Dear readers. As has been clear to many of you, our blog discontinued once the 2008 Presidential Elections were over. Please excuse this one-off brief post, which is related to the 2012 elections. It is really an attempt to communicate some advice to the Secretary of State, Hillary Rodham Clinton who we believe stands a serious  chance of dethroning Barack Obama in two years time.

Observations lead us to conclude that Obama is the only president in the last 40 years to have delegated nearly all responsibility for Foreign Relations to his Secretary of State. Clinton is now the face of America to the same degree Henry Kissinger once revolutionized America’s relations with gold, oil, and China.

Obama entered the White House as an international relations ingenue, and he’s made few efforts to change this. He’s traveled to fewer countries than either George Bush or Bill Clinton, and abandoned foreign policy to the secretaries and deputies of the National Security council where Hillary Clinton sometimes clashes with Jim Jones and area/issue  experts.

As with domestic politics, which Obama has abandoned to a powerful clique of financiers on economic issues, anti-Constitutional America bashers on legal and civil rights issues, and assorted Czars on every other issue, the foreign part of America’s politics is not in the hands of the President.

Naive readers - those with little life experience - might consider this division of labor praiseworthy. The reality is different. Behind the facade lies incompetence and a broken chain of responsibility. Foreign events are spinning out of control, because the person who is to pronounce on them, is not aware of them, while the person aware of them, can not pronounce on them. The person responsible for the decisions, is not the person having to stand-up for them. If Clinton wants to run the Middle East, she should be standing up in Cairo, not Obama.

It would be illogical to lay the blame for this situation on Clinton herself. It is the Democratic party, who cried foul in 2000 over hanging chads, but lacked all conscience when stealing Clinton’s delegate counts in the 2008 Democratic Primary (not to mention mafia-like tactics to keep third parties off the ballot in 30 states). Florida and Michigan were systematically marginalized until the very day of the Democratic Convention, by which time most independent delegates had been strong-armed into supporting Obama. Racial smears against Clinton, played no small part in this strong-arming. Strong-arming accomplished in ways which still remain to be documented, like the Obama camps direct links with Anarchist organizations used to threaten chaos and blood on the streets of Denver.

When we broke that story in April 2008, we had no idea just how close the actual ties between William Domhoff and the R68 groups we profiled were. Nor did we suspect to what degree assistants to Barack Obama had been in touch with William Ayers and used the threat of violence in Denver, to scare independent delegates from the Clinton camp.

2012 could provide a corrective to all this. It’s now been 2 years that the remnants of the Clinton camp have had to accumulate evidence against Obama. When we first realized the importance of the birth certificate no such term as “birthers” had yet been coined. Now, it should be possible to make this fundamental constitutional issue a reason bar Obama from any possible re-election run. Hawaian law has been studied thoroughly and there can be no doubt that a certificate of live birth from the State of Hawaii is not sufficient proof of Native Birth, as required by American law based on precedent. This means that Obama’s failure to justify the absence of a Birth Certificate is a one-stop constitutional sledgehammer to his one-term presidency.

Aside from the birth certificate, Clinton should accumulate all possible evidence of skulduggery and incompetence at the White House, and document her own initiative and power at the State Department. Her policies as a Secretary of State are those of middle-America, and the average American. They are closer to the political center and invite both Republicans and Democrats. Since she is the one making America’s foreign policy decisions, she should be the one standing up for them, and taking credit for their success or failure.

Obama’s incompetence is now evident to all Democratic Politicos. If the world is to be saved from potential nuclear confrontation, and America from economic meltdown, she needs a leader who can not only assume her decisions, but is competent enough to make them. The world needs an America that can lead, so America needs someone who can lead her. Two years ago we suggested Obama lacked all the qualities needed for leadership, and now its evident to everyone. It is only appropriate that those who make up for his faults and keep us afloat, come out of the shadows and assume their roles.

Towards a Theoretical Understanding of the Obama Social Movement and the Anti-Democratic & Anti-American Revolution.

***

There is something fundamental that just happened in America, and by default, the rest of the world. It is so fundamental, that it has been entirely ignored by analysts and grossly distorted by pundits.

Most commentarors hail Obama’s victory as a reinvigoration of the American Dream. They cite the euphoria of countries that literally weeks ago, spat in America’s direction as proof of the nations capacity of reinvention. Talk of a new-age, of breakthroughs, of Peace in the World is everywhere - and everywhere, all of it, is wrong.

For what the world just witnessed is not the start of a new Dream, but exactly its opposite, the beginning of a long nightmare. Not only would Martin Luther King have turned in his grave, soon enough, someone will actually turn him.

The power of the pro-Obama movement, its enthusiasm and excitement, is awesome. Obama’s election victory revealed a level of energy, and mobilization, never seen in a healthy democracy.

Fortunately, such energy would be labeled as “passion” by our Founding Fathers, and treated warily. The wise men who shaped this nation explicitly sought to prevent the reigns of power from passing into the hands of the hysterical, and immunized the institutions of power from the fervor of the masses. All too familiar with the nexus of demagogue-power-crowd, these erudite deists explicitly asserted the supremacy of deliberation, reflection, and hesitation over extortion, excoriation, and precipitation.

As a form of energy, a mob’s ardor can be neutral, but socially, it goes where politicians take it. Rather than err on the side of hope, the founders preferred to err on the side of caution, and put up obstacle after obstacle to the madness of crowds. Everything to prevent the temptation which stems from control over hyperactive masses.

Either unawares of their Civic duty, or openly contemptuous of it, pro-Obama voters have put American Democracy in Danger by electing to power a man who tapped their passions with demagoguery, and whose campaign used intimidation to suppress opposition turnout.

Obama is no longer a Democrat nor a political figure. Obama is a Cult Lader/Personality at the heart of a Social Movement. A Social Movement ignorant of American values, seeking to impose concept and principles on the American body-politic contemptuous of American history and identity. It is a movement where the cerebral cortexes of a few opaque opportunists plot and scheme behind the veneer of Obama’s Orwellian cult symbols.

