<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?><rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>TaxGuru.in - Daily Newsletter</title>
	<atom:link href="https://taxguru.in/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
	<link>https://taxguru.in/</link>
	<description>Daily updates for CA, CS, CMA, MBA, Tax and Account Professionals, Advocates on Amendments in Income Tax, MVAT, Company Law, Service Tax, GST, LLP, DGFT, SEBI, RBI, Excise Duty, Custom Duty,  DTC, Corporate Laws, ICAI, ICSI and ICWAI Regulation, FEMA , Government Policies etc.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 15:22:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<xhtml:meta content="noindex" name="robots" xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"/><item>
		<title>Bombay HC Quashes 138 Crore GST Demands Against Non-Existent Vodafone Entities</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/bombay-hc-quashes-138-crore-gst-demands-vodafone-india-limited.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/bombay-hc-quashes-138-crore-gst-demands-vodafone-india-limited.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ca.yogesh_porwal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 15:20:48 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1041973</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Bombay High Court held that GST proceedings initiated against a company that ceased to exist after merger were void ab initio. The Court ruled that Section 87 of the CGST Act does not permit fresh notices against non-existent entities.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/bombay-hc-quashes-138-crore-gst-demands-vodafone-india-limited.html">Bombay HC Quashes 138 Crore GST Demands Against Non-Existent Vodafone Entities</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/bombay-hc-quashes-138-crore-gst-demands-vodafone-india-limited.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Failure to File GST Returns Can Be Treated as Wilful Suppression: Sriba Nirman Case</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/failure-file-gst-returns-treated-wilful-suppression-sriba-nirman-case.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/failure-file-gst-returns-treated-wilful-suppression-sriba-nirman-case.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[S PRASAD]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 15:18:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CGST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1041979</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The High Court observed that filing GST returns is the statutory mechanism for disclosing tax liability. Failure to file returns while issuing taxable invoices was treated as concealment amounting to suppression of facts.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/failure-file-gst-returns-treated-wilful-suppression-sriba-nirman-case.html">Failure to File GST Returns Can Be Treated as Wilful Suppression: Sriba Nirman Case</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/failure-file-gst-returns-treated-wilful-suppression-sriba-nirman-case.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tax Implications of Investing in FDs, MFs, PMS and AIFs</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/tax-implications-investing-fds-mfs-pms-aifs.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/tax-implications-investing-fds-mfs-pms-aifs.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anish Dasharathi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 15:11:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Income Tax Act 2025]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1041970</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The article explains how equity mutual funds, PMS, and AIFs are taxed compared to Fixed Deposits under current income tax rules. It highlights that long-term equity investments continue to enjoy lower tax rates than interest income from FDs.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/tax-implications-investing-fds-mfs-pms-aifs.html">Tax Implications of Investing in FDs, MFs, PMS and AIFs</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/tax-implications-investing-fds-mfs-pms-aifs.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>ITAT Remands Case as CIT(A) Ignored Survey Findings on Accommodation Entries</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-remands-case-cita-survey-findings-accommodation-entries.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-remands-case-cita-survey-findings-accommodation-entries.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adv (CA) Vijay Gupta]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 14:50:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 68]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1041908</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The ITAT Mumbai set aside the CIT(A) order after finding that crucial survey findings and Tally data relating to accommodation entries were not properly examined. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to conduct a fresh examination of the transactions and related evidence.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-remands-case-cita-survey-findings-accommodation-entries.html">ITAT Remands Case as CIT(A) Ignored Survey Findings on Accommodation Entries</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-remands-case-cita-survey-findings-accommodation-entries.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Presumptive Taxation Simplified as Income Tax Act 2025 Merges 44AD, 44ADA &amp; 44AE</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/presumptive-taxation-simplified-income-tax-act-2025-merges-44ad-44ada-44ae.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/presumptive-taxation-simplified-income-tax-act-2025-merges-44ad-44ada-44ae.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MOHIT SINGH]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 14:47:55 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income tax act 1961]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Income Tax Act 2025]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Presumptive Taxation Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 44AD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 44ADA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 44AE]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1041919</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Income Tax Act, 2025 replaces Sections 44AD, 44ADA, and 44AE with a unified Section 58 framework. While the structure has been simplified, presumptive taxation rates and turnover limits largely remain unchanged.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/presumptive-taxation-simplified-income-tax-act-2025-merges-44ad-44ada-44ae.html">Presumptive Taxation Simplified as Income Tax Act 2025 Merges 44AD, 44ADA &#038; 44AE</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/presumptive-taxation-simplified-income-tax-act-2025-merges-44ad-44ada-44ae.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rupee Borrowings by Resident Individuals from NRIs/OCIs: Recent Amendments</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/rbi/rupee-borrowings-resident-individuals-nris-ocis-recent-amendments.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/rbi/rupee-borrowings-resident-individuals-nris-ocis-recent-amendments.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DHANUSH D BOLAR]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 14:45:52 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Fema / RBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FEMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fema Notifications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reserve bank of india]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1041895</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The 2026 FEMA amendment removes uncertainty surrounding INR borrowings by resident individuals from NRIs and OCI relatives. The RBI has now prescribed clear conditions relating to fund receipt channels and repayment rules.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/rbi/rupee-borrowings-resident-individuals-nris-ocis-recent-amendments.html">Rupee Borrowings by Resident Individuals from NRIs/OCIs: Recent Amendments</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/rbi/rupee-borrowings-resident-individuals-nris-ocis-recent-amendments.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Income Tax Rule 46(8): Mandatory Daily Backup of Digital Books in India</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/income-tax-rule-46-8-mandatory-daily-backup-digital-books-india.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/income-tax-rule-46-8-mandatory-daily-backup-digital-books-india.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Neeraj Bhagat &#38; Co.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 14:22:23 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Income Tax Act 2025]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1041972</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Rule 46(8) of the Income-tax Rules, 2026 requires businesses maintaining electronic books to create daily backups on servers located in India. The provision strengthens data localisation, audit readiness, and financial record accessibility.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/income-tax-rule-46-8-mandatory-daily-backup-digital-books-india.html">New Income Tax Rule 46(8): Mandatory Daily Backup of Digital Books in India</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/income-tax-rule-46-8-mandatory-daily-backup-digital-books-india.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Compliance Calender for Listed Companies</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/sebi/compliance-calender-listed-companies.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/sebi/compliance-calender-listed-companies.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[NupurGupta]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 14:20:20 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[SEBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Compliance Calendar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LODR Regulations]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1041994</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>SEBI has restructured the LODR compliance framework through amendments affecting quarterly, annual, and event-based disclosures. The revised framework extends filing timelines, removes certain compliance requirements, and standardizes reporting obligations for listed entities.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/sebi/compliance-calender-listed-companies.html">Compliance Calender for Listed Companies</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/sebi/compliance-calender-listed-companies.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>CCPA Penalises Seller for Selling Non-BIS Toys Through Snapdeal</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/ccpa-penalises-seller-selling-non-bis-toys-snapdeal.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/ccpa-penalises-seller-selling-non-bis-toys-snapdeal.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 14:05:07 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Protection Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1041966</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>CCPA held that sale of toys without mandatory BIS certification violated the Consumer Protection Act and Toys Quality Control Order. The Authority imposed a penalty and directed future compliance with mandatory standards.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/ccpa-penalises-seller-selling-non-bis-toys-snapdeal.html">CCPA Penalises Seller for Selling Non-BIS Toys Through Snapdeal</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/ccpa-penalises-seller-selling-non-bis-toys-snapdeal.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>PFRDA Launches NPS Sanchay to Simplify Pension Access for Informal Sector Workers</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/pfrda-launches-nps-sanchay-simplify-pension-access-informal-sector-workers.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/pfrda-launches-nps-sanchay-simplify-pension-access-informal-sector-workers.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[editor7]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 14:03:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new pension scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PFRDA]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1041996</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>PFRDA has introduced NPS Sanchay as a simplified National Pension System variant aimed at expanding pension coverage for India’s informal workforce. The scheme reduces complexities in investment selection and asset allocation.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/pfrda-launches-nps-sanchay-simplify-pension-access-informal-sector-workers.html">PFRDA Launches NPS Sanchay to Simplify Pension Access for Informal Sector Workers</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/pfrda-launches-nps-sanchay-simplify-pension-access-informal-sector-workers.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Holds Builder Liable for Profiteering Due to Failure to Pass ITC Benefit Uniformly: GSTAT</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/holds-builder-liable-profiteering-due-failure-pass-itc-benefit-uniformly-gstat.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/holds-builder-liable-profiteering-due-failure-pass-itc-benefit-uniformly-gstat.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 13:10:52 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anti-Profiteering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GSTAT]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1041959</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>GSTAT held that the builder failed to uniformly pass on additional GST input tax credit benefits to homebuyers in a housing project. The Tribunal directed refund of the remaining profiteered amount with 18% interest.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/holds-builder-liable-profiteering-due-failure-pass-itc-benefit-uniformly-gstat.html">Holds Builder Liable for Profiteering Due to Failure to Pass ITC Benefit Uniformly: GSTAT</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/holds-builder-liable-profiteering-due-failure-pass-itc-benefit-uniformly-gstat.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cabinet Approves ECLGS 5.0 to Support Businesses Hit by West Asia Crisis</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/cabinet-approves-eclgs-5-0-support-businesses-hit-west-asia-crisis.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/cabinet-approves-eclgs-5-0-support-businesses-hit-west-asia-crisis.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[editor7]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 13:09:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Policy]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1041955</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Union Cabinet approved ECLGS 5.0 to provide guaranteed emergency credit support to MSMEs, non-MSMEs, and airlines facing liquidity stress due to the West Asia conflict. The scheme offers up to 100% guarantee coverage and aims to protect jobs and supply chains.