Cincy Jungle

Post-Game Thread: Cincinnati Bengals (7-3) 17 - Oakland Raiders 20 (3-7)

2009-11-23T00:23:45Z

More photos » by Marcio Jose Sanchez - AP

Who do we blame for the loss? Larry Johnson? (AP Photo/Marcio Jose Sanchez)

So, I don't really have anything to say about this one. We dominated every phase of the game but turned the ball over at some very inopportune times, including Andre Caldwell's fumble kickoff, and Jeremi Johnson's fumble in the red zone. Shayne Graham also missed a field goal that was about 35 yards long. Feel free to continue discussing the loss here, I really don't have anything to say about it, I'm too disgusted. The Bengals did not play a complete game and made terrible mistakes down the stretch, including a dropped interception by Johnathan Joseph, and did not put the game away.

Unbelievable. Enjoy the gift Oakland, Pittsburgh, and the rest of the AFC. The Bengals really served this one up on a platter.

2nd Half Thread: Cincinnati Bengals (7-2) 14 - Oakland Gradkowskis (2-7) 7

2009-11-22T22:38:41Z

More photos » by Paul Sakuma - AP

about 3 hours ago: Cincinnati Bengals quarterback Carson Palmer (9) scores a touchdown as Oakland Raiders defensive end Greg Ellis (99) in unable to stop him in the first quarter an NFL football game in Oakland, Calif., Sunday, Nov. 22, 2009. (AP Photo/Paul Sakuma)

Browse more photos »

So far, not too great for Cincinnati on the scoreboard. Or on the football field, it turns out, as the injury bug continued to bite the Bengals at the end of the 2nd quarter. Andrew Whitworth limped off the field after a collision with Carson Palmer. Then they just got all conservative, and stuff, and stopped trying to score points with only 43 seconds left in the half. As a result, the Bengals gave the Raiders enough time to take a 57-yard field goal attempt that Janikowski missed wide left. The point is, it was almost 10 points in 1 minute because of conservative play calling. That's awful. Marvin really needs to light a fire under the boys in the second half or this game could go south.

Statistically, it was a pretty good half for the Bengals on both sides of the football. The boys in orange and black possessed the ball for over 21 minutes to Oakland's under 9 minutes of possession. Carson Palmer, however, has only thrown the ball 10 times (completed 8) for 12.9 yards per pass. Hmmm... Meanwhile, the Bengals have rushed the ball 25 times for 3.3 yards per carry. Hmmm... I wonder if Bob Bratkowski is privy to these stats. I know we ran the ball down their throats on one drive, but you can't get that conservative. You have to score more points, you can't stop trying to score points. These guys really need to step their game up in the second half.

Other stats: 0 sacks, 0 QB hits for the Bengals (and 1 tackle for a loss). 1 sack for Oakland (and 6 tackles for a loss).

Bruce Gradkowski, Bengal killer, is 9/15 for 74 yards and a TD, much of that coming on dump-offs to wide open receivers that had room to run underneath. All that is good for a 94.9 passer rating. What is it about this guy against the Bengals?

In unsurprising news, the Bengals can't cover TE Zach Miller, and he's really been the Raiders' biggest weapon. Here's hoping the second half goes our way, these guys really need to get the foot back on the gas and put this one away.

Open Thread: Cincinnati Bengals (7-2) at Oakland Raiders (2-7)

2009-11-22T19:30:11Z

Game: Cincinnati Bengals (7-2) at Oakland Raiders (2-7)
Series Leader: Raiders, 17-8
Streak: Raiders have won three of the past four
Coaches vs. Opponent: Lewis: 1-1. Cable: 0-0
Broadcast: CBS (4:15 PM ET): Kevin Harlan, Solomon Wilcots. SIRIUS: 127 (Cin.), 130 (Oak.). XM: 104 (Cin.).
SB Nation: Silver and Black Pride
NFL.com: Game Center
Weather: Partly cloudy with a high 59 and light winds. [Weather.com]
Uniform: White
Television Coverage: Most of Ohio, West Virginia, northern Kentucky and areas around Oakland and into Nevada. [506]


INACTIVES	DOUBTFUL	PROBABLE
Jordan Palmer	Cedric Benson	Laveranues Coles
Andre Smith	Evan Mathis	Jeremi Johnson
Cedric Benson	Keith Rivers
Evan Mathis
Keith Rivers	QUESTIONABLE
Chase Coffman	Chris Crocker
Jerome Simpson	Johnathan Joseph
Fui Vakapuna	Morgan Trent


INACTIVES	OUT
Charlie Frye	LB Ricky Brown (ankle)
Todd Watkins	WR Nick Miller (shin)
Jon Alston	WR Javon Walker (hamstring)
Khalif Barnes
Erik Pears	QUESTIONABLE
Javon Walker	LB Isaiah Ekejiuba (ankle)
Nick Miller	DE Greg Ellis (knee, shoulder)
William Joseph
	PROBABLE
	S Hiram Eugene (shoulder)

Open Thread: NFL Early Games

2009-11-22T17:09:39Z

Happy, happy Who Dey friends. Today is the third time this year that the Bengals have played a game outside the 1PM time slot. I know, it screws up our gardening schedule, but we'll manage. The Bengals are in Oakland today and will play the Raiders. The latest news is that Cedric Benson is likely to sit while Larry Johnson will get significant playing time. We'll see.

In the meantime, there's 1pm games coming up. Here's where we talk about those. One game of interest is the Indianapolis Colts and the Baltimore Ravens. If you're in the Cincinnati area, this is the CBS game. Pittsburgh is in Kansas City and I know one of us will be able to see that game to tell us what it was like to see the Steelers fall to the Chiefs.

Anyway, bring all discussions of football -- including a mediocre college Saturday. Bring it on.

Are the Bengals Super Bowl Contenders?

2009-11-21T02:00:14Z

Now hang on before you completely beat me to a bloody pulp questioning what kind of moron I am. I know and understand that it is week 10 of the season with 7 more games to go against some formidable opponents. Anything can happen, from a sudden rash of injuries to complacency. But there is aura in the air for us Bengals fans that can be as contagious as the Swine Flu. My wife, who knows football so well half of the men in her office won't hesitate to talk the game with her, proclaimed that if the Bengals beat the Steelers, "they are going to the Super Bowl!" Yes, that is a direct quote.

