Sippin' On Purple

NIT: vs. Rhode Island on Wednesday

2010-03-15T01:19:35Z

SFTF wins this time, as they correctly reported we'd be playing the University of Rhode Island Wednesday. We're a seven seed, they're a two seed.

Discuss, more later.

P.S. Cuttino Mobley is a tool.

Selection Sunday: Kiddie Edition.

2010-03-14T18:44:17Z

So, today, we'll find out what NU's postseason plans are. It's not the same experience as it should be - SPOILER ALERT: don't watch CBS' selection show at 6 - but still, I'm a little excited.

I laid out a lot of stuff here about where we could potentially end up. Now, the CBI and CIT are already giving out bids - Chicago College Basketball is doing yeoman's work tracking down confirmed biddees to the itty-bitty tournaments - but most likely, we won't hear about a potential NU destination until later tonight. Presumably, NU will hold off until they're absolutely sure that they aren't in the NIT. Now, the NCAA selection is announced at 5, then, the NIT goes to work and pumps out a bracket by 8, and we should be finding out about stuff shortly after then.

Right now, NIT-ology has us as the 13th team out of the NIT, and they last updated a few days ago. I think that's a little conservative - there's no way we're teetering on the brink of CIT-dom, I'm sticking by my statement that we've got a roughly 20 percent shot of NIT-ing it up - but NU we're a long shot.

I've got a final and a paper due tomorrow, so, other than an hour and a half of playing ball to relieve stress and some time for dinner, I'll be reloading and trying to see what's up all day long. If history is any indicator, it's that somebody will probably let LTP know about what's going down about 20 minutes before anybody else knows, so, keep your eyes peeled over there, and keep checking back over here as I'll tell you what's going down as soon as the internets reveal an answer.

Oh, and in case you're wondering, two of the 55 never-beens made it to the NCAA tournament, most recently the Arkansas-Pine Bluff Golden Lions. Congrats to them - you'll be missed, but really, we're more just sad that we're now officially worse than Arkansas-Pine Bluff.

Update: 5:05 PM - NU is inviting reporters to watch the NIT selection show on campus and making Carmody and players available for comment afterwards. If that's not saying "HEY, WE HAVE AN NIT BID" I don't know what is.

Update: 8:15 PM - Spread Far the Fame reports we're playing URI on the road.

Technically Not Over Yet: Looking at NU's Postseason Options.

2010-03-13T19:42:23Z

So, with yesterday's loss to Purdue, Northwestern is finished playing the games that you're guaranteed to play in at the beginning of the season. If you look at our schedule, there are no upcoming games.

But don't pour one out for Jeremy Nash just yet: yeah, losing to Purdue severely tarnished NU's hopes of playing in a respectable postseason tournament, but it's still almost guaranteed that Northwestern hasn't played their last game yet. For better or worse, NU will most likely accept a bid to a postseason tournament. We'll probably find out where NU is going tomorrow night, and the Cats will play as early as Tuesday.

After the jump, I'll give you the lowdown on each possibility.

The NCAA Tournament.

What: The big daddy of college basketball tournaments. You've probably heard of it.

Can NU make it?: Goodness no. Technically, the selection committee is allowed to select any team in the country with an at-large bid, and hypothetically, that team could be Northwestern. Other hypothetical events: Joe Lunardi hooking up with Scarlett Johansson, me studying for my final on Monday before writing a post about obscure college basketball tournaments. To get a bid, NU would have had to have won the tournament (automatic bid) or lost in the final with wins over Purdue and MSU, with one of those wins being noncompetitive. Anything else wouldn't have cut it, most likely. Give up, and stop whining, that is, if you were still whining.

Would NU accept a bid?: Uhhh, Jim Phillips and Morty Schapiro would probably each consider selling the other into wage slavery in a southeast Asian sweatshop for an NCAA bid, and neither of them would feel bad about it, including the one in wage slavery. That's how important that bid would be for the school. (Also, the NCAA made it illegal for their schools to decline NCAA tournament bids after Marquette did it in 1970, so there's that.)

National Invitation Tournament

What: The perennial second-best postseason tournament, the NIT takes the 32 next best teams and put them in a big ol' pot that ends up with the semis and finals taking place in the World's Greatest Arena, Madison Square Garden. (Go New York Go New York Go!)

Can I watch?: Yeah. During the NCAA's, the worldwide leader needs counter-programming, baby, and NIT provides the ESPN family of networks with the perfect way to draw a really tiny amount of viewers away from CBS and the juggernaut that is the big tourney.

Who typically competes?: A combination of three distinct groups: good programs in a down year, who are never really that into it, teams that just missed the NCAA's, and are pissed, and regular-season champs of minor conferences that didn't win their conference tourneys and were from small enough conferences not to get at-large bids to the NCAA's. It's a pretty high level of competition.

Can NU make it?: Tough question. Some NU people are furious about the concept that we won't get an NIT bid, and to some extent, they should be. We made the NIT last year, and we have more wins this year! Can't they cut us some slack?

The thing is, there are going to be a lot of teams that miss the NCAA's with 20 wins or more. Probably around 50 of them. A lot of these teams have a few good wins on their resume.

Northwestern has adapted a strategy in football for scheduling that I think is pretty smart: make sure you have at least eight - possibly nine - games at home, make as many of your out-of-conference games against meaningless opponents as possible. It's smart. In football, wins are the be-all end-all. You have six, you make a bowl. If you can get four off of the Towson Tigers of the world at Ryan Field, you make postseason play.

It sure as hell looks like NU adapted that strategy for basketball this year. No true out-of-conference road games (EDITORS NOTE: ONE true out of conference road game. forgot about NCState. Thanks, @manofsuds!), very few out-of-conference games against good opponents. I wrote back on the old site that NU's basketball schedule was great, for people who really, really hated RPI, and, well, I'm a prescient dude. The Cats handled their biz, but they played poorly in the conference season. The price they'll pay for a favorable schedule will be that they most likely won't make the NIT: there are seven auto bids from minor conferences, and a lot of teams with similar win totals, but with higher quality wins, better conference tournament performances, and no choke jobs against Penn State and Indiana down the stretch. I'd peg NU's odds of making the NIT at all at 20%, roughly, but don't count it out.

Would NU accept a bid?: Teams have been known to occasionally decline NIT bids, but thus far in history, NU basketball success has been measured in NIT bids. Make of this statement what you will, but it's true.

Would I be pumped?: Yeah. A little. Not a lot.

College Basketball Invitational (CBI)

What: In 2008, a shady sports marketing firm called the Gazelle Group decided they could make some money off of more postseason basketball. So they started a 16-team tourney with a really uncreative name to coincide with the NIT, featuring all games at home sites and a best-of-three championship series.

Can I watch?: Yes, actually. In market games are on the FoxSportsNet channels, and all games are available on the website, it's for a fee, though, and I hope none of you pay for that, because it's silly.

Who typically competes?: Each edition of the tourney has seen three major conference teams compete: in the first year, it was Cincinnati, Virginia, and Washington, last year, St. Johns, Oregon State (the eventual winners) and Stanford. However, the first year, there were at least four teams (that we know of) from major conferences that were offered and turned it down, not just because it's embarrassing to be in the CBI, but because a) the tournament makes teams guarantee money for home games up front and b) hosting games nobody will attend loses money as well. Virginia estimates they lost up to $150,000 on their tourney run. That being said, it's primarily a lot of respectable mid-major level programs, with a few of the lower-level big boys sprinkled in.

