The “Salvador option”, this means, this model, which was developed in the United States, was responsible in the 1980s in Central America, El Salvador, that about 75,000 people have lost their lives. In Nicaragua, about 50000 people were the victims of these death squads.

The task of these murder gangs was to break the resistance against the military dictatorships in Central America, which have cooperated well with Washington. John Negroponte was ambassador from 1981 to 1985 in Honduras, where he was responsible for special operations, as it was stated in the article by Chossudovsky. In 2004, Negroponte arrived in Baghdad and also had the “Iraqi Salvador option” in his luggage.

At the side of Negroponte, in the so-called “Green Zone”, Robert Stephen Ford became the number two of the U.S. embassy. The U.S. Embassy in Baghdad has actively supported from now the Iraqi paramilitary forces on the model of the “Salvador option” and based on the former experiences with the death squads in Central America.

The “Iraqi death squads” were fighting against the Iraqi resistance against the occupation by the United States and, in addition, the Iraqi death squads also fueled the sectarian conflict, which was useful for the interests of the United States.

The American “death squads” in Iraq can also be responsible for the attack on the Golden Dome of the Al-Askeri Mosque in Samara in the year 2006, which was a totally professional attack – the Golden Dome was blown totally professional and it was never a surprise that a lot of people thought that the CIA might also be behind it or, at least, has trained the responsible people behinds this attack.

Afterwards, the sectarian conflict begun and this sectarian “war” last till today. The conflict between Shiites and Sunnis became quickly a so-called proxy war between the Shiite Muslim theocracy Iran and the wahabbi-salafist Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

At the end of January 2011, Robert Ford became the U.S. Ambassador to Syria and the rest is almost “history repeating”. According to Chossudovsky, the engagement of “death squads” from Iraq for Syria was already prepared at this time, but at this time the “death squads” were still on hold.

The riots in Syria, which have begun in March 2011, were almost immediately undermined at the beginning by the Iraqi death squads, which had sadly no real problem to enter Syrian soil. Attacks, kidnappings and assassinations bear the mark of such death squads since March 2011.

The massacre of children and their parents and relatives in Hula (Houla / May 25) may have been committed by these death squads, too. The UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon speaks about a “third side” which he makes responsible for the bloody crimes and he also talks about al-Qaeda, like the Syrian government does.

Presumably, the “al-Qaeda in Iraq”, which is now in Syria, is only a new package for the old model of El Salvador. American foreign policy of death.

Article from Prof. Michel Chossudovsky:

“THE SALVADOR OPTION FOR SYRIA”: US-NATO Sponsored Death Squads Integrate “Opposition Forces”

The Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Gennady Gatilov has told Interfax that Moscow is strongly against any kind of an external interference into the Syrian conflict. Deputy Foreign Minister Gatilov is sure that any external interference into the situation in Syria would only worsen the situation.

Gennady Gatilov also said to Interfax that any kind of an external interference into the conflict in Syria would bring unpredictable consequences for Syria and also for the whole region, even for the entire Middle East.

The Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Gennady Gatilov also stated that Moscow is opposing the convention of a new UN Security Council (UNSC) meeting on the topic Syria in the near future. It seems that this allegedly planned meeting of the UN Security Council could be a similar meeting like the meeting before the war on Libya.

Although Western mass media fails in the real coverage of the current events in Libya, more and more people know that this “No-Fly zone” over Libya was finally a war on Libya and has caused a lot of dead. In addition, the current situation in Libya is no good example for any new military intervention in a sovereign state, on the contrary.

He is also convinced that the statement of the UN Security Council president concerning the horrible massacre in Houla (Houla, near Homs) is a strong enough signal to all the parties in the Syrian conflict and also a “sufficient reaction of the Secrutiy Council”. Not to mention that it is questionable why the horrible “Houla massacre” is in the news, but the other massacre that has happened, seems to be forgotten.

The Russian diplomat is also sure that any new measures against the Syrian government or the sovereignty of Syria would affect the situation and would also be too premature for the UN Security Council (UNSC).

The Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Gennady Gatilov was sure not happy about the statements of the French President Francois Holland, who said that a foreign military interference into Syria would be possible. The new French President, who seems to be just another Sarkozy, said earlier, that France does not exclude a military intervention in Syria and that this topic is not out of the questions.

The French President Holland also mentioned that this military intervention has to happen only with the respect to norms of the international law. But what is to think about the so-called international law, while looking at Afghanistan, Iraq, Somalia, Libya and other countries?

Of course, the French president has noted at the same time that also “another solution” is preferable for him and sure for the European Union (EU), too. France demanded more sanctions against the Syrian government, but such sanctions are hypocritically and mainly only harm the Syrian people, although some Western governments still sell the false imagination that those sanctions never harm civilians, which is only to condemn.

It is no surprise that Australia and Belgium support this position of France. Also Germany and Britain could jump in and support it. It would not surprise anyone.

Source: rt.com

The now published list of the victims speaks clearly of the assassination and annihilation of a large Syrian family. The following reports and video footage are of first-hand in Syria.

The scenario within Syria and around Syria becomes more and more threatening. The new French President Hollande, who is not better or worse than Sarkozy, says that he would attack Syria after the mass killings in Al-Hula (Houla) and Taldou. Western countries have expelled the Syrian ambassador and more countries will follow and also do the same with the Syrian ambassadors.

Some Western journalists knew that Western governments will do this with the Syrian ambassadors, already two weeks ago. That the Syrian ambassadors will be expelled from Western countries was planned and it was said two weeks ago that it will happen in the upcoming days.

Thus, Western countries have now expelled the Syrian ambassadors. For example, the Syrian ambassador in Germany was given 72 hours to leave the country. It is not only an action for propaganda purposes but also an action to fetch the headlines again, after some relevant questions appeared about the horrible “Hula massacre” in Syria.

Overall it is also interesting that Western mass media only concentrates about this massacre that was sadly not the only massacre in the last days within Syria. General Mustafa Ahmad al-Sheikh hysterical calls for bombs, bombs, bombs.

Nobody is interested in the truth, or at least, in a hint of the truth about the horrible massacre in Syria. The journalist Marat Musin of ANNA News wrote on his blog yesterday:

“We have just returned from the region of Al-Hula and Homs (Syria). Apparently, the world has gone insane. At least the U.S. and Europe. Money, professional soldiers, cold blooded murder of infants, dead bodies every day. Currently, there is a total cleansing of all those who are more or less loyal to the state power in the region of Al-Hula, the bandits specifically shoot at everyone, who comes in front of them – they shoot at the UN observers, they shoot at the military and even at us journalists.

The combatants have precision weapons, sniper rifles, machine guns, antitank weapons, grenade launchers, grenades. The number of Wahhabi fighters and terrorists, which came from Al Rastan and shabby invaded al-Hula (al Houla), are about 700, currently the village (region) is in their hands and is also held by them.

We just translate the testimony of survivors into Russian and are working on a video report that will be posted here in the blog and overnight at ANNA News. The Syrian government does appear to participate in the cat and mouse game, it seems we were the only journalists who have filmed at this location. So I ask for help in the dissemination of this material.”

The journalist Anhar Kotschnewa, located in Damascus, published some documents, data that demonstrates that the situation is completely different as it is shown by Western mass media.

But even in these documents, nobody seems to be interested in.

Schockstarre-nach-Al-Hula

Schockstarre-nach-Al-Hula2

“The first document is the Statement of General Mood, to which is always referred by the press, just like (the statement) it would (really) include, that the Syrian army is to blame for everything. No word of a conviction of the Syrian army (…).”

