds as irrelevant. They are birds of a feather.

Using the word “illegal” to refer to wetbacks is “more offensive than spitting on someone.” Write that down. The reason stated is that the Declaration of Independence calls God-given rights “unalienable.” Therefore, there are no aliens. This guy must be a preacher.

Those who say that race is irrelevant are like those who say that money isn’t important, when in fact it’s “right up there with oxygen on their list of priorities.”

Those who think national borders actually mean something are being arrested and charged with the sin-crime of “racism.”

If you haven’t seen this McCain ad, it’s hilarious – not so much because he lies and pretends that he is in favor of closing the border, but because he affects the word “danged.”

Will 2010 be remembered as the year our fortunes turned?

Probably not yet. The outstanding laws coming out of Arizona are extremely popular with whites, but Jews are exerting financial pressure on politicians, and boycotts are underway, having the premise that it “is now ‘un-American’ to enforce immigration laws in America.” We’ll know that the whole game has changed when survival is more important to all of us, not just to Arizonans, than bribery. It was hilarious when L.A. was about to start a boycott of Arizona. The city had second thoughts when informed by Arizona that a new provider of electricity should be found if the boycott commences. Now is the time for white men everywhere to rally to the defense of Arizona. Run to the sound of the guns!

Jews, through their media outlets, are trumpeting statistics that show that young people are clearly not on our side. (The young have always appreciated tradition the least. James Burnham called tradition “social experience acting through time.”) But as Steve Sailer points out, those who consider youthful ignorance to be a good thing don’t seem to get the joke that the places with the largest imbalance of elderly whites and non-white youths are the sand states, where the greatest loan defaults may be found. In other words, the economy is suffering the most in the places where whites are being dispossessed to the greatest degree, and it was the advanced economy that drew the wets in the first place.

An Aztec who is worked up about “frail” white “oppressors” and “exploiters.”

“If a Tea Party protester fails to tip his hat to a passing black crackhead, it’s all over the media as proof of the racist, hateful, treasonous nature of those evil white Tea Party rallies. But when a Mexican high school teacher calls for the overthrow of the ‘racist, imperialist’ government of ‘frail white people’ in this country, it’s a non-story.”

If the law no longer protects us, of what use is it? God forbid that we should respect any law simply because it’s a law.

While we would be arrested for trying to start a race war, big-time motion picture director Robert Rodriguez is given public tax dollars by the Texas Film Commission to make a movie about a race war, with venomous words for Arizona in the trailer. Look at this well-funded racial supremacism (strong language). “We didn’t cross the border! The border crossed us!”

The drawing of an American flag is now called offensive and racist.

Slack-jawed race-mixer Roger Ebert equates the wearing of American flag t-shirts on the minor Mexican holiday of May 5 to those who wear hammer and sickle t-shirts on July 4.

Brave, white, pioneering exploration is denounced as “Genocide” and “Colonisation” by these hyphenated shrews.

Some languages are more equal than others.

I think the time has come at last when we have heard it all. Look how many restaurants in negrified Jackson, Mississippi, are offering 22% discounts to tables with multiracial diners.

If I lived there I’d call and give them a piece of my mind, and tell them I’d never be eating at their restaurant again if they think it’s their job to punish white families and friends by charging them higher prices in the name of social engineering.

“The human brain reacts differently when dealing with people of another race, says a new study.” It confirms many other studies that show that “people are less likely to feel connected to people outside their own ethnic groups.” Call this prejudice if you will, but it’s how God made us.

Here’s a little girl who is naturally led by her racial instincts, as all people are. The difference is that children are more honest. They’re too young to be seminary graduates. This little girl is inclined to associate that which is good and beautiful with her own kind. She was born with this instinct because it’s healthy, and chances are that it will make her safe and secure. For the same reason, a duckling knows to follow its mother, without ever having been taught. Instincts can sometimes be shown to be wrong after being balanced with other data, but nothing could be more normal than having them. Contrast the honesty of the child in the video with her mother, who is brought to tears, not because she would have different suspicions if she were being followed late at night on a dark street, but because she is at pains to prove that she is not a racist and has never taught her daughter to be a racist. The mother knows that racism is considered the vilest of all “secular sins,” and to corner her like this on camera, with an ugly mutt interviewer, is despicable.

Here’s another woman who almost waited too long to have a racial awakening. My blood boils when I read about what our own people have done to our once-fair countries by opening the borders to strangers. This precious little 8-year-old girl just wants to live in peace, and the animals that are granted a legal status as her equals “dry hump” her on the playground and call her a “dirty white girl.” They poke her with sticks and laugh as she cries. The school does nothing about it, of course. Hell has not seen the fury that would be unleashed upon this scum by some people we know, given an advantageous time and place. Notice that pro-white websites publish stories like this all the time, which are ignored by the mainstream media. The only reason this one is published is because the paper won’t be called racist since the girl’s family has several members who are “African-Canadian.”

But just think about it. If the preceding story angers you, as it surely must, multiply it by the millions who have likewise suffered unnecessarily. There is no way to eradicate sinfulness from the world until all is fulfilled, but a great many of our troubles are self-inflicted. And still our people sleep.

The tone of betrayal and envy.

This country is far too big. If this were happening on the outskirts of DC, the “representatives” of this “republic” would be sounding a very different tune.

Minneapolis is only 17% black, yet blacks commit murder at about 11 times the national white murder rate. If you love your own children, you’ll raise them among as many white people as possible. Please don’t lie to your own children by telling them you love them if you teach them that blacks and whites are equal. You would not give your beloved child a stone when he asks for bread, or a serpent when he asks for a fish, or a scorpion when he asks for an egg (Luke 11). So please, don’t give him a holocaust when he asks for a future.

Another travesty of justice in Knoxville. “We’ve been cheated,” says Hugh Newsom. “I don’t feel anymore. I feel less every day,” says Gary Christian.

The Attorney General and the ADL are worked up over one (count him, one) “African American” man who says he was “terrorized” by two whites. That sounds pretty important, seeing as how the AG worked it into the speech he gave at the meeting of the hate group. The tens of thousands of white victims of violent black crime merited no mention, but I hear the evening’s dessert was a big hit.

Judeochristians, please do not read this. Glenn Beck has a full hour of entertainment planned for you tonight.

Why did Nashville not turn out like New Orleans? It’s a racial question with a racial answer, which means that racial imbeciles will cock their heads to the side like confused puppies.

Where were the photos of white men lugging bins of purloined Pabst Blue Ribbon through the watery streets? Where were the reports of rapes and maimings in the schools where flood victims took shelter? Even the smarmy and odious Anderson Cooper marvels at how the Nashville folks take care of their own.

Why are no celebrities accusing Obama of not caring about white people who have been devastated by natural disasters? The Nashville flood was the worst catastrophe to hit Tennessee since Lincoln made war on it.

Why are no white mayors boasting that vanilla cities will return to life? Why is the Jewmedia keeping silent about these double standards?

These potential American voters are innovative entrepreneurs. They are eager to do jobs Americans refuse to do, and therefore they deserve to live the American Dream.

Are African babies just as important as your own?

Forty percent of American adoptions are interracial! Now, in Italy, choosing the race of an adoptee is considered racist and illegal. Such “mercenary” interests “disqualify them from being parents.” In similar news, faithful pastors in once-Christian countries are now being arrested for calling faggotry sinful; for quoting the Bible “in a loud voice that could be overheard by others.” Read more. 

A new term has been created: The Full Bullock.

Even in a depressed economy, there are still job opportunities that will interest Bullocks:

We love how the governor of New Jersey answers this faggoty question. How rare is the man in our day who acts like a man.

Here’s a man. “I fit in. But I’m not who you think I am.” There’s a priceless line in that article. You’ll know it when you see it. Lord have mercy, I love real men. My rule of thumb is to never trust a male who doesn’t get his hands dirty. It almost never steers me wrong.

The destruction of manhood.

The comparative ratio of men graduating from college compared to women has fallen by 50 percent in the last 40 years, according to U.S. Census Bureau figures… The male employment rate dropped by three percent from 1980 to 2008 while the female rate grew by more than 12 percent. Median wages for men, in the 25 to 54 age group, remained flat from 1973 to 2007 while hourly wages for women increased by 30 percent, according to the Economic Policy Institute…

Journalists frequently cite the fact that women earn 79 cents for every dollar men earn, but given the amount of time women take for childbirth and child care and their preference for lower paying and less dangerous fields in the first place, this figure is remarkably high.

Amazingly, the sexes are dividing by class. It is impossible for this to be permanent. There is an unavoidable correction coming, and it won’t be pretty.

“There are two sorts of women – those with excellent voices, sweet and low, and cackling hens that cannot make me dream.”

Victor Mature with a ghetto scowl.

A statue in a Peking mall shows what Chinese think of Americans.

“The economic changes have meant that India no longer sees itself as a third-world country. This newfound pride will help us accept our own skin color.”

The logic of racism. If a white person doesn’t like rap, he’s a racist, but if he likes it and performs it, he’s also a racist.

Wigger videos.

A black Harvard professor agrees that blacks, on average, are less intelligent than whites. This is like agreeing that the sky is blue, but whatever. Harvard obviously demands the highest of faculties in their faculty.

Blacks are free to assault whites, and the threats are accepted as routine because everyone assumes that the assailants are stupid and/or inebriated. This is a common theme in movies, in which white men “get what they deserve” for walking or driving into “a bad part of town.” I can think of three Bruce Willis movies in which this was a plot device. But “if you’re a white man, and you mail a piece of rope to a black person,” you’ll spend five years in jail. Always know your double standards!

A massive boom in the black homeschooling population.

This ad implies that blacks never pollute their environment. Pollution is always the fault of evil Western corporations. Again, a standard plot device.

Here’s a shocker: 90% of South African farms (stolen from whites, given to blacks) are failing. Who could have guessed that 10% of the farms would survive? You mean there are Negroes who know how to plant crops? Are you sure they aren’t making their conquests do it while they smoke weed?

It’s so important to close the racial achievement gap that black children are now being taken on their own field trips.

Whites should be happy that their money is being taken from them for such a worthy project. It proves the point, made repeatedly, that no one still thinks that the gap can be closed by lifting the bottom end. It now requires suppressing the top end. The Supreme Court’s ongoing experiment in equality is not working as planned.

To correct an excess of white privilege, the Supreme Court is set to become one-third Jewish. (Obama also gets bonus female, lesbian, and Ivy League points.)

Talking about the disproportionate representation of Jews on the Supreme Court is ”bigoted,” “unacceptable,” and “anti-Semitic,” says Shylock Foxman.

James Edwards asks, “How many Christians are on Israel’s Supreme Court?” Obviously, Mr. Edwards is an anti-Semite. He should be ashamed of himself for asking such hateful questions. Doesn’t he know that such inquiries lead to asphyxiation chambers and color-coded crematory smoke and shrunken heads and geysers of blood?

“Clearly, the prospect of a Supreme Court that is two-thirds Catholic and one-third Jewish and without a single Protestant represents a watershed in American life.” You might remember that Protestants are the people who actually wrote the constitutions and the Bill of Rights. “Diversity” is achieving its goal of dispossessing the American tribal stock.

“The early Soviet government was dominated by minorities. Jews, followed by Georgians, held positions in extreme disproportion to their numbers. According to a recent study done by Tel Aviv University, 38.5% of the senior leadership of the Soviet security apparatus in the mid 1930’s was made up of Jews.” So the U.S. Supreme Court is now closing in on the Supreme Soviet.

The new Jew anti-justice has said that speech “which perpetuates discrimination” must be outlawed, and she has volunteered to define for us what is “discriminatory” and what is not. She will work for the goal that is dear to every Jew: ending our constitutional right to free speech. In fact, she has said that “all government efforts to regulate such speech” are constitutionally permissible. It couldn’t be more clear. One of their goals is to imprison us for holding unauthorized opinions about their sacred Holohoax.

Jews and free speech are antithetical. Under a Supreme Court dominated by Jews (and a few token non-whites), which is almost certainly Obama’s goal, pornography and obscenity will be constitutionally protected, but ideas or words that Jews, non-whites and homosexuals don’t like will be declared “hate speech” outside the protection of the First Amendment. You can have a Supreme Court dominated by Jews, or you can have free speech. But you can’t have both.

“Boy, those fearless satirists at Comedy Central! They’ll create an entire series mocking the God and Savior of white people, but they’re scared shitless to even mention Islam or Muhammad. And then at the award ceremonies, when ‘JC’ wins, they’ll all be applauding each other for their ‘courage’ and ‘refusal to give in to censorship,’ etc., etc.”

“In the past, Jews made up stories about WASPy superheroes with names like Clark Kent, but now Jews make up stories about Jews making up stories about WASPy superheroes… Today, ethnic pride demands that a rich, powerful group have a rich, powerful, vibrant cultural history, even if it actually had a kind of dull, self-limited one. So, Jewish artists at the elite level, and their funders, are turning inward. Thus, Golem Mania.”

The greatest bank robbery in world history (and the banksters are the robbers).

As you know, our future has been mortgaged in the vain attempt to close the racial achievement gap, as though this is far more important than anything our own children might need, and certainly far more important than devoting resources to general improvements, whether a gap exists or not. Someone wrote to Steve Sailer and drew attention to the excellent example of life expectancy. Women live longer than men; always have, always will, and there’s no use griping about it. That’s just the way it is. Even if there is no medical reason for it, there are more social reasons for it than can be counted. You can choose to live with it or try to make the sexes equal, and the latter is not an option. Even if you were a queer who wanted to equalize the sexes, it would be useless. So why do so many race queers think that they can close gaps that are every bit as naturally determined?