***

There is a reason Obama chose Rahm Emanuel, as his chief aide. Like Obama, Rahm Emanuel is a man with the thinnest of connections to America. Like Obama, he boasts a thug mentality. Obama flashes three pit-bulls - the most dangerous dog on the planet, responsible for more child deaths than any other domestic animal on Earth- as presidential pets! Rahm Emanuel, didn’t even bother learning Proper English, because in the confines of Democratic smoke-rooms, a few expletives sufficed to organize party tactics and strategy. His mafia style is no secret to anyone.

That Rahm is a Jew from Israel is irrelevant. Personally for me as a Jew, it’s just a shame, little else. His pedigree is no excuse for him being wrong. It is absurdly illogical to suggest that his origin can possibly serve as justification for his politics or the morally decrepit individual he has chosen to be.

On the whole, America has known its slew of foreigners, who have served this country well. Rahm Emanuel under the tutelage of a Hyphen, will not be one of them. He belongs in the Brzezinsky camp - a Polish émigré with a biological hatred for Russia, single-handedly responsible for Carter’s calamitous foreign policy. Whatever the talent of foreign transplants to Beltway soil, it can’t be guided by hyphens if it is to have any use to this country. Only a self-respecting American (not self-loathing like Carter) will do. A Rahm Emanuel under Clinton, would have been a different story. Under a Hyphen, it’s the story of a puppet-master.

Now add the diabolic presence of David Axelrod and David Plouff, and countless other criminal-political types with no patriotic credentials, and you understand the dynamic of the Obama social movement. Again, these are types who could be tapped for their talent, and channeled in a constructive fashion. But this would require sound leadership, sound knowledge, and two feet soundly planted on American soil - none of which Obama has.

Basking in glorified love of the worlds leading anti-Semitic actors and organizations, Obama feared a backlash among his pro-Israel Jewish backers. Having won the election over the dead body of the Clinton faction, relying largely on her x-backers and toadies, he placated both the Jewish and Clinton Democratic coalitions (sometimes overlapping) with Rahm’s appointment. It’s a move which presages the schizophrenia and dynamics of the tragedy that awaits America’s next four years.

That Rahm would antagonize Obama’s terrorist and anti-Semitic supporters from Tehran to Trinity Church of Christ, mattered to him- but not enough. Politically, Obama had no choice. The supreme demagogue, he tied himself down in so many election strings, made so many contradictory promises to the myriad groups who prayed for his victory, that he can now only reward those, who were actually responsible for it.

The Rahms and Axelrods would have been good for America, if they weren’t going to run it. In the case of Obama, they have found themselves a way to unchecked power, and as an incidental by-product, in the middle of a Revolutionary Social Movement.

Revolutionary for two reasons. For reasons of size, and reasons of context. Size, I’ve mentioned – it’s the energy, the force. The context has to do with geography, and culture. Culturaly the Obama Movement is Un-American. Stupid things like pit-bulls, or forced community service, are expressions of a deep-seated disregard for America’s context.

Weak as Obama may be to reconcile his retainers inevitably contradictory interests, he rose to power on an Anti-American trinity of Fear, Censorship, and Intimidation, hence shares his retainers a-historicity, their a-contextuality, and their ability to distance themselves from the interest of those people, who define themselves as Americans.

***

The Democratic Party has always suffered from a Democratic deficit, and hence a deficit of Americana. It was founded by a foreigner, in opposition to Republican Abolitionism. Its role in the Civil Rights movement has been exaggerated, and its crimes against minorities covered up, downplayed and swept-under the rug. Already by the times of Roosevelt (PBUH) it consisted of a largely self-loathing Anglo element in coalition with an immigrant one. The latter had absolutely no experience with Democracy, hence little understanding of American Values. Perhaps since the days of its inception as a modern American political party, the Ass has made a living off of those who are either alien to, or scornful of significant portions of, America’s cultural traditions.

Since the late sixties, The Democratic notion of Freedom of Speech, translates into uncritical support for anything involving nudity and obscenity. The party’s ideas about Democratization amount to dropping a few bombs on Serbia and then jumping ship, or funneling billions of dollars into the pockets of Russian oligarchs, and then harping on about Putin when he tries to redress the balance in favor of the Russian people. Civil Rights in the Democratic sense mean abrogation of American Federalism. As the latest threats by select Californian interests groups to legally filibuster the will of the people of California on Proposition 8 demonstrate, Democrats are a party who consistently cares little for actual democratic principles, or the voice of regular Americans.

Democrats make the impression that they will side with anything that denigrates America’s Western Tradition, and historical Values. At its core, it is a party of several large victim groups with consistent anti-social, anti-middle class , anti-American, anti-Western platforms; e.g. exemplified in the uniquely Democratic ability to defend radical Islamists, terrorist, and Jihadists, without so much as batting an eye for the women, minorities, and innocent civilians who are their main victims.

For those of us who voted Clinton in the Democratic Primaries, all of this was a Democratic heritage we unambiguously rejected, but a heritage which the Obama Revolution has unequivocally embraced.

***

Never in his life has Obama referred to himself as an “American.” The goons who will run this country, even if they could drop their hyphens, would still refuse to say “American’ with any sense of a priory pride. Unless there is an immediate benefit, to being seen as an “American,” they will prefer something more sophisticated. They are multi-culti. They are this or that. But they are not “Americans” in an ordinary sense, and even worst, they are deeply resentful of labels such as “Western” or G-d forbid, the notion of being “Civilized”.

All of this is already clear in the Obama Social Movement they have now spawned on this country. A social movement which will seek to redefine this nation along the lines these compradors see fit, in keeping with their fragmented and schizophrenic identities, and not those of the country’s Founders; not in keeping with the traditions and culture of the people who built this country - taken with all their faults as well as their blessings.

