<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0"><channel><title>Whitepapers</title><link>http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/default.aspx</link><description /><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007.1 (Build: 20910.1126)</generator><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/sqlcat/Whitepapers" type="application/rss+xml" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" /><item><title>Using Replication for High Availability and Disaster Recovery</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/sqlcat/Whitepapers/~3/We2I2g8cX1U/using-replication-for-high-availability-and-disaster-recovery.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 16:29:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">e9619797-5f48-4d02-a1a8-7f300d09be66:917</guid><dc:creator>Nicholas Dritsas</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=917</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/2009/09/23/using-replication-for-high-availability-and-disaster-recovery.aspx#comments</comments><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal;"&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-FAMILY:&amp;#39;Calibri&amp;#39;,&amp;#39;sans-serif&amp;#39;;FONT-SIZE:11pt;mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri;mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-latin;mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;mso-bidi-font-family:&amp;#39;Times New Roman&amp;#39;;mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;"&gt;Writers:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-FAMILY:&amp;#39;Calibri&amp;#39;,&amp;#39;sans-serif&amp;#39;;FONT-SIZE:11pt;mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri;mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-latin;mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;mso-bidi-font-family:&amp;#39;Times New Roman&amp;#39;;mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;"&gt; Manaphan Huntrakoon, Nicholas Dritsas&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-FAMILY:&amp;#39;Calibri&amp;#39;,&amp;#39;sans-serif&amp;#39;;FONT-SIZE:11pt;mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri;mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-latin;mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;mso-bidi-font-family:&amp;#39;Times New Roman&amp;#39;;mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-SIZE:10pt;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;font size="3"&gt;&lt;font face="Calibri"&gt;&lt;b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal;"&gt;Technical&lt;/b&gt; &lt;b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal;"&gt;Reviewers&lt;/b&gt;: Burzin Patel, Sanjay Mishra&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;font size="3"&gt;&lt;font face="Calibri"&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;font face="Calibri"&gt;&lt;font size="3"&gt;&lt;b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal;"&gt;Published:&lt;/b&gt; August 2009&lt;/font&gt;&lt;span style="LINE-HEIGHT:115%;FONT-SIZE:10pt;"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;font face="Calibri"&gt;&lt;span style="LINE-HEIGHT:115%;FONT-SIZE:10pt;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;font face="Calibri"&gt;&lt;span style="LINE-HEIGHT:115%;FONT-SIZE:10pt;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;font face="Calibri"&gt;&lt;b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal;"&gt;&lt;span style="LINE-HEIGHT:115%;FONT-SIZE:10pt;"&gt;Summary: &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;span style="LINE-HEIGHT:115%;FONT-SIZE:10pt;"&gt;An essential part of IT mission is maintaining high availability and disaster recovery capability. This technical case study shows how a company can use SQL Server 2008 database replication to eliminate single points of failure in data centers, and to enable fast recovery from a possible disaster at its primary data center. These strategies and solutions will be of interest to database administrators, senior IT managers, project leads, and architects.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;font face="Calibri"&gt;&lt;span style="LINE-HEIGHT:115%;FONT-SIZE:10pt;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;font face="Calibri"&gt;&lt;span style="LINE-HEIGHT:115%;FONT-SIZE:10pt;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="LINE-HEIGHT:115%;FONT-SIZE:12pt;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style="LINE-HEIGHT:115%;FONT-FAMILY:&amp;#39;Calibri&amp;#39;,&amp;#39;sans-serif&amp;#39;;FONT-SIZE:10pt;mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;mso-bidi-font-family:&amp;#39;Times New Roman&amp;#39;;mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;"&gt;Introduction: &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;font face="Calibri"&gt;&lt;span style="LINE-HEIGHT:115%;FONT-SIZE:10pt;mso-fareast-language:ZH-CN;"&gt;An international company has deployed a number of SQL Server instances spread out over different locations in Asia, the United States and Europe.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="LINE-HEIGHT:115%;FONT-SIZE:10pt;"&gt;&lt;span style="mso-spacerun:yes;"&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;The main problem they wanted to resolve was the high availability of data critical to their main application.&lt;span style="mso-spacerun:yes;"&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;In the event this data ever became unavailable, the financial repercussions would have been substantial.&lt;span style="mso-spacerun:yes;"&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;While the company had many ways and methods to alleviate this problem, they were unsure of which SQL Server high availability/disaster recovery technology would address their problem plus provide a strategic platform for the future.&lt;span style="mso-spacerun:yes;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;They engaged with Microsoft to help in the design of an architecture best fit for their needs, budget, expectations and skill set. In this document, we will be going through the steps and processes the project team went through to evaluate and decide on the best choices and options.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;font face="Calibri"&gt;&lt;span style="LINE-HEIGHT:115%;FONT-SIZE:10pt;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;font face="Calibri"&gt;&lt;span style="LINE-HEIGHT:115%;FONT-SIZE:10pt;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;span style="LINE-HEIGHT:115%;FONT-SIZE:10pt;"&gt;&lt;font face="Calibri"&gt;For more details, please look in this white paper: &lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://download.microsoft.com/download/d/9/4/d948f981-926e-40fa-a026-5bfcf076d9b9/Replication_HADR_CaseStudy.docx"&gt;&lt;span style="mso-bidi-font-family:Calibri;mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;"&gt;&lt;font color="#0000ff" size="3" face="Calibri"&gt;Using Replication for High Availability and Disaster Recovery in SQL Server 2008&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span style="LINE-HEIGHT:115%;FONT-SIZE:10pt;"&gt;&lt;font face="Calibri"&gt;. &lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://sqlcat.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=917" width="1" height="1"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/sqlcat/Whitepapers/~4/We2I2g8cX1U" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/Availability/default.aspx">Availability</category><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/Replication/default.aspx">Replication</category><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/SQL+Server/default.aspx">SQL Server</category><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/SQL+Server+2008/default.aspx">SQL Server 2008</category><feedburner:origLink>http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/2009/09/23/using-replication-for-high-availability-and-disaster-recovery.aspx</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Accelerating Microsoft adCenter with Microsoft SQL Server 2008 Analysis Services</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/sqlcat/Whitepapers/~3/RWxTz8vZk6g/accelerating-microsoft-adcenter-with-microsoft-sql-server-2008-analysis-services.aspx</link><pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 23:12:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">e9619797-5f48-4d02-a1a8-7f300d09be66:914</guid><dc:creator>denny.lee</dc:creator><slash:comments>3</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=914</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/2009/09/19/accelerating-microsoft-adcenter-with-microsoft-sql-server-2008-analysis-services.aspx#comments</comments><description>&lt;p&gt;How Microsoft adCenter takes advantage of groundbreaking performance and scalability enhancements and innovative design tools available with Microsoft SQL Server 2008 Analysis Services&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;

