<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?><rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>TaxGuru.in - Daily Newsletter</title>
	<atom:link href="https://taxguru.in/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
	<link>https://taxguru.in</link>
	<description>Daily updates for CA, CS, CMA, MBA, Tax and Account Professionals, Advocates on Amendments in Income Tax, MVAT, Company Law, Service Tax, GST, LLP, DGFT, SEBI, RBI, Excise Duty, Custom Duty,  DTC, Corporate Laws, ICAI, ICSI and ICWAI Regulation, FEMA , Government Policies etc.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 15:52:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.2</generator>

 
	<xhtml:meta content="noindex" name="robots" xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"/><item>
		<title>Bombay HC: Assessee Cannot Seek Relief on ₹16 Lakh Already Disallowed in Income Computation</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/bombay-hc-assessee-cannot-seek-relief-rs-16-lakh-disallowed-income-computation.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/bombay-hc-assessee-cannot-seek-relief-rs-16-lakh-disallowed-income-computation.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 17:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 260A]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1066567</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Bombay HC allowed the Revenues appeal after the assessee admitted disallowing ₹16 lakh in its income computation, making the Tribunals restriction to ₹3 lakh contrary to record.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/bombay-hc-assessee-cannot-seek-relief-rs-16-lakh-disallowed-income-computation.html">Bombay HC: Assessee Cannot Seek Relief on ₹16 Lakh Already Disallowed in Income Computation</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/bombay-hc-assessee-cannot-seek-relief-rs-16-lakh-disallowed-income-computation.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>ITAT Mumbai Deletes ₹1.71 Crore Section 68 Addition on Advance Received &amp; Refunded Through Banking Channels</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-mumbai-deletes-rs-1-71-crore-section-68-addition-advance-received-refunded-banking-channels.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-mumbai-deletes-rs-1-71-crore-section-68-addition-advance-received-refunded-banking-channels.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 16:45:46 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(2)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 147]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 148]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 68]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1066544</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[ITAT deleted the Section 68 addition on advance received under an MOU, holding that banking transactions and supporting documents established the transaction's genuineness.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-mumbai-deletes-rs-1-71-crore-section-68-addition-advance-received-refunded-banking-channels.html">ITAT Mumbai Deletes ₹1.71 Crore Section 68 Addition on Advance Received &#038; Refunded Through Banking Channels</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-mumbai-deletes-rs-1-71-crore-section-68-addition-advance-received-refunded-banking-channels.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>ITAT Mumbai Deletes Section 68 Addition on Repaid Unsecured Loans Through Banking Channels</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-mumbai-deletes-section-68-addition-repaid-unsecured-loans-banking-channels.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-mumbai-deletes-section-68-addition-repaid-unsecured-loans-banking-channels.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 16:30:44 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(3)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 68]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1066511</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[ITAT upheld deletion of the Section 68 addition after finding the assessee had proved identity, creditworthiness and genuineness of repaid unsecured loans through banking channels.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-mumbai-deletes-section-68-addition-repaid-unsecured-loans-banking-channels.html">ITAT Mumbai Deletes Section 68 Addition on Repaid Unsecured Loans Through Banking Channels</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-mumbai-deletes-section-68-addition-repaid-unsecured-loans-banking-channels.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>ITAT Mumbai Upholds 0.5% Corporate Guarantee Fee, Allows ESOP Deduction</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-mumbai-upholds-0-5-percent-corporate-guarantee-fee-esop-deduction.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-mumbai-upholds-0-5-percent-corporate-guarantee-fee-esop-deduction.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 16:15:42 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 115JB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 14A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 37(1)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transfer Pricing]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1066492</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[ITAT upheld 0.5% corporate guarantee commission, allowed ESOP deduction under Section 37(1), and deleted Section 14A and Section 115JB adjustments.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-mumbai-upholds-0-5-percent-corporate-guarantee-fee-esop-deduction.html">ITAT Mumbai Upholds 0.5% Corporate Guarantee Fee, Allows ESOP Deduction</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-mumbai-upholds-0-5-percent-corporate-guarantee-fee-esop-deduction.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fresh ₹216.78 Crore ESOP Deduction Claim Can Be Raised Before Appellate Authorities: ITAT Mumbai</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/fresh-rs-216-78-crore-esop-deduction-claim-raised-appellate-authorities-itat-mumbai.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/fresh-rs-216-78-crore-esop-deduction-claim-raised-appellate-authorities-itat-mumbai.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 16:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(3)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 254]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 37]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 37(1)]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1066453</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[ITAT remanded the ESOP deduction claim under Section 37 to the AO after holding that the Tribunal can entertain an additional legal claim not made in the return.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/fresh-rs-216-78-crore-esop-deduction-claim-raised-appellate-authorities-itat-mumbai.html">Fresh ₹216.78 Crore ESOP Deduction Claim Can Be Raised Before Appellate Authorities: ITAT Mumbai</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/fresh-rs-216-78-crore-esop-deduction-claim-raised-appellate-authorities-itat-mumbai.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Orissa HC Directs RTO to Unblock Vehicle on Vahan Portal Pending Penalty Proceedings</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/orissa-hc-directs-rto-unblock-vehicle-vahan-portal-pending-penalty-proceedings.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/orissa-hc-directs-rto-unblock-vehicle-vahan-portal-pending-penalty-proceedings.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[editor8]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 15:52:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1066582</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Orissa HC directed unblocking of a vehicle in the Vahan Portal, permitted reply to the show cause notice, and ordered consideration of the penalty proceedings.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/orissa-hc-directs-rto-unblock-vehicle-vahan-portal-pending-penalty-proceedings.html">Orissa HC Directs RTO to Unblock Vehicle on Vahan Portal Pending Penalty Proceedings</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/orissa-hc-directs-rto-unblock-vehicle-vahan-portal-pending-penalty-proceedings.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>ITAT Ahmedabad Quashes Section 263 Revision Over Change of Disallowance Provision</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-ahmedabad-quashes-section-263-revision-change-disallowance-provision.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-ahmedabad-quashes-section-263-revision-change-disallowance-provision.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 15:45:38 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 115BBE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 147]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 263]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 37]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 68]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 69C]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1066437</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[ITAT quashed the Section 263 revision, holding that disallowance under Section 37 instead of Section 69C was a plausible view where expenditure source was explained.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-ahmedabad-quashes-section-263-revision-change-disallowance-provision.html">ITAT Ahmedabad Quashes Section 263 Revision Over Change of Disallowance Provision</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-ahmedabad-quashes-section-263-revision-change-disallowance-provision.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Madras HC: Section 80IB Deduction Need Not Reduce Section 80HHC Relief</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/madras-hc-section-80ib-deduction-not-reduce-section-80hhc-relief.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/madras-hc-section-80ib-deduction-not-reduce-section-80hhc-relief.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 15:26:03 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income tax act 1961]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(2)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 80HHC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 80IA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 80IB]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1066293</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Madras HC set aside the ITAT order and remanded the matter for recomputation of Sections 80IB and 80HHC deductions following the Supreme Court's ruling in Shital Fibres Limited.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/madras-hc-section-80ib-deduction-not-reduce-section-80hhc-relief.html">Madras HC: Section 80IB Deduction Need Not Reduce Section 80HHC Relief</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/madras-hc-section-80ib-deduction-not-reduce-section-80hhc-relief.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bangalore ITAT Condones 4-Year Delay as Assessee Bona Fide Pursued Section 119(2)(b) Remedy</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/bangalore-itat-condones-4-year-delay-assessee-bona-fide-pursued-section-119-2-remedy.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/bangalore-itat-condones-4-year-delay-assessee-bona-fide-pursued-section-119-2-remedy.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 15:25:29 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 154]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1066415</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[ITAT condoned a four-year delay, holding sufficient cause existed as the assessee pursued an alternative remedy, and restored the appeal for decision on merits.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/bangalore-itat-condones-4-year-delay-assessee-bona-fide-pursued-section-119-2-remedy.html">Bangalore ITAT Condones 4-Year Delay as Assessee Bona Fide Pursued Section 119(2)(b) Remedy</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/bangalore-itat-condones-4-year-delay-assessee-bona-fide-pursued-section-119-2-remedy.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gujarat HC Upholds Section 148 Reopening Based on Tangible Material in Penny Stock Case</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/gujarat-hc-upholds-section-148-reopening-based-tangible-material-penny-stock-case.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/gujarat-hc-upholds-section-148-reopening-based-tangible-material-penny-stock-case.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 15:15:31 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bogus Capital Gain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Long Term Capital Gain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(3)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 147]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 148]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1066407</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Gujarat HC upheld reopening under Sections 147 and 148, holding information on penny stock transactions constituted tangible material to form reason to believe.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/gujarat-hc-upholds-section-148-reopening-based-tangible-material-penny-stock-case.html">Gujarat HC Upholds Section 148 Reopening Based on Tangible Material in Penny Stock Case</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/gujarat-hc-upholds-section-148-reopening-based-tangible-material-penny-stock-case.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bhandari Scrap Traders: Does SC Require Recipient to Prove GST Payment?</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/bhandari-scrap-traders-supreme-court-require-recipient-prove-gst-payment.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/bhandari-scrap-traders-supreme-court-require-recipient-prove-gst-payment.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[akgupta487]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 15:07:32 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[input tax credit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court judgements]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1066503</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Article examines the Supreme Court's Bhandari Scrap Traders ruling, stating Section 16(2)(c) operates through Section 41 and Rule 37A, not recipient investigation.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/bhandari-scrap-traders-supreme-court-require-recipient-prove-gst-payment.html">Bhandari Scrap Traders: Does SC Require Recipient to Prove GST Payment?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/bhandari-scrap-traders-supreme-court-require-recipient-prove-gst-payment.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cash Deposit Before Registered Sale Indicates On-Money Receipt: Delhi ITAT</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/delhi-itat-infers-money-pre-sale-cash-deposit-grants-partial-relief.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/delhi-itat-infers-money-pre-sale-cash-deposit-grants-partial-relief.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Vijayakumar Shetty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 15:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Gain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 142]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 144]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 147]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 148]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 149]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 250]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1066474</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Delhi ITAT upheld reassessment, inferred ₹4.88 lakh on-money, reduced unexplained cash deficit, and directed fresh capital gains computation.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/delhi-itat-infers-money-pre-sale-cash-deposit-grants-partial-relief.html">Cash Deposit Before Registered Sale Indicates On-Money Receipt: Delhi ITAT</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/delhi-itat-infers-money-pre-sale-cash-deposit-grants-partial-relief.