It will not be a social movement encouraging values, principles, and hard work. It will not be a social movement encouraging dissent, debate, and deliberation. It will not be a social movement capable or even interested in the country’s national interests and political imperatives. No. It was from its inception, and will be till its death, a movement based on verbiage and rhetoric, dissimulating its intention to make this country represent what those who have hated it, want it to represent. It is a movement which rejects everything America has ever been, because it’s run by the disconnected, with the intention of disconnecting.

Obama is the face of a new fascist force in global politics. A face, without which it could never have risen.

***

Prior to his win, the Obama movement had already become largely negative to those who opposed it. Just imagine if tomorrow Obama has a heart-attack? Is it a stretch to speculate that the same joyous hordes celebrating Obama’s victory today, will take to tearing this world apart tomorrow?

Such is the force of the Obama movement. And it is a frightening force. A force which the Founding Fathers of this Nation – either did not foresee, or simply couldn’t offer any functional assurances against.

Publics the world over, may think that Obama’s victory is their victory, and Americans assume we have increased good-will for our nation. While few members of these international publics understand what American Democracy is about, nor what Obama’s victory beckons for this Democracy, Americans who voted Obama, exhibit an even greater form of ignorance as they fail to properly comprehend our civic duty and evaluate fairly the impact of their voting conduct on our political process. It is an impact high on promise, low on delivery. So far, here is what Obama’s done for the country, and the world:

-1- Never in our country’s history has a candidate transformed his name into an official campaign, and political logo. In fact, this is something which last happened only in Turkmenistan! Even Stalin and Hitler, didn’t have logos which represented any part of themselves.

Logos are important. Symbols are important. They channel energy, and make it a force. It is via symbols, that the diverse, becomes the united. It is through symbols, that power is accumulated. Obama’s logo, the “O” is unprecedented in the American context, but even internationally, its hard to find precedent. While uniting can be good, democratic unity is by definition anti-personal. Unity through the manipulation of cult logos at the national level in America, is simply mind-blowing.

-2- In the case of the Obama Social Movement, it is one which is entirely personal on the activist level. Activist have little care for the details and facts of their object of worship. Talking to them about insider politics or the strings used to pull their idol’s appendages is to enrage them. In the case of Obama, this is a stage already reached with most of his supporters; oblivious to his reality.

What matters is Obama’s symbolic value, and it’s a value entirely focused on Obama’s personal narrative-story. On his face, voice, character, words. A total negation of American concepts of leadership.

-3- Obama represents the Weberian charismatic leader. This is precisely the leader which time after time undermines all reason, all rational, all democratic systems. He is the authoritarian prototype. He is the Mohammed razing hell throughout the desert. The Jesus get people to abandon the family type. He is the Nasserite, Hitlerite, Lenin type. Hardly American.

-4- Since Obama has no experience, no credentials, no significant achievements to his name, it is all the more contradictory to see his cultural preeminence with the above characteristics all of which are profoundly antagonistic to American culture. This begs the question, isn’t Obama simply a culmination of Anti-American sentiment? Perhaps as a caveat to those elites who think that an Obama victory has resulted in sudden reversal of Global Anti-Americanism: In as much as his victory is a reflection of a subconscious distaste for sound American values, the global good-will is better understood as the joy of the victors over the vanquished.

The Obama social movement, is perhaps a coagulated form of various strands of anti-Americanism of the last 100 years. All the way from minority resentment and socialism, to third-Worldism and Islamism. As such, it is a movement, which is contradictory to the likes of Martin Luther King, or similar staunch pro-American reformers.

-5- The amount of energy channeled by the symbolism and activism of the Obama camp, becoming the Obama Social Movement is of Revolutionary magnitude. It is a force so strong, that to challenge it in an open confrontation, will result in an actual, physical, social and political Revolution. So much so, is already apparent from our election.

Why?

-6- Contrary to what all the analysts may suggest, Obama’s victory on November 4th was largely the product of fear. At a basic level, first Clinton, and then McCain refused to hit Obama where it hurt most. The reasons probably differed, but Clinton’s are not really clear. Here is what clearly took place:

a) Official Republican party fear - at the highest level of the GOP, Karl Rove convened a meeting with leading academicians and scholars to discuss the role of race in this year’s election. It was then that the Party formulated a hands-off approach to anything related to Race. McCain received the info, and followed it to the T. Hence, it can safely be concluded that McCain feared the social effects of really going after Obama on his anti-Americanism, and did so in effete and comical ways to placate the Laura Ingrams.

b) Journalist fear and inhibition - The Karl Rove study filtered through to Fox. Hence Fox didn’t pull the cards it could have. Sowell and Steele weren’t invited to the show. James Manning never made the headline. Black Republicans weren’t pulled out of the hat. This was Fear in Fox. Then there was another kind of fear in the rest of the journalist profession. Fear of being labeled Racist, if any questions about Obama were put forth. The fear was so great - AND STILL IS- that any initiative to raise question, remains inhibited.

c) Analyst fear - analysts fear pulling the Michael Lind and Sean Wilentz types of anti-Racial analysis which seek to expose the use and abuse of Race framing by Axelrod/Obama, and to present honest analyses of the cultural and social events which are taking place this very moment in our country.

c) political activist fear - McCain and Clinton camp had a hard time opposing Obama vocally. The breakthrough came with Palin, who effectively channeled some of this opposition. But in personal conversations, and in public discourse, Obama supporters were often aggressive and intimidating. They created an atmosphere of fear, where anti-Obama voters felt demoralized in stating their obvious, natural, and reasonable reasons to oppose Obama. There was a nasty burden of proof upon any Anti-Obama voter, and it’s as if everyone was up against an irate Black-mama, that would scream your head down if you disagreed. So much so was clear from Whoopi Goldberg’s notions about “nigger,” and thousands of other anecdotal examples.

d) voter fear - in the end, the greatest threat in this election came with the actual voting done by mixed race precincts. Americas political elites (rightfully) feared an election day tainted with Racial animosity. The specter of mixed race polling stations erupting in violence was real - and had McCain and the GOP chosen to take down Obama for the Fabricator and Liar that he is , this animosity would have been inevitable. Axelrod/Obama skillfully manipulated the Black and “Anti-Racist” vote to anticipate a defeat at the hands of Racists. They injected tension into the atmosphere, which was entirely in their favor. In the end, the refrain of “racists” and “Bradley effect” worked to suppress Anti-Obama turn-out.