The second document is a part of a list of victims, which was created by the “opposition”.

Only 4 of the victims died as a result of the use of heavy weapons (while we remember how the bandits liked it to scrabbling around with the grenade launchers). The remaining 104 people were killed by gunfire or a knife.

And another thing: from 108 dead, 62 dead have the same family names. The others have almost all double names. ALL victims are related to each other. This looks like the extinction of a clan and not at all like an artillery shelling.”

It is more than obvious that Syria has to handle a situation which is a provocative in the style of Gliwice (blessed memory). It is all obvious – it just seems that nobody is interested in. One is interested in “revenge”.

Only to whom? The Syrian government, meanwhile, remains in either a state of shock, or there are already betrayals at higher levels.

There is hardly any other way to explain the relative lack of reaction and the quite unreasonable inaction from the Syrian government.

Just yesterday a new video has surfaced. This video of the region near the Syrian city of Homs shows almost everything that has happened in al-Hula (Houla), Syria. Here’s the video with translation / subtitles:

Source / Based on: Schockstarre nach Al-Hula

It’s a long time ago the northern part of Lebanon became the main transition route for delivering arms to Syrian militants, fighting the legitimate government of Syrian President. The border between Lebanon and Syria is used by Western special services as a passageway for getting special operations units and militants inside Syria. Formally Lebanon takes a neutral position on the Syrian crisis.

But the opposition leader Saad al-Hariri openly supports the adversaries of President Bashar Assad, some sources say he is involved in arms supplies to the Syrian insurgents. According to French Le Figaro, there is a smoothly running system of providing funds to terroristson the territory of Syria. Its center is situated in Lebanese Tripoli. The network faces no problem of funds shortage, it exists at the expense of the Persian Gulf monarchies, in particular the Eid Charity Foundation under the control of Saudi national Safar al-Hawali, Walid Tabtabi from Kuwait and Abdul Rahman al-Naimi from Qatar.

The operation aimed at eliminating Syria is in full swing, it has already moved to the final stage. According to the CNN the US military instructors prepare the special operations forces of Jordan to capture government buildings and overthrow the Syrian government. The “Eager Lion-2012” military exercises started in Jordan in the middle of May bringing together up to 11 thousand special operations troops from 19 Arab and European countries. The exercise is led by the US Central Command. Besides Jordan hosts the US army units that have left Iraq and the militants who came back from Libya to get more training by Jordanian, Saudi and Pakistani instructors.

The exacerbation of the situation in Syria and Lebanon since 2011 is part of the New Greater Middle East concept elaborated long ago by the US “think tanks”. It envisages changing borders in the Middle and Near East. It was expounded in the monograph Strategic Geography and the Changing Middle East by Geoffrey Kemp and Robert Harkavy in the days of Bill Clinton in 1997. Right after the 9/11 2001 Washington started to ponder over the Middle East “redrawing”. US reporter Garrett Porter informed that three weeks after the terrorist acts of 9/11, 2001 then Defense Secretary Donald Ramsfeld came up with a new military strategy, that included as goals the overthrow of Saddam Hussein in Iraq, and then toppling regimes in Syria, Iran and four other Middle East countries. The concept was strongly supported by such a well known neocon as Paul Wolfowitz.

The Porter’s assessment was based on the report by Douglas Feight, a Rumsfeld’s subordinate that emphasized that the idea to redraw the Middle East map by military means was supported by the entire US military establishment. In his book War and Decision Feight included fragments of the report sent by Rumsfeld to then President George Bush on September 30, 2001 calling for focusing on bringing to power “new regimes” in some Arab countries.

The Feight’s words are supported by US retired General Wesley Clark. In his book Winning Modern Wars he said a friend of his who was in the Pentagon at the time said in November 2001 that the Defense Department list of countries where governments were to be overthrown included Iraq, Iran, Syria, Lebanon, Libya and Somalia. The very same countries mentioned by Clark were included into the Rumsfeld’s report published on September 30, 2001 (referred to by Feight).

Formally then President George Bush, Junior came out with the Greater Middle East concept on November 6, 2003 before the National Endowment for Democracy. The occupation of Iraq was to be the first stage of a long struggle for “the victory of democracy” in the Greater Middle East. The list of authors of the concept included Henry Kissinger, Dick Cheney, Condoleezza Rice, Richard Perle and Paul Wolfowitz.

Before G8 summit in June 2004 in Sea Island, Georgia, Washington published a working document Partnership for Progress and a Common Future with the Region of the Broader Middle East and North Africa. Back then Washington failed to receive support for the US way “democratization” of the Middle East. But the US political ruling top never refused the idea and in July 2006 the Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice announced a regional rebuilding plan.

The US leading think tanks had spent a number of years to come up with the plan. The goal of the Greater Middle East concept is creating chaos in the region that would make appear an axis of instability from Lebanon, Palestine to Syria, Iraq, the Persian Gulf states, Iran up to the border with Afghanistan. Besides the Anglo-Saxon military “road map” appears to encompass the whole post Soviet Central Asia, a region to link the unstable Middle East with even more unstable Afghanistan and Pakistan. 

A relatively little known map of the Middle East, Afghanistan and Pakistan started to go around in US government and military circles since the middle of 2006. It was prepared by Lieutenant Colonel Ralf Peters from the National Defense University. His last active service assignment was to the Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff for Intelligence. He is one of the most well known strategy experts with military background. The Map of the Middle East with his notes saw light in June 2006 in the Armed Forces Journal, that is right on the eve of the loud statements by Condoleezza Rice. The article was calledBlood borders: How a better Middle East would look. Never Quit the Fight, the main book by the author that was published in July 2006, was based on the same Map. The US media reported that the four previous books by the author were popular among US government and military circles.

As Ralph Peters saw it, a part of Syria was to be taken away to join “Free Kurdistan”and Sunni Iraq, the Syrian sea shore areas were to become part of Lebanon. Syria was to terminate its existence as a state.

There was an alternative map by prepared by a US Pentagon associated professor Michael F. Davie from Université François-Rabelais. In his work on the reconstruction of Middle East he mentioned the “axis of evil”, formally recognized by the USA, including Sudan, Iraq and Syria. The Michael Davie’s map doesn’t include the territory of Syria in its present day borders: instead there is a small state of Alawites at the sea shore, while Syria itself becomes part of a “new entity” formed together with the Iraqi Sunni. As Davie sees it, the Golan heights would become part of Israel as a result of liquidation of Syria as a sovereign state. Besides a new Palestinian state is going to become established on the territory of contemporary Jordan in exchange for Israel’s refusal to claim East Jerusalem. Lebanon is to be divided into two states: one belonging to the Shiites, another to the Maronites.

There is one more Middle and Near East division map published by the Vanity Fair magazine. It reflects the views of four experts: Dennis Ross, a diplomat with Middle East experience, David Fromkin, a historian, political scholars Kenneth Pollak and Daniel Byman. The idea is as follows. First: The division of Saudi Arabia and Iraq is a must. Second: Egypt is to be divided into two states – an urban area in the Nile delta and the western tribal area. Third, Kuwait and Qatar to be part of the United Arab Emirates to establish a new liberal state on the territory. At last, fourth, the Levant in the eastern part of the Mediterranean is to be a zone belonging to no nation.