Can NU make it?: For sure. NU is probably on the lower end of the CBI's spectrum this year, to be honest, but I'd be surprised if they didn't pick up a bid, especially considering some of the schools likely to be offered will no doubt decline. The CBI is probably pleased any time they can convince a major conference school that had a passable year to join.

Would NU accept a bid?: Yes. We're not at the level where we can act like we're above a tournament that has featured major conference teams.

Would I be pumped?: No, on principle. The plus side is that while NU has no chance of being a higher seeded team in the NIT, they very well could host a home game if they feel like footing the bill next week, and I could use another home game, especially considering I'm done with my finals Monday.

Collegeinsider.com Posteseason Tournament (CIT)

What: Some people saw that the CBI wasn't a total failure, and were like, "hey, we could do that!" So this joke of a company, Collegeinsider.com (not collegebasketballinsider - just Collegeinsider, presumably sorta similar to CollegeACB, but I don't feel like actually giving their company the dignity of me going to their website.) made aj oke of a tournament supposedly to compete with the CBI in 2009. The problem is, it doesn't really, as the teams in this one are a caliber that's a little bit below the CBI. (Also, "Collegeinsider.com Postseason Tournament" DOES NOT abbreviate to "CIT", as hard as you make it try. "CIT" means "counselor-in-training". "CPT" or "CIPT" or "CI.comPT" would have been acceptable. If those don't work for you, change the name of your joke of a tournament.)

Can I watch?: Not that I know of. Did I mention this tournament is a joke?

Who typically competes?: Exclusively above average to mediocre teams from mid-major conferences, and this year, the champion of the Great West conference gets an automatic bid. Did I mention this tournament is a joke? Yeah? Oh, well, it's still a joke, surprisingly.

Can NU make it?: Hopefully, they're in the NIT or CBI, but if they're not, the CIT would be pretty obligated to offer them a bid. However, it appears the CIT might be gunning for a niche as "the mid-major tournament", so, because they're a joke of a tournament, they might opt not to bid NU.

Would NU accept a bid?: To be honest, probably. Nobody knows the difference between the CBI and CIT in the grand scheme of things - I didn't until I wrote this post, but it's become immediately evident that this tourney is a joke - so going to one and not the other would only make a difference to the select few who can distinguish between the two and actually care enough to pay attention to NU sports during the midst of the NCAA's. NU wants to play in the postseason, period, and this is the postseason.

Would I be pumped?: Oh dear. No. Although the previous statement about a home game next week applies.

Purdue 69, Northwestern 61

2010-03-13T03:34:48Z

More photos » Darron Cummings - AP

Crawford had a huge game, but it ended in disappointment.

Browse more photos »

Going into tonight, I expected Northwestern to lose. While I didn't think NU would get blown out, I thought Purdue would be too tough to overcome, and didn't really expect the game to be within reach in the final minute. I was wrong; the 'Cats played their hearts out the entire night, and should have had the final possession with at worst a chance to force overtime with a three, but they screwed it up and suffered what has to be their most frustrating loss of the season.

Despite the allegedly tight rims, Northwestern hit their first 5 threes and took an early 17-6 lead. Luka Mirkovic was doing great work inside, drawing early two fouls on JaJuan Johnson and passing well out of the post. Unfortunately, NU couldn't exploit Johnson's absence because Mirkovic picked up two quick fouls of his own. That left the remainder of the first half as a battle of the backup centers, and Patrick Bade held his own against Davide Curletti and Kyle Rowley (perhaps he was motivated after I gave him the Big White Stiff award). The 'Cats took a 4 point lead to the locker room, and it could have been a lot more had Purdue not forced 11 turnovers with their aggressive man to man defense. Also, E'Twaun Moore had a monster first half with 16 points, keeping his team in the game pretty much by himself.

In the second half, Purdue really clamped down on defense and opened with a 15-4 run, taking a 7 point lead. But Northwestern hung tough, thanks in large part to Drew Crawford and John Shurna. Crawford shook off his late season struggles and had a big night with 15 points and 10 rebounds, but more importantly played excellent defense with 2 emphatic blocked shots. Shurna was hounded by Purdue for much of the game, but finally got loose down the stretch and hit several very tough shots to finish with 16 points.

The 'Cats had cut the lead to two with about 7 minutes left when Johnson went to the line for a 1 and 1. As he was making the first free throw, Luka Mirkovic stupidly elbowed Kelsey Barlow in the face and was called for an intentional foul. That led to a 5 point possession for Purdue and killed the NU momentum. Just an absolutely idiotic play, and Bill Carmody rightfully put him on the bench the rest of the game. While it would have been nice to have Mirkovic out there down the stretch, Carmody had no choice but to sit him, just a stupid, dirty play.

The Boiler lead stayed at 5 to 7 for much of the rest of the game, and things looked bleak when Michael Thompson fouled out on a charge with just under 2 minutes to go (as an aside, it was unquestionably a charge, but slow-motion replays clearly showed Chris Kramer going into a flop before Juice made contact. His head whipped back as though he'd been shot, and he hadn't even been touched yet. Kramer's already a great defender, no need for weak stuff like that). However, Northwestern made a late rally, as Shurna hit 2 free throws to cut the deficit to 4 with just under a minute left. Purdue then easily broke the NU pressure and had a 3 on 1 break, but Crawford somehow managed to get a steal, and quickly got the ball ahead to Jeremy Nash, who buried a contested 3 for his only field goal of the night, cutting it to 1 with about 45 seconds left. Here is where Bill Carmody made a huge tactical error. NU wasn't in position to set up their press, they were all over the place after the wild sequence right before Nash hit the three. Plus, with a 10 second differential, he had to make a decision about how to approach the final possession. So it was an obvious situation to use a timeout and set up his defense. However, Carmody inexplicably didn't use one, and with Northwestern scrambling around unsure whether or not to foul, Purdue once again broke the pressure and Kramer made the biggest play of the game, converting a tough lay-up while getting fouled by Curletti. On that play, the 'Cats had a chance to foul a sub--50% foul shooter in Barlow, but because there was no timeout, the players on the court didn't realize that and missed a golden opportunity. I'm really furious with Carmody for that decision; had he used a timeout to set the defense Kramer never gets that chance. Worst case, they hit two free throws and NU has a chance to tie with a three. Ugh, just ugh. Instead, Kramer completed the 3-point play, and Alex Marcotullio bricked a contested 3 on the next NU possession. Purdue rebounded and hit 4 free throws down the stretch to make the final margin a deceiving 8.

Credit really has to go to both teams in this game. Purdue is without a great player in Hummel, and Johnson and Moore stepped up in his absence, scoring 50 of their team's 69 points. Northwestern did a nice job on the rest of the Boilers, holding the role players to 5 for 26 shooting, but the two stars were too much to overcome. Purdue also played fantastic defense, as the 'Cats got very few easy looks, but Shurna and Crawford were able to keep them in it by hitting some very tough shots. 21 for 27 free throw shooting for NU was also nice. It was a hard-fought, grind it out game, as both teams gave it their all and left everything out on the floor (and that's 4 cliches in one sentence, brutal, I feel like LTP). But seriously, it was a hell of a game; it's too bad Northwestern doesn't consistently put forth that kind of effort. Purdue brings it on the defensive end every night, and that's why they're a top 10 team and can still do damage in the NCAAs despite Hummel's absence. Hopefully, the 'Cats learn from this game and realize the type of effort necessary to compete at the highest levels.

