AMA Alliance President Nancy Kyler

The AMA Alliance is the largest organization representing the family of medicine in the United States. It is organized in 40 states and more than 400 countries throughout the world, placing it in a unique position to serve the interests of medical families as no other single organization can. The Alliance network of physicians and physicians’ spouses represents all stages of the medical lifestyle, from the training years to retirement. The Alliance’s 2009-2010 President Nancy Kyler, a medical malpractice defense consultant from Stanton, Virginia married to a radiation oncologist recently took time away from her hectic schedule to talk with Student Doctor Network (SDN) about the Alliance’s services and programs.

Who makes up the membership of the AMA Alliance – is it limited to physician spouses/partners and families, or are others encouraged to join?

The AMA Alliance is a membership organization made up of medical students, medical student spouses, residents, resident physician spouses, physicians and physician spouses.  We have the unique perspective of the physician family and can offer support and guidance along the way.  We partner with a number of organizations such as Student Doctor Network,  American Medical Association, American Medical Association Foundation, American Medical Association Political Action Committee, National Council on Violence Prevention, American Psychiatric Association Alliance, Internet Keep Safe Coalition, American Legacy Foundation,  American Heart Association, American Lung Association, and Partnership for a Drug-Free America.

The Student Doctor Network membership consists mainly of pre-health and health professional students.  Why should they or their partners consider joining the AMA Alliance?

The Alliance serves the interests and meets the needs of physicians and their partners at all stages within the medical family—students, residents, practicing physicians and retirees. The AMA Alliance particularly recognizes that medical school and residency are stressful for physicians in training, young physicians and their families.  The AMA Alliance has resources to provide support for partners of physicians in training, as well as assistance in finding an Alliance in your area.  We invite you to join us at our national meetings where we provide practical guidance and information on thriving in the unique relationship of the family of medicine.

The AMA Alliance also provides a “Physician-In-Training” Host Program which is an opportunity for fourth-year medical students to receive free housing as they interview for residency programs. The program was created to help cut down on interviewing costs, get to know the community surrounding potential residency programs and introduce them to the local medical society and Alliance.  Through the Physicians-In-Training Host Program, students can expect a one-or-two-night stay in an Alliance member’s home.  To request a host and download an application, go to www.amaalliance.org

Also available on the Alliance Web site is an active blog written by our young members for young members!

Do you have any activities and programs that are targeted specifically to pre-health and health professional students and their partners?

Log onto our website and take a look at all the activities and opportunities to get involved at www.amaalliance.org.  The Alliance has everything from community health projects to national programs such as “Screen Out” promoting removing smoking from children’s movies; and “Faux Paw” focusing on Internet safety for children.  The AMA Alliance also has a long history of raising money for medical student scholarships through the AMA Foundation.   This is a tangible benefit to students and their partners in helping to alleviate the financial stress of medical school tuition today.   We are also involved in advocacy on behalf of physician families on a local, state, and national level.

What trends do you see for the families of new physicians and physicians-in-training?

Physicians of today look different from physicians of 20 years ago in terms of gender.  Over 48% of students entering medical school today are female.  The younger generation’s career expectations are different from those entering the workforce 10 to 15 years ago, which is not unique to medicine.  Gone are the days of a single career family and also the notion that the mother would stay at home while the father works.  Our members are stay at home dads or moms, working dads and moms, dual career families, married and single physicians.  Research from the independent sector has shown that younger volunteers today are more likely to create their own volunteer activities instead of being mandated what activities they are to do.  That is the beauty of the AMA Alliance and our younger members involvement.  We do not mandate what activities our members should do.  Instead we give our Alliance groups and members the autonomy to be involved in whatever ways best fits their lifestyle.

What do you think the greatest challenges are for physician partners and families right now?

Time poverty appears to be one of the greatest challenges for not only physician families, but people in all walks of life.  Historically, physicians have put in long hours, leaving little time for their family, not to mention themselves.  Many physician families have dual careers, sometimes both doctors or professionals, also adding to the stress for the family.  Our newly completed strategic plan, which will guide the Alliance through 2012, focuses on the physician family and ways in which we can take care of the family of medicine through education on work/family/life balance, healthy lifestyles, time management, managing the medical family and managing the business of medicine. As a result of our work on the strategic plan, we have refocused our resources and offerings on our core constituency—individual members.  This has brought us back to our roots with an emphasis on work/life balance and wellness.

What role do students play in the leadership of the AMA Alliance, if any?

Two years ago the Young Member Connect Task Force was created in an effort address this issue.  The Task Force is made up of medical students, medical student spouses, resident physicians spouses as well as young members, many of which are students.  Their role is to address and promotes ways in which young members will have a greater voice in our organization.

What do you see as the role of the AMA Alliance in the current debate on health care? How is the AMA Alliance working to impact the debate?

The AMA Alliance feels our voices need to be heard so that we may impact the change going on around us.  We recognize the need for health care reform; we know there is heated debate on how this should be accomplished.  The AMA Alliance is serving as a portal to a voice on this issue.  We are gathering feedback and sharing the views of our members with the AMA through the members-only AMA Alliance Facebook page and Presidents blog.   We are providing this information to the AMA as it works to meet the challenge of health system reform.  The Alliance is posting up to date advocacy updates from the AMA on our Web site as well as links to the AMA’s health system reform bulletins.  We are offering a side by side comparison of health care reform proposals from the Kaiser Family Foundation as well other health system information from reputable media outlets.

How can SDN members learn more about the Alliance?

The Alliance is a one-stop-shopping source for help, answers and opportunities.  The best way to learn more is to visit our Web site at www.amaalliance.org.

For most residency applicants, the arrival of November marks the beginning of the interview season. This often brings back memories of the medical school admission interview, with the ubiquitous “Why do you want to be a doctor?” question.

Four years later, you find yourself in a similar situation – this time, hoping to land a position in the specialty and residency program of your choice. “Why do you want to be a doctor?” is now replaced with “Why do you want to go into [this specialty]?” and “Why are you interested in our residency program?” While the questions will differ to some extent, you may be experiencing the same gamut of emotions – uncertainty, nervousness, and perhaps even fear.

Given the highly evaluative nature of the interview process and its importance in the residency selection process, this anxiety is well-placed. Over the years, many surveys of program directors have inquired about the importance of the interview. Recently, the National Resident Match Program surveyed 1,840 program directors representing the nineteen largest specialties to determine the factors used for ranking applicants.¹ Ranked number one, even higher than clerkship grades and USMLE scores, was the residency interview. A number of previous studies substantiate this finding. In one study done at the Children’s Hospital of Pennsylvania, interview scores were found to be the most important tool for the ranking of applicants.² In a survey of family medicine and obstetrics/gynecology residency program directors, the residency interview was found to be most valuable in the ranking of applicants.³ Program directors of internal medicine residency programs have also rated the interview as most useful for ranking decisions, with 96% of respondents reporting the interview to be highly or moderately useful.⁴

While receiving an interview invitation is an honor, simply being interviewed does not guarantee a place on a program’s rank list. In a study of emergency medicine residency programs, with data obtained from 3,800 individual interviews, a total of 14% of interviews resulted in unranked applicants.⁵ In another study, one third of applicants were actually ranked less favorably following the interview.⁶ Dr. Reilly, former program director of the University of Texas medical school at Houston psychiatry residency program, states that a “good interview can save someone with the less than perfect application. A bad interview cannot always be salvaged by a paper record.”⁷ The conclusion here is that the interview is critical to your chances of a successful outcome.

Recognizing the importance of the interview, we have devoted four chapters and nearly fifty rules to the interview process in our book, The Successful Match: 200 Rules to Succeed in the Residency Match. In this column, we discuss three of the most important rules for interview success.

Dig deep

The primary goal of an interview is to impress upon the decision-makers that your unique qualifications are exactly what they seek.  Many decision-makers refer to this as “fit.” Will your strengths and aspirations help the program achieve its own goals? Are your proven qualities the type necessary to achieve success as a resident in their program? In order to convey this message, you need to know yourself, and you need to know the program, and you need to be able to convey this knowledge during the interview.

Conveying this message starts with demonstrating a strong and sincere interest in this particular residency program. One of the easiest ways to impress an interviewer is to arrive well prepared, having thoroughly researched the residency program. Start with the program’s website. What is the program’s philosophy? Is the program known to produce academicians? Is it recognized for its contributions to community service? Is research an area of key emphasis in the department? What is the program looking for in a resident?  With this knowledge in hand, you will be better prepared to demonstrate to the program that you are precisely the type of individual they seek. Equally important, the information that you gain will help you decide if this is a program where you would like to train.