The Arab Persian Gulf based TV channels hostile to Syria offer their own map of Syria after Assad. It also envisages the country’s division: a Kurds state in the North, a state of the Druze in the South and a Sunni state in the heart of it. The headquarters of radical groupings calling for a new revolution in Egypt have been searched recently. As a result the “corrected” versions of the Middle East maps have been produced. They have been made public by Al-Ahram and other Egyptian media outlets.

Syria has great role in the US plans. There are only three out of twenty Mediterranean states that are not NATO members and are not tied to the Alliance by “partnership programs”. They are Libya, Lebanon and Syria. Libya has already fallen down under the NATO’s strikes, now it’s the turn of Syria and Lebanon. It’s an occasion than then Secretary of Defense Robert Gates said the Middle East has three repressive regimes: Libya, Syria. Iran. The Where to Invade Next? publication edited by Stephen Elliott and inspired by actual Pentagon documents also lists Syria and Iran among US potential targets.

So, NATO and its Arab allies have already sentenced Syria to dismemberment. The “Arab Spring” gave an impetus to the US plans to redraw the Middle East borders and to the policy of Controlled Chaos worked out in the US Santa-Fe institute. The plans presuppose that the Syria’s downfall will weaken Iran and divert the world attention from the repressions taking place in Saudi Arabia and Bahrain (the both countries – key regional allies of the USA). It’s symptomatic that the talks are already in the air. It is said that Saudi Arabia is to engulf Bahrain, all Shiites are going to be evicted from the territory of the newly formed state. That’s the issue that topped the agenda of the last session of the Persian Gulf Cooperation Council. In the meantime the occupation of Bahrain by Saudi military goes on – their presence there lasts for the whole year and there is no sign they are going to leave.

Source: Sentenced to Extermination
Written by: Igor Ignatchenko
Strategic Culture Foundation on-line journal www.strategic-culture.org.
Image: taoty / FreeDigitalPhotos.net

With the adoption of the UN resolutions on Syria, the Zionist-Wahhabi U.S. plan has failed. The plan included to force a “regime change” in Libya and Syria, implemented  through propaganda, terror, sanctions, and an ultimately genocidal-bombing of the resistance. These steps should prepare the long-planned military regime change in Iran.

The terrorist gangs, which are subordinated to the Zionist U.S. Secretary of State Jeffrey D. Feltman, and which terrorize the Syrian population in fancy names like “Free Syrian Army” (FSA), “Al Qaeda”, or “Farouk Brigade” by bombings and death squads, have in the ongoing democratic process in Syria, despite the massive support of Zionist propaganda and Wahhabi networks, no chance to come to power in Syria, because they are all rejected by the overwhelming majority of the Syrian population.

But behind the scenes, the Zionists and the U.S. government continue to work hard to destabilize Syria, together with the loose combination of the “enemies of the Syrian people” (“Friends of Syria”), in order to fomenting terrorism and the armed violence, because they want to undermine the so-called UN peace plan for Syria.

The recent talks by Jeffrey Feltman with his fascist-Wahhabi friends from the “March 14″ in Lebanon (Beirut) reveal the calculus behind it.

The U.S. reign of terror thinks that it would be useful to further destabilize Syria, at least, until next year (by terrorism), in order to also weaken Iran, at least, temporarily. And by the weakening of Syria, they have also a better chance to reach a “regime change” in Lebanon – at the latest in the Lebanese parliamentary elections in 2013, but a “regime change” in Lebanon is still also possible before this date.

Ultimately, the NATO Allies, who are dominated by Zionists, want the Zionist apartheid regime over Palestine and the Anglo-American dictatorships of Wahhabi-Arabia and Qatar, with the strategy of continuously terrorism in Iran and Syria – of course, also in order to weaken the Lebanese resistance-force, Hezbollah.

Disturbing for these goals is the UN peace plan. The NATO countries agreed on the UN peace plan under the pressure by unmasked propaganda lies in April.

Also disturbing for these goals are the UN observers, who mean a danger for them, because contrary to the strong Zionist and Wahhabi propaganda, it could become more and more clear that the Zionist apartheid regime, the states of the North Atlantic Terror Organization (NATO), under U.S. leadership, as well as the feudal extreme dictatorships, Qatar and Saudi Arabia, were behind the murderous terror in Syria in the past 15 months. Thousands of Syrian people are the victims of organized terrorism (under the false flag of democracy and peace).

To end the fragile peace in Syria officially and thus to get rid of those pesky UN Observers, Feltman`s gang implemented a complex terror and propaganda operation in Syria, consisting of at least two operative parts, just on time for the visit by Kofi Annan to Damascus.

The scheduled plan of the “Feltman operation” is assumed to include the following operation steps:

The main part of the “Feltman operation” was to make sure that about 100 heavily armed Feltman bandits enter the village “Hula” (Houla) near the Syrian city of Homs. (al Houleh, allegedly a name of a Syrian region with three villages near Homs). This armed gang had the order to force chaos and bloodshed in this village. They wildly shoot around, put houses on fire and attack a building of the Syrian security forces. These armed “Feltman rebels” also conquered the hospital of the area.

The Feltman-bandits should entrench themselves in the hospital then. During the attack, the UN observers would be alarmed by the news that the Syrian security forces carry out a massacre on opposition supporters and the civil society with heavy weapons in this area near Homs.

The UN observers should come to Hula (Houlah/al-Houleh), thus that they confirm that the Syrian security forces used (contrary to their obligations under the six-point peace plan by Kofi Annan) heavy weapons in the city. The UN Observers should also monitor the withdrawal of the Feltman-terrorists, who should pretend to be Syrian civilians and that they have defended the hospital against the violent Government forces.

This process would then be used to blame the Syrian government, at least, “semi-officially” confirmed by observers from the UN, with a serious breach of UN resolutions, in the commitment to the ceasefire.

The second part of the Feltman-operation was that some terrorists, with a short run-up to the major surgery, go to the nearby villages, such as al-Shumariyeh, and carry out simple massacre of innocent families to push this horrible violence in the shoes of the Syrian government.

The armed charge of this part of the Feltman operation should murder defenseless people, or especially children and women, the more senseless and cruel the better.

Afterwards, the Feltman-terrorists should take videos and pictures with the murdered victims, which were killed by them. The armed gang should pretend that they are neighbors, who just found the victims by accident.

Then they should explain that the victims were members of friendly families of them and also opponents of the Syrian governments, who were just killed by Syrian security forces. These armed people should also strongly indicate that the Syrian security forces are very close to them, namely in Hula, i.e. where the main operation of the complex Feltman-operation takes place, and currently carry out a massacre there, thus that UN observers are urgent and quickly needed in this area.

With the help of the satellite uplinks, which are described as “non-lethal opposition assistance” by the NATO and GCC countries, which also have provided this, the videos, taken by the Feltman-terrorists, should be uploaded to the Internet, so that the videos can be massive disseminated with the help of the Zionist-Wahhabi propaganda apparatus.

Subsequently, the part of the second Feltman operation should flee and also make the prosecution of them more difficult by e.g. arson.

The main task of the second part of the Feltman-operation was to ensure, that the gruesome pictures and videos of the operation in Hula (Houla/el-Houleh) quickly spreads over the whole world and gets disseminated in all media, so that UN observers quickly come to Hula in order that the desired propaganda effect of the local operation works; and e.g. will not fail because of lower coverage.

After the successful completion of the whole operation should the emerging branch of the Feltman-terrorists, called “Free Syrian Army” (FSA), make a public statement that it is no more possible for them to comply with the ceasefire of the UN resolution(s).