&lt;p&gt;For more information, please refer to the whitepaper &lt;a href="http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee410017.aspx" target="_blank"&gt;Accelerating Microsoft adCenter with Microsoft SQL Server 2008 Analysis Services&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Executive Summary&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As an Internet platform for online advertising campaigns on Microsoft® Bing™, Microsoft adCenter offers customers a wide range of intelligence and analytics tools to target, reach, and engage the right audience with the right ad at the right time. A complex, multi-faceted Online Analytical Processing (OLAP) environment based on SQL Server® 2008 Analysis Services drives the adCenter intelligence solutions. This large-scale environment includes numerous data marts that consolidate information from various sources through SQL Server 2008 Integration Services. The adCenter data marts, based on SQL Server 2008 Enterprise Edition, maintain up to two terabytes of data in relational databases, equivalent to one month of Web activities at a current accumulation rate of approximately 60 to 70 gigabytes per day. The OLAP cubes built on top of these relational stores hold 13 months of data and are up to three terabytes in size.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Prior to SQL Server 2008, adCenter relied on Microsoft SQL Server 2005 as the technological foundation of its intelligence and analytics infrastructure. Among other benefits, SQL Server 2005 enabled adCenter to take full advantage of the 64-bit platform, the Unified Dimensional Model (UDM), and Multidimensional Expressions (MDX). However, it was difficult to sustain processing and query execution performance levels during peak usage as scalability became a limiting factor. At 500 users per cube, adCenter began to notice performance issues, challenging a continually growing user base. By upgrading to SQL Server 2008, adCenter was able to break through existing limitations without the need to replace server hardware or redesign infrastructure. The performance and scalability improvements are vital for keeping adCenter agile, competitive, and ready for further growth.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In comparison to its predecessor, SQL Server 2008 offers better hardware utilization, optimized cube processing, and substantially faster MDX query execution, and it promotes efficient UDM designs and code quality in analytics solutions. These are key factors that enable adCenter to increase its return on investment (ROI) in server hardware by allowing more users per server, while at the same time improving user experience and service level agreements (SLAs). For the most critical data marts, adCenter SLAs now state that 80 percent of the queries must return results in 3 seconds or less. Moreover, adCenter gained new options to track service level compliance and establish baselines for Analysis Services capacity planning. By exploiting the new monitoring capabilities in addition to Analysis Services traces, such as Management Data Warehouse (MDW) and new performance counters for Analysis Services-related system resources, adCenter can locate root causes of performance issues faster than with traces alone. This ultimately increases the productivity of OLAP developers when troubleshooting performance issues and optimizing analytics solutions.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The upgrade to SQL Server 2008 also allows adCenter to prepare for future OLAP infrastructure optimizations and relational data-warehousing technologies, such as SQL Server code-named Project &amp;quot;Madison.&amp;quot; The adCenter Data Mart team has developed concrete plans to assess a load-balanced scale-out data warehouse appliance for the largest data marts and data warehouses. adCenter also plans to increase the size of the relational data stores to a massive volume of more than 150 terabytes as soon as Madison becomes available. This will allow adCenter to maintain between five and six months of Web activity data online, assuming an increase in data collection rates of one terabyte per day. For adCenter, the upgrade to SQL Server 2008 represents an important step toward the future.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The purpose of this technical white paper is to share Microsoft knowledge, experiences, and recommendations related to the architecture and design of SQL Server 2008 Analysis Services for high performance and scalability in a large-scale OLAP environment. This paper is not intended to serve as a procedural guide. Although many organizations have similar requirements, each enterprise environment also has unique needs, making it necessary to adapt the information discussed in this paper.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This white paper assumes that readers are IT professionals and technical decision makers, already familiar with Windows Server®, Active Directory®, and SQL Server. Specifically, knowledge about SQL Server 2008 Analysis Services, Integration Services, and Business Intelligence Development Studio is helpful. Detailed product information is available in the SQL Server 2008 TechCenter at &lt;a href="http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/sqlserver/default.aspx"&gt;http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/sqlserver/default.aspx&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Note:&lt;/strong&gt; For security reasons, the sample names of forests, domains, servers, databases, and other internal resources used in this paper do not represent real resource names used within Microsoft and are for illustration purposes only.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;

&lt;p&gt;For more information, please refer to the whitepaper &lt;a href="http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee410017.aspx" target="_blank"&gt;Accelerating Microsoft adCenter with Microsoft SQL Server 2008 Analysis Services&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://sqlcat.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=914" width="1" height="1"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/sqlcat/Whitepapers/~4/RWxTz8vZk6g" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/Performance/default.aspx">Performance</category><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/Analysis+Services/default.aspx">Analysis Services</category><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/SAN/default.aspx">SAN</category><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/Availability/default.aspx">Availability</category><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/Capacity/default.aspx">Capacity</category><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/Optimization/default.aspx">Optimization</category><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/design/default.aspx">design</category><feedburner:origLink>http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/2009/09/19/accelerating-microsoft-adcenter-with-microsoft-sql-server-2008-analysis-services.aspx</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Configure a Sharepoint Server Farm for minimal downtime during software updates</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/sqlcat/Whitepapers/~3/HIZdtWDufvg/configure-a-server-farm-for-minimal-downtime-during-software-updates.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 21:32:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">e9619797-5f48-4d02-a1a8-7f300d09be66:910</guid><dc:creator>Lindsey.allen</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=910</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/2009/09/18/configure-a-server-farm-for-minimal-downtime-during-software-updates.aspx#comments</comments><description>&lt;p&gt;This article describes how to update Office SharePoint Server farms with minimal downtime. By following the procedures in this article, you can update servers to add the latest service pack or cumulative update without incurring significant downtime for users. This article describes a step-by-step process for Office SharePoint Server farms that incorporate &lt;a href="http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc917680.aspx"&gt;SQL Server database mirroring&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It often takes several teams or roles in an organization to configure, upgrade, and maintain a server farm environment. To implement this solution, you must confer with network engineers, SQL Server database administrators, and all affected SharePoint farm administrators. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This article is written for IT professionals who maintain server farms that are running Microsoft Office SharePoint Server 2007 with Service Pack 2 (SP2) .&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The complete step by step instruction can be found here: &lt;a title="http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee514459.aspx" href="http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee514459.aspx"&gt;http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee514459.aspx&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://sqlcat.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=910" width="1" height="1"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/sqlcat/Whitepapers/~4/HIZdtWDufvg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/Scale-Out/default.aspx">Scale-Out</category><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/Scalability/default.aspx">Scalability</category><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/Availability/default.aspx">Availability</category><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/Mirroring/default.aspx">Mirroring</category><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/Optimization/default.aspx">Optimization</category><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/Failover/default.aspx">Failover</category><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/Operations/default.aspx">Operations</category><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/Transaction+Log/default.aspx">Transaction Log</category><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/SQL+Server/default.aspx">SQL Server</category><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/Architecture/default.aspx">Architecture</category><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/OLTP/default.aspx">OLTP</category><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/SQL+Server+2008/default.aspx">SQL Server 2008</category><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/Sharepoint/default.aspx">Sharepoint</category><feedburner:origLink>http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/2009/09/18/configure-a-server-farm-for-minimal-downtime-during-software-updates.aspx</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>A Technical Case Study: Fast and Reliable Backup and Restore of Multi-Terabytes Database over the Network</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/sqlcat/Whitepapers/~3/dZgqyl8--x4/a-technical-case-study-fast-and-reliable-backup-and-restore-of-a-vldb-over-the-network.