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/cabinet-approves-eclgs-5-0-support-businesses-hit-west-asia-crisis.html">Cabinet Approves ECLGS 5.0 to Support Businesses Hit by West Asia Crisis</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/cabinet-approves-eclgs-5-0-support-businesses-hit-west-asia-crisis.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Prudential Norms on Specified Non-financial Assets (SNFA) Directions</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/rbi/prudential-norms-non-financial-assets-snfa-directions.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/rbi/prudential-norms-non-financial-assets-snfa-directions.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 13:05:09 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Fema / RBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RBI Notifications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reserve bank of india]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1041924</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>RBI issued draft directions governing acquisition and treatment of specified non-financial assets acquired during recovery of non-performing loans. The framework introduces valuation, disclosure, and disposal requirements for regulated entities.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/rbi/prudential-norms-non-financial-assets-snfa-directions.html">Prudential Norms on Specified Non-financial Assets (SNFA) Directions</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/rbi/prudential-norms-non-financial-assets-snfa-directions.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Power of Attorney in Tax Proceedings: Legal Validity &amp; Scope</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/power-attorney-tax-proceedings-legal-validity-scope.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/power-attorney-tax-proceedings-legal-validity-scope.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adv. Sudarshan Raturi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 08:28:31 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Policy]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1041882</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The article explains how Power of Attorney has become essential in modern tax practice because of increasing digitization and faceless proceedings. It highlights the importance of proper authorization for smooth representation before tax authorities.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/power-attorney-tax-proceedings-legal-validity-scope.html">Power of Attorney in Tax Proceedings: Legal Validity &#038; Scope</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/power-attorney-tax-proceedings-legal-validity-scope.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>When Late Filing Becomes Suppression: Section 74 Risk After Sriba Nirman</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/late-filing-suppression-section-74-risk-sriba-nirman.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/late-filing-suppression-section-74-risk-sriba-nirman.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA. Shafaly Girdharwal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 08:23:07 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST Notifications]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1041888</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Andhra Pradesh High Court held that failure to file monthly GSTR-3B returns can amount to suppression of facts under Section 74 of the CGST Act. The ruling increases exposure to 100% penalty where wilfulness is established.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/late-filing-suppression-section-74-risk-sriba-nirman.html">When Late Filing Becomes Suppression: Section 74 Risk After Sriba Nirman</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/late-filing-suppression-section-74-risk-sriba-nirman.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sale of Capital Goods under GST: When to Apply Section 18(4) &amp; 18(6)</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/sale-capital-goods-gst-apply-section-18-4-18-6.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/sale-capital-goods-gst-apply-section-18-4-18-6.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bhavik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 08:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST Notifications]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1041886</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The article explains the legal distinction between ITC reversal on opting for composition and tax liability on sale of capital goods. It clarifies when Section 18(4) and Section 18(6) apply under GST law.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/sale-capital-goods-gst-apply-section-18-4-18-6.html">Sale of Capital Goods under GST: When to Apply Section 18(4) &#038; 18(6)</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/sale-capital-goods-gst-apply-section-18-4-18-6.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>GST Refund Orders Quashed as AO Ignored Clarificatory Amendment to Rule 89(5)</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-refund-orders-quashed-ao-clarificatory-amendment-rule-895.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-refund-orders-quashed-ao-clarificatory-amendment-rule-895.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 08:14:03 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST Refund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1041869</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Court ruled that refund claims under inverted duty structure cannot be restricted using the earlier anomalous formula once Rule 89(5) was amended to remove inconsistencies. The authorities were directed to reconsider the refund claims under the amended provisions.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-refund-orders-quashed-ao-clarificatory-amendment-rule-895.html">GST Refund Orders Quashed as AO Ignored Clarificatory Amendment to Rule 89(5)</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-refund-orders-quashed-ao-clarificatory-amendment-rule-895.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>RTI Cannot Be Used to Obtain Spouse’s Income Details for Maintenance Dispute: Delhi HC</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/rti-obtain-spouses-income-details-maintenance-dispute-rules-delhi-hc.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/rti-obtain-spouses-income-details-maintenance-dispute-rules-delhi-hc.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 08:09:45 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RTI ACT]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1041880</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Delhi High Court held that income tax returns and taxable income details are personal information protected under Section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act. The Court ruled that such information cannot be disclosed merely because it is sought in a matrimonial dispute.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/rti-obtain-spouses-income-details-maintenance-dispute-rules-delhi-hc.html">RTI Cannot Be Used to Obtain Spouse’s Income Details for Maintenance Dispute: Delhi HC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/rti-obtain-spouses-income-details-maintenance-dispute-rules-delhi-hc.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Foreign Exchange Management (Authorised Persons) Regulations, 2026</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/rbi/foreign-exchange-management-authorised-persons-regulations-2026.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/rbi/foreign-exchange-management-authorised-persons-regulations-2026.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 08:06:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Fema / RBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FEMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fema Notifications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RBI Notifications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reserve bank of india]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1041881</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>RBI notified the Foreign Exchange Management (Authorised Persons) Regulations, 2026 introducing revised eligibility, compliance, and operational conditions for authorised persons. The regulations also restructure forex operations through new categorisation and oversight mechanisms.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/rbi/foreign-exchange-management-authorised-persons-regulations-2026.html">Foreign Exchange Management (Authorised Persons) Regulations, 2026</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/rbi/foreign-exchange-management-authorised-persons-regulations-2026.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Revisiting Grandfathering under GAAR: Rule 10U Amendment and Its Impact on Tiger Global</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/grandfathering-gaar-rule-10u-amendment-impact-tiger-global.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/grandfathering-gaar-rule-10u-amendment-impact-tiger-global.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aman Khurana]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 06:42:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GAAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court judgements]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1041857</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>CBDT’s 2026 amendment strengthens grandfathering protection for investments made before the commencement of GAAR. The clarification addresses concerns created by the Tiger Global ruling regarding scrutiny of legacy investments.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/grandfathering-gaar-rule-10u-amendment-impact-tiger-global.html">Revisiting Grandfathering under GAAR: Rule 10U Amendment and Its Impact on Tiger Global</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/grandfathering-gaar-rule-10u-amendment-impact-tiger-global.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Karnataka HC Protects Genuine Buyers from ITC Denial Due to Supplier Default</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/important-karnataka-high-court-decisions-gst-taxpayer-karnataka.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/important-karnataka-high-court-decisions-gst-taxpayer-karnataka.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[S PRASAD]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 06:40:27 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1041858</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Court clarified that an NGTP or non-genuine taxpayer tag is only a risk indicator and not conclusive proof against buyers. Authorities must conduct proper enquiry, examine records, and provide transaction-wise findings before rejecting ITC claims.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/important-karnataka-high-court-decisions-gst-taxpayer-karnataka.html">Karnataka HC Protects Genuine Buyers from ITC Denial Due to Supplier Default</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/important-karnataka-high-court-decisions-gst-taxpayer-karnataka.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>PFRDA Aligns NPS Investments with SEBI Rules as Insider Trading Regulation Falls Under SEBI Domain</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/pfrda-aligns-nps-investments-sebi-rules-insider-trading-regulation-falls-sebi-domain.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/pfrda-aligns-nps-investments-sebi-rules-insider-trading-regulation-falls-sebi-domain.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 06:37:15 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insider Trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PFRDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEBI notifications]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1041861</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The circular clarifies that SEBI regulations on insider trading, self-dealing, and front running will apply to all NPS investment activities. PFRDA withdrew its separate framework to eliminate regulatory duplication and ensure uniform compliance standards.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/pfrda-aligns-nps-investments-sebi-rules-insider-trading-regulation-falls-sebi-domain.html">PFRDA Aligns NPS Investments with SEBI Rules as Insider Trading Regulation Falls Under SEBI Domain</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/pfrda-aligns-nps-investments-sebi-rules-insider-trading-regulation-falls-sebi-domain.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Revision of withdrawal limit for Aadhaar authenticated (e-KYC) transactions without voucher</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/finance/revision-withdrawal-limit-aadhaar-authenticated-e-kyctransactions-voucher.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/finance/revision-withdrawal-limit-aadhaar-authenticated-e-kyctransactions-voucher.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 06:36:27 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Post office notifications]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1041863</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Department of Posts revised the limit for voucher-free Aadhaar-authenticated withdrawals from ₹5,000 to ₹20,000. The move strengthens paperless banking and simplifies POSB transactions through e-KYC processes.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/finance/revision-withdrawal-limit-aadhaar-authenticated-e-kyctransactions-voucher.html">Revision of withdrawal limit for Aadhaar authenticated (e-KYC) transactions without voucher</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/finance/revision-withdrawal-limit-aadhaar-authenticated-e-kyctransactions-voucher.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>SEBI Issues AI Cybersecurity Advisory Because Advanced AI Tools Increase Vulnerability</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/sebi/sebi-issues-ai-cybersecurity-advisory-advanced-ai-tools-increase-vulnerability.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/sebi/sebi-issues-ai-cybersecurity-advisory-advanced-ai-tools-increase-vulnerability.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 06:35:53 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[SEBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Artificial Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEBI notifications]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1041867</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>SEBI warned that AI-driven tools like Mythos can rapidly identify and exploit cybersecurity weaknesses across the securities market ecosystem. The advisory mandates stronger monitoring, patch management, and coordinated cyber resilience measures for regulated entities.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/sebi/sebi-issues-ai-cybersecurity-advisory-advanced-ai-tools-increase-vulnerability.html">SEBI Issues AI Cybersecurity Advisory Because Advanced AI Tools Increase Vulnerability</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/sebi/sebi-issues-ai-cybersecurity-advisory-advanced-ai-tools-increase-vulnerability.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>SEBI Defines ‘Significant Indices’ Based on ₹20,000 Crore Mutual Fund AUM Threshold</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/sebi/sebi-defines-significant-indices-based-rs-20000-crore-mutual-fund-aum-threshold.