The co-operating regimes of states of NATO and the GCC should then condemn the Syrian government and declare their solidarity with the Feltman-terrorists. Afterwards, the governments should declare in a new UN Security meeting that they drop the previously UN Resolutions and stop the observer mission.

Of course, this should also include that they declare in public to supply the Feltman-terrorists in Syria with weapons and that they threaten Syria again, like it happened at the previous UN resolutions, with an aggressive war on humanitarian reasons.

The ceasefire agreement would thus officially ended, the UN observer mission to monitor the ceasefire would be over and the progress of the disturbing campaign of the UN observers in Syria, which were counterproductive for the terror plans, would also be no more problem, though perhaps not immediately, but no later than the end of the 90-day period.

Significant parts of the Feltman-operation succeeded as they were planned. The killing of innocent women and children in al-Shumariyeh was managed by the Feltman-terrorists, without getting caught by Syrian government forces in the horrible act. The massacres were also pushed by the Zionist-Wahhabi propaganda networks as planned; for example, the German news www.tagesschau.de and www.spiegel.de published this as top news.

This news in the leading media of the NATO countries was also given the needed headlines, so that it was mentioned that forces of the Syrian government could have massacred civilians, women and children in Hula – “Massacres in Syrian Hula: Opposition complains about dozens of dead children” and “Activists speak of massacres – apparently 110 dead after attacks in Syria” and so on.

Notorious lackeys of the Zionist lobby, such as the German and French foreign ministers, also have immediately condemned the Syrian government in public and also very harshly, as it were scheduled.

But in some parts of the Feltman-operation, it did not work as planned.

Some numerous German media in the NATO state Germany have reported, while citing “exile groups”, that strangers went from house to house and that these “insurgents” have indiscriminately murdered people, including children.

This created a risk that contrary to the scheduled scenario to make the Syrian government responsible for the horrible crimes of the Feltman-terrorists, that a “third force” could appear again. But with the crimes of the terrorists, the Syrian government forces should be made responsible, that was the Feltman plan. While heavy weapons like tanks and artillery should be named as murder weapons, because that was the only way to accuse the Syrian government that they have broken the ceasefire.

But the pictures of the murdered children reveal, however, at least in some cases, that they were purposefully murdered by shots from close in or with the help of stabbing, cutting and slashing. Victims of artillery look different.

This mistake leads to new difficulties for the Feltman-terrorists. The attempt to establish the general opinion, that these franctireur (“insurgents”) belong to pro-government forces, which were backed by Syrian security forces, was threatening to fail. It threatened to reach the public, that it actually were the Feltman-terrorists who have committed the horrible crimes.

While numerous German media have subsequently removed the term “insurgents” (franctireur) from their coverage of the Feltman-massacre, some propaganda outlets had this term also in the headlines and all know that the Internet has a persistent memory.

The Feltman-terrorists have made also a mistake in the presentation of the children in their propaganda movies. It is, for example, very evident that the Feltman-terrorists, who have filmed themselves and also have pretended to be neighbors and friends of the dead children and people, handled the bodies of the children like a raw piece of meat and not like friends and neighbors would do it.

Unplanned was also that the Syrian authorities have discovered some victims of the second part of the Feltman-operation already before the start of the operational phase of the main part of this horrible false-flag operation, and therefore the timeline of the story of the Feltman-terrorists has some problems.

Also the UN observers have not reacted in the way as it was scheduled by the Feltman-terrorists. The UN observers did not rushed to help immediately as it was planned by the operation of the Feltman terrorists and despite the cruel policies of the second operation part, so that the withdrawal of the Feltman-terrorists did not work out as planned.

Instead to use the expected propaganda line of the Feltman-terrorist tune, the UN observers condemned the murderous violence without naming a specific party in the conflict as guilty. The UN Observers have condemned the violence in the strongest terms, without accusing one of the sides. They also came to the place when the safety was restored and not on time as it was scheduled by the Feltman-terrorists.

It remains unclear whether the Feltman-terrorists and their NATO-GCC supporters are able to succeed in the manipulating the investigation of the UN Observers. It remains also unclear of the barbaric terrorist operation by Jeffrey Feltman will have the scheduled results – a long-running civil war in Syria to weaken Iran and Hezbollah.

Based on / Source: http://nocheinparteibuch.wordpress.com/2012/05/27/die-feltman-operation/

Image: FreeDigitalPhotos.net

Facts? No evidence, no facts! The German mainstream media babble and publish their articles in the manner of the requirements of the psychological warfare, like it is ordered by the people behind the curtains.

Western Politicians condemn the Syrian President al-Assad unilaterally, although they should know it better. From responsible politicians it is expected, that they want to know the facts to evaluate them, and to come to balanced results.

But the Western media and politicians conceal the truth of others. The truth of the Syrian side. And they blame Syria one-sided for everything. And always immediately, without results of examinations. They rely on anonymous sources, paid by the West. If that doesn’t stink, then what? The Germans are deprived of the most important eyewitness reports.

Here are a few.

The German audience even is not informed about that, that Syria has formed a commission of inquiry (of the “Hula massacre”), which has the plan to present results soon.  Then, when the truth comes to light, it is still dark here (e.g. Germany), behind the Iron Curtain of information.

We will report about the information, which is suppressed by the complex of imperialists. Please, also read the article by Christof Lehmann from yesterday.

U.S. is prepared for war in Syria

What is the purpose of the massacre (Houla)? Who benefits from it? A Syrian government, which would thereby provoke more international pressure by propaganda? Logically, no. Then who?

The answer is provided by the (German State media channel) ARD.

U.S. Chief of Staff, Martin Dempsey, is considering a military action against Syria for the first time. “I think that diplomatic pressure should always precede any discussions about military options. And that is my job by the way, is options, not policy. And so, we will be prepared to provide (military) options if asked to do so,” Dempsey said to CBS.

A conference like before the war in Libya

The killer of Libya, which snotty call themselves “Friends of Syria” now, plan another conference of terrorism, following the role model of the Libyan scenario. And just the usual culprits take back the leadership of the gang.

France and Great Britain, meanwhile, have agreed to convene a conference about Syria. This was announced by the Elysee Palace. A specific date for the “Conference of the Friends of the Syrian people” is not initially named.

The British Prime Minister David Cameron and the new French President François Hollande have stressed that they wanted to increase the pressure of the international community against Assad. (tagesschau 29th 5th 2012)

(This Sarkozy-behavior of Hollande is a prime example that in imperialism – including the Germans – it does not matter which party the people will elect, all follow the same policy, in the end)

Let us remember, the Imperialists met to the same knitting pattern, in Paris, 2011. France and Great Britain were the spokesmen, and without hesitation, the bombing of Libya started. The current Libya lies in ruins and has to complain about tens of thousands dead.

The peaceful protesters turned out to be what they were (and are): armed gangs which are sponsored and also protected by the NATO-UN Alliance.

Today, only a year after the massacre of Tripoli, Bani Walid, and hundreds of other places, where everyone knows about this, the Western media and politics still take the words of the same “peaceful opposition”, from al-Qaeda, the CIA, and the Muslim Brotherhood (also Salafists) in and outside Syria. That is madness!

There is an alternative to war: the West stops the support of its terrorist groups. Yes, dear audience, even you are not informed about this by Western mass media.

The terror is made by the “Friends of Syria”.

Do not forget to read Christof Lehmann`s article.