Now I don't want to start any unnecessary Super Bowl hype for the Bengals, but having swept the teams considered contenders for the division title, a certain level of expectation may be placed on this accomplishment. My wife and I both know that there are still seven games yet to be played and anything can happen to include a meltdown that might leave them out of the playoffs. Given past history of ineptitude, why should anyone even consider the Bengals a contender when they play in the same conference as the Indianapolis Colts and New England Patriots, who are considered the class of the league? But let's take last season for instance. Perennial NFL laughing stock Arizona Cardinals, a franchise considered by many the worst in Pro Sports history, not only won their division for the first time since forever, showed that even perennial losers can have a streak of good luck and get to the Super Bowl. As a team, there may have been areas of concern; they still made the title game and nearly won it.

Each year, the prognosticators and supposed experts say defense wins championships. And every year this theory is proven as the team playing good defense during the season goes on to play in the Super Bowl. There is no reason not to expect the same from this season's Super Bowl participants. This year's Bengals defense is probably the best that has been fielded since the Marvin Lewis era began. Defensive coordinator Mike Zimmer, carrying a heavy heart with the sudden passing of his wife a few weeks ago, has the defense playing the best we have seen in a number of years as it is currently ranked 10^th in total defense. More importantly, the defense is second in scoring defense allowing 16.3 points per game. The Bengals rushing defense is also ranked 2^nd giving up 83.4 yards per game, making opposing offenses one dimensional giving the defense the ability pin their ears back and go after the quarterback. This has led to 25 sacks so far this season, placing them 4^th overall. Last season, the defense finished the season with a total of 17 sacks placing them near the bottom of the pack. Some may say the defense has rallied around Zim's tragedy; I say that is true and they are responding to just plain good coaching.

A number of nay sayers will point to the offensive struggles at scoring. The 2000 Baltimore Ravens had a five game streak which the offense failed to score a touchdown but went on to win their only Super Bowl appearance. The Bengals currently has one. In each of this seasons win, a different part of the Bengals team contributed with either an interception return for a touchdown or a kickoff return to help propel them to victory. Both of these instances occurred in a game against the defending Super Bowl Champion. Jonathon Joseph's 30 yard INT return help provide a spark to the Bengals by cutting the deficit from 13-3 to 13-9. The kickoff return for touchdown by Bernard Scott in the rematch helped provide the Bengals with the six point difference of the game. Without these touchdowns, an argument can be made that the Bengals would not be 7-2. One can say that the entire team is contributing and doing what it takes to win.

Seeding can also play a factor as to whether a team lands in the Super Bowl. If both the Colts and Bengals continue their winning ways, the Bengals would grab the second seed behind the Colts, securing a bye week at the start of the playoffs and hosting at least one playoff game. Peyton Manning has a reputation of struggling in the playoffs with only one Super Bowl appearance (and victory) in his 9 playoff appearances. His record is less then stellar at 7-8 with an 84.6 passer rating. So the possibility exists that the Colts could get eliminated early possibly setting up the AFC Championship in Cincy. But the other part of this equation is the New England Patriots. They have a reputation of rallying behind Bill Belichick when things get rough and making stunning runs through the playoffs. They have a quarterback in Tom Brady that set a record of 12 straight playoff wins at the start of career and is 14-2 in his playoff career. If they clinch the 3 seed, this could be the team they could face in the first playoff game.

It is obvious that the remaining schedule looks favorable for the Bengals to finish with their best record in franchise history. There are only two teams with winning records remaining on their schedule in the Minnesota Vikings and San Diego Chargers, and both are on the road. With the Bengals victory at Pittsburgh last week, they set a team record 5 straight road victories dating back to last season. The games against the Vikes and Bolts may not look good on paper, but the Bengals have done nothing short of surprising those who have doubted them all season.

Marvin Lewis has called this team a group of misfits and outcasts and it seems they are using this as a battle cry. He has them believing in themselves and thinking that they can achieve goals being placed in front of them. Although many people think what the Bengals are doing is a nice story, we believe that it can only get better when they contend for an appearance in the Super Bowl.

Bengals struggle in California; Benson "doubtful" to play against Oakland

2009-11-20T16:24:10Z

Californeya has the internet gold rush. So the Bengals have broken several trends this year. They've swept the Steelers for the first time since 1998. Dating back to last year, they've won five straight road games for the first time in franchise history. With a win over the Cleveland Browns, the Bengals will go undefeated in the division for the first time in franchise history -- they've won five divisional games in only six seasons (2009, 2005, 1996, 1990, 1989, 1984).

Another trend remains. Games on the West Coast. Specifically, in California. The Bengals have lost 26 of 35 regular season games in California. Dating back to 1992, they've won only one of ten games. The Bengals history in California is terrible enough that if you take the Bengals all-time record and remove regular season games played in California, the Bengals all-time winning percentage jumps ten points. (Note: I'm a South Park junkie).

Larry Johnson could play Sunday. C Trent Rosecrans writes that Larry Johnson "said his first practice as a Bengal on Wednesday went smoothly, and he's just happy to be practicing." This is important because it's believed that Cedric Benson will miss Sunday's game against the Oakland Raiders. Joe Reedy writes that "Benson did not practice for a second straight day, meaning that it is unlikely he will play on Sunday at Oakland." To be honest, I'm interested to see what Johnson can do behind this offensive line.

Moving on...

Great piece by Hobson, detailing the defense on third down.

Charles Robinson writes that Larry Johnson created enough of a disruption with the Chiefs, that he forced his way off the team and joined the 7-2 Bengals.

Don Banks lists Mike Zimmer as a potential head coaching candidate.

The job Zimmer has done with the Bengals defense this season speaks for itself, and if Cincy rides its magic carpet all the way to Miami, who knows how far it might advance a Zimmer candidacy? Strange as it sounds, Zimmer's time in front of the HBO cameras on "Hard Knocks'' probably raised his visibility level significantly within league circles, even though he was known as a quality teacher of the game long before last summer.

Against the Pittsburgh Steelers, Bernard Scott rushed the football 13 times. Geoff Hobson writes that the Bengals don't want to give Scott "that many touches any time soon."

Sad news: Chris Spielman's wife Stephanie passed away Thursday night.

How great has Kyle Cook been this year?

CNati's Scott Priestle takes a look at Dhani Jones.

Notes regarding the Bengals games in California.

All-Time Record	279	356	2	.440
Games in California	9	26	0	.257
All-Time Record w/o California	270	330	2	.450

Games played in California since 1968.