Either way, I'm a lot more optimistic about NU's chances should they make the NIT, as this was a virtual road game and they acquitted themselves quite well. And should they fall to the CBI, I really like their chances in that. But that's small consolation right now, as this could have been an NU win had Carmody used a timeout at the end. Obviously it would have been tough to score and potentially force overtime, and winning in overtime would have been very difficult with Thompson fouled out and Crawford, Nash and Shurna all with 4 fouls, but they would have at least had a chance. I hope someone asked Carmody about this after the game, as I'd really like an explanation.

Thanks to everyone who showed up for the game thread tonight, I believe we set a basketball season record for comments, so hats off all-around. See everyone for whatever postseason tournament chooses NU.

Northwestern vs. Purdue/conference tournament live game thread spectacular

2010-03-12T17:03:00Z

Despite a smaller than expected turnout yesterday, we're opening up another all day game thread. There a ton of great match-ups all day, of course leading up the NU-Purdue game at 5:30 central. So join us, and if you're a betting man, here are my picks for today's other Big Ten games.

#8 Michigan vs. #1 Ohio State (-9). 11 AM central, ESPN

Michigan couldn't put Iowa away yesterday and let the Hawkeyes hang around for way way too long. Since Ohio State is somewhere between 2 and 500 times better than Iowa, I expect a blowout Buckeye win, although maybe this will be like the Big East with the top seeds losing after getting a bye. As a side note, can someone explain to me why Big East teams getting a double bye is somehow a bad thing for those teams? It's a deep conference and sometimes there are upsets, I can't think of one logical reason why having an extra day off would lead a team to play worse. It's not like Syracuse and Villanova had 2 weeks off; both were in action on Saturday. Makes no sense that some in the media think a double bye hurts a team (I'm looking at you, Adrian Branch).

Pick: Ohio State

#5 Illinois vs. #4 Wisconsin (-8.5), approx. 1:30 central. ESPN

I have to say I am a bit confused by this line, and really want to take Illinois, but the Illini are impossible to figure out. Just when you think they're dead, they pull off an upset, and just when you think they've got an NCAA bid locked down, they do things like scoring 14 in a half vs. Minnesota and collapsing down the stretch vs. Wisconsin. Illinois could win this game by 15 or lose by 25 and neither would really surprise me. While I expect them to complete their late-season collapse with a loss, 8.5 is bit too many to give.

Pick: Illinois

#6 Minnesota vs. #3 Michigan State (-3), approx. 8 PM central, BTN

As I typed the last sentence, I looked the line for the first time and said "Wow!" out loud. I know Chris Allen is suspended for Michigan State, but this line should be at least 4 points higher. When an NIT team is playing a top 15 team on a neutral court, and the top 15 team is only giving 3, that's way too good to pass up.

Pick: Michigan State

Overall record: 45-47-2
Northwestern games: 15-7

Preview: Northwestern vs. Purdue: Can lightning strike twice?

2010-03-12T06:16:50Z

More photos » Michael Conroy - AP

Juice will need to have another big game for Northwestern to pull off the upset.

Browse more photos »

Yesterday, Northwestern won their 20th game a season, the first time they've accomplished that feat, and tonight they will go for another first: advancing to the semifinals of the Big Ten tournament. Standing in their way are the #6 Purdue Boilermakers, who are looking to defend their conference tournament title and improve their NCAA seeding. Tip-off is at 5:30 central on the Big Ten Network. I can't find info on the announcers, but I'm really hoping it's Gus Johnson and Shon Morris like it was last night on BTN.

Although Purdue has dominated the all time series, Northwestern is actually 8-6 in the last 14 meetings, and has mostly been the better team head to head against very good Boiler teams over the past two years. In 2009, the 'Cats forced 22 Purdue turnovers in the first meeting at home, leading most of the way before choking down the stretch. In the second meeting, NU rallied in the second half for an upset win at Mackey Arena, spoiling Purdue's senior night. And this year, in case you've forgotten, this happened:

It was the biggest win of the season for Northwestern, and their first over a top 10 team at home since beating Magic Johnson and Michigan State back in the late 70's. A few silly NU fans dismissed the win as only being "technically" over a top 10 teams since it was Purdue's 3rd straight loss and knocked them out of the top 10 in the next poll. However, the Boilers immediately turned their season around and have won 12 of 13 games since, including 10 in a row after the NU loss to rise as high as #3 in the country. Unfortunately, they lost first team All-Big Ten forward Robbie Hummel for the season to an ACL injury during the 10th win, then promptly lost at home to Michigan State, a defeat that cost them the outright Big Ten title, although they still managed to share the title with Ohio State and Michigan State.

So how did Northwestern manage to pull off the upset last time?

1) Attacking the basket and getting to the free throw line. The 'Cats attempted a season low 11 threes, and attempted 30 free throws, making 26.

2) Dominating on the glass, to the tune of a 42-23 advantage. I have no stats to back this up, but that has to be the biggest rebounding advantage for a Northwestern team in the Bill Carmody era.

3) Holding Purdue to 36% shooting, including 5 for 22 from the 3-point line.

Of those three, the rebounding edge is by far the least likely to be repeated, because it was due largely to Purdue center JaJuan Johnson being limited to 18 minutes thanks to foul trouble. Backup center is a big weakness for the Boilers, as the only option is the over-matched Patrick Bade. In fact, Bade was so ineffective that Matt Painter used a very small lineup for parts of that game, with Robbie Hummel at center along with 4 guards. With Hummel now injured, it is imperative for Purdue to keep Johnson on the court, as they are a small team even with him; without him they will have huge problems on the interior.

Since the last meeting with Northwestern, Painter has made some changes to his rotation, namely relegating Ryne Smith to the bench. To say Smith struggled a bit in Evanston is like saying the Battle of the Little Bighorn was a minor setback for General Custer. In 18 minutes, Smith had 0 points, 0 rebounds, 0 assists, 0 steals, and 0 blocks, missed all 6 of his field goal attempts, committed 4 fouls, and played horrendous defense on Drew Crawford down the stretch. if you watch the above video, at around 3:10 Smith just lets Crawford go right by him for a lay-up, just awful.

So Smith is no longer playing many minutes, and instead those are going to point guard Lewis Jackson, who was out with an injury in the last meeting. He's undersized at 5'9", and isn't much of an outside shooter, but he's a solid ball-handler and distributor, and quick enough to keep opponents from driving by him at will. He's joined in the backcourt by John Hart, a sophomore who came out of nowhere against Illinois earlier this year, scoring 14 points off the bench. However, he hasn't scored in double figures since and has shot just 35% from the field, so while he is capable of getting hot, he's not exactly a guy a defense needs to key on.

Instead, Northwestern will have to find a way to slow down All-Big Ten guard E'Twaun Moore. He averages nearly 17 points a game, had 24 in Evanston, and can score either spotting up or creating his own shot off the dribble. Not only that, he has a knack for hitting big shots down the stretch. So the 'Cats will have their hands full.