Source of Translation:

http://hinter-der-fichte.blogspot.de/2012/05/syrien-punktliches-massaker-liefert.html

Upon his arrival, Kofi Annan took the time to condemn the massacre of al-Houla (Hula/al-Houleh) and called for an investigation of the events in this place, which apparently only got this name by an intervention of the dubious “Syrian National Council” (SNC) and the scheming of Google / Google Maps.

Already yesterday, Kofi Annan met with the Syrian Foreign Minister al-Muallem, and will talk with the Syrian President Bashar al-Assad today, before he will hold talks with representatives of the opposition.

Annan’s visit presents an important point in terms of implementing the peace plan, but the recent massacre of al-Houla (Hula) is like a Damocles sword above him and his mission. The so-called six-point peace plan by Kofi Annan for Syria is still officially promoted and, in public, the West sees this plan as the only solution for the situation in Syria.

What is unofficially going on behind the scenes within the NATO governments can only be guessed. Considering the fragments that falsely have slipped to the outside or the information and statements by NATO countries, which do not fit to the facts or even do not match together, a lot is really questionable.

As before the massacre in Houla is maintained, the propaganda against Syria continues and the Western representatives know very well whom they have to blame for the brutal slaying of civilians. But all this is not so sure. There are more questions than answers to the “Hula massacre”. Although everybody demands an investigation of this horrible incident (at least officially) and although it was not the only massacre in the last days, the offender is already determined for the Western NATO vassals and their Arab Gulf friends.

But anyone who has followed the news coverage about this horrible massacre near the Syrian city of Homs should have noticed how the content of the events has been repeatedly changed. The descriptions of the events in and around al-Houla (Hula/Houlah) have repeatedly changed. This is particularly striking with the published statements by the head of the UN Observer mission in Syria, the statements of the Norwegian Major General Robert Mood.

While the Norwegian Major General Robert Mood was cited with these words by Reuters on Sunday: “Whoever started it, whoever has always responded, and whoever has made this deplorable act of violence, should be held accountable,”, one was able to read the following statement of Maj. Gen. Mood today (e.g. at the German state media channel ZDF): “I urge the (Syrian) government to urgently stop any use of violence in all its forms.

Those who use violence to achieve their own goals, will force even more instability, generate even more unpredictable situations and the country might slip a step closer to civil war.” Two almost contradictory statements, though one must assume that the clear condemnation of the Syrian government was put into his mouth, at least, by the German State media.

This is nothing new. ARD, ZDF are known to publish willfully false translations, transcriptions or to change statements. In the end, it`s state media of Germany and Germany is under pressure by foreign governments and organizations. The West wants to topple the Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.

Because of the previously proposed plan did not work, the West, together with Gulf allies and e.g. Turkey, are now working to find new ways to push Assad out of the way (to understand both literally and figuratively). That the allegedly massacre of al-Houla should now play a major role, can be seen, for example, in the attention that is drawn to it and how it is always kept as an issue of the international press, while naming the main culprit, also without results of investigations, so that just nobody forgets who is the bad guy in the Middle East.

Western mass media have lost the dogmas of journalism, already years ago. Not only because of economic interests, but also because of pressures from outside. Investigative journalism is a fairy tale, just as the designation “moderate Islamists” for Salafists and Muslim Brotherhood.

Al-Houla raises more questions than it delivers answers. Not even the sequence of events is really clear. Each side has its representation and the West, which has supposedly no journalists on the spot, at least, no independent, uses statements of allegedly witnesses and so-called (ominous) activists, as usually. But who asserts that these statements are correct? Nobody.

If one follows the mainstream media reporting about al-Houla, one can only see that the condemnation of this massacre near the Syrian city of Homs is rightly. Western mainstream media are selling the image that the Syrian government is to blame.

But why does one not read nothing of the conscience or the religious affiliation of those who were massacred in Hula (al-Houla/Houleh)? Why do Western main stream media keep the voices out of their coverage of the “Hula massacre”, who are saying something about this and other backgrounds? Just ask the easy question, who benefits from this?

These reports should have the same attention like the other unconfirmed reports get, which are willfully used as sources for Western media. It is said that many victims were from the al-Kard tribe, a tribe in Syria which is known to support the Syrian government. Against this backdrop, the question appears:

Why should the Syrian army behind this massacre against supporters of the Syrian government? In addition, some makes really no sense if one wants to really stick to the story that it should have been the Syrian army, which has executed these people.

If this massacre was ordered by the Syrian government, why did the responsible people not care about all the corpses, so that members of the terrorist “Free Syrian Army” (FSA) were able to photograph and film all the victims and use the videos and pictures for their purposes?

So much stupidity and thoughtlessness cannot be given to the Syrian government in Damascus and also the Syrian army is not so stupid. The armed “rebels” have achieved what they wanted with their depiction of the massacre: the armed gangs wanted to boost the debate about a military intervention in Syria.

The Islamists council in Istanbul, Turkey, has been calling for an active support and an intervention from the outside for quite some time. The “Syrian National Council” (SNC) can be called an Islamists council because the majority of members are Islamists, confirmed by e.g. Reuters and opposition members.

The “Syrian National Council” (SNC) in Turkey is not really interested in political talks and favors a military intervention in Syria. At least, this dubious council in Istanbul wants officially support for the armed gangs in Syria to fight against the Syrian President al-Assad and the government in the capital Damascus.

The massacre was now right, especially so close to Annan’s visit in Damascus and to boost the debate about military strikes against Syria. In fact, the U.S. chief of staff, Dempsey, approved in public now the military readiness of U.S. troops if the diplomatic pressure is no longer sufficient. Whether these statements are just threats or not is undecided. The fact is that NATO troops informally, also foreign mercenaries, are already active on Syrian soil, covered by the West, and paid by the Gulf States.

In addition to the requirements for intervention from the ranks of the questionable “Syrian National Council” (SNC), also the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood had a clear message to Syria now. The Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, which has made a deal with the U.S. administration some time ago, calls on all Arab, Islamic and other countries to intervene in Syria and to help the Syrian people.

The battle cries to implement democracy in Syria are repeatedly used. But with violence, weapons and religious fanaticism, this is no good condition to create democracy in a foreign country.

All NATO slaves are not really interested to bring democracy to Syria. These phrases are commonly used to cover real interests. The Western people like democracy and freedom, thus they are influenced with such phrases. The West and its Gulf allies do not care about the Syrian people, they never did. The “Syrian National Council”, based in Istanbul, has also confirmed that this council does not care about the Syrians in Syria.

They want to weaken Syria and to eliminate the anti-imperialist leaders, thus a puppet government can be implemented. Syria would be the next client state after e.g. Jordan and Egypt. The leadership of Syria is not only a huge thorn in the eyes of the imperialists, but also a huge thorn in the eyes of the Gulf monarchies, Gulf regimes.

These Gulf States like Qatar and Saudi Arabia stand up for democracy in Syria and call to help their fellow Muslims there. Impressive, or? Saudi Arabia, Qatar, the democratic role models of the Middle East.

Secular “monarchies” with freedom of press and freedom to protest?! Come on! Nobody can really believe the hypocritically demands of Qatar and Saudi Arabia, just like nobody should trust the biased and partly faked coverage by al Jazeera and al Arabiya. Qatar and Saudi Arabia want to remove the “non-Islamic” leadership in Syria, which is, at least, in their eyes not Islamic, and Qatar as well as Saudi Arabia want to increase their power over Iran.