Season	Location	Result
2007	San Francisco	L, 13-20
2003	Oakland	L, 20-23
2003	San Diego	W, 34-27
2001	San Diego	L, 14-28
1998	Oakland	L, 10-27
1996	San Francisco	L, 21-28
1996	San Diego	L, 14-27
1994	San Diego	L, 10-27
1993	San Francisco	L, 8-21
1992	San Diego	L, 10-27
1990*	Los Angeles	L, 10-20
1990	San Diego	W, 21-16
1990	Los Angeles (Rams)	W, 34-31
1990	Los Angeles	L, 7-24
1989	Los Angeles	L, 7-28
1988	Los Angeles	W, 45-21
1985	Los Angeles	L, 6-13
1984	San Francisco	L, 17-23
1982	San Diego	L, 34-50
1981	San Diego	W, 40-17
1980	Oakland	L, 17-28
1978	Los Angeles (Rams)	W, 20-19
1978	San Francisco	L, 12-28
1978	San Diego	L, 13-22
1977	San Diego	L, 3-24
1976	Oakland	L, 20-35
1975*	Oakland	L, 28-31
1974	San Francisco	W, 21-3
1974	Oakland	L, 27-30
1973	San Diego	W, 20-13
1972	Los Angeles (Rams)	L, 12-15
1971	Oakland	L, 27-31
1970	San Diego	W, 17-14
1969	San Diego	L, 14-21
1969	Oakland	L, 17-37
1968	Oakland	L, 10-31
1968	San Diego	L, 13-29
* Playoff game.

Larry Johnson signing could indirectly challenge Cedric Benson causing post-apocalyptic scenario

2009-11-19T16:51:28Z

More photos » by Ed Reinke - AP

28 days ago: Cincinnati Bengals running back Cedric Benson (32) is tackled by Chicago Bears safety Al Afalava (24) in the second half of an NFL football game, Sunday, Oct. 25, 2009, in Cincinnati. Benson ran for a career high 189 yards in the game won by Cincinnati 45-10. (AP Photo/Ed Reinke)

Browse more photos »

The biggest question I had with the Larry Johnson signing was team chemistry and lockerroom cohesiveness. Some will disregard the whole idea that chemistry and cohesiveness are critical components for success on the field. But that's fine. My knowledge about NFL lockerrooms is admittedly limited. Others who claim it's overrated probably have sat on one of the wooden stools in front of a locker, watching players interact with each other, jotting notes for their conducted experiments with white lab coats, bunsen burners and beakers. I can't compete with that. So I elect not to try.

However, since the over-rated aspect of chemistry and cohesiveness translating to better success on the field hasn't actually presented substance, I'll continue with my belief. A happy lockerroom is good. A tension filled lockerroom is bad. Kind of like work. You have those people. Idiots. Nincompoops. Those annoying jerks that make you drink in so much excess that you mutter things like, "I... (sigh).. gtttn... tiii (sigh)... of... yoour (sigh)... crap" and steal your women. At least so I've heard.

But the speculation will take form. The worry? How does Cedric Benson react to the move? Admittedly, even if he hates the move, some measure of professionalism must be observed here. There's no reason to believe this move is personal, and I don't believe he thinks of it that way. Though, speculation comes in many forms. Ranging from taking quotes at face value, to interpretation quotes on the best possible angle.

The quote from Benson:

“Oh, I didn’t know I was supposed to be jumping out of my seat or anything. I really have no feelings about it,” Benson said after Wednesday morning’s walkthrough. “They made a move they felt they needed to do, and that’s fine with me. It’s not going to affect me in any kind of way. Whatever happens from here on, I can guarantee you I’ll definitely be making the best of it.

“The offensive playbook here can be tricky, so it takes a little bit to get adjusted. But Larry’s all right,” Benson said. “He’s a professional and a great player at that. I’m sure whatever adjustments he has to make, or if he gets a chance to play, I’m sure he’ll make the best of it.”

Personally, I took the quote at face value. I had no reason to suspect otherwise and that's why we didn't mention it on Wednesday. Then again, I'm not there. Maybe while he was talking, Benson was flinging boogers at him with his back turned. "Hey, since when did put yellow polka dots on our practice jerseys? Awesome!" Chad says in passing.

Paul Daugherty question it on The Morning Line Thursday morning. "Ced Benson was not pleased with the LJ move. It wasnt just what he said yesterday, but how he said it. Even as M. Lewis has said repeatedly that #32 is the guy, you could tell Benson was more than a little hissed." Definitely boogers.

Cnati's Scott Priestle writes, "Cedric Benson did not bother to put on a happy face Wednesday. He insisted he has no opinion about the Bengals signing former Pro Bowl running back Larry Johnson, but his body language suggested frustration."

The Associated Press' Joe Key writes, "After a light morning workout, Benson didn't have much to say about the Bengals' decision to sign Johnson. Told that he didn't appear to be thrilled with the move, Benson smiled."

Then again, you have to consider that even if Benson isn't happy, or as he subtly put it, "didn't know I was supposed to be jumping out of my seat," that you love the kid for his ambition. Now it feels like it he might be challenged with Johnson. Running back controversy? I doubt it. But based on people's competitive nature, the idea that Johnson is sitting patiently behind Benson does challenge him.

Now he's even more motivated. Now, with a weak three game stretch, you know Benson is going to kick some ass and not bother taking names because he's going to beat the crap out of the letters that compose the names too. Don't agree?

"Most of the time, you hold your fate in your own hands," Benson said. "I'm not letting up in any aspect of what I do. I expect to continue to be the No. 1 guy, and if not, I'll make it that way."

At this point, you can only grin like giddy fans grin.

Oakland will start Bruce Gradkowski at quarterback against the Bengals. Yes, that same Bruce Gradkowski in 2006

2009-11-19T14:55:47Z

More photos » by John Froschauer - AP

2 months ago: Seattle Seahawks linebacker Aaron Curry hits Oakland Raiders quarterback Bruce Gradkowski (5) during the second quarter Thursday, Sept. 3, 2009, in an NFL preseason football game in Seattle. The Seahawks won 31-24. (AP Photo/John Froschauer)

Browse more photos »

The date was October 15, 2006. The weather was a warm 77 degrees at kickoff, with light winds. The game featured the 3-1 Cincinnati Bengals and the 0-4 Tampa Bay Buccaneers. The Buccaneers quarterback, Bruce Gradkowski, was making his second NFL start. With Cincinnati leading 13-7 and 4:21 left in the game, the Gradkowski led Buccaneers offense takes the field. After converting a first down, Tampa Bay lined up at the Bengals 32-yard line. What happened next is bound to be etched in the memory of many Bengals fans. Since I got the way-back machine out yesterday for our Chris Henry piece, I figure, why not reference an old entry during Cincy Jungle's first year in existence.

But the bigger controversy was Justin Smith's roughing the passer. Smith wrapped up Bruce Gradkowski, who lowered his head, hitting the ground with the top of his helmet. Gradkowski lost the ball and I put my arms up thinking this game was over. But since Smith tried to tackle the quarterback - which is illegal - the Bengals were penalized 15 yards; Tampa Bay scored the winning touchdown a few plays later.

