<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
<channel><title>The Symphony Blog | Comments</title><description>All the latest Lotus Symphony news from Stuart McIntyre</description><link>http://lotussymphonyblog.com/blog/symblog.nsf/</link><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 5 May 2009 07:46:08 +0100</lastBuildDate>
<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/symphonyblogcomments" type="application/rss+xml" /><item>
<title>Microsoft Office 2007 SP2 ODF interoperability is a FAIL!</title>
<pubDate>Tue, 5 May 2009 07:46:08 +0100</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Stuart McIntyre - Symphony</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Microsoft Office 2007 SP2 ODF interoperability is a FAIL!</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Just to be fair, <a href="http://www.oooninja.com/2009/05/microsoft-office-opendocument-odf.html">here</a> is a slightly more positive view on the new ODF compatibility:<blockquote><i>Microsoft has opened the ODF door and will be pressured on better interoperability, so even my inner cynic has a hard time imagining interoperability will not improve. With Office 2007 SP2 and Wordpad in Windows 7 supporting ODF, the future looks bright for OpenDocument Format. Has Microsoft turned a new leaf? Microsoft's recent investments in ODF, PDF, and web standards (in Internet Explorer 8) are probably more a function of government regulation or business demand than corporate goodwill. Backed into a corner or otherwise, Microsoft has done the right thing, but further work is necessary before the general public can use ODF transparently in Office.</i></blockquote>However, in the same post the author points out the inconsistencies in Office 2007 SP2 when rendering the ODF Reference Document (which you would have thought MS would have tested against, right?):<blockquote><i>To evaluate the quality, I opened the reference document ODF_text_reference_v3.odt in Word 2007. Overall the conversion was respectable for what is essentially a version 1.0 release for Microsoft Office. The bugs I noticed were:<br /><br /> * Tracked changes were missing.<br /><br /> * The second level of an ordered list was indented like first level (that is, it was not intended correctly).<br /><br /> * An inline image was out of place.<br /><br /> * One active hyperlink was neither blue nor underlined (though another hyperlink is fine).<br /><br /> * All form controls were missing.<br /><br /> * Not exactly a format bug, but Word 2007 considers "OpenDocument" misspelled though "WordPerfect" is recognized.</i></blockquote>]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Just to be fair, <a href="http://www.oooninja.com/2009/05/microsoft-office-opendocument-odf.html">here</a> is a slightly more positive view on the new ODF compatibility:<blockquote><i>Microsoft has opened the ODF door and will be pressured on better interoperability, so even my inner cynic has a hard time imagining interoperability will not improve. With Office 2007 SP2 and Wordpad in Windows 7 supporting ODF, the future looks bright for OpenDocument Format. Has Microsoft turned a new leaf? Microsoft's recent investments in ODF, PDF, and web standards (in Internet Explorer 8) are probably more a function of government regulation or business demand than corporate goodwill. Backed into a corner or otherwise, Microsoft has done the right thing, but further work is necessary before the general public can use ODF transparently in Office.</i></blockquote>However, in the same post the author points out the inconsistencies in Office 2007 SP2 when rendering the ODF Reference Document (which you would have thought MS would have tested against, right?):<blockquote><i>To evaluate the quality, I opened the reference document ODF_text_reference_v3.odt in Word 2007. Overall the conversion was respectable for what is essentially a version 1.0 release for Microsoft Office. The bugs I noticed were:<br /><br /> * Tracked changes were missing.<br /><br /> * The second level of an ordered list was indented like first level (that is, it was not intended correctly).<br /><br /> * An inline image was out of place.<br /><br /> * One active hyperlink was neither blue nor underlined (though another hyperlink is fine).<br /><br /> * All form controls were missing.<br /><br /> * Not exactly a format bug, but Word 2007 considers "OpenDocument" misspelled though "WordPerfect" is recognized.</i></blockquote><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/symphonyblogcomments/~4/sy0sgDq-GpI" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/symphonyblogcomments/~3/sy0sgDq-GpI/microsoft-office-2007-sp2-odf-interoperability-is-a-fail</link>