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/sebi/sebi-defines-significant-indices-based-rs-20000-crore-mutual-fund-aum-threshold.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[editor2]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 06:33:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[SEBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEBI notifications]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1041865</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>SEBI released an official list of Significant Indices that includes major benchmarks such as Nifty 50, Nifty Bank, and Sensex. Index providers managing these benchmarks must comply with the SEBI (Index Providers) Regulations, 2024.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/sebi/sebi-defines-significant-indices-based-rs-20000-crore-mutual-fund-aum-threshold.html">SEBI Defines ‘Significant Indices’ Based on ₹20,000 Crore Mutual Fund AUM Threshold</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/sebi/sebi-defines-significant-indices-based-rs-20000-crore-mutual-fund-aum-threshold.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>ITAT Deletes Section 271D Penalty as Cash Sale Consideration Is Not Covered by Section 269SS</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-deletes-section-271d-penalty-cash-sale-consideration-covered-section-269ss.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-deletes-section-271d-penalty-cash-sale-consideration-covered-section-269ss.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA AJAY KUMAR AGRAWAL]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 06:22:03 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 260A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 263]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 269SS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 269T]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 271(1)(c)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 271D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 271E]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1041856</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The ITAT ruled that penalty proceedings under Section 271D are invalid if the Assessing Officer fails to record satisfaction in assessment or related proceedings. Since no assessment proceedings existed in the case, the penalty was held unsustainable in law.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-deletes-section-271d-penalty-cash-sale-consideration-covered-section-269ss.html">ITAT Deletes Section 271D Penalty as Cash Sale Consideration Is Not Covered by Section 269SS</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-deletes-section-271d-penalty-cash-sale-consideration-covered-section-269ss.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>ITAT Deletes On-Money Addition Due to Lack of Corroborative Evidence</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-deletes-on-money-addition-due-lack-corroborative-evidence.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-deletes-on-money-addition-due-lack-corroborative-evidence.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA AJAY KUMAR AGRAWAL]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 06:20:07 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(3)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 147]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 148]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 148A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 69]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 69B]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1041851</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The ITAT Hyderabad held that additions for alleged cash payments cannot be sustained merely on the basis of third-party seized documents. The Tribunal ruled that absence of corroborative evidence, cash trail, or signed records makes such additions legally unsustainable.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-deletes-on-money-addition-due-lack-corroborative-evidence.html">ITAT Deletes On-Money Addition Due to Lack of Corroborative Evidence</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-deletes-on-money-addition-due-lack-corroborative-evidence.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gujarat HC Upholds ITC Denial on Supplier Default</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gujarat-hc-upholds-itc-denial-supplier-default.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gujarat-hc-upholds-itc-denial-supplier-default.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ca.yogesh_porwal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 06:06:52 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[input tax credit]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1041835</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Gujarat HC upheld Section 16(2)(c) of the CGST Act, allowing denial of ITC where suppliers fail to deposit GST with the government.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gujarat-hc-upholds-itc-denial-supplier-default.html">Gujarat HC Upholds ITC Denial on Supplier Default</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gujarat-hc-upholds-itc-denial-supplier-default.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Company &amp; Directors Penalized by ROC for Extending Rights Issue Beyond Permissible Period</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/company-law/company-directors-penalized-roc-extending-rights-issue-permissible-period.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/company-law/company-directors-penalized-roc-extending-rights-issue-permissible-period.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[editor2]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 05:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Company Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies Act 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[company law notifications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Company Law Penalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ministry of corporate affairs]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1041862</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The ROC imposed penalties after a company extended its rights issue offer period following requests from promoter shareholders. The adjudication order clarified that the Companies Act restricts rights issue offers from remaining open for more than 30 days.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/company-law/company-directors-penalized-roc-extending-rights-issue-permissible-period.html">Company &#038; Directors Penalized by ROC for Extending Rights Issue Beyond Permissible Period</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/company-law/company-directors-penalized-roc-extending-rights-issue-permissible-period.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bombay HC Orders ITC Unblocking as Rule 86A Restriction Expired After One Year</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/bombay-hc-orders-itc-unblocking-rule-86a-restriction-expired-year.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/bombay-hc-orders-itc-unblocking-rule-86a-restriction-expired-year.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[a2zbimaljain]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 05:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CA Bimal Jain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST Notifications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[input tax credit]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1041854</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Court held that blocking of the electronic credit ledger under Rule 86A cannot continue beyond the statutory one-year period. It clarified that such restriction automatically lapses by operation of law regardless of pending departmental proceedings.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/bombay-hc-orders-itc-unblocking-rule-86a-restriction-expired-year.html">Bombay HC Orders ITC Unblocking as Rule 86A Restriction Expired After One Year</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/bombay-hc-orders-itc-unblocking-rule-86a-restriction-expired-year.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>TDS Never Sleeps: How Form 26AS Triggers Tax Scrutiny</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/tds-sleeps-form-26as-triggers-tax-scrutiny.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/tds-sleeps-form-26as-triggers-tax-scrutiny.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anita Bhadra]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 05:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Form 26AS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Income Tax Notifications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TDS]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1041843</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Tribunal held that TDS entries appearing in Form 26AS are sufficient material for reopening assessments when no return is filed. The ruling emphasizes that taxpayers must reconcile Form 26AS with books and returns to avoid reassessment proceedings.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/tds-sleeps-form-26as-triggers-tax-scrutiny.html">TDS Never Sleeps: How Form 26AS Triggers Tax Scrutiny</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/tds-sleeps-form-26as-triggers-tax-scrutiny.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>GST Confiscation Proceedings Quashed as Stock Discrepancy Must Be Examined Under Sections 73/74</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-confiscation-proceedings-quashed-stock-discrepancy-examined-sections-73-74.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-confiscation-proceedings-quashed-stock-discrepancy-examined-sections-73-74.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 05:28:47 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1041853</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The case involved GST proceedings initiated after alleged excess stock was found during a factory survey. The Court held that Section 130 proceedings were wrongly initiated and invalidated the confiscation-related orders passed by the authorities.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-confiscation-proceedings-quashed-stock-discrepancy-examined-sections-73-74.html">GST Confiscation Proceedings Quashed as Stock Discrepancy Must Be Examined Under Sections 73/74</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-confiscation-proceedings-quashed-stock-discrepancy-examined-sections-73-74.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tax Exemption at Risk for Charitable Institutions Allegedly Operated Like Businesses</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/tax-exemption-risk-charitable-institutions-allegedly-operated-businesses.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/tax-exemption-risk-charitable-institutions-allegedly-operated-businesses.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Amresh Vashisht]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 05:26:20 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Income Tax Notifications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 12AB]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1041852</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Income-tax Department intensified scrutiny of charitable entities after finding high surplus margins, premium pricing, and commercial-style operations. The developments show that institutions functioning like businesses may lose tax exemptions despite charitable registration.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/tax-exemption-risk-charitable-institutions-allegedly-operated-businesses.html">Tax Exemption at Risk for Charitable Institutions Allegedly Operated Like Businesses</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/tax-exemption-risk-charitable-institutions-allegedly-operated-businesses.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Unlisted Bonds Lose LTCG Benefit; No Capital Gains Exemption for Depreciable Assets under Income Tax Act 2025</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/unlisted-bonds-lose-ltcg-benefit-capital-gains-exemption-depreciable-assets-income-tax-act-2025.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/unlisted-bonds-lose-ltcg-benefit-capital-gains-exemption-depreciable-assets-income-tax-act-2025.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Amresh Vashisht]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 05:23:20 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Gain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Income Tax Act 2025]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Income Tax Notifications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Long Term Capital Gain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 54]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 54EC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 54F]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Short Term Capital Gain]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1041846</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The new law treats gains from depreciable assets as short-term capital gains for all purposes, not merely for computation. This effectively removes exemption benefits previously allowed through judicial interpretation under the old regime.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/unlisted-bonds-lose-ltcg-benefit-capital-gains-exemption-depreciable-assets-income-tax-act-2025.html">Unlisted Bonds Lose LTCG Benefit; No Capital Gains Exemption for Depreciable Assets under Income Tax Act 2025</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/unlisted-bonds-lose-ltcg-benefit-capital-gains-exemption-depreciable-assets-income-tax-act-2025.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Customs Broker Cannot Be Penalised Merely for Non-Physical Verification of Client Address</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/customs-broker-penalised-non-physical-verification-client-address.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/customs-broker-penalised-non-physical-verification-client-address.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 15:25:41 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Custom Duty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1040987</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>High Court held that customs regulations require verification through reliable documents and data, not mandatory physical inspection of a client’s premises.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/customs-broker-penalised-non-physical-verification-client-address.html">Customs Broker Cannot Be Penalised Merely for Non-Physical Verification of Client Address</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/customs-broker-penalised-non-physical-verification-client-address.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>GST on Hosting Services: OIDAR Classification, RCM Liability &amp; Latest Judgments</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-hosting-services-oidar-classification-rcm-liability-latest-judgments.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-hosting-services-oidar-classification-rcm-liability-latest-judgments.