I understand the idea of protecting helpless children, women and quarterbacks. Let's be honest though, hard knocks are what injures quarterbacks; not being rolled onto your head or the extension of arms. A cornerback, safety or linebacker, with a full head of steam, will devastate a Quarterback's body (Google the Ohio State Buckeyes and Drew Stanton... or Chris Simms). It took until this off-season to make a rule that defensive players couldn't shred the knee of a quarterback. Smith's sack was minimal in scope to the health of the quarterback but monumental in scope to the game.

The penalty not only pushed the Buccaneers to the Cincinnati 25-yard line, but Cincinnati lost a fumble recovery which would have likely sealed the game. The Bengals couldn't stop the offense after that, even though Tampa Bay was forced to make a third-and-13 conversion -- which they did on fourth down when Gradkowski completed an eight-yard touchdown pass to Mark Clayton. Game over.

Peter King wrote at the time, "... HORRENDOUS roughing-the-passer call in Tampa, giving the Bucs good field position as they drive, with a Toledo Rocket at quarterback, Bruce Gradkowski, to try to beat the hanging-on-for-dear-life Bengals at the Pirate Ship." And Justin Smith said at the time, "That was the ballgame," Smith said. "There was no whistle call, nothing like that to stop the play. I didn't slam him (or) pick him up. He doubled over, went down and fumbled the ball."

Why bring all of this up, you ask? For one, I can. For two, the Bengals will be seeing Gradkowski again this weekend in Oakland.

The Oakland Raiders benched former No. 1 overall pick JaMarcus Russell on Wednesday, handing the starting job to journeyman Bruce Gradkowski for the foreseeable future.

Coach Tom Cable made the announcement of the change following practice as the Raiders (2-7) prepare to play the Cincinnati Bengals on Sunday. Cable said this was not a temporary move, that his plan is to stick with Gradkowski.

"I don't want to be like that," he said. "This is where we're headed and what we're going to do. He'll take this team and go with it."

If the Bengals bring their best game to Oakland, I don't see this as remotely being a problem. Cincinnati, I believe, is fielding the best overall team this year compared to the entire Marvin Lewis era. And the players are well aware of the implications of playing a 2-7 team. However, sometimes the football gods mix it up a little. And they did that weekend in 2006. When the 3-1 Cincinnati Bengals lost to the 0-4 Tampa Bay Buccaneers.

Practice Report: Cincinnati Bengals (7-2) at Oakland Raiders (2-7)

2009-11-19T14:15:48Z

Every Wednesday, Thursday and Friday evening, we'll (TRY TO) update the practice/injury chart leading up to Sunday's game. The chart is pretty self-explanatory. If the player is listed as out, they're out for the game. If they did not participate, they didn't practice. If they were limited, then they only participated during a portion of practice (typically means missing 11-on-11 drills). If the player is listed as full participation, it simply means that they practiced fully and that the only reason they're listed is because injury was an issue the week before.

Practice

BENGALS	WED	THUR	FRI
RB Cedric Benson (hip)	DNP	DNP
S Chris Crocker (calf)	DNP	DNP
G Evan Mathis (ankle)	DNP	LP
LB Keith Rivers (calf)	DNP	DNP
CB Johnathan Joseph (foot)	LP	LP
RB Jeremi Johnson (chest)	FP	FP
WR Laveranues Coles (head)	--	LP

OAKLAND	WED	THUR	FRI
LB Ricky Brown (ankle)	DNP
S Hiram Eugene (shoulder)	DNP
WR Nick Miller (shin)	DNP
WR Javon Walker (hamstring)	DNP
DE Greg Ellis (knee, shoulder)	LP
LB Isaiah Ekejiuba (ankle)	FP

Oakland's practice hadn't ended by the time the injury report was released.

Chris Henry would "prefer to return to Bengals"; a look at how one year can change everything

2009-11-18T19:46:58Z

More photos » by Charles Krupa - AP

3 months ago: Cincinnati Bengals wide receiver Chris Henry (15) hauls in a touchdown against New England Patriots cornerback Terrence Wheatley, left, during a preseason NFL football game in Foxborough, Mass., Thursday, Aug. 20, 2009. (AP Photo/Charles Krupa)

Browse more photos »

To give you an idea of Chris Henry before the 2008 regular season, one could watch a few seasons of The Wire (one of the better shows I've seen in ages). Suddenly, something nailed him like a well placed punch of reality, which spoke to him: you have talent, you have opportunity, you have everything if you want it. Take it. It's yours. Henry listened this time. And after his latest trouble turned out to be nothing more than wasted time on a dropped lawsuit, the Bengals signed Henry to a two-year deal. Bengals fans were far more than skeptical. We were enraged in our classic, what the hell, moments. In fact, let's go back in time, shall we?

April 3, 2008. Henry released. Cincy Jungle headline reads: "Bengals release Chris Henry -- adios, idiot". Perhaps we were a little over-enthusiastic. But if anything described fans feelings regarding Henry at the time, that's close enough.

July 17, 2008. Henry's agent at the time said several teams were interested in Henry, including Cincinnati. We wrote:

There's no question about his talent. And though I'm not as weighted on the character bandwagon like many others, I do see the point that Henry's conduct has forced his limitation on the field -- i.e., suspensions. In a sense, you can't trust the guy. You can't trust him to remain clean with the constant threat of suspensions hovering over the team's head. That's simple dependability.

August 7, 2008. It was learned that Henry was seen at Bengals camp during last year's training camp. I wrote, "based on 3rd-grade logic, I just don't see it and most scenarios that invite his return, are too far-fetched." Nailed that one, didn't I?

August 13, 2008, I wrote "Chris Henry isn't coming back to Cincinnati. If he does, I'll leave this job." Hopefully no one noticed.

August 19, 2008. Reports started surfacing that Henry was signing a contract with the Bengals. A few hours later, the signing became official. We wrote:

For the most part, writers and responders from other sites are generally the same. They're optimistically cautious that Henry will help this team, but aren't sold that signing Henry was the wisest of choices. First off, the publicity is something the team wants to avoid. Surely, people are questioning the Bengals decision.

August 20, 2008. It was learned that Marvin Lewis had zero influence on whether the Bengals signed Henry or not. We wrote:

I understand and applaud those that talk about the team's integrity and being forced to wonder if Henry will be arrested on any given night, before any given Sunday. The jokes will return, the confusion and head shaking grows with intensity. On the other hand, you can't argue Henry's physical talents. When he played, he's the most lethal and productive third wide receiver on any team right now. And if there's reasons why Chad Johnson and T.J. Houshmandzadeh can't go, the Bengals are lucky to have a talented guy like Henry step into the void and limit any production degradation.

