<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/atom10full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:openSearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearch/1.1/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" gd:etag="W/&quot;CkIDQXkycCp7ImA9WxJUE00.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7018230518319999846</id><updated>2009-07-11T04:22:50.798-04:00</updated><title>The Strategic Sourceror</title><subtitle type="html">You have reached the Strategic Sourceror Blog. Created and maintained by strategic sourcing and procurement professionals, this blog seeks to cover topics surrounding best practices in procurement, strategic sourcing, spend management, cost reduction and the supply chain.  We are not just another blog covering the procurement software or the SaaS space.  We offer real world tips, solutions, humor and rants to make the procurement professional's day a bit easier.</subtitle><link rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.strategicsourceror.com/feeds/posts/default" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.strategicsourceror.com/" /><link rel="next" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7018230518319999846/posts/default?start-index=26&amp;max-results=25&amp;redirect=false&amp;v=2" /><author><name>Strategic Sourceror</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/01028298940153171661</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><generator version="7.00" uri="http://www.blogger.com">Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>264</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><logo>http://www.sourceoneinc.com/images/powered_by_source_one.gif</logo><link rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/strategicsourceror/Fkxf" type="application/atom+xml" /><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;A0YERn4_cSp7ImA9WxJUEUs.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7018230518319999846.post-8780845938880791066</id><published>2009-07-09T15:50:00.001-04:00</published><updated>2009-07-09T15:51:47.049-04:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-07-09T15:51:47.049-04:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="cost reduction" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="strategic sourcing" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="procurement processes" /><title>The Supplier Stall Game</title><content type="html">As a consultant that helps companies reduce their cost of goods, I find that many suppliers try to avoid me.  That’s understandable – some of consultants out there don’t do what they say or say what they do, or even try to consider the suppliers requirements/business needs.  Most suppliers have war stories about bad experiences with these types of consultants.  I like to think that my company is an exception to that “bad consultant” rule, and feedback I get from suppliers at the end of an...&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
Please visit the www.StrategicSourceror.com for the rest.  Brought to you by: Source One Management Services, LLC.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/strategicsourceror/Fkxf/~4/J3TqpdGNCbg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.strategicsourceror.com/feeds/8780845938880791066/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7018230518319999846&amp;postID=8780845938880791066" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7018230518319999846/posts/default/8780845938880791066?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7018230518319999846/posts/default/8780845938880791066?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/strategicsourceror/Fkxf/~3/J3TqpdGNCbg/supplier-stall-game.html" title="The Supplier Stall Game" /><author><name>Joe Payne</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07060197286776584338</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="11719810060228625693" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.strategicsourceror.com/2009/07/supplier-stall-game.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CU4EQ3Y7eip7ImA9WxJVGUo.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7018230518319999846.post-8996942941758766970</id><published>2009-07-07T09:33:00.005-04:00</published><updated>2009-07-07T09:38:22.802-04:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-07-07T09:38:22.802-04:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="recession" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="spending" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="economy" /><title>Fireworks or Workers Fired</title><content type="html">That was the mentality of the mayor of Lowell, Massachusetts, who cancelled the city’s fireworks display as a result of an $18 million budget gap and 48 layoffs this year.  The New York Times explained that the city’s show would have cost about $45,000, equivalent to one full-time job.  “If we hadn’t cut off the fireworks, we would have had to lay off 49,” said Bernard Lynch, Lowell’s city manager.  Lowell had a lot of company this year as many cities and communities struggled to find room for...&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
Please visit the www.StrategicSourceror.com for the rest.  Brought to you by: Source One Management Services, LLC.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/strategicsourceror/Fkxf/~4/hWR8IN1tlZ0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.strategicsourceror.com/feeds/8996942941758766970/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7018230518319999846&amp;postID=8996942941758766970" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7018230518319999846/posts/default/8996942941758766970?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7018230518319999846/posts/default/8996942941758766970?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/strategicsourceror/Fkxf/~3/hWR8IN1tlZ0/fireworks-or-workers-fired.html" title="Fireworks or Workers Fired" /><author><name>Kathleen Daly</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13679097316238760557</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="15138694170250140750" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.strategicsourceror.com/2009/07/fireworks-or-workers-fired.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;AkUMQHg8eip7ImA9WxJVGEU.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7018230518319999846.post-3411789901435218514</id><published>2009-07-06T09:48:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2009-07-06T09:51:21.672-04:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-07-06T09:51:21.672-04:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="supply chain" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="risk management" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="strategic sourcing" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="spend management" /><title>Payment Terms and Supply Chain Risk</title><content type="html">I was somewhat surprised over the last few quarters as buyers went to their supply base, normally at the request of the Finance Department, to extend standard payment terms from 30 days to 60 days. I was even more surprised at how quickly that request changed from 60 to 90, and eventually 120. So what comes after 120? Frequently, a Chapter 11 filing. But Chapter 11 isn’t always an issue limited to the customer – in a lot of cases, the supplier that accepts these terms will be filing as...&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