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Madras HC Upholds Reopening Within 4 Years Based on TDS Default on Foreign Payment</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/madras-hc-upholds-reopening-4-years-based-tds-default-foreign-payment.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/madras-hc-upholds-reopening-4-years-based-tds-default-foreign-payment.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 15:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(3)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 147]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 148]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 37(1)]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1066385</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Madras HC upheld reassessment under Section 147, holding reopening within four years was based on tangible material and reasons to believe.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/madras-hc-upholds-reopening-4-years-based-tds-default-foreign-payment.html">Madras HC Upholds Reopening Within 4 Years Based on TDS Default on Foreign Payment</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/madras-hc-upholds-reopening-4-years-based-tds-default-foreign-payment.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Karnataka HC: Cashless Exercise of Stock Options Gives Rise to Long-Term Capital Gains, Not Salary</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/karnataka-hc-cashless-exercise-stock-options-rise-long-term-capital-gains-not-salary.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/karnataka-hc-cashless-exercise-stock-options-rise-long-term-capital-gains-not-salary.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 14:45:28 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Gain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(3)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 234B]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 260A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 54F]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1066375</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Karnataka HC held cashless exercise of stock options by an independent consultant resulted in capital gains, not salary, and quashed the Tribunals order.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/karnataka-hc-cashless-exercise-stock-options-rise-long-term-capital-gains-not-salary.html">Karnataka HC: Cashless Exercise of Stock Options Gives Rise to Long-Term Capital Gains, Not Salary</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/karnataka-hc-cashless-exercise-stock-options-rise-long-term-capital-gains-not-salary.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>CAAR Mumbai Reclassifies Pelaforce Extract Under CTH 1302, Grants Customs Duty Exemption</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/caar-mumbai-reclassifies-pelaforce-extract-cth-1302-grants-customs-duty-exemption.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/caar-mumbai-reclassifies-pelaforce-extract-cth-1302-grants-customs-duty-exemption.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 14:41:31 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Custom Duty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AAR Rulings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advance Ruling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Custom Duty Notifications]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1066485</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[CAAR modified its advance ruling, classified Pelaforce EMA1170 under CTH 1302 and held it eligible for Notification No. 45/2025-Customs benefits.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/caar-mumbai-reclassifies-pelaforce-extract-cth-1302-grants-customs-duty-exemption.html">CAAR Mumbai Reclassifies Pelaforce Extract Under CTH 1302, Grants Customs Duty Exemption</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/caar-mumbai-reclassifies-pelaforce-extract-cth-1302-grants-customs-duty-exemption.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>MVAT Appeals Cannot Be Dismissed for Non-Prosecution: Bombay HC</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/mvat-appeals-cannot-dismissed-non-prosecution-bombay-hc.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/mvat-appeals-cannot-dismissed-non-prosecution-bombay-hc.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 14:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MVAT]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1066341</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Bombay High Court set aside Tribunal orders dismissing a VAT appeal for default, holding Section 26(5)(a) MVAT requires appeals to be decided on merits.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/mvat-appeals-cannot-dismissed-non-prosecution-bombay-hc.html">MVAT Appeals Cannot Be Dismissed for Non-Prosecution: Bombay HC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/mvat-appeals-cannot-dismissed-non-prosecution-bombay-hc.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Parent Company Subvention to Prevent Subsidiary Losses Is Capital Receipt: ITAT Pune</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/parent-company-subvention-prevent-subsidiary-losses-capital-receipt-itat-pune.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/parent-company-subvention-prevent-subsidiary-losses-capital-receipt-itat-pune.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 14:15:22 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(3)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 234B]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 263]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 271(1)(c)]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1066297</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[ITAT held parent company subvention was a capital receipt, treated it as operating income for PLI, deleted TP adjustments on intra-group services and royalty.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/parent-company-subvention-prevent-subsidiary-losses-capital-receipt-itat-pune.html">Parent Company Subvention to Prevent Subsidiary Losses Is Capital Receipt: ITAT Pune</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/parent-company-subvention-prevent-subsidiary-losses-capital-receipt-itat-pune.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>SEBI Proposes REIT and InvIT Ease of Doing Business Reforms for Public Consultation</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/sebi/sebi-proposes-reit-invit-ease-business-reforms-public-consultation.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/sebi/sebi-proposes-reit-invit-ease-business-reforms-public-consultation.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 14:07:59 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[SEBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEBI notifications]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1066583</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[SEBI seeks comments on proposed REIT and InvIT reforms covering investments, voting, exit offers, remote infrastructure and OFS cooling-off norms.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/sebi/sebi-proposes-reit-invit-ease-business-reforms-public-consultation.html">SEBI Proposes REIT and InvIT Ease of Doing Business Reforms for Public Consultation</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/sebi/sebi-proposes-reit-invit-ease-business-reforms-public-consultation.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>SEBI Proposes Settlement and Risk Management Changes to Ease Compliance for MIIs</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/sebi/sebi-proposes-settlement-risk-management-ease-compliance-miis.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/sebi/sebi-proposes-settlement-risk-management-ease-compliance-miis.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 14:07:44 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[SEBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEBI notifications]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1066578</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[SEBI seeks public comments on proposed changes to settlement and risk management norms to simplify compliance and reduce regulatory burden on clearing corporations.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/sebi/sebi-proposes-settlement-risk-management-ease-compliance-miis.html">SEBI Proposes Settlement and Risk Management Changes to Ease Compliance for MIIs</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/sebi/sebi-proposes-settlement-risk-management-ease-compliance-miis.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>ITAT Bangalore Remands Goodwill Amortisation and Transfer Pricing Issues for Fresh Review</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-bangalore-remands-goodwill-amortisation-transfer-pricing-issues-fresh-review.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-bangalore-remands-goodwill-amortisation-transfer-pricing-issues-fresh-review.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 14:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(3)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transfer Pricing]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1066220</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[ITAT remanded transfer pricing and goodwill depreciation issues to the AO/TPO, directing fresh examination on benchmarking, comparables, working capital adjustment, and goodwill claims.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-bangalore-remands-goodwill-amortisation-transfer-pricing-issues-fresh-review.html">ITAT Bangalore Remands Goodwill Amortisation and Transfer Pricing Issues for Fresh Review</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-bangalore-remands-goodwill-amortisation-transfer-pricing-issues-fresh-review.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>ITAT Delhi Deletes ALP Adjustment on Imported Capital Goods, Removes Mark-Up on Cost-to-Cost Reimbursements</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-delhi-deletes-alp-adjustment-imported-capital-goods-removes-mark-cost-cost-reimbursements.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-delhi-deletes-alp-adjustment-imported-capital-goods-removes-mark-cost-cost-reimbursements.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 13:45:18 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(3)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 144C]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transfer Pricing]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1066213</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[ITAT deleted transfer pricing adjustments on imported capital goods and expense reimbursements, remanded interest on receivables, and directed consequential relief on depreciation set-off.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-delhi-deletes-alp-adjustment-imported-capital-goods-removes-mark-cost-cost-reimbursements.html">ITAT Delhi Deletes ALP Adjustment on Imported Capital Goods, Removes Mark-Up on Cost-to-Cost Reimbursements</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-delhi-deletes-alp-adjustment-imported-capital-goods-removes-mark-cost-cost-reimbursements.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>ITAT Bangalore Allows Warranty Provision, Remands Transfer Pricing Adjustments</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-bangalore-warranty-provision-remands-transfer-pricing-adjustments.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-bangalore-warranty-provision-remands-transfer-pricing-adjustments.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 13:26:15 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transfer Pricing]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1066048</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[ITAT remanded key transfer pricing issues for fresh examination, allowed warranty provision deduction, and examined comparability and licence fee issues.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-bangalore-warranty-provision-remands-transfer-pricing-adjustments.html">ITAT Bangalore Allows Warranty Provision, Remands Transfer Pricing Adjustments</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-bangalore-warranty-provision-remands-transfer-pricing-adjustments.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Corporate Laws Amendment Bill 2026 Proposes New Section 88(2A) on Trust Entries: FAQs</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/company-law/corporate-laws-amendment-bill-2026-proposes-section-88-2a-trust-entries-faqs.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/company-law/corporate-laws-amendment-bill-2026-proposes-section-88-2a-trust-entries-faqs.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sushil Kumar Antal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 13:20:13 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Company Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies Act 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FAQs]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1066571</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Clause 31 of the Corporate Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2026 proposes Section 88(2A) to bar recording notices of trust in company statutory registers.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/company-law/corporate-laws-amendment-bill-2026-proposes-section-88-2a-trust-entries-faqs.html">Corporate Laws Amendment Bill 2026 Proposes New Section 88(2A) on Trust Entries: FAQs</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/company-law/corporate-laws-amendment-bill-2026-proposes-section-88-2a-trust-entries-faqs.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Unsigned &amp; Unauthenticated ‘Reasons to Believe’ Cannot Sustain Notice under Section 148: Delhi ITAT</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/delhi-itat-quashes-reassessment-unsigned-unauthenticated-reasons-cannot-sustain-notice-section-148.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/delhi-itat-quashes-reassessment-unsigned-unauthenticated-reasons-cannot-sustain-notice-section-148.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Vijayakumar Shetty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 13:05:55 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 144B]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 147]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 148]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1066304</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[ITAT quashed the reassessment after holding that the recorded reasons lacked the Assessing Officer's authentication required under Sections 148(2) and 282A.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/delhi-itat-quashes-reassessment-unsigned-unauthenticated-reasons-cannot-sustain-notice-section-148.html">Unsigned &#038; Unauthenticated &#8216;Reasons to Believe&#8217; Cannot Sustain Notice under Section 148: Delhi ITAT</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/delhi-itat-quashes-reassessment-unsigned-unauthenticated-reasons-cannot-sustain-notice-section-148.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bangalore ITAT: Cash Deposit Addition Unsustainable Without Examining Withdrawals &amp; Cash Flow</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/bangalore-itat-addition-cant-based-gross-cash-deposits.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/bangalore-itat-addition-cant-based-gross-cash-deposits.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Vijayakumar Shetty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 12:13:55 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1066471</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Bangalore ITAT deleted a ₹60 lakh addition after accepting documentary evidence explaining cash deposits and considering withdrawals, cash flow and explanation.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/bangalore-itat-addition-cant-based-gross-cash-deposits.html">Bangalore ITAT: Cash Deposit Addition Unsustainable Without Examining Withdrawals &#038; Cash Flow</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/bangalore-itat-addition-cant-based-gross-cash-deposits.