Another Purdue guard to worry about is senior Keaton Grant, who really struggled for much of the season before coming on strong late. While his scoring and 3-point percentage are both down from his sophomore and junior years, he hit a clutch shot to win a game at Minnesota and hit 5 threes last time out vs Penn State for a season high 17 points. Grant is a much better shooter than his 29% from three stat line would indicate; hopefully he reverts back to his early season form.

Rounding out the guard rotation for Purdue are Chris Kramer and Kelsey Barlow. Kramer is well-known to Big Ten fans as one of the conference's top defenders, and he was recently honored with the defensive player of the year award. On offense, he's not much of a jump shooter, but he is capable of driving to the basket and scoring that way, so you can't totally ignore him. Maybe the most interesting match-up tomorrow will be Kramer on John Shurna. Painter is going with a 4-guard lineup with Hummel out, so I assume he'll put his best defender on NU's best scorer. Kramer is very strong and quick laterally, but he's giving up 5 inches, so Shurna should be able to post Kramer up like he does at 2:20 of the above video. For most of that game, Shurna was being hounded and completely shut down by Hummel, so I'm sure he'll be happy not to have to face Hummel again. As for Barlow, he's an athletic 6'5" freshman who has some promise but struggles with turnovers.

I am curious as to what defense Northwestern comes out in tonight. In the first meeting they played almost entirely match-up zone, and did a nice job of keeping Purdue on the perimeter. Of course, they were greatly aided by Johnson being on the bench for over half the game. There is no one on the 'Cats roster who can guard him one and one, so the best bet would be to double-team him in the post and force Purdue to win with outside shooting. That's not exactly an exciting alternative, but it beats Johnson dominating inside.

On offense, taking care of the ball will be key, as Northwestern turned it over 17 times in the first meeting. Purdue plays a very aggressive style of man to man defense, so the best bet would be to take advantage of Boiler defenders overplaying the passing lanes and beat them with backdoor cuts. I'd also like to see Northwestern attack the offensive glass, hopefully taking advantage of Purdue's small lineups. In his post-game press conference, Bill Carmody blamed the Conseco Field House rims for his team's poor shooting performance vs. Indiana; personally I'm not buying it;. Jump shots are going to have to fall for Northwestern to have any chance of pulling the upset.

In the last two meetings between these teams, I didn't think the 'Cats had much chance to beat Purdue. Last season, the Boilers really struggled in Evanston before escaping with a win, so you had to think they'd bounce back strong at home, yet Northwestern pulled the upset. And this year, Purdue was coming off 2 straight losses and I expected them to play angry and win easily, yet Northwestern pulled another upset. So can it happen again? As much as I'd like to hope so, I don't see it happing.

Purdue 63, Northwestern 58

I haven't seen a line yet, but I'm assuming it will be around Purdue -8. (edit, line is Purdue -8.5) The Boilers have had some trouble scoring since Hummel's been out, but they are still such a good defensive team that I expect them to grind out a victory.

See everyone later, I plan on opening up another all day game thread as the conference tournaments heat up.

Northwestern 73, Indiana 58: Winning ugly

2010-03-12T01:08:36Z

More photos » Darron Cummings - AP

Davide Curletti came out of nowhere to score 12 points off the bench in Northwestern's opening round win over Illinois.

Browse more photos »

it certainly wasn't pretty, but Northwestern pulled away down the stretch to beat woeful Indiana and win their 20th game of the season. Michael Thompson led the way with 16 points, John Shurna added 14, and Davide Curletti had a career high 12 points off the bench.

In the first half, the 'Cats were ice cold on 3-pointers, hitting just 2 of 18, and if it weren't for solid work on the offensive glass (made easier since Indiana was in a zone the whole game), the Hoosiers may have had a big lead. Instead, Indiana only led by 3, as a Shurna tip in at the first half buzzer gave Northwestern some momentum heading into the locker room.

But that momentum didn't carry over, as the cold outside shooting continued and Indiana stretched the lead to as many as 8. And when Luka Mirkovic fouled out with just over 10 minutes left, things didn't look good. However, Northwestern clamped down in the 1-3-1 zone, and Indiana completely lost their composure, committing turnover after turnover and letting the 'Cats pull ahead. Michael Thompson then got hot, scoring 11 points in less than 3 minutes, capped off by a deep three to give NU a 10 point lead with 4 minutes left and effectively seal the game. Northwestern hit their free throws (18 of 20) and Indiana continued to turn the ball over, making the final margin a deceptive 15 points.

A key factor in the win was the production off the bench: Curletti had 12 points including 6 for 6 from the free throw line, and Alex Marcotullio returned to his early season form, with 8 points, 5 assists, and solid defense. While he tried to do too much at times, it's nice to see him looking like a Big Ten player again. Of course, the other key factor was Indiana being absolutely awful down the stretch. The Hoosiers panicked against the 1-3-1 and started turning the ball over like crazy (18 times in the game with most coming in the last 10 minutes) and looked a lot like the team that lost 11 straight games earlier this year, most of them by huge margins. Tom Crean has a ton of work to do if he wants to get the Hoosiers back to a Big Ten contender.

There were some good signs tonight, namely the bench production and Thompson's cold-blooded scoring in the 2nd half, but it's going to take a vastly superior effort to beat Purdue tomorrow. Jeremy Nash's jump shot has seemingly abandoned him; while he had 13 points, his only field goals were on open lay-ups. Drew Crawford continues to be limited by his injury, and Luka Mirkovic was a complete non-factor. Curletti did a nice job scoring off the bench, but he doesn't have the size or strength to bang inside, so Mirkovic will have to stay on the court. Also, 22% 3-point shooting isn't going to get it done against a top 10 team.

Despite the ugly first 30 minutes, a win is a win and the 'Cats lived to fight another day. See everyone tomorrow, and hopefully we get a better turnout for the game thread, although there was a firebillcarmody sighting.

highlights:

Women's Lacrosse vs. Duquesne, 3/12 at 3pm

2010-03-12T00:52:17Z

Women's Lacrosse vs. Duquesne, 3/12 at 3pm

All eyes will be (and should be) on the basketball team tomorrow against Purdue at 6:30pm. But if you're not planning on being in Indianapolis for the game, you should head over to Lakeside Field for the second NU Women's Lacrosse home game, this time against Duquesne.

3pm. Plenty of time for you to cheer for the team, get a quick dinner, and find a TV or watch party for NU vs. Purdue.

Northwestern vs. Indiana/conference tournament game thread extravaganza

2010-03-11T18:16:33Z

We're opening this up early today, as there's lots of college basketball on and who better to discuss it with then my closest internet friends? Northwestern game isn't til about 4 PM central, but there are plenty of games to entertain us until then. Comment away; rants, analysis, and predictions for today's game are all welcome.

Thursday Random Thoughts and Picks

2010-03-11T15:33:50Z

More photos » Colin E Braley - AP

Montana's Anthony Johnson is a full grown man.

Browse more photos »

- As Rodger and I have been tweeting about (and follow us on Twitter please), NIT auto-bids are being scooped up left and right. For those unfamiliar with the NIT selection process, teams that win their regular season conference title are guaranteed a spot in the NIT if they don't win their conference tournament, and last night regular season champions Quinnipiac, Jackson State, and Weber State all lost. Weber State's loss to Montana was at least entertaining, as Montana's Anthony Johnson led his team back from a 20 point halftime deficit by scoring 34 second half points. He has to be the best Big Sky conference player since the legendary Harold "The Show" Arceneaux led Weber State past North Carolina in the 1999 NCAA tournament . However, this is terrible news for Northwestern, as the 'Cats will probably need at least 2 Big Ten tournament wins in order to qualify for the NIT.