Please visit the www.StrategicSourceror.com for the rest.  Brought to you by: Source One Management Services, LLC.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/strategicsourceror/Fkxf/~4/nIeI_bLeYbE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.strategicsourceror.com/feeds/3411789901435218514/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7018230518319999846&amp;postID=3411789901435218514" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7018230518319999846/posts/default/3411789901435218514?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7018230518319999846/posts/default/3411789901435218514?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/strategicsourceror/Fkxf/~3/nIeI_bLeYbE/payment-terms-and-supply-chain-risk.html" title="Payment Terms and Supply Chain Risk" /><author><name>Joe Payne</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07060197286776584338</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="11719810060228625693" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.strategicsourceror.com/2009/07/payment-terms-and-supply-chain-risk.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;AkYCRXszeCp7ImA9WxJVE0U.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7018230518319999846.post-4094923316968618984</id><published>2009-06-30T14:54:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2009-06-30T14:56:04.580-04:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-06-30T14:56:04.580-04:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="global economy" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="human resources" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="salary" /><title>Changes in attitude, Changes In Latitude</title><content type="html">Studies show that the job=career equation is no longer a  sound proposition. Most workers will change jobs numerous times in their life;  as often as every seven to ten years on the average. For procurement  professionals, that rule of thumb will mean retraining, retooling and often  relocation. For as long as most of us can remember, those facts meant new  companies, new processes, new tools and often new home towns.   Add, new cultures, new countries and new continents to that  list. Perhaps...&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
Please visit the www.StrategicSourceror.com for the rest.  Brought to you by: Source One Management Services, LLC.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/strategicsourceror/Fkxf/~4/q0CA3NH2E9M" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.strategicsourceror.com/feeds/4094923316968618984/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7018230518319999846&amp;postID=4094923316968618984" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7018230518319999846/posts/default/4094923316968618984?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7018230518319999846/posts/default/4094923316968618984?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/strategicsourceror/Fkxf/~3/q0CA3NH2E9M/changes-in-attitude-changes-in-latitude.html" title="Changes in attitude, Changes In Latitude" /><author><name>Strategic Sourceror</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/01028298940153171661</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="13141705001988746968" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.strategicsourceror.com/2009/06/changes-in-attitude-changes-in-latitude.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CEcFQ30-eSp7ImA9WxJVEkU.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7018230518319999846.post-5950923121950280380</id><published>2009-06-29T09:20:00.005-04:00</published><updated>2009-06-29T09:26:52.351-04:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-06-29T09:26:52.351-04:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="supply chain" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="risk management" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="food safety" /><title>Some Food for Thought</title><content type="html">It’s better to be safe than sorry.  That is at least the mindset of the Chairman of the U.S. House of Representatives Energy and Commerce Committee, Henry Waxman (D-California), and his sidekick, John Dingell (D-Michigan).  These two individuals are currently at the forefront of The Food Safety Enhancement Act of 2009.  The purpose of this legislation is to establish a more efficient food safety plan and enforce safety standards in all food production facilities.  The efforts associated with...&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
Please visit the www.StrategicSourceror.com for the rest.  Brought to you by: Source One Management Services, LLC.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/strategicsourceror/Fkxf/~4/kO_4NZBAceY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.strategicsourceror.com/feeds/5950923121950280380/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7018230518319999846&amp;postID=5950923121950280380" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7018230518319999846/posts/default/5950923121950280380?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7018230518319999846/posts/default/5950923121950280380?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/strategicsourceror/Fkxf/~3/kO_4NZBAceY/some-food-for-thought.html" title="Some Food for Thought" /><author><name>Kathleen Daly</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/13679097316238760557</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="15138694170250140750" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.strategicsourceror.com/2009/06/some-food-for-thought.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;A0EHRHs_eyp7ImA9WxJVEE4.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7018230518319999846.post-7372292247595229818</id><published>2009-06-26T14:00:00.004-04:00</published><updated>2009-06-26T14:07:15.543-04:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-06-26T14:07:15.543-04:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="technology" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="green" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="economy" /><title>Space-Based Solar Power Plant – Wait…What?</title><content type="html">I’ll bet you never thought you would hear the word “space” and “solar power” in the same context! You read it right folks, the May 2009 issue of Electrical Wholesaling mentioned that PG&amp;amp;E, California’s utility, has worked out a deal for the world’s first space-based solar power plant.

