The program is part of the National Healthcare Safety Network of the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), and allows all U.S. hospitals that transfuse blood and blood products to enroll and contribute data on adverse events associated with blood transfusions.    

The Hemovigilance Program is a component of the U.S. Biovigilance Network.  Data collected and analyzed by this new program is expected to improve patient safety and reduce U.S. healthcare costs.

If your organization is interested in participating, click here for the Intent to Participate Form.

Buckeye Surgeon offers up a slightly different perspective.  If you work with surgeons, or just know one, you’ll want to read “It’s Never Easy.

Performs related functions for tracking and data analysis of JHH Medical Staff and Affiliate Staff as it relates to compliance with Hospital requirements and Joint Commission standards. Will track staff quality data, initiate requests on a scheduled basis for related information, perform high-level analysis through use of sophisticated database software and other tools, identify problems and perform all necessary follow-up to resolve problems.

 Will independently be responsible for making sure that all appointed staff are in compliance with FPPE and OPPE standards as set forth by The Johns Hopkins Hospital and will work with administrative and clinical staff throughout Hospital to accomplish goals.

Also responsible for other compliance tracking and reporting, including medical staff education requirements; various database functions, (such as creating databases, systems and workflow design and implementation, automation of processes and advanced queries and reports in Microsoft Access and Excel, importing and exporting of data from a variety of sources to produce reports for own workflow as well as management review and analysis).

Will independently schedule, track, and follow-through on a wide variety of priorities, working both independently and with the Manager of Medical Staff Systems. Will function in a highly independent way, and be responsible for resolving a diverse set of complex problems.

If you’re a medical staff professional who enjoys statistics and data, this could be the job for you. 

Hmm, I wonder if Johns Hopkins would consider a remote employee…

Click here for the full-text of the JC announcement. 

This post is to help spread the word that the BAC web site recently moved to a new location on the web and can now be found at   www.buchananassociatesconsulting.com

Fortunately, Taylee survived and now appears to be a healthy toddler. 

In May, the California Department of Public Health fined Mission $50,000 for the error.

What bothers me most about this story is not the mistake, or even the initial accusation, it’s the official, carefully worded response that was recently issued by the hospital:

Our healthcare organization is deeply concerned about an incident that occurred in which an infant was mistakenly administered a medication last year. Consistent with our commitment to our patients we have conducted a process review and provided ongoing education and training for our patient care teams with regard to administering medications. While this incident is regretful, we are thankful that both the mother and baby were discharged in healthy condition …”

“While the incident is regretful?”  Now that’s a statement that exudes compassion and sincerity.

What is so difficult about saying ‘We are so sorry that Taylee was injured while under our care.”  It’s what Todd and Jessica Blischke deserve to hear.

More: Newborn Medical Mixup

9/2/10 Addendum: 

This case has, understandably, sparked a strong emotional response from many readers.  My purpose in including it here was not to blame or shame anyone.  I know that in nearly every case of serious medical error, caregivers are distraught.

My purpose was to draw attention to how fearful many  organization leaders remain to simply saying “We’re sorry,” when a sincere apology could do everyone so much good.  Sadly, it seems to be a challenge for most of us to say those words when they are called for.    ~Rita~

The physician patient relationship is unique, sensitive, and vitally important.  Imagine for a moment, that you are the physician who made the opening statement, and that the patient to whom you spoke those words has suddenly, unexpectedly, died.

You grieve, and you have a right to.  That patient and those who love him matter to you.

Now imagine that the death is attributable, at least in part, to a medical error that you made.  How do you deal with the stress of that knowledge?

Most physicians want to do what you or I would want to do if we made an unintentional error that harmed someone.  We’d want to offer a sincere, heartfelt apology, and tell those left behind that we are sorry.  We’d want to offer some explanation as to how such a devasting event could have happened, and share what we were doing to make sure it never happened again. 

Now imagine that you’re told that option is not available to you.  You are instructed by lawyers, insurance company representatives, and risk managers, not to speak about the event, not speak to any of the patient’s family members, not to return their phone calls, and not to attend the patent’s funeral.

Imagine how that would feel.

Too many physicians and grieving family members don’t have to imagine; they know.

Slowly, that tide is turning.  Healthcare is discovering that a more humanistic approach to medical errors not only helps the people directly affected, but helps protect organizations as well.  That is welcome news for both patients and caregivers.

The New York Times article When Doctors Admit Their Mistakes delves further into this complex issue.

Despite the best efforts of health care professionals, bad things can happen in hospitals. Up until more recently, when errors occurred, the scenario that played out was always the same. Clinicians, devastated but fearful of litigation, would shut down. Patients and their families, grieving but desperate to make sense of the event, would find that their doctors and nurses were no longer responsive or available. Eventually, the most important relationship in health care, that between patient and doctor, would cede to the most adversarial one, that between plaintiff and defendant.

Read When Doctors Admit Their Mistakes

Related:  Talking to Patients After Medical Mistakes