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court Judgments Apply Retrospectively Unless Expressly Made Prospective: SC</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/supreme-court-judgments-apply-retrospectively-unless-prospective-no-subvention-pai.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/supreme-court-judgments-apply-retrospectively-unless-prospective-no-subvention-pai.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Vijayakumar Shetty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 12:02:20 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court judgements]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1066345</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[SC held its judgments apply retrospectively unless expressly prospective and ruled no Government subvention was payable beyond academic year 2002-03.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/supreme-court-judgments-apply-retrospectively-unless-prospective-no-subvention-pai.html">Supreme Court Judgments Apply Retrospectively Unless Expressly Made Prospective: SC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/supreme-court-judgments-apply-retrospectively-unless-prospective-no-subvention-pai.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bangalore ITAT: Credit Co-op Society Entitled to Section 80P Deduction on Bank Interest</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/bangalore-itat-credit-op-society-entitled-section-80p-deduction-bank-interest.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/bangalore-itat-credit-op-society-entitled-section-80p-deduction-bank-interest.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Vijayakumar Shetty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 11:50:59 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(3)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 144B]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 234A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 234B]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 234C]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 250]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 56]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 80P]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1066339</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Bangalore ITAT allowed full section 80P deduction on bank deposit interest, holding section 80P(4) inapplicable to a credit co-operative society.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/bangalore-itat-credit-op-society-entitled-section-80p-deduction-bank-interest.html">Bangalore ITAT: Credit Co-op Society Entitled to Section 80P Deduction on Bank Interest</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/bangalore-itat-credit-op-society-entitled-section-80p-deduction-bank-interest.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>SEBI Appeal Amendment Does Not Affect Pending High Court Appeals: SC</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/sebi/sebi-appeal-amendment-not-affect-pending-high-court-appeals-sc.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/sebi/sebi-appeal-amendment-not-affect-pending-high-court-appeals-sc.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 11:50:22 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[SEBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court judgements]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1066371</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Supreme Court held that appeals filed before the High Court prior to the amendment of Section 15Z of the SEBI Act remain maintainable and dismissed the appeal.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/sebi/sebi-appeal-amendment-not-affect-pending-high-court-appeals-sc.html">SEBI Appeal Amendment Does Not Affect Pending High Court Appeals: SC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/sebi/sebi-appeal-amendment-not-affect-pending-high-court-appeals-sc.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>ITAT Delhi Quashes Section 263 Revision as AO Had Conducted Adequate Enquiry</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-delhi-quashes-section-263-revision-ao-conducted-adequate-enquiry.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-delhi-quashes-section-263-revision-ao-conducted-adequate-enquiry.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 11:45:55 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(3)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 144B]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 263]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 43B]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1066268</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[ITAT quashed the Section 263 revision after finding the AO had conducted adequate enquiries on all issues and the PCIT merely directed fishing enquiries.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-delhi-quashes-section-263-revision-ao-conducted-adequate-enquiry.html">ITAT Delhi Quashes Section 263 Revision as AO Had Conducted Adequate Enquiry</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-delhi-quashes-section-263-revision-ao-conducted-adequate-enquiry.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>ITAT Hyderabad Quashes Section 263 Revision as AO Had Examined Bad Debts &amp; Buy-Back Tax</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-hyderabad-quashes-section-263-revision-ao-examined-bad-debts-buy-tax.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-hyderabad-quashes-section-263-revision-ao-examined-bad-debts-buy-tax.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 11:45:18 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(3)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 144B]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 263]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 68]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1066259</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[ITAT partly set aside the Section 263 revision, restored relief on bad debts and buy-back tax, and upheld fresh examination of Ind AS 116 and onerous contract issues.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-hyderabad-quashes-section-263-revision-ao-examined-bad-debts-buy-tax.html">ITAT Hyderabad Quashes Section 263 Revision as AO Had Examined Bad Debts &#038; Buy-Back Tax</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-hyderabad-quashes-section-263-revision-ao-examined-bad-debts-buy-tax.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>ITAT Chennai Deletes ₹24 Cr ICDS Adjustment Made by CPC Under Section 143(1)</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-chennai-deletes-rs-24-cr-icds-adjustment-cpc-section-143-1.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-chennai-deletes-rs-24-cr-icds-adjustment-cpc-section-143-1.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 11:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICDS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 154]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1066233</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[ITAT upheld deletion of a Section 143(1) ICDS adjustment, finding it caused double disallowance, restored carried forward loss, and allowed prepaid tax credits.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-chennai-deletes-rs-24-cr-icds-adjustment-cpc-section-143-1.html">ITAT Chennai Deletes ₹24 Cr ICDS Adjustment Made by CPC Under Section 143(1)</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-chennai-deletes-rs-24-cr-icds-adjustment-cpc-section-143-1.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bangalore ITAT Restores Section 80G Approval After CIT(E) Ignored Filed Documents</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/bangalore-itat-restores-section-80g-approval-cit-filed-documents.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/bangalore-itat-restores-section-80g-approval-cit-filed-documents.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Vijayakumar Shetty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 11:39:12 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 80G]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1066334</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Bangalore ITAT restored a section 80G approval application after finding the CIT(E) ignored documents filed before passing the rejection order.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/bangalore-itat-restores-section-80g-approval-cit-filed-documents.html">Bangalore ITAT Restores Section 80G Approval After CIT(E) Ignored Filed Documents</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/bangalore-itat-restores-section-80g-approval-cit-filed-documents.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>ITAT Deletes Duplicate ICDS Disallowance on Tangible Fixed Assets</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-deletes-duplicate-icds-disallowance-tangible-fixed-assets.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-deletes-duplicate-icds-disallowance-tangible-fixed-assets.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 11:36:35 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICDS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1066201</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[ITAT deleted duplicate ICDS and MSMED interest disallowances, directed TDS verification, and dismissed transfer pricing grounds as withdrawn.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-deletes-duplicate-icds-disallowance-tangible-fixed-assets.html">ITAT Deletes Duplicate ICDS Disallowance on Tangible Fixed Assets</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-deletes-duplicate-icds-disallowance-tangible-fixed-assets.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>20% Deposit Under Section 148 NI Act Not Mandatory in Exceptional Cases: SC</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/20-percent-deposit-section-148-ni-act-not-mandatory-exceptional-cases-sc.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/20-percent-deposit-section-148-ni-act-not-mandatory-exceptional-cases-sc.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 11:33:48 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Negotiable Instruments Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court judgements]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1066292</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Supreme Court held that 20% deposit under Section 148 of the NI Act is not mandatory in every appeal and exceptional cases may justify suspension of sentence without such deposit.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/20-percent-deposit-section-148-ni-act-not-mandatory-exceptional-cases-sc.html">20% Deposit Under Section 148 NI Act Not Mandatory in Exceptional Cases: SC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/20-percent-deposit-section-148-ni-act-not-mandatory-exceptional-cases-sc.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>SC Upholds CESTAT Order Rejecting Customs Demand Based on Uncertified Electronic Evidence</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/sc-upholds-cestat-order-rejecting-customs-demand-based-uncertified-electronic-evidence.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/sc-upholds-cestat-order-rejecting-customs-demand-based-uncertified-electronic-evidence.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 11:31:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Custom Duty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court judgements]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1066402</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Supreme Court dismissed Revenue's customs appeals, leaving undisturbed the CESTAT order setting aside undervaluation demands and penalties.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/sc-upholds-cestat-order-rejecting-customs-demand-based-uncertified-electronic-evidence.html">SC Upholds CESTAT Order Rejecting Customs Demand Based on Uncertified Electronic Evidence</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/sc-upholds-cestat-order-rejecting-customs-demand-based-uncertified-electronic-evidence.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bangalore ITAT Quashes Reassessment on Non-Existent Company After LLP Conversion</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/bangalore-itat-quashes-reassessment-company-llp-conversion.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/bangalore-itat-quashes-reassessment-company-llp-conversion.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Vijayakumar Shetty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 11:30:56 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LLP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(2)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(3)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 147]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 148]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 153A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 250]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 292B]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1066330</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Bangalore ITAT quashed reassessment orders passed on a company after its conversion into an LLP despite prior intimation to the Assessing Officer.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/bangalore-itat-quashes-reassessment-company-llp-conversion.html">Bangalore ITAT Quashes Reassessment on Non-Existent Company After LLP Conversion</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/bangalore-itat-quashes-reassessment-company-llp-conversion.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>ITAT Chennai Deletes Section 69A Addition on Explained SBN Deposits During Demonetisation</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-chennai-deletes-section-69a-addition-explained-sbn-deposits-demonetisation.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-chennai-deletes-section-69a-addition-explained-sbn-deposits-demonetisation.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 11:29:32 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Demonetization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 115BBE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 144]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 234A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 234B]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 68]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 69A]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1066417</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[ITAT deleted the Section 69A addition on demonetisation cash deposits after holding that the assessee had explained the source through loans from relatives and friends.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-chennai-deletes-section-69a-addition-explained-sbn-deposits-demonetisation.html">ITAT Chennai Deletes Section 69A Addition on Explained SBN Deposits During Demonetisation</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-chennai-deletes-section-69a-addition-explained-sbn-deposits-demonetisation.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Delhi ITAT Deletes ₹15.90 Lakh Addition; Genuine Sale Not Bogus Due to Buyer’s Status</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/delhi-itat-deletes-rs-15-90-lakh-addition-genuine-sale-not-bogus-due-buyers-status.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/delhi-itat-deletes-rs-15-90-lakh-addition-genuine-sale-not-bogus-due-buyers-status.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Vijayakumar Shetty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 11:22:01 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 148]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 250]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 68]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1066327</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Delhi ITAT deleted a ₹15.90 lakh section 68 addition after finding the sale was supported by books, GST records, invoices, stock records and bank receipts.