<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>SweBee Blogs</title>
<generator>SweBee</generator>
<description>SweBee is an online service containing recent technology news, blogs, information, reviews, downloads, tips &amp; tricks, online tools (whois, templates, SEO) and also jokes.</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright (c)2007-2008 SweBee. All rights reserved.</copyright><link>http://www.swebee.com/</link>
<pubDate>2012-06-01T16:00-05:00</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>2012-06-01T16:00-05:00</lastBuildDate>
<category>SweBee - Tech News, Blogs, Reviews, Downloads, Tips, and Fun</category>

<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/SweBeeBlogs" /><feedburner:info uri="swebeeblogs" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item>
<title>The Worst Microsoft Products Ever Produced</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SweBeeBlogs/~3/sULggisEcZE/2008-08-03_97-1.html</link>

<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://blogs.swebee.com/microsoft/the-worst-microsoft-products-ever-produced/2008-08-03_97-1.html"&gt; &lt;img hspace="3" border="0" align="left" height="66" width="88" src="http://i.swebee.com/cover/thumb/microsoft-worst-products.jpg" alt="Microsoft Worst Products" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;Throughout its history the company has been design and develop many software and hardware. But have you ever wonder what are the worst Microsoft products ever produced and released to the market?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/SweBeeBlogs/~4/sULggisEcZE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 08:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.swebee.com/microsoft/the-worst-microsoft-products-ever-produced/2008-08-03_97-1.html</guid>
<feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.swebee.com/microsoft/the-worst-microsoft-products-ever-produced/2008-08-03_97-1.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>The Use of Pirated Software Dropped in 67 Countries</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SweBeeBlogs/~3/tvlD2iF_vgM/2008-05-16_82-1.html</link>

<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://blogs.swebee.com/business-software-alliance/the-use-of-pirated-software-dropped-in-67-countries/2008-05-16_82-1.html"&gt; &lt;img hspace="3" border="0" align="left" height="66" width="88" src="http://i.swebee.com/cover/thumb/bsa.png" alt="Business Software Alliance" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;A study of 108 countries conducted by International Data Corp (IDC) - and the results released by the Business Software Alliance (BSA) in their fifth-annual study on global software piracy - shows the use of pirated software dropped in 67 countries and in just eight countries did the piracy rate increase.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/SweBeeBlogs/~4/tvlD2iF_vgM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 08:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.swebee.com/business-software-alliance/the-use-of-pirated-software-dropped-in-67-countries/2008-05-16_82-1.html</guid>
<feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.swebee.com/business-software-alliance/the-use-of-pirated-software-dropped-in-67-countries/2008-05-16_82-1.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>XP vs Vista vs Mac OS X vs Ubuntu</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SweBeeBlogs/~3/3U-QntPh4XA/2008-05-13_79-1.html</link>

<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://blogs.swebee.com/operating-system/xp-vs-vista-vs-mac-os-x-vs-ubuntu/2008-05-13_79-1.html"&gt; &lt;img hspace="3" border="0" align="left" height="66" width="88" src="http://i.swebee.com/cover/thumb/mac-win-ubuntu.jpg" alt="Mac OS, Windows and Ubuntu Linux" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;Today we have many choise of desktop OS. The UNIX-based OS such as Mac OS X and Linux or Windows-based such as XP and Vista. Each OS has well known stereotype and features. Lets start comparing point by point.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/SweBeeBlogs/~4/3U-QntPh4XA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 08:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.swebee.com/operating-system/xp-vs-vista-vs-mac-os-x-vs-ubuntu/2008-05-13_79-1.html</guid>
<feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.swebee.com/operating-system/xp-vs-vista-vs-mac-os-x-vs-ubuntu/2008-05-13_79-1.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>Free Webmail Services Comparison</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SweBeeBlogs/~3/DA6R30z2eTU/2008-05-01_69-1.html</link>

<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://blogs.swebee.com/e-mail-service/free-webmail-services-comparison/2008-05-01_69-1.html"&gt; &lt;img hspace="3" border="0" align="left" height="88" width="88" src="http://i.swebee.com/cover/thumb/gmail-stamp.jpg" alt="GMail" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;Many free webmail services available now in the Internet. Which one is the best? Which one can block spam, virus and trojan better than other?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/SweBeeBlogs/~4/DA6R30z2eTU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 08:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.swebee.com/e-mail-service/free-webmail-services-comparison/2008-05-01_69-1.html</guid>
<feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.swebee.com/e-mail-service/free-webmail-services-comparison/2008-05-01_69-1.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>Country Domain Extensions</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SweBeeBlogs/~3/6ZGQE0LCJDE/2008-04-25_67-1.html</link>