Henry missed the first four-games of 2008, serving out a four-game suspension handed down by Chancellor Roger Goodell. In the twenty games he played on the two-year contract, Henry caught 31 passes for 456 yards receiving and four touchdowns. Henry suffered a broken arm against the Baltimore Ravens.

The progressive feeling of Chris Henry fascinates me. His talent is one thing. But going from what he was, to what he is now, is remarkable. He learned. He grew.

Henry's scheduled to become a free agent after this season and could sign with any team. C Trent tweets: "Chris Henry says he'd prefer to return to Bengals". And damn it, I believe the Bengals should sign him. No, they better sign him.

Man, how things can change in a year.

Bernard Scott named AFC Special Teams Player of the Week

2009-11-18T18:44:17Z

More photos » by Keith Srakocic - AP

7 days ago: Cincinnati Bengals' Bernard Scott, left, returns a kickoff for a touchdown past Pittsburgh Steelers' Keyaron Fox in the first quarter of an NFL football game in Pittsburgh, Sunday, Nov. 15, 2009. (AP Photo/Keith Srakocic)

Browse more photos »

As if we didn't document Bernard Scott's weekend enough already, we've decided to pile on the mountain of awesomeness that is Bernard Scott. Every Wednesday, the NFL announces players of the week for offense, defense and special teams for the AFC and NFC. Carson Palmer won the award during his five touchdown day (aka, holy-freaking awesome day) against the Bears during week seven and Antwan Odom won it in week two after recording an impressive five sacks against the Green Bay Packers.

Add Bernard Scott to the list.

The NFL announced Wednesday that Scott won the AFC Special Teams Player of the Week after recording a 96-yard touchdown return against the Pittsburgh Steelers and 206 yards on kickoff return. Scott is the first Bengals player named the Special Teams Player of the Week since Tab Perry in week 13 during the 2005 season, ironically enough against the Pittsburgh Steelers, recording 197 yards on five kickoff returns, including a 94-yarder that setup Rudi Johnson's one-yard touchdown run giving the Bengals the lead (31-24) with 7:57 left in the third quarter (run-on sentences for the win!). Scott is also the first Bengals player to record a touchdown on kickoff return since Glenn Holt on November 4, 2007.

Here's the award winnings for week 10.

AFC Offensive Player of the Week: QB Peyton Manning, Colts
AFC Defensive Player of the Week: Safety Mike Brown, Chiefs
AFC Special Teams Player of the Week: RB Bernard Scott, Bengals
NFC Offensive Player of the Week: WR Sidney Rice, Vikings
NFC Defensive Player of the Week: CB Charles Woodson, Packers
NFC Special Teams Player of the Week: P Hunter Smith, Redskins

A premature look at playoff scenarios: Bengals have the second seed in the AFC

2009-11-18T17:03:55Z

More photos » by AJ Mast - AP

6 days ago: New England Patriots running back Kevin Faulk (33) is tackled by Indianapolis Colts cornerback Melvin Bullitt (33) on fourth down during the fourth quarter of an NFL football game in Indianapolis, Sunday, Nov. 15, 2009. Indianapolis won 35-34. (AP Photo/AJ Mast)

Browse more photos »

With 2:08 left in the fourth quarter, with a 34-28 lead, the New England Patriots take a timeout Sunday night. They were discussing the upcoming punt situation with two yards to go on fourth down at the Patriots own 28-yard line. Everyone was sure of it. Tom Brady was there, talking about personnel and offering his input about a special teams play. Right? He is, after all, Tom freaking Brady. When Brady returned to the field, you flipped your wrist in a gesture to say "get the hell out", you're just trying to draw the defense offsides. Why do teams do that? When the situation is clearly obvious that the quarterback is trying to... Wait. Dan Koppen just snapped it. Wait. Tom Brady caught the snap in shotgun. Wait. Tom Brady is surveying the field. Wait. He threw the pass to Kevin Faulk. Wait. The official marked it short of a first down. Wait. Indianapolis' ball. What. The. Hell. Just. Happened. Did New England just go for it? The lonely echoes of an electronic guitar playing a sad ballard, like in a bar off an Arizona highway, emanate on the Patriots' sidelines.

In the following minute and 44 seconds, Peyton Manning led the offense on a four-play, 29-yard touchdown drive to win the game with 16 seconds remaining. This, by far, led to one of the biggest sessions of Monday Morning Quarterbacking in recent memory. And it's deserved. But the Patriots' justification, who haven't shied away from making similar choices in the past, makes sense. Before the game winning touchdown, Manning led two touchdown drives, both with a time of possession under 2:04, forcing Bill Belichick to conclude that Manning will score from anywhere; a conclusion that every person that's paid by the NFL and all of their teams have reached. If the Patriots had picked up the first down, the game is over.

From a Bengals fan perspective, that missed fourth down conversation gave the Bengals sole possession of the second seed in the AFC. Granted, it doesn't mean much with seven games remaining. But they are in sole possession of the second seed. Let that digest for a moment. Go ahead, lean back in your chair, interlock your fingers behind your head and grin like only maddening fans of a team with decades of futility can grin. If the playoffs were to start today -- yes, yes, I know they don't -- the Bengals would have a bye week and host at least one home game.

In the meantime, the Bengals are still a trap game away from losing everything they've earned so far. Let's take a look at the Bengals and Steelers remaining schedule.

Side-by-side comparison of the Bengals and Steelers remaining schedule
Date	Opponent	Date	Opponent
Nov 22	@ Oakland	Nov 22	@ Kansas City
Nov 29	Cleveland	Nov 29	@ Baltimore (SNF)
Dec 6	Detroit	Dec 6	Oakland
Dec 13	@ Minnesota	Dec 10	@ Cleveland (TNF)
Dec 20	@ San Diego	Dec 20	Green Bay
Dec 27	Kansas City	Dec 27	Baltimore
Jan 3	@ NY Jets	Jan 3	@ Miami

NOTES:

If the season were to end today. The Steelers and Chargers would be the wild card and the Patriots would host the Steelers during the first weekend. If the Broncos beat the Chargers and the Steelers beat the Patriots, Cincinnati would host the Steelers in the playoffs... again. If the Broncos and Patriots win opening playoff weekend, the Bengals would host the Broncos... again.
The Bengals could find themselves in trouble if the Denver Broncos lose the AFC West to the San Diego Chargers and say another team, like the Houston Texans made a run for the playoffs. The Bengals would lose the tie-breaker to the Broncos and Texans because Cincinnati lost the head-to-head meeting to both teams.