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/delhi-itat-deletes-rs-15-90-lakh-addition-genuine-sale-not-bogus-due-buyers-status.html">Delhi ITAT Deletes ₹15.90 Lakh Addition; Genuine Sale Not Bogus Due to Buyer&#8217;s Status</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/delhi-itat-deletes-rs-15-90-lakh-addition-genuine-sale-not-bogus-due-buyers-status.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Delhi ITAT Remands ₹1.17 Crore Addition After Trust Alleges Forged Bank Account</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/delhi-itat-remands-rs-1-17-crore-addition-trust-alleges-forged-bank-account.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/delhi-itat-remands-rs-1-17-crore-addition-trust-alleges-forged-bank-account.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Vijayakumar Shetty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 11:15:26 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(2)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(3)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 147]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 148]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 271(1)(c)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 69]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1066325</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Delhi ITAT remanded a ₹1.17 crore section 69 addition after finding no proper enquiry into the trust's claim of a forged bank account.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/delhi-itat-remands-rs-1-17-crore-addition-trust-alleges-forged-bank-account.html">Delhi ITAT Remands ₹1.17 Crore Addition After Trust Alleges Forged Bank Account</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/delhi-itat-remands-rs-1-17-crore-addition-trust-alleges-forged-bank-account.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Section 271D Penalty Cannot Survive After Quantum Assessment Is Quashed: Delhi ITAT</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/delhi-itat-section-271d-penalty-cannot-survive-quantum-assessment-quashed-limitation-runs-aos-satisfaction.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/delhi-itat-section-271d-penalty-cannot-survive-quantum-assessment-quashed-limitation-runs-aos-satisfaction.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Vijayakumar Shetty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 11:02:38 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 153C]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 250]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 269SS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 271D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 271E]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1066313</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[ITAT upheld deletion of Section 271D penalty after the quantum assessment was quashed and agreed limitation ran from the AO's recorded satisfaction.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/delhi-itat-section-271d-penalty-cannot-survive-quantum-assessment-quashed-limitation-runs-aos-satisfaction.html">Section 271D Penalty Cannot Survive After Quantum Assessment Is Quashed: Delhi ITAT</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/delhi-itat-section-271d-penalty-cannot-survive-quantum-assessment-quashed-limitation-runs-aos-satisfaction.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Debenture Redemption Reserve Not Book Profit Reserve Under Section 115JB: ITAT Ahmedabad</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/debenture-redemption-reserve-not-book-profit-reserve-section-115jb-itat-ahmedabad.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/debenture-redemption-reserve-not-book-profit-reserve-section-115jb-itat-ahmedabad.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 11:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 115JB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(3)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 144B]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 14A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 250]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 270A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 80IB]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1066059</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[ITAT allowed the assessee's Section 14A appeal, upheld Section 80-IE deduction and MAT relief on Debenture Redemption Reserve, and dismissed Revenue's appeal.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/debenture-redemption-reserve-not-book-profit-reserve-section-115jb-itat-ahmedabad.html">Debenture Redemption Reserve Not Book Profit Reserve Under Section 115JB: ITAT Ahmedabad</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/debenture-redemption-reserve-not-book-profit-reserve-section-115jb-itat-ahmedabad.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Delhi ITAT: AO Cannot Add New Issues After Dropping Reopening Reason</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/delhi-itat-ao-cannot-add-issues-dropping-reopening-reason.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/delhi-itat-ao-cannot-add-issues-dropping-reopening-reason.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Vijayakumar Shetty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 10:53:26 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 148]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 148A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 250]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 68]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1066322</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Delhi ITAT quashed reassessment as no addition was made on the issue for which reopening was initiated, while additions were made on unrelated issues.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/delhi-itat-ao-cannot-add-issues-dropping-reopening-reason.html">Delhi ITAT: AO Cannot Add New Issues After Dropping Reopening Reason</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/delhi-itat-ao-cannot-add-issues-dropping-reopening-reason.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bombay HC Admits Revenue Appeal on Investment Write-Off, Rejects Challenge to Inventory and Bad Debts</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/bombay-hc-admits-revenue-appeal-investment-write-off-rejects-challenge-inventory-bad-debts.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/bombay-hc-admits-revenue-appeal-investment-write-off-rejects-challenge-inventory-bad-debts.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 10:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 36(1)(vii)]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1066193</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[HC dismissed Revenue's challenge to inventory and bad debt write-offs as factual findings but admitted appeals on investment and advance write-offs.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/bombay-hc-admits-revenue-appeal-investment-write-off-rejects-challenge-inventory-bad-debts.html">Bombay HC Admits Revenue Appeal on Investment Write-Off, Rejects Challenge to Inventory and Bad Debts</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/bombay-hc-admits-revenue-appeal-investment-write-off-rejects-challenge-inventory-bad-debts.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Delhi ITAT: Genuine Form 10B Error Not a Bar to Section 11 Exemption; AO to Consider Revised Form</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/delhi-itat-genuine-form-10b-error-not-bar-section-11-exemption-ao-revised-form.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/delhi-itat-genuine-form-10b-error-not-bar-section-11-exemption-ao-revised-form.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Vijayakumar Shetty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 10:45:18 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(2)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(3)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 154]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 250]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1066320</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Delhi ITAT set aside orders under sections 143(3) and 154, directing the AO to consider revised Form 10B and recompute income after a genuine reporting error.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/delhi-itat-genuine-form-10b-error-not-bar-section-11-exemption-ao-revised-form.html">Delhi ITAT: Genuine Form 10B Error Not a Bar to Section 11 Exemption; AO to Consider Revised Form</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/delhi-itat-genuine-form-10b-error-not-bar-section-11-exemption-ao-revised-form.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>For Other Person, Date of Search is Date of Handing Over of Seized Material: Delhi ITAT</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/delhi-itat-quashes-section-153c-proceedings-person-date-search-date-handing-seized-material.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/delhi-itat-quashes-section-153c-proceedings-person-date-search-date-handing-seized-material.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Vijayakumar Shetty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 10:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 132]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 153C]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 250]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1066311</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[ITAT quashed Section 153C proceedings, holding action impermissible where seized material was handed over after 01.04.2021.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/delhi-itat-quashes-section-153c-proceedings-person-date-search-date-handing-seized-material.html">For Other Person, Date of Search is Date of Handing Over of Seized Material: Delhi ITAT</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/delhi-itat-quashes-section-153c-proceedings-person-date-search-date-handing-seized-material.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Section 148 Notice Quashed as AO Revisited Already Examined Section 10AA Claim: Bombay HC</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-148-notice-quashed-ao-revisited-examined-section-10aa-claim-bombay-hc.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-148-notice-quashed-ao-revisited-examined-section-10aa-claim-bombay-hc.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 10:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 10A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 115JB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(3)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 144B]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 147]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 148]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 54]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1066216</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Bombay HC quashed reassessment under Sections 147/148, holding reopening of Section 10AA deduction claim was based on change of opinion and invalid reasons.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-148-notice-quashed-ao-revisited-examined-section-10aa-claim-bombay-hc.html">Section 148 Notice Quashed as AO Revisited Already Examined Section 10AA Claim: Bombay HC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-148-notice-quashed-ao-revisited-examined-section-10aa-claim-bombay-hc.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Delhi ITAT Remands Reassessment Over Alleged Fraudulent Misuse of PAN and Identity</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/delhi-itat-remands-reassessment-alleged-fraudulent-misuse-pan-identity.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/delhi-itat-remands-reassessment-alleged-fraudulent-misuse-pan-identity.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Vijayakumar Shetty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 10:28:02 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 147]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 148]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 250]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 69A]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1066315</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Delhi ITAT remanded reassessment for fresh verification after the assessee alleged fraudulent misuse of his PAN and identity to operate bank accounts.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/delhi-itat-remands-reassessment-alleged-fraudulent-misuse-pan-identity.html">Delhi ITAT Remands Reassessment Over Alleged Fraudulent Misuse of PAN and Identity</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/delhi-itat-remands-reassessment-alleged-fraudulent-misuse-pan-identity.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Omission of Section 92BA(i) Invalidates Specified Domestic Transfer Pricing Proceedings: Delhi ITAT</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/delhi-itat-omission-section-92ba-invalidates-domestic-transaction-transfer-pricing-proceedings.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/delhi-itat-omission-section-92ba-invalidates-domestic-transaction-transfer-pricing-proceedings.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TG Team]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 10:19:44 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Specified Domestic Transaction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transfer Pricing]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1066309</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[ITAT allowed the appeal by following earlier decisions holding that transfer pricing proceedings under omitted Section 92BA(i) were unsustainable.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/delhi-itat-omission-section-92ba-invalidates-domestic-transaction-transfer-pricing-proceedings.html">Omission of Section 92BA(i) Invalidates Specified Domestic Transfer Pricing Proceedings: Delhi ITAT</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/delhi-itat-omission-section-92ba-invalidates-domestic-transaction-transfer-pricing-proceedings.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ad Hoc Disallowance Without Rejecting Books Unsustainable: ITAT Delhi</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/ad-hoc-disallowance-without-rejecting-books-unsustainable-itat-delhi.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/ad-hoc-disallowance-without-rejecting-books-unsustainable-itat-delhi.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 10:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(2)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(3)]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1065992</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[ITAT Delhi deleted the disallowance of business promotion expenses, holding that ad hoc disallowance without rejecting books and departure from consistent treatment was unjustified.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/ad-hoc-disallowance-without-rejecting-books-unsustainable-itat-delhi.html">Ad Hoc Disallowance Without Rejecting Books Unsustainable: ITAT Delhi</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/ad-hoc-disallowance-without-rejecting-books-unsustainable-itat-delhi.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Delhi ITAT Deletes Section 270A Penalty as AO Failed to Specify Exact Charge of Misreporting</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/delhi-itat-deletes-section-270a-penalty-ao-failed-exact-charge-misreporting.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/delhi-itat-deletes-section-270a-penalty-ao-failed-exact-charge-misreporting.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Vijayakumar Shetty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 10:08:47 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 132]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 153C]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 270A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 271DA]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1066300</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Delhi ITAT deleted Section 270A penalty as the AO failed to specify the applicable misreporting clause under Section 270A(9), rendering proceedings invalid.