<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://blogs.swebee.com/country-code-top-level-domains/country-domain-extensions/2008-04-25_67-1.html"&gt; &lt;img hspace="3" border="0" align="left" height="59" width="88" src="http://i.swebee.com/cover/thumb/country-extensions.jpg" alt="Country Domain Extensions" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;Many Web address doesn't end in .com, .org, .biz, or .edu. Most likely, this Website is hosted on a server in another country or have the business in another country. Here is a detail list of country domain extensions.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/SweBeeBlogs/~4/6ZGQE0LCJDE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 08:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.swebee.com/country-code-top-level-domains/country-domain-extensions/2008-04-25_67-1.html</guid>
<feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.swebee.com/country-code-top-level-domains/country-domain-extensions/2008-04-25_67-1.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>Google's Registered Domains</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SweBeeBlogs/~3/xjB9dLNcZZk/2008-04-13_64-1.html</link>

<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://blogs.swebee.com/google/google-registered-domains/2008-04-13_64-1.html"&gt; &lt;img hspace="3" border="0" align="left" height="66" width="88" src="http://i.swebee.com/cover/thumb/google.jpg" alt="Google Products" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;Do you know Google's registered domain arround the world in addition to Google.com? Here is the list.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/SweBeeBlogs/~4/xjB9dLNcZZk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 08:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.swebee.com/google/google-registered-domains/2008-04-13_64-1.html</guid>
<feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.swebee.com/google/google-registered-domains/2008-04-13_64-1.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>Mac OS X Will Be The Next Target of Hackers</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SweBeeBlogs/~3/yjG_cQQbPlQ/2008-02-20_39-1.html</link>

<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://blogs.swebee.com/sophos/mac-os-x-will-be-the-next-target-of-hackers/2008-02-20_39-1.html"&gt; &lt;img hspace="3" border="0" align="left" height="66" width="88" src="http://i.swebee.com/cover/thumb/sophos-hq.jpg" alt="Sophos Headquarter" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;A web survey of more than 350 computer users held by Sophos - an IT security and control firm - has revealed that 93 percent believe Apple Mac OS will be increasingly targeted by cybercriminals in the future.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/SweBeeBlogs/~4/yjG_cQQbPlQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 08:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.swebee.com/sophos/mac-os-x-will-be-the-next-target-of-hackers/2008-02-20_39-1.html</guid>
<feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.swebee.com/sophos/mac-os-x-will-be-the-next-target-of-hackers/2008-02-20_39-1.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>Sign the "SAVE XP" Petition</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SweBeeBlogs/~3/Z5cHI-LkMJc/2008-01-16_17-1.html</link>

<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://blogs.swebee.com/infoworld/sign-the-save-xp-petition/2008-01-16_17-1.html"&gt; &lt;img hspace="3" border="0" align="left" height="66" width="88" src="http://i.swebee.com/cover/thumb/savexp.jpg" alt="Save Windows XP!" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;Microsoft has announced that they will end most sales of Windows XP on June 30, 2008 then forcing users to shift to Vista. InfoWorld has launched an online petition to convince Microsoft not to retire Windows XP.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/SweBeeBlogs/~4/Z5cHI-LkMJc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 08:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.swebee.com/infoworld/sign-the-save-xp-petition/2008-01-16_17-1.html</guid>
<feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.swebee.com/infoworld/sign-the-save-xp-petition/2008-01-16_17-1.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>Facebook, The Worst Performer Social Networking Site</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SweBeeBlogs/~3/0il04tOYJCE/2008-01-14_16-1.html</link>

<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://blogs.swebee.com/watchmouse/facebook-the-worst-performer-social-networking-site/2008-01-14_16-1.html"&gt; &lt;img hspace="3" border="0" align="left" height="53" width="88" src="http://i.swebee.com/cover/thumb/socialnetworking.png" alt="Social Networking" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;Facebook might be the most immensely popular social networking service today. However, recent research from WatchMouse has shown that Facebook was the worst performer; recording a slow load time and more errors than any other monitored site.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/SweBeeBlogs/~4/0il04tOYJCE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 08:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.swebee.com/watchmouse/facebook-the-worst-performer-social-networking-site/2008-01-14_16-1.html</guid>
<feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.swebee.com/watchmouse/facebook-the-worst-performer-social-networking-site/2008-01-14_16-1.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>Best Open Source Applications of 2007</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SweBeeBlogs/~3/wUiU85OnlHo/2008-01-02_7-1.html</link>

<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://blogs.swebee.com/softpedia/best-open-source-applications-of-2007/2008-01-02_7-1.html"&gt; &lt;img hspace="3" border="0" align="left" height="51" width="88" src="http://i.swebee.com/cover/thumb/opensource.gif" alt="Open Source" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;Every year there are many open source applications released, but not all of them can be the best. These are the &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;Best Ten Open Source Desktop Applications of 2007&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/SweBeeBlogs/~4/wUiU85OnlHo" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 08:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.swebee.com/softpedia/best-open-source-applications-of-2007/2008-01-02_7-1.html</guid>
<feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.swebee.com/softpedia/best-open-source-applications-of-2007/2008-01-02_7-1.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>Ten Ways to Guarantee Project Failure</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SweBeeBlogs/~3/_HPSqG_hA7Y/2007-12-22_5-1.html</link>