While most applicants will review the program’s website, too often the research begins and ends there. We recommend that you dig deeper. Perform an internet search to learn more about the program, its faculty, the hospital, and the city. Well before your interview, contact graduates of your medical school who are residents or faculty at the program. Locate physicians in your area who trained at that program. These individuals can provide valuable information about the program, which you, in turn, can refer to during the interview. For example, “Dr. Ran, the chairman at my medical school, was recently a visiting professor in your department. In speaking with him, I learned about how your program really pioneered human simulation training as a teaching tool. I’ve been looking forward to learning more about that during this interview.” Candidates who make the effort to take these steps can convincingly demonstrate that they are truly interested in the program.

Many applicants do an excellent job in researching a program in advance. Unfortunately, many don’t know how to, or don’t feel comfortable, demonstrating this knowledge. They may end up making no reference to the specific information that they have read or learned about the program, or they may ask the type of basic questions that could have been asked by any other applicant.  The end result is a generic interview, and a lost opportunity to demonstrate your strong interest in the program.

First impressions can make or break you

Multiple studies have shown that creating a favorable first impression is critical to interview success.  In one study done by Thomas Dougherty, chair of business and economics at the University of Missouri, a favorable first impression led to an easier and more successful interview. Interviewers who are more favorably impressed by interviewees during the first few minutes went on to treat those applicants more positively. They spoke with a more positive vocal style, engaged in more active recruiting of the applicant, and asked less questions.⁸ Although this study was in another field, medical faculty interviewers are not unlike those in other fields. The impressions they form of you through your first interactions will play a pivotal role in your interview success, or lack thereof.

The obvious measures in managing first impressions remain critical. One should arrive early and be well-dressed and impeccably groomed. The ability to maintain appropriate eye contact and shake hands properly are little discussed in medicine, yet are no less important. One article in the Lancet found a strong correlation “between a firm handshake – as evidenced by strength, vigor, duration, completeness of grip, and eye contact – and a good first impression.”⁹ It is important to be able to walk into a room and project self-confidence through your body language, facial expressions, and tone. In addition, the ability to engage in small talk is more important than many applicants realize. Dr. Jamie Collings, program director of the emergency residency program at Northwestern University, states that “whether the topic is the weather, current events, or sports, you’re expected to participate.”¹⁰ She encourages applicants to get “up to date on current events, see a movie, read a non-medical book, and read the paper regularly.”

Dr. Ziegelstein, associate program director of the internal medicine residency at Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center, states that “individuals who interview and judge others for a living (e.g., program directors) often form very strong first impressions. Typically, those individuals are flexible and those impressions are changeable, but those first impressions are nevertheless important.”¹¹ In our experience helping applicants prepare for interviews, we know that applicants spend considerable time preparing for anticipated questions. Unfortunately, most applicants then give little or no thought to the factors involved in a favorable first impression. Preparing for the subjective factors involved in first impressions is just as important as preparing for the typical interview questions. If you’re uncomfortable with small talk, practice with others. Mock interviews with friends, colleagues, and mentors may highlight weaknesses, and are an important tool in interview preparation. Make sure you’ve received honest feedback on your interview performance.

Stand out from the rest of the crowd

You are competing with, perhaps, hundreds of other applicants. It is critical that you ask yourself “What is it that sets me apart from the other candidates?” Through our own experiences interviewing applicants, and through discussions we have had with other faculty interviewers, we know that few applicants make a concerted effort to stand out from the rest of the pack. We agree with Dr. Krogh, former faculty member of the department of family practice and community medicine at the University of Minnesota, who reminds applicants that “programs interview hundreds of applicants, many of whom are compatible with the program. Make yourself noticeable enough. How you do it is up to you but many unfortunately do not even try to do it.”¹²

We understand that you may not consider yourself unique. In fact, parts of your background and qualifications are likely to be similar to other applicants – good grades, solid USMLE score, and good medical school. Is there anything truly unique about this package? Not on the face of it. But there can be. Many applicants have remarkable accomplishments, but fail to recognize or discuss them. Others have unique strengths or particularly strong qualities that they fail to emphasize in their application materials and interview.

Did you have a fantastic overseas international health experience during medical school? Were you involved in cutting edge research? Do you have a special or unusual talent? Have you gone out of your way on clinical rotations to emphasize patient education and the provision of patient educational materials? Do you have an aptitude for teaching, and have you demonstrated that through your activities in medical school? Were you the founder of your medical school’s pathology club or the president of AMSA? If so, the interview represents a wonderful opportunity to highlight these accomplishments.

We’ve spoken to applicants who brainstorm, and don’t feel as though they can discuss anything remarkable or unique about themselves. While that’s hardly ever the case, you can still utilize additional ways to stand out. Impress your interviewers with your level of preparation. Showcase your strong communication skills. Answer each question by taking it one step further than most applicants. For example, applicants often answer the question “What are your strengths?” with a short list of qualities. “My strengths include my attention to detail, interpersonal skills, and ability to persevere.” Most applicants stop there. The few that continue with an example that highlights their strengths succeed in leaving a memorable impression. “My ability to persevere has been central to my success. The pathology interest club that I wanted to set up at my medical school was initially applauded, but my cofounder and I hit many obstacles. Even though I started during first year, the club didn’t come into existence until my third year, and it was my perseverance that kept me going and dealing with all the roadblocks.”

Asking insightful questions is yet another way to distinguish yourself. These can highlight your individual qualities, as well as your interest in the individual program. Dr. Ksiazek, program director of the Pritzker School of Medicine ophthalmology program at the University of Chicago, states that “You do not want to blend into a sea of other applicants by asking the same old questions.”¹³ As interviewers, we’ve all heard the typical “What do you consider to be the weaknesses of the program?” Contrast that with: “In medical school, I have had several international health experiences which I have found very fulfilling. That’s why I was particularly excited to learn about the global health track your residency offers in Kenya. What kind of impact has the global health track had on residents in your program?”

And finally…

As you approach your interviews, focus on how far you’ve come.  By offering you an interview, the program has essentially informed you that you are a competitive candidate. Given that programs routinely receive hundreds or even thousands of applications, an interview invitation is a real honor. Programs only extend these invitations to candidates who are being seriously considered for a residency position. Having come so far, it is essential now that you devote the effort, time, and preparation necessary to sell yourself effectively and convincingly to programs.

References

¹Results of the 2008 NRMP Program Director Survey. Available at http://www.nrmp.org/data/programresultsbyspecialty.pdf.  Accessed on October 26, 2009.

²SwansonWS, Harris MC, Master C, Gallagher PR, Maruo AE, Ludwig S. The impact of the interview in pediatric residency selection. Amb Pediatr 2005; 5 (4): 216-220.

³Taylor CA, Weinstein L, Mayhew HE. The process of resident selection: a view from the residency director’s desk. Obstet Gynecol 1995; 85 (2): 299-303.

⁴Adams LJ, Brandenburg S, Blake M. Factors influencing internal medicine program directors decisions about applicants. Acad Med 2000; 75: 542-543.

⁵Martin-Lee L, Park H, Overton DT. Does interview date affect match list position in the emergency medicine national residency matching program match? Acad Emerg Med 2000; 7 (9): 1022-1026.

⁶Gong H, Parker NH, Agar FA, Shank C. Influence of the interview on ranking in the residency selection process. Med Educ 1984; 18 (5): 366-369.

⁷Reilly E. Career counseling: psychiatry. Available at www.uth.tmc.edu/med/administration/student/ms4/2003CCC.htm.  Accessed October 22, 2008.

⁸Dougherty TW, Turban DB, Callender JC. Confirming first impressions in the employment interview: A field study of interviewer behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology 1994; 79: 659-665.

⁹Larkin M. Getting a grip on handshakes. Lancet 2000; 356: 227.

¹⁰Available at www.saem.org/…/0/…/MSS_CollingsTheInterview2009SAEM.doc.  Accessed on October 22, 2009.

¹¹Ziegelstein RC. “Rocking the match”: applying and getting into residency. J Natl Med Assoc. 2007; 99: 994-999.

¹²Krogh C, Vorheis C, Abbott G. The residency interview: advice from the interviewer. The New Physician 1984; 8.

¹³Ksiazek S, Taylor TL. Pritzker residency process guide: ophthalmology. Available at http://pritzker.uchicago.edu/current/students/ResidencyProcessGuide.pdf.  Accessed on October 22, 2009.