- I finished the regular season one game under .500 picking against the spread, but l'm now going to flip the switch and start taking over in crunch time.

#9 Iowa vs #8 Michigan (-8), 1:30 PM central, ESPN2

I was expecting this line to be double digits, as Iowa has just gotten destroyed their last 2 games and got swept during the regular season by Michigan. Todd Lickliter's first 2 seasons at Iowa saw them get smoked by Michigan in the 1st round of the conference tournament, and today will be no different.

Pick: Michigan

#11 Penn State vs #6 Minnesota (-6), approx. 6:30 PM, BTN

Everyone and their mother thinks Penn State is the sleeper team in this tournament and has a great chance to win today. Unfortunately for Penn State, in the words of the legendary Bill Parcells, you are what you are, and the bottom line is that Penn State is a 3-15 team in the Big Ten. Yes, they have had a lot of close losses, but most of those have been because of their inability to execute down the stretch. Picking Minnesota is always dangerous because they are such a Jekyll & Hyde team, but the bottom line is they are a much better team than Penn State and should win this game.

Pick: Minnesota

Overall Record: 44-45-2
Northwestern games: 15-6

Preview: Northwestern vs. Indiana: Glory's Last Shot

2010-03-11T00:21:37Z

More photos » Darron Cummings - AP

We'd better not see any Jordan Hulls high fives after tomorrow's game.

Browse more photos »

The Big Ten tournament starts tomorrow, and as usual Northwestern is playing in the opening round, taking on Indiana for the third time this season. Tip-off is at approximately 3:55 central time (25 minutes after the Iowa-Michigan game), and can be seen on ESPN2 with Brent Musberger and Steve Lavin on the call.

Going into conference play, many NU fans thought there would be post-season implications on the line in today's game; unfortunately no one thought the 'Cats would find themselves on the wrong side of the NIT bubble. According to this site, Northwestern is well short of the NIT right now, so there is work to do. Of course, the Holy Grail of the NCAA tournament is still possible, but it seems like a such a pipe dream at this point that it isn't even worth discussing. Instead, let's break down Indiana. The teams split the season series, with Northwestern winning easily at home in early February and Indiana winning on their floor in overtime on Saturday. The Hoosiers came into last Saturday's game on an 11 game losing streak, but certainly didn't look like a 10-20 team, as they had very little trouble scoring, and used a 2-3 zone to slow down the NU offense.

For Northwestern to win tomorrow, Bill Carmody is going to have to make some adjustments on defense. In the first half on Saturday, he went with a passive match-up zone that was highly ineffective. In a lengthy but insightful post, Welsh-Ryan Ramblings pointed out the big problem with this defense, namely that NU defenders don't fight through screens and instead just switch men. All Indiana had to do was just have one of their big men set a ball screen for slashing guard Verdell Jones, causing NU to switch and leaving Jones matched up with a bigger, slower defender and the Indiana big man (usually Derek Elston or Bobby Capobianco) matched up a much smaller defender. So it's easy to see why that didn't work. In the second half, Carmody switched to the 1-3-1 trap, and while it did force some turnovers, once Indiana got into their sets they had no trouble getting good looks, mostly by freshman 3-point specialist Jordan Hulls who hit 8 of his 12 3-point attempts. And when Indiana actually missed, the extended 1-3-1 left Northwestern too far from the basket to box out, allowing 17 offensive rebounds.

So clearly, changes need to be made. I'm certainly not a basketball genius (as seen by my losing record against the spread picking Big Ten games), but here's what I'd do. Instead of these weird zone defenses that are no longer fooling opposing coaches, I'd simply play man to man defense, starting with putting All-Big Ten defensive team member Jeremy Nash on Verdell Jones; Nash is quick enough and long enough to at least slow Jones down. I'd then put Michael Thompson on Jordan Hulls. Hulls isn't much more than a spot-up perimeter shooter, and that will keep Thompson out of foul trouble as he won't have to worry about Hulls driving by him. I'd then put Drew Crawford on Indiana's forward Christian Watford. This is the worst match-up for NU because Crawford has been hampered by injury and is giving up 5 inches, but I don't see an alternative, and Crawford should at least be able to keep Watford from driving past him. Watford shoots under 40% from the field, so I'd make him beat me with mid-range jump shots. Then you put John Shurna on improving freshman Derek Elston. Elston had a solid game last time with 17 points, but I recall him getting rejected by Shurna on a drive attempt, so Shurna should be able to slow him down. That leaves Luka Mirkovic on whoever Indiana rolls out there at center, which will likely be a combination of Tom Pritchard and Bobby Capobianco, and neither of those guys are great scorers. I don't see too many holes in that defensive strategy, at the very least it has to be better than what NU used last time.

In the last meeting, Northwestern got huge games from John Shurna and Michael Thompson, but very little from the rest of the roster. That was a big contrast from the first meeting when all 5 NU starters were in double figures. Tomorrow, someone else is going to have to step up, because it's very unlikely Shurna and Thompson will combine for 56 points again. Crawford is playing hurt and thus can't be counted on to do too much, and Mirkovic has been so bad away from home that I don't expect much out of him either, so Jeremy Nash will have to provide a lot more on offense. On Saturday he really struggled, shooting just 1 for 10 and missing several lay-ups, so hopefully he has some pride and bounces back strong. I'd also like to see Alex Marcotullio return to the form he showed in November, as he should get plenty of good looks from three against the Hoosier zone. I also hope he's been working on right-handed lay-ups.

Looking at the line for this game, I was surprised to see that Northwestern is an 8 point favorite. Indiana has a bit of an advantage playing so close to home in Indianapolis, and NU has done nothing in the last month for me to want to give that many points. On paper there's no reason Northwestern should lose, but there was no reason to think they'd get blown out by Iowa and Penn State either.

Northwestern 73, Indiana 70

I expect a high scoring game, but I think Northwestern will pull it off; after all they were a missed lay-up away from winning in Bloomington on Saturday. However, the smart money isn't anywhere near NU -8. Teasing Indiana +8 with the over 134 is highly tempting though if you're looking for action, in fact, that's my official pick for this game. For those unfamiliar with a teaser, it mean you're betting on 2 different things, and both have to win for you to win. However, you get 4 extra points for your trouble, so for me to win on this pick Indiana has to lose by less than 12 points and 130 or more points need to be scored.

I'll be back tomorrow morning for picks of the other Big Ten tournament games (and they'll be against the spread, none of this weak straight up picking like every other Big Ten SB Nation blog is doing), and I'll open up the game thread a bit early so we can talk about the other tournament games. See you then, hopefully we can do it all again on Friday.

Ranking the Big Eleven's Stadiums

2010-03-10T20:27:38Z

Ranking the Big Eleven's Stadiums

Somehow, Welsh-Ryan Arena isn't the worst.

The 55.

2010-03-09T22:28:29Z

Gentlemen,

Northwestern basketball is part of an elite, unprestigious club. A club you can't join, but which you can leave, but only if you want to never be allowed back again.

Us, and 54 other schools schools, AS YOU MIGHTA HEARD, ain't never been to the NCAA tournament.