<feedburner:origLink>http://lotussymphonyblog.com/blog/symblog.nsf/dx/microsoft-office-2007-sp2-odf-interoperability-is-a-fail?opendocument&amp;comments#05052009074608SMI9XX.htm</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>Carl Tyler</title>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 10:42:49 PM +0100</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Carl Tyler</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>New Archos 10 netbook shipping with Lotus Symphony</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[That's good news. If Symphony is to have any chance of success it has to be successful as an OEMed product.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[That's good news. If Symphony is to have any chance of success it has to be successful as an OEMed product.<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/symphonyblogcomments/~4/u1LMzWweQhQ" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/symphonyblogcomments/~3/u1LMzWweQhQ/new-archos-10-netbook-shipping-with-lotus-symphony</link>
<feedburner:origLink>http://lotussymphonyblog.com/blog/symblog.nsf/dx/new-archos-10-netbook-shipping-with-lotus-symphony?opendocument&amp;comments#01142009104249PMBLOUMT.htm</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>Forgot to mention ...</title>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 09:22:53 PM +0100</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Lars Olufsen</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>New Archos 10 netbook shipping with Lotus Symphony</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[The Notes 8.5 included Symphony 1.2 runs brilliantly on my lenovo S10e netbook with 1Gb ram.<br /><br />It even runs fine with the Notes client running at the same time.<br /><br />And it runs almost just as fine while the Domino server is running too.<br /><br />Hot package!]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The Notes 8.5 included Symphony 1.2 runs brilliantly on my lenovo S10e netbook with 1Gb ram.<br /><br />It even runs fine with the Notes client running at the same time.<br /><br />And it runs almost just as fine while the Domino server is running too.<br /><br />Hot package!<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/symphonyblogcomments/~4/z2IIYzbTJls" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/symphonyblogcomments/~3/z2IIYzbTJls/new-archos-10-netbook-shipping-with-lotus-symphony</link>
<feedburner:origLink>http://lotussymphonyblog.com/blog/symblog.nsf/dx/new-archos-10-netbook-shipping-with-lotus-symphony?opendocument&amp;comments#14-01-2009212253BLOT3U.htm</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>Untitled</title>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 09:18:42 PM +0100</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Lars Olufsen</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>New Archos 10 netbook shipping with Lotus Symphony</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Oooohh ... Next up a free Notes "Lite" client as a pre-inst.<br /><br />Safe, extendable, pretty as sin.<br /><br />Breaking news: Hell freezing ;-)]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Oooohh ... Next up a free Notes "Lite" client as a pre-inst.<br /><br />Safe, extendable, pretty as sin.<br /><br />Breaking news: Hell freezing ;-)<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/symphonyblogcomments/~4/Ih5-7tFIKq0" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/symphonyblogcomments/~3/Ih5-7tFIKq0/new-archos-10-netbook-shipping-with-lotus-symphony</link>
<feedburner:origLink>http://lotussymphonyblog.com/blog/symblog.nsf/dx/new-archos-10-netbook-shipping-with-lotus-symphony?opendocument&amp;comments#14-01-2009211842BLOSZ9.htm</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>You’re right</title>