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 00:06:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">e9619797-5f48-4d02-a1a8-7f300d09be66:891</guid><dc:creator>Lindsey.allen</dc:creator><slash:comments>5</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=891</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/2009/08/13/a-technical-case-study-fast-and-reliable-backup-and-restore-of-a-vldb-over-the-network.aspx#comments</comments><description>&amp;nbsp;&lt;font size="3"&gt;&lt;b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal;"&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-FAMILY:&amp;#39;Arial&amp;#39;,&amp;#39;sans-serif&amp;#39;;"&gt;Writer:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-FAMILY:&amp;#39;Arial&amp;#39;,&amp;#39;sans-serif&amp;#39;;"&gt; Thomas H. Grohser (=tg=)&lt;b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal;"&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;font size="3"&gt;&lt;b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal;"&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-FAMILY:&amp;#39;Arial&amp;#39;,&amp;#39;sans-serif&amp;#39;;"&gt;Contributor:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-FAMILY:&amp;#39;Arial&amp;#39;,&amp;#39;sans-serif&amp;#39;;"&gt; Lindsey Allen&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;font size="3"&gt;&lt;b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal;"&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-FAMILY:&amp;#39;Arial&amp;#39;,&amp;#39;sans-serif&amp;#39;;"&gt;Technical Reviewers&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-FAMILY:&amp;#39;Arial&amp;#39;,&amp;#39;sans-serif&amp;#39;;"&gt;: Sanjay Mishra, Lubor Kollar, Stuart Ozer, Thomas Kejser, Juergen Thomas, James Podgorski, Burzin Patel&lt;b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal;"&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/font&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;font size="3"&gt;&lt;b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal;"&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-FAMILY:&amp;#39;Arial&amp;#39;,&amp;#39;sans-serif&amp;#39;;"&gt;Summary:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-FAMILY:&amp;#39;Arial&amp;#39;,&amp;#39;sans-serif&amp;#39;;"&gt; Database sizes increase constantly, as do requirements for access and availability. At the same time, it is more important than ever to have a fast and reliable backup and recovery plan in place. This document discusses the challenges of designing a robust backup and restore solutions for very large databases (VLDBs). Using a real-world example, it demonstrates how to make the best use of the backup and restore features of SQL Server 2008 to help create a fast and reliable backup and restore plan for VLDBs over the network.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;font size="3"&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-FAMILY:&amp;#39;Arial&amp;#39;,&amp;#39;sans-serif&amp;#39;;"&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-FAMILY:&amp;#39;Arial&amp;#39;,&amp;#39;sans-serif&amp;#39;;"&gt;Backing up a 2-terabyte database onto a local hard drive and then restoring it is fast, but this simple process does not provide adequate protection against&amp;nbsp;worst-case scenario. On the other hand, backing up the database over the network to another location provides protection against our worst-case scenario, but with a typical 1-gigabit-per-second (Gbps) connection, performance suffers. When we looked at this situation, as a baseline test, we backed up the 2-terabyte database over a 1-Gbps network link to another data center 10 miles away. This took more than 24 hours, which was far from acceptable. We needed to design a solution that would remove the bottleneck, enabling us to complete the backup within that time-to-restore window specified in our SLA.&lt;/span&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="LINE-HEIGHT:115%;FONT-FAMILY:&amp;#39;Arial&amp;#39;,&amp;#39;sans-serif&amp;#39;;FONT-SIZE:11pt;mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri;mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-latin;mso-ansi-language:EN-US;mso-fareast-language:EN-US;mso-bidi-language:AR-SA;"&gt;Assembling all the small pieces of the backup puzzle and running endless tests, we were able to reduce the backup of the 2-terabyte database to 36 minutes. The solution, which we termed “multistreamed backups over the network”, used &lt;i style="mso-bidi-font-style:normal;"&gt;eight&lt;/i&gt; 1-Gbps network connections. Jumbo frames were configured for each network card, and each network card was then aggregated to layer 2 backup switches to one 10GE (10Gbit Ethernet) line that ran to the second site. Backup now took 2 hours and 15 minutes. Enabling SQL Server 2008 &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="LINE-HEIGHT:115%;FONT-FAMILY:&amp;#39;Calibri&amp;#39;,&amp;#39;sans-serif&amp;#39;;FONT-SIZE:11pt;mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri;mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-latin;mso-ansi-language:EN-US;mso-fareast-language:EN-US;mso-bidi-language:AR-SA;mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;mso-bidi-font-family:&amp;#39;Times New Roman&amp;#39;;mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;"&gt;&lt;a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb964719.aspx"&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-FAMILY:&amp;#39;Arial&amp;#39;,&amp;#39;sans-serif&amp;#39;;"&gt;&lt;font color="#0000ff"&gt;backup compression&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="LINE-HEIGHT:115%;FONT-FAMILY:&amp;#39;Arial&amp;#39;,&amp;#39;sans-serif&amp;#39;;FONT-SIZE:11pt;mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri;mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-latin;mso-ansi-language:EN-US;mso-fareast-language:EN-US;mso-bidi-language:AR-SA;"&gt; finally brought the time down to 36 minutes. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;font size="3"&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-FAMILY:&amp;#39;Arial&amp;#39;,&amp;#39;sans-serif&amp;#39;;"&gt;For details please refer to the whitepaper:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-FAMILY:&amp;#39;Times New Roman&amp;#39;,&amp;#39;serif&amp;#39;;FONT-SIZE:12pt;mso-fareast-font-family:&amp;#39;MS Mincho&amp;#39;;mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast;mso-ansi-language:EN-US;mso-fareast-language:ZH-CN;mso-bidi-language:AR-SA;"&gt;&lt;a href="http://download.microsoft.com/download/d/9/4/d948f981-926e-40fa-a026-5bfcf076d9b9/Technical%20Case%20Study-Backup%20VLDB%20Over%20Network_Final.docx"&gt;http://download.microsoft.com/download/d/9/4/d948f981-926e-40fa-a026-5bfcf076d9b9/Technical Case Study-Backup VLDB Over Network_Final.docx&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-FAMILY:&amp;#39;Times New Roman&amp;#39;,&amp;#39;serif&amp;#39;;FONT-SIZE:12pt;mso-fareast-font-family:&amp;#39;MS Mincho&amp;#39;;mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast;mso-ansi-language:EN-US;mso-fareast-language:ZH-CN;mso-bidi-language:AR-SA;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://sqlcat.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=891" width="1" height="1"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/sqlcat/Whitepapers/~4/dZgqyl8--x4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/Performance/default.aspx">Performance</category><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/SQL/default.aspx">SQL</category><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/Scalability/default.aspx">Scalability</category><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/Operations/default.aspx">Operations</category><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/SQL+Server/default.aspx">SQL Server</category><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/Manageability/default.aspx">Manageability</category><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/SQL+Server+2008/default.aspx">SQL Server 2008</category><feedburner:origLink>http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/2009/08/13/a-technical-case-study-fast-and-reliable-backup-and-restore-of-a-vldb-over-the-network.aspx</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>High Availability and Disaster Recovery at ServiceU: A SQL Server 2008 Technical Case Study</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/sqlcat/Whitepapers/~3/ieR86mRACVU/high-availability-and-disaster-recovery-at-serviceu-a-sql-server-2008-technical-case-study.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 20:59:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">e9619797-5f48-4d02-a1a8-7f300d09be66:881</guid><dc:creator>SanjayMishra</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=881</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/2009/08/04/high-availability-and-disaster-recovery-at-serviceu-a-sql-server-2008-technical-case-study.aspx#comments</comments><description>&lt;div class="BlogPostContent"&gt;