Five basic fears, all with one source: the Obama Camp. Fear skillfully created and manipulated by David Axelrod and decision-makers parallel to the Obama campaign.

-7- The victory of fear, in a political election, is a fundamental blow to America’s political institutions, and the heritage that sustains it. American democracy had reached a terminal point - that of Race Relations.

We’ve gone from the Civil Rights victories of the sixties, into a veritable Defeat of Democratic Rights in the 21st century. The naive nature of Civil Rights, with their emphasis on militant politics, has been exposed as anathema to a healthy democracy, which relies on democratic cultures such as freedom of speech and access to media to sustain the larger freedoms of Civil Rights. At its core the Civil Rights movements were more about minority nationalism, than actual equality. Its vindictive nature permeated American culture for fifty years, and has now gained political ascendancy. The un-Democratic nature of its culture, does not predisposes it to running a country such as the United States. It bodes terror. What was nominally a quest for equality, in reality stifled intellectual exchange and hence created an atmosphere of race-based opposition politics. It had in effect, annulled freedom of thought, expression, and intercourse.

-8- Symptomatic of this un-democratic heritage are forms of anti-social militancy, often ethnocentric and nationalist, or self-negating and nihilist. Politically, it has the following traits:

A) Comformism. It already stands out as the unifying characteristic of the Obama movement, and of the Obama Revolution. Obama trolls intimidate others, when dissent is in the air. This is the case in America, and in all the Developed World except Japan.

B) Suppression of thought and expression, is the default mode of this movement. If you’re Berlusconni, we don’t care if you are joking, you’re Racist. Comedians are scratching their heads. This is especially the case in America, but the same has taken place abroad.

C) Media deterioration. Fox was Out-foxed by ten other foxes. It didn’t stand a chance. But even worst is the situation in other developed countries, where 80 % of the population support Obama, having had absolutely ZERO negative or recriminating information about him during the entire campaign, and largely negative information on Clinton and McCain. The media are a pillar of a Free Society, and with Obama, this is a Pillar, which no longer stands.

D) The negation of obvious reality. That Obama’s victory presents:

a) a victory for lobbyists and special interests - CONTRARY to his rhetoric.

b) a victory for money, IGNORED entirely by the Obama movement. A further commoditization of the vote. The Entrenchment of the role of political merchants and technocrats. Money was more central to this election than any in previous history.

c) a victory for rabid partisanship CONTRARY to any Obama rhetoric. Even a Schwarzenegger appointment is pointless - as he has been a lifelong Democrat, and married into the Kennedy clan.

d) victory of slander and calumny CONTRARY to Obama claims. The slander of “racism” pinned on all questions pertaining to Obama.

e) issues not important at all in election CONTRARY To all Obama claims. Issues were debated, and Clinton beat Obama on all of them. When faced with McCain, Obama lacked any initiative on oil prices, the economy, and Georgia. The first two were the leading issues in this election. McCain lead on both. In the end, he even won more voter trust on them. Didn’t matter to the election one bit. Issues were irrelevant on the backdrop of the “historicity” of the election.

-9- The end result is the defeat of America’s oppositional Democracy. The Republicans have absolutely no discursive means at their disposal that can effectively challenge the Obama Movement in the public market-place. They may be able to fight him on spending, but this will be a fight they will fight alone in their rarefied Senate-world. It will speak little to Americans, and even less to the rest of the Obama-loving world.

This lack of discursive space, was apparent from day one, and is why Clinton, and not McCain, was the real contender in this election. Clinton herself, was defeated as a result of un-democratic practices within the Democratic party, because otherwise, as the popular vote shows.

-10- With America’s fall, comes the fall of the Western Democratic tradition, of Democracy, and the West. Europe is already blindly following in America’s wake- even more militant Socialist and left-wing parties demand their own Obama on the same Affirmative Action grounds, with absolute disregard for Democratic tradition, and soft institutions.

]]> http://www.stop-obama.org/?feed=rss2&p=639 http://www.stop-obama.org/?p=637 http://www.stop-obama.org/?p=637#comments Tue, 11 Nov 2008 17:31:37 +0000 Juanita Gonzales http://www.stop-obama.org/?p=637

From Zaire to Paris, ignorant masses shed tears of unrestrained joy, bleating “Obama” like some freshly sheered sheep! Dictators send their heartfelt praise as their favorite terrorists pen warm regards on underground websites. Depending on which color figures in their weekly pastoral venom, hate-mongers pronounce him either Messiah or AntiChrist.

As if in some irreversible stage of delirium tremens, the Global Media is reduced to a broken gramophone repeating “Obama” at every hour in its eternal newscycle. Soon the Discovery channel and National Geographic will boast month long retrospectives on His childhood years as a penurious Catholic in Jakarta!

The overpaid cows in America’s newsrooms have overdosed on 0-Viagra, giving them a permanent hard-on (or swelling) for their Black Deliverance. You can’t hide from this malady, its the first airborne virus you are unlikely to ever physically touch yet you’re guaranteed to get.

Is it nauseating? Is it sick? Is it beyond irritating?

November 4th was a triumph, as is every such date when Americans select our President, of Democracy. But it was the first time in my adult life, that I felt shame to be an American, and especially, an American Democrat. That day I watched former party mates don lemming-felt hats, and nose-dive off a cliff. I watched as the World hooted “Obama” in an orgiastic and demeaning frenzy in order to voodoo America into an impotent, selfless, self-hating crustacean.

The glee and smirks on the vapid heads of news-show hosts, reminded me of apes. The felicitations of world audiences, of America’s imminent barbarization. Knowing that more than half of the electorate in my own country had explicitly rejected civilization, I am marking Novemeber 4th 2008, as its official date of expiration.

The narrow-mindedness and spleen of Excrement0 hos, deserves no apologies. Their sluttish infatuation is juvenile - Whores looking for their sugar-daddy.