<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 11:21:20 AM +0100</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Stuart McIntyre</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Lotus Symphony 1.2 beta for Mac</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Spot on - I hadn't noticed that one before. I'm sure that is a minor buggette.<br /><br />You might want to report it via the forums at { <a href="http://symphony.lotus.com" target="_blank" title="Link: symphony.lotus.com">Link</a> }<br /><br />Thanks for your kind comments anyway - glad you're enjoying the Symphony experience.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Spot on - I hadn't noticed that one before. I'm sure that is a minor buggette.<br /><br />You might want to report it via the forums at { <a href="http://symphony.lotus.com" target="_blank" title="Link: symphony.lotus.com">Link</a> }<br /><br />Thanks for your kind comments anyway - glad you're enjoying the Symphony experience.<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/symphonyblogcomments/~4/1UWYvD7d_7Y" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/symphonyblogcomments/~3/1UWYvD7d_7Y/lotus-symphony-1.2-beta-for-mac</link>
<feedburner:origLink>http://lotussymphonyblog.com/blog/symblog.nsf/dx/lotus-symphony-1.2-beta-for-mac?opendocument&amp;comments#12122008112120AMBLOFBV.htm</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>Text Properties</title>
<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 05:04:56 AM +0100</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Robert Guthrie</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Lotus Symphony 1.2 beta for Mac</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Good Suite: I like it...nice price...functionality is excellent.<br /><br />Text Properties: I cannot change the size of the window in 'float' mode. The standard method of dragging the bottom right corner of the window in mac os x has no effect. Am I missing something? Or, is there a kink?<br /><br />Great App, though!]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Good Suite: I like it...nice price...functionality is excellent.<br /><br />Text Properties: I cannot change the size of the window in 'float' mode. The standard method of dragging the bottom right corner of the window in mac os x has no effect. Am I missing something? Or, is there a kink?<br /><br />Great App, though!<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/symphonyblogcomments/~4/rpPB6eIsU1Q" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/symphonyblogcomments/~3/rpPB6eIsU1Q/lotus-symphony-1.2-beta-for-mac</link>
<feedburner:origLink>http://lotussymphonyblog.com/blog/symblog.nsf/dx/lotus-symphony-1.2-beta-for-mac?opendocument&amp;comments#12122008050456AMBLO7YM.htm</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>What about pivot table?</title>
<pubDate>Thu, 6 Nov 2008 11:38:28 AM +0100</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Rodrigo Borges</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Lotus Symphony futures</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Stuart, any idea about when pivot table will be available on Symphony. This is the feature that I miss a lot.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Stuart, any idea about when pivot table will be available on Symphony. This is the feature that I miss a lot.<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/symphonyblogcomments/~4/BslcGNe_WwY" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/symphonyblogcomments/~3/BslcGNe_WwY/lotus-symphony-futures</link>
<feedburner:origLink>http://lotussymphonyblog.com/blog/symblog.nsf/dx/lotus-symphony-futures?opendocument&amp;comments#11062008113828AMBLOFNL.htm</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>Untitled</title>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 12:04:41 PM +0100</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Dvir Reznik</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>IBM now has 140,000 users on Lotus Symphony</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Hey Stuart,<br /><br />I think there's a problem with your comments - who's 'The Liberator' and why he appears 7/8 times?<br /><br />Second, I also posted on the story (linking to your story of course, and Chris's one), which started a discussion with MS Guy on 'why there's no 100% adoption at IBM', for Notes and Symphony: { <a href="http://dvirreznik.blogspot.com/2008/10/140000-lotus-symphony-users-at-ibm.html" target="_blank" title="Link: dvirreznik.blogspot.com/2008/10/140000-lotus-symphony-users-at-ibm.html">Link</a> }]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Hey Stuart,<br /><br />I think there's a problem with your comments - who's 'The Liberator' and why he appears 7/8 times?<br /><br />Second, I also posted on the story (linking to your story of course, and Chris's one), which started a discussion with MS Guy on 'why there's no 100% adoption at IBM', for Notes and Symphony: { <a href="http://dvirreznik.blogspot.com/2008/10/140000-lotus-symphony-users-at-ibm.html" target="_blank" title="Link: dvirreznik.blogspot.com/2008/10/140000-lotus-symphony-users-at-ibm.html">Link</a> }<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/symphonyblogcomments/~4/3gk1HLYx_F8" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/symphonyblogcomments/~3/3gk1HLYx_F8/ibm-now-has-180000-users-on-lotus-symphony</link>