Bengals worked out Joey Galloway, Ed Johnson and Mike Doss Tuesday

2009-11-18T16:27:58Z

More photos » by Winslow Townson - AP

3 months ago: New England Patriots wide receiver Joey Galloway hauls in a pass during NFL football training camp at Gillette Stadium in Foxborough, Mass. Saturday, Aug. 1, 2009. (AP Photo/Winslow Townson)

Browse more photos »

While the signing of Larry Johnson, and to a smaller degree, the release of Ben Utecht, were Tuesday's primary headlines, the Bengals weren't through, just yet. On Tuesday, the Bengals worked out three other players; wide receiver Joey Galloway, safety Mike Doss and defensive lineman Ed Johnson. Johnson was released by the Indianapolis Colts in October because he lacked production. In Joey Galloway's case, he just never caught on with the Patriots. Mike Doss, who played for Cincinnati at the end of last year, was released with Chris Perry, Eric Henderson, Nate Lawrie and Gary Russell in April.

The Bengals invited Galloway, who could be used as a deep threat on a core of wide receivers that are more possession receivers. Unless, of course, you play Jerome Simpson, who has speed. It appears that Ed Johnson is more trouble than he's worth. Johnson was arrested in September of 2008 when Indiana police pulled Johnson over for speeding and found he was in possession of marijuana. Along with lacking production, there's no benefit signing Johnson at this point. Doss was awesome in college. Since then, injuries have really slowed him down and he's, at best, a special teams contributor.

In the end, I'll be surprised if the Bengals offer anyone that visited a contract.

Primer: Cincinnati Bengals (7-2) at Oakland Raiders (2-7)

2009-11-18T15:10:39Z

Cincinnati Bengals

The Bengals are 4-0 on the road in 2009 and looks to win the fifth consecutive road game for the first time in franchise history.
Under Marvin Lewis, when a running back rushes 25 times or more, the Bengals are 26-1.
Carson Palmer needs four touchdown passes to reach 125 in his career -- third Bengals player in franchise history to achieve that milestone.
In his past three games, Palmer has thrown for six touchdowns and no interceptions.
Cedric Benson needs 141 yards rushing for his first 1,000-yard season.
When rushing 20 times or more in a game, Benson averages 106.2 yards rushing in those games -- teams are 11-1-1.
Frostee Rucker recorded his first career interception last week.
Jonathan Fanene has a career-high five quarterback sacks in 2009; including a career-best two last week.
Johnathan Joseph and Leon Hall have combined for 25 passes defensed this season.

Oakland Raiders

The Raiders are 8-0 all-time against the Bengals in games played in Oakland since October 27, 1968.
Quarterback JaMarcus Russell needs 137 yards passing to reach 4,000 yards in his career.
Running back Michael Bush posted his first 100-yard rushing game last week and second of his career.
Justin Fargas has a career 6.2 yards-per-rush average against the Bengals (15 attempts, 93 yards).
Fargas looks to record a touchdown in his third straight game.
Tight End Zach Miller ranks sixth in franchise history among Tight Ends with 129 receptions and 1,652 yards receiving.
Defense has 10 sacks in the past four games.
Since 2008, cornerback Chris Johnson leads the team with six interceptions and looks to record a pick in his third straight game.
Defensive Ends Richard Seymour and Greg Ellis have a combined 124 career quarterback sacks.
Rookie defensive end Matt Shaughnessy looks to record a sack in his third straight game.

TEAM RANKINGS

Offense	Bengals	Raiders
Total	334.2 (19th)	222.0 (31st)
Scoring	22.0 (17th)	9.8 (31st)
Third Downs	41% (15th)	27% (29th)
Rushing	122.3 (11th)	103.4 (20th)
Rushing TDs	7 (t-15th)	5 (t-23rd)
Passing	211.9 (19th)	118.6 (31st)
Passing TDs	14 (t-12th)	2 (32nd)
Sacks Allowed	14 (6th)	27 (t-26th)
20-yard Passes	24 (t-16th)	11 (t-31st)

Defense	Bengals	Raiders
Total	314.4 (11th)	367.1 (24th)
Scoring	16.3 (2nd)	24.1 (25th)
3rd Downs Allowed	34% (7th)	34% (5th)
Rushing	83.4 (2nd)	155.6 (29th)
Rushing TDs	4 (t-5th)	14 (t-31st)
Passing	231.0 (21st)	211.6 (14th)
Passing TDs	10 (t-10th)	8 (t-4th)
Sacks	25 (t-4th)	19 (t-17th)
QB Rating	77.9 (9th)	83.1 (16th)
20-Yard Passes Allowed	28 (t-21st)	28 (t-21st)
Interceptions	11 (t-6th)	6 (t-26th)

Special Teams	Bengals	Raiders
Kickoff Return	22.5 (19th)	18.7 (32nd)
Punt Return	11.7 (5th)	2.6 (32nd)
Punting (Net)	37.3 (t-20th)	44.8 (1st)
Punts Inside the 20	14 (t-18th)	19 (t-5th)

2009 STATISTICAL INDIVIDUAL RANKINGS

Carson Palmer	Stat	Ranking
Quarterback Rating	88.1	15th
Yards Passing	2,010	16th
Touchdowns	14	t-10th
First Downs	103	14th
Average Yards/Att	6.9	18th
Completions	178	t-14th
Interceptions	7	t-14th
Times Sacked	14	10th

Cedric Benson	Stat	Ranking
Yards Rushing	859	6th
Attempts / Game	22.8	1st
Touchdowns	6	t-8th
First Downs	36	t-6th

Chad Ochocinco	Stat	Ranking
Receptions	46	t-17th
Yards Receiving	668	t-11th
Touchdowns	5	t-12th
20-yard receptions	10	t-7th
First Downs	35	t-8th

CAREER AGAINST THE OAKLAND RAIDERS

Carson Palmer

Date	Result	Comp	Att	Yards	TDs	INTs
12.10.2006	W, 27-10	20	28	297	2	3

Chad Johnson

Date	Rec	Yards	TDs
12.10.2006	5	101	0
9.14.2003	8	131	0

Laveranues Coles

Date	Rec	Yards	TDs
10.19.2008	4	51	0
12.31.2006	2	24	0
12.11.2005	3	30	0
12.2.2002	10	158	0
1.6.2002	5	111	1
12.10.2000	1	16	0

Cedric Benson

Date	Rush	Yards	TDs
11.11.2007	28	72	1

Larry Johnson

Date	Rush	Yards	TDs
11.30.2008	24	92	1
9.14.2008	12	22	0
10.21.2007	24	112	1
12.23.2006	31	135	1
11.19.2006	31	154	2
11.6.2005	22	107	2
9.18.2005	9	41	1
12.25.2004	25	79	2
12.5.2004	20	118	1

Bernard Scott's Beastly Return

2009-11-18T00:00:17Z

There's a little bit of contention going around CJ, thanks in large part to the Larry Johnson signing and the residual fallout. With that in mind, I thought it might be prudent to lighten the mood around here by posting the video of Bernard Scott's awesome kick off return against the Pittsburgh Steelers. As we all know, it was the game's only touchdown, and because it was so essential to the Bengals victory, it needs to be celebrated -- especially in light of the newest acquisition.

