<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/atom10full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:idx="urn:atom-extension:indexing" xmlns:gr="http://www.google.com/schemas/reader/atom/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" idx:index="no"><!--
Content-type: Preventing XSRF in IE.

--><generator uri="http://www.google.com/reader">Google Reader</generator><id>tag:google.com,2005:reader/user/05041919899886319834/label/standards</id><link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><title type="text">T2P Rules, Regulations &amp; Standards News</title><gr:continuation>CO3o4J299J0C</gr:continuation><author><name>Truth to Power Association</name></author><updated>2009-11-09T23:20:40Z</updated><link rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/t2pnewsstandards" type="application/atom+xml" /><feedburner:emailServiceId>t2pnewsstandards</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname>http://feedburner.google.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" /><entry gr:crawl-timestamp-msec="1257808840144"><id gr:original-id="http://www.pogowasright.org/?p=5176">tag:google.com,2005:reader/item/c2042c4975c6f9f2</id><category term="Featured Headlines" scheme="http://www.pogowasright.org" /><category term="Internet" scheme="http://www.pogowasright.org" /><category term="Legislation" scheme="http://www.pogowasright.org" /><category term="Non-U.S." scheme="http://www.pogowasright.org" /><category term="advertising" scheme="http://www.pogowasright.org" /><category term="cookies" scheme="http://www.pogowasright.org" /><category term="opt-in" scheme="http://www.pogowasright.org" /><title type="html">Consent will be required for cookies in Europe</title><published>2009-11-09T16:50:02Z</published><updated>2009-11-09T16:50:02Z</updated><link rel="alternate" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/t2pnewsstandards/~3/cgyEfg0UqH4/" type="text/html" /><content xml:base="http://www.pogowasright.org/?p=5176" xml:lang="en" type="html">&lt;p&gt;An editorial at Out-Law.com written by Struan Robertson, editor:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;The fate of Europe’s cookie law became improbably entwined with a &lt;a href="http://www.out-law.com/page-10475"&gt;debate over file-sharing&lt;/a&gt;. To cut a long story short, it broke free. On 26th October, it was voted through by the Council of the EU. It cannot be stopped and awaits only the rubber-stamp formalities of signature and publication.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The vote’s result was announced by way of a whisper. It featured at the tail end of an &lt;a title="Opens in a new window" href="http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/gena/110776.pdf"&gt; 18-page Council press release&lt;/a&gt; (PDF) that first had to address fishing quotas, train driving licences and a maritime treaty with China. I’m afraid we missed it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There was no attempt to bury this news – but the hushed tones of its reporting were consistent with the media attention it has received to date. There has been almost no fuss about this little law, despite the harm it could do to advertising, the lifeblood of online publishing. It also threatens to irritate all web users by appearing at every new destination like an over-zealous security guard.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Read more on &lt;a href="http://www.out-law.com/page-10510"&gt;Out-Law.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/t2pnewsstandards/~4/cgyEfg0UqH4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><author><name>Dissent</name></author><source gr:stream-id="feed/http://www.pogowasright.org/?cat=14&amp;feed=atom"><id>tag:google.com,2005:reader/feed/http://www.pogowasright.org/?cat=14&amp;feed=atom</id><title type="html">PogoWasRight.org » Legislation</title><link rel="alternate" href="http://www.pogowasright.org/" type="text/html" /></source><feedburner:origLink>http://www.pogowasright.org/?p=5176</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gr:crawl-timestamp-msec="1257808494159"><id gr:original-id="http://www.govinfosecurity.com/articles.php?art_id=1915">tag:google.com,2005:reader/item/9b061c540266e493</id><title type="html">Data Breach Bills Clear Senate Panel</title><published>2009-11-09T23:14:54Z</published><updated>2009-11-09T23:14:54Z</updated><link rel="alternate" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/t2pnewsstandards/~3/1pb04hmzkDQ/articles.php" type="text/html" /><summary xml:base="http://www.govinfosecurity.com/rss_feed/rss_articles.xml" type="html">&lt;img src="http://docs.govinfosecurity.com/files/images_articles/1915_Leahy2.jpg" align="right" hspace="4"&gt;&lt;b&gt;Legislation Heads for a Senate Vote&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;The Senate Judiciary Committee approved two companion bill that would require businesses and government agencies to notify individuals of security breaches involving their sensitive personally identifiable information.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GovinfosecuritycomRssArticles/~4/n9ZvlC6txa8" height="1" width="1"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/t2pnewsstandards/~4/1pb04hmzkDQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><author gr:unknown-author="true"><name>(author unknown)</name></author><source gr:stream-id="feed/http://feeds.feedburner.com/GovinfosecuritycomRssArticles"><id>tag:google.com,2005:reader/feed/http://feeds.feedburner.com/GovinfosecuritycomRssArticles</id><title type="html">GovInfoSecurity.com Articles RSS Syndication</title><link rel="alternate" href="http://www.govinfosecurity.com/rss_feed/rss_articles.xml" type="text/html" /></source><feedburner:origLink>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/GovinfosecuritycomRssArticles/~3/n9ZvlC6txa8/articles.php</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gr:crawl-timestamp-msec="1257807978563"><id gr:original-id="">tag:google.com,2005:reader/item/2617720dc66c7437</id><title type="html">Major SSL Flaw Find Prompts Protocol