<feedburner:origLink>http://lotussymphonyblog.com/blog/symblog.nsf/dx/ibm-now-has-180000-users-on-lotus-symphony?opendocument&amp;comments#10162008120441PMBLOEZG.htm</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>don’t expect a major ooo code merge</title>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 05:04:11 PM +0100</pubDate>
<dc:creator>john head</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>An update on Lotus Symphony for the Mac</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Simon - anyone expecting a major code merge between Symphony and OoO is going to be waiting a long time. I doubt IBM will ever do a major code merge, but instead pick out pieces they want to bring over. IBM has already proven this by building their own table engine, doing their own document format import/export support, and building their own mail merge and pivot table engines (some of which is in 1.1).]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Simon - anyone expecting a major code merge between Symphony and OoO is going to be waiting a long time. I doubt IBM will ever do a major code merge, but instead pick out pieces they want to bring over. IBM has already proven this by building their own table engine, doing their own document format import/export support, and building their own mail merge and pivot table engines (some of which is in 1.1).<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/symphonyblogcomments/~4/sp8qr4RBPw4" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/symphonyblogcomments/~3/sp8qr4RBPw4/an-update-on-lotus-symphony-for-the-mac</link>
<feedburner:origLink>http://lotussymphonyblog.com/blog/symblog.nsf/dx/an-update-on-lotus-symphony-for-the-mac?opendocument&amp;comments#10152008050411PMBLOLUP.htm</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>Untitled</title>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 11:55:05 AM +0100</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Simon Scullion</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>An update on Lotus Symphony for the Mac</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Just two thoughts, yes, dangerous I know!<br /><br />First up, following @bepoole's &lt;a href="{ <a href="http://twitter.com/benpoole/statuses/960412255"&gt;tweet&lt;/a&gt; " target="_blank" title="Link: twitter.com/benpoole/statuses/960412255"&gt;tweet&lt;/a&gt; ">Link</a> } OoO is 3 now, so I'd hope that we're to see some of that effort reaching the codestream of Symphony before long. To still be based on OoO 1.1 is not good.<br /><br />Secondly, re the point on "native integration" with OSX, maybe they're taking this to a higher level than currently with the Notes client? (Could be a dumb question as I'm unfortunately not a Mac user!) <br /><br />Would be good to see native integration on Linux too though! ;-)]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Just two thoughts, yes, dangerous I know!<br /><br />First up, following @bepoole's &lt;a href="{ <a href="http://twitter.com/benpoole/statuses/960412255"&gt;tweet&lt;/a&gt; " target="_blank" title="Link: twitter.com/benpoole/statuses/960412255"&gt;tweet&lt;/a&gt; ">Link</a> } OoO is 3 now, so I'd hope that we're to see some of that effort reaching the codestream of Symphony before long. To still be based on OoO 1.1 is not good.<br /><br />Secondly, re the point on "native integration" with OSX, maybe they're taking this to a higher level than currently with the Notes client? (Could be a dumb question as I'm unfortunately not a Mac user!) <br /><br />Would be good to see native integration on Linux too though! ;-)<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/symphonyblogcomments/~4/UOGwTRjIPXc" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/symphonyblogcomments/~3/UOGwTRjIPXc/an-update-on-lotus-symphony-for-the-mac</link>
<feedburner:origLink>http://lotussymphonyblog.com/blog/symblog.nsf/dx/an-update-on-lotus-symphony-for-the-mac?opendocument&amp;comments#15102008115505BLOETG.htm</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>Liberate</title>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 02:16:24 PM +0100</pubDate>