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[akshay.akac]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 15:18:42 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OIDAR Services]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1041812</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>This case explains how foreign digital services like hosting fall under OIDAR and become taxable imports under GST. It highlights compliance through Reverse Charge Mechanism and ITC eligibility for registered businesses.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-hosting-services-oidar-classification-rcm-liability-latest-judgments.html">GST on Hosting Services: OIDAR Classification, RCM Liability &#038; Latest Judgments</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-hosting-services-oidar-classification-rcm-liability-latest-judgments.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Legal Analysis of Applicability of GST on Bar Associations</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/legal-analysis-applicability-gst-bar-associations.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/legal-analysis-applicability-gst-bar-associations.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ela Garg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 15:02:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1041800</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>This case explains how GST law overrides mutuality by treating associations and members as distinct taxable persons. It clarifies that internal transactions like membership fees now qualify as taxable supply.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/legal-analysis-applicability-gst-bar-associations.html">Legal Analysis of Applicability of GST on Bar Associations</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/legal-analysis-applicability-gst-bar-associations.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Political Donation Reassessment Notice Quashed as Issued by Wrong Authority</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/political-donation-reassessment-notice-quashed-issued-wrong-authority.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/political-donation-reassessment-notice-quashed-issued-wrong-authority.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 14:55:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 148]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 80GGC]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1041825</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Tribunal held that notice under Section 148 was invalid as it was issued by an officer lacking jurisdiction. It relied on CBDT Instruction prescribing monetary limits. The ruling highlights strict adherence to jurisdictional norms.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/political-donation-reassessment-notice-quashed-issued-wrong-authority.html">Political Donation Reassessment Notice Quashed as Issued by Wrong Authority</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/political-donation-reassessment-notice-quashed-issued-wrong-authority.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>RTI Appeal Rejected Due to Information Already Provided in Existing Records</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/rti-appeal-rejected-due-information-existing-records.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/rti-appeal-rejected-due-information-existing-records.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 14:52:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankruptcy code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBC 2016]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RTI ACT]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1041797</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The issue involved alleged incomplete disclosure under RTI. The authority held that all available records were already shared and no further disclosure was required.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/rti-appeal-rejected-due-information-existing-records.html">RTI Appeal Rejected Due to Information Already Provided in Existing Records</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/rti-appeal-rejected-due-information-existing-records.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Insolvency Professional Suspended Due to Failure to Disclose Conflict of Interest</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/insolvency-professional-suspended-due-failure-disclose-conflict-interest.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/insolvency-professional-suspended-due-failure-disclose-conflict-interest.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 14:51:23 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankruptcy code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBC 2016]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1041789</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The case involved non-disclosure of overlapping interests between contractor and resolution applicant. The authority held that lack of transparency compromised the process and imposed a three-year suspension.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/insolvency-professional-suspended-due-failure-disclose-conflict-interest.html">Insolvency Professional Suspended Due to Failure to Disclose Conflict of Interest</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/insolvency-professional-suspended-due-failure-disclose-conflict-interest.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ad-Hoc Norms Validity Extended Till 31.03.2028 Due to DGFT Policy Amendment</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/dgft/ad-hoc-norms-validity-extended-31-03-2028-due-dgft-policy-amendment.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/dgft/ad-hoc-norms-validity-extended-31-03-2028-due-dgft-policy-amendment.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 14:50:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[DGFT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DGFT Notifications]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1041787</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The issue involved limited validity of norms for Advance Authorisation. The amendment extends validity to 2028, ensuring continuity and reducing compliance burden.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/dgft/ad-hoc-norms-validity-extended-31-03-2028-due-dgft-policy-amendment.html">Ad-Hoc Norms Validity Extended Till 31.03.2028 Due to DGFT Policy Amendment</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/dgft/ad-hoc-norms-validity-extended-31-03-2028-due-dgft-policy-amendment.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>SEBI Proposes OBPP Reforms to Ease Business and Expand Product Offerings</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/sebi/sebi-proposes-obpp-reforms-ease-business-expand-product-offerings.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/sebi/sebi-proposes-obpp-reforms-ease-business-expand-product-offerings.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[editor4]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 14:47:46 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[SEBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEBI notifications]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1041799</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The consultation paper proposes allowing OBPPs to offer products regulated by IFSCA. It aligns with broader efforts to enhance cross-border investment opportunities. The proposal also ensures compliance with foreign exchange rules.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/sebi/sebi-proposes-obpp-reforms-ease-business-expand-product-offerings.html">SEBI Proposes OBPP Reforms to Ease Business and Expand Product Offerings</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/sebi/sebi-proposes-obpp-reforms-ease-business-expand-product-offerings.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>SEBI Proposes Extending Early Pay-In Benefit to Options Due to Stakeholder Demand</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/sebi/sebi-proposes-extending-early-pay-in-benefit-options-due-stakeholder-demand.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/sebi/sebi-proposes-extending-early-pay-in-benefit-options-due-stakeholder-demand.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[editor4]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 14:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[SEBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEBI notifications]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1041786</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The consultation paper issued by Securities and Exchange Board of India seeks public comments on a draft circular proposing to extend the benefit of early pay-in (EPI) in the commodity derivatives segment to options contracts, in addition to its current applicability to futures contracts. Under the existing framework prescribed in the SEBI Master Circular dated [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/sebi/sebi-proposes-extending-early-pay-in-benefit-options-due-stakeholder-demand.html">SEBI Proposes Extending Early Pay-In Benefit to Options Due to Stakeholder Demand</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/sebi/sebi-proposes-extending-early-pay-in-benefit-options-due-stakeholder-demand.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>ITAT Chennai Allowed Section 80-IA Deduction as Consumer Tariff Held Correct Benchmark</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-chennai-allowed-section-80-ia-deduction-consumer-tariff-held-correct-benchmark.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-chennai-allowed-section-80-ia-deduction-consumer-tariff-held-correct-benchmark.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 14:45:53 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 14A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 80IA]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1041818</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Tribunal found that the transfer pricing adjustment was incorrectly computed using SEB sale rates. It allowed deduction based on consumer tariff rates. The decision clarifies benchmarking for captive consumption.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-chennai-allowed-section-80-ia-deduction-consumer-tariff-held-correct-benchmark.html">ITAT Chennai Allowed Section 80-IA Deduction as Consumer Tariff Held Correct Benchmark</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-chennai-allowed-section-80-ia-deduction-consumer-tariff-held-correct-benchmark.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Excess Stock Found in GST Survey Cannot Trigger Confiscation Proceedings: Allahabad HC</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/excess-stock-gst-survey-trigger-confiscation-proceedings-allahabad-hc.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/excess-stock-gst-survey-trigger-confiscation-proceedings-allahabad-hc.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 14:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1041823</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The court held that initiating proceedings under the penalty provision for alleged excess stock discovered during a survey was improper. It ruled that such cases must be dealt with under assessment provisions, leading to quashing of the order.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/excess-stock-gst-survey-trigger-confiscation-proceedings-allahabad-hc.html">Excess Stock Found in GST Survey Cannot Trigger Confiscation Proceedings: Allahabad HC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/excess-stock-gst-survey-trigger-confiscation-proceedings-allahabad-hc.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Section 130 Cannot Be Used for Excess Stock Detected in GST Survey: Allahabad HC</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/section-130-excess-stock-detected-gst-survey-allahabad-hc.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/section-130-excess-stock-detected-gst-survey-allahabad-hc.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 14:43:52 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1041817</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Court examined whether Section 130 could be used when discrepancies were found during a GST survey. It held that the correct legal route is Sections 73/74 and reinforced settled precedents. </p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/section-130-excess-stock-detected-gst-survey-allahabad-hc.html">Section 130 Cannot Be Used for Excess Stock Detected in GST Survey: Allahabad HC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/section-130-excess-stock-detected-gst-survey-allahabad-hc.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Excess Stock During Survey Cannot Trigger GST Section 130 Action: Allahabad HC</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/excess-stock-survey-trigger-gst-section-130-actionallahabad-hc.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/excess-stock-survey-trigger-gst-section-130-actionallahabad-hc.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 14:39:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1041806</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Court examined whether confiscation proceedings under Section 130 were valid for alleged excess stock found during a survey. It held that the law mandates action under Sections 73/74, rendering the orders unsustainable.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/excess-stock-survey-trigger-gst-section-130-actionallahabad-hc.html">Excess Stock During Survey Cannot Trigger GST Section 130 Action: Allahabad HC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/excess-stock-survey-trigger-gst-section-130-actionallahabad-hc.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Allahabad HC Quashed GST Penalty as Wrong Provision Invoked for Excess Stock During Survey</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/allahabad-hc-quashed-gst-penalty-wrong-provision-invoked-excess-stock-survey.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/allahabad-hc-quashed-gst-penalty-wrong-provision-invoked-excess-stock-survey.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 14:37:31 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1041793</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Court examined whether Section 130 proceedings were valid when excess stock was found during a survey. It held that such cases must be dealt with under Sections 73/74, rendering the penalty order unsustainable.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/allahabad-hc-quashed-gst-penalty-wrong-provision-invoked-excess-stock-survey.html">Allahabad HC Quashed GST Penalty as Wrong Provision Invoked for Excess Stock During Survey</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/allahabad-hc-quashed-gst-penalty-wrong-provision-invoked-excess-stock-survey.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>GST Confiscation Invalid as Section 130 Used Instead of Sections 73/74 Procedure: Allahabad HC</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-confiscation-invalid-section-130-sections-73-74-procedure-allahabad-hc.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-confiscation-invalid-section-130-sections-73-74-procedure-allahabad-hc.