“Is there a doctor in the house?” is a Hollywood cliche.  But when it comes to the houses of the United States Congress, the answer is always “Yes.”  Physicians have served in every Congress from the first in 1789 through the current 111th Congress.(1)

Currently, there are 16 physicians who serve as members of Congress (1), 14 in the House of Representatives and two in the Senate (2). With health care reform a pressing issue currently facing the United States, several additional physicians are seeking election to Congress this year in races across the country (3).

Dr. Ami Bera

The Student Doctor Network recently spoke with physician candidate Ami Bera about what health care professionals bring as candidates, and what life is like on the campaign trail for a physician.

Dr. Ami Bera is a Clinical Professor of Medicine and former Associate Dean of Admissions at the UC Davis School of Medicine. He also served as former Chief Medical Officer for Sacramento County, CA where he directed SacAdvantage, a program providing access to care for 200,000 uninsured.

Tell me about the office that you seeking.

I am running for the Democratic nomination for the 3rd U.S. Congressional District in California. The seat is currently held by Republican Congressman Dan Lungren, who has served eight terms and is a former California attorney general. There are three candidates running in the Democratic primary so far: myself, Elk Grove City Councilman Gary Davis and Sacramento Municipal Utility District Director Bill Slaton.

What motivated you to enter the race?

Honestly, it was never a stated goal for me to run for elected office. But after I stepped down from my position as Associate Dean of Admissions at UC Davis, I found myself looking for a way to serve. In the past I have done service behind the podium and have been disappointed by the follow-up on important issues by our elected officials. I realized that I have a desire to change the political conversations we have been having: to move away from doing what is best for one’s polling and promotion to advancing some of the great work on issues that is done by those behind the scenes and at non-profits.

What steps did you take before entering the race?

The idea of entering this race first occurred to me last October. I decided that I would explore the idea instead of focusing on “why shouldn’t I do this.” I started by speaking with some friends who are in the state legislature. They told me I had a great resume on healthcare, and that my experience growing up in an immigrant family would make me a compelling candidate. But they encouraged me to run for city council first and to work my way up the political escalator.

I had no desire to be a career politician and when looking at the race from an intellectual perspective it seemed like the time was right for me to enter. This district is now 40% Republican and 38% Democratic. The demographics have shifted with an increase in minority voters and migration from the Bay Area. With approval ratings for elected officials at record lows and the focus on healthcare, this is the perfect election to run as a non-career politician and a physician. It is a potentially winnable race, an opportunity for me to change our political conversations, and to fix healthcare.

What is your day-to-day life like as a candidate?

After filing in April, the first phase in a campaign was to establish legitimacy. A sad reality of the U.S. political system is that legitimacy is measured by fundraising ability. Generally a day starts around 5:30 am with email and internet communication. I meet with people for coffee and lunch. It is essential to build relationships with potential donors. Also, we have focused on getting people engaged with the campaign and on collecting small donations of $5-$20.

This next quarter ends September 30 and we are still focused on fundraising. I am going to Washington, D.C. to meet with Democratic leaders and to build a buzz about the race.

We have been able to focus more on voter outreach through townhalls and house parties. In the evening I usually attend multiple events. I am working as hard as I did during residency and I do miss having some quiet evenings at home to relax. But I love what I am doing.

What do you love about being a candidate?

When I first started in the race I had to see if I enjoyed being a candidate. I very quickly found that I love it. Being a candidate and talking with voters is a lot like what we are trained to do as physicians. I listen to other people sharing their suffering, ask questions, listen, and reflect back to them. As a physician I am trained to engage with people in tough subjects and this has been an asset as a candidate, especially when discussing controversial topics that can inspire passionate responses in voters.

What have been the most rewarding and challenging aspects of the campaign so far?

It has been very rewarding to put my ideas out there and to see them resonate with people. I try to present my ideas in an authentic way and I want to understand where people in the community are coming from. I have found that by doing this communities have really let me into their lives. This has been a very humbling experience.

The greatest challenge with campaigning is that it involves a lot of talking about myself. I know I have a healthy ego, but I always want it to be less about myself and more about the voters. So I try to find a balance by focusing on my values, telling my story, and presenting the stories of other people I meet. It has been hard because I am not a “sound bite” guy. How do you focus on a topic as complex as healthcare reform in a sound bite? But I have focused on stories and hope that they will stick better than sound bites.

How has being a candidate affected your work as a physician and educator at UC Davis?

I took a leave of absence from UC Davis at the end of June to focus on the race. The medical school has been supportive but as an apolitical organization, they cannot overtly support me.

The students are mostly aware that I am running. I would love to get the students more engaged in the race because I think it is a unique opportunity. But I am very conscious not to push myself on them. I will be teaching periodically, but am largely removing myself from the medical school’s daily activities.

How have your wife and daughter responded to your candidacy?

When I first verbalized my idea to run this past December and January, Janine, my wife, was in disbelief. But after she realized I was serious, she raised questions about how it would impact our family. Would we have to move to Washington, D.C.? To split time between two locations? She did not embrace it at first, but as she has seen it unfold she is in it with me to win. Janine is my best asset and I expect that as we get busier she will represent the campaign at events.

My daughter just started 7th grade, so she does not fully grasp the implications of my candidacy yet. As we get further along we will have lots to talk about and some big decisions to make if I win. In the end I am most concerned about being authentic and running as hard as I can. If I do that and I lose, it is okay. But I am not willing to compromise my self, my values, or my family to win.

Have you always had an interest in politics?

Most of the people in my life who have known me well are not surprised that I am running. I have always been engaged in politics, mostly focused on the politics of change and how to move forward on issues that I care about. My mom would say that I was a pain as a child, always questioning and exploring new ways of doing things. I was very fortunate to grow up in a family that allowed exploration and offered safety and support whenever I fell down.

How have the positions that you have held in the past helped to prepare you for elected office?

My experiences as a physician have given me perspective on all aspects of healthcare delivery. My life has unfolded unexpectedly and I have taken opportunities as they have presented themselves. As chief resident I realized I was interested in working on systems issues. After residency I spent four years in practice at the county medical clinic and as the medical director of care management for the five hospital Mercy system. This experience allowed me to focus on systems issues and way to increase efficiency in care delivery.

I then served as the Chief Medical Officer for Sacramento County and worked on ways to increase coverage for the uninsured. I was then offered the opportunity to look at how we train the next generation of physicians by serving as the Associate Dean of Admissions at the UC Davis School of Medicine. While I never planned to set up these experiences, they have built upon each other and given me a very unique perspective on healthcare.

Tell me more about the program you started to increase coverage for the uninsured.

Using two million dollars from the county and one million from the federal government, we created a program called SacAdvantage that targeted low wage workers and small businesses with two to fifty employees that had not previously offered health insurance. It was built on the employer-based model of care and provided a subsidy from the county to make it affordable for small businesses to cover their employees.

The main problem I see with it now is that it still ties coverage to employers and people could lose coverage if they moved to another state or changed jobs. I now favor offering all Americans a compassionate baseline of health care that is not tied to employers. Additional coverage could then be provided by employers or purchased by individuals.

What do you see health professionals being able to bring to elected office?

All of the training that we have will help us in politics. What makes a good doctor—having compassion, good listening ability, the ability to make hard decisions quickly, and leadership skills—are all essential in politics. As physicians we have a particular ability to articulate the story of healthcare in this country. If voters ask me about “death panels” at a townhall I can tell them about what happens in the ICU regarding end-of-life issues. I find it embarrassing how silent physicians are given that we are held in high esteem by many. As a group physicians need to step up to the plate on healthcare.

If health professional students have interests in politics what do you advise they do to pursue a career in this realm?

I think it is most important for students to discover their passions and what is most important to them. Too often students look decades into the future and try to plan out every step of their career. But it is better to focus on the present than to try to be calculating. Look at what you are passionate about today and work on issues within your sphere of influence, for example resident work hours. It takes courage to address these issues and the skills you build will help if you choose to run for office later. You will learn by doing.

It is also important to know your strengths and weaknesses. Embrace your flaws and your ignorance. That way you will know when to delegate tasks and to let others with greater knowledge take over for you.

How can health professionals with limited time get involved in politics?

I would advise that they find a local organization that does work on an issue that they really care about. Focus on finding one project that can be done to really make an impact. The skills that one builds working at the local level are the same ones that are used in elected office. In politics there is just a bigger stage.