Update</title><published>2009-11-05T21:05:00Z</published><updated>2009-11-05T21:05:00Z</updated><link rel="alternate" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/t2pnewsstandards/~3/Om3cctU7yfY/showArticle.jhtml" type="text/html" /><summary xml:base="http://www.darkreading.com/" type="html">Vendors, IETF, have been working on a fix since last month for a newly discovered vulnerability in the SSL protocol that spans browsers, servers, smart cards, and other products&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/t2pnewsstandards/~4/Om3cctU7yfY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><author gr:unknown-author="true"><name>(author unknown)</name></author><source gr:stream-id="feed/http://www.darkreading.com/rss/all.xml;jsessionid=LOYAJXMQ3NYJEQSNDLQSKH0CJUNN2JVN"><id>tag:google.com,2005:reader/feed/http://www.darkreading.com/rss/all.xml;jsessionid=LOYAJXMQ3NYJEQSNDLQSKH0CJUNN2JVN</id><title type="html">DarkReading - All Stories</title><link rel="alternate" href="http://www.darkreading.com/" type="text/html" /></source><feedburner:origLink>http://www.darkreading.com/security/vulnerabilities/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=221600523&amp;cid=RSSfeed</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gr:crawl-timestamp-msec="1257807926522"><id gr:original-id="http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9140410/Six_Steps_to_Pull_App_Security_Back_to_the_Future?source=rss_security">tag:google.com,2005:reader/item/c4b183798b85ba82</id><title type="html">Six Steps to Pull App Security Back to the Future</title><published>2009-11-05T20:55:00Z</published><updated>2009-11-05T20:55:00Z</updated><link rel="alternate" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/t2pnewsstandards/~3/E4FGWMoUmuc/Six_Steps_to_Pull_App_Security_Back_to_the_Future" type="text/html" /><summary xml:base="http://www.computerworld.com/" xml:lang="en" type="html">OWASP will host its 2009 AppSec DC conference next week, hoping to arm IT security practitioners with knowledge to improve application security. For a taste of what to expect, organization member Matt Fisher discusses what's wrong with app security today and six ways to make it better.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/t2pnewsstandards/~4/E4FGWMoUmuc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><author><name>(Bill Brenner)</name></author><source gr:stream-id="feed/http://feeds.computerworld.com/Computerworld/Security/News"><id>tag:google.com,2005:reader/feed/http://feeds.computerworld.com/Computerworld/Security/News</id><title type="html">Computerworld Security News</title><link rel="alternate" href="http://www.computerworld.com/" type="text/html" /></source><feedburner:origLink>http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9140410/Six_Steps_to_Pull_App_Security_Back_to_the_Future?source=rss_security</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gr:crawl-timestamp-msec="1257807730840"><id gr:original-id="tag:news.google.com,2005:cluster=http://www.scmagazineuk.com/US-government-fails-to-publish-social-networking-guidelines-as-former-US-CERT-director-claims-that-websites-have-a-responsibility-to-privacy-and-security/article/157106/">tag:google.com,2005:reader/item/55045f3029ace132</id><title type="html">US government fails to publish social networking guidelines as former US-CERT ... - SC Magazine UK</title><published>2009-11-05T13:00:35Z</published><updated>2009-11-05T13:00:35Z</updated><link rel="alternate" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/t2pnewsstandards/~3/nja4UZ8znU0/url" type="text/html" /><summary xml:base="http://news.google.com/" type="html">&lt;table border="0" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="7" style="vertical-align:top"&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td width="80" align="center" valign="top"&gt;&lt;font style="font-size:85%;font-family:arial,sans-serif"&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td valign="top"&gt;&lt;font style="font-size:85%;font-family:arial,sans-serif"&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="padding-top:0.8em"&gt;&lt;img alt="" height="1" width="1"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;a href="http://news.google.com/news/url?fd=R&amp;amp;sa=T&amp;amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.scmagazineuk.com%2FUS-government-fails-to-publish-social-networking-guidelines-as-former-US-CERT-director-claims-that-websites-have-a-responsibility-to-privacy-and-security%2Farticle%2F157106%2F&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHuI-sbKL3kk2mUYcLkWRaV4G4-dg"&gt;&lt;b&gt;US government fails to publish social networking guidelines as former US-CERT &lt;b&gt;...&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;font size="-1"&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;font color="#6f6f6f"&gt;SC Magazine UK&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;font size="-1"&gt;With regard to privacy and dealing with &lt;b&gt;information control&lt;/b&gt; and access, Kwon claimed that this is a &amp;#39;shared responsibility&amp;#39; of both the department and &lt;b&gt;...&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;font size="-1"&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;font size="-1"&gt;&lt;a href="http://news.google.com/news/more?pz=1&amp;amp;ned=us&amp;amp;ncl=dyUSUxswemTsIJM"&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/t2pnewsstandards/~4/nja4UZ8znU0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><author gr:unknown-author="true"><name>(author unknown)</name></author><source gr:stream-id="feed/http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&amp;oe=UTF-8&amp;um=1&amp;tab=wn&amp;resnum=0&amp;cd=1&amp;q=%22information+control%22&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;nolr=1&amp;output=rss"><id>tag:google.com,2005:reader/feed/http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&amp;oe=UTF-8&amp;um=1&amp;tab=wn&amp;resnum=0&amp;cd=1&amp;q=%22information+control%22&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;nolr=1&amp;output=rss</id><title type="html">&amp;quot;information