From two centuries of White Supremacism, to half a century of Supremacism of the Minority, it’s the same Racial Straightjacket. Far from being a victory of Idealism and Dreams, Hussein’s triumph marks the rise of an embittered mob. A mob whose vision of politics is driven by an internalized ideology of Reverse Racism, based on hate, rejections, and recrimination. The ultimate expression of such low- “ideals” is a Demagogue, whose rise was long to be expected in a country where the issue of greatest importance - of Identity- has become the issue of least open Discussion and greatest censorship. Hussein0 took what as Americans has pained us the most - Race and Ethnicity - and polarized his way to power.

He did so with less than 2 laws to his Senatorial name. With no executive experience. With no significant achievement to speak of. From total obscurity to Messiah-dom in just two years. With the biggest campaign war-chest ever amassed in the nation’s history. With millions of brain-dead drones voluntarily trolling on his behalf throughout the vastness of the virtual world, and thousands of doped journalists spreading his message free-of-charge in make-believe-land. With a virtual monopoly on the media narrative, and with his critics held at the gunpoint of Political Correctness – the bastard become the Son.

If there is one thing I appreciate in Turd0’s victory , its the rush of honesty finally flowing from the mouths of his supporters. The same bozos who spent much of the campaign pretending “Race” was strictly a verb, now can’t write a title or byline without the word “Black” or “African-Americna” exposing the chief raison-d’etre of their sophomoric joy.

By no means was 2008 a simple victory of a third-rate community organizer over an aged 30 year Veteran of the Senate. Nor was it the defeat of Bush’s Third Term. Judging strictly by the unrestrained ecstasy of the Messiah’s supporters, it was nothing but the simple triumph of Darkness, over Light.

It’s the people who claim Excrement0 is America’s First Black President.

Saddly, they’ve put the cart before the horse.

IT is America’s President, Because IT is Black.

It?

Color, remember, is not Human.

Congratulations to all my compatriots. To all those who think the American Dream has been rejuvenated, through our capitulation to the cries and calls of the World’s unenlightened tyrannical masses. Congratulations to those ingénues who honestly believe, nothing bad can come of this capitulation. We have fallen off the precipice, and November 4th, 2008, marks the end of Democratic Civilization. The epoch of Race, Ethnicity, Illiberalism and Comformism, has just begun. Good luck navigating. Rely on your brains –keep your guts to yourselves. The only way out of Chaos, is through Rational Thought. Guts got us Bush, got us Obama. Only Brains, can get us something better.

Here is a simple equation of how “Racism” works in this Election. Since Racism is the least significant reason for “Black Community” failure in America, the more the Hussein0 camp plays up Racism - either in relation to Obama’s electoral failure, or “Black Community” failure - the more Americans (the ones not identifying with “Black Victimhood”) - cringe.

Making race an issue, in a society more Politically Correct than Stalinist Russia - is akin to mutilating Reality. Most Americans who go out of their way to censor themselves make an honest effort to think “positive” about the Black experience. Penalize them for this by talking down their effort, and you lose the election.

The Victim Industrial Complex - en economy of scapegoating all your personal, cultural, and social failings to the color of your skin, isn’t popular in Real (not the Politically Correct) America. Except for those who benefit from this Industry, the 95 % of America’s working hard to make our society just and equal, take offense at an industry which negates our efforts, our ideals, and our beliefs; an industry which is a source of Social Pollution, relying on censoring our public thoughts and expressions for the sake of empowering ethnocentrism.

Sometime ago Jeff penned a piece in defense of McCain’s foreign policy advisers - the identifiable neocons- claiming that these people had America’s best interest in mind when determining who to bomb and when. I wasn’t sure I agreed with this point of view when it was posted, and now I am more than certain that I couldn’t possibly disagree more. I find the suggestion that the select cabal of people known as the “neocons” can possibly function in my best interest a proposterous one - and Georgia is why.

The present situation in the Caucasus, is solid proof that McCain is a deranged warmonger. If Obama really wants to stand out on his foreign policy, and prove that he is the independent man of judgment that he claims, now is his last and only chance. If, he chooses to follow McCain’s lead and play the groundless Russia-baiting card, then Ralph Nader really is Americas last chance at sanity.

Both Juanita and Jeff advocate a vote for McCain, on the grounds that Obama represents a threat to the “Western” or “American” order. While I agree that Obama is an identity crisis for the country (entitlement vs merit), it is not at all certain, that the possible outcome of this crisis will be as potentially negative as the outcome of a McCain the Warmonger brining the entire World back to the brink of Nuclear Annihilation.

The facts of the Russian-Georgian conflict are as plain as day, and anyone choosing to deny them plays into the hands of Bush-McCain propaganda. McCain’s participation in this propaganda should be a wake-up call to PUMA and all Clinton Democrats who consider him an alternative to Obama. If Obama manages to stake out a less bellicose position vis a vis Russia in this conflict, then he deserves America’s vote. Here are the facts, and nothing extra-

1) “Acts of Russian imperialism” are invention of some McCain PR boutique run by neocon friends. The reality is this – the events in the Caucasus are the result of a deliberate provocation aimed at Russia. An American backed dictator, known for his human rights abuses, has launched a genocidal offensive against semi-independent peoples, most of whom are Russian citizens. He has launched this offesnsive in violation of a UN mandate, and he has done so with the Bush administrations support. Georgia started this war - and it remains to be seen what role the neocon mafia played.

2) The aggression in this conflict began with an unprovoked (contrary to the “claims” of Georgia) attack with heavy artillery and bombing of civilians in Ossetia - resulting in at least 1000 civilian deaths in just a day, and 40,000 refugees from a Republic with only 60,000 Ossetians. This is as close to a premeditated genocide as one can get. Ethnic clensing, which is removing Ossetians from their homeland. All of these Ossetians are Russian citizens, and Georgia knew that their cleansing could only be prevented with a Russian intervention.