The NATO states, Gulf allies and some other governments and organizations want to prevent that Syria will be more powerful again. These NATO warmongers want to prevent real reforms in Syria, who could be benefits for the Syrian people, because the plan of destabilization, the plan of a so-called “regime change”, includes the method to bring up the civilians against their government. This is easily to understand.

Thus, some governments in the West and in the Gulf have no real interest in the welfare of the Syrian people. They have no interest that Syria will be strengthened again. These imperialistic warmongers want to further weaken Syria and to further decrease the welfare of the Syrian people. In addition, it is sad but to expect, that there will be more massacres and terrorist attacks in the upcoming days and weeks, even months, in Syria.

This is a part of the “destabilization plan” for Syria. As usually, the double-sided policy of e.g. the United States relies on the so-called terror management. It will be counterproductive again, but it seems the leaders of the West do not care about.

Because of Syria’s ties to Iran and not to be underestimated role in the region, it is not easy for the Western powers and the NATO vassals to officially invade in Syria. Just as Turkey, which has since the beginning of the crisis on the side of Assad’s opponents, and which has probably also infiltrated them politically, is not really willing to intervene in Syria officially, because even for the Turkish government in Ankara, this matter of Syria is too sensitive.

Thus, a lot of sides support the armed groups, religious radicals and criminals behind closed doors, since months. Not to mention that some sides seem very interested in the involvement of Hezbollah (Hezbollah) in this situation. Some sides have already tried to push Hezbollah into these events, but it seems that e.g. Nasrallah is a bit too smart to become another figure of the chessboard for the American games.

Today, the conversation between UN-Arab League envoy Kofi Annan and the Syrian President Bashar al-Assad is on the agenda. It is interesting what will be published from the content of this talk between Annan and al-Assad. It is also interesting what will be released from this in Western media and which will be kept hidden by Western editorial offices for their readers and viewers.

Germany in particular, is playing an evil game when it comes to Syria and acts absolutely dependent and submissive. It seems that the pressures of the United States and some other governments and organizations must be really intensive on the German leadership (and even on German media?).

Like a source of the German state criminal office has mentioned, the United States threaten the German government, that Germany will no more receive any security information and economic benefits, when Germany is not willing to participate in this “redrawing of the Middle East”.

This source has also confirmed that the U.S. administration has made a deal with the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood, even some years ago already. This information seems to be finally confirmed by the recent leak of a meeting with the reincarnation of Lawrence of Arabia, Jeffrey D. Feltman.

The Syrian government repeatedly stated its interest in the implementation of the so-called Annan plan, but the terrorism and armed fights of “opposition forces” must come to an end.

For the welfare of the Syrian people and the purposes of people in the Middle East, the West should end with his false games and stop their “terror management” to achieve “regime changes” and their dubious goals and questionable intentions.

Not to mention that such a horrible massacre is a benefit for the Syrian opposition and not for the Syrian government and President al-Assad. The real implementation of a ceasefire in Syria and the following political dialogue is not in the interests of some sides and e.g. the “Free Syrian Army” (FSA) knows that such political talks are counterproductive to their (only) goal.

To the question “Cui bono?”, the visit of William Hague to Moscow, Russia, could deliver a possible answer.

Even after the statement of the United Nations (UN) to the horrible massacre in Hula (Houla / al-Houlah), there are more questions than answers. Not to mention that the Norwegian Major General Robert Mood is still not able to say who is responsible for all the dead in the Syrian region of the city Homs.

Apart from the important question “Cui bono?”, especially about this “Hula massacre”, there are still some other couple of things which are interesting.

1. The journalist Anhar Kotschnewa is in Damascus and said that she has long studied a detailed map of the province of the Syrian city of Homs and that there is no place called “al-Hula” (or “El-Houleh” like the UN is using it). The journalist Anhar Kotschnewa was not able to find this village on the map.

She knows the region and has even already reported from Homs.  But this is only the Latin version of the name, because the place “Houla” reads in Arabic like “Kafr Laha”. A village called “Houla” (also in Arabic) can be found in South Lebanon. Google was recently in the news because of the fact that Google has deleted the name “Persian Gulf” from Google Maps.

Already in February, Google has changed geographical names without respect, especially in Syria. Google became a collaborator of the armed gangs in this country: even street names were changed in the capital Damascus, at the behest of the “Syrian National Council” (SNC), based in Istanbul, Turkey.

As a viable source of this conflict, “Google Maps” is, at least, to put into question. Or different: Where is this village of Hula?

Google Maps al Houla

About the screenshots: On the left, there is a screenshot of the website “toptopglobe.com” which operates on the basis of Google Maps. Maybe at this service, older data are cached. In any case, everybody is able to read the Latin name there – written “Kafr Laha”. On the right: A current screenshot of Google Maps and it shows the name “Houla”.  It is, at least, strange. In any case, there’s an irregularity.

2. Even such an apparently non-Syria-friendly source like BBC accompanied the news of Al-Hula with the usual phrase for reporting from Syria, “International media are not able to report freely in Syria and it is impossible to verify reports of violence.” But already Christoph Hoerstel (Christoph Hörstel) showed that this phrase is just used for propaganda purposes and not true.

This affects the stories of the armed rebels: artillery fire and targeted executions by the Syrian army had caused the deaths of more than 90 people, including 32 children, in Al-Hula (al-Houleh/Hula), near Homs. Despite all this, several Western leaders have assigned the responsibility for the “Hula massacre” immediately to the Syrian government, of course.

From Stalin’s time the following dialogue from the Politburo was handed down: Stalin said about a “state enemy” – “Arrest, condemn and execute!“. Berija answered: “Perhaps we should conduct an investigation of this matter?” Stalin replied, “Sure, Comrade Berija. Investigate this incident and then, execute him immediately.”

The authenticity of this dialogue is uncertain, but that’s how things go with the massacre of Al-Hula, Syria. It is not to say who is to blame for this “Hula massacre”, but the culprit is already a foregone conclusion for the West.

The massacre in the village (or town) is in itself an extraordinary horrible event, but may be the cause of much worse things in future. The signs are right now that way, that this induces retaliation or aggression against Syria.

Not to mention that the logical conclusion of the so-called “terror management” would assume that more horrible events could follow. More terrorism, explosions, suicide bombings and massacres. The further destabilization of Syria and the plan to keep Syria on a weak level is in the interests of some sides.

In the near future – certainly within the next week – there will be a reaction to this mass murder in al-Houleh/Hula. Then the matter is out of date, so far, the “topic” must be exploited quickly as possible to the maximum.

3. William Hague, the British foreign minister, flies to Moscow to discuss the situation in Syria. The reason for the trip is (also) Al-Hula. The spontaneity, which lets the effect follow the cause at this point, is raising a polite interest in this visit.

Just two days ago, the statements of UN observers were publicized, and these statements are raising a lot of questions, and lo and behold, Hague is going to fly to Russia (Moscow).

Good appetite, William Hague!

Why the British minister William Hague will discuss the topic Syria with Moscow and not the “crazy Clinton” is actually clear. Ever since the Litvinenko affair, the British-Russian relations are rather tense. Whether the Russian Cheka has really poisoned the obscure man in London with exotic teas or not, cannot be determined exactly, in any case, the relations between Russia and England are bad at the moment. But because the United Kingdom is almost a sacred land within the Russian elite and anti-elite, the UK has his change here.

The issue is also clear: Syria for us and you stay away, and we make the relationships good again.