control&amp;quot; - Google News</title><link rel="alternate" href="http://news.google.com?pz=1&amp;ned=us&amp;hl=en" type="text/html" /></source><feedburner:origLink>http://news.google.com/news/url?fd=R&amp;sa=T&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.scmagazineuk.com%2FUS-government-fails-to-publish-social-networking-guidelines-as-former-US-CERT-director-claims-that-websites-have-a-responsibility-to-privacy-and-security%2Farticle%2F157106%2F&amp;usg=AFQjCNHuI-sbKL3kk2mUYcLkWRaV4G4-dg</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gr:crawl-timestamp-msec="1257805660449"><id gr:original-id="http://www.cio.com/article/506710/Analyst_PCI_Security_a_Devil_Like_No_Child_Left_Behind_?source=rss_compliance">tag:google.com,2005:reader/item/d93d4021896d5f85</id><title type="html">Analyst: PCI Security a Devil, 'Like No Child Left Behind'</title><published>2009-11-04T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-11-04T05:00:00Z</updated><link rel="alternate" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/t2pnewsstandards/~3/gPtK5OmusV8/Analyst_PCI_Security_a_Devil_Like_No_Child_Left_Behind_" type="text/html" /><summary xml:base="http://www.cio.com/" type="html">By obsessing about PCI security compliance and spending money on overly complex and underperforming defenses, companies are ignoring risk management and making themselves a target of state-sponsored cyber villains.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/cio/feed/topic/1473/~4/hOMPZRSQtqc" height="1" width="1"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/t2pnewsstandards/~4/gPtK5OmusV8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><author><name>Bill Brenner &lt;info@cio.com&gt;</name></author><source gr:stream-id="feed/http://feeds.feedburner.com/cio/feed/topic/1473"><id>tag:google.com,2005:reader/feed/http://feeds.feedburner.com/cio/feed/topic/1473</id><title type="html">CIO.com - Compliance</title><link rel="alternate" href="http://www.cio.com/" type="text/html" /></source><feedburner:origLink>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/cio/feed/topic/1473/~3/hOMPZRSQtqc/Analyst_PCI_Security_a_Devil_Like_No_Child_Left_Behind_</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gr:crawl-timestamp-msec="1257805653043"><id gr:original-id="http://www.cio.com/article/506733/Delayed_Again_Red_Flags_Rule_Deadline_Now_June_1_2010?source=rss_compliance">tag:google.com,2005:reader/item/a61a390df90a2446</id><title type="html">Delayed Again: Red Flags Rule Deadline Now June 1, 2010</title><published>2009-11-02T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-11-02T05:00:00Z</updated><link rel="alternate" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/t2pnewsstandards/~3/25usO39lZD8/Delayed_Again_Red_Flags_Rule_Deadline_Now_June_1_2010" type="text/html" /><summary xml:base="http://www.cio.com/" type="html">Bowing to Congressional pressure, the FTC is delaying enforcement of the Red Flags Rule until June 1, 2010, for financial institutions and creditors. Here, IT security pros weigh in on what the rule means for them.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/cio/feed/topic/1473/~4/dR69kcEmVaA" height="1" width="1"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/t2pnewsstandards/~4/25usO39lZD8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><author><name>Bill Brenner &lt;info@cio.com&gt;</name></author><source gr:stream-id="feed/http://feeds.feedburner.com/cio/feed/topic/1473"><id>tag:google.com,2005:reader/feed/http://feeds.feedburner.com/cio/feed/topic/1473</id><title type="html">CIO.com - Compliance</title><link rel="alternate" href="http://www.cio.com/" type="text/html" /></source><feedburner:origLink>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/cio/feed/topic/1473/~3/dR69kcEmVaA/Delayed_Again_Red_Flags_Rule_Deadline_Now_June_1_2010</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gr:crawl-timestamp-msec="1257805560496"><id gr:original-id="http://www.cio.com/article/21275/SEC_Denies_Sarbanes_Oxley_Exemption?source=rss_compliance">tag:google.com,2005:reader/item/67ec08353af7e517</id><title type="html">SEC Denies Sarbanes-Oxley Exemption</title><published>2006-05-18T04:00:00Z</published><updated>2006-05-18T04:00:00Z</updated><link rel="alternate" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/t2pnewsstandards/~3/yu19IlP5I1M/SEC_Denies_Sarbanes_Oxley_Exemption" type="text/html" /><summary xml:base="http://www.cio.com/" type="html">Small public cos. will need to comply.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/cio/feed/topic/1475/~4/ih0Cci-JdiM" height="1" width="1"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/t2pnewsstandards/~4/yu19IlP5I1M" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><author gr:unknown-author="true"><name>(author unknown)</name></author><source gr:stream-id="feed/http://feeds.feedburner.com/cio/feed/topic/1475"><id>tag:google.com,2005:reader/feed/http://feeds.feedburner.com/cio/feed/topic/1475</id><title type="html">CIO.com - SARBOX</title><link rel="alternate" href="http://www.cio.com/" type="text/html" /></source><feedburner:origLink>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/cio/feed/topic/1475/~3/ih0Cci-JdiM/SEC_Denies_Sarbanes_Oxley_Exemption</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gr:crawl-timestamp-msec="1257805547558"><id gr:original-id="http://www.cio.com/article/27370/SEC_Sarbanes_Oxley_Changes_to_Give_Small_Public_Firms_a_Break?source=rss_compliance">tag:google.com,2005:reader/item/30eb1ad8560c8342</id><title type="html">SEC Sarbanes-Oxley Changes to Give Small, Public Firms a Break</title><published>2006-12-11T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2006-12-11T05:00:00Z</updated><link rel="alternate" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/t2pnewsstandards/~3/oW_pquTdHCk/SEC_Sarbanes_Oxley_Changes_to_Give_Small_Public_Firms_a_Break" type="text/html" /><summary xml:base="http://www.cio.com/" type="html">The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is on Wednesday expected to start the process to modify existing auditing provisions for small, public firms within the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Sarbox) when it presents new rules related to section 404 of the act, The New York Times reports.Under section 404 of Sarbox, publicly-traded firms are required to evaluate and document the  ...