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 14:36:21 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1041821</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The court held that tax determination must follow Sections 73 or 74 and cannot be replaced by Section 130 proceedings. It found the action legally unsustainable. The ruling reinforces procedural compliance under GST law.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-confiscation-invalid-section-130-sections-73-74-procedure-allahabad-hc.html">GST Confiscation Invalid as Section 130 Used Instead of Sections 73/74 Procedure: Allahabad HC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-confiscation-invalid-section-130-sections-73-74-procedure-allahabad-hc.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oppression &amp; Mismanagement Petition Rejected Due to Dispute Being Purely Contractual &amp; Arbitrable</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/company-law/oppression-mismanagement-petition-rejected-due-dispute-purely-contractual-arbitrable.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/company-law/oppression-mismanagement-petition-rejected-due-dispute-purely-contractual-arbitrable.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 14:27:59 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Company Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NCLT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oppression and mismanagement]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1041717</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The issue involved allegations of mismanagement framed under company law provisions. The Tribunal held that the core dispute arose from contractual obligations under a term sheet. It referred the matter to arbitration, emphasizing that such disputes must follow agreed dispute resolution mechanisms.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/company-law/oppression-mismanagement-petition-rejected-due-dispute-purely-contractual-arbitrable.html">Oppression &#038; Mismanagement Petition Rejected Due to Dispute Being Purely Contractual &#038; Arbitrable</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/company-law/oppression-mismanagement-petition-rejected-due-dispute-purely-contractual-arbitrable.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>ITAT Remands Addition Due to Failure to Verify GST Turnover Instead of Bank Credits</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-remands-addition-due-failure-verify-gst-turnover-bank-credits.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-remands-addition-due-failure-verify-gst-turnover-bank-credits.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 14:26:03 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 144]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 144B]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 147]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 148]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1041766</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The issue involved estimation of income based solely on bank credits without supporting verification. The Tribunal remanded the case, directing assessment based on GST and VAT turnover.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-remands-addition-due-failure-verify-gst-turnover-bank-credits.html">ITAT Remands Addition Due to Failure to Verify GST Turnover Instead of Bank Credits</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-remands-addition-due-failure-verify-gst-turnover-bank-credits.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gujarat HC Dismisses Appeal as Only Profit Element of Bogus Purchases Taxable</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/gujarat-hc-dismisses-appeal-profit-element-bogus-purchases-taxable.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/gujarat-hc-dismisses-appeal-profit-element-bogus-purchases-taxable.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 14:24:36 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bogus purchases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income tax act 1961]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 260A]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1041761</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The court held that only the income component of alleged bogus purchases can be taxed, not the entire transaction. It upheld the Tribunal’s restriction of addition to 6%. The ruling reinforces limits on full disallowance.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/gujarat-hc-dismisses-appeal-profit-element-bogus-purchases-taxable.html">Gujarat HC Dismisses Appeal as Only Profit Element of Bogus Purchases Taxable</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/gujarat-hc-dismisses-appeal-profit-element-bogus-purchases-taxable.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Penalty Under Section 114AA Set Aside as No False Declaration Proven: CESTAT Delhi</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/penalty-section-114aa-set-false-declaration-proven-cestat-delhi.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/penalty-section-114aa-set-false-declaration-proven-cestat-delhi.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 14:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Custom Duty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cestat judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1041774</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Tribunal held that delayed submission of required certificates constituted a procedural lapse without intent to evade duty. It reduced penalties and redemption fine. The ruling emphasizes leniency in technical non-compliance cases.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/penalty-section-114aa-set-false-declaration-proven-cestat-delhi.html">Penalty Under Section 114AA Set Aside as No False Declaration Proven: CESTAT Delhi</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/penalty-section-114aa-set-false-declaration-proven-cestat-delhi.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>No Section 68 Addition Where Loan Repaid Through Banking Channels &amp; Supported by Evidence</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-68-addition-loan-repaid-banking-channels-supported-evidence.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-68-addition-loan-repaid-banking-channels-supported-evidence.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 14:20:44 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income tax act 1961]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(3)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 153A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 194A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 260A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 68]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1041777</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The tribunal held that interest cannot be disallowed where advances to related parties are made for business purposes and out of own funds, emphasizing the principle of commercial expediency.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-68-addition-loan-repaid-banking-channels-supported-evidence.html">No Section 68 Addition Where Loan Repaid Through Banking Channels &#038; Supported by Evidence</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-68-addition-loan-repaid-banking-channels-supported-evidence.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Section 263 Upheld as AO Failed to Examine Nature of ₹3.98 Crore Receipt: ITAT Chandigarh</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-263-upheld-ao-failed-examine-nature-rs-3-98-crore-receipt-itat-chandigarh.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-263-upheld-ao-failed-examine-nature-rs-3-98-crore-receipt-itat-chandigarh.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 14:18:37 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 144]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 144B]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 147]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 263]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1041780</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Tribunal held that lack of inquiry into a large receipt justified revision under Section 263. It found the assessment erroneous and prejudicial to revenue. The ruling reinforces duty of proper verification.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-263-upheld-ao-failed-examine-nature-rs-3-98-crore-receipt-itat-chandigarh.html">Section 263 Upheld as AO Failed to Examine Nature of ₹3.98 Crore Receipt: ITAT Chandigarh</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-263-upheld-ao-failed-examine-nature-rs-3-98-crore-receipt-itat-chandigarh.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Section 271(1)(c) Penalty deleted Due to Bona Fide Claim on Lease Premium Deduction</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-2711c-penalty-deleted-due-bona-fide-claim-lease-premium-deduction.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-2711c-penalty-deleted-due-bona-fide-claim-lease-premium-deduction.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 14:17:13 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Income Tax Penalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Penalty for Concealment of Income]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 250]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 271(1)(c)]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1041803</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The issue involved penalty on disallowance of lease premium deduction. The Tribunal held that admission of the issue by the High Court made it debatable. It ruled that penalty cannot be imposed in such cases.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-2711c-penalty-deleted-due-bona-fide-claim-lease-premium-deduction.html">Section 271(1)(c) Penalty deleted Due to Bona Fide Claim on Lease Premium Deduction</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-2711c-penalty-deleted-due-bona-fide-claim-lease-premium-deduction.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Delhi HC Set Aside Anti-Profiteering Order Due to Need for Fresh Examination of Facts</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/delhi-hc-set-anti-profiteering-order-due-fresh-examination-facts.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/delhi-hc-set-anti-profiteering-order-due-fresh-examination-facts.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 14:12:52 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anti-Profiteering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1041748</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The issue involved alleged failure to pass on input tax credit benefits. The Court set aside the order and remanded the matter for fresh factual determination by the tribunal.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/delhi-hc-set-anti-profiteering-order-due-fresh-examination-facts.html">Delhi HC Set Aside Anti-Profiteering Order Due to Need for Fresh Examination of Facts</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/delhi-hc-set-anti-profiteering-order-due-fresh-examination-facts.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Delhi HC Grants Interim Relief as GSTAT Exceeded Scope of Remand Order</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/delhi-hc-grants-interim-relief-as-gstat-exceeded-scope-of-remand-order.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/delhi-hc-grants-interim-relief-as-gstat-exceeded-scope-of-remand-order.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 14:11:34 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1041760</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The issue concerned whether the tribunal acted beyond the High Court’s earlier remand directions. The Court granted interim protection and restrained coercive action pending further hearing.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/delhi-hc-grants-interim-relief-as-gstat-exceeded-scope-of-remand-order.html">Delhi HC Grants Interim Relief as GSTAT Exceeded Scope of Remand Order</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/delhi-hc-grants-interim-relief-as-gstat-exceeded-scope-of-remand-order.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Section 271(1)(c) Penalty Cannot Be Imposed for Valuation Differences Without Proof of Inaccuracy: SC</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-2711c-penalty-imposed-valuation-differences-proof-inaccuracy-sc.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-2711c-penalty-imposed-valuation-differences-proof-inaccuracy-sc.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 14:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Income Tax Penalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Penalty for Concealment of Income]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 271(1)(c)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court judgements]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1041713</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Supreme Court held that mere differences in property valuation do not amount to furnishing inaccurate particulars. Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) requires proof of deliberate inaccuracy. The ruling clarifies that estimation disputes alone cannot justify penalty.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-2711c-penalty-imposed-valuation-differences-proof-inaccuracy-sc.html">Section 271(1)(c) Penalty Cannot Be Imposed for Valuation Differences Without Proof of Inaccuracy: SC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-2711c-penalty-imposed-valuation-differences-proof-inaccuracy-sc.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>LTCG Addition Deleted as Assessee Proved Genuine Investment Activity Through Evidence</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/ltcg-addition-deleted-assessee-proved-genuine-investment-activity-evidence.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/ltcg-addition-deleted-assessee-proved-genuine-investment-activity-evidence.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 13:56:51 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Long Term Capital Gain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(3)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 68]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1041739</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Tribunal held that consistent investment history and documentary proof established genuineness of share transactions. Additions under Section 68 were deleted due to lack of contrary evidence.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/ltcg-addition-deleted-assessee-proved-genuine-investment-activity-evidence.html">LTCG Addition Deleted as Assessee Proved Genuine Investment Activity Through Evidence</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/ltcg-addition-deleted-assessee-proved-genuine-investment-activity-evidence.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>GST Order Quashed as Penalty Not Mentioned in DRC-01 Form: Allahabad HC</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-order-quashed-penalty-mentioned-drc-01-form-allahabad-hc.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-order-quashed-penalty-mentioned-drc-01-form-allahabad-hc.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 13:56:13 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1041699</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Court set aside the order because the penalty was not disclosed in the statutory Form DRC-01. It held that demands must be clearly specified in the prescribed notice.