<dc:creator>The Liberator</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>IBM now has 140,000 users on Lotus Symphony</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Stuart,<br /><br />IBM has already saved that money. Back in 2005 I understand they cancelled their Enterprise Agreement with Microsoft, saving tens of millions of dollars.<br /><br />Furthermore, it precipitated the Liberate project (www.ibm.com/software/info/liberate) which shows clients how to make similar savings, un-hooking them from their Redmond addiction.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Stuart,<br /><br />IBM has already saved that money. Back in 2005 I understand they cancelled their Enterprise Agreement with Microsoft, saving tens of millions of dollars.<br /><br />Furthermore, it precipitated the Liberate project (www.ibm.com/software/info/liberate) which shows clients how to make similar savings, un-hooking them from their Redmond addiction.<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/symphonyblogcomments/~4/Alt6cDrIL4M" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/symphonyblogcomments/~3/Alt6cDrIL4M/ibm-now-has-180000-users-on-lotus-symphony</link>
<feedburner:origLink>http://lotussymphonyblog.com/blog/symblog.nsf/dx/ibm-now-has-180000-users-on-lotus-symphony?opendocument&amp;comments#13102008141624BLOHKT.htm</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>Crescendo</title>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 12:56:35 +0100</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Symphony Blog (Stuart McIntyre)</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Crescendo</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Fair comment Ben. Well put.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Fair comment Ben. Well put.<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/symphonyblogcomments/~4/-AcuNqxP0PM" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/symphonyblogcomments/~3/-AcuNqxP0PM/crescendo</link>
<feedburner:origLink>http://lotussymphonyblog.com/blog/symblog.nsf/dx/crescendo?opendocument&amp;comments#21082008125635SMIFZX.htm</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>It’s good, but it is not viral</title>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 12:51:57 +0100</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Ben Langhinrichs</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Crescendo</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[I like the presentation, but it is not even remotely viral. This is a classic corporate "fun" video. It is easier to watch than a completely boring "facts" demo, but nobody would watch it for the sheer fun of it, and nobody is going to pass it around unless they are already complete fans and want to show that IBM "gets it".<br /><br />My reason for posting is not to put down the effort, but rather to say that if it is oversold, it will disappoint people rather than excite them. Don't call it viral or think it is going to be watched for the sake of being watched, or you are going to create a negative "IBM doesn't get it" backlash.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I like the presentation, but it is not even remotely viral. This is a classic corporate "fun" video. It is easier to watch than a completely boring "facts" demo, but nobody would watch it for the sheer fun of it, and nobody is going to pass it around unless they are already complete fans and want to show that IBM "gets it".<br /><br />My reason for posting is not to put down the effort, but rather to say that if it is oversold, it will disappoint people rather than excite them. Don't call it viral or think it is going to be watched for the sake of being watched, or you are going to create a negative "IBM doesn't get it" backlash.<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/symphonyblogcomments/~4/wppSBksq8ag" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/symphonyblogcomments/~3/wppSBksq8ag/crescendo</link>
<feedburner:origLink>http://lotussymphonyblog.com/blog/symblog.nsf/dx/crescendo?opendocument&amp;comments#08212008125157PMDOMFX2.htm</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>also on The Register</title>