As championship week progresses, we're going to see our numbers thin. Teams we've been sitting at college basketball's kiddy table with for decades are going to win games and get closer to making it, and/or lose them and become resigned to chilling with NU over in the corner for another year. As far as I can tell, there's no such list on the internet featuring every school who has not made the NCAA's - USA Today compiled a list of the 25 longest streaks two years ago, but since then, five of those schools have qualified, and several teams (primarily the independent ones listed below) have joined.

So here, fellas, is every school currently competing in D-I never to have made the NCAA's. As they progress/falter, I'll update this thread, but, keep an eye out for these schools in the upcoming days.

Actually, it's after the jump. But you can figure it out.

Teams who have made the NCAA's (and will not be in our bond this time next year) will have a big crossmark put through their name. Teams that have been eliminated from contention (unless they, for some freakish reason, receive an at-large bid) will be put in italics. Teams that have not yet been eliminated will be moved to the top of the list.

As of Selection Sunday, two schools - Wofford and Arkansas-Pine Bluff - have left us behind, while 53 - including Northwestern - will be back next year.

Qualified:

Wofford Terriers, Southern Conference (won conference tournament - No. 1 seed, beat NC-Greenboro 59-47 in first round, Western Carolina 77-58 in semis, Appalachian State 56-41 in finals.)

Arkansas-Pine Bluff Golden Lions, SWAC (won conference tournament - No. 2 seed, beat Mississippi Valley State 69-66 in first round, beat Alcorn State 46-44 in second round, beat Texas Southern 50-38 in fiinals)

Back Next Years:

Northwestern Wildcats, BIg Ten ( beat Indiana 78-53 in first round, lost 69-61 in second round to Purdue))

UC-Davis Aggies, Big West (beat Cal State Fullerton 68-65 in first round, lost 76-62 to UC-Santa Barbara)

Grambling State Tigers, SWAC (beat No. 1 Jackson State 65-57 in first round, lost 60-57 to Texas Southern)

Cal Poly Mustangs, Big West (beat UC-Irvine 73-69 in first round, lost second round 79-69 to Long Beach State)

Maryland-Eastern Shore Hawks, MEAC (No. 6 seed, beat Coppin State 64-48 in first round, lost second round 59-53 to South Carolina State)

Buffalo Bulls, MAC (won first round 72-54 over Toledo, lost in second round 73-59 to Miami (OH))

San Jose State Spartans, WAC (lost in first round, 90-69 to New Mexico State)

Norfolk State Spartans, MEAC (lost in first round, 73-70, to Hampton)

Quinnipiac Bobcats, NEC (beat Monmouth 84-75 in first round, Long Island 83-78 in second, lost in finals 52-50 to Robert Morris)

Bethune-Cookman Wildcats, MEAC (won first round, 64-53 over Florida A&M, lost second round to Delaware State)

UC Irvine Anteaters, Big West (lost in first round, 73-69 to Cal Poly)

Northern Colorado Bears, Big Sky (lost in second round, 68-63, to Montana)

Army Black Knights, Patriot League, (lost in first round, 64-45 to Lehigh)

The Citadel Bulldogs, Southern Conference (lost in second round, 71-61, to Appalachian State.)

St. Francis Terriers, NEC (9th in conference, did not qualify for conference tourney)

William & Mary Tribe, CAA (lost in finals, 60-53, to Old Dominion)

Centenary Gentlemen, Summit (9th in conference, did not qualify for conference tourney)

Maine Black Bears, America East (lost in first round, 68-57, to New Hampshire)

New Hampshire Wildcats, America East (lost in second round, 57-38, to Vermont)

Denver Pioneers, Sun Belt (lost in third round, 63-56, to North Texas)

Texas- Pan American Broncos, Great West (transitional conference, tournament winner does not receive automatic bid to NCAA's)

Stetson Hatters, Atlantic Sun (11th in conference, did not qualify for conference tourney)

Youngstown State Penguins, Horizon (lost in first round, 81-67, to UW-Green Bay)

Western Illinois Leathernecks, Summit (lost in first round, 77-68, to IUPUI)

Chicago State Cougars, Great West (transitional conference, tournament winner does not receive automatic bid to NCAA's)

Hartford Hawks, America East (lost in first round, 87-46, to Boston University)

Sacramento State Hornets, Big Sky (9th in conference, did not qualify for conference tourney)

Gardner-Webb Bulldogs, Big South (9th in conference, did not qualify for conference tourney)

High Point Panthers, Big South (lost in first round, 84-73, to UNC-Ashevillle)

NC Central Eagles, independent

Savannah State Tigers, Independent

NJIT Highlanders, Great West (transitional conference, tournament winner does not receive automatic bid to NCAA's)

North Dakota Fighting Sioux, Great West (transitional conference, tournament winner does not receive automatic bid to NCAA's)

South Dakota Coyotes, Great West (transitional conference, tournament winner does not receive automatic bid to NCAA's)

Utah Valley State Wolverines, Great West (transitional conference, tournament winner does not receive automatic bid to NCAA's)

Winston-Salem Rams, Independent

Sacred Heart Pioneers, NEC (10th in conference, did not qualify for conference tourney)

Jacksonville State Gamecocks, OVC (lost in first round, 87-54, to Morehead State)

SIU-Edwardsville Cougars, independent

Tennessee-Martin Skyhawks, OVC (10th in conference, did not qualify for conference tourney)

Elon Phoenix, Southern, (lost in second round, 68-57, to Western Carolina)

Central Arkansas Bears, Southland (12th in conference, did not qualify for conference tourney)

Stony Brook Seawolves, America East (lost in second round, 70-63, to Boston University)

Florida Gulf Coast Eagles, Atlantic Sun (10th in conference, did not qualify for conference tourney)

Kennesaw State Owls, Atlantic Sun (lost in second round, 69-64, to East Tennessee State)

Lipscomb Bison, Atlantic Sun (lost in first round, 72-69, to Kennesaw State - will qualify for the NIT as regular-season conference champions)

North Florida Ospreys, Atlantic Sun (lost in first round, 76-69, to Jacksonville)

South Carolina-Upstate Spartans, Atlantic Sun (9th in conference, did not qualify for conference tourney)

UC-Riverside Highlanders, Big West (9th in conference, did not qualify for conference tourney)

Longwood Lancers, independent

Cal State Bakersfield Roadrunners, independent

IPFW Mastodons, Summit (lost in second round, 71-58, to Oakland)

South Dakota State Jackrabbits, Summit (lost in first round, 71-66, to IPFW)

Northwestern basketball trivia

2010-03-09T20:58:46Z

Northwestern basketball trivia

To get everyone fired up (or perhaps depressed) for Thursday's Big Ten tournament opener, test your knowledge of the starting lineups NU has used for each of their opening round games.

Tuesday Random Thoughts

2010-03-09T17:14:05Z

More photos » Charles Cherney - AP

John Shurna is a weird-looking dude, but he can score the basketball.

Browse more photos »

- As I mentioned earlier, it makes no sense to me that Bo Ryan didn't win coach of the year from either the media or the coaches. The guy has gotten way more out of his roster than any coach in the conference, Matt Painter and Thad Matta both did a good job, but neither came close to the job done by Ryan. I feel like Ryan has become a victim of his own success; it's so standard for him to dramatically exceed expectations that no one bats an eye when he takes a roster expected to be a bubble team at best and has them in the top 20 all season.