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-order-quashed-penalty-mentioned-drc-01-form-allahabad-hc.html">GST Order Quashed as Penalty Not Mentioned in DRC-01 Form: Allahabad HC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-order-quashed-penalty-mentioned-drc-01-form-allahabad-hc.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>GST Not Applicable on Affiliation &amp; NOC Fee collected by University: AP HC</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-applicable-affiliation-noc-fee-collected-university-ap-hc.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-applicable-affiliation-noc-fee-collected-university-ap-hc.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 13:52:01 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1041702</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Court held that affiliation and NOC issuance by universities are statutory duties, not business activities. Therefore, such fees cannot be treated as taxable supply under GST, and related assessment orders were set aside.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-applicable-affiliation-noc-fee-collected-university-ap-hc.html">GST Not Applicable on Affiliation &#038; NOC Fee collected by University: AP HC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-applicable-affiliation-noc-fee-collected-university-ap-hc.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Loose Papers Without Identifiable Link Cannot Justify Reassessment: Gujarat HC</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/loose-papers-identifiable-link-justify-reassessment-gujarat-hc.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/loose-papers-identifiable-link-justify-reassessment-gujarat-hc.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 13:47:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income tax act 1961]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reassessment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 148]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1041709</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The High Court ruled that reopening based on unrelated and non-specific seized material is not permissible. It concluded that no prima facie belief of income escapement could be formed. The decision highlights limits on the use of indirect evidence.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/loose-papers-identifiable-link-justify-reassessment-gujarat-hc.html">Loose Papers Without Identifiable Link Cannot Justify Reassessment: Gujarat HC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/loose-papers-identifiable-link-justify-reassessment-gujarat-hc.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Section 54 Exemption Allowed as Possession Date Considered Over Registration Date</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-54-exemption-allowed-possession-date-considered-registration-date.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-54-exemption-allowed-possession-date-considered-registration-date.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 13:41:34 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Gain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 54]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 54F]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1041737</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Tribunal held that for under-construction properties, the date of possession is the relevant factor for Section 54 exemption. It rejected the reliance on registration date alone. The ruling clarifies timing criteria for capital gains exemption.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-54-exemption-allowed-possession-date-considered-registration-date.html">Section 54 Exemption Allowed as Possession Date Considered Over Registration Date</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-54-exemption-allowed-possession-date-considered-registration-date.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Section 263 Invalid as AO Conducted Proper Inquiry &amp; Took Plausible View: ITAT Surat</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-263-invalid-ao-conducted-proper-inquiry-plausible-view-itat-surat.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-263-invalid-ao-conducted-proper-inquiry-plausible-view-itat-surat.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 13:39:31 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 115BBE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(3)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 145]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 263]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 68]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1041747</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Tribunal held that revisionary powers cannot be used to substitute the AO’s view with that of the Pr. CIT. It emphasized that such substitution is beyond Section 263. The decision protects independent assessment decisions.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-263-invalid-ao-conducted-proper-inquiry-plausible-view-itat-surat.html">Section 263 Invalid as AO Conducted Proper Inquiry &#038; Took Plausible View: ITAT Surat</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-263-invalid-ao-conducted-proper-inquiry-plausible-view-itat-surat.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>SC Remits Section 148A Reassessment Row Back to High Courts</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/sc-remits-section-148a-reassessment-row-high-courts.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/sc-remits-section-148a-reassessment-row-high-courts.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 13:33:15 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income tax act 1961]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 148]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court judgements]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1041677</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The issue involved whether jurisdictional officers could issue reassessment notices. The Court set aside High Court rulings after a retrospective amendment clarified their authority and remanded the matter.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/sc-remits-section-148a-reassessment-row-high-courts.html">SC Remits Section 148A Reassessment Row Back to High Courts</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/sc-remits-section-148a-reassessment-row-high-courts.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>GST Registration Reinstated After Withdrawal of Retrospective Cancellation Order</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-registration-reinstated-withdrawal-retrospective-cancellation-order.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-registration-reinstated-withdrawal-retrospective-cancellation-order.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 13:29:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST Registration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1041727</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The court disposed of the petition after the State withdrew the contested GST cancellation order. Authorities were directed to restore the registration promptly. The ruling clarifies that defective orders may be withdrawn and corrected.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-registration-reinstated-withdrawal-retrospective-cancellation-order.html">GST Registration Reinstated After Withdrawal of Retrospective Cancellation Order</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-registration-reinstated-withdrawal-retrospective-cancellation-order.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Karnataka HC Sets Aside GST Order, Grants Fresh Opportunity to Taxpayer</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/karnataka-hc-sets-gst-ordergrants-fresh-opportunity-taxpayer.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/karnataka-hc-sets-gst-ordergrants-fresh-opportunity-taxpayer.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 13:27:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1041682</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The High Court set aside the adjudication order after finding that the petitioner had not responded to the show-cause notice. It remitted the matter for reconsideration with an opportunity to present evidence.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/karnataka-hc-sets-gst-ordergrants-fresh-opportunity-taxpayer.html">Karnataka HC Sets Aside GST Order, Grants Fresh Opportunity to Taxpayer</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/karnataka-hc-sets-gst-ordergrants-fresh-opportunity-taxpayer.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Allahabad HC Quashed ITC Blocking Order for Failure to Record Reason to Believe</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/allahabad-hc-quashed-itc-blocking-order-failure-record-reason.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/allahabad-hc-quashed-itc-blocking-order-failure-record-reason.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 13:27:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[input tax credit]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1041686</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Court found that the authority acted solely on a recommendation without independent evaluation. It ruled that such action does not meet the statutory requirement of reason to believe.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/allahabad-hc-quashed-itc-blocking-order-failure-record-reason.html">Allahabad HC Quashed ITC Blocking Order for Failure to Record Reason to Believe</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/allahabad-hc-quashed-itc-blocking-order-failure-record-reason.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>GST on Solar Projects Cannot Be Taxed at Flat 18% Due to 70:30 Rule: AP HC</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-solar-projects-taxed-flat-18-percent-due-70-30-rule-ap-hc.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-solar-projects-taxed-flat-18-percent-due-70-30-rule-ap-hc.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 13:24:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1041685</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The court held that solar power system supplies must follow the statutory 70:30 valuation mechanism, rejecting full 18% taxation. It ruled that separate invoicing does not negate eligibility for concessional treatment.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-solar-projects-taxed-flat-18-percent-due-70-30-rule-ap-hc.html">GST on Solar Projects Cannot Be Taxed at Flat 18% Due to 70:30 Rule: AP HC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-solar-projects-taxed-flat-18-percent-due-70-30-rule-ap-hc.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Income Tax: Madras HC Orders Fresh Review Due to Ignored Remand Report Evidence</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/income-tax-madras-hc-orders-fresh-review-due-remand-report-evidence.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/income-tax-madras-hc-orders-fresh-review-due-remand-report-evidence.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 13:14:14 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(3)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 147]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 154]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 260A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 271(1)(c)]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1041783</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Court held that failure to consider a remand report acknowledging agricultural income constituted an apparent error, leading to recall of the earlier judgment and remand for fresh adjudication.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/income-tax-madras-hc-orders-fresh-review-due-remand-report-evidence.html">Income Tax: Madras HC Orders Fresh Review Due to Ignored Remand Report Evidence</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/income-tax-madras-hc-orders-fresh-review-due-remand-report-evidence.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Advocate’s Refusal to Defend: Professional Misconduct?</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/advocates-refusal-defend-professional-misconduct.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/advocates-refusal-defend-professional-misconduct.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adv. Sudarshan Raturi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 13:12:10 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Policy]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1041784</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Explains when a lawyer’s refusal crosses into professional misconduct, especially in cases of discrimination or collective boycotts, and reinforces the duty to ensure access to justice.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/advocates-refusal-defend-professional-misconduct.html">Advocate’s Refusal to Defend: Professional Misconduct?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/advocates-refusal-defend-professional-misconduct.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bogus Purchase vs Non-Genuine Purchase in Income Tax: Key Differences, Case Laws &amp; Tax Impact</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/bogus-purchase-non-genuine-purchase-income-tax-key-differences-case-laws-tax-impact.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/bogus-purchase-non-genuine-purchase-income-tax-key-differences-case-laws-tax-impact.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Manish Gugliya]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 13:08:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bogus purchases]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1041752</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The issue concerns how purchase classification affects tax treatment. The key takeaway is that bogus purchases lead to full disallowance, while non-genuine ones attract only profit-based additions.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/bogus-purchase-non-genuine-purchase-income-tax-key-differences-case-laws-tax-impact.html">Bogus Purchase vs Non-Genuine Purchase in Income Tax: Key Differences, Case Laws &#038; Tax Impact</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/bogus-purchase-non-genuine-purchase-income-tax-key-differences-case-laws-tax-impact.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Essentials of Audit And Accounting In A Company/Organisation</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/finance/essentials-audit-accounting-company-organisation.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/finance/essentials-audit-accounting-company-organisation.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Soumyaranjan Adhikary]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 13:07:32 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[method of accounting]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1041749</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The issue highlights the distinction between accounting and auditing functions. The key takeaway is that independent audits ensure accuracy, compliance, and reliability of financial statements.