<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
<channel><title>The Symphony Blog | Comments</title><description>All the latest Lotus Symphony news from Stuart McIntyre</description><link>http://lotussymphonyblog.com/blog/symblog.nsf/</link><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2011 23:30:37 +0100</lastBuildDate>
<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/symphonyblogcomments" /><feedburner:info uri="symphonyblogcomments" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item>
<title>SmartSuite compatibility</title>
<pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2011 23:30:37 +0100</pubDate>
<dc:creator>T. Roach</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Using Lotus Symphony? Do you need Smartsuite compatibility?</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[We have been using and still use Lotus WordPro. We have thousands of documents in WordPro format. Still love it by the way!]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[We have been using and still use Lotus WordPro. We have thousands of documents in WordPro format. Still love it by the way!<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/symphonyblogcomments/~4/yLVW0LyRyFg" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/symphonyblogcomments/~3/yLVW0LyRyFg/using-lotus-symphony-do-you-need-smartsuite-compatibility</link>
<feedburner:origLink>http://lotussymphonyblog.com/blog/symblog.nsf/dx/using-lotus-symphony-do-you-need-smartsuite-compatibility?opendocument&amp;comments#10292011113037PMBLOUE7.htm</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>I would expect it to be the default.</title>
<pubDate>Sat, 13 Aug 2011 00:44:05 +0100</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Edith</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Using Lotus Symphony? Do you need Smartsuite compatibility?</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[I also have documents from over 10 years ago that I'd like to update, now that I'm retired. If I have to convert them all to .rtf, then I'll reconvert them to .doc before I convert to Symphony.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I also have documents from over 10 years ago that I'd like to update, now that I'm retired. If I have to convert them all to .rtf, then I'll reconvert them to .doc before I convert to Symphony.<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/symphonyblogcomments/~4/4WFPpPe_FW0" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/symphonyblogcomments/~3/4WFPpPe_FW0/using-lotus-symphony-do-you-need-smartsuite-compatibility</link>
<feedburner:origLink>http://lotussymphonyblog.com/blog/symblog.nsf/dx/using-lotus-symphony-do-you-need-smartsuite-compatibility?opendocument&amp;comments#08132011124405AMBLOVU4.htm</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>Absolutely!</title>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 13:34:13 +0100</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Mike Dean</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Using Lotus Symphony? Do you need Smartsuite compatibility?</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[My wife has a huge wodge of documents written ten years ago or more in AmiPro and WordPro - and quite likely Freelance because they're training materials - which she still wants. There isn't any other path for bringing them up to date.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[My wife has a huge wodge of documents written ten years ago or more in AmiPro and WordPro - and quite likely Freelance because they're training materials - which she still wants. There isn't any other path for bringing them up to date.<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/symphonyblogcomments/~4/hRHmVQqSWp4" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/symphonyblogcomments/~3/hRHmVQqSWp4/using-lotus-symphony-do-you-need-smartsuite-compatibility</link>
<feedburner:origLink>http://lotussymphonyblog.com/blog/symblog.nsf/dx/using-lotus-symphony-do-you-need-smartsuite-compatibility?opendocument&amp;comments#20052011133413BLOGRF.htm</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>Yes PLease</title>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 07:51:23 +0100</pubDate>
<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Using Lotus Symphony? Do you need Smartsuite compatibility?</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[I would love to be able to open my old freelance files without having to install smartsuite again!]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I would love to be able to open my old freelance files without having to install smartsuite again!<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/symphonyblogcomments/~4/YaecLgL-GdA" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/symphonyblogcomments/~3/YaecLgL-GdA/using-lotus-symphony-do-you-need-smartsuite-compatibility</link>