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/cio/feed/topic/1475/~4/KmVQgSrnbSg" height="1" width="1"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/t2pnewsstandards/~4/oW_pquTdHCk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><author gr:unknown-author="true"><name>(author unknown)</name></author><source gr:stream-id="feed/http://feeds.feedburner.com/cio/feed/topic/1475"><id>tag:google.com,2005:reader/feed/http://feeds.feedburner.com/cio/feed/topic/1475</id><title type="html">CIO.com - SARBOX</title><link rel="alternate" href="http://www.cio.com/" type="text/html" /></source><feedburner:origLink>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/cio/feed/topic/1475/~3/KmVQgSrnbSg/SEC_Sarbanes_Oxley_Changes_to_Give_Small_Public_Firms_a_Break</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gr:crawl-timestamp-msec="1257805536083"><id gr:original-id="http://www.cio.com/article/28674/SOX_and_Micromanagement?source=rss_compliance">tag:google.com,2005:reader/item/9f9c5f4722e16372</id><title type="html">SOX and Micromanagement</title><published>2007-01-31T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2007-01-31T05:00:00Z</updated><link rel="alternate" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/t2pnewsstandards/~3/Iqh9ndI1Nio/SOX_and_Micromanagement" type="text/html" /><summary xml:base="http://www.cio.com/" type="html">Organizational consultant N. Dean Meyer reveals how regulations are used as an excuse for costly disempowerment.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/cio/feed/topic/1475/~4/xFpIiXIgK1c" height="1" width="1"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/t2pnewsstandards/~4/Iqh9ndI1Nio" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><author><name>N. Dean Meyer &lt;info@cio.com&gt;</name></author><source gr:stream-id="feed/http://feeds.feedburner.com/cio/feed/topic/1475"><id>tag:google.com,2005:reader/feed/http://feeds.feedburner.com/cio/feed/topic/1475</id><title type="html">CIO.com - SARBOX</title><link rel="alternate" href="http://www.cio.com/" type="text/html" /></source><feedburner:origLink>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/cio/feed/topic/1475/~3/xFpIiXIgK1c/SOX_and_Micromanagement</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gr:crawl-timestamp-msec="1257805503168"><id gr:original-id="http://www.cio.com/article/506630/SP_800_53_is_Essential_for_Security_in_Federal_Government_IT_Systems?source=rss_risk_management">tag:google.com,2005:reader/item/93fb32af5c538e2e</id><title type="html">SP 800-53 is Essential for Security in Federal Government IT Systems</title><published>2009-11-04T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-11-04T05:00:00Z</updated><link rel="alternate" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/t2pnewsstandards/~3/NAn7ktVTmxs/SP_800_53_is_Essential_for_Security_in_Federal_Government_IT_Systems" type="text/html" /><summary xml:base="http://www.cio.com/" type="html">The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Special Publication (SP) SP 800-53 provides a unified information security framework to achieve information system security and effective risk management across the entire Federal Government.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/cio/feed/topic/1464/~4/aoE0xoaYH8w" height="1" width="1"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/t2pnewsstandards/~4/NAn7ktVTmxs" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><author><name>M. E. Kabay &lt;info@cio.com&gt;</name></author><source gr:stream-id="feed/http://feeds.feedburner.com/cio/feed/topic/1464"><id>tag:google.com,2005:reader/feed/http://feeds.feedburner.com/cio/feed/topic/1464</id><title type="html">CIO.com - Risk Management</title><link rel="alternate" href="http://www.cio.com/" type="text/html" /></source><feedburner:origLink>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/cio/feed/topic/1464/~3/aoE0xoaYH8w/SP_800_53_is_Essential_for_Security_in_Federal_Government_IT_Systems</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gr:crawl-timestamp-msec="1257805477187"><id gr:original-id="http://www.cio.com/article/507068/UK_to_Push_for_Law_to_Retain_All_Communications_Data?source=rss_risk_management">tag:google.com,2005:reader/item/0d61a3b1c8a9a5bb</id><title type="html">UK to Push for Law to Retain All Communications Data</title><published>2009-11-09T05:00:00Z</published><updated>2009-11-09T05:00:00Z</updated><link rel="alternate" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/t2pnewsstandards/~3/id88n-rXkxE/UK_to_Push_for_Law_to_Retain_All_Communications_Data" type="text/html" /><summary xml:base="http://www.cio.com/" type="html">The U.K. government said Monday it plans to push for a law requiring service providers such as ISPs to retain data about instant messages, e-mail and other electronic communications.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/cio/feed/topic/1464/~4/6EieFCRyhng" height="1" width="1"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/t2pnewsstandards/~4/id88n-rXkxE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><author><name>Jeremy Kirk &lt;info@cio.com&gt;</name></author><source gr:stream-id="feed/http://feeds.feedburner.com/cio/feed/topic/1464"><id>tag:google.com,2005:reader/feed/http://feeds.feedburner.com/cio/feed/topic/1464</id><title type="html">CIO.com - Risk Management</title><link rel="alternate" href="http://www.cio.com/" type="text/html" /></source><feedburner:origLink>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/cio/feed/topic/1464/~3/6EieFCRyhng/UK_to_Push_for_Law_to_Retain_All_Communications_Data</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gr:crawl-timestamp-msec="1257805334320"><id gr:original-id="http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9140543/Microsoft_to_release_security_guidelines_for_Agile?source=rss_storage">tag:google.com,2005:reader/item/8525e48bb1f62ff7</id><title type="html">Microsoft to release security guidelines for Agile</title><published>2009-11-09T08:03:00Z</published><updated>2009-11-09T08:03:00Z</updated><link rel="alternate" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/t2pnewsstandards/~3/s5njAkBd-KI/Microsoft_to_release_security_guidelines_for_Agile" type="text/html" /><summary xml:base="http://www.computerworld.com/" xml:lang="en" type="html">Microsoft will release on Tuesday guidelines for developers building online applications and for those utilizing the Agile code-development process.