Coincidentally, also just now, Mikhail Khodorkovsky wrote to Cameron and asks him to implement a travel ban to the UK for some 300 Russian government officials. Here is something in the bush.

All in all, the classic scenario: a trading, the carrot and the stick. Of course, his trade about Syria is unfavorable for Russia, because the give up of Syria would be irreversible for Moscow. The relations of the British are a bit tricky. We know from the past: the Russians have allowed themselves to move to enter the First World War, without any interest in contributing to, and had to pay for it with the collapse of their own country. So there are already such experiences.

The trouble is that the interest of the Russian elite does not necessarily reflect the interests of Russia. The entry ban may therefore represent quite a pretty painful maneuver against some powerful Russians: children and wives, lovers and lovers of the beloved, etc., etc. are there.

Immovable property in London is a question of prestige for the Russian elite. The Brits know this, of course. That’s why they come – well, that the subordinate bandits in Syria just provide a reason is a benefit, too.

In this whole situation, it may well be that the Syrian army was not at all close, but the accompanying print resources for yesterday`s trip to Moscow could not so easy be leave to chance.

Source: http://apxwn.blogspot.de/

The terrorists came from Ar-Rastan or Hama and asked the residents that they have to either kill Syrian soldiers with them or they will be killed.

(Such an action is not unique, this is also internationally known, for example, the Mexican drug cartel “Zetas”, which is led by ex-elite soldier, is known for similar actions)

The pharmacy in the village (it seems they mean the health station of the region, because it is later described as a hospital) was set on fire by the terrorists and was also devastated by the armed group. Just because Syrian soldiers were also treated there.

The residents of this Syrian region call the armed rebels “murder gangs”. These Syrian residents which were interviews by “Anna News” complained further, that these “murder gangs” have also written the cause of Islam on their flags.

These Syrian people are especially angry on the Arab news channel Al Jazeera, because al Jazeera lies – “from the beginning to the end”. A Syrian witness said the whole world would already know that Al Jazeera lies and now, they were able to witness these lies of Al Jazeera with their own eyes.

The Syrian residents, which were interviewed by “Anna News”, demand that the Syrian army uses more forces against the armed terrorists that everything will soon be so peaceful and secure like before.

Source: Anna News

The UN Security Council has convened an emergency meeting yesterday. The result of the UNSC emergency meeting about the horrible massacre(s) in Syria was not yet the similar declaration just as it has happened about Libya, but it condemned the violent crimes, of course.

For the most members of the UN Security Council, who have met in New York yesterday, it was just clear after some hours that the Syrian army is to blame for this massacre in Houla (al-Houleh), Homs. Although the statements of the Norwegian Major General Robert Mood have not directly accused a side for this horrible crimes in the Syrian region of the city of Homs.

Some statements of participating members of the UN Security Council assume that the statements of Major General Mood in Syria are somehow irrelevant for some member states of the UN Security Council (UNSC). Repeatedly, the so-called armed rebels commit a lot of crimes within Syria, but only the Syrian government in Damascus is held accountable by Western governments and Western media for these crimes in Syria.

This goes so far that use West editorial offices also images that are sent to them. These photos are not checked but simply published. For example BBC, that has made a huge journalistic mistake in an article about the „Hula massacre” in Syria. BBC has used an image for this report on the massacre in Houla, Homs, which BBC has, as usually, received by a so-called “activists”.

The picture was old and came from Iraq. Later, the wrong image was simply replaced by the staff of BBC, a statement or even excuse is still missing. It was not the first time and some would call this, after all the recent months, just call it willfully propaganda.

It often gives the impression that the NATO countries and some Western editorial offices support the so-called “peaceful protesters”, which are Islamists and also members of the terrorist “Free Syrian Army” (FSA). As a note we have to say that not all armed gangs comply with to the command of the “Free Syrian Army” (FSA).

There are also armed groups of people in Syria. Iraqi jihadists, Libyan fighters, foreign mercenaries and it seems even clear that some special forces of foreign powers are also on Syrian soil. Overall, we have to write, that the increasing sectarian crimes and human rights violations are not only inhuman, but also an indicator that some sides might be interested in boosting these crimes to instigate a real and huge civil war.

This civil war in Syria would finally include some neighboring states and is a risk for the entire Middle East. Not to mention that the statements seem correct that some sides are also interested to get Hezbollah involved in the current situation in Syria.

Since April, Saudi Arabia and Qatar are officially handing money to the armed fighters in Syria and the NATO countries do their part to keep the “Free Syrian Army” (FSA) strong and some Western sides do care about that not much is able to unmask the real face of these religious radicals, criminals and armed strangers.

They want to influence the people in the West so that they are ready and even that they support a new war. All this is already known from previously false wars based on propaganda, false information and Media brainwashing. Not to mention the lies by some Presidents and Ministers around the globe (e.g. war of Iraq). No surprise that some say that it is somehow even a wonder that no official military intervention in Syria has been granted by the special meeting of the UN Security Council yesterday.

Perhaps some Western governments are still the opinion that the secret intervention by armed groups is still sufficient to destabilize and weaken Syria; perhaps the U.S. President Barack Obama wants to wait until the elections, perhaps Syria is not yet weakened as much as it should be. Maybe there are also other motives behind it.

That some more people in the West wake up and realize the propaganda and false reports, at least, the lack of journalism, is a good sign but also irrelevant for the UN Security Council and NATO member states. At least at the moment, because these people are still not enough to be relevant.

While the U.S. President Barack Obama is waiting on Russia’s support and seems to be convinced of the Yemenite model for Syria, the EU (European Union) wants a more decisive action by the so-called “international community” against Syria. For example, the recent leak of a meeting in Lebanon with e.g. Jeffrey D. Feltman has made it clear what is really going on behind the curtains of the “democracy & peace”-farce by Western governments. For sure, this is no new development.

Jeffrey D. Feldman, Robert Ford and Maura Connelly are modern versions of Lawrence of Arabia, T. E. Lawrence 2.0 or already 3.0. Catherine Ashton has announced personally all support of the EU for Ban Ki Moon. Whatever ideas are spun for Syria by the so-called “international community”, they always intervene in Syria’s sovereignty. But that is also irrelevant, as one can see it again and again.

All those who have a keen interest in overthrowing the Syrian President Bashar al-Assad and to involve Hezbollah as soon as possible, have miscalculated and thought it would be easier to overthrow Assad and also faster possible to include Hezbollah in this Middle East plan  game.

After 15 months of fighting, arms smuggling, and secret intervening, they probably have notices that the situation in Syria is in a stalemate from which one has to free themselves somehow. For the NATO-vassals it is clear that the Syrian President Bashar al-Assad must be overthrown; now they have to work on the implementation of this aim. The six-point peace plan by the UN-Arab League envoy Kofi Annan does not work, as the ceasefire in Syria is broken again and again, by all sides.

Such atrocities and massacres as the “Hula massacre” (al-Houlah/al-Houleh) come just right to get an even better means of exerting pressure, to tighten the pace in Syria. The horrible massacre in the Syrian region of Homs (Houla/Hula) raises more questions, than this violent crime is able to deliver some answers.

Thus, the head of the UN Observer Mission convicted the massacre in Hula (Homs, Syria) on Saturday and he has appealed to both sides to finally stop the violence, without specifically blaming the massacre on one side. Robert Mood condemned the massacres and violence but was not able to say who is responsible for e.g. the “Hula massacre” in Syria.