&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Writer:&lt;/strong&gt; David P. Smith (ServiceU Corporation)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Contributors:&lt;/strong&gt; Ron Talmage (Solid Quality Mentors); Sanjay Mishra, Prem Mehra&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Technical Reviewers:&lt;/strong&gt; James Podgorski, Mike Weiner, Peter Carlin&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Published:&lt;/strong&gt; August 2009&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;ServiceU Corporation, based in Memphis, Tennessee, is a leading provider of online and on-demand event management software. Our software services are used by churches, schools, universities, theaters, and businesses to manage events such as concerts and conferences as well as online payments. We have customers in all 50 states of the United States and in 15 countries worldwide.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;Our software services are built and deployed using the Microsoft® Application Platform, including the Microsoft .NET connection software, the Microsoft SQL Server® 2008 database software, and the Windows Server® 2008 operating system. The Microsoft Application Platform helps us provide a seamless user experience and maximum availability of our applications to users. The applications use both the Software as a Service (SaaS) model and the Microsoft Software + Services architecture.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;From a security standpoint, we maintain Payment Card Industry (PCI) Level 1 compliance to protect credit card holder and Automated Clearing House (ACH) information. (Details of our PCI Compliance are not covered in this case study.)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;Achieving maximum availability and near immediate recovery from a disaster is essential for maintaining our revenue stream. We have worked hard to eliminate all single points of failure in our architecture, and we have developed procedures for patching servers, upgrading software, and implementing application changes that preserve high availability. Based on these efforts, we have achieved 99.99 percent uptime, including both planned and unplanned downtime.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;This case study examines the decisions that we made and the procedures we employed to maintain maximum availability with minimal downtime. This information will be of interest to senior IT managers, project leads, architects, and database administrators (DBAs).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For more information, please refer to the whitepaper &lt;a title="High Availability and Disaster Recovery at ServiceU: A SQL Server 2008 Technical Case Study" href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee355221.aspx"&gt;High Availability and Disaster Recovery at ServiceU: A SQL Server 2008 Technical Case Study&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://sqlcat.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=881" width="1" height="1"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/sqlcat/Whitepapers/~4/ieR86mRACVU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/Performance/default.aspx">Performance</category><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/SAN/default.aspx">SAN</category><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/SQL/default.aspx">SQL</category><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/Availability/default.aspx">Availability</category><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/Mirroring/default.aspx">Mirroring</category><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/Concurrency/default.aspx">Concurrency</category><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/Failover/default.aspx">Failover</category><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/Log+Shipping/default.aspx">Log Shipping</category><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/Compliance/default.aspx">Compliance</category><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/Transaction+Log/default.aspx">Transaction Log</category><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/SQL+Server/default.aspx">SQL Server</category><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/Architecture/default.aspx">Architecture</category><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/Manageability/default.aspx">Manageability</category><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/OLTP/default.aspx">OLTP</category><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/SQL+Server+2008/default.aspx">SQL Server 2008</category><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/Cluster/default.aspx">Cluster</category><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/Failover+Clustering/default.aspx">Failover Clustering</category><feedburner:origLink>http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/2009/08/04/high-availability-and-disaster-recovery-at-serviceu-a-sql-server-2008-technical-case-study.aspx</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>SQL Server 2008 Failover Clustering</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/sqlcat/Whitepapers/~3/JlyaQLE5k6g/sql-server-2008-failover-clustering.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 22:49:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">e9619797-5f48-4d02-a1a8-7f300d09be66:871</guid><dc:creator>Mike Weiner</dc:creator><slash:comments>10</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=871</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/2009/07/08/sql-server-2008-failover-clustering.aspx#comments</comments><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;font size="3"&gt;&lt;b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal;"&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-FAMILY:&amp;#39;Arial&amp;#39;,&amp;#39;sans-serif&amp;#39;;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;font size="3"&gt;&lt;b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal;"&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-FAMILY:&amp;#39;Arial&amp;#39;,&amp;#39;sans-serif&amp;#39;;"&gt;Writers:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-FAMILY:&amp;#39;Arial&amp;#39;,&amp;#39;sans-serif&amp;#39;;"&gt; Mike Weiner, Paul Burpo, Max Verun, Joseph Sack, Justin Erickson&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;font size="3"&gt;&lt;b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal;"&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-FAMILY:&amp;#39;Arial&amp;#39;,&amp;#39;sans-serif&amp;#39;;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;font size="3"&gt;&lt;b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal;"&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-FAMILY:&amp;#39;Arial&amp;#39;,&amp;#39;sans-serif&amp;#39;;"&gt;Contributors: &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-FAMILY:&amp;#39;Arial&amp;#39;,&amp;#39;sans-serif&amp;#39;;"&gt;Sanjay Mishra, Jason Wu, Uttam Parui&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;font size="3"&gt;&lt;b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal;"&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-FAMILY:&amp;#39;Arial&amp;#39;,&amp;#39;sans-serif&amp;#39;;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;font size="3"&gt;&lt;b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal;"&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-FAMILY:&amp;#39;Arial&amp;#39;,&amp;#39;sans-serif&amp;#39;;"&gt;Technical Reviewers:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-FAMILY:&amp;#39;Arial&amp;#39;,&amp;#39;sans-serif&amp;#39;;"&gt; Prem Mehra, James Podgorski, David Whitney, Richard Tkachuk, Sethu Kalavakur, Cindy Gross, Neal Graves, Farzan Ratistari, Ayad Shammout (Caregroup Healthcare Systems), David P. Smith (ServiceU Corporation)&lt;b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal;"&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-FAMILY:&amp;#39;Arial&amp;#39;,&amp;#39;sans-serif&amp;#39;;"&gt;&lt;font size="3"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-FAMILY:&amp;#39;Arial&amp;#39;,&amp;#39;sans-serif&amp;#39;;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;font size="3"&gt;&lt;b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal;"&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-FAMILY:&amp;#39;Arial&amp;#39;,&amp;#39;sans-serif&amp;#39;;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/font&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;font size="3"&gt;&lt;b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal;"&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-FAMILY:&amp;#39;Arial&amp;#39;,&amp;#39;sans-serif&amp;#39;;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;font size="3"&gt;&lt;b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal;"&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-FAMILY:&amp;#39;Arial&amp;#39;,&amp;#39;sans-serif&amp;#39;;"&gt;Published:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-FAMILY:&amp;#39;Arial&amp;#39;,&amp;#39;sans-serif&amp;#39;;"&gt; &lt;span style="COLOR:black;"&gt;June 2009&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;font size="3"&gt;&lt;b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal;"&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-FAMILY:&amp;#39;Arial&amp;#39;,&amp;#39;sans-serif&amp;#39;;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;font size="3"&gt;&lt;b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal;"&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-FAMILY:&amp;#39;Arial&amp;#39;,&amp;#39;sans-serif&amp;#39;;"&gt;Applies to:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-FAMILY:&amp;#39;Arial&amp;#39;,&amp;#39;sans-serif&amp;#39;;"&gt; SQL Server 2008&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;font size="3"&gt;&lt;b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal;"&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-FAMILY:&amp;#39;Arial&amp;#39;,&amp;#39;sans-serif&amp;#39;;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;font size="3"&gt;&lt;b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal;"&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-FAMILY:&amp;#39;Arial&amp;#39;,&amp;#39;sans-serif&amp;#39;;"&gt;Summary:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-FAMILY:&amp;#39;Arial&amp;#39;,&amp;#39;sans-serif&amp;#39;;"&gt; This white paper complements the existing documentation on planning, implementation, and administration of a SQL Server 2008 failover cluster, which can be found in Microsoft SQL Server 2008 Books Online. There are links to relevant existing content throughout the paper, which is intended primarily for a technical audience. This white paper covers failover cluster architecture and concepts for Windows Server (2003 and 2008)&amp;nbsp;and SQL Server 2008; installation of a SQL Server 2008 failover cluster; upgrades and updates to SQL Server 2008 failover clustering; and maintenance and administration of SQL Server 2008.