3) It is inconceivable that Saakashvili the Georgian Brute- whose army is American trained and who doesn’t make a move without advice from perennial American hanger-ons (notably US ambassador in Tbilisi), could have launched this offensive without Washington’s authorization. Nor could he make appearances on all the major Western news networks, without direct approval from the Department of State. Such activity is governed by laws - althout 99.9% of American’s are not aware of such laws!

4) As this photo illustrates (originally on the US embassy in Georgia website, now contraband; Left: Georgian Dictator Saakashvili, to his immediate left, Warmonger McCain, then Senators Burr and Chambliss) - McCain is a notorious anti-Russian pro-Georgian war hawk. McCain Russophobia and Russia- bashing, need little elaboration. They are legendary. I do wonder, does this senile geriatric imagine what’s at stake?

5) For years now, Georgia has been trained and received the newest arms from America and its allies. It has been among the most rapidly arming countries in the world. With an annual increase in its military budget of 30 percent. The Bush administration is behind this military buildup, and whatever strategic objectives it reveals.

6) Saakashvili is a notorious thug and nationalist. He has limited free speech in his country, brutally suppresses any opposition, and has consistently made threats to Russia, to the South Ossetians, and Abkhazians. In backing this thug, America is backing another Hussein, another Pol Pot, another Pinchoet.

7) Russian peacekeepers are installed in South Ossetia and Abkhazia since 1992, under a UN madnate.

8 ) Russia is under the mandate to keep peace in Ossetia and Abkhazia, and thus, just as NATO bombed the smithereens out of Serbia when intervening in the Kosovo, so Russia is no doubt obliged to bomb military targets within Georgia

9) Part of this well crafted propaganda campaign against Russia, is the notion that Georgia has offered a cease-fire. The truth is, if Georgia were serious about a cease-fire it should stop broadcasting to its own people messages about a victory in South Ossetia. Georgia needs to move its troops and tanks out of S. Ossetia, in keeping with the UN mandate. Obviously Georgia is offering a “cease-fire” as a propaganda ploy against Russia. And boy, does it work wonders. Western audiences are now thinking “those mean Russians can’t even accept peace”. I suppose only kindergarteners need further elaboration.

Just as we backed Hussein when he gassed his Kurds - Regan passing it off as the work of Iran - now we are backing another murderer. Everyone, including my colleagues at this blog, need to think twice before granting any support to the McCain camp.

By backing a brutal dictator ethnically cleansing Ossetia, the neocons are once again engaging America in unethical, and morally repugnant politics, which impugn on the good name of this country, and rightfully destroy the goodwill people of the world accord us. To vote for a man who surrounds himself with these lunatics, is to back World War III. For me personally, this is the only chance Obama is likely to get, to convince me that he may just possibly be about Change. I expect he will blow it – but that only leaves America’s voters, all the poorer. One wonders what Clinton would do, and can we possibly somehow still get her back?

PS. For info contradicting nearly everything we hear about the conflict from our biased media, try a bias of another kind, the English Russian news, at Russia Today. While it is clearly a form of pro-Russian propaganda, its a much needed source of another opinion, another take, on this situation. Dismissing it out of hand, is wrong. Without seeing this side, viewers are immersed in pure anti-Russian propaganda. Balance is hard to find, so a good look at Russia Today, is as good an antidote to the McCain- Fox- CNN spin, as any.

Um, why waste or mince words? There was a reason I said what I said at the time. There was a reason the Turd0 camp said what they had to say at the time. Well, for the un-tutored in US history, or not too wiki-savvy, or just too bamboozled by the Stupid0, here’s a toast to Florida and Michigan, which played the pawns - and Clinton safely removed from the running - are “back” in the game. What sweet pleasure, 4 million voters, all in the hands of one incompetent nincompoop who happens to be a shade darker than the “average” American. Wow!

The coverage of this disembowelment of democracy has, and remains, especially disturbing and pathetic. Who cares about Zer0 - its the fact that so many do- which is heart wrenching.

for reference, some of Greg’s posts on the subject.

So you all see what censorship can deprive you of?! Some provocative food thought from Da Man Who Says It!

Guess what? If you want to keep that body shapely and thin, and your chin trim - exercising your brain may be more important than paying your gym fees. Your willingness to work-out that gray-matter - impacts how you vote. Going for the empty-suit, empty-pocket, rambling Zero experience Mr. Hype and Political bling, speaks miles on your neuronal connections.

Every third Latino marries outside of his/her “Race” (dumb word!) Every third Asian marries outside of his/her “Race” (last time I use it!). Then there are two outliers - guess which ones? One of them intermarries very little, the other, a great deal. Unless you a racist, your intuition is correct.

“Blacks” are keeping themselves apart, while others do the melting. The reluctance on the part of some who claim membership in the “Black” category to intermarry, is an explicit refusal to move up. Now I’d theorize that part of the “reluctance” is related to just that - the stigma attached to “moving-up” - even the small increment from lower- and lower-middle, to that simple middle - where life ain’t all milk and honey, but sure beats the bleak prospect of stomping for your cash just cuz someone’s morally superior enough to claim responsibility for all the World’s Sins!

Another part of the “reluctance” stems from the sense of “Racial Solidarity” Black women are brainwashed to feel, when looking at their fatherless sons and then comparing them with those pathetic Inner City males who fathered them. They’ve got the Jeremiah Wrights and Jesse Jackson’s to beat “sympathy” for such irresponsible and morally decrepit trash (since they call themselves “niggers” as a matter of pride, this trash!). They’ve grown up seeing this trash, and assume that because its hue happens to be black, it’s their trash. Racialism takes its toll - even on logical thought.  Instead of moving up, by marrying up – hypogyny – in the name of trash, we fight to stay low and become trash-collectors! Then we get the dishonest dispenserfs of Fake Wisdom filtching IQs from our brains!

More pastor Mannings are necessary - less censorship, more honest, open debate. It’s one way to avoid Affirmative Action Presidential candidates, who in order to make it to that White House, have to destroy the very system which made it possible. Ambiguity intended.
Thanks to SavagePolitics for posting these, and to Pastor Manning for making them. Manning is a reminder to everyone that Freedom of Speech and Thought exist only in deed and practice, not just on paper and in theory.