<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://blogs.swebee.com/it-project-management/ten-ways-to-guarantee-project-failure/2007-12-22_5-1.html"&gt; &lt;img hspace="3" border="0" align="left" height="73" width="88" src="http://i.swebee.com/cover/thumb/profit.jpg" alt="Management" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;Imagine that you've been put in charge of a mighty important project. What can you do to ensure that the project doesn't just fail, but (just to be safe) fails miserably? Here are ten suggestions.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/SweBeeBlogs/~4/_HPSqG_hA7Y" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 08:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.swebee.com/it-project-management/ten-ways-to-guarantee-project-failure/2007-12-22_5-1.html</guid>
<feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.swebee.com/it-project-management/ten-ways-to-guarantee-project-failure/2007-12-22_5-1.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>Windows XP Service Pack 3 Full Preview</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SweBeeBlogs/~3/Ho8vMaA7x44/2007-12-12_4-1.html</link>

<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://blogs.swebee.com/microsoft-windows-xp/windows-xp-service-pack-3-full-preview/2007-12-12_4-1.html"&gt; &lt;img hspace="3" border="0" align="left" height="55" width="88" src="http://i.swebee.com/cover/thumb/xpsp3.jpg" alt="Microsoft Windows XP SP3" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;Since SP2 came out, Microsoft has continued to supply fixes and enhancements via Windows (and Microsoft) Updates. Windows XP Service Pack 3 simply rolls all the fixes and upgrades into a single convenient package, though there are a few brand-new addition&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/SweBeeBlogs/~4/Ho8vMaA7x44" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 08:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.swebee.com/microsoft-windows-xp/windows-xp-service-pack-3-full-preview/2007-12-12_4-1.html</guid>
<feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.swebee.com/microsoft-windows-xp/windows-xp-service-pack-3-full-preview/2007-12-12_4-1.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>New Era of 45 nm CPU Technology</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SweBeeBlogs/~3/k95z848MYlA/2007-11-30_6-1.html</link>

<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://blogs.swebee.com/intel-penryn/new-era-of-45-nm-cpu-technology/2007-11-30_6-1.html"&gt; &lt;img hspace="3" border="0" align="left" height="60" width="88" src="http://i.swebee.com/cover/thumb/intel.jpg" alt="Intel" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;In November 2007, Intel has shipped its first 45 nanometer based processor on the 5400-series Xeon&amp;amp;reg; platform, while AMD still developing their 65 nm based processor.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/SweBeeBlogs/~4/k95z848MYlA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 08:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.swebee.com/intel-penryn/new-era-of-45-nm-cpu-technology/2007-11-30_6-1.html</guid>
<feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.swebee.com/intel-penryn/new-era-of-45-nm-cpu-technology/2007-11-30_6-1.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>Service Pack 3 Speeds Windows XP</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SweBeeBlogs/~3/Iwv1xxp2YWw/2007-11-26_2-1.html</link>

<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://blogs.swebee.com/microsoft-windows-xp/service-pack-3-speeds-windows-xp/2007-11-26_2-1.html"&gt; &lt;img hspace="3" border="0" align="left" height="55" width="88" src="http://i.swebee.com/cover/thumb/xpsp3.jpg" alt="Microsoft Windows XP SP3" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;Microsoft Windows XP Service Pack 3 (SP3), the update scheduled to release on 2008, runs some applications 10% faster than XP SP2.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/SweBeeBlogs/~4/Iwv1xxp2YWw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 08:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.swebee.com/microsoft-windows-xp/service-pack-3-speeds-windows-xp/2007-11-26_2-1.html</guid>
<feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.swebee.com/microsoft-windows-xp/service-pack-3-speeds-windows-xp/2007-11-26_2-1.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>Java EE vs .Net Framework</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SweBeeBlogs/~3/MD6sFHxZOqE/2007-11-05_3-1.html</link>

<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://blogs.swebee.com/web-services-technology/java-ee-vs-.net-framework/2007-11-05_3-1.html"&gt; &lt;img hspace="3" border="0" align="left" height="65" width="88" src="http://i.swebee.com/cover/thumb/java.jpg" alt="Java" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;With the hype surrounding .NET Web Services, and Sun bringing together an offering for Web Services, it's time we took a look at what's happening. In this article, we compare the two approaches to Web Services.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/SweBeeBlogs/~4/MD6sFHxZOqE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 08:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.swebee.com/web-services-technology/java-ee-vs-.net-framework/2007-11-05_3-1.html</guid>
<feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.swebee.com/web-services-technology/java-ee-vs-.net-framework/2007-11-05_3-1.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
</channel>
</rss>