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/font&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;font size="3"&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;font size="3"&gt;For further information&amp;nbsp;please download the &lt;a title="SQL Server 2008 Failover Clustering" href="http://download.microsoft.com/download/6/9/D/69D1FEA7-5B42-437A-B3BA-A4AD13E34EF6/SQLServer2008FailoverCluster.docx"&gt;SQL Server 2008 Failover Clustering&lt;/a&gt; whitepaper. &lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://sqlcat.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=871" width="1" height="1"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/sqlcat/Whitepapers/~4/JlyaQLE5k6g" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/Availability/default.aspx">Availability</category><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/Failover/default.aspx">Failover</category><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/Manageability/default.aspx">Manageability</category><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/SQL+Server+2008/default.aspx">SQL Server 2008</category><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/Cluster/default.aspx">Cluster</category><feedburner:origLink>http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/2009/07/08/sql-server-2008-failover-clustering.aspx</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Configure disaster recovery across SharePoint farms by using SQL Server log shipping</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/sqlcat/Whitepapers/~3/ooj_Oz5Lssk/configure-disaster-recovery-across-sharepoint-farms-by-using-sql-server-log-shipping.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 22:19:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">e9619797-5f48-4d02-a1a8-7f300d09be66:857</guid><dc:creator>SanjayMishra</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=857</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/2009/06/05/configure-disaster-recovery-across-sharepoint-farms-by-using-sql-server-log-shipping.aspx#comments</comments><description>&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Contributors / &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Technical Reviewers:&lt;/strong&gt; Doron Bar-Caspi, Lindsay Allen, Sanjay Mishra, Burzin Patel, Bill Baer, Cory Burns, Steve Peschka, JP Poissant&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Published:&lt;/strong&gt; May 2009&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;This article describes how to use Microsoft SQL Server 2005 or Microsoft SQL Server 2008 log shipping to create a disaster recovery farm in a geographically distributed data center for Microsoft Office SharePoint Server 2007 with Service Pack 2 (SP2). By using this configuration, you can provide a disaster recovery site that provides current search results when a failover occurs. The article assumes that you are familiar with the concepts and terms presented in Plan for availability (Office SharePoint Server). &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;It often takes many teams or roles in an organization to create and configure a secondary data center and farm. In order to configure and test the secondary environment, you need to confer with the administrators of the authentication providers, the SQL Server database administrators, and all affected SharePoint farm administrators. This article is intended primarily for SharePoint farm administrators to help them do the following: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;Understand the requirements for creating log-shipped disaster recovery farms&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;Set up trial log-shipped environments&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;Communicate with the SQL Server database administrators who will configure log shipping for the production environments. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p class="BlogPostContent"&gt;For more information, please refer to the whitepaper &lt;a title="Configure disaster recovery across SharePoint farms by using SQL Server log shipping" href="http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd890507.aspx"&gt;Configure disaster recovery across SharePoint farms by using SQL Server log shipping&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://sqlcat.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=857" width="1" height="1"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/sqlcat/Whitepapers/~4/ooj_Oz5Lssk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/Availability/default.aspx">Availability</category><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/Log+Shipping/default.aspx">Log Shipping</category><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/Transaction+Log/default.aspx">Transaction Log</category><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/SQL+Server/default.aspx">SQL Server</category><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/Manageability/default.aspx">Manageability</category><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/OLTP/default.aspx">OLTP</category><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/SQL+Server+2008/default.aspx">SQL Server 2008</category><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/Sharepoint/default.aspx">Sharepoint</category><feedburner:origLink>http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/2009/06/05/configure-disaster-recovery-across-sharepoint-farms-by-using-sql-server-log-shipping.aspx</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Data Compression: Strategy, Capacity Planning and Best Practices</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/sqlcat/Whitepapers/~3/ZGHrEDjCAu0/data-compression-strategy-capacity-planning-and-best-practices.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 16:39:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">e9619797-5f48-4d02-a1a8-7f300d09be66:850</guid><dc:creator>SanjayMishra</dc:creator><slash:comments>4</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=850</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/2009/05/29/data-compression-strategy-capacity-planning-and-best-practices.aspx#comments</comments><description>&lt;div class="BlogPostContent"&gt;
&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Writer:&lt;/strong&gt; Sanjay Mishra&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Contributors:&lt;/strong&gt; Marcel van der Holst, Peter Carlin, Sunil Agarwal&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Technical Reviewers:&lt;/strong&gt; Stuart Ozer, Lindsey Allen, Juergen Thomas, Thomas Kejser, Burzin Patel, Prem Mehra, Joseph Sack, Jimmy May, Cameron Gardiner, Mike Ruthruff, Glenn Berry (SQL Server MVP), Paul S Randal (SQLskills.com), David P Smith (ServiceU Corporation)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Published:&lt;/strong&gt; May 2009&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;The data compression feature in the Microsoft® SQL Server® 2008 database software can help reduce the size of the database as well as improve the performance of I/O intensive workloads. However, extra CPU resources are required on the database server to compress and decompress the data, while data is exchanged with the application. Therefore, it is important to understand the workload characteristics when deciding which tables to compress. This white paper provides guidance on the following:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;How to decide which tables and indexes to compress&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;How to estimate the resources required to compress a table&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;How to reclaim space released by data compression&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;The performance impacts of data compression on typical workloads&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For more information, please refer to the whitepaper &lt;a title="Data Compression: Strategy, Capacity Planning and Best Practices" href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd894051.aspx" target="_blank"&gt;Data Compression: Strategy, Capacity Planning and Best Practices&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://sqlcat.