References

1. “Doctors on Hill seek voice in reform debate”, June 15, 2009, AMEDNEWS.com, http://www.ama-assn.org/amednews/200…5/gvl20615.htm

2. http://www.ama-assn.org/amednews/200…3/gvsa0223.htm

3. http://www.beraforcongress.com/, http://www.trivediforcongress.com/, http://www.jayfleitman.com/,  http://wargotzforussenate.org/

Dr. William James

By Samir P. Desai, M.D., and Rajani Katta, M.D.
Authors of The Successful Match: 200 Rules to Succeed in the Residency Match and
250 Biggest Mistakes 3rd Year Medical Students Make And How To Avoid Them

As the Paul Gross Professor and Vice Chair of the Department of Dermatology at the University of Pennsylvania, Dr. William James directs the dermatology residency program at the University of Pennsylvania, which recently was found to be the highest ranked academic dermatology department in the United States.¹

He is widely regarded as an outstanding clinician, teacher, and researcher, having received numerous honors and awards. He has published over 200 peer-reviewed publications, served as the editor-in-chief emeritus of the emedicine dermatology section, and been on a variety of national committees.  We recently had the opportunity to speak with him about the dermatology residency selection process.

In a recent survey of dermatology residency program directors, 87% of programs cited a letter of recommendation from the department chair as an important factor in selecting applicants to interview.²  How can students interact and work with the chair in such a way that the chair is able to write a productive and meaningful letter?

First of all, the Chair is certainly a great person to be able to work with and get a letter from. In many circumstances, though, that’s not going to be the person who is most involved with students, especially depending on the size of the program. Your letter doesn’t necessarily need to be from the Chair. It could be from one of the academic dermatologists in the program, either the Program Director or one of the faculty members.

It should be from someone with whom you’ve worked and who knows you in some meaningful way. That would usually mean at least working in a clinic with the letter-writer. Specifically, not just observing in clinic but actually interacting with patients and discussing diseases. It may involve rounding with the inpatient team and presenting patients in follow-up. It could be writing or participating in a project, such as a clinical project or a case report. There should be some meaningful interaction. There needs to be information about how the applicant works, what kind of ideas they have, and how they interact with patients and the team. That really is the key: being able to get to know your letter-writer long enough so that they can take examples and then detail how an applicant would be a good person to have in the residency program. For the people reading the letters, they’re going to be looking for some meaningful pieces of information that is based on personal observation.

Audition electives have been found to be very important in the dermatology residency selection process.³ What sets apart students who shine during these rotations from those that are average?

First of all, enthusiasm. There are students, believe it or not, who show up and look a little bored. I think enthusiasm for the work and the subject is very important. The way students interact with others is certainly a key. You can have all the brains in the world, but if you can’t get along with people, that doesn’t say much for your ability to work on a team or work with patients. Sometimes students can be a little too aggressive in their interactions, probably because they’re trying to either come across as enthusiastic or they’re trying to show off their smarts. There is a fine line regarding what is appropriate for the level of training. At the same time, I think faculty members do take into account that students are trying to make a good impression, so I think there is some leeway there.

Hopefully, there will be opportunities to demonstrate their knowledge base or get involved with a project. If you find that the dermatologists are getting excited about a case and saying “I haven’t seen this before” or “I don’t really know what is a good treatment for this condition; let’s go look it up”, this would a great opportunity for the student to follow up by reporting ”This is a case that I learned something from; I looked it up, I thought about it, and I’d like to pursue it a little further.”  

Dr. Miller, who is Vice Chair of Clinical and Educational Affairs in the department of dermatology at Penn State College of Medicine, has encouraged applicants to make their personal statement unique.⁴ Too often, he has read statements where an applicant writes about “being a visual person” or is drawn to the specialty because of the “ability to do procedures.” Having read thousands of statements, what advice can you offer for the dermatology applicant seeking to create a unique statement?

I think the main point is that this can’t be a recitation of what’s already in other parts of the application. I’ll get to the positive side, but one of the main things that bothers me with personal statements is reading about that first I did this, and then I did that, and I wrote this paper, and I did this research, and I published it in this journal, and I did this volunteer work. It’s all in the CV already and the whole statement becomes “I, I, I.”

But while the personal statement is just that – personal – if it’s all going to be about delineating accomplishments that are covered in other places, then that simply isn’t helpful. What is helpful is to draw a picture of yourself that can’t be obtained from anywhere else in the application. It should be personal – this is who you are, this is what makes you excited, these are your special interests. Sometimes it may be outside of medicine, sometimes it may be a volunteer experience that is expanded upon, or it could be a personal connection that stimulated the applicant to want to do something more, such as a specific part of Dermatology down the line. You might express your future goal, as that is something that wouldn’t be revealed in other parts of the application.  

It certainly has to be sincere. If everyone just says at the end of their statement “I want to be an academic dermatologist” and there’s nothing else in the application that tells a reason for this, it’s not believable. It would help if you can describe your personal background and bring in information about your life that isn’t available in other places, and then transfer that into a future plan.

Overall, your statement has got to be personal, sincere, and bring out information not available in other places.

Students recognize the importance of research in the dermatology residency selection process and hope to participate and, perhaps, become published in the field.  Although there are over 100 dermatology residency programs in the United States, some programs are more prolific than others in terms of scholarly activity. For example, between 2001 and 2004, your program produced 318 publications, placing it among the top dermatology programs in the country.¹ What recommendations do you have for students who wish to do research but are either at schools lacking a dermatology residency program or for those whose dermatology department focus is largely clinical?

I would expand the idea of research. If a student doesn’t have any background in laboratory-based basic science research, then they could work in a lab to see what it’s like. However, most of the time people that don’t have that type of background, and don’t have advanced degrees, are not going to end up in that situation.

Most of the time, students are going to be looking for more of a clinical-based project. Protocol-based projects and clinical research do require a fair amount of time in order to get things off the ground and move through the process. For the person that you’re describing, they could get involved with a review article, a case report, or a small case series. Other possibilities could be a review of charts or a review of pathologic specimens. With that type of background, these are the types of projects that such a student would be both capable of and interested in, and would make the most sense for their background.

There is a growing shortage of academic dermatologists with fewer residents pursuing a career in academics.⁵ Years ago, your program developed the unique Dermatology Fellowship for Academic Clinician-Teachers, with the goal being “to develop future leaders in dermatology who will attain positions such as residency program directors, professors in clinician-educator tracts, and departmental chairman.”⁶ As a lifelong academician, what are some misconceptions that students have about academic dermatology?

Students are, of course, being taught in an academic setting, and depending upon the people they’re exposed to, some may tend to see the bright side of things, while others will focus on a less attractive side. There are pluses for academic Dermatology and pluses for private practice, but there are also negatives for both. If someone is more negative they may assume that “since this is what academic medicine is about, private practice must be better.” However, they don’t have the knowledge base about what actually goes on in private practice, and they don’t know the negative aspects.  In other words, they think it’s greener on the other side of the fence, but they don’t really look on that other side to see what’s there.

I think that some of the misconceptions are that academicians don’t make such a good living – but I don’t really know any academic dermatologists that are living out of their car.  I think we make a better living than 99% of the citizenship in the United States, so I think that that’s underappreciated. 

I sometimes hear things like “there’s too much politics in academics” and I can’t say I don’t understand, but personally I think it’s an overstatement. In my opinion, it’s all about interactions with others, and if you have good interaction skills, then you’ll do fine.

Certainly there are concerns about independence and the size of organizations, or what some people might call bureaucracy. I think that you have to be able to operate in a larger setting. If you are someone who is an entrepreneur and wants to be in charge all the time, then you probably aren’t built to go into academics.  But if you are more able to accept some bureaucracy, then certainly in exchange for that you get a lot of infrastructure. You have a lot of the business side of medicine that you don’t have to deal with, and in return you can concentrate on patients.  In private practice, you’re responsible for hiring and firing, balancing the books, and complying with the regulatory requirements. Private practitioners are small business operators and good business sense is necessary.

You have to be self-aware of what kind of arena your personality would best operate in, and in the end that’s something you are going to have to figure out for yourself.

Dermatology residency programs routinely receive hundreds of applications for just a few positions. As the years have passed, the academic credentials of applicants have become more impressive. In the 2007 Match, 47% of U.S. seniors who matched were members of AOA and the mean USMLE Step 1 score was 238.⁷ While strong credentials are certainly important to secure interviews, it is the interview that ultimately makes the difference. What advice can you offer students as they prepare for interviews? 

One of the things I find is that people tend to want to downplay what they have done. If it’s done out of modesty, that’s fine, but I think there are people that have a pretty darn good record, and unfortunately they say things like “Well, my boards could have been better, but you know I had this happen in my personal life.” Basically, they’re apologizing. They may have gotten 80% honors grades and yet they’re apologizing for this one rotation that they didn’t honor, and trying to come up with a reason or excuse. That’s just not a good way to approach an interview.