What sounds even more sci-fi is just how they plan to harvest solar power in space and be able to use it on earth. Solar panels in the earth’s orbit will convert power to radio frequency to transmit to Fresno...&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
Please visit the www.StrategicSourceror.com for the rest.  Brought to you by: Source One Management Services, LLC.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/strategicsourceror/Fkxf/~4/ktHn-5159ds" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.strategicsourceror.com/feeds/7372292247595229818/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7018230518319999846&amp;postID=7372292247595229818" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7018230518319999846/posts/default/7372292247595229818?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7018230518319999846/posts/default/7372292247595229818?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/strategicsourceror/Fkxf/~3/ktHn-5159ds/space-based-solar-power-plant-waitwhat.html" title="Space-Based Solar Power Plant – Wait…What?" /><author><name>Tina Lamanna</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/11102836840011012558</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="16359287397463967153" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.strategicsourceror.com/2009/06/space-based-solar-power-plant-waitwhat.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;AkEESHc6fSp7ImA9WxJVEEw.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7018230518319999846.post-8086659247068106584</id><published>2009-06-26T08:10:00.003-04:00</published><updated>2009-06-26T08:16:49.915-04:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-06-26T08:16:49.915-04:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="strategic sourcing blog" /><title>2009 Supply &amp; Demand Chain Executive 100</title><content type="html">Yesterday, Supply and Demand Chain Executive magazine announced their eighth annual "Supply and Demand Chain Executive 100". This annual listing identifies the top innovative supply and demand chain vendors.

This year the magazine focused the criteria for its "100" feature on economic recovery. Source One (the sponsor of this blog) is proud to have been listed for the fourth consecutive year.

Read about it: Source One Awarded Supply &amp;amp; Demand Chain 100 in 2009.Brought to you by the The...&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
Please visit the www.StrategicSourceror.com for the rest.  Brought to you by: Source One Management Services, LLC.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/strategicsourceror/Fkxf/~4/uKTpVznr-Os" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.strategicsourceror.com/feeds/8086659247068106584/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7018230518319999846&amp;postID=8086659247068106584" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7018230518319999846/posts/default/8086659247068106584?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7018230518319999846/posts/default/8086659247068106584?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/strategicsourceror/Fkxf/~3/uKTpVznr-Os/2009-supply-demand-chain-executive-100.html" title="2009 Supply &amp; Demand Chain Executive 100" /><author><name>William Dorn</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02549920745510718716</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="03830024347589690976" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.strategicsourceror.com/2009/06/2009-supply-demand-chain-executive-100.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;C04CSHsyeSp7ImA9WxJWGEg.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7018230518319999846.post-1544421465987516937</id><published>2009-06-24T08:57:00.004-04:00</published><updated>2009-06-24T09:59:29.591-04:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-06-24T09:59:29.591-04:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="government" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="procurement" /><title>20,000 New Jobs in Government Procurement</title><content type="html">According to an article published by the Federal Times, the Defense Department has introduced a new bill with the goal of testing new procurement approaches and evaluating acquisition positions within the Department of Defense.  The bill will mandate that new procurement approaches must be taken as a trial for up to 10 information technology projects per year.  Specifically, they are attempting to streamline the existing processes that have been labeled "too long and cumbersome" by the Defense...&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
Please visit the www.StrategicSourceror.com for the rest.  Brought to you by: Source One Management Services, LLC.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/strategicsourceror/Fkxf/~4/Wz64dZyQUac" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.strategicsourceror.com/feeds/1544421465987516937/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7018230518319999846&amp;postID=1544421465987516937" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7018230518319999846/posts/default/1544421465987516937?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7018230518319999846/posts/default/1544421465987516937?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/strategicsourceror/Fkxf/~3/Wz64dZyQUac/20000-new-jobs-in-government.html" title="20,000 New Jobs in Government Procurement" /><author><name>William Dorn</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02549920745510718716</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="03830024347589690976" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.strategicsourceror.com/2009/06/20000-new-jobs-in-government.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DkIAQH49fip7ImA9WxJWFkU.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7018230518319999846.post-1468674776700189203</id><published>2009-06-22T11:27:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2009-06-22T11:29:01.066-04:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-06-22T11:29:01.066-04:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="economy" /><title>What to do in the event of a fire (sale)</title><content type="html">While no one likes to admit it, many companies are living “on  the margin” these days. For those firms, a few crucial decisions can make the  difference in survival. Too often, it comes to the dreaded Chapter 11, for the  big companies.  But for smaller firms, the time, money and resources necessary  for a filing are all luxuries they can’t pile on top of necessary expenses. The  truth is, unlike GM, some organizations are simply “too poor for bankruptcy”.  Maybe Saab can work the system, pay...&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