The best part of Scott's return, besides him crossing the goal line, has to be Steelers kicker Jeff Reed's "attempt" to "tackle" Scott. Granted, kickers aren't usually known as the best tackler, but that was just poor. It would've been better if Reed simply escorted Scott to the end zone, for all the good his bullfighter approach to tackling did.

One last thing, make sure to look for Quan Cosby knocking the stuffing out of Stefan Logan right before Scott goes into score. It's around the 18 or 19 second mark.

Larry Johnson might play on Sunday if Cedric Benson is out

2009-11-17T22:07:30Z

More photos » by David Kohl - AP

5 days ago: Newly acquired Cincinnati Bengals running back Larry Johnson, right, sits next to head coach Marvin Lewis, left, as he speaks during a news conference at Paul Brown Stadium, Tuesday, Nov. 17, 2009 in Cincinnati. (AP Photo/David Kohl)

Browse more photos »

Larry Johnson is the fourth running back. Larry Johnson is an insurance policy. Larry Johnson won't play on Sunday as long as the other three running backs are healthy. These were the talking points from head coach Marvin Lewis, who carefully walked a minefield after reports surfaced that the Bengals were signing a player with potentially incendiary qualities. Signing Johnson wasn't a popular move with Bengals fans. Players are optimistically cautious -- some completely defer to Cedric Benson, which is a true sign of the respect players have of Benson in the lockerroom. Benson himself approves the moves, based on very good conditions. Help the team.

However, on Tuesday, head coach Marvin Lewis said that Johnson could play on Sunday, writes Geoff Hobson.

With former Chiefs running back Larry Johnson sitting next to him in a Paul Brown Stadium news conference Tuesday, head coach Marvin Lewis didn’t rule out using the newest Bengal this Sunday in Oakland if Cedric Benson can’t play.

Ah, one of the conditions. Good. Good.

What I really like out of all of this is the growing perception of Benson. In the 14 months, we went from wondering if he was what we're thinking of Larry Johnson now, to not only being one of the best players on the team, but respected and liked by all of the fans. And I really loved this:

“Once the hip is ready, I’m gone,” he said. “I’m running all the way to Miami and the Super Bowl.”

Benson is the man.

Like him or not, Johnson is in Cincinnati. He is a Bengal. Like him or not, he's here.

Bengals release Ben Utecht and Antonio Chatman from Injured Reserve; sign Brannon Condren to the practice squad

2009-11-17T21:49:27Z

More photos » by Al Behrman - AP

7 months ago: -- FILE -- In this July 28, 2008 file photo, Cincinnati Bengals tight end Ben Utecht takes a break during practice at training camp, in Georgetown, Ky. Utecht will release his first album on Tuesday, April 21, 2009 under the Stylos Records label. The 12-song album titled "Ben Utecht" is the first for the professional football player, who wrote songs about his faith.(AP Photo/Al Behrman)

Browse more photos »

In a somewhat of a surprising move in that category of moves that shouldn't surprise anyone, the Cincinnati Bengals announced that they released Antonio Chatman and Ben Utecht Tuesday afternoon. Both players were released from the reserve/injury list, which means they wouldn't affect the current 53-man roster. Utecht was scheduled to earn $2.25 million in 2009 and $2.5 million in 2010. Chatman was scheduled to earn $620,000 this year only.

Utecht's release is a bit surprising considering the tight ends they have signed for 2010. Chase Coffman. Clark Harris. And Harris is hardly a tight end, now taking on the role as the team's long snapper.

Makes you wonder what they'll plan for next year. Will Coffman be the leading tight end? Will they re-sign Utecht to a cheaper one-year deal? Will Reggie Kelly make his return with Cincinnati? What about J.P. Foschi, who I could argue has been a decent tight end on the rushing offense.

In other news of player transactions, the Bengals signed safety Brannon Condren to the team's practice squad on Tuesday. Since I have no idea who this guy is, I'll cite the Bengals.com piece.

Condren (6-1, 205; Troy) is a third-year NFL player. He opened 2009 with Indianapolis, but was waived on July 29. A fourth-round draft choice of Indianapolis in 2007, he played in eight games for the Colts that season, with two tackles, a pass defensed and four special teams tackles. He was waived by the Colts on Aug. 30, 2008. Later in ’08, he was inactive for four games with St. Louis and played in four games for Miami, with three special teams tackles.

Cedric Benson has second-most Pro Bowl votes in the AFC; Gregg Doyel colossally fails

2009-11-17T20:45:12Z

In a release by the NFL on Tuesday, the Bengals' Cedric Benson has received 321,552 votes for the 2009 NFL Pro Bowl. That's the most by any running back in the AFC and second most among any player in the conference. The Pro Bowl consists of three votes; a consensus vote of the fans, the players and coaches. Each group counts for one-third of the total vote that determines each roster. The top vote getters are as follows:

Player	Position	Votes
Drew Brees	QB	539,228
Peyton Manning	QB	532,455
Adrian Peterson	RB	529,319
Brett Favre	QB	476,799
Larry Fitzgerald	WR	328,451
Cedric Benson	RB	321,552
Tom Brady	QB	295,477
Ben Roethlisberger	QB	291,466
Andre Johnson	WR	279,395
Dallas Clark	TE	274,400

No other Bengals player is leading in votes. The league made several changes this year to the Pro Bowl; it'll be played on the mainland in Miami a week before the Super Bowl (January 31, 2010).

When a journalist elicits an opposite response of the one they had aimed for, does that mean he succeeded or failed? Sunday night, after the Bengals beat the Steelers (sorry, I just can't stop saying that!), CBS' Gregg Doyel, wrote that Cincinnati's chances of winning is based on whether or not Chad Ochocinco can keep it "buttoned up".

But the Bengals can't be called a playoff lock yet, because they still have to traverse the mental minefield that is Chad Ochocinco. I tried to traverse it after the game Sunday, and it didn't go so well.