<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 20:37:55 +0100</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Mike VandeVelde</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>IBM pushing staff to use Symphony...</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[{ <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/06/13/ibm_staff_ditch_microsoft_office/" target="_blank" title="Link: www.theregister.co.uk/2008/06/13/ibm_staff_ditch_microsoft_office/">Link</a> }<br /><br />Interesting comments there!]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[{ <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/06/13/ibm_staff_ditch_microsoft_office/" target="_blank" title="Link: www.theregister.co.uk/2008/06/13/ibm_staff_ditch_microsoft_office/">Link</a> }<br /><br />Interesting comments there!<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/symphonyblogcomments/~4/BTZnt7d5z4k" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/symphonyblogcomments/~3/BTZnt7d5z4k/ibm-pushing-staff-to-use-symphony...</link>
<feedburner:origLink>http://lotussymphonyblog.com/blog/symblog.nsf/dx/ibm-pushing-staff-to-use-symphony...?opendocument&amp;comments#06132008083755PMDOMR29.htm</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>Symphony is not music in Redmond</title>
<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 19:38:45 +0100</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Ed Maloney</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>IBM pushing staff to use Symphony...</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Some years ago I worked for a company which had IBM as their largest customer. IBM "suggested" that Lotus Smartsuite was the preferred format for exchanging documents with IBM. They also suggested OS/2 and IBM servers, all of which were quickly adopted in my office per instructions from the company president. IBM has the muscle to make a real dent in MS Office if they choose to.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Some years ago I worked for a company which had IBM as their largest customer. IBM "suggested" that Lotus Smartsuite was the preferred format for exchanging documents with IBM. They also suggested OS/2 and IBM servers, all of which were quickly adopted in my office per instructions from the company president. IBM has the muscle to make a real dent in MS Office if they choose to.<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/symphonyblogcomments/~4/aZKOh6MKo-w" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/symphonyblogcomments/~3/aZKOh6MKo-w/ibm-pushing-staff-to-use-symphony...</link>
<feedburner:origLink>http://lotussymphonyblog.com/blog/symblog.nsf/dx/ibm-pushing-staff-to-use-symphony...?opendocument&amp;comments#06132008073845PMDOMPVA.htm</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>LOL!</title>
<pubDate>Thu, 5 Jun 2008 10:55:40 +0100</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Stuart McIntyre</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Lotus Symphony "Elite Support" announced</dc:subject>
<description />
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/symphonyblogcomments/~4/bwlte7dHGUk" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/symphonyblogcomments/~3/bwlte7dHGUk/06042008043609PMDOMLB6.htm</link>
<feedburner:origLink>http://lotussymphonyblog.com/blog/symblog.nsf/dx/06042008043609PMDOMLB6.htm?opendocument&amp;comments#06052008105540AMDOMDNC.htm</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>Nope, that’s not "elite" support, THIS is l337 sUppOrTzOMG!!!!11!!!</title>
<pubDate>Wed, 4 Jun 2008 19:37:25 +0100</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Turtle</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Lotus Symphony "Elite Support" announced</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[IBM 7#3T SUPpROT FOR IBM LOTUAZ SYMPJONY 1!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! THEIR UIS A RATIO DOONNT RIPE ME OFf!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11~~ LOLOLOLOLOLOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!~~~ oi own j00~ 0<br /><br />OVERVIE\/\/<br /><br />IBM 733T SUpPROT FRO IBM lOTUS SYMPHONY l!!!!!!!!!!!11~~~~~ OLLOLOLOLOLOLOL!!!!!!!!!!!!1 0, as upprot-only fofra1|\|G, deliverx remmote techNical supp0rt!!!!!!!1 coome to my ftp!!!!!!