Please visit the www.StrategicSourceror.com for the rest.  Brought to you by: Source One Management Services, LLC.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/strategicsourceror/Fkxf/~4/l319qEZ-cnM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.strategicsourceror.com/feeds/1468674776700189203/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7018230518319999846&amp;postID=1468674776700189203" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7018230518319999846/posts/default/1468674776700189203?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7018230518319999846/posts/default/1468674776700189203?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/strategicsourceror/Fkxf/~3/l319qEZ-cnM/what-to-do-in-event-of-fire-sale.html" title="What to do in the event of a fire (sale)" /><author><name>Strategic Sourceror</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/01028298940153171661</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="13141705001988746968" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.strategicsourceror.com/2009/06/what-to-do-in-event-of-fire-sale.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;A0YMQ3o6cSp7ImA9WxJWFE4.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7018230518319999846.post-5526253705728291608</id><published>2009-06-19T15:16:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2009-06-19T15:19:42.419-04:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-06-19T15:19:42.419-04:00</app:edited><title>Shifting Paradigms at Points of Inflection</title><content type="html">In differential calculus, an inflection point refers to the place on a line at which the direction of the line’s curvature shifts. I hated calculus, but the term applies well to certain business situations. The concept was first presented to me by University of Scranton management professor Len Tischler during a lecture on business policy and strategy. The idea is that every so often within a given industry, events occur (technological advances, process innovations, political policies, economic...&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
Please visit the www.StrategicSourceror.com for the rest.  Brought to you by: Source One Management Services, LLC.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/strategicsourceror/Fkxf/~4/Nonv5DYc_7M" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.strategicsourceror.com/feeds/5526253705728291608/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7018230518319999846&amp;postID=5526253705728291608" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7018230518319999846/posts/default/5526253705728291608?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7018230518319999846/posts/default/5526253705728291608?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/strategicsourceror/Fkxf/~3/Nonv5DYc_7M/shifting-paradigms-at-points-of.html" title="Shifting Paradigms at Points of Inflection" /><author><name>Steve Tatum</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10303343476232524272</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="13190167864544996864" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_DBjF-kBGANo/SjvksudhYxI/AAAAAAAAAAM/7DfU2myirLs/s72-c/Point.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.strategicsourceror.com/2009/06/shifting-paradigms-at-points-of.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CkUGSHw4eip7ImA9WxJWE0g.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7018230518319999846.post-4518511365495152196</id><published>2009-06-18T14:36:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2009-06-18T14:37:09.232-04:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-06-18T14:37:09.232-04:00</app:edited><title>Getting End-User Buy-In – A Critical Step in the Process</title><content type="html">End-user feedback is crucial in any strategic sourcing initiative.  Their buy-in and commitment to the process can either make or break a project.  Suppliers want to see a willingness to change, or at least make sure the customer does not intend to maintain the status quo, before they will get aggressive on price (or in some cases, even place a bid).  The level of participation and engagement from the end-users will determine how the incumbent responds to the sourcing event, as well as how...&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
Please visit the www.StrategicSourceror.com for the rest.  Brought to you by: Source One Management Services, LLC.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/strategicsourceror/Fkxf/~4/e0Wz-UW_4-4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.strategicsourceror.com/feeds/4518511365495152196/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7018230518319999846&amp;postID=4518511365495152196" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7018230518319999846/posts/default/4518511365495152196?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7018230518319999846/posts/default/4518511365495152196?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/strategicsourceror/Fkxf/~3/e0Wz-UW_4-4/getting-end-user-buy-in-critical-step.html" title="Getting End-User Buy-In – A Critical Step in the Process" /><author><name>Joe Payne</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07060197286776584338</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="11719810060228625693" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.strategicsourceror.com/2009/06/getting-end-user-buy-in-critical-step.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;C0QARX48eCp7ImA9WxJWEks.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7018230518319999846.post-5533426337644885239</id><published>2009-06-17T13:52:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2009-06-17T13:55:44.070-04:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-06-17T13:55:44.070-04:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="tips to save money" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="technology" /><title>What's That Behind Your Ear?  Savings!</title><content type="html">Creative solutions do not need to be complex to be effective.  When it comes time to sign your next telecommunications contract, you may have all the tools you need to achieve significant savings already sitting in your toolbox.  And you may not know it.  We are always looking at emerging technologies to better streamline and optimize our telecommunications, but new does not always mean appropriate nor does it mean that one time costs associated with a technology change will be within budget....&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
Please visit the www.StrategicSourceror.com for the rest.  Brought to you by: Source One Management Services, LLC.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/strategicsourceror/Fkxf/~4/ZaAd_MTDxtw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.strategicsourceror.com/feeds/5533426337644885239/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7018230518319999846&amp;postID=5533426337644885239" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7018230518319999846/posts/default/5533426337644885239?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7018230518319999846/posts/default/5533426337644885239?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/strategicsourceror/Fkxf/~3/ZaAd_MTDxtw/whats-that-behind-your-ear-savings.html" title="What's That Behind Your Ear?  Savings!" /><author><name>David Pastore</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/18305861384385875620</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="06291009157055048923" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.strategicsourceror.com/2009/06/whats-that-behind-your-ear-savings.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DEEHRn0_fip7ImA9WxJWEUo.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7018230518319999846.post-363001791972098806</id><published>2009-06-16T11:05:00.001-04:00</published><updated>2009-06-16T14:23:57.346-04:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-06-16T14:23:57.346-04:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="procurement tools" /><title>It's a User Issue</title><content type="html">Ariba’s May 2009 White Paper-“Next Generation Spend Analysis” invests heavily in examining the limitations of inexplicit data, and the paralysis by analysis factor as major reasons why spend analysis “fails” to deliver the desired result.