It’s important to the Judaized West to bail out Greece, which has an economy approximately equal to that of Dallas, because if Greece defaults on her debt, usurious Jew-banks will suffer badly, and then Western governments, which are in the pocket of the Jews, will be forced to bail out the Jew-banks. This is why German Chancellor Angela Merkel, who is so enslaved to Jews that they lead her around by a collar, is saying, “Nothing less than the future of Europe…is at stake.” How is usury working out for you?

Remember when Christians used to follow the Bible? Pat Buchanan correctly observes that enslavement is in the cards for all of us. The strings attached to the bailout of Greece will require that “Greeks work longer, retire later and live on smaller pensions, so holders of Greek bonds can get their interest payments right on time.” Not likely! Greece’s deficit is 14% of GDP and the debt is close to 100% of GDP. Our own annual deficit is now 11%, and Obama has pushed the debt close to 100% of GDP. California and New York would already have defaulted if not for the rest of the country giving them money to stay afloat. It’s only a matter of time before the imperial whore is buried, and the global system of usury with her. You’ll know where to find us. We’ll be dancing on the grave of the bitch, and the band will be playing Dixie.

Helen of Troy, who calls herself “a huge believer in states’ rights,” loses a beauty pageant to something called Rima Fakih.

Five of the past nine winners of the NBC “competition,” in which many of the judges are unqualified celebrities, have been minorities. Miss USA 2002, 2007, and 2008 have all been very light-skinned Mulattoes. Miss USA 2003 was half-Dominican and half-Puerto Rican, and very fair-skinned for someone of that background. [The 2010 winner] is a fair-skinned Arab. NBC uses the “competition” as a means to promote diversity (but no one too dark!).

If you’re a super-light-skinned racial minority your odds of winning Miss USA appear to increase astronomically.

(Predictably-misspelled words from the CofCC website corrected here for your reading pleasure.)

The Marines now forbid expressions of Confederate heritage. All other heritages are perfectly acceptable because they’re no threat at all to the empire. Notice that the imperial military now considers Confederate symbols incendiary while imperial schools consider imperial symbols incendiary (on Cinco de Mayo).

In planning the festivities for the sesquicentennial of Lincoln’s War of Genocide, Virginia is doing everything possible “to avoid the impression that they will amount to a celebration of the Confederacy.” The governor says he’ll take the opportunity “to [be] a champion for racial reconciliation.” The great flag that millions of Americans have adored will be hidden from view for fear of offending the delicate moods of strangers. In other words, no one will actually learn what caused the war or why it was so important. Everything will be geared towards reaffirming current political views. For instance, a black publisher states, “Most eighth-graders know that Virginia’s participation [in the war] was hardly worthy of promoting.” Fancy that! Pre-pubescent teens, hundreds of years after the fact, have a better grasp of issues that divided a nation and led to unprecedented bloodshed than the most learned, eloquent, and courageous men in American history! Public school aptitude must be off the charts. Having dismissed the ancestors of these kids as racists, there is no need to understand what was really at stake. So in order to make Virginians feel worthy, there will be one anecdote after another about the silent suffering of the noble savage, and none of it will have anything to do with our history. Says an SCV member: “I think they’re so afraid of offending someone, hurting someone’s feelings, that they’re just going to do this generic, bland commemoration, where at the end, we know we’ve commemorated something, but we’re not quite sure what.” When it’s all over, eighth graders from one end of the state to the other can feel all educated and stuff.

“Apparently Southern whites, whose ancestors fought and bled in the Civil War, should not be allowed to commemorate their ancestral event without having to apologize to black civil rights leaders, for not being obsessive enough about atoning for white racism. But aren’t there already occasions for exhibition of white guilt? Doesn’t Black History Month serve this purpose? Then whites are encouraged to abase themselves for their sins and for those of their ancestors against non-whites. This updated form of Lent comes in the wake of the celebration of the epiphany of MLK, which also encourages the outpouring of white guilt. Why then are McDonnell’s voters not permitted a single month in which to celebrate their ancestral experiences?”

Doug Wilson is so full of it that the floor of a cave in Idaho is publicly demanding that he return its batshit. He knows that his career would end overnight if he were to tell the truth about Jews. So instead, he joins in the litanies about how Chosenites are irrationally oppressed by Christians. He writes:

Less than five percent of the population is Jewish, and their cultural contributions are “both brilliant and unrivaled” (p. 20). This, in the face of a significant prejudice against them. And it is a tenacious kind of prejudice, the kind that uses your very successes as evidence that “you must be cheating whenever you win.” For those interested, I would refer back to my recent sermon on Romans 11 – the apostle Paul’s strategy, one that he assigned to us, was to provoke the Jews to cultural envy, and to be provoked to envy by them instead is about the most unPauline thing we could think up to do. The achievements of Jews have been far more than political, and have included “science, literature, art, music, letters, film, and architecture” (p. 20). The apostle Paul argues that the salvation of the world depends on Christians figuring out the riposte to this.

How could more crap be packed into one paragraph without a dehydrator? He assumes that Jews have gone on the White Accomplishment Tour, and their “brilliant and unrivaled” success has made them victims of envy and prejudice. Opposition to Jews is rooted not in their championing of immorality and usury and resentment, says Wilson. Oh, heavens no. We oppose them simply because we’ve convinced ourselves that they cheat. Why are such things never said about Asians, who are also not Christians, and are almost never given special preferences, yet are responsible for far more impressive achievements? Wilson has made the mistake of believing that there is merit to the moaning and groaning and kvetching of Jews. Then he tops it off by saying that “the salvation of the world depends on Christians” reversing irrational “anti-Semitism” and making a particular tribe of anti-Christs envious of us! Yes, he says the salvation of the world depends on it!

Speaking of moonbats, Greg Johnson believes that a person or a movement can be indifferent to Christ without being hostile to Christ. This is a fundamental misunderstanding of Christianity. Christ does not demand a part of you. If He grants you repentance, He demands all of you, and your descendants too. Therefore, it is not acceptable for Christians to tolerate blasphemy in the interest of free and open debate. There are many short-term alliances that Christians might make with non-Christians, but light and darkness will never mix. True Christians will not place their trust in a movement that is anti-Christian. Their hope, as always, lies in repentance. The white nationalist movement is particularly interesting in this regard because it mirrors our history as a nation and a race. The wheat and chaff have always grown up together. The difference is that atheists, until quite recently, have not had sufficient numbers to show their true faces in public. In past times, they always dressed up their atheism with Christian lingo and affectations. So while bitter disagreements about the truth of God’s Word are nothing new, it is very new to think that the West that has actually existed can be preserved without its Christian faith. Kinists aren’t the only ones who recognize this as a fool’s errand. Go ahead and read Johnson’s article, and it will be immediately apparent to you that the white homeland he seeks, where Christians in the ranks are utilized only to bring churches in line, and where there is naught but condescension for the church’s duty to call upon Caesar to obey the Word of God, is the white homeland of Greg Johnson’s fantasy, not the white homeland that has actually existed for a very long time. If white nationalists wish to be taken seriously, the first step is to come out of the land of make-believe and into the real world.

If you want to get high and believe in purpose and providence in a world without God, which is basically the theme of those stupid Matrix movies, it would be more honest to call yourself a Buddhist. Just remember this: Buddhist white nationalism is as real as reincarnation. It has no basis in fact. Atheist white nationalists land some very well-placed criticisms against the wayward churches, but the problem is that the churches are wayward and liberal, not that they are faithful to their calling! I have no doubt that Greg Johnson would not wish to be associated with Kevin Strom and James von Brunn, but he doesn’t hesitate to lump together all who call themselves Christians (even Mormons), and then condemn Christianity on the basis of his false associations.

“The white man’s love for his race was greatest when his faith in the risen Lord was greatest.” ~ CWNY

“The Europeans believed wisdom came through the blood. Their God entered the bloodstream of humanity and they kept the knowledge of God in their hearts. The Christian church does not consist of those people who give their assent to a philosophical system that contains Christ somewhere in the midst of the system. The Christian church consists of those Christians who have a blood faith, the type of faith that the Hebrew prophets, St. Paul and the older Europeans had.”

The NIV, while not a perfect translation of the Bible, does a beautiful job on Romans 9:3:

For I could wish that I myself were cursed and cut off from Christ for the sake of my brothers, those of my own race…

James Kalb makes a very good point about Galatians 3:28 here. In the context of this verse, Judeochristians typically claim that the things we think are most important have no importance at all. (Bombastic Joe Morecraft’s word is “insignificant.”) But this is the opposite of what the apostle is teaching. He is saying that spiritual unity in Christ is so important that it is even more important than the most important things in life. If he had compared it to things that really are insignificant, he would have said, “There is neither New York Times nor USA Today crossword puzzle expert; there is neither John Deere nor Husqvarna lawn mower owner; there is neither B cup nor C cup; for you are all one in Christ Jesus.” We are again compelled to ask the question: When will Bible teachers return to the Bible?

Matthew Henry believed that “we must acquiesce in the order of nature God hath established, believing that is best and sufficient, and not covet monsters… As what God has joined we must not separate, so what he has separated we must not join.” William Blackstone tells us that “monsters” are “nullius filius, kin to nobody.” A monster “hath no heritable blood, and cannot be heir to any land…because it is not capable of inheriting. And therefore, if there appears no other heir than such a prodigious birth, the land shall escheat to the lord” (Commentary on the Law, Vol. II, Ch. XV). Ehud agrees with these learned men, and wisely refers us to Lev. 19:19, which prohibits the breeding of livestock with other kinds. “[T]he laws regarding cattle haven’t chiefly to do with cattle, but with human relations (1 Cor. 9:9-10).” Choose life! Abstain from bastardy.

Fathers only chasten sons, not “bastards” (baseborn, adulterated, cross-bred, mongrel). “Of course, as our modern English texts have conspicuously replaced the politically incorrect terms mongrel and bastard with the word illegitimate, the modern Luther Bible has likewise replaced bastarde with the denatured term, Ausgestobene, meaning ‘outcasts.’”

This is an excellent review from Kinism.net of Greg Bahnsen’s uncharacteristically ridiculous defense of miscegenation. If he had lived to debate a Kinist, he would have walked away looking like Gordon Stein. John Marshall is correct that “Bahnsen’s reading of the matter is superficial at best, and tendentious at worst.” There are plenty of good points made on the Kinism.net page, including that the act of thinking is itself a process of discrimination. And don’t miss the Owen Barfield quote!

Bahnsen defines “racism” as treating races differently. By this (absence of) logic, the governor of Arizona could be indicted as both a “countryist” and “racist.” After all, if “God looks on all humanity as a common humanity,” what right do we have to prevent Mexicans from crossing the border? Aren’t they made in God’s image too?

It’s interesting, though, that Bahnsen didn’t go as far as most pastors today. Though he denied that race should be a biblical factor in marriage, he affirmed that parents might have valid reasons for forbidding marriage on the basis of race. This is evidence that Bahnsen lived in a liberal time, and it’s also evidence that his time was not as liberal as ours. Now it’s common for pastors to denounce a sanction of this kind as blatant sinfulness, and to bring under discipline anyone who promotes it.

Bahnsen calls “the sin of racism” a violation of the Sixth Commandment. As Ehud shows here, Bahnsen’s own, incomparable Westminster Confession of Faith states the exact opposite.

The sixth commandment requireth all lawful endeavors to preserve our own life, and the life of others… The sixth commandment forbiddeth the taking away of our own life, or the life of our neighbor unjustly, or whatsoever tendeth thereunto.

You are categorically forbidden, as a Christian, from allowing your people to perish. Your duty, as a Christian, is to make war against foreign and domestic threats to your nation’s existence.

“If we do not defend ourselves, none will defend us; if we yield, we will be more and more pressed as we recede; and if we submit, we will be trampled underfoot.” ~ John C. Calhoun

Crazy Uncle Tom Fleming nails it here as he launches a broadside against sentimentalists (most of whom are Christians, making them more properly “mentalists”).

What this sort of thinking leads to was on display recently when a group of Southern Baptists were caught smuggling children out of Haiti. Whether or not the parents received any money, whether or not the child-savers really had an orphanage, whether or not they were acting even before the earthquake is of little interest to me. What is interesting is the moral arrogance of the Americans who assume, first, that the kids will be better off in a society that is committed to destroying whatever human norms may still exist even in Haiti; and second, that it is their right to impose Third World children with who knows what sort of native abilities and disabilities ultimately on the people of the United States.

Oh, but Haiti is such a poor and violent country. Don’t we have a duty to rescue Haitian children? But why is Haiti such a poor country and America so rich? Could it possibly be that it is because America is populated by Americans and Haiti by Haitians?…

It would be nice to have just one example in which such remedies have worked with people who were neither European nor Asian.

In his forthcoming article, Crazy Uncle Tom will explain that he is not a racist, has never been a racist, and loathes all racists. Unconvinced leftists will condemn him for his moral turpitude. Fleming will descend into a world-is-ending funk and will spend the next six months insulting his friends. Then he will write another racist article. Wash, rinse, and repeat.

Evangelical Relevance scales new heights of glory!

Meet Steroid Sam, the new leader of the Power Team:

Arizona’s reassertion of state sovereignty in a crisis that the “federal” government has encouraged is the most significant action of its kind since the 1960s. I feel a change in the wind. Texas, Utah, and South Carolina are following.