The media seem to have fooled everyone, including themselves. When it isn’t journalists spouting mind-numbing drivel about the “inevitability” of an Obama presidency, when it isn’t the Obama lemming plying his trite verbiage, then it is the heads-of state of otherwise self-respecting Republics, that are demeaning the American Democratic Process by welcoming Obama as a fait acompli. The show in Israel, Germany, and France, simply reinforced what many of us suspected - that the heads of some of the most prominent countries in the world can’t be counted on to fully appreciate the basics of a democratic election system.

I don’t know how it works in Germany or France, but here in the the oh-so-easy-to-hate USA, we actually count the vote, work it through the electoral college, and then announce the winner of a Presidential Election. Try as hard as they may, the media have yet to actually cast a vote in proportion to the noise they make. Sarkozy’s snide remarks in McCain’s direction expose a degree of diplomatic incorrectness stunningly shameful for a Frenchman. While they speak miles about Sarkozy’s handle on - well - himself, once he’s president, McCain won’t ever penalize him for it. I say McCain, because there is no way in hell, that a Democratic candidate who loses 30-40 % of his Party’s vote come November, can stand his ground against a Republican, let alone a perfectly centrist one.

Of course, don’t take my word for it. Just cast your vote responsibly, and watch the media, the Obama loonies, and half the European diplomatic corpus, sweat in shame. That said, I have a few modest suggestions that McCain’s team might consider, in its upcoming battle for that House.

1) Take Obama on Race. While the Obama camp thrives on tarring everyone as a Racist, Retrograde, and Bigot - guaranteeing prime television stuff for the corporate networks- the tables are easy to turn. The Obama patterns of Race Baiting are easy to expose, and even easier to transcend. Standing out as the post-racial candidate is a hair’s breadth away for even a Sidney.

McCain needs to be firmly against Affirmative-Action. There are enough “minorities” out there who dislike this “acceptable” form of Racism, because we don’t make it into the quotas, or simply find ourselves demeaned by the assumption that we need crutches to succeed in a land where only our talent is the limit.

Initially, any talk of race-related manner is liable to get McCain pigeonholed as the “White Candidate”. But this is a perfect opportunity to demonstrate what Obama is all about. As Axelrod and Donna Brazile take the bate, it will simply prove Obama’s divisive scheme for America - more Victims, more Political Correctness, more Censorship, less unity. Remember Theodore Roosevelt, America’s greatest progressive – we are tired of Hyphens, and especially one’s forced on us by the Federal government. There is only one people Washington DC serves- the American people. Since when is it in the business of assigning colors, ethnicities, and origins to us?

America is ready for post-racialism- and that means an end to Reverse Racism, and hyphens. McCain must do what Hillary Clinton refused - to speak on Race without inhibitions, at a national and candidate level. The notion that someone “White” must keep his/her mouth shut on providing us with a vision of America where color and ethnicity should in any way be taken into political account - is itself a gross form of Racism; a thorough negation of Humanist Universalism, and of basic American Values. It is a backward, particularistic, and communitarian perspective. Breaking this mold, is in itself rewarding, as the courage it requires will be acknowledged by the electorate.

Succinctly - take Obama head-on on Race, and you take away his greatest asset. Then, Obama just needs a regular beating.

2) Attack Obama on all Fronts. Stop niggling, stop tip-toeing, do unloading from now till November. Be more consistently negative on Obama. Forget the details of visiting a veteran’s hospital. While this appeals to southern states, it does nothing to solidity McCain’s Democratic (Clinton) base. The message on Obama should be 70% negative, all the time. Some frames to work from:

Obama is a Nobody. What has he done? Where? How? What’s the experience? Repeat over and over that he is a Nobody. It’s the simple truth, and it needs repeating.

Obama is dishonest. He lacks the integrity and character to lead this nation, or any nation on Earth. Again, simple truth.

Obama is a pompous ass - even other “asses” acknowledge this What could be easier than doing comedy on a man who even acts like the Messiah? There is room for humor here, room for deflating the Hopium machine.

Obama has no discernible convictions. When he isn’t voting present, or both ways, he is talking out of both sides of his mouth. Make his complexity, his liability. Obama is not forthcoming, on a hundred different issues – no papers from school, no papers from Springfield, no papers on his law-work – no birth-certificate. How much does it take to bury him on this?

Obama is divisive. He uses Race to divide the country through guilt, shame, and association. He belittles America with rhetoric that consistently implies a national degree of shame. He first divided and destroyed the Democratic party (make this a theme of some talks), now he is going to divide the Rest of US. Already his nut-cases are calling for petitions slamming the most objective newsource for this election (Fox), as Racist. Has Obama stood up for Fox? He’s given numerous interviews. Time to Attack.

Obama deserves the royal-treatment, and it’s long over due. Time to take the kid-gloves off. Begin with Race, and reinforce the message with persistently scathing remarks. This will provoke, over and over again, over-heated and Reverse Racist charges from the Obama camp and the Democrats- further proving what kind of “Change” Obama implies.

***

I realize McCain doesn’t need anyone’s advice - least of all mine- on how to run his campaign. Not only is it likely that his staff are fully aware of what I suggest - they know full well that they first want Obama as the actual Democratic nominee- before they take him down. After all- do Obama now, and you end with a Clinton in November. I especially appreciate how Republicans go out of their way to tone-down expectations - half the stories about their inability to win - originate with themselves. As if they’ve never read basic literature on self-confidence. Look everybody- their selling bridges over the Hudson!

I conclude my sober reminder to those who regularly confound reality with wishful thinking (math with ethnomathematics).