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/finance/essentials-audit-accounting-company-organisation.html">Essentials of Audit And Accounting In A Company/Organisation</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/finance/essentials-audit-accounting-company-organisation.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>RSP-based Valuation under GST: Constitutional Limits &amp; Structural Incompatibility</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/rsp-based-valuation-gst-constitutional-limits-structural-incompatibility.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/rsp-based-valuation-gst-constitutional-limits-structural-incompatibility.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lovish Goyal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 13:02:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1041735</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The issue concerns taxing goods based on retail price instead of actual transaction value. It highlights that such valuation lacks nexus with supply and may violate constitutional principles governing tax measures.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/rsp-based-valuation-gst-constitutional-limits-structural-incompatibility.html">RSP-based Valuation under GST: Constitutional Limits &#038; Structural Incompatibility</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/rsp-based-valuation-gst-constitutional-limits-structural-incompatibility.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>HC Awards ₹10 Lakh Compensation For Failure To Furnish Arrest Grounds in Writing</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/hc-awards-rs-10-lakh-compensation-failure-furnish-arrest-grounds-writing.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/hc-awards-rs-10-lakh-compensation-failure-furnish-arrest-grounds-writing.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sanjeev Sirohi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 12:57:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1041772</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The case addressed whether arrest without written grounds violates constitutional safeguards. The Court held the arrest illegal and awarded compensation for unlawful detention. It reinforces mandatory compliance with arrest procedures.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/hc-awards-rs-10-lakh-compensation-failure-furnish-arrest-grounds-writing.html">HC Awards ₹10 Lakh Compensation For Failure To Furnish Arrest Grounds in Writing</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/hc-awards-rs-10-lakh-compensation-failure-furnish-arrest-grounds-writing.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Discrepancy In Stock And Action Under Section 130 of CGST Act, 2017</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/discrepancy-stock-action-section-130-cgst-act-2017.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/discrepancy-stock-action-section-130-cgst-act-2017.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dr. Sanjiv Agarwal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 12:54:01 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1041741</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The ruling clarifies that unaccounted stock discovered in surveys should be assessed as tax liability under Sections 73 and 74. It holds that Section 130 confiscation proceedings are not applicable in such cases.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/discrepancy-stock-action-section-130-cgst-act-2017.html">Discrepancy In Stock And Action Under Section 130 of CGST Act, 2017</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/discrepancy-stock-action-section-130-cgst-act-2017.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reopening Invalid Due to Change of Opinion on Same Material: Bombay HC</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/reopening-invalid-due-change-opinion-material-bombay-hc.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/reopening-invalid-due-change-opinion-material-bombay-hc.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 12:40:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 115JB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(3)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 147]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 148]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 80HHC]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1041744</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The court examined whether reassessment could be initiated after four years based on existing records. It held that reopening founded on a change of opinion is impermissible, and such reassessment was quashed. The ruling reinforces limits on reassessment powers.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/reopening-invalid-due-change-opinion-material-bombay-hc.html">Reopening Invalid Due to Change of Opinion on Same Material: Bombay HC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/reopening-invalid-due-change-opinion-material-bombay-hc.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>No Substantial Question of Law Where AO Accepts Claims in Remand: Karnataka HC</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/substantial-question-law-ao-accepts-claims-remand-karnataka-hc.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/substantial-question-law-ao-accepts-claims-remand-karnataka-hc.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 12:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(3)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 260A]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1041740</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The case involved multiple additions challenged by the revenue after relief was granted to the assessee. The Court held that once the Assessing Officer accepted the claims in remand, no substantial question of law survives.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/substantial-question-law-ao-accepts-claims-remand-karnataka-hc.html">No Substantial Question of Law Where AO Accepts Claims in Remand: Karnataka HC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/substantial-question-law-ao-accepts-claims-remand-karnataka-hc.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>SC Dismisses Penalty as Capital vs Revenue Receipt Issue Held Debatable</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/sc-dismisses-penalty-capital-revenue-receipt-issue-held-debatable.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/sc-dismisses-penalty-capital-revenue-receipt-issue-held-debatable.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 12:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Income Tax Penalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Penalty for Concealment of Income]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 271(1)(c)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court judgements]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1041754</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Supreme Court upheld deletion of penalty where the dispute involved classification of subsidy as capital or revenue receipt. It ruled that such debatable issues do not amount to furnishing inaccurate particulars. The decision reinforces limits on penalty under Section 271(1)(c).</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/sc-dismisses-penalty-capital-revenue-receipt-issue-held-debatable.html">SC Dismisses Penalty as Capital vs Revenue Receipt Issue Held Debatable</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/sc-dismisses-penalty-capital-revenue-receipt-issue-held-debatable.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>P&amp;H HC Deleted Penalty as Subsidy Classification Held Debatable Issue</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/ph-hc-deleted-penalty-subsidy-classification-held-debatable-issue.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/ph-hc-deleted-penalty-subsidy-classification-held-debatable-issue.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 12:15:02 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Income Tax Penalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Penalty for Concealment of Income]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 260A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 271(1)(c)]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1041759</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The High Court held that classification of grant-in-aid as capital or revenue is a debatable issue. It ruled that such classification disputes do not amount to furnishing inaccurate particulars.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/ph-hc-deleted-penalty-subsidy-classification-held-debatable-issue.html">P&#038;H HC Deleted Penalty as Subsidy Classification Held Debatable Issue</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/ph-hc-deleted-penalty-subsidy-classification-held-debatable-issue.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Miscellaneous Application Rejected as Tribunal Lacks Power to Review Its Own Order</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/miscellaneous-application-rejected-tribunal-lacks-power-review-order.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/miscellaneous-application-rejected-tribunal-lacks-power-review-order.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 12:12:39 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Long Term Capital Gain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 115BBE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(3)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 254]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 69]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1041728</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Tribunal held that challenges to appreciation of evidence amount to review, not rectification. It ruled that Section 254(2) permits only correction of apparent errors, leading to dismissal of the Revenue’s application.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/miscellaneous-application-rejected-tribunal-lacks-power-review-order.html">Miscellaneous Application Rejected as Tribunal Lacks Power to Review Its Own Order</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/miscellaneous-application-rejected-tribunal-lacks-power-review-order.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Penny Stock LTCG Cannot Be Treated as Bogus Without Independent Evidence: ITAT Delhi</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/penny-stock-ltcg-treated-bogus-independent-evidence-itat-delhi.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/penny-stock-ltcg-treated-bogus-independent-evidence-itat-delhi.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 12:12:01 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bogus Capital Gain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Long Term Capital Gain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 115BBE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(3)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 68]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Short Term Capital Gain]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1041731</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Tribunal held that long-term capital gains cannot be disallowed solely on investigation reports and assumptions. It found that documentary evidence and investment history supported genuineness, leading to deletion of additions under Section 68.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/penny-stock-ltcg-treated-bogus-independent-evidence-itat-delhi.html">Penny Stock LTCG Cannot Be Treated as Bogus Without Independent Evidence: ITAT Delhi</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/penny-stock-ltcg-treated-bogus-independent-evidence-itat-delhi.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bombay HC Set Aside GST Refund Rejection for Not Issuing SCN</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/bombay-hc-set-gst-refund-rejection-issuing-scn.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/bombay-hc-set-gst-refund-rejection-issuing-scn.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 12:08:26 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1041725</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The case involved denial of GST refund without following mandatory procedure under Rule 92(3). The Court held that absence of notice and hearing invalidates the rejection and ordered fresh consideration.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/bombay-hc-set-gst-refund-rejection-issuing-scn.html">Bombay HC Set Aside GST Refund Rejection for Not Issuing SCN</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/bombay-hc-set-gst-refund-rejection-issuing-scn.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>GST Appeal Delay Condoned Based on Precedent, Court Orders Fresh Hearing</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-appeal-delay-condoned-based-precedent-court-orders-fresh-hearing.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-appeal-delay-condoned-based-precedent-court-orders-fresh-hearing.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 11:49:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1041723</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The case involved refusal to entertain a delayed GST appeal due to limitation. The Court followed its earlier ruling and directed authorities to hear the appeal on merits subject to statutory deposits.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-appeal-delay-condoned-based-precedent-court-orders-fresh-hearing.html">GST Appeal Delay Condoned Based on Precedent, Court Orders Fresh Hearing</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-appeal-delay-condoned-based-precedent-court-orders-fresh-hearing.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>GST Appeal Delay Excused Due to Partner’s Death, Court Orders Fresh Hearing</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-appeal-delay-excused-due-partners-death-court-orders-fresh-hearing.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-appeal-delay-excused-due-partners-death-court-orders-fresh-hearing.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 11:47:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1041711</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The case involved delay in filing GST appeal due to death of a key partner managing operations. The Court held that such circumstances constitute sufficient cause and directed the appeal to be heard on merits after statutory compliance.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-appeal-delay-excused-due-partners-death-court-orders-fresh-hearing.html">GST Appeal Delay Excused Due to Partner’s Death, Court Orders Fresh Hearing</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-appeal-delay-excused-due-partners-death-court-orders-fresh-hearing.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>GST Appeal Delay Condoned Due to Medical Emergency, Court Restores Appeal Rights</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-appeal-delay-condoned-due-medical-emergency-court-restores-appeal-rights.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-appeal-delay-condoned-due-medical-emergency-court-restores-appeal-rights.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 11:46:59 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1041706</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The case involved cancellation of GST registration and delay in filing appeal due to illness. The Court held that writ jurisdiction can override limitation where sufficient cause is shown and restored the appeal for decision on merits.