<feedburner:origLink>http://lotussymphonyblog.com/blog/symblog.nsf/dx/using-lotus-symphony-do-you-need-smartsuite-compatibility?opendocument&amp;comments#04292011075123AMBLOA36.htm</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>SmartSuite compatibility - yes please!</title>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2011 00:40:16 +0100</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Nathan Stewart</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Using Lotus Symphony? Do you need Smartsuite compatibility?</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Yes, we need this rather desperately. There are still many legacy documents that must be at least converted to ODF. We are quite dismayed to find that this is not possible with Symphony 3.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Yes, we need this rather desperately. There are still many legacy documents that must be at least converted to ODF. We are quite dismayed to find that this is not possible with Symphony 3.<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/symphonyblogcomments/~4/j_kzdqjjhsU" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/symphonyblogcomments/~3/j_kzdqjjhsU/using-lotus-symphony-do-you-need-smartsuite-compatibility</link>
<feedburner:origLink>http://lotussymphonyblog.com/blog/symblog.nsf/dx/using-lotus-symphony-do-you-need-smartsuite-compatibility?opendocument&amp;comments#23022011124016AMBLO2T8.htm</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>Anything on a roadmap for Lotus Symphony?</title>
<pubDate>Tue, 8 Feb 2011 14:54:39 +0100</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Fred Janssen</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>LotusLIve Symphony to offer online document editing and collaboration</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Is there any info available on a roadmap for the local version of Lotus Symphony?]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Is there any info available on a roadmap for the local version of Lotus Symphony?<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/symphonyblogcomments/~4/oZdbIgEtBxw" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/symphonyblogcomments/~3/oZdbIgEtBxw/lotuslive-symphony-to-offer-online-document-editing-and-collaboration</link>
<feedburner:origLink>http://lotussymphonyblog.com/blog/symblog.nsf/dx/lotuslive-symphony-to-offer-online-document-editing-and-collaboration?opendocument&amp;comments#02082011025439PMBLOKH8.htm</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>Having said that...</title>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 02:30:43 +0100</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Carl Tyler</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Using Lotus Symphony? Do you need Smartsuite compatibility?</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[I don't need the filters in Symphony. I moved to Office, not Symphony. Yep Office doesn't have filters, but it has more apps, I like the ribbon and it feels more reliable/faster than Symphony.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I don't need the filters in Symphony. I moved to Office, not Symphony. Yep Office doesn't have filters, but it has more apps, I like the ribbon and it feels more reliable/faster than Symphony.<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/symphonyblogcomments/~4/Ch545M3srDY" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/symphonyblogcomments/~3/Ch545M3srDY/using-lotus-symphony-do-you-need-smartsuite-compatibility</link>
<feedburner:origLink>http://lotussymphonyblog.com/blog/symblog.nsf/dx/using-lotus-symphony-do-you-need-smartsuite-compatibility?opendocument&amp;comments#12152010023043AMBLO4Y9.htm</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>Isn’t the answer obvious?</title>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2010 14:40:38 +0100</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Carl Tyler</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Using Lotus Symphony? Do you need Smartsuite compatibility?</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Isn't the answer obvious? IBM still sells SmartSuite, and Ed frequently posts on his blog that Rip and Replace is a terrible thing, and companies shouldn't buy from companies with a rip and replace technologies. If Symphony cannot read and work with SmartSuite files, then what is the migration path for paying SmartSuite customers?]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Isn't the answer obvious? IBM still sells SmartSuite, and Ed frequently posts on his blog that Rip and Replace is a terrible thing, and companies shouldn't buy from companies with a rip and replace technologies. If Symphony cannot read and work with SmartSuite files, then what is the migration path for paying SmartSuite customers?<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/symphonyblogcomments/~4/PnkkzIsksPU" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/symphonyblogcomments/~3/PnkkzIsksPU/using-lotus-symphony-do-you-need-smartsuite-compatibility</link>
<feedburner:origLink>http://lotussymphonyblog.com/blog/symblog.nsf/dx/using-lotus-symphony-do-you-need-smartsuite-compatibility?opendocument&amp;comments#12142010024038PMBLOK8F.htm</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>LOL, they did!</title>
<pubDate>Wed, 3 Nov 2010 05:19:35 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Stuart McIntyre</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>IBM Lotus Symphony 3 Overview</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[You're right, Sean. They did show the product. I think this is a good overview and makes the key points in a concise and clear way... Will be using it a fair bit I imagine.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You're right, Sean. They did show the product. I think this is a good overview and makes the key points in a concise and clear way... Will be using it a fair bit I imagine.<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/symphonyblogcomments/~4/BhcjO1gk7Ow" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/symphonyblogcomments/~3/BhcjO1gk7Ow/ibm-lotus-symphony-3-overview</link>