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=850" width="1" height="1"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/sqlcat/Whitepapers/~4/ZGHrEDjCAu0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/SQL/default.aspx">SQL</category><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/Loading/default.aspx">Loading</category><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/Partitions/default.aspx">Partitions</category><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/Index/default.aspx">Index</category><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/Capacity/default.aspx">Capacity</category><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/I_2F00_O/default.aspx">I/O</category><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/Heaps/default.aspx">Heaps</category><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/Data+Types/default.aspx">Data Types</category><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/Bulk+Insert/default.aspx">Bulk Insert</category><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/SQL+Server/default.aspx">SQL Server</category><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/Architecture/default.aspx">Architecture</category><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/OLTP/default.aspx">OLTP</category><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/SQL+Server+2008/default.aspx">SQL Server 2008</category><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/ROW+Compression/default.aspx">ROW Compression</category><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/PAGE+Compression/default.aspx">PAGE Compression</category><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/Index+Rebuild/default.aspx">Index Rebuild</category><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/Data+Compression/default.aspx">Data Compression</category><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/Compression/default.aspx">Compression</category><feedburner:origLink>http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/2009/05/29/data-compression-strategy-capacity-planning-and-best-practices.aspx</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Improving Microsoft CRM Performance and Securing Data with SQL Server 2008</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/sqlcat/Whitepapers/~3/kwXolO44cEk/improving-microsoft-crm-performance-and-securing-data-with-sql-server-2008.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 18:22:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">e9619797-5f48-4d02-a1a8-7f300d09be66:846</guid><dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=846</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/2009/05/28/improving-microsoft-crm-performance-and-securing-data-with-sql-server-2008.aspx#comments</comments><description>&lt;span style="COLOR:black;mso-themecolor:text1;"&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;font face="Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;font size="3"&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR:black;mso-themecolor:text1;"&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;font face="Times New Roman"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Writers: &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-SIZE:11pt;COLOR:black;FONT-FAMILY:&amp;#39;Calibri&amp;#39;,&amp;#39;sans-serif&amp;#39;;mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri;mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-latin;mso-bidi-font-family:&amp;#39;Times New Roman&amp;#39;;mso-themecolor:text1;mso-ansi-language:EN-US;mso-fareast-language:EN-US;mso-bidi-language:AR-SA;"&gt;Microsoft Corporation&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-SIZE:11pt;COLOR:black;FONT-FAMILY:&amp;#39;Calibri&amp;#39;,&amp;#39;sans-serif&amp;#39;;mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri;mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-latin;mso-bidi-font-family:&amp;#39;Times New Roman&amp;#39;;mso-themecolor:text1;mso-ansi-language:EN-US;mso-fareast-language:EN-US;mso-bidi-language:AR-SA;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Contributors:&amp;nbsp; &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-SIZE:11pt;COLOR:black;FONT-FAMILY:&amp;#39;Calibri&amp;#39;,&amp;#39;sans-serif&amp;#39;;mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri;mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-latin;mso-bidi-font-family:&amp;#39;Times New Roman&amp;#39;;mso-themecolor:text1;mso-ansi-language:EN-US;mso-fareast-language:EN-US;mso-bidi-language:AR-SA;"&gt;Amir Jafri, Jim Toland, Peter Scharlock&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Technical Reviewers: &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-SIZE:11pt;COLOR:black;FONT-FAMILY:&amp;#39;Calibri&amp;#39;,&amp;#39;sans-serif&amp;#39;;mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri;mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-latin;mso-bidi-font-family:&amp;#39;Times New Roman&amp;#39;;mso-themecolor:text1;mso-ansi-language:EN-US;mso-fareast-language:EN-US;mso-bidi-language:AR-SA;"&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-SIZE:11pt;COLOR:black;FONT-FAMILY:&amp;#39;Calibri&amp;#39;,&amp;#39;sans-serif&amp;#39;;mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri;mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-latin;mso-bidi-font-family:&amp;#39;Times New Roman&amp;#39;;mso-themecolor:text1;mso-ansi-language:EN-US;mso-fareast-language:EN-US;mso-bidi-language:AR-SA;"&gt;Srini Acharya, Sunil Agarwal, Peter Carlin, Roger Gilchrist&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Published: &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-SIZE:11pt;COLOR:black;FONT-FAMILY:&amp;#39;Calibri&amp;#39;,&amp;#39;sans-serif&amp;#39;;mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri;mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-latin;mso-bidi-font-family:&amp;#39;Times New Roman&amp;#39;;mso-themecolor:text1;mso-ansi-language:EN-US;mso-fareast-language:EN-US;mso-bidi-language:AR-SA;"&gt;January 2009&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Applies To: &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-SIZE:11pt;COLOR:black;FONT-FAMILY:&amp;#39;Calibri&amp;#39;,&amp;#39;sans-serif&amp;#39;;mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri;mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-latin;mso-bidi-font-family:&amp;#39;Times New Roman&amp;#39;;mso-themecolor:text1;mso-ansi-language:EN-US;mso-fareast-language:EN-US;mso-bidi-language:AR-SA;"&gt;SQL Server 2008, MS CRM 4.0&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Summary: &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR:black;mso-themecolor:text1;"&gt;&lt;font face="Calibri"&gt;Microsoft SQL Server 2008 contains many new features that can enhance the performance and security of a MS CRM 4.0 deployment. This paper describes a project, including&amp;nbsp;findings and specific implementation guidence, which the MS CRM Engineering for Enterprise&amp;nbsp;team in conjunction with SQLCAT recently completed. &lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR:black;mso-themecolor:text1;"&gt;&lt;font face="Calibri"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR:black;mso-themecolor:text1;"&gt;&lt;font face="Calibri"&gt;This project evaluated how to maximize the performance and security of MS CRM 4.0 utilizing the following SQL Server 2008 features: Compression, Filtered Indexes, Sparse Columns, Transparent Data Encryption, and Data Encryptions. &lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR:black;mso-themecolor:text1;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR:black;mso-themecolor:text1;"&gt;&lt;font face="Calibri"&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR:black;mso-themecolor:text1;"&gt;For more information, please refer to the&lt;/span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=b5bb47a4-5ece-4a2a-a9b5-5435264f627d&amp;amp;DisplayLang=en"&gt;Improving Microsoft CRM Performance and Securing Data with SQL Server 2008&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;Whitepaper.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://sqlcat.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=846" width="1" height="1"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/sqlcat/Whitepapers/~4/kwXolO44cEk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/Performance/default.aspx">Performance</category><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/Security/default.aspx">Security</category><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/ISV/default.aspx">ISV</category><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/CRM/default.aspx">CRM</category><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/SQL+Server+2008/default.aspx">SQL Server 2008</category><feedburner:origLink>http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/2009/05/28/improving-microsoft-crm-performance-and-securing-data-with-sql-server-2008.aspx</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>SQL Server 2008 with Siebel, PeopleSoft and JD Edwards Applications</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/sqlcat/Whitepapers/~3/9XpwseHBdAc/sql-server-2008-with-siebel-peoplesoft-and-jd-edwards-applications.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 19:40:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">e9619797-5f48-4d02-a1a8-7f300d09be66:835</guid><dc:creator>wandahe</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=835</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/2009/05/19/sql-server-2008-with-siebel-peoplesoft-and-jd-edwards-applications.aspx#comments</comments><description>&lt;div class="Section1"&gt;&lt;font size="3"&gt;&lt;span style="COLOR:black;mso-bidi-font-family:Arial;mso-themecolor:text1;"&gt;