~ YOU CAN PURCHASE THIS OPTIOANL SUPPORT VIA AN ANNUAL SUBSCrIPOTINO THROuGH PASSPORT ADVANTAGE RO PASDSPROT DAVANTAGE ExPRESS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11~~~~<br /><br />Teh thred core applicaTionz making up ibm lotus symphony - lotuss ymphOny documentz, lotus smyphony spreasdsheerz, and lotus symphony pReasenatrionS -r fesigned to handle most office productovity tasks taht Workers typical7y parform lOtiuz symphony applications uspport the op3n document formAt (odf) sstndard, whihc helpz gree userz from propreitary f1Le fromatd adn expensive warez lice|\|sing and upgrade agreemetns!!!!!111<br /><br />ibm lotus symphony gives Usarz the gfreedom to creat3 an shar inforMaTio|\| as well as 4ssewmble compoasite 4pp71cat1ons that link to business proc3sss~~~~ compaenzi can integrate ibm lotus symphon yto0lz itno trheir custom apPLicatinoz and eAsliy conneCt to a myriad of d4at sources to creatrre composite appl1cationz,,, tehsE rich applications enable uasars to \\\\////\\\\////ork ni a single veiw, and preasent data from mu7tiple sourves instantly!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1 comd to my ftP<br /><br />ibm loTus symphony i sa suite of office prodUctivity tools thzt caN be downloaded, oinstalled, and used 4tno charge!!!!!!!!!!!!1<br /><br />at a glandd<br /><br />ibm 733t suppRto fro ibm ltouz symphony 1!!!!!111~~~~~~ LOLOLOO!!!!!!!!!!111 I 1;l AHX0R cause you suck!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!111 0 delivertz thhe followIng benefis:<br /><br />* conistent l3vel of support: ibm 733t supprot for lotuz symphony porov1des a level of spport c0nsisten twith rthat uesd by oth3 stAffs equipped witj 1bm oproducts inclUding phone support and electronic supprot<br /><br />* dierct respo|\|sr t0 tehj customar: an ibm supprot techniican qwill rtespond wiythhin wto businesz hourz...<br /><br />* UNLIMITED SUPPROT: THER3 S IN0 KLIMIT TO THe NUMBER OF TECHNICaL SUPPORT INCIDNETS U CAN REPORT THORUgH ERMOTE ASSISTANCE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11 <br /><br />pl4nne davailABility dsatyes:<br /><br />juyne 3, 2008 (ibm 733t suppoRt)<br /><br />mroe detai7s avai7able In the annuoncement l3tter!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11~ plz note!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!111~~ THIS ISJ UST FOR TEH STANDSALONeSYMPHO|\|Y PR0DUCT!!!!!!!111~ supprot fro teh sYmpHony ediotrs ni l0Tus noets Will e co\/eerd by yoR existi|\|g notes suprot entitlmeent]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[IBM 7#3T SUPpROT FOR IBM LOTUAZ SYMPJONY 1!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! THEIR UIS A RATIO DOONNT RIPE ME OFf!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11~~ LOLOLOLOLOLOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!~~~ oi own j00~ 0<br /><br />OVERVIE\/\/<br /><br />IBM 733T SUpPROT FRO IBM lOTUS SYMPHONY l!!!!!!!!!!!11~~~~~ OLLOLOLOLOLOLOL!!!!!!!!!!!!1 0, as upprot-only fofra1|\|G, deliverx remmote techNical supp0rt!!!!!!!1 coome to my ftp!!!!!!~ YOU CAN PURCHASE THIS OPTIOANL SUPPORT VIA AN ANNUAL SUBSCrIPOTINO THROuGH PASSPORT ADVANTAGE RO PASDSPROT DAVANTAGE ExPRESS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11~~~~<br /><br />Teh thred core applicaTionz making up ibm lotus symphony - lotuss ymphOny documentz, lotus smyphony spreasdsheerz, and lotus symphony pReasenatrionS -r fesigned to handle most office productovity tasks taht Workers typical7y parform lOtiuz symphony applications uspport the op3n document formAt (odf) sstndard, whihc helpz gree userz from propreitary f1Le fromatd adn expensive warez lice|\|sing and upgrade agreemetns!!!!!111<br /><br />ibm lotus symphony gives Usarz the gfreedom to creat3 an shar inforMaTio|\| as well as 4ssewmble compoasite 4pp71cat1ons that link to business proc3sss~~~~ compaenzi can integrate ibm lotus symphon yto0lz itno trheir custom apPLicatinoz and eAsliy conneCt to a myriad of d4at sources to creatrre composite appl1cationz,,, tehsE rich applications enable uasars to \\\\////\\\\////ork ni a single veiw, and preasent data from mu7tiple sourves instantly!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1 comd to my ftP<br /><br />ibm loTus symphony i sa suite of office prodUctivity tools thzt caN be downloaded, oinstalled, and used 4tno charge!!!!!!!!!!!!1<br /><br />at a glandd<br /><br />ibm 733t suppRto fro ibm ltouz symphony 1!!!!!111~~~~~~ LOLOLOO!!!!!!!!!!111 I 1;l AHX0R cause you suck!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!111 0 delivertz thhe followIng benefis:<br /><br />* conistent l3vel of support: ibm 733t supprot for lotuz symphony porov1des a level of spport c0nsisten twith rthat uesd by oth3 stAffs equipped witj 1bm oproducts inclUding phone support and electronic supprot<br /><br />* dierct respo|\|sr t0 tehj customar: an ibm supprot techniican qwill rtespond wiythhin wto businesz hourz...