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/delhi-itat-deletes-section-270a-penalty-ao-failed-exact-charge-misreporting.html">Delhi ITAT Deletes Section 270A Penalty as AO Failed to Specify Exact Charge of Misreporting</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/delhi-itat-deletes-section-270a-penalty-ao-failed-exact-charge-misreporting.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>CIT(A) Cannot Enhance Income by Introducing Source Not Examined by AO: ITAT Delhi</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/cit-cannot-enhance-income-introducing-source-not-examined-ao-itat-delhi.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/cit-cannot-enhance-income-introducing-source-not-examined-ao-itat-delhi.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 10:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 132]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 147]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 148]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 153A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 153C]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 154]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 263]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1065999</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[ITAT deleted CIT(A)'s enhancement of 1% commission, holding that appellate powers cannot be used to tax a new source of income not examined by the Assessing Officer.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/cit-cannot-enhance-income-introducing-source-not-examined-ao-itat-delhi.html">CIT(A) Cannot Enhance Income by Introducing Source Not Examined by AO: ITAT Delhi</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/cit-cannot-enhance-income-introducing-source-not-examined-ao-itat-delhi.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Delhi ITAT: Section 40(a)(ia) Disallowance Cannot Apply to Interest Capitalised as WIP</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/delhi-itat-section-40-ia-disallowance-cannot-apply-interest-capitalised-wip.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/delhi-itat-section-40-ia-disallowance-cannot-apply-interest-capitalised-wip.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Vijayakumar Shetty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 09:54:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(3)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 144]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 194I]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 250]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 40(a)(ia)]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1066294</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Delhi ITAT held section 40(a)(ia) cannot disallow interest capitalised as WIP and directed section 201(1A) interest be computed up to deductee's return date.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/delhi-itat-section-40-ia-disallowance-cannot-apply-interest-capitalised-wip.html">Delhi ITAT: Section 40(a)(ia) Disallowance Cannot Apply to Interest Capitalised as WIP</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/delhi-itat-section-40-ia-disallowance-cannot-apply-interest-capitalised-wip.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>ITAT Delhi Deletes Section 68 Addition as Unsecured Loan Was Repaid Through Banking Channels</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/revenue-appeal-dismissed-deletion-sections-68-69c-additions-upheld-itat.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/revenue-appeal-dismissed-deletion-sections-68-69c-additions-upheld-itat.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Vijayakumar Shetty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 09:46:37 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 144]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 147]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 68]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 69C]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1066306</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[ITAT upheld deletion of Sections 68 and 69C additions after noting the unsecured loan was supported by documents and repaid through banking channels.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/revenue-appeal-dismissed-deletion-sections-68-69c-additions-upheld-itat.html">ITAT Delhi Deletes Section 68 Addition as Unsecured Loan Was Repaid Through Banking Channels</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/revenue-appeal-dismissed-deletion-sections-68-69c-additions-upheld-itat.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>ITAT Quashes Reopening After 4 Years as Shortage Claim Was Already Examined</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-quashes-reopening-4-years-shortage-claim-examined.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-quashes-reopening-4-years-shortage-claim-examined.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 09:45:05 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 142]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(3)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 147]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 148]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 37]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1066006</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[ITAT quashed reassessment under Sections 147 and 148, holding that reopening beyond four years was based on a mere change of opinion.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-quashes-reopening-4-years-shortage-claim-examined.html">ITAT Quashes Reopening After 4 Years as Shortage Claim Was Already Examined</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-quashes-reopening-4-years-shortage-claim-examined.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Delhi ITAT Deletes Sections 271D &amp; 271E Penalties for Farmers’ Cash Transactions</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/delhi-itat-deletes-sections-271d-271e-penalties-farmers-cash-transactions.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/delhi-itat-deletes-sections-271d-271e-penalties-farmers-cash-transactions.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Vijayakumar Shetty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 09:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 144]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 147]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 148]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 250]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 269SS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 269T]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 271D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 271E]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1066285</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Delhi ITAT deleted sections 271D and 271E penalties, holding cash transactions with farmers were protected by reasonable cause under section 273B.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/delhi-itat-deletes-sections-271d-271e-penalties-farmers-cash-transactions.html">Delhi ITAT Deletes Sections 271D &#038; 271E Penalties for Farmers&#8217; Cash Transactions</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/delhi-itat-deletes-sections-271d-271e-penalties-farmers-cash-transactions.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Section 148 Notice Quashed as TDS and Expense Claims Were Already Scrutinized: Gujarat HC</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-148-notice-quashed-tds-expense-claims-scrutinized-gujarat-hc.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-148-notice-quashed-tds-expense-claims-scrutinized-gujarat-hc.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 09:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income tax act 1961]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(2)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(3)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 148]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1066065</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Gujarat HC quashed the Section 148 notice issued beyond four years, holding the reassessment was based on issues already examined during scrutiny assessment.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-148-notice-quashed-tds-expense-claims-scrutinized-gujarat-hc.html">Section 148 Notice Quashed as TDS and Expense Claims Were Already Scrutinized: Gujarat HC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-148-notice-quashed-tds-expense-claims-scrutinized-gujarat-hc.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Delhi ITAT: Belated Form 10B Filing Is Procedural; Section 11 Exemption Cannot Be Denied</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/delhi-itat-belated-form-10b-filing-procedural-section-11-exemption-cannot-denied.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/delhi-itat-belated-form-10b-filing-procedural-section-11-exemption-cannot-denied.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Vijayakumar Shetty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 09:15:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 12A]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1066282</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Delhi ITAT held delayed Form 10B filing is procedural, set aside denial of section 11 exemption, and directed fresh consideration on merits.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/delhi-itat-belated-form-10b-filing-procedural-section-11-exemption-cannot-denied.html">Delhi ITAT: Belated Form 10B Filing Is Procedural; Section 11 Exemption Cannot Be Denied</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/delhi-itat-belated-form-10b-filing-procedural-section-11-exemption-cannot-denied.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Managing Partner Liable for Customs Penalty Despite Penalty on Firm: CESTAT Hyderabad</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/managing-partner-liable-customs-penalty-penalty-firm-cestat-hyderabad.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/managing-partner-liable-customs-penalty-penalty-firm-cestat-hyderabad.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 09:15:01 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Custom Duty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cestat judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1066014</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[CESTAT Hyderabad dismissed the appeals, upholding confiscation, redemption fine and penalties after deliberate undervaluation was supported by documentary, electronic and statement evidence.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/managing-partner-liable-customs-penalty-penalty-firm-cestat-hyderabad.html">Managing Partner Liable for Customs Penalty Despite Penalty on Firm: CESTAT Hyderabad</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/managing-partner-liable-customs-penalty-penalty-firm-cestat-hyderabad.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>GST Council Implements IGST Settlement Reforms Through GST Settlement of Fund Rules, 2026</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-council-implements-igst-settlement-reforms-gst-settlement-fund-rules-2026.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-council-implements-igst-settlement-reforms-gst-settlement-fund-rules-2026.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 09:13:33 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST Notifications]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1066236</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[GST Council adopted Committee recommendations on IGST settlement, notified GST Settlement of Fund Rules, 2026, and implemented a new SOP for ITC reversals.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-council-implements-igst-settlement-reforms-gst-settlement-fund-rules-2026.html">GST Council Implements IGST Settlement Reforms Through GST Settlement of Fund Rules, 2026</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-council-implements-igst-settlement-reforms-gst-settlement-fund-rules-2026.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Government Explains ₹10 Per Litre Excise Duty Cut on Petrol and Diesel</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/excise-duty/government-explains-rs-10-litre-excise-duty-cut-petrol-diesel.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/excise-duty/government-explains-rs-10-litre-excise-duty-cut-petrol-diesel.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 09:13:24 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Excise Duty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Policy]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1066264</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Government says ₹10 per litre excise duty cut in March 2026 protected consumers, supported OMCs and was managed within fiscal consolidation objectives.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/excise-duty/government-explains-rs-10-litre-excise-duty-cut-petrol-diesel.html">Government Explains ₹10 Per Litre Excise Duty Cut on Petrol and Diesel</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/excise-duty/government-explains-rs-10-litre-excise-duty-cut-petrol-diesel.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Finance Ministry Continues Anti-Dumping Duty on Phthalic Anhydride from China &amp; Korea</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/finance-ministry-continues-anti-dumping-duty-phthalic-anhydride-china-korea.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/finance-ministry-continues-anti-dumping-duty-phthalic-anhydride-china-korea.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 09:12:13 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Custom Duty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Custom Duty Notifications]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1066267</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Notification No. 20/2026-Customs (ADD) continues anti-dumping duty on Phthalic Anhydride imports from China and Korea for five years.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/finance-ministry-continues-anti-dumping-duty-phthalic-anhydride-china-korea.html">Finance Ministry Continues Anti-Dumping Duty on Phthalic Anhydride from China &#038; Korea</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/finance-ministry-continues-anti-dumping-duty-phthalic-anhydride-china-korea.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>CBDT Procedure for Delayed Income Tax Refund Claims Under Section 119(2)(b)</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/cbdt-procedure-delayed-income-tax-refund-claims-section-119-2.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/cbdt-procedure-delayed-income-tax-refund-claims-section-119-2.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AJIT SHAH]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 09:04:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Income Tax Notifications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Income Tax Refund]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1066352</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Article explains delayed income tax refund claims under Section 119(2)(b), CBDT approval limits, eligibility conditions and refund adjustment under Section 245.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/cbdt-procedure-delayed-income-tax-refund-claims-section-119-2.html">CBDT Procedure for Delayed Income Tax Refund Claims Under Section 119(2)(b)</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/cbdt-procedure-delayed-income-tax-refund-claims-section-119-2.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lease of Tinting Machines Is Deemed Sale, Not Liable to Service Tax: CESTAT Mumbai</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/service-tax/lease-tinting-machines-deemed-sale-not-liable-service-tax-cestat-mumbai.