The way to approach an interview is to be self-confident and to accentuate the positives. They’re clearly there, because if you’re interviewing for a program, you must have a lot of positives. We don’t just interview anybody. You’ve got a good record, so you want to go in and be self-confident about that. You want to look good, and you want to come in sharp and enthusiastic. 

You should also treat everybody well. Some applicants will bow down before the Chair and then are rude to the residency program coordinator. That’s just not a good practice. I also think there’s something to be said for a practice interview if you’re nervous.

Ultimately, you want to be honest and open during your interview.

In 2007, out of 407 U.S. seniors applying to dermatology, 158 failed to match (39% of U.S. senior applicants).⁷ Applicants who fail to match often wish to reapply the following year. What can these applicants do to strengthen their application?

There are certainly a number of dermatology fellowships out there. It’s been documented that applicants who complete these fellowships have a higher match rate the second time around. I think that’s probably because you get to know the director well, and since they know how you work and how you produce results, they can write you a better letter of recommendation. I’ve also seen some individuals plan to do degree-producing programs, such as a Masters of Public Health, or a program with a focus in biostatistics or epidemiology.

There are certain objective measures that can’t be changed. You can’t change the Dean’s letter, you can’t change your board scores, and you can’t be AOA the second time around. However, you can publish and get new letters of recommendation. These are ways to strengthen your application.

Some applicants who fail to match pursue a pre-residency dermatology fellowship. In a recent survey of fellowship directors, it was learned that 92% of past fellows (176/190) were able to match successfully following completion of the fellowship.⁸  How can applicants make the most of these fellowships?

Most of these fellowships are directed by individuals that are fairly well-known in their specialty. A letter of recommendation from a faculty member that spent months, or sometimes a year, with an applicant is a very valuable resource. That’s going to be more information than the prior application, and the letter writer is able to be very rich in their detail about what supports the positive things that they say about the applicant. We look very closely at that.

Many fellowships are directed by some very productive members of our specialty. If the director is known for publishing, putting abstracts in meetings, and making headway in addressing different questions, then it’s expected that the applicant will have participated in those results.

There may be interview questions such as “why do you think you didn’t match?” There are certainly applicants who don’t match who have fantastic records, and for some reason they just didn’t make it. There may be cases where you cannot say that’s the reason I didn’t get in. But if there were an item or items that weren’t so good, then you have to plan to address those. You can’t change those items, but another way to address prior performance is to demonstrate in a more current job that you can do the work, and you can do it well.

References

¹Wu JJ, Ramirez CC, Alonso CA, Berman B, Tyring SK. Ranking the dermatology programs based on measurements of academic achievement. Dermatol Online J 2007; 13(3): 3.

²Results of the 2008 NRMP Program Director Survey. Available at http://www.nrmp.org/data/programresultsbyspecialty.pdf.   Accessed June 12, 2009.

³Clarke JT, Miller JJ, Sceppa J, Goldsmith LA, Long E. Success in the dermatology resident match in 2003: perceptions and importance of home institutions and away rotations. Arch Dermatol 2006; 142(7): 930-2.

⁴Miller J, Miller OF 3^rd, Freedberg I. Dear dermatology applicant. Arch Dermatol 2004; 140(7): 884.

⁵Resneck, J Jr, Kimball AB. The dermatology workforce shortage. J Am Acad Dermatol 2004; 50: 50-4.

⁶Available at the University of Pennsylvania Department of Dermatology website (http://www.uphs.upenn.edu/dermatol/education/clinician-educator.html).  Accessed on June 12, 2009.

⁷Charting outcomes in the match: characteristics of applicants who matched to their preferred specialty in the 2007 National Resident Matching Program main residency match (2^nd edition). Available at http://www.nrmp.org/data/chartingoutcomes2007.pdf.  Accessed June 12, 2009.

⁸Wasong SH, Miller JJ, Zaenglein AL. Does a predermatology fellowship increase the chance to match in dermatology? J Am Acad Dermatol 2008; 59(3): 535-6.

Treating a pediatric patient at a mission clinic in Albania (courtesy Joel Mundall)

“In Africa, we wash and re-use the gloves,” said one of our resident physicians who was doing clinic procedures with me.

When he graduates from our Family Medicine Residency Program at Loma Linda University, he is planning to work in the mission field in Africa where he spent time as a medical student. We had been discussing principles of “universal precautions” and discussing the use of medical gloves.

I looked at him as he was wistfully staring at the boxes of gloves that line the exam rooms in our Family Medicine clinic at Loma Linda University in California. Gloves that are ubiquitous here in the United States are so precious in the mission field. I remembered seeing mission photos, from our doctors who went to Africa and Papua New Guinea, showing gloves drying on clotheslines ready to be re-used. All day, I thought about medical gloves and the hands that wear them, the hands that are extensions of the doctors we are training to care for patients in the United States and around the world.

At Loma Linda University School of Medicine, students are encouraged to take elective rotations at mission hospitals and clinics around the world. The program, called Students for International Mission Service (SIMS) exemplifies the university’s commitment to global service. It empowers students to become compassionate, socially responsible health professionals and helps to promote the health of global communities. SIMS offers students opportunities to do mission work of various lengths. There are weekend interdisciplinary trips to mission clinics in Mexico and longer trips to various other countries. Students can also participate in an International Service Learning program (I-Serve) in which they do a month long observational or hands on clinical experience at a mission hospital. There is funding available through the Dean’s office to help defray travel costs. The students are usually housed at the mission site.

Mother with newborn at clinic in Nigeria (courtesy Joel Mundall)

Resident physicians at Loma Linda University (LLU) are also encouraged to do a mission elective either domestically or overseas. Some of our residents have recently returned from mission work in Malawi, Mexico and Nepal.

When resident physicians (at our institution or other institutions) plan an elective rotation, they must consider if their salary, malpractice insurance and benefits such as health insurance will carry over during their elective. At LLU, residents can choose from the “big book” of approved mission clinics around the world which will allow their salary and benefits to be uninterrupted.

Resident physicians and other health professionals often face the dilemma that they want to enter mission service but they are concerned about how to pay their student loans. For non–medical students who wish to serve in the mission field, they can apply for the Global Service Scholarship Program (administered by the Loma Linda University Global Health Institute in conjunction with SIMS) and they can get their student loan indebtedness amortized while they volunteer in an international setting.

At Loma Linda University Family Medicine Residency Program, several of our residents have chosen to participate in the Deferred Mission Appointment (DMA) Program. This program enables medical or dental students to work in overseas mission service with financial stability. During medical school they receive a stipend to cover room and board. After graduation they are placed in one of the Seventh–day Adventist Church’s many health care organizations world wide. In the DMA program, they receive a salary and competitive benefits such as health insurance, licensure fees, one month furlough (vacation time) plus continuing medical education time each year, and a percentage of their student loan indebtedness is amortized each year they serve in the mission field.

“The DMA program was an obvious choice because it makes it possible to work internationally without any delays after residency for repaying my loans,” said Dr. Joel Mundall. “Without this program, if I were to try to work for a little while to repay my loans before going, I would be at risk for never leaving this country or going where God wants me to be.”

The mission hospital in Nepal (courtesy Aaron Sartin)

Most of our residents will serve a six year term in the mission field and they may choose to stay on afterwards. At their mission site, they staff medical clinics or possibly a hospital and train indigenous people to provide health care services. This program is administered by the World headquarters of the Seventh-day Adventist Church in Silver Spring, Maryland.

As Dr. Aaron Sartin, a third-year resident in the DMA program explained: “A large barrier to doing mission service after residency is the enormous medical school debt, which grows exponentially after years of in-school and residency deferments. That barrier is removed with this program as the medical school debt is amortized over a six year mission term overseas. At the time I signed up for the program it seemed like seven years was so far away and would seemingly never arrive. Now in my third year and last year of residency in Family Medicine this reality is less than a year away.”

Although our residents in the DMA program may be placed around the world, most of them will be heading to Asia or Africa. They can request their first choice but they will not know until they complete their residency where they will be going.

“Recently, my wife and I returned from a three week mission elective to Nepal where we witnessed first hand the poverty and great need (physical, emotional and spiritual) as well as the beauty of the people,” continued Dr. Sartin. “We were awakened as never before to how blessed we are in the United States and reminded of our responsibility to use these gifts to be a blessing to others, both here and abroad. Where will we end up? That remains to be seen but as a Christian physician I am confident that God will direct us to the right mission field.”