Naturally, Jews and their clones are denouncing Arizonans as “Nazis.” Speaking of which, Tim Tebow’s family showed up for the NFL draft hoping to kill six million Jews. “It looked like some kind of Nazi rally,” said a radio show host. “So lily-white is what I’m trying to say. Yeah, Stepford Wives.” This article on so-called socially-maladjusted homeschoolers explains much of the hatred for Tebow’s success.

Jews are mighty upset by the new Arizona law, even as they build a massive wall along Israel’s Egyptian border to keep African aliens out, both legal and illegal. Those who are granted guest visas to Israel must sign a statement promising not to have sexual relations with Israeli women, even prostitutes. This is to say nothing of the poor Ethiopians, who once thought that Judaism was a religion and are now being contracepted out of existence.

I ain’t no ordinary jigaboo!
I’se yo Kosher Nigger-Jew!

But the point is, Arizonans are racists, and the ADL intends to do something about it.

So do black agitators, who vow to childishly create disturbances whenever they don’t like the law. Years later, these tantrums will be lionized as “peaceful, non-violent protests.” Except that they’re not, and vandalism is the least of it. Keep in mind that you could tally the crimes committed by Tea Partiers over the past couple of years, and your number would be somewhere around zero. Just since the news broke that Arizona is simply trying to enforce a federal law that the “federal” government doesn’t care to enforce, there have been numerous crimes committed by leftists.

Leftists respond that Tea Partiers should hate the Arizona law because they profess to favor reduced government. This is where the schizophrenia of Tea Partiers, and colorblind conservatives in general, comes back to bite them. Every time a Tea Partier shouts that he’s going to take his country back, there is an unmistakable racial subtext, despite his protestations to the contrary. Liberals can see right through it.

Everyone knows that if Mexicans were wealthy and stayed in their own country, and Canadians were coming across the border looking for low-paying jobs, there would be some grumbling about jobs that were being taken from Americans, but there would be none of the racial animosity that now drives the Aztlan movement. Since “conservatives” are self-castrated, they are very careful not to link their support for Arizona to anything racial. In public, at least, they essentially become libertarians, abandoning covenant for economy. This is what leads them to hypocritically denounce the Dutch for not wishing to be overrun by racial and religious strangers, even as they themselves do not wish to be overrun by racial and religious strangers.

The Glenn Beck types have a vested interest then in making sure that when they say “the American people,” they mean a generic people with no common religion, no common race, and no common cultural heritage…

When the European man embraced democracy he unknowingly embraced the devil… All the European’s best instincts were killed when he tried to cater to some abstract idea of the people’s will. Far better to listen to the call of the blood.

A non-democratic European is the liberals’ and the barbarians’ greatest nightmare because they cannot understand, having never felt connected to God or another human being at the deepest level, what motivates a man to fight against impossible odds, against all reason, out of love for the Savior and His people.

“A country that cannot control its borders isn’t really a country anymore.” ~ Pat Buchanan

It’s true. The health of any country can be measured by its willingness to defend its borders. The “United States of America” ceased to be a country a long time ago. Now we only care about Israel’s borders, and anyone who wants to defend our southern border against the encroachments of a hostile race, which every country has always done, is called a racist. For weeks now, I’ve listened to politicians (who share traits with serial killers) and celebrities and anyone whose job is at risk from giving offense, backpedal furiously when asked directly if deporting aliens is a good thing (regardless of cost). This is not a country.

“The average hourly wage for American workers, adjusted for inflation, has risen only 36 cents in 33 years, from $16.39 per hour in 1973 to $16.75 per hour in 2006. There has been no growth in real income this century.”

Every American is paying $330 a year to provide government services for illegal aliens. When they retire, it will cost us $2.6 trillion. Oh, and American Idol wants you to give generously to treat AIDS in Africa. The check’s in the mail!

More immigrants are needed to pay the bills, says Bill Clinton. “Which is why California, the state with the highest proportion of immigrants and children of immigrants, is in such great fiscal shape compared to, say, North Dakota.”

Scheduling moving trucks for pederasts is hard work, as the pope knows. Many clergymen like to take a break from their duties and denounce the deportation of illegal aliens as “Nazi” and “Communist.”

Attention, wetbacks: Google Maps is ready when you are.

Wandering nomads whose ancestors now believe held a legal claim on an entire continent, without government, without law, without husbandry, without history, without God, ask arriving Pilgrims for their papers. Oh, that’s a hoot!

Newsweek is on the job! Hot off the wire: Tea Partiers are 25% more likely to be racists. What news could be more important at the present time? And what reason do white people have to be “racially resentful”? Could it have anything to do with being expected to pay through the nose to feed the world, fight wars for Jews, open the borders to hostile races, and ignore 40,000 rapes per year of their women? Jews and their clones are writing about the “racism” (i.e., whiteness) of Tea Parties because it allows them to avoid covering stories like this. You can see why Newsweek is nearly bankrupt.

A new tribe is rising, writes Pat Buchanan.

“Ethnonationalism—the recognition of an embryonic people that they are different from their neighbors, and the concomitant drive to live apart—is, as Arthur Schlesinger Jr. wrote 20 years ago, a more powerful force than any ideology, be it communism, fascism or democracy… Adversity and abuse increase the awareness of separate identity and accelerate the secession of peoples from each other.” In other words, the South will rise again, but in a different form.

Jared Taylor doesn’t share Buchanan’s praise of Tea Partiers.

Buchanan compares the Tea Party movement to the breakup of the Soviet Union along ethnic lines. Until Tea Partiers are prepared to echo the motto of the Vlams Belang Flemish-identity political party in Belgium - Eigen volk eerst! (Our people first!) – that comparison is fantasy. The motto of the Tea Party Patriots, “fiscal responsibility, limited government, and free markets,” is hardly a celebration of ethnic identity…

Don’t expect a speaker at a Tea Party rally to point out the contradiction between wanting “good” schools, “safe” neighborhoods, and “diversity.”

It takes a “racist” to point out the color of “good” schools and “safe” neighborhoods. That’s why “racists” are our favorite people in the world. They are both honest and courageous. They’re polite too!

Tea Partiers are pro-feminist, as long as feminists can win votes for the Republican Party. This shows that white people are starting to get angry but are not yet serious.

“Do you ever see the NAACP bragging that they’re not a black organization? How about the Urban League? No, these groups are proud of standing up for their people. The same goes for Mexicans and La Raza. Do AIPAC and the ADL pack their podiums with Muslims and Hindus when they get together? No, they don’t. So why do white people do it?”

Like Pavlov’s dogs, white people have been conditioned to be repulsed by white faces. The Tea Party Steering Committees are obsessed with getting blacks to join the movement so that they can be comforted by faces that look unlike their own. This is the same madness that drives Christian families to “adopt” strangers. They just can’t stand the overwhelming whiteness in the family portrait. They pretend that this is being called by God to minister to others, and they call it compassionate and charitable, but it is simply a pathological mental illness. A parasitic race with a destructive agenda has been spreading this virus through the schools and media for generations.

Do-gooders also frequently suffer from mental illness, like this woman, who, “ever committed to preserving the dignity of Black men in a world which constantly stereotypes them as violent savages,” says she’s “grateful for the experience” of having been raped all night by one of them. Finally, she blames it all on white racism FTW. Here’s another who appreciates the pain she endured from a gang rape because it helps her to appreciate the pain that blacks endured under slavery.

Speaking of the mentally ill, Sandra Bullock was oblivious to the well-known fact that her husband is a model whoremonger, and now that she is single, doesn’t seem to realize that a single-parent home is not ideal for any child, much less an adopted one, much less an “adopted” child of a different race. She doesn’t seem to be aware of the alienation experienced by black children raised in white homes. But she does understand the liberal “cultural trope that what black children need is to be taken away from their black parents for as much of their waking hours as possible and raised right,” as Steve Sailer puts it. This is the white supremacy that liberals find unavoidable.

The cover of that magazine would have been outlawed as lewd in a more civilized age. White women used to grace the covers of their magazines with beauty.

Mestizos dump their swarthy families to copulate with white women. The crazy thing is that voters seem to love it.

Haitians are now leaving their homes and jobs to join tent cities, where everything is free. This has ruined the economy, according to the Haitian government, and now farmers and businessmen are unable to sell their goods. All in a month’s work for the do-gooder West! What else can we do for you today? The idiotic Judeochristians who have set up adoption programs to remove Haitian kids from their own people, so that the selfish maternal urges of middle-aged American women can be satisfied, now look even more ridiculous, if such a thing is possible.

The covenant is established through the blood, as O. Palmer Robertson taught (Deut. 5 & 29). Or as CWNY puts it, “There has never been, nor will there ever be, a deep Faith in the living God without the fire that can only be kindled by the bonds human beings form with their kith and kin… The faith must be planted in the blood if it is to take root and grow.” (You can also read at that link what pro-white neo-pagans have in common with Jews.)

To insist on service from white people, and for a business to accomodate this request from a customer, is a “civil rights” violation. “So, it’s ‘discrimination’ if the hotel chooses to cater to its guests, but it’s NOT discrimination to ban guests from renting a room for the night.” Freedom of association has been effectively outlawed.

Asking questions of a black state senator is the “evil of white supremacy.”

Groceries are a civil right, and Kroger is racist.

Vacationing, the newest “human right.” Liberals have a long list of rights, all of them subsidized with someone else’s money.

Birds are racist.

“Black thugs raping, robbing and murdering America’s best and brightest, well, that’s a shame, but it’s nothing compared to white people pointing it out and complaining about it.”

No hate crime here, folks! “Two men beaten senseless by angry mobs for their beliefs, and not a single person arrested.”

Now that the flood waters have subsided and New Orleans has been rebuilt and Negroes have returned to it, the “Chocolate City” reclaims its title as one of the most violent cities in the world. “New Orleans is one of several mini-South Africas located inside the United States.”

Remember when it was legal for cops to racially profile?

There have been more murders in South Africa in two months than Ireland has seen in 30 years. The Jewmedia will tackle this problem immediately with a series of news articles on the epidemic of white racism in Ireland.

What George Orwell called “facecrime” has now come true. “A racist incident is any incident which is perceived to be racist by the victim or any other person.”

Now a Harvard student has been reported to the authorities for having opinions. A university is no place for that sort of illegality.

How’s this for irony? An actual sign in front of Orwell’s house in Barcelona:

As James Edwards always says, you can have liberty or you can have diversity, but you can’t have both.

Media outlets everywhere, including Drudge, trumpeted the Terreblanche-like murder of Richard Barrett, a Mississippi attorney who once argued and won a case before the U.S. Supreme Court, with this headline: “White supremacist ‘stabbed and beaten to death by his black neighbour’ in Mississippi town.” Jews choose their words carefully. Barrett was just asking to be killed, it is implied, because he was a “white supremacist.” His murderer is described in friendly terms, as a “neighbor.” What’s more, this neighborly neighbor was just doing his job, and all of a sudden he snapped. The sheriff “did not disclose a motive,” because then we would have to investigate a hate crime, and we’re trying to reserve those for white people. A more accurate headline would be “Elderly white patriot viciously murdered by black convict,” but this wouldn’t have had the desired effect.

“I wonder if Mark Potok and the other race hustlers at the Southern Poverty Law Center have black ex-cons doing their yardwork.”

“Slaves began to be imported into Italy in numbers in the second century B.C. to work the large plantations—latifundia—of the wealthy Romans. This importation of slaves and the ultimate extension of the Roman citizenship to their manumitted descendants and to inferior races throughout the growing Empire and the losses in internal and foreign wars, ruined the state. In America we find another close parallel in the Civil War and the subsequent granting of citizenship to Negroes and to ever increasing numbers of immigrants of plebeian, servile or Oriental races, who throughout history have shown little capacity to create, organize or even to comprehend Republican institutions. In Rome, when this change in blood was substantially complete, the state could no longer be operated under Republican forms of government and the Empire arose to take its place. At the beginning the Empire was clothed in the garb of republicanism in deference to such Roman elements as still persisted in the Senate and among the Patricians but ultimately these external forms were discarded and the state became virtually a pure despotism.” ~ Madison Grant, The Passing of the Great Race

Does any of that sound familar to you?

Michael Jackson’s mother is segregating the colors. You know racism must be bad when it works its way into the Jackson household. I wish I had thought to use the name “Jermajesty” for my son. Negroes are so creative.

Gary DeMar plays the fool again by pretending that black illegitimacy would not be rampant today if not for welfare money. He argues that blacks are mired in sin because the government has subsidized immorality and illegitimacy. Blacks didn’t even understand the concept of marriage until they were brought here as slaves. Their animalistic tendencies were muted only by the discipline of domestic government and Christian civilization. Even after slavery ended, black families continued to be somewhat stable, though there was a level of promiscuity 60 years ago that whites are committing only now. It took some time, but after the paternal hand of the slaveowner was removed from their heads, black degeneracy steadily rose to shocking levels over the span of a couple of generations. It is far, far worse today, and it’s true that the welfare boom of the 1960s exacerbated the problems by removing the need for fathers. But this doesn’t mean that blacks only act black when they live under socialism. DeMar’s theory is easily shown to be false by a casual survey of black societies over the course of their entire history and in all places. Women have been meat for black men both before they came to America and still today. But Gary DeMar, the racial imbecile, must explain it away as being the fault of slaveowners breaking up families 200 years ago. There are two small problems with this: 1) The Bible allows it; and 2) There were no black “families.”

Let’s hear from two presbyterians who were infinitely wiser than Gary DeMar.