<feedburner:origLink>http://lotussymphonyblog.com/blog/symblog.nsf/dx/ibm-lotus-symphony-3-overview?opendocument&amp;comments#11032010051935AMBLO89S.htm</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>Hang on, did IBM just show the product ?</title>
<pubDate>Tue, 2 Nov 2010 21:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Sean Cull</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>IBM Lotus Symphony 3 Overview</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Darren has obviously unleashed IBMs marketing talents]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Darren has obviously unleashed IBMs marketing talents<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/symphonyblogcomments/~4/x7RVQ8192pI" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/symphonyblogcomments/~3/x7RVQ8192pI/ibm-lotus-symphony-3-overview</link>
<feedburner:origLink>http://lotussymphonyblog.com/blog/symblog.nsf/dx/ibm-lotus-symphony-3-overview?opendocument&amp;comments#02112010210015BLOSMQ.htm</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>I actually understood that one</title>
<pubDate>Tue, 2 Nov 2010 20:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Sean Cull</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>IBM Lotus Symphony 3 Overview</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[unlike the customer experience suite thing]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[unlike the customer experience suite thing<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/symphonyblogcomments/~4/Sm8ymUh--20" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/symphonyblogcomments/~3/Sm8ymUh--20/ibm-lotus-symphony-3-overview</link>
<feedburner:origLink>http://lotussymphonyblog.com/blog/symblog.nsf/dx/ibm-lotus-symphony-3-overview?opendocument&amp;comments#02112010205909BLOSM2.htm</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>Thanks</title>
<pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2010 04:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Stuart McIntyre</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Lotus Symphony 3 now available for download</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Isabel, thanks for raising the issue - however, based on my own experience and that of others that I've spoken to, this seems to be a specific issue on your environment.<br /><br />Have you tried uninstalling and reinstalling? Also, can you raise it as anissue on the Symphony Support Forums? { <a href="http://symphony.lotus.com/software/lotus/symphony/ForumnsHome.nsf/home" target="_blank" title="Link: symphony.lotus.com/software/lotus/symphony/ForumnsHome.nsf/home">Link</a> }]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Isabel, thanks for raising the issue - however, based on my own experience and that of others that I've spoken to, this seems to be a specific issue on your environment.<br /><br />Have you tried uninstalling and reinstalling? Also, can you raise it as anissue on the Symphony Support Forums? { <a href="http://symphony.lotus.com/software/lotus/symphony/ForumnsHome.nsf/home" target="_blank" title="Link: symphony.lotus.com/software/lotus/symphony/ForumnsHome.nsf/home">Link</a> }<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/symphonyblogcomments/~4/buRPvx4p_Yg" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/symphonyblogcomments/~3/buRPvx4p_Yg/lotus-symphony-3-now-available-for-download</link>
<feedburner:origLink>http://lotussymphonyblog.com/blog/symblog.nsf/dx/lotus-symphony-3-now-available-for-download?opendocument&amp;comments#10252010042820AMBLO79R.htm</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>Lotus Synphony CANNOT open ANY Word File</title>
<pubDate>Sun, 24 Oct 2010 21:39:02 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Isabel</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Lotus Symphony 3 now available for download</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[I just wanted to tell you I installed the 3 version tonight, and Lotus Symphony CANNOT open ANY MS Word file. The files are 2 pages long, are written in Spanish, no links, no pics, plain text. The Symphony version is Spanish too. The bar simply keeps filling, and filling and filling.<br /><br />I do not believe I need to add anything more about IBM work on this product.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I just wanted to tell you I installed the 3 version tonight, and Lotus Symphony CANNOT open ANY MS Word file. The files are 2 pages long, are written in Spanish, no links, no pics, plain text. The Symphony version is Spanish too. The bar simply keeps filling, and filling and filling.<br /><br />I do not believe I need to add anything more about IBM work on this product.<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/symphonyblogcomments/~4/OKvdPhnUSK8" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/symphonyblogcomments/~3/OKvdPhnUSK8/lotus-symphony-3-now-available-for-download</link>
<feedburner:origLink>http://lotussymphonyblog.com/blog/symblog.nsf/dx/lotus-symphony-3-now-available-for-download?opendocument&amp;comments#10242010093902PMBLOTDX.htm</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>Lotus Synphony CANNOT open ANY Word File</title>