<br /><br />* UNLIMITED SUPPROT: THER3 S IN0 KLIMIT TO THe NUMBER OF TECHNICaL SUPPORT INCIDNETS U CAN REPORT THORUgH ERMOTE ASSISTANCE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11 <br /><br />pl4nne davailABility dsatyes:<br /><br />juyne 3, 2008 (ibm 733t suppoRt)<br /><br />mroe detai7s avai7able In the annuoncement l3tter!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11~ plz note!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!111~~ THIS ISJ UST FOR TEH STANDSALONeSYMPHO|\|Y PR0DUCT!!!!!!!111~ supprot fro teh sYmpHony ediotrs ni l0Tus noets Will e co\/eerd by yoR existi|\|g notes suprot entitlmeent<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/symphonyblogcomments/~4/hUqNsaxT5hw" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/symphonyblogcomments/~3/hUqNsaxT5hw/06042008043609PMDOMLB6.htm</link>
<feedburner:origLink>http://lotussymphonyblog.com/blog/symblog.nsf/dx/06042008043609PMDOMLB6.htm?opendocument&amp;comments#06042008073725PMDOMPUF.htm</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>IBM Lotus Symphony 1 released! :-)</title>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 06:45:03 +0100</pubDate>
<dc:creator>VITRIOL</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>More evidence that Symphony 1.0 isn’t far away...</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[IBM Lotus Symphony 1 released! :-)<br /><br />Best regards<br /><br />VITRIOL]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[IBM Lotus Symphony 1 released! :-)<br /><br />Best regards<br /><br />VITRIOL<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/symphonyblogcomments/~4/jCLhfWj-_nU" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/symphonyblogcomments/~3/jCLhfWj-_nU/more-evidence-that-symphony-1.0-isnt-far-away...</link>
<feedburner:origLink>http://lotussymphonyblog.com/blog/symblog.nsf/dx/more-evidence-that-symphony-1.0-isnt-far-away...?opendocument&amp;comments#3005200806.45.03DOM8RQ.htm</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>IBM Lotus Symphony 1 released!</title>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 06:40:36 +0100</pubDate>
<dc:creator>VITRIOL</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>More evidence that Symphony 1.0 isn’t far away...</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[IBM Lotus Symphony 1 released! :-)<br /><br />Best regards<br /><br />VITRIOL]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[IBM Lotus Symphony 1 released! :-)<br /><br />Best regards<br /><br />VITRIOL<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/symphonyblogcomments/~4/tcObuvbnj4o" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/symphonyblogcomments/~3/tcObuvbnj4o/more-evidence-that-symphony-1.0-isnt-far-away...</link>
<feedburner:origLink>http://lotussymphonyblog.com/blog/symblog.nsf/dx/more-evidence-that-symphony-1.0-isnt-far-away...?opendocument&amp;comments#3005200806.40.36DOM8NX.htm</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>The Symphony Attack</title>
<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 07:48:05 +0100</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Albert Buendia</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>developerWorks: Introducing OpenDocument</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Hi Stuart.<br /><br />We've linked your excellent blog at SLUG's Blogroll section. Yesterday I've posted an humour entry about "The Symphony attack". Thank you very much about your blog. You can read our blog in English. It has a Google translation gadget at the left bottom. See you,<br /><br />Albert Buendia]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Hi Stuart.<br /><br />We've linked your excellent blog at SLUG's Blogroll section. Yesterday I've posted an humour entry about "The Symphony attack". Thank you very much about your blog. You can read our blog in English. It has a Google translation gadget at the left bottom. See you,<br /><br />Albert Buendia<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/symphonyblogcomments/~4/aUpiPwFgTxc" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/symphonyblogcomments/~3/aUpiPwFgTxc/developerworks-introducing-opendocument</link>
<feedburner:origLink>http://lotussymphonyblog.com/blog/symblog.nsf/dx/developerworks-introducing-opendocument?opendocument&amp;comments#24042008074805DOM9Z4.htm</feedburner:origLink></item>

</channel></rss>