“Their minds, perverted with vain dreams of the powers and perfectibility of the State, cannot be made to apprehend that God has made other parties than the commonwealth and the civil magistrate, depositories of ruling power; and that this arrangement is right and benevolent.” ~ R.L. Dabney

“In the first place, we would have it distinctly understood that, in our ecclesiastical capacity, we are neither friends nor the foes of slavery, that is to say, we have no commission either to propagate or abolish it. The policy of its existence or nonexistence is a question which exclusively belongs to the state. We have no right, as a church, to enjoin it as a duty or to condemn it as a sin.” ~ James Thornwell

We can’t help but wonder if DeMar’s never-ending spew of anti-white nonsense comes from his own Moorish heritage:

This writer is confused on a number of points, which leads him to draw some dubious connections, but he deserves credit for recognizing that the gospel of Jesus Christ, as professed by John Calvin, Cornelius Van Til, and Greg Bahnsen, calls for God’s law to be obeyed both inside and outside church doors. This is quite an alarming thought to a liberal, who feels that one day in seven is more than enough for the Jesus talk. Christians actually believe that murderers must die, according to God’s law, and Gary North’s argument that we can’t do anything about it unless a “covenantal agent” acts on our behalf is laughable. This would be like failing to shoot an armed trespasser because that’s the job of the police. It makes perfect sense that the very same people call Confederates “terrorists.”

The nobility of the Confederate soldier compared to the savagery of the Imperial soldier.

The greatest of all Americans is now considered too embarrassing to honor because he offends strangers.

Three hundred thousand Yankees
Is stiff in southern dust
We got three hundred thousand
Before they conquered us.

The Truth…according to Yankees. “Southerners always make up flattering stories about themselves while Northerners just tell the true facts.”

View the first issues of the Citizen’s Council newspapers from the fifties and sixties! This is a real treasure. Ed Sebesta (picture), the moron who posted them, who hates whites, federalism, and white federalism, is too thick to realize that he just did my generation a big favor. You can understand his motive, though. He has written: “Confederate symbols as the tools of Confederate ideology are a threat to lesbians and gays.” Indeed. Among faggots, he writes, “Interracial dating is much more accepted [than] dating across class boundaries… [T]his fluid mixing challenges the Confederate hierarchical idea of society with its many divisions of race, class, and ethnic groups.” Double indeed. As a friend commented to me, it’s very strange that the Left, which claims to favor the new and expedient over the historical and traditional, is always so obsessed with our history. Ironically and unfortunately, our side is not particularly concerned about preserving our own movement history.

An excellent article from Chuck Baldwin on secession.

I doubt that there are many Christian pastors and churchmen who would be willing to denounce, denigrate, or declare as illegitimate the nation-state of Norway today. What Christian would advocate cutting off trade or diplomatic relations with Norway? Where is the Christian denomination or Church that would not recognize the right of Norway to peacefully exist?

Of course, Norway’s parliament dissolved the union between Sweden and Norway on June 7, 1905. While an attempted dissolution that had taken place in 1814 was squashed by a Swedish military victory, the separation of 1905 was done peacefully and without bloodshed (although Norway was willing to shed blood, had it been required). Since Norway’s secession in 1905, the two neighboring countries have enjoyed extremely close – even brotherly – relations.

So, where is the spiritual condemnation for Norway? Who among us would quote Romans 13, et al., in an attempt to demonize the brave, independent spirit of the Norwegians?

By the same token, where is the spiritual outrage over the dissolution of Czechoslovakia? On January 1, 1993, the federal State of Czechoslovakia separated into the Czech Republic and Slovakia. This has been called the “Velvet Divorce” in political parlance, due to the amicable and peaceful nature of the separation. (Of course, Czechoslovakia itself had come into existence by the breakup of Austria-Hungary at the end of World War I.)

We could go on an on with historical examples of how nation-states separated – by either violent or non-violent means. So, why is it that Christians, pastors, and churchmen will not so much as bat an eye at the numerous State separations that have taken place over the centuries, but suddenly become righteously indignant when discussing the American South’s attempted separation from the Union in 1861 – or even of the 13 Colonies’ separation from Great Britain in 1776?

Obamination reaches out to his base: jigs, wets, and nags. “I can’t remember, in my lifetime, such an overt appeal to racial identity by a sitting President.”

Obama has increased military funding in Africa by 300%, but it has nothing to do with race, of course. Besides, we have money to burn.

Never trust a man who doesn’t get dirt under his fingernails. “[Obama] has never lifted a shovel or driven a truck or had to make a payroll. He has never grown a tomato or convicted a criminal. He has never coached a team or bagged groceries. He has never cleaned a toilet for minimum wage, never hammered a nail for a serious purpose, never made a cold call on a customer trying to sell encyclopedias, never climbed a ladder to paint the third story of a house. He has never sat in a cubicle and processed forms or had to worry about his next evaluation. He’s never done anything but politics.” And almost none of that either. If his health care takeover is not overturned by the Supreme Court, it will be the first item on his resume. Yet this is the Great Mulatto whose Hope and Change will wash our sins of racism away.

Afghanistan will be conquered just as soon as we can understand this chart.

Kick your knees up, step in time
Kick your knees up, step in time
Never need a reason,
Never need a rhyme
Kick your knees up, step in time

I see that Cultist Doug Phillips is giving an award to Michelle Duggar, mother of 19. It’s unfortunate that she is participating in his Rent-a-Negro conference this year, but it’s true that she is a remarkable woman who is worthy of honor. The thing I appreciate most about her is her humility. She makes it clear that she and her hairspray-loving husband with the hillbilly name of Jim Bob view children as blessings and want to bless others with their example. But there’s a problem, and it is with those, like the poser Doug Phillips, who are promoting mega-families as a Christian imperative. Phillips even calls it murder to end an ectopic pregnancy that could kill the mother. There are times when “Quiverfull” Christians elevate the birthing of children to a duty higher than all others in life. While all Christian mothers would gladly sacrifice their lives for the lives of their children (born and unborn), there are many women who, for many reasons, are capable of having more children but have such high risk factors that their doctors strongly advise against it. This could be a woman in her forties who has had multiple surgeries and faces an inevitable and dangerous c-section or worse. The last thing a woman like this should do is treat the advice of a cultist as being of greater moment than the advice of a doctor, because only one of these actually knows what he’s talking about. In some cases, natural family planning can be an act of mercy. But there is no question that we, as an endangered race, should be doing everything we can to have as many children as we can afford.

Yes, affordability is a major consideration, and anyone who pretends otherwise is lying. The Duggars themselves are an interesting case in point. It’s wonderful that they are able to afford the needs of their huge family, but the average family is simply not going to be able to afford two big houses butted up against each other or a bus for transportation or a kitchen and pantry that most restaurants would envy, because they are not going to have a TV contract to pay their bills. Yet in our time, with infant mortality as low as it is, thanks to world-class medical technology, a couple who marries young and “trusts God” for as many children as physically possible could easily have far more than they can afford. Well-meaning folks are goaded by charlatans and hypocrites like Phillips into hyper-fecundity and “adoption” of Negroes and Orientals, and it places a tremendous strain on marriages and communities. In this sense only, it is wise to not get too carried away with what the Duggars have done.

At least Esau sold his birthright. Today’s “Christians” give the birthrights of their childen away to strangers for nothing.

The oldest Duggar boy got married and his first child was born last year. He and the wife of his youth very emphatically said they would not be having 19 children. They were asked if they would use contraception, and they hemmed and hawed. Clearly, they will take voluntary action of some kind to prevent pregnancies when they feel that their family is big enough, and they will keep it private, because they know that they will be publicly denounced for it, even if it’s as trivial as scheduling around ovulation.

Many of the Quiverfull people are doing good work, promoting sterilization reversal surgery, for instance. The problem, in a nutshell, is that many of them tend to remove the concept of stewardship from the gift of birth.

Anglicans, at the 1930 Lambeth Conference, resolved that birth control is permitted only “when there is a clearly felt moral obligation to limit or avoid parenthood and where there is a morally sound reason for avoiding complete abstinence.” (This also encompasses eugenics, so that genetic abnormalities are not passed to future generations.) “We utter an emphatic warning against the use of unnatural means for the avoidance of conception, together with the grave dangers – physical, moral, and religious – thereby incurred, and against the evils with which the extension of such use threatens the race.” There was a different emphasis ten years earlier, in 1920: “The Conference records its strong condemnation of the use of any methods of conception-control from motives of selfishness, luxury, or mere convenience.” So they went from disallowing even natural family planning to disallowing only unnatural means. But the camel’s nose was in the tent.

Joe Sobran writes about the effect of this decision here: “Few of us can now remember how sternly nearly all Christians disapproved of birth control before 1931, when the Anglican Church opened the floodgates with a few seemingly innocuous exceptions in certain cases of hardship. By now the old standards of chastity have melted away like ice in August.” Christians continue to wrestle with whether avoidance of pregnancy is the same as killing a human life, and the Duggars are not excepted. But Sobran is right; the hard cases did open the floodgates. The hard cases have also driven the abortion debate. Even back when the Attorney General of Kansas had to decide if it was permissible for a woman to wear pants to work, a hard case opened the floodgates to the ugliness of almost all women wearing pants today.

Feminists in the last century were eager to escape the “prison” of domestic life because, in the words of Robert Louis Stevenson, they had “not one thought to rub against another.” This explains why we are afflicted with TV chatter everywhere we go today, as though we’re living in a Bradbury novel. This has happened because stupid people need constant noise to distract them from the introspection and prayerfulness that serenity brings. This kind always prefers the chaos of big cities to the peaceful rural homestead.

So let me get this straight. Germans invented the first personal jet craft, called the Himmelstürmer (Skystormer), but they tried to asphyxiate the Jew race using old diesel engines to produce carbon monoxide? Apparently, brilliant German scientists, who made it possible for men to fly like birds, using jet packs, didn’t realize that diesel engines produce such small amounts of CO that they can be used in underground mines. Wasting their money in the heat of battle must not have bothered them. Well, there’s only one rational explanation: Aliens from Betelgeuse inhabited German bodies when the war started and left when the war ended. Any other explanation would be offensive to Jews, and therefore illegal.

Take fluoride, for instance. Google the word and you’ll find that Nazis were the first to use it medically, in concentration camps. This statement alone is supposed to make the Nazis look bad, and then you realize that your dentist is a big fan of the stuff, and everyone is fluoridating public water now. (A good reason to have a well.) But if this was yet another example of German pioneering, and if it was true that the Nazis planned the extermination of the Jew race, we must wonder if they were retarded. Why waste the expense, in wartime, of adding chemicals to the water supply for people who were on their way to the gas chambers? Of course, to even ask the question is an anti-Semitic felony, so let’s talk about something else.

A funny yidbug joke from a National Security Advisor.

Michael Hoffman is the world’s foremost expert in his field of research, but he’s so odd that he badgers his readers if they don’t pay him for writing, and when that doesn’t work, he insults them by calling them Jewish infiltrators! The following is an excerpt from an email he sent a few days ago. After thanking a couple of people who fund his work, he writes:

As for the rest of my readers, who number in the many thousands according to the Alexa online rating service, they are either reading my material for entertainment purposes, or could it be that there are that many ADL agents monitoring my column?

I can’t imagine what most of these disconnected, uninvolved people are thinking. I can’t parse it. It’s a mystery. They’re either too discouraged to do anything or contribute anything, or they are that species of human being that have no clue that you only reap what you sow.

We feel his pain, as Slick Willy used to say. There are only a couple of people who keep the lights burning at our office too, but we write because we are compelled to speak the truth, regardless of who reads it or even cares. If I may quote William Blake, “I tell the truth not to convince those who do not know it, but to defend those that do.” There’s nothing remotely political about it.

Even leftists admit that the English have been so brow-beaten by accusations of racism that they are afraid to fly their own flag.

Don’t you hate it when nerds think they’re funny?

The Earth from Mars.

“While a non-white breaking into a white sport is lionized and set up as a highly-sponsored poster boy by the global sports media, the same is not true in reverse. When the Ukrainian boxers Vitali and Vladimir Klitschko re-established white dominance of heavyweight boxing around the same time as Woods’ rise, the sponsors and media frenzy were noticeably absent. There is no word other than racism for this kind of double standard.” This is an extremely important point. I’ve had several pastors consign me to outer darkness, where there is weeping and gnashing of teeth, or so they thought. They did this, in reality, because I refuse to abide by their double standards. It is widely considered “racist” to use words that were perfectly appropriate to our honorable Christian forefathers. Today, the very same words are allowable only for certain groups who are approved by popular consensus. The word “racist” means the exact opposite of what it should mean, but this doesn’t stop Christians from using it liberally.

This is a strange interview. The king of westerns explains why High Noon is not as good as you think it is (though the theme song is unmatched). But then, having denounced it as un-American, he defends blacklisted Communist Jews.

After the blatant racialism of his Lord of the Rings and King Kong movies, I became a fan of Peter Jackson, so I was curious to see The Lovely Bones. I’ll never get those two hours back. It’s sentimental claptrap that is horrifying without being meaningful. I was most interested in the casting. The mother, Rachel Weisz, is a Jew. The father, Mark Wahlberg, has a Jewey name but is actually a Kraut. The daughter is a beautiful, freckle-faced, red-haired, blue-eyed Aryan. The girl’s love interest is a Moorish boy with an English accent who even calls himself the Moor. He looks completely out of place (the actors look just like these two), but the reference to Othello is obviously intended to signal the end of the peaceful, idyllic, homogeneous, suburban life of the early 1970s. The cinematic world is painted the color of Jew. There are no churches, no prayers, and no Christian imagery of any kind. There are only close-knit, traditional families that have no qualms whatsoever about mixing their blood, just as the preachers of today would have it. This is the only kind of America in which the Jew is welcome. No redemption is needed where there is no sin, and so everyone goes to heaven. In the fantasy world of the Jew, heaven is not what is described in the final chapter of the Bible, where the river of life, bordered by the tree of life, proceeds from the throne of the Lamb of God. No, heaven is all about beauty and forests and the seaside and playful laughter. There is no God in the midst of it, so heaven must have also evolved.