As I put on my gloves for the next procedure, I couldn’t help but wonder where the skills I was teaching my residents would be used to provide health care around the world.

For more information, access http://www.llu.edu.

Jessica Freedman, MD

By Jessica Freedman, MD
President of MedEdits

Your son or daughter wants to get into medical school. Of course, you want to help, but how? Many parents, including those who are physicians themselves, are overwhelmed by the medical school application process. They want to guide their young adult children but also want to allow their “kids” to work independently and don’t want to do too much hand holding.

So, what do you, as parents, need to know about the medical school admissions process to help your premedical student to succeed? This article reviews some basic material to help parents and their children make wise choices that will help them to gain acceptance to medical school.

Know the facts, but try not to add more pressure to the cooker

It is important for parents to know what is required of their children to gain admission to medical school. This means knowing the premedical prerequisites and the activities in which students should be involved. But it also means understanding how to help without adding more stress.

Achieving this balance often depends on the relationship between parent and child. It is essential, however, that parents understand that their children are young adults who will someday soon be required to make independent (and very important) decisions. Since a career in medicine requires maturity and independent thought and decision making, parents should encourage these qualities while remaining involved in their children’s lives.

Consider carefully what college to attend

Many premedical parents ask me where their child should attend college. The most common question is: “Should my child attend a prestigious college where ‘As’ are more difficult to earn or go to a college or university that is considered less prestigious but where high grades may be easier to earn?” The answer to this question is not easy.

What is most important with regard to medical school admissions is academics. A high GPA (3.9) and a strong MCAT score (above 30 with a good distribution) are the most important factors for an application to be considered for review by an admissions committee. I have seen people who went to outstanding colleges but earned 3.3s or so who had difficulty gaining admission to medical school. Thus, students with similar MCAT scores but with higher GPAs from less prestigious undergraduate colleges may receive more interviews (and thus more acceptances) than the student who went to a top ranked college but had a lower GPA.

Help your child choose best major and courses for them

The emphasis in medical school admissions now is diversity. So, beyond the basic premedical prerequisites, students should major in what interests them most. Majoring in something other than biology or chemistry would be looked upon favorably by admissions committee members. It is always wise, however, to take upper level science classes regardless of the student’s major to demonstrate academic excellence in the sciences. I also suggest that all premedical students take biochemistry and, if possible, statistics; Medical schools like to see these courses on transcripts.

Think about the activities in which your premedical student should participate

Just as with their courses, students should become involved in activities that motivate and interest them. While everyone knows that medical schools “like to see” research, community service, and teaching, first and foremost, all applicants must have clinical and shadowing experiences. Also important is that students do not become involved in extracurricular activities at the expense of their academic success and that they do not accumulate a list of activities just for the sake of doing so. In-depth involvement is preferred over a long list of superficial activities and will likely lead to stronger letters of reference.

Put together a good “team” to help your son/daughter gain admission to medical school

This team should consist of professors, mentors, extracurricular leaders and premedical advisors. Remember that you cannot be everything to your child and that having other people to provide support and guidance throughout this process is helpful. I find that many “kids” like to have other objective authority figures to help advise them.

Think seriously about some time away from formal academics

Many applicants now take a year away from formal academics before going to medical school and apply during the spring of the senior year rather than the spring of junior year.  Some parents are uncomfortable with this idea, but it can be difficult for students to get “all of their ducks in a row” in time to submit a successful application at the end of their junior year of college. Applying in the senior year also allows applicants to have an extra year of grades on their transcript, which can be important for many applicants whose grade point average (GPA) tends to trend upward from the freshman to senior year. I find that some applicants who are not successful the first time they apply often fail because they and their parents did not understand how much work and organization is required for a successful medical school application.

Understand that the medical school application process is long!

As parents, it is important to understand that the process of applying to medical school requires a tremendous amount of endurance and perseverance. Many parents of my clients who are physicians lament: “It wasn’t this complicated when I applied!” Indeed, as medical school admissions have become more competitive, the process has become more laborious and expensive.

The application season officially begins when the student starts thinking about composing and submitting his or her primary application in June. But, students must also take all required courses and the MCAT and request letters of reference and transcripts in addition to composing an excellent application. Then, after the primary application is submitted, students must fill out secondary application essays for many schools and go on interviews. Some applicants may not know what school they will attend until they “get off a waitlist” in August. Thus, the application season may last for more than a full year.

Medical school applicants tend to be a highly motivated group who hold themselves to high standards. Sometimes, in an effort to make sure their kids stay on track, parents ask questions constantly, do GPA calculations, plan curriculums and seek out summer activities that will bolster their child’s application. There is a fine line between helping and hovering, and I find that this added pressure can sometimes backfire.  The premedical race requires agility and careful judgment, and parents play an important role in helping premedical students to reach the finish line.

Jessica Freedman, MD, a former medical admissions officer, is president of MedEdits (www.MedEdits.com), a medical school, residency and fellowship admissions consulting firm. She is also the author of the MedEdits blog, a useful resource for applicants: (www.MedEdits.blogspot.com).

Dr. Al Berg

by William Burnett

Alfred O. Berg, MD, MPH, is a professor at the Department of Family Medicine at the University of Washington in Seattle.  He is board certified in Family Medicine and General Preventive Medicine and Public Health.

Dr. Berg’s research has focused on clinical epidemiology in primary care settings.  He has served as chairman of the United States Preventive Services Task Force, co-chair of the otitis media panel convened by the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, chair of the CDC STD Treatment Guidelines panel, member of the AMA/CDC panel producing Guidelines for Adolescent Preventive Services, member of the Institute of Medicine’s Immunization Safety Review Committee, and chair of the Institute of Medicine’s Committee on the Treatment of Post-traumatic Stress Disorder.

He currently chairs the CDC’s panel on Evaluation of Genomic Applications in Practice and Prevention.

He recently spoke with the Student Doctor Network about evidence-based medicine and health care reform.

You have been associated with the concept of “evidence-based medicine [EBM]”. Would you explain the term, and its relevance to the current debate on health care and health insurance reform?

The average person imagines that medicine has always been “evidence-based”, but there is quite a difference between the older ways of thinking about evidence and the systematic approach to evidence that is now considered the state of the art.

In the past, if you were a medical student, resident, or practicing physician trying to find answers to a specific problem, and your attending or your consulting physician said “this is your answer” you assumed it to be true.

What has changed is that we now ask who or what is the authority for the evidence. We are now more systematic about deciding when something is authoritative.

The most important characteristic about the new approach is that the evidence is scrutinized in standard ways, leading to more accountable and transparent clinical recommendations.

Unfortunately much of current medical practice still uses the “it’s true if I say so” approach, so a lot of medical practice is not evidence-based by current standards.

EBM is one of the “under the radar” features of the current health care reform debate. Would you see it as a major change, if it ends up in any form of the final legislation?

EBM could have a huge impact on reform. It could lead to more transparent and accountable practice, and would change the ways things are done now.

One of the likely outcomes of health care reform, in whatever final form the legislation takes, is that clinical practices and outcomes will be monitored and behaviors that depart from evidence-based standards of care will not be acceptable.

Over time, evidence-based practice has potential to reduce the huge variations in procedures and interventions we have now when there are no medical reasons for the differences.

You have been a member of and chaired advisory bodies on EBM for both the Institute of Medicine [IOM] and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services [DHHS] over the past two decades.  How did you come to be involved with these advisory bodies?

My interest began as a fellow in the Robert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholars Program where I first learned basic epidemiology, health services, and biostatistics.  I made some connections with one of the DHHS committees that existed in the late 1980s, in which I had expressed skepticism whether a guideline released for treating asthma was supported by the published evidence – there was too much expert opinion.

In 1989 I was appointed to the Preventive Services Task Force, my first real assignment in this area. I was then asked to chair the Centers for Disease Control committee that published the 1993 Sexually Transmitted Disease guidelines, and co-chaired a committee for the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research on otitis media with effusion.  I have gone on to other committees on vaccine safety, genetic testing, post-traumatic stress disorder, and genetic tests, sponsored by various agencies.

What qualifications led to your appointments to such a diverse group of committees?

Being a generalist on clinical topics and a specialist in critical appraisal and systematic review has led me to be involved in a variety of clinical questions. As a non-specialist on any given clinical topic, I do not come into the process with preconceptions about what our conclusions should be.

And, because of the experience in reviewing the basis of evidence in dissimilar clinical areas, I have developed some general expertise at managing the committee processes that are designed to reach clinical and research conclusions.

You are a member of the Institute of Medicine.  What does it do?