&lt;p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN:0in 0in 10pt;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Published:&lt;/b&gt; March, 2009&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Applies to:&lt;/b&gt; SQL Server 2008&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Introduction&lt;/b&gt;: This white paper describes why Microsoft®&amp;nbsp;SQL Server®&amp;nbsp;is the optimal data platform to use with JD Edwards, PeopleSoft, and Siebel applications that run on the Microsoft®&amp;nbsp;platform. The paper describes the new and enhanced features of SQL Server 2008 that enable Oracle application customers to reduce cost, optimize performance, improve availability and reliability, and simplify data management and security. It is assumed that the reader has a working knowledge of these Oracle applications and Microsoft SQL Server concepts and features.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For more information, please refer to the&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://download.microsoft.com/download/9/F/4/9F4B4F2B-3853-4AE6-BD80-DF2D37F5C59F/SQL_Server_2008_with_Oracle_Applications.docx" target="_blank"&gt;SQL Server 2008 with Siebel, PeopleSoft and JD Edwards Applications&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;Whitepaper &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN:0in 0in 10pt;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-SIZE:11pt;COLOR:black;LINE-HEIGHT:115%;FONT-FAMILY:&amp;#39;Arial&amp;#39;,&amp;#39;sans-serif&amp;#39;;mso-themecolor:text1;mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri;mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-latin;mso-ansi-language:EN-US;mso-fareast-language:EN-US;mso-bidi-language:AR-SA;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://sqlcat.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=835" width="1" height="1"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/sqlcat/Whitepapers/~4/9XpwseHBdAc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/PeopleSoft/default.aspx">PeopleSoft</category><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/ISV/default.aspx">ISV</category><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/Siebel/default.aspx">Siebel</category><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/SQL+Server+2008/default.aspx">SQL Server 2008</category><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/JD+Edwards/default.aspx">JD Edwards</category><feedburner:origLink>http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/2009/05/19/sql-server-2008-with-siebel-peoplesoft-and-jd-edwards-applications.aspx</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>SQL Server 2008 with Siebel CRM Applications</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/sqlcat/Whitepapers/~3/vpk34flv74w/sql-server-2008-with-siebel-crm-applications.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 19:32:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">e9619797-5f48-4d02-a1a8-7f300d09be66:834</guid><dc:creator>wandahe</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=834</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/2009/05/19/sql-server-2008-with-siebel-crm-applications.aspx#comments</comments><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Writers:&lt;/b&gt; Microsoft Corporation&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Technical Reviewers: &lt;/b&gt;Anu Chawla, Wanda He, George Heynen, Peter Samson&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Published&lt;/b&gt;&lt;b&gt;: &lt;/b&gt;April&amp;nbsp;2009&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Applies To:&lt;/b&gt; SQL Server 2008&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Summary:&lt;/strong&gt; Microsoft SQL Server 2008 offers best-of breed performance for Siebel.&amp;nbsp; This paper describes the capabilities of SQL Server 2008, how to maximize database performance for Siebel, and how to resolve common issues encountered by customers. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For more information, please refer to the&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://download.microsoft.com/download/8/7/1/871AB973-56AA-4A43-A8FB-2BFF5F2FF8D2/SQL_Server_2008_for_Siebel_CRM_Applications.docx" target="_blank"&gt;SQL Server 2008 with Siebel CRM Applications&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;Whitepaper&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://sqlcat.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=834" width="1" height="1"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/sqlcat/Whitepapers/~4/vpk34flv74w" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/Performance/default.aspx">Performance</category><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/ISV/default.aspx">ISV</category><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/Siebel/default.aspx">Siebel</category><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/SQL+Server+2008/default.aspx">SQL Server 2008</category><feedburner:origLink>http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/2009/05/19/sql-server-2008-with-siebel-crm-applications.aspx</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Disk Partition Alignment Best Practices for SQL Server</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/sqlcat/Whitepapers/~3/kcKMg58L5_g/disk-partition-alignment-best-practices-for-sql-server.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 03:44:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">e9619797-5f48-4d02-a1a8-7f300d09be66:809</guid><dc:creator>denny.lee</dc:creator><slash:comments>8</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=809</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/2009/05/11/disk-partition-alignment-best-practices-for-sql-server.aspx#comments</comments><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;SQL Server Techical Article&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Published:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/strong&gt;May 2009&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Authors:&lt;/strong&gt; Jimmy May (&lt;a href="http://www.msinfosec.com/"&gt;MS IT Assessment, Consulting, &amp;amp; Engineering (ACE)&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href="http://sqlcat.com/members/aspiringgeek.aspx"&gt;bio&lt;/a&gt;), Denny Lee&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Contributors: &lt;/strong&gt;Mike Ruthruff, Robert Smith, Bruce Worthington, Jeff Goldner, Mark Licata, Deborah Jones, Michael Thomassy, Michael Epprecht, Frank McBath, Joseph Sack, Matt Landers, Jason McKittrick, Linchi Shea, Juergen Thomas, Emily Wilson, John Otto, Brent Dowling&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Technical Reviewers:&lt;/strong&gt; Mike Ruthruff, Robert Smith, Bruce Worthington, Emily Wilson, Lindsey Allen, Stuart Ozer, Thomas Kejser, Kun Cheng, Nicholas Dritsas, Paul Mestemaker, Alexei Khalyako, Mike Anderson, Bong Kang&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Disk partition alignment is a powerful tool for improving SQL Server performance. Configuring optimal disk performance is often viewed as much art as science. A best practice that is essential yet often overlooked is disk partition alignment. Windows Server 2008 attempts to align new partitions out-of-the-box, yet disk partition alignment remains a relevant technology for partitions created on prior versions of Windows.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This paper documents performance for aligned and nonaligned storage and why nonaligned partitions can negatively impact I/O performance; it explains disk partition alignment for storage configured on Windows Server 2003, including analysis, diagnosis, and remediation; and it describes how Windows Server 2008 attempts to remedy challenges related to partition alignment for new partitions yet does not correct the configuration of preexisting partitions.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The following topics are also included: background information, implementation, vendor considerations, two essential correlations, valid starting partition offsets, and the simple protocol to align partitions, define file allocation unit size, and assign drive letters. It includes results from tests that show how partition alignment can affect performance for SQL Server 2008.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For more information, please refer to the&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd758814.aspx"&gt;Disk Partition Alignment Best Practices for SQL Server&lt;/a&gt; whitepaper.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You can also &lt;a&gt;&lt;a id="ctl00_MTContentSelector1_mainContentContainer_ctl02" href="http://download.microsoft.com/download/C/E/7/CE7DA506-CEDF-43DB-8179-D73DA13668C5/DiskPartitionAlignment.docx"&gt;download a Microsoft Word version of this article&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://sqlcat.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=809" width="1" height="1"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/sqlcat/Whitepapers/~4/kcKMg58L5_g" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/SQL/default.aspx">SQL</category><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/I_2F00_O/default.aspx">I/O</category><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/disk/default.aspx">disk</category><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/partition+alignment/default.aspx">partition alignment</category><feedburner:origLink>http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/2009/05/11/disk-partition-alignment-best-practices-for-sql-server.aspx</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>BizTalk Server 2009 Hyper-V Guide</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/sqlcat/Whitepapers/~3/3-YC2-ncxT8/biztalk-server-2009-hyper-v-guide.aspx</link><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 03:23:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">e9619797-5f48-4d02-a1a8-7f300d09be66:785</guid><dc:creator>Lindsey.allen</dc:creator><slash:comments>3</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=785</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/2009/05/01/biztalk-server-2009-hyper-v-guide.aspx#comments</comments><description>&lt;p&gt;The purpose of this guide is to provide practical guidance for using Microsoft BizTalk Server 2009 with Microsoft Windows Server 2008 Hyper-V. The emphasis is on BizTalk Server, but the performance evaluation methods and performance testing scenarios are useful for analyzing the performance of virtualized server applications in general. This guidance will be of interest to both the IT Pro and Developer communities.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;To download a copy of this guide, go to &lt;a href="http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=149267"&gt;http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=149267&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://sqlcat.