In other Hollywood news, here are Lando and Chewie in the new low-budget remake of The Empire Strikes Back:

We love this image of the outstretched arms in heil at the Terreblanche funeral. It’s the kind of image that makes a world of white-haters quake with fear.

It’s because of images like this and Terreblanche’s masculine apartheid flag that the group is being called “neo-Nazi” everywhere. This is not true, but even if it were true, South African survival is more important than South African politics. The countless whites who are trying to score points with their enemies by saying “good riddance” to Terreblanche only shame themselves.

In the golden warmth of summer,
In the chill of winter’s air,
In the surging life of springtime,
In the autumn of despair;
When the wedding bells are chiming,
Or when those we love depart,
Thou dost know us for thy children
And dost take us to thy heart.
Loudly peals the answering chorus;
We are thine, and we shall stand,
Be it life or death, to answer
Thy call, beloved land.

CWNY reminds us that John Paul II called Nelson Mandela a “freedom fighter,” but Terreblanche is called a “white supremacist.”

Christianity’s roots are in humanity, in the blood. Sever those roots and Christianity becomes liberalism. All halfway house Christians who want Christianity without the depth of feeling that can only be engendered by love for our kind – our family members and our people – will eventually become part of liberalism’s kingdom of thorns…

The liberals want white people to believe that so long as they are without sin, so long as they vote for Obama, condemn South Africa and Southern American white supremacists, and cheer every time there is a mixed-race marriage, they will be able to sleep safe and sound in their beds. But they are warned; if they tread the path of white supremacy, which means white solidarity against race-mixing and bestial savagery, they will be exterminated…

Can the modern day neo-pagans boast of any heroes that can equal Andries Pretorius, the white Christian leader of the punitive expedition against the Zulus at Blood River? No, they can’t. So it seems that the reality is that the white man is not in decline because he is Christian, but is in decline because he is insufficiently Christian…

The neo-pagans talk about Viking sperm banks and getting the neo-pagan message out to white people. That is not what the European cares about. He has one message: “I will serve Christian Europe, or else I will not serve.” The thorns must be painstakingly removed from our sacred nation. Then we must plant the seeds of a blood faith deep into the European soil again.

“Can’t you understand that we have our own history, our own culture, our own language, our own religion?” The Negro answer: “From your perspective, and it’s a very narrow perspective.” How does one even begin to grasp the vacuousness, the equivocation, of such an answer? We will not happily accept our genocide, as they wish, and anyone who expects us to do so is both our enemy and God’s enemy.

I like how CWNY calls the “civil rights movement” what it actually was: a mixed-race movement.

The mixed-race movement was the precursor of the sexual revolution. When a European embraces race-mixing, he must not only reject the authenticity of the Bible, he must also reject the traditional wisdom of the European people. He must believe that the strictures against interracial marriage and the desire to live with one’s own kind were the prejudices of a sick and demented people. Henceforth the new European will emerge, free of prejudice and free from any ties to kith or kin. His is a universal tie to all mankind…

Racial Babylon and Sexual Babylon are fraternal twins…

Little pious tracts by hypocritical liars such as Harper Lee, in which the white Christian horror of race-mixing is depicted as a sick prejudice, paved the way for the great barbarian blood and sex orgy of today. Rape and murder by colored barbarians is so familiar now in every European country that we no longer even raise our eyebrows in response. The only action that ever elicits a response from the white liberals is when a white man actually condemns black savagery.

Political correctness “demands that our intellectual discourse aspire towards Williams Syndrome,” a form of mental retardation.

Never has a human population been found that has no racial stereotypes. Not in other cultures or far-flung countries. Nor among tiny tots or people with various psychological conditions.

Until now.

Children with Williams Syndrome, a rare genetic disorder that makes them lack normal social anxiety, have no racial biases.

But before your lying preacher has visions of sugarplums dancing in his head, it seems that colorblindness is not all it’s cracked up to be:

They will put themselves at great peril to help someone and despite their skills at empathy, are unable to process social danger signals. As a result, they are at increased risk for rape and physical attack.

Hey, don’t worry about violence at the World Cup in South Africa this year. A new invention designed especially for Negroes will take a bite out of a rapist’s weapon.

Rape-aXe is a flexible polyurethane condom-like tube that fits into the woman’s body. Rows of jagged plastic hooks line the inside of the tube – bent backward like teeth in a shark’s mouth – and lodge in a perpetrator’s penis upon entry. The perpetrator can withdraw from the woman, but the Rape-aXe remains clamped on.

The “president” of South Africa himself is a confessed rapist, but he said it would have been “ungentlemanly not to rape the woman.” Negroes know all about chivalry.

“It would have been better if whites had continued to rule because the money would have continued to come… Now we have no money, no food.”

Doug Phillips is hosting a “baby conference” that has the aim of convincing white families to adopt Negroes. He calls this system of unbiblical adoption a triumph over “the culture of death.”

We’re very sorry to hear that the president of Poland, who outlawed faggot parades in Warsaw, died in a plane crash en route to an unprecedented day (after 70 years!) in which major heads of state honored 22,000 Polish officers murdered 70 years ago by the Soviets in the Katyn Forest massacre. He had planned to say in his speech: “All the localities associated with the Katyn crimes must be revealed and investigated…[and] all documents in relation to this crime be made available.” This is precisely what the Jews avoid with all their might concerning the Holohoax.

The unnecessary war:

On Sept. 3, 1939, Britain and France declared war on Germany to restore the integrity and independence of Poland. For this great goal they converted a German-Polish clash that lasted three weeks – into a world war lasting six years.

And was Poland saved? No. Poland was crucified…

Before, during and after the Nuremberg trials that would convict the Nazis of “crimes against humanity,” one of the greatest crimes against humanity in history was being committed. Fifteen million Germans – old men, women, children – were driven like cattle out of ancestral homes in Prussia, Pomerania, Brandenburg, Silesia and the Sudetenland.

Cuban soap is anti-Semitic.

Bishop Williamson was found guilty of denying the Holohoax. As Michael Hoffman writes, Williamson “would not be in any hot water with the Catholic Church if he had denied that Mohammed had flown to heaven from Al Quds, or doubted that Mormon founder Joseph Smith found the golden plates on Hill Cumorah. Williamson has been made a leper for casting doubt on a doctrine which both the Vatican and the SSPX hold sacred, the new creed of Holocaustianity… How long do the vassals of Rome imagine that God will be mocked by popes who make common cause with the ideological and spiritual descendants of those who stoned, laid hands upon and conspired in the murder of His Divine Son?”

Wow! They’re surviving in the second generation now. That’s what I call survivability. Anyone who can survive like that deserves a taxpayer-funded pension, and so do their children to a thousand generations.

Pope Benedict, who threw Williamson to the wolves, on “the good of the Universal Church.”

More race-mixing propaganda from Jews who are gloating that their campaign of media indoctrination is working.

The guileless murders of a “pro-life” president.

Kosovo, a pseudo-nation created by Islamic illegal aliens and backed by the American empire.

“‘The government should dissolve the people and elect another one,’ quipped the Communist playwright Bertolt Brecht after the East German riots of 1953. For good or ill, the U.S. political elite seems to be acting on his advice.” ~ Peter Brimelow, 1992

We have learned that Byron Jost, the producer of A Line in the Sand, died recently in Cambodia. His remains were cremated in Phnom Penh. Some are saying that it was a heroin overdose. Very sad.

Golf has always been a refined and gentlemanly game, but now that a black man has been found who has a talent for the game, decorum is a distant memory.

Notice that Tiger Woods, at his ballyhooed press conference, with his adoring mother present, beaming with pride for the humility of her whoremonger son, never bothered to apologize to the white women he treated like meat. He still hasn’t apologized. Sports idolaters are gushing over his admittedly stunning golf swings. The endorsement money is rolling in again. Does anyone care about the casualties? Sure, they were whores, but so is Tiger’s own “wife.” It’s no consolation to know that she has now become cognizant of her station.

“She’ll betray her family for an ugly mongrel because he’s rich and famous, but if he copulates with a porn actress, well, that’s the last straw. A girl’s got to have standards, right?”

Despite his vaunted mixed-race credentials, the women of only one race need apply for the job of being Tiger’s whore.

From his Nordic model wife to the dumpiest diner waitress, all of his trysts are with white women.

So much for the ideal, mixed race, perfect man of the future, eh?

Segregation in the old South was all about maintaining racial integrity and civilization. About keeping our wives and daughters safe from sexual animals like Tiger. About building up and maintaining what is noble and good.

If the “black messiahs” like Tiger Woods and Martin Luther King, Jr. are such animals, what about the mere mortals among them?

Do we want to find out?

What will it be like when merely pointing this out is outlawed? Do we even want to imagine what the world will be then?…

We don’t owe them any apologies for anything. They can go to Hell.

Now, keep fresh in your mind the South’s utter refusal to allow anything like Tiger Woods to exist, and read on for the latest anti-Confederate hysteria.

“The State of Virginia has decided to honor the people who actually fought in her defense! Doesn’t Governor Bob McDonnell know that you’re only supposed to issue proclamations of support in favor of blacks and homosexuals these days?”

“Jews, White liberals, parasites, and negroes across America quickly began to shriek in horror about the Confederacy’s horrible legacy of racism and slavery. As everyone knows by now, McDonnell folded under pressure and issued a wimpy apology in which he decried slavery as the cause of the War Between the States.”

Pat Buchanan summons a litany of facts to put liars in their place, but the real value of his tremendous article comes near the end when he correctly observes that slavery is merely a stand-in for the real subjects of vilification: “Southern white Christian men.” Still, we think it’s an unbiblical cop-out to concede that slavery was evil (though it certainly was an evil for whites).

I like Clyde Wilson’s comment here: “What a disgusting mess of a pseudo-country the U.S. is. My family on both sides were here in the 1600s and played a modest part in everything since. And I am lectured about my own evil history by someone named Ramesh Ponurru. The U.S. is not a country, it is a dead carcass being picked over by international con artists.”

Contrast the harakiri over Virginia honoring men who fought and died in her defense with this letter from the state of Florida to a Confederate widow in 1933. To her was owed a “debt of gratitude…[that] cannot be estimated in material wealth and therefore, cannot be composed by mere payment of money. It is a liability that cannot be expressed in dollars; but it can be enshrined in the sacred archives of tradition; and by teaching the succeeding generations that by your actions, experience and devotion to a sacred principle you have proved that God does not force us into deep water to drown us, but to cleanse us. And that adversity is the trial of principle without which one hardly knows whether or not he is honest; unless, like those who fought for the ‘Lost Cause,’ he is sorely tried, smelted, polished and glorified in the furnace of our tribulation. If we remain true to our ideals and steadfast to our principles, as exemplified by those who followed the ‘Stars and Bars,’ we are reminded that honor is likened to certain herbs and flowers; they send forth their most delightful odors only after they have been crushed and broken. Therefore we should, all of us, profit from the experience and example of you brave souls who have conquered discouragement and despair and have, Phoenix-like, risen from the dead ashes of destitution and want to the heights of honor, peace and tranquility.”

This paper on Dixie by Dr. Michael Hill is simply excellent. You can see why he is so admired.

CNN provides a forum to a suited savage who compares Confederates to the Taliban (“they were, and forever will be, domestic terrorists”).

Here’s a Negro who, fresh from having suckled at the tits of academia, is worked up about the Confederate “Nazi” flag having flown over slave states. He is not as obstreperous as one might expect though. It is explained to him that the American flag flew over slave states much longer, but a lot of people still salute it. The British flag also flew over slave states, but it didn’t stop us from seceding from that empire. It might interest you to know that when Fort Sumter was fired upon, there were more slaves states in the USA than in the CSA. Just one month earlier, Lincoln himself, in his first inaugural, proposed perpetual constitutional protection of slavery if only the Southern states would rejoin his soon-to-be-compulsory “Union” and keep Northern bankers in the green.

“Political language…is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind.” ~ George Orwell

As recently as 2002, “Ben Jones – who is best known for his role of Cooter in the Dukes of Hazzard – ran as a Democrat against Eric Cantor, now Republican minority Whip, in Virginia’s seventh congressional district. Jones campaigned in the famous General Lee – a bright orange Dodge Charger with a Confederate flag painted on the roof – from the TV show.”

You know what else is Nazi? Straight Pride t-shirts. “It’s like white supremacy,” says Penny Gardner, president of the Lansing Association for Human Rights.

Quoting John Lennon is racist.

Animal racism is a capital offense. My guess is that PETA will have no complaints.

I’m just warning you in advance, you’re not going to believe this. Homeschool associations are ever on the prowl for token Negroes. Meet Cedric Saunders, who tells stories and makes trumpet sounds with his lips. He’ll be at the Illinois state homeschool convention in June to talk about George Washington Carver and Booker T. Washington, who are apparently the only two black men of moderate renown in American history. But have a look at his closing speech: “The Lump of Clay – Minority Gathering Only.” Yes, ladies and germs, you read it correctly. No word yet on whether other speakers will be hosting white-only events. Doug Phillips should hire this guy to be his token Negro if Voddie Baucham is ever under the weather.

Racist cops are always “focusing on the bad” and pepper-spraying innocent youths.