Yesterday, after the special session of the UN Security Council, it was suddenly spread that even some UN Observers have seen tanks in Hula (al-Houleh/Houla). These articles in Western media were later weakened a bit or, at least, a source has finally published a better version of this story. One Syrian tank was allegedly spotted outside this Syrian village.

This is no surprise because tanks of the government forces are in some areas of Syria to provide security. This is the duty of a army and considering the huge human rights violations and terrorism by the armed groups, e.g. “Free Syrian Army” (FSA), it is logically that there are some tanks somewhere. There are even more and more Syrian people, who share the opinion, that there are still too less forces of the Syrian government to protect them of the armed rebels.

Not to mention that Syrian tanks, stationed outside of villages, do not violate the conditions of the peace plan by the UN-Arab League envoy Kofi Annan. Some journalists should better read the content of the six-point plan by Kofi Annan before they make themselves even more ridiculous.

First, the story was published about the “Hula massacre”, that the victims were massacred; shot at close range and then mistreated and stabbed to death. Then suddenly there was the story that many victims were victims of a shelling (grenades). Suddenly, there is information of the United Nations (UN) observers that they have noticed fresh tracks of tanks in this region of Homs.

It’s all so confusing and it suggests that someone acts as “helping tutor”, so that they are able to finally achieve what many forces want since a long time: A military intervention in Syria, at least, an intervention, covered behind so-called “humanitarian zones”.

Both Jihad Makdissi, the spokesman for the Syrian Foreign Ministry, as well as al-Jaafari (Syrian ambassador to the United Nations / Jaffari), have stressed that it is necessary to investigate the crime.

Although everybody has to rely on information provided by some eyewitnesses and some typical videos and although there are different partly contradictory statements about the dead and the facts and the situation that no autopsies were made by independent doctors, the United Nations (UN) in New York was convinced that the Syrian Government shall be accountable for this “Hula massacre”, although in the UN declaration after the special session, just the horrible massacre was condemned as such.

Of course, as it was to expect, the terrorist “Free Syrian Army” (FSA) said after the massacre in Hula (al-Houleh/Houla) that the ceasefire is dead and they have already announced reprisals. Reprisals for the dead of so-called “pro-Assad” supporters? Hm. Yesterday, there were several explosions and clashes between gunmen and Syrian soldiers in different cities in Syria.

Also yesterday, deaths were again reported from Syria, including soldiers of the Syrian army. Unfortunately, Western media is not really interested in publishing objective articles, which means that dead Syrian soldiers are not really mentioned or get even sold as dead Syrian civilians.

Western media has no real interests to condemn all the sides who help to further destabilize Syria and who violate the six-point plan by Kofi Annan since the beginning of the implementation of a ceasefire in Syria. Western mass media has a one-sided coverage, and they use partly double standards for the reports or they even willfully hide facts so that the “Western consumers” are not really able to form an objective opinion.

The armed rebels are celebrated as heroes, while the enemy image, the Syrian government and President al-Assad, is repeatedly rebuilt and reinforced. Like before every major war and the American invasion of Iraq or the NATO invasion of Libya, propaganda is operated to a large extent, to justify the impending violence.

Again and again there are reports of dead children, children’s bodies are shown, and so they stoke the hatred against the government in Damascus. Whether and what is true on all the pictures and videos, nobody can say. Without doubt, it is clear that over 30 small children were slaughtered in Hula (al-Houleh/Houla), but it is absolutely not clear who has carried out such a huge crime against any human sense.

Not to mention that it is again not traceable or verified that the latest information of the so-called “Syrian Observatory for Human Rights” in Syria, based in London, are to believe. This Muslim Brotherhood office in London, the two-man show, has reported again about seven dead babies in the Syrian city of Hama.

But to say it clear and to be honest, every journalist who still uses this source in London is harming his own credibility. Maybe that is a reason that some Western newspapers (online editions) have started to not publish the shortcut of the journalist / author in articles about Syria. The propaganda is ongoing and it is supported by the most sides.

The Syrian government in Damascus is the guilty party, without effective investigations of the massacre in Hula, Homs, and without any secure evidence. Not to mention that the Syrian government has failed in protection its civilians. The so-called “Syrian National Council” (SNC), based in Istanbul, has announced a liberation struggle, an illegal war, which should begin when the UN Security Council will not implement “appropriate action”.

This sounds like the Islamists council, which can be called that way because the majority of SNC-members are Islamists, confirmed by opposition members and e.g. Reuters, would not support the violent fights of the “Free Syrian Army” (FSA) currently. But that is wrong, of course. A real ceasefire in Syria, followed by serious diplomatic talks, would have never been for the benefits of the “Syrian National Council” (SNC) and the terrorist “Free Syrian Army” (FSA).

This should mean, in the understanding of the Muslim Brotherhood puppet Ghalioun that the “Free Syrian Army” (FSA) does its business as usually and probably might increase the crimes to a next level, when there is no international aid for them to fight against the Syrian army and government in Damascus. One can tell which way the wind is blowing. War crimes, the illegaly use of international organizations and councils, and the next misuse of NATO.

Not to mention that even some Western governments, beside the Gulf States like Qatar and Saudi Arabia, are supporting the armed rebels, terrorists, with weapons, funds and advices. But thanks to his election campaign and some concerns about an official NATO mission in Syria, the current U.S. President Barack Obama sticks to politics, albeit very doubtful and double-sided policy.

Today, the UN-Arab League envoy Kofi Annan is expected again in the Syrian capital Damascus. How the day will run is unclear. It remains to be feared that again bombs explode and that fights will cost the lives of people. The “Free Syrian Army” (FSA) tries to overthrow the Syrian government and President Bashar al-Assad by implementing a guerrilla war.

Unlike the common one-sided image in Western media, the Syrian government in Damascus shows much more interest in a political dialogue than the so-called Western-backed (external) opposition, which has so far refused any negotiations which could have led to solutions.

As mention, the violations of the ceasefire in Syria seems to be a benefit of those sides who just have one aim, the overthrow or even the killing of the Syrian President al-Assad. Not to mention that a member of the so-called “Syrian National Council” (SNC), based in Turkey, has stated some time ago, that the Syrian President and his whole family should be killed.

Since the motivation of Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Turkey and the West is clear and since these sides want to overthrow the Syrian government and President al-Assad, it seems only to be a matter of time before they will decide a military intervention, when the supported terrorist tool, the “Free Syrian Army” (FSA), is not able to achieve this by guerilla war and the help of foreign mercenaries and foreign special forces.

They will probably wait until the election campaign in the United States is over, or they will act without the United States. Considering Libya, it does not really matter whether the United States is officially on board or not. Turkey, as vassal of NATO, would be high on the list of the dogs of war.

So far, Turkey has acted in secret, it remains to be seen, when Turkey officially intervenes in Syria. Some believe that the war is coming and that it’s only a matter of time before it erupts. The victims are the civilians, who are already caught in the crossfire in this lousy game, in which the “Free Syrian Army” (FSA) is unilaterally supported and strengthened.

The stalemate in Syria is already reached and the Syrian people suffer of terrorism, violence and the hypocritically sanctions. That secular Syria, that was some time ago a really peaceful place, seems to get more and more destroyed in the power struggle and the dirty games of some sides. It seems that no side really cares about the Syrian civilians.

One can only hope that a “humanitarian intervention” as it has happened in Libya, is prevented. After Tunisia, Libya and Yemen (not to forget Egypt) one should stop to support the Islamists and to bring them to power, because they are cutting into their own flesh.

Image: africa / FreeDigitalPhotos.net