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/service-tax/lease-tinting-machines-deemed-sale-not-liable-service-tax-cestat-mumbai.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 09:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Service Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cestat judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1066016</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[CESTAT held leasing of tinting machines constituted a deemed sale liable to VAT, not service tax, and set aside the service tax demand for the post-negative list period.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/service-tax/lease-tinting-machines-deemed-sale-not-liable-service-tax-cestat-mumbai.html">Lease of Tinting Machines Is Deemed Sale, Not Liable to Service Tax: CESTAT Mumbai</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/service-tax/lease-tinting-machines-deemed-sale-not-liable-service-tax-cestat-mumbai.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Delhi ITAT Quashes Reassessment for Failure to Issue Mandatory Notice under Section 143(2)</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/delhi-itat-quashes-reassessment-failure-issue-mandatory-notice-section-143-2.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/delhi-itat-quashes-reassessment-failure-issue-mandatory-notice-section-143-2.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Vijayakumar Shetty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 09:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(2)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 144]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 147]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 148]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1066278</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Delhi ITAT quashed reassessment, holding that failure to issue a mandatory notice under section 143(2) invalidated jurisdiction despite assessment under section 144.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/delhi-itat-quashes-reassessment-failure-issue-mandatory-notice-section-143-2.html">Delhi ITAT Quashes Reassessment for Failure to Issue Mandatory Notice under Section 143(2)</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/delhi-itat-quashes-reassessment-failure-issue-mandatory-notice-section-143-2.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>ESOP Taxation Guide: Perquisite Tax, Capital Gains and Compliance</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/esop-taxation-guide-perquisite-tax-capital-gains-compliance.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/esop-taxation-guide-perquisite-tax-capital-gains-compliance.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Vineet Rawat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 08:58:24 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Gain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESOP]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1066123</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Reference guide on ESOP taxation covering Sections 17(2)(vi), 45, 49(2AA), Rule 3, TDS, FMV, foreign ESOPs, and reconciliation with AIS and Form 26AS.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/esop-taxation-guide-perquisite-tax-capital-gains-compliance.html">ESOP Taxation Guide: Perquisite Tax, Capital Gains and Compliance</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/esop-taxation-guide-perquisite-tax-capital-gains-compliance.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Limited Liability Partnership – Incorporation and Post Incorporation Procedures</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/limited-liability-partnership-incorporation-post-incorporation-procedures.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/limited-liability-partnership-incorporation-post-incorporation-procedures.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Veda Prakash Mishra]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 08:56:10 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LLP]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1066114</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Learn the LLP incorporation process, MCA forms, filing fees, LLP Agreement requirements, and annual compliance including Forms 3, 8 and 11.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/limited-liability-partnership-incorporation-post-incorporation-procedures.html">Limited Liability Partnership &#8211; Incorporation and Post Incorporation Procedures</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/limited-liability-partnership-incorporation-post-incorporation-procedures.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Delhi HC: 10% GST Penalty Appeal Pre-Deposit Cannot Apply Retrospectively</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/delhi-hc-10-percent-gst-penalty-appeal-pre-deposit-cannot-apply-retrospectively.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/delhi-hc-10-percent-gst-penalty-appeal-pre-deposit-cannot-apply-retrospectively.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RAMASWAMY SRIVATSAN]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 08:53:26 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1066116</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Delhi HC held the 10% pre-deposit under amended Sections 107(6) and 112(8) CGST Act cannot retrospectively apply to pre-amendment proceedings.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/delhi-hc-10-percent-gst-penalty-appeal-pre-deposit-cannot-apply-retrospectively.html">Delhi HC: 10% GST Penalty Appeal Pre-Deposit Cannot Apply Retrospectively</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/delhi-hc-10-percent-gst-penalty-appeal-pre-deposit-cannot-apply-retrospectively.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Investment in BARC Does Not Violate Section 11(5) as It Was Policy-Driven, Not Commercial: ITAT Delhi</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/investment-barc-not-violate-section-11-5-policy-driven-not-commercial-itat-delhi.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/investment-barc-not-violate-section-11-5-policy-driven-not-commercial-itat-delhi.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 08:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 12]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 12A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(3)]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1066023</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[ITAT Delhi upheld the assessee's Section 11 exemption and remanded the claims for doubtful debts, gratuity and leave encashment for fresh adjudication.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/investment-barc-not-violate-section-11-5-policy-driven-not-commercial-itat-delhi.html">Investment in BARC Does Not Violate Section 11(5) as It Was Policy-Driven, Not Commercial: ITAT Delhi</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/investment-barc-not-violate-section-11-5-policy-driven-not-commercial-itat-delhi.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Possession Under Siege: Reconciling RERA &amp; SARFAESI in India’s Real Estate Disputes</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/possession-siege-reconciling-rera-sarfaesi-indias-real-estate-disputes.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/possession-siege-reconciling-rera-sarfaesi-indias-real-estate-disputes.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mihirkumar Patel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 08:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RERA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SARFAESI Act]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1066337</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Article examines RERA-SARFAESI disputes, key judicial propositions, promoter disclosure duties, and settlement issues in bank recovery cases.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/possession-siege-reconciling-rera-sarfaesi-indias-real-estate-disputes.html">Possession Under Siege: Reconciling RERA &#038; SARFAESI in India&#8217;s Real Estate Disputes</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/possession-siege-reconciling-rera-sarfaesi-indias-real-estate-disputes.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>GST Scrutiny Triggers: 15 Red Flags Every Business Must Fix to Avoid a Notice</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-scrutiny-triggers-15-red-flags-business-fix-avoid-notice.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-scrutiny-triggers-15-red-flags-business-fix-avoid-notice.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gstrajender]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 08:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST Notifications]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1066344</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Article highlights 15 common GST compliance lapses, reconciliation checks and documentation practices that frequently trigger departmental scrutiny.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-scrutiny-triggers-15-red-flags-business-fix-avoid-notice.html">GST Scrutiny Triggers: 15 Red Flags Every Business Must Fix to Avoid a Notice</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-scrutiny-triggers-15-red-flags-business-fix-avoid-notice.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mumbai ITAT: PCIT Cannot Invoke Section 263 on Issues Already Pending Before CIT(A)</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/mumbai-itat-pcit-cannot-invoke-section-263-issues-pending-cit.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/mumbai-itat-pcit-cannot-invoke-section-263-issues-pending-cit.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Vijayakumar Shetty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 08:35:07 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 115BBE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(3)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 144]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 144B]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 147]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 263]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 54]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 54F]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 69C]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1066035</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Mumbai ITAT set aside a section 263 revision, holding the PCIT cannot revise issues already pending before the CIT(A) under Explanation 1(c).<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/mumbai-itat-pcit-cannot-invoke-section-263-issues-pending-cit.html">Mumbai ITAT: PCIT Cannot Invoke Section 263 on Issues Already Pending Before CIT(A)</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/mumbai-itat-pcit-cannot-invoke-section-263-issues-pending-cit.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>CESTAT Awards 12% Interest on Refund of Investigation Deposit, Rejects 6% Rate</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/cestat-awards-12-percent-interest-refund-investigation-deposit-rejects-6-percent-rate.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/cestat-awards-12-percent-interest-refund-investigation-deposit-rejects-6-percent-rate.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 08:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Custom Duty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cestat judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1066031</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[CESTAT held the importer entitled to 12% interest on delayed refund of investigation deposit, following the binding Calcutta High Court decision.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/cestat-awards-12-percent-interest-refund-investigation-deposit-rejects-6-percent-rate.html">CESTAT Awards 12% Interest on Refund of Investigation Deposit, Rejects 6% Rate</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/cestat-awards-12-percent-interest-refund-investigation-deposit-rejects-6-percent-rate.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Land Division on Society Bifurcation Is Final, MOFA Cannot Reallocate Land: Bombay HC</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/land-division-society-bifurcation-final-mofa-cannot-reallocate-land-bombay-hc.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/land-division-society-bifurcation-final-mofa-cannot-reallocate-land-bombay-hc.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 08:16:27 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1066203</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Bombay HC set aside a deemed conveyance order under MOFA, holding the Competent Authority lacked jurisdiction after statutory conveyance on society bifurcation.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/land-division-society-bifurcation-final-mofa-cannot-reallocate-land-bombay-hc.html">Land Division on Society Bifurcation Is Final, MOFA Cannot Reallocate Land: Bombay HC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/land-division-society-bifurcation-final-mofa-cannot-reallocate-land-bombay-hc.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>ITAT Deletes ₹17.85 Lakh Addition on Sikkim Land Sale Cash Deposits Under Section 10(26AAA)</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-deletes-rs-17-85-lakh-addition-sikkim-land-sale-cash-deposits-section-10-26aaa.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-deletes-rs-17-85-lakh-addition-sikkim-land-sale-cash-deposits-section-10-26aaa.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 08:15:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 144]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1066034</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[ITAT Kolkata deleted the Section 69A addition after accepting registered sale deeds and holding the assessee entitled to exemption under Section 10(26AAA).<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-deletes-rs-17-85-lakh-addition-sikkim-land-sale-cash-deposits-section-10-26aaa.html">ITAT Deletes ₹17.85 Lakh Addition on Sikkim Land Sale Cash Deposits Under Section 10(26AAA)</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-deletes-rs-17-85-lakh-addition-sikkim-land-sale-cash-deposits-section-10-26aaa.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>On-Demand Guarantee Default Arises on First Invocation, Petition Within Limitation: NCLT Mumbai</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/demand-guarantee-default-arises-invocation-petition-limitation-nclt-mumbai.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/demand-guarantee-default-arises-invocation-petition-limitation-nclt-mumbai.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 08:04:47 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankruptcy code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBC 2016]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NCLT]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1066219</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[NCLT admitted a Section 95 IBC petition against a personal guarantor, holding the application within limitation and initiating the insolvency resolution process.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/demand-guarantee-default-arises-invocation-petition-limitation-nclt-mumbai.html">On-Demand Guarantee Default Arises on First Invocation, Petition Within Limitation: NCLT Mumbai</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/demand-guarantee-default-arises-invocation-petition-limitation-nclt-mumbai.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supplies to SEZ May Qualify as Exports for CENVAT Refund: Bombay HC Remands Matter</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/supplies-sez-qualify-exports-cenvat-refund-bombay-hc-remands-matter.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/supplies-sez-qualify-exports-cenvat-refund-bombay-hc-remands-matter.