This issue stand alongside the why SAAS (software as a service) isn’t producing the ROI that so many SAAS suppliers pitch. It amazes me, though that sourcing experts still focus on the data and the tools as the reason clients never realize the expected ROI...&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
Please visit the www.StrategicSourceror.com for the rest.  Brought to you by: Source One Management Services, LLC.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/strategicsourceror/Fkxf/~4/bo11SOlBqa0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.strategicsourceror.com/feeds/363001791972098806/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7018230518319999846&amp;postID=363001791972098806" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7018230518319999846/posts/default/363001791972098806?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7018230518319999846/posts/default/363001791972098806?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/strategicsourceror/Fkxf/~3/bo11SOlBqa0/its-user-issue.html" title="It's a User Issue" /><author><name>Strategic Sourceror</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/01028298940153171661</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="13141705001988746968" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.strategicsourceror.com/2009/06/its-user-issue.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CUECQ3Y5cSp7ImA9WxJWEUg.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7018230518319999846.post-6472795130189349398</id><published>2009-06-15T15:43:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2009-06-16T08:01:02.829-04:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-06-16T08:01:02.829-04:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="cost reduction" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="oil" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="materials" /><title>For Polypropylene Purchasers Pondering Propylene Price Increases</title><content type="html">As the focus of a recent sourcing engagement, I have been working to help a client diversify his polypropylene supply base while driving cost savings. Considering the client’s stringent requirements for efficient, reliable delivery and a resilient “run on any machine, at any time, under the supervision of any technician” film, many foreign suppliers were off the table from the get-go. As a result, we ended up working with several brokers to identify domestic suppliers that could provide local...&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
Please visit the www.StrategicSourceror.com for the rest.  Brought to you by: Source One Management Services, LLC.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/strategicsourceror/Fkxf/~4/SxrJmUxrRj8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.strategicsourceror.com/feeds/6472795130189349398/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7018230518319999846&amp;postID=6472795130189349398" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7018230518319999846/posts/default/6472795130189349398?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7018230518319999846/posts/default/6472795130189349398?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/strategicsourceror/Fkxf/~3/SxrJmUxrRj8/for-polypropylene-purchasers-pondering.html" title="For Polypropylene Purchasers Pondering Propylene Price Increases" /><author><name>Steve Tatum</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10303343476232524272</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="13190167864544996864" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.strategicsourceror.com/2009/06/for-polypropylene-purchasers-pondering.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DkMHSX88fyp7ImA9WxJXFk4.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7018230518319999846.post-6114232361149615282</id><published>2009-06-10T07:41:00.001-04:00</published><updated>2009-06-10T07:47:18.177-04:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-06-10T07:47:18.177-04:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="global economy" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="government" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="procurement" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="materials" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="economy" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Buy American" /><title>Buy American Update: Canucks Strike Back.  Steelers Fight Amongst Themselves</title><content type="html">As things have continued to heat up with the “Buy American” legislation situation, a few more notable developments have occurred.  According to an article published Monday in American Metal Market, Canadian municipalities took steps to encourage retaliation while constituents of the US steel industry feuded over the provisions’ clarity.

After meeting last weekend to vote affirmatively on measures that will encourage retaliatory actions, the AMM article suggests that a “full-scale attack on the...&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
Please visit the www.StrategicSourceror.com for the rest.  Brought to you by: Source One Management Services, LLC.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/strategicsourceror/Fkxf/~4/TENm-D1GdfU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.strategicsourceror.com/feeds/6114232361149615282/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7018230518319999846&amp;postID=6114232361149615282" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7018230518319999846/posts/default/6114232361149615282?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7018230518319999846/posts/default/6114232361149615282?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/strategicsourceror/Fkxf/~3/TENm-D1GdfU/buy-american-update-canucks-strike-back.html" title="Buy American Update: Canucks Strike Back.  Steelers Fight Amongst Themselves" /><author><name>Steve Tatum</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10303343476232524272</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="13190167864544996864" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.strategicsourceror.com/2009/06/buy-american-update-canucks-strike-back.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CU4ARns7eSp7ImA9WxJXFUs.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7018230518319999846.post-1484874337178842492</id><published>2009-06-09T08:23:00.006-04:00</published><updated>2009-06-09T12:12:27.501-04:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-06-09T12:12:27.501-04:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="tips to save money" /><title>3 Unique Offerings to Cut Costs Without Reducing Headcount</title><content type="html">For many of us Procurement Service Providers, inbound calls &amp;amp; interest in our services have been up significantly these last few months. In this economy, companies of all sizes are looking for ways to maintain or increase their profitability, but just don't know where to get started.

In response, Source One put together a quick summary of 3 unique ways it can help any size company to reduce costs and increase profits.