It is an organization of around 1,700 elected members, part of the National Academy of Sciences which was chartered by Congress during President Lincoln’s administration, although the IOM formally began just in 1970. It receives no direct federal appropriation, but does accept contracts from federal agencies when an agency wants answers that are unbiased and evidence-based.

For example, the VA commissioned the IOM to do a study to advise them what interventions work in treating PSTD — a controversial topic where some might have questioned the conclusions if the VA had done the study on their own.  The agency negotiates the contract with the IOM, but once the project begins the IOM works independently. The IOM accepts broad input but its internal processes are confidential. The IOM also takes extraordinary steps to limit conflict of interest on its committees so that the conclusions are not tainted.

How does one determine what kinds of medical interventions are “evidence-based” and what kinds are not?

Medical students, residents, and physicians need to be moving towards asking that question more often. I have become wary of what I call the “journal club approach” to medicine where a single article is discussed hoping that it might be a “silver bullet” that will change practice. From where did the article come? What were the clinical questions asked? Are the questions relevant to my own practice?  Where does this fit in the body of evidence already available?

Medical schools are beginning to do a good job of teaching how to evaluate individual studies, but there is a parallel list of questions on how to evaluate evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. I believe this skill is as important as being able to evaluate a single research article.

How much of a problem are health care disparities in your opinion?

The folks at Dartmouth have shown how the same condition is managed in different ways at different costs in different parts of the country, when there is no apparent reason for difference.  If we were following evidence-based practice more uniformly, a patient with the same characteristics would be managed the same way in rural Texas as in New York City.

A New Yorker article (”The Cost Conundrum“) looking at the highest Medicare costs in the U.S. showed that over-treating and over-diagnosing have negative consequences. If one wants to maximize health, the “sweet spot” is when you use only as much health care as you need. When you use more medical services than you need it can lead to poorer outcomes.

If we have high standards for evidence-based practice, we could decrease costs and make health care more rational, regardless of who you are, who your doctor is, or where you are.

How do you assess President Obama’s health care reform efforts?

I believe his heart is in the right place. What I think he is finding is that EBM is important. He is also finding that science is not what is driving the system, but rather the economic benefits enjoyed by lots of people in the healthcare industry. EBM threatens the profits of some very powerful special interests. I believe that all the special interests are willing to bend on some issues, but their second best position tends to be keeping the status quo.

I hope the public will figure out that they are getting neither good value nor good health from its money, and we’ll finally be able to move ahead.  EBM has potential to help in that process.

Are there models in other countries of how EBM would work?

Much of the rest of the developed world is ahead of us on EBM. In many countries, there is a process for deciding when there is enough evidence about an intervention’s efficacy to make a product or intervention available to the public at public expense. Interventions considered experimental or not achieving a level of confidence in the outcome are generally not paid for with public funds. The U.S. is quite unique in that evidence of an intervention’s proven effects can take a back seat to other concerns.

Can you employ EBM techniques to determine if less invasive therapies work, such as those advanced by, for example, holistic health practitioners?

Of course. We should move toward a single standard of evidence that is blind to the kind of therapy being promoted.  We should be able to objectively assess the balance of benefits and harms of any test or intervention, whether performed by an MD or a naturopath.

How do you see the future widespread use of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) interfacing with the idea of EBM and federal funding of evidence based preventive care?

That is something I’m working on at the moment. One of the issues of EHRs is the proliferation of products that cannot talk with each other. The business incentives are not aligned to make this easy. The feds have been trying to come up with a list of common data elements, but EHR vendors are dragging their feet. At the University of Washington, we would like to develop ways to use EHRs across practices for disease management and prevention within the practice and for collaborative research regardless of the particular EHR being employed.

What are things do you believe have a chance of going right?

President Obama has made it clear that he is interested in science and objectivity. I have faith that in the long run being open and transparent about evidence supporting medical practice will result in desirable change. There are many examples of where the EBM approach has made a difference in the outcomes of patients and where it has nudged the funded research agenda. People like me continue to hope that focusing on the evidence will eventually improve the public’s health. 

Alex Shalman

by Alex Shalman
AlexShalman.com – Practical Personal Development

“The brick walls are there for a reason. The brick walls are not there to keep us out; the brick walls are there to give us a chance to show how badly we want something.”

~Randy Pausch

There are certain goals in your life for which success is a non-negotiable conclusion. It’s inevitable that the bus of your life is going to drive towards a fork in the road.  The trick is to position yourself in the drivers seat.

My most current and biggest obstacle so far has been to get into dental school. If my whole story was simple, that “I applied, I got in, woot!” then it wouldn’t have been very inspirational. Luckily, for the story’s sake, it took me three years of applications, rejections, retaking the DAT, and upping the ante with a master’s degree in order to push my way through.

The whole process really humbled me, and at the same time made me really proud of what I can do when I put everything I’ve got into it. I’ve had the benefit of being very self-aware, and carefully analyzing the mental processes that I went through in order to reach this goal. I could have been depressed at the first rejection. I could have quit and found another line of work…I almost did…but I didn’t, because my brain thinks as follows:

1. Cut Off Unsupportive People
   I’ve long been going through the process of purging negative people from my life. The friends that were just great to party with, the people that were disgustingly pessimistic, and the ones that clearly did not have my best interests in mind. Getting rid of negative people opens you up to meeting new ones with qualities you respect and admire.

   Several months ago I had a friend ask me why am I still trying to get in, and why don’t I just give up and go and get a real job instead of trying for this dental dream. My girlfriend Marina had an awesome response to this onslaught. She said, “How can you live if you stop trying? That’s the formula for regret.” I like it a lot. I have to keep this Marina person around me more!

2. Cut Off Plan B
   I’m very inspired by a story of Julius Caesar that I heard from one of my personal development tapes years back. When Caesar’s ships landed on the enemy beach, he immediately ordered his army to turn around and burn down all of their own ships. This left only one option, plow through the enemy lines, no matter what, and on to victory.

   In my own life, I gave myself only one option, no plan B, no alternatives, and that option was to become the best Dental health professional in the world. Other options and job opportunities were presented to me, quite often, and I always thought of them as the “Serpent’s apple” which I refused to pick.

3. Talk About Your Dream
   Everyone that I encountered knew that my number one goal, the thing that I wanted so much I could taste it, was to get into dental school. I didn’t ask them for help, I presented myself as a passionate individual who has wanted to be a dentist since he was five years old and would stop at nothing to achieve this dream. People respect this form of sincerity.

   In fact, people would often times start trying to think of solutions to how they might help me, or who they knew in a great position to help me. Over three years, I got a lot of contacts, some of which were dead leads, but the sheer volume that was generated from me speaking about my number one goal created some golden opportunities and referrals.

4. Believe In Yourself
   You know those days: When you’re down on yourself, and you’re thinking about quitting. Perhaps you even start to entertain some good reasons for why quitting would be a good idea.

   *SLAP*

   The trick is to give yourself a mental slap.  Take those negative thoughts and nip them in the bud before the weeds overthrow the yard of your mind. Don’t be the kind of person that thinks this way.

   It’s your job, not your friends or your parents, to believe that you’re the best. You must believe, deep in your soul, that whatever you have, whatever you’re selling is absolutely the air that everyone should be breathing. If you don’t believe you’re the best, and don’t do everything in your power to really be the best, then no one else will believe – so believe!

I’ve played a dangerous game my friends. I got a Masters degree, albeit educational and interesting, in a field that I didn’t want to spend my life working in – but I pushed on. I talked to everyone and their dog about my dreams, and encountered some pessimistic backlash – but I pushed on.

I even spent this summer studying to retake the admission test “just in case,” while having a promising spot on the waiting list, when I could have taken a vacation and hoped I’d make it off the list – but I pushed on.

Never stop trying, not while you’re still alive and capable. As I like to say… “If you have a dream, whether you have to go through those doors sideways, backwards, or jump in from the roof… don’t give up.”

Alex Shalman is a Personal Development writer and speaker, and most recently an NYU Dental student. If you enjoyed this article please tweet it and vote for it on StumbleUpon. I’d appreciate it.

Joseph Baker

by Joseph Baker

For many students looking for a career in healthcare, allopathic medical school is the only option that they have considered. While information exists on podiatry as a professional career choice, it can be missed behind the stacks of information on allopathic and osteopathic medicine.

Podiatry school, or podiatric medical school, is very similar to its allopathic and osteopathic medical school counterparts, with some key differences.  The biggest difference is the degree earned.  A graduate of podiatric medical school receives a doctoral degree of podiatric medicine, or a DPM.  This degree certifies the graduate to be a complete and specialized physician of the foot and ankle.