Thanks,

Juanita

What a coincidence. Remember when Obama lied about his “uncle” liberating “Auschwitz”? Never mind the ignobility of the ignorance underlying the lie; both Juanita at our blog, and Larry Johnson at Noquarter, questioned the very existance of any such uncle. At the time, the Obama goons clarified that the One had “mispoken” (where were all the Bosnia journalists?) because the camp in question was Buchenwald, and the uncle was Obama’s “great-uncle.”  Larry at Noquarter did some digging and found it implossible that any such Obama relation could have been at Buchenwald, since the only great-uncle in Obama’s possession supposedly enlisted in the US. Navy.

Well, if you needed further proof of the collusion between the Obama-Axelrod and American media, look no further than the timing of stories about Obama’s mysterious great-uncle. They didn’t surface two days after Obama’s initial lie, not a week after, nor two - no, they just happened to have surfaced precisely the day Obama  landed in Isarel, and precisely one day before he donned a kipah at the Yad Vashem museum in Israel to commemorate the Jewish Holocaust.

Again, just Coincidence?

Judging from the 188 stories on Google News about Obama’s great-uncle liberating Buchenwald, hardly. In nearly each  you will find the word “Holocaust”, and even appropriate mentions of Schindler’s list. Assuming Obama’s great-uncle is indeed the real thing, the timing of this proof of his existance amounts to cheap pandering and the most insidous form of propaganda I cold possibly imagine.

I lost relatives in the Holocaust, and I don’t take such politiking lightly. In the Jewish  community that I am part of Obama’s initial lie on Auschwitz did not go down well, and I fully understand the importance of the need to turn this issue around. However, if Obama intends to do the turning with media manipulation and transparent PR, he’s got another history lesson coming. What do Obama-Axelrod think they are doing - writing the proverbial “letters to the Jews”?

The subsection of Buchenwald that Obama’s great-uncle “liberated” was known as Ohrdruf. It was just one of 177 such subsections of the Buchenwald concentration/labor camp system in Germany. What this “great-uncle” would have witnessed is  relatively well documented. 32 murdered bodies in the courtyard and 40 in a shed. Now Obama never met his great-uncle, and the reference to the event was meant to sheer up Jewish votes - absolutely nothing else. Never mind Obama’s anointed Uncle who vilifies Israelin countless sermons and cavorts with notorious anti-Semites - as does Michelle Obama by the way- now there is an Uncle, never seen or spoken to by Obama- permitting the instrumentalization of the Holocaust for Obama’s private gain. Some facts are called to order.

Neither Obama, nor any American politician should talk much about the Allies and the Holocaust. Not a single extermination camp was liberated or even lightly bombed by a single Allied plane. Neither French, British, or Americans troops, came across Auschwitz or Treblinka, where actual annihilation of Jews, Soviet POWs, gypsies, and countless others, was taking place. For a few Western countries who wouldn’t even open their borders to Holocaust refugees while the war raged, to so much as refer to the Holocaust in ways that shore up political capital is an insult.

The only political force to liberate actual victims of death-extermination camps, were the Soviets - about 80% of the entire Nazi camp system (including labor, concentration, and extermination). While it is historically accurate that Canadians, Americans, and the British came upon “labor and concentration camps”, these were mostly in Germany proper, where Germans exploited an assortment of nationalities as slave labor for purposes of building a greater Germany.  Ohrduf - on German soil, counts about 13,000 undocumented casualties (Soviet POW and Jews), murdered as a result of excruciating exploitation. By the time Obama’s great-uncle arrived in Ohrdruf, there were virtually no inmates, as the camp had been decommissioned. When the Nazi’s left the camp, they left 80 dead bodies in their stead. Knowing this hardly requires in-depth knowledge of history. These are facts, any Occidental College/Columbia University/Harvard graduate should be familiar with, and I sincerely hope not all instances of lowered standards can be expalined with Affirmative-Action.

Not only is it deeply insulting that Obama would attempt to trivialize history by exploiting others suffering for his personal gain, to cook-up an uncle on the day he visits the Holocaust museum in Jerusalem reveals a cynicism beyond all comprehension.

Instances of human suffering, including the the Holocaust-  should remain off limits to political aspirants with zero credibility, little experience, and prodigal ignorance. As valuable as Jewish support may be to Obama’s presidential ambitions, one way to lose it is by playing games with history, some of us know first hand. Ohrdruf, like the entire Nazi camp system, was the summation of human barbarism executed on an industrial scale, but beware before advertising the Western record.

While millions perished under Racist Nazi laws- the only force which pushed forward was that of the Soviet Union - Auschwitz, Treblinka, Majdanek - extermination where millions perished in gas chambers- always within range of American/British bombers were well within bombing range. Only the Soviet marched on. While Zionists in then British Palestine attempted to paratroop a handful of volunteers to these zones, the American and British high-command explicitly forbade such an option. Waltzing into an abandoned camp with 80 cadavers was little compared to the corpse strewn landscapes of Poland, Belorosu, Ukraine, Czechoslovakia, and even Yugoslavia, while not a joke, amounts to a slap in the face of those, whose voices were turned away as their ships attempted to dock in New York, and various ports in the UK.

Obama, his great-uncle, Ohrdruf -the pandering alone is proof of moral decrepitude. A stern face, a  kipah on the head, a bowed head, just visual fluff. Lies, dishonesty, manipulation, pompousness, presumptuousness, arrogance, and worst of all ignorance, stand behind every Obama gets, every Obama outreach, behind everyone of  Obama’s words. Not only is Obama not a candidate for Israel, Iraq, Afghanistan, or the poor Germans (what kind of people turn out 200,000 to see this act?) - more importantly, Obama is not even fit to be a Senator for the people of Illinois.

You can take your gimmicks and letters up yours Mr. Obama, and just get out of the race, before you lose the rest of your face.  Lay off the Holocaust, and  get that  kipah off your dirty head.  With the hate that you’ve allowed to nestle in between those dumbo ears,  you  should have  a restraining order  placed on your loose-tongue. And lets see that birth-certificate of yours. Based on your world tours, there are a few pathetic countries out there, who apparently can’t get anything better than you for their Commander in Chief - you can boast all the forgeries you like - with their history of disrespect for democracy, they deserve your kind.