Read: "Businesses Can Cut Costs Without Reducing Headcount" to learn...&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
Please visit the www.StrategicSourceror.com for the rest.  Brought to you by: Source One Management Services, LLC.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/strategicsourceror/Fkxf/~4/zsSFPatru7s" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.strategicsourceror.com/feeds/1484874337178842492/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7018230518319999846&amp;postID=1484874337178842492" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7018230518319999846/posts/default/1484874337178842492?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7018230518319999846/posts/default/1484874337178842492?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/strategicsourceror/Fkxf/~3/zsSFPatru7s/3-unique-offerings-to-cut-costs-without.html" title="3 Unique Offerings to Cut Costs Without Reducing Headcount" /><author><name>William Dorn</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02549920745510718716</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="03830024347589690976" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.strategicsourceror.com/2009/06/3-unique-offerings-to-cut-costs-without.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;D0AER3Yzfip7ImA9WxJXFEo.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7018230518319999846.post-77257212225721266</id><published>2009-06-08T11:39:00.001-04:00</published><updated>2009-06-08T11:41:46.886-04:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-06-08T11:41:46.886-04:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="supply chain" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="strategic sourcing" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="spend management" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="building strategic sourcing team" /><title>The Role of a Strategic Sourcing Professional – No Sacred Cows Allowed</title><content type="html">In my last post, “Strategic Sourcing – A Reality Check”, I wrote about the limited role strategic sourcing plays in many organizations. Ultimately, an effective strategic sourcing professional will shift their organization in the right direction, but it’s not easy. The spend areas with the biggest savings opportunities also tend to be the least visible (think banking, legal, marketing). In addition, end users managing categories that did not traditionally fall under “procurement” control are...&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
Please visit the www.StrategicSourceror.com for the rest.  Brought to you by: Source One Management Services, LLC.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/strategicsourceror/Fkxf/~4/Bxx20zwnUhs" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.strategicsourceror.com/feeds/77257212225721266/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7018230518319999846&amp;postID=77257212225721266" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7018230518319999846/posts/default/77257212225721266?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7018230518319999846/posts/default/77257212225721266?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/strategicsourceror/Fkxf/~3/Bxx20zwnUhs/role-of-strategic-sourcing-professional.html" title="The Role of a Strategic Sourcing Professional – No Sacred Cows Allowed" /><author><name>Joe Payne</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07060197286776584338</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="11719810060228625693" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.strategicsourceror.com/2009/06/role-of-strategic-sourcing-professional.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DkMCRH88fyp7ImA9WxJXEkw.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7018230518319999846.post-932890049285225535</id><published>2009-06-05T11:06:00.001-04:00</published><updated>2009-06-05T11:07:45.177-04:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-06-05T11:07:45.177-04:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="economy" /><title>The price of inefficiency</title><content type="html">A sentence taken from an article in the Wall Street Journal:

"GM made twice as many vehicles as Chrysler's 1.5 million last year and employs 235,000 people compared with Chrysler's 54,000."

No, it’s not a misprint. And it’s the Journal, not Fox news.

Let me restate that for the purpose of comparison; GM’s 235,000 employees made 3,000,000 cars. Chrysler’s 54,000 employees made 1,500,000 cars.

In HR terms, the average GM employee (granted this includes many non-production employees) produced...&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
Please visit the www.StrategicSourceror.com for the rest.  Brought to you by: Source One Management Services, LLC.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/strategicsourceror/Fkxf/~4/A-_HHOsxDEA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.strategicsourceror.com/feeds/932890049285225535/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7018230518319999846&amp;postID=932890049285225535" title="1 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7018230518319999846/posts/default/932890049285225535?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7018230518319999846/posts/default/932890049285225535?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/strategicsourceror/Fkxf/~3/A-_HHOsxDEA/price-of-inefficiency.html" title="The price of inefficiency" /><author><name>Strategic Sourceror</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/01028298940153171661</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="13141705001988746968" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">1</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.strategicsourceror.com/2009/06/price-of-inefficiency.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CUEMRH4-cSp7ImA9WxJWEUg.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7018230518319999846.post-8765696915894326353</id><published>2009-06-03T16:02:00.003-04:00</published><updated>2009-06-16T08:01:25.059-04:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-06-16T08:01:25.059-04:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="global economy" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="stimulus" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="procurement" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Buy American" /><title>“Buy American” Update: The Rest of the World and the NY Times Agree with Canada</title><content type="html">Apparently the staff of The NY Times subscribes to The Canadian Press too. Or, as I’d like to believe, they read The Strategic Sourceror religiously. Either way, I opened to page A26 this morning to see some nice follow up coverage on the “Buy American” situation. The editorial touched on some of the information we already knew, but also brought to light three other concerns my original blog-post and our friends in Canada did not take into consideration.