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 08:02:48 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Custom Duty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CENVAT Credit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1066208</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Bombay High Court remanded CENVAT credit refund disputes for fresh adjudication after directing authorities to consider CBEC Circular dated 28.04.2015.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/supplies-sez-qualify-exports-cenvat-refund-bombay-hc-remands-matter.html">Supplies to SEZ May Qualify as Exports for CENVAT Refund: Bombay HC Remands Matter</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/supplies-sez-qualify-exports-cenvat-refund-bombay-hc-remands-matter.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>No Evidence of Accommodation Entry, Section 10(38) Exemption Allowed: ITAT Mumbai</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/no-evidence-accommodation-entry-section-10-38-exemption-allowed-itat-mumbai.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/no-evidence-accommodation-entry-section-10-38-exemption-allowed-itat-mumbai.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 08:01:43 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bogus Capital Gain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Long Term Capital Gain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 68]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 69]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 69C]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1066175</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[ITAT allowed Section 10(38) exemption after holding that documented share transactions could not be treated as bogus under Sections 68 and 69C without supporting evidence.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/no-evidence-accommodation-entry-section-10-38-exemption-allowed-itat-mumbai.html">No Evidence of Accommodation Entry, Section 10(38) Exemption Allowed: ITAT Mumbai</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/no-evidence-accommodation-entry-section-10-38-exemption-allowed-itat-mumbai.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>ITAT Delhi Sets Aside Section 153C Assessments Due to Common Section 153D Approval</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-delhi-sets-section-153c-assessments-due-common-section-153d-approval.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-delhi-sets-section-153c-assessments-due-common-section-153d-approval.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 08:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 153C]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 153D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 250]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1066157</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[ITAT quashed Section 153C assessments for AYs 2004-05 to 2010-11, holding that common mechanical approval under Section 153D vitiated the assessments.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-delhi-sets-section-153c-assessments-due-common-section-153d-approval.html">ITAT Delhi Sets Aside Section 153C Assessments Due to Common Section 153D Approval</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-delhi-sets-section-153c-assessments-due-common-section-153d-approval.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reassessment Notice Issued by JAO Instead of NFAC Remitted Back to HC for Fresh Consideration: SC</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/reassessment-notice-issued-jao-nfac-remitted-hc-fresh-consideration-sc.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/reassessment-notice-issued-jao-nfac-remitted-hc-fresh-consideration-sc.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 07:48:28 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 144B]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 148]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 151A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court judgements]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1066170</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[SC remitted the Section 148 notice dispute to the High Court for fresh adjudication in light of its earlier orders dated 10.04.2026 and 04.05.2026.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/reassessment-notice-issued-jao-nfac-remitted-hc-fresh-consideration-sc.html">Reassessment Notice Issued by JAO Instead of NFAC Remitted Back to HC for Fresh Consideration: SC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/reassessment-notice-issued-jao-nfac-remitted-hc-fresh-consideration-sc.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>ITAT Order Must Be Judged by Law Prevailing When Passed, Not Later Amendment: Telangana HC</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-order-judged-law-prevailing-passed-not-amendment-telangana-hc.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-order-judged-law-prevailing-passed-not-amendment-telangana-hc.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 07:46:55 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Income tax department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 147]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1066152</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Telangana HC rejected the Revenue's appeal, holding the ITAT order was consistent with the law prevailing when it was passed and raised no substantial question of law.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-order-judged-law-prevailing-passed-not-amendment-telangana-hc.html">ITAT Order Must Be Judged by Law Prevailing When Passed, Not Later Amendment: Telangana HC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-order-judged-law-prevailing-passed-not-amendment-telangana-hc.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Section 13 Cannot Be Invoked to Deny Section 12A Registration: Gujarat HC</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-13-cannot-invoked-deny-section-12a-registration-gujarat-hc.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-13-cannot-invoked-deny-section-12a-registration-gujarat-hc.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 07:45:44 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 12AB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 260A]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1066054</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Gujarat HC dismissed the Revenue's appeal, holding that Section 13(1)(b) cannot be invoked while considering grant of registration under Section 12A.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-13-cannot-invoked-deny-section-12a-registration-gujarat-hc.html">Section 13 Cannot Be Invoked to Deny Section 12A Registration: Gujarat HC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-13-cannot-invoked-deny-section-12a-registration-gujarat-hc.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>RBI Invites Public Comments on Draft On-Tap Licensing Framework for Urban Co-operative Banks</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/rbi/rbi-invites-public-comments-draft-tap-licensing-framework-urban-operative-banks.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/rbi/rbi-invites-public-comments-draft-tap-licensing-framework-urban-operative-banks.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 07:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Fema / RBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RBI Notifications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reserve bank of india]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1066329</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[RBI has released draft guidelines for on-tap licensing of Urban Co-operative Banks and invited public comments until 05 September 2026.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/rbi/rbi-invites-public-comments-draft-tap-licensing-framework-urban-operative-banks.html">RBI Invites Public Comments on Draft On-Tap Licensing Framework for Urban Co-operative Banks</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/rbi/rbi-invites-public-comments-draft-tap-licensing-framework-urban-operative-banks.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>DGFT Extends i-CAS-Halal Implementation Timeline for Meat Exports to Egypt</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/dgft/dgft-extends-cas-halal-implementation-timeline-meat-exports-egypt.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/dgft/dgft-extends-cas-halal-implementation-timeline-meat-exports-egypt.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 07:39:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[DGFT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DGFT Notifications]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1066318</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[DGFT Notification No. 28/2026-27 extends the i-CAS-Halal transition period for specified meat exports to Egypt from six to nine months.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/dgft/dgft-extends-cas-halal-implementation-timeline-meat-exports-egypt.html">DGFT Extends i-CAS-Halal Implementation Timeline for Meat Exports to Egypt</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/dgft/dgft-extends-cas-halal-implementation-timeline-meat-exports-egypt.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>ROC Chennai Imposes ₹7 Lakh Penalty on Port City Nidhi for NRC Composition Default</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/company-law/roc-chennai-imposes-rs-7-lakh-penalty-port-city-nidhi-nrc-composition-default.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/company-law/roc-chennai-imposes-rs-7-lakh-penalty-port-city-nidhi-nrc-composition-default.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 07:38:33 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Company Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies Act 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[company law notifications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Company Law Penalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ministry of corporate affairs]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1066299</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[ROC Chennai imposed penalties under Section 178(8) for non-compliant Nomination and Remuneration Committee composition despite subsequent rectification.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/company-law/roc-chennai-imposes-rs-7-lakh-penalty-port-city-nidhi-nrc-composition-default.html">ROC Chennai Imposes ₹7 Lakh Penalty on Port City Nidhi for NRC Composition Default</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/company-law/roc-chennai-imposes-rs-7-lakh-penalty-port-city-nidhi-nrc-composition-default.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>ROC Imposes ₹4.09 Lakh Penalty on Space Link Consultancy for Financial Statement Filing Default</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/company-law/roc-imposes-rs-4-09-lakh-penalty-space-link-consultancy-financial-statement-filing-default.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/company-law/roc-imposes-rs-4-09-lakh-penalty-space-link-consultancy-financial-statement-filing-default.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 07:36:41 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Company Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies Act 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[company law notifications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Company Law Penalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ministry of corporate affairs]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1066272</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[ROC Cuttack penalised a company and its directors under Section 137(3) for failure to file FY 2021-22 financial statements within the prescribed period.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/company-law/roc-imposes-rs-4-09-lakh-penalty-space-link-consultancy-financial-statement-filing-default.html">ROC Imposes ₹4.09 Lakh Penalty on Space Link Consultancy for Financial Statement Filing Default</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/company-law/roc-imposes-rs-4-09-lakh-penalty-space-link-consultancy-financial-statement-filing-default.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>ROC Delhi Imposes ₹5.5 Crore Penalty on Hindustan Coca-Cola Holdings for Section 42 Violation</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/company-law/roc-delhi-imposes-rs-5-5-crore-penalty-hindustan-coca-cola-holdings-section-42-violation.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/company-law/roc-delhi-imposes-rs-5-5-crore-penalty-hindustan-coca-cola-holdings-section-42-violation.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 07:34:56 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Company Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies Act 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[company law notifications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Company Law Penalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ministry of corporate affairs]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1066288</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[ROC Delhi II penalised a company, directors and promoters for accepting private placement subscription money from a non-subscriber bank account.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/company-law/roc-delhi-imposes-rs-5-5-crore-penalty-hindustan-coca-cola-holdings-section-42-violation.html">ROC Delhi Imposes ₹5.5 Crore Penalty on Hindustan Coca-Cola Holdings for Section 42 Violation</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/company-law/roc-delhi-imposes-rs-5-5-crore-penalty-hindustan-coca-cola-holdings-section-42-violation.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Incidental Rental Income Used for Charitable Objects Does Not Deny Sections 11 &amp; 12 Exemption: ITAT Chandigarh</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/incidental-rental-income-charitable-objects-not-deny-sections-11-12-exemption-itat-chandigarh.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/incidental-rental-income-charitable-objects-not-deny-sections-11-12-exemption-itat-chandigarh.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 07:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income tax act 1961]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 12]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1066092</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[ITAT upheld exemption under Sections 11 and 12, holding rental income, CEO remuneration, FCRA receipts and grant accounting did not justify denial of charitable status.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/incidental-rental-income-charitable-objects-not-deny-sections-11-12-exemption-itat-chandigarh.html">Incidental Rental Income Used for Charitable Objects Does Not Deny Sections 11 &#038; 12 Exemption: ITAT Chandigarh</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/incidental-rental-income-charitable-objects-not-deny-sections-11-12-exemption-itat-chandigarh.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mumbai ITAT: Reassessment Beyond Three Years Quashed; Escaped Income Below ₹50 Lakh</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/mumbai-itat-reassessment-years-quashed-escaped-income-rs-50-lakh.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/mumbai-itat-reassessment-years-quashed-escaped-income-rs-50-lakh.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Vijayakumar Shetty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 07:17:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 147]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 148]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 148A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 149]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 44AD]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1066045</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Mumbai ITAT quashed reassessment as alleged escaped income was below ₹50 lakh and notice under section 148 lacked valid sanction under section 151.