<pubDate>Sun, 24 Oct 2010 21:36:47 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Isabel</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Whats new in Lotus Symphony 3?</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Just wanted to tell you that I downloaded Lotus Symphony final version tonight, installed, and it cannot open ANY MS Word. The texts are 2 pages long, in spanish, no links, no pics, plain text.<br /><br />I do not believe I need to add anything more about this IBM product.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Just wanted to tell you that I downloaded Lotus Symphony final version tonight, installed, and it cannot open ANY MS Word. The texts are 2 pages long, in spanish, no links, no pics, plain text.<br /><br />I do not believe I need to add anything more about this IBM product.<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/symphonyblogcomments/~4/9e4PSCP9wlg" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/symphonyblogcomments/~3/9e4PSCP9wlg/whats-new-in-lotus-symphony-3</link>
<feedburner:origLink>http://lotussymphonyblog.com/blog/symblog.nsf/dx/whats-new-in-lotus-symphony-3?opendocument&amp;comments#10242010093647PMBLOTCJ.htm</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>Notes upgrade tool</title>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 08:43:27 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Sean Cull</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Lotus Symphony 3 now available for download</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Stuart, if you hear about availability of the utility to upgrade the Notes symphony code in place ( as mentioned in the podcast ) can you shout it out too, tks, Sean]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Stuart, if you hear about availability of the utility to upgrade the Notes symphony code in place ( as mentioned in the podcast ) can you shout it out too, tks, Sean<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/symphonyblogcomments/~4/-8LtZDvSoKg" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/symphonyblogcomments/~3/-8LtZDvSoKg/lotus-symphony-3-now-available-for-download</link>
<feedburner:origLink>http://lotussymphonyblog.com/blog/symblog.nsf/dx/lotus-symphony-3-now-available-for-download?opendocument&amp;comments#21102010084327BLOC98.htm</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>Symphony Beta 4: NOW EVEN SLOWER!</title>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 10:14:46 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Isabel</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Lotus Symphony 3 Beta 4 now available</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[IBM speeds up its crash with a new release of the office suite very few use, now even slower. Lacking of features and based on OOO 3 with more java sht, IBM keeps telling around it's a useful suite while companies like Aussie Coke keep rushing to MS arm.<br /><br />Hey IBM EMPLOYEE: WORK A LITTLE, won't kill you. Build from scratch once for all instead all these stinking layers of Eclipse that will Eclipse your stock once for all.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[IBM speeds up its crash with a new release of the office suite very few use, now even slower. Lacking of features and based on OOO 3 with more java sht, IBM keeps telling around it's a useful suite while companies like Aussie Coke keep rushing to MS arm.<br /><br />Hey IBM EMPLOYEE: WORK A LITTLE, won't kill you. Build from scratch once for all instead all these stinking layers of Eclipse that will Eclipse your stock once for all.<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/symphonyblogcomments/~4/gZ02ou4CDSo" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/symphonyblogcomments/~3/gZ02ou4CDSo/lotus-symphony-3-beta-4-now-available</link>
<feedburner:origLink>http://lotussymphonyblog.com/blog/symblog.nsf/dx/lotus-symphony-3-beta-4-now-available?opendocument&amp;comments#09102010101446AMBLOE2A.htm</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>Cannot install Beta 4</title>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 13:06:40 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Nick Halliwell</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Lotus Symphony 3 Beta 3 is now available</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Hi I cannot install the new Beta 4. I have Win 7 Ultimate 64 Bit, 8 Gb of RAM and a high spec rest of the machine. I am running Notes 8.5.2 Gold, also have installed OO.o 3.2.1.<br /><br />I have uninstalled Beta 3 gone through the Registry with a fine tooth comb to remove all references to Symphony. Removed all directories containg anything vaguely like Symphony.<br /><br />The error I am getting is RCP Base plug in not found. <br /><br />What do I do now. I have tried to install older versions and it comes back saying that I must first remove the new version in Programs/x86/Lotus ..... There is no directory left.<br /><br />So what now? Please help.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Hi I cannot install the new Beta 4. I have Win 7 Ultimate 64 Bit, 8 Gb of RAM and a high spec rest of the machine. I am running Notes 8.5.2 Gold, also have installed OO.o 3.2.1.<br /><br />I have uninstalled Beta 3 gone through the Registry with a fine tooth comb to remove all references to Symphony. Removed all directories containg anything vaguely like Symphony.<br /><br />The error I am getting is RCP Base plug in not found. <br /><br />What do I do now. I have tried to install older versions and it comes back saying that I must first remove the new version in Programs/x86/Lotus ..... There is no directory left.<br /><br />So what now? Please help.<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/symphonyblogcomments/~4/9QBEZSBg420" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/symphonyblogcomments/~3/9QBEZSBg420/lotus-symphony-3-beta-3-is-now-available</link>