- In trying to keep up with the NCAA bubble, I realize just how thankless a task the committee has and how much work various bracketologists have to put in to accurately predict the field of 65, especially when it comes to evaluating the mediocre resumes of bubble teams. For example, Illinois is currently generating a lot of discussion, and opinions are split on the Illini, as Glockner and Lunardi both have them in, but Jerry Palm doesn't even have them in his first four out. It's easy to argue both ways for Illinois. Supporters could point to their four quality wins (home vs. Michigan St. and Vanderbilt, at Wisconsin and Clemson) and their 10-8 Big Ten record, while dissenters could cite their mediocre 18-13 record, weak RPI (75), and numerous bad losses (Utah, Bradley, Georgia, Northwestern). But in order to actually determine whether or not they are in, you can't just look at Illinois individually; you have to come up with 65 other teams to put in ahead of them. So is Illinois better or worse than other bubble teams like Georgia Tech, San Diego State, Ole Miss, Washington, Arizona State, Notre Dame, etc.? It's almost impossible to tell, as you can clearly see by the differing opinions of professional bracketologists. I'm very glad I don't have the committee's job.

- KJ at the fantastic Michigan State blog The Only Colors uses some advanced stats that rank John Shurna as the best offensive player in the Big Ten.

- BHGP breaks down struggling Iowa basketball coaches as only they can, while Clone Chronicles is slightly displeased with another year of Greg McDermott. When I saw Iowa State against NU early this season, I thought they had NCAA talent, yet they are on their way to a losing season. Not sure how McDermott still has a job.

- Speaking of controversial coaches, the New York Times had an excellent piece on crazy Seton Hall coach Bobby Gonzalez.

Big Ten Awards announced

2010-03-09T01:11:49Z

Big Ten Awards announced

John Shurna 2nd team all-conference for both the coaches and media, Jeremy Nash makes the all defensive team, Drew Crawford named freshman of the year by the media. Only real surprise was Bo Ryan not getting coach of the year.

First Annual Sippin' On Purple Big Ten Awards

2010-03-08T18:07:19Z

Tonight the all-conference teams are announced, so we here at SoP are going to give out our own Big Ten awards. All stats I cite are from conference games only, I'm not counting non-conference games since strength of schedule is so wildly different for the various teams. Anyways, onto the awards.

Player of the Year (The Glenn Robinson)

Big Dog had maybe the most dominant season a Big Ten player has ever had in 1994, that is until this season when Evan Turner came along. Turner led the Big Ten in points per game, rebounds per game, and steals per game, while finishing second in assists per game and leading Ohio State to the Big Ten regular season title. The kid has dominated like no other player in the nation, and should win the national player of the year instead of the overrated John Wall. It might be a long time before we see another Big Ten player as good as Turner, so enjoy him while you still can.

Least Valuable Player (The Michael Thompson)

For newer Big Ten fans, this award is not named for the current NU point guard, but rather the McDonald's All-American of the same name who played center for NU in the middle of this decade, and underachieved perhaps more than any player in the history of the conference. Also, in order to be eligible for this award, you need to consistently play a lot of minutes, so scrubs like Nick Fruendt, Patrick Bade, and Andrew Brommer are ineligible.

Despite that caveat, there were several contenders for this award. Purdue's Keaton Grant was an early favorite, but that was all the motivation he needed to remember how to shoot during the second half of league play. Devin Bawinkel drew the ire of Iowa fans for his refusal to contribute anything other than shooting 3-pointers, but he hit 42% of those threes so at least he did one thing well. That leaves us with two players, Wisconsin's Tim Jarmusz and Michigan State's Korie Lucious. Jarmusz started 15 conference games and played 22 minutes per game despite his putrid 26% percent shooting from the field. He also didn't do much on defense, namely when John Shurna lit him up in Madison. However, Jarmusz did a good job of avoiding mistakes, as he turned the ball over just twice the entire Big Ten season, and that is why he is not the LVP. Instead, the winner of the first annual LVP is Korie Lucious. Lucious.struggled mightily with his shooting at just 29% from the field and 23% from 3-point range, and also had big problems with turnovers, at 1.8 a game while averaging just 21 minutes. His highest profile bad game came at Illinois while filling in for the injured Kalin Lucas, as Lucious turned the ball over 6 times in a loss that cost the Spartans the outright conference title. He is a kid with talent, so hopefully for him he uses this award for motivation and helps Michigan State go on another deep post-season run (and yes, I'm sure he reads this blog).

Most Improved Player (The John Shurna)

Several Big Ten players elevated their game this season, including Jon Leuer, Draymond Green and David Lighty, but the unquestioned winner of this award is Northwestern's John Shurna, who I am bestowing with the great honor of having the award named after him for future seasons. Shurna nearly quadrupled his scoring, going from 5.5 points a game last season to 20.1 this season, which I believe makes him the first NU player to average 20 a night in Big Ten games since Evan Eschmeyer. It was a leap forward that would have made Chairman Mao proud. Despite his goofy looking shooting form, Shurna scored more points than anyone in the conference and finished a very close second to Evan Turner in points per game, while shooting 53% on 2-pointers and 40% on 3-pointers. He will likely fall short of the All-Big Ten team, as he is not yet a complete player, but if he improves his defense and rebounding he could certainly get that honor next season.

Least Improved Player (The Vince Scott)

This award could be named after any of about 10 Northwestern players during the Bill Carmody era, but I am bestowing that honor upon the incredibly disappointing Vince Scott, who might be the softest 7 footer in the history of basketball. He was so bad as a senior that Carmody was often forced to play Kevin Coble at the center position. Therefore, it seems fitting to give this award to another underachieving Northwestern center, Kyle Rowley. He started most of last year, and averaged just 2.9 points and 1.7 rebounds per game, yet somehow managed to get even worse in the off-season, averaging 1.3 points a game on downright awful 33% shooting and going from starting center to the third string. While he was limited by a broken foot in the off-season and a bout with the flu during the season, it's safe to say Rowley will never be a significant contributor in the Big Ten.

Freshman of the Year (The Greg Oden)

Maurice Creek was the runaway favorite for this award before getting hurt, and in his absence this was the worst Big Ten freshman class in recent memory. Not only will there be no one leaving for the NBA after this season, there might not be one player in the entire class who will ever be drafted. There are only three candidates for this award, Indiana's Christian Watford, Illinois's D.J. Richardson, and Northwestern's Drew Crawford. Watford was the leading scorer and rebounder at 12 points and 6 rebound per game, but he was such an inefficient scorer for a power forward (an ugly 36% from the field) that he is eliminated. Crawford looked like the clear winner for a while, but he struggled down the stretch due to injury and finished with numbers similar to Richardson, but I am still giving the award to Crawford due to his edge in field goal percentage, rebounding, and assist to turnover ratio. Hopefully for Northwestern fans, he makes a John Shurna-like improvement next season.

Coach of the Year (The Bob Knight)

Tom Izzo, Matt Painter, and Thad Matta all did a good job in leading their teams to a tie for the regular season title, but the unquestioned winner of this award is Wisconsin's Bo Ryan. Picked by many to finish 8th in the Big Ten, Ryan led the Badgers to a 13-5 conference record despite losing arguably his best player for half the season due to injury. While he may not be a great recruiter, Ryan is consistently the best teacher in the conference and always gets the most out of his players (much like the legendary Knight). The only thing keeping him from a perfect score was his overuse of LVP runner up Tim Jarmusz, but other than that he was absolutely brilliant, so kudos to Ryan for exceeding expectations as usual.