Typos are annoying, but they’s everywhere. Normal people, after a modicum of grumbling, tend to overlook them. But no expense must be spared to eliminate typos that make humorless minorities and women uncomfortable. Thus, an Australian publisher has been forced to recall an edition of a cookbook after a recipe for spelt tagliatelle gave instructions to include a dash of “salt and freshly ground black people.” Whatever it takes to spare the fragile mood of a Negro; we live to serve.

Snake-handling, sanctified baptists from Kentucky are running wild through Chicago, shooting everyone who disrespects them. Clearly, poverty and low education are to blame for the violence.

Just as there is a futile effort to close the racial gap in education, the HHS Secretary intends to close the racial gap in health care.

So that if say, the elderly are disproportionately white, Washington may go and decide that taking money away from programs helping older Americans to fund health clinics in inner-city neighborhoods would contribute to reducing health care gaps. Both the advantage accrued to blacks and the reduced life expectancy for whites would be seen as pluses.

What diversity looks like.

Another white, conservative movement is being compromised. It always begins this way, with accusations of racism, and then those involved do everything they can to keep from being called racists, at which time the movement bears no resemblance to its original. Invariably, participation by blacks curses every white political movement.

As sure as the sun rises, “any black in a leadership position over a largely white organization will blame criticism of himself on the racism of the organization he is leading.”

Trapped between a rock and a black face.

Steele hasn’t brought any blacks into the party.

It’s amazing that Obamination, who has throughout his life sought affirmation from his race, and for the sins of his parents has always felt like an outsider, has resorted to lying about how he has been treated by whites. (Tiger Woods does the same thing, saying that boys in the sixth grade tied him up and wrote the word “nigger” on his chest.) This makes him feel more black because it is what all other blacks do.

Barry was treated very well and almost worshiped at Punahou because he was black. This “poor me, nobody ever liked me” is a complete fabrication.

Republicans are now saying that feminism is a good thing if there are good-looking “conservative” feminists who can get votes. Meanwhile, their home lives are wrecked.

“The modern woman is becoming more childlike by the year.”

Reverend Barbie. “When women become leaders of society, entering previously male domains of authority in significant numbers, they feminize leadership. To feminize something is by definition to make it less stern, less weighty, less serious and less plain.”

Nebraska will soon require women who intend to kill babies to be screened for mental illness. It’s only logical.

“In 1790, the average white woman in America gave birth to eight children. The white population doubled every twenty-two years. Today, according to the latest birth statistics, the average white woman gives birth to 1.84 children, not enough to replace the current white population and not enough to sustain economic growth in the long run…” You’ve come a long way, baby!

“The revolt against marriage and childrearing is an overwhelmingly white phenomenon. It is primarily in white countries that the birthrate has fallen below replacement level. It would behoove racially conscious whites, therefore, not to ignore the sexual side of the revolt against our civilization, nor shortsightedly to limit our attention to the single issue of miscegenation. The homosexual bathhouse view of sex as merely a means to personal pleasure attacks our race from within and at its source. As much as with inimical races and racial ideologies, our survival will depend upon our ability to organize effective resistance.” ~ Dr. Roger Devlin

This insane hypersensitivity must end. “People who would have stood by him had he been drunk driving or addicted to heroin may have cut him off once the accusation of thoughtcrime was made, either out of self-righteousness or fear for their own careers.” Leftist hysteria has caused the word “racist” to be the worst accusation of all. Even Jeffrey Dahmer, a murdering, necrophiliac cannibal, made it known that he was not a racist. His reputation could not abide the stain! So here we have a case of two men joking with each other, and some perpetually-offended woman reported it to the authorities, driving a man to suicide because he knew how loaded the word has become. This is why we often tell irresponsible Christians, especially pastors, to stop using Communist words. The word “racist” lumps too many things together, some of them sinful and some of them perfectly normal and healthy.

It’s interesting that race is suddenly important when a Hispanic is appointed to the largest Roman Catholic archdiocese in the country. The end result will surely be increased agitation for heterogeneous immigration, making this particular church a hostile element in American society. Rather than effusive praise from the Jew-media, any white church that praised the appointment of a white minister as being conducive to racial solidarity would be immediately and universally denounced as racist. Double standards are funny little things.

Very soon, there may be no white Protestants remaining on the Supreme Court, even though the institution was founded by white Protestants alone. Jews claim their identity through the blood, not through their satanic religion, but they claim either one as the source of their identity as it suits them. When accused of violating the separation of church and state, they always claim to be ethnic. When accused of racism, they always claim to be religious. They do the same to other groups, always according to whether it suits Jews. So when the news broke that the last Protestant will soon leave the Supreme Court, the Jewmedia decided to speak of Protestants in purely religious terms. But Steve Sailer knows that “Protestant” is largely an ethnic categorization. Sotomayor’s “Catholicism” was bandied as strictly ethnic flavor by the very same Jewmedia, again because it suits the Jews to do so.

How does one actually tell when a Supreme Court Justice has gone senile?

Thirty years ago it was a different story. Justice Stevens knew that since quotas are actually reparations to blacks, they could not logically be given to voluntary immigrants. “Quite obviously, the history of discrimination against black citizens in America cannot justify a grant of privileges to Eskimos or Indians.” (Even more amazing, he used the words “Eskimo” and “Indian” without being convicted of a hate crime.) So here you have a Supreme Court Justice making the same point that we who are opposed to quotas routinely make, but it had no traction, despite being inherently racial. There are now many blacks whose ancestors were never enslaved who are nevertheless entitled to a variety of benefits under the illegal 14th Amendment, for no other reason than that they belong to the right race. And in fact, Eskimos and Indians reap the same benefits, because when a gap is to be closed, half of the job is suppressing the advanced race.

Baby Jihad has become a victim of jihad, along with Keyshai and Keleasha. Antwonnierra, Shakeitha, and Shaquille pay their condolences.

Read comments 11 and 27 here.

Till we have built Jerusalem in England’s green and pleasant land.

In this post, the humanists make their intentions plain:

White men should no longer require any exogenous gods, whether new or old; we instead should strive toward godhood for our race. It is time for the white man to grow up and put away the fantasies of childhood, fantasies of gods and external intelligent forces controlling a destiny that should be ours, and ours alone, to mold.

“Away with you, Satan! For it is written, ‘You shall worship the LORD your God, and Him only you shall serve.’” ~ Matthew 4:10

The writer disingenuously claims that “in the short to medium-term, we must defend…traditional Christianity… Note that this doesn’t mean promoting Christian beliefs…” In other words, he affects a lie, pretending to accept that which he rejects. Why should anyone trust anything he says about race or anything else? What exactly are these people selling, and what does it have to do with the West that actually exists? The funniest part of the article is when he says that this ambitious program of animal existence is “a long-term, multi-generational project.” We’re still waiting for these losers to prove that they can successfully produce well-rounded children from stable marriages who share the same commitments as their parents. Instead, with each passing generation, Christians reveal these people for the fools they are and have always been.

Hey, TOQ editors! Now would be a good time for another article on Revilo Oliver or Friedrich Nietzsche! Time’s a-wastin’. Gotta save the West.

“Hostility to Radicalism, incessant, implacable hostility, is the essential definition of Conservatism.” ~ Lord Salisbury

Contrast the nihilistic stupidity of humanists with this Easter letter from the BNP. Nick Griffin apparently realizes that the British Isles, long since having lost faith in their phony churches and lying preachers, still realize that they have been ransomed:

Dear Fellow Patriot,

A special event that happened recently has changed my outlook on our struggle and the situation facing our sacred country. That event was the peaceful, sensible, mature debate with the Christian Party leader George Hargreaves and a large number of Christian Party members. I thoroughly enjoyed the entire debate which was noticeably absent of the usual hysterical fanaticism of the liberal-left.

It made me think long and hard about a new dimension of our struggle: our Christian religion, culture and traditions. In the past too much emphasis has been placed on the ethnic aspect of our present national dilemma, whilst the longest running feature of our identity has been overlooked: the fact that our country has been held together and guided for millennia by our common, ancient religion: Christianity.

And before you misunderstand me, I do not mean the gut-wrenching politically correct quasi-Marxist nonsense spewing forth from the treacherous leaders of the modern Anglican Church. I mean the traditional, upright, decent and honest Christianity that defended Europe from Islamic conquest, the Christianity of the Crusades and the Christianity of our forefathers.

There is nothing in traditional Christianity about world government, abolishing the nations, enslaving the world to finance capitalism and big business, eradicating traditional unique cultures and national identities, the promotion of sexual perversion, the glorification of treason, letting criminals run rampant and political correctness.

No, the Christianity of our forefathers was about honesty, family, patriotism, sacrifice, loyalty, king and country. For over 1,000 years Christianity held our people together and guided us through the centuries. If Christianity had not existed Europe would have been conquered by Islam centuries ago.

I made the irrefutable point during the debate with the Christian Party that the British National Party is the only political organisation in Britain that wants to keep this country fundamentally Christian, with Christian values, traditions and culture. Every other political party would happily allow Islam to engulf our Christian homeland.

After the General Election, all BNP leaflets will carry a Christian Cross to demonstrate our commitment to maintaining and preserving our Christian heritage as a nation. Politically correct scoundrels like Rowen Williams will cry foul but we have nothing to be ashamed of as we are the defenders of Britain’s Christian heritage, just like our Crusader ancestors in the Middle Ages.

So this weekend enjoy the Christian festival of Easter with pride and remember the War Heroes that fell in the many wars to defend our homeland. Be proud of your British, Christian identity and reject the false guilt and self-loathing of the liberal-left political class.

The darkest hour is just before the dawn, but be of good cheer for Christ Our Lord is risen!

Yours sincerely,

Nick Griffin

Kirk and King and Klan.

There has been of late a hopeful resurgence of Calvinism. “By most logic, the stern system of Calvinism shouldn’t be popular today. Much of modern Christianity preaches a comforting Home Depot theology: You can do it. We can help.”

In 1907, William Montgomery Brown, the Episcopal bishop of Arkansas (previously the Archdeacon of Ohio) wrotethese six propositions that were affirmed by an almost unanimous vote and are every bit as true today:

(1) No race can amount to anything without self-government; (2) The only realm in which the Negro in these United States can hope to govern himself is that of religion; (3) Under present conditions, the American Negro, speaking generally, is degenerating instead of advancing; (4) The Afro-American can be saved from utter ruin and extinction only by the bridging of the ever-widening and deepening gulf which now exists between him and the Anglo-American; (5) This necessary bridging cannot be done without the complete drawing of the Color-Line around the Social, Political and Religious Realms; and (6) The necessity for self-government and for the bridging of the gulf between Anglo-Americans and Afro-Americans by the drawing of the Color-Line makes it necessary that American Negroes should have a wholly independent, autonomous Church…

The essence of religion is obedience to God’s will. Now it manifestly is God’s will to have different races of mankind, otherwise he would have made all alike. He drew the Color-Line, and the failure to recognize it is irreligious, because it is disobedience. To argue that it should be recognized in the social realm, but that the contrary is true in the religious realm, is to take an irreligious position, because the unity of God and nature would be denied… The hypothesis that the Christian religion does away with human distinctions in the religious realm will not stand, because it denies the unity of nature, and such denial involves the rejection of the fundamental doctrine of Christianity, the Divinity of Christ, for God is the author of nature; and if Christ was Divine, He could not have disregarded its unity…

“Righteousness exalteth a nation”… The whole family of facts here assembled, especially those that establish the greater and faster growing criminality of the Northern Negro, show clearly that education is not the cure for his ills. Generation after generation of coddling and sympathy in the North has not effaced a single racial trait nor raised by a single notch the average character, moral or mental or physical, of hundreds of thousands of the pick of their race. Nearly forty years of devoted and enthusiastic effort to elevate and educate the Southern Negro lie stretched out behind us in a dead level of failure. We grant freely and gladly that there are exceptions, rare and remarkable enough. But that the average of the Negro, both moral and physical, has fallen and is falling measurably under all endeavors to lift him up, is a fact that shines out clear in the light of the foregoing statistics…

There may be a good deal of spiritual unity between sheep and deer, but, as they do not naturally herd together, there cannot be said to be any schism between them when, in the pasture or corral, they gravitate each kind to themselves. Even among the same species of animals different varieties or breeds manifest a strong tendency to consort together. Owing to this natural disposition there is very little of social comity between St. Bernard dogs and rat-terriers. If dogs had any organizations corresponding to State or Church, how absurd it would be for some Republican or Catholic-minded dog to set up a howl against the sin and danger of schism because the rat-terriers and the Newfoundlands manifested a preference for Kings and Bishops of their own breed. Bees and ants are said to have queens. Think of a swarm of honey-bees choosing a bumble-bee for its queen, or a hill of black ants elevating a white or red ant to their throne. But to expect honey-bees to be satisfied with bumble-bee or black ants with white ant queens would be about as reasonable as to expect Afro-American Churchmen to be satisfied with Anglo-American Bishops…

One race cannot admit another race to political and ecclesiastical equality because, to do so is to open the way to social equality. If, for the purpose of illustrating our meaning we say that social equality represents the marriage relationship, we may claim that political and ecclesiastical equality represent the courtships which lead to that relationship. And in view of the main purpose of this essay, it is important to note that of the two courtships, the one which is promoted by ecclesiastical equality is more dangerous than that which grows out of political equality…

The Anglo-Saxon branch of the Aryan Race is happily exceedingly jealous of its blood. The Southern part of the American branch of our race is especially guarded against the introduction of Negro blood into its veins. It is, indeed, true that many Mulatto children throughout the South bear witness to the shameful mixture of Anglo-Saxon with African blood, but they are all born of Negro women by impure white men who are degenerates. The white women of the South are pure. They are a high-minded, proud, spotless race. If they were not this, the Anglo-Saxon people in America would rapidly degenerate into a lowgrade, mongrel breed, and that would be the end of American civilization, and the beginning of barbarism…

Judeochristians today, like Gary North, continue to accuse Southern Christians of having legalized rape on their plantations. But this is a lie, and lies are to be expected of liars. As the bishop notes, miscegenation was very rare in in the South. When trust was broken, it was far more likely to be broken by a transient farmhand than an owner. See the 1860 Census:

Bishop Brown prefaces his book with this brief speech by John Temple Graves:

On this great question I stand now, where Webster stood and Henry Clay; where Thomas stood, and Abraham Lincoln, and Henry Grady, and Councill and Turner and the rest—where in time all men will stand who see the light and dare to face it.