Following graduation from a four-year podiatric medical college, a podiatrist will then go through three years of residency training.  Podiatrists, or podiatric physicians, commonly treat sprains, strains, and fractures of the foot and ankle, biomechanical deformities, dermatological problems of the lower extremity, and many other conditions of the lower extremity.

As an undergraduate student, I knew that I wanted a career in healthcare, but I was not sure which aspect of healthcare would interest me the most.  I shadowed several different doctors, including an internist, an otolaryngologist, and an orthopedic surgeon.  I also shadowed a dentist and a pharmacist, and worked in a research lab with a microbiologist.  I had lots of experiences with all kinds of healthcare professionals, but my decision to apply to podiatry school came after shadowing a podiatrist.

It was truly a great experience.  The podiatrist that I shadowed was the most willing of any of the professionals to have me come to work with him for a day.  In fact, I ended up going back several times to see various procedures, including both clinical and surgical operations.

The array of procedures that I observed would have been enough to turn me on to the field, but it was a comment from one of the patients that really had an impact in my decision.  She told me that her podiatrist was her absolute favorite doctor, and the only one that she looked forward to seeing.  It was right then and there that I knew that this was the profession was for me.

To be fair, I did have some experience working with foot and ankle injuries.  I worked a part-time job in college in a running store, and was exposed to quite a bit of sports-related injuries.  I think that this exposure contributed to my interest in the field of podiatric medicine, and the experience I had shadowing a doctor of podiatric medicine solidified my decision.

Now that I have been through one year of school and am beginning my second year, I can without a single doubt say that my decision to go to podiatric medical school was the best decision that I’ve ever made.  The day-to-day learning that comes with an education in podiatric medicine includes the basic science curriculum seen in other medical fields, but tailored to podiatry.  This gets me and my fellow students pumped up about learning, because we learn about our specialty much earlier than allopathic or osteopathic medical students.  Right now I’m taking a sports medicine class, and we’ll be starting podiatric radiology soon.  It’s great to begin learning about the specialty while still in school, rather than waiting until residency to begin training in a particular area.

Students working in podiatry anatomy lab

A typical day for me in school involves either a full day of class, or a day spent in the podiatry clinic that is run by the school.  In the clinic, we get lots of patient exposure and practice.  We take the patient’s history, perform a focused physical exam, and may assist in procedures.  I’ve seen lots of really interesting cases so far, and I’ve only just begun in the clinic.  By the end of the second year I will have had a ton of interactions with patients, which is something unique to podiatry school.

As far as the curriculum goes, our classes are a lot like the classes at any other medical school.  In fact, our podiatry school is at the same university as an allopathic medical school, and we take a lot of classes with the allopathic students.  This helps to promote an interprofessional learning environment, something that is very common in healthcare.  We as podiatry students take anatomy and pathology with the allopathic students, as well as our clinical reasoning course.  It’s nice to have friends and colleagues in school that are going into different fields of medicine, because we will likely be working together in the future as physicians.

Being a podiatrist is an excellent career choice, and it is something that all pre-health students should consider.  It is an option among many, but for me it is the best choice.

Dr. Conrad Fischer

Despite the growing number of scientific advances over recent years, the ability of doctors to cure or deal with diseases that were fatal not ten years ago, and heightened recognition by patients for those in the medical profession, a study conducted by Dr. Conrad Fischer suggested that many in the medical field were highly dissatisfied with their careers. Armed with these alarming results, Dr. Fischer set out to let everyone know that now is an exciting era in medical history and, quite possibly, the best time to be in medicine. The result is his book, Routine Miracles.

Dr. Conrad Fischer, author of Routine Miracles, is an infectious diseases specialist and a prolific teacher of medicine; he has published twelve books for the medical community. He is also an influential medical advocate. He was instrumental in the construction and passage of legislation that led to the near eradication of pediatric AIDS in the United States. He was formerly the Associate Chief of Medicine for Educational and Academic Activities at SUNY Downstate School of Medicine. He has been Chairman of Medicine for Kaplan Medical since 1999, and has held Residency Program Director positions at both Maimonides Medical Center and Flushing Hospital in New York City. He lives in New York City with his two boys.

Dr. Fischer recently sat down to talk to the Student Doctor Network about his research.

Please explain a little about your research for Routine Miracles and what surprised you the most?

There is an enormous disconnect between patients who feel the “miraculous” nature of what they receive in terms of treatments and a near-numb “routineness” of flat emotionality from doctors.  I can’t help but feel the root of the problem stems from our own medical school faculty and senior physicians poisoning the minds of medical students.  In our own research data it shows that 80% of medical students feel that medicine was better 25 years ago and that the public does not trust them. They identify senior physicians and faculty as the source of this impression. So, our best role models for a life of practicing medicine, and pursuing a life of investigation turn out to be the most damaging influence of all.

Why is this the best time to be practicing medicine and why is it the worst time?

Treatment is the best it has ever been by far.  We now have brain operated artificial limbs, hearing restoration, cancer cures, corneal transplants in four minutes, and cures that seemed like science fiction a few years ago.  It is hard to write good science fiction because the facts catch up so fast. Paradoxically, a recent study showed that more than 90% of primary care doctors are dissatisfied.  There is an unprecedented level of demoralization at a time when we can heal people in so many amazing new ways.  The worst news is that our freshest and newest members, students, interns and residents firmly believe medicine was better before and we are devolving as a profession.  They are not motivated to follow a life of investigation that will give us the next generation of scientific and medical breakthroughs.

You work with students every week. How are they different from you and your colleagues 20 years ago?

Students and especially residents are less cynical, less sarcastic and more professional than they were 20 years ago.  This is because of the mandatory decrease in resident work hours. You couldn’t possibly expect the same energy and compassion when you were up for 36 hours straight.  Now residents rest a little and you are kinder, warmer, and not burnt out and cynical.  Most MDs do not see this.  They look down on new students telling them it was better before.

Students on the other hand seem more concerned with personal economic issues.  They think the sky is falling in medicine, so they should find a nice high paying subspecialty to hide in.  There is virtually NO drive to consider careers of investigation that might lead to new cures.  So, you have nicer and kinder people taking care of patients, but who rarely question how they might find a cure.  In 20 years I predict the rate of medical advancement will be dramatically diminished.

In your opinion what three things need to happen quickly to help fix our healthcare system?

1. Universal coverage
2. Doubling of the research budget at National Institutes of Health
3. Decrease or supplement the cost of Medical education so that students choose a future that is not based on income potential or concerns about paying off student loans.

Why are you such a fervent advocate of universal health insurance coverage for all U.S. citizens?  How do you respond to arguments against—and fears surrounding—implementing a system of socialized medicine?

First off, universal coverage is just the right thing to do. I think the concern about financing is ludicrous. We did not worry about financing when the military budget went from 350 billion to 750 billion, which is considerably in excess of the amount needed for healthcare reform.

“Socialized medicine” is a scary word to frighten ignorant people. We have Medicare as a government run system as the largest insurer in the country. We have the veteran’s hospitals as the largest system in the country and it all works well.

Doctors are scared for their paychecks. Other people are, frankly, just unconcerned with people who will be sick if they think they have to pay for it.

If we are to live in a Great Civilization, we MUST take care of all our citizens, Period.

Routine Miracles

As you stress in Routine Miracles, young doctors are frequently weighed down by hundreds of thousands of dollars in student loan debt.  What would you change about how we finance medical school education?

I would subsidize the medical schools to lower tuition and I would add trading a year of tuition for every year you spend in a lab during research. We do it for the military, why not for research?

It only costs about $2.4 billion a year for EVERY student in the country.  That is about what we paid for ‘cash for clunkers’ car program.

What is your relationship with insurance companies like?

This is the only thing that 95% of MDs and students agree on – it is HORRIBLE!  If I had to deal with insurance companies full time, I would drop out of medicine.  I also find it unconscionable that while facilities are closing because of budget gaps, the CEO of Aetna insurance is getting a 32 million dollar salary.

What do you hope people will take away from reading Routine Miracles?

Unless we take better care of the emotional well being of our best and brightest students and trainees, in terms of seeing the grandeur of finding new cures and treatment, the amazing advancement in medicine will screech to a near stop.   There is action to take here. It is about fixing the disconnect between breakthroughs and the complete lack of excitement and engagement of the “Best and Brightest” new doctors.  Routine Miracles is about how, in an age of extraordinary advances, we need to get our students into the lab and in a life of investigation and discovery.  If we don’t do this now, the future will be a lot less bright.