<feedburner:origLink>http://lotussymphonyblog.com/blog/symblog.nsf/dx/lotus-symphony-3-beta-3-is-now-available?opendocument&amp;comments#08272010010640PMBLOHDQ.htm</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>Cool !!</title>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 06:48:33 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Albert Buendia</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Lotus Symphony 3 Beta 4 now available</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Our upgrade enterprise path from Notes 7.x to Notes 8.5.2 will start as soon as Symphony 3 gets gold. We want to install a full power Notes client. So the Ms Office replacement will start. So the Symphony guys have the key !<br /><br />Regards, Albert.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Our upgrade enterprise path from Notes 7.x to Notes 8.5.2 will start as soon as Symphony 3 gets gold. We want to install a full power Notes client. So the Ms Office replacement will start. So the Symphony guys have the key !<br /><br />Regards, Albert.<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/symphonyblogcomments/~4/9VkuWXFJ4PI" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/symphonyblogcomments/~3/9VkuWXFJ4PI/lotus-symphony-3-beta-4-now-available</link>
<feedburner:origLink>http://lotussymphonyblog.com/blog/symblog.nsf/dx/lotus-symphony-3-beta-4-now-available?opendocument&amp;comments#27082010064833BLO9ZE.htm</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>Symphony 3 compared to Openoffice.org</title>
<pubDate>Wed, 9 Jun 2010 12:22:14 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Ulf Stider</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Lotus Symphony 3 Beta 3 is now available</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Hi,<br /><br />Wrote this comment on Beta 2 post but perhaps I was to late..<br /><br />I am using the new Beta3 and it seams very stable and in comparison to Symphony version 2.x it looks great.<br /><br />I need more arguments for Lotus Symphony when compared to OpenOffice.orgs own compilation.<br /><br />I can see many good reasons as a Lotus Notes customer to use Symphony instead of Openoffice.org, especially when Symphony 3 is released. It would be good with an article on the advantages to use Symphony over OpenOffice.org for non Lotus Notes shops /users.<br /><br />Thanks]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Hi,<br /><br />Wrote this comment on Beta 2 post but perhaps I was to late..<br /><br />I am using the new Beta3 and it seams very stable and in comparison to Symphony version 2.x it looks great.<br /><br />I need more arguments for Lotus Symphony when compared to OpenOffice.orgs own compilation.<br /><br />I can see many good reasons as a Lotus Notes customer to use Symphony instead of Openoffice.org, especially when Symphony 3 is released. It would be good with an article on the advantages to use Symphony over OpenOffice.org for non Lotus Notes shops /users.<br /><br />Thanks<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/symphonyblogcomments/~4/LqV3TLGSGv4" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/symphonyblogcomments/~3/LqV3TLGSGv4/lotus-symphony-3-beta-3-is-now-available</link>
<feedburner:origLink>http://lotussymphonyblog.com/blog/symblog.nsf/dx/lotus-symphony-3-beta-3-is-now-available?opendocument&amp;comments#2010-06-09122214BLOGHX.htm</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
<title>Where can I find a comparison between Symphony 3 and OPenoffice.org?</title>
<pubDate>Tue, 8 Jun 2010 11:13:36 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Ulf Stider</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>PCMech review: Lotus Symphony 3 Beta 2</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[Hi,<br /><br />I am using the new Beta3 and it seams very stable and in comparison to version 2.x it looks great.<br /><br />I need more arguments for Lotus Symphony when compared to OpenOffice.orgs own compilation.<br /><br />I can see many good reasons as a Lotus Notes customer to use Symphony instead of Openoffice.org, at least when Symphony 3 is released. It would be good with an article on the advantages to use Symphony over OpenOffice.org for non Lotus Notes shops/users.<br /><br />Thanks]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Hi,<br /><br />I am using the new Beta3 and it seams very stable and in comparison to version 2.x it looks great.<br /><br />I need more arguments for Lotus Symphony when compared to OpenOffice.orgs own compilation.<br /><br />I can see many good reasons as a Lotus Notes customer to use Symphony instead of Openoffice.org, at least when Symphony 3 is released. It would be good with an article on the advantages to use Symphony over OpenOffice.org for non Lotus Notes shops/users.<br /><br />Thanks<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/symphonyblogcomments/~4/KVRY9HT2h3k" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/symphonyblogcomments/~3/KVRY9HT2h3k/pcmech-review-lotus-symphony-3-beta-2</link>
<feedburner:origLink>http://lotussymphonyblog.com/blog/symblog.nsf/dx/pcmech-review-lotus-symphony-3-beta-2?opendocument&amp;comments#2010-06-08111336BLOF73.htm</feedburner:origLink></item>

</channel></rss>