Do American-Made Alternatives...&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
Please visit the www.StrategicSourceror.com for the rest.  Brought to you by: Source One Management Services, LLC.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/strategicsourceror/Fkxf/~4/1BGTt9l0i84" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.strategicsourceror.com/feeds/8765696915894326353/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7018230518319999846&amp;postID=8765696915894326353" title="1 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7018230518319999846/posts/default/8765696915894326353?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7018230518319999846/posts/default/8765696915894326353?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/strategicsourceror/Fkxf/~3/1BGTt9l0i84/buy-american-update-rest-of-world-and.html" title="“Buy American” Update: The Rest of the World and the NY Times Agree with Canada" /><author><name>Steve Tatum</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10303343476232524272</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="13190167864544996864" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">1</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.strategicsourceror.com/2009/06/buy-american-update-rest-of-world-and.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;C0MFSXw9eyp7ImA9WxJXEEs.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7018230518319999846.post-2942768328288977366</id><published>2009-06-02T15:08:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2009-06-03T16:36:58.263-04:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-06-03T16:36:58.263-04:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="contracts" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="government" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="procurement" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="economy" /><title>Canucks:  Buy American….Eh?</title><content type="html">As a part of much of the recent stimulus legislation, many US lawmakers have added “Buy American” clauses to ensure that the American economy reaps the intended benefits of government investments, cash injections, subsidies, and tax breaks. These clauses basically stipulate that, in order for companies to take advantage of the benefits from a given piece of legislation, they must purchase a specific amount (percentage) of supplies, services, and labor from American-based companies. According to...&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
Please visit the www.StrategicSourceror.com for the rest.  Brought to you by: Source One Management Services, LLC.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/strategicsourceror/Fkxf/~4/hm6aLDpPhvc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.strategicsourceror.com/feeds/2942768328288977366/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7018230518319999846&amp;postID=2942768328288977366" title="2 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7018230518319999846/posts/default/2942768328288977366?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7018230518319999846/posts/default/2942768328288977366?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/strategicsourceror/Fkxf/~3/hm6aLDpPhvc/canucks-buy-americaneh.html" title="Canucks:  Buy American….Eh?" /><author><name>Steve Tatum</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10303343476232524272</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="13190167864544996864" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">2</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.strategicsourceror.com/2009/06/canucks-buy-americaneh.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CE4CQ34zcSp7ImA9WxJQGUo.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7018230518319999846.post-1933198767885725406</id><published>2009-06-02T13:58:00.003-04:00</published><updated>2009-06-02T16:02:42.089-04:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-06-02T16:02:42.089-04:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="strategic sourcing" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="procurement processes" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="procurement" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="building strategic sourcing team" /><title>Strategic Sourcing – A Reality Check</title><content type="html">In recent months, I have read many posts on this blog and others about the role strategic sourcing plays within an organization. I have even read some posts that indicate that the “tool” known as strategic sourcing is becoming a thing of the past, and that the strategic sourcing professional needs to evolve into the “relationship manager”. All this talk of change and evolution makes me scratch my head, because most of the companies I deal with - large and small - still don’t practice true...&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
Please visit the www.StrategicSourceror.com for the rest.  Brought to you by: Source One Management Services, LLC.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/strategicsourceror/Fkxf/~4/g0puDJokz8E" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.strategicsourceror.com/feeds/1933198767885725406/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7018230518319999846&amp;postID=1933198767885725406" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7018230518319999846/posts/default/1933198767885725406?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7018230518319999846/posts/default/1933198767885725406?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/strategicsourceror/Fkxf/~3/g0puDJokz8E/strategic-sourcing-reality-check.html" title="Strategic Sourcing – A Reality Check" /><author><name>Joe Payne</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07060197286776584338</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="11719810060228625693" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.strategicsourceror.com/2009/06/strategic-sourcing-reality-check.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DkcBRHY7eyp7ImA9WxJQGUk.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7018230518319999846.post-328113358893921417</id><published>2009-06-02T07:58:00.001-04:00</published><updated>2009-06-02T08:00:55.803-04:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-06-02T08:00:55.803-04:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="government" /><title>“We’re the Government; we always get the best deals”</title><content type="html">But not from NetApp . . . . Information Technology Product supplier Network Appliances Inc. agreed to repay the Government $128 million dollars for overcharging GSA employees on IT purchases. Thankfully Government watchdogs chased our misspent tax dollars down, right?