SEPARATION is the logical, the inevitable, the only way. No other proposed solution will stand the test of logic and experiment.

For no statute will permanently solve this problem. No anodyne of law, no counter-irritant of legislation will quiet it longer than the hour of its application. The evil is in the blood of races, the disease is in the bones and the marrow and the skin of antagonistic people.

Religion does not solve the problem, for the Christ Spirit will not be all-pervasive until the millenial dawn.

Education complicates the problem. Every year of enlightenment increases the negro’s apprehension of his position, of his merit and attainment and of the inconsistency between his real and his constitutional status in the Republic. Education brings perception, and ambition follows, with the aggressive assertion against the iron walls of a prejudice that has never yielded and will never yield. The conflict is irrepressible and inevitable.

Time complicates the problem by giving increasing numbers and additional provocation to the Negro, and increasing danger to the struggle which logic and destiny render certain.

Politics complicates the problem by bringing times of fierce conflict when the passions and prejudices of faction may be moved to partisan alignment with the deep and lurking dangers of the Race Question.

We have come in God’s providence to the parting of the ways. In the name of history and of humanity; in the interest of both races, and in the fear of God, I call for a division. We can make it peaceably now. We may be forced to accomplish it in blood hereafter.

Compare this article that calls Afrikaners “white supremacists” who ran their country “according to their belief in white superiority” (they hatefully gave blacks their own residential areas, post offices, and courts!) to this article in which the present-day rulers of South Africa defend a popular song that promotes white genocide called “Kill the Boer.” Whites are called evil and racist for giving blacks their own institutions when they were obliged to do nothing more than run them off as trespassers. These free gifts under apartheid were the very reason given for why whites should be stripped of their own inheritance, government, and future. Now the erstwhile black recipients of white kindness and wealth have taken control and are complaining that they are still not being given enough, and the only way to settle the account is through murder. “These songs cannot be regarded as hate speech or unconstitutional,” ANC Secretary General Gwede Mantashe told reporters. “Any judgment that describes them as such is impractical and unimplementable.” We do not exaggerate when we call Negroes savages. This is what the vast majority of them are, and perhaps it is all they ever will be. We don’t really know the answer to that question, but we know for certain that we are not obliged to give another drop of blood or another tear or another cent to them in the hope that they will change. Those days are over, and our only concern now is to give our children a future.

More than 3,000 white South African farmers have been murdered by savages since 1994. As you saw on TV, 3,000 deaths at the World Trade Center meant something.

Add to the list Eugene Terre’blanche, whose death has been repeatedly announced by Matt Drudge with the epithet “white supremacist.” Anyone who reads such headlines will conclude that Terra’blanche had it coming. Here are some representative comments. The media shares the guilt of murder.

What greater privilege is there than to stand in front of your own people and to be able to say, after all the years, you were faithful. And that you are still faithful and thankful to be able to stand and know that you have never been a traitor to the path, the truth, or will of the Volk.

Terra’blanche wanted to create three white republics that would allow blacks to be admitted only as guest workers. He was bludgeoned to death by two of these Negro workers, which only goes to show that the charity he extended to blacks was imprudent. The same could be said of our own Southerners, who should have picked their own cotton.

White South Africans (whose descendants here are not called African-Americans) are living under siege, and no one on earth, except for us “racists,” cares at all. “A woman is raped every 26 seconds in South Africa, the most violent ‘non-war zone’ in the world; 40% of those are children, 65% are gang rapes. It is commonplace for children and babies to be raped in the new and improved South Africa. Blacks even molest animals to avoid catching HIV. Under black rule, South Africa is also an innovator and world leader in murder, assault, robbery, and hijackings.” Those who think this is a desirable state of affairs are not called black supremacists; those who steal white-owned land are not called black supremacists; those who sing songs about killing white farmers are not called black supremacists; those who shoot and bludgeon white farmers to death are not called black supremacists. Whites, on the other hand, who comprise only about 5% of the population of South Africa; who are four times more likely to be killed than were American troops in Vietnam; who nevertheless want all people to have a free, representative government and patria; these are called supremacists. Historically, whites are the only people in the world who have respected the rights of minorities. But in the case of the minority of whites in Africa, not even most whites care what happens to them.

The independent white homeland that Terra’blanche advocated was a fallback position, like segregation here after the War. Paradoxically, it was this very desire on the part of whites that blacks should rule themselves that ended apartheid. It was an experiment in ending paternalism, and it has resulted in terror for white people on that continent. Notice that Jews in Israel are doggedly holding on to their apartheid state because, despite the lies they tell to gullible whites, they know that they would not survive on equal political footing with Palestinians. Whites must relinquish control of their countries in order to prove they are not “racist,” but Jews will never relent, because they invented the word “racist” and control its application in the media.

The fact that the US was so hostile to White Christian South Africa, yet is now engaged in two Middle Eastern wars for the convenience of the closely parallel phenomenon of Israel is really the definitive word on the state of ethnic politics in America.

Rev. Manning says God has shown him a thing or two, and I can’t dispute the truth of it. Wisdom is vindicated by her children (Luke 7:35).

“The proposition that individuals can differ by innate mental ability and that races can differ by the average of such abilities:

1) conflicts with no major Western religious tradition;

2) conflicts with no major Western philosophical tradition;

3) is consistent with everyday experience;

4) is probably believed by the majority of ordinary people of all races;

5) is consistent with the weight of evidence from the most exhaustive and sophisticated empirical studies;

6) is consistent with, indeed is an almost inevitable implication of, the most basic version of evolutionary theory, which theory all educated people are supposed to accept.

And yet the operative assumption of government policy and the protocols of almost all public journals are that this proposition cannot be true.”

Ehud makes an excellent point here. How could the Supreme Court conclude that “separate is inherently unequal” in schools when the founding fathers, in the Declaration of Independence, justified the establishment of the republic on the principle that peoples are entitled by God and nature to “separate and equal” stations? Roll that one around in your head for a while, unless you’re a preacher, in which case hairspray takes precedence. We can have liberty or we can have equality, but we can’t have both.

As an important corollary, read these wonderful excerpts from the Texas Declaration of Independence from Mexico. You will immediately notice that the very same document could be written today and mailed to Rome-on-the-Potomac. “[T]he whole nature of their government has been forcibly changed, without their consent, from a restricted federative republic, composed of sovereign states, to a consolidated central military despotism.” What is “the first law of nature”? The “right of self-preservation.” What gives us the authority “to abolish such government, and create another in its stead”? Our “sacred obligation to [our] posterity.” Focus on that last word, “posterity.” It all comes back to race. The Tea Partiers don’t realize this yet. They still think their nation was founded on ideas rather than blood. “The necessity of self-preservation, therefore, now decrees our eternal political separation.”

“A century and a half ago, John C. Calhoun, one of the most prescient observers of the American regime, remarked that the South was the balance wheel of the Union which prevented the whole from flying apart under the stress of the manias that regularly seized hold of the mainstream.” It’s amazing that the South remains the most conservative region of the country in spite of the fact that this is where most of the blacks live. (Diversities have never been fans of limited government.)

Read Sam Dickson’s excellent paper on Lincoln.

Michael Hoffman has a good article on why consistent Christians cannot belong to the Republican Party. Of course, belonging to that other party is even more unthinkable.

“They’re pigs, Neil!” Ted Nugent, folks. That’s a man. He’s no ass-kisser.

Tocqueville knew that despotism in a constitutional republic “would be more extensive and more mild; it would degrade men without tormenting them.”

Above this race of men stands an immense and tutelary power, which takes upon itself alone to secure their gratifications and to watch over their fate… [It seeks] to keep them in perpetual childhood… For their happiness such a government willingly labors, but it chooses to be the sole agent and the only arbiter of that happiness; it provides for their security, foresees and supplies their necessities, facilitates their pleasures, manages their principal concerns, directs their industry, regulates the descent of property, and subdivides their inheritances: what remains, but to spare them all the care of thinking and all the trouble of living?…

The will of man is not shattered, but softened, bent, and guided; men are seldom forced by it to act, but they are constantly restrained from acting. Such a power does not destroy, but it prevents existence; it does not tyrannize, but it compresses, enervates, extinguishes, and stupefies a people, till each nation is reduced to nothing better than a flock of timid and industrious animals, of which the government is the shepherd…

Our contemporaries are constantly excited by two conflicting passions: they want to be led, and they wish to remain free. As they cannot destroy either the one or the other of these contrary propensities, they strive to satisfy them both at once. They devise a sole, tutelary, and all-powerful form of government, but elected by the people. They combine the principle of centralization and that of popular sovereignty; this gives them a respite: they console themselves for being in tutelage by the reflection that they have chosen their own guardians. Every man allows himself to be put in leading-strings, because he sees that it is not a person or a class of persons, but the people at large who hold the end of his chain.

For a perfect example of what Tocqueville meant when he wrote this hundreds of years ago, see this clip of Chris “Thrill Going Up My Leg” Matthews and another liberal. They actually suggest that Tea Partiers have no reason to complain about the government because our government officials are elected. This is democracy as the antithesis of theocracy, and you don’t have to guess which of these we prefer.

“Future generations have a right to demand of us that they shall be born white in a white man’s land.” ~ Lothrop Stoddard

La Raza pretends that its name has nothing to do with race. Its founder wasn’t so coy. Jose Vasconcelos, who coined the term La Raza, explains that the true purpose of the organization is to be anti-white: “The struggle of Latinity against Saxonism has come to be, and continues being in our era, a struggle of institutions, of purposes and of ideals.” Whites are understandably singled out from the red, yellow, and black races. Vasconcelos hoped for a fifth raza to arise—la raza cósmica—the cosmic race, which would be a mestizo-mixture of all, “the union of all men in a fifth universal race, fruit of the previous [races] and an improvement [superación] over all the past [races].” Naturally, this would never be called racial supremacy. Though J.V. believed that of his fellow Mexicans, “90% of those contracting marriage…[are] ugly,” careful eugenics would bring about an “infinitely superior type to all that have existed.” (I wonder why this isn’t working for the weird-looking children Elin Nordegren carries around on her hip.)

The low types of the species will be absorbed by the superior type. In this way the Negro, for example, can be redeemed and, little by little, through voluntary extinction, the ugliest stocks will be less prolific, and the better specimens will yield to the more beautiful. The inferior races, when educated, will be less prolific, and the better specimens will ascend in a scale of ethnic improvement. Their type will not exactly be the white, but this new raza, to which the white himself will have to aspire with the object of conquering the synthesis. The Indian, by means of the injection of a similar race, will make the jump of myriad years…and in a few decades of aesthetic eugenics the Negro can disappear together with the types which the free instinct of beauty will designate as fundamentally recessive and unworthy…of perpetuation.

Though they would not put it in these terms, Judeochristian liar-preachers have the same goal in view for the diverse peoples of the world, since they all came from Adam. And oh heck, wouldn’t you know it? Vasconcelos was a Nazi sympathizer as well, and now his organization receives federal funds to wage war against white people who refuse to wage war against God.

The goal of “No Child Left Behind” is to close the racial achievement gap by raising off-white test scores. Absolutely nothing is being done to boost white, Jewish, and Asian scores, because then the gap would be even wider. Whites, Jews, and Asians are seeing their scores suppressed, even as they fund the system. Liberal do-gooders like Bill Gates are donating their fortunes to boost only the scores of off-whites. Gates knows what everyone else knows, which is that the gap is not going to close if all races are given equal resources. It’s intractable.

Higher taxes for white parents and violent schools for white children: such is the 56-year failed attempt to make black people white. Now California must rethink its math standards in order boost black scores while keeping white scores down.

Truth or fiction?

Oh, I’d say we burn through a hundred or so ethnic-studies majors each year. They tend to last a little longer than women’s studies majors and art-therapy students, but Cuellen got mashed to a pulp pretty quickly. It usually takes ethnic-studies majors another year to realize that they’re wasting their precious youth on a Sisyphean endeavor… Every year, there’s a fresh crop to throw in the grinder… But the majority of them will march on like cattle to the slaughter, thinking that pure determination and hope can change young lives. I can hear their footsteps now, marching toward our offices like lemmings to a cliff.

We were just saying that of 3,000 students enrolled at Oxford in 2008, five were black. Of all Americans who claimed doctoral degrees in physics in 2008, only twelve were black.

Who says that Negro congressmen don’t understand science?

Now blacks are being bribed in the hope that it will train them to be civilized. White liberals love programs like this because they get to assuage their chronic white guilt and collect other people’s money too. (A huge chunk of the donations are absorbed by “administrative costs.”)

An Easter Sunday chimpout, in which we learn that it is disrespectful to blow whistles at Negroes because they’re no longer slaves.