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-appeal-delay-condoned-due-medical-emergency-court-restores-appeal-rights.html">GST Appeal Delay Condoned Due to Medical Emergency, Court Restores Appeal Rights</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-appeal-delay-condoned-due-medical-emergency-court-restores-appeal-rights.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pre-Deposit Bars Recovery: Calcutta HC Orders Refund of Excess GST Recovery</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/pre-deposit-bars-recovery-calcutta-hc-orders-refund-excess-gst-recovery.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/pre-deposit-bars-recovery-calcutta-hc-orders-refund-excess-gst-recovery.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 10:03:53 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1041696</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The issue involved recovery despite statutory pre-deposit under GST law. The Court held that once pre-deposit is made, further recovery must stop and excess amounts should be refunded.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/pre-deposit-bars-recovery-calcutta-hc-orders-refund-excess-gst-recovery.html">Pre-Deposit Bars Recovery: Calcutta HC Orders Refund of Excess GST Recovery</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/pre-deposit-bars-recovery-calcutta-hc-orders-refund-excess-gst-recovery.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>ITC Denial Based Only on GSTR-2A Mismatch Set Aside for Lack of Proper Verification: Karnataka HC</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/itc-denial-based-gstr-2a-mismatch-set-lack-proper-verification-karnataka-hc.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/itc-denial-based-gstr-2a-mismatch-set-lack-proper-verification-karnataka-hc.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 10:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GSTR 2A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1041704</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The case involved denial of input tax credit solely due to return mismatch without examining records. The Court held that such mechanical reliance is invalid and ordered fresh adjudication.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/itc-denial-based-gstr-2a-mismatch-set-lack-proper-verification-karnataka-hc.html">ITC Denial Based Only on GSTR-2A Mismatch Set Aside for Lack of Proper Verification: Karnataka HC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/itc-denial-based-gstr-2a-mismatch-set-lack-proper-verification-karnataka-hc.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Understanding Risk-Based Internal Audit: A Learner’s Perspective</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/chartered-accountant/understanding-risk-based-internal-audit-learners-perspective.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/chartered-accountant/understanding-risk-based-internal-audit-learners-perspective.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Divyansh kalra]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 09:53:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[CA, CS, CMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internal Audit]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1041700</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>This article explains how risk-based internal audit prioritises high-impact business areas over routine verification. It highlights how focusing on key risks improves efficiency and strengthens business controls.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/chartered-accountant/understanding-risk-based-internal-audit-learners-perspective.html">Understanding Risk-Based Internal Audit: A Learner’s Perspective</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/chartered-accountant/understanding-risk-based-internal-audit-learners-perspective.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>GST Registration Cancellation Reversed on Condition of Tax Compliance: J&amp;K&amp;H HC</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-registration-cancellation-reversed-condition-tax-compliance-jkh-hc.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-registration-cancellation-reversed-condition-tax-compliance-jkh-hc.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 09:42:05 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST Registration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1041694</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The case involved cancellation of GST registration due to non-response to a notice. The Court allowed restoration subject to filing returns and payment of tax, penalty, and interest.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-registration-cancellation-reversed-condition-tax-compliance-jkh-hc.html">GST Registration Cancellation Reversed on Condition of Tax Compliance: J&#038;K&#038;H HC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-registration-cancellation-reversed-condition-tax-compliance-jkh-hc.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>No Evidence of Rowdyism: Karnataka HC Strikes Down Police Register Entry</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/evidence-rowdyism-karnataka-hc-strikes-police-register-entry.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/evidence-rowdyism-karnataka-hc-strikes-police-register-entry.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 09:23:48 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1041681</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Court examined inclusion in a rowdy register without supporting material and found no criminal cases or evidence. It held that such listing is unlawful without tangible proof and ordered deletion of the entry.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/evidence-rowdyism-karnataka-hc-strikes-police-register-entry.html">No Evidence of Rowdyism: Karnataka HC Strikes Down Police Register Entry</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/evidence-rowdyism-karnataka-hc-strikes-police-register-entry.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Constitutional Infirmity of Retrospective Section 147A of Income Tax Act, 1961</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/constitutional-infirmity-retrospective-section-147a-income-tax-act-1961.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/constitutional-infirmity-retrospective-section-147a-income-tax-act-1961.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DINESH KUMAR BISHNOI]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 09:23:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income tax act 1961]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1041396</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Examines whether retrospective tax laws can validly alter past legal interpretations. The case highlights how constitutional limits prevent legislatures from rewriting judicially settled meanings under the guise of clarification.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/constitutional-infirmity-retrospective-section-147a-income-tax-act-1961.html">Constitutional Infirmity of Retrospective Section 147A of Income Tax Act, 1961</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/constitutional-infirmity-retrospective-section-147a-income-tax-act-1961.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Illegible Bill of Lading Leads to Refund Denial, Calcutta HC Orders Reconsideration</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/illegible-bill-lading-leads-refund-denial-calcutta-hc-orders-reconsideration.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/illegible-bill-lading-leads-refund-denial-calcutta-hc-orders-reconsideration.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 09:22:36 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1041688</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The case involved denial of GST refund due to unclear documentation on shipping details. The Court held that the assessee must be given a chance to submit proper evidence and ordered fresh adjudication.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/illegible-bill-lading-leads-refund-denial-calcutta-hc-orders-reconsideration.html">Illegible Bill of Lading Leads to Refund Denial, Calcutta HC Orders Reconsideration</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/illegible-bill-lading-leads-refund-denial-calcutta-hc-orders-reconsideration.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Seized Data Must Be Shared If Relied Upon, Calcutta HC Clarifies in GST Case</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/seized-data-shared-relied-upon-calcutta-hc-clarifies-gst-case.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/seized-data-shared-relied-upon-calcutta-hc-clarifies-gst-case.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 09:20:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1041691</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The issue involved denial of access to seized documents relied upon in a GST notice. The Court held that taxpayers must be given inspection and copies of relied documents before responding.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/seized-data-shared-relied-upon-calcutta-hc-clarifies-gst-case.html">Seized Data Must Be Shared If Relied Upon, Calcutta HC Clarifies in GST Case</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/seized-data-shared-relied-upon-calcutta-hc-clarifies-gst-case.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>GSTAT Appeals Filing Procedure and Compliances at a Glance</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gstat-appeals-filing-procedure-compliances-glance.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gstat-appeals-filing-procedure-compliances-glance.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MOHIT SINGH]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 09:07:33 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GSTAT]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1041684</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Explains the complete process for filing appeals before GSTAT, including the three-month limitation period and mandatory pre-deposit requirements. Highlights that compliance with procedural rules is essential for admissibility and automatic stay of recovery.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gstat-appeals-filing-procedure-compliances-glance.html">GSTAT Appeals Filing Procedure and Compliances at a Glance</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gstat-appeals-filing-procedure-compliances-glance.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jharkhand HC Dismissed Writ Petition Due to Availability of Alternate GST Appeal Remedy</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/jharkhand-hc-dismissed-writ-petition-due-availability-alternate-gst-appeal-remedy.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/jharkhand-hc-dismissed-writ-petition-due-availability-alternate-gst-appeal-remedy.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 08:41:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1041653</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Court clarified that local self-government bodies are not automatically exempt from GST on all activities. It ruled that such claims require factual scrutiny and cannot bypass the statutory appellate mechanism.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/jharkhand-hc-dismissed-writ-petition-due-availability-alternate-gst-appeal-remedy.html">Jharkhand HC Dismissed Writ Petition Due to Availability of Alternate GST Appeal Remedy</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/jharkhand-hc-dismissed-writ-petition-due-availability-alternate-gst-appeal-remedy.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>CIRP initiation for recovery amounts to misuse of Insolvency Framework: SC</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/cirp-initiation-recovery-amounts-misuse-insolvency-framework-sc.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/cirp-initiation-recovery-amounts-misuse-insolvency-framework-sc.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 08:39:07 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankruptcy code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBC 2016]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court judgements]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1041672</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Supreme Court held that the IBC cannot be used as a substitute for execution of a civil court decree. It ruled that initiating CIRP for recovery purposes amounts to misuse of the insolvency framework.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/cirp-initiation-recovery-amounts-misuse-insolvency-framework-sc.html">CIRP initiation for recovery amounts to misuse of Insolvency Framework: SC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/cirp-initiation-recovery-amounts-misuse-insolvency-framework-sc.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Single-Member US LLC Tax in India: Disregarded Entity Status Explained</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/finance/single-member-llc-tax-india-disregarded-entity-status-explained.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/finance/single-member-llc-tax-india-disregarded-entity-status-explained.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 08:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Policy]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1041673</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The issue concerns differing tax treatment of single-member US LLCs in India and the US. The position clarifies that India taxes global income regardless of US classification, requiring proper reporting.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/finance/single-member-llc-tax-india-disregarded-entity-status-explained.html">Single-Member US LLC Tax in India: Disregarded Entity Status Explained</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/finance/single-member-llc-tax-india-disregarded-entity-status-explained.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sailing in Two Boats: Navigating Dual Regime of Income Tax Act, 1961 &amp; 2025</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/sailing-boats-navigating-dual-regime-income-tax-act-1961-2025.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/sailing-boats-navigating-dual-regime-income-tax-act-1961-2025.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[icajaind]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 08:06:41 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income tax act 1961]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Income Tax Act 2025]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1041626</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A clear guide explaining how both the 1961 and 2025 tax laws will coexist, and why professionals must apply each depending on the assessment year.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/sailing-boats-navigating-dual-regime-income-tax-act-1961-2025.html">Sailing in Two Boats: Navigating Dual Regime of Income Tax Act, 1961 &#038; 2025</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/sailing-boats-navigating-dual-regime-income-tax-act-1961-2025.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>