Well, not exactly. A former employee of NetApp blew the whistle on NetApp disclosing to the Government that while GSA employees received a 20% discount, firms such as Citigroup received discounts of 50% and higher. The whistle...&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
Please visit the www.StrategicSourceror.com for the rest.  Brought to you by: Source One Management Services, LLC.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/strategicsourceror/Fkxf/~4/_LSoSflk6-g" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.strategicsourceror.com/feeds/328113358893921417/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7018230518319999846&amp;postID=328113358893921417" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7018230518319999846/posts/default/328113358893921417?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7018230518319999846/posts/default/328113358893921417?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/strategicsourceror/Fkxf/~3/_LSoSflk6-g/were-government-we-always-get-best.html" title="“We’re the Government; we always get the best deals”" /><author><name>Strategic Sourceror</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/01028298940153171661</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="13141705001988746968" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.strategicsourceror.com/2009/06/were-government-we-always-get-best.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;AkUNSHozcCp7ImA9WxJQGEg.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7018230518319999846.post-4642230817555610559</id><published>2009-06-01T08:08:00.004-04:00</published><updated>2009-06-01T08:11:39.488-04:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-06-01T08:11:39.488-04:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="government" /><title>The Government doesn’t trust Government data</title><content type="html">The Government doesn’t trust Government  data   Federal Times.com reports that Government contracting officers rarely use  Government data on contractors’ past performance because they don’t think the  information is reliable.
The contracting officers’ consensus, as reported to the GAO (Government  Accountability Office) was that past performance data is the most reliable  predictive data for future performance, but they lack confidence in the  Government’s PPIRS (Past Performance Information...&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
Please visit the www.StrategicSourceror.com for the rest.  Brought to you by: Source One Management Services, LLC.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/strategicsourceror/Fkxf/~4/AcW9hnq64Mg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.strategicsourceror.com/feeds/4642230817555610559/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7018230518319999846&amp;postID=4642230817555610559" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7018230518319999846/posts/default/4642230817555610559?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7018230518319999846/posts/default/4642230817555610559?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/strategicsourceror/Fkxf/~3/AcW9hnq64Mg/government-doesnt-trust-government-data.html" title="The Government doesn’t trust Government data" /><author><name>Strategic Sourceror</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/01028298940153171661</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="13141705001988746968" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.strategicsourceror.com/2009/06/government-doesnt-trust-government-data.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CkEERno_eip7ImA9WxJWE04.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7018230518319999846.post-4555622365307608751</id><published>2009-05-27T17:06:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2009-06-18T09:10:07.442-04:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-06-18T09:10:07.442-04:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="tax" /><title>Capital Stimulus Just Isn’t Cutting it...Yet</title><content type="html">In a recent entry about 2009 Tax Incentives I relayed some interesting tax stimulus information and urged managers to examine the opportunity and decide if the incentive was enough to persuade them to make a capital investment. In this week’s issue of BusinessWeek, the “Numbers” section certainly suggests one of two things. Either companies are taking a “wait and see” approach, or the stimulus just isn’t enough.

According to the “Numbers”, capital spending in the private sector dropped at an...&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
Please visit the www.StrategicSourceror.com for the rest.  Brought to you by: Source One Management Services, LLC.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/strategicsourceror/Fkxf/~4/IpEqU47VzaY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.strategicsourceror.com/feeds/4555622365307608751/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7018230518319999846&amp;postID=4555622365307608751" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7018230518319999846/posts/default/4555622365307608751?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7018230518319999846/posts/default/4555622365307608751?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/strategicsourceror/Fkxf/~3/IpEqU47VzaY/capital-stimulus-just-isnt-cutting.html" title="Capital Stimulus Just Isn’t Cutting it...Yet" /><author><name>Steve Tatum</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/10303343476232524272</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="13190167864544996864" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.strategicsourceror.com/2009/05/capital-stimulus-just-isnt-cutting.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CkEGSHg_eCp7ImA9WxJWE04.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7018230518319999846.post-95534880422265905</id><published>2009-05-27T10:22:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2009-06-18T09:10:29.640-04:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-06-18T09:10:29.640-04:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="interest rate" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="business" /><title>Keep your Friends Far, Far, Away (Unless They Have Good Credit)</title><content type="html">An article in the June 1st edition of Business Week titled “What’s a Friend Worth?” provides insight into behind-the-scenes research going on within the largest social networking sites on the web. The goal of the research is to get as many people as possible to click on ads that show up on a webpage. The basic premise of this particular set of studies is that people with similar interests or bonds, (Friends on Facebook, Colleagues on LinkedIn, Followers on Tumbler/Twitter/Blogger) will click on...&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
Please visit the www.StrategicSourceror.com for the rest.  Brought to you by: Source One Management Services, LLC.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/strategicsourceror/Fkxf/~4/0ht5ZhY9AkE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.strategicsourceror.com/feeds/95534880422265905/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7018230518319999846&amp;postID=95534880422265905" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7018230518319999846/posts/default/95534880422265905?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7018230518319999846/posts/default/95534880422265905?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/strategicsourceror/Fkxf/~3/0ht5ZhY9AkE/keep-your-friends-far-far-away-unless.html" title="Keep your Friends Far, Far, Away (Unless They Have Good Credit)" /><author><name>Joe Payne</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07060197286776584338</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="11719810060228625693" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.strategicsourceror.com/2009/05/keep-your-friends-far-far-away-unless.html</feedburner:origLink></entry></feed>