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/t2pnewsstandards/~4/s5njAkBd-KI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><author><name>(Jeremy Kirk)</name></author><source gr:stream-id="feed/http://feeds.computerworld.com/Computerworld/Storage/Disaster/Recovery/News"><id>tag:google.com,2005:reader/feed/http://feeds.computerworld.com/Computerworld/Storage/Disaster/Recovery/News</id><title type="html">Computerworld Disaster Recovery News</title><link rel="alternate" href="http://www.computerworld.com/" type="text/html" /></source><feedburner:origLink>http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9140543/Microsoft_to_release_security_guidelines_for_Agile?source=rss_storage</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gr:crawl-timestamp-msec="1257805299721"><id gr:original-id="http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9140223/Opinion_Red_Flags_Rule_deadline_delayed_again_now_June_1?source=rss_compliance">tag:google.com,2005:reader/item/67bc152e309bce35</id><title type="html">Opinion: Red Flags Rule deadline delayed again, now June 1</title><published>2009-11-02T16:07:00Z</published><updated>2009-11-02T16:07:00Z</updated><link rel="alternate" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/t2pnewsstandards/~3/FtZ5cvJFvQQ/Opinion_Red_Flags_Rule_deadline_delayed_again_now_June_1" type="text/html" /><summary xml:base="http://www.computerworld.com/" xml:lang="en" type="html">Bowing to Congressional pressure, the FTC is delaying enforcement of the Red Flags Rule until June 1, 2010, for financial institutions and creditors. Here, IT security pros weigh in on what the rule means for them.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/t2pnewsstandards/~4/FtZ5cvJFvQQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><author><name>(Bill Brenner)</name></author><source gr:stream-id="feed/http://feeds.computerworld.com/Computerworld/Compliance/News"><id>tag:google.com,2005:reader/feed/http://feeds.computerworld.com/Computerworld/Compliance/News</id><title type="html">Computerworld Compliance News</title><link rel="alternate" href="http://www.computerworld.com/" type="text/html" /></source><feedburner:origLink>http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9140223/Opinion_Red_Flags_Rule_deadline_delayed_again_now_June_1?source=rss_compliance</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gr:crawl-timestamp-msec="1257805146213"><id gr:original-id="tag:news.google.com,2005:cluster=http://www.bankinfosecurity.com/articles.php?art_id=1923">tag:google.com,2005:reader/item/80d470583d530c6a</id><title type="html">ID Theft Red Flags Rule: What Have Exams Uncovered? - BankInfoSecurity.com</title><published>2009-11-09T14:44:32Z</published><updated>2009-11-09T14:44:32Z</updated><link rel="alternate" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/t2pnewsstandards/~3/-5icFh-35FU/url" type="text/html" /><summary xml:base="http://news.google.com/" type="html">&lt;table border="0" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="7" style="vertical-align:top"&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td width="80" align="center" valign="top"&gt;&lt;font style="font-size:85%;font-family:arial,sans-serif"&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td valign="top"&gt;&lt;font style="font-size:85%;font-family:arial,sans-serif"&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="padding-top:0.8em"&gt;&lt;img alt="" height="1" width="1"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;a href="http://news.google.com/news/url?fd=R&amp;amp;sa=T&amp;amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bankinfosecurity.com%2Farticles.php%3Fart_id%3D1923&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHhVLUIONb20xqHKLVTtGTPrhU2iQ"&gt;&lt;b&gt;ID Theft Red Flags Rule: What Have Exams Uncovered?&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;font size="-1"&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;font color="#6f6f6f"&gt;BankInfoSecurity.com&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;font size="-1"&gt;It&amp;#39;s been one year since federal regulators started examining banks and credit unions for &lt;b&gt;compliance&lt;/b&gt; with the Identity Theft Red Flags Rule. &lt;b&gt;...&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;font size="-1"&gt;&lt;a href="http://news.google.com/news/url?fd=R&amp;amp;sa=T&amp;amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ama-assn.org%2Famednews%2F2009%2F11%2F09%2Fgvbf1109.htm&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNEztWmuyzOMtB9H4zmu4bEsTNaovQ"&gt;Red flags rule delayed until June 2010&lt;/a&gt;&lt;font size="-1" color="#6f6f6f"&gt;American Medical News&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;font size="-1"&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;font size="-1"&gt;&lt;a href="http://news.google.com/news/more?pz=1&amp;amp;ned=us&amp;amp;ncl=dhbvajfR5wr1pcMdj_oPHPiw3MuEM"&gt;&lt;b&gt;all 2 news articles »&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/t2pnewsstandards/~4/-5icFh-35FU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><author gr:unknown-author="true"><name>(author unknown)</name></author><source gr:stream-id="feed/http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&amp;oe=UTF-8&amp;um=1&amp;tab=wn&amp;resnum=0&amp;cd=1&amp;q=compliance&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;nolr=1&amp;output=rss"><id>tag:google.com,2005:reader/feed/http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&amp;oe=UTF-8&amp;um=1&amp;tab=wn&amp;resnum=0&amp;cd=1&amp;q=compliance&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;nolr=1&amp;output=rss</id><title type="html">compliance - Google News</title><link rel="alternate" href="http://news.google.com?pz=1&amp;ned=us&amp;hl=en" type="text/html" /></source><feedburner:origLink>http://news.google.com/news/url?fd=R&amp;sa=T&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bankinfosecurity.com%2Farticles.php%3Fart_id%3D1923&amp;usg=AFQjCNHhVLUIONb20xqHKLVTtGTPrhU2iQ</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gr:crawl-timestamp-msec="1257446612930"><id gr:original-id="http://www.financetechnews.com/?p=3327">tag:google.com,2005:reader/item/ba5682a295ff40e3</id><category term="Communication" /><category term="Compliance" /><category term="Search engines" /><category term="Special Report" /><category term="User behavior" /><category term="Web sites" /><category term="cybercrime" /><category term="subscribers" /><title type="html">Users misbehave, IT gets punished</title><published>2009-11-04T20:50:02Z</published><updated>2009-11-04T20:50:02Z</updated><link rel="alternate" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/t2pnewsstandards/~3/cJ6ayuX3tyo/" type="text/html" /><content xml:base="http://www.financetechnews.com/" type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;img title="courtroom-detail" src="http://www.hrmorning.com/wp-content/uploads/courtroom-detail.jpg" alt="courtroom-detail" width="360" height="255"&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Another reason to take employee computer monitoring seriously: Lawyers say IT pros could be on the hook for employees’ online behavior. &lt;span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Based on several state laws and court decisions, employers could have a duty to monitor Web use and tell police about employees who access child pornography, according to employment attorney &lt;a href="http://www.shrm.org/LegalIssues/FederalResources/Pages/PoliciesChildPornography.aspx"&gt;Gina M. Smith&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So far, seven states have laws on the books requiring companies to report those crimes: Arkansas, Illinois, Missouri, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina and South Dakota. Failure to do so can result in jail time for IT pros.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Also, in 2005, a company was sued for negligence by the mother of a child pornography victim.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The plaintiff’s husband was arrested after posting inappropriate pictures of his step-daughter online. Apparently, the company monitored his Internet access and saw child pornography sites listed, but never did anything about it. The woman claimed the conduct would have stopped much earlier if the company had stepped in.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A New Jersey court decided in her favor, ruling that a company on notice that a law is being broken with its equipment has a duty to investigate and inform police (&lt;strong&gt;Cite: &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;Doe v. XYC Corp.&lt;/em&gt;).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To avoid liability, Smith recommends companies:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Designate one person to be a point of contact with police if necessary&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Tell all IT staffers about the legal risks and outline a formal report procedure, and&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Let all employees know what they should do if they find someone committing a crime on compant-owned devices.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.financetechnews.com%2Fusers-misbehave-hr-and-it-get-punished%2F&amp;amp;linkname=Users%20misbehave%2C%20IT%20gets%20punished"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.financetechnews.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_120_16.gif" width="120" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/t2pnewsstandards/~4/cJ6ayuX3tyo" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><author><name>Sam Narisi</name></author><source gr:stream-id="feed/http://www.financetechnews.com/feed/"><id>tag:google.com,2005:reader/feed/http://www.financetechnews.com/feed/</id><title type="html">FinanceTechNews.com</title><link rel="alternate" href="http://www.financetechnews.com" type="text/html" /></source><feedburner:origLink>http://www.financetechnews.com/users-misbehave-hr-and-it-get-punished/</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gr:crawl-timestamp-msec="1257446307469"><id gr:original-id="">tag:google.com,2005:reader/item/975d671882b335c9</id><title type="html">New COSO Thought Paper Supports Integration of Strategy and ERM</title><published>2009-11-05T01:30:00Z</published><updated>2009-11-05T01:30:00Z</updated><link rel="alternate" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/t2pnewsstandards/~3/UeArkEE8S6k/" type="text/html" /><summary xml:base="http://www.theiia.org/recent-iia-news/" type="html"> 
COSO highlights specific areas where management can work with its board to enhance the board’s risk oversight capabilities for strategic advantage
 
ALTAMONTE SPRINGS, Fla. – The Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) - an organization providing thought leadership and guidance on internal controls, enterprise risk management and fraud deterrence – has released a new thought paper, Strengthening Enterprise Risk Management for Strategic Advantage, that highlights specific areas where senior management can work with its board of directors to enhance the board’s risk oversight capabilities and the organization’s strategic value. This document builds upon four specific board risk oversight responsibilities outlined in a recently released COSO thought paper, Effective Enterprise Risk Oversight: The Role of the Board of Directors, to provide more detail on ways senior management can work with the board and others in the organization to strengthen risk management in all types of organizations.

“Management is often being asked to provide their boards with more information regarding key risk exposures,” said COSO Chairman David Landsittel. “The challenge facing management is designing and implementing an enterprise wide approach to risk management that is both strategic and value-adding so that the board and senior management have a rich understanding of the organization’s top risk exposures. This thought paper highlights four specific areas where management can work with their board to provide appropriate risk oversight related to strategies and objectives.”

This thought paper calls attention to COSO’s Enterprise Risk Management – Integrated Framework (2004), COSO’s definition of ERM, and the key elements of effective board risk oversight. The paper builds upon four critical areas, which are also highlighted in COSO’s Effective Enterprise Risk Oversight: The Role of the Board of Directors, to provide a basis for introspection about current approaches to risk management and to be a catalyst for management to strengthen its overall approach to enterprise wide risk management to help boards fulfill their risk oversight responsibilities.

“Through our hands-on work with boards and senior executives of organizations of all sizes and industries, we observe a desire for stronger integration of strategy execution and risk oversight,” said Mark Beasley, Deloitte Professor of Enterprise Risk Management and Director of NC State’s ERM Initiative. “This COSO thought paper provides a rich discussion of the many ways management and boards can work to capture the strategic advantage of an enterprise-wide approach to risk management.”

COSO has developed these two thought papers on enterprise risk management to provide more in-depth discussion on how senior management can strengthen risk management processes for strategic advantage. Both thought papers can be downloaded for free at www.coso.org, in addition to the executive summary of COSO’s Enterprise Risk Management – Integrated Framework (2004).
 ###
 
About COSO
Originally formed in 1985 to sponsor the National Commission on Fraudulent Financial Reporting, COSO is a voluntary private sector organization dedicated to improving the quality of financial reporting through business ethics, effective internal controls, and corporate governance. COSO comprises the American Accounting Association (AAA), the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA), Financial Executives International (FEI), the Institute of Management Accountants (IMA), and The Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA).
 
About NC State’s ERM Initiative
The ERM Initiative in the College of Management at North Carolina State University is pioneering thought-leadership about the emergent discipline of enterprise risk management, with a particular focus on the integration of ERM in strategy planning and governance. The ERM Initiative conducts outreach to business professionals through executive education and hands-on advising, its internet portal (www.erm.ncsu.edu); research, advancing knowledge and understanding of ERM issues; and undergraduate and graduate business education for the next generation of business executives.
 &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/t2pnewsstandards/~4/UeArkEE8S6k" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><author gr:unknown-author="true"><name>(author unknown)</name></author><source gr:stream-id="feed/http://www.theiia.org/rss/IIANewsfeed.xml"><id>tag:google.com,2005:reader/feed/http://www.theiia.org/rss/IIANewsfeed.xml</id><title type="html">IIA News Feed</title><link rel="alternate" href="http://www.theiia.org/recent-iia-news/" type="text/html" /></source><feedburner:origLink>http://www.theiia.org/recent-iia-news/?i=12124</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gr:crawl-timestamp-msec="1257446202358"><id gr:original-id="">tag:google.com,2005:reader/item/54558934def931bb</id><title type="html">Almost half ISO 27001 'compliant' firms break basic security requirements</title><published>2009-11-05T18:36:42Z</published><updated>2009-11-05T18:36:42Z</updated><link rel="alternate" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/t2pnewsstandards/~3/EbcB9ZMpP-E/018383.html" type="text/html" /><summary xml:base="http://www.infosecnews.org/mailman/listinfo/isn" type="html">InfoSec News: Almost half ISO 27001 'compliant' firms break basic security requirements: http://www.computerworlduk.com/management/security/data-control/news/index.cfm?newsid=17211
&lt;br&gt;
By Leo King
Computerworld UK
October 22, 2009
&lt;br&gt;
Almost half of businesses that claim compliance with ISO 27001 are 
sharing privileged user accounts and breaking other standard guidance,  [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/t2pnewsstandards/~4/EbcB9ZMpP-E" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><author gr:unknown-author="true"><name>(author unknown)</name></author><source gr:stream-id="feed/http://www.infosecnews.org/isn.rss"><id>tag:google.com,2005:reader/feed/http://www.infosecnews.org/isn.rss</id><title type="html">[ISN] InfoSec News Mailing List</title><link rel="alternate" href="http://www.infosecnews.org/mailman/listinfo/isn" type="text/html" /></source><feedburner:origLink>http://www.infosecnews.org/pipermail/isn/2009-October/018383.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gr:crawl-timestamp-msec="1257446161068"><id gr:original-id="">tag:google.com,2005:reader/item/fc5fba49e7e18b4b</id><title type="html">FDIC Warns Banks to Watch for 'Money Mules' Duped by Hackers</title><published>2009-11-05T18:36:01Z</published><updated>2009-11-05T18:36:01Z</updated><link rel="alternate" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/t2pnewsstandards/~3/sa4rP6rYti4/018410.html" type="text/html" /><summary xml:base="http://www.infosecnews.org/mailman/listinfo/isn" type="html">InfoSec News: FDIC Warns Banks to Watch for 'Money Mules' Duped by Hackers: http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2009/10/money_mules/
&lt;br&gt;
By Kevin Poulsen
Threat Level
Wired.com
October 29, 2009
&lt;br&gt;
Bank customers are increasingly being duped into acting as 'money mules' 
for hackers, unwittingly laundering cash stolen from business bank  [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/t2pnewsstandards/~4/sa4rP6rYti4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><author gr:unknown-author="true"><name>(author unknown)</name></author><source gr:stream-id="feed/http://www.infosecnews.org/isn.rss"><id>tag:google.com,2005:reader/feed/http://www.infosecnews.org/isn.rss</id><title type="html">[ISN] InfoSec News Mailing List</title><link rel="alternate" href="http://www.infosecnews.org/mailman/listinfo/isn" type="text/html" /></source><feedburner:origLink>http://www.infosecnews.org/pipermail/isn/2009-November/018410.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gr:crawl-timestamp-msec="1257445497312"><id gr:original-id="tag:news.google.com,2005:cluster=http://www.cio.co.uk/whitepapers/3204549/beyond-pci-checklists/?otc=41&amp;intcmp=HPM10">tag:google.com,2005:reader/item/f1804618da96bf6f</id><title type="html">Beyond PCI Checklists - CIO UK</title><published>2009-10-26T14:59:51Z</published><updated>2009-10-26T14:59:51Z</updated><link rel="alternate" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/t2pnewsstandards/~3/39TzrrK1mCU/url" type="text/html" /><summary xml:base="http://news.google.com/" type="html">&lt;table border="0" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="7" style="vertical-align:top"&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td width="80" align="center" valign="top"&gt;&lt;font style="font-size:85%;font-family:arial,sans-serif"&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td valign="top"&gt;&lt;font style="font-size:85%;font-family:arial,sans-serif"&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="padding-top:0.8em"&gt;&lt;img alt="" height="1" width="1"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;a href="http://news.google.com/news/url?fd=R&amp;amp;sa=T&amp;amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cio.co.uk%2Fwhitepapers%2F3204549%2Fbeyond-pci-checklists%2F%3Fotc%3D41%26intcmp%3DHPM10&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHlI5cMH3zOcLRKei920g9NMr3Htg"&gt;&lt;b&gt;Beyond PCI Checklists&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;font size="-1"&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;font color="#6f6f6f"&gt;CIO UK&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;font size="-1"&gt;Exploring security requirements under &lt;b&gt;HIPAA&lt;/b&gt; and the privacy and security rules, and reviewing deadlines, penalties and sanctions for non compliance. &lt;b&gt;...&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;font size="-1"&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;font size="-1"&gt;&lt;a href="http://news.google.com/news/more?pz=1&amp;amp;ned=us&amp;amp;ncl=dJmeVcP_hQjsOTM"&gt;&lt;b&gt;and more »&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/t2pnewsstandards/~4/39TzrrK1mCU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><author gr:unknown-author="true"><name>(author unknown)</name></author><source gr:stream-id="feed/http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&amp;oe=UTF-8&amp;um=1&amp;tab=wn&amp;resnum=0&amp;cd=1&amp;q=OCEG+OR+HIPAA&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;nolr=1&amp;output=rss"><id>tag:google.com,2005:reader/feed/http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&amp;oe=UTF-8&amp;um=1&amp;tab=wn&amp;resnum=0&amp;cd=1&amp;q=OCEG+OR+HIPAA&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;nolr=1&amp;output=rss</id><title type="html">OCEG OR HIPAA - Google News</title><link rel="alternate" href="http://news.google.com?pz=1&amp;ned=us&amp;hl=en" type="text/html" /></source><feedburner:origLink>http://news.google.com/news/url?fd=R&amp;sa=T&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cio.co.uk%2Fwhitepapers%2F3204549%2Fbeyond-pci-checklists%2F%3Fotc%3D41%26intcmp%3DHPM10&amp;usg=AFQjCNHlI5cMH3zOcLRKei920g9NMr3Htg</feedburner:origLink></entry></feed>