Worst Coach (The Kevin O'Neill)

Many NU fans have credited O'Neill for reaching the NIT in just his second season at the school, but he only managed that because he inherited one of the best centers in the country in Evan Eschmeyer, and once Eschmeyer left he led Northwestern to their worst season ever. Why USC decided to hire this idiot is beyond me, but I'm sure he will run that program into the ground shortly. As for this year's O'Neill award, the three candidates are Tubby Smith, John Beilein, and Ed DeChellis. Tubby has taken a pre-season top 25 to the NIT and has been unable to keep his players out of trouble, but at least he's going to a post-season tournament. And while Penn State has certainly underachieved, there isn't much talent there and no one thought DeChellis would do much with that roster anyways. So the clear winner of this award is Michigan's John Beilein, who led a pre-season top 15 team to a losing record. He was unable to get the Wolverines to consistently play as a team, and continued to run a 3-point shooting oriented offense despite having a poor 3-point shooting roster. If Manny Harris decides to leave early for the NBA, it could be a very long season next year in Ann Arbor unless a great recruiting class is coming in.

The Big White Stiff Award (The Nate Doornekamp)

I am going outside the Big Ten with Doornekamp, but he so perfectly exemplified the qualities of the big white stiff that I couldn't resist. Doornekamp was a 4-year starter at center for Boston College, and was such a stiff he had more career fouls than points for nearly his entire career before a scoring outburst midway through his senior year. I am still baffled as to how this guy started for 4 years, but from an unintentional comedy standpoint I'm glad he did.

As usual, there is a ton of competition for this award. Luka Mirkovic would seem to a be a good candidate, but played good basketball at times and thus removed himself from consideration. Kyle Rowley certainly played like a big white stiff, but was disqualified for pigmentation reasons. Zack Gibson, Kyle Madsen, Garrick Sherman, Andrew Brommer and Tom Pritchard also received consideration, but the winner of this award is Purdue's Patrick Bade. While I feel bad making fun of the kid, who is simply an over-matched freshman, I am a heartless individual and couldn't resist. Bade shot just 25% from the field during conference play, was unable to corral rebounds that bounced right to him, and was the only candidate who finished the season with more fouls than points. Bade seems like a nice kid, so hopefully turns things around and eventually becomes a solid Big Ten player.

So there are the awards, I'll break down the All-Big Ten teams tomorrow and start to look ahead to the Big Ten tournament, but you know things are bad for NU when LTP is being negative.

Big Ten Tournament Thoughts

2010-03-08T06:23:09Z

I know no one should really be surprised by the announcement, but the Big Ten made it official and announced the tournament seedings sometime today, so now we as northwestern fans know what we're up against. The official bracket is here and you should all gaze in wonder. Or something.

ANYWAY the important thing is how NU is going to faire, right? Right. So here's some of my thoughts:

Game 1: NU vs. Indiana. Again. Well alright, we beat them pretty soundly the first time, and they handled our defense pretty well a couple days ago, so the real question here is which NU team decides to show up? The one that can defend sometimes, or none of the time? I think that Carmody is a decent enough coach to be able to figure out what Indiana was doing at Bloomington, so NU will be able to scratch out a win.

Game 2: NU vs. Purdue. Well the things we've got going for us in this game, assuming we make it, is that we match up well with Purdue according to Matt Painter, and they don't have Robbie Hummel. They showed that they can still win without him, and I don't recall him having a major role in our win, so we'll see if we can make lightning strike twice against the first of potentially 3 conference winners that NU will need to face. I don't think we'll win this game but let's assume we do for the sake of continuing this thought pattern...

Game 3: NU vs (MSU or MN or PSU). I personally think NU will draw MSU if they make it this far. They've started playing cohesively, and Raymar Morgan has emerged as a guy who can score almost at will. Which doesn't bode well for a team that has trouble defending teams that are relatively inept at scoring, like NU is. This, combined with the fact that now MSU is playing in a win or go home situation, and is vying for a high tournament seed, and the fact that NU can't win on the road, means that this is setting up to be a slaughter. Again. But if lightning already struck twice and we beat Purdue, why not hope for a third time, eh?

Championship: NU vs (the others). I'm predicting that the winner of the other half of the bracket will be Ohio St, because they too have been playing lights out. So this would set up the third game in a row against a conference champion. How's that for a gauntlet? All I remember from the last meeting in Buckeyeland is that it was really, really embarrassing, and I've basically suppressed all memory of the event. I know that Evan Turner is a contender for player of the year, and that's reason enough to be nervous (remember, can't defend to save our lives), so I really think that if by some miracle we win this thing, we'll fall here. I believe that Ohio St is the best team in the conference (as well as having the best player), so this will be the ultimate challenge. Win here and I might say that even if we didn't get an auto bid, we'd deserve an at large selection to the NCAA tournament.

But none of that's going to happen. We're probably going to lose in the second round to Purdue, and I wouldn't be terribly surprised if we fall earlier to Indiana.

Thoughts?

Sunday Random Thoughts and Picks

2010-03-07T13:00:32Z

- There has been some discussion recently about this potentially being the best season in Northwestern basketball history. Now I'm not much of an NU historian, but there's no way that's true right now because last year's team had a better regular season than this year's team. Yes, they were 19-12 this year as opposed to 17-12, but the two extra wins are a direct consequence of playing 2 extra non-conference games. Last year the Big Ten was much tougher, and Northwestern managed to get 8 conference wins as opposed to this year's 7, and finished the regular season with an RPI of 71 compared to this year's 116. Of course with a couple of wins in the Big Ten tournament and/or some wins in whichever tournament they end up in, that could change, but for now, no way is this the best Northwestern team ever. Compared to other Bill Carmody squads, this year's edition reminds me of the 2001-02 team that started the season 16-9 before losing their last 3 conference games to finish in 7th place at 7-9. That team was then embarrassed by a bad Michigan team in the Big Ten tournament and was passed over by the NIT selection committee; hopefully history doesn't repeat itself.

- 0-2 picking yesterday, no excuses. Gonna need a perfect day to finish the regular season above .500

Wisconsin at Illinois (+2.5), 1 PM central, ESPN

No strong feelings either way here, but when in doubt, take the more desperate team playing at home.

Pick: Illinois

Michigan at Michigan State (-10), 3 PM central, CBS

The Spartans are playing for a share of the Big Ten title, while the Wolverines are playing for pride, and they haven't shown much pride at times this season. Michigan State blows this one open late.

Pick: Michigan State

Iowa at Minnesota (-13.5), 5 PM central, BTN

The Gophers totally dominated the first meeting, leading by as many as 30 before calling off the dogs. I don't think anything changes at the Barn.

Pick: Minnesota

Overall Record: 42-44-2
Northwestern games: 15-6

NU Football Team Parties in the USA

2010-03-07T00:27:55Z

NU Football Team Parties in the USA

I'm not doing DM, but the Wildcats, as well as some guy wearing a hot dog costume, are, so here's video of them dancing along to what was my previous favorite song (I've moved on to Ke$ha).

Credit where credit is due, NBN is covering the bejeesus out of DM. The reason I was checking their site is because a friend of mine was telling me that he performed a set at the show 20 minutes ago, and that the video is already online. Pretty crazy.