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=785" width="1" height="1"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/sqlcat/Whitepapers/~4/3-YC2-ncxT8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/2009/05/01/biztalk-server-2009-hyper-v-guide.aspx</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Troubleshooting Performance Problems in SQL Server 2008</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/sqlcat/Whitepapers/~3/HYWEDyzfYxE/troubleshooting-performance-problems-in-sql-server-2008.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 04:21:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">e9619797-5f48-4d02-a1a8-7f300d09be66:758</guid><dc:creator>Cheng_kun</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=758</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/2009/04/14/troubleshooting-performance-problems-in-sql-server-2008.aspx#comments</comments><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;font size="3"&gt;&lt;span style="mso-bidi-font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Writers:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="mso-bidi-font-family:Arial;"&gt; Sunil Agarwal, Boris Baryshnikov, Keith Elmore, Juergen Thomas, Kun Cheng, Burzin Patel&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;font size="3"&gt;&lt;span style="mso-bidi-font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal;"&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal;"&gt;&lt;span style="mso-bidi-font-family:Arial;"&gt;Technical Reviewers:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;span style="mso-bidi-font-family:Arial;"&gt; Jerome Halmans, Fabricio Voznika, George Reynya&lt;b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal;"&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="mso-bidi-font-family:Arial;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;font size="3"&gt;&lt;span style="mso-bidi-font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;font size="3"&gt;&lt;span style="mso-bidi-font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;font size="3"&gt;&lt;span style="mso-bidi-font-family:Arial;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal;"&gt;&lt;span style="mso-bidi-font-family:Arial;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/font&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;font size="3"&gt;&lt;b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal;"&gt;&lt;span style="mso-bidi-font-family:Arial;"&gt;Published:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;span style="mso-bidi-font-family:Arial;"&gt; March 2009&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;font size="3"&gt;&lt;b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal;"&gt;&lt;span style="mso-bidi-font-family:Arial;"&gt;Applies to:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;span style="mso-bidi-font-family:Arial;"&gt; SQL Server 2008&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="mso-bidi-font-family:Arial;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/font&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal;"&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-FAMILY:&amp;#39;Calibri&amp;#39;,&amp;#39;sans-serif&amp;#39;;FONT-SIZE:11pt;mso-bidi-font-family:Arial;mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri;mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-latin;mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;mso-ansi-language:EN-US;mso-fareast-language:EN-US;mso-bidi-language:AR-SA;"&gt;Summary:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-FAMILY:&amp;#39;Calibri&amp;#39;,&amp;#39;sans-serif&amp;#39;;FONT-SIZE:11pt;mso-bidi-font-family:Arial;mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri;mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-latin;mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;mso-ansi-language:EN-US;mso-fareast-language:EN-US;mso-bidi-language:AR-SA;"&gt; Sometimes a poorly designed database or a system that is improperly configured for the workload can cause the slowdowns in SQL Server. Administrators need to proactively prevent or minimize problems and, when they occur, diagnose the cause and take corrective action. This paper provides step-by-step guidelines for diagnosing and troubleshooting common performance problems by using publicly available tools such as SQL Server Profiler, Performance Monitor, dynamic management views, and SQL Server Extended Events (Extended Events) and the data collector, which are new in SQL Server&amp;nbsp;2008.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-FAMILY:&amp;#39;Calibri&amp;#39;,&amp;#39;sans-serif&amp;#39;;FONT-SIZE:11pt;mso-bidi-font-family:Arial;mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri;mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-latin;mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;mso-ansi-language:EN-US;mso-fareast-language:EN-US;mso-bidi-language:AR-SA;"&gt;For more information, please refer to &lt;a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd672789.aspx"&gt;http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd672789.aspx&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://sqlcat.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=758" width="1" height="1"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/sqlcat/Whitepapers/~4/HYWEDyzfYxE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/Performance/default.aspx">Performance</category><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/SQL/default.aspx">SQL</category><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/Troubleshooting/default.aspx">Troubleshooting</category><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/Scalability/default.aspx">Scalability</category><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/Waits+and+Queues/default.aspx">Waits and Queues</category><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/Index/default.aspx">Index</category><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/I_2F00_O/default.aspx">I/O</category><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/Optimization/default.aspx">Optimization</category><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/Operations/default.aspx">Operations</category><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/Tuning/default.aspx">Tuning</category><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/SQL+Server/default.aspx">SQL Server</category><feedburner:origLink>http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/2009/04/14/troubleshooting-performance-problems-in-sql-server-2008.aspx</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Service Broker: Performance and Scalability Techniques</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/sqlcat/Whitepapers/~3/9j_rimqSlSk/service-broker-performance-and-scalability-techniques.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:16:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">e9619797-5f48-4d02-a1a8-7f300d09be66:739</guid><dc:creator>MichaelThomassy</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=739</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/2009/03/24/service-broker-performance-and-scalability-techniques.aspx#comments</comments><description>&lt;div class="BlogPostContent"&gt;
&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Writer:&lt;/strong&gt; Michael Thomassy&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Contributors:&lt;/strong&gt; Sanjay Mishra&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Technical Reviewers:&lt;/strong&gt; Lindsey Allen, Lubor Kollar, Mark Souza, Thomas Kejser, Burzin Patel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Published:&lt;/strong&gt; March 2009&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;Service Broker provides support for building asynchronous messaging and queuing applications with the SQL Server Database Engine. This &lt;a title="Service Broker: Performance and Scalability Techniques" href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd576261.aspx"&gt;paper&lt;/a&gt; describes a large scale customer scenario and the techniques employed in scaling Service Broker to process tens of thousands of messages per second on one server.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;Microsoft SQL Server Service Broker provides native support to the SQL Server Database Engine for asynchronous, transactional messaging. Finding Service Broker bottlenecks requires a similar approach to tuning any high-end OLTP database systems. This paper will describe the performance and scalability techniques applied to a real-world workload to increase overall system throughput. After you understand the workload and Service Broker system tables that are used, you’ll be able to find and remove the bottlenecks to scale Service Broker applications.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For more information, please refer to the&amp;nbsp;&lt;a title="Service Broker: Performance and Scalability Techniques" href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd576261.aspx"&gt;Service Broker: Performance and Scalability Techniques&lt;/a&gt; whitepaper.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://sqlcat.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=739" width="1" height="1"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/sqlcat/Whitepapers/~4/9j_rimqSlSk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/Performance/default.aspx">Performance</category><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/Scalability/default.aspx">Scalability</category><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/SQL+Server/default.aspx">SQL Server</category><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/Service+Broker/default.aspx">Service Broker</category><category domain="http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/tags/OLTP/default.aspx">OLTP</category><feedburner:origLink>http://sqlcat.com/whitepapers/archive/2009/03/24/service-broker-performance-and-scalability-techniques.aspx</feedburner:origLink></item></channel></rss>