After reminding us of Chad's history before the 2009 season, including wrongfully dating Chad's "trade demands" in 2007 rather than 2008, Doyel continues during a one-on-one interview.

"I never have a big impact in games when we're up against these guys," he said. "They throw the whole house on me. But it's not always going to be about me. It was a team win today."

He went on, and was complimentary about the Pittsburgh defense, but I asked one more question, and that's where it went south. And don't look at me like that. I knew what I was going to write after this game -- read my first sentence again; I wrote it right after the game ended, before I went to the locker room for interviews -- and I wanted Ochocinco's thoughts on the topic.

Me: "As the season goes along -- you guys are 7-2, first place in the division -- are you going to be OK if it stays 'not about you'?"

Him: "Sure I am -- wait. What? Why are you so interested in talking about me?"

Me: "Because you're so interested in talking about you. And that interests me."

Him: "You need to get out of here."

Jake wrote on Monday that "Doyel was just upset that Chad told him to get lost." I think it's more than that. I think Doyel had every intention of writing a negatively-spun article about Chad no matter what Chad said or did. Doyel asks Chad about Chad, and Chad, upset that it turned to just him, leaves. The irony of all ironies, I say. Then you ask yourself, what did Doyel really bring us here? Does he bring us insight into the game he's covering? Does he bring us a unique perspective about what he saw? No, he couldn't keep Chad seated for the interview. What did you learn about Chad? WDR simply called this a glamour piece for Doyel, who wanted everyone to pay attention to him. In other words, a glamour-whore.

In truth, Doyel's article did bring me insight. I'm starting to actually believe that Chad is a bigger team player than what we believed. How's that for irony?

UPDATE: Larry Johnson signs contract, reportedly gets veteran minimum, Orien Harris gets the axe

2009-11-17T06:10:24Z

More photos » by Nick Wass - AP

13 days ago: FILE -- This is an Oct. 18, 2009, file photo showing Kansas City Chiefs running back Larry Johnson carrying the ball during an NFL football game against the Washington Redskins, in Landover, Md. The Chiefs have released troubled running back Larry Johnson. A two-paragraph statement from the team Monday, Nov. 9, 2009, simply listed Johnson's statistics and announced his release. (AP Photo/Nick Wass)

Browse more photos »

The Cincinnati Bengals and running back Larry Johnson have agreed to terms and the "deal is done", writes Mike Florio at Pro Football Talk. As of this posting, neither the Bengals nor Johnson's agent Peter Schaffer had announced anything official. But we're sure a nice morning announcement will be scheduled, maybe even with the introduction of Johnson to the press and fans.

The initial thought was that the Bengals were concerned enough about Cedric Benson's injury that they contacted and invited Johnson for a workout. However, Marvin Lewis said during the press conference Monday afternoon, that he "spoke to Larry Johnson last Thursday, and I wanted to visit with him about his future." ESPN's Michael Smith wrote that the Bengals were one of several teams to express interest before Sunday.

Which means the Bengals were interested before Benson's injury on Sunday.

Johnson's legal troubles are well documented. He's been arrested four times since 2003. The charges include felony aggravated assault and misdemeanor domestic battery when he waved a gun at his girlfriend at the time. Charges were later dropped. A woman made an accusation that Johnson pushed her to the ground. The case was dropped because the accuser didn't appear in the hearings. In 2008, he allegedly pushed a woman's head and his fourth arrest came when he spit a drink in a woman's face. He pled guilty to both and sentenced to two years of probation.

Nice.

Johnson's career peaked, so far, between 2005 and 2006 when he rushed for 3,539 yards and recorded 37 rushing touchdowns. He was a threat out of the backfield in the passing game too, catching 74 passes in that time frame.

I understand the points against signing Johnson. I've made them myself.

From a purely football perspective, Johnson does bring something to the table. Even though he only carried the football seven times on Sunday, Benson is still the league leader with 205 rushing attempts. He's nine rushing attempts from reaching a career-high 214 attempts in 2008. Furthermore, Benson is hurt. What better scenario than to give give Benson a game or two off to rest and recover, allowing a healthier and stronger Benson during the stretch run towards the playoffs.

I know what you're saying. What about the Bernard Scott and Brian Leonard committee. I wondered that myself. But we honestly don't know whether either running back can be a 20-carry feature back. Scott said he felt great after a 13-carry performance against a hard-hitting Steelers defense. And, as Lewis said, this potential signing is merely an insurance policy.

UPDATE: Contract Signed and Benson responds. Joe Reedy tweets that the contract is signed and that we're just waiting for the official announcement. Reedy also tweets a Cedric Benson comment, "It’s good for him. I was once in that position and he’s getting his opportunity again."

UPDATE: Schefter provides contract situation. ESPN's Adam Schefter writes that "Larry Johnson gets $4 million Chiefs owed him AND veteran minimum Bengals will pay him AND chance to play for contender." This is Johnson's seventh season, so he's accrued six seasons. Estimates are that he should get between $630,000-$730,000.

UPDATE: Bengals cut Orien Harris to make room for Johnson. For the second time, the Bengals excused themselves of defensive tackle Orien Harris for a running back. The first, a trade with St. Louis for Brian Leonard. The second, released to make room for Larry Johnson.

Bernard Scott nominated for Pepsi NFL Rookie of the Week.

2009-11-17T18:45:04Z

More photos » by Keith Srakocic - AP

7 days ago: Cincinnati Bengals' Bernard Scott, right, returns a kickoff for a touchdown past Pittsburgh Steelers' Ike Taylor, left, in the first quarter of an NFL football game in Pittsburgh, Sunday, Nov. 15, 2009. (AP Photo/Keith Srakocic)

Browse more photos »

In our post-game write up, we talked about Bernard Scott's game in the Bengals win over the Pittsburgh Steelers Sunday. We wrote that "Scott recorded 206 yards on kickoff returns, giving him 260 yards total on offense and special teams." More importantly, he had a five-yard run with 3:05 left in the game that picked up a first down, forcing Pittsburgh to use two timeouts and subsquently taking another minute off the clock.

Scott is one of five NFL rookies nominated for Pepsi NFL Rookie of the Week.

The others are.

WR Jeremy Maclin, Philadelphia Eagles. Caught six passes for 76 yards and a touchdown.
RB Beanie Wells, Arizona Cardinals. Rushed the football 16 times for 85 yards, two touchdowns and 32 yards receiving.
LB Clay Matthews, Green Bay Packers. One sack and two fumble recoveries.
LB Brian Orakpo, Washington Redskins. Five tackles and 1.5 quarterback sacks.

This is a fan vote. So come in full force and vote for Scott.