Gonorrhea is now almost exclusively a black disease. Black illegitimacy is now at 72% and rising, and whites are now as promiscuous as blacks were 50 years ago. Perhaps soon we can replace “E Pluribus Unum” with “Anything With a Hole” on imperial currency. Washington, Lincoln, and Franklin could be replaced by Beyonce Knowles, Tyra Banks, and Mariah Carey.

“Cops can’t win when it comes to blacks. When the police step up patrols in high crime areas, they’re accused of racism, ‘hassling the black community,’ and violating civil rights. When they don’t step up patrols in high crime areas, they’re denounced for not caring about the black community, and, you guessed it, accused of racism.”

Here’s an uppity Negro who can get away with writing words that would get any white man fired if the roles were reversed. Here’s an article in which ownership of the country is placed squarely in racial terms, even though the word “race” is never used. Here’s another black “journalist” who equates lynching and bombing with protests against the empire spending money that it does not have. And here’s an article by Jew Frank Rich in which Tea Partiers are accused of “small-scale mimicry of Kristallnacht,” and the slogan “Take our country back!” heard at “virtually all white” Tea Party rallies is correctly said to be aimed at Negroes and faggots. Don’t leave out Jews, Frank!

Speaking of Kristallnacht, Pat Buchanan writes that after “that terrible night, half the Jews remaining in Germany fled.” Since there could not have been many more than six million Jews in all of Europe, and far fewer in Germany, I wonder when Buchanan will publicly repent of his Holocaust Denial.

Bishop Williamson will go on trial next week. His own society refuses to offer public prayers for him. The pope threw Williamson under the bus, expressed his “unquestionable solidarity” with anti-Christs, and stated his hope that “the memory of the Shoah will induce humanity to reflect on the unpredictable power of hate when it conquers the heart of man.” Now, as if by divine retribution, the pope must explain why he never defrocked a priest who abused 200 deaf boys.

The pope is comparing his present turmoil over pederasty to “the persecution of the Jews.” But when it comes to child abuse, Jews have a higher level of comfort. Remember this Jew who called for the public display of crucifixes in Italy to be outlawed?

See this article, in which merely viewing a debate is said to dishonor WWII veterans. But forcing kids to watch propaganda like Schindler’s List is considered perfectly appropriate. In fact, this Jew-film is considered so crucial to education that networks refuse to censor its full-frontal nudity even during primetime.

“Even if reason tells us, even shouts with all its force the very absurdity of this confrontation between the small and insignificant people of Israel and the rest of humanity…as absurd, as incoherent and as monstrous as it may seem, we are engaged in close combat between Israel and the Nations – and it can only be genocidal and total because it is about our and their identities.” ~ Yitzhak Attia of the Yad Vashem Holocaust Institute

“Jewry is well-known for these syndromes: Hysteria, depression, introspection, amnesia, manipulation, pathological lying, ambivalent identity, prophetic deception, sexual ambiguity, and so on. Every Jewish symptom is found in hysteria.”

Jews host a “Cracker Ball” to ridicule real Floridians.

I was just watching The Right Stuff, which is an excellent film, and it shows that the scientists who headed both the Soviet and American space programs were German. Isn’t it amazing that prior to WWII, Germans were winning all the Nobel prizes, and less than 15 years afterwards they were putting men in outer space? But for some reason, during the Great War for Zion, they thought up the most inept ways of killing millions of people that have ever been conceived. And we know this is true because Communists and Jews don’t lie.

There’s some good humor in that flick too. Alan Shepard has to relieve himself in his spacesuit, and he says, “Well, I’m a wetback now.”

Jews want blacks to live everywhere on the planet except in Israel.

Fight the Nazis by swallowing colon-cancer-inducing white bread! See the beautiful woman, nourished on a diet of fresh-baked crap, riding her motorcycle to war. This is what America is all about! You’re a great American, Sean Hannity, you’re a great American.

Imagine, if you will, an event called “The White Agenda is the American Agenda.” A speaker rises to exclaim, “The White agenda has always been the best thing for the nation.” Another says, “We have a Tea Party and a Coffee Party – we need a White Party.” Then a pastor says, “I love white people and I make no excuses for that.” How do you think the SPLC and ADL would react? How could such an event be held anywhere without the forces of Tolerance making death threats against the hotel staff, as is now customary?

This emasculated errand boy says whites are going to be in the minority by 2050, so now is not the time to get angry about it because this will be bad for business and our children’s future. Thanks, Nancy. I think I smell your cookies burning.

Jim Kalb on anti-racism.

Although now considered fundamental, anti-racism is a recent growth. Many dictionaries did not include the word “racism” before the Second World War. The 1968 convention was the first the Democratic Party held without whites-only delegations. One of the first Roman Catholics to identify racial segregation as a sin died just last year. The dimension anti-racism adds to moral life is thus novel…

The anti-racist sees racism as pure pathology, like smallpox. It would be all gain if it and everything that might lead to it were utterly destroyed… Unparalleled evil though it is thought to be, racism is seen everywhere, whether there is evidence for it or not…

Life worth living depends on culture, and culture on ethnicity… Things that knit society together are therefore difficult to disentangle from implicit racial distinctions. Ethnic habits, loyalties and ideals order social life whether we like it or not. To forbid discrimination with respect to such things is to demand that things that are crucial to social life be ignored, a demand that cannot be satisfied… Anti-racism is thus at odds with basic principles of human life…

A world without transcendence lacks universal qualities that transcend particulars. Universals like redness or goodness refer as much to things that might exist as those that do exist. Since universals are not wholly contained in our experience in the way particular red or good things are, to deny whatever exceeds our experience is to deny them. It is nonetheless difficult to dispense with universals. Although not contained within experience, they order it and make it possible for us to comprehend and deal with it. We understand the world by calling things by names such as “red” and “good” that could also apply to other things, past, present and future. Without them, we are left with an inexplicable world of unbridgeable differences…

Moderns are nonetheless uncomfortable with universals. Denying transcendence and thus universals, as moderns do, makes classification arbitrary. If things do not have stable natures that precede our purposes, if the difference (for example) between the sexes is just a social construction that can as well be deconstructed, then classifying is simply an exercise of the will of the classifier, and to be defined is to be subjected to that will. Those who reject transcendence therefore insist on escaping definition as the necessary ground of their dignity, and part of escaping definition is throwing off ethnicity.

A black singer “felt her spirit wince” when her black friend married a white woman. I know the feeling; I can seldom get through an entire day without feeling my spirit wince. It always makes me laugh to see blacks do what this writer does. She claims immunity from racism by going back hundreds of years and blaming her feelings on plantation slavery. Millions of whites were also once enslaved, but their descendants never do this. And in order for blacks to do it, they must ignore all the slavery which is currently active, and which is far greater and far more brutal than occurred in the South. They’re not the brightest bulbs on the ceiling.

Hundreds of millions of dollars are being stolen from your paychecks every year to send to Senegal, and $28 million of it has been used to erect a monument to the Negro race. According to the president of Senegal, “Africa has arrived in the 21st century standing tall and more ready than ever to take its destiny into its hands.” Except that they couldn’t pay for their ridiculous statue, which oversees mountains of garbage, and they aren’t building it either. North Koreans are building it. Apparently, there is at least one Negro in the government who is smart enough to realize that the men of his race have never built anything of their own accord.

It’s funny that Michael Steele says that he has a “slimmer margin” of error in his party leadership job because of his race, just as Obama has among white voters at large. The truth, of course, is just the opposite. In spite of being so corrupt and incompetent that there are now shadow fundraising organizations for Republicans, Steele can’t be fired, because to do so would be to “disrespect” the handful of black voters who support the Republican Party. (Blacks are racially cohesive, even when whites pretend that race doesn’t exist.) So Steele is given even more chances than would be allowed a white man, just as the Second Coming of Christ has been eclipsed by Obama’s presidency. Really, this is just another opportunity for Steele to accuse his critics of being racists, just as Clarence Thomas played his cards on the “high-tech lynching.” This is what happens when you send a token to do a man’s job.

Disneyland, 1956 – nothing but white people as far as the eye can see. One person leaves this “racist” comment: “Wonderful film – a great trip back in time to a time before the country was destroyed.” Whites are now a minority in California. One can only imagine the lawsuits that would result today from trolleying park-goers hither and yon in cars labeled “monkeys” and “wild animals.” Little boys could buy toy pistols in Frontierland back then. Now little boys are drugged with Ritalin in the hope that they will turn into queers or at least little girls. Do they still shoot at hippos on the jungle cruise? I doubt it, if guns are even being airbrushed out of movies like E.T. They probably call it the “rainforest” cruise now.

“Open immigration is essential for a libertarian country,” writes a prominent libertarian. Patrick Ford responds:

As much as many would like to believe the growing [Ron Paul] libertarian movement is based on an outpouring of intellectual curiosity about the Austrian business cycle, it has a lot more to do with buzzwords like “liberty” and an irrational worship of the individual. In this way, it has a lot more in common with the “hope” and “change” movement on the left than it does with anything written by Schmitt or de Maistre or Jünger or Chesterton or Kirk or Evola or Buchanan.

I’m very impressed by this analogy for culture:

A culture is comparable to the floor of a forest. The first layer is made up of clearly recognizable leaves from the most recent autumn. The next layer is less recognizable, the one after that formless, and finally there is a rich mass of unremembered mold from remote times. But the plant atop this composition grows out of it all, is nourished by all, and contributes to it all. The composite layer is the plant’s heritage.

A culture is accumulated in the same manner, an accretion deposited by each generation. Six or eight generations back, the deposits become formless, but the influences persist. We cannot escape the consequences of what those old dead generations did and left to us. Daily we confront in others, and ourselves act out, influences whose social beginnings were old in Europe when Caesar’s legions sailed for Britain.

Forgetting the art of husbandry.

The everlasting gobstopper.

Study Proves Dinner Serves a Purpose!

“It is now proposed to turn the control of the mothers of the land over to a few single ladies [lesbians] holding government jobs in Washington.” ~ Senator James A. Reed

“In place of family ties based on what seems natural and customary and supported by upbringing and social expectation, feminism would permit only ties based on contract and idiosyncratic sentiment, with government stepping in when those prove too shaky for serious reliance.” ~ James Kalb

It’s interesting that the sex organs bear the shape of the assertive and receptive roles of the sexes themselves. It’s as though they provide a picture for how men and women are to behave. “These two poles working together provide a unity of purpose in the physical world as humankind progresses on its spiritual journey.” Feminism denies this self-evident truth. But it’s not just self-evident, it’s God-ordained. When we deny the God who created us, we lose sight of what makes us masculine and feminine. Instead of monogamy and the traditional roles of men and women, we have hypergamy. Dr. Roger Devlin has a lot to say about this. We all know what happens to men when they are not civilized. For one, they treat women like meat. Women, having bought into the lies of feminism, seek not the kind of men who will provide for them and protect and cherish them; instead, they are attracted to the stereotypical alpha males (players). Whites mimic the behavior they see among Negroes, in other words.

Scott Roeder was barred from describing abortion procedures during his trial for killing Kansas murderer George Tiller.

Abortion is legal in Kansas, and prosecutors were careful not turn the trial into a referendum on abortion.

Because, after all, what place does motive have in a capital trial?

On Thursday, Roeder told the court that Tiller “dismembered living children with the nod of approval from the state”…

Thompson described Tiller as a devoted husband, father and grandfather and a strong believer in women’s rights… As he spoke, Tiller’s widow Jeanne cried. Roeder at times looked away, yawned and took a drink of water…

“The impact of his death on women throughout the world is like an earthquake,” Thompson said. “They ask, where can I go? What will I do?’ I have to say, ‘I’m sorry, I can’t tell you.’ That’s the impact of this crime.”

Here’s the best part. Wait for it…wait for it…

Thompson said Roeder targeted Tiller in a “hate crime” because Tiller provided abortion services.

The Wreck of the Titan, by Morgan Robertson, is the most astounding literary coincidence of all time. It’s about an “unskinkable” ocean liner, British-owned and made of steel, “the largest craft afloat and the greatest of the works of men,” “equal to that of a first class hotel.” It doesn’t seem like the author is even trying to be original, right? Just like the Titanic, the Titan is 800 feet long and sinks after hitting an iceberg in the starboard bow, in the North Atlantic, in April, “around midnight.” While the Titanic crashed into an iceberg 400 miles from Newfoundland while moving at a speed of 25 knots, the Titan crashes into an iceberg “400 miles from Newfoundland” at a speed of 22.5 knots. The Titan has too few lifeboats, “as few as the law allowed,” though the author gives it four more than the Titanic had. Here’s the catch: The book was published in 1898, 14 years before the Titanic’s fateful voyage. Robertson predicted the whole thing.

Isaac Newton had possibly the most visionary mind in history. Consider that at age 22, when Cambridge University closed down for two years to escape the bubonic plague, Newton went home and invented calculus. He had to invent calculus in order to discover the law of universal gravitation. And just like that, mankind was able to understand planetary motion, even though we still don’t know what causes gravity. He also proved that white light is composed of all colors. Then he turned 24. But as the article shows, he was much more captivated by theology than any of the physical sciences. How did he evaluate his herculean accomplishments as he approached the end of his life?

I do not know what I may appear to the world, but to myself I seem to have been only like a boy playing on the seashore, and diverting myself in now and then finding a smoother pebble or prettier shell than ordinary, whilst the great ocean of truth lay all undiscovered before me.

Unlike our vapid atheists and neo-pagans, Dr. Newton placed his soul in the loving care of his Creator and Redeemer. At no time did he ever believe that faith and science are at odds. He is now plumbing the depths of that vast ocean.