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/mumbai-itat-reassessment-years-quashed-escaped-income-rs-50-lakh.html">Mumbai ITAT: Reassessment Beyond Three Years Quashed; Escaped Income Below ₹50 Lakh</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/mumbai-itat-reassessment-years-quashed-escaped-income-rs-50-lakh.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>RTO Can Cancel Vehicle Registration Obtained Using Fake Documents: Karnataka HC</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/rto-cancel-vehicle-registration-obtained-fake-documents-karnataka-hc.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/rto-cancel-vehicle-registration-obtained-fake-documents-karnataka-hc.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 07:15:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1065957</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Karnataka HC allowed the State’s appeal, upheld the vehicle seizure proceedings, and restored cancellation of registration obtained on allegedly fabricated documents.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/rto-cancel-vehicle-registration-obtained-fake-documents-karnataka-hc.html">RTO Can Cancel Vehicle Registration Obtained Using Fake Documents: Karnataka HC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/rto-cancel-vehicle-registration-obtained-fake-documents-karnataka-hc.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Co-op Housing Society Entitled to Section 80P(2)(d) Deduction on Bank Interest: ITAT Mumbai</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/op-housing-society-entitled-section-80p-2-deduction-bank-interest-itat-mumbai.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/op-housing-society-entitled-section-80p-2-deduction-bank-interest-itat-mumbai.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 07:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(3)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 144B]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 56]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 80P]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1065940</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[ITAT condoned delay, restored the appeal on merits, and allowed Section 80P(2)(d) deduction on interest earned from investments with cooperative banks.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/op-housing-society-entitled-section-80p-2-deduction-bank-interest-itat-mumbai.html">Co-op Housing Society Entitled to Section 80P(2)(d) Deduction on Bank Interest: ITAT Mumbai</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/op-housing-society-entitled-section-80p-2-deduction-bank-interest-itat-mumbai.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Delhi ITAT: Section 153C Assessment Quashed; Assumed Higher Assured Returns-Based On-Money Addition Deleted</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/delhi-itat-section-153c-assessment-quashed-assumed-higher-assured-returns-based-money-addition-deleted.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/delhi-itat-section-153c-assessment-quashed-assumed-higher-assured-returns-based-money-addition-deleted.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Vijayakumar Shetty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 07:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 115BBE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 132]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 153A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 153C]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 194A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 250]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 69]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1066060</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Delhi ITAT quashed section 153C assessments and deleted section 69 on-money additions, holding no incriminating material or cogent evidence existed.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/delhi-itat-section-153c-assessment-quashed-assumed-higher-assured-returns-based-money-addition-deleted.html">Delhi ITAT: Section 153C Assessment Quashed; Assumed Higher Assured Returns-Based On-Money Addition Deleted</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/delhi-itat-section-153c-assessment-quashed-assumed-higher-assured-returns-based-money-addition-deleted.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>RBI Keeps Repo Rate at 5.25%, Announces Major Banking Reforms Amid Global Uncertainty</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/rbi/rbi-repo-rate-5-25-percent-announces-major-banking-reforms-global-uncertainty.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/rbi/rbi-repo-rate-5-25-percent-announces-major-banking-reforms-global-uncertainty.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 06:52:28 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Fema / RBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RBI Notifications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Repo Rate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reserve bank of india]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1066273</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[RBI Keeps Repo Rate Unchanged at 5.25% Amid Global Uncertainty; Announces Major Banking Reforms The Reserve Bank of India (RBI), in its Monetary Policy Committee (MPC)&#8230;<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/rbi/rbi-repo-rate-5-25-percent-announces-major-banking-reforms-global-uncertainty.html">RBI Keeps Repo Rate at 5.25%, Announces Major Banking Reforms Amid Global Uncertainty</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/rbi/rbi-repo-rate-5-25-percent-announces-major-banking-reforms-global-uncertainty.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Family Disputes &amp; Mental Distress Are Valid Grounds for Delay Condonation: ITAT Delhi</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/family-disputes-mental-distress-valid-grounds-delay-condonation-itat-delhi.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/family-disputes-mental-distress-valid-grounds-delay-condonation-itat-delhi.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 06:45:32 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 250]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 271B]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1065955</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[ITAT remanded a delayed appeal in a Section 271B penalty matter, directing CIT(A) to reconsider condonation after considering COVID limitation relief and family disputes.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/family-disputes-mental-distress-valid-grounds-delay-condonation-itat-delhi.html">Family Disputes &#038; Mental Distress Are Valid Grounds for Delay Condonation: ITAT Delhi</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/family-disputes-mental-distress-valid-grounds-delay-condonation-itat-delhi.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>No Coercive Income Tax Recovery After 7-Year Delay in Appeal Disposal: Andhra Pradesh HC</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/no-coercive-income-tax-recovery-7-year-delay-appeal-disposal-andhra-pradesh-hc.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/no-coercive-income-tax-recovery-7-year-delay-appeal-disposal-andhra-pradesh-hc.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 06:30:48 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income tax act 1961]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(3)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 148]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1065942</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Andhra Pradesh HC directed disposal of a pending income tax appeal within four months and restrained coercive recovery until the appeal is decided.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/no-coercive-income-tax-recovery-7-year-delay-appeal-disposal-andhra-pradesh-hc.html">No Coercive Income Tax Recovery After 7-Year Delay in Appeal Disposal: Andhra Pradesh HC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/no-coercive-income-tax-recovery-7-year-delay-appeal-disposal-andhra-pradesh-hc.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Delhi ITAT: Genuine Depreciation Claim Cannot Be Denied for Schedule DPM Omission</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/delhi-itat-genuine-depreciation-claim-cannot-denied-schedule-dpm-omission.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/delhi-itat-genuine-depreciation-claim-cannot-denied-schedule-dpm-omission.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Vijayakumar Shetty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 06:27:36 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 154]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 32]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 80IB]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1066066</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Delhi ITAT allowed depreciation despite Schedule DPM omission, holding a genuine section 32 claim cannot be denied due to a technical error.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/delhi-itat-genuine-depreciation-claim-cannot-denied-schedule-dpm-omission.html">Delhi ITAT: Genuine Depreciation Claim Cannot Be Denied for Schedule DPM Omission</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/delhi-itat-genuine-depreciation-claim-cannot-denied-schedule-dpm-omission.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Delhi ITAT: Section 12AB Registration Cannot Be Cancelled for Engaging Builder for Staff Housing Project</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/delhi-itat-12ab-registration-cannot-cancelled-engaging-builder-staff-housing-project.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/delhi-itat-12ab-registration-cannot-cancelled-engaging-builder-staff-housing-project.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Vijayakumar Shetty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 06:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 12]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 12A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 12AB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(3)]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1066069</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Delhi ITAT restored 12AB registration, holding builder engagement for a staff housing project was not a specified violation under section 12AB(4).<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/delhi-itat-12ab-registration-cannot-cancelled-engaging-builder-staff-housing-project.html">Delhi ITAT: Section 12AB Registration Cannot Be Cancelled for Engaging Builder for Staff Housing Project</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/delhi-itat-12ab-registration-cannot-cancelled-engaging-builder-staff-housing-project.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>GST Assessment Set Aside As Officer Ignored Assessee’s Accident: Andhra Pradesh HC</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-assessment-set-officer-assessees-accident-andhra-pradesh-hc.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-assessment-set-officer-assessees-accident-andhra-pradesh-hc.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 06:15:45 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1065935</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Andhra Pradesh HC set aside a GST assessment order after finding the officer proceeded despite being informed of the taxpayer's accident and remanded the matter.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-assessment-set-officer-assessees-accident-andhra-pradesh-hc.html">GST Assessment Set Aside As Officer Ignored Assessee&#8217;s Accident: Andhra Pradesh HC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-assessment-set-officer-assessees-accident-andhra-pradesh-hc.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Delhi ITAT: Enhanced Security Expenses During Directors’ Dispute Are Allowable Business Expenditure</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/delhi-itat-enhanced-security-expenses-directors-dispute-allowable-business-expenditure.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/delhi-itat-enhanced-security-expenses-directors-dispute-allowable-business-expenditure.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Vijayakumar Shetty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 06:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 144B]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 147]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 271B]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 37]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 37(1)]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1066073</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Delhi ITAT deleted the Section 37(1) disallowance of watch and ward expenses, holding additional security due to director disputes was allowable.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/delhi-itat-enhanced-security-expenses-directors-dispute-allowable-business-expenditure.html">Delhi ITAT: Enhanced Security Expenses During Directors&#8217; Dispute Are Allowable Business Expenditure</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/delhi-itat-enhanced-security-expenses-directors-dispute-allowable-business-expenditure.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Freight Concession Under LWIS Not Taxable as Supply of Tangible Goods Service: CESTAT Hyderabad</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/service-tax/freight-concession-lwis-not-taxable-supply-tangible-goods-service-cestat-hyderabad.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/service-tax/freight-concession-lwis-not-taxable-supply-tangible-goods-service-cestat-hyderabad.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 06:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Service Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cestat judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1065965</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[CESTAT held that freight concession under the Liberalized Wagon Investment Scheme is a policy incentive, not consideration for taxable service, and set aside service tax demands.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/service-tax/freight-concession-lwis-not-taxable-supply-tangible-goods-service-cestat-hyderabad.html">Freight Concession Under LWIS Not Taxable as Supply of Tangible Goods Service: CESTAT Hyderabad</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/service-tax/freight-concession-lwis-not-taxable-supply-tangible-goods-service-cestat-hyderabad.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Alleged Commission Addition Cannot Rest on Loose Third-Party Papers &amp; WhatsApp Chats: ITAT Delhi</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/delhi-itat-alleged-commission-addition-cannot-rest-loose-party-papers-whatsapp-chats.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/delhi-itat-alleged-commission-addition-cannot-rest-loose-party-papers-whatsapp-chats.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Vijayakumar Shetty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 05:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 115BBE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 147]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 68]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 69]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 69A]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1066076</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Delhi ITAT deleted alleged commission additions, holding loose third-party papers and WhatsApp chats unrelated to the relevant years could not sustain them.<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/delhi-itat-alleged-commission-addition-cannot-rest-loose-party-papers-whatsapp-chats.html">Alleged Commission Addition Cannot Rest on Loose Third-Party Papers &#038; WhatsApp Chats: ITAT Delhi</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in/">TaxGuru</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/delhi-itat-alleged-commission-